ching -cheng chang chinese taipei august 7, 2013
DESCRIPTION
APEC Seminar on “Strengthening Public-Private Partnership to Reduce Food Losses in the Supply Chain” 5-8 August, 2013, Taipei. Future Action Plan and Toolkit Idea APEC / ATCWG&PPFS Multi-Year Project “Strengthening Public-Private Partnership to Reduce Food Losses in the Supply Chain” - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Ching-Cheng ChangChinese Taipei
August 7, 2013
Future Action Plan and Toolkit Idea
APEC/ ATCWG&PPFS Multi-Year Project “Strengthening Public-Private Partnership to Reduce
Food Losses in the Supply Chain”(M SCE 02 2013A)
APEC Seminar on“Strengthening Public-Private Partnership to Reduce Food Losses in the Supply Chain”
5-8 August, 2013, Taipei
OUTLINE• Background• Objectives• Implementation
– Phase I~III– Information Platform (Data, Method, Tools) – Survey (Stocktaking, Capacity Building)
• Participants– Project Overseers– Focal Point Network
Increasing Population
Excessive Food Losses
Pressure on Food Supply
Enhancing Public-Private Partnership
FAO estimates world’s population will grow to 9.1 billion people by 2050
Increase of food supply may not satisfy the demand of human
need.
UN’s research reveals one-third of food for human consumption was wasted globally, about 1.3 billion ton per year
It is vital of importance to strengthen Public-Private
Partnership (PPP) to reduce food losses
Food Security
Background
3
Relevance to APEC
2012 APEC Leaders’Declaration
2010 Niigata Declaration on APEC Food Security
PPFSs Action Plan for 2012-2013
ATCWG’s Medium-Term Workplan (2010-2015)
2012 Kazan Declaration on APEC Food Security
Addressing key issues in
Supporting
Responding to
Representing continuously
effort to
Achieving .
4
To identify key issues on reducing post-harvest losses and costs along the entire food supply chain
To seek best practices in private and public sectors on reducing post-harvest losses and costs
To enhance the role of public-private partnership (PPP) along the entire food supply chain
1
2
3
Objectives of Project (1)
5
To reinforce policy coordination among APEC economies
To search and identify practical solutions and enhance capacity-building
To establish • a toolkit, dataset on reducing food losses, • a consolidated methodology of food losses
assessment
4
5
6
Objectives of Project (2)
6
Phase I (2013)
Establish a Focal Point Network (FPN)
Study the current status and key issues of post-harvest food losses
in the APEC region
Hold a seminar with on reducing food losses on food crops
Build a solid foundation for future project
implementation
Formulate a methodology of food losses assessment,
Establish a toolkit and dataset
7
Phase II (2014-2016)
• Fruit and vegetables in 2014
• Fishery and livestock products in 2015
• Food losses & wastes issues occurred on the food consumption in 2016
Annual seminar
• Trace and monitor the progress of applications
• Improve the methodology, and enriching the toolkit and dataset
• modify and extend the methodology of food losses assessment on other types of food
Continuous Actions
8
To synthesize the previous progress of the project and to generate the final conclusion of policy recommendations
Phase III (2017)
A High-Level Policy Dialogue Meeting
A consolidatedmethodology Completion of
Toolkit & dataset
Policy recommenda
tions & follow-upstrategies
Upload in Asia-Pacific Information on Food Security (APIP) website
Propose
9
Understanding of post-
harvest food losses
A preliminary methodology on food crops
Best practices & Public-Private Partnership (PPP)
Toolkit & dataset For solutions
2013 APEC Seminar (1)“APEC Seminar on Strengthening Public-Private-Partnership to Reduce Food Losses in the Supply Chain” August 5th-8th, 2013, in Westin Taipei, Taipei
key issues and challenges
Objectives
10
11
Strategies to Improve Post Harvest Loss System
Handling and
Storage
Processingand
Packaging
Distributionand
Marketing Consumption
QualitySafetyAffordableTimely
• Linking Postharvest technology with food security and safety• Linking small farm/agribusiness with global supply chain• Linking technology and management capacity building
APEC Food Security
Agricultural Production
Facilitating Factors• Access to market information• Access to affordable technologies adapted to local conditions• R&D on resistant variety, cost-effective drying, storage, grading, packaging, ..• Infrastructure investment on road, storage, water/electricity supply, …• Setting standards and creating incentives for collective marketing• Mainstream postharvest loss reduction into agricultural policies• Facilitate credit to small farmers and supply chain actors
Post Harvest Loss Value Chain System
12
Project Deliverables and Sustainability• APIP-PHLOWS Webpage
Methodology PHLOWS Calculation Template Dataset Input and Output for PHLOWS Toolkits Provide Solutions and Contact Info
https://sites.google.com/site/apecharvestlost/
13
APIP-PHLOWS Calculation TemplatePurpose
Support food security policy formulation Identify opportunities to improve food value chains Monitor and evaluate PHL reduction activities
14
Data Source
1. FAOSTAT: – Food Balance Sheet (Annual, ~ 2009)– Producer Prices (Annual, ~2010)– Population (Annual, ~2010)
2. Statistical Report of Each ME• Annual Production Data• Loss Ratios – by product, stage• Allocation factor: food vs nonfood use for fresh and
processed • Conversion factor• Edible factor
15
INPUT DATA -11. UN/FAO, Food Balance Sheet
Prod. Import. Stock Var. Export. Feed Seed Processing Waste Oth. Uses Food
Australia 21,656 196 1,198 17,786 5,264 1,940 669 70 217 635 1,733Canada 26,848 883 - 285 20,126 7,320 2,768 729 18 32 959 2,884
Chile 1,145 744 230 134 1,985 145 42 - 53 3 1,850P. Rep of China 115,115 2,712 - 5,972 672 111,183 7,562 4,150 52 5,756 2,949 90,714
Indonesia - 5,575 - 130 5,444 140 - - 108 210 4,986Japan 674 5,000 1,563 276 6,962 541 20 166 161 - 6,074
Rep of Korea 19 4,025 590 73 4,561 2,172 2 - 10 2 2,376Malaysia - 1,486 720 206 2,000 110 - - 63 - 1,827Mexico 4,116 2,955 - 1,702 5,369 80 74 - 303 1,301 3,612
New Zealand 403 335 - 71 43 624 200 10 72 13 2 327Peru 226 1,543 - 93 1,677 - 23 - 78 - 1,575
The Philippines - 3,252 - 700 41 2,511 350 - - - 5 2,156Russia 61,740 300 288 17,461 44,867 18,921 6,000 804 363 67 18,712
Thailand 1 1,319 180 1,141 - - 4 363 - 1,136United States 60,366 4,301 - 9,527 23,184 31,955 4,899 1,989 108 - 1 24,958
Viet Nam - 1,311 - 51 1,260 - - - 25 - 1,234
Domestic Demand Side
Food Balance Sheet of Wheat, 2009 Domestic Supply Side
Total Unit: 1000 MT
16
INPUT DATA -2 Loss Ratios: by stage & by product
Rice WheatProduction Handling Processing Distribution Consumption Production Handling Processing Distribution Consumption
Australia
Brunei Darussalamo
CanadaChilePeople's Rep of ChinaHong Kong, China IndonesiaJapanRepublic of KoreaMalaysiaMexicoNew Zealand
Papua New Guinea
PeruThe PhilippinesRussiaSingapore Chinese TaipeiThailandThe United StatesViet Nam
Unit: %
17
INPUT DATA -3 Conversion/Allocation Factor
Conversion (portion of edible) Allocation (portion for human consumption)
Rice Wheat Maize … Rice Wheat Maize …AustraliaBrunei DarussalamoCanadaChilePeople's Rep of ChinaHong Kong, China IndonesiaJapanRepublic of KoreaMalaysiaMexicoNew ZealandPapua New Guinea PeruThe PhilippinesRussiaSingapore Chinese TaipeiThailandThe United StatesViet Nam
18
Output (Tables, Graphs, Maps)
19
Regional Report
20
Output (Tables, Graphs, Maps)
21
Regional Report
Survey 1Template for Loss Assessment
– Food Balance Sheet (recent update)– Loss Ratios along Food Supply Chain– Allocation Ratios for Food/Nonfood Usage– Conversion Factors into Calories– Food Prices (producer, wholesale, retail) for
converting into economic cost
Survey 2 – Toolkits for Loss Reduction
• Function– Provide practical solutions to reduce food losses at each stage of food supply
chain– Provide business opportunities for all actors in food supply chain
• Main Content– Technologies available
• Stage of supply chain• Product types• Sectors (Public/Private)
– Best Practices (Public-Private Partnerships)• Government Agencies• Associations• Research Institutions• NGOs
– Capacity Building• Training courses• Contact
Survey 3- Technology/Best Practices
Production Handling Processing Distribution Consumption
Definition & Causes (Mechanical, Heat/moisture, Insect, Mircoorganism, Rodent/bird)LossWaste
Technology Available Cereal/Root Veg/Fruit Meat/Dairy SeafoodPublic Policy Implemented Loss WasteBest Practices (Public/Private/PP Partnership) Loss WasteCapacity Building (Training, Education, Credit/Loan, Infrastructure,…etc)
25
Project participants
• Capacity building• Formulate
effective policies
• Capacity building• Experience
sharing
• Promote environmental protection and recycling
• Consumer education and protection
• Share research outcome and expertise
• Data and solution
Policy Makers
Food Supply Chain
Environmental & consumer
protection NGOs
Academic and Experts
Focal Point Network (FPN)
• Purpose– Ensure the multi-year project contributes to APEC’s
work to reduce food losses in the supply chain. – Provide suggestions for strengthening public-private
partnership. – Monitor and assess the implementation of the multi-
year project. • Membership
– Every APEC ME will appoint a FPN member for a 5-year (2013~2017) term.
Terms of Reference (TOR) of FPN• Internal Organizational Arrangements
– The Chair of FPN will be the Project Overseer.– The FPN Secretariat will be located at the Chinese Taipei APEC
Study Center • work on administrative matters.
– The FPN members will primarily conduct business via emails.• Work Mandate
– Provide advice on issues relating to the implementation of the project.
– Suggest speakers for the project’s seminars. – Assist with conducting the surveys.
Project Overseers• Dr. Jack Kuei-son SHEU
Director General Department of International Affairs, Council of Agriculture, Chinese Taipei
Tel: 886-2-2312-4647 Fax: 886-2-2312-3827 Email: [email protected]
• Ms. Tracy TARNGSenior Specialist & Section ChiefTel: 886-2-2312-6969Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
28
Thank Youfor Your Attention!
29