chemical treatment processes

152
1 Topic 5.1: Chemical Treatment Processes Dr. Lee Khia Min Department of Civil Engineering UEMX3653 Water and Wastewater Treatment

Upload: teo-peng-keat

Post on 30-Jan-2016

250 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chemical Treatment Processes

1

Topic 5.1: Chemical Treatment Processes

Dr. Lee Khia Min

Department of Civil Engineering

UEMX3653 Water and Wastewater Treatment

Page 2: Chemical Treatment Processes

2

ObjectivesObjectives

Review some basic concepts of the chemistry involve in chemical treatment processes.

To discuss types of chemical processes and their roles within treatment systems.

Page 3: Chemical Treatment Processes

3

Inorganic Chemicals and Compounds Valence – the combining power of an element relative to that of

the hydrogen atom which has an assigned value of 1. An element with a valence of 2+ can replace two hydrogen atoms in a

compound. An element with a valence of 2- can react with two hydrogen atoms.

Equivalent or combining weight of an element is equal to its atomic weight divided by the valence. For example, the EW of calcium equals 40 g divided by 2, or 20 g.

Equivalent weight of a molecule is equal to its molecular weight divided by the number of positive or negative electrical charges. For example, the EW of sulfuric acid equals 98.1 g divided by 2, or 49 g.

Page 4: Chemical Treatment Processes

4

Page 5: Chemical Treatment Processes

5

Page 6: Chemical Treatment Processes

6

Units of Expression mg/g ppm %1 1 mg/L = 8.34 lb/million gal

Page 7: Chemical Treatment Processes

7

Units of Expression (mg/L as CaCO3)The concentration given in milligrams of

weight may not relate to specific element whose concentration is being expressed. Hardness: Ca2+ and Mg2+

Alkalinity: OH-, CO32-, and HCO3

-

The common units is given in mg/L as CaCO3.

Ammonia, nitrate, and organic nitrogen expressed as mg/L as N.

Phosphates expressed as mg/L as P.

Page 8: Chemical Treatment Processes

8

Units of Expression (meq/L) The term milliequivalents per liter (meq/L) expresses

the concentration of a dissolved substance in terms of its electrical charge or its combination in reaction.

Milliequivalents are calculated from milligrams per liter for elemental ions by the following equation:

and for radicals or compounds by the following equation:

EW

mg/L

weightatomic

valencemg/Lmeq/L

EW

mg/L

weightmolecular

charge electricalmg/Lmeq/L

Page 9: Chemical Treatment Processes

9

Milliequivalents-per-Liter Bar Graph For better visualization of the chemical composition, meq/L bar graph is

used. The top row consists of major cations arranged in the order of Ca2+, Mg2+,

Na+, K+. Anions in the bottom row are aligned in the sequence of carbonate (if present), bicarbonate, sulfate, and chloride.

The sum of the positive meq/L must equal the sum of the negative meq/L. Hypothetical combinations of “+” and “–” ions can be written from a bar

graph, and are useful in evaluating a water for lime-soda ash softening.

Page 10: Chemical Treatment Processes

10

Page 11: Chemical Treatment Processes

11

Page 12: Chemical Treatment Processes

12

Example 11.2 The results of a water analysis are Ca 40 mg/L, Mg 10

mg/L, Na 11.7 mg/L, K 7 mg/:, HCO3- 110 mg/L, SO4

2- 6.2 mg/L, and Cl- 11 mg/L. Draw a meq/L bar graph and express the hardness and alkalinity in units of mg/L as CaCO3.

Answer:

Hardness = 141 mg/L

Alkalinity = 90 mg/L

Page 13: Chemical Treatment Processes

13

Page 14: Chemical Treatment Processes

14

Alkalinity and pH Relationships

Page 15: Chemical Treatment Processes

15

Coagulation

Page 16: Chemical Treatment Processes

16

Definitions Coagulation is

The addition and rapid mixing of coagulantsThe destabilization of colloidal and fine particlesThe initial aggregation of destabilized particles

Flocculation isThe gentle agitation to aggregate destabilized

particles to form rapid-settling floc

Page 17: Chemical Treatment Processes

17

Colloidal Characteristics What are colloidal particles

Colloids

Have particle size between 0.001 to 1.0 micron

Colloids do not settle by the force of gravity

Are stable in suspensions because Extremely small size

State of hydration (chemical combination with water)

Surface electrical charge

10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 cmMoleculesions

colloids silt sand

1nm 1µm

Page 18: Chemical Treatment Processes

18

Colloidal Characteristics

Have large surface area per unit volume – surface phenomena such as electrostatic repulsion and hydration become important.

Adsorb substances from surrounding water. Have electrostatic charge (mostly negatively

charged). Can be hydrophilic (organic colloids) or hydrophobic

(inorganic colloids). Attract ions of opposite charge to its surface (fixed

layer and diffused layer).

Page 19: Chemical Treatment Processes

19

Coagulation Theory

Colloid particles are in constant motion in water and tend to collide each other.

Forces on the colloid Electrostatic repulsive forces

Attractive force: Van der Waals force

1 2 1 212 2 2

1 2( )

q q q qF k k

R r r

When the two particles collide

Page 20: Chemical Treatment Processes

20

Coagulation Theory – Force between particles

Electrostatic force ~ 1/r2,Repulsive

Net force

Van der Waals force ~ 1/r

Energy barrier

Distance

Energ

y/

Forc

e

Repuls

ive

Att

ract

ive

Page 21: Chemical Treatment Processes

21

Stabilization/Destabilization Destablization of hydrophobic colloids can be

accomplished by double layer compression, charge neutralization, enmeshment, and interparticle bridging.

1. Adding electrolytes into the solution (Figure 11.10b) destablizes colloids by double layer compression. Counterions of the electrolyte suppress the double-layer charge of the colloids to permit particles to contact due to excession van der Waals forces.

2. Charged species adsorb to (attach to the surface of) of the colloid and reduce the surface charge (Figure 11.11a). Trivalent metals hydrolyze in water to produce hydroxo complexes that carry positive charge and have an affinity to attach to negatively charged colloids, thereby reducing overall colloidal charge and resulting in aggregation.

Page 22: Chemical Treatment Processes

22

Stabilization/Destabilization A colloidal suspension is stable when the dispersion shows little

or no tendency to aggregate (Figure 11.10a). The repulsive force disperses particle and prevents aggregation.

Particles with a high zeta potential produce a stable sol. Factors tending to destabilize a sol are van der Waals forces of

attraction and Brownian movement. Van der Waals are the molecular cohesive forces of attraction

that increase in intensity as particle approach each other. Brownian motion is the random motion of colloids caused by their

bombardment by molecules of the dispersion medium. This motion has a destabilizing effect on a sol because aggregation may result.

Page 23: Chemical Treatment Processes

23

Figure 11. 10 Schematic representations of coagulation and bridging of colloids. (a) A stable suspension of particle where forces of repulsion exceeds forces of attraction. (b) Destablization and coagulation caused by counterions of a coagulant suppressing the double-layer charges.

