child labour multiple indicator cluster surveys- mics3 analysis and report writing workshop panama...
TRANSCRIPT
Child labour
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys- MICS3Analysis and Report Writing Workshop
Panama City, July 12-20, 2006
Indicators
1. Percentage of children 5-14 years of age involved in child labour activities
2. Labourer students
3. Student labourers
Goals World Fit for Children (WFFC)Protect children against abuse, exploitation and violence. Under general protection nine strategies are mentioned to combat child labour
Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)
The Millennium Declaration calls for the protection of children against abuse, exploitation and violence but no goal, target or indicator is included
Why to measure child labour?
Reasons:
• Identify the magnitude of the problem as well as its characteristics• Evaluate impact of programs and interventions based on trends
Data sources/methods
• Administrative records• Population census• Household surveys• Other surveys
The MICS3 approach
• Estimation of indicator based on household survey data• Present results by background variables to localize the problem• Promote the design and implementation of further analysis of the main determinants of child labour to help the design of policies and the development of programs and interventions
Child labour
Numerator:Ages 5-11
at least one hour of economic activity or at least 28 hours of household chores per
weekAges 12-14
at least 14 hours of economic activity orat least 28 hours of household chores per
weekEconomic activity of children is defined as any paid or
unpaid work for someone who is not a member of the household, or other family work
Denominator: All children 5-14 years of age
CHILD LABOUR MODULE CL TO BE ADMINISTERED TO MOTHER/CARETAKER OF EACH CHILD IN THE HOUSEHOLD AGE 5 THROUGH 14 YEARS. FOR HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS BELOW AGE 5 OR ABOVE AGE 14, LEAVE ROWS BLANK. NOW I WOULD LIKE TO ASK ABOUT ANY WORK CHILDREN IN THIS HOUSEHOLD MAY DO.
CL1. LINE NO.
CL2. NAME
CL3. DURING THE PAST
WEEK, DID (name) DO
ANY KIND OF WORK FOR SOMEONE WHO IS NOT A
MEMBER OF THIS
HOUSEHOLD? If yes: FOR PAY IN CASH
OR KIND? 1 YES, FOR PAY (CASH OR KIND) 2 YES, UNPAID 3 NO TO CL5
CL4. IF YES:
SINCE LAST (day of the week), ABOUT HOW MANY
HOURS DID HE/SHE
DO THIS WORK FOR
SOMEONE WHO IS
NOT A MEMBER OF
THIS HOUSEHOLD? IF MORE THAN ONE JOB, INCLUDE ALL HOURS AT ALL JOBS. RECORD RESPONSE THEN CL.6
CL5. AT ANY TIME
DURING THE PAST
YEAR, DID (name)
DO ANY KIND OF
WORK FOR
SOMEONE WHO IS
NOT A MEMBER OF
THIS HOUSEHOLD? If yes: FOR PAY IN
CASH OR KIND? 1 YES, FOR PAY (CASH OR KIND) 2 YES, UNPAID 3 NO
CL6. DURING THE PAST
WEEK, DID (name)
HELP WITH
HOUSEHOLD
CHORES SUCH AS SHOPPING, COLLECTING
FIREWOOD, CLEANING, FETCHING WATER, OR CARING FOR CHILDREN? 1 YES 2 NO TO CL8
CL7. If yes:
SINCE LAST (day of the week), ABOUT HOW MANY
HOURS DID HE/SHE
SPEND DOING
THESE CHORES?
CL8. DURING THE PAST
WEEK, DID (name)
DO ANY OTHER
FAMILY WORK (ON
THE FARM OR IN A BUSINESS OR
SELLING GOODS IN
THE STREET?) 1 YES 2 NO NEXT LINE
CL9. If yes:
SINCE LAST (day of the week), ABOUT HOW MANY
HOURS DID HE/SHE
DO THIS WORK?
LINE YES YES NO. NAME PAID UNPAID NO PAID PAID UNPAID NO YES NO NO. HOURS YES NO NO. HOURS
01 1 2 3 ____ ____ 1 2 3 1 2 ____ ____ 1 2 ____ ____
02 1 2 3 ____ ____ 1 2 3 1 2 ____ ____ 1 2 ____ ____
03 1 2 3 ____ ____ 1 2 3 1 2 ____ ____ 1 2 ____ ____
04 1 2 3 ____ ____ 1 2 3 1 2 ____ ____ 1 2 ____ ____
05 1 2 3 ____ ____ 1 2 3 1 2 ____ ____ 1 2 ____ ____
06 1 2 3 ____ ____ 1 2 3 1 2 ____ ____ 1 2 ____ ____
07 1 2 3 ____ ____ 1 2 3 1 2 ____ ____ 1 2 ____ ____
08 1 2 3 ____ ____ 1 2 3 1 2 ____ ____ 1 2 ____ ____
09 1 2 3 ____ ____ 1 2 3 1 2 ____ ____ 1 2 ____ ____
10 1 2 3 ____ ____ 1 2 3 1 2 ____ ____ 1 2 ____ ____
11 1 2 3 ____ ____ 1 2 3 1 2 ____ ____ 1 2 ____ ____
12 1 2 3 ____ ____ 1 2 3 1 2 ____ ____ 1 2 ____ ____
13 1 2 3 ____ ____ 1 2 3 1 2 ____ ____ 1 2 ____ ____
14 1 2 3 ____ ____ 1 2 3 1 2 ____ ____ 1 2 ____ ____
15 1 2 3 ____ ____ 1 2 3 1 2 ____ ____ 1 2 ____ ____
Child labour in CEE/CIS(MICS2 1999-2001)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Romania
Azerbaijan
Bosnia&Her.
Uzbekistan
Tajikistan
Albania
Rep.of Moldova
SPSS Program
• Generates basic table: CP 2• Percent of children 5-14 years of age involved in
child labour activities
Table CP.2: Child labourPercentage of children aged 5-14 years who are involved in child labour activities by type of work, Country, Year
1.4 2.2 4.6 1.6 9.4 5796
1.4 2.1 6.0 1.4 10.6 5246
.1 .2 .4 1.8 2.5 862
2.6 3.2 4.5 1.6 11.5 4118
1.3 1.5 6.3 2.5 11.1 3129
.2 1.0 6.0 .2 7.4 2663
.8 12.1 13.3 .8 23.4 270
1.7 1.8 2.4 2.6 8.1 2861
1.3 2.3 6.2 1.1 10.6 8181
1.0 2.3 2.2 1.2 6.4 7678
2.3 1.8 12.1 2.3 18.1 3364
1.7 2.5 6.5 1.6 11.8 8315
.5 1.1 1.5 1.4 4.4 2728
1.7 2.3 2.2 3.0 9.0 688
3.3 .9 3.0 1.8 9.1 165
1.4 2.2 5.5 1.4 10.1 10189
2.6 2.2 8.9 1.5 14.6 2415
1.4 2.1 5.8 2.3 11.2 2391
1.0 3.1 5.9 .9 10.6 2131
.7 1.6 3.3 1.1 6.5 2023
1.1 1.8 1.8 1.7 6.0 2083
1.0 2.1 4.9 1.6 9.3 8171
2.6 1.4 5.8 1.5 10.8 2630
.0 5.7 .0 1.1 6.8 40
.0 7.5 25.7 .0 32.0 38
1.3 12.5 13.6 .5 24.0 157
.0 50.0 .0 .0 50.0 7
1.4 2.2 5.3 1.5 10.0 11043
Male
Female
Sex
Dushanbe
Khatlon
Sogd
RRS
GBAO
Region
Urban
Rural
Residence
5-11 years
12-14 years
Age
Yes
No
School participation
None
Primary
Secondary +
Mother's education
Poorest
Second
Middle
Fourth
Richest
Wealth indexquintiles
Tajik
Uzbek
Russian
Kirgiz
Other
Missing
Mother tongue ofhead
Total
Paid work Unpaid work
Working outsidehousehold
Householdchores for
28+hours/week
Workingfor familybusiness
Total childlabour *
Number ofchildren aged
5-14 years
* MICS Indicator 71
Labourer students
Numerator:Number of children aged 5-14 years involved in child
labour activities (labourers) that attend school
