children's services management report...management report october 2016 missouri department of...
TRANSCRIPT
Department of Social Services Children's Division
Children's Services Management Report
October 2016
Missouri Department of Social Services Research & Data Analysis
221 W. High Street Jefferson City, MO 65101
Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis Research and Data Analysis
State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement:
“To maintain or improve the quality of life for Missouri citizens." The Department of Social Services is an equal opportunity employer. Services provided by the Department of Social Services are offered on a non-discriminatory basis.
Children’s Services Management Report II Research and Data Analysis
Table of Contents
Unless otherwise indicated, information contained in this publication is intended for monthly use only.
Although the information presented is the best available at the time of publication, because of delays in processing, data may be incomplete. Accordingly, data should NOT simply be summed from one month
to the next to obtain 3 month, 6 month or 12 month (etc.) values.
Figure 1. Map – Department of Social Services Regions ...............................................................V
Child Abuse and Neglect (CA/N)
Table 1. Incidents and Children Reported During the Month Compared to Those
Reported for the Same Month Last Year ....................................................................... 2
Table 2. Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed During the Month ....................................................................................... 4
Table 3. Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed by Conclusion During the Month .................................................................. 6
Table 4. Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed in the Month .................................. 8
Table 5. Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed in the Month ................................ 10
Table 6. CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During the Month .......................................... 12
Figure 2. CA/N Reports for Four Years Through the Current Month ............................................ 14
Figure 3. CA/N Reports Comparing the Last Two Years.............................................................. 14
Figure 4. Percentage Change in CA/N Reports Made Twelve Months Apart ................................. 15
Figure 5. CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed During the Month by Conclusion.............. 15
Figure 6. CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed During the Month by Conclusion.............. 16
Figure 7. Time Between Report and Child Contact for Investigations/Assessments
Completed in the Month ............................................................................................ 16
Figure 8. Percentage of Investigations/Assessments Completed Within Forty Five Days ............... 17
Notes Child Abuse and Neglect Tables and Figures ............................................................... 18
Family-Centered Services (FCS)
Table 7. FCS Cases Open at the End of the Month by Reason for Opening ................................. 22
Table 8. FCS Cases Active During the Month by Reason for Opening ......................................... 24
Table 9. Persons in Family-Centered Services During the Month ............................................... 26
Table 10. FCS Cases Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ...................................... 28
Children’s Services Management Report III Research and Data Analysis
Table 11. FCS Cases By Region Closed During the Month by Close Reason .................................. 30
Table 12. FCS Cases Active During the Month Which Have Had Court Involvement ...................... 32
Table 13. FCS Cases By Region Active During the Month Which Have Had No Court Involvement . 34
Figure 9. FCS Cases Active as of the End of the Month Over the Previous Four Years .................. 36
Figure 10. Percentage Change in FCS Cases by Region Active as of the End of the Month,
Twelve Months Apart ................................................................................................ 36
Figure 11. FCS Cases by Region Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ....................... 37
Figure 12. FCS Cases Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ...................................... 37
Figure 13. FCS Cases by Region Closed During the Month by Reason for Closing .......................... 38
Figure 14. FCS Cases Active During the Month With Court Involvement By Number of Months Open ....................................................................................... 38
Figure 15. FCS Cases Active During the Month With No Court Involvement
By Number of Months Open ....................................................................................... 39
Notes Family-Centered Services Tables and Figures .............................................................. 40
Out-of-Home Placement
Table 14. Children Entering Children’s Division Custody for the First Time During the Month
By Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category ................................... 44
Table 15. Children Re-Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Month by Case
Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category ............................................... 46
Table 16. Children (Re)Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Last Two Years ............... 48
Table 17. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody During the Month Grouped by
Length of Stay and Region ........................................................................................ 49
Table 18. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month By Length of Stay and Case Manager County .............................................................. 50
Table 19. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month by Case Manager County and Placement Category ................................................................... 52
Table 20. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month by Case
Manager County and Placement Type......................................................................... 54
Table 21. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody During the Month Grouped by
Placement Category and Case Manager County........................................................... 64
Table 22. Children Closed from the Alternative Care System During the Month Grouped by Reason for Case Closing .......................................................................... 66
Children’s Services Management Report IV Research and Data Analysis
Table 23. Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of the Month With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody ................................................................................ 68
Table 24. Currently Licensed Children’s Division Foster Homes by Vendor Type ........................... 70
Table 25. Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of the Month Grouped By Case Manager County and Legal Status ................................................................. 72
Table 26. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month Grouped
By Case Manager County and Goal ............................................................................. 74
Table 27. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month Grouped
By Case Manager County and Number of Previous Placements..................................... 76
Table 28. Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year .............................................................................. 78
Figure 16. Children (Re)Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Month ............................ 80
Figure 17. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month During
the Last Two Years ................................................................................................... 80
Figure 18. Children Closing from Alternative Care During the Month by Reason for Case Closing and Region ...................................................................................... 81
Figure 19. Adoptions Finalized During the Last Two Years ........................................................... 81
Figure 20. Children in Children’s Division Custody as of the Last of the Month by Age and Placement Type ........................................................................................... 82
Figure 21. Children in Children’s Division Custody as of the Last Day of the Month By Placement Category for Four Years ........................................................................ 82
Figure 22. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody by Quarter and
Subsequent Disposition ............................................................................................. 83
Notes Out-of-Home Placement Tables and Figures ............................................................... 84
Intensive In-Home Services (IIS)
Table 29. Families Referred to IIS During the Month Grouped by Referral County ........................ 90
Table 30. Families and Children Accepted in IIS During the Month Grouped by Household County ................................................................................................ 92
Table 31. Exit Status of Families Exiting IIS During the Month .................................................... 94
Table 32. Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting IIS ...................................................... 96
Table 33. Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting IIS ................................................ 98
Notes Intensive In-Home Services Tables ......................................................................... 100
Children’s Services Management Report V Research and Data Analysis
Figure 1. Department of Social Services Regions
Child Abuse and Neglect
Table 1.
Incidents and Children Reported During October 2016
Compared to Those Reported During October 2015
Current Incidents Current Children
Month One Year Percentage Month One Year Percentage
Incidents Prior Change Children Prior Change
Northwest Andrew 9 15 -40.00% 14 25 -44.00%
Atchison 4 4 0.00% 4 7 -42.86%
Buchanan 142 186 -23.66% 199 269 -26.02%
Caldwell 7 13 -46.15% 10 14 -28.57%
Carroll 7 6 16.67% 12 9 33.33%
Cass 82 79 3.80% 100 113 -11.50%
Chariton 11 10 10.00% 18 16 12.50%
Clay 195 204 -4.41% 280 288 -2.78%
Clinton 14 18 -22.22% 19 23 -17.39%
Cooper 14 9 55.56% 20 12 66.67%
Daviess 15 12 25.00% 25 22 13.64%
De Kalb 5 8 -37.50% 6 11 -45.46%
Gentry 7 7 0.00% 13 12 8.33%
Grundy 8 19 -57.90% 11 26 -57.69%
Harrison 9 13 -30.77% 11 22 -50.00%
Holt 9 0 0.00% 15 0 0.00%
Johnson 40 41 -2.44% 63 56 12.50%
Lafayette 25 24 4.17% 48 41 17.07%
Linn 7 13 -46.15% 10 23 -56.52%
Livingston 16 16 0.00% 28 25 12.00%
Mercer 2 3 -33.33% 2 6 -66.67%
Nodaway 15 20 -25.00% 18 25 -28.00%
Pettis 39 47 -17.02% 54 68 -20.59%
Platte 57 40 42.50% 77 50 54.00%
Putnam 7 6 16.67% 11 10 10.00%
Ray 13 31 -58.07% 17 47 -63.83%
Saline 28 28 0.00% 44 45 -2.22%
Sullivan 7 7 0.00% 10 10 0.00%
Worth 2 0 0.00% 2 0 0.00%
* Region Total * 796 879 -9.44% 1,141 1,275 -10.51%
Northeast Adair 22 27 -18.52% 31 41 -24.39%
Audrain 19 31 -38.71% 35 38 -7.90%
Boone 141 129 9.30% 207 180 15.00%
Callaway 49 76 -35.53% 67 94 -28.72%
Clark 5 11 -54.55% 8 18 -55.56%
Cole 76 71 7.04% 117 94 24.47%
Franklin 110 112 -1.79% 145 175 -17.14%
Gasconade 15 11 36.36% 20 22 -9.09%
Howard 15 10 50.00% 25 17 47.06%
Jefferson 196 157 24.84% 292 210 39.05%
Knox 1 3 -66.67% 1 5 -80.00%
Lewis 12 12 0.00% 18 20 -10.00%
Lincoln 57 99 -42.42% 76 138 -44.93%
Macon 9 7 28.57% 14 9 55.56%
Marion 38 42 -9.52% 59 73 -19.18%
Monroe 10 11 -9.09% 13 18 -27.78%
Montgomery 18 9 100.00% 31 17 82.35%
Osage 3 11 -72.73% 3 19 -84.21%
Pike 24 23 4.35% 40 32 25.00%
Ralls 10 4 150.00% 18 5 260.00%
Randolph 45 44 2.27% 62 65 -4.62%
Schuyler 8 1 700.00% 13 1 1200.00%
Scotland 2 2 0.00% 2 4 -50.00%
Shelby 4 4 0.00% 4 4 0.00%
St Charles 203 226 -10.18% 295 317 -6.94%
Warren 48 52 -7.69% 57 72 -20.83%
* Region Total * 1,140 1,185 -3.80% 1,653 1,688 -2.07%
Southeast Bollinger 8 13 -38.46% 16 21 -23.81%
Butler 69 59 16.95% 98 83 18.07%
Cape Girardeau 56 55 1.82% 97 82 18.29%
Carter 9 4 125.00% 13 4 225.00%
Crawford 42 32 31.25% 53 46 15.22%
Dent 27 29 -6.90% 48 44 9.09%
2Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 1.
Incidents and Children Reported During October 2016
Compared to Those Reported During October 2015
Current Incidents Current Children
Month One Year Percentage Month One Year Percentage
Incidents Prior Change Children Prior Change
Southeast Dunklin 45 38 18.42% 74 62 19.36%
Howell 69 90 -23.33% 105 132 -20.46%
Iron 8 14 -42.86% 13 22 -40.91%
Madison 14 14 0.00% 18 21 -14.29%
Maries 3 12 -75.00% 3 26 -88.46%
Mississippi 7 8 -12.50% 8 11 -27.27%
New Madrid 37 34 8.82% 58 44 31.82%
Oregon 19 12 58.33% 31 21 47.62%
Pemiscot 32 31 3.23% 51 46 10.87%
Perry 14 21 -33.33% 18 42 -57.14%
Phelps 57 45 26.67% 84 64 31.25%
Pulaski 34 34 0.00% 45 53 -15.09%
Reynolds 5 4 25.00% 8 8 0.00%
Ripley 23 23 0.00% 31 37 -16.22%
Scott 48 57 -15.79% 80 75 6.67%
Shannon 5 10 -50.00% 5 12 -58.33%
St Francois 85 80 6.25% 125 131 -4.58%
Ste Genevieve 18 15 20.00% 27 23 17.39%
Stoddard 33 31 6.45% 43 47 -8.51%
Texas 28 35 -20.00% 37 55 -32.73%
Washington 35 29 20.69% 54 51 5.88%
Wayne 18 14 28.57% 25 29 -13.79%
* Region Total * 848 843 0.59% 1,268 1,292 -1.86%
Southwest Barry 38 44 -13.64% 51 56 -8.93%
Barton 14 14 0.00% 20 31 -35.48%
Bates 15 16 -6.25% 21 22 -4.55%
Benton 20 11 81.82% 24 13 84.62%
Camden 55 40 37.50% 71 73 -2.74%
Cedar 28 21 33.33% 45 28 60.71%
Christian 104 89 16.85% 145 124 16.94%
Dade 6 11 -45.46% 6 19 -68.42%
Dallas 25 29 -13.79% 38 38 0.00%
Douglas 17 16 6.25% 26 24 8.33%
Greene 471 438 7.53% 645 615 4.88%
Henry 27 19 42.11% 39 34 14.71%
Hickory 8 9 -11.11% 18 14 28.57%
Jasper 167 158 5.70% 230 230 0.00%
Laclede 54 57 -5.26% 75 71 5.63%
Lawrence 38 50 -24.00% 54 87 -37.93%
Mcdonald 22 19 15.79% 29 31 -6.45%
Miller 32 28 14.29% 48 37 29.73%
Moniteau 17 24 -29.17% 28 43 -34.88%
Morgan 26 23 13.04% 32 32 0.00%
Newton 59 55 7.27% 89 90 -1.11%
Ozark 11 8 37.50% 17 10 70.00%
Polk 37 53 -30.19% 48 80 -40.00%
St Clair 14 10 40.00% 22 20 10.00%
Stone 30 32 -6.25% 47 43 9.30%
Taney 65 90 -27.78% 88 126 -30.16%
Vernon 17 37 -54.05% 24 57 -57.90%
Webster 31 53 -41.51% 54 86 -37.21%
Wright 31 21 47.62% 35 29 20.69%
* Region Total * 1,479 1,475 0.27% 2,069 2,163 -4.35%
Kansas City Jackson 732 752 -2.66% 1,046 1,090 -4.04%
* Region Total * 732 752 -2.66% 1,046 1,090 -4.04%
St. Louis St Louis City 343 358 -4.19% 492 538 -8.55%
St Louis County 648 629 3.02% 907 868 4.49%
* Region Total * 991 987 0.41% 1,399 1,406 -0.50%
Other Out Home Inv 199 243 -18.11% 305 345 -11.59%
Out Of State 8 9 -11.11% 14 12 16.67%
* Region Total * 207 252 -17.86% 319 357 -10.64%
State Total 6,193 6,373 -2.82% 8,895 9,271 -4.06%
3Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 2.
Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed During October 2016
Substan- Total
tiated Children
Substan- Unsubstan- Unsubstan- Family Children Per Per
tiated tiated PSI tiated Assessment Other Total Thousand Thousand
Northwest Andrew 2 0 8 15 2 27 0.48 6.48
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Buchanan 18 1 73 129 6 227 0.86 10.83
Caldwell 1 0 4 3 0 8 0.42 3.33
Carroll 0 0 9 15 0 24 0.00 10.95
Cass 3 1 14 58 1 77 0.11 2.92
Chariton 0 2 1 6 0 9 0.00 5.09
Clay 6 3 41 104 4 158 0.10 2.76
Clinton 1 1 13 10 1 26 0.20 5.10
Cooper 0 0 1 3 0 4 0.00 1.01
Daviess 1 0 9 3 0 13 0.44 5.77
De Kalb 0 0 2 6 0 8 0.00 3.46
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Grundy 0 2 7 2 1 12 0.00 4.86
Harrison 1 2 5 7 1 16 0.45 7.20
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Johnson 1 0 10 15 2 28 0.08 2.33
Lafayette 3 2 5 20 0 30 0.37 3.66
Linn 0 1 4 10 0 15 0.00 4.75
Livingston 0 0 7 4 0 11 0.00 3.30
Mercer 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.00 1.04
Nodaway 1 0 1 4 0 6 0.23 1.41
Pettis 0 0 4 13 0 17 0.00 1.58
Platte 5 3 24 26 4 62 0.23 2.82
Putnam 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00 0.86
Ray 0 0 15 55 4 74 0.00 12.61
Saline 4 1 23 9 0 37 0.74 6.86
Sullivan 0 0 5 7 0 12 0.00 7.38
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 47 20 285 525 26 903 0.22 4.17
Northeast Adair 0 1 7 20 1 29 0.00 5.83
Audrain 1 9 18 55 2 85 0.16 13.35
Boone 9 5 30 80 6 130 0.26 3.80
Callaway 1 0 8 17 2 28 0.10 2.80
Clark 1 1 0 2 0 4 0.58 2.33
Cole 1 11 15 61 1 89 0.06 4.96
Franklin 12 6 22 85 9 134 0.48 5.34
Gasconade 1 1 3 7 1 13 0.30 3.86
Howard 3 1 1 9 0 14 1.38 6.43
Jefferson 18 25 24 140 5 212 0.33 3.86
Knox 0 0 0 3 0 3 0.00 2.91
Lewis 4 0 3 10 0 17 1.67 7.10
Lincoln 0 4 21 47 0 72 0.00 4.89
Macon 0 0 2 5 0 7 0.00 1.85
Marion 6 1 5 30 3 45 0.87 6.53
Monroe 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00 0.49
Montgomery 0 0 1 5 0 6 0.00 2.10
Osage 0 0 1 5 0 6 0.00 1.75
Pike 1 1 4 23 0 29 0.24 7.06
Ralls 4 0 2 7 0 13 1.68 5.47
Randolph 3 0 12 48 3 66 0.51 11.23
Schuyler 3 0 1 0 0 4 2.63 3.51
Scotland 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00 0.73
Shelby 0 0 2 1 0 3 0.00 1.88
St Charles 2 4 41 75 6 128 0.02 1.38
Warren 2 1 3 31 0 37 0.25 4.55
* Region Total * 72 71 226 768 39 1,176 0.23 3.73
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 6 7 0 13 0.00 4.46
Butler 4 2 19 32 0 57 0.40 5.72
Cape Girardeau 7 4 15 20 2 48 0.42 2.89
Carter 0 0 2 6 0 8 0.00 5.28
Crawford 1 5 7 16 1 30 0.17 5.00
Dent 0 0 3 3 0 6 0.00 1.64
4Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 2.
Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed During October 2016
Substan- Total
tiated Children
Substan- Unsubstan- Unsubstan- Family Children Per Per
tiated tiated PSI tiated Assessment Other Total Thousand Thousand
Southeast Dunklin 3 2 18 37 2 62 0.37 7.67
Howell 2 3 7 41 3 56 0.20 5.56
Iron 0 3 9 11 0 23 0.00 9.57
Madison 1 0 16 37 2 56 0.34 19.11
Maries 1 0 2 4 0 7 0.46 3.25
Mississippi 0 0 8 6 0 14 0.00 4.39
New Madrid 0 1 0 5 0 6 0.00 1.33
Oregon 3 3 3 5 0 14 1.24 5.77
Pemiscot 1 0 2 14 0 17 0.20 3.38
Perry 1 0 2 12 0 15 0.21 3.15
Phelps 4 5 9 13 3 34 0.41 3.47
Pulaski 0 5 3 9 1 18 0.00 1.44
Reynolds 0 0 2 5 0 7 0.00 4.57
Ripley 6 3 10 9 0 28 1.81 8.47
Scott 1 0 8 12 0 21 0.10 2.13
Shannon 0 0 1 3 0 4 0.00 2.03
St Francois 4 3 42 91 9 149 0.28 10.34
Ste Genevieve 4 0 12 16 1 33 0.95 7.82
Stoddard 1 2 1 16 0 20 0.15 2.93
Texas 1 3 0 5 0 9 0.17 1.57
Washington 5 0 24 18 1 48 0.82 7.92
Wayne 4 2 8 17 0 31 1.43 11.05
* Region Total * 54 46 239 470 25 834 0.33 5.05
Southwest Barry 4 2 24 27 1 58 0.46 6.71
Barton 0 0 1 3 0 4 0.00 1.24
Bates 0 0 11 13 0 24 0.00 5.64
Benton 0 1 6 14 1 22 0.00 6.40
Camden 1 4 20 27 0 52 0.12 6.20
Cedar 1 1 4 13 1 20 0.30 6.05
Christian 3 3 13 69 3 91 0.14 4.30
Dade 0 0 0 2 0 2 0.00 1.12
Dallas 0 4 10 17 0 31 0.00 7.44
Douglas 0 0 1 2 0 3 0.00 0.98
Greene 6 14 71 175 4 270 0.10 4.63
Henry 2 0 4 22 3 31 0.40 6.26
Hickory 0 0 0 7 0 7 0.00 4.20
Jasper 2 6 38 50 1 97 0.07 3.20
Laclede 19 6 11 41 1 78 2.13 8.76
Lawrence 0 1 12 23 2 38 0.00 3.73
Mcdonald 0 5 13 18 1 37 0.00 5.71
Miller 2 1 10 9 0 22 0.33 3.58
Moniteau 0 0 0 12 0 12 0.00 3.06
Morgan 0 1 7 10 0 18 0.00 3.97
Newton 0 5 20 64 3 92 0.00 6.23
Ozark 0 0 0 5 0 5 0.00 2.57
Polk 0 5 30 40 4 79 0.00 10.31
St Clair 0 0 2 13 1 16 0.00 8.16
Stone 1 4 5 21 1 32 0.17 5.31
Taney 0 0 3 17 0 20 0.00 1.75
Vernon 1 3 6 20 0 30 0.19 5.70
Webster 2 5 14 40 3 64 0.20 6.38
Wright 1 5 17 14 6 43 0.21 8.83
* Region Total * 45 76 353 788 36 1,298 0.17 4.98
Kansas City Jackson 35 23 142 550 73 823 0.21 4.97
* Region Total * 35 23 142 550 73 823 0.21 4.97
St. Louis St Louis City 13 11 118 162 45 349 0.19 5.17
St Louis County 11 9 106 198 22 346 0.05 1.48
* Region Total * 24 20 224 360 67 695 0.08 2.30
Other Out Home Inv 6 0 309 1 19 335 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 6 0 309 1 19 335 0.00 0.00
State Total 283 256 1,778 3,462 285 6,064 0.20 4.25
5Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 3.
Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed by Conclusion During October 2016
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Northwest Andrew 1 5.56% 0 0.00% 5 27.78% 10 55.56% 2 11.11% 18
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Buchanan 10 6.94% 1 0.69% 45 31.25% 84 58.33% 4 2.78% 144
Caldwell 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 29.41% 12 70.59% 0 0.00% 17
Cass 3 4.84% 1 1.61% 13 20.97% 45 72.58% 0 0.00% 62
Chariton 0 0.00% 2 22.22% 1 11.11% 6 66.67% 0 0.00% 9
Clay 2 1.91% 2 1.91% 30 28.57% 68 64.76% 3 2.86% 105
Clinton 1 6.67% 1 6.67% 6 40.00% 7 46.67% 0 0.00% 15
Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Daviess 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 4 57.14% 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 7
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Grundy 0 0.00% 2 25.00% 4 50.00% 2 25.00% 0 0.00% 8
Harrison 1 9.09% 2 18.18% 4 36.36% 3 27.27% 1 9.09% 11
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 1 4.55% 0 0.00% 8 36.36% 12 54.55% 1 4.55% 22
Lafayette 3 15.00% 2 10.00% 4 20.00% 11 55.00% 0 0.00% 20
Linn 0 0.00% 1 11.11% 3 33.33% 5 55.56% 0 0.00% 9
Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 42.86% 4 57.14% 0 0.00% 7
Mercer 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Nodaway 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Pettis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 22.22% 7 77.78% 0 0.00% 9
Platte 4 8.33% 2 4.17% 18 37.50% 21 43.75% 3 6.25% 48
Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 12 26.09% 31 67.39% 3 6.52% 46
Saline 2 10.53% 1 5.26% 11 57.90% 5 26.32% 0 0.00% 19
Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 37.50% 5 62.50% 0 0.00% 8
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 31 5.19% 18 3.02% 185 30.99% 346 57.96% 17 2.85% 597
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 1 4.76% 5 23.81% 14 66.67% 1 4.76% 21
Audrain 1 1.96% 5 9.80% 10 19.61% 35 68.63% 0 0.00% 51
Boone 5 5.88% 3 3.53% 21 24.71% 54 63.53% 2 2.35% 85
Callaway 1 4.17% 0 0.00% 6 25.00% 15 62.50% 2 8.33% 24
Clark 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 4
Cole 1 1.64% 8 13.12% 11 18.03% 40 65.57% 1 1.64% 61
Franklin 10 11.49% 4 4.60% 16 18.39% 52 59.77% 5 5.75% 87
Gasconade 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 3 37.50% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 8
Howard 1 11.11% 1 11.11% 1 11.11% 6 66.67% 0 0.00% 9
Jefferson 12 8.76% 16 11.68% 12 8.76% 94 68.61% 3 2.19% 137
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Lewis 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 2 22.22% 6 66.67% 0 0.00% 9
Lincoln 0 0.00% 3 5.88% 13 25.49% 35 68.63% 0 0.00% 51
Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 4 66.67% 0 0.00% 6
Marion 4 12.50% 1 3.13% 3 9.38% 22 68.75% 2 6.25% 32
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 5
Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 4
Pike 1 5.88% 1 5.88% 3 17.65% 12 70.59% 0 0.00% 17
Ralls 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 2 25.00% 5 62.50% 0 0.00% 8
Randolph 2 4.26% 0 0.00% 11 23.40% 32 68.09% 2 4.26% 47
Schuyler 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
St Charles 1 1.08% 2 2.15% 32 34.41% 56 60.22% 2 2.15% 93
Warren 2 12.50% 1 6.25% 3 18.75% 10 62.50% 0 0.00% 16
* Region Total * 46 5.88% 48 6.13% 160 20.43% 509 65.01% 20 2.55% 783
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 28.57% 5 71.43% 0 0.00% 7
Butler 3 7.50% 2 5.00% 14 35.00% 21 52.50% 0 0.00% 40
Cape Girardeau 5 15.63% 2 6.25% 7 21.88% 17 53.13% 1 3.13% 32
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 4
Crawford 1 4.76% 3 14.29% 6 28.57% 11 52.38% 0 0.00% 21
Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstantiated OtherFamily Assessment
6Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 3.
Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed by Conclusion During October 2016
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Southeast Dunklin 1 2.50% 2 5.00% 14 35.00% 22 55.00% 1 2.50% 40
Howell 2 6.06% 1 3.03% 5 15.15% 23 69.70% 2 6.06% 33
Iron 0 0.00% 1 6.25% 5 31.25% 10 62.50% 0 0.00% 16
Madison 1 3.45% 0 0.00% 7 24.14% 19 65.52% 2 6.90% 29
Maries 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 57.14% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 7
New Madrid 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 4
Oregon 1 11.11% 3 33.33% 2 22.22% 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 9
Pemiscot 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 1 10.00% 8 80.00% 0 0.00% 10
Perry 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 2 18.18% 8 72.73% 0 0.00% 11
Phelps 3 15.00% 3 15.00% 4 20.00% 9 45.00% 1 5.00% 20
Pulaski 0 0.00% 1 7.69% 3 23.08% 8 61.54% 1 7.69% 13
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 5
Ripley 3 18.75% 3 18.75% 5 31.25% 5 31.25% 0 0.00% 16
Scott 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 4 26.67% 10 66.67% 0 0.00% 15
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
St Francois 4 4.04% 2 2.02% 28 28.28% 58 58.59% 7 7.07% 99
Ste Genevieve 4 15.39% 0 0.00% 7 26.92% 14 53.85% 1 3.85% 26
Stoddard 1 6.25% 2 12.50% 0 0.00% 13 81.25% 0 0.00% 16
Texas 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 4
Washington 3 8.57% 0 0.00% 17 48.57% 14 40.00% 1 2.86% 35
Wayne 2 13.33% 0 0.00% 3 20.00% 10 66.67% 0 0.00% 15
* Region Total * 39 7.28% 27 5.04% 149 27.80% 304 56.72% 17 3.17% 536
Southwest Barry 2 5.56% 2 5.56% 14 38.89% 17 47.22% 1 2.78% 36
Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3
Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 33.33% 10 66.67% 0 0.00% 15
Benton 0 0.00% 1 6.67% 5 33.33% 8 53.33% 1 6.67% 15
Camden 1 2.70% 3 8.11% 13 35.14% 20 54.05% 0 0.00% 37
Cedar 1 6.25% 1 6.25% 3 18.75% 10 62.50% 1 6.25% 16
Christian 2 3.39% 1 1.70% 10 16.95% 45 76.27% 1 1.70% 59
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Dallas 0 0.00% 4 17.39% 8 34.78% 11 47.83% 0 0.00% 23
Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3
Greene 4 2.20% 9 4.95% 48 26.37% 120 65.93% 1 0.55% 182
Henry 2 11.11% 0 0.00% 4 22.22% 10 55.56% 2 11.11% 18
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 6
Jasper 2 2.94% 4 5.88% 27 39.71% 34 50.00% 1 1.47% 68
Laclede 10 18.52% 3 5.56% 9 16.67% 31 57.41% 1 1.85% 54
Lawrence 0 0.00% 1 3.57% 8 28.57% 18 64.29% 1 3.57% 28
Mcdonald 0 0.00% 3 13.04% 7 30.44% 12 52.17% 1 4.35% 23
Miller 2 14.29% 0 0.00% 5 35.71% 7 50.00% 0 0.00% 14
Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 8
Morgan 0 0.00% 1 8.33% 4 33.33% 7 58.33% 0 0.00% 12
Newton 0 0.00% 2 3.45% 14 24.14% 40 68.97% 2 3.45% 58
Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Polk 0 0.00% 1 2.22% 15 33.33% 28 62.22% 1 2.22% 45
St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 16.67% 10 83.33% 0 0.00% 12
Stone 1 5.26% 2 10.53% 3 15.79% 12 63.16% 1 5.26% 19
Taney 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 30.00% 7 70.00% 0 0.00% 10
Vernon 1 5.26% 3 15.79% 4 21.05% 11 57.90% 0 0.00% 19
Webster 1 3.03% 3 9.09% 8 24.24% 19 57.58% 2 6.06% 33
Wright 1 5.88% 4 23.53% 6 35.29% 5 29.41% 1 5.88% 17
* Region Total * 30 3.58% 48 5.74% 227 27.12% 514 61.41% 18 2.15% 837
Kansas City Jackson 23 4.24% 14 2.58% 96 17.71% 370 68.27% 39 7.20% 542
* Region Total * 23 4.24% 14 2.58% 96 17.71% 370 68.27% 39 7.20% 542
St. Louis St Louis City 11 4.70% 5 2.14% 80 34.19% 110 47.01% 28 11.97% 234
St Louis County 8 3.24% 3 1.22% 76 30.77% 143 57.90% 17 6.88% 247
* Region Total * 19 3.95% 8 1.66% 156 32.43% 253 52.60% 45 9.36% 481
Other Out Home Inv 6 2.73% 0 0.00% 200 90.91% 1 0.46% 13 5.91% 220
* Region Total * 6 2.73% 0 0.00% 200 90.91% 1 0.46% 13 5.91% 220
State Total 194 4.86% 163 4.08% 1,173 29.35% 2,297 57.48% 169 4.23% 3,996
Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstantiated Family Assessment Other
7Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 4.
Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During October 2016
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Northwest Andrew 13 76.47% 4 23.53% 0 0.00% 17
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Buchanan 120 86.96% 18 13.04% 0 0.00% 138
Caldwell 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Carroll 16 94.12% 1 5.88% 0 0.00% 17
Cass 57 93.44% 4 6.56% 0 0.00% 61
Chariton 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Clay 86 90.53% 9 9.47% 0 0.00% 95
Clinton 14 93.33% 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 15
Cooper 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Daviess 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
De Kalb 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Grundy 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Harrison 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 20 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 20
Lafayette 19 95.00% 1 5.00% 0 0.00% 20
Linn 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Livingston 5 71.43% 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 7
Mercer 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Nodaway 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Pettis 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Platte 41 95.35% 2 4.65% 0 0.00% 43
Putnam 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Ray 40 93.02% 3 6.98% 0 0.00% 43
Saline 18 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 18
Sullivan 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 520 91.71% 47 8.29% 0 0.00% 567
Northeast Adair 18 90.00% 2 10.00% 0 0.00% 20
Audrain 45 90.00% 5 10.00% 0 0.00% 50
Boone 73 86.91% 11 13.10% 0 0.00% 84
Callaway 22 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 22
Clark 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Cole 54 94.74% 3 5.26% 0 0.00% 57
Franklin 66 79.52% 17 20.48% 0 0.00% 83
Gasconade 6 75.00% 2 25.00% 0 0.00% 8
Howard 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Jefferson 106 82.81% 22 17.19% 0 0.00% 128
Knox 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Lewis 6 66.67% 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 9
Lincoln 46 93.88% 3 6.12% 0 0.00% 49
Macon 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Marion 29 96.67% 1 3.33% 0 0.00% 30
Monroe 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Montgomery 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
Osage 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Pike 16 94.12% 1 5.88% 0 0.00% 17
Ralls 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Randolph 43 95.56% 2 4.44% 0 0.00% 45
Schuyler 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Scotland 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Shelby 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
St Charles 76 82.61% 16 17.39% 0 0.00% 92
Warren 14 87.50% 2 12.50% 0 0.00% 16
* Region Total * 660 87.77% 92 12.23% 0 0.00% 752
Southeast Bollinger 5 71.43% 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 7
Butler 37 92.50% 3 7.50% 0 0.00% 40
Cape Girardeau 30 96.77% 1 3.23% 0 0.00% 31
Carter 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Crawford 17 80.95% 4 19.05% 0 0.00% 21
Dent 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
0 - 24 Hours Over 24 Hours No Contact
8Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 4.
Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During October 2016
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Southeast Dunklin 35 89.74% 4 10.26% 0 0.00% 39
Howell 27 87.10% 4 12.90% 0 0.00% 31
Iron 13 81.25% 3 18.75% 0 0.00% 16
Madison 26 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 26
Maries 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Mississippi 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
New Madrid 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Oregon 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Pemiscot 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10
Perry 11 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11
Phelps 13 72.22% 5 27.78% 0 0.00% 18
Pulaski 6 54.55% 5 45.46% 0 0.00% 11
Reynolds 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Ripley 13 86.67% 2 13.33% 0 0.00% 15
Scott 13 86.67% 2 13.33% 0 0.00% 15
Shannon 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
St Francois 87 94.57% 5 5.44% 0 0.00% 92
Ste Genevieve 25 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 25
Stoddard 15 93.75% 1 6.25% 0 0.00% 16
Texas 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Washington 31 93.94% 2 6.06% 0 0.00% 33
Wayne 14 93.33% 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 15
* Region Total * 467 90.86% 47 9.14% 0 0.00% 514
Southwest Barry 32 91.43% 3 8.57% 0 0.00% 35
Barton 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Bates 12 85.71% 2 14.29% 0 0.00% 14
Benton 14 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 14
Camden 35 94.60% 2 5.41% 0 0.00% 37
Cedar 14 93.33% 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 15
Christian 53 92.98% 4 7.02% 0 0.00% 57
Dade 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Dallas 22 95.65% 1 4.35% 0 0.00% 23
Douglas 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Greene 164 92.14% 14 7.87% 0 0.00% 178
Henry 14 87.50% 2 12.50% 0 0.00% 16
Hickory 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Jasper 61 92.42% 5 7.58% 0 0.00% 66
Laclede 41 78.85% 11 21.15% 0 0.00% 52
Lawrence 25 92.59% 2 7.41% 0 0.00% 27
Mcdonald 21 91.30% 2 8.70% 0 0.00% 23
Miller 14 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 14
Moniteau 5 62.50% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 8
Morgan 10 83.33% 2 16.67% 0 0.00% 12
Newton 53 94.64% 3 5.36% 0 0.00% 56
Ozark 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
Polk 38 86.36% 6 13.64% 0 0.00% 44
St Clair 11 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11
Stone 13 81.25% 3 18.75% 0 0.00% 16
Taney 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10
Vernon 17 89.47% 2 10.53% 0 0.00% 19
Webster 28 90.32% 3 9.68% 0 0.00% 31
Wright 16 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 16
* Region Total * 738 91.11% 72 8.89% 0 0.00% 810
Kansas City Jackson 446 91.39% 42 8.61% 0 0.00% 488
* Region Total * 446 91.39% 42 8.61% 0 0.00% 488
St. Louis St Louis City 136 65.70% 71 34.30% 0 0.00% 207
St Louis County 192 86.10% 31 13.90% 0 0.00% 223
* Region Total * 328 76.28% 102 23.72% 0 0.00% 430
Other Out Home Inv 220 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 220
* Region Total * 220 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 220
State Total 3,379 89.37% 402 10.63% 0 0.00% 3,781
0 - 24 Hours Over 24 Hours No Contact
9Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 5.
The Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During October 2016
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Northwest Andrew 3 16.67% 4 22.22% 8 44.44% 3 16.67% 0 0.00% 18
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Buchanan 43 29.86% 15 10.42% 64 44.44% 20 13.89% 2 1.39% 144
Caldwell 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Carroll 1 5.88% 4 23.53% 4 23.53% 2 11.77% 6 35.29% 17
Cass 10 16.13% 7 11.29% 38 61.29% 5 8.07% 2 3.23% 62
Chariton 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 6 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Clay 28 26.67% 6 5.71% 59 56.19% 11 10.48% 1 0.95% 105
Clinton 7 46.67% 1 6.67% 7 46.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 15
Cooper 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Daviess 4 57.14% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7
De Kalb 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Grundy 5 62.50% 1 12.50% 2 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Harrison 7 63.64% 0 0.00% 3 27.27% 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 11
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 1 4.55% 8 36.36% 7 31.82% 3 13.64% 3 13.64% 22
Lafayette 6 30.00% 3 15.00% 11 55.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 20
Linn 4 44.44% 0 0.00% 5 55.56% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Livingston 1 14.29% 2 28.57% 4 57.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Mercer 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Nodaway 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Pettis 0 0.00% 2 22.22% 2 22.22% 1 11.11% 4 44.44% 9
Platte 23 47.92% 2 4.17% 19 39.58% 4 8.33% 0 0.00% 48
Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Ray 6 13.04% 7 15.22% 10 21.74% 12 26.09% 11 23.91% 46
Saline 11 57.90% 3 15.79% 3 15.79% 2 10.53% 0 0.00% 19
Sullivan 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 5 62.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 172 28.81% 67 11.22% 264 44.22% 65 10.89% 29 4.86% 597
Northeast Adair 4 19.05% 2 9.52% 14 66.67% 1 4.76% 0 0.00% 21
Audrain 4 7.84% 12 23.53% 9 17.65% 17 33.33% 9 17.65% 51
Boone 14 16.47% 16 18.82% 33 38.82% 10 11.77% 12 14.12% 85
Callaway 2 8.33% 5 20.83% 10 41.67% 7 29.17% 0 0.00% 24
Clark 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Cole 20 32.79% 0 0.00% 41 67.21% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 61
Franklin 16 18.39% 17 19.54% 32 36.78% 13 14.94% 9 10.35% 87
Gasconade 1 12.50% 4 50.00% 2 25.00% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8
Howard 1 11.11% 2 22.22% 6 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Jefferson 7 5.11% 33 24.09% 34 24.82% 32 23.36% 31 22.63% 137
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Lewis 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 3 33.33% 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 9
Lincoln 10 19.61% 6 11.77% 31 60.78% 3 5.88% 1 1.96% 51
Macon 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 4 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Marion 6 18.75% 2 6.25% 22 68.75% 2 6.25% 0 0.00% 32
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Montgomery 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 3 60.00% 5
Osage 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Pike 3 17.65% 2 11.77% 11 64.71% 1 5.88% 0 0.00% 17
Ralls 2 25.00% 1 12.50% 4 50.00% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8
Randolph 8 17.02% 5 10.64% 24 51.06% 5 10.64% 5 10.64% 47
Schuyler 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Shelby 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
St Charles 16 17.20% 21 22.58% 24 25.81% 29 31.18% 3 3.23% 93
Warren 1 6.25% 5 31.25% 1 6.25% 3 18.75% 6 37.50% 16
* Region Total * 124 15.84% 136 17.37% 312 39.85% 132 16.86% 79 10.09% 783
Southeast Bollinger 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 2 28.57% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 7
Butler 11 27.50% 8 20.00% 16 40.00% 5 12.50% 0 0.00% 40
Cape Girardeau 3 9.38% 11 34.38% 7 21.88% 7 21.88% 4 12.50% 32
Carter 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Crawford 10 47.62% 0 0.00% 11 52.38% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 21
Dent 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Investigations Assessments
0 - 45 Days Over 45 Days 0 - 45 Days 46 - 90 Days Over 90 days
Note: Investigations and Assessments reported
separately beginning July 2016. 10Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 5.
The Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During October 2016
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Southeast Dunklin 7 17.50% 11 27.50% 8 20.00% 13 32.50% 1 2.50% 40
Howell 3 9.09% 7 21.21% 6 18.18% 17 51.52% 0 0.00% 33
Iron 5 31.25% 1 6.25% 8 50.00% 2 12.50% 0 0.00% 16
Madison 3 10.35% 5 17.24% 10 34.48% 8 27.59% 3 10.35% 29
Maries 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Mississippi 0 0.00% 4 57.14% 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 2 28.57% 7
New Madrid 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Oregon 3 33.33% 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 9
Pemiscot 2 20.00% 0 0.00% 6 60.00% 0 0.00% 2 20.00% 10
Perry 0 0.00% 3 27.27% 4 36.36% 4 36.36% 0 0.00% 11
Phelps 5 25.00% 5 25.00% 6 30.00% 2 10.00% 2 10.00% 20
Pulaski 2 15.39% 2 15.39% 6 46.15% 2 15.39% 1 7.69% 13
Reynolds 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
Ripley 6 37.50% 5 31.25% 4 25.00% 1 6.25% 0 0.00% 16
Scott 1 6.67% 4 26.67% 1 6.67% 4 26.67% 5 33.33% 15
Shannon 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
St Francois 14 14.14% 23 23.23% 26 26.26% 32 32.32% 4 4.04% 99
Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 11 42.31% 8 30.77% 6 23.08% 1 3.85% 26
Stoddard 1 6.25% 2 12.50% 7 43.75% 2 12.50% 4 25.00% 16
Texas 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Washington 3 8.57% 17 48.57% 5 14.29% 10 28.57% 0 0.00% 35
Wayne 5 33.33% 0 0.00% 7 46.67% 3 20.00% 0 0.00% 15
* Region Total * 93 17.35% 128 23.88% 159 29.66% 127 23.69% 29 5.41% 536
Southwest Barry 10 27.78% 9 25.00% 13 36.11% 4 11.11% 0 0.00% 36
Barton 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
Bates 1 6.67% 4 26.67% 10 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 15
Benton 6 40.00% 0 0.00% 9 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 15
Camden 7 18.92% 10 27.03% 9 24.32% 11 29.73% 0 0.00% 37
Cedar 1 6.25% 5 31.25% 6 37.50% 4 25.00% 0 0.00% 16
Christian 12 20.34% 1 1.70% 46 77.97% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 59
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Dallas 12 52.17% 0 0.00% 11 47.83% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 23
Douglas 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Greene 36 19.78% 26 14.29% 67 36.81% 37 20.33% 16 8.79% 182
Henry 3 16.67% 3 16.67% 8 44.44% 1 5.56% 3 16.67% 18
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6
Jasper 30 44.12% 3 4.41% 33 48.53% 2 2.94% 0 0.00% 68
Laclede 14 25.93% 8 14.82% 29 53.70% 2 3.70% 1 1.85% 54
Lawrence 8 28.57% 1 3.57% 15 53.57% 4 14.29% 0 0.00% 28
Mcdonald 11 47.83% 0 0.00% 12 52.17% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 23
Miller 7 50.00% 0 0.00% 6 42.86% 1 7.14% 0 0.00% 14
Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Morgan 4 33.33% 1 8.33% 6 50.00% 1 8.33% 0 0.00% 12
Newton 16 27.59% 0 0.00% 37 63.79% 5 8.62% 0 0.00% 58
Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Polk 16 35.56% 0 0.00% 29 64.44% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 45
St Clair 1 8.33% 1 8.33% 6 50.00% 0 0.00% 4 33.33% 12
Stone 5 26.32% 1 5.26% 11 57.90% 2 10.53% 0 0.00% 19
Taney 1 10.00% 2 20.00% 2 20.00% 1 10.00% 4 40.00% 10
Vernon 4 21.05% 4 21.05% 3 15.79% 8 42.11% 0 0.00% 19
Webster 12 36.36% 1 3.03% 17 51.52% 1 3.03% 2 6.06% 33
Wright 6 35.29% 6 35.29% 4 23.53% 1 5.88% 0 0.00% 17
* Region Total * 224 26.76% 87 10.39% 409 48.87% 87 10.39% 30 3.58% 837
Kansas City Jackson 98 18.08% 53 9.78% 310 57.20% 76 14.02% 5 0.92% 542
* Region Total * 98 18.08% 53 9.78% 310 57.20% 76 14.02% 5 0.92% 542
St. Louis St Louis City 57 24.36% 50 21.37% 74 31.62% 45 19.23% 8 3.42% 234
St Louis County 42 17.00% 52 21.05% 89 36.03% 41 16.60% 23 9.31% 247
* Region Total * 99 20.58% 102 21.21% 163 33.89% 86 17.88% 31 6.45% 481
Other Out Home Inv 216 98.18% 3 1.36% 1 0.46% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 220
* Region Total * 216 98.18% 3 1.36% 1 0.46% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 220
State Total 1,026 25.68% 576 14.41% 1,618 40.49% 573 14.34% 203 5.08% 3,996
0 - 45 Days Over 45 Days 0 - 45 Days 46 - 90 Days Over 90 days
Investigations Assessments
Note: Investigations and Assessments reported
separately beginning July 2016. 11Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 6.
CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During October 2016
Newborn Non- Preventive Non CA/N
CA/N Crisis Caretaker Service Fatality
Reports Assessment Referral Referral Referral Total
Northwest Andrew 9 0 4 0 0 13
Atchison 4 0 0 1 0 5
Buchanan 142 2 25 10 0 179
Caldwell 7 0 0 0 0 7
Carroll 7 0 2 0 0 9
Cass 82 2 11 3 0 98
Chariton 11 0 0 0 0 11
Clay 195 15 27 6 0 243
Clinton 14 2 9 2 0 27
Cooper 14 1 3 0 0 18
Daviess 15 0 0 0 0 15
De Kalb 5 0 0 1 0 6
Gentry 7 0 3 0 0 10
Grundy 8 0 2 2 0 12
Harrison 9 0 2 0 0 11
Holt 9 0 4 1 0 14
Johnson 40 3 5 4 0 52
Lafayette 25 1 7 2 0 35
Linn 7 0 1 2 0 10
Livingston 16 0 1 1 0 18
Mercer 2 0 0 0 0 2
Nodaway 15 0 4 0 0 19
Pettis 39 4 6 3 0 52
Platte 57 6 6 2 0 71
Putnam 7 0 1 0 0 8
Ray 13 1 0 1 0 15
Saline 28 0 3 1 0 32
Sullivan 7 1 1 0 0 9
Worth 2 0 0 0 0 2
* Region Total * 796 38 127 42 0 1,003
Northeast Adair 22 0 3 4 0 29
Audrain 19 3 8 4 0 34
Boone 141 5 25 7 0 178
Callaway 49 2 6 7 0 64
Clark 5 0 1 1 0 7
Cole 76 4 7 9 0 96
Franklin 110 13 11 11 0 145
Gasconade 15 0 3 1 0 19
Howard 15 0 3 1 0 19
Jefferson 196 13 24 22 0 255
Knox 1 0 0 0 0 1
Lewis 12 2 1 2 0 17
Lincoln 57 6 8 7 0 78
Macon 9 0 1 1 0 11
Marion 38 2 2 1 0 43
Monroe 10 0 2 0 0 12
Montgomery 18 0 1 1 0 20
Osage 3 2 0 0 0 5
Pike 24 1 4 2 0 31
Ralls 10 0 1 1 0 12
Randolph 45 2 3 4 0 54
Schuyler 8 0 1 0 0 9
Scotland 2 0 0 0 0 2
Shelby 4 0 0 2 0 6
St Charles 203 5 27 11 0 246
Warren 48 2 9 3 0 62
* Region Total * 1,140 62 151 102 0 1,455
Southeast Bollinger 8 0 1 3 0 12
Butler 69 4 5 3 0 81
Cape Girardeau 56 5 4 11 0 76
Carter 9 0 0 0 0 9
Crawford 42 2 9 0 0 53
Dent 27 0 1 0 0 28
12Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 6.
CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During October 2016
Newborn Non- Preventive Non CA/N
CA/N Crisis Caretaker Service Fatality
Reports Assessment Referral Referral Referral Total
Southeast Dunklin 45 1 4 3 0 53
Howell 69 3 9 5 0 86
Iron 8 1 0 2 0 11
Madison 14 0 4 1 0 19
Maries 3 0 1 0 0 4
Mississippi 7 0 1 1 0 9
New Madrid 37 1 3 2 0 43
Oregon 19 1 3 3 0 26
Pemiscot 32 4 2 3 0 41
Perry 14 0 5 0 0 19
Phelps 57 2 3 6 0 68
Pulaski 34 4 2 1 0 41
Reynolds 5 0 0 0 0 5
Ripley 23 1 1 4 0 29
Scott 48 5 6 5 0 64
Shannon 5 1 1 0 0 7
St Francois 85 4 8 7 0 104
Ste Genevieve 18 0 1 1 0 20
Stoddard 33 0 6 8 0 47
Texas 28 2 2 1 0 33
Washington 35 3 6 1 0 45
Wayne 18 1 1 1 0 21
* Region Total * 848 45 89 72 0 1,054
Southwest Barry 38 2 6 3 0 49
Barton 14 2 1 2 0 19
Bates 15 2 4 2 0 23
Benton 20 1 0 1 0 22
Camden 55 1 3 4 0 63
Cedar 28 1 1 4 0 34
Christian 104 2 11 4 0 121
Dade 6 0 2 3 0 11
Dallas 25 3 2 1 0 31
Douglas 17 0 3 1 0 21
Greene 471 30 78 39 0 618
Henry 27 2 7 3 0 39
Hickory 8 2 0 0 0 10
Jasper 167 7 21 21 0 216
Laclede 54 8 3 6 0 71
Lawrence 38 4 6 5 0 53
Mcdonald 22 1 1 2 0 26
Miller 32 2 5 3 0 42
Moniteau 17 0 2 0 0 19
Morgan 26 2 1 2 0 31
Newton 59 3 5 5 0 72
Ozark 11 2 1 1 0 15
Polk 37 2 13 6 0 58
St Clair 14 1 0 0 0 15
Stone 30 3 8 5 0 46
Taney 65 3 10 9 0 87
Vernon 17 1 4 1 0 23
Webster 31 2 5 5 0 43
Wright 31 2 4 8 0 45
* Region Total * 1,479 91 207 146 0 1,923
Kansas City Jackson 732 73 126 43 0 974
* Region Total * 732 73 126 43 0 974
St. Louis St Louis City 343 30 56 29 0 458
St Louis County 648 41 78 56 0 823
* Region Total * 991 71 134 85 0 1,281
Other Out Home Inv 199 0 0 0 0 199
Out Of State 8 0 0 0 0 8
Stat Unit 0 0 0 0 94 94
* Region Total * 207 0 0 0 94 301
State Total 6,193 380 834 490 94 7,991
13Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0% 0%
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
6,500
7,000
7,500O
ct-1
2
Jan
-13
Ap
r-1
3
Jul-
13
Oct
-13
Jan
-14
Ap
r-1
4
Jul-
14
Oct
-14
Jan
-15
Ap
r-1
5
Jul-
15
Oct
-15
Jan
-16
Ap
r-1
6
Jul-
16
Oct
-16
Figure 2.
Child Abuse & Neglect Reports
October 2012 Through October 2016
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
6,500
7,000
7,500
No
v
De
c
Jan
Feb
Mar
Ap
r
May Jun
Jul
Au
g
Sep
Oct
Figure 3.
Child Abuse & Neglect Reports
November 2014 Through October 2016
Nov 2014 to Oct 2015 Nov 2015 to Oct 2016
14Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0% 0%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 4.
Percentage Change in CA/N Reports
Made Twelve Months Apart October 2015 and October 2016
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 5.
CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed
During October 2016 by Conclusion
Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstianted Family Assessment Other
15Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0% 0%
Substantiated 5% Unsubstantiated
P S I 4%
Unsubstantiated 26%
Family Assessment 61%
Other 4%
Figure 6. CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed
During October 2016 by Conclusion
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 7.
Time Between Report and Child Contact
For Investigations/Assessments Completed in October 2016
Within 24 Hours After 24 Hours No Contact
16Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 8a.