Page 24: Chemical Treatment Processes

24

Stabilization/Destabilization3. At particular pH conditions and high enough Al or Fe

concentrations, the metal will precipitate. Colloids tend to adsorb to these solids and become enmeshed in the resulting solid (Figure 11.11b). This mechanism is called sweep floc coagulation.

4. Interparticle bridging is the adsorption of colloids to a relatively large molecule, such as organic polymer, to destablize and aggregate the colloidal suspension. The long polymer molecule attaches to absorbent surfaces of colloidal particles by chemical or physical interactions, resulting in aggregation.

Page 25: Chemical Treatment Processes

25

Figure 11.11 Coagulation mechanisms: (a) charge neutralization, (b) sweep floc, (c) agglomeration of destablized particle by attachment of coagulant ions and bridging of polymers.

Page 26: Chemical Treatment Processes

26

Destabilization Two basic destabilization mechanisms:

Coagulation reduces the net electrical repulsive forces at particle surfaces by adding coagulant chemicals.

Flocculation is a agglomeration of the destabilized particles by chemical joining and bridging.

In water treatment, both are used to destabilize turbidity, color, odor-producing compounds, pathogens, etc.

In wastewater treatment, coagulation precedes tertiary filtration necessary to clarify a biologically treated effluent for effective chemical disinfection.

Page 27: Chemical Treatment Processes

27

Coagulation process The common unit operations and chemical additions in

the treatment of surface waters for a potable supply (Figure 11.12).

Page 28: Chemical Treatment Processes

28

Coagulants Mainly aluminum and iron salts

Aluminum sulfate (most common) Ferric sulfate (second most common) Ferric chloride

Lime [Ca(OH)2]

Aluminum salts are cheaper, but iron salts are more effective over wider pH range (pH 4-9), and are more effective at removing NOM.

For some waters, cationic polymers are effective as a primary coagulant (the higher the charge on the cation, the more effective is the coagulant), but polymers are more commonly applied as coagulant aids.

Page 29: Chemical Treatment Processes

29

Aluminum Sulfate (Filter Alum) Aluminum sulfate reacts with natural alkalinity in water to form

soluble Al hydroxo complexes or Al hydroxide floc:

The production of H+ will tend to depress the pH. So, the types of hydrolysis products formed depend on the pH. Addition of base to control the pH shift may be required.

If sufficient alum is added, and pH = 6-8, aluminum hydroxide precipitate is formed for the sweep floc coagulation mechanism:

Each mg/L of alum decreases water alkalinity by 0.5 mg/L as CaCO3.

O14.3H3SO2H2Al(OH)OH2O14.3H)(SOAl 2-2

42

22342

O14.3H3SO6H2Al(OH)OH6O14.3H)(SOAl 2-2

4322342

Page 30: Chemical Treatment Processes

30

Aluminum Sulfate (Filter Alum) Lime or soda ash is added to provide necessary alkalinity

and control the pH of the coagulation process:

Soda ash does not increase hardness, only corrosiveness, but lime is more popular and less expensive.

Dosage range : 5-50 mg/L; optimum pH: 5.5-8.0.

O14.3H3CaSO2Al(OH)3Ca(OH)O.14.3H)(SOAl 24322342

O14.3H3COSO3Na2Al(OH)

O3HCO3NaO.14.3H)(SOAl

22423

2322342

Page 31: Chemical Treatment Processes

31

Ferric Sulfate

It reacts with alkalinity presents in water:

Fe(OH)3 is dense and settle fast. If alkalinity is not enough, hydrated lime is used. Optimum pH is between 4 and 12.

24323342 6CO3CaSO2Fe(OH))3Ca(HCO)(SOFe

Page 32: Chemical Treatment Processes

32

Ferric Chloride It reacts with natural alkalinity

If alkalinity is insufficient, lime is added

Each of the above equation has an optimum pH range.

223233 6CO3CaCl2Fe(OH))3Ca(HCO2FeCl

2323 3CaCl2Fe(OH)3Ca(OH)2FeCl

Page 33: Chemical Treatment Processes

33

Advantages of Ferric Coagulation

Coagulation is possible over a wider pH range, generally 4-9 for most waters.

The floc settes better than alum floc. more effective in the removal of NOM, taste,

and odor compounds.

Page 34: Chemical Treatment Processes

34

Synthetic Polymers Are water-soluble high-MW organic compounds that have

multiple electrical charges along a molecular chain of C atoms.

Three types: Cationic polymer: the ionization groups have a positive charge Anionic polymer: the ionization groups have a negative charge Nonionic polymer: no charges are exhibited or if the net charge is

zero

Are extensively used as coagulant aids with aluminum and iron coagulants in treatment of turbid waters to build larger floc by bridging mechanism.

Page 35: Chemical Treatment Processes

35

Synthetic Polymers Cationic polymers can be effective for coagulation, without

hydrolyzing metals, by producing destablization through charge neutralization and interparticle bridging. Common dosage: 0.5-1.5 mg/L

Anionic and nonionic polymers are effective coagulant aids. After destablizing the colloidal suspension by hydrolyzing metals such as alum, polymers promote larger floc by a bridging mechanism (Figure 11.11c). Common dosage: 0.1-0.5 mg/L

Page 36: Chemical Treatment Processes

36

pH Adjustment Used if pH of water to be treated is not within

the optimum pH of the coagulant. pH is increased using lime, sodium

hydroxide, and soda ash. pH is reduced using sulfuric acid,

phosphoric acid.

Page 37: Chemical Treatment Processes

37

Factors Affecting Coagulation

1. Coagulant

2. Coagulant aids

3. pH

4. Alkalinity

5. Temperature

6. Time

7. Velocity

8. Zeta potential

Page 38: Chemical Treatment Processes

38

Water Softening

Page 39: Chemical Treatment Processes

39

Causes of Hardness Water hardness is principally caused by:

calcium ionsmagnesium ions

Source of calcium and magnesium ionsgeological formations

Page 40: Chemical Treatment Processes

40

Types of Hardness

Carbonate hardness - carbonates and bicarbonates of calcium, magnesium and sodium, which can be removed and settled by boiling of water.

CO32-, HCO3

-

Noncarbonate hardness - metallic cations of iron, manganese and strontium

SO42-, Cl-, NO3

-

Total hardness = carbonate + noncarbonate

Page 41: Chemical Treatment Processes

41

Water Hardness The maximum level of hardness considered for public

supply is 300 to 500 mg/l, though many customers object to water harder than 150 mg/l.

Disadvantages of hardnessexcessive soap consumption during launderingscale-formation in hot water heaters and pipes.

The use of synthetic detergents and pipe linings can overcome those problems.

