christchurch, nz - front lot landscape guidelines: block 5 … · 2018-08-20 · permeable paving...

Date: 20/12/16 | File E16005

In association with

FRONT LOT LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES: Block 5 - Lots 35-44

ROUGH AND MILNE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS l EARTHWORK LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Date: 20/12/16 | File E16005

INTRODUCTION | Document Structure

Introduction

Contents

This document contains landscape guidelines for planting residential front lots in Lots 35-44 of the Exemplar Zone in Halswell Commons.

The landscape guidelines are tailored to both building typology and setback. A front lot includes the area between the front boundary and the front facing walls of the building (as indicated in Figure A). Building placement is to be confirmed by the developer in relation to setback allowances (illustrated on page 1).

Landscape guidelines are separated into areas defined as ‘front landscape zone’, ‘side landscape zone’, ‘boundary treatment,’ and include tree species where appropriate. Beyond the 1.5m 'front landcape zone,' sites may include a ‘general landscape zone’ which allows buyers to choose the treatment as long as it is permeable. Plants may be chosen from the palette that corresponds to the street frontage; this ensures front lots and street planting is complementary and contributes to a more cohesive site character.

Fencing typologies are included for residential lots.

FRONT LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES: Lot Classification Plan........................................................................................... Stand Alone Front Yard.........................................................................................

PLANT PALETTