chilled water systems total cost of ownership april 17, 2008

46
Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

Upload: theodore-nichols

Post on 15-Jan-2016

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

Chilled Water SystemsTotal Cost of Ownership

April 17, 2008

Page 2: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

Todd Brown

Business Development Manager - Chillers

Page 3: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

AGENDA

• Low temperature, low flow

• Primary-Secondary vs Variable Primary Flow

• Chillers in Series-Series Counterflow

• Chiller-Tower Optimization

Page 4: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

Goal:Goal: Minimize Minimize Capital & OperatingCapital & Operating CostsCosts

Without Sacrificing:Without Sacrificing:

RReliability, Efficiency, & Comforteliability, Efficiency, & Comfort

Page 5: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

• Good for Business...

– Offers lower first cost and lower operating cost.

• Good for the Environment:

– Reduced utility generated greenhouse gas emissions.

High Performance Chilled Water Systems:

Page 6: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

Base Design: 450 Tons

ASSUMPTIONS

• Designwet bulb: 78 F(25.5C)

• Entering condenser water temperature (ECWT): 85 F(29.4C)

• Evaporator and condenser temperature differences: 10 F (5.6C)

• Coil, valve and chilled water piping pressure drop: 80 ft

• Condenser water piping pressure drop: 30 ft

• Pump efficiency: 75%

• Pump motorefficiency: 93%

Example: Low Flow/ High Delta T

Page 7: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

example chilled water plant …

Chiller (2.4, 3.0 gpm/ton)

• Consumption:256 kW (0.569 kW/ton)

• Evaporatorpressure drop: 21.0 ft

• Condenserpressure drop: 21.3 ft

Page 8: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

example chilled water plant …

Cooling Tower (3.0 gpm/ton)

• Power rating:30 hp

• Tower static head:10.0 ft

Page 9: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

ASSUMPTIONS

example chilled water plant …

Design Formulas

DP2/DP1 = (Flow2/Flow1)

kW =0.746 x hp

motor efficiency

hp =gpm x PD

3960 x pump efficiency

1.85

gpm œ rpmHead œ (gpm)²Power œ (gpm)³

Page 10: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

example chilled water plant …

Chilled Water Pump (2.4 gpm/ton)

• System conditions …

– System head: 80 ft– Bundle head: 21.0 ft– Flow rate: 1080 gpm

• Pump power …

– 36.7 hp– 29.5 kW

Page 11: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

• System conditions …

– System head: 26.0 ft

– Bundle head: 21.3 ft

– Tower static: 10.0 ft

– Flow rate: 1350 gpm

• Pump power …

– 26.0 hp

– 20.8 kW

example chilled water plant …

Condenser Water Pump (3.0 gpm/ton)

Page 12: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

example chilled water plant …

System Energy Consumption

• With 2.4, 3.0 gpm/ton flows … (0.043, 0.054 L/S/KW)

2.4/3.0Chiller 256.0Chilled Water Pump 29.5Condenser Water Pump 20.8Cooling Tower 24.1

Total kW 330.4

Page 13: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

example chilled water plant …

Low Flow System

Base Case Low Flow……………….

ARI 42, 16dT 44 F, 14dT 44 F, 14dT; 83.3 F 42 F, 16dT

2.4/3.0 1.5/3.0 1.7/2.0 1.7/2.0 1.5/2.0

Chiller 256.0 268.0 288.0 269.0 296.0Chilled Water Pump 29.5 16.2 19.0 19.0 16.2Condenser Water Pump 20.8 20.8 11.3 11.3 11.3Cooling Tower 24.1 24.1 16.0 24.1 16.0

Total kW 330.4 329.1 334.6 323.4 339.5

Page 14: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

ASSUMPTIONS

What About Part Load Operation?

We’ll use …• Chiller kW values for NPLV

– Derived from the selection program

• Cooling tower kW

– Tower energy at part load based on being linear with speed reduction

And constant kW values for the …

• Chilled water pump• Condenser water pump

Page 15: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

Part Load Operation

Page 16: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

you’ve got more …

System Design Options

Either …

• Take full energy (operatingcost) savings

Or …

• Reduce piping size and costExperienced designers use pump,piping and tower savings to select aneven more efficient chiller

Page 17: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

Decoupled Systems Decoupled Systems moving to… moving to…

Variable Flow SystemsVariable Flow Systems

Page 18: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

58.0°F2571 gpm

44.0°F 2571 gpm

58.0°F

857 gpm(each)

bypass(decoupler)

Primary–Secondarydesign

Primary–Secondarydesign

primarypumpsprimarypumps

secondarypumps

secondarypumps

2571 gpm

44.0°F

44.0°F

44.0°F

58.0°F

58.0°F

58.0°F

857 gpm

857 gpm

857 gpm

Page 19: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

58.0°F2571 gpm

44.0°F 2571 gpm

58.0°F

Variable Primary

design

Variable Primary

design

2571 gpm

44.0°F

44.0°F

44.0°F

58.0°F

58.0°F

58.0°F

857 gpm

857 gpm

857 gpm

P

typical)

Page 20: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

56.0°F1050 gpm

44.0°F 1050 gpm

56.0°F

Variable Primary part loadVariable Primary part load

1050 gpm

44.0°F 56.0°F1050

off

off

P

typical)

