children's services management report - missouri ... · by case manager county and legal...
TRANSCRIPT
Department of Social Services
Children's Division
Children's Services
Management Report
July 2015
Missouri Department of Social Services
Research & Data Analysis
221 W. High Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis Research and Data Analysis
State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement:
“To maintain or improve the quality of life for Missouri citizens." The Department of Social Services is an equal opportunity employer. Services provided by the Department of Social Services are offered on a non-discriminatory basis.
Children’s Services Management Report II Research and Data Analysis
Table of Contents
Unless otherwise indicated, information contained in this publication is intended for monthly use only.
Although the information presented is the best available at the time of publication, because of delays in processing, data may be incomplete. Accordingly, data should NOT simply be summed from one month
to the next to obtain 3 month, 6 month or 12 month (etc.) values.
Figure 1. Map – Department of Social Services Regions ...............................................................V
Child Abuse and Neglect (CA/N)
Table 1. Incidents and Children Reported During the Month Compared to Those
Reported for the Same Month Last Year ....................................................................... 2
Table 2. Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed During the Month ....................................................................................... 4
Table 3. Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed by Conclusion During the Month .................................................................. 6
Table 4. Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed in the Month .................................. 8
Table 5. Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed in the Month ................................ 10
Table 6. CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During the Month .......................................... 12
Figure 2. CA/N Reports for Four Years Through the Current Month ............................................ 14
Figure 3. CA/N Reports Comparing the Last Two Years.............................................................. 14
Figure 4. Percentage Change in CA/N Reports Made Twelve Months Apart ................................. 15
Figure 5. CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed During the Month by Conclusion.............. 15
Figure 6. CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed During the Month by Conclusion.............. 16
Figure 7. Time Between Report and Child Contact for Investigations/Assessments
Completed in the Month ............................................................................................ 16
Figure 8. Percentage of Investigations/Assessments Completed Within Forty Five Days ............... 17
Notes Child Abuse and Neglect Tables and Figures ............................................................... 18
Family-Centered Services (FCS)
Table 7. FCS Cases Open at the End of the Month by Reason for Opening ................................. 22
Table 8. FCS Cases Active During the Month by Reason for Opening ......................................... 24
Table 9. Persons in Family-Centered Services During the Month ............................................... 26
Table 10. FCS Cases Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ...................................... 28
Children’s Services Management Report III Research and Data Analysis
Table 11. FCS Cases By Region Closed During the Month by Close Reason .................................. 30
Table 12. FCS Cases Active During the Month Which Have Had Court Involvement ...................... 32
Table 13. FCS Cases By Region Active During the Month Which Have Had No Court Involvement . 34
Figure 9. FCS Cases Active as of the End of the Month Over the Previous Four Years .................. 36
Figure 10. Percentage Change in FCS Cases by Region Active as of the End of the Month,
Twelve Months Apart ................................................................................................ 36
Figure 11. FCS Cases by Region Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ....................... 37
Figure 12. FCS Cases Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ...................................... 37
Figure 13. FCS Cases by Region Closed During the Month by Reason for Closing .......................... 38
Figure 14. FCS Cases Active During the Month With Court Involvement By Number of Months Open ....................................................................................... 38
Figure 15. FCS Cases Active During the Month With No Court Involvement
By Number of Months Open ....................................................................................... 39
Notes Family-Centered Services Tables and Figures .............................................................. 40
Out-of-Home Placement
Table 14. Children Entering Children’s Division Custody for the First Time During the Month
By Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category ................................... 44
Table 15. Children Re-Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Month by Case
Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category ............................................... 46
Table 16. Children (Re)Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Last Two Years ............... 48
Table 17. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody During the Month Grouped by
Length of Stay and Region ........................................................................................ 49
Table 18. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month By Length of Stay and Case Manager County .............................................................. 50
Table 19. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month by Case Manager County and Placement Category ................................................................... 52
Table 20. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month by Case
Manager County and Placement Type......................................................................... 54
Table 21. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody During the Month Grouped by
Placement Category and Case Manager County........................................................... 64
Table 22. Children Closed from the Alternative Care System During the Month Grouped by Reason for Case Closing .......................................................................... 66
Children’s Services Management Report IV Research and Data Analysis
Table 23. Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of the Month With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody ................................................................................ 68
Table 24. Currently Licensed Children’s Division Foster Homes by Vendor Type ........................... 70
Table 25. Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of the Month Grouped By Case Manager County and Legal Status ................................................................. 72
Table 26. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month Grouped
By Case Manager County and Goal ............................................................................. 74
Table 27. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month Grouped
By Case Manager County and Number of Previous Placements..................................... 76
Table 28. Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year .............................................................................. 78
Figure 16. Children (Re)Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Month ............................ 80
Figure 17. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month During
the Last Two Years ................................................................................................... 80
Figure 18. Children Closing from Alternative Care During the Month by Reason for Case Closing and Region ...................................................................................... 81
Figure 19. Adoptions Finalized During the Last Two Years ........................................................... 81
Figure 20. Children in Children’s Division Custody as of the Last of the Month by Age and Placement Type ........................................................................................... 82
Figure 21. Children in Children’s Division Custody as of the Last Day of the Month By Placement Category for Four Years ........................................................................ 82
Figure 22. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody by Quarter and
Subsequent Disposition ............................................................................................. 83
Notes Out-of-Home Placement Tables and Figures ............................................................... 84
Intensive In-Home Services (IIS)
Table 29. Families Referred to IIS During the Month Grouped by Referral County ........................ 90
Table 30. Families and Children Accepted in IIS During the Month Grouped by Household County ................................................................................................ 92
Table 31. Exit Status of Families Exiting IIS During the Month .................................................... 94
Table 32. Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting IIS ...................................................... 96
Table 33. Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting IIS ................................................ 98
Notes Intensive In-Home Services Tables ......................................................................... 100
Children’s Services Management Report V Research and Data Analysis
Figure 1. Department of Social Services Regions
Table 1.
Incidents and Children Reported During July 2015
Compared to Those Reported During July 2014
Current Incidents Current Children
Month One Year Percentage Month One Year Percentage
Incidents Prior Change Children Prior Change
Northwest Andrew 9 18 -50.00% 16 26 -38.46%
Atchison 2 2 0.00% 3 2 50.00%
Buchanan 130 128 1.56% 200 211 -5.21%
Caldwell 4 7 -42.86% 4 9 -55.56%
Carroll 9 11 -18.18% 10 22 -54.55%
Cass 58 66 -12.12% 81 94 -13.83%
Chariton 9 2 350.00% 14 2 600.00%
Clay 139 120 15.83% 226 202 11.88%
Clinton 21 19 10.53% 30 29 3.45%
Cooper 15 11 36.36% 24 19 26.32%
Daviess 10 3 233.33% 24 4 500.00%
De Kalb 2 8 -75.00% 4 11 -63.64%
Gentry 7 3 133.33% 7 3 133.33%
Grundy 11 13 -15.39% 19 16 18.75%
Harrison 12 9 33.33% 15 15 0.00%
Holt 5 3 66.67% 5 3 66.67%
Johnson 36 32 12.50% 59 51 15.69%
Lafayette 25 24 4.17% 42 34 23.53%
Linn 15 11 36.36% 29 16 81.25%
Livingston 19 10 90.00% 34 15 126.67%
Mercer 2 3 -33.33% 2 10 -80.00%
Nodaway 18 9 100.00% 31 13 138.46%
Pettis 36 54 -33.33% 56 82 -31.71%
Platte 42 40 5.00% 58 57 1.75%
Putnam 5 4 25.00% 13 5 160.00%
Ray 28 26 7.69% 35 39 -10.26%
Saline 32 21 52.38% 45 29 55.17%
Sullivan 4 13 -69.23% 5 20 -75.00%
Worth 3 0 0.00% 5 0 0.00%
* Region Total * 708 670 5.67% 1,096 1,039 5.49%
Northeast Adair 31 24 29.17% 51 44 15.91%
Audrain 35 40 -12.50% 62 63 -1.59%
Boone 123 113 8.85% 169 173 -2.31%
Callaway 38 60 -36.67% 53 87 -39.08%
Clark 10 4 150.00% 13 6 116.67%
Cole 60 59 1.70% 104 96 8.33%
Franklin 74 67 10.45% 123 102 20.59%
Gasconade 8 17 -52.94% 17 23 -26.09%
Howard 6 4 50.00% 7 6 16.67%
Jefferson 139 151 -7.95% 212 235 -9.79%
Knox 3 2 50.00% 5 2 150.00%
Lewis 12 6 100.00% 23 10 130.00%
Lincoln 49 40 22.50% 77 65 18.46%
Macon 17 9 88.89% 26 16 62.50%
Marion 37 31 19.36% 55 55 0.00%
Monroe 3 6 -50.00% 3 9 -66.67%
Montgomery 13 12 8.33% 25 19 31.58%
Osage 2 7 -71.43% 5 10 -50.00%
Pike 16 14 14.29% 28 20 40.00%
Ralls 7 7 0.00% 10 10 0.00%
Randolph 21 31 -32.26% 29 45 -35.56%
Schuyler 3 4 -25.00% 6 6 0.00%
Scotland 3 1 200.00% 7 1 600.00%
Shelby 8 1 700.00% 9 1 800.00%
St Charles 145 145 0.00% 209 240 -12.92%
Warren 26 32 -18.75% 48 48 0.00%
* Region Total * 889 887 0.23% 1,376 1,392 -1.15%
Southeast Bollinger 11 9 22.22% 19 18 5.56%
Butler 55 57 -3.51% 93 89 4.49%
Cape Girardeau 50 52 -3.85% 71 86 -17.44%
Carter 3 5 -40.00% 5 7 -28.57%
Crawford 22 36 -38.89% 32 78 -58.97%
Dent 18 14 28.57% 27 17 58.82%
2Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 1.
Incidents and Children Reported During July 2015
Compared to Those Reported During July 2014
Current Incidents Current Children
Month One Year Percentage Month One Year Percentage
Incidents Prior Change Children Prior Change
Southeast Dunklin 49 45 8.89% 79 79 0.00%
Howell 59 38 55.26% 103 59 74.58%
Iron 13 15 -13.33% 17 19 -10.53%
Madison 16 13 23.08% 27 21 28.57%
Maries 7 9 -22.22% 9 14 -35.71%
Mississippi 9 16 -43.75% 21 23 -8.70%
New Madrid 30 23 30.44% 59 31 90.32%
Oregon 10 13 -23.08% 20 32 -37.50%
Pemiscot 25 32 -21.88% 36 52 -30.77%
Perry 13 19 -31.58% 20 26 -23.08%
Phelps 39 41 -4.88% 64 60 6.67%
Pulaski 40 63 -36.51% 56 95 -41.05%
Reynolds 16 10 60.00% 28 13 115.39%
Ripley 17 16 6.25% 25 29 -13.79%
Scott 44 56 -21.43% 68 99 -31.31%
Shannon 11 10 10.00% 19 18 5.56%
St Francois 73 67 8.96% 116 114 1.75%
Ste Genevieve 22 11 100.00% 37 20 85.00%
Stoddard 24 28 -14.29% 35 56 -37.50%
Texas 32 24 33.33% 49 43 13.95%
Washington 27 25 8.00% 38 40 -5.00%
Wayne 17 19 -10.53% 26 31 -16.13%
* Region Total * 752 766 -1.83% 1,199 1,269 -5.52%
Southwest Barry 42 26 61.54% 71 48 47.92%
Barton 14 13 7.69% 21 21 0.00%
Bates 20 13 53.85% 31 20 55.00%
Benton 13 11 18.18% 23 14 64.29%
Camden 43 38 13.16% 73 61 19.67%
Cedar 16 20 -20.00% 22 38 -42.11%
Christian 53 73 -27.40% 93 107 -13.08%
Dade 6 2 200.00% 11 2 450.00%
Dallas 21 26 -19.23% 38 42 -9.52%
Douglas 16 6 166.67% 28 7 300.00%
Greene 331 297 11.45% 515 473 8.88%
Henry 31 21 47.62% 54 35 54.29%
Hickory 8 3 166.67% 10 4 150.00%
Jasper 129 139 -7.19% 199 205 -2.93%
Laclede 50 56 -10.71% 76 85 -10.59%
Lawrence 29 31 -6.45% 34 46 -26.09%
Mcdonald 22 32 -31.25% 31 49 -36.74%
Miller 18 15 20.00% 31 23 34.78%
Moniteau 14 20 -30.00% 20 30 -33.33%
Morgan 16 21 -23.81% 26 37 -29.73%
Newton 63 56 12.50% 110 99 11.11%
Ozark 4 8 -50.00% 7 8 -12.50%
Polk 40 32 25.00% 71 57 24.56%
St Clair 12 7 71.43% 17 17 0.00%
Stone 36 29 24.14% 48 44 9.09%
Taney 74 64 15.63% 111 93 19.36%
Vernon 32 27 18.52% 51 41 24.39%
Webster 32 41 -21.95% 55 60 -8.33%
Wright 29 30 -3.33% 52 42 23.81%
* Region Total * 1,214 1,157 4.93% 1,929 1,808 6.69%
Kansas City Jackson 591 538 9.85% 933 855 9.12%
* Region Total * 591 538 9.85% 933 855 9.12%
St. Louis St Louis City 248 266 -6.77% 431 444 -2.93%
St Louis County 376 397 -5.29% 573 595 -3.70%
* Region Total * 624 663 -5.88% 1,004 1,039 -3.37%
Other Out Home Inv 176 196 -10.20% 261 327 -20.18%
Out Of State 11 10 10.00% 13 13 0.00%
* Region Total * 187 206 -9.22% 274 340 -19.41%
State Total 4,965 4,887 1.60% 7,811 7,742 0.89%
3Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 2.
Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed During July 2015
Substan- Total
tiated Children
Substan- Unsubstan- Unsubstan- Family Children Per Per
tiated tiated PSI tiated Assessment Other Total Thousand Thousand
Northwest Andrew 1 3 0 6 0 10 0.24 2.40
Atchison 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00 0.85
Buchanan 6 9 76 96 4 191 0.29 9.11
Caldwell 0 1 1 2 0 4 0.00 1.66
Carroll 0 0 3 2 1 6 0.00 2.74
Cass 5 6 30 36 3 80 0.19 3.03
Chariton 0 4 0 7 0 11 0.00 6.22
Clay 14 7 69 103 5 198 0.24 3.46
Clinton 1 1 1 26 0 29 0.20 5.69
Cooper 0 0 0 4 0 4 0.00 1.01
Daviess 1 3 2 7 0 13 0.44 5.77
De Kalb 1 0 4 6 0 11 0.43 4.76
Gentry 0 0 2 2 0 4 0.00 2.42
Grundy 0 1 3 8 0 12 0.00 4.86
Harrison 0 0 5 6 0 11 0.00 4.95
Holt 0 0 0 4 0 4 0.00 4.12
Johnson 3 0 19 23 0 45 0.25 3.74
Lafayette 4 1 9 14 0 28 0.49 3.42
Linn 3 0 6 4 0 13 0.95 4.12
Livingston 2 3 1 12 0 18 0.60 5.41
Mercer 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.00 1.04
Nodaway 0 4 7 11 1 23 0.00 5.40
Pettis 1 0 6 15 0 22 0.09 2.04
Platte 7 0 16 37 2 62 0.32 2.82
Putnam 1 0 0 1 1 3 0.86 2.59
Ray 5 0 14 10 0 29 0.85 4.94
Saline 4 1 9 31 0 45 0.74 8.34
Sullivan 1 1 0 5 0 0 0.62 6.77
Worth 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.00 6.76
* Region Total * 60 45 291 479 17 892 0.28 4.12
Northeast Adair 0 3 6 16 1 26 0.00 5.23
Audrain 1 1 4 17 3 26 0.16 4.08
Boone 26 13 55 72 2 168 0.76 4.91
Callaway 4 9 18 21 1 53 0.40 5.30
Clark 2 1 2 9 0 14 1.16 8.15
Cole 0 10 22 29 5 66 0.00 3.68
Franklin 6 10 36 75 0 127 0.24 5.06
Gasconade 0 0 0 15 0 15 0.00 4.46
Howard 1 1 1 1 0 4 0.46 1.84
Jefferson 9 19 33 120 4 185 0.16 3.36
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Lewis 2 0 5 1 0 8 0.84 3.34
Lincoln 2 3 19 45 1 70 0.14 4.75
Macon 9 1 14 11 0 35 2.38 9.26
Marion 13 6 13 12 0 44 1.89 6.39
Monroe 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.00 0.49
Montgomery 0 7 6 5 1 19 0.00 6.66
Osage 0 0 3 1 0 4 0.00 1.17
Pike 7 2 7 10 2 28 1.70 6.82
Ralls 0 0 0 7 0 7 0.00 2.94
Randolph 3 0 9 25 1 38 0.51 6.46
Schuyler 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00 0.88
Scotland 0 1 7 1 0 9 0.00 6.61
Shelby 0 0 0 7 2 9 0.00 5.64
St Charles 24 4 54 71 4 157 0.26 1.69
Warren 7 1 17 29 2 56 0.86 6.89
* Region Total * 116 92 331 601 30 1,170 0.37 3.71
Southeast Bollinger 3 0 4 5 0 12 1.03 4.11
Butler 16 2 29 35 1 83 1.60 8.32
Cape Girardeau 1 2 18 33 0 54 0.06 3.25
Carter 0 0 9 4 0 13 0.00 8.58
Crawford 5 12 15 39 0 71 0.83 11.83
Dent 5 7 3 10 0 25 1.37 6.85
4Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 2.
Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed During July 2015
Substan- Total
tiated Children
Substan- Unsubstan- Unsubstan- Family Children Per Per
tiated tiated PSI tiated Assessment Other Total Thousand Thousand
Southeast Dunklin 3 5 16 17 2 43 0.37 5.32
Howell 11 4 33 31 3 82 1.09 8.15
Iron 3 1 6 3 3 16 1.25 6.66
Madison 0 1 4 11 0 16 0.00 5.46
Maries 0 0 4 3 0 7 0.00 3.25
Mississippi 0 0 10 24 0 34 0.00 10.67
New Madrid 1 2 5 7 0 15 0.22 3.32
Oregon 4 2 7 2 0 15 1.65 6.18
Pemiscot 9 4 16 27 1 57 1.79 11.32
Perry 1 0 10 6 1 18 0.21 3.78
Phelps 7 3 14 30 2 56 0.71 5.72
Pulaski 5 5 16 39 0 65 0.40 5.18
Reynolds 0 0 2 6 0 8 0.00 5.22
Ripley 1 2 6 8 0 17 0.30 5.14
Scott 7 3 13 24 0 47 0.71 4.77
Shannon 0 0 4 11 0 15 0.00 7.61
St Francois 9 5 25 62 3 104 0.62 7.22
Ste Genevieve 4 0 16 21 0 41 0.95 9.71
Stoddard 4 4 12 23 2 45 0.59 6.59
Texas 9 5 7 16 2 39 1.57 6.82
Washington 4 0 18 17 1 40 0.66 6.60
Wayne 1 3 14 15 0 33 0.36 11.76
* Region Total * 113 72 336 529 21 1,071 0.68 6.48
Southwest Barry 3 2 7 19 0 31 0.35 3.59
Barton 0 0 4 9 0 13 0.00 4.04
Bates 1 0 1 12 0 14 0.24 3.29
Benton 2 0 3 7 5 17 0.58 4.95
Camden 13 0 20 33 0 66 1.55 7.87
Cedar 0 1 12 15 0 28 0.00 8.46
Christian 4 16 32 61 0 113 0.19 5.33
Dade 0 0 5 13 0 18 0.00 10.08
Dallas 1 3 13 32 1 50 0.24 11.99
Douglas 0 0 5 9 1 15 0.00 4.90
Greene 19 28 129 253 11 440 0.33 7.54
Henry 7 0 6 18 0 31 1.41 6.26
Hickory 0 0 2 0 2 4 0.00 2.40
Jasper 4 10 51 120 19 204 0.13 6.74
Laclede 15 7 18 49 1 90 1.68 10.10
Lawrence 0 2 17 21 3 43 0.00 4.23
Mcdonald 3 5 5 10 1 24 0.46 3.71
Miller 4 1 11 27 0 43 0.65 7.00
Moniteau 1 0 5 13 2 21 0.25 5.35
Morgan 4 14 2 24 1 45 0.88 9.93
Newton 3 5 21 40 0 69 0.20 4.67
Ozark 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.00 1.03
Polk 7 4 20 34 0 65 0.91 8.48
St Clair 2 0 5 7 0 14 1.02 7.14
Stone 3 0 5 8 0 16 0.50 2.65
Taney 5 17 18 39 8 87 0.44 7.61
Vernon 7 1 10 19 2 39 1.33 7.41
Webster 5 2 10 25 0 42 0.50 4.18
Wright 3 0 5 16 2 26 0.62 5.34
* Region Total * 116 118 444 933 59 1,670 0.44 6.40
Kansas City Jackson 39 19 112 489 46 705 0.24 4.26
* Region Total * 39 19 112 489 46 705 0.24 4.26
St. Louis St Louis City 35 14 180 224 81 534 0.52 7.91
St Louis County 38 45 225 365 45 718 0.16 3.07
* Region Total * 73 59 405 589 126 1,252 0.24 4.15
Other Out Home Inv 12 0 227 0 3 242 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 12 0 227 0 3 242 0.00 0.00
State Total 529 405 2,146 3,620 302 7,002 0.37 4.91
5Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 3.
Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed by Conclusion During July 2015
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Northwest Andrew 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 4 66.67% 0 0.00% 6
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Buchanan 5 4.13% 6 4.96% 42 34.71% 64 52.89% 4 3.31% 121
Caldwell 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 4
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 5
Cass 3 5.26% 2 3.51% 22 38.60% 28 49.12% 2 3.51% 57
Chariton 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 6 85.71% 0 0.00% 7
Clay 8 6.15% 7 5.39% 47 36.15% 66 50.77% 2 1.54% 130
Clinton 1 5.88% 1 5.88% 1 5.88% 14 82.35% 0 0.00% 17
Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Daviess 1 9.09% 1 9.09% 2 18.18% 7 63.64% 0 0.00% 11
De Kalb 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Grundy 0 0.00% 1 11.11% 3 33.33% 5 55.56% 0 0.00% 9
Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 44.44% 5 55.56% 0 0.00% 9
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Johnson 2 6.25% 0 0.00% 15 46.88% 15 46.88% 0 0.00% 32
Lafayette 2 10.00% 1 5.00% 7 35.00% 10 50.00% 0 0.00% 20
Linn 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 5 50.00% 4 40.00% 0 0.00% 10
Livingston 1 7.69% 3 23.08% 0 0.00% 9 69.23% 0 0.00% 13
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Nodaway 0 0.00% 1 10.00% 1 10.00% 7 70.00% 1 10.00% 10
Pettis 1 5.88% 0 0.00% 5 29.41% 11 64.71% 0 0.00% 17
Platte 5 11.91% 0 0.00% 10 23.81% 26 61.91% 1 2.38% 42
Putnam 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 3
Ray 4 20.00% 0 0.00% 8 40.00% 8 40.00% 0 0.00% 20
Saline 3 13.04% 1 4.35% 6 26.09% 13 56.52% 0 0.00% 23
Sullivan 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 41 7.00% 28 4.78% 187 31.91% 318 54.27% 12 2.05% 586
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 3 15.00% 4 20.00% 12 60.00% 1 5.00% 20
Audrain 1 6.25% 1 6.25% 3 18.75% 10 62.50% 1 6.25% 16
Boone 18 15.79% 8 7.02% 28 24.56% 57 50.00% 3 2.63% 114
Callaway 4 10.53% 5 13.16% 12 31.58% 16 42.11% 1 2.63% 38
Clark 2 22.22% 1 11.11% 1 11.11% 5 55.56% 0 0.00% 9
Cole 0 0.00% 4 9.76% 13 31.71% 20 48.78% 4 9.76% 41
Franklin 5 5.88% 7 8.24% 21 24.71% 52 61.18% 0 0.00% 85
Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 8
Howard 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
Jefferson 7 5.51% 12 9.45% 24 18.90% 83 65.35% 1 0.79% 127
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Lincoln 2 4.17% 3 6.25% 13 27.08% 29 60.42% 1 2.08% 48
Macon 6 25.00% 1 4.17% 9 37.50% 8 33.33% 0 0.00% 24
Marion 8 27.59% 6 20.69% 8 27.59% 7 24.14% 0 0.00% 29
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Montgomery 0 0.00% 2 18.18% 4 36.36% 4 36.36% 1 9.09% 11
Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
Pike 4 23.53% 1 5.88% 2 11.77% 9 52.94% 1 5.88% 17
Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4
Randolph 2 8.00% 0 0.00% 7 28.00% 15 60.00% 1 4.00% 25
Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Scotland 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 3 60.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 66.67% 2 33.33% 6
St Charles 15 14.42% 1 0.96% 38 36.54% 49 47.12% 1 0.96% 104
Warren 5 12.82% 1 2.56% 14 35.90% 19 48.72% 0 0.00% 39
* Region Total * 82 10.49% 58 7.42% 207 26.47% 416 53.20% 19 2.43% 782
Southeast Bollinger 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 3 33.33% 5 55.56% 0 0.00% 9
Butler 10 17.86% 1 1.79% 18 32.14% 27 48.21% 0 0.00% 56
Cape Girardeau 1 2.86% 2 5.71% 13 37.14% 19 54.29% 0 0.00% 35
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 62.50% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 8
Crawford 5 11.11% 8 17.78% 9 20.00% 23 51.11% 0 0.00% 45
Dent 3 25.00% 2 16.67% 1 8.33% 6 50.00% 0 0.00% 12
Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstantiated OtherFamily Assessment
6Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 3.
Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed by Conclusion During July 2015
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Southeast Dunklin 3 10.00% 4 13.33% 10 33.33% 12 40.00% 1 3.33% 30
Howell 7 14.00% 1 2.00% 19 38.00% 21 42.00% 2 4.00% 50
Iron 3 30.00% 1 10.00% 4 40.00% 1 10.00% 1 10.00% 10
Madison 0 0.00% 1 10.00% 3 30.00% 6 60.00% 0 0.00% 10
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5
Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 33.33% 8 66.67% 0 0.00% 12
New Madrid 1 7.14% 2 14.29% 5 35.71% 6 42.86% 0 0.00% 14
Oregon 2 18.18% 1 9.09% 6 54.55% 2 18.18% 0 0.00% 11
Pemiscot 7 20.00% 2 5.71% 8 22.86% 17 48.57% 1 2.86% 35
Perry 1 8.33% 0 0.00% 6 50.00% 4 33.33% 1 8.33% 12
Phelps 3 7.90% 2 5.26% 12 31.58% 18 47.37% 3 7.90% 38
Pulaski 3 6.82% 3 6.82% 11 25.00% 27 61.36% 0 0.00% 44
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 5
Ripley 1 7.14% 1 7.14% 5 35.71% 7 50.00% 0 0.00% 14
Scott 5 13.16% 3 7.90% 10 26.32% 20 52.63% 0 0.00% 38
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 25.00% 6 75.00% 0 0.00% 8
St Francois 7 9.86% 4 5.63% 19 26.76% 40 56.34% 1 1.41% 71
Ste Genevieve 3 13.64% 0 0.00% 7 31.82% 12 54.55% 0 0.00% 22
Stoddard 3 11.54% 2 7.69% 7 26.92% 13 50.00% 1 3.85% 26
Texas 4 20.00% 2 10.00% 5 25.00% 8 40.00% 1 5.00% 20
Washington 3 10.00% 0 0.00% 12 40.00% 14 46.67% 1 3.33% 30
Wayne 1 5.88% 1 5.88% 8 47.06% 7 41.18% 0 0.00% 17
* Region Total * 77 11.21% 43 6.26% 217 31.59% 337 49.05% 13 1.89% 687
Southwest Barry 2 8.33% 1 4.17% 6 25.00% 15 62.50% 0 0.00% 24
Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 36.36% 7 63.64% 0 0.00% 11
Bates 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 1 11.11% 7 77.78% 0 0.00% 9
Benton 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 2 18.18% 6 54.55% 2 18.18% 11
Camden 7 17.95% 0 0.00% 9 23.08% 23 58.97% 0 0.00% 39
Cedar 0 0.00% 1 5.88% 5 29.41% 11 64.71% 0 0.00% 17
Christian 3 4.17% 9 12.50% 21 29.17% 39 54.17% 0 0.00% 72
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 44.44% 5 55.56% 0 0.00% 9
Dallas 1 3.45% 2 6.90% 7 24.14% 19 65.52% 0 0.00% 29
Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 55.56% 3 33.33% 1 11.11% 9
Greene 13 4.31% 21 6.95% 90 29.80% 170 56.29% 8 2.65% 302
Henry 6 28.57% 0 0.00% 3 14.29% 12 57.14% 0 0.00% 21
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2
Jasper 4 3.15% 8 6.30% 37 29.13% 71 55.91% 7 5.51% 127
Laclede 8 15.69% 3 5.88% 12 23.53% 28 54.90% 0 0.00% 51
Lawrence 0 0.00% 1 3.57% 10 35.71% 16 57.14% 1 3.57% 28
Mcdonald 3 18.75% 1 6.25% 4 25.00% 7 43.75% 1 6.25% 16
Miller 3 12.00% 1 4.00% 6 24.00% 15 60.00% 0 0.00% 25
Moniteau 1 8.33% 0 0.00% 2 16.67% 8 66.67% 1 8.33% 12
Morgan 2 8.70% 6 26.09% 2 8.70% 13 56.52% 0 0.00% 23
Newton 3 6.82% 4 9.09% 12 27.27% 25 56.82% 0 0.00% 44
Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Polk 2 5.56% 2 5.56% 11 30.56% 21 58.33% 0 0.00% 36
St Clair 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 2 22.22% 5 55.56% 0 0.00% 9
Stone 3 25.00% 0 0.00% 2 16.67% 7 58.33% 0 0.00% 12
Taney 3 5.36% 7 12.50% 12 21.43% 30 53.57% 4 7.14% 56
Vernon 3 15.00% 0 0.00% 5 25.00% 11 55.00% 1 5.00% 20
Webster 5 16.13% 2 6.45% 6 19.36% 18 58.07% 0 0.00% 31
Wright 2 12.50% 0 0.00% 4 25.00% 9 56.25% 1 6.25% 16
* Region Total * 78 7.35% 69 6.50% 286 26.93% 601 56.59% 28 2.64% 1,062
Kansas City Jackson 28 5.87% 11 2.31% 85 17.82% 322 67.51% 31 6.50% 477
* Region Total * 28 5.87% 11 2.31% 85 17.82% 322 67.51% 31 6.50% 477
St. Louis St Louis City 28 8.26% 8 2.36% 104 30.68% 150 44.25% 49 14.45% 339
St Louis County 25 5.21% 23 4.79% 155 32.29% 254 52.92% 23 4.79% 480
* Region Total * 53 6.47% 31 3.79% 259 31.62% 404 49.33% 72 8.79% 819
Other Out Home Inv 10 6.06% 0 0.00% 154 93.33% 0 0.00% 1 0.61% 165
* Region Total * 10 6.06% 0 0.00% 154 93.33% 0 0.00% 1 0.61% 165
State Total 369 8.06% 240 5.24% 1,395 30.47% 2,398 52.38% 176 3.84% 4,578
Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstantiated Family Assessment Other
7Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 4.
Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During July 2015
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Northwest Andrew 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6
Atchison 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Buchanan 107 91.45% 10 8.55% 0 0.00% 117
Caldwell 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Carroll 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Cass 52 94.55% 3 5.46% 0 0.00% 55
Chariton 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7
Clay 119 92.97% 9 7.03% 0 0.00% 128
Clinton 16 94.12% 1 5.88% 0 0.00% 17
Cooper 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Daviess 11 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11
De Kalb 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
Gentry 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Grundy 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Harrison 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Holt 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Johnson 30 93.75% 2 6.25% 0 0.00% 32
Lafayette 17 85.00% 3 15.00% 0 0.00% 20
Linn 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10
Livingston 11 84.62% 2 15.39% 0 0.00% 13
Mercer 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Nodaway 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10
Pettis 17 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 17
Platte 34 82.93% 7 17.07% 0 0.00% 41
Putnam 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Ray 20 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 20
Saline 22 95.65% 1 4.35% 0 0.00% 23
Sullivan 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Worth 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 531 92.35% 44 7.65% 0 0.00% 575
Northeast Adair 16 84.21% 3 15.79% 0 0.00% 19
Audrain 14 93.33% 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 15
Boone 91 83.49% 18 16.51% 0 0.00% 109
Callaway 35 92.11% 3 7.90% 0 0.00% 38
Clark 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Cole 34 91.89% 3 8.11% 0 0.00% 37
Franklin 65 77.38% 19 22.62% 0 0.00% 84
Gasconade 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8
Howard 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Jefferson 103 83.74% 20 16.26% 0 0.00% 123
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Lincoln 45 95.75% 2 4.26% 0 0.00% 47
Macon 22 91.67% 2 8.33% 0 0.00% 24
Marion 29 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 29
Monroe 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Montgomery 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10
Osage 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Pike 16 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 16
Ralls 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Randolph 22 91.67% 2 8.33% 0 0.00% 24
Schuyler 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Scotland 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Shelby 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
St Charles 88 85.44% 15 14.56% 0 0.00% 103
Warren 38 97.44% 1 2.56% 0 0.00% 39
* Region Total * 669 88.03% 91 11.97% 0 0.00% 760
Southeast Bollinger 7 77.78% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 9
Butler 52 94.55% 3 5.46% 0 0.00% 55
Cape Girardeau 33 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 33
Carter 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Crawford 44 97.78% 1 2.22% 0 0.00% 45
Dent 11 91.67% 1 8.33% 0 0.00% 12
0 - 24 Hours Over 24 Hours No Contact
8Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 4.
Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During July 2015
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Southeast Dunklin 27 93.10% 2 6.90% 0 0.00% 29
Howell 47 97.92% 1 2.08% 0 0.00% 48
Iron 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Madison 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10
Maries 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
Mississippi 12 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 12
New Madrid 12 85.71% 2 14.29% 0 0.00% 14
Oregon 11 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11
Pemiscot 30 90.91% 3 9.09% 0 0.00% 33
Perry 10 90.91% 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 11
Phelps 29 80.56% 7 19.44% 0 0.00% 36
Pulaski 42 95.46% 2 4.55% 0 0.00% 44
Reynolds 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 5
Ripley 13 92.86% 1 7.14% 0 0.00% 14
Scott 38 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 38
Shannon 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8
St Francois 68 98.55% 1 1.45% 0 0.00% 69
Ste Genevieve 19 86.36% 3 13.64% 0 0.00% 22
Stoddard 25 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 25
Texas 19 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 19
Washington 26 96.30% 1 3.70% 0 0.00% 27
Wayne 17 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 17
* Region Total * 632 94.61% 36 5.39% 0 0.00% 668
Southwest Barry 24 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 24
Barton 9 81.82% 2 18.18% 0 0.00% 11
Bates 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Benton 8 88.89% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9
Camden 36 92.31% 3 7.69% 0 0.00% 39
Cedar 15 88.24% 2 11.77% 0 0.00% 17
Christian 64 88.89% 8 11.11% 0 0.00% 72
Dade 8 88.89% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9
Dallas 28 96.55% 1 3.45% 0 0.00% 29
Douglas 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Greene 239 83.57% 47 16.43% 0 0.00% 286
Henry 20 95.24% 1 4.76% 0 0.00% 21
Hickory 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Jasper 111 92.50% 9 7.50% 0 0.00% 120
Laclede 48 94.12% 3 5.88% 0 0.00% 51
Lawrence 25 92.59% 2 7.41% 0 0.00% 27
Mcdonald 12 80.00% 3 20.00% 0 0.00% 15
Miller 25 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 25
Moniteau 11 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11
Morgan 22 95.65% 1 4.35% 0 0.00% 23
Newton 41 93.18% 3 6.82% 0 0.00% 44
Ozark 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Polk 31 86.11% 5 13.89% 0 0.00% 36
St Clair 8 88.89% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9
Stone 11 91.67% 1 8.33% 0 0.00% 12
Taney 49 92.45% 4 7.55% 0 0.00% 53
Vernon 19 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 19
Webster 28 93.33% 2 6.67% 0 0.00% 30
Wright 14 87.50% 2 12.50% 0 0.00% 16
* Region Total * 925 90.07% 102 9.93% 0 0.00% 1,027
Kansas City Jackson 395 89.17% 48 10.84% 0 0.00% 443
* Region Total * 395 89.17% 48 10.84% 0 0.00% 443
St. Louis St Louis City 212 75.99% 67 24.01% 0 0.00% 279
St Louis County 373 84.77% 67 15.23% 0 0.00% 440
* Region Total * 585 81.36% 134 18.64% 0 0.00% 719
Other Out Home Inv 165 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 165
* Region Total * 165 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 165
State Total 3,902 89.56% 455 10.44% 0 0.00% 4,357
0 - 24 Hours Over 24 Hours No Contact
9Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 5.
The Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During July 2015
Number Percent Number Percent Total
Northwest Andrew 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 6
Atchison 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Buchanan 118 97.52% 3 2.48% 121
Caldwell 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4
Carroll 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 5
Cass 27 47.37% 30 52.63% 57
Chariton 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 7
Clay 129 99.23% 1 0.77% 130
Clinton 17 100.00% 0 0.00% 17
Cooper 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
Daviess 11 100.00% 0 0.00% 11
De Kalb 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 5
Gentry 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Grundy 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 9
Harrison 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 9
Holt 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Johnson 20 62.50% 12 37.50% 32
Lafayette 14 70.00% 6 30.00% 20
Linn 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 10
Livingston 9 69.23% 4 30.77% 13
Mercer 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Nodaway 7 70.00% 3 30.00% 10
Pettis 9 52.94% 8 47.06% 17
Platte 38 90.48% 4 9.52% 42
Putnam 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Ray 14 70.00% 6 30.00% 20
Saline 20 86.96% 3 13.04% 23
Sullivan 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 5
Worth 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 500 85.32% 86 14.68% 586
Northeast Adair 18 90.00% 2 10.00% 20
Audrain 16 100.00% 0 0.00% 16
Boone 58 50.88% 56 49.12% 114
Callaway 34 89.47% 4 10.53% 38
Clark 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 9
Cole 39 95.12% 2 4.88% 41
Franklin 70 82.35% 15 17.65% 85
Gasconade 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 8
Howard 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
Jefferson 81 63.78% 46 36.22% 127
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4
Lincoln 46 95.83% 2 4.17% 48
Macon 20 83.33% 4 16.67% 24
Marion 29 100.00% 0 0.00% 29
Monroe 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Montgomery 10 90.91% 1 9.09% 11
Osage 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Pike 14 82.35% 3 17.65% 17
Ralls 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4
Randolph 18 72.00% 7 28.00% 25
Schuyler 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Scotland 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 5
Shelby 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 6
St Charles 83 79.81% 21 20.19% 104
Warren 37 94.87% 2 5.13% 39
* Region Total * 616 78.77% 166 21.23% 782
Southeast Bollinger 7 77.78% 2 22.22% 9
Butler 27 48.21% 29 51.79% 56
Cape Girardeau 27 77.14% 8 22.86% 35
Carter 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 8
Crawford 44 97.78% 1 2.22% 45
Dent 4 33.33% 8 66.67% 12
0 - 45 Days Over 45 Days
10Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 5.
The Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During July 2015
Number Percent Number Percent Total
Southeast Dunklin 30 100.00% 0 0.00% 30
Howell 50 100.00% 0 0.00% 50
Iron 9 90.00% 1 10.00% 10
Madison 5 50.00% 5 50.00% 10
Maries 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 5
Mississippi 12 100.00% 0 0.00% 12
New Madrid 12 85.71% 2 14.29% 14
Oregon 10 90.91% 1 9.09% 11
Pemiscot 24 68.57% 11 31.43% 35
Perry 4 33.33% 8 66.67% 12
Phelps 27 71.05% 11 28.95% 38
Pulaski 32 72.73% 12 27.27% 44
Reynolds 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 5
Ripley 11 78.57% 3 21.43% 14
Scott 38 100.00% 0 0.00% 38
Shannon 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 8
St Francois 32 45.07% 39 54.93% 71
Ste Genevieve 7 31.82% 15 68.18% 22
Stoddard 25 96.15% 1 3.85% 26
Texas 12 60.00% 8 40.00% 20
Washington 10 33.33% 20 66.67% 30
Wayne 17 100.00% 0 0.00% 17
* Region Total * 501 72.93% 186 27.07% 687
Southwest Barry 9 37.50% 15 62.50% 24
Barton 9 81.82% 2 18.18% 11
Bates 8 88.89% 1 11.11% 9
Benton 11 100.00% 0 0.00% 11
Camden 31 79.49% 8 20.51% 39
Cedar 8 47.06% 9 52.94% 17
Christian 67 93.06% 5 6.94% 72
Dade 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 9
Dallas 28 96.55% 1 3.45% 29
Douglas 7 77.78% 2 22.22% 9
Greene 159 52.65% 143 47.35% 302
Henry 18 85.71% 3 14.29% 21
Hickory 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Jasper 104 81.89% 23 18.11% 127
Laclede 45 88.24% 6 11.77% 51
Lawrence 8 28.57% 20 71.43% 28
Mcdonald 11 68.75% 5 31.25% 16
Miller 24 96.00% 1 4.00% 25
Moniteau 12 100.00% 0 0.00% 12
Morgan 22 95.65% 1 4.35% 23
Newton 34 77.27% 10 22.73% 44
Ozark 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Polk 36 100.00% 0 0.00% 36
St Clair 7 77.78% 2 22.22% 9
Stone 7 58.33% 5 41.67% 12
Taney 52 92.86% 4 7.14% 56
Vernon 18 90.00% 2 10.00% 20
Webster 26 83.87% 5 16.13% 31
Wright 12 75.00% 4 25.00% 16
* Region Total * 784 73.82% 278 26.18% 1,062
Kansas City Jackson 326 68.34% 151 31.66% 477
* Region Total * 326 68.34% 151 31.66% 477
St. Louis St Louis City 203 59.88% 136 40.12% 339
St Louis County 320 66.67% 160 33.33% 480
* Region Total * 523 63.86% 296 36.14% 819
Other Out Home Inv 162 98.18% 3 1.82% 165
* Region Total * 162 98.18% 3 1.82% 165
State Total 3,412 74.53% 1,166 25.47% 4,578
0 - 45 Days Over 45 Days
11Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 6.
CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During July 2015
Newborn Non- Preventive Non CA/N
CA/N Crisis Caretaker Service Fatality
Reports Assessment Referral Referral Referral Total
Northwest Andrew 9 2 0 1 0 12
Atchison 2 0 0 0 0 2
Buchanan 130 5 8 7 0 150
Caldwell 4 2 3 0 0 9
Carroll 9 0 1 1 0 11
Cass 58 5 5 6 0 74
Chariton 9 0 0 1 0 10
Clay 139 9 21 4 0 173
Clinton 21 1 0 2 0 24
Cooper 15 1 0 0 0 16
Daviess 10 0 0 1 0 11
De Kalb 2 0 0 2 0 4
Gentry 7 0 0 0 0 7
Grundy 11 1 2 1 0 15
Harrison 12 0 0 0 0 12
Holt 5 0 0 1 0 6
Johnson 36 1 3 3 0 43
Lafayette 25 1 2 2 0 30
Linn 15 0 0 1 0 16
Livingston 19 1 1 0 0 21
Mercer 2 0 1 1 0 4
Nodaway 18 0 0 0 0 18
Pettis 36 0 6 7 0 49
Platte 42 3 3 1 0 49
Putnam 5 0 0 0 0 5
Ray 28 1 2 0 0 31
Saline 32 0 4 1 0 37
Sullivan 4 0 0 1 0 5
Worth 3 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 708 33 62 44 0 847
Northeast Adair 31 0 6 2 0 39
Audrain 35 0 2 4 0 41
Boone 123 8 17 15 0 163
Callaway 38 1 5 8 0 52
Clark 10 0 1 0 0 11
Cole 60 5 9 7 0 81
Franklin 74 4 8 5 0 91
Gasconade 8 1 3 1 0 13
Howard 6 0 4 0 0 10
Jefferson 139 12 15 16 0 182
Knox 3 0 0 0 0 3
Lewis 12 0 2 1 0 15
Lincoln 49 1 3 6 0 59
Macon 17 2 2 1 0 22
Marion 37 1 3 1 0 42
Monroe 3 0 3 0 0 6
Montgomery 13 2 1 2 0 18
Osage 2 1 0 2 0 5
Pike 16 0 1 2 0 19
Ralls 7 0 1 0 0 8
Randolph 21 0 7 1 0 29
Schuyler 3 0 0 0 0 3
Scotland 3 0 0 0 0 3
Shelby 8 0 2 1 0 11
St Charles 145 11 16 11 0 183
Warren 26 2 2 4 0 34
* Region Total * 889 51 113 90 0 1,143
Southeast Bollinger 11 0 2 2 0 15
Butler 55 2 1 9 0 67
Cape Girardeau 50 5 5 9 0 69
Carter 3 0 0 0 0 3
Crawford 22 0 2 0 0 24
Dent 18 2 1 0 0 21
12Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 6.
CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During July 2015
Newborn Non- Preventive Non CA/N
CA/N Crisis Caretaker Service Fatality
Reports Assessment Referral Referral Referral Total
Southeast Dunklin 49 4 2 3 0 58
Howell 59 1 8 5 0 73
Iron 13 1 0 1 0 15
Madison 16 0 1 1 0 18
Maries 7 0 0 0 0 7
Mississippi 9 0 0 0 0 9
New Madrid 30 0 0 3 0 33
Oregon 10 0 1 1 0 12
Pemiscot 25 0 2 2 0 29
Perry 13 1 4 0 0 18
Phelps 39 6 10 7 0 62
Pulaski 40 2 10 4 0 56
Reynolds 16 1 2 0 0 19
Ripley 17 1 1 1 0 20
Scott 44 1 5 3 0 53
Shannon 11 2 0 0 0 13
St Francois 73 4 3 1 0 81
Ste Genevieve 22 0 1 1 0 24
Stoddard 24 1 1 4 0 30
Texas 32 1 5 2 0 40
Washington 27 4 3 1 0 35
Wayne 17 1 0 2 0 20
* Region Total * 752 40 70 62 0 924
Southwest Barry 42 4 4 5 0 55
Barton 14 1 1 0 0 16
Bates 20 2 2 0 0 24
Benton 13 1 2 1 0 17
Camden 43 5 7 3 0 58
Cedar 16 0 1 2 0 19
Christian 53 4 14 9 0 80
Dade 6 0 0 0 0 6
Dallas 21 0 4 1 0 26
Douglas 16 0 0 0 0 16
Greene 331 31 52 47 0 461
Henry 31 5 3 0 0 39
Hickory 8 1 2 0 0 11
Jasper 129 4 10 15 0 158
Laclede 50 3 5 6 0 64
Lawrence 29 2 3 1 0 35
Mcdonald 22 3 2 1 0 28
Miller 18 1 2 2 0 23
Moniteau 14 1 1 1 0 17
Morgan 16 2 1 1 0 20
Newton 63 3 3 6 0 75
Ozark 4 0 0 0 0 4
Polk 40 0 10 3 0 53
St Clair 12 1 0 0 0 13
Stone 36 5 5 1 0 47
Taney 74 1 8 11 0 94
Vernon 32 2 0 3 0 37
Webster 32 2 4 4 0 42
Wright 29 0 5 1 0 35
* Region Total * 1,214 84 151 124 0 1,573
Kansas City Jackson 591 74 82 61 0 808
* Region Total * 591 74 82 61 0 808
St. Louis St Louis City 248 24 16 20 0 308
St Louis County 376 27 58 37 0 498
* Region Total * 624 51 74 57 0 806
Other Out Home Inv 176 0 0 0 0 176
Out Of State 11 0 0 0 0 11
Stat Unit 0 0 0 0 76 76
* Region Total * 187 0 0 0 76 263
State Total 4,965 333 552 438 76 6,364
13Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0% 0%
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
6,500
7,000
7,500
Jul-
11
Oct
-11
Jan
-12
Ap
r-1
2
Jul-
12
Oct
-12
Jan
-13
Ap
r-1
3
Jul-
13
Oct
-13
Jan
-14
Ap
r-1
4
Jul-
14
Oct
-14
Jan
-15
Ap
r-1
5
Jul-
15
Figure 2.
Child Abuse & Neglect Reports
For 4 Years Through July 2015
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
6,500
7,000
7,500
Au
g
Sep
Oct
No
v
De
c
Jan
Feb
Mar
Ap
r
May Jun
Jul
Figure 3.
Child Abuse & Neglect Reports
From August 2013 Through July 2015
2013-2014 2014-2015
14Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0% 0%
-10.00%
-5.00%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 4.
Percentage Change in CA/N Reports
Made Twelve Months Apart July 2014 and July 2015
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 5.
CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed
During July 2015 by Conclusion
Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstianted Family Assessment Other
15Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0% 0%
Substantiated 8%
Unsubstantiated P S I 5%
Unsubstantiated 28%
Family Assessment 55%
Other 4%
Figure 6.
CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed
During July 2015 by Conclusion
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 7.
Time Between Report and Child Contact
For Investigations/Assessments Completed in July 2015
Within 24 Hours After 24 Hours No Contact
16Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 8.
Percentage of Investigations/Assessments
Completed Within 45 Days During July 2015
Within 45 Days More Than 45 Days
17Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Children’s Services Management Report 18 Research and Data Analysis
Notes: Child Abuse and Neglect Tables and Figures
Table 1.
• Based upon incidents and children reported during the month.
• Counts of children may be duplicated (i.e., children may be victims on multiple incidents during any
given month).
Table 2.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.
• Counts of children may be duplicated (i.e., children may be victims on multiple incidents during any
given month).
• Conclusions are as follows:
Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated
Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated
Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-Services Not Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-cooperative/Child Safe
Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 30 Days Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined
Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State, Home Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation), Substantiated (School
Investigation), and Unresolved (School Investigation)
• Population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19, 2011 by The US Census
Bureau, www.census.gov.
Table 3.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.
• Conclusions are as follows: Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence
Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated
Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-Services Not
Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-cooperative/Child Safe Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 30 Days
Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State, Home
Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation), Substantiated (School
Investigation), and Unresolved (School Investigation)
Table 4.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. Does not include information
on expunged reports and reports where the only alleged category of abuse/neglect was
educational neglect, or reports concluded as E- Unable to Locate, G- Inappropriate report or H- Located out of state.
Children’s Services Management Report 19 Research and Data Analysis
Table 5.
• Based upon incidents concluded during the month.
Table 6.
• Based upon incidents and referrals reported during the month.
Figure 2. and Figure 3.
• Based upon incidents reported during the month.
Figure 4.
• Based upon incidents reported during the month compared to incidents reported during the same month of the previous year.
Figure 5. and Figure 6.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.
• Conclusions are as follows: Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence
Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated
Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-Services Not
Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-cooperative/Child Safe Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 30 Days
Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State, Home
Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation), Substantiated (School
Investigation), and Unresolved (School Investigation)
• Figures do not include Out-of-Home Investigation, STAT Unit, or Out of State categories.
Figure 7.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. Does not include information
on expunged reports and reports where the only alleged category of abuse/neglect was educational neglect, or reports concluded as E- Unable to Locate, G- Inappropriate report or H- Located out of state.
Figure 8.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.
Table 7.