Page 42: Chemical Treatment Processes

42

Hardness Ranges

Degree of HardnessHardness Concentration (mg/L as CaCO3)

US International

Soft 0 – 60 0 – 50

Moderate Soft 51 – 100

Slightly Hard 101 – 150

Moderately Hard 61 – 120 151 – 200

Hard 121 – 180 201 – 300

Very Hard > 180 > 300

Page 43: Chemical Treatment Processes

43

Softening In precipitation softening, lime (CaO) and soda ash

(Na2CO3) are used to precipitate calcium and magnesium form water. Lime treatment can also:

kill bacteriaremove ironhelp in clarification of surface water (coagulant)

Lime treatment will raise the pH value, so recarbonation by carbon dioxide is used to lower the pH by converting the hydroxide and carbonate ions to bicarbonate ion.

Page 44: Chemical Treatment Processes

44

Lime Lime is commercially available in the forms of:

quicklimehydrated lime

Quicklimeavailable in granular formcontains minimum of 90% CaOmagnesium oxide is the primary impurity

Hydrated Limecontains about 68% CaO

Slurry lime is written as Ca(OH)2.

Page 45: Chemical Treatment Processes

45

CO2

Carbon dioxide is:gascolorlessclearproduced by burning fuel such as coal, oil, or gasused to recarbonate lime-softened waterapplied through diffusers immersed in the treatment

tank

Page 46: Chemical Treatment Processes

46

Removal of hardness with soda ash and lime

.....(8)CaCONaCl2CaClCONa

.....(7)CaCOSONaCaSOCONa

.....(6)Mg(OH)CaClMgClCa(OH)

.....(5)Mg(OH)CaSOMgSOCa(OH)

.....(4)Mg(OH)CaCOMgCOCa(OH)

O.....(3)2HCaCO2Mg(OH))Mg(HCO22Ca(OH)

O.....(2)2H2CaCO)Ca(HCOCa(OH)

O....(1)HCaCOCOCa(OH)

3232

342432

2222

2442

2332

232232

23232

2322

Free of hardness?

Minimum practical limits of precipitation softening are 30 mg/L of Ca2+ and 10 mg/L Mg2+ expressed as CaCO3.

Page 47: Chemical Treatment Processes

47

Reactions From the reaction equations, it can be seen that:

Lime reacts first with free carbon dioxide (eq. 1)Next, lime reacts with calcium bicarbonate (eq. 2)Lime also reacts with magnesium carbonate and

bicarbonate (eqs. 3 and 4)Noncarbonate hardness (magnesium sulphate and chloride)

requires the addition of soda ash for precipitation (eqs. 5 and 6)

Noncarbonate hardness (calcium sulphate and chloride) requires the addition of soda ash only for precipitation (eqs. 7 and 8)

Hardness?

Page 48: Chemical Treatment Processes

48

Pros and Cons of Softening Advantage of precipitation softening:

the lime added is removed along with the hardness taken out of solution.

TDS of the water are reduced.the chemical reactions can be used to estimate the quantity

of sludge produced.

Disadvantage of precipitation softening:sodium ions, from the addition of soda ash, remain in the

finished water.

Page 49: Chemical Treatment Processes

49

Recarbonation

Recrabonation is used to stabilize lime-treated water, and thus reducing its scale-forming potential.

Carbon dioxide is used for the recarbonation process. It converts lime to calcium carbonate. Further recarbonation will convert carbonate to bicarbonate.

Page 50: Chemical Treatment Processes

50

Recarbonation Reactions

23232

2322

2322

)Ca(HCOOHCaCOCO

8.5)(pHcontrolpHforionRecarbonat

OHMgCOMg(OH)CO

OHCaCOCa(OH)CO

9.5) (pH

control pH and lime excess of removalfor ionRecarbonat

Page 51: Chemical Treatment Processes

51

Stoichiometric Requirement Based on the above equations, the stoichiometric

requirement for lime and soda ash expressed in equivalent per unit volumes are

Approximately 1 eq/m3 of lime in excess of the stoichiometric requirement must be added to bring the pH to above 11 to ensure Mg(OH)2 complete precipitation. After precipitation, recarbonation is needed to bring pH down to a range of 9.2 to 9.7.

alkalinityMgCa)(eq/m requiredash Soda

excessMgHCOCO)(eq/m required Lime223

2-32

3

Page 52: Chemical Treatment Processes

52

Example Water has the following composition: calcium = 82 mg/L,

magnesium = 33 mg/L, sodium = 14 mg/L, bicarbonate = 280 mg/L, sulfate = 82 mg/L, and chloride = 36 mg/L. Determine carbonate hardness, noncarbonate hardness, and total hardness, all in terms of mg/L of CaCO3.

Solution:

The species concentration in meg/L is computed as

The species concentration in mg/L of CaCO3 is calculated as

3CaCOfor502

100

weightequivalent

mg/Lmeq/L

species ofweight equivalent

50species ofmg/L

50speciesofmeq/LCaCO asmg/L 3

Page 53: Chemical Treatment Processes

53

Solution Construct a table for ions in mg/L as CaCO3:

Ion species MW EWConcentration

mg/L meq/L mg/L as CaCO3

Ca2+ 40 20 82 4 200

Mg2+ 24.3 12.2 33 2.7 135

Na+ 23 23 14 0.6 30

Total: 7.3 365

HCO3- 61 61 280 4.6 230

Cl- 35.5 35.5 36 1 50

SO42- 96.1 48 82 1.7 85

Total: 7.3 65

Page 54: Chemical Treatment Processes

54

Solution Construct an equivalent bar diagram for the cationic and anionic

species of the water: The diagram shows the relative proportions of the chemical species

important to the water softening process. Cations are placed above anions on the graph. The calcium equivalent should be placed first on the cationic scale and

be followed by magnesium and other divalent species and then by the monovalent species sodium equivalent.

The bicarbonate equivalent should be placed first on the anionic scale and immediately be followed by the chloride equivalent and then by the sulfate equivalent.

0 200 335 365

0 230 280 365

Ca2+ Mg2+ Na+

HCO3- Cl- SO4

2-

Page 55: Chemical Treatment Processes

55

Solution Compute the hardness distribution:

Total hardness = 200 + 135 = 335 (mg/L as CaCO3)

Alkalinity = bicarbonate = 230 mg/L as CaCO3

Carbonate hardness = bicarbonate = 230 mg/L as CaCO3

Noncarbonate hardness = 335 – 230 = 105 mg/L as CaCO3

Page 56: Chemical Treatment Processes

56

Process Variations in Lime-Soda Ash Softening Depend on the degree of hardness and types and amount of

chemical added. Include

Excess-lime treatment Selective calcium removal Split treatment

Page 57: Chemical Treatment Processes

57

Excess-Lime Softening Carbonate hardness associated with Ca ion can be

effectively removed to the practical limit of CaCO3 solubility by stoichiometric additions of lime.

Precipitation of Mg ion needs additional 35 mg/L of CaO (1.25 meq/L) above stoichiometric requirements.

The practice of excess-lime treatment reduces the TH to about 40 mg/L (i.e., 30 mg/L of CaCO3 and 10 mg/L of Mg hardness).

Page 58: Chemical Treatment Processes

58

Excess-Lime Softening In excess-lime softening:

After excess lime addition, the water is flocculated and settled to remove CaCO3 and Mg(OH)2 precipitates.

