charles p. baker

33
www.fitzpatrickcella.com _______________________________________ Copyright 2003, Charles P. Baker, TZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO, W YORK CITY WHETHER GOVERNMENT PATENT OFFICES SHOULD CONTRACT WITH PRIVATE COMPANIES TO SEARCH THE PRIOR ART Charles P. Baker Colloquium on Reform of the Patent Cooperation Treaty April 8-9, 2003 Nice, France

Upload: akiko

Post on 12-Jan-2016

39 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

WHETHER GOVERNMENT PATENT OFFICES SHOULD CONTRACT WITH PRIVATE COMPANIES TO SEARCH THE PRIOR ART                   . Charles P. Baker. Colloquium on Reform of the Patent Cooperation Treaty April 8-9, 2003 Nice, France. Interested Parties. Patent Offices. Interested Parties. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Charles P. Baker

www.fitzpatrickcella.com

_________________________________________© Copyright 2003, Charles P. Baker,FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO, NEW YORK CITY

WHETHER GOVERNMENT PATENT OFFICES SHOULD CONTRACT WITH

PRIVATE COMPANIES TO SEARCH THE PRIOR

ART                   

Charles P. Baker

Colloquium on Reform of the Patent Cooperation TreatyApril 8-9, 2003Nice, France

Page 2: Charles P. Baker

2

Interested Parties

•Patent Offices

Page 3: Charles P. Baker

3

Interested Parties

•Patent Offices•Patent Owners

Page 4: Charles P. Baker

4

Interested Parties

•Patent Offices•Patent Owners•The Public

Page 5: Charles P. Baker

5

Interests of Patent Offices

•Budgets

Page 6: Charles P. Baker

6

Interests of Patent Owners

•More Patents

Page 7: Charles P. Baker

7

Interests of Patent Owners

•More Patents•Less Cost

Page 8: Charles P. Baker

8

Interests of the Public

•An Incentive Interest:– Investors in New

Technology and in New Jobs

Page 9: Charles P. Baker

9

Interests of Investors

•Certainty

Page 10: Charles P. Baker

10

Interests of Investors

•Certainty– Quality

Page 11: Charles P. Baker

11

Interests of Investors

•Certainty– Quality– Promptness

Page 12: Charles P. Baker

12

Interested Parties

•Patent Offices•Patent Owners•The Public

Page 13: Charles P. Baker

13

Interested Parties

•The Public•Patent Offices•Patent Owners

Page 14: Charles P. Baker

14

Interests

•Quality •Promptness•Patent Office Budget•More Patents•Less Cost

Page 15: Charles P. Baker

15

Quality

•Enhanced by Combined Search and Examination

Page 16: Charles P. Baker

16

Quality

•Enhanced by Combined Search and Examination

•Diminished by Private Search Companies

Page 17: Charles P. Baker

17

Quality

• Enhanced by Combined Search and Examination

• Diminished by Private Search Companies– Profit Motives

Page 18: Charles P. Baker

18

Quality

•Enhanced by Combined Search and Examination

•Diminished by Private Search Companies– Profit Motive– Decertification Casts

Doubt on Quality

Page 19: Charles P. Baker

19

Interests

•Quality•Promptness•Patent Office Budget•More Patents•Less Cost

Page 20: Charles P. Baker

20

Promptness

•Diminished by Separated Search and Examination

Page 21: Charles P. Baker

21

Interests

•Quality •Promptness•Patent Office Budget•More Patents•Less Cost

Page 22: Charles P. Baker

22

Budget/Cost

•Inefficiencies of Doing the Same Work Twice

Page 23: Charles P. Baker

23

Budget/Cost

•Inefficiencies of Doing the Same Work Twice

•Costs of Certification and Monitoring Private Companies

Page 24: Charles P. Baker

24

Searches by Other Governments

Page 25: Charles P. Baker

25

Searches by Other Governments

•Less Concern About– Promptness– Budget– Cost

Page 26: Charles P. Baker

26

Searches by Other Governments

•Quality– Differences in the Laws

Page 27: Charles P. Baker

27

Searches by Other Governments

•Quality– Start to Examine Based

on Search of Other Government

Page 28: Charles P. Baker

28

Searches by Other Governments

•Quality– Start to Examine Based on

Other Government Search– If Allowable Subject Matter

Found, Supplement Search

Page 29: Charles P. Baker

29

Conclusion:

•Public Interests•Investors

– New Technology– New Jobs

Page 30: Charles P. Baker

30

Conclusion:

•Certainty – Quality– Promptness

Page 31: Charles P. Baker

31

Conclusion:

•Search Not Based on Private Company Profit Motive

Page 32: Charles P. Baker

32

Conclusion:

•Search Not Based on Private Company Profit

•Examination and Search Combined

Page 33: Charles P. Baker

www.fitzpatrickcella.com

_________________________________________© Copyright 2003, Charles P. Baker,FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO, NEW YORK CITY

WHETHER GOVERNMENT PATENT OFFICES SHOULD CONTRACT WITH PRIVATE COMPANIES TO SEARCH

THE PRIOR ART        

Charles P. Baker

Colloquium on Reform of the Patent Cooperation TreatyApril 8-9, 2003Nice, France