Maximum Flow = 1300 gpmMinimum Flow = 244 gpmSelection Flow = 750 gpm

Page 21: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

56.0°F1050 gpm

44.0°F 1050 gpm

56.0°F

Variable Primary part loadVariable Primary part load

1050 gpm

44.0°F 56.0°F525

525

off

P

typical)

Maximum Flow = 1300 gpmMinimum Flow = 244 gpmSelection Flow = 750 gpm

44.0°F 56.0°F

Page 22: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

56.0°F1050 gpm

44.0°F 1050 gpm

51.2°F

857 gpm(each)

664 gpm

Primary–Secondarydesign

Primary–Secondarydesign

primarypumpsprimarypumps

secondarypumps

secondarypumps

1714 gpm

44.0°F

44.0°F

51.2°F

51.2°F

857 gpm

857 gpm

off

44.0°F

Page 23: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

Lower Capital Cost Variable Primary advantages

• Fewer …– Pumps– Motors– Pump bases– Starters and wiring– Fittings and piping– Controls

• Less labor

Page 24: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

More Available Space

Opportunity to …

– Add other equipment

– Select larger, more efficient chillers

– Improve service access

Page 25: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

Simplified Control

• Unfetters chillers from flow-based control

• Operates distribution pumps to transport water

… not to start/stop chillers

Page 26: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

Improved Reliability

Provides system with …

– Fewer pumps and accessories

– Fewer chiller recovery options

– Fewer pump recovery options

– Better balance between pumps and chillers online

Page 27: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

Chiller Selection Considerations

• Evaporator flow limits

• Rate-of-change tolerance

• Flow “range-ability”

– Difference between selection flow rate and evaporator minimum flow limit

Page 28: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

What are other’s What are other’s saying???saying???

Variable Primary Flow Chilled Water Plant Design …

Page 29: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008
Page 30: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008
Page 31: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

VFP systems:VFP systems:• Reduces total annual plant energy 3-8%Reduces total annual plant energy 3-8%• Reduces first cost 4-8%Reduces first cost 4-8%• Reduces life-cycle cost 3-5%*Reduces life-cycle cost 3-5%*

*Relative to conventional Decoupled chilled-water systems.

Page 32: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

VPF SystemMore information

• “Don’t Ignore Variable Flow,” Waltz, Contracting Business, July 1997

• “Primary-Only vs. Primary-Secondary Variable Flow Systems,” Taylor, ASHRAE Journal, February 2002

• “Comparative Analysis of Variable and Constant Primary-Flow Chilled-Water-Plant Performance,” Bahnfleth and Peyer, HPAC Engineering, April 2001

• “Campus Cooling: Retrofitting Systems,” Kreutzmann, HPAC Engineering, July 2002

Page 33: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

unsuited for Variable Primary Flow

• Inadequate control capability– Insufficient chiller unloading– Vintage chiller controls

• Poor financial return(Consider chilled water reset instead)

Page 34: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

Parallel VPF Systems Parallel VPF Systems

moving to…moving to…

Series Evaporator Series Evaporator SystemsSystems

Page 35: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

VPF system configurationsSeries-Counter Flow

VFD

41°F57°F

48.96°F

103.82°F 89.6°F

96.63°F

89.6°F103.82°F

96.63°F

48.96°F

Page 36: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

SingleCompressorChiller

103.82° F

Lift62.82° F

41° F

103.82° F

Lift54.86° F

48.96° F

Series-Counter flowArrangement

Upstream Chiller96.63° F

Lift55.63° F

41° F

Downstream Chiller

• Upstream chiller: 103.82 - 48.96 = 54.86

• Downstream chiller: 96.63 - 41 = 55.63

• Average lift: 55.24 (vs. 62.82 for single compressor (12%))

Better chiller efficiency, but high P

VPF system configurationsSeries-Counter Flow

Page 37: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

Chiller–Tower Optimization …

Do It Right!

Chiller–Tower Optimization …

Do It Right!

Page 38: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

chiller–tower optimization

The Question …

• What’s the “right” condenser water temperature?

Page 39: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

Or Said Another Way …

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85

Chiller kW

Tower kW

Total kW

Condenser Water Temperature

kW

Page 40: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

chiller–tower optimization

How Do You Do It?

With real-life controls!

Page 41: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

• MicroTech II and BAS Combination

The optimized method requires auto-adaptive controls. This control logic constantly adjusts the condenser water supply temperature to the value that uses the least amount of power. The controller measures the power requirement for the chiller and cooling tower. The condenser water temperature setpoint then is altered and the power consumption is checked again. If the total power consumption goes down, a similar adjustment is made and the total power is checked again.

How do you do it?

Page 42: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

What’s good for the component …may NOT be good for the system!

Page 43: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

where’s the meter?

The Only Possible Response …

On the building!On the building!

Page 44: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

chiller–tower optimization

In Summary …

• Defines the optimal entering condenser temperature

• Optimal control is the right thing to do …AND it saves money

• Savings are real and can be quantified• The control strategy is available NOW!

Page 45: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

FirstFirstCostCost

OperatingOperatingCostCost

Exploit technology!Exploit technology!• Low flowLow flow• Low temperatureLow temperature• High efficiencyHigh efficiency• ControlsControlsLeverage:Leverage:• Optimized ControlsOptimized Controls• Variable Primary FlowVariable Primary Flow• Series EvaporatorsSeries Evaporators

Lowest Total Cost of Ownership

Page 46: Chilled Water Systems Total Cost of Ownership April 17, 2008

Questions or Comments?