After that, recarbonation is carried out in two stages.

In the first stage, CO2 is added to lower the pH to 10.3 and converts excess lime to CaCO3.

Water is then flocculated and settled. If needed, soda ash is added at this stage to remove noncarbonate

hardness.

In the second stage, CO2 is added to further lower the pH to the range of 8.5 to 9.5 to convert most of the remaining carbonate ion to bicarbonate ion in order to stabilize the water against scale formation.

Page 59: Chemical Treatment Processes

59

Figure 11.13 Schematic flow diagram for a two-stage excess-lime softening plant.

Page 60: Chemical Treatment Processes

60

Example 11.6 Water defined by the following analysis is to be softened by excess-lime

treatment in a two-stage system (Figure 11.13):

CO2 = 8.8 mg/L as CO2 Alk(HCO3-) = 115 mg/L as CaCO3

Ca2+ = 70 mg/L SO42- = 96 mg/L

Mg2+ = 9.7 mg/L Cl- = 10.6 mg/L

Na+ = 6.9 mg/L

The practical limits of removal can be assumed to be 30 mg/L of CaCO3 and 10 mg/L of Mg(OH)2, expressed as CaCO3.

a) Sketch a meq/L bar graph and list the hypothetical combinations of chemical compounds in the raw water.

b) Calculate the quantity of softening chemicals required in lb/Mgal of water treated and the theoretical quantity of CO2 needed to provide a finished water with one-half of the alkalinity converted to bicarbonate ion.

c) Draw a bar graph for the softened water after recarbonation and filtration.

Page 61: Chemical Treatment Processes

61

SolutionFigure 11.14 Meq/L bar

graph.

(a) Bar graph and hypothetical chemical combinations in the raw water.

(b) Bar graph of the water after lime and soda ash additions and settling but before recarbonation.

(c) Bar graph of the water after two-stage recarbonation and final filtration.

Page 62: Chemical Treatment Processes

62

Selective Calcium Removal If the water to be treated contains low concentration of magnesium

(< 40 mg/L as CaCO3), selective calcium removal can be used.

Magnesium hardness of more than 40 mg/L as caCO3 is not recommended due to the possible formation of hard magnesium silicate in high temperature waters (180F).

Enough lime is added to precipitate calcium hardness without providing any excess for Mg removal.

Soda ash may be used depending on the extent of noncarbonate hardness.

If precipitation of CaCO3 is not satisfactory, alum or a polymer can be used to aid flocculation.

Recarbonation is used to reduce scale formation on the filter and to produce stable water.

Page 63: Chemical Treatment Processes

63

Figure 11.15 Schematic diagram for a single-stage calcium-carbonate softening plant.

Page 64: Chemical Treatment Processes

64

Example 11.7 Determine the chemical dosages needed for selective calcium softening

of the water described in Example 11.6. Draw a bar graph of the processed water.

Page 65: Chemical Treatment Processes

65

Solution

Figure 11.16 Bar graph of the softened water after selective calcium removal.

Page 66: Chemical Treatment Processes

66

Iron and Manganese Removal

Page 67: Chemical Treatment Processes

67

Iron (Fe) and Manganese (Mn) Fe and Mn in concentrations greater than 0.3 mg/L of

Fe and 0.05 mg/L of Mn stain plumbing fixtures and laundered clothes.

Foul tastes and odors can be produced by growth of Fe bacteria in water distribution mains. These filamentous bacteria, using reduced Fe as an energy source, precipitate it, causing pipe encrustations. Decay of the accumulated bacterial slimes creates offensive tastes and odors.

Page 68: Chemical Treatment Processes

68

Chemistry of Fe and Mn Fe and Mn are abundant elements in the earth’s crust. They get into

natural water from dissolution of rocks and soil, from acid mine drainage, and from corrosion of metals.

Under reducing conditions (absence of DO and low pH), ferrous iron Fe2+ and manganous manganese Mn2+ are

chemically reduced soluble complexed with NOM

When exposed to air, they are oxidized to ferric iron Fe3+ and manganic manganese Mn4+, which are:

oxidized stable insoluble

Page 69: Chemical Treatment Processes

69

Chemistry of Fe and Mn Oxygen, chlorine, and potassium permanganate

(KMnO4) are the most frequent oxidizing agents.

Oxidation reactions using KMnO4 are

3Fe+ + MnO4- 3Fe3+ + MnO2

3Mn2+ + 2MnO4- 5MnO2

MnO2 acts as catalysts that increase the rate of Mn oxidation.

Page 70: Chemical Treatment Processes

70

Fe and Mn Removal Process The techniques for removing Fe and Mn are based on the

oxidation of Fe2+ and Mn2+ to the Fe3+, Mn3+ and Mn4+, and the oxidation of any organic-complex compounds. This is followed by filtration to remove insoluble compounds.

Four major techniques for Fe and Mn removal from water are: Aeration-Filtration Aeration-Chemical Oxidation-Sedimentation-Filtration Water Softening Greensand Filtration

Page 71: Chemical Treatment Processes

71

Aeration-Filtration Aeration (air oxidation) is the simplest oxidation

treatment in removing iron. The reaction that takes place is in the form of:

2Fe(HCO3)2 + 0.5O2 +H2O 2Fe(OH)3 + 4CO2

Aeration alone cannot remove manganese effectively. Increasing the pH to 8.5 can enhance the oxidation process. If manganese is not effectively removed from the water, it can cause problems with post-chlorination. When oxidized:

it can clog the solution-feed chlorinatorit cause a staining water

Page 72: Chemical Treatment Processes

72

Aeration-Chemical Oxidation- Sedimentation-Filtration This is a common method for removing iron and manganese

from well water without softening treatment. Contact tray aeration is designed to displace dissolved gases

(i.e., CO2) and initiate oxidation of the reduced Fe and Mn.

Chlorine, potassium permanganate, ozone, chlorine dioxide can oxidize Fe and Mn.

Page 73: Chemical Treatment Processes

73

Aeration-Chemical Oxidation- Sedimentation-Filtration When Cl2 is used, a free available chlorine residual is

maintained throughout the treatment process.

The KMnO4 oxidation is many times faster than Cl2 for the oxidation of Mn. Potassium permanganate oxidizes iron and manganese at rates faster than dissolved oxygen and its reaction is relatively pH independent.

Ozone oxidizes Mn faster than other oxidants, but if the dosage is too high, it may convert the manganese to permanganate and thereby cause the water to turn pink (the color of permanganate solution).

Since iron and manganese can not be completely removed by sedimentation, effective filtration is required.

Page 74: Chemical Treatment Processes

74

4H2ClOMnOO2H2ClOMn

2Cl4HMnOO2HClMn

4H2MnOO2HO2Mn

3HClOFe(OH)O3HClOFe

2Cl6H2Fe(OH)O6HCl2Fe

8H4Fe(OH)O10HO4Fe

22222

2222

2222

23222

3222

3222

Oxidation of Iron and Manganese with Oxygen, Chlorine, and Chlorine Dioxide

Page 75: Chemical Treatment Processes

75

Water Softening Lime-soda ash softening will also remove Fe and Mn. Lime treatment has been used to remove organically bound Fe

and Mn from surface water. The process scheme aeration-coagulation-lime treatment-sedimentation-filtration can treat surface waters containing color, turbidity, and organically bound Fe and Mn.