CA/N Investigations Completed
During October 2016
Within 45 Days More Than 45 Days
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 8b.
CA/N Assessments Completed
During October 2016
Within 45 Days Within 46-90 Days More Than 90 Days
17Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Children’s Services Management Report 18 Research and Data Analysis
Notes: Child Abuse and Neglect Tables and Figures
Table 1.
• Based upon incidents and children reported during the month.
• Counts of children may be duplicated (i.e., children may be victims on multiple incidents during any
given month).
Table 2.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.
• Counts of children may be duplicated (i.e., children may be victims on multiple incidents during any
given month).
• Conclusions are as follows:
Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated
Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated
Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-Services Not Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-cooperative/Child Safe
Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 30 Days Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined
Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State, Home Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation), Substantiated (School
Investigation), and Unresolved (School Investigation)
• Population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19, 2011 by The US Census
Bureau, www.census.gov.
Table 3.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.
• Conclusions are as follows: Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence
Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated
Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-Services Not
Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-cooperative/Child Safe Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 45 Days
Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State, Home
Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation), Substantiated (School
Investigation), and Unresolved (School Investigation)
Table 4.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. Does not include information
on expunged reports and reports where the only alleged category of abuse/neglect was
educational neglect, or reports concluded as E- Unable to Locate, G- Inappropriate report or H- Located out of state.
Children’s Services Management Report 19 Research and Data Analysis
Table 5.
• Based upon incidents concluded during the month.
Table 6.
• Based upon incidents and referrals reported during the month.
Figure 2. and Figure 3.
• Based upon incidents reported during the month.
Figure 4.
• Based upon incidents reported during the month compared to incidents reported during the same month of the previous year.
Figure 5. and Figure 6.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.
• Conclusions are as follows: Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence
Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated
Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-Services Not
Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-cooperative/Child Safe Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 45 Days
Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State, Home
Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation), Substantiated (School
Investigation), and Unresolved (School Investigation)
• Figures do not include Out-of-Home Investigation, STAT Unit, or Out of State categories.
Figure 7.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. Does not include information
on expunged reports and reports where the only alleged category of abuse/neglect was educational neglect, or reports concluded as E- Unable to Locate, G- Inappropriate report or H- Located out of state.
Figure 8a. and Figure 8b.
• Based upon investigations and assessments completed during the month.
Family-Centered Services
Table 7.
Family-Centered Services Cases Open at the End of October 2016
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment Cases Active
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 4 4
Buchanan 6 6 1 2 47 62
Caldwell 0 3 0 1 2 6
Carroll 2 0 0 0 0 2
Cass 4 22 12 0 107 145
Chariton 0 4 4 0 11 19
Clay 10 4 10 15 59 98
Clinton 6 2 0 1 26 35
Cooper 0 3 3 2 7 15
Daviess 3 0 0 0 5 8
De Kalb 1 0 0 0 13 14
Gentry 1 0 0 2 5 8
Grundy 3 3 0 1 14 21
Harrison 4 5 0 0 8 17
Holt 0 0 0 0 5 5
Johnson 0 8 10 2 50 70
Lafayette 2 4 0 2 19 27
Linn 2 2 10 1 15 30
Livingston 3 1 0 1 12 17
Mercer 1 1 0 0 1 3
Nodaway 3 1 4 2 19 29
Pettis 9 10 2 2 17 40
Platte 1 5 1 1 11 19
Putnam 1 0 2 0 2 5
Ray 1 1 0 1 3 6
Saline 5 4 2 3 10 24
Sullivan 1 1 2 0 5 9
Worth 1 0 0 0 1 2
* Region Total * 70 90 63 39 478 740
Northeast Adair 2 7 1 1 39 50
Audrain 2 8 0 1 34 45
Boone 17 15 14 7 163 216
Callaway 8 5 1 1 56 71
Clark 4 6 2 0 13 25
Cole 4 8 6 8 67 93
Franklin 12 30 0 9 118 169
Gasconade 2 3 0 1 23 29
Howard 0 2 0 0 5 7
Jefferson 63 19 14 15 375 486
Knox 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lewis 2 3 1 0 14 20
Lincoln 3 3 3 7 33 49
Macon 2 8 0 0 17 27
Marion 26 3 5 3 33 70
Monroe 2 2 1 0 10 15
Montgomery 2 1 0 1 13 17
Osage 1 1 0 0 9 11
Pike 12 7 0 5 11 35
Ralls 1 2 0 0 2 5
Randolph 2 5 2 1 56 66
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 5 5
Scotland 0 0 0 0 4 4
Shelby 2 2 0 0 9 13
St Charles 26 6 2 8 149 191
Warren 4 10 0 4 15 33
* Region Total * 199 156 52 72 1,275 1,754
Southeast Bollinger 3 4 0 2 21 30
Butler 6 20 2 11 68 107
Cape Girardeau 3 13 3 9 75 103
Carter 0 0 0 2 3 5
Crawford 4 9 0 0 10 23
Dent 2 7 1 5 16 31
22Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 7.
Family-Centered Services Cases Open at the End of October 2016
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment Cases Active
Southeast Dunklin 1 3 3 4 60 71
Howell 2 7 0 9 36 54
Iron 2 3 0 2 6 13
Madison 1 1 0 0 12 14
Maries 0 2 0 1 15 18
Mississippi 1 2 0 3 16 22
New Madrid 2 2 1 4 52 61
Oregon 2 1 0 1 14 18
Pemiscot 1 3 0 8 69 81
Perry 1 3 0 0 8 12
Phelps 6 19 0 6 116 147
Pulaski 5 12 1 0 103 121
Reynolds 0 0 1 0 2 3
Ripley 3 4 1 3 25 36
Scott 5 6 1 9 90 111
Shannon 1 4 0 3 3 11
St Francois 10 7 4 4 61 86
Ste Genevieve 4 2 0 0 7 13
Stoddard 2 5 5 1 69 82
Texas 4 2 2 4 33 45
Washington 3 3 0 2 39 47
Wayne 3 4 0 3 13 23
* Region Total * 77 148 25 96 1,042 1,388
Southwest Barry 2 7 0 3 74 86
Barton 0 1 0 2 19 22
Bates 2 0 2 5 18 27
Benton 1 2 0 0 8 11
Camden 5 10 0 4 45 64
Cedar 0 2 1 0 26 29
Christian 0 9 2 3 41 55
Dade 1 1 0 1 8 11
Dallas 1 1 1 1 20 24
Douglas 0 1 0 0 5 6
Greene 6 7 3 6 320 342
Henry 0 5 0 2 34 41
Hickory 1 1 0 0 8 10
Jasper 1 51 36 18 208 314
Laclede 12 3 2 1 89 107
Lawrence 0 9 1 5 65 80
Mcdonald 0 4 1 2 32 39
Miller 0 9 0 1 42 52
Moniteau 2 1 0 0 6 9
Morgan 4 2 0 2 26 34
Newton 0 2 8 4 57 71
Ozark 0 0 0 0 5 5
Polk 2 4 2 0 40 48
St Clair 0 0 0 4 10 14
Stone 1 15 2 2 32 52
Taney 3 12 5 4 108 132
Vernon 0 2 0 3 16 21
Webster 2 5 0 1 23 31
Wright 2 3 0 0 33 38
* Region Total * 48 169 66 74 1,418 1,775
Kansas City Jackson 65 30 61 45 907 1,108
* Region Total * 65 30 61 45 907 1,108
St. Louis St Louis City 33 19 3 26 301 382
St Louis County 166 104 37 96 372 775
* Region Total * 199 123 40 122 673 1,157
State Total 658 716 307 448 5,793 7,922
23Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 8.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During October 2016
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment Cases Active
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 4 4
Buchanan 9 9 1 3 65 87
Caldwell 0 3 0 1 2 6
Carroll 2 0 0 0 0 2
Cass 4 22 12 0 114 152
Chariton 0 5 4 0 11 20
Clay 10 4 11 16 62 103
Clinton 8 2 0 1 28 39
Cooper 0 3 3 2 8 16
Daviess 3 0 0 0 5 8
De Kalb 1 0 0 1 15 17
Gentry 1 0 0 2 5 8
Grundy 3 3 0 1 15 22
Harrison 4 5 0 0 8 17
Holt 0 0 0 0 5 5
Johnson 0 8 10 2 51 71
Lafayette 3 4 0 3 20 30
Linn 2 2 10 1 16 31
Livingston 3 1 0 1 12 17
Mercer 1 1 0 0 1 3
Nodaway 3 2 4 3 19 31
Pettis 9 11 2 3 19 44
Platte 1 6 1 1 12 21
Putnam 1 0 2 0 3 6
Ray 1 1 0 2 3 7
Saline 5 5 2 3 10 25
Sullivan 1 1 2 0 5 9
Worth 1 0 0 0 1 2
* Region Total * 76 98 64 46 519 803
Northeast Adair 2 8 1 1 40 52
Audrain 2 8 0 1 36 47
Boone 19 17 15 8 167 226
Callaway 9 6 1 1 57 74
Clark 4 7 2 0 14 27
Cole 4 9 6 8 72 99
Franklin 12 31 0 9 124 176
Gasconade 2 3 0 1 24 30
Howard 0 2 0 0 11 13
Jefferson 66 22 14 16 395 513
Knox 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lewis 2 3 1 0 14 20
Lincoln 3 4 3 7 35 52
Macon 2 8 0 0 18 28
Marion 27 5 5 3 35 75
Monroe 2 2 1 0 10 15
Montgomery 2 2 0 1 13 18
Osage 1 2 0 0 10 13
Pike 13 7 0 5 13 38
Ralls 2 2 0 0 2 6
Randolph 4 8 2 2 75 91
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 6 6
Scotland 0 0 0 0 4 4
Shelby 3 3 0 0 16 22
St Charles 26 8 2 8 163 207
Warren 4 10 0 4 17 35
* Region Total * 211 177 53 75 1,373 1,889
Southeast Bollinger 7 5 0 2 26 40
Butler 7 24 2 12 78 123
Cape Girardeau 4 15 3 11 85 118
Carter 0 0 0 3 3 6
Crawford 4 9 0 1 11 25
Dent 3 7 1 5 18 34
24Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 8.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During October 2016
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment Cases Active
Southeast Dunklin 1 4 3 6 61 75
Howell 3 9 0 12 48 72
Iron 2 3 0 2 8 15
Madison 1 1 0 0 13 15
Maries 0 2 0 1 15 18
Mississippi 1 3 0 3 17 24
New Madrid 2 2 1 4 56 65
Oregon 2 2 0 1 19 24
Pemiscot 1 3 0 9 72 85
Perry 1 4 0 0 16 21
Phelps 6 19 0 7 123 155
Pulaski 5 13 1 0 103 122
Reynolds 0 0 1 1 2 4
Ripley 4 5 1 5 25 40
Scott 5 6 1 10 96 118
Shannon 1 4 0 5 4 14
St Francois 11 7 4 6 66 94
Ste Genevieve 5 2 0 0 11 18
Stoddard 2 5 5 1 79 92
Texas 4 2 2 4 34 46
Washington 3 3 0 2 42 50
Wayne 4 4 0 3 14 25
* Region Total * 89 163 25 116 1,145 1,538
Southwest Barry 3 9 0 3 86 101
Barton 0 1 0 2 19 22
Bates 2 0 2 5 18 27
Benton 2 2 0 1 9 14
Camden 7 12 0 4 50 73
Cedar 0 2 1 0 26 29
Christian 0 9 2 3 43 57
Dade 1 1 0 2 10 14
Dallas 2 2 1 1 22 28
Douglas 0 1 1 1 10 13
Greene 6 7 3 6 339 361
Henry 0 5 0 2 36 43
Hickory 1 1 0 0 8 10
Jasper 1 52 39 18 217 327
Laclede 12 3 2 1 95 113
Lawrence 0 12 1 5 67 85
Mcdonald 0 4 1 2 36 43
Miller 0 9 0 1 45 55
Moniteau 2 1 0 0 6 9
Morgan 4 2 0 2 31 39
Newton 0 2 8 4 60 74
Ozark 0 0 0 0 5 5
Polk 2 4 2 0 41 49
St Clair 0 1 0 4 10 15
Stone 1 16 2 2 37 58
Taney 3 12 5 4 116 140
Vernon 0 2 1 4 18 25
Webster 2 5 0 1 25 33
Wright 2 3 0 0 34 39
* Region Total * 53 180 71 78 1,519 1,901
Kansas City Jackson 67 31 63 53 960 1,174
* Region Total * 67 31 63 53 960 1,174
St. Louis St Louis City 34 20 3 26 320 403
St Louis County 179 112 39 100 385 815
* Region Total * 213 132 42 126 705 1,218
State Total 709 781 318 494 6,221 8,523
25Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 9.
Persons in Family-Centered Services During October 2016
Child Total Persons with
Adults Children Caretakers Persons Court Action
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 7 6 0 13 5
Buchanan 186 189 0 375 82
Caldwell 11 19 0 30 0
Carroll 5 4 0 9 3
Cass 275 284 2 561 222
Chariton 47 63 0 110 41
Clay 240 212 2 454 172
Clinton 71 81 0 152 60
Cooper 33 30 0 63 17
Daviess 12 12 0 24 11
De Kalb 28 30 0 58 21
Gentry 12 14 0 26 14
Grundy 50 51 0 101 30
Harrison 38 49 0 87 24
Holt 8 17 0 25 12
Johnson 131 145 1 277 116
Lafayette 69 50 0 119 37
Linn 68 68 0 136 53
Livingston 30 35 1 66 32
Mercer 5 11 0 16 9
Nodaway 54 66 0 120 45
Pettis 77 99 0 176 57
Platte 46 41 2 89 25
Putnam 10 13 0 23 11
Ray 12 20 0 32 10
Saline 42 58 0 100 47
Sullivan 18 22 0 40 18
Worth 4 4 0 8 2
* Region Total * 1,589 1,693 8 3,290 1,176
Northeast Adair 96 97 0 193 81
Audrain 89 101 1 191 77
Boone 441 462 3 906 346
Callaway 150 159 1 310 136
Clark 39 50 0 89 36
Cole 202 237 0 439 126
Franklin 410 381 1 792 281
Gasconade 63 66 1 130 43
Howard 34 28 0 62 17
Jefferson 1,125 972 8 2,105 758
Knox 4 3 0 7 3
Lewis 51 37 0 88 29
Lincoln 109 115 0 224 83
Macon 57 68 1 126 36
Marion 135 158 1 294 110
Monroe 27 36 0 63 22
Montgomery 39 42 0 81 27
Osage 27 36 0 63 28
Pike 72 92 1 165 61
Ralls 17 14 0 31 7
Randolph 161 173 0 334 123
Schuyler 15 11 0 26 5
Scotland 8 14 0 22 14
Shelby 37 52 0 89 29
St Charles 470 402 1 873 288
Warren 74 61 0 135 37
* Region Total * 3,952 3,867 19 7,838 2,803
Southeast Bollinger 83 99 0 182 62
Butler 241 271 0 512 149
Cape Girardeau 239 282 0 521 183
Carter 12 11 0 23 0
Crawford 54 58 0 112 38
Dent 77 74 1 152 50
26Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 9.
Persons in Family-Centered Services During October 2016
Child Total Persons with
Adults Children Caretakers Persons Court Action
Southeast Dunklin 116 157 1 274 114
Howell 159 170 0 329 55
Iron 35 31 0 66 20
Madison 29 27 0 56 16
Maries 40 40 1 81 30
Mississippi 56 44 0 100 33
New Madrid 119 144 0 263 77
Oregon 57 66 0 123 29
Pemiscot 150 215 1 366 129
Perry 34 45 0 79 32
Phelps 292 290 0 582 186
Pulaski 234 248 3 485 148
Reynolds 10 9 0 19 4
Ripley 75 92 0 167 46
Scott 230 240 0 470 172
Shannon 25 36 0 61 8
St Francois 202 210 1 413 132
Ste Genevieve 44 43 0 87 32
Stoddard 178 189 0 367 141
Texas 98 92 5 195 46
Washington 89 104 0 193 86
Wayne 56 70 1 127 36
* Region Total * 3,034 3,357 14 6,405 2,054
Southwest Barry 168 205 0 373 156
Barton 50 53 0 103 34
Bates 53 55 0 108 46
Benton 22 30 0 52 17
Camden 175 165 0 340 89
Cedar 55 76 0 131 50
Christian 110 119 0 229 82
Dade 25 22 0 47 16
Dallas 59 56 0 115 34
Douglas 30 30 0 60 15
Greene 827 755 4 1,586 477
Henry 84 107 1 192 67
Hickory 17 19 0 36 6
Jasper 645 702 4 1,351 450
Laclede 246 246 0 492 147
Lawrence 166 170 0 336 139
Mcdonald 76 94 0 170 65
Miller 117 105 0 222 48
Moniteau 16 14 1 31 7
Morgan 79 77 1 157 25
Newton 136 152 3 291 138
Ozark 10 13 0 23 6
Polk 110 98 0 208 76
St Clair 30 31 0 61 27
Stone 118 128 0 246 83
Taney 259 286 0 545 219
Vernon 48 53 3 104 38
Webster 78 72 0 150 55
Wright 69 102 0 171 69
* Region Total * 3,878 4,035 17 7,930 2,681
Kansas City Jackson 2,252 2,541 15 4,808 1,967
* Region Total * 2,252 2,541 15 4,808 1,967
St. Louis St Louis City 759 1,028 9 1,796 696
St Louis County 1,569 1,824 12 3,405 1,108
* Region Total * 2,328 2,852 21 5,201 1,804
State Total 17,033 18,345 94 35,472 12,485
27Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 10.
Family-Centered Services Cases Opened During October 2016
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment Cases Active
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 1 1
Buchanan 1 2 0 0 6 9
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 0 0 0 0 5 5
Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clay 0 0 0 0 1 1
Clinton 0 0 0 0 1 1
Cooper 0 1 0 0 0 1
Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grundy 0 0 0 0 1 1
Harrison 1 0 0 0 1 2
Holt 0 0 0 0 1 1
Johnson 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lafayette 0 0 0 0 1 1
Linn 0 0 1 0 0 1
Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 0 0 0 2 2
Pettis 0 0 0 0 0 0
Platte 0 1 0 0 0 1
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 2 4 1 0 21 28
Northeast Adair 0 0 0 0 1 1
Audrain 0 1 0 0 1 2
Boone 0 1 0 1 3 5
Callaway 0 0 0 0 6 6
Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cole 0 3 0 0 8 11
Franklin 2 2 0 0 3 7
Gasconade 0 0 0 0 2 2
Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jefferson 0 1 2 1 35 39
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lincoln 0 0 0 0 3 3
Macon 0 1 0 0 3 4
Marion 1 0 0 0 3 4
Monroe 0 1 0 0 0 1
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 1 0 0 0 1 2
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0
Randolph 1 0 0 0 5 6
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 1 1
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shelby 0 1 0 0 0 1
St Charles 0 0 0 0 14 14
Warren 0 0 0 1 1 2
* Region Total * 5 11 2 3 91 112
Southeast Bollinger 0 1 0 0 1 2
Butler 0 3 1 3 14 21
Cape Girardeau 0 2 0 1 10 13
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0
Crawford 0 1 0 0 0 1
Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0
28Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 10.
Family-Centered Services Cases Opened During October 2016
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment Cases Active
Southeast Dunklin 0 1 1 1 8 11
Howell 0 0 0 2 4 6
Iron 0 1 0 0 0 1
Madison 0 0 0 0 2 2
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 0 1 0 1
New Madrid 0 0 0 0 3 3
Oregon 0 0 0 0 1 1
Pemiscot 0 0 0 2 9 11
Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0
Phelps 0 1 0 0 9 10
Pulaski 0 4 0 0 4 8
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ripley 1 1 0 3 4 9
Scott 0 1 0 0 10 11
Shannon 0 1 0 0 1 2
St Francois 0 1 1 0 4 6
Ste Genevieve 0 1 0 0 2 3
Stoddard 0 0 0 1 14 15
Texas 0 0 0 1 1 2
Washington 0 1 0 1 9 11
Wayne 1 0 0 0 1 2
* Region Total * 2 20 3 16 111 152
Southwest Barry 0 0 0 0 1 1
Barton 0 0 0 1 2 3
Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0
Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Camden 0 2 0 0 1 3
Cedar 0 1 0 0 3 4
Christian 0 1 0 0 3 4
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dallas 0 1 0 1 4 6
Douglas 0 0 0 0 1 1
Greene 0 1 0 1 35 37
Henry 0 0 0 1 0 1
Hickory 1 0 0 0 0 1
Jasper 0 4 0 1 16 21
Laclede 0 1 0 0 8 9
Lawrence 0 0 0 0 2 2
Mcdonald 0 0 0 0 4 4
Miller 0 0 0 0 4 4
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 3 3
Morgan 0 0 0 0 5 5
Newton 0 0 0 1 2 3
Ozark 0 0 0 0 1 1
Polk 0 0 0 0 1 1
St Clair 0 0 0 1 0 1
Stone 0 1 0 0 1 2
Taney 0 0 1 0 6 7
Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 0
Webster 0 0 0 0 1 1
Wright 0 0 0 0 3 3
* Region Total * 1 12 1 7 107 128
Kansas City Jackson 4 1 2 3 51 61
* Region Total * 4 1 2 3 51 61
St. Louis St Louis City 0 2 0 0 14 16
St Louis County 3 7 0 3 15 28
* Region Total * 3 9 0 3 29 44
State Total 17 57 9 32 410 525
29Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 11.
Family-Centered Services Cases Closed During October 2016
by Close Reason
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Cases Closed
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Buchanan 16 64.00% 9 36.00% 25
Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cass 2 28.57% 5 71.43% 7
Chariton 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Clay 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 5
Clinton 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 4
Cooper 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
De Kalb 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Grundy 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Lafayette 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
Linn 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Pettis 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4
Platte 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Putnam 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Ray 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Saline 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 37 57.81% 27 42.19% 64
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Audrain 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Boone 8 80.00% 2 20.00% 10
Callaway 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Clark 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Cole 1 16.67% 5 83.33% 6
Franklin 4 57.14% 3 42.86% 7
Gasconade 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Howard 1 16.67% 5 83.33% 6
Jefferson 22 81.48% 5 18.52% 27
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lincoln 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
Macon 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Marion 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 5
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Montgomery 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Osage 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Pike 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
Ralls 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Randolph 2 8.00% 23 92.00% 25
Schuyler 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shelby 2 22.22% 7 77.78% 9
St Charles 12 75.00% 4 25.00% 16
Warren 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
* Region Total * 67 49.63% 68 50.37% 135
Southeast Bollinger 5 50.00% 5 50.00% 10
Butler 11 68.75% 5 31.25% 16
Cape Girardeau 7 46.67% 8 53.33% 15
Carter 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Crawford 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Dent 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 3
Goal Achieved Other
30Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 11.