Denominator: Total number of children aged 5-14 years involved in
child labour activities (labourers)
Students labourers
Numerator:Number of children aged 5-14 years attending school
that are involved in child labour activities
Denominator: Total number of children aged 5-14 years attending
school
SPSS Program
• Generates basic table: CP 3• Generates
– the percent of children 5-14 years of age involved in child labour activities (labourers) that also are attending school and
– The percent of children 5-14 years of age attending school who are also involved in child labour activities
Table CP.3: Labourer students and student labourersPercentage of children aged 5-14 years who are labourer students and student labourers, Country, Year
9.4 76.7 5796 90.8 544 11.1 4444
10.6 73.8 5246 87.3 558 12.6 3871
2.5 81.1 862 85.7 21 2.6 700
11.5 76.0 4118 89.7 473 13.6 3131
11.1 76.4 3129 87.3 349 12.7 2392
7.4 70.5 2663 89.9 196 9.4 1877
23.4 79.7 270 91.8 63 27.0 215
8.1 77.9 2861 74.3 232 7.7 2229
10.6 74.4 8181 93.0 870 13.3 6086
6.4 67.2 7678 89.8 494 8.6 5162
18.1 93.7 3364 88.4 608 17.1 3153
9.0 82.6 688 77.2 62 8.4 569
9.1 72.0 165 74.5 15 9.4 119
10.1 74.9 10189 90.0 1025 12.1 7628
14.6 73.8 2415 92.7 353 18.4 1782
11.2 73.4 2391 80.8 267 12.3 1755
10.6 73.7 2131 88.7 225 12.7 1572
6.5 75.5 2023 96.7 132 8.3 1528
6.0 80.6 2083 88.8 125 6.6 1678
9.3 74.2 8171 85.6 761 10.7 6061
10.8 78.2 2630 97.2 285 13.5 2058
6.8 79.2 40 100.0 3 8.6 32
32.0 73.5 38 90.2 12 39.2 28
24.0 82.6 157 95.1 38 27.7 130
50.0 100.0 7 100.0 3 50.0 7
10.0 75.3 11043 89.0 1102 11.8 8315
Male
Female
Sex
Dushanbe
Khatlon
Sogd
RRS
GBAO
Region
Urban
Rural
Residence
5-11 years
12-14 years
Age
None
Primary
Secondary +
Mother'seducation
Poorest
Second
Middle
Fourth
Richest
Wealthindexquintiles
Tajik
Uzbek
Russian
Kirgiz
Other
Missing
Mothertongue ofhead
Total
Percentageof children inchild labour *
Percentageof childrenattendingschool ***
Number ofchildren
aged 5-14
Percentageof child
labourerswho are also
attendingschool **
Number ofchild
labourersaged 5-14
Percentageof students
who are alsoinvolved inchild labour
****
Number ofstudentsaged 5-14
** MICS Indicator 72**** MICS Indicator 73
Methodological issues
• 28 hours as the cut-off for household chores• Gender issue• Shall we measure economic activity only?• Where do agencies (ILO and the World Bank)
stand on the child labour problem?• Presentation of results for disadvantaged groups
Child Labour, Education and thePrinciple of Non-Discrimination
Elizabeth D. Gibbons, Friedrich Huebler, and Edilberto Loaiza
Division of Policy and Planning, UNICEFNew YorkJune 9, 2004
Thank you!