Page 76: Chemical Treatment Processes

76

Greensand Filtration The mineral glauconite, commonly known as greensand, can be used

in pressure filters with either continuous or periodic addition of permanganate to remove Fe and Mn.

Oxides on the greensand surface can oxidize Fe and Mn. Permanganate oxidizes Fe and Mn and regenerates the greensand.

Page 77: Chemical Treatment Processes

77

Greensand Filtration KMnO4 is applied prior to filtration.

The filter is a dual-media filter with anthracite filter medium is placed on top of the manganese zeolite.

Iron and manganese are oxidized by KMnO4.

The upper layer will remove the insoluble metal ions. Any iron and manganese ions not oxidized, it will be captured

by the lower layer of manganese zeolite.

Any surplus KMnO4 will regenerate the greensand.

When the bed becomes saturated, it is backwashed by KMnO4 to remove particles from the upper layer and regenerate the greensand.

Page 78: Chemical Treatment Processes

78

2432

332

22

332

22

MnOZKMnOOMnZ

onRegenerati

MnOMnZMnMnOZ

FeOMnZFeMnOZ

Oxidation

Reaction Equations

Page 79: Chemical Treatment Processes

79

Disinfection

Page 80: Chemical Treatment Processes

80

Disinfection Definition: the process of destruction or inactivation of waterborne

pathogens or living pathogenic microorganisms. Post-disinfection – to disinfect filtered water and leave an adequate

disinfectant residual in the treated water to ensure its safety in the distribution system until its use by the farthest consumer

Disinfection depends on: The physico-chemistry of the disinfectant The cyto-chemical nature and physical state of the pathogens The interaction of the above Temperature pH Electrolytes Interfering substances

Page 81: Chemical Treatment Processes

81

Disinfection Most chemical disinfectants form harmful DBPs:

Chlorine: THMs and HAAs Chloramines: cyanogen chloride and chloropicrin Chlorine dioxide: chlorites and chlorates Ozone: bromates and aldehydes

The balance between proper disinfection and disinfection byproducts is the goal of each water utility.

Page 82: Chemical Treatment Processes

82

Disinfection Methods

Chlorine Alternative disinfectants and oxidants:

Ozone Chlorine dioxide UV irradiation High pH Other halogens (iodine and bromine)

Reasons: DBPs, greater disinfection efficiency Disadvantages: Typically more costly, etc.

Page 83: Chemical Treatment Processes

83

(1) Chlorine and Chloramines Chlorine (Cl2) is widely used

Effective at low concentration Cheap Helpful in controlling taste and odor, Fe, Mn, cyanides, and

phenols Forms residual if applied in sufficient dosages

Chlorine is applied as: Gas (most common) hypochlorite

Chlorine is a strong oxidizing agent It reacts with various organic substances, ammonia, and metals. It inactivates microorganisms by reacting with their enzymes.

Page 84: Chemical Treatment Processes

84

Chlorination Reaction Chlorine gas reacts with water (hydrolyzes) to form (lower the

pH) Hypochlorous acid (HOCl) – the principal disinfecting form of

chlorine. H+ and Cl- (no disinfection potential)

At pH above 7.5, HOCl dissociates to hypochlorite ion (OCl–) ( a function of pH); thus, it becomes less and less effective. The higher the pH, the higher the ionization, the less effective the

Cl2.

ClHHOClOHCl 22

OClHHOCl So, ACID!!!

Page 85: Chemical Treatment Processes

85

Figure 11.21

Page 86: Chemical Treatment Processes

86

Chloramines Reaction with ammonia (a function of pH, [Cl2]/[NH3],

temperature)

At pH 4.5-8.5, monochloramine and dichloramine are formed. At pH > 8.5, monochloramine predominates. At pH about 4.5, dichloramine predominates. At pH 4.4, trichloramine predominates Chloramines are effective against bacteria but not viruses.

hloramine tric

OH3NCl3HOClNHCl

nedichlorami

O2HNHCl2HOClClNH

minemonochlora

OHClNHHOClNH

232

222

223

pH

Page 87: Chemical Treatment Processes

87

Chlorination Reaction

Reaction with organicsReaction with phenol produces chlorophenolsReaction with humic substances (or NOM) produces

trihalomethanes (THMs) Chloroform (CHCl3)

Bromodichloromethane (CHCl2Br)

Dibromochloromethane (CHClBr2)

Page 88: Chemical Treatment Processes

88

Dosages, Demand and Residuals Dosage: the amount of chlorine added. Demand: the amount of chlorine needed to oxidize materials,

or the difference between the amount added and the quantity of free and combined available chlorine remaining at the end of a specified contact period.

Residual: the amount of chlorine remaining after oxidation. Assume we used 3 mg/L chlorine dose in a sample, and after 30 min

there was 2 mg/L residual.

Chlorine demand is therefore 3 mg/L – 2mg/L = 1 mg/L.

Page 89: Chemical Treatment Processes

89

Page 90: Chemical Treatment Processes

90

Combined and Free Available Residual Chlorine Combined available residual chlorine

– residual chlorine existing in chemical combination with ammonia (chloramines) or organic nitrogen compounds.

Free available residual chlorine

– residual chlorine existing in water as hypochlorous acid or hypochlorite ion. (Note: some say +Cl2)

Page 91: Chemical Treatment Processes

91

Chlorine Residual Curve When chlorine is added to water containing reducing agents

and ammonia, residual develop that yield a curve as shown in the next slide.

A-B When chlorine is added to water, chlorine first reacts with reducing agents, such as nitrites, ferrous ions, and H2S.

B-C The excessive addition of chlorine results in the formation of chloramines (combined available residual chlorine) which are much less effective than the free chlorine (faster and higher disinfection capacity).

C-D The previously produced chloramines are oxidized to produce nitrogen compounds, such N2, N2O, NO3

-.D Once most of the chloramines are oxidized, additional

chlorine creates an equal residual. Point D is referred to as the breakpoint.

Beyond point D, all added residual is free available chlorine.

Page 92: Chemical Treatment Processes

92

No residual

Hump

Breakpoint or dip

Free residual chlorine / breakpoint residual

HOCl

Completion of chlorination reactions

N2, N2O, NO3-

Reducing agents

A B

C

D

Page 93: Chemical Treatment Processes

93

Reactions of Chlorine with Reactants in Water Reactions in sequence: Reducing agents

Fe, Mn, H2S and nitrites neutralize Cl2 into chlorides.

Red water, black water, tastes and odors are removed. No residual chlorine at this stage.

Ammonia Choramines are formed until hump. Combined available residual chlorine

Destruction of combined residual chlorine Chlorine reacts with combine chlorine, resulting in a drop of residual

chlorine.

Breakpoint chlorination therefore ensures a proper disinfection after control of Fe, Mn, bacteria, tastes and odors.