Family-Centered Services Cases Closed During October 2016
by Close Reason
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Cases Closed
Southeast Dunklin 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4
Howell 10 52.63% 9 47.37% 19
Iron 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Madison 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mississippi 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
New Madrid 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 4
Oregon 2 33.33% 4 66.67% 6
Pemiscot 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4
Perry 2 22.22% 7 77.78% 9
Phelps 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 9
Pulaski 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Reynolds 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Ripley 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 4
Scott 2 28.57% 5 71.43% 7
Shannon 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
St Francois 3 37.50% 5 62.50% 8
Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 5 100.00% 5
Stoddard 9 90.00% 1 10.00% 10
Texas 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Washington 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
Wayne 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
* Region Total * 74 48.68% 78 51.32% 152
Southwest Barry 11 73.33% 4 26.67% 15
Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Benton 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
Camden 6 66.67% 3 33.33% 9
Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Christian 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Dade 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
Dallas 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4
Douglas 5 71.43% 2 28.57% 7
Greene 8 40.00% 12 60.00% 20
Henry 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jasper 9 69.23% 4 30.77% 13
Laclede 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 6
Lawrence 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 5
Mcdonald 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4
Miller 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Morgan 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 5
Newton 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Polk 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
St Clair 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Stone 2 33.33% 4 66.67% 6
Taney 6 75.00% 2 25.00% 8
Vernon 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4
Webster 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Wright 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 84 66.14% 43 33.86% 127
Kansas City Jackson 46 69.70% 20 30.30% 66
* Region Total * 46 69.70% 20 30.30% 66
St. Louis St Louis City 14 66.67% 7 33.33% 21
St Louis County 23 57.50% 17 42.50% 40
* Region Total * 37 60.66% 24 39.34% 61
State Total 345 57.03% 260 42.98% 605
Goal Achieved Other
31Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 12.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During October 2016
Which Have Had Court Involvement by Number of Months Open
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Atchison 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 3
Buchanan 9 19.15% 8 17.02% 5 10.64% 25 53.19% 47
Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carroll 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Cass 21 15.79% 15 11.28% 22 16.54% 75 56.39% 133
Chariton 2 11.11% 5 27.78% 4 22.22% 7 38.89% 18
Clay 8 8.33% 21 21.88% 9 9.38% 58 60.42% 96
Clinton 9 28.13% 6 18.75% 6 18.75% 11 34.38% 32
Cooper 0 0.00% 4 33.33% 2 16.67% 6 50.00% 12
Daviess 5 62.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 2 25.00% 8
De Kalb 2 14.29% 0 0.00% 4 28.57% 8 57.14% 14
Gentry 2 25.00% 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 4 50.00% 8
Grundy 1 6.67% 5 33.33% 3 20.00% 6 40.00% 15
Harrison 3 30.00% 4 40.00% 1 10.00% 2 20.00% 10
Holt 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 5
Johnson 18 26.47% 7 10.29% 10 14.71% 33 48.53% 68
Lafayette 6 27.27% 5 22.73% 3 13.64% 8 36.36% 22
Linn 4 14.29% 3 10.71% 3 10.71% 18 64.29% 28
Livingston 2 13.33% 0 0.00% 5 33.33% 8 53.33% 15
Mercer 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3
Nodaway 4 16.67% 10 41.67% 5 20.83% 5 20.83% 24
Pettis 5 14.29% 8 22.86% 3 8.57% 19 54.29% 35
Platte 2 15.39% 2 15.39% 0 0.00% 9 69.23% 13
Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 5
Ray 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 4
Saline 4 19.05% 1 4.76% 3 14.29% 13 61.91% 21
Sullivan 0 0.00% 2 25.00% 0 0.00% 6 75.00% 8
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 109 16.77% 115 17.69% 93 14.31% 333 51.23% 650
Northeast Adair 6 11.54% 11 21.15% 12 23.08% 23 44.23% 52
Audrain 10 23.81% 7 16.67% 7 16.67% 18 42.86% 42
Boone 12 6.74% 29 16.29% 22 12.36% 115 64.61% 178
Callaway 16 23.19% 11 15.94% 11 15.94% 31 44.93% 69
Clark 6 27.27% 5 22.73% 2 9.09% 9 40.91% 22
Cole 17 26.15% 8 12.31% 5 7.69% 35 53.85% 65
Franklin 18 13.53% 21 15.79% 20 15.04% 74 55.64% 133
Gasconade 3 17.65% 2 11.77% 1 5.88% 11 64.71% 17
Howard 1 11.11% 4 44.44% 0 0.00% 4 44.44% 9
Jefferson 85 19.50% 84 19.27% 92 21.10% 175 40.14% 436
Knox 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2
Lewis 5 31.25% 3 18.75% 2 12.50% 6 37.50% 16
Lincoln 4 9.30% 12 27.91% 10 23.26% 17 39.54% 43
Macon 8 38.10% 4 19.05% 4 19.05% 5 23.81% 21
Marion 6 10.17% 11 18.64% 10 16.95% 32 54.24% 59
Monroe 1 9.09% 4 36.36% 2 18.18% 4 36.36% 11
Montgomery 3 23.08% 2 15.39% 2 15.39% 6 46.15% 13
Osage 0 0.00% 6 54.55% 1 9.09% 4 36.36% 11
Pike 4 12.90% 11 35.48% 4 12.90% 12 38.71% 31
Ralls 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4
Randolph 16 20.78% 27 35.07% 7 9.09% 27 35.07% 77
Schuyler 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 3
Scotland 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 4
Shelby 2 14.29% 5 35.71% 2 14.29% 5 35.71% 14
St Charles 27 16.56% 32 19.63% 26 15.95% 78 47.85% 163
Warren 4 14.29% 5 17.86% 6 21.43% 13 46.43% 28
* Region Total * 257 16.88% 307 20.16% 250 16.42% 709 46.55% 1,523
Southeast Bollinger 12 42.86% 5 17.86% 4 14.29% 7 25.00% 28
Butler 29 37.18% 17 21.80% 18 23.08% 14 17.95% 78
Cape Girardeau 19 22.62% 14 16.67% 15 17.86% 36 42.86% 84
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Crawford 0 0.00% 4 25.00% 5 31.25% 7 43.75% 16
Dent 5 17.86% 9 32.14% 5 17.86% 9 32.14% 28
0 - 3 Months 4 - 7 Months 8 - 11 Months 12 + Months
32Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 12.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During October 2016
Which Have Had Court Involvement by Number of Months Open
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases
Southeast Dunklin 19 32.76% 23 39.66% 4 6.90% 12 20.69% 58
Howell 4 12.90% 8 25.81% 7 22.58% 12 38.71% 31
Iron 2 20.00% 5 50.00% 2 20.00% 1 10.00% 10
Madison 1 9.09% 4 36.36% 1 9.09% 5 45.46% 11
Maries 1 7.14% 2 14.29% 5 35.71% 6 42.86% 14
Mississippi 3 18.75% 4 25.00% 4 25.00% 5 31.25% 16
New Madrid 10 25.64% 9 23.08% 6 15.39% 14 35.90% 39
Oregon 3 30.00% 3 30.00% 1 10.00% 3 30.00% 10
Pemiscot 12 25.53% 7 14.89% 10 21.28% 18 38.30% 47
Perry 1 5.56% 12 66.67% 2 11.11% 3 16.67% 18
Phelps 20 18.35% 29 26.61% 25 22.94% 35 32.11% 109
Pulaski 13 14.77% 22 25.00% 27 30.68% 26 29.55% 88
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Ripley 13 54.17% 6 25.00% 2 8.33% 3 12.50% 24
Scott 24 26.67% 28 31.11% 19 21.11% 19 21.11% 90
Shannon 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
St Francois 11 16.18% 17 25.00% 7 10.29% 33 48.53% 68
Ste Genevieve 1 7.14% 1 7.14% 7 50.00% 5 35.71% 14
Stoddard 28 37.84% 20 27.03% 14 18.92% 12 16.22% 74
Texas 7 23.33% 7 23.33% 4 13.33% 12 40.00% 30
Washington 11 26.19% 10 23.81% 4 9.52% 17 40.48% 42
Wayne 2 13.33% 1 6.67% 4 26.67% 8 53.33% 15
* Region Total * 252 24.09% 268 25.62% 202 19.31% 324 30.98% 1,046
Southwest Barry 11 11.96% 15 16.30% 17 18.48% 49 53.26% 92
Barton 3 20.00% 2 13.33% 1 6.67% 9 60.00% 15
Bates 0 0.00% 2 8.70% 8 34.78% 13 56.52% 23
Benton 1 7.69% 2 15.39% 2 15.39% 8 61.54% 13
Camden 14 28.57% 8 16.33% 4 8.16% 23 46.94% 49
Cedar 4 19.05% 2 9.52% 4 19.05% 11 52.38% 21
Christian 8 18.18% 10 22.73% 13 29.55% 13 29.55% 44
Dade 2 16.67% 4 33.33% 2 16.67% 4 33.33% 12
Dallas 3 15.79% 3 15.79% 6 31.58% 7 36.84% 19
Douglas 2 25.00% 1 12.50% 3 37.50% 2 25.00% 8
Greene 59 23.14% 54 21.18% 31 12.16% 111 43.53% 255
Henry 0 0.00% 5 15.15% 4 12.12% 24 72.73% 33
Hickory 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 1 16.67% 3 50.00% 6
Jasper 39 15.66% 36 14.46% 27 10.84% 147 59.04% 249
Laclede 14 18.18% 18 23.38% 15 19.48% 30 38.96% 77
Lawrence 10 13.89% 20 27.78% 14 19.44% 28 38.89% 72
Mcdonald 7 21.21% 7 21.21% 8 24.24% 11 33.33% 33
Miller 4 11.77% 4 11.77% 5 14.71% 21 61.77% 34
Moniteau 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 80.00% 5
Morgan 2 13.33% 5 33.33% 2 13.33% 6 40.00% 15
Newton 19 26.39% 15 20.83% 15 20.83% 23 31.94% 72
Ozark 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 3
Polk 3 6.98% 6 13.95% 5 11.63% 29 67.44% 43
St Clair 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 12 92.31% 13
Stone 8 20.51% 10 25.64% 8 20.51% 13 33.33% 39
Taney 22 17.89% 29 23.58% 12 9.76% 60 48.78% 123
Vernon 4 20.00% 3 15.00% 3 15.00% 10 50.00% 20
Webster 7 26.92% 7 26.92% 4 15.39% 8 30.77% 26
Wright 3 8.82% 6 17.65% 4 11.77% 21 61.77% 34
* Region Total * 251 17.33% 277 19.13% 218 15.06% 702 48.48% 1,448
Kansas City Jackson 159 15.92% 166 16.62% 126 12.61% 548 54.86% 999
* Region Total * 159 15.92% 166 16.62% 126 12.61% 548 54.86% 999
St. Louis St Louis City 39 11.61% 46 13.69% 56 16.67% 195 58.04% 336
St Louis County 92 14.29% 97 15.06% 102 15.84% 353 54.81% 644
* Region Total * 131 13.37% 143 14.59% 158 16.12% 548 55.92% 980
State Total 1,159 17.44% 1,276 19.20% 1,047 15.75% 3,164 47.61% 6,646
0 - 3 Months 4 - 7 Months 8 - 11 Months 12 + Months
33Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 13.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During October 2016
Which Have Had No Court Involvement by Number of Months Open
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Atchison 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Buchanan 24 60.00% 11 27.50% 2 5.00% 3 7.50% 40
Caldwell 1 16.67% 2 33.33% 2 33.33% 1 16.67% 6
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cass 8 42.11% 6 31.58% 2 10.53% 3 15.79% 19
Chariton 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Clay 2 28.57% 2 28.57% 2 28.57% 1 14.29% 7
Clinton 4 57.14% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 7
Cooper 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
De Kalb 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Grundy 3 42.86% 2 28.57% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 7
Harrison 4 57.14% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Lafayette 5 62.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 2 25.00% 8
Linn 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Livingston 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 5 71.43% 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Pettis 5 55.56% 3 33.33% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9
Platte 3 37.50% 1 12.50% 2 25.00% 2 25.00% 8
Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Ray 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Saline 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4
Sullivan 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Worth 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 82 53.60% 41 26.80% 14 9.15% 16 10.46% 153
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Audrain 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Boone 22 45.83% 20 41.67% 1 2.08% 5 10.42% 48
Callaway 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Clark 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Cole 25 73.53% 7 20.59% 0 0.00% 2 5.88% 34
Franklin 14 32.56% 21 48.84% 3 6.98% 5 11.63% 43
Gasconade 5 38.46% 6 46.15% 1 7.69% 1 7.69% 13
Howard 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Jefferson 40 51.95% 28 36.36% 6 7.79% 3 3.90% 77
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4
Lincoln 4 44.44% 3 33.33% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 9
Macon 5 71.43% 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Marion 6 37.50% 7 43.75% 3 18.75% 0 0.00% 16
Monroe 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Montgomery 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 5
Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Pike 3 42.86% 4 57.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Ralls 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Randolph 10 71.43% 2 14.29% 1 7.14% 1 7.14% 14
Schuyler 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shelby 3 37.50% 5 62.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
St Charles 23 52.27% 17 38.64% 2 4.55% 2 4.55% 44
Warren 3 42.86% 3 42.86% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7
* Region Total * 186 50.82% 134 36.61% 23 6.28% 23 6.28% 366
Southeast Bollinger 3 25.00% 7 58.33% 0 0.00% 2 16.67% 12
Butler 32 71.11% 8 17.78% 4 8.89% 1 2.22% 45
Cape Girardeau 16 47.06% 9 26.47% 7 20.59% 2 5.88% 34
Carter 1 16.67% 3 50.00% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 6
Crawford 6 66.67% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 1 11.11% 9
Dent 5 83.33% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6
0 - 3 Months 4 - 7 Months 8 - 11 Months 12 + Months
34Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 13.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During October 2016
Which Have Had No Court Involvement by Number of Months Open
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases
Southeast Dunklin 12 70.59% 1 5.88% 1 5.88% 3 17.65% 17
Howell 16 39.02% 12 29.27% 8 19.51% 5 12.20% 41
Iron 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Madison 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Maries 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Mississippi 6 75.00% 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8
New Madrid 8 30.77% 7 26.92% 4 15.39% 7 26.92% 26
Oregon 8 57.14% 4 28.57% 1 7.14% 1 7.14% 14
Pemiscot 21 55.26% 8 21.05% 0 0.00% 9 23.68% 38
Perry 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
Phelps 26 56.52% 14 30.44% 5 10.87% 1 2.17% 46
Pulaski 14 41.18% 11 32.35% 6 17.65% 3 8.82% 34
Reynolds 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Ripley 8 50.00% 4 25.00% 2 12.50% 2 12.50% 16
Scott 23 82.14% 4 14.29% 0 0.00% 1 3.57% 28
Shannon 8 66.67% 3 25.00% 1 8.33% 0 0.00% 12
St Francois 16 61.54% 8 30.77% 1 3.85% 1 3.85% 26
Ste Genevieve 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Stoddard 9 50.00% 8 44.44% 1 5.56% 0 0.00% 18
Texas 9 56.25% 6 37.50% 0 0.00% 1 6.25% 16
Washington 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Wayne 5 50.00% 2 20.00% 2 20.00% 1 10.00% 10
* Region Total * 273 55.49% 129 26.22% 49 9.96% 41 8.33% 492
Southwest Barry 6 66.67% 1 11.11% 1 11.11% 1 11.11% 9
Barton 4 57.14% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Bates 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 4
Benton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Camden 13 54.17% 3 12.50% 6 25.00% 2 8.33% 24
Cedar 4 50.00% 2 25.00% 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 8
Christian 6 46.15% 3 23.08% 3 23.08% 1 7.69% 13
Dade 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Dallas 7 77.78% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Douglas 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Greene 67 63.21% 28 26.42% 5 4.72% 6 5.66% 106
Henry 2 20.00% 3 30.00% 3 30.00% 2 20.00% 10
Hickory 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Jasper 49 62.82% 19 24.36% 6 7.69% 4 5.13% 78
Laclede 23 63.89% 10 27.78% 3 8.33% 0 0.00% 36
Lawrence 7 53.85% 2 15.39% 2 15.39% 2 15.39% 13
Mcdonald 5 50.00% 4 40.00% 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 10
Miller 10 47.62% 7 33.33% 4 19.05% 0 0.00% 21
Moniteau 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Morgan 16 66.67% 6 25.00% 2 8.33% 0 0.00% 24
Newton 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Ozark 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Polk 4 66.67% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 6
St Clair 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Stone 12 63.16% 7 36.84% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 19
Taney 14 82.35% 2 11.77% 1 5.88% 0 0.00% 17
Vernon 2 40.00% 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
Webster 4 57.14% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Wright 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
* Region Total * 279 61.59% 113 24.95% 40 8.83% 21 4.64% 453
Kansas City Jackson 100 57.14% 39 22.29% 12 6.86% 24 13.71% 175
* Region Total * 100 57.14% 39 22.29% 12 6.86% 24 13.71% 175
St. Louis St Louis City 41 61.19% 17 25.37% 6 8.96% 3 4.48% 67
St Louis County 55 32.16% 55 32.16% 27 15.79% 34 19.88% 171
* Region Total * 96 40.34% 72 30.25% 33 13.87% 37 15.55% 238
State Total 1,016 54.13% 528 28.13% 171 9.11% 162 8.63% 1,877
0 - 3 Months 4 - 7 Months 8 - 11 Months 12 + Months
35Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
7,500
8,000
8,500
9,000
9,500
10,000
10,500
11,000
11,500
Oct
-12
Dec-
12
Feb-1
3
Apr-
13
Jun-1
3
Aug-1
3
Oct
-13
Dec-
13
Feb-1
4
Apr-
14
Jun-1
4
Aug-1
4
Oct
-14
Dec-
14
Feb-1
5
Apr-
15
Jun-1
5
Aug-1
5
Oct
-15
Dec-
15
Feb-1
6
Apr-
16
Jun-1
6
Aug-1
6
Oct
-16
Figure 9.
FCS Cases Active as of the End of the Month
October 2012 Through October 2016
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 10.
Percentage Change in FCS Cases Active
as of the End of the Month, Twelve Months Apart October 2015 and October 2016
36Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St Louis
Figure 11.
FCS Cases Opened During October 2016
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance of Evidence Preventive Services Court Ordered Newborn Crisis Assessment Family Assessment
Court Ordered 2%
Preponderance of Evidence
3%
Newborn Crisis Assessment
6%
Family Assessment 78%
Preventive Services 11%
Figure 12.
FCS Cases Opened During October 2016
by Reason for Opening
37Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 13. FCS Cases Closed During October 2016
by Reason for Closing
Goal Achieved Other Reason
0 to 3 Months 17%
4 to 7 Months 19%
8 to 11 Months 16%
12+ Months 48%
Figure 14.
FCS Cases Active During October 2016
With Court Involvement by the Number of Months Open
38Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0 to 3 Months 54%
4 to 7 Months 28%
8 to 11 Months 9%
12+ Months 9%
Figure 15.
FCS Cases Active During October 2016
With No Court Involvement by the Number of Months Open
39Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Children’s Services Management Report 40 Research and Data Analysis
Notes: Family-Centered Services Tables and Figures
Table 9.
Counts of persons are unduplicated.
Child caretakers are persons under legal age who are also parents.
Table 11.
Close reason of “Goal Achieved” includes;
function plan achieved and/or the reasons for needed services no longer exist; all contracted services completed and risk factors are sufficiently reduced;
case goals have been achieved; services can be provided by other resource without intervention of the Division and
family can/will access such resources;
no child under age 18 is still in the home;
Close reason of "Other" includes;
client not making progress but there are no legal grounds for court intervention;
client moved-unable to locate;
client moved-other state notified; referred to other appropriate resource;
other; family is unwilling to cooperate with the service plan;
family moved out of state; family requests that the case be closed;
progress no longer being made;
resources have been exhausted and are no longer available to assist the family;
Table 12.
All court activities/actions are considered as court involvement except for court reports.
Figure 13.
Close reason of “Goal Achieved” includes;
function plan achieved and/or the reasons for needed services no longer exist; all contracted services completed and risk factors are sufficiently reduced;
case goals have been achieved;
services can be provided by other resource without intervention of the Division and family can/will access such resources;
no child under age 18 is still in the home;
Children’s Services Management Report 41 Research and Data Analysis
Close reason of "Other" includes;
client not making progress but there are no legal grounds for court intervention;
client moved-unable to locate; client moved-other state notified;
referred to other appropriate resource; other;
family is unwilling to cooperate with the service plan;
family moved out of state; family requests that the case be closed;
progress no longer being made; resources have been exhausted and are no longer available to assist the family;
Figure 14.
All court activities/actions are considered as court involvement except for court reports.
Out-of-Home Placement
Table 14.
Children Entering Children's Division Custody For the First Time During October 2016
by Case Manager County and the Most Recent Placement Category
Group Home/ Entries
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Atchison 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.85 3.00
Buchanan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cass 0 2 3 2 0 7 0.27 9.29
Chariton 0 0 4 0 2 6 3.39 9.00
Clay 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.02 0.00
Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Daviess 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.44 0.00
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Harrison 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.90 4.50
Holt 0 0 3 0 0 3 3.09 6.33
Johnson 0 0 4 2 0 6 0.50 14.67
Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Linn 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.32 16.00
Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Pettis 0 3 0 0 0 3 0.28 1.33
Platte 0 0 0 2 0 2 0.09 15.50
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Sullivan 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.62 10.00
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 7 17 6 4 34 0.16 8.79
Northeast Adair 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.20 13.00
Audrain 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.16 0.00
Boone 0 2 3 0 1 6 0.18 4.00
Callaway 0 1 6 0 0 7 0.70 4.86
Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cole 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Franklin 0 1 3 0 0 4 0.16 3.25
Gasconade 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.30 1.00
Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Jefferson 0 7 20 0 0 27 0.49 5.56
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Lewis 0 0 3 0 0 3 1.25 6.33
Lincoln 0 3 2 0 0 5 0.34 3.00
Macon 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.26 16.00
Marion 0 3 0 0 0 3 0.44 3.33
Monroe 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.97 2.50
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Osage 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.29 0.00
Pike 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.49 8.50
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Randolph 0 5 1 1 1 8 1.36 4.88
Schuyler 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.88 3.00
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
St Charles 0 3 1 1 0 5 0.05 5.20
Warren 0 0 2 0 1 3 0.37 7.33
* Region Total * 0 28 46 4 3 81 0.26 5.02
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Butler 0 1 11 0 2 14 1.40 5.21
Cape Girardeau 0 2 1 0 0 3 0.18 1.00
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
44Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 14.
Children Entering Children's Division Custody For the First Time During October 2016
by Case Manager County and the Most Recent Placement Category
Group Home/ Entries
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age
Southeast Crawford 0 0 6 0 0 6 1.00 5.33
Dent 0 0 4 0 0 4 1.10 4.25
Dunklin 0 3 9 0 0 12 1.48 5.58
Howell 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.10 8.00
Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Madison 0 3 0 1 0 4 1.36 11.75
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
New Madrid 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.44 8.00
Oregon 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.41 15.00
Pemiscot 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.20 1.00
Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Phelps 0 2 7 1 1 11 1.12 9.00
Pulaski 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.16 0.00
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ripley 0 7 1 0 0 8 2.42 8.13
Scott 0 1 6 0 3 10 1.02 7.20
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
St Francois 0 5 0 0 0 5 0.35 2.80
Ste Genevieve 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.47 8.00
Stoddard 0 3 3 3 0 9 1.32 4.33
Texas 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.35 8.50
Washington 0 2 2 0 0 4 0.66 2.00
Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 34 54 6 7 101 0.61 6.03
Southwest Barry 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.23 5.50
Barton 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.62 3.00
Bates 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.47 12.50
Benton 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.87 1.67
Camden 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.12 0.00
Cedar 0 1 0 2 1 4 1.21 10.75
Christian 0 0 1 2 1 4 0.19 6.25
Dade 0 0 2 0 0 2 1.12 14.50
Dallas 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.48 0.00
Douglas 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.33 0.00
Greene 0 6 9 2 2 19 0.33 5.05
Henry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Jasper 0 1 2 4 1 8 0.26 7.50
Laclede 0 2 0 0 1 3 0.34 9.67
Lawrence 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.10 8.00
Mcdonald 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.31 8.00
Miller 0 0 2 1 0 3 0.49 3.33
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Newton 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.14 6.50
Ozark 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.51 1.00
Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Stone 0 0 3 1 0 4 0.66 4.50
Taney 0 1 8 0 1 10 0.88 8.10
Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Webster 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Wright 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.41 0.50
* Region Total * 0 17 40 13 8 78 0.30 6.12
Kansas City Jackson 0 11 23 8 7 49 0.30 4.94
* Region Total * 0 11 23 8 7 49 0.30 4.94
St. Louis St Louis City 0 4 6 5 2 17 0.25 6.00
St Louis County 0 20 8 5 5 38 0.16 4.03
* Region Total * 0 24 14 10 7 55 0.18 4.64
Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
State Total 0 121 194 47 36 398 0.28 5.75
45Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 15.
Children Re-Entering Children's Division Custody During October 2016
by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category
Group Home/ Entries
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Buchanan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cass 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.04 16.00
Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Clay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Grundy 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.41 13.00
Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Johnson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Linn 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.32 12.00
Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Pettis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 0 1 0 2 3 0.01 13.67
Northeast Adair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Audrain 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Boone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Callaway 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.10 4.00
Clark 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.58 13.00
Cole 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.11 9.00
Franklin 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.04 8.00
Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Jefferson 0 2 6 0 2 10 0.18 11.30
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Lincoln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Macon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Marion 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.15 17.00
Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Montgomery 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.35 12.00
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Randolph 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
St Charles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Warren 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 6 8 0 3 17 0.05 10.88
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Butler 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.20 12.00
Cape Girardeau 0 4 1 0 0 5 0.30 8.20
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
46Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 15.
Children Re-Entering Children's Division Custody During October 2016
by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category
Group Home/ Entries
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age
Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Dunklin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Howell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Madison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
New Madrid 0 0 1 0 2 3 0.66 8.00
Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Pemiscot 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.20 6.00
Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Phelps 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.10 14.00
Pulaski 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ripley 0 6 2 0 0 8 2.42 10.63
Scott 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
St Francois 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ste Genevieve 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.47 12.00
Stoddard 0 3 4 0 1 8 1.17 12.13
Texas 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.52 6.00
Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 16 13 1 3 33 0.20 10.09
Southwest Barry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Camden 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cedar 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.30 10.00
Christian 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Greene 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Henry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Jasper 0 0 0 2 0 2 0.07 11.00
Laclede 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Lawrence 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Mcdonald 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Newton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Stone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Taney 0 0 1 2 0 3 0.26 11.67
Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Webster 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Wright 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 1 1 4 0 6 0.02 11.17
Kansas City Jackson 0 4 3 6 0 13 0.08 9.38
* Region Total * 0 4 3 6 0 13 0.08 9.38
St. Louis St Louis City 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.03 10.50
St Louis County 0 1 0 6 1 8 0.03 11.50
* Region Total * 0 3 0 6 1 10 0.03 11.30
State Total 0 30 26 17 9 82 0.06 10.50
47Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 16.
Children (Re)Entering Children's Division Custody
October 2014 Through September 2016
Total
Month/Year Entries Reentries (Re)Entries
Oct-2014 577 105 682
Nov-2014 410 82 492
Dec-2014 463 73 536
Jan-2015 506 84 590
Feb-2015 437 90 527
Mar-2015 481 97 578
Apr-2015 543 80 623
May-2015 478 89 567
Jun-2015 485 86 571
Jul-2015 462 92 554
Aug-2015 568 90 658
Sep-2015 538 86 624
Oct-2015 602 76 678
Nov-2015 495 77 572
Dec-2015 419 95 514
Jan-2016 513 105 618
Feb-2016 539 120 659
Mar-2016 672 96 768
Apr-2016 583 117 700
May-2016 434 86 520
Jun-2016 563 83 646
Jul-2016 434 77 511
Aug-2016 538 81 619
Sep-2016 549 93 642
Total 12,289 2,160 14,449
48Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 17.
Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During October 2016
by Length of Stay and Region
Average
Length of Average
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age
Northwest 2 6.45% 18 58.07% 11 35.48% 31 32.52 7.81
Northeast 22 29.33% 25 33.33% 28 37.33% 75 20.17 8.52
Southeast 36 48.00% 23 30.67% 16 21.33% 75 15.35 7.36
Southwest 30 28.57% 43 40.95% 32 30.48% 105 21.95 9.19
Kansas City 7 18.92% 12 32.43% 18 48.65% 37 24.49 8.08
St. Louis 8 25.00% 9 28.13% 15 46.88% 32 36.34 9.44
Other 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2 12.00 10.50
State Total 105 29.41% 132 36.98% 120 33.61% 357 22.61 8.46
0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More
49Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 18.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2016
by Length of Stay and Case Manager County
Average
Length of Average
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0.00
Atchison 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 5 62.50% 8 24.75 8.88
Buchanan 38 52.78% 22 30.56% 12 16.67% 72 13.36 7.63
Caldwell 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 4 80.00% 5 34.60 7.80
Carroll 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 7.00 2.33
Cass 84 38.53% 51 23.39% 83 38.07% 218 22.24 10.50
Chariton 17 48.57% 11 31.43% 7 20.00% 35 17.57 10.37
Clay 75 40.32% 55 29.57% 56 30.11% 186 20.17 7.45
Clinton 33 45.83% 24 33.33% 15 20.83% 72 18.54 7.68
Cooper 10 47.62% 4 19.05% 7 33.33% 21 17.29 8.48
Daviess 13 46.43% 5 17.86% 10 35.71% 28 23.43 7.71
De Kalb 7 24.14% 19 65.52% 3 10.35% 29 16.07 8.72
Gentry 7 41.18% 8 47.06% 2 11.77% 17 24.24 6.12
Grundy 11 25.58% 15 34.88% 17 39.54% 43 22.77 9.37
Harrison 19 55.88% 8 23.53% 7 20.59% 34 17.29 7.09
Holt 8 47.06% 6 35.29% 3 17.65% 17 12.29 10.65
Johnson 64 51.61% 34 27.42% 26 20.97% 124 19.36 10.44
Lafayette 26 55.32% 7 14.89% 14 29.79% 47 18.53 7.81
Linn 23 38.33% 17 28.33% 20 33.33% 60 18.67 10.15
Livingston 10 21.28% 23 48.94% 14 29.79% 47 26.06 9.62
Mercer 8 72.73% 2 18.18% 1 9.09% 11 11.91 10.45
Nodaway 20 48.78% 11 26.83% 10 24.39% 41 24.00 7.54
Pettis 24 34.78% 22 31.88% 23 33.33% 69 22.72 8.86
Platte 8 25.81% 10 32.26% 13 41.94% 31 28.97 10.55
Putnam 5 20.83% 13 54.17% 6 25.00% 24 24.67 8.96
Ray 4 23.53% 7 41.18% 6 35.29% 17 25.76 5.82
Saline 30 51.72% 14 24.14% 14 24.14% 58 14.86 6.26
Sullivan 10 38.46% 11 42.31% 5 19.23% 26 19.38 8.35
Worth 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 9.00 2.00
* Region Total * 562 41.78% 400 29.74% 383 28.48% 1,345 20.21 8.79
Northeast Adair 41 48.24% 30 35.29% 14 16.47% 85 15.22 8.60
Audrain 45 41.67% 34 31.48% 29 26.85% 108 22.24 8.58
Boone 118 38.31% 104 33.77% 86 27.92% 308 22.39 9.15
Callaway 59 49.58% 24 20.17% 36 30.25% 119 18.97 7.80
Clark 16 39.02% 9 21.95% 16 39.02% 41 22.85 9.49
Cole 36 30.51% 52 44.07% 30 25.42% 118 23.80 9.06
Franklin 117 35.14% 101 30.33% 115 34.54% 333 23.94 8.20
Gasconade 12 29.27% 20 48.78% 9 21.95% 41 18.56 6.85
Howard 15 60.00% 4 16.00% 6 24.00% 25 15.32 9.24
Jefferson 369 53.40% 185 26.77% 137 19.83% 691 15.42 7.95
Knox 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 4 29.25 9.25
Lewis 13 39.39% 11 33.33% 9 27.27% 33 21.21 11.30
Lincoln 50 55.56% 22 24.44% 18 20.00% 90 18.72 7.06
Macon 18 39.13% 22 47.83% 6 13.04% 46 16.50 8.91
Marion 71 46.41% 38 24.84% 44 28.76% 153 19.22 9.10
Monroe 11 55.00% 4 20.00% 5 25.00% 20 15.35 6.95
Montgomery 13 35.14% 15 40.54% 9 24.32% 37 24.81 9.41
Osage 12 63.16% 2 10.53% 5 26.32% 19 12.68 6.26
Pike 27 50.00% 17 31.48% 10 18.52% 54 17.00 7.67
Ralls 0 0.00% 2 18.18% 9 81.82% 11 42.00 13.18
Randolph 83 70.94% 9 7.69% 25 21.37% 117 13.67 9.88
Schuyler 4 50.00% 1 12.50% 3 37.50% 8 17.75 9.13
Scotland 9 56.25% 4 25.00% 3 18.75% 16 21.13 7.88
Shelby 11 45.83% 10 41.67% 3 12.50% 24 14.04 10.88
St Charles 138 42.20% 94 28.75% 95 29.05% 327 21.98 8.90
Warren 29 55.77% 11 21.15% 12 23.08% 52 16.50 8.81
* Region Total * 1,318 45.76% 827 28.72% 735 25.52% 2,880 19.40 8.54
Southeast Bollinger 46 66.67% 17 24.64% 6 8.70% 69 9.91 7.26
Butler 119 56.13% 38 17.93% 55 25.94% 212 15.87 8.09
Cape Girardeau 128 46.89% 96 35.17% 49 17.95% 273 16.13 8.21
Carter 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 4 16.75 8.00
0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More
50Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 18.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2016
by Length of Stay and Case Manager County
Average
Length of Average
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age
Southeast Crawford 36 45.57% 17 21.52% 26 32.91% 79 17.27 8.05
Dent 32 42.67% 19 25.33% 24 32.00% 75 21.24 7.71
Dunklin 108 65.46% 35 21.21% 22 13.33% 165 13.38 8.05
Howell 26 41.27% 18 28.57% 19 30.16% 63 23.43 10.63
Iron 19 55.88% 5 14.71% 10 29.41% 34 16.03 7.38
Madison 11 29.73% 14 37.84% 12 32.43% 37 22.86 8.54
Maries 20 62.50% 4 12.50% 8 25.00% 32 14.50 7.44
Mississippi 23 60.53% 11 28.95% 4 10.53% 38 13.87 8.55
New Madrid 42 56.00% 11 14.67% 22 29.33% 75 17.01 7.45
Oregon 16 64.00% 3 12.00% 6 24.00% 25 23.52 8.32
Pemiscot 89 56.69% 33 21.02% 35 22.29% 157 18.04 8.01
Perry 40 83.33% 4 8.33% 4 8.33% 48 10.21 7.33
Phelps 119 64.32% 27 14.60% 39 21.08% 185 13.11 7.47
Pulaski 93 54.71% 45 26.47% 32 18.82% 170 14.77 7.06
Reynolds 3 21.43% 5 35.71% 6 42.86% 14 34.43 8.29
Ripley 43 59.72% 10 13.89% 19 26.39% 72 19.15 9.81
Scott 100 65.36% 38 24.84% 15 9.80% 153 10.79 6.69
Shannon 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3 69.67 17.67
St Francois 57 28.50% 55 27.50% 88 44.00% 200 24.99 8.65
Ste Genevieve 17 53.13% 8 25.00% 7 21.88% 32 15.72 9.41
Stoddard 81 57.86% 35 25.00% 24 17.14% 140 15.14 8.96
Texas 31 44.29% 21 30.00% 18 25.71% 70 16.04 7.89
Washington 38 32.48% 47 40.17% 32 27.35% 117 21.13 7.85
Wayne 15 27.78% 16 29.63% 23 42.59% 54 26.02 8.67
* Region Total * 1,353 52.12% 636 24.50% 607 23.38% 2,596 16.95 8.06
Southwest Barry 42 26.75% 57 36.31% 58 36.94% 157 22.06 8.68
Barton 18 48.65% 6 16.22% 13 35.14% 37 20.81 8.76
Bates 25 53.19% 14 29.79% 8 17.02% 47 14.83 7.51
Benton 10 34.48% 7 24.14% 12 41.38% 29 20.97 11.69
Camden 45 47.87% 18 19.15% 31 32.98% 94 18.96 8.06
Cedar 30 62.50% 17 35.42% 1 2.08% 48 9.94 8.42
Christian 58 46.03% 33 26.19% 35 27.78% 126 19.21 8.09
Dade 8 57.14% 5 35.71% 1 7.14% 14 10.21 10.00
Dallas 19 38.78% 13 26.53% 17 34.69% 49 22.98 7.86
Douglas 9 37.50% 3 12.50% 12 50.00% 24 20.75 12.42
Greene 249 36.94% 172 25.52% 253 37.54% 674 24.43 7.91
Henry 23 31.94% 20 27.78% 29 40.28% 72 27.40 9.86
Hickory 3 30.00% 2 20.00% 5 50.00% 10 26.10 5.90
Jasper 128 30.48% 153 36.43% 139 33.10% 420 22.81 10.20
Laclede 72 44.72% 43 26.71% 46 28.57% 161 19.20 8.23
Lawrence 69 38.33% 52 28.89% 59 32.78% 180 22.12 9.42
Mcdonald 40 52.63% 21 27.63% 15 19.74% 76 20.05 10.13
Miller 16 31.37% 14 27.45% 21 41.18% 51 27.90 9.37
Moniteau 4 33.33% 5 41.67% 3 25.00% 12 16.75 8.83
Morgan 12 40.00% 5 16.67% 13 43.33% 30 21.67 10.30
Newton 69 50.00% 33 23.91% 36 26.09% 138 18.16 9.33
Ozark 6 40.00% 5 33.33% 4 26.67% 15 21.53 11.13
Polk 16 21.33% 36 48.00% 23 30.67% 75 22.49 8.72
St Clair 11 35.48% 13 41.94% 7 22.58% 31 18.45 10.90
Stone 42 45.65% 30 32.61% 20 21.74% 92 18.59 8.46
Taney 112 41.33% 78 28.78% 81 29.89% 271 20.93 8.11
Vernon 15 42.86% 11 31.43% 9 25.71% 35 23.06 8.29
Webster 27 46.55% 17 29.31% 14 24.14% 58 19.93 8.95
Wright 39 42.86% 15 16.48% 37 40.66% 91 21.16 9.25
* Region Total * 1,217 39.04% 898 28.81% 1,002 32.15% 3,117 21.65 8.83
Kansas City Jackson 782 42.52% 448 24.36% 609 33.12% 1,839 21.45 8.55
* Region Total * 782 42.52% 448 24.36% 609 33.12% 1,839 21.45 8.55
St. Louis St Louis City 220 30.35% 204 28.14% 301 41.52% 725 29.88 8.85
St Louis County 405 40.54% 307 30.73% 287 28.73% 999 21.92 7.83
* Region Total * 625 36.25% 511 29.64% 588 34.11% 1,724 25 8.26
Other Icama 0 0.00% 4 44.44% 5 55.56% 9 28.78 9.89
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 4 44.44% 5 55.56% 9 28.78 9.89
State Total 5,857 43.35% 3,724 27.57% 3,929 29.08% 13,510 20.56 8.50
0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More
51Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 19.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2016
by Case Manager County and Placement Category
Group Home/ Children
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Children Thousand Age
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Atchison 0 4 4 0 0 8 6.77 8.88
Buchanan 1 30 25 15 1 72 3.43 7.63
Caldwell 0 5 0 0 0 5 2.08 7.80
Carroll 0 2 1 0 0 3 1.37 2.33
Cass 0 55 91 44 28 218 8.26 10.50
Chariton 0 9 11 10 5 35 19.79 10.37
Clay 0 74 84 19 9 186 3.25 7.45
Clinton 0 37 28 5 2 72 14.13 7.68
Cooper 0 10 6 5 0 21 5.28 8.48
Daviess 0 11 11 2 4 28 12.43 7.71
De Kalb 0 16 11 1 1 29 12.55 8.72
Gentry 0 8 7 0 2 17 10.28 6.12
Grundy 0 15 17 7 4 43 17.43 9.37
Harrison 0 12 19 1 2 34 15.31 7.09
Holt 0 2 15 0 0 17 17.51 10.65
Johnson 1 37 50 29 7 124 10.30 10.44
Lafayette 0 12 28 6 1 47 5.74 7.81
Linn 0 23 25 8 4 60 19.01 10.15
Livingston 0 16 22 6 3 47 14.12 9.62
Mercer 0 1 9 1 0 11 11.42 10.45
Nodaway 0 9 28 0 4 41 9.62 7.54
Pettis 0 26 22 14 7 69 6.40 8.86
Platte 0 16 3 8 4 31 1.41 10.55
Putnam 0 5 15 0 4 24 20.69 8.96
Ray 0 11 5 0 1 17 2.90 5.82
Saline 0 20 33 5 0 58 10.75 6.26
Sullivan 0 8 13 4 1 26 16.00 8.35
Worth 0 0 2 0 0 2 4.50 2.00
* Region Total * 2 474 585 190 94 1,345 6.21 8.79
Northeast Adair 0 32 40 7 6 85 17.10 8.60
Audrain 0 34 57 11 6 108 16.96 8.58
Boone 0 95 131 68 14 308 8.99 9.15
Callaway 1 35 66 14 3 119 11.90 7.80
Clark 0 11 23 7 0 41 23.88 9.49
Cole 0 52 41 15 10 118 6.58 9.06
Franklin 0 119 155 21 38 333 13.26 8.20
Gasconade 0 18 19 2 2 41 12.19 6.85
Howard 0 8 15 2 0 25 11.48 9.24
Jefferson 3 178 436 41 33 691 12.57 7.95
Knox 0 0 3 0 1 4 3.88 9.25
Lewis 0 9 18 3 3 33 13.78 11.30
Lincoln 0 39 39 9 3 90 6.11 7.06
Macon 0 15 22 5 4 46 12.17 8.91
Marion 0 81 45 19 8 153 22.21 9.10
Monroe 0 2 12 5 1 20 9.70 6.95
Montgomery 0 10 19 0 8 37 12.97 9.41
Osage 0 9 10 0 0 19 5.53 6.26
Pike 0 27 22 3 2 54 13.15 7.67
Ralls 0 9 1 1 0 11 4.63 13.18
Randolph 0 45 53 15 4 117 19.90 9.88
Schuyler 0 0 5 1 2 8 7.02 9.13
Scotland 0 6 10 0 0 16 11.75 7.88
Shelby 0 4 16 3 1 24 15.03 10.88
St Charles 2 125 152 27 21 327 3.52 8.90
Warren 0 14 25 7 6 52 6.40 8.81
* Region Total * 6 977 1,435 286 176 2,880 9.13 8.54
Southeast Bollinger 0 11 53 5 0 69 23.65 7.26
Butler 0 69 99 36 8 212 21.26 8.09
Cape Girardeau 0 88 147 30 8 273 16.45 8.21
Carter 0 1 3 0 0 4 2.64 8.00
52Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis Unit
Table 19.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2016
by Case Manager County and Placement Category
Group Home/ Children
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Children Thousand Age
Southeast Crawford 0 21 37 19 2 79 13.16 8.05
Dent 0 22 36 14 3 75 20.54 7.71
Dunklin 0 41 94 24 6 165 20.41 8.05
Howell 0 19 13 19 12 63 6.26 10.63
Iron 0 4 24 5 1 34 14.15 7.38
Madison 4 8 15 10 0 37 12.62 8.54
Maries 0 10 18 3 1 32 14.86 7.44
Mississippi 0 7 25 5 1 38 11.92 8.55
New Madrid 0 26 40 5 4 75 16.62 7.45
Oregon 0 9 8 3 5 25 10.31 8.32
Pemiscot 0 43 83 23 8 157 31.19 8.01
Perry 0 14 23 10 1 48 10.08 7.33
Phelps 0 45 107 29 4 185 18.89 7.47
Pulaski 0 67 79 20 4 170 13.56 7.06
Reynolds 0 2 7 5 0 14 9.14 8.29
Ripley 0 26 28 9 9 72 21.77 9.81
Scott 0 35 105 10 3 153 15.53 6.69
Shannon 0 1 0 1 1 3 1.52 17.67
St Francois 3 81 63 40 13 200 13.88 8.65
Ste Genevieve 1 17 5 5 4 32 7.58 9.41
Stoddard 0 37 67 29 7 140 20.49 8.96
Texas 0 15 40 12 3 70 12.24 7.89
Washington 6 40 55 15 1 117 19.30 7.85
Wayne 0 16 26 10 2 54 19.24 8.67
* Region Total * 14 775 1,300 396 111 2,596 15.71 8.06
Southwest Barry 0 68 57 25 7 157 18.17 8.68
Barton 0 12 20 4 1 37 11.51 8.76
Bates 0 16 28 1 2 47 11.05 7.51
Benton 0 5 9 12 3 29 8.44 11.69
Camden 4 38 40 9 3 94 11.20 8.06
Cedar 0 19 19 6 4 48 14.51 8.42
Christian 0 50 49 12 15 126 5.95 8.09
Dade 0 4 9 1 0 14 7.84 10.00
Dallas 1 24 13 6 5 49 11.75 7.86
Douglas 0 7 8 6 3 24 7.84 12.42
Greene 12 314 208 84 56 674 11.55 7.91
Henry 0 25 30 7 10 72 14.53 9.86
Hickory 0 6 3 0 1 10 6.01 5.90
Jasper 3 128 166 98 25 420 13.87 10.20
Laclede 0 54 83 20 4 161 18.08 8.23
Lawrence 0 67 63 37 13 180 17.69 9.42
Mcdonald 0 22 41 8 5 76 11.74 10.13
Miller 0 18 17 7 9 51 8.30 9.37
Moniteau 0 3 8 1 0 12 3.06 8.83
Morgan 0 20 5 4 1 30 6.62 10.30
Newton 0 56 55 16 11 138 9.35 9.33
Ozark 0 5 8 1 1 15 7.70 11.13
Polk 0 26 30 11 8 75 9.78 8.72
St Clair 0 14 11 6 0 31 15.82 10.90
Stone 0 38 39 9 6 92 15.25 8.46
Taney 1 126 81 45 18 271 23.72 8.11
Vernon 0 13 17 3 2 35 6.65 8.29
Webster 0 23 21 12 2 58 5.78 8.95
Wright 0 43 33 9 6 91 18.68 9.25
* Region Total * 21 1,244 1,171 460 221 3,117 11.95 8.83
Kansas City Jackson 1 649 850 183 156 1,839 11.10 8.55
* Region Total * 1 649 850 183 156 1,839 11.10 8.55
St. Louis St Louis City 1 270 299 95 60 725 10.73 8.85
St Louis County 3 340 482 107 67 999 4.27 7.83
* Region Total * 4 610 781 202 127 1,724 5.71 8.26
Other Icama 1 4 2 2 0 9 0.00 9.89
* Region Total * 1 4 2 2 0 9 0.00 9.89
State Total 49 4,733 6,124 1,719 885 13,510 9.48 8.50
53Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis Unit
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2016
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
ADF ADO ADR CFP CTO DET FAH FGB FGH
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0
Caldwell 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 0 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 0
Chariton 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0
Clay 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0
Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cooper 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Daviess 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grundy 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0
Harrison 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Linn 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Livingston 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Pettis 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0
Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Putnam 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Sullivan 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 1 31 11 2 1 0 0
Northeast Adair 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Audrain 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Boone 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0
Callaway 0 0 1 7 1 0 0 0 0
Clark 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Cole 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0
Franklin 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0
Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Howard 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Jefferson 1 0 2 18 3 5 0 0 0
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Lincoln 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Macon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marion 0 0 0 4 1 1 0 0 0
Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Montgomery 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Randolph 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Charles 0 2 0 18 0 0 0 0 0
Warren 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
* Region Total * 1 2 3 86 14 9 0 0 0
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Butler 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
54Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2016
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
ADF ADO ADR CFP CTO DET FAH FGB FGH
Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dunklin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Howell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Madison 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
New Madrid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Phelps 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Pulaski 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ripley 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Scott 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Francois 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 0
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0
Stoddard 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Washington 4 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0
Wayne 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 9 0 2 7 12 4 3 0 4
Southwest Barry 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Camden 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2
Cedar 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Christian 0 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 0
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dallas 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
Douglas 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Greene 4 2 6 22 3 1 0 0 0
Henry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hickory 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Jasper 0 0 0 17 2 0 3 0 0
Laclede 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0
Lawrence 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0
Mcdonald 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Moniteau 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2
Newton 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0
Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Polk 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stone 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0
Taney 1 0 0 13 4 0 0 0 0
Vernon 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Webster 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wright 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 9 2 7 95 15 1 3 0 4
Kansas City Jackson 0 1 0 105 4 4 0 1 1
* Region Total * 0 1 0 105 4 4 0 1 1
St. Louis St Louis City 1 0 0 33 4 2 0 0 0
St Louis County 1 0 2 43 1 1 0 0 0
* Region Total * 2 0 2 76 5 3 0 0 0
Other Icama 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
State Total 21 5 16 401 61 23 7 1 9
55Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2016
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
FGM FHB FHE FHM FHO ILA JHO KHB KHM
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 0 5 0 3 20 0 0 0 0
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Cass 0 4 0 1 42 7 0 0 0
Chariton 0 0 2 0 7 0 0 0 0
Clay 0 5 0 3 60 0 0 1 0
Clinton 0 0 0 0 37 1 0 0 0
Cooper 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0
Daviess 0 0 0 1 9 0 0 0 0
De Kalb 0 1 0 2 13 0 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0
Grundy 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0
Harrison 0 1 0 0 11 1 0 0 0
Holt 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 2 0 1 33 0 0 0 0
Lafayette 0 1 0 0 11 1 0 0 0
Linn 0 1 0 2 19 0 0 0 0
Livingston 0 0 2 1 12 1 0 0 0
Mercer 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 2 0 0 6 3 0 2 1
Pettis 0 2 0 0 21 0 0 0 0
Platte 0 0 0 0 16 2 0 0 0
Putnam 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0
Ray 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0
Saline 0 0 5 0 12 0 0 0 0
Sullivan 0 2 0 0 5 1 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 26 9 15 393 18 0 3 1
Northeast Adair 0 2 0 1 28 1 0 0 1
Audrain 0 1 0 1 29 1 0 0 1
Boone 0 7 3 2 73 4 0 0 0
Callaway 0 3 1 1 23 0 0 2 1
Clark 0 0 1 0 7 0 0 0 0
Cole 0 5 0 3 40 2 0 0 0
Franklin 0 4 5 4 102 8 0 0 1
Gasconade 0 0 0 0 18 1 0 0 1
Howard 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0
Jefferson 0 15 1 9 135 7 0 1 2
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 1 0 0 6 1 0 0 0
Lincoln 0 0 0 3 34 0 0 0 0
Macon 0 0 0 1 14 1 0 0 0
Marion 0 2 4 2 69 3 0 0 1
Monroe 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 2
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0
Osage 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0
Pike 0 1 1 1 24 0 0 0 0
Ralls 0 1 0 1 7 0 0 0 0
Randolph 0 1 0 1 38 2 0 0 0
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
Shelby 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
St Charles 0 14 0 1 92 4 0 1 0
Warren 0 0 0 3 10 3 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 57 16 35 783 42 0 4 10
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 2 1 8 0 0 0 0
Butler 0 1 1 2 64 0 0 1 3
Cape Girardeau 0 1 12 7 63 1 0 0 0
Carter 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
56Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2016
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
FGM FHB FHE FHM FHO ILA JHO KHB KHM
Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 1 20 0 0 0 0
Dent 0 1 0 3 18 0 0 0 0
Dunklin 0 0 12 3 26 0 0 0 0
Howell 0 0 0 2 17 0 0 0 0
Iron 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
Madison 0 0 2 0 6 0 0 0 0
Maries 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
New Madrid 0 1 0 0 25 2 0 0 0
Oregon 0 1 1 2 5 0 0 0 1
Pemiscot 0 1 0 1 41 0 0 0 0
Perry 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0
Phelps 0 1 2 3 39 0 0 1 1
Pulaski 0 3 1 3 59 0 0 2 3
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Ripley 0 0 0 1 25 1 0 0 1
Scott 0 3 0 1 31 0 0 0 1
Shannon 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
St Francois 0 0 0 1 79 1 0 0 1
Ste Genevieve 0 0 4 0 13 0 0 0 0
Stoddard 0 0 0 1 36 1 0 0 2
Texas 0 0 0 2 13 2 0 0 0
Washington 0 0 0 3 36 0 0 0 0
Wayne 0 0 0 3 11 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 13 37 41 673 8 0 4 13
Southwest Barry 0 3 1 0 60 1 0 0 1
Barton 0 0 0 0 12 1 0 0 0
Bates 0 0 2 0 14 0 0 0 1
Benton 0 3 0 0 2 1 0 0 0
Camden 0 1 0 0 32 0 0 0 2
Cedar 0 0 0 0 19 1 0 0 0
Christian 0 3 1 4 39 4 0 0 1
Dade 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
Dallas 0 0 0 2 21 0 0 0 0
Douglas 0 0 2 0 4 1 0 0 0
Greene 0 25 0 16 251 13 0 1 0
Henry 0 3 1 0 21 6 0 0 0
Hickory 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0
Jasper 0 6 0 5 100 2 0 1 3
Laclede 0 3 0 2 43 0 0 0 0
Lawrence 0 2 0 1 56 5 0 0 0
Mcdonald 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0
Miller 0 1 0 1 16 1 0 0 1
Moniteau 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 1 0 0 14 0 0 0 0
Newton 0 1 0 1 49 1 0 0 0
Ozark 0 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 0
Polk 0 0 0 0 26 2 0 0 0
St Clair 0 1 1 0 12 0 0 0 0
Stone 0 3 0 1 29 3 0 0 1
Taney 0 7 0 9 97 6 0 1 0
Vernon 0 0 0 1 11 0 0 0 0
Webster 0 2 0 2 19 1 0 0 0
Wright 0 1 0 4 38 0 0 0 1
* Region Total * 0 69 9 50 1,017 51 0 3 11
Kansas City Jackson 0 61 22 35 424 47 0 4 4
* Region Total * 0 61 22 35 424 47 0 4 4
St. Louis St Louis City 0 26 8 16 187 7 0 1 1
St Louis County 0 30 24 19 224 14 0 0 5
* Region Total * 0 56 32 35 411 21 0 1 6
Other Icama 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
State Total 0 282 125 211 3,704 187 0 19 45
57Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2016
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
KHO KHU LGS MMD MMF MMH MMW RFA RFP
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 7 11 0 2 0 6 0 4 2
Chariton 3 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Clay 4 13 0 0 0 6 1 2 0
Clinton 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cooper 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Daviess 4 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 0
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gentry 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Grundy 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Harrison 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Holt 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 2 14 0 0 0 4 2 3 1
Lafayette 5 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Linn 6 1 0 0 1 2 1 2 0
Livingston 1 3 0 0 0 2 0 1 0
Mercer 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 6 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Pettis 4 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 1
Platte 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0
Putnam 3 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0
Ray 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Saline 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sullivan 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 87 59 2 4 1 39 4 16 5
Northeast Adair 14 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0
Audrain 11 13 0 0 0 3 0 1 0
Boone 18 20 0 1 0 8 0 10 8
Callaway 8 7 0 0 0 2 0 3 0
Clark 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cole 14 5 0 0 0 6 1 1 3
Franklin 33 9 0 1 0 16 1 0 0
Gasconade 5 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Howard 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jefferson 57 57 0 0 1 13 0 4 2
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lewis 2 5 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Lincoln 6 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Macon 10 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 0
Marion 7 8 0 0 0 3 0 4 0
Monroe 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0
Osage 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 3 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Ralls 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Randolph 4 8 0 1 0 0 0 3 1
Schuyler 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shelby 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
St Charles 20 21 0 1 0 10 2 1 0
Warren 5 3 0 0 1 1 0 2 0
* Region Total * 233 169 0 6 2 83 4 32 14
Southeast Bollinger 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Butler 23 4 0 1 0 6 0 1 0
Cape Girardeau 14 19 0 0 0 4 0 2 0
Carter 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
58Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2016
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
KHO KHU LGS MMD MMF MMH MMW RFA RFP
Southeast Crawford 6 4 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Dent 12 4 0 0 0 2 0 1 0
Dunklin 13 7 0 1 0 5 0 0 0
Howell 4 0 0 0 0 9 0 2 0
Iron 5 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Madison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maries 4 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Mississippi 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
