che 594 lecture 17
DESCRIPTION
CHE 594 Lecture 17. The Specific Objectives. Review: Keys To Building A Successful Proposal. Create Excitement. Describe The Work Well. Solid Research Plan. Qualified Investigator. Good Research Idea. Lect 12, 13. Lect 2,3. Lect 4, 5, 7. My Typical Outline. Introduction - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
CHE 594 Lecture 17The Specific Objectives
2
Solid
Rese
arch
Pla
n
Qu
alifi
ed
Investig
ato
r
Good Research Idea
Describe The Work Well
Review: Keys To Building A Successful Proposal
Lect 4, 5, 7
Lect 2,3
Lect 12, 13
3
My Typical Outline
Introduction One page giving an overview of the work, describe how it
advances the literature and make a case for funding Figure that gives a picture of the work I am proposing
Literature review (NSF, DOE, NIH not DARPA, DHS) 1-2 pages giving the main themes in the literature
Proposed work Specific Objectives
Paragraph outlining the entire scope of work & its major challenges
Work plan Subsections organized around each major question (paper) I
wish to address Variables I will vary Techniques I will use Sometimes data analysis if that is significant Description of preliminary data
Summary Highlight the significance -
Lect 13-16
Lect 18
Lect 17
Lect 6,7 12
Today: The Specific Objectives
The specific objectives are a 1-2 page summary of what you are going to do and its impact
It is like the case statement but greatly shorten the discussion of your work and
where it fits Explain you hypothesis and why you believe it is
plausible given the previous literature Explain your specific objectives in more detail.
Explain how you will accomplish them. Include a discussion of data analysis so you can
say how you specific objectives will allow you to test your hypothesis
4
5
What is your hypothesis? Explain why the hypothesis is reasonable
based on previous literature This may be a repeat but remember that
not every reviewer will read every section of your proposal
How you are going to go about resolving the issue identified above? What are your specific technical objectives
and what are their roles in proving of feasibility?
How are you going to go about accomplishing these objectives?
How will you analyze your data?
Questions you need to answer
Adapted from http://www.sba.gov/gopher/Innovation-And-Research/SBIR-Pro-Prep/
6
Research Plan Starts By Defining The Technical Objectives/Hypothesis
Specify what questions you will answer Important to have a clear connection
between the questions you raised and the experiments you will do
Reaching your objectives should mean you have proven the feasibility or solving the problem or realizing the opportunity
Adapted from http://www.sba.gov/gopher/Innovation-And-Research/SBIR-Pro-Prep/
7
SBA Gives The Following Hints
Your technical objectives should be plausible; Do not promise more than you can do with the available staff, facilities and budget.
In presenting your objectives, begin by specifying those objectives which are most clearly related to the solicitation topic and agency concerns.
Next proceed to objectives relating to "spin-off" benefits. Make sure that "spin-off" related objectives are clearly secondary to topic related objectives.
Adapted from http://www.sba.gov/gopher/Innovation-And-Research/SBIR-Pro-Prep/
8
Next Summarize The Approach
Second paragraph of a research plan should describe what approach(es) are being taken to address the problem or answer the question(s). How does the approach(es) answer the questions, i.e. what is the hypothesis being investigated and how is the hypothesis being proved or disproved (supported or refuted)?
Usually a 1 paragraph summary of exactly what you are planning to do
My Usual Outline
9
The long term goal …So far we have seenTechnical objectives, hypothesis …
Explain why this hypothesis is plausable based on the literature, preliminary data
Specific objective 1 – one sentence descriptionSeveral sentences describing the rational for the objective, saying why this goal is important and describing how it will be accomplished
Specific objective 2 – one sentence descriptionSeveral sentences describing the rational for the objective, saying why this goal is important and describing how it will be accomplished
Data analysis
Example From My Work
My longterm objective is to develop a better model for water transport in PEM fuel cells. So far we have demonstrated that we can observe water motion for the first time using MRI and microCt imaging. We have found that water is mainly transported by a slip and stick mechanism not slug or mist flow as previously supposed. In this proposal we will develop and equation for slip and stick motion.
10
Specific objectives
Specific objective 1 measure the rate of water motion as a function of key wall properties
Specific objective 2: determine the key mechanism for motion: tank treading, wave collapse, other
Specific objective 3: use the results to develop an equation for the motion.