Page 94: Chemical Treatment Processes

94

Breakpoint Chlorination The purpose of breakpoint chlorination is to

produce and maintain free-residual chlorine in the water after complete oxidation of substances that react with chlorine.

Page 95: Chemical Treatment Processes

95

Chloramination Often practiced in water treatment, particularly to

maintain a residual in the distribution system after some other disinfectant (chlorine, ozone, or chlorine dioxide) is used as the primary disinfectant.

Effective for bacteria, but not for viruses.

[Cl2]:[NH3] = 3-6.

Page 96: Chemical Treatment Processes

96

Manual-Control Chlorinator

Page 97: Chemical Treatment Processes

97

Automatic Proportional-Control Chlorinator

Page 98: Chemical Treatment Processes

98

Factors Affecting Chlorination pH

The lower the pH, the more effective the free-residual chlorine. Why?

The amount of HOCl decreases at above pH 7.5 as it ionizes into OCl-.

Type of residual chlorine HOCl is more effective than the OCl-.

Temperature The higher the temperature, the quicker the

disinfection and the shorter the required contact time is.

Page 99: Chemical Treatment Processes

99

Factors Affecting Chlorination Contact time period

Chlorine requires a certain amount of contact time at different temperatures to react with microorganisms.

The longer the contact time, the more effective the disinfection is. So, the concept of CT is used to ensure a proper disinfection.

CT stands for concentration of a disinfectant as mg/L and its contact time in minutes.

Required CT is constant for each disinfection at different temperatures.

In chlorination, it also takes into consideration the pH of the water. The lower the pH, the better the disinfection, and the lower the CT value is.

Page 100: Chemical Treatment Processes

100

Factors Affecting Chlorination Concentration

The higher the concentration, the more effective the disinfectant is.

Normally 0.5 to 1 ppm free-residual chlorine will effectively disinfect the water.

According to the SDWA, the maximum allowable chlorine residual in the distribution system is 4 mg/L and the minimum required is 0.2 mg/L.

Page 101: Chemical Treatment Processes

101

CT and CT Ratio C stands for the concentration of a disinfectant as mg/L, which is the

lowest residual value of the disinfectant at the highest flow at the effluent site.

T stands for the contact time in minutes, which is the detention time of a pipe or a basin at the highest flow during 24 hours.

CT value is CT as mg/L-minutes. CT value takes into consideration the lowest C and its shortest T, and

vice versa. CT calculation needs the disinfectant residual at the effluent end of

each pipe and basin and their detention times at the highest flow to satisfy CT requirements.

The calculated CT for each part of the disinfection train divided by he required CT (from the CT table provided by the EPA) for each disinfectant is called available CT.

The higher the available CT value, the better the disinfection is.

Page 102: Chemical Treatment Processes

102

Dechlorination Chlorinated effluents can have negative impacts

on receiving environment Chemicals used for dechlorination include:

Sulfur dioxide (most common)Sodium sulfiteSodium bisulfiteSodium thiosulfateHydrogen peroxideAmmonia

Page 103: Chemical Treatment Processes

103

Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) General characteristics

Has solubility in water of 18.6% at 0CWhen reacts with water, it forms a weak solution of sulfurous

acid (H2SO3)Sulfurous acid dissociates as follows:

233

332

SOHHSO

HSOHSOH

Page 104: Chemical Treatment Processes

104

Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

Free and combined chlorine forms react readily with sulfite ion (SO3

2-) as follows:

Required mass ratio of SO2 to Cl2 is 1.1:1

42422

23

24

23

NHClSOOHClNHSO

HClSOHOClSO

Page 105: Chemical Treatment Processes

105

(2) Chlorine Dioxide (ClO2)

ClO2 was originally used to remove taste and odor from water

General characteristics of ClO2

More powerful oxidant than chlorineIts effectiveness is not affected by ammonia and pHIt is very effective when followed by chlorine or

chloraminesDoes not react with water, so can be easily removed from

water by aerationReadily decomposed by exposure to UV radiationMaintains a stable residual

Page 106: Chemical Treatment Processes

106

Preparation of ClO2

Produced onsite by mixing sodium chlorite and (excessive) chlorine:

Acid and sodium chlorite

Sodium hypochlorite and sodium chlorite

HNaClClOHClNaClO 22

OH2NaCl2ClO2NaClOHClHOCl

HClHOClOHCl

222

22

222 H3NaCl2ClO2HClNaOCl2NaClO

Page 107: Chemical Treatment Processes

107

Advantages of ClO2 Disinfection

ClO2 is strong bactericide and viricide over a wide pH range.

ClO2 has longer lasting residual than HOCl.

In wastewater, ClO2 use is limited to phenolic wastes and the control of sulfide in wastewater collection systems.

ClO2 does not produce measurable amounts of THMs (trihalomethanes) or TOXs (total organic halogens).

Page 108: Chemical Treatment Processes

108

Disadvantages of ClO2 Disinfection

ClO2 is unstable compound that shortly reverts to chlorine. Being short lived, it is generated onsite and applied immediately.

It is explosive at a concentration above 10% in the air. It is relatively expensive to generate. It forms chlorites (can be reduced by ferrous ions) and

chlorates, which are toxic. Chlorite is regulated as a DBP in the primary drinking water standards at 1 mg/L, and ClO2’s maximum residual disinfectant level leaving the treatment plant is 0.8 mg/L. Chlorate is unregulated yet.

Page 109: Chemical Treatment Processes

109

(3) Ozone General characteristics of ozone (O3)

More reactive than Cl2 and ClO2.

The reactions are rapid in inactivating microorganisms, oxidizing Fe, Mn, sulfide, and nitrite, and slower in oxidizing organic compounds like humic and fulvic substances, pesticides, and VOCs.

Does not react with water to produce DBPs, but decomposes in water to produce O2 and OH·.

Unstable in aqueous solutions, has a half-life of 10 to 30 minutes in distilled water; therefore, it is produced on-site and cannot be stored.

Page 110: Chemical Treatment Processes

110

Ozone Production1. Air is refrigerated to remove moisture (dew point = -

40 to -60 C).

2. Air is dried through desiccants (silica gel and activated alumina).

3. Air is passed between oppositely charged plates .

4. This process converts a small % of O2 to O3 (1-3% from air, and 2-6 % from the O2 feed).

Page 111: Chemical Treatment Processes

111

Ozonation Processes Ozonation treatment of water can be divided into

3 parts: Preparation of feed gas is mainly filtration of air to

remove dust particles and moisture. Pure O2 feed is more efficient.

Production of O3

Contaction is contacting the microbes by the bubbling of an O3 and O2/air mixture through the water by dispersing it mostly by diffusers at the bottom of a contact chamber for the maximum O3 transfer.

Page 112: Chemical Treatment Processes

112

Ozonation System

Figure 11.25 Two-compartment ozone contactor with porous diffusers.