New Madrid 8 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Oregon 2 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0
Pemiscot 23 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 1
Perry 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 2
Phelps 16 7 0 0 1 1 0 2 2
Pulaski 12 9 0 1 0 1 2 0 0
Reynolds 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ripley 5 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 0
Scott 9 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Francois 9 1 0 0 0 7 0 1 1
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Stoddard 19 2 0 2 0 3 0 4 0
Texas 9 6 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Washington 12 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Wayne 10 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
* Region Total * 231 111 0 9 1 60 3 16 6
Southwest Barry 10 6 0 0 0 4 1 1 0
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bates 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Benton 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Camden 4 3 0 0 0 2 0 1 0
Cedar 5 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Christian 8 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 1
Dade 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dallas 5 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0
Douglas 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Greene 49 13 0 2 0 24 2 4 9
Henry 5 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
Hickory 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jasper 36 10 0 0 1 9 2 11 3
Laclede 20 9 0 2 0 2 0 1 3
Lawrence 7 2 0 0 1 4 0 11 0
Mcdonald 4 3 0 0 0 3 1 0 0
Miller 4 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 3
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Newton 4 4 0 2 0 6 0 3 0
Ozark 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Polk 8 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0
St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Stone 4 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
Taney 17 3 0 1 1 5 0 8 2
Vernon 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Webster 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wright 12 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0
* Region Total * 215 69 0 8 3 94 8 44 24
Kansas City Jackson 84 93 0 3 0 47 3 22 7
* Region Total * 84 93 0 3 0 47 3 22 7
St. Louis St Louis City 24 22 3 4 0 12 0 12 2
St Louis County 74 26 0 8 1 16 0 4 2
* Region Total * 98 48 3 12 1 28 0 16 4
Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
State Total 948 549 5 42 8 351 22 146 60
59Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2016
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
RF2 RF3 RF4 RFE RFH RFM RFI RFT RHB
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 0 0 13 1 0 0 0 0 0
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 0 2 25 0 4 1 0 2 0
Chariton 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 2 0
Clay 0 0 14 1 0 0 0 2 0
Clinton 0 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0
Cooper 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daviess 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grundy 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0
Harrison 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 3 16 2 2 0 0 0 0
Lafayette 0 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0
Linn 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0
Livingston 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mercer 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pettis 0 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 0
Platte 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0
Sullivan 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 10 124 7 9 1 0 7 0
Northeast Adair 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Audrain 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 2
Boone 9 12 17 3 6 0 0 0 5
Callaway 0 1 5 0 4 0 0 0 0
Clark 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cole 1 2 6 1 0 0 0 0 1
Franklin 0 2 15 1 0 0 0 0 0
Gasconade 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Howard 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jefferson 1 4 13 6 11 0 0 0 2
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lincoln 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Macon 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marion 0 7 6 1 0 0 0 0 0
Monroe 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ralls 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Randolph 0 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shelby 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Charles 1 4 14 0 4 0 0 0 0
Warren 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 13 54 117 13 27 0 0 0 10
Southeast Bollinger 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Butler 0 18 12 2 1 0 0 2 0
Cape Girardeau 0 9 13 0 2 0 0 1 0
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
60Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2016
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
RF2 RF3 RF4 RFE RFH RFM RFI RFT RHB
Southeast Crawford 0 9 4 0 4 0 0 1 0
Dent 0 5 4 0 3 0 0 0 0
Dunklin 0 7 17 0 0 0 0 0 0
Howell 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0
Iron 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Madison 0 4 4 1 1 0 0 0 0
Maries 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
New Madrid 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Oregon 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
Pemiscot 0 13 8 0 1 0 0 0 0
Perry 0 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0
Phelps 0 9 9 1 5 0 0 0 0
Pulaski 0 4 7 0 7 1 1 0 0
Reynolds 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ripley 0 2 5 0 1 0 0 0 0
Scott 0 7 1 1 0 0 0 1 0
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Francois 0 17 16 0 1 0 0 2 2
Ste Genevieve 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0
Stoddard 0 7 12 1 3 1 0 1 0
Texas 0 3 0 2 4 1 1 0 0
Washington 0 9 5 0 0 0 0 1 0
Wayne 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 1 157 142 11 34 3 2 9 2
Southwest Barry 3 6 11 0 3 0 0 0 0
Barton 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
Bates 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Benton 0 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Camden 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cedar 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0
Christian 0 3 4 0 3 0 0 1 0
Dade 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dallas 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Douglas 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Greene 6 9 31 8 15 0 0 0 8
Henry 0 1 5 0 1 0 0 0 0
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jasper 4 17 43 6 5 0 0 8 2
Laclede 0 2 11 0 3 0 0 0 0
Lawrence 1 4 13 0 3 0 0 1 0
Mcdonald 2 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0
Miller 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Newton 0 4 7 0 1 0 0 0 0
Ozark 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Polk 0 0 7 1 2 0 0 0 0
St Clair 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stone 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0
Taney 0 6 15 7 5 0 0 0 0
Vernon 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Webster 0 5 3 1 2 0 0 0 0
Wright 0 0 6 1 1 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 16 68 205 28 47 0 0 10 10
Kansas City Jackson 2 30 62 26 13 2 0 4 4
* Region Total * 2 30 62 26 13 2 0 4 4
St. Louis St Louis City 4 8 42 6 18 1 0 1 11
St Louis County 3 14 36 12 28 2 0 1 1
* Region Total * 7 22 78 18 46 3 0 2 12
Other Icama 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
State Total 39 341 730 103 176 9 2 32 38
61Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2016
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
RHM RHO RHU RUN SCH TLA TLG TLS TOTAL
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 8
Buchanan 0 14 6 0 0 0 1 0 72
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
Carroll 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Cass 0 30 43 6 0 0 4 6 218
Chariton 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 35
Clay 1 28 37 0 0 0 0 1 186
Clinton 0 21 4 0 0 0 0 1 72
Cooper 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 21
Daviess 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 28
De Kalb 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 29
Gentry 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 17
Grundy 0 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 43
Harrison 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 34
Holt 0 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 17
Johnson 0 25 9 0 0 0 2 1 124
Lafayette 0 14 5 0 0 0 1 0 47
Linn 0 11 7 0 0 0 1 0 60
Livingston 0 17 1 0 0 0 1 0 47
Mercer 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 11
Nodaway 0 8 9 0 0 0 0 0 41
Pettis 0 11 7 0 0 0 0 0 69
Platte 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 31
Putnam 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 24
Ray 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 17
Saline 0 19 11 0 0 0 0 0 58
Sullivan 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 26
Worth 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
* Region Total * 1 261 171 6 0 0 11 9 1,345
Northeast Adair 1 19 5 0 0 0 0 0 85
Audrain 1 26 3 1 0 0 1 1 108
Boone 1 61 26 0 0 0 3 1 308
Callaway 0 30 18 0 0 0 1 0 119
Clark 0 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 41
Cole 0 13 8 0 0 0 1 0 118
Franklin 0 84 28 1 0 0 3 3 333
Gasconade 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 41
Howard 0 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 25
Jefferson 0 165 152 2 0 0 0 2 691
Knox 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 4
Lewis 0 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 33
Lincoln 0 29 3 0 0 0 1 1 90
Macon 0 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 46
Marion 0 19 10 0 0 0 1 0 153
Monroe 1 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 20
Montgomery 0 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 37
Osage 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 19
Pike 0 14 2 0 0 0 1 0 54
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11
Randolph 0 23 18 0 0 0 0 0 117
Schuyler 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 8
Scotland 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 16
Shelby 0 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 24
St Charles 0 79 31 2 0 0 3 2 327
Warren 1 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 52
* Region Total * 5 646 358 6 0 0 16 10 2,880
Southeast Bollinger 0 20 24 0 0 0 0 0 69
Butler 1 39 28 0 0 0 0 0 212
Cape Girardeau 0 75 39 0 0 1 3 2 273
Carter 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
62Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2016
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
RHM RHO RHU RUN SCH TLA TLG TLS TOTAL
Southeast Crawford 0 10 17 0 0 0 1 0 79
Dent 0 10 10 0 0 0 1 1 75
Dunklin 1 39 34 0 0 0 0 0 165
Howell 0 6 3 0 1 0 4 2 63
Iron 0 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 34
Madison 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 37
Maries 0 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 32
Mississippi 0 8 9 0 0 0 0 0 38
New Madrid 0 15 11 0 0 0 0 0 75
Oregon 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 25
Pemiscot 0 35 20 0 0 0 0 0 157
Perry 1 6 12 0 0 0 0 0 48
Phelps 2 54 26 0 0 0 1 1 185
Pulaski 1 27 25 0 0 0 0 0 170
Reynolds 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 14
Ripley 1 10 10 0 0 0 1 1 72
Scott 0 48 33 0 0 0 0 0 153
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3
St Francois 2 44 4 2 0 0 2 1 200
Ste Genevieve 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 32
Stoddard 1 30 13 0 0 0 0 0 140
Texas 1 15 9 0 0 0 0 0 70
Washington 1 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 117
Wayne 0 14 0 0 0 1 1 0 54
* Region Total * 12 589 338 2 1 2 15 9 2,596
Southwest Barry 0 31 9 0 0 1 1 0 157
Barton 0 16 4 0 0 0 2 0 37
Bates 0 23 2 0 0 0 0 1 47
Benton 0 4 3 0 0 0 2 1 29
Camden 0 22 9 0 0 1 0 0 94
Cedar 0 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 48
Christian 0 32 7 1 0 0 0 0 126
Dade 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 14
Dallas 1 5 2 0 0 1 0 1 49
Douglas 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 24
Greene 6 91 40 1 0 0 2 10 674
Henry 0 13 11 0 0 0 0 1 72
Hickory 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
Jasper 3 86 25 2 0 0 1 7 420
Laclede 0 40 14 0 0 0 0 0 161
Lawrence 0 52 2 0 0 2 4 1 180
Mcdonald 0 23 11 0 0 0 1 1 76
Miller 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 51
Moniteau 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
Morgan 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 30
Newton 0 34 13 2 0 0 1 0 138
Ozark 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 15
Polk 0 20 2 0 0 0 1 1 75
St Clair 0 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 31
Stone 0 25 6 0 0 0 0 0 92
Taney 0 41 19 0 0 0 2 1 271
Vernon 1 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 35
Webster 1 7 8 0 0 0 1 1 58
Wright 0 18 2 0 0 0 0 2 91
* Region Total * 12 647 204 6 0 5 18 30 3,117
Kansas City Jackson 3 284 374 31 1 2 15 14 1,839
* Region Total * 3 284 374 31 1 2 15 14 1,839
St. Louis St Louis City 5 171 61 14 0 0 1 17 725
St Louis County 3 228 145 9 0 0 5 17 999
* Region Total * 8 399 206 23 0 0 6 34 1,724
Other Icama 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
* Region Total * 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
State Total 41 2,828 1,651 74 2 9 81 106 13,510
63Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 21.
Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During October 2016
by Case Manager County and Placement Category at Time of Exit
Group Home/
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total
Home Home Home Care Other Exits
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 1 1 0 0 2
Buchanan 0 1 0 0 0 1
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 0 1 0 0 1 2
Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clay 0 1 0 1 1 3
Clinton 0 0 2 0 0 2
Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0
De Kalb 0 3 2 0 0 5
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0
Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lafayette 0 0 5 0 0 5
Linn 0 1 0 0 0 1
Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mercer 0 0 1 0 0 1
Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pettis 0 3 3 0 0 6
Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 0 1 2 0 0 3
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 12 16 1 2 31
Northeast Adair 0 3 0 0 0 3
Audrain 0 1 0 0 0 1
Boone 0 3 7 0 1 11
Callaway 0 1 0 0 0 1
Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cole 0 4 2 0 0 6
Franklin 0 2 2 0 0 4
Gasconade 0 0 1 0 0 1
Howard 0 0 4 0 0 4
Jefferson 0 3 13 0 2 18
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lincoln 0 0 0 0 0 0
Macon 0 0 2 0 0 2
Marion 0 1 0 0 0 1
Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0
Montgomery 0 1 0 0 0 1
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 0 2 2 0 0 4
Ralls 0 0 0 0 1 1
Randolph 0 2 0 0 0 2
Schuyler 0 0 1 0 0 1
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Charles 0 9 3 0 1 13
Warren 0 0 1 0 0 1
* Region Total * 0 32 38 0 5 75
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 2 0 0 2
Butler 0 1 0 0 0 1
Cape Girardeau 0 1 8 1 0 10
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0
64Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 21.
Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During October 2016
by Case Manager County and Placement Category at Time of Exit
Group Home/
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total
Home Home Home Care Other Exits
Southeast Crawford 0 1 6 0 0 7
Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dunklin 0 1 1 0 0 2
Howell 0 2 2 0 0 4
Iron 0 0 1 0 0 1
Madison 0 0 0 1 0 1
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 1 0 0 1
New Madrid 0 0 0 0 0 0
Oregon 0 0 1 0 0 1
Pemiscot 0 0 2 0 0 2
Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0
Phelps 0 0 6 6 0 12
Pulaski 0 0 2 0 0 2
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 1 1
Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scott 0 0 6 0 0 6
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Francois 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ste Genevieve 0 4 0 0 0 4
Stoddard 0 1 14 1 1 17
Texas 0 1 0 0 0 1
Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 12 52 9 2 75
Southwest Barry 0 4 3 2 0 9
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bates 0 0 0 0 1 1
Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Camden 0 0 8 0 0 8
Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0
Christian 0 0 2 0 2 4
Dade 0 0 0 1 1 2
Dallas 0 0 1 0 0 1
Douglas 0 0 0 0 1 1
Greene 1 11 4 2 2 20
Henry 0 0 3 0 0 3
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jasper 1 10 10 1 0 22
Laclede 0 1 4 1 0 6
Lawrence 0 3 9 0 0 12
Mcdonald 0 2 1 0 0 3
Miller 0 0 1 0 0 1
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0
Newton 0 0 3 0 2 5
Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0
Polk 0 1 0 0 0 1
St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stone 0 0 1 0 0 1
Taney 0 2 1 1 0 4
Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 0
Webster 0 0 1 0 0 1
Wright 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 2 34 52 8 9 105
Kansas City Jackson 1 7 22 4 3 37
* Region Total * 1 7 22 4 3 37
St. Louis St Louis City 0 2 4 0 3 9
St Louis County 0 3 15 2 3 23
* Region Total * 0 5 19 2 6 32
Other Icama 0 0 2 0 0 2
* Region Total * 0 0 2 0 0 2
State Total 3 102 201 24 27 357
65Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 22.
Children Closed from Alternative Care During October 2016
by Case Manager County and Reason for Case Closing
Returned Other Living with Achieved Total
Home Agency Other Relatives Independence Other Closings
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 1 0 0 1
Buchanan 1 1 0 0 0 2
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 3 3
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 1 0 0 1 0 2
Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clay 0 0 0 1 2 3
Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0
De Kalb 3 0 0 0 0 3
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0
Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lafayette 1 0 1 0 0 2
Linn 1 0 0 0 0 1
Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mercer 0 0 0 1 0 1
Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pettis 3 0 0 0 0 3
Platte 0 0 0 0 2 2
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 10 1 2 3 7 23
Northeast Adair 1 0 1 0 2 4
Audrain 0 0 0 0 0 0
Boone 7 0 0 1 0 8
Callaway 1 0 0 0 0 1
Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cole 0 0 0 0 0 0
Franklin 2 0 0 0 2 4
Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0
Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jefferson 10 0 0 1 3 14
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lincoln 0 0 0 0 0 0
Macon 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marion 0 0 0 0 0 0
Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 4 0 0 0 1 5
Ralls 0 0 0 0 1 1
Randolph 2 0 0 0 0 2
Schuyler 1 0 0 0 0 1
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Charles 7 0 0 0 2 9
Warren 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 35 0 1 2 12 50
Southeast Bollinger 2 0 0 0 0 2
Butler 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cape Girardeau 1 0 1 1 1 4
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0
Crawford 3 0 0 0 2 5
66Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 22.
Children Closed from Alternative Care During October 2016
by Case Manager County and Reason for Case Closing
Returned Other Living with Achieved Total
Home Agency Other Relatives Independence Other Closings
Southeast Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dunklin 1 0 0 0 0 1
Howell 4 0 0 0 1 5
Iron 1 0 0 0 0 1
Madison 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 1 1
New Madrid 0 0 0 0 0 0
Oregon 0 0 0 0 1 1
Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 0 0
Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0
Phelps 5 0 1 1 0 7
Pulaski 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 1 1
Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scott 3 0 0 0 0 3
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Francois 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ste Genevieve 4 0 0 0 0 4
Stoddard 15 0 0 0 2 17
Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0
Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 39 0 2 2 9 52
Southwest Barry 8 0 0 0 0 8
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bates 0 0 0 1 0 1
Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Camden 8 0 0 0 1 9
Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0
Christian 3 0 0 1 1 5
Dade 1 0 0 1 0 2
Dallas 1 0 0 0 0 1
Douglas 0 0 0 1 0 1
Greene 6 1 0 3 4 14
Henry 0 0 0 0 1 1
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jasper 3 0 0 1 0 4
Laclede 2 0 0 0 1 3
Lawrence 9 0 0 0 0 9
Mcdonald 1 0 0 0 0 1
Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0
Newton 3 1 0 1 3 8
Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0
Polk 1 0 0 0 0 1
St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stone 1 0 0 0 0 1
Taney 3 0 1 0 0 4
Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 0
Webster 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wright 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 50 2 1 9 11 73
Kansas City Jackson 10 0 0 1 7 18
* Region Total * 10 0 0 1 7 18
St. Louis St Louis City 1 0 0 4 1 6
St Louis County 9 0 0 2 4 15
* Region Total * 10 0 0 6 5 21
Other Icama 0 0 0 0 10 10
* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 10 10
State Total 154 3 6 23 61 247
67Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 23.
Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of October 2016
With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody
Temporary Adoptions No Identified
Legal Status 1 Legal Status 1 Adoptive Finalized Total Adoptive
TPR Incomplete TPR Complete Custody During Month Children Resource
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 3 2 0 1 6 5
Buchanan 7 1 0 0 8 6
Caldwell 0 3 0 0 3 3
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 30 3 0 0 33 29
Chariton 3 4 0 0 7 7
Clay 12 11 0 0 23 13
Clinton 11 1 0 0 12 10
Cooper 4 0 0 0 4 4
Daviess 5 2 0 0 7 3
De Kalb 6 0 0 0 6 4
Gentry 1 0 0 0 1 1
Grundy 3 1 0 0 4 1
Harrison 0 1 0 0 1 0
Holt 8 0 0 0 8 4
Johnson 5 7 0 0 12 7
Lafayette 2 0 0 0 2 2
Linn 5 0 0 0 5 4
Livingston 11 0 0 0 11 11
Mercer 5 1 0 0 6 4
Nodaway 5 3 0 0 8 5
Pettis 6 4 0 0 10 8
Platte 4 0 0 0 4 4
Putnam 13 0 0 0 13 9
Ray 7 0 0 0 7 7
Saline 16 0 0 3 19 12
Sullivan 6 1 0 0 7 3
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 178 45 0 4 227 166
Northeast Adair 11 5 0 1 17 8
Audrain 36 6 0 1 43 30
Boone 12 9 0 1 22 14
Callaway 13 3 0 0 16 12
Clark 4 1 0 0 5 4
Cole 5 3 0 3 11 4
Franklin 42 10 1 0 53 33
Gasconade 2 0 0 0 2 0
Howard 5 0 0 0 5 4
Jefferson 62 35 0 0 97 57
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lincoln 4 8 0 0 12 8
Macon 4 1 0 2 7 4
Marion 13 0 0 1 14 8
Monroe 1 1 0 0 2 0
Montgomery 1 0 0 1 2 1
Osage 1 0 0 0 1 1
Pike 5 4 0 0 9 9
Ralls 2 0 0 0 2 0
Randolph 10 0 0 0 10 5
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 1 0 0 1 1
Shelby 1 0 0 0 1 1
St Charles 29 16 2 2 49 41
Warren 4 1 0 0 5 3
* Region Total * 267 104 3 12 386 248
Southeast Bollinger 3 1 0 0 4 4
Butler 31 17 0 0 48 32
Cape Girardeau 17 13 0 1 31 10
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0
Crawford 13 9 0 0 22 14
Note: Column "No Identified Adoptive Resource" added July 2016 68
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 23.
Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of October 2016
With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody
Temporary Adoptions No Identified
In Legal Status 1 In Legal Status 1 Adoptive Finalized Total Adoptive
TPR Incomplete TPR Complete Custody During Month Children Resource
Southeast Dent 13 5 0 0 18 15
Dunklin 10 0 1 0 11 4
Howell 2 0 0 0 2 2
Iron 7 2 0 0 9 8
Madison 2 13 1 0 16 9
Maries 5 0 0 0 5 5
Mississippi 3 0 0 0 3 0
New Madrid 13 6 0 0 19 12
Oregon 0 1 0 0 1 1
Pemiscot 6 9 1 2 18 13
Perry 1 1 0 0 2 1
Phelps 17 6 0 1 24 17
Pulaski 30 4 0 0 34 31
Reynolds 1 2 0 0 3 3
Ripley 4 3 0 0 7 0
Scott 13 3 0 0 16 10
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Francois 23 8 0 0 31 24
Ste Genevieve 1 1 0 0 2 0
Stoddard 8 2 0 0 10 8
Texas 20 7 0 1 28 22
Washington 8 11 0 0 19 10
Wayne 11 6 0 0 17 17
* Region Total * 262 130 3 5 400 272
Southwest Barry 40 1 0 1 42 17
Barton 4 1 0 0 5 5
Bates 6 0 0 0 6 1
Benton 0 3 0 0 3 2
Camden 5 4 0 0 9 3
Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0
Christian 17 5 0 0 22 14
Dade 1 0 0 0 1 1
Dallas 12 1 0 0 13 6
Douglas 4 1 0 0 5 5
Greene 107 144 0 8 259 107
Henry 13 5 0 0 18 12
Hickory 4 1 0 0 5 3
Jasper 106 10 25 5 146 56
Laclede 11 8 0 0 19 4
Lawrence 51 3 0 3 57 39
Mcdonald 12 4 0 1 17 8
Miller 1 0 0 0 1 1
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 2 4 0 0 6 3
Newton 27 8 0 0 35 20
Ozark 2 0 0 0 2 1
Polk 20 1 0 1 22 10
St Clair 1 2 0 0 3 3
Stone 8 6 0 0 14 4
Taney 42 31 0 1 74 39
Vernon 2 1 0 0 3 1
Webster 3 1 0 1 5 2
Wright 15 3 2 0 20 7
* Region Total * 516 248 27 21 812 374
Kansas City Jackson 434 63 0 11 508 359
* Region Total * 434 63 0 11 508 359
St. Louis St Louis City 68 21 2 0 91 68
St Louis County 114 20 1 5 140 84
* Region Total * 182 41 3 5 231 152
Other Icama 1 0 34 0 35 0
* Region Total * 1 0 34 0 35 0
State Total 1,840 631 70 58 2,599 1,571
Note: Column "No Identified Adoptive Resource" added July 2016 69
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 24.