11
The Book Proposes a different outline for NIH
The long term goal …So far we have seenSpecifically I propose examining the
following hypothesesHypothesis 1 – one sentence descriptionHypothesis 2 – one sentence description
Specific experiment 1Specific experiment 2Rationale
12
13
Good Science and Good Proposals Not The Same
Good science uses inductive and deductive reasoning
Deductive Inductive
NIH encourages hypothesis based (deductive) proposals
Adapted From William M.K. Trochim Cornell
Example from Ogden and Goldberg
14
A number of clinical diseases have been associated with disorders of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) transport and barrier function. The long-term goal of this research is to fully characterize these properties of human RPE to facilitate treatment and perhaps prevention of these diseases.
During the last period we also developed and standardized a new method by which fluid fluxes can be measured directly rather than calculated from isotope fluxes, which are subject to cumulative experimental errors.
Example cont
15
We plan to incorporate this method into our proposed studies, to test the following hypotheses:1.Cultured fetal human RPE, under normal conditions, transports fluid from is apical side to it basal side utilizing a Na+, K+, Cl- cotransport system as well as a Na+, HCO3 – cotransport system.2.The activities of these transport systems are modulated by intracellular cAMP concentrations.3.Cultured fetal human RPE mediated transepithelial fluid movement is modulated by beta adrenergic agonists, histamine, prostaglandin E1, and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) that alter intracellular cAMP concentration. In addition, agents that alter intracellular cAMP metabolism, such as the phosphodiesterase inhibitor isobutylmethylxanthine (IBMX), also alter human RPE mediated transepithelial fluid movement
Example cont
16
To test these hypotheses, we propose studies with the following specific aims: 1.To characterize cultured fetal human RPE transepithelial transport by extending Ussing chamber studies using pharmacologic probes, ion manipulation, and isotope flux studies.2.To determine how cultured fetal human RPE transepithelial transport is modulated by intracellular cAMP.3.To determine the degree to which cultured fetal human RPE transepithelial transport may be regulated by extracellular receptors (such as those to beta adrenergic agents) and to determine the degree to which cultured fetal human RPE transepithelial transport is affected by agents (such as IBMX that alter intracellular cAMP metabolism
Key Hints
All work needs to be completed in 2-3 years
No more than three hypotheses and specific aims
Use action verbs “to determine, to examine, to identify, to verify, to calculate”
Avoid non-action verbs “to study, to appreciate, to understand”
17
Key Pitfalls
Do not propose too much Only propose what you can realistically
do in two years
18
19
Recall The Hourglass Picture Of Research
Adapted From William M.K. Trochim Cornell
Start with an important big question
Focus to solvable question
Observe
Analyze data
Reach conclusions
Generalize back to big problem
Need to convince
reviewers it is solvableLimits
problems to ones the reviewers
think they can solve
20
Four Most Common Mistakes
Writing too ambitious a proposal Proposing too much
Unfocused technical objectives Talking about the large problem instead of a
narrower idea that you can really do Proposal hard for reviewers to navigate
No clear sections (i.e. introduction, literature review, technical objectives) that the reviewers can jump to
Hoping that the reviewers will get the idea instead of telling them directly
Unclear/unfocused writing
21
Other Common Errors In The Work Plan
Proposing things that are insufficiently novel Proposals that propose to use a well established
technique on a small variation of a problem that has already been solved
Exception if the variation is of great importance
Failure to consider important variables Makes reviewer doubt your qualifications OK to say that we will control these variables
and only consider variations in these variables Unfounded claims
Important new conclusions from preliminary data without strong evidence
22
Items To Improve Your Odds Of Success
Pretty pictures showing your expected molecules, devices
Table outlining your research plan Diagram outlining and complex procedures Table outlining your risk mitigation strategy
Remember that most reviewers will not read every word in your proposal so it is important to make it easy for them.
The saying “A Picture is worth 1000 words” is doubly true in proposals
23
Other Important Points On Writing
Read the instructions NSF requires you to discuss the broad impacts
of your work http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2007/nsf07046/nsf07046.jsp
NIH requires risk mitigation Be sure to give the review panel what
they want to hear NSF – 50+ references, some theory NIH – Lots of preliminary data, real application
to human health, all details of procedures, supporting letters
24
Writing Style Is Important!
You need to write in a plain style and spell everything out clearly No jargon
Most reviewers will be outside of your sub-field. The proposal needs to be clear to them
No mystery novels Keep everything clear and in the right section If the reviewer cannot quickly find something
important where he expects to find it, he will assume that you have not included it and recommend someone else’s proposal for funding
25
Read Chapter 9 In Johnson-Sheehan
Chapter 9 in the Johnson-Sheehan has a good discussion of style. Simplify your sentences Keep the subject the same in all of the
sentences in a paragraph Keep the sentence length a “breathable
length” Be sure to carry ideas from one
sentence to the next
26
Questions?