Page 113: Chemical Treatment Processes

113

Ozone Reactions A need to balance pathogen inactivation and DBP control. Ozone reacts rapidly with NOM, producing small organic

compounds. The biodegradability of the resulting organic carbon is increased. This biodegradable organic matter (BOM), measured as

biodegradable dissolved organic carbon (BDOC) or assimilable organic carbon (AOC), can cause problems of bacterial regrowth in the distribution system, production of tastes and odors, and increased residual chlorine demand.

Granular media filters can be operated in a biologically active state (i.e., microbial growth is encouraged in the filter to biodegrade the organics so they are not released to the distribution system.

Page 114: Chemical Treatment Processes

114

Alternatives of Ozonation

Various combinations of O3 and other disinfectants: Peroxone is the use of H2O2 and O3 to accelerate the

oxidation of some organics by 2-6 times when compared to O3 itself.

Soozone is a combination of ultrasonic waves and O3, where ultrasonic waves break organics particles, and O3 oxidizes them.

Page 115: Chemical Treatment Processes

115

Advantages of Ozonation

When compared to chlorination: Ozone degrades to O2, so no toxic residues.

Ozone has been used to remove tastes and odors, color, algae, THMs precursors, phenols, cyanides, sulfides, sulfites and heavy metals.

The required CT is very low.

Page 116: Chemical Treatment Processes

116

Disadvantages of Ozonation High cost of production. Short-lived with almost no residual effect. On-site production. Oxidizes bromide ion (Br-) to bromate (BrO3

-) (difficult to remove), a DBP regulated at 10 g/L.

Therefore, ozonation is less common than chlorination. Generally, ozonation is followed by chlorination or chloramination for the residual effect.

Page 117: Chemical Treatment Processes

117

(4) Ultraviolet (UV) Radiation

UV rays have wavelengths from 100 to 400 nm (Figure 11.26) and are produced by a variety of lamps (Table 11.6).

UV radiation is absorbed by and damages the nucleic acids in DNA and RNA of microorganisms which prevents their replication.

Although many microorganisms have enzymes that enable them to repair the damaged nuclei acids, higher UV doses and residual chemical disinfectants are expected to inhibit the repair and maintain inactivation.

Page 118: Chemical Treatment Processes

118

Figure 11.26 UV light in the electromagnetic spectrum

Page 119: Chemical Treatment Processes

119

Page 120: Chemical Treatment Processes

120

U-V Tube

U-V Sterilizer

Page 121: Chemical Treatment Processes

121

Advantages and Disadvantages of UV In wastewaters, SS can shield bacteria and viruses from the UV

radiation. pH, temperature, alkalinity, and total organic carbon do not influence

the UV radiation. Potable water systems have low SS and turbidity. In potable water systems, chemical disinfection is used after UV

radiation to maintain a disinfectant residual. (LACK OF DISINFECANT RESIDUAL)

For wastewaters where residual disinfectants are not allowed, UV radiation has this particular advantage for disinfecting wastewaters. (DISINFECANT RESIDUAL IS NOT REQUIRED)

Chemical disinfection may be used together with UV radiation to inactivate viruses.

Page 122: Chemical Treatment Processes

122

Factors Affecting UV Treatment Turbidity

Turbidity shield microorganisms from radiation. The higher the turbidity, the less effective the UV treatment is

TDS Solids deposit on the lamp and foul it. The less the TDS, the better the treatment is.

Dissolved organic matter DOM absorbs the UV light and shields microbes from radiation. The less the DOM, the better the treatment is.

Depth The shallow the water, the more effective the UV treatment is

Page 123: Chemical Treatment Processes

123

Relative Strength of Disinfectants

O3 > ClO2 > HOCl > OCl- > NH2Cl

Page 124: Chemical Treatment Processes

124

Taste and Odor Control

Page 125: Chemical Treatment Processes

125

Causes of Taste and Odor

Taste and odor can be caused by: Decaying of natural organic compounds Microbes: algae and bacteria Dissolved gases (e.g., H2S) in GW Inorganic salts Metal ions (e.g., Fe, Mn, Pb, Cu, Zn) Disinfectants Organic compounds resulting from industrial activities Sewage

Page 126: Chemical Treatment Processes

126

Causes of Taste and Odor

In water systems, taste and odor problems are unique in each system.

in groundwater, odor is caused by dissolved gases that can be stripped from water by aeration.

Aeration

in surface water, odor is caused by nonvolatile organic compounds which can not be removed by aeration.

Breakpoint chlorination and AC treatment

Page 127: Chemical Treatment Processes

127

Prevention

Preventing taste and odor-producing substances from reaching surface water should be given priority.

if the problem is caused by industrial waste discharge, the source may be removed.

if algal growth is causing the problem, copper sulfate (one of the algaecides) or powered activated carbon can be used to stop the growth of algae.

Page 128: Chemical Treatment Processes

128

Treatment

Aeration

Oxidation

Activated Carbon

Page 129: Chemical Treatment Processes

129

(1) Aeration/Air Stripping

It is effective for removing dissolved gases and highly volatile odorous compounds.

Aeration as the first step in processing well water may acgieve any of the following: Removal of H2S, CO2 and CH4

Addition of DO for oxidation of Fe and Mn

Rarely effective in processing surface waters since the odor-causing substances are nonvolatile.

Page 130: Chemical Treatment Processes

130

(2) Oxidation Oxidation can be done by the use of:

chlorine (formation of THMs must be considered)chlorine dioxide (has the stronger oxidative power as

chlorine without forming THMs)potassium permanganate (strong oxidizing agent but

forms MnO2, so filtration must be applied after treatment with KMNO4)

Ozone

Page 131: Chemical Treatment Processes

131

Adsorption What is adsorption?

Attachment to interfaces between phases water and solid Air and solid

Effects removal of species

Uses removal of contaminants

activated carbon – removal of trace organic compounds ion exchange – resins for water softening metal hydroxides – coagulation in water treatment

Page 132: Chemical Treatment Processes

132

Adsorption on AC Adsorption on AC is the most effective treatment for the removal of taste

and odor from water. Activated carbon (AC) adsorption

Main treatment for the removal of tastes and odors, volatile organic compounds, and synthetic (pesticides) organic chemicals.

AC is a wood product made by burning plant matter to form charcoal through carbonation and activation.

Carbonation is the burning of wood material at 550 to 700C in the absence of air to form charcoal.

Activation is the further burning of charcoal at 800 to 900C in the presence of steam and CO2 to produce pores and crevices in and on the surface of the particles.

Two forms of AC in the water treatment: Powdered Activated Carbon (PAC) Granulate/Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) The choice depends on the water quality and design of the plant.

Page 133: Chemical Treatment Processes

133

Powdered Activated Carbon (PAC) Power is mixed with water to form slurry. Slurry is added to the water at

several points, starting from intake to the filter influent. AC is also a reducing agent because it reacts with disinfectants such as

chlorine, chloramines, chlorine dioxide and ozone. It adsorbs them and causes a higher disinfectant demand. Therefore, both should not be applied at the same time or in sequence without proper time interval.

