chapter two: explaining winston jackson and norine verberg methods: doing social research, 4e
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter Two: Explaining
Winston Jackson and Norine Verberg
Methods: Doing Social Research, 4e
© 2007 Pearson Education Canada 2
The Explanatory Role of Theory
Theories offer testable explanations for relationships in the social and physical world.
The role of the social researcher is to develop, test, and re-test explanations of social relations.
A theory is an explanation.
© 2007 Pearson Education Canada 3
Formal Theory
Set of concepts (individualism, suicide)
Set of propositions: statements of relationship between variables e.g., > individualism > suicide
Testability: some of the propositions must be testable (suicide rate in Spain is low)
© 2007 Pearson Education Canada 4
Partial Theory
A partial theory is one that attempts to account for a particular relationship by specifying a testable causal model.
Use alternative explanations for a relationship Test them
© 2007 Pearson Education Canada 5
Testing Partial Theories
Need a relationship that is assumed to hold true, either commonsensical or from review of the literature
Propose alternative explanations for the relationship Could be intervening variables, sources of
spuriousness, antecedent variables
© 2007 Pearson Education Canada 6
Testing Formal Theories
Axiomatic derivation Axiomatically derive a testable hypothesis
if > A > B and if > B > C than > A > C
Replacement of terms Replacing a general term with a specific
instance of it deviance replaced by shoplifting incident A = A1 etc
© 2007 Pearson Education Canada 7
Levels in Quantitative Research
Research in the positivist, quantitative tradition can be conceived as having three levels:
Theoretical Conceptual Operational
© 2007 Pearson Education Canada 8
Theoretical Level
Most general level: ideas about how things are related; general predictions of behavior. Here one can work with propositions that state the relationship between variables.
> A > B
> B > C
> A > C
General terms may be replaced by specific instances of terms: i.e., A = A1 or C = C1
© 2007 Pearson Education Canada 9
Proposition: >A >B >B >C
>A >C
And given: A = A1 = A2
C = C1
Derivation: >A2 >C1
>A2 Concept
>C1 Concept
>A2 Measure
>C1 Measure
THERORETICAL LEVEL
Axiomatic derivation
Replacement of terms
Derived hypothesis
CONCEPTUAL LEVEL
OPERATIONAL LEVEL
© 2007 Pearson Education Canada 10
Conceptual Level
The conceptual level defines the variables that are to be used in the research
Conceptual variable: an idea that has a dimension that can vary Gender, weight, intelligence, peer approval
Conceptual hypothesis: a relationship between conceptual variablese.g., the greater the X, the greater the Y The higher one’s socioeconomic status, the
higher one’s educational aspirations
© 2007 Pearson Education Canada 11
Operational Level
Operationalization refers to defining and executing the research protocol. It includes selecting:
The indicators for concepts in the study measurement of concepts (chapter 13)
The research design (chapters 3 – 7) The sampling method (chapter 15) Method of data collection Method of data analysis (chapter 8 & 9)
© 2007 Pearson Education Canada 12
Linkages between Levels
Validity: indicator reflects neither more nor less than that implied by definition of the concept
Reliability: repeated measures will yield similar readings if the measure is reliable
Discussed in chapter 13
© 2007 Pearson Education Canada 13
Types of Social Science Explanations1. Deductive explanations
2. Probabilistic explanations
3. Functional explanations
4. Causal explanations
5. Empathic explanations
© 2007 Pearson Education Canada 14
Deductive explanations
Explanations that show that the phenomenon to be explained is a logically necessary consequence of former explanatory premises
e.g., if A=B and if B = C, than A = C
Example: Durkheim’s explanation of why the suicide rate will be low in Spain
© 2007 Pearson Education Canada 15
Probabilistic Explanations
Explanations that are based on the likelihood of something happening are probabilistic ones.
Example: If a particular boy wants to play with a truck and you say that boys like to do that sort of thing, you have given a probabilistic explanation. He wants to play with a truck because he is a member of a gender that tends to like that sort of activity..
© 2007 Pearson Education Canada 16
Functional Explanations
To explain the presence of some phenomenon in terms of the role it plays in maintaining a system, is to use a functional explanation.
Example: The universal presence of family structures may be understood in terms of its role in population reproduction and child socialization.
© 2007 Pearson Education Canada 17
Causal Explanations
An explanation of an event is explained as the results of a series of previous events, that x causes y.
Example: To identify possible influencing factors in program selection at university would be to identify possible previous conditions that led to the particular program selection.
© 2007 Pearson Education Canada 18
Empathic explanations
Explanations that give emphasis to developing an understanding of the experiences or social processes under investigation
Associated with qualitative approaches to explanation and theory-building
Example: Qualitative researchers would strive to understand the experience of a social group will hope that their conclusions will ring true to the participants.
© 2007 Pearson Education Canada 19
The Nature of Social Science EvidenceTheory is used to explain social life. Social
science research anchors theoretical explanations in the evidence provided by data collection and analysis
Although both quantitative and qualitative research connect theory and evidence, the approaches differ Quantitative: deductive Qualitative: inductive
© 2007 Pearson Education Canada 20
Quantitative evidence
Generalization an important goal (i.e., arrive at general statements to apply to a variety of social situations)
Place emphasis on: Being objective (free of bias) Verifying results (confirming previous results) Controlled observations Use established research protocol Precise communication to peers
© 2007 Pearson Education Canada 21
Qualitative evidence
Strive to illuminate the culture, processes or experiences being studied
Interpretation judged by how well the study shed light on the subject matter
Emphasis on: Richness of description Interpretations which ring true to participants
© 2007 Pearson Education Canada 22
Types of Flawed Explanations
Illegitimate appeal to an authority Provincialism False dilemma Missing evidence Insufficient evidence Selected or suppressed evidence Unwarranted conclusions
© 2007 Pearson Education Canada 23
Conclusion
Research methods are debated by social scientists but many agree on the following:
1. Study the full range of social behaviour• With both qualitative and quantitative
approaches
2. Use the methodology appropriate to the questions asked – no one approach “better”
3. Systematic explanation – evidence-based
4. Peer scrutiny – welcome critical appraisal