Licensed Children's Division Resource Homes on the Last Day of October 2016
by Vendor Type and County
Current Licensed
Career Foster Foster Relative/ Newly Number of Vendors
Foster Adoptive Group Foster Kinship Licensed Vendors in Licensed 12 Months Percentage
Home Home Home Home Home Vendors Use Vendors Ago Change
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 3 6 1 5 9 9 0.00%
Atchison 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 3 4 -25.00%
Buchanan 5 1 0 24 16 1 27 38 37 2.70%
Caldwell 0 0 0 4 3 1 5 7 11 -36.36%
Carroll 0 0 0 1 4 0 3 5 4 25.00%
Cass 4 0 1 44 34 1 45 66 74 -10.81%
Chariton 0 0 0 4 9 0 4 12 9 33.33%
Clay 5 0 0 96 50 2 89 135 123 9.76%
Clinton 0 0 0 14 7 0 11 20 25 -20.00%
Cooper 2 0 0 6 6 1 5 10 9 11.11%
Daviess 0 0 0 5 8 2 10 11 8 37.50%
De Kalb 0 0 0 4 6 0 7 9 8 12.50%
Gentry 0 0 0 3 2 0 3 5 8 -37.50%
Grundy 0 0 0 3 7 0 6 10 8 25.00%
Harrison 0 0 0 2 5 1 3 7 8 -12.50%
Holt 0 0 0 1 2 0 2 3 3 0.00%
Johnson 2 0 0 28 27 4 28 47 38 23.68%
Lafayette 1 1 0 18 11 2 21 26 26 0.00%
Linn 1 0 0 6 9 0 7 15 16 -6.25%
Livingston 0 0 0 6 7 1 8 11 16 -31.25%
Mercer 0 0 0 1 4 1 3 5 2 150.00%
Nodaway 0 0 0 10 10 1 6 19 16 18.75%
Pettis 0 0 0 16 8 0 18 23 24 -4.17%
Platte 2 0 0 32 9 0 25 39 45 -13.33%
Putnam 0 0 0 4 2 0 5 5 5 0.00%
Ray 0 0 0 7 10 0 13 17 21 -19.05%
Saline 0 0 0 1 12 1 8 13 10 30.00%
Sullivan 0 0 0 2 4 0 2 5 9 -44.44%
Worth 1 0 0 2 2 0 3 3 2 50.00%
* Region Total * 23 2 1 348 282 20 373 578 578 0.00%
Northeast Adair 3 0 0 18 23 0 24 36 23 56.52%
Audrain 0 0 0 10 34 1 27 42 33 27.27%
Boone 6 0 0 48 38 2 49 81 84 -3.57%
Callaway 1 0 0 12 22 2 23 34 25 36.00%
Clark 0 0 0 7 11 1 10 16 11 45.46%
Cole 2 0 1 38 14 1 33 46 60 -23.33%
Franklin 1 0 1 42 45 3 64 86 85 1.18%
Gasconade 0 0 0 4 5 0 5 8 12 -33.33%
Howard 0 0 0 4 6 0 4 10 7 42.86%
Jefferson 2 0 0 58 73 4 94 127 141 -9.93%
Knox 0 0 0 4 1 0 4 5 8 -37.50%
Lewis 0 0 0 3 6 0 5 9 9 0.00%
Lincoln 1 0 0 23 22 0 37 45 32 40.63%
Macon 0 0 0 7 14 2 6 20 21 -4.76%
Marion 3 0 0 40 20 1 38 57 57 0.00%
Monroe 0 0 0 5 8 1 7 13 15 -13.33%
Montgomery 0 0 0 5 9 1 8 14 11 27.27%
Osage 1 0 0 6 5 1 7 10 8 25.00%
Pike 0 0 0 13 9 0 16 22 18 22.22%
Ralls 0 0 0 10 7 0 10 15 14 7.14%
Randolph 6 0 0 19 17 1 24 35 40 -12.50%
Schuyler 0 0 0 3 4 0 3 5 4 25.00%
Scotland 0 0 0 3 5 0 4 6 6 0.00%
Shelby 0 0 0 7 16 0 9 23 11 109.09%
St Charles 10 0 0 68 64 4 82 127 97 30.93%
Warren 0 0 0 11 25 0 16 34 42 -19.05%
* Region Total * 36 0 2 468 503 25 609 926 874 5.95%
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 8 13 0 16 20 17 17.65%
Butler 1 0 0 20 35 4 38 52 65 -20.00%
Cape Girardeau 2 0 1 47 61 6 76 106 95 11.58%
Carter 1 0 0 7 6 1 7 13 8 62.50%
70Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 24.
Licensed Children's Division Resource Homes on the Last Day of October 2016
by Vendor Type and County
Current Licensed
Career Foster Foster Relative/ Newly Number of Vendors
Foster Adoptive Group Foster Kinship Licensed Vendors in Licensed 12 Months Percentage
Home Home Home Home Home Vendors Use Vendors Ago Change
Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 12 17 0 19 29 25 16.00%
Dent 1 0 0 3 14 2 10 16 10 60.00%
Dunklin 0 0 0 17 36 6 41 53 33 60.61%
Howell 0 0 0 21 15 0 19 34 37 -8.11%
Iron 0 0 0 5 10 0 11 15 9 66.67%
Madison 0 0 0 8 17 4 20 24 21 14.29%
Maries 0 0 0 2 4 0 2 6 7 -14.29%
Mississippi 0 0 0 1 3 0 3 3 6 -50.00%
New Madrid 0 0 0 15 18 0 20 30 27 11.11%
Oregon 0 0 0 5 4 1 6 8 7 14.29%
Pemiscot 1 0 0 12 36 0 27 48 34 41.18%
Perry 0 0 0 8 8 0 12 16 17 -5.88%
Phelps 2 0 0 28 36 4 39 63 51 23.53%
Pulaski 1 1 0 24 28 2 34 52 41 26.83%
Reynolds 0 0 0 5 3 0 6 8 5 60.00%
Ripley 0 0 0 20 17 0 27 34 35 -2.86%
Scott 1 0 0 18 39 2 42 54 40 35.00%
Shannon 1 0 0 5 0 0 2 5 7 -28.57%
St Francois 0 0 0 38 33 2 49 68 61 11.48%
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 6 8 2 10 13 7 85.71%
Stoddard 0 0 0 19 30 1 31 47 39 20.51%
Texas 0 0 0 10 9 1 9 19 25 -24.00%
Washington 0 0 0 11 22 1 24 33 27 22.22%
Wayne 0 0 0 3 13 0 7 16 11 45.46%
* Region Total * 11 1 1 378 535 39 607 885 767 15.39%
Southwest Barry 0 0 0 17 20 0 20 35 43 -18.61%
Barton 0 0 0 18 12 1 20 27 17 58.82%
Bates 1 0 0 14 21 0 25 34 18 88.89%
Benton 2 0 0 13 5 0 11 17 20 -15.00%
Camden 2 0 2 18 23 3 24 35 33 6.06%
Cedar 0 0 0 8 11 0 7 17 17 0.00%
Christian 6 0 0 86 30 5 62 103 105 -1.91%
Dade 0 0 0 5 6 0 5 11 7 57.14%
Dallas 0 0 0 16 11 0 18 26 23 13.04%
Douglas 0 0 0 11 11 1 12 22 20 10.00%
Greene 7 0 0 261 69 7 174 307 305 0.66%
Henry 0 0 0 31 23 1 30 52 42 23.81%
Hickory 1 0 0 6 5 0 8 10 13 -23.08%
Jasper 8 0 1 110 77 2 98 168 195 -13.85%
Laclede 5 0 0 33 20 0 33 45 40 12.50%
Lawrence 0 0 0 24 36 0 39 58 70 -17.14%
Mcdonald 1 0 0 18 18 1 23 33 37 -10.81%
Miller 0 0 0 6 8 0 10 14 18 -22.22%
Moniteau 2 0 0 10 6 0 10 15 14 7.14%
Morgan 0 0 0 8 6 0 12 14 18 -22.22%
Newton 3 0 0 41 30 3 45 68 85 -20.00%
Ozark 0 0 0 2 6 0 6 8 13 -38.46%
Polk 3 0 0 32 20 2 33 47 52 -9.62%
St Clair 0 0 0 6 7 0 7 12 9 33.33%
Stone 2 0 0 31 18 1 27 42 35 20.00%
Taney 2 0 0 38 29 5 45 65 68 -4.41%
Vernon 0 0 0 5 9 0 11 13 9 44.44%
Webster 0 0 0 33 10 0 27 43 44 -2.27%
Wright 1 0 0 14 18 1 17 30 35 -14.29%
* Region Total * 46 0 3 915 565 33 859 1,371 1,405 -2.42%
Kansas City Jackson 54 1 1 355 200 16 315 470 541 -13.12%
* Region Total * 54 1 1 355 200 16 315 470 541 -13.12%
St. Louis St Louis City 13 0 0 65 66 2 86 129 147 -12.25%
St Louis County 30 4 0 179 199 6 231 356 314 13.38%
* Region Total * 43 4 0 244 265 8 317 485 461 5.21%
State Total 213 8 8 2,708 2,350 141 3,080 4,715 4,626 1.92%
71Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 25.
Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of October 2016
by Case Manager County and Legal Status
Total
LS 1 LS 2 LS 3 LS 4 LS 5 LS 6 LS 7 LS 8 LS 9 LS V Children
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 8 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 11
Buchanan 72 0 0 3 112 0 0 2 55 0 244
Caldwell 5 0 3 0 218 0 0 0 122 0 348
Carroll 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5
Cass 218 0 0 8 242 0 2 3 64 0 537
Chariton 35 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 37
Clay 186 0 0 17 396 0 0 0 88 0 687
Clinton 72 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 17 0 94
Cooper 21 0 0 0 7 0 0 1 12 0 41
Daviess 28 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 32
De Kalb 29 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 22 0 80
Gentry 17 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 3 0 24
Grundy 43 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 44
Harrison 34 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 36
Holt 17 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 4 0 29
Johnson 124 0 0 2 116 0 0 0 33 0 275
Lafayette 47 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 4 0 55
Linn 60 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 64
Livingston 47 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 10 0 64
Mercer 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11
Nodaway 41 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 14 0 105
Pettis 69 0 0 1 130 0 0 1 43 0 244
Platte 31 0 0 2 136 0 0 0 27 0 196
Putnam 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24
Ray 17 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 21
Saline 58 0 0 2 146 0 1 0 40 0 247
Sullivan 26 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 27
Worth 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 5
* Region Total * 1,345 0 3 42 1,620 0 4 9 564 0 3,587
Northeast Adair 85 0 0 0 68 0 1 0 44 0 198
Audrain 108 0 0 4 22 0 0 0 11 0 145
Boone 308 0 3 4 335 0 1 2 202 0 855
Callaway 119 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 125
Clark 41 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 15 0 64
Cole 118 0 0 13 196 0 0 0 109 0 436
Franklin 333 1 0 0 271 0 1 1 144 0 751
Gasconade 41 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 10 0 57
Howard 25 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 13 0 45
Jefferson 691 0 1 8 539 0 1 0 457 0 1,697
Knox 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 6
Lewis 33 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 3 0 40
Lincoln 90 0 0 0 122 0 0 0 75 0 287
Macon 46 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 34 0 128
Marion 153 0 0 0 92 0 0 0 68 0 313
Monroe 20 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 4 0 30
Montgomery 37 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 29 0 116
Osage 19 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 24
Pike 54 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 8 0 74
Ralls 11 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 4 0 23
Randolph 117 0 0 0 83 0 0 1 75 0 276
Schuyler 8 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 4 0 18
Scotland 16 0 0 0 7 0 1 0 8 0 32
Shelby 24 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 5 0 51
St Charles 327 2 1 9 384 0 2 1 163 0 889
Warren 52 0 0 0 79 0 1 0 50 0 182
* Region Total * 2,880 3 5 38 2,380 0 8 5 1,543 0 6,862
Southeast Bollinger 69 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 72
Butler 212 0 0 1 109 0 1 0 93 0 416
Cape Girardeau 273 0 0 1 161 0 1 1 167 0 604
Carter 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 6
Crawford 79 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 0 87
72Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 25.
Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of October 2016
by Case Manager County and Legal Status
Total
LS 1 LS 2 LS 3 LS 4 LS 5 LS 6 LS 7 LS 8 LS 9 LS V Children
Southeast Dent 75 0 0 0 142 0 0 2 59 0 278
Dunklin 165 1 0 0 55 0 1 0 79 0 301
Howell 63 0 0 2 38 0 1 1 30 0 135
Iron 34 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 45 0 106
Madison 37 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 40
Maries 32 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 11 0 47
Mississippi 38 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 29 0 70
New Madrid 75 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 22 0 101
Oregon 25 0 0 7 49 0 0 0 24 0 105
Pemiscot 157 1 0 2 58 0 1 0 75 0 294
Perry 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 52
Phelps 185 0 0 0 50 0 0 2 27 0 264
Pulaski 170 0 0 1 260 0 0 1 95 0 527
Reynolds 14 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 18
Ripley 72 0 0 0 110 0 0 3 56 0 241
Scott 153 0 0 0 78 0 0 0 104 0 335
Shannon 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4
St Francois 200 0 0 2 354 0 0 4 120 0 680
Ste Genevieve 32 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 34
Stoddard 140 0 0 1 135 0 1 3 129 0 409
Texas 70 0 0 1 37 0 0 1 18 0 127
Washington 117 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 118
Wayne 54 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 2 0 69
* Region Total * 2,596 3 0 23 1,695 0 6 22 1,194 1 5,540
Southwest Barry 157 0 0 1 275 0 0 0 63 0 496
Barton 37 0 0 0 88 0 0 0 12 0 137
Bates 47 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 2 0 54
Benton 29 0 0 1 29 0 0 0 17 0 76
Camden 94 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 97
Cedar 48 0 0 4 39 0 1 0 6 0 98
Christian 126 0 0 1 311 0 0 0 45 0 483
Dade 14 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 15
Dallas 49 0 0 0 77 0 0 0 20 0 146
Douglas 24 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 3 0 48
Greene 674 0 0 8 1,110 0 1 33 189 0 2,015
Henry 72 0 0 1 128 0 0 0 56 0 257
Hickory 10 0 0 1 36 0 0 0 2 0 49
Jasper 420 25 0 9 734 0 3 0 147 0 1,338
Laclede 161 0 0 2 360 0 0 0 68 0 591
Lawrence 180 0 0 1 179 0 0 0 21 0 381
Mcdonald 76 0 0 2 105 0 0 0 19 0 202
Miller 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 66
Moniteau 12 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 7 0 21
Morgan 30 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 8 0 40
Newton 138 0 0 5 361 0 0 0 68 0 572
Ozark 15 0 0 3 12 0 0 0 2 0 32
Polk 75 0 0 0 93 0 0 0 28 0 196
St Clair 31 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 36
Stone 92 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 93
Taney 271 0 0 3 135 0 1 0 52 0 462
Vernon 35 0 0 0 17 0 1 0 7 0 60
Webster 58 0 0 2 103 0 0 0 18 0 181
Wright 91 2 0 1 78 0 0 0 94 0 266
* Region Total * 3,117 27 0 54 4,297 0 7 33 973 0 8,508
Kansas City Jackson 1,839 0 11 7 2,462 0 19 11 404 0 4,753
* Region Total * 1,839 0 11 7 2,462 0 19 11 404 0 4,753
St. Louis St Louis City 725 2 2 7 1,159 0 7 0 471 0 2,373
St Louis County 999 1 2 22 1,170 0 9 13 454 0 2,670
* Region Total * 1,724 3 4 29 2,329 0 16 13 925 0 5,043
Other Icama 9 34 2 24 2,020 0 0 0 19 0 2,108
* Region Total * 9 34 2 24 2,020 0 0 0 19 0 2,108
State Total 13,510 70 25 217 16,803 0 60 93 5,622 1 36,401
73Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 26.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2016
by Case Manager County and Goal
Total
01 AD 05 06 07 08 09 Children
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 8
Buchanan 53 8 0 3 7 1 0 72
Caldwell 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 5
Carroll 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Cass 147 33 0 26 4 2 6 218
Chariton 21 7 0 0 2 0 5 35
Clay 145 23 0 10 6 2 0 186
Clinton 54 12 0 5 0 0 1 72
Cooper 11 4 0 3 1 0 2 21
Daviess 15 7 0 2 3 0 1 28
De Kalb 19 6 0 1 3 0 0 29
Gentry 13 1 0 2 0 0 1 17
Grundy 33 4 0 2 4 0 0 43
Harrison 29 1 0 1 1 0 2 34
Holt 7 8 0 0 0 1 1 17
Johnson 86 12 0 15 5 3 3 124
Lafayette 31 2 0 6 5 0 3 47
Linn 37 5 0 6 3 5 4 60
Livingston 25 11 0 5 6 0 0 47
Mercer 3 6 0 0 2 0 0 11
Nodaway 20 8 0 3 4 0 6 41
Pettis 40 10 0 5 8 0 6 69
Platte 16 4 0 9 2 0 0 31
Putnam 7 13 0 1 3 0 0 24
Ray 7 7 0 3 0 0 0 17
Saline 36 16 0 2 2 0 2 58
Sullivan 13 7 0 2 0 3 1 26
Worth 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
* Region Total * 876 223 0 112 73 17 44 1,345
Northeast Adair 60 16 0 5 3 0 1 85
Audrain 40 42 0 14 6 0 6 108
Boone 222 21 0 23 31 3 8 308
Callaway 84 16 0 5 11 1 2 119
Clark 28 5 0 4 3 0 1 41
Cole 67 8 0 18 25 0 0 118
Franklin 196 52 0 39 35 6 5 333
Gasconade 31 2 0 1 0 7 0 41
Howard 15 5 0 1 3 0 1 25
Jefferson 449 97 0 34 79 2 30 691
Knox 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 4
Lewis 15 0 0 10 2 0 6 33
Lincoln 60 12 0 10 6 0 2 90
Macon 35 5 0 6 0 0 0 46
Marion 96 13 0 15 24 0 5 153
Monroe 14 2 0 1 1 0 2 20
Montgomery 22 1 0 7 3 0 4 37
Osage 18 1 0 0 0 0 0 19
Pike 36 9 0 3 5 1 0 54
Ralls 1 2 0 2 6 0 0 11
Randolph 72 10 0 15 3 0 17 117
Schuyler 0 0 0 3 1 0 4 8
Scotland 13 1 0 2 0 0 0 16
Shelby 18 1 0 0 5 0 0 24
St Charles 210 45 0 39 23 2 8 327
Warren 25 5 0 7 4 0 11 52
* Region Total * 1,830 371 0 265 279 22 113 2,880
Southeast Bollinger 58 4 0 4 3 0 0 69
Butler 104 48 0 21 24 5 10 212
Cape Girardeau 199 30 0 22 12 3 7 273
Carter 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 4
74Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 26.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2016
by Case Manager County and Goal
Total
01 AD 05 06 07 08 09 Children
Southeast Crawford 45 22 0 3 2 1 6 79
Dent 40 18 0 5 5 0 7 75
Dunklin 109 10 0 13 24 0 9 165
Howell 47 2 0 10 1 3 0 63
Iron 20 9 0 1 3 0 1 34
Madison 17 15 0 1 0 0 4 37
Maries 19 5 0 2 6 0 0 32
Mississippi 22 3 0 3 10 0 0 38
New Madrid 38 19 0 5 5 4 4 75
Oregon 14 1 0 2 3 0 5 25
Pemiscot 88 15 0 7 40 4 3 157
Perry 44 2 0 2 0 0 0 48
Phelps 116 23 0 10 21 3 12 185
Pulaski 109 34 0 8 13 0 6 170
Reynolds 9 3 0 1 1 0 0 14
Ripley 31 7 0 17 5 0 12 72
Scott 104 16 0 6 24 0 3 153
Shannon 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 3
St Francois 130 31 0 26 7 0 6 200
Ste Genevieve 23 2 0 3 0 0 4 32
Stoddard 80 10 0 11 28 1 10 140
Texas 37 27 0 4 2 0 0 70
Washington 88 19 0 0 4 3 3 117
Wayne 31 17 0 3 3 0 0 54
* Region Total * 1,627 392 0 191 246 27 113 2,596
Southwest Barry 76 41 0 14 22 1 3 157
Barton 23 5 0 5 4 0 0 37
Bates 31 6 0 1 9 0 0 47
Benton 16 3 0 6 3 1 0 29
Camden 69 9 0 6 6 0 4 94
Cedar 37 0 0 1 3 0 7 48
Christian 83 22 0 11 6 2 2 126
Dade 9 1 0 0 2 0 2 14
Dallas 21 13 0 7 8 0 0 49
Douglas 7 5 0 7 4 0 1 24
Greene 280 251 0 73 48 3 19 674
Henry 35 18 0 14 3 0 2 72
Hickory 2 5 0 1 2 0 0 10
Jasper 220 116 0 34 36 2 12 420
Laclede 118 19 0 9 13 0 2 161
Lawrence 90 54 0 20 16 0 0 180
Mcdonald 46 16 0 9 4 0 1 76
Miller 34 1 0 10 5 1 0 51
Moniteau 4 0 0 3 5 0 0 12
Morgan 18 6 0 5 1 0 0 30
Newton 69 35 0 9 13 2 10 138
Ozark 7 2 0 4 2 0 0 15
Polk 38 21 0 12 3 1 0 75
St Clair 24 3 0 1 2 0 1 31
Stone 56 14 0 8 10 0 4 92
Taney 139 73 0 24 25 1 9 271
Vernon 23 3 0 6 0 0 3 35
Webster 35 4 0 3 16 0 0 58
Wright 49 18 0 11 13 0 0 91
* Region Total * 1,659 764 0 314 284 14 82 3,117
Kansas City Jackson 967 497 0 159 87 10 119 1,839
* Region Total * 967 497 0 159 87 10 119 1,839
St. Louis St Louis City 418 89 0 99 79 12 28 725
St Louis County 553 134 0 100 73 18 121 999
* Region Total * 971 223 0 199 152 30 149 1,724
Other Icama 2 1 0 2 2 1 1 9
* Region Total * 2 1 0 2 2 1 1 9
State Total 7,932 2,471 0 1,242 1,123 121 621 13,510
75Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 27.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2016
by Case Manager County and the Number of Previous
Placements. Most Current Legal Status 1 Spell
Number of Placements Average
Total Number of
1 2 3 4 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 + Children Placements
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
Atchison 6 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 8 1.63
Buchanan 20 25 10 2 1 8 3 3 72 3.76
Caldwell 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 5 4.40
Carroll 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 2.33
Cass 71 38 33 11 14 27 10 13 218 4.69
Chariton 8 5 8 5 2 5 2 0 35 4.03
Clay 83 37 20 9 5 23 4 5 186 3.24
Clinton 24 13 24 2 4 3 2 0 72 2.72
Cooper 6 6 4 0 0 1 3 1 21 4.48
Daviess 11 8 1 2 2 0 2 1 28 3.14
De Kalb 9 15 2 3 0 0 0 0 29 1.97
Gentry 5 6 3 2 0 1 0 0 17 2.47
Grundy 17 12 8 0 1 2 1 2 43 3.40
Harrison 14 9 8 0 1 1 1 0 34 2.38
Holt 10 5 0 1 0 1 0 0 17 1.88
Johnson 51 32 18 6 6 7 3 0 124 2.47
Lafayette 23 8 4 1 5 4 2 0 47 2.94
Linn 14 12 8 9 7 6 1 1 60 3.40
Livingston 11 9 8 6 2 7 3 1 47 4.30
Mercer 2 3 4 0 0 1 1 0 11 3.82
Nodaway 17 9 2 4 1 6 1 1 41 3.39
Pettis 16 19 1 6 6 16 2 3 69 4.80
Platte 5 8 3 2 1 9 3 0 31 4.71
Putnam 6 5 6 4 2 1 0 0 24 2.75
Ray 2 5 6 1 1 2 0 0 17 3.12
Saline 31 14 4 0 2 5 1 1 58 2.43
Sullivan 6 12 4 2 2 0 0 0 26 2.31
Worth 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1.00
* Region Total * 470 318 191 82 65 137 45 32 1,345 3.45
Northeast Adair 31 20 15 8 1 7 2 1 85 3.00
Audrain 42 17 7 7 6 14 8 6 108 4.40
Boone 68 72 45 28 22 42 11 19 308 4.54
Callaway 51 15 13 12 7 16 1 4 119 3.87
Clark 15 2 10 3 1 4 3 3 41 4.85
Cole 33 34 19 7 5 10 6 4 118 3.72
Franklin 124 69 48 27 12 29 10 11 333 3.39
Gasconade 10 14 9 5 0 1 1 1 41 2.98
Howard 15 1 3 0 1 2 2 1 25 4.00
Jefferson 279 175 84 61 32 35 15 10 691 2.87
Knox 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 4.00
Lewis 10 6 3 1 4 7 0 2 33 4.55
Lincoln 37 18 11 7 4 12 0 1 90 2.86
Macon 21 10 9 0 2 3 0 1 46 2.63
Marion 47 30 25 15 5 25 6 0 153 3.39
Monroe 5 3 8 0 2 2 0 0 20 3.00
Montgomery 21 4 6 0 0 5 0 1 37 2.92
Osage 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 1.16
Pike 26 12 9 1 1 3 2 0 54 2.50
Ralls 3 3 1 1 0 2 1 0 11 3.91
Randolph 41 20 22 12 7 10 1 3 117 3.32
Schuyler 1 0 4 0 0 2 0 1 8 6.63
Scotland 7 3 0 1 2 2 0 1 16 3.94
Shelby 13 2 3 2 0 2 2 0 24 3.13
St Charles 127 94 30 29 10 22 4 11 327 3.10
Warren 21 10 5 3 3 6 1 2 52 4.37
* Region Total * 1,066 638 389 230 127 263 77 83 2,880 3.41
Southeast Bollinger 31 23 11 1 1 2 0 0 69 1.91
Butler 86 50 23 12 9 18 9 3 212 3.18
Cape Girardeau 108 62 48 15 11 23 1 5 273 2.82
Carter 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 3.00
76Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 27.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2016
by Case Manager County and the Number of Previous
Placements. Most Current Legal Status 1 Spell
Number of Placements Average
Total Number of
1 2 3 4 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 + Children Placements
Southeast Crawford 35 15 7 7 3 12 0 0 79 2.85
Dent 35 10 6 8 2 11 1 2 75 3.96
Dunklin 67 47 22 9 8 8 1 3 165 2.75
Howell 18 15 5 5 8 5 3 3 63 4.16
Iron 16 9 3 0 1 2 1 1 34 2.76
Madison 17 6 2 3 2 5 1 1 37 3.24
Maries 9 6 15 2 0 0 0 0 32 2.31
Mississippi 12 16 7 1 0 2 0 0 38 2.16
New Madrid 38 13 10 1 5 6 1 0 75 2.36
Oregon 8 3 3 5 2 1 3 0 25 3.92
Pemiscot 49 40 24 10 13 10 5 4 157 3.35
Perry 20 9 12 0 2 3 0 2 48 3.15
Phelps 96 37 24 9 12 5 2 0 185 2.20
Pulaski 61 55 20 9 11 10 4 0 170 2.66
Reynolds 8 1 1 1 0 1 2 0 14 3.57
Ripley 34 20 5 1 1 7 2 2 72 3.00
Scott 75 48 17 2 6 3 2 0 153 1.99
Shannon 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 10.67
St Francois 58 52 24 21 18 19 3 5 200 3.50
Ste Genevieve 14 4 5 3 1 3 0 2 32 3.69
Stoddard 37 41 9 13 15 19 2 3 140 3.62
Texas 27 12 14 3 2 10 1 0 70 2.90
Washington 45 20 23 11 5 11 1 1 117 2.79
Wayne 18 19 6 5 2 4 0 0 54 2.44
* Region Total * 1,024 635 346 157 142 200 45 38 2,596 2.93
Southwest Barry 46 27 23 17 13 23 2 6 157 4.19
Barton 20 5 1 2 0 5 4 0 37 3.62
Bates 23 17 3 1 0 2 0 1 47 2.28
Benton 7 3 2 2 1 9 2 2 29 6.10
Camden 36 21 16 9 1 5 4 2 94 3.35
Cedar 11 9 20 4 1 3 0 0 48 2.75
Christian 52 27 21 8 2 10 3 2 126 2.83
Dade 11 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 14 1.50
Dallas 15 17 6 6 0 4 1 0 49 2.73
Douglas 3 4 3 1 3 7 3 0 24 5.25
Greene 212 145 84 53 48 80 23 24 674 3.96
Henry 19 16 15 6 1 4 5 5 72 5.19
Hickory 2 3 0 2 0 2 0 1 10 5.70
Jasper 103 104 53 41 17 55 25 21 420 4.63
Laclede 43 40 30 19 11 11 2 4 161 3.40
Lawrence 50 29 35 12 13 24 6 11 180 4.71
Mcdonald 32 12 10 9 5 3 2 3 76 3.82
Miller 12 10 7 7 5 4 2 4 51 5.49
Moniteau 5 3 2 0 0 2 0 0 12 2.92
Morgan 14 6 3 1 0 3 0 3 30 3.77
Newton 25 43 12 16 8 18 10 5 138 4.47
Ozark 7 2 3 1 1 1 0 0 15 2.47
Polk 20 26 6 8 1 9 3 2 75 3.65
St Clair 13 7 1 5 2 1 1 1 31 3.42
Stone 15 23 23 9 3 13 6 0 92 3.71
Taney 111 66 30 18 8 24 4 10 271 3.30
Vernon 15 10 1 2 1 1 4 1 35 3.97
Webster 27 11 6 5 1 4 1 3 58 3.40
Wright 26 17 17 6 6 11 4 4 91 4.25
* Region Total * 975 704 434 270 153 338 117 115 3,117 3.95
Kansas City Jackson 679 433 212 139 92 174 60 38 1,839 3.27
* Region Total * 679 433 212 139 92 174 60 38 1,839 3.27
St. Louis St Louis City 195 155 111 61 45 85 33 36 725 4.47
St Louis County 320 288 124 68 44 86 27 33 999 3.61
* Region Total * 515 443 235 129 89 171 60 69 1,724 3.97
Other Icama 5 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 9 4.56
* Region Total * 5 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 9 4.56
State Total 4,734 3,171 1,807 1,008 668 1,285 405 375 13,510 3.50
77Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 28.
Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year and Case Manager County
(FY 2017 Adoptions are Year to Date October 2016)
Total
FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 Adoptions
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 1 1 2
Buchanan 2 2 9 5 8 5 31
Caldwell 14 22 11 14 10 2 73
Carroll 0 1 0 0 1 0 2
Cass 19 23 8 17 20 11 98
Chariton 1 0 0 0 1 0 2
Clay 40 42 30 43 39 4 198
Clinton 0 1 0 1 3 0 5
Cooper 3 0 1 0 0 0 4
Daviess 1 2 0 0 0 0 3
De Kalb 0 1 3 2 16 3 25
Gentry 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Grundy 1 0 0 0 1 0 2
Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Holt 0 5 1 0 0 0 6
Johnson 12 15 16 11 8 4 66
Lafayette 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Linn 0 0 0 0 0 3 3
Livingston 1 1 0 0 3 1 6
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 4 4 0 7 0 15
Pettis 13 15 7 8 5 4 52
Platte 2 18 14 19 12 8 73
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ray 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Saline 11 10 14 22 4 5 66
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 121 163 118 142 141 51 736
Northeast Adair 1 5 2 10 7 1 26
Audrain 0 0 0 7 9 3 19
Boone 20 18 37 32 39 12 158
Callaway 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Clark 0 0 0 0 6 0 6
Cole 10 20 12 12 29 12 95
Franklin 15 25 24 33 20 7 124
Gasconade 1 0 2 2 0 0 5
Howard 1 0 0 0 6 0 7
Jefferson 44 45 44 49 56 4 242
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 4 0 0 0 4
Lincoln 4 10 13 13 14 4 58
Macon 0 2 3 5 4 2 16
Marion 9 2 7 15 12 1 46
Monroe 1 0 1 2 1 0 5
Montgomery 4 4 4 1 2 1 16
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 4 1 1 1 1 0 8
Ralls 0 0 2 2 1 2 7
Randolph 6 7 10 2 3 3 31
Schuyler 0 0 1 0 0 1 2
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shelby 5 1 0 2 6 0 14
St Charles 29 26 11 36 37 8 147
Warren 4 4 5 7 4 0 24
* Region Total * 158 170 183 231 259 61 1,062
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Butler 4 10 1 11 26 18 70
Cape Girardeau 8 10 11 11 18 4 62
Carter 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Crawford 0 0 0 0 2 1 3
78Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 28.
Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year and Case Manager County
(FY 2017 Adoptions are Year to Date October 2016)
Total
FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 Adoptions
Southeast Dent 5 13 12 2 8 3 43
Dunklin 1 2 10 1 5 5 24
Howell 4 3 6 3 3 0 19
Iron 10 4 3 0 0 0 17
Madison 0 0 0 3 0 0 3
Maries 1 0 0 0 4 0 5
Mississippi 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
New Madrid 0 0 0 0 3 0 3
Oregon 3 5 6 4 0 0 18
Pemiscot 8 6 8 0 3 2 27
Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Phelps 1 2 3 11 19 9 45
Pulaski 24 20 20 10 23 3 100
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 4 4
Ripley 1 8 9 17 24 4 63
Scott 3 5 7 8 6 1 30
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
St Francois 33 48 37 33 32 1 184
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Stoddard 11 13 15 17 12 0 68
Texas 2 2 3 9 12 11 39
Washington 1 0 0 0 1 0 2
Wayne 0 0 0 0 1 4 5
* Region Total * 120 153 151 141 203 71 839
Southwest Barry 11 27 29 23 29 11 130
Barton 7 6 8 11 5 2 39
Bates 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Benton 2 3 6 6 3 0 20
Camden 0 0 0 0 3 0 3
Cedar 8 6 1 5 1 0 21
Christian 50 25 32 24 38 9 178
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dallas 19 3 9 2 9 0 42
Douglas 3 0 3 5 3 1 15
Greene 111 115 122 91 143 58 640
Henry 17 12 14 14 12 0 69
Hickory 4 1 2 6 5 1 19
Jasper 52 72 92 70 69 21 376
Laclede 39 41 25 45 28 8 186
Lawrence 12 5 14 18 16 4 69
Mcdonald 10 8 13 11 15 4 61
Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Newton 37 23 22 36 46 10 174
Ozark 0 0 0 1 10 0 11
Polk 9 13 6 8 10 12 58
St Clair 1 0 0 0 0 1 2
Stone 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Taney 11 6 17 16 20 8 78
Vernon 0 2 1 6 0 0 9
Webster 12 6 13 4 14 2 51
Wright 3 7 7 5 16 1 39
* Region Total * 419 381 436 407 496 153 2,292
Kansas City Jackson 191 222 219 246 292 91 1,261
* Region Total * 191 222 219 246 292 91 1,261
St. Louis St Louis City 57 64 70 71 52 9 323
St Louis County 81 67 68 72 84 17 389
* Region Total * 138 131 138 143 136 26 712
Other Icama 2 3 5 5 1 0 16
* Region Total * 2 3 5 5 1 0 16
State Total 1,149 1,223 1,250 1,315 1,528 453 6,918
79Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 16.
Children (Re)Entering Children's Division Custody
During October 2016
Total Entries Total Re Entries
12,000
12,200
12,400
12,600
12,800
13,000
13,200
13,400
13,600
13,800
14,000
Oct
-14
No
v-1
4
De
c-1
4
Jan
-15
Feb
-15
Mar
-15
Ap
r-1
5
May
-15
Jun
-15
Jul-
15
Au
g-1
5
Sep
-15
Oct
-15
No
v-1
5
De
c-1
5
Jan
-16
Feb
-16
Mar
-16
Ap
r-1
6
May
-16
Jun
-16
Jul-
16
Au
g-1
6
Sep
-16
Oct
-16
Figure 17.
Children Active in Children's Division Custody
on the Last day of the Month October 2014 Through October 2016
80Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 18.
Children Closing from Alternative Care During October 2016
by Reason for Case Closing and Region
Returned Home Other
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Oct
-14
No
v-1
4
De
c-1
4
Jan
-15
Feb
-15
Mar
-15
Ap
r-1
5
May
-15
Jun
-15
Jul-
15
Au
g-1
5
Sep
-15
Oct
-15
No
v-1
5
De
c-1
5
Jan
-16
Feb
-16
Mar
-16
Ap
r-1
6
May
-16
Jun
-16
Jul-
16
Au
g-1
6
Sep
-16
Oct
-16
Figure 19.
Adoptions Finalized by Month
October 2014 Through October 2016
81Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 - 3 4 - 7 8 - 11 12 - 15 16 +
Figure 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody as of October 2016
by Age and Placement Category
Foster Home Other Relative Home Group Home/Res. Care Adoptive Home
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
Oct
-12
De
c-1
2
Feb
-13
Ap
r-1
3
Jun
-13
Au
g-1
3
Oct
-13
De
c-1
3
Feb
-14
Ap
r-1
4
Jun
-14
Au
g-1
4
Oct
-14
De
c-1
4
Feb
-15
Ap
r-1
5
Jun
-15
Au
g-1
5
Oct
-15
De
c-1
5
Feb
-16
Ap
r-1
6
Jun
-16
Au
g-1
6
Oct
-16
Figure 21.
Children in Children's Division Custody
as of the Last Day of the Month October 2012 Through October 2016 by Placement Category
Foster Home Other Relative Home Group Home Adoptive Home
82Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
20
12
-1
20
12
-2
20
12
-3
20
12
-4
20
13
-1
20
13
-2
20
13
-3
20
13
-4
20
14
-1
20
14
-2
20
14
-3
20
14
-4
20
15
-1
20
15
-2
20
15
-3
20
15
-4
20
16
-1
20
16
-2
20
16
-3
20
16
-4
Exit
s p
er
10
0 C
hild
ren
in
Fost
er
Car
e P
op
ula
tio
n
Figure 22.
Children Exiting Children's Division Custody
by Quarter and Subsequent Disposition 1st Quarter 2012 Through 4th Quarter 2016
Adoption Child Independence Other Legal Status Relative Home Other Closing Return Home
83Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Children’s Services Management Report 84 Research and Data Analysis
Notes: Out-of-Home Placement Tables and Figures
Table 14.
• This table includes children entering Legal Status 1 for the first time. • Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other • Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19,
2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov. • Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.
Table 15.
• This table includes children re-entering Legal Status 1 who have had prior Out-of-Home
Placements. • Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other • Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19,
2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov. • Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.
Table 16.
• This data includes children (re)entering (entering and/or re-entering) Legal Status 1.
Table 17. and Table 18.
• Length of Stay is computed for the last continuous period in Legal Status 1 during the month.
Table values, for the length of stay, indicate the average number of months in custody.
Children’s Services Management Report 85 Research and Data Analysis
Table 19.
• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.
• Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19,
2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov.
• Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.
Table 20.
• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only. • Placement Types are: ADF Adoption (by foster parent) ADO Adoption (by other) ADR Adoption (by relative) CFP Career Foster Parent CTO Non-Licensed/Court Ordered Placement DET Detention FAH Foster Adoptive Home FGB Behavioral Foster Family Group Home FGH Foster Family Group Home FGM Medical Foster Family Group Home FHB Behavioral Foster Home FHE Emergency Foster Home FHM Medical Foster Home FHO Foster Home ILA Independent Living Arrangement JHO Juvenile Court Home KHB Kinship Behavioral Home KHM Kinship Medical Home KHO Licensed Kinship Home KHU Unlicensed Kinship Home LGS Legal Guardianship Subsidy MMD Medical Facility MMF Mental Health Facility MMH Mental Health Home MMW Mental Health Medicaid Waiver RFA Residential Treatment Facility RFP Residential Treatment Facility- Initial Placement - No Level RF2 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 2 RF3 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 3 RF4 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 4 RFE Residential Treatment Facility- Emergency
Children’s Services Management Report 86 Research and Data Analysis
Table 20 (contd). RFH Residential Foster Home RFI Residential Treatment Facility- Infant
RFM Residential Treatment Facility-Maternity RFT Residential Treatment Facility-Transitional/Aftercare RHB Behavioral Relative Home
RHM Medical Relative Home RHO Relative Home RHU Unlicensed Relative Home RUN Runaway SCH School TLA Transitional Living Arrangement TLG Transitional Living Group TLS Transitional Living Scattered Site
Table 21.
• This table includes children exiting Legal Status 1 only. • Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other
Table 22.
Table includes children closing from all legal status categories.
• Closing categories include the following closing reasons: Returned Home - Goal Achieved (Returned child to parent(s), CYAC child, Returned Child to
sending state) Achieved Independence - Goal Achieved (Child Independence) Living with Other Relatives – Goal Achieved (Placement with a fit and willing relative) Other Agency - Care and Custody with other Agency Other - Married, Runaway, Adoption, Adoption Subsidy Terminated, Deceased, Guardianship
and Other
Table 23.
• Legal Status 1, TPR (Termination of Parental Rights) Incomplete includes children with a Goal
of 'AD' and no completed TPR (TPR is not completed for the mother and the putative and/or legal father).
• Legal Status 1, TPR Complete includes children with a Goal of 'AD' and TPR has been
completed (TPR is completed for the mother and the putative and/or legal father).
Children’s Services Management Report 87 Research and Data Analysis
• Temporary Adoptive Custody includes Legal Status 2 children. • Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children are
counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal Status 5.
• No Identified Adoptive Resource includes Legal Status 1 children with a Goal of 'AD' and no pre-adoptive placement marked.
Table 24.
• This table includes vendor types of – CF, FA, FG, FH, LA, RH, and KH. • Existing vendor types RH and KH were added to this table in October 2015 and are shown
under the heading Relative/Kinship Home. • Newly Licensed Vendors includes vendors which are licensed during the month and have either
no previous license or one which ended more than five years ago. • The categories “Current # of Licensed Vendors” and “Licensed Vendors Twelve Months Ago”
represent unduplicated vendor counts.
Table 25.
• Legal Status Definitions: LS 1 - Care and custody with Children’s Division (includes temporary custody) LS 2 - Temporary custody with adoptive parents LS 3 - Supervision only by Children’s Division LS 4 - Care and custody with juvenile court/other agency LS 5 - Final custody awarded to adoptive parents LS 6 – Children’s Division relieved of legal responsibility LS 7 - CYAC Child (Children of Youth in Alternative Care) LS 8 - Chafee Independent Living Program LS 9 - Subsidized Guardianship LS V – Voluntary Placement Agreement
Table 26.
• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.
• Goals are:
01 - Return child to parent(s)/caretaker(s) AD - Adoption 05 - CYAC Child 06 - Child Independence/Independent Living 07 - Guardianship 08 - Live with Other Relatives 09 - Case Plan Goal Not Yet Established / Missing
Table 27.
Children’s Services Management Report 88 Research and Data Analysis
• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only. • Table values are children active at the end of the month categorized by the number of
placements experienced in their most recent stay in Legal Status 1. • The number of placements represents the movement of children among distinct vendors. • Short term temporary settings are not counted when the child returns to the previous vendor.
Table 28.
• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children are
counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal Status 5.
Figure 18.
• Closing categories includes the following closing reasons:
Returned Home - Goal Achieved (Returned child to parent(s) Other - Achieved Independence, Living with other Relatives, Other Agency , Married, Runaway, Returned Child to Sending State, Adoption, Adoption Subsidy Terminated, Deceased, Children of Youth in Alternative Care (CYAC) Child and Other.
Figure 19.
• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children are
counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal Status 5.
Figure 20.
• Placement categories include the following placement types:
Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other
• Age is calculated as of the last day of the month.
Figure 21.
• Placement categories include the following placement types:
Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other
Intensive In-Home Services
Table 29.
Families Referred to Intensive In-Home Services During October 2016
Grouped by Referral County
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Referrals
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Atchison 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Buchanan 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cass 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clay 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Clinton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cooper 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Harrison 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Lafayette 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pettis 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Saline 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4
Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 13 59.09% 9 40.91% 22
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 4
Audrain 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
Boone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Callaway 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cole 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
Franklin 0 0.00% 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 6
Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howard 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
Jefferson 0 0.00% 6 46.15% 7 53.85% 13
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lincoln 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Macon 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Marion 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Montgomery 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Randolph 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
Schuyler 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Charles 0 0.00% 3 37.50% 5 62.50% 8
Warren 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 31 52.54% 28 47.46% 59
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Butler 0 0.00% 2 14.29% 12 85.71% 14
Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 3 37.50% 5 62.50% 8
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
for Screening
Referrals Accepted
Accepted
Referrals
Accepted
Referrals Not
90
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 29.
Families Referred to Intensive In-Home Services During October 2016
Grouped by Referral County
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Referrals
Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dunklin 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4
Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Maries 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
New Madrid 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Perry 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Phelps 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Pulaski 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 4
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ripley 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 4
Scott 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Francois 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Stoddard 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Washington 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 4
Wayne 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 2 3.85% 23 44.23% 27 51.92% 52
Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Barton 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Camden 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Christian 0 0.00% 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 6
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Greene 0 0.00% 11 84.62% 2 15.38% 13
Henry 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Hickory 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3
Jasper 0 0.00% 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 5
Laclede 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mcdonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Miller 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Newton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Ozark 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Polk 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stone 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4
Taney 0 0.00% 4 66.67% 2 33.33% 6
Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Webster 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 3
Wright 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
* Region Total * 3 5.26% 37 64.91% 17 29.82% 57
Kansas City Jackson 5 41.67% 3 25.00% 4 33.33% 12
* Region Total * 5 41.67% 3 25.00% 4 33.33% 12
St. Louis St Louis City 0 0.00% 13 72.22% 5 27.78% 18
St Louis County 0 0.00% 21 77.78% 6 22.22% 27
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 34 75.56% 11 24.44% 45
State Total 10 4.05% 141 57.09% 96 38.87% 247
Referrals Accepted Referrals Referrals Not
for Screening Accepted Accepted
91
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 30.
Families and Children Accepted Into Intensive In-Home Services During October 2016
Grouped by Household County
Families Children Average # At-Risk Average # At-Risk
Accepted Accepted Children per Family Children Accepted Children per Family
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Atchison 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Buchanan 1 2 2.00 2 2.00
Caldwell 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Carroll 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Cass 2 2 1.00 2 1.00
Chariton 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Clay 1 5 5.00 2 2.00
Clinton 1 4 4.00 2 2.00
Cooper 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Daviess 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
De Kalb 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Gentry 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Grundy 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Harrison 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Holt 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Johnson 1 2 2.00 2 2.00
Lafayette 1 3 3.00 1 1.00
Linn 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Livingston 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Mercer 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Nodaway 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Pettis 1 3 3.00 3 3.00
Platte 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Putnam 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Ray 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Saline 2 4 2.00 3 1.50
Sullivan 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Worth 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
* Region Total * 13 28 2.15 20 1.54
Northeast Adair 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Audrain 2 4 2.00 3 1.50
Boone 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Callaway 1 3 3.00 1 1.00
Clark 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Cole 2 4 2.00 3 1.50
Franklin 6 11 1.83 8 1.33
Gasconade 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Howard 2 4 2.00 3 1.50
Jefferson 6 13 2.17 11 1.83
Knox 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Lewis 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Lincoln 1 5 5.00 5 5.00
Macon 2 8 4.00 8 4.00
Marion 1 2 2.00 2 2.00
Monroe 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Montgomery 1 4 4.00 4 4.00
Osage 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Pike 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Ralls 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Randolph 1 2 2.00 2 2.00
Schuyler 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Scotland 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Shelby 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
St Charles 3 3 1.00 3 1.00
Warren 3 7 2.33 7 2.33
* Region Total * 32 71 2.22 61 1.91
Southeast Bollinger 1 2 2.00 1 1.00
Butler 2 5 2.50 5 2.50
Cape Girardeau 2 4 2.00 3 1.50
Carter 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
92
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 30.
Families and Children Accepted Into Intensive In-Home Services During October 2016
Grouped by Household County
Families Children Average # of At-Risk Average # of At-Risk
Accepted Accepted Children per Family Children Accepted Children per Family
Southeast Crawford 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Dent 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Dunklin 2 2 1.00 2 1.00
Howell 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Iron 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Madison 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Maries 1 2 2.00 1 1.00
Mississippi 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
New Madrid 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Oregon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Pemiscot 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Perry 1 2 2.00 1 1.00
Phelps 2 7 3.50 7 3.50
Pulaski 3 5 1.67 3 1.00
Reynolds 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Ripley 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Scott 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Shannon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
St Francois 1 2 2.00 2 2.00
Ste Genevieve 2 5 2.50 2 1.00
Stoddard 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Texas 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Washington 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Wayne 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
* Region Total * 21 40 1.90 31 1.48
Southwest Barry 1 3 3.00 3 3.00
Barton 2 5 2.50 2 1.00
Bates 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Benton 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Camden 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Cedar 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Christian 2 9 4.50 8 4.00
Dade 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Dallas 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Douglas 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Greene 11 33 3.00 29 2.64
Henry 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Hickory 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Jasper 5 10 2.00 10 2.00
Laclede 2 7 3.50 4 2.00
Lawrence 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Mcdonald 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Miller 2 7 3.50 7 3.50
Moniteau 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Morgan 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Newton 1 4 4.00 4 4.00
Ozark 1 3 3.00 3 3.00
Polk 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
St Clair 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Stone 3 8 2.67 4 1.33
Taney 4 8 2.00 5 1.25
Vernon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Webster 1 4 4.00 4 4.00
Wright 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
* Region Total * 36 102 2.83 84 2.33
Kansas City Jackson 8 25 3.13 13 1.63
* Region Total * 8 25 3.13 13 1.63
St. Louis St Louis City 13 30 2.31 26 2.00
St Louis County 22 49 2.23 45 2.05
* Region Total * 35 79 2.26 71 2.03
State Total 145 345 2.38 280 1.93
93
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 31.
Exit Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During October 2016
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Buchanan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Caldwell 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cass 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clay 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Grundy 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Harrison 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mercer 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pettis 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ray 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 7 70.00% 3 30.00% 0 0.00% 10
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Audrain 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Boone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Callaway 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Clark 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cole 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Franklin 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Gasconade 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jefferson 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lincoln 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Montgomery 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pike 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Randolph 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5
Schuyler 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Charles 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6
Warren 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
* Region Total * 20 68.97% 9 31.03% 0 0.00% 29
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Butler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Family Intact Family Not Intact Other
94Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 31.
Exit Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During October 2016
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
New Madrid 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Oregon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pulaski 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Francois 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stoddard 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Camden 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Christian 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dallas 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Greene 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5
Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jasper 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6
Laclede 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mcdonald 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Miller 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Morgan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Newton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Taney 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Vernon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Webster 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Wright 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 19 79.17% 5 20.83% 0 0.00% 24
Kansas City Jackson 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
St. Louis St Louis City 14 77.78% 4 22.22% 0 0.00% 18
St Louis County 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
* Region Total * 23 85.19% 4 14.81% 0 0.00% 27
State Total 75 77.32% 22 22.68% 0 0.00% 97
Family Not Intact Family Intact Other
95Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 32.
Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During April 2016
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Buchanan 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cass 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clay 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Grundy 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Linn 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pettis 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Saline 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Sullivan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 7 77.78% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 9
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Audrain 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Boone 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Callaway 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cole 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Franklin 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Gasconade 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jefferson 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lincoln 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Montgomery 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Randolph 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Charles 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Warren 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 18 90.00% 2 10.00% 0 0.00% 20
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Butler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cape Girardeau 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Other Family Intact Family Not Intact
96Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 32.
Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During April 2016
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Francois 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Bates 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Camden 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Christian 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Greene 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jasper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Laclede 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mcdonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Miller 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Newton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Taney 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Webster 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Wright 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6
Kansas City Jackson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St. Louis St Louis City 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
St Louis County 4 57.14% 0 0.00% 3 42.86% 7
* Region Total * 6 66.67% 0 0.00% 3 33.33% 9
State Total 37 82.22% 5 11.11% 3 6.67% 45
Other Family Intact Family Not Intact
97Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 33.
Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During October 2015
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Atchison 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Buchanan 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cass 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clay 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clinton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gentry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Grundy 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Lafayette 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Livingston 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pettis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Saline 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 8 72.73% 2 18.18% 1 9.09% 11
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Audrain 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Boone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Callaway 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cole 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Franklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jefferson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lincoln 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Randolph 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Charles 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Warren 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Butler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Other Family Intact Family Not Intact
98Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 33.
Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During October 2015
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Francois 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Washington 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Camden 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Christian 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Greene 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jasper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Laclede 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mcdonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Miller 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Newton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Clair 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Taney 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Webster 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Wright 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Kansas City Jackson 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 4
* Region Total * 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 4
St. Louis St Louis City 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
St Louis County 3 60.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 5
* Region Total * 4 66.67% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 6
State Total 22 75.86% 4 13.79% 3 10.34% 29
Other Family Intact Family Not Intact
99Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Children’s Services Management Report 100 Research and Data Analysis
Notes: Intensive In-Home Services Tables
Table 31., Table 32., and Table 33.
• Tables include only those families with an exit date during the month in question
and an exit status which is not missing.
• Exit status includes the following status codes:
Family Intact 10 Family Intact
Family Not Intact 12 Child Ran Away
13 Child Moved out of Home (not placed) 14 Child Living with Relative or Guardian (not Court Ordered)
15 Child Living with Relative or Guardian (Court Ordered)
16 In Foster Home or Group Home 17 In Residential
18 With DYS (Division of Youth Services) 19 In Juvenile Justice
20 In In-Patient Psychiatric
Other
11 Can't Locate Family 21 Information Not Available
99 Other