AC is mostly applied into the influents of presedimentation basin and the final sedimentation basin. Other application points are rapid mix, flocculation basin and influent of the primary sedimentation basin. It is also applied to the influent of microfiltration and ultrafiltration processes. It is also applied after the recarbonation of the softened water to prevent the blocking of the adsorption sites by calcium carbonate.

A typical dose of PAC varies from 3 to 50 mg/L. Low capital cost and dose, flexibility of application point, no required

regeneration, coagulation aid by providing particulate matter for flocculation, but produces extra sludge.

Page 134: Chemical Treatment Processes

134

Granulate/Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) Used for a continuous treatment when there is a need for

continuous removal of volatile and synthetic organics compounds in addition to occasional taste and odor control.

It does filtration and adsorption. GAC needs regeneration when GAC is exhausted and then

releases adsorbed substances. More expensive than PAC due to regeneration and initial cost,

no flexibility of application at different points. So, PAC is more popular.

Page 135: Chemical Treatment Processes

135

Fluoridation

Page 136: Chemical Treatment Processes

136

Fluoridation Water fluoridation is the precise adjustment of the natural fluoride

concentration in a public water supply up to the level recommended for preventing tooth decay.

Low levels of fluoride result in increasing incidence of caries, while excessive fluoride results in mottled tooth enamel.

Recommended limits (Table 11.15) are based on air temperature, since this influences the amount of water ingested by people.

The US EPA has set the maximum contaminant level for fluoride in the drinking water at 4 mg/L.

To prevent dental decay, the optimum fluoride concentration has been established at 1 mg/L (American Dental Association, 1980).

Page 137: Chemical Treatment Processes

137

Table 11.15

Page 138: Chemical Treatment Processes

138

Fluoridation Most common fluoride compounds (Table 11.16):

Sodium fluoride (NaF) (45% F)

Sodium silicofluoride (Na2SiF6) (61% F)Most common, economical, convenient, and safe.

Fluosilicic acid (H2SiF6) (79% F)

Application of fluoride is best in a channel or water main coming from the filters, or directly to the clear well. If it is applied prior to filtration, some of the fluoride

may be lost due to reactions with other chemicals.

Page 139: Chemical Treatment Processes

139

Page 140: Chemical Treatment Processes

140

Water Fluoridation Chemicals Sodium Fluoride (NaF)

Crystalline powder Relatively constant (low) solubility pH 7.6 Saturator Systems

Sodium Fluorosilicate (Na2SiF6) Crystalline powder Solubility varies with water temperature pH 3.5 Dry-feed Systems

Fluorosilicic Acid (H2SiF6) Liquid Infinite solubility pH 1.2 Venturi Systems

Page 141: Chemical Treatment Processes

141

Venturi Chemical InjectorBypass venturi Bypass venturi injection device injection device for injection of for injection of liquid chlorine, liquid chlorine, liquid fertilizer or liquid fertilizer or acid.acid.

Cutaway of a Cutaway of a venturi injector venturi injector cross-section.cross-section.

throttling valvethrottling valve

chemical suction portchemical suction port

Page 142: Chemical Treatment Processes

142

Example 11.14 The fluoride ion concentration in a water supply is

increased from 0.3 mg/L to 1 mg/L by applying 98% pure sodium silicofluoride. How many milligrams of chemical are required per liter of water?

Solution:

From Table 11.16, Na2SiF6 is 61% F.

Dosage = (1 – 0.3)/(0.98 0.61) = 1.17 mg/L

Page 143: Chemical Treatment Processes

143

Synthetic Organic Chemical Removal

Page 144: Chemical Treatment Processes

144

Removal of Synthetic Organic Chemicals

Synthetic organic compounds (SOCs) include a large number of chemicals used in industrial, agricultural, and household activities, e.g., pesticides, VOCs, and THMs.

Some of the SOCs are toxic substances and can cause cancer or damage to vital organs, others can impair the nervous system. The maximum allowable level of SOCs in water range from 0.0002 to 0.1 mg/l.

Page 145: Chemical Treatment Processes

145

Sources of SOCs

Groundwaters can be polluted by:leaching of agricultural pesticidesseepage from improper disposal of industrial volatile

organic chemicals (VOCs)

Surface waters can be polluted by SOCs through runoff from:

agricultural landsdischarge of industrial wastewaterspillage of chemicals

Page 146: Chemical Treatment Processes

146

Treatment Conventional water treatment (coagulation -

sedimentation - filtration) is not effective in removing SOCs.

Other alternatives that can improve the treatment include:

changing the coagulantschanging the polymersadjustment of pHuse of activated carbon adsorption – poor adsorption due

to pore structure of PAC, short contact time between carbon particles and dissolved organic chemicals, and interference by adsorption of other organic compounds.

use of filtration through a bed of granular activated carbon

Page 147: Chemical Treatment Processes

147

Treatment

Granular activated carbon (GAC) can be reactivated by heating in a furnace.

Pilot plant studies need to be conducted in order to:

select the best type and dosage of carbondetermine the contact timedetermine the effect of water quality variationdetermine the effectiveness of reactivation

Page 148: Chemical Treatment Processes

148

Involves the incorporation of PO43- into TSS and the

subsequent removal of those solids. Phosphorus can be incorporated into either biological

solid (microorganism) or chemical precipitates. Phosphate precipitation can be brought about by the

addition of the salts of multivalent metal ions that form precipitates of separingly soluble phosphates.

eg: Ca2+, Al3+, Fe3+.

Chemical Precipitation for Phosphorus Removal

Page 149: Chemical Treatment Processes

149

Phosphate Precipitation with Calcium

Ca is added in the form of lime, Ca(OH)2. When lime is added to water, it reacts with

the natural bicarbonate alkalinity to CaCO3.

Ca(OH)2 + Ca(HCO3)2 2CaCO3 + 2H2O

When pH > 10, excess Ca2+ will precipitate out PO4

3- as hydroxylapatite.

10Ca2+ + 6PO43- + 2OH- Ca10(PO4) 6(OH) 2

Page 150: Chemical Treatment Processes

150

The quantity of lime required depends on the alkalinity of the water but not on the amount of phosphate present.depends on the alkalinity of the water but not on the amount of phosphate present.

Quantity required to precipitate P is typically ~1.4 to 1.5 times the total alkalinity expressed as CaCO3.

Phosphate Precipitation with Calcium

Page 151: Chemical Treatment Processes

151

Phosphate precipitation with Al:Al3+ + HnPO4

3-n AlPO4 + nH+

Phosphate precipitation with Fe:Fe3+ + HnPO4

3-n FePO4 + nH+

Many competing reaction occur at the same time when Al or Fe precipitate out the PO4

3-. This causes the requires precipitant dosage cannot be estimated.

Phosphate Precipitation with Aluminium and Iron

Page 152: Chemical Treatment Processes

152

Al & Fe salts are added to the untreated water, in the activated sludge aeration tank or the final clarifier influent channel.

P is removed from the liquid phase through precipitation, adsorption, agglomeration and removed as 1’ or 2’ sludges.

Phosphate Precipitation with Aluminium and Iron