Family-Centered Services Cases Open at the End of July 2015
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment Cases Active
Northwest Andrew 0 1 0 0 2 3
Atchison 0 1 0 0 4 5
Buchanan 19 13 1 11 41 85
Caldwell 1 3 0 0 4 8
Carroll 3 1 0 0 0 4
Cass 8 17 21 1 82 129
Chariton 1 1 5 0 12 19
Clay 6 19 12 11 72 120
Clinton 3 5 1 2 5 16
Cooper 1 1 2 2 4 10
Daviess 1 4 0 0 6 11
De Kalb 0 2 0 1 11 14
Gentry 5 0 0 1 3 9
Grundy 5 4 0 1 12 22
Harrison 1 1 0 0 1 3
Holt 0 0 1 0 4 5
Johnson 0 17 15 2 41 75
Lafayette 10 9 1 2 17 39
Linn 1 6 12 2 23 44
Livingston 0 5 0 2 11 18
Mercer 1 1 0 0 3 5
Nodaway 0 1 0 1 16 18
Pettis 6 9 4 2 24 45
Platte 1 9 2 0 17 29
Putnam 3 3 2 0 1 9
Ray 3 3 0 2 4 12
Saline 6 8 1 3 16 34
Sullivan 2 0 1 2 10 15
Worth 0 0 0 0 1 1
* Region Total * 87 144 81 48 447 807
Northeast Adair 2 9 2 1 32 46
Audrain 6 9 0 0 40 55
Boone 17 24 26 5 168 240
Callaway 21 11 3 6 51 92
Clark 3 2 2 0 13 20
Cole 4 20 5 9 109 147
Franklin 24 23 0 10 99 156
Gasconade 2 2 0 3 19 26
Howard 2 3 1 1 12 19
Jefferson 78 31 18 15 334 476
Knox 0 0 0 0 3 3
Lewis 2 4 2 0 15 23
Lincoln 1 3 4 8 47 63
Macon 2 4 2 0 15 23
Marion 30 8 5 3 21 67
Monroe 1 2 1 0 8 12
Montgomery 3 5 0 1 12 21
Osage 1 1 0 0 8 10
Pike 9 4 0 1 19 33
Ralls 4 2 0 0 6 12
Randolph 9 14 1 2 71 97
Schuyler 1 1 1 0 9 12
Scotland 0 2 1 0 7 10
Shelby 1 4 0 0 3 8
St Charles 16 20 5 14 146 201
Warren 6 10 2 5 25 48
* Region Total * 245 218 81 84 1,292 1,920
Southeast Bollinger 4 3 0 2 19 28
Butler 6 12 2 14 54 88
Cape Girardeau 11 17 2 28 101 159
Carter 0 0 0 1 2 3
Crawford 3 14 0 3 15 35
Dent 2 12 0 3 20 37
22Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 7.
Family-Centered Services Cases Open at the End of July 2015
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment Cases Active
Southeast Dunklin 2 5 3 2 45 57
Howell 8 16 0 4 52 80
Iron 2 6 0 0 17 25
Madison 0 0 0 0 8 8
Maries 1 0 1 1 8 11
Mississippi 1 4 0 2 14 21
New Madrid 1 10 0 8 55 74
Oregon 1 2 0 1 5 9
Pemiscot 2 9 0 6 49 66
Perry 1 2 0 0 20 23
Phelps 2 14 2 2 92 112
Pulaski 1 8 0 2 78 89
Reynolds 0 4 1 1 12 18
Ripley 5 5 0 1 12 23
Scott 2 4 0 6 66 78
Shannon 1 1 0 2 10 14
St Francois 15 9 2 4 48 78
Ste Genevieve 2 2 0 0 7 11
Stoddard 4 1 3 6 76 90
Texas 4 3 1 5 44 57
Washington 12 6 1 4 28 51
Wayne 2 7 0 2 16 27
* Region Total * 95 176 18 110 973 1,372
Southwest Barry 2 7 2 0 94 105
Barton 1 0 0 2 17 20
Bates 2 0 1 7 17 27
Benton 4 3 1 0 9 17
Camden 6 6 1 3 49 65
Cedar 1 5 1 1 19 27
Christian 2 16 4 4 53 79
Dade 0 3 0 1 10 14
Dallas 3 3 0 0 21 27
Douglas 1 1 0 1 15 18
Greene 10 22 2 5 428 467
Henry 0 7 3 4 41 55
Hickory 0 1 0 0 3 4
Jasper 4 37 52 21 292 406
Laclede 13 7 2 0 75 97
Lawrence 2 12 0 7 59 80
Mcdonald 1 8 3 1 60 73
Miller 1 9 0 0 45 55
Moniteau 2 4 0 0 6 12
Morgan 4 7 0 2 17 30
Newton 0 14 13 6 135 168
Ozark 1 0 0 0 11 12
Polk 3 10 3 2 59 77
St Clair 0 2 1 1 14 18
Stone 1 19 1 1 41 63
Taney 6 14 9 11 119 159
Vernon 0 3 0 4 19 26
Webster 5 3 0 0 22 30
Wright 5 9 1 1 53 69
* Region Total * 80 232 100 85 1,803 2,300
Kansas City Jackson 111 66 73 40 935 1,225
* Region Total * 111 66 73 40 935 1,225
St. Louis St Louis City 54 33 4 19 284 394
St Louis County 209 165 38 80 433 925
* Region Total * 263 198 42 99 717 1,319
State Total 881 1,034 395 466 6,167 8,943
23Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 8.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During July 2015
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment Cases Active
Northwest Andrew 0 1 0 0 2 3
Atchison 0 2 0 0 6 8
Buchanan 21 15 2 13 47 98
Caldwell 1 3 0 0 6 10
Carroll 3 1 0 0 0 4
Cass 9 17 22 1 85 134
Chariton 1 1 5 0 12 19
Clay 6 19 12 11 79 127
Clinton 3 5 1 2 6 17
Cooper 1 1 2 2 5 11
Daviess 2 4 0 0 6 12
De Kalb 1 2 0 1 11 15
Gentry 5 0 0 1 4 10
Grundy 5 4 1 1 12 23
Harrison 2 4 0 0 3 9
Holt 0 0 1 0 4 5
Johnson 0 18 15 2 43 78
Lafayette 10 10 1 2 17 40
Linn 1 6 12 2 24 45
Livingston 0 5 0 2 12 19
Mercer 1 1 0 0 3 5
Nodaway 1 2 0 1 18 22
Pettis 6 9 4 2 29 50
Platte 1 11 2 0 17 31
Putnam 3 4 2 0 1 10
Ray 3 3 0 2 4 12
Saline 6 8 2 3 16 35
Sullivan 2 0 1 2 10 15
Worth 0 0 0 0 1 1
* Region Total * 94 156 85 50 483 868
Northeast Adair 2 9 2 1 33 47
Audrain 6 11 0 0 41 58
Boone 19 27 28 6 173 253
Callaway 23 12 3 6 56 100
Clark 3 2 3 0 13 21
Cole 4 21 5 9 112 151
Franklin 29 28 0 10 108 175
Gasconade 2 2 0 3 19 26
Howard 2 3 1 1 12 19
Jefferson 81 32 20 15 358 506
Knox 0 0 0 0 3 3
Lewis 2 4 2 0 17 25
Lincoln 1 4 5 8 51 69
Macon 3 5 2 0 17 27
Marion 33 9 5 3 24 74
Monroe 1 2 1 0 8 12
Montgomery 3 6 0 1 12 22
Osage 1 1 0 0 8 10
Pike 10 4 0 1 20 35
Ralls 4 2 0 0 6 12
Randolph 9 15 2 2 74 102
Schuyler 1 1 1 0 9 12
Scotland 0 3 1 0 9 13
Shelby 2 4 0 0 4 10
St Charles 18 21 5 16 156 216
Warren 6 11 2 7 26 52
* Region Total * 265 239 88 89 1,369 2,050
Southeast Bollinger 5 3 0 2 21 31
Butler 8 15 2 18 65 108
Cape Girardeau 12 19 2 29 106 168
Carter 0 0 0 1 5 6
Crawford 5 17 0 3 21 46
Dent 2 13 0 3 23 41
24Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 8.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During July 2015
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment Cases Active
Southeast Dunklin 2 7 5 2 49 65
Howell 10 16 0 6 57 89
Iron 2 7 0 0 18 27
Madison 0 0 0 0 9 9
Maries 1 0 1 1 8 11
Mississippi 1 5 0 2 14 22
New Madrid 1 10 0 8 60 79
Oregon 1 2 0 2 7 12
Pemiscot 3 11 0 7 54 75
Perry 1 5 0 0 20 26
Phelps 3 14 2 2 102 123
Pulaski 1 8 0 2 87 98
Reynolds 0 4 1 1 13 19
Ripley 5 7 0 1 16 29
Scott 2 6 0 6 67 81
Shannon 1 1 0 2 10 14
St Francois 15 9 2 5 51 82
Ste Genevieve 2 3 0 0 7 12
Stoddard 5 2 3 7 80 97
Texas 4 3 1 5 46 59
Washington 12 8 1 4 29 54
Wayne 2 9 0 2 17 30
* Region Total * 106 204 20 121 1,062 1,513
Southwest Barry 3 7 2 1 97 110
Barton 1 0 0 2 20 23
Bates 2 0 1 7 19 29
Benton 4 3 1 0 9 17
Camden 7 6 3 4 58 78
Cedar 1 5 1 1 21 29
Christian 2 20 4 4 61 91
Dade 1 3 0 1 10 15
Dallas 3 3 0 0 22 28
Douglas 1 1 0 3 16 21
Greene 11 22 2 5 455 495
Henry 0 7 4 4 42 57
Hickory 0 1 0 0 3 4
Jasper 5 40 56 21 309 431
Laclede 15 7 2 0 86 110
Lawrence 3 16 0 7 64 90
Mcdonald 1 10 4 1 63 79
Miller 1 9 0 0 49 59
Moniteau 3 5 0 0 9 17
Morgan 7 10 0 2 18 37
Newton 0 18 14 7 149 188
Ozark 1 0 0 0 12 13
Polk 3 10 3 2 62 80
St Clair 0 2 1 1 14 18
Stone 1 22 1 1 45 70
Taney 6 15 9 11 124 165
Vernon 0 3 0 4 21 28
Webster 5 3 0 0 23 31
Wright 6 10 2 1 60 79
* Region Total * 93 258 110 90 1,941 2,492
Kansas City Jackson 115 70 76 41 990 1,292
* Region Total * 115 70 76 41 990 1,292
St. Louis St Louis City 56 35 4 19 312 426
St Louis County 231 181 43 86 477 1,018
* Region Total * 287 216 47 105 789 1,444
State Total 960 1,143 426 496 6,634 9,659
25Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 9.
Persons in Family-Centered Services During July 2015
Child Total Persons with
Adults Children Caretakers Persons Court Action
Northwest Andrew 9 8 0 17 1
Atchison 14 16 0 30 11
Buchanan 249 209 0 458 74
Caldwell 22 23 0 45 11
Carroll 8 7 0 15 4
Cass 256 279 0 535 203
Chariton 39 42 0 81 24
Clay 290 267 1 558 172
Clinton 30 34 0 64 19
Cooper 17 24 0 41 16
Daviess 26 31 0 57 15
De Kalb 37 34 0 71 24
Gentry 19 14 0 33 9
Grundy 36 54 0 90 27
Harrison 16 29 0 45 9
Holt 13 9 0 22 6
Johnson 149 158 1 308 115
Lafayette 89 79 0 168 37
Linn 91 92 0 183 58
Livingston 34 37 0 71 24
Mercer 10 15 0 25 10
Nodaway 50 41 0 91 27
Pettis 94 118 0 212 76
Platte 73 75 0 148 28
Putnam 19 16 0 35 11
Ray 26 33 2 61 21
Saline 61 85 0 146 56
Sullivan 40 41 0 81 28
Worth 1 1 0 2 1
* Region Total * 1,818 1,871 4 3,693 1,117
Northeast Adair 98 94 0 192 65
Audrain 149 138 3 290 72
Boone 541 496 2 1,039 318
Callaway 232 216 1 449 151
Clark 36 47 0 83 39
Cole 311 335 1 647 190
Franklin 370 367 1 738 236
Gasconade 58 65 1 124 35
Howard 40 37 0 77 27
Jefferson 1,128 978 7 2,113 745
Knox 5 7 0 12 4
Lewis 53 39 0 92 24
Lincoln 163 134 2 299 60
Macon 47 49 0 96 34
Marion 127 151 0 278 95
Monroe 22 22 0 44 13
Montgomery 42 56 0 98 23
Osage 21 26 0 47 19
Pike 80 82 0 162 42
Ralls 23 29 0 52 16
Randolph 180 191 0 371 129
Schuyler 18 13 1 32 13
Scotland 21 28 0 49 17
Shelby 13 23 0 36 16
St Charles 457 437 3 897 250
Warren 114 116 1 231 72
* Region Total * 4,349 4,176 23 8,548 2,705
Southeast Bollinger 82 78 1 161 39
Butler 223 249 0 472 135
Cape Girardeau 292 352 0 644 208
Carter 16 10 0 26 2
Crawford 102 113 0 215 50
Dent 99 95 0 194 55
26Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 9.
Persons in Family-Centered Services During July 2015
Child Total Persons with
Adults Children Caretakers Persons Court Action
Southeast Dunklin 112 143 0 255 99
Howell 161 193 0 354 42
Iron 70 69 0 139 41
Madison 25 23 0 48 14
Maries 23 21 0 44 16
Mississippi 49 41 0 90 27
New Madrid 157 174 1 332 61
Oregon 23 33 0 56 12
Pemiscot 118 197 0 315 90
Perry 55 52 1 108 25
Phelps 234 245 5 484 163
Pulaski 205 212 3 420 116
Reynolds 44 34 0 78 15
Ripley 58 71 0 129 41
Scott 177 180 0 357 121
Shannon 33 30 1 64 8
St Francois 178 154 1 333 118
Ste Genevieve 25 27 0 52 11
Stoddard 174 178 0 352 109
Texas 104 135 0 239 85
Washington 111 100 0 211 85
Wayne 76 87 0 163 36
* Region Total * 3,026 3,296 13 6,335 1,824
Southwest Barry 219 247 0 466 176
Barton 54 45 0 99 27
Bates 57 53 0 110 33
Benton 35 40 0 75 20
Camden 158 153 1 312 82
Cedar 55 73 0 128 39
Christian 197 190 0 387 111
Dade 34 31 0 65 20
Dallas 67 65 0 132 46
Douglas 46 44 0 90 30
Greene 1,074 980 4 2,058 686
Henry 109 115 0 224 68
Hickory 8 15 0 23 3
Jasper 843 872 4 1,719 646
Laclede 232 262 0 494 170
Lawrence 170 208 0 378 141
Mcdonald 130 157 0 287 128
Miller 119 119 0 238 50
Moniteau 38 28 0 66 10
Morgan 76 91 0 167 29
Newton 335 366 0 701 310
Ozark 21 25 0 46 21
Polk 154 136 1 291 80
St Clair 36 40 1 77 27
Stone 127 167 0 294 95
Taney 314 342 2 658 207
Vernon 47 60 1 108 39
Webster 67 70 0 137 43
Wright 164 188 0 352 110
* Region Total * 4,986 5,182 14 10,182 3,447
Kansas City Jackson 2,462 2,795 16 5,273 2,160
* Region Total * 2,462 2,795 16 5,273 2,160
St. Louis St Louis City 793 1,100 15 1,908 640
St Louis County 1,914 2,228 19 4,161 1,114
* Region Total * 2,707 3,328 34 6,069 1,754
State Total 19,348 20,648 104 40,100 13,007
27Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 10.
Family-Centered Services Cases Opened During July 2015
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment Cases Active
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 0 2 0 0 5 7
Caldwell 0 1 0 0 1 2
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 1 1 1 0 1 4
Chariton 0 0 0 0 1 1
Clay 1 1 1 0 5 8
Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cooper 0 0 1 0 0 1
Daviess 1 0 0 0 1 2
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gentry 2 0 0 0 0 2
Grundy 0 0 0 0 2 2
Harrison 0 1 0 0 0 1
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 1 0 0 1 2
Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0
Linn 0 0 0 0 1 1
Livingston 0 2 0 1 1 4
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 0 0 0 4 4
Pettis 0 2 0 0 1 3
Platte 0 2 1 0 0 3
Putnam 0 0 0 0 1 1
Ray 1 0 0 0 1 2
Saline 1 1 0 0 2 4
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 7 14 4 1 28 54
Northeast Adair 0 4 0 0 3 7
Audrain 0 1 0 0 4 5
Boone 1 4 1 0 9 15
Callaway 3 0 0 1 3 7
Clark 1 0 0 0 0 1
Cole 0 0 1 1 5 7
Franklin 2 2 0 1 10 15
Gasconade 0 0 0 1 1 2
Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jefferson 3 7 1 0 21 32
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 1 0 0 0 0 1
Lincoln 0 0 1 0 9 10
Macon 0 0 0 0 3 3
Marion 2 5 0 1 3 11
Monroe 0 0 0 0 2 2
Montgomery 0 1 0 0 1 2
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 1 0 0 0 4 5
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0
Randolph 0 0 0 0 6 6
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 2 2
Scotland 0 1 0 0 0 1
Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Charles 0 1 0 4 14 19
Warren 0 0 0 1 2 3
* Region Total * 14 26 4 10 102 156
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 1 1
Butler 3 2 0 2 3 10
Cape Girardeau 0 1 0 0 10 11
Carter 0 0 0 1 1 2
Crawford 1 2 0 1 1 5
Dent 0 2 0 0 2 4
28Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 10.
Family-Centered Services Cases Opened During July 2015
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment Cases Active
Southeast Dunklin 0 2 1 1 9 13
Howell 2 1 0 1 8 12
Iron 0 1 0 0 1 2
Madison 0 0 0 0 2 2
Maries 0 0 0 1 1 2
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0
New Madrid 0 2 0 0 6 8
Oregon 1 0 0 0 1 2
Pemiscot 0 1 0 0 6 7
Perry 0 0 0 0 1 1
Phelps 0 0 0 0 8 8
Pulaski 0 0 0 0 12 12
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ripley 2 0 0 0 1 3
Scott 1 1 0 1 9 12
Shannon 0 1 0 1 2 4
St Francois 0 2 0 0 1 3
Ste Genevieve 0 1 0 0 1 2
Stoddard 0 0 0 0 11 11
Texas 0 0 0 0 3 3
Washington 1 0 1 0 4 6
Wayne 0 1 0 0 1 2
* Region Total * 11 20 2 9 106 148
Southwest Barry 0 0 0 0 8 8
Barton 0 0 0 0 1 1
Bates 0 0 0 1 1 2
Benton 1 0 0 0 1 2
Camden 2 1 0 1 4 8
Cedar 0 0 0 0 3 3
Christian 0 0 0 0 7 7
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dallas 0 0 0 0 5 5
Douglas 0 0 0 0 1 1
Greene 0 1 0 0 34 35
Henry 0 0 1 1 3 5
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jasper 0 1 0 0 18 19
Laclede 1 0 1 0 12 14
Lawrence 0 0 0 0 2 2
Mcdonald 0 2 1 0 0 3
Miller 0 1 0 0 8 9
Moniteau 1 1 0 0 3 5
Morgan 0 4 0 1 5 10
Newton 0 1 0 0 15 16
Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0
Polk 0 1 0 0 4 5
St Clair 0 0 0 0 2 2
Stone 0 0 0 0 4 4
Taney 1 2 1 0 7 11
Vernon 0 0 0 1 0 1
Webster 0 0 0 0 1 1
Wright 1 0 0 0 1 2
* Region Total * 7 15 4 5 150 181
Kansas City Jackson 0 3 1 2 63 69
* Region Total * 0 3 1 2 63 69
St. Louis St Louis City 0 0 0 2 25 27
St Louis County 17 15 1 4 31 68
* Region Total * 17 15 1 6 56 95
State Total 56 93 16 33 505 703
29Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 11.
Family-Centered Services Cases Closed During July 2015
by Close Reason
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Cases Closed
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Atchison 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Buchanan 11 85.00% 2 15.00% 13
Caldwell 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cass 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 5
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clay 3 43.00% 4 57.00% 7
Clinton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Cooper 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Daviess 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
De Kalb 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Gentry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Grundy 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Harrison 4 67.00% 2 33.00% 6
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 2 67.00% 1 33.00% 3
Lafayette 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Linn 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Livingston 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 2 33.00% 4 67.00% 6
Pettis 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 5
Platte 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Putnam 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Saline 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 36 56.00% 28 44.00% 64
Northeast Adair 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Audrain 2 67.00% 1 33.00% 3
Boone 7 50.00% 7 50.00% 14
Callaway 5 63.00% 3 38.00% 8
Clark 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Cole 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4
Franklin 9 47.00% 10 53.00% 19
Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jefferson 19 63.00% 11 37.00% 30
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Lincoln 1 17.00% 5 83.00% 6
Macon 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4
Marion 6 75.00% 2 25.00% 8
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Montgomery 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pike 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Randolph 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 5
Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scotland 2 67.00% 1 33.00% 3
Shelby 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
St Charles 8 53.00% 7 47.00% 15
Warren 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 5
* Region Total * 79 59.00% 54 41.00% 133
Southeast Bollinger 1 33.00% 2 67.00% 3
Butler 13 65.00% 7 35.00% 20
Cape Girardeau 3 33.00% 6 67.00% 9
Carter 2 67.00% 1 33.00% 3
Crawford 4 31.00% 9 69.00% 13
Dent 4 57.00% 3 43.00% 7
Goal Achieved Other
30Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 11.
Family-Centered Services Cases Closed During July 2015
by Close Reason
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Cases Closed
Southeast Dunklin 6 67.00% 3 33.00% 9
Howell 5 56.00% 4 44.00% 9
Iron 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4
Madison 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mississippi 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
New Madrid 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 5
Oregon 1 33.00% 2 67.00% 3
Pemiscot 7 70.00% 3 30.00% 10
Perry 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Phelps 9 82.00% 2 18.00% 11
Pulaski 4 44.00% 5 56.00% 9
Reynolds 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Ripley 5 83.00% 1 17.00% 6
Scott 2 67.00% 1 33.00% 3
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Francois 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4
Ste Genevieve 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Stoddard 5 71.00% 2 29.00% 7
Texas 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Washington 2 67.00% 1 33.00% 3
Wayne 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 5
* Region Total * 97 63.00% 56 37.00% 153
Southwest Barry 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 5
Barton 2 67.00% 1 33.00% 3
Bates 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Camden 7 54.00% 6 46.00% 13
Cedar 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Christian 9 69.00% 4 31.00% 13
Dade 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Dallas 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Douglas 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Greene 18 53.00% 16 47.00% 34
Henry 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jasper 20 77.00% 6 23.00% 26
Laclede 10 67.00% 5 33.00% 15
Lawrence 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 10
Mcdonald 4 67.00% 2 33.00% 6
Miller 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 5
Moniteau 1 20.00% 4 80.00% 5
Morgan 3 43.00% 4 57.00% 7
Newton 17 85.00% 3 15.00% 20
Ozark 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Polk 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 3
St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stone 2 29.00% 5 71.00% 7
Taney 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 6
Vernon 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Webster 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Wright 6 60.00% 4 40.00% 10
* Region Total * 133 66.00% 70 34.00% 203
Kansas City Jackson 50 72.00% 19 28.00% 69
* Region Total * 50 72.00% 19 28.00% 69
St. Louis St Louis City 25 74.00% 9 26.00% 34
St Louis County 66 69.00% 29 31.00% 95
* Region Total * 91 71.00% 38 29.00% 129
State Total 486 65.00% 265 35.00% 751
Goal Achieved Other
31Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 12.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During July 2015
Which Have Had Court Involvement by Number of Months Open
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Atchison 1 17.00% 0 0.00% 2 33.00% 3 50.00% 6
Buchanan 12 27.00% 11 24.00% 5 11.00% 17 38.00% 45
Caldwell 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 2 40.00% 5
Carroll 1 33.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 67.00% 3
Cass 14 12.00% 15 13.00% 15 13.00% 74 63.00% 118
Chariton 1 8.00% 4 31.00% 2 15.00% 6 46.00% 13
Clay 20 20.00% 13 13.00% 13 13.00% 53 54.00% 99
Clinton 2 15.00% 1 8.00% 3 23.00% 7 54.00% 13
Cooper 2 18.00% 1 9.00% 2 18.00% 6 55.00% 11
Daviess 1 14.00% 2 29.00% 0 0.00% 4 57.00% 7
De Kalb 4 31.00% 4 31.00% 0 0.00% 5 38.00% 13
Gentry 5 63.00% 0 0.00% 1 13.00% 2 25.00% 8
Grundy 2 13.00% 2 13.00% 1 6.00% 11 69.00% 16
Harrison 1 33.00% 1 33.00% 0 0.00% 1 33.00% 3
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 3
Johnson 14 21.00% 10 15.00% 9 13.00% 35 51.00% 68
Lafayette 3 13.00% 3 13.00% 5 21.00% 13 54.00% 24
Linn 4 12.00% 8 24.00% 5 15.00% 17 50.00% 34
Livingston 5 42.00% 4 33.00% 0 0.00% 3 25.00% 12
Mercer 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 4
Nodaway 7 41.00% 4 24.00% 3 18.00% 3 18.00% 17
Pettis 6 16.00% 9 24.00% 8 21.00% 15 39.00% 38
Platte 3 18.00% 3 18.00% 5 29.00% 6 35.00% 17
Putnam 2 25.00% 1 13.00% 1 13.00% 4 50.00% 8
Ray 1 10.00% 2 20.00% 2 20.00% 5 50.00% 10
Saline 6 22.00% 4 15.00% 3 11.00% 14 52.00% 27
Sullivan 1 9.00% 1 9.00% 2 18.00% 7 64.00% 11
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
* Region Total * 120 19.00% 104 16.00% 91 14.00% 320 50.00% 635
Northeast Adair 12 29.00% 10 24.00% 2 5.00% 17 41.00% 41
Audrain 6 15.00% 11 28.00% 8 20.00% 15 38.00% 40
Boone 37 19.00% 31 16.00% 31 16.00% 96 49.00% 195
Callaway 17 22.00% 15 19.00% 13 16.00% 34 43.00% 79
Clark 3 17.00% 4 22.00% 4 22.00% 7 39.00% 18
Cole 18 18.00% 20 20.00% 9 9.00% 52 53.00% 99
Franklin 24 19.00% 18 15.00% 22 18.00% 60 48.00% 124
Gasconade 4 25.00% 1 6.00% 2 13.00% 9 56.00% 16
Howard 3 20.00% 1 7.00% 1 7.00% 10 67.00% 15
Jefferson 79 19.00% 76 18.00% 76 18.00% 194 46.00% 425
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 67.00% 1 33.00% 3
Lewis 5 28.00% 3 17.00% 5 28.00% 5 28.00% 18
Lincoln 15 38.00% 7 18.00% 6 15.00% 12 30.00% 40
Macon 10 48.00% 7 33.00% 2 10.00% 2 10.00% 21
Marion 10 20.00% 5 10.00% 3 6.00% 33 65.00% 51
Monroe 0 0.00% 1 10.00% 2 20.00% 7 70.00% 10
Montgomery 2 15.00% 6 46.00% 1 8.00% 4 31.00% 13
Osage 1 13.00% 1 13.00% 3 38.00% 3 38.00% 8
Pike 3 14.00% 6 27.00% 4 18.00% 9 41.00% 22
Ralls 1 11.00% 2 22.00% 0 0.00% 6 67.00% 9
Randolph 17 20.00% 14 16.00% 11 13.00% 43 51.00% 85
Schuyler 4 33.00% 1 8.00% 2 17.00% 5 42.00% 12
Scotland 1 11.00% 1 11.00% 4 44.00% 3 33.00% 9
Shelby 0 0.00% 3 38.00% 3 38.00% 2 25.00% 8
St Charles 28 19.00% 24 16.00% 26 18.00% 68 47.00% 146
Warren 11 27.00% 14 34.00% 2 5.00% 14 34.00% 41
* Region Total * 311 20.00% 282 18.00% 244 16.00% 711 46.00% 1,548
Southeast Bollinger 8 42.00% 3 16.00% 3 16.00% 5 26.00% 19
Butler 12 21.00% 13 23.00% 12 21.00% 19 34.00% 56
Cape Girardeau 27 25.00% 28 25.00% 17 15.00% 38 35.00% 110
Carter 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Crawford 7 30.00% 4 17.00% 2 9.00% 10 43.00% 23
Dent 8 30.00% 4 15.00% 8 30.00% 7 26.00% 27
0 - 4 Months 4 - 8 Months 8 - 12 Months 12 + Months
32Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 12.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During July 2015
Which Have Had Court Involvement by Number of Months Open
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases
Southeast Dunklin 20 43.00% 7 15.00% 12 26.00% 7 15.00% 46
Howell 7 25.00% 4 14.00% 5 18.00% 12 43.00% 28
Iron 5 24.00% 3 14.00% 0 0.00% 13 62.00% 21
Madison 3 38.00% 0 0.00% 1 13.00% 4 50.00% 8
Maries 1 11.00% 3 33.00% 1 11.00% 4 44.00% 9
Mississippi 1 6.00% 7 44.00% 4 25.00% 4 25.00% 16
New Madrid 6 19.00% 3 10.00% 6 19.00% 16 52.00% 31
Oregon 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 4
Pemiscot 14 35.00% 5 13.00% 4 10.00% 17 43.00% 40
Perry 5 29.00% 3 18.00% 3 18.00% 6 35.00% 17
Phelps 27 27.00% 18 18.00% 18 18.00% 38 38.00% 101
Pulaski 12 19.00% 12 19.00% 6 10.00% 32 52.00% 62
Reynolds 1 8.00% 4 33.00% 4 33.00% 3 25.00% 12
Ripley 7 37.00% 7 37.00% 2 11.00% 3 16.00% 19
Scott 20 34.00% 14 24.00% 16 27.00% 9 15.00% 59
Shannon 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 4
St Francois 14 21.00% 7 11.00% 7 11.00% 38 58.00% 66
Ste Genevieve 3 43.00% 1 14.00% 2 29.00% 1 14.00% 7
Stoddard 25 36.00% 20 29.00% 10 14.00% 15 21.00% 70
Texas 5 13.00% 8 21.00% 4 10.00% 22 56.00% 39
Washington 14 28.00% 10 20.00% 5 10.00% 21 42.00% 50
Wayne 2 12.00% 3 18.00% 3 18.00% 9 53.00% 17
* Region Total * 256 27.00% 193 20.00% 155 16.00% 358 37.00% 962
Southwest Barry 23 25.00% 21 23.00% 24 26.00% 25 27.00% 93
Barton 1 6.00% 4 22.00% 5 28.00% 8 44.00% 18
Bates 6 32.00% 4 21.00% 3 16.00% 6 32.00% 19
Benton 4 29.00% 5 36.00% 1 7.00% 4 29.00% 14
Camden 9 17.00% 5 10.00% 11 21.00% 27 52.00% 52
Cedar 4 22.00% 5 28.00% 4 22.00% 5 28.00% 18
Christian 18 28.00% 18 28.00% 13 20.00% 16 25.00% 65
Dade 2 17.00% 0 0.00% 2 17.00% 8 67.00% 12
Dallas 3 13.00% 5 22.00% 5 22.00% 10 43.00% 23
Douglas 3 18.00% 4 24.00% 5 29.00% 5 29.00% 17
Greene 55 14.00% 54 14.00% 59 15.00% 219 57.00% 387
Henry 11 24.00% 7 16.00% 5 11.00% 22 49.00% 45
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Jasper 61 17.00% 51 15.00% 37 11.00% 200 57.00% 349
Laclede 21 26.00% 18 22.00% 8 10.00% 34 42.00% 81
Lawrence 10 14.00% 13 19.00% 17 24.00% 30 43.00% 70
Mcdonald 15 21.00% 10 14.00% 12 17.00% 33 47.00% 70
Miller 11 30.00% 4 11.00% 4 11.00% 18 49.00% 37
Moniteau 2 25.00% 3 38.00% 1 13.00% 2 25.00% 8
Morgan 4 29.00% 4 29.00% 0 0.00% 6 43.00% 14
Newton 43 25.00% 34 20.00% 39 23.00% 54 32.00% 170
Ozark 2 17.00% 2 17.00% 1 8.00% 7 58.00% 12
Polk 12 20.00% 9 15.00% 15 25.00% 25 41.00% 61
St Clair 2 14.00% 4 29.00% 2 14.00% 6 43.00% 14
Stone 12 26.00% 12 26.00% 11 24.00% 11 24.00% 46
Taney 25 20.00% 19 15.00% 15 12.00% 68 54.00% 127
Vernon 2 12.00% 6 35.00% 2 12.00% 7 41.00% 17
Webster 4 18.00% 2 9.00% 8 36.00% 8 36.00% 22
Wright 7 12.00% 11 19.00% 11 19.00% 28 49.00% 57
* Region Total * 372 19.00% 334 17.00% 321 17.00% 893 47.00% 1,920
Kansas City Jackson 190 17.00% 154 14.00% 151 14.00% 619 56.00% 1,114
* Region Total * 190 17.00% 154 14.00% 151 14.00% 619 56.00% 1,114
St. Louis St Louis City 59 19.00% 45 14.00% 43 14.00% 167 53.00% 314
St Louis County 115 17.00% 116 17.00% 86 13.00% 361 53.00% 678
* Region Total * 174 18.00% 161 16.00% 129 13.00% 528 53.00% 992
State Total 1,423 20.00% 1,228 17.00% 1,091 15.00% 3,429 48.00% 7,171
0 - 4 Months 4 - 8 Months 8 - 12 Months 12 + Months
33Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 13.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During July 2015
Which Have Had No Court Involvement by Number of Months Open
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases
Northwest Andrew 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Buchanan 29 55.00% 15 28.00% 4 8.00% 5 9.00% 53
Caldwell 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cass 10 63.00% 4 25.00% 0 0.00% 2 13.00% 16
Chariton 4 67.00% 2 33.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Clay 20 71.00% 7 25.00% 1 4.00% 0 0.00% 28
Clinton 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Daviess 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
De Kalb 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Grundy 5 71.00% 2 29.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Harrison 4 67.00% 1 17.00% 1 17.00% 0 0.00% 6
Holt 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Johnson 6 60.00% 3 30.00% 0 0.00% 1 10.00% 10
Lafayette 11 69.00% 3 19.00% 2 13.00% 0 0.00% 16
Linn 5 45.00% 5 45.00% 0 0.00% 1 9.00% 11
Livingston 5 71.00% 1 14.00% 1 14.00% 0 0.00% 7
Mercer 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Nodaway 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Pettis 10 83.00% 2 17.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 12
Platte 10 71.00% 3 21.00% 1 7.00% 0 0.00% 14
Putnam 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Ray 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Saline 6 75.00% 1 13.00% 1 13.00% 0 0.00% 8
Sullivan 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 151 65.00% 54 23.00% 15 6.00% 13 6.00% 233
Northeast Adair 4 67.00% 2 33.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Audrain 9 50.00% 7 39.00% 1 6.00% 1 6.00% 18
Boone 20 34.00% 23 40.00% 4 7.00% 11 19.00% 58
Callaway 11 52.00% 8 38.00% 1 5.00% 1 5.00% 21
Clark 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Cole 24 46.00% 23 44.00% 4 8.00% 1 2.00% 52
Franklin 36 71.00% 9 18.00% 5 10.00% 1 2.00% 51
Gasconade 4 40.00% 3 30.00% 2 20.00% 1 10.00% 10
Howard 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Jefferson 43 53.00% 18 22.00% 12 15.00% 8 10.00% 81
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 5 71.00% 1 14.00% 1 14.00% 0 0.00% 7
Lincoln 22 76.00% 4 14.00% 1 3.00% 2 7.00% 29
Macon 4 67.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 33.00% 6
Marion 22 96.00% 1 4.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 23
Monroe 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Montgomery 7 78.00% 1 11.00% 0 0.00% 1 11.00% 9
Osage 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Pike 7 54.00% 4 31.00% 0 0.00% 2 15.00% 13
Ralls 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Randolph 13 76.00% 3 18.00% 1 6.00% 0 0.00% 17
Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scotland 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Shelby 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
St Charles 56 80.00% 11 16.00% 2 3.00% 1 1.00% 70
Warren 8 73.00% 1 9.00% 2 18.00% 0 0.00% 11
* Region Total * 315 63.00% 119 24.00% 36 7.00% 32 6.00% 502
Southeast Bollinger 9 75.00% 2 17.00% 0 0.00% 1 8.00% 12
Butler 27 52.00% 16 31.00% 3 6.00% 6 12.00% 52
Cape Girardeau 31 53.00% 17 29.00% 6 10.00% 4 7.00% 58
Carter 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Crawford 12 52.00% 6 26.00% 4 17.00% 1 4.00% 23
Dent 5 36.00% 2 14.00% 3 21.00% 4 29.00% 14
0 - 4 Months 4 - 8 Months 8 - 12 Months 12 + Months
34Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 13.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During July 2015
Which Have Had No Court Involvement by Number of Months Open
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases
Southeast Dunklin 15 79.00% 3 16.00% 1 5.00% 0 0.00% 19
Howell 30 49.00% 23 38.00% 5 8.00% 3 5.00% 61
Iron 4 67.00% 1 17.00% 1 17.00% 0 0.00% 6
Madison 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Maries 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Mississippi 5 83.00% 1 17.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
New Madrid 19 40.00% 10 21.00% 11 23.00% 8 17.00% 48
Oregon 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Pemiscot 18 51.00% 5 14.00% 6 17.00% 6 17.00% 35
Perry 3 33.00% 3 33.00% 2 22.00% 1 11.00% 9
Phelps 15 68.00% 5 23.00% 1 5.00% 1 5.00% 22
Pulaski 30 83.00% 6 17.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 36
Reynolds 5 71.00% 2 29.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Ripley 7 70.00% 3 30.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10
Scott 16 73.00% 3 14.00% 2 9.00% 1 5.00% 22
Shannon 8 80.00% 2 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10
St Francois 4 25.00% 10 63.00% 2 13.00% 0 0.00% 16
Ste Genevieve 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Stoddard 16 59.00% 8 30.00% 3 11.00% 0 0.00% 27
Texas 12 60.00% 3 15.00% 2 10.00% 3 15.00% 20
Washington 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Wayne 5 38.00% 6 46.00% 1 8.00% 1 8.00% 13
* Region Total * 318 58.00% 140 25.00% 53 10.00% 40 7.00% 551
Southwest Barry 9 53.00% 6 35.00% 2 12.00% 0 0.00% 17
Barton 1 20.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 5
Bates 5 50.00% 2 20.00% 2 20.00% 1 10.00% 10
Benton 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Camden 20 77.00% 4 15.00% 2 8.00% 0 0.00% 26
Cedar 5 45.00% 4 36.00% 1 9.00% 1 9.00% 11
Christian 16 62.00% 8 31.00% 0 0.00% 2 8.00% 26
Dade 1 33.00% 1 33.00% 1 33.00% 0 0.00% 3
Dallas 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Douglas 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Greene 73 68.00% 25 23.00% 6 6.00% 4 4.00% 108
Henry 7 58.00% 2 17.00% 3 25.00% 0 0.00% 12
Hickory 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Jasper 43 52.00% 23 28.00% 7 9.00% 9 11.00% 82
Laclede 22 76.00% 6 21.00% 0 0.00% 1 3.00% 29
Lawrence 7 35.00% 10 50.00% 2 10.00% 1 5.00% 20
Mcdonald 8 89.00% 1 11.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Miller 14 64.00% 6 27.00% 2 9.00% 0 0.00% 22
Moniteau 8 89.00% 1 11.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Morgan 21 91.00% 1 4.00% 1 4.00% 0 0.00% 23
Newton 8 44.00% 4 22.00% 3 17.00% 3 17.00% 18
Ozark 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Polk 13 68.00% 5 26.00% 1 5.00% 0 0.00% 19
St Clair 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Stone 14 58.00% 7 29.00% 2 8.00% 1 4.00% 24
Taney 23 61.00% 9 24.00% 4 11.00% 2 5.00% 38
Vernon 4 36.00% 4 36.00% 1 9.00% 2 18.00% 11
Webster 7 78.00% 2 22.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Wright 13 59.00% 7 32.00% 1 5.00% 1 5.00% 22
* Region Total * 355 62.00% 146 26.00% 42 7.00% 29 5.00% 572
Kansas City Jackson 113 63.00% 34 19.00% 14 8.00% 17 10.00% 178
* Region Total * 113 63.00% 34 19.00% 14 8.00% 17 10.00% 178
St. Louis St Louis City 96 86.00% 9 8.00% 3 3.00% 4 4.00% 112
St Louis County 159 47.00% 83 24.00% 35 10.00% 63 19.00% 340
* Region Total * 255 56.00% 92 20.00% 38 8.00% 67 15.00% 452
State Total 1,507 61.00% 585 24.00% 198 8.00% 198 8.00% 2,488
0 - 4 Months 4 - 8 Months 8 - 12 Months 12 + Months
35Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
8,000
8,500
9,000
9,500
10,000
10,500
11,000
11,500
Jul-11
Sep-1
1
Nov-1
1
Jan-1
2
Mar-
12
May-1
2
Jul-12
Sep-1
2
Nov-1
2
Jan-1
3
Mar-
13
May-1
3
Jul-13
Sep-1
3
Nov-1
3
Jan-1
4
Mar-
14
May-1
4
Jul-14
Sep-1
4
Nov-1
4
Jan-1
5
Mar-
15
May-1
5
Jul-15
Figure 9.
FCS Cases Active as of the End of the Month
Over the Previous Four Years
-20.00%
-10.00%
0.00%
10.00%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 10.
Percentage Change in FCS Cases Active
as of the End of the Month, Twelve Months Apart July 1, 2014 and July 1, 2015
36Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St Louis
Figure 11.
FCS Cases Opened During July 2015
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance of Evidence Preventive Services Court Ordered Other
Court Ordered 2%
Preponderance of Evidence
8%
Other 77%
Preventive Services 13%
Figure 12.
FCS Cases Opened During July 2015
by Reason for Opening
37Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 13.
FCS Cases Closed During July 2015
by Reason for Closing
Goal Achieved Other Reason
0 to 4 Months 20%
4 to 8 Months 17%
8 to 12 Months 15%
12+ Months 48%
Figure 14.
FCS Cases Active During July 2015
With Court Involvement by the Number of Months Open
38Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0 to 4 Months 61%
4 to 8 Months 23%
8 to 12 Months 8%
12+ Months 8%
Figure 15.
FCS Cases Active During July 2015
With No Court Involvement by the Number of Months Open
39Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Children’s Services Management Report 40 Research and Data Analysis
Notes: Family-Centered Services Tables and Figures
Table 9.
Counts of persons are unduplicated.
Child caretakers are persons under legal age who are also parents.
Table 11.
Close reason of “Goal Achieved” includes;
function plan achieved and/or the reasons for needed services no longer exist; all contracted services completed and risk factors are sufficiently reduced;
case goals have been achieved; services can be provided by other resource without intervention of the Division and
family can/will access such resources;
no child under age 18 is still in the home;
Close reason of "Other" includes;
client not making progress but there are no legal grounds for court intervention;
client moved-unable to locate;
client moved-other state notified; referred to other appropriate resource;
other; family is unwilling to cooperate with the service plan;
family moved out of state; family requests that the case be closed;
progress no longer being made;
resources have been exhausted and are no longer available to assist the family;
Table 12.
All court activities/actions are considered as court involvement except for court reports.
Figure 11. and Figure 12.
Other includes Newborn Crisis Assessment and Family Assessment.
Children’s Services Management Report 41 Research and Data Analysis
Figure 13.
Close reason of “Goal Achieved” includes;
function plan achieved and/or the reasons for needed services no longer exist;
all contracted services completed and risk factors are sufficiently reduced; case goals have been achieved;
services can be provided by other resource without intervention of the Division and
family can/will access such resources; no child under age 18 is still in the home;
Close reason of "Other" includes;
client not making progress but there are no legal grounds for court intervention; client moved-unable to locate;
client moved-other state notified;
referred to other appropriate resource; other;
family is unwilling to cooperate with the service plan; family moved out of state;
family requests that the case be closed;
progress no longer being made; resources have been exhausted and are no longer available to assist the family;
Figure 14.
All court activities/actions are considered as court involvement except for court reports.
Table 14.
Children Entering Children's Division Custody For the First Time During July 2015
by Case Manager County and the Most Recent Placement Category
Group Home/ Entries
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Buchanan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cass 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Chariton 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.57 1.00
Clay 0 1 3 0 0 4 0.07 13.25
Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cooper 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.25 0.00
Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Gentry 0 0 3 0 0 3 1.81 2.00
Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Johnson 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.17 2.50
Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Linn 0 2 3 0 0 5 1.58 5.40
Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Nodaway 0 3 2 0 0 5 1.17 4.60
Pettis 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.09 14.00
Platte 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.05 15.00
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 8 13 1 1 23 0.11 6.26
Northeast Adair 0 1 2 2 1 6 1.21 11.67
Audrain 0 1 5 0 0 6 0.94 11.17
Boone 0 7 7 0 0 14 0.41 3.86
Callaway 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.30 2.67
Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cole 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.17 5.67
Franklin 0 0 7 0 0 7 0.28 12.00
Gasconade 0 3 0 0 0 3 0.89 3.00
Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Jefferson 0 10 20 0 0 30 0.55 6.13
Knox 0 0 3 0 0 3 2.91 7.33
Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Lincoln 0 2 2 0 0 4 0.27 3.00
Macon 0 0 9 0 1 10 2.65 7.80
Marion 0 2 4 0 0 6 0.87 3.17
Monroe 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.97 2.00
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Pike 0 1 2 0 0 3 0.73 2.67
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Randolph 0 2 1 0 1 4 0.68 6.00
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
St Charles 0 2 5 0 2 9 0.10 7.33
Warren 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.37 1.67
* Region Total * 0 31 78 2 5 116 0.37 6.30
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.34 10.00
Butler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cape Girardeau 0 5 3 0 1 9 0.54 1.56
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
44Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 14.
Children Entering Children's Division Custody For the First Time During July 2015
by Case Manager County and the Most Recent Placement Category
Group Home/ Entries
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age
Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.17 13.00
Dent 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.82 0.00
Dunklin 0 3 7 0 0 10 1.24 4.30
Howell 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.10 9.00
Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Madison 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.34 1.00
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Mississippi 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.31 15.00
New Madrid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Pemiscot 0 0 7 0 0 7 1.39 8.86
Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Phelps 0 2 2 1 2 7 0.71 3.14
Pulaski 0 1 1 0 1 3 0.24 1.00
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ripley 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.30 0.00
Scott 0 1 8 0 0 9 0.91 8.00
Shannon 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.51 17.00
St Francois 0 3 0 0 0 3 0.21 4.67
Ste Genevieve 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.24 15.00
Stoddard 0 0 4 1 0 5 0.73 9.20
Texas 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.17 1.00
Washington 0 0 2 1 0 3 0.49 9.00
Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 18 40 6 4 68 0.41 5.65
Southwest Barry 0 1 2 2 2 7 0.81 10.71
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Bates 0 2 1 0 0 3 0.71 11.00
Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Camden 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.12 14.00
Cedar 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.91 4.33
Christian 0 6 2 5 1 14 0.66 9.36
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Douglas 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.65 13.00
Greene 0 4 11 0 1 16 0.27 6.94
Henry 0 1 1 1 0 3 0.61 7.00
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Jasper 0 5 13 3 0 21 0.69 7.10
Laclede 0 4 0 1 1 6 0.67 6.33
Lawrence 0 1 3 0 0 4 0.39 7.25
Mcdonald 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.31 8.00
Miller 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.33 0.50
Moniteau 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.51 10.50
Morgan 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.22 0.00
Newton 0 12 7 0 1 20 1.35 5.60
Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
St Clair 0 0 2 1 0 3 1.53 9.00
Stone 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.17 0.00
Taney 0 4 0 3 0 7 0.61 5.57
Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Webster 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.10 2.00
Wright 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.41 4.50
* Region Total * 0 49 49 16 7 121 0.46 7.17
Kansas City Jackson 0 10 8 6 3 27 0.16 4.67
* Region Total * 0 10 8 6 3 27 0.16 4.67
St. Louis St Louis City 0 7 7 1 1 16 0.24 2.50
St Louis County 0 19 8 0 2 29 0.12 4.76
* Region Total * 0 26 15 1 3 45 0.15 3.96
Other Icama 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.00 4.00
* Region Total * 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.00 4.00
State Total 0 143 203 32 23 401 0.28 6.07
45Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 15.
Children Re-Entering Children's Division Custody During July 2015
by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category
Group Home/ Entries
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Buchanan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cass 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Clay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Johnson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Linn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Pettis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Platte 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.05 17.00
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00 17.00
Northeast Adair 0 5 0 1 0 6 1.21 6.33
Audrain 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Boone 0 0 2 3 0 5 0.15 10.80
Callaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cole 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Franklin 0 1 6 0 0 7 0.28 9.00
Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Jefferson 0 0 4 0 0 4 0.07 11.00
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Lewis 0 0 0 2 1 3 1.25 16.00
Lincoln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Macon 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.26 16.00
Marion 0 0 4 0 0 4 0.58 10.25
Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Pike 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.24 2.00
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Randolph 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
St Charles 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.01 10.00
Warren 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 6 19 6 1 32 0.10 9.88
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Butler 0 1 0 0 1 2 0.20 15.50
Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
46Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 15.
Children Re-Entering Children's Division Custody During July 2015
by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category
Group Home/ Entries
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age
Southeast Crawford 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.17 2.00
Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Dunklin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Howell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Madison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
New Madrid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Oregon 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.41 13.00
Pemiscot 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.20 8.00
Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Phelps 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Pulaski 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Scott 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
St Francois 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Stoddard 0 0 3 8 0 11 1.61 7.00
Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Washington 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.16 20.00
Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 3 3 10 1 17 0.10 8.88
Southwest Barry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Bates 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.24 13.00
Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Camden 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Christian 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Greene 0 5 0 0 1 6 0.10 5.83
Henry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Jasper 0 1 1 4 0 6 0.20 9.00
Laclede 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.11 16.00
Lawrence 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.20 6.00
Mcdonald 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Newton 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.14 6.50
Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Stone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Taney 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.09 3.00
Vernon 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.19 20.00
Webster 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Wright 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 9 4 5 2 20 0.08 8.30
Kansas City Jackson 0 3 0 1 0 4 0.02 8.00
* Region Total * 0 3 0 1 0 4 0.02 8.00
St. Louis St Louis City 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.01 15.00
St Louis County 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00 16.00
* Region Total * 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.01 15.50
State Total 0 21 26 24 5 76 0.05 9.38
47Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 16.
Children (Re)Entering Children's Division Custody
From July 2013 Through June 2015
Total
Month/Year Entries Reentries (Re)Entries
Jul-2013 491 71 562
Aug-2013 533 107 640
Sep-2013 503 85 588
Oct-2013 538 89 627
Nov-2013 471 79 550
Dec-2013 397 69 466
Jan-2014 477 76 553
Feb-2014 436 77 513
Mar-2014 461 100 561
Apr-2014 680 96 776
May-2014 475 109 584
Jun-2014 525 84 609
Jul-2014 521 100 621
Aug-2014 554 100 654
Sep-2014 596 83 679
Oct-2014 576 104 680
Nov-2014 410 82 492
Dec-2014 463 75 538
Jan-2015 506 84 590
Feb-2015 437 90 527
Mar-2015 482 95 577
Apr-2015 543 81 624
May-2015 479 93 572
Jun-2015 484 83 567
Total 12,038 2,112 14,150
48Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 17.
Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During July 2015
by Length of Stay and Region
Average
Length of Average
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age
Northwest 5 19.00% 7 26.00% 15 56.00% 27 23.96 8.52
Northeast 37 36.00% 25 24.00% 41 40.00% 103 25.24 10.11
Southeast 24 45.00% 10 19.00% 19 36.00% 53 18.34 9.49
Southwest 39 30.00% 48 37.00% 43 33.00% 130 23.62 9.88
Kansas City 18 32.00% 16 29.00% 22 39.00% 56 24.25 10.45
St. Louis 11 29.00% 13 34.00% 14 37.00% 38 38.47 9.74
State Total 134 33.00% 119 29.00% 154 38.00% 407 24.84 9.86
0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More
49Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 18.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2015
by Length of Stay and Case Manager County
Average
Length of Average
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 84.00 20.00
Atchison 1 14.00% 3 43.00% 3 43.00% 7 20.71 5.00
Buchanan 31 51.00% 22 36.00% 8 13.00% 61 15.61 7.82
Caldwell 2 13.00% 7 47.00% 6 40.00% 15 24.13 9.27
Carroll 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 4 13.25 3.00
Cass 58 26.00% 79 36.00% 85 38.00% 222 24.97 11.25
Chariton 16 57.00% 2 7.00% 10 36.00% 28 17.25 9.29
Clay 64 36.00% 61 34.00% 55 31.00% 180 20.82 7.69
Clinton 21 40.00% 15 29.00% 16 31.00% 52 19.85 9.52
Cooper 7 39.00% 5 28.00% 6 33.00% 18 24.06 11.94
Daviess 2 9.00% 13 57.00% 8 35.00% 23 28.65 9.39
De Kalb 13 43.00% 8 27.00% 9 30.00% 30 18.87 7.40
Gentry 6 50.00% 4 33.00% 2 17.00% 12 24.00 5.33
Grundy 17 40.00% 15 36.00% 10 24.00% 42 20.90 8.52
Harrison 6 23.00% 7 27.00% 13 50.00% 26 25.19 11.54
Holt 0 0.00% 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 5 14.80 10.20
Johnson 44 44.00% 23 23.00% 34 34.00% 101 22.29 9.85
Lafayette 20 40.00% 21 42.00% 9 18.00% 50 19.08 7.88
Linn 22 40.00% 21 38.00% 12 22.00% 55 17.09 9.85
Livingston 22 51.00% 11 26.00% 10 23.00% 43 24.70 8.84
Mercer 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6 7.83 8.83
Nodaway 20 54.00% 4 11.00% 13 35.00% 37 22.86 8.16
Pettis 35 48.00% 25 34.00% 13 18.00% 73 20.21 9.95
Platte 15 50.00% 7 23.00% 8 27.00% 30 23.47 11.23
Putnam 8 42.00% 2 11.00% 9 47.00% 19 22.84 10.00
Ray 9 47.00% 6 32.00% 4 21.00% 19 16.74 7.00
Saline 19 37.00% 24 46.00% 9 17.00% 52 15.25 7.98
Sullivan 20 59.00% 5 15.00% 9 26.00% 34 15.74 8.91
Worth 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 15.00 1.00
* Region Total * 485 39.00% 398 32.00% 363 29.00% 1,246 21.13 9.24
Northeast Adair 39 57.00% 14 21.00% 15 22.00% 68 14.03 9.22
Audrain 52 58.00% 18 20.00% 20 22.00% 90 19.79 9.71
Boone 143 48.00% 82 27.00% 74 25.00% 299 20.29 10.25
Callaway 55 44.00% 37 30.00% 33 26.00% 125 20.10 7.97
Clark 22 42.00% 11 21.00% 19 37.00% 52 21.25 10.29
Cole 95 55.00% 39 23.00% 39 23.00% 173 22.40 8.62
Franklin 107 38.00% 58 21.00% 115 41.00% 280 23.59 9.00
Gasconade 18 50.00% 8 22.00% 10 28.00% 36 16.39 7.58
Howard 10 38.00% 5 19.00% 11 42.00% 26 19.77 8.65
Jefferson 343 52.00% 188 28.00% 135 20.00% 666 16.22 8.30
Knox 7 78.00% 0 0.00% 2 22.00% 9 14.89 9.44
Lewis 15 56.00% 2 7.00% 10 37.00% 27 26.89 13.59
Lincoln 26 39.00% 12 18.00% 29 43.00% 67 25.94 8.34
Macon 22 52.00% 14 33.00% 6 14.00% 42 17.95 9.26
Marion 49 39.00% 39 31.00% 39 31.00% 127 19.73 9.25
Monroe 9 45.00% 7 35.00% 4 20.00% 20 15.60 6.00
Montgomery 9 33.00% 8 30.00% 10 37.00% 27 29.44 9.26
Osage 10 71.00% 2 14.00% 2 14.00% 14 12.07 7.07
Pike 25 54.00% 8 17.00% 13 28.00% 46 21.20 9.28
Ralls 7 25.00% 7 25.00% 14 50.00% 28 26.64 10.21
Randolph 56 45.00% 44 35.00% 25 20.00% 125 17.92 9.96
Schuyler 3 25.00% 5 42.00% 4 33.00% 12 20.50 11.17
Scotland 8 73.00% 1 9.00% 2 18.00% 11 18.27 8.18
Shelby 15 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 15 6.60 11.80
St Charles 112 42.00% 74 28.00% 79 30.00% 265 22.51 9.40
Warren 26 41.00% 23 37.00% 14 22.00% 63 17.49 8.52
* Region Total * 1,283 47.00% 706 26.00% 724 27.00% 2,713 19.73 9.05
Southeast Bollinger 21 58.00% 7 19.00% 8 22.00% 36 13.33 7.86
Butler 82 35.00% 111 48.00% 38 16.00% 231 18.24 8.34
Cape Girardeau 124 53.00% 69 29.00% 43 18.00% 236 14.31 7.88
Carter 5 50.00% 3 30.00% 2 20.00% 10 26.20 11.90
0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More
50Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 18.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2015
by Length of Stay and Case Manager County
Average
Length of Average
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age
Southeast Crawford 39 54.00% 22 31.00% 11 15.00% 72 14.49 9.35
Dent 29 55.00% 14 26.00% 10 19.00% 53 20.21 9.06
Dunklin 76 55.00% 51 37.00% 10 7.00% 137 13.10 7.98
Howell 28 42.00% 23 34.00% 16 24.00% 67 21.16 10.31
Iron 8 25.00% 11 34.00% 13 41.00% 32 20.38 10.19
Madison 4 14.00% 12 41.00% 13 45.00% 29 26.21 7.31
Maries 2 20.00% 7 70.00% 1 10.00% 10 14.30 9.10
Mississippi 21 68.00% 6 19.00% 4 13.00% 31 11.19 8.77
New Madrid 18 35.00% 18 35.00% 15 29.00% 51 20.35 7.00
Oregon 4 57.00% 0 0.00% 3 43.00% 7 37.57 8.29
Pemiscot 42 42.00% 17 17.00% 40 40.00% 99 20.15 8.23
Perry 11 41.00% 12 44.00% 4 15.00% 27 16.56 10.33
Phelps 71 40.00% 73 41.00% 35 20.00% 179 17.56 8.17
Pulaski 49 41.00% 44 37.00% 27 23.00% 120 17.03 7.61
Reynolds 15 58.00% 6 23.00% 5 19.00% 26 23.54 9.77
Ripley 18 28.00% 29 45.00% 17 27.00% 64 23.72 9.42
Scott 77 75.00% 16 16.00% 9 9.00% 102 10.91 7.01
Shannon 1 8.00% 7 58.00% 4 33.00% 12 30.25 11.17
St Francois 54 29.00% 58 32.00% 72 39.00% 184 24.92 9.04
Ste Genevieve 8 62.00% 1 8.00% 4 31.00% 13 17.85 8.85
Stoddard 82 63.00% 31 24.00% 18 14.00% 131 13.69 8.98
Texas 35 43.00% 35 43.00% 11 14.00% 81 14.47 7.88
Washington 42 40.00% 29 27.00% 35 33.00% 106 21.69 7.92
Wayne 6 15.00% 15 37.00% 20 49.00% 41 29.46 9.85
* Region Total * 972 44.00% 727 33.00% 488 22.00% 2,187 18.01 8.44
Southwest Barry 112 59.00% 46 24.00% 33 17.00% 191 15.34 8.23
Barton 14 52.00% 7 26.00% 6 22.00% 27 16.33 9.26
Bates 19 61.00% 8 26.00% 4 13.00% 31 13.87 7.84
Benton 7 33.00% 9 43.00% 5 24.00% 21 15.38 13.90
Camden 28 31.00% 36 40.00% 26 29.00% 90 22.54 9.72
Cedar 19 90.00% 1 5.00% 1 5.00% 21 5.29 9.81
Christian 73 56.00% 34 26.00% 23 18.00% 130 17.89 9.50
Dade 7 50.00% 3 21.00% 4 29.00% 14 28.57 9.43
Dallas 30 60.00% 8 16.00% 12 24.00% 50 20.62 8.84
Douglas 18 53.00% 12 35.00% 4 12.00% 34 13.59 10.74
Greene 254 31.00% 284 35.00% 281 34.00% 819 23.59 8.73
Henry 26 34.00% 22 29.00% 29 38.00% 77 27.30 11.38
Hickory 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 4 46.50 15.00
Jasper 246 42.00% 191 32.00% 154 26.00% 591 18.76 9.12
Laclede 68 46.00% 32 22.00% 48 32.00% 148 21.73 9.55
Lawrence 83 45.00% 55 30.00% 47 25.00% 185 19.61 10.14
Mcdonald 63 53.00% 35 30.00% 20 17.00% 118 15.71 10.94
Miller 17 35.00% 11 22.00% 21 43.00% 49 26.65 9.12
Moniteau 5 42.00% 2 17.00% 5 42.00% 12 24.33 10.25
Morgan 12 32.00% 13 34.00% 13 34.00% 38 24.39 9.82
Newton 123 57.00% 61 28.00% 32 15.00% 216 14.08 8.81
Ozark 17 43.00% 7 18.00% 16 40.00% 40 18.38 7.48
Polk 36 46.00% 26 33.00% 16 21.00% 78 19.60 8.91
St Clair 13 41.00% 15 47.00% 4 13.00% 32 15.72 11.69
Stone 39 46.00% 22 26.00% 24 28.00% 85 19.07 9.66
Taney 79 35.00% 64 28.00% 83 37.00% 226 24.15 8.73
Vernon 17 40.00% 15 36.00% 10 24.00% 42 24.33 8.98
Webster 24 41.00% 15 26.00% 19 33.00% 58 20.60 9.52
Wright 48 40.00% 51 42.00% 22 18.00% 121 17.82 8.98
* Region Total * 1,497 42.00% 1,086 31.00% 965 27.00% 3,548 20.20 9.21
Kansas City Jackson 722 38.00% 520 28.00% 645 34.00% 1,887 21.99 9.07
* Region Total * 722 38.00% 520 28.00% 645 34.00% 1,887 21.99 9.07
St. Louis St Louis City 197 32.00% 164 27.00% 253 41.00% 614 33.10 9.64
St Louis County 418 45.00% 242 26.00% 267 29.00% 927 22.08 8.61
* Region Total * 615 40.00% 406 26.00% 520 34.00% 1,541 26 9.02
Other Icama 2 22.00% 2 22.00% 5 56.00% 9 21.56 11.89
* Region Total * 2 22.00% 2 22.00% 5 56.00% 9 21.56 11.89
State Total 5,576 42.00% 3,845 29.00% 3,710 28.00% 13,131 20.82 9.01
0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More
51Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 19.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Category
Group Home/ Children
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Children Thousand Age
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.24 20.00
Atchison 0 3 4 0 0 7 5.92 5.00
Buchanan 0 29 26 6 0 61 2.91 7.82
Caldwell 0 5 10 0 0 15 6.24 9.27
Carroll 0 2 2 0 0 4 1.82 3.00
Cass 0 63 92 55 12 222 8.41 11.25
Chariton 0 15 5 6 2 28 15.83 9.29
Clay 0 81 65 24 10 180 3.14 7.69
Clinton 0 23 23 6 0 52 10.21 9.52
Cooper 0 4 3 11 0 18 4.52 11.94
Daviess 0 10 8 4 1 23 10.21 9.39
De Kalb 0 16 12 2 0 30 12.99 7.40
Gentry 0 0 11 0 1 12 7.26 5.33
Grundy 0 18 16 6 2 42 17.02 8.52
Harrison 0 5 17 2 2 26 11.71 11.54
Holt 0 2 2 1 0 5 5.15 10.20
Johnson 0 28 45 18 10 101 8.39 9.85
Lafayette 0 9 33 8 0 50 6.11 7.88
Linn 1 18 28 6 2 55 17.43 9.85
Livingston 0 12 20 8 3 43 12.92 8.84
Mercer 0 5 0 1 0 6 6.23 8.83
Nodaway 0 9 24 1 3 37 8.68 8.16
Pettis 0 41 17 8 7 73 6.77 9.95
Platte 0 13 8 6 3 30 1.36 11.23
Putnam 0 10 6 3 0 19 16.38 10.00
Ray 0 13 4 0 2 19 3.24 7.00
Saline 0 12 36 4 0 52 9.64 7.98
Sullivan 0 10 20 2 2 34 20.92 8.91
Worth 0 0 1 0 0 1 2.25 1.00
* Region Total * 1 456 538 188 63 1,246 5.76 9.24
Northeast Adair 0 22 27 13 6 68 13.68 9.22
Audrain 2 26 47 10 5 90 14.13 9.71
Boone 0 79 136 66 18 299 8.73 10.25
Callaway 3 32 57 29 4 125 12.50 7.97
Clark 0 12 29 7 4 52 30.29 10.29
Cole 0 67 70 18 18 173 9.64 8.62
Franklin 0 119 121 8 32 280 11.15 9.00
Gasconade 0 22 10 1 3 36 10.70 7.58
Howard 0 10 10 3 3 26 11.94 8.65
Jefferson 1 213 395 34 23 666 12.11 8.30
Knox 0 0 8 0 1 9 8.72 9.44
Lewis 0 9 10 3 5 27 11.27 13.59
Lincoln 0 35 22 4 6 67 4.55 8.34
Macon 0 10 23 3 6 42 11.11 9.26
Marion 0 51 53 16 7 127 18.44 9.25
Monroe 0 5 14 1 0 20 9.70 6.00
Montgomery 0 4 13 2 8 27 9.46 9.26
Osage 0 2 12 0 0 14 4.08 7.07
Pike 0 22 20 1 3 46 11.20 9.28
Ralls 0 19 5 3 1 28 11.77 10.21
Randolph 0 44 57 16 8 125 21.26 9.96
Schuyler 0 6 3 2 1 12 10.53 11.17
Scotland 0 3 5 3 0 11 8.08 8.18
Shelby 0 3 10 2 0 15 9.39 11.80
St Charles 4 105 114 25 17 265 2.85 9.40
Warren 0 15 38 4 6 63 7.75 8.52
* Region Total * 10 935 1,309 274 185 2,713 8.60 9.05
Southeast Bollinger 0 6 25 3 2 36 12.34 7.86
Butler 1 74 117 30 9 231 23.17 8.34
Cape Girardeau 0 77 128 20 11 236 14.22 7.88
Carter 0 6 2 0 2 10 6.60 11.90
52Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis Unit
Table 19.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Category
Group Home/ Children
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Children Thousand Age
Southeast Crawford 0 17 32 18 5 72 12.00 9.35
Dent 0 18 17 15 3 53 14.51 9.06
Dunklin 0 37 76 18 6 137 16.95 7.98
Howell 0 27 24 10 6 67 6.66 10.31
Iron 0 5 17 8 2 32 13.32 10.19
Madison 0 13 10 6 0 29 9.89 7.31
Maries 0 1 8 1 0 10 4.64 9.10
Mississippi 0 11 18 2 0 31 9.72 8.77
New Madrid 2 19 26 4 0 51 11.30 7.00
Oregon 0 3 1 1 2 7 2.89 8.29
Pemiscot 1 31 52 10 5 99 19.67 8.23
Perry 0 8 9 8 2 27 5.67 10.33
Phelps 1 51 100 23 4 179 18.28 8.17
Pulaski 0 43 49 22 6 120 9.57 7.61
Reynolds 0 5 15 5 1 26 16.97 9.77
Ripley 0 9 42 8 5 64 19.35 9.42
Scott 1 28 67 4 2 102 10.36 7.01
Shannon 0 5 3 4 0 12 6.09 11.17
St Francois 7 79 59 29 10 184 12.77 9.04
Ste Genevieve 0 8 1 3 1 13 3.08 8.85
Stoddard 0 30 56 39 6 131 19.18 8.98
Texas 0 25 47 7 2 81 14.16 7.88
Washington 3 46 40 17 0 106 17.48 7.92
Wayne 0 15 17 9 0 41 14.61 9.85
* Region Total * 16 697 1,058 324 92 2,187 13.23 8.44
Southwest Barry 0 64 88 30 9 191 22.11 8.23
Barton 0 14 7 5 1 27 8.40 9.26
Bates 0 8 19 1 3 31 7.29 7.84
Benton 0 8 3 9 1 21 6.11 13.90
Camden 3 45 25 9 8 90 10.73 9.72
Cedar 0 6 11 2 2 21 6.35 9.81
Christian 0 47 53 17 13 130 6.14 9.50
Dade 0 5 6 3 0 14 7.84 9.43
Dallas 0 20 20 6 4 50 11.99 8.84
Douglas 0 8 14 10 2 34 11.11 10.74
Greene 5 349 282 129 54 819 14.03 8.73
Henry 0 33 22 14 8 77 15.54 11.38
Hickory 0 1 1 0 2 4 2.40 15.00
Jasper 5 217 256 81 32 591 19.52 9.12
Laclede 0 51 74 16 7 148 16.62 9.55
Lawrence 1 42 88 41 13 185 18.18 10.14
Mcdonald 0 39 59 11 9 118 18.22 10.94
Miller 0 20 18 7 4 49 7.98 9.12
Moniteau 2 3 3 2 2 12 3.06 10.25
Morgan 2 17 15 2 2 38 8.38 9.82
Newton 0 83 98 29 6 216 14.63 8.81
Ozark 0 15 24 1 0 40 20.52 7.48
Polk 1 37 18 13 9 78 10.17 8.91
St Clair 0 7 16 5 4 32 16.33 11.69
Stone 0 29 31 21 4 85 14.09 9.66
Taney 1 98 74 44 9 226 19.78 8.73
Vernon 0 23 9 7 3 42 7.98 8.98
Webster 0 31 15 9 3 58 5.78 9.52
Wright 0 46 51 15 9 121 24.84 8.98
* Region Total * 20 1,366 1,400 539 223 3,548 13.60 9.21
Kansas City Jackson 11 730 765 216 165 1,887 11.39 9.07
* Region Total * 11 730 765 216 165 1,887 11.39 9.07
St. Louis St Louis City 0 237 235 90 52 614 9.09 9.64
St Louis County 3 357 411 95 61 927 3.96 8.61
* Region Total * 3 594 646 185 113 1,541 5.11 9.02
Other Icama 0 4 2 2 1 9 0.00 11.89
* Region Total * 0 4 2 2 1 9 0.00 11.89
State Total 61 4,782 5,718 1,728 842 13,131 9.21 9.01
53Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis Unit
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
ADF ADO ADR CFP CTO DET FAH FGB FGH
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 3
Chariton 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Clay 0 0 0 6 3 0 0 0 0
Clinton 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Cooper 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
De Kalb 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grundy 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Harrison 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0
Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Linn 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Livingston 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Pettis 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0
Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Sullivan 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 1 0 0 34 6 0 0 0 6
Northeast Adair 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0
Audrain 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0
Boone 0 0 0 12 0 1 0 0 0
Callaway 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0
Clark 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Cole 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0
Franklin 0 0 0 8 7 2 0 0 0
Gasconade 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Howard 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0
Jefferson 1 0 0 23 0 1 0 0 0
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0
Lincoln 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Macon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marion 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Randolph 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
St Charles 0 3 1 15 0 1 0 0 0
Warren 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 1 3 4 93 10 8 2 0 1
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Butler 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
54Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
ADF ADO ADR CFP CTO DET FAH FGB FGH
Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dunklin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Howell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Madison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
New Madrid 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pemiscot 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Phelps 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pulaski 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scott 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Francois 5 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stoddard 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0
Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Washington 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Wayne 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 12 0 2 5 4 2 2 0 14
Southwest Barry 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0
Barton 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Camden 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5
Cedar 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Christian 0 0 0 7 3 1 0 0 0
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dallas 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Greene 1 0 4 29 2 0 0 0 0
Henry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jasper 1 0 4 30 2 0 0 0 0
Laclede 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Lawrence 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 0
Mcdonald 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0
Miller 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Moniteau 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3
Newton 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0
Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Polk 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stone 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Taney 0 1 0 11 1 0 0 0 0
Vernon 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Webster 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Wright 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 8 1 11 103 13 3 0 0 8
Kansas City Jackson 4 1 1 106 3 2 5 1 4
* Region Total * 4 1 1 106 3 2 5 1 4
St. Louis St Louis City 0 0 0 31 3 2 0 0 0
St Louis County 0 0 1 52 0 1 2 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 1 83 3 3 2 0 0
Other Icama 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
State Total 26 5 19 425 39 18 11 1 33
55Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
FGM FHB FHE FHM FHO ILA JHO KHB
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
Buchanan 0 5 0 1 20 0 0 2
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Cass 0 4 0 3 45 2 0 0
Chariton 0 1 1 0 12 0 0 0
Clay 0 4 0 4 67 0 0 0
Clinton 0 1 0 0 21 0 0 0
Cooper 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
Daviess 0 1 0 0 9 0 0 0
De Kalb 0 0 0 1 14 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grundy 0 0 0 0 16 1 0 0
Harrison 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
Holt 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Johnson 0 1 0 0 25 2 0 0
Lafayette 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0
Linn 0 2 2 2 9 0 0 0
Livingston 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0
Mercer 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 1 0 0 7 2 0 0
Pettis 0 3 0 0 36 0 0 0
Platte 0 1 0 0 12 2 0 0
Putnam 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 0
Ray 0 0 0 1 12 0 0 0
Saline 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 9 2 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 30 3 12 371 13 0 2
Northeast Adair 0 0 6 0 14 1 0 0
Audrain 0 5 0 2 16 1 0 0
Boone 0 6 1 4 56 5 0 0
Callaway 0 4 1 3 21 0 0 0
Clark 0 1 0 0 9 0 0 0
Cole 0 6 0 0 58 3 0 0
Franklin 0 2 3 2 104 8 0 0
Gasconade 0 0 1 0 20 0 0 0
Howard 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 0
Jefferson 0 25 11 11 143 9 0 0
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
Lincoln 0 1 0 2 29 1 0 0
Macon 0 1 0 0 9 4 0 0
Marion 0 1 0 2 45 1 0 1
Monroe 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0
Montgomery 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 0
Osage 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Pike 0 2 0 0 20 0 0 0
Ralls 0 3 0 0 16 1 0 0
Randolph 0 2 0 1 34 2 0 0
Schuyler 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 0
Scotland 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0
Shelby 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
St Charles 0 9 1 1 79 1 0 0
Warren 0 0 0 0 14 4 0 0
* Region Total * 0 70 25 32 714 44 0 1
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 0
Butler 0 2 0 3 68 0 0 0
Cape Girardeau 0 1 5 8 50 0 0 1
Carter 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
56Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
FGM FHB FHE FHM FHO ILA JHO KHB
Southeast Crawford 0 1 1 0 15 0 0 0
Dent 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0
Dunklin 0 0 5 0 32 0 0 0
Howell 0 0 0 3 24 1 0 0
Iron 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0
Madison 0 1 0 1 11 0 0 0
Maries 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0
New Madrid 0 1 0 1 16 0 0 0
Oregon 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
Pemiscot 0 0 0 1 30 2 0 0
Perry 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
Phelps 0 4 0 3 44 0 0 0
Pulaski 0 3 4 3 33 1 0 2
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0
Ripley 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0
Scott 0 0 1 1 26 0 0 0
Shannon 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0
St Francois 0 1 3 1 74 4 0 0
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0
Stoddard 0 0 0 3 26 1 0 0
Texas 0 1 0 2 22 0 0 0
Washington 0 1 4 1 39 0 0 0
Wayne 0 0 1 3 10 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 17 24 36 601 10 0 3
Southwest Barry 0 2 0 2 57 1 0 0
Barton 0 1 2 0 10 0 0 0
Bates 0 0 3 0 5 0 0 0
Benton 0 1 0 1 6 0 0 0
Camden 0 3 0 2 34 1 0 0
Cedar 0 0 2 0 4 1 0 0
Christian 0 3 2 4 31 3 0 1
Dade 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0
Dallas 0 1 0 0 18 1 0 0
Douglas 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0
Greene 0 25 2 15 278 11 0 3
Henry 0 4 1 0 28 2 0 0
Hickory 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0
Jasper 0 8 0 5 174 2 0 0
Laclede 0 1 0 1 47 0 0 0
Lawrence 0 1 0 2 36 2 0 1
Mcdonald 0 0 0 0 36 1 0 0
Miller 0 1 0 2 14 1 0 0
Moniteau 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0
Morgan 0 0 0 1 10 1 0 0
Newton 0 4 0 0 77 2 0 1
Ozark 0 0 0 5 10 0 0 0
Polk 0 0 0 1 36 2 0 0
St Clair 0 0 0 0 7 2 0 0
Stone 0 1 0 2 24 0 0 0
Taney 0 7 0 5 75 2 0 0
Vernon 0 0 0 1 21 1 0 0
Webster 0 0 0 4 26 1 0 0
Wright 0 2 0 4 40 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 66 12 57 1,120 39 0 6
Kansas City Jackson 0 81 14 23 501 29 0 3
* Region Total * 0 81 14 23 501 29 0 3
St. Louis St Louis City 0 43 3 10 150 5 0 1
St Louis County 0 45 6 17 237 12 0 3
* Region Total * 0 88 9 27 387 17 0 4
Other Icama 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0
State Total 0 352 88 187 3,696 152 0 19
57Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
KHM KHO KHU LGS MMD MMH RFA RFP RF2
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 0 1 3 0 0 0 5 0 0
Caldwell 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 1 13 6 0 1 5 46 0 1
Chariton 0 1 1 0 0 2 6 0 0
Clay 0 1 6 0 1 6 22 0 0
Clinton 0 9 0 0 0 0 6 0 0
Cooper 0 1 0 0 0 0 10 0 0
Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
Gentry 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0
Grundy 0 2 0 0 0 1 5 0 0
Harrison 0 4 4 0 0 0 1 0 0
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Johnson 0 5 3 0 0 5 17 0 0
Lafayette 0 12 0 0 0 0 7 0 0
Linn 0 5 2 0 0 2 5 0 0
Livingston 0 0 2 0 0 3 8 0 0
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Nodaway 0 4 4 0 0 1 1 0 0
Pettis 0 2 0 0 0 6 7 0 1
Platte 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 0 0
Putnam 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
Ray 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0
Saline 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 0
Sullivan 0 4 5 0 0 0 2 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 1 70 44 0 2 36 167 0 2
Northeast Adair 0 14 3 0 0 3 10 0 0
Audrain 0 5 5 0 1 3 3 0 0
Boone 0 22 31 0 0 8 37 0 0
Callaway 0 4 2 0 0 4 23 0 0
Clark 1 13 4 0 0 3 4 0 0
Cole 0 12 7 0 0 11 15 0 0
Franklin 0 26 7 0 0 15 5 0 0
Gasconade 1 2 1 0 0 2 1 0 0
Howard 0 3 2 0 0 1 2 0 0
Jefferson 0 59 27 0 2 9 21 1 1
Knox 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lewis 1 2 1 0 0 3 3 0 0
Lincoln 0 6 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Macon 1 5 3 0 0 2 2 0 0
Marion 0 9 4 4 1 5 8 0 0
Monroe 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Montgomery 0 1 0 0 0 6 1 0 0
Osage 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 0 0 6 0 0 2 0 0 0
Ralls 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
Randolph 0 9 6 1 0 4 12 0 0
Schuyler 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0
Scotland 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
Shelby 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
St Charles 0 20 8 0 2 12 13 0 0
Warren 0 7 2 0 0 2 3 0 0
* Region Total * 5 227 125 5 6 99 172 1 1
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0
Butler 0 25 11 0 1 7 26 0 0
Cape Girardeau 0 19 10 1 4 4 17 0 0
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
58Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
KHM KHO KHU LGS MMD MMH RFA RFP RF2
Southeast Crawford 0 8 1 0 0 4 12 0 0
Dent 0 4 8 0 1 2 8 0 0
Dunklin 0 6 11 0 0 6 17 0 0
Howell 0 8 1 0 0 5 4 0 0
Iron 0 3 2 0 0 1 7 0 0
Madison 0 6 0 0 0 0 5 0 0
Maries 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Mississippi 1 1 4 0 0 0 2 0 0
New Madrid 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 0 0
Oregon 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0
Pemiscot 0 13 4 0 1 2 10 0 0
Perry 0 0 2 0 0 2 4 0 0
Phelps 1 12 8 0 2 1 13 0 0
Pulaski 2 5 7 0 1 4 19 1 0
Reynolds 0 2 0 0 0 1 4 0 0
Ripley 0 10 1 0 0 3 5 0 0
Scott 1 10 6 0 0 0 4 0 0
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
St Francois 0 13 1 0 0 3 25 0 0
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0
Stoddard 0 9 0 0 0 3 32 0 0
Texas 0 5 0 0 0 2 6 0 0
Washington 0 6 7 0 0 0 16 0 0
Wayne 0 5 0 0 0 0 8 0 0
* Region Total * 5 176 88 1 10 56 256 1 0
Southwest Barry 0 11 5 0 1 4 23 0 0
Barton 0 0 1 0 0 1 4 0 0
Bates 0 0 3 0 0 2 1 0 0
Benton 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0
Camden 2 2 0 0 1 4 5 0 0
Cedar 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 0
Christian 0 8 1 0 0 5 7 0 0
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
Dallas 0 0 4 0 0 2 5 0 0
Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 0
Greene 3 57 12 1 2 27 88 0 1
Henry 0 2 0 0 0 2 9 0 0
Hickory 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jasper 3 59 34 0 0 17 71 1 0
Laclede 0 19 11 0 1 6 13 0 0
Lawrence 0 18 2 0 0 5 22 0 0
Mcdonald 0 15 4 0 1 4 11 0 0
Miller 1 7 0 0 0 3 6 0 0
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0
Morgan 0 7 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Newton 0 21 9 0 0 3 26 0 0
Ozark 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Polk 0 0 0 0 0 4 10 0 0
St Clair 0 2 0 0 0 1 4 0 0
Stone 0 4 2 0 0 3 14 0 0
Taney 0 21 1 0 0 3 28 0 1
Vernon 0 1 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
Webster 0 5 0 0 0 1 5 0 0
Wright 0 5 6 0 2 6 6 0 0
* Region Total * 9 265 103 1 9 109 380 1 2
Kansas City Jackson 2 71 58 1 7 55 186 1 0
* Region Total * 2 71 58 1 7 55 186 1 0
St. Louis St Louis City 0 27 14 0 5 11 64 0 2
St Louis County 2 76 32 0 6 14 53 0 1
* Region Total * 2 103 46 0 11 25 117 0 3
Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0
State Total 24 912 464 8 45 381 1,280 4 8
59Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
RF3 RF4 RFE RFH RFM RFI RFT RHB RHM
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1
Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clay 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cooper 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grundy 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lafayette 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Linn 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pettis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Platte 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 7 1 3 0 0 1 1 2
Northeast Adair 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Audrain 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 1
Boone 4 16 0 5 0 0 1 0 2
Callaway 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
Clark 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cole 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Franklin 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jefferson 2 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lincoln 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 1
Macon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marion 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Randolph 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Schuyler 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Charles 4 4 0 3 0 0 0 1 1
Warren 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
* Region Total * 27 45 0 15 0 0 2 5 10
Southeast Bollinger 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Butler 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cape Girardeau 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
60Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
RF3 RF4 RFE RFH RFM RFI RFT RHB RHM
Southeast Crawford 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0
Dent 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
Dunklin 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Howell 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Madison 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
New Madrid 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Perry 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Phelps 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 2 2
Pulaski 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reynolds 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ripley 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Scott 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shannon 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
St Francois 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ste Genevieve 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stoddard 1 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Texas 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Washington 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0
Wayne 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 9 30 0 13 0 0 1 5 7
Southwest Barry 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Benton 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Camden 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Christian 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 1 0
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Douglas 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Greene 1 11 4 16 0 0 0 5 3
Henry 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jasper 3 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 2
Laclede 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lawrence 0 6 4 2 0 0 0 0 1
Mcdonald 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Miller 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Moniteau 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Newton 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Ozark 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4
Polk 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Clair 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stone 0 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 1
Taney 2 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 1
Vernon 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Webster 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Wright 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 6 52 23 33 0 0 1 6 12
Kansas City Jackson 0 13 0 4 0 0 1 5 0
* Region Total * 0 13 0 4 0 0 1 5 0
St. Louis St Louis City 5 7 2 3 0 0 0 5 0
St Louis County 13 9 1 12 0 0 0 0 1
* Region Total * 18 16 3 15 0 0 0 5 1
Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
State Total 60 163 27 83 0 0 6 27 32
61Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
RHO RHU RUN SCH TLA TLG TLS TOTAL
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Atchison 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 7
Buchanan 8 11 0 0 0 0 0 61
Caldwell 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 15
Carroll 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
Cass 45 26 2 0 1 4 1 222
Chariton 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 28
Clay 32 26 0 0 0 1 0 180
Clinton 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 52
Cooper 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 18
Daviess 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 23
De Kalb 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 30
Gentry 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 12
Grundy 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 42
Harrison 3 6 0 0 0 1 0 26
Holt 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5
Johnson 31 6 0 0 0 1 2 101
Lafayette 17 4 0 0 0 0 0 50
Linn 13 8 0 0 0 0 0 55
Livingston 12 6 0 0 0 0 0 43
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
Nodaway 11 5 0 0 0 0 0 37
Pettis 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 73
Platte 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 30
Putnam 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 19
Ray 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 19
Saline 29 4 0 0 0 0 0 52
Sullivan 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 34
Worth 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
* Region Total * 277 141 2 0 1 7 3 1,246
Northeast Adair 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 68
Audrain 16 17 0 0 0 1 0 90
Boone 45 36 2 0 0 3 2 299
Callaway 23 28 0 0 0 0 0 125
Clark 11 0 0 0 0 0 1 52
Cole 31 19 2 0 0 1 1 173
Franklin 51 37 0 0 0 1 0 280
Gasconade 4 2 0 0 0 0 1 36
Howard 3 2 1 0 0 1 0 26
Jefferson 192 117 1 0 0 0 1 666
Knox 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
Lewis 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 27
Lincoln 6 8 1 0 0 0 2 67
Macon 2 12 0 0 0 1 0 42
Marion 19 16 0 0 0 0 0 127
Monroe 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 20
Montgomery 10 2 0 0 0 1 0 27
Osage 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 14
Pike 8 6 1 0 0 0 0 46
Ralls 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 28
Randolph 28 12 0 0 0 1 1 125
Schuyler 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
Scotland 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11
Shelby 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 15
St Charles 47 37 1 0 0 1 0 265
Warren 18 9 0 0 0 0 0 63
* Region Total * 549 382 9 0 0 11 9 2,713
Southeast Bollinger 17 7 0 0 0 0 0 36
Butler 66 15 0 0 0 2 1 231
Cape Girardeau 69 27 0 0 1 1 2 236
Carter 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
62Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
RHO RHU RUN SCH TLA TLG TLS TOTAL
Southeast Crawford 19 4 0 0 0 0 0 72
Dent 3 2 0 0 0 3 0 53
Dunklin 32 27 0 0 0 0 0 137
Howell 11 4 0 0 0 2 0 67
Iron 7 5 0 0 0 1 1 32
Madison 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 29
Maries 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
Mississippi 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 31
New Madrid 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 51
Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
Pemiscot 19 15 0 0 0 0 0 99
Perry 4 1 0 0 0 2 0 27
Phelps 52 23 0 0 0 1 1 179
Pulaski 24 9 0 0 0 1 0 120
Reynolds 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 26
Ripley 19 11 0 0 0 0 2 64
Scott 33 17 0 0 1 0 0 102
Shannon 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
St Francois 41 4 0 0 0 1 1 184
Ste Genevieve 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13
Stoddard 25 22 0 0 0 0 0 131
Texas 31 11 0 0 0 0 0 81
Washington 21 3 0 0 0 0 0 106
Wayne 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 41
* Region Total * 555 218 0 0 2 14 8 2,187
Southwest Barry 50 22 0 0 0 1 1 191
Barton 5 1 0 0 0 1 0 27
Bates 9 7 0 0 0 0 1 31
Benton 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 21
Camden 16 5 0 0 2 1 0 90
Cedar 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 21
Christian 30 12 0 0 0 3 1 130
Dade 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 14
Dallas 14 2 0 0 0 1 1 50
Douglas 10 4 0 0 0 2 0 34
Greene 161 37 5 0 1 8 6 819
Henry 14 6 0 0 0 1 4 77
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
Jasper 120 38 2 0 0 1 9 591
Laclede 34 10 0 0 0 2 0 148
Lawrence 54 12 0 0 3 7 1 185
Mcdonald 19 21 0 0 0 0 2 118
Miller 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 49
Moniteau 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
Morgan 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 38
Newton 45 22 0 0 0 0 0 216
Ozark 14 4 0 0 0 0 0 40
Polk 15 3 0 0 0 1 3 78
St Clair 12 2 1 0 0 0 0 32
Stone 13 11 0 0 1 0 0 85
Taney 48 3 0 0 1 3 2 226
Vernon 4 2 0 0 0 3 1 42
Webster 10 0 0 0 1 2 0 58
Wright 31 9 0 0 0 3 1 121
* Region Total * 750 248 8 0 9 41 33 3,548
Kansas City Jackson 326 299 43 0 1 11 25 1,887
* Region Total * 326 299 43 0 1 11 25 1,887
St. Louis St Louis City 139 49 11 0 1 7 14 614
St Louis County 191 106 12 0 0 6 16 927
* Region Total * 330 155 23 0 1 13 30 1,541
Other Icama 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
* Region Total * 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
State Total 2,789 1,443 85 0 14 97 108 13,131
63Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 21.
Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During July 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Category at Time of Exit
Group Home/
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total
Home Home Home Care Other Exits
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 2 0 0 2
Buchanan 0 3 0 0 0 3
Caldwell 0 0 1 0 0 1
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 0 1 4 1 0 6
Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clay 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clinton 0 0 1 0 0 1
Cooper 0 1 0 0 0 1
Daviess 0 0 2 0 0 2
De Kalb 0 0 1 0 0 1
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0
Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0
Linn 0 0 0 1 0 1
Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 0 1 0 0 1
Pettis 0 0 0 0 1 1
Platte 0 3 2 1 0 6
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 0 0 0 0 1 1
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 8 14 3 2 27
Northeast Adair 0 1 1 1 0 3
Audrain 0 0 0 0 1 1
Boone 0 2 0 0 0 2
Callaway 0 1 4 1 0 6
Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cole 0 0 7 0 0 7
Franklin 0 3 8 0 1 12
Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0
Howard 0 0 6 0 0 6
Jefferson 1 1 17 2 1 22
Knox 0 0 1 0 0 1
Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lincoln 0 0 1 0 0 1
Macon 0 0 7 0 1 8
Marion 0 0 0 1 1 2
Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0
Montgomery 0 0 0 1 0 1
Osage 0 1 0 0 0 1
Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0
Randolph 0 0 0 0 0 0
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 2 1 0 0 3
Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Charles 0 7 14 0 1 22
Warren 0 2 3 0 0 5
* Region Total * 1 20 70 6 6 103
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0
Butler 0 3 6 2 0 11
Cape Girardeau 0 3 0 0 0 3
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0
64Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 21.
Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During July 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Category at Time of Exit
Group Home/
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total
Home Home Home Care Other Exits
Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 1 0 1
Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dunklin 0 3 3 0 0 6
Howell 0 0 0 0 0 0
Iron 0 3 3 0 0 6
Madison 0 0 1 0 1 2
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0
New Madrid 0 0 1 0 0 1
Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pemiscot 0 0 4 0 0 4
Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0
Phelps 0 2 6 2 1 11
Pulaski 0 0 1 0 1 2
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scott 0 2 0 0 0 2
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Francois 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 1 0 1
Stoddard 0 0 0 0 0 0
Texas 0 2 0 0 0 2
Washington 0 0 0 1 0 1
Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 18 25 7 3 53
Southwest Barry 0 0 0 1 0 1
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bates 0 0 1 0 0 1
Benton 0 0 1 0 0 1
Camden 0 2 0 0 2 4
Cedar 0 0 1 0 0 1
Christian 1 0 4 0 1 6
Dade 0 0 1 0 0 1
Dallas 0 0 3 0 0 3
Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0
Greene 6 5 8 3 3 25
Henry 0 5 0 0 1 6
Hickory 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jasper 0 12 2 3 2 19
Laclede 0 0 2 0 2 4
Lawrence 0 0 4 0 1 5
Mcdonald 0 0 3 1 0 4
Miller 0 0 1 0 0 1
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 0 1 1 1 3
Newton 0 8 11 1 0 20
Ozark 0 1 0 0 0 1
Polk 0 1 2 0 0 3
St Clair 0 0 0 0 1 1
Stone 0 0 0 2 0 2
Taney 0 1 3 1 1 6
Vernon 0 0 3 0 0 3
Webster 0 1 0 0 0 1
Wright 0 1 6 0 0 7
* Region Total * 7 37 57 13 16 130
Kansas City Jackson 7 9 26 2 12 56
* Region Total * 7 9 26 2 12 56
St. Louis St Louis City 0 6 0 3 1 10
St Louis County 0 9 17 2 0 28
* Region Total * 0 15 17 5 1 38
Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0
State Total 15 107 209 36 40 407
65Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 22.
Children Closed from Alternative Care During July 2015
by Case Manager County and Reason for Case Closing
Returned Other Living with Achieved Total
Home Agency Other Relatives Independence Other Closings
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 2 0 0 0 0 2
Buchanan 2 0 0 0 3 5
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 3 3
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 2 0 0 0 1 3
Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clay 0 0 0 0 8 8
Clinton 0 0 0 0 1 1
Cooper 1 0 0 0 0 1
Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 0 0 1 1
Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0
Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0
Linn 0 0 0 1 0 1
Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mercer 0 0 0 0 1 1
Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pettis 1 0 0 0 0 1
Platte 2 0 0 0 0 2
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 0 0 0 1 0 1
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 10 0 0 2 18 30
Northeast Adair 2 0 0 0 0 2
Audrain 0 0 0 1 0 1
Boone 2 0 0 0 0 2
Callaway 3 0 0 1 1 5
Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cole 1 0 0 0 0 1
Franklin 3 0 0 1 0 4
Gasconade 0 0 0 0 1 1
Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jefferson 6 0 0 1 2 9
Knox 1 0 0 0 0 1
Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lincoln 1 0 0 0 0 1
Macon 3 0 0 1 1 5
Marion 1 0 0 1 0 2
Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0
Montgomery 1 0 0 0 0 1
Osage 1 0 0 0 0 1
Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0
Randolph 1 0 0 0 0 1
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 3 0 0 0 0 3
Shelby 0 0 0 0 1 1
St Charles 9 0 0 3 5 17
Warren 4 0 0 0 1 5
* Region Total * 42 0 0 9 12 63
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 1 1
Butler 6 0 0 1 4 11
Cape Girardeau 1 0 0 0 0 1
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0
Crawford 1 0 0 0 0 1
66Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 22.
Children Closed from Alternative Care During July 2015
by Case Manager County and Reason for Case Closing
Returned Other Living with Achieved Total
Home Agency Other Relatives Independence Other Closings
Southeast Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dunklin 4 0 2 0 2 8
Howell 0 0 0 0 0 0
Iron 3 0 0 0 1 4
Madison 1 0 0 0 1 2
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0
New Madrid 1 0 0 0 4 5
Oregon 0 0 0 0 1 1
Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 2 2
Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0
Phelps 4 0 0 1 4 9
Pulaski 0 0 0 1 4 5
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scott 2 0 0 0 1 3
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Francois 0 0 0 0 2 2
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 1 0 1
Stoddard 0 0 0 0 7 7
Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0
Washington 1 0 0 0 0 1
Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 24 0 2 4 34 64
Southwest Barry 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0
Benton 0 0 0 1 0 1
Camden 2 0 0 2 0 4
Cedar 1 0 0 0 1 2
Christian 2 0 0 1 0 3
Dade 1 0 0 0 0 1
Dallas 2 0 0 0 0 2
Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0
Greene 11 0 0 1 5 17
Henry 4 0 0 0 0 4
Hickory 0 0 0 1 0 1
Jasper 7 0 1 1 3 12
Laclede 2 0 0 2 1 5
Lawrence 1 0 0 0 1 2
Mcdonald 4 0 0 0 0 4
Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 2 0 0 1 0 3
Newton 16 0 0 0 4 20
Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0
Polk 3 0 0 0 0 3
St Clair 0 0 0 0 1 1
Stone 2 0 0 0 0 2
Taney 5 0 0 0 1 6
Vernon 3 0 0 0 1 4
Webster 1 0 0 0 0 1
Wright 4 0 0 0 0 4
* Region Total * 73 0 1 10 18 102
Kansas City Jackson 31 1 0 7 10 49
* Region Total * 31 1 0 7 10 49
St. Louis St Louis City 7 0 0 4 10 21
St Louis County 16 0 0 1 9 26
* Region Total * 23 0 0 5 19 47
Other Icama 0 0 0 0 44 44
* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 44 44
State Total 203 1 3 37 155 399
67Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 23.
Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of July 2015
With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody
Temporary Adoptions
In Legal Status 1 In Legal Status 1 Adoptive Finalized Total
TPR Incomplete TPR Complete Custody During Month Children
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 1 0 0 0 1
Buchanan 6 2 0 0 8
Caldwell 4 0 0 1 5
Carroll 1 0 0 0 1
Cass 20 10 0 3 33
Chariton 5 0 0 0 5
Clay 8 9 0 0 17
Clinton 6 1 0 0 7
Cooper 0 1 0 0 1
Daviess 3 0 0 0 3
De Kalb 10 0 0 0 10
Gentry 2 0 0 0 2
Grundy 1 4 0 0 5
Harrison 4 0 0 0 4
Holt 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 13 4 0 0 17
Lafayette 5 0 0 1 6
Linn 10 0 0 0 10
Livingston 1 0 0 0 1
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 6 3 0 0 9
Pettis 4 4 0 0 8
Platte 2 0 2 1 5
Putnam 4 0 0 0 4
Ray 3 0 0 0 3
Saline 10 0 0 0 10
Sullivan 5 0 0 0 5
Worth 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 134 38 2 6 180
Northeast Adair 9 1 0 0 10
Audrain 17 0 0 0 17
Boone 11 8 0 0 19
Callaway 3 7 0 0 10
Clark 10 1 0 0 11
Cole 21 2 0 2 25
Franklin 24 6 0 3 33
Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0
Howard 7 0 6 0 13
Jefferson 77 22 1 1 101
Knox 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 0 0
Lincoln 6 6 0 0 12
Macon 4 0 0 0 4
Marion 21 2 0 0 23
Monroe 2 3 0 0 5
Montgomery 1 0 0 0 1
Osage 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 7 6 0 0 13
Ralls 4 0 0 0 4
Randolph 9 2 0 0 11
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 1 1 0 0 2
Shelby 0 0 0 0 0
St Charles 28 14 1 5 48
Warren 4 1 0 1 6
* Region Total * 266 82 8 12 368
Southeast Bollinger 2 0 0 0 2
Butler 59 18 0 0 77
Cape Girardeau 10 10 0 2 22
Carter 1 0 0 0 1
Crawford 4 7 0 0 11
68Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 23.
Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of July 2015
With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody
Temporary Adoptions
In Legal Status 1 In Legal Status 1 Adoptive Finalized Total
TPR Incomplete TPR Complete Custody During Month Children
Southeast Dent 6 0 0 0 6
Dunklin 6 1 0 0 7
Howell 3 0 0 0 3
Iron 5 4 0 0 9
Madison 4 10 0 0 14
Maries 1 0 0 0 1
Mississippi 1 0 0 0 1
New Madrid 11 2 0 0 13
Oregon 0 1 0 0 1
Pemiscot 9 3 0 0 12
Perry 2 2 0 0 4
Phelps 29 8 0 2 39
Pulaski 11 3 0 0 14
Reynolds 0 2 0 0 2
Ripley 3 1 0 0 4
Scott 3 2 0 0 5
Shannon 1 0 0 0 1
St Francois 7 15 0 0 22
Ste Genevieve 0 1 0 0 1
Stoddard 7 3 0 0 10
Texas 23 1 0 0 24
Washington 4 10 0 0 14
Wayne 11 1 0 0 12
* Region Total * 223 105 0 4 332
Southwest Barry 23 3 0 0 26
Barton 0 2 0 0 2
Bates 7 0 0 1 8
Benton 1 4 0 0 5
Camden 8 3 0 0 11
Cedar 0 0 0 0 0
Christian 8 5 0 1 14
Dade 0 0 0 0 0
Dallas 11 1 0 0 12
Douglas 0 1 0 0 1
Greene 170 136 0 6 312
Henry 16 5 3 0 24
Hickory 1 0 0 0 1
Jasper 117 13 23 0 153
Laclede 6 6 0 0 12
Lawrence 32 0 0 2 34
Mcdonald 14 4 0 0 18
Miller 1 3 0 1 5
Moniteau 2 0 0 0 2
Morgan 0 2 0 0 2
Newton 30 7 0 1 38
Ozark 13 0 1 0 14
Polk 6 2 0 0 8
St Clair 3 0 0 0 3
Stone 10 3 0 0 13
Taney 38 19 0 0 57
Vernon 3 4 0 0 7
Webster 4 5 0 0 9
Wright 12 4 0 0 16
* Region Total * 536 232 27 12 807
Kansas City Jackson 415 77 0 11 503
* Region Total * 415 77 0 11 503
St. Louis St Louis City 81 20 0 0 101
St Louis County 91 23 2 8 124
* Region Total * 172 43 2 8 225
Other Icama 0 0 33 0 33
* Region Total * 0 0 33 0 33
State Total 1,746 577 72 53 2,448
69Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 24.
Licensed Children's Division Foster Homes on the Last Day of July 2015
by Vendor Type and County
Current Licensed
Career Foster Foster Newly Number of Vendors
Foster Adoptive Group Foster Licensed Vendors in Licensed 12 Months Percentage
Home Home Home Home Vendors Use Vendors Ago Change
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 2 0.00
Atchison 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0.00
Buchanan 7 0 0 21 3 16 21 19 10.53
Caldwell 0 0 0 3 0 3 3 2 50.00
Carroll 0 0 0 2 1 1 2 1 100.00
Cass 3 0 1 34 2 23 31 28 10.71
Chariton 0 0 0 5 0 4 5 2 150.00
Clay 3 0 0 72 3 55 70 66 6.06
Clinton 0 0 0 13 0 10 13 10 30.00
Cooper 2 0 0 7 0 4 6 4 50.00
Daviess 0 0 0 6 0 5 6 7 -14.29
De Kalb 0 0 0 3 0 3 3 1 200.00
Gentry 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 1 100.00
Grundy 0 0 0 4 1 2 4 5 -20.00
Harrison 0 0 0 6 1 3 6 7 -14.29
Holt 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0.00
Johnson 2 0 0 21 4 13 20 16 25.00
Lafayette 1 0 0 13 0 8 13 10 30.00
Linn 1 0 0 5 1 3 5 4 25.00
Livingston 0 0 0 6 0 5 6 4 50.00
Mercer 0 0 1 2 0 2 2 3 -33.33
Nodaway 0 0 0 6 0 1 6 5 20.00
Pettis 0 0 0 17 0 9 16 14 14.29
Platte 3 0 0 30 3 17 30 32 -6.25
Putnam 0 0 0 3 0 2 2 2 0.00
Ray 1 0 0 11 0 6 10 8 25.00
Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
Sullivan 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 2 0.00
Worth 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0.00
* Region Total * 24 0 2 299 19 204 289 258 12.02
Northeast Adair 1 0 0 14 0 8 14 17 -17.65
Audrain 1 0 0 14 0 7 14 8 75.00
Boone 7 0 0 43 1 28 42 46 -8.70
Callaway 1 0 0 13 0 9 13 12 8.33
Clark 0 0 0 3 0 2 3 2 50.00
Cole 2 0 0 39 0 30 39 40 -2.50
Franklin 3 0 1 60 0 42 60 67 -10.45
Gasconade 0 0 0 6 1 3 6 5 20.00
Howard 0 0 0 3 0 2 3 3 0.00
Jefferson 4 0 0 57 0 46 57 60 -5.00
Knox 0 0 0 3 0 2 3 6 -50.00
Lewis 0 0 0 4 2 0 4 2 100.00
Lincoln 1 0 0 19 0 17 19 18 5.56
Macon 0 0 0 7 0 4 5 6 -16.67
Marion 3 0 0 39 0 27 38 37 2.70
Monroe 0 0 0 5 0 3 5 8 -37.50
Montgomery 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 2 0.00
Osage 1 0 0 6 0 5 6 7 -14.29
Pike 0 0 0 9 0 8 9 7 28.57
Ralls 0 0 0 9 0 8 9 9 0.00
Randolph 5 0 0 16 0 11 16 14 14.29
Schuyler 0 0 0 4 0 3 4 6 -33.33
Scotland 0 0 0 3 0 3 3 4 -25.00
Shelby 0 0 0 4 0 2 4 5 -20.00
St Charles 5 0 0 47 1 29 46 56 -17.86
Warren 0 0 0 11 0 8 11 12 -8.33
* Region Total * 34 0 1 440 5 309 435 459 -5.23
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 7 0 5 7 4 75.00
Butler 1 0 0 18 0 16 18 19 -5.26
Cape Girardeau 1 0 1 40 0 33 41 33 24.24
Carter 1 0 0 4 0 4 4 4 0.00
70Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 24.
Licensed Children's Division Foster Homes on the Last Day of July 2015
by Vendor Type and County
Current Licensed
Career Foster Foster Newly Number of Vendors
Foster Adoptive Group Foster Licensed Vendors in Licensed 12 Months Percentage
Home Home Home Home Vendors Use Vendors Ago Change
Southeast Crawford 1 0 0 9 0 8 9 8 12.50
Dent 1 0 0 4 0 3 4 6 -33.33
Dunklin 0 0 0 13 2 12 13 9 44.44
Howell 0 0 0 24 0 17 24 22 9.09
Iron 0 0 0 5 0 3 5 5 0.00
Madison 0 0 0 9 1 7 8 7 14.29
Maries 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 1 100.00
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
New Madrid 1 0 0 9 0 6 8 9 -11.11
Oregon 0 0 0 6 0 4 6 6 0.00
Pemiscot 1 0 0 15 0 9 15 15 0.00
Perry 0 0 0 7 0 5 7 7 0.00
Phelps 1 0 0 29 0 22 29 31 -6.45
Pulaski 2 0 0 22 0 14 21 20 5.00
Reynolds 0 0 0 4 0 4 4 5 -20.00
Ripley 0 0 0 15 0 9 15 15 0.00
Scott 0 0 0 16 1 12 16 14 14.29
Shannon 0 0 0 4 0 4 4 5 -20.00
St Francois 0 0 0 28 3 20 27 31 -12.90
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 6 1 3 5 2 150.00
Stoddard 0 0 0 22 2 16 22 22 0.00
Texas 0 0 0 16 0 10 16 18 -11.11
Washington 0 0 0 13 0 13 13 14 -7.14
Wayne 0 0 0 5 0 4 5 6 -16.67
* Region Total * 10 0 1 352 10 265 348 338 2.96
Southwest Barry 0 0 0 15 0 13 15 14 7.14
Barton 0 0 0 10 0 8 10 13 -23.08
Bates 2 0 0 11 0 5 11 11 0.00
Benton 1 0 0 15 0 11 15 16 -6.25
Camden 2 0 1 17 1 12 16 18 -11.11
Cedar 0 0 0 8 0 5 7 9 -22.22
Christian 5 0 0 87 1 59 83 71 16.90
Dade 0 0 0 3 0 3 3 3 0.00
Dallas 1 0 0 13 0 11 13 14 -7.14
Douglas 0 0 0 13 0 10 12 11 9.09
Greene 5 0 0 220 5 117 209 186 12.37
Henry 1 0 0 23 0 18 23 22 4.55
Hickory 0 0 0 8 0 5 8 8 0.00
Jasper 6 0 0 107 1 75 105 111 -5.41
Laclede 3 0 0 21 0 16 20 24 -16.67
Lawrence 0 0 0 23 1 13 21 23 -8.70
Mcdonald 1 0 0 15 2 9 15 11 36.36
Miller 0 0 0 5 0 4 5 10 -50.00
Moniteau 2 0 0 10 0 8 10 14 -28.57
Morgan 0 0 0 7 0 4 7 11 -36.36
Newton 3 0 0 41 2 29 41 32 28.13
Ozark 0 0 0 4 0 3 4 2 100.00
Polk 3 0 0 31 0 20 31 23 34.78
St Clair 0 0 0 3 0 2 2 4 -50.00
Stone 1 0 0 23 1 15 22 19 15.79
Taney 3 0 0 32 0 25 32 29 10.35
Vernon 1 0 0 5 0 3 4 7 -42.86
Webster 0 0 0 32 0 17 31 30 3.33
Wright 1 0 0 12 0 11 12 9 33.33
* Region Total * 41 0 1 814 14 531 787 755 4.24
Kansas City Jackson 50 0 1 315 9 215 299 306 -2.29
* Region Total * 50 0 1 315 9 215 299 306 -2.29
St. Louis St Louis City 19 0 0 74 0 50 74 85 -12.94
St Louis County 25 3 0 145 4 92 136 125 8.80
* Region Total * 44 3 0 219 4 142 210 210 0.00
State Total 203 3 6 2,439 61 1,666 2,368 2,326 1.81
71Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 25.
Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of July 2015
by Case Manager County and Legal Status
Total
LS 1 LS 2 LS 3 LS 4 LS 5 LS 6 LS 7 LS 8 LS 9 LS V Children
Northwest Andrew 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Atchison 7 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 11
Buchanan 61 0 0 8 106 0 0 0 42 0 217
Caldwell 15 0 0 0 227 0 0 0 116 0 358
Carroll 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
Cass 222 0 0 6 235 0 1 0 47 0 511
Chariton 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 29
Clay 180 0 0 13 514 0 0 0 69 0 776
Clinton 52 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 0 63
Cooper 18 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 7 0 33
Daviess 23 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 1 30
De Kalb 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 31
Gentry 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 17
Grundy 42 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 44
Harrison 26 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 28
Holt 5 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 13
Johnson 101 0 0 1 126 0 1 0 37 0 266
Lafayette 50 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 54
Linn 55 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 56
Livingston 43 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 51
Mercer 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
Nodaway 37 0 0 0 45 0 0 1 12 0 95
Pettis 73 0 0 4 121 0 0 0 33 0 231
Platte 30 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 16 0 50
Putnam 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19
Ray 19 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 29
Saline 52 0 0 0 149 0 1 0 31 0 233
Sullivan 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 37
Worth 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
* Region Total * 1,246 2 0 38 1,569 0 3 3 432 1 3,294
Northeast Adair 68 0 0 0 60 0 1 0 37 0 166
Audrain 90 0 0 3 43 0 1 0 15 0 152
Boone 299 0 0 0 328 0 2 0 184 1 814
Callaway 125 0 3 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 138
Clark 52 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 14 0 69
Cole 173 0 2 5 172 0 1 1 81 0 435
Franklin 280 0 0 0 268 0 0 0 135 0 683
Gasconade 36 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 10 0 56
Howard 26 6 0 0 13 0 0 0 12 0 57
Jefferson 666 1 0 2 520 0 0 2 429 0 1,620
Knox 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
Lewis 27 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 7 0 38
Lincoln 67 0 0 1 109 0 0 0 65 0 242
Macon 42 0 0 0 44 0 1 0 42 0 129
Marion 127 0 0 1 90 0 0 0 47 0 265
Monroe 20 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 7 0 36
Montgomery 27 0 0 2 18 0 1 0 13 0 61
Osage 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 16
Pike 46 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 8 0 66
Ralls 28 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 2 0 36
Randolph 125 0 0 0 73 0 0 0 58 0 256
Schuyler 12 0 0 0 7 0 1 0 3 0 23
Scotland 11 0 0 1 8 0 0 0 11 0 31
Shelby 15 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 2 0 32
St Charles 265 1 0 7 387 0 0 0 171 0 831
Warren 63 0 0 0 72 0 1 0 28 0 164
* Region Total * 2,713 8 5 25 2,273 0 9 3 1,388 1 6,425
Southeast Bollinger 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 41
Butler 231 0 0 3 79 0 1 0 63 0 377
Cape Girardeau 236 0 0 1 169 0 0 0 109 0 515
Carter 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 11
Crawford 72 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 7 0 87
72Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 25.
Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of July 2015
by Case Manager County and Legal Status
Total
LS 1 LS 2 LS 3 LS 4 LS 5 LS 6 LS 7 LS 8 LS 9 LS V Children
Southeast Dent 53 0 0 0 170 0 0 1 75 0 299
Dunklin 137 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 65 0 255
Howell 67 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 74
Iron 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 34
Madison 29 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 30
Maries 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 15
Mississippi 31 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 21 0 56
New Madrid 51 0 0 0 58 0 0 1 59 0 169
Oregon 7 0 0 5 87 0 0 0 38 0 137
Pemiscot 99 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 12 0 119
Perry 27 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 30
Phelps 179 0 0 0 19 0 0 2 3 0 203
Pulaski 120 0 0 1 253 0 0 2 87 0 463
Reynolds 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 28
Ripley 64 0 0 0 84 0 0 2 40 0 190
Scott 102 0 0 1 70 0 0 0 77 0 250
Shannon 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
St Francois 184 0 0 3 340 0 0 2 94 0 623
Ste Genevieve 13 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 15
Stoddard 131 0 0 0 133 0 0 2 146 0 412
Texas 81 0 0 3 11 0 0 1 9 0 105
Washington 106 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 109
Wayne 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41
* Region Total * 2,187 0 0 26 1,552 0 1 16 918 0 4,700
Southwest Barry 191 0 0 5 245 0 0 0 58 0 499
Barton 27 0 0 0 92 0 0 0 8 0 127
Bates 31 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 33
Benton 21 0 0 5 31 0 0 0 10 0 67
Camden 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90
Cedar 21 0 0 3 43 0 1 0 4 0 72
Christian 130 0 0 4 287 0 0 0 24 0 445
Dade 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14
Dallas 50 0 0 0 31 0 0 0 8 0 89
Douglas 34 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 3 0 98
Greene 819 0 0 12 989 0 1 40 166 0 2,027
Henry 77 3 0 4 127 0 0 0 43 0 254
Hickory 4 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 7 0 39
Jasper 591 23 0 2 708 0 3 0 119 0 1,446
Laclede 148 0 0 6 347 0 0 0 52 0 553
Lawrence 185 0 0 0 183 0 0 0 22 0 390
Mcdonald 118 0 0 0 103 0 0 0 16 0 237
Miller 49 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 15 0 68
Moniteau 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 20
Morgan 38 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 8 0 48
Newton 216 0 0 4 331 0 0 0 50 0 601
Ozark 40 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 43
Polk 78 0 0 0 169 0 0 0 35 0 282
St Clair 32 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 34
Stone 85 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 86
Taney 226 0 0 4 121 0 3 0 59 0 413
Vernon 42 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 3 1 55
Webster 58 0 0 1 29 0 0 0 14 0 102
Wright 121 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 82 0 219
* Region Total * 3,548 27 0 52 3,960 0 9 40 814 1 8,451
Kansas City Jackson 1,887 0 22 13 2,315 0 16 36 348 0 4,637
* Region Total * 1,887 0 22 13 2,315 0 16 36 348 0 4,637
St. Louis St Louis City 614 0 0 8 1,254 0 12 5 456 0 2,349
St Louis County 927 2 2 20 1,191 0 11 32 443 0 2,628
* Region Total * 1,541 2 2 28 2,445 0 23 37 899 0 4,977
Other Icama 9 33 0 20 1,836 0 0 0 15 0 1,913
* Region Total * 9 33 0 20 1,836 0 0 0 15 0 1,913
State Total 13,131 72 29 202 15,950 0 61 135 4,814 3 34,397
73Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 26.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2015
by Case Manager County and Goal
Total
01 AD 05 06 07 08 09 Children
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Atchison 4 1 0 0 2 0 0 7
Buchanan 36 8 0 3 14 0 0 61
Caldwell 6 4 0 0 5 0 0 15
Carroll 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 4
Cass 139 30 0 33 11 4 5 222
Chariton 15 5 0 3 0 0 5 28
Clay 121 17 0 15 26 1 0 180
Clinton 32 7 0 4 9 0 0 52
Cooper 8 1 0 7 0 1 1 18
Daviess 13 3 0 3 4 0 0 23
De Kalb 16 10 0 1 3 0 0 30
Gentry 6 2 0 1 1 1 1 12
Grundy 33 5 0 2 1 1 0 42
Harrison 14 4 0 4 4 0 0 26
Holt 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
Johnson 63 17 0 15 4 0 2 101
Lafayette 37 5 0 1 6 0 1 50
Linn 30 10 0 7 2 0 6 55
Livingston 31 1 0 8 2 0 1 43
Mercer 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
Nodaway 17 9 0 3 4 0 4 37
Pettis 44 8 0 5 7 0 9 73
Platte 22 2 0 4 0 0 2 30
Putnam 10 4 0 0 5 0 0 19
Ray 14 3 0 1 0 1 0 19
Saline 33 10 0 1 8 0 0 52
Sullivan 19 5 0 2 7 0 1 34
Worth 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
* Region Total * 778 172 0 124 125 9 38 1,246
Northeast Adair 37 10 0 6 2 0 13 68
Audrain 43 17 0 13 4 1 12 90
Boone 207 19 0 26 15 1 31 299
Callaway 93 10 0 7 9 1 5 125
Clark 35 11 0 6 0 0 0 52
Cole 99 23 0 28 15 0 8 173
Franklin 171 30 0 45 27 4 3 280
Gasconade 33 0 0 2 1 0 0 36
Howard 9 7 0 2 5 0 3 26
Jefferson 408 99 0 36 84 3 36 666
Knox 4 0 0 1 3 0 1 9
Lewis 17 0 0 7 3 0 0 27
Lincoln 30 12 0 10 8 0 7 67
Macon 24 4 0 10 2 0 2 42
Marion 60 23 0 16 12 3 13 127
Monroe 14 5 0 1 0 0 0 20
Montgomery 15 1 0 11 0 0 0 27
Osage 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 14
Pike 19 13 0 8 4 0 2 46
Ralls 10 4 0 4 10 0 0 28
Randolph 82 11 0 8 14 0 10 125
Schuyler 9 0 0 1 2 0 0 12
Scotland 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 11
Shelby 12 0 0 1 0 2 0 15
St Charles 164 42 0 39 9 0 11 265
Warren 27 5 0 11 11 0 9 63
* Region Total * 1,645 348 0 299 240 15 166 2,713
Southeast Bollinger 20 2 0 4 6 0 4 36
Butler 88 77 0 36 25 2 3 231
Cape Girardeau 164 20 0 19 18 0 15 236
Carter 6 1 0 3 0 0 0 10
74Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 26.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2015
by Case Manager County and Goal
Total
01 AD 05 06 07 08 09 Children
Southeast Crawford 45 11 0 5 9 1 1 72
Dent 39 6 0 6 2 0 0 53
Dunklin 106 7 0 12 9 1 2 137
Howell 44 3 0 12 4 4 0 67
Iron 16 9 0 2 5 0 0 32
Madison 9 14 0 1 5 0 0 29
Maries 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 10
Mississippi 22 1 0 1 6 0 1 31
New Madrid 25 13 0 3 10 0 0 51
Oregon 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 7
Pemiscot 41 12 0 8 24 9 5 99
Perry 16 4 0 4 3 0 0 27
Phelps 105 37 0 9 11 0 17 179
Pulaski 80 14 0 13 2 5 6 120
Reynolds 18 2 0 3 2 1 0 26
Ripley 27 4 0 18 15 0 0 64
Scott 73 5 0 3 14 0 7 102
Shannon 10 1 0 1 0 0 0 12
St Francois 128 22 0 18 11 1 4 184
Ste Genevieve 8 1 0 3 0 0 1 13
Stoddard 77 10 0 16 13 0 15 131
Texas 47 24 0 7 3 0 0 81
Washington 84 14 0 3 5 0 0 106
Wayne 13 12 0 6 10 0 0 41
* Region Total * 1,325 328 0 217 212 24 81 2,187
Southwest Barry 139 26 0 10 12 0 4 191
Barton 23 2 0 2 0 0 0 27
Bates 20 7 0 2 1 0 1 31
Benton 14 5 0 2 0 0 0 21
Camden 67 11 0 10 2 0 0 90
Cedar 12 0 0 1 1 0 7 21
Christian 78 13 0 17 10 1 11 130
Dade 11 0 0 0 3 0 0 14
Dallas 28 12 0 9 0 1 0 50
Douglas 26 1 0 4 3 0 0 34
Greene 363 306 0 114 22 5 9 819
Henry 29 21 0 18 7 0 2 77
Hickory 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 4
Jasper 344 130 0 51 25 8 33 591
Laclede 118 12 0 13 4 1 0 148
Lawrence 111 32 0 24 17 0 1 185
Mcdonald 73 18 0 11 7 4 5 118
Miller 36 4 0 6 2 0 1 49
Moniteau 8 2 0 2 0 0 0 12
Morgan 27 2 0 3 6 0 0 38
Newton 152 37 0 10 4 1 12 216
Ozark 13 13 0 7 5 0 2 40
Polk 55 8 0 12 2 1 0 78
St Clair 23 3 0 4 1 0 1 32
Stone 38 13 0 11 9 1 13 85
Taney 126 57 0 28 14 0 1 226
Vernon 29 7 0 6 0 0 0 42
Webster 33 9 0 5 11 0 0 58
Wright 79 16 0 15 11 0 0 121
* Region Total * 2,076 768 0 399 179 23 103 3,548
Kansas City Jackson 1,024 492 0 180 125 13 53 1,887
* Region Total * 1,024 492 0 180 125 13 53 1,887
St. Louis St Louis City 314 101 0 107 53 29 10 614
St Louis County 533 114 0 113 68 18 81 927
* Region Total * 847 215 0 220 121 47 91 1,541
Other Icama 1 0 0 3 3 1 1 9
* Region Total * 1 0 0 3 3 1 1 9
State Total 7,696 2,323 0 1,442 1,005 132 533 13,131
75Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 27.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2015
by Case Manager County and the Number of Previous
Placements. Most Current Legal Status 1 Spell
Number of Placements Average
Total Number of
1 2 3 4 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 + Children Placements
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 4.00
Atchison 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 1.29
Buchanan 8 26 5 7 8 6 1 0 61 3.26
Caldwell 5 5 1 1 2 1 0 0 15 2.53
Carroll 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1.00
Cass 68 56 27 16 15 32 3 5 222 3.59
Chariton 9 6 3 4 1 4 1 0 28 3.14
Clay 74 42 25 7 13 15 3 1 180 2.72
Clinton 19 12 11 2 4 3 1 0 52 2.71
Cooper 3 5 2 1 1 3 1 2 18 5.94
Daviess 6 3 7 4 1 1 1 0 23 3.13
De Kalb 8 11 3 3 1 3 0 1 30 3.27
Gentry 8 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 12 1.50
Grundy 22 7 3 5 1 3 0 1 42 2.79
Harrison 5 14 1 3 0 2 1 0 26 2.96
Holt 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 1.60
Johnson 42 21 12 13 8 5 0 0 101 2.41
Lafayette 27 3 5 6 4 2 2 1 50 3.02
Linn 23 10 5 9 3 5 0 0 55 2.67
Livingston 20 10 3 3 1 3 2 1 43 3.51
Mercer 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 1.50
Nodaway 10 14 0 3 4 5 1 0 37 3.27
Pettis 26 9 8 7 9 8 2 3 73 4.42
Platte 15 6 2 0 1 5 1 0 30 2.77
Putnam 3 10 1 4 1 0 0 0 19 2.47
Ray 4 7 2 2 1 2 0 0 19 2.68
Saline 24 8 13 1 1 4 1 0 52 2.50
Sullivan 11 16 3 3 1 0 0 0 34 2.03
Worth 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1.00
* Region Total * 460 304 143 108 81 112 21 15 1,246 3.04
Northeast Adair 31 17 6 4 2 6 0 1 68 2.57
Audrain 35 20 10 3 1 16 3 2 90 3.57
Boone 93 72 37 18 10 46 16 6 299 3.84
Callaway 43 22 21 7 16 9 4 3 125 3.60
Clark 15 12 8 5 2 6 4 0 52 3.65
Cole 64 42 21 14 9 11 5 6 173 3.35
Franklin 111 66 26 14 16 30 10 5 280 3.17
Gasconade 14 10 6 2 0 4 0 0 36 2.56
Howard 9 3 3 3 3 1 4 0 26 4.04
Jefferson 267 182 72 60 28 34 12 9 666 2.76
Knox 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 2.22
Lewis 9 5 2 3 1 3 1 2 27 4.11
Lincoln 23 17 2 5 5 12 1 2 67 3.64
Macon 18 8 10 1 1 2 0 2 42 3.95
Marion 48 26 14 8 8 17 2 3 127 3.22
Monroe 15 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 20 1.65
Montgomery 10 7 3 0 1 5 0 1 27 3.41
Osage 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1.07
Pike 18 7 4 6 4 3 2 2 46 4.04
Ralls 6 5 8 1 5 3 0 0 28 3.11
Randolph 38 32 20 16 4 9 2 3 125 3.15
Schuyler 2 5 0 1 0 3 1 0 12 3.92
Scotland 3 2 5 0 0 0 0 1 11 3.45
Shelby 7 5 1 1 1 0 0 0 15 1.93
St Charles 92 69 29 23 9 25 9 6 265 3.38
Warren 24 12 10 2 6 6 0 3 63 3.79
* Region Total * 1,016 649 318 199 132 252 77 57 2,713 3.24
Southeast Bollinger 22 7 4 0 0 0 1 2 36 2.92
Butler 84 65 27 17 16 15 4 2 231 2.79
Cape Girardeau 104 56 29 21 11 9 2 2 236 2.42
Carter 3 0 1 5 0 1 0 0 10 3.40
76Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 27.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2015
by Case Manager County and the Number of Previous
Placements. Most Current Legal Status 1 Spell
Number of Placements Average
Total Number of
1 2 3 4 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 + Children Placements
Southeast Crawford 31 11 11 6 6 6 0 1 72 2.83
Dent 19 9 10 4 5 4 0 2 53 3.89
Dunklin 59 42 14 13 2 5 0 2 137 2.48
Howell 28 14 5 7 5 3 2 3 67 3.51
Iron 13 6 3 0 2 7 0 1 32 3.56
Madison 11 5 7 1 1 2 1 1 29 3.34
Maries 4 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 10 1.90
Mississippi 16 11 1 0 0 3 0 0 31 1.94
New Madrid 22 13 6 2 2 5 1 0 51 2.61
Oregon 3 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 7 5.57
Pemiscot 35 21 12 7 12 6 4 2 99 3.57
Perry 9 6 5 3 1 2 0 1 27 3.26
Phelps 72 56 19 12 5 9 2 2 179 2.46
Pulaski 36 31 24 6 6 15 0 1 120 3.05
Reynolds 15 2 3 0 3 1 2 0 26 2.77
Ripley 26 20 6 2 4 4 1 1 64 2.70
Scott 53 28 6 8 3 4 0 0 102 2.01
Shannon 7 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 12 3.75
St Francois 59 45 17 31 15 9 5 3 184 3.28
Ste Genevieve 2 4 4 0 0 1 1 1 13 4.85
Stoddard 42 43 17 6 7 14 1 1 131 2.87
Texas 44 12 13 3 1 7 1 0 81 2.33
Washington 29 35 17 13 2 7 1 2 106 2.91
Wayne 21 4 2 6 3 4 0 1 41 3.00
* Region Total * 869 552 267 173 113 144 31 32 2,187 2.84
Southwest Barry 64 48 36 20 9 10 1 3 191 2.84
Barton 10 4 1 3 2 5 2 0 27 3.85
Bates 11 12 2 3 2 1 0 0 31 2.26
Benton 4 7 4 1 3 1 1 0 21 3.19
Camden 21 26 24 2 6 9 0 2 90 3.28
Cedar 6 6 6 2 1 0 0 0 21 2.33
Christian 45 40 16 9 5 9 3 2 130 2.85
Dade 3 2 4 4 1 0 0 0 14 2.86
Dallas 15 13 12 4 0 6 0 0 50 2.72
Douglas 10 6 9 7 0 2 0 0 34 2.65
Greene 233 192 111 75 49 104 27 23 819 3.82
Henry 17 20 13 5 3 8 6 5 77 5.43
Hickory 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 4 9.00
Jasper 199 128 90 43 34 69 16 12 591 3.44
Laclede 41 56 19 11 7 5 3 6 148 3.49
Lawrence 57 33 32 14 13 22 10 3 185 3.82
Mcdonald 48 25 16 10 2 14 1 2 118 3.11
Miller 15 14 5 2 4 4 2 3 49 4.55
Moniteau 4 4 2 1 0 1 0 0 12 2.33
Morgan 10 15 8 0 0 2 2 1 38 3.16
Newton 56 56 44 20 11 21 7 1 216 3.24
Ozark 30 5 1 4 0 0 0 0 40 1.48
Polk 29 25 6 3 2 8 2 2 78 3.27
St Clair 11 10 5 2 2 1 1 0 32 2.56
Stone 24 17 10 9 3 17 5 0 85 3.85
Taney 107 34 27 14 14 20 3 6 226 3.12
Vernon 24 9 2 0 0 2 2 3 42 3.88
Webster 24 17 10 3 0 3 0 1 58 2.40
Wright 46 24 16 13 2 18 1 1 121 3.04
* Region Total * 1,164 848 531 284 176 364 95 77 3,548 3.42
Kansas City Jackson 608 442 275 151 109 216 57 10 1,887 3.18
* Region Total * 608 442 275 151 109 216 57 10 1,887 3.18
St. Louis St Louis City 147 155 81 50 39 69 29 40 614 4.72
St Louis County 272 258 132 74 49 79 31 27 927 3.61
* Region Total * 419 413 213 124 88 148 60 67 1,541 4.05
Other Icama 4 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 9 3.33
* Region Total * 4 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 9 3.33
State Total 4,540 3,208 1,747 1,042 700 1,237 341 258 13,131 3.29
77Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 28.
Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year and Case Manager County
(FY 2016 Adoptions are Year to Date July 2015)
Total
FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 Adoptions
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 3 0 0 3
Buchanan 9 2 2 11 5 0 29
Caldwell 16 15 22 14 16 1 84
Carroll 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Cass 26 18 24 8 11 3 90
Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clay 35 45 58 44 47 0 229
Clinton 0 0 1 0 3 0 4
Cooper 1 3 1 1 0 0 6
Daviess 0 1 2 0 0 0 3
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grundy 3 1 0 0 1 0 5
Harrison 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Holt 0 0 5 0 0 0 5
Johnson 8 14 19 13 10 0 64
Lafayette 1 0 1 0 0 1 3
Linn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Livingston 0 1 1 0 1 0 3
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 5 0 4 2 2 0 13
Pettis 13 13 10 7 8 0 51
Platte 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ray 1 1 1 1 0 0 4
Saline 14 11 8 18 14 0 65
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 132 125 160 122 120 6 665
Northeast Adair 10 1 5 3 9 0 28
Audrain 4 1 4 3 8 0 20
Boone 40 20 18 38 33 0 149
Callaway 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cole 7 10 21 12 12 2 64
Franklin 18 15 25 25 31 3 117
Gasconade 0 1 0 2 2 0 5
Howard 1 1 1 0 0 0 3
Jefferson 53 44 43 43 43 1 227
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 4 0 0 4
Lincoln 7 4 8 15 11 0 45
Macon 1 0 2 3 5 0 11
Marion 4 9 4 6 15 0 38
Monroe 3 1 0 1 2 0 7
Montgomery 0 3 0 1 0 0 4
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 0 4 1 0 1 0 6
Ralls 0 0 0 2 2 0 4
Randolph 6 6 6 10 2 0 30
Schuyler 1 0 0 1 0 0 2
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shelby 1 5 1 0 2 0 9
St Charles 31 29 25 14 30 5 134
Warren 1 3 3 5 6 1 19
* Region Total * 188 157 167 188 216 12 928
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Butler 8 4 10 1 13 0 36
Cape Girardeau 19 8 10 11 10 2 60
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Crawford 0 0 0 2 0 0 2
78Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 28.
Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year and Case Manager County
(FY 2016 Adoptions are Year to Date July 2015)
Total
FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 Adoptions
Southeast Dent 7 15 18 13 2 0 55
Dunklin 6 1 2 9 0 0 18
Howell 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Madison 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Maries 1 1 0 0 0 0 2
Mississippi 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
New Madrid 2 7 6 10 0 0 25
Oregon 12 7 8 12 6 0 45
Pemiscot 0 2 0 1 0 0 3
Perry 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Phelps 2 0 1 3 10 2 18
Pulaski 33 23 20 20 9 0 105
Reynolds 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Ripley 6 1 8 9 16 0 40
Scott 2 2 4 4 8 0 20
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Francois 32 33 47 37 31 0 180
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Stoddard 12 11 13 15 18 0 69
Texas 0 1 2 3 7 0 13
Washington 0 1 0 0 3 0 4
Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 145 117 151 150 136 4 703
Southwest Barry 32 8 27 24 15 0 106
Barton 6 7 7 8 12 0 40
Bates 0 0 0 0 1 1 2
Benton 5 2 3 6 9 0 25
Camden 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cedar 1 8 6 2 5 0 22
Christian 21 52 19 34 25 1 152
Dade 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Dallas 5 5 3 4 2 0 19
Douglas 5 4 1 6 9 0 25
Greene 86 111 118 129 99 6 549
Henry 5 16 12 14 13 0 60
Hickory 3 3 1 2 5 0 14
Jasper 43 54 73 92 71 0 333
Laclede 35 40 44 24 33 0 176
Lawrence 12 12 6 15 22 2 69
Mcdonald 8 11 8 13 10 0 50
Miller 0 0 0 0 3 1 4
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Newton 40 36 23 22 39 1 161
Ozark 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Polk 13 27 18 9 7 0 74
St Clair 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Stone 0 1 0 0 1 0 2
Taney 8 12 6 18 19 0 63
Vernon 0 0 1 0 6 0 7
Webster 2 7 2 12 0 0 23
Wright 0 1 6 2 3 0 12
* Region Total * 331 418 384 436 410 12 1,991
Kansas City Jackson 213 193 222 216 258 11 1,113
* Region Total * 213 193 222 216 258 11 1,113
St. Louis St Louis City 71 57 63 66 73 0 330
St Louis County 84 80 73 67 77 8 389
* Region Total * 155 137 136 133 150 8 719
Other Icama 2 2 3 5 5 0 17
* Region Total * 2 2 3 5 5 0 17
State Total 1,166 1,149 1,223 1,250 1,295 53 6,136
79Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 16.
Children (Re)Entering Children's Division Custody
Total Entries Total Re Entries
9,0009,2009,4009,6009,800
10,00010,20010,40010,60010,80011,00011,20011,40011,60011,80012,00012,20012,40012,60012,80013,00013,20013,40013,600
Jul-
13
Au
g-1
3
Sep
-13
Oct
-13
No
v-1
3
De
c-1
3
Jan
-14
Feb
-14
Mar
-14
Ap
r-1
4
May
-14
Jun
-14
Jul-
14
Au
g-1
4
Sep
-14
Oct
-14
No
v-1
4
De
c-1
4
Jan
-15
Feb
-15
Mar
-15
Ap
r-1
5
May
-15
Jun
-15
Jul-
15
Figure 17.
Children Active in Children's Division Custody on the Last day of the Month
July 2013 - July 2015
80Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 18.
Children Closing from Alternative Care During
July 2015 by Reason for Case Closing and Region
Returned Home Other
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Jul-
13
Au
g-1
3
Sep
-13
Oct
-13
No
v-1
3
De
c-1
3
Jan
-14
Feb
-14
Mar
-14
Ap
r-1
4
May
-14
Jun
-14
Jul-
14
Au
g-1
4
Sep
-14
Oct
-14
No
v-1
4
De
c-1
4
Jan
-15
Feb
-15
Mar
-15
Ap
r-1
5
May
-15
Jun
-15
Jul-
15
Figure 19.
Adoptions Finalized by Month July 2013 - July 2015
81Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 - 3 4 - 7 8 - 11 12 - 15 16 +
Figure 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody as of
July 2015 by Age and Placement Category
Foster Home Other Relative Home Group Home/Res. Care Adoptive Home
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
Jul-
11
Sep
-11
No
v-1
1
Jan
-12
Mar
-12
May
-12
Jul-
12
Sep
-12
No
v-1
2
Jan
-13
Mar
-13
May
-13
Jul-
13
Sep
-13
No
v-1
3
Jan
-14
Mar
-14
May
-14
Jul-
14
Sep
-14
No
v-1
4
Jan
-15
Mar
-15
May
-15
Jul-
15
Figure 21. Children in Children's Division Custody as of the Last Day of the
Month July 2011 - July 2015 by Placement Category
Foster Home Other Relative Home Group Home Adoptive Home
82Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
-
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
20
10
-4
20
11
-1
20
11
-2
20
11
-3
20
11
-4
20
12
-1
20
12
-2
20
12
-3
20
12
-4
20
13
-1
20
13
-2
20
13
-3
20
13
-4
20
14
-1
20
14
-2
20
14
-3
20
14
-4
20
15
-1
20
15
-2
20
15
-3
Exit
s p
er
10
0 C
hild
ren
in
Fost
er
Car
e P
op
ula
tio
n
Figure 22.
Children Exiting Children's Division Custody
by Quarter and Subsequent Disposition 4th Quarter 2010 Through 3rd Quarter 2015
Adoption Child Independence Other Legal Status Relative Home Other Closing Return Home
83Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Children’s Services Management Report 84 Research and Data Analysis
Notes: Out-of-Home Placement Tables and Figures
Table 14.
• This table includes children entering Legal Status 1 for the first time. • Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMH, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other • Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19,
2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov. • Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.
Table 15.
• This table includes children re-entering Legal Status 1 who have had prior Out-of-Home
Placements. • Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMH, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other • Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19,
2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov. • Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.
Table 16.
• This data includes children (re)entering (entering and/or re-entering) Legal Status 1.
Table 17. and Table 18.
• Length of Stay is computed for the last continuous period in Legal Status 1 during the month.
Table values, for the length of stay, indicate the average number of months in custody.
Children’s Services Management Report 85 Research and Data Analysis
Table 19.
• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.
• Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMH, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19,
2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov.
• Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.
Table 20.
• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only. • Placement Types are: ADF Adoption (by foster parent) ADO Adoption (by other) ADR Adoption (by relative) CFP Career Foster Parent CTO Non-Licensed/Court Ordered Placement DET Detention FAH Foster Adoptive Home FG B Behavioral Foster Family Group Home FG H Foster Family Group Home FG M Medical Foster Family Group Home FHB Behavioral Foster Home FHE Emergency Foster Home FHM Medical Foster Home FHO Foster Home ILA Independent Living Arrangement JHO Juvenile Court Home KHB Kinship Behavioral Home KHM Kinship Medical Home KHO Licensed Kinship Home KHU Unlicensed Kinship Home LGS Legal Guardianship Subsidy MMD Medical Facility MMH Mental Health Facility RFA Residential Treatment Facility RFP Residential Treatment Facility- Initial Placement - No Level RF2 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 2 RF3 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 3 RF4 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 4 RFE Residential Treatment Facility- Emergency
Children’s Services Management Report 86 Research and Data Analysis
Table 20 (contd). RFH Residential Foster Home RFI Residential Treatment Facility- Infant
RFM Residential Treatment Facility-Maternity RFT Residential Treatment Facility-Transitional/Aftercare RHB Behavioral Relative Home
RHM Medical Relative Home RHO Relative Home RHU Unlicensed Relative Home RUN Runaway SCH School TLA Transitional Living Arrangement TLG Transitional Living Group TLS Transitional Living Scattered Site
Table 21.
• This table includes children exiting Legal Status 1 only. • Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMH, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other
Table 22.
Table includes children closing from all legal status categories.
• Closing categories include the following closing reasons: Returned Home - Goal Achieved (Returned child to parent(s), CYAC child, Returned Child to
sending state) Achieved Independence - Goal Achieved (Child Independence) Living with Other Relatives – Goal Achieved (Placement with a fit and willing relative) Other Agency - Care and Custody with other Agency Other - Married, Runaway, Adoption, Adoption Subsidy Terminated, Deceased, Guardianship
and Other
Table 23.
• Legal Status 1, TPR (Termination of Parental Rights) Incomplete includes children with a Goal
of 'AD' and no completed TPR (TPR is not completed for the mother and the putative and/or legal father).
• Legal Status 1, TPR Complete includes children with a Goal of 'AD' and TPR has been
completed (TPR is completed for the mother and the putative and/or legal father). • Temporary Adoptive Custody includes Legal Status 2 children.
Children’s Services Management Report 87 Research and Data Analysis
• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children are counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal Status 5.
Table 24.
• This table includes vendor types of – CF, FA, FG, and FH. • Newly Licensed Vendors includes vendors which are licensed during the month and have either
no previous license or one which ended more than five years ago. • The categories “Current # of Licensed Vendors” and “Licensed Vendors Twelve Months Ago”
represent unduplicated vendor counts.
Table 25.
• Legal Status Definitions: LS 1 - Care and custody with Children’s Division (includes temporary custody) LS 2 - Temporary custody with adoptive parents LS 3 - Supervision only by Children’s Division LS 4 - Care and custody with juvenile court/other agency LS 5 - Final custody awarded to adoptive parents LS 6 – Children’s Division relieved of legal responsibility LS 7 - CYAC Child (Children of Youth in Alternative Care) LS 8 - Chafee Independent Living Program LS 9 - Subsidized Guardianship LS V – Voluntary Placement Agreement
Table 26.
• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.
• Goals are:
01 - Return child to parent(s)/caretaker(s) AD - Adoption 05 - CYAC Child 06 - Child Independence/Independent Living 07 - Guardianship 08 - Live with Other Relatives 09 - Case Plan Goal Not Yet Established / Missing
Table 27.
• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only. • Table values are children active at the end of the month categorized by the number of
placements experienced in their most recent stay in Legal Status 1. • The number of placements represents the movement of children among distinct vendors.
Children’s Services Management Report 88 Research and Data Analysis
• Short term temporary settings are not counted when the child returns to the previous vendor.
Table 28.
• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children are
counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal Status 5.
Figure 18.
• Closing categories includes the following closing reasons:
Returned Home - Goal Achieved (Returned child to parent(s) Other - Achieved Independence, Living with other Relatives, Other Agency , Married, Runaway, Returned Child to Sending State, Adoption, Adoption Subsidy Terminated, Deceased, Children of Youth in Alternative Care (CYAC) Child and Other.
Figure 19.
• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children are
counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal Status 5.
Figure 20.
• Placement categories include the following placement types:
Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMH, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other
• Age is calculated as of the last day of the month.
Figure 21.
• Placement categories include the following placement types:
Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMH, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other
Table 29.
Families Referred to Intensive In-Home Services During July 2015
Grouped by Referral County
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Referrals
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Atchison 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Buchanan 0 0.00% 1 11.00% 8 89.00% 9
Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carroll 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cass 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clay 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4
Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Lafayette 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Pettis 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Platte 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 3
Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 13 48.00% 14 52.00% 27
Northeast Adair 1 13.00% 5 63.00% 2 25.00% 8
Audrain 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Boone 0 0.00% 4 67.00% 2 33.00% 6
Callaway 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cole 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Franklin 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howard 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Jefferson 0 0.00% 7 50.00% 7 50.00% 14
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lincoln 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Montgomery 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Randolph 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4
Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Charles 0 0.00% 4 67.00% 2 33.00% 6
Warren 0 0.00% 2 67.00% 1 33.00% 3
* Region Total * 1 2.00% 36 64.00% 19 34.00% 56
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4
Butler 0 0.00% 2 13.00% 13 87.00% 15
Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 6
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
for Screening
Referrals Accepted
Accepted
Referrals
Accepted
Referrals Not
90
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 29.
Families Referred to Intensive In-Home Services During July 2015
Grouped by Referral County
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Referrals
Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Dent 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2
Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7 100.00% 7
Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
New Madrid 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pemiscot 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Perry 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pulaski 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 4
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6 100.00% 6
Scott 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Francois 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Washington 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Wayne 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 3 5.00% 19 33.00% 35 61.00% 57
Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Bates 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Camden 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Christian 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dallas 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Greene 0 0.00% 4 36.00% 7 64.00% 11
Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jasper 0 0.00% 3 27.00% 8 73.00% 11
Laclede 0 0.00% 4 67.00% 2 33.00% 6
Lawrence 0 0.00% 2 67.00% 1 33.00% 3
Mcdonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Miller 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Moniteau 0 0.00% 1 33.00% 2 67.00% 3
Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Newton 0 0.00% 2 18.00% 9 82.00% 11
Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stone 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Taney 0 0.00% 3 38.00% 5 63.00% 8
Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Webster 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Wright 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 27 36.00% 47 64.00% 74
Kansas City Jackson 3 18.00% 3 18.00% 11 65.00% 17
* Region Total * 3 18.00% 3 18.00% 11 65.00% 17
St. Louis St Louis City 0 0.00% 18 75.00% 6 25.00% 24
St Louis County 5 16.00% 12 39.00% 14 45.00% 31
* Region Total * 5 9.00% 30 55.00% 20 36.00% 55
State Total 12 4.00% 128 45.00% 146 51.00% 286
Referrals Accepted Referrals Referrals Not
for Screening Accepted Accepted
91
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 30.
Families and Children Accepted Into Intensive In-Home Services During July 2015
Grouped by Household County
Families Children Average # At-Risk Average # At-Risk
Accepted Accepted Children per Family Children Accepted Children per Family
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Atchison 1 4 4.00 4 4.00
Buchanan 1 3 3.00 3 3.00
Caldwell 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Carroll 1 2 2.00 2 2.00
Cass 2 3 1.50 3 1.50
Chariton 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Clay 2 4 2.00 4 2.00
Clinton 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Cooper 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Daviess 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
De Kalb 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Gentry 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Grundy 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Harrison 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Holt 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Johnson 1 4 4.00 1 1.00
Lafayette 1 2 2.00 2 2.00
Linn 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Livingston 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Mercer 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Nodaway 1 2 2.00 2 2.00
Pettis 3 7 2.33 7 2.33
Platte 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Putnam 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Ray 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Saline 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Sullivan 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Worth 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
* Region Total * 14 32 2.29 29 2.07
Northeast Adair 5 13 2.60 9 1.80
Audrain 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Boone 4 7 1.75 5 1.25
Callaway 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Clark 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Cole 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Franklin 3 11 3.67 11 3.67
Gasconade 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Howard 1 2 2.00 1 1.00
Jefferson 8 18 2.25 13 1.63
Knox 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Lewis 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Lincoln 2 4 2.00 4 2.00
Macon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Marion 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Monroe 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Montgomery 1 2 2.00 2 2.00
Osage 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Pike 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Ralls 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Randolph 3 3 1.00 3 1.00
Schuyler 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Scotland 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Shelby 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
St Charles 4 10 2.50 7 1.75
Warren 2 4 2.00 4 2.00
* Region Total * 36 77 2.14 62 1.72
Southeast Bollinger 3 8 2.67 6 2.00
Butler 2 9 4.50 9 4.50
Cape Girardeau 3 9 3.00 9 3.00
Carter 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
92
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 30.
Families and Children Accepted Into Intensive In-Home Services During July 2015
Grouped by Household County
Families Children Average # of At-Risk Average # of At-Risk
Accepted Accepted Children per Family Children Accepted Children per Family
Southeast Crawford 1 3 3.00 3 3.00
Dent 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Dunklin 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Howell 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Iron 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Madison 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Maries 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Mississippi 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
New Madrid 1 3 3.00 3 3.00
Oregon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Pemiscot 3 7 2.33 7 2.33
Perry 1 2 2.00 1 1.00
Phelps 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Pulaski 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Reynolds 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Ripley 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Scott 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Shannon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
St Francois 1 0 0.00 0 0.00
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Stoddard 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Texas 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Washington 2 4 2.00 3 1.50
Wayne 1 3 3.00 3 3.00
* Region Total * 20 50 2.50 46 2.30
Southwest Barry 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Barton 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Bates 1 4 4.00 4 4.00
Benton 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Camden 1 2 2.00 1 1.00
Cedar 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Christian 3 6 2.00 6 2.00
Dade 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Dallas 1 7 7.00 7 7.00
Douglas 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Greene 4 8 2.00 8 2.00
Henry 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Hickory 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Jasper 3 7 2.33 7 2.33
Laclede 4 4 1.00 4 1.00
Lawrence 2 5 2.50 3 1.50
Mcdonald 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Miller 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Moniteau 1 4 4.00 1 1.00
Morgan 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Newton 2 2 1.00 2 1.00
Ozark 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Polk 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
St Clair 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Stone 1 2 2.00 2 2.00
Taney 3 9 3.00 9 3.00
Vernon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Webster 1 3 3.00 3 3.00
Wright 1 2 2.00 2 2.00
* Region Total * 28 65 2.32 59 2.11
Kansas City Jackson 8 29 3.63 22 2.75
* Region Total * 8 29 3.63 22 2.75
St. Louis St Louis City 18 48 2.67 38 2.11
St Louis County 13 37 2.85 33 2.54
* Region Total * 31 85 2.74 71 2.29
State Total 137 338 2.47 289 2.11
93
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 31.
Exit Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During July 2015
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Buchanan 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carroll 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cass 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clay 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Daviess 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
De Kalb 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lafayette 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Linn 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pettis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Platte 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 7 88.00% 1 13.00% 0 0.00% 8
Northeast Adair 1 33.00% 2 67.00% 0 0.00% 3
Audrain 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Boone 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Callaway 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Clark 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cole 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Franklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gasconade 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2
Howard 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Jefferson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lincoln 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Marion 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Montgomery 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pike 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Randolph 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shelby 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
St Charles 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Warren 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 16 73.00% 5 23.00% 1 5.00% 22
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Butler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Family Intact Family Not Intact Other
94Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 31.
Exit Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During July 2015
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Southeast Crawford 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howell 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pemiscot 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pulaski 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ripley 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Francois 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Ste Genevieve 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Stoddard 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Texas 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Washington 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 9 82.00% 2 18.00% 0 0.00% 11
Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Camden 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cedar 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Christian 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Greene 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 5
Henry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jasper 3 50.00% 2 33.00% 1 17.00% 6
Laclede 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Lawrence 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Mcdonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Miller 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Morgan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Newton 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stone 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Taney 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Webster 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Wright 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 21 78.00% 4 15.00% 2 7.00% 27
Kansas City Jackson 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
St. Louis St Louis City 8 73.00% 2 18.00% 1 9.00% 11
St Louis County 11 73.00% 4 27.00% 0 0.00% 15
* Region Total * 19 73.00% 6 23.00% 1 4.00% 26
State Total 73 77.00% 18 19.00% 4 4.00% 95
Family Not Intact Family Intact Other
95Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 32.
Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During January 2015
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Buchanan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cass 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clay 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Clinton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Linn 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pettis 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Saline 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 7 88.00% 1 13.00% 0 0.00% 8
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Audrain 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Boone 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Callaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cole 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Franklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gasconade 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Howard 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Jefferson 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lincoln 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Montgomery 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Randolph 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Charles 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Warren 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
* Region Total * 9 75.00% 3 25.00% 0 0.00% 12
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Butler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Other Family Intact Family Not Intact
96Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 32.
Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During January 2015
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mississippi 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Francois 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Benton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Camden 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Christian 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Greene 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jasper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Laclede 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mcdonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Miller 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Morgan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Newton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Clair 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Stone 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Taney 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Webster 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Wright 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Kansas City Jackson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St. Louis St Louis City 2 67.00% 1 33.00% 0 0.00% 3
St Louis County 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 4
* Region Total * 4 57.00% 3 43.00% 0 0.00% 7
State Total 28 78.00% 8 22.00% 0 0.00% 36
Other Family Intact Family Not Intact
97Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 33.
Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During July 2014
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Buchanan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cass 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clay 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Lafayette 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Pettis 2 67.00% 1 33.00% 0 0.00% 3
Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 7 88.00% 1 13.00% 0 0.00% 8
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Audrain 2 67.00% 1 33.00% 0 0.00% 3
Boone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Callaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cole 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Franklin 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jefferson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lincoln 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Randolph 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Charles 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Warren 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 6
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Butler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Other Family Intact Family Not Intact
98Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 33.
Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During July 2014
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Francois 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Bates 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Camden 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Christian 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Greene 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Henry 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jasper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Laclede 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mcdonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Miller 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Newton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Taney 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Webster 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Wright 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 4 57.00% 3 43.00% 0 0.00% 7
Kansas City Jackson 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
St. Louis St Louis City 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
St Louis County 5 83.00% 1 17.00% 0 0.00% 6
* Region Total * 6 86.00% 1 14.00% 0 0.00% 7
State Total 20 67.00% 9 30.00% 1 3.00% 30
Other Family Intact Family Not Intact
99Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Children’s Services Management Report 100 Research and Data Analysis
Notes: Intensive In-Home Services Tables
Table 31., Table 32., and Table 33.
• Tables include only those families with an exit date during the month in question
and an exit status which is not missing.
• Exit status includes the following status codes:
Family Intact 10 Family Intact
Family Not Intact 12 Child Ran Away
13 Child Moved out of Home (not placed) 14 Child Living with Relative or Guardian (not Court Ordered)
15 Child Living with Relative or Guardian (Court Ordered)
16 In Foster Home or Group Home 17 In Residential
18 With DYS (Division of Youth Services) 19 In Juvenile Justice
20 In In-Patient Psychiatric
Other
11 Can't Locate Family 21 Information Not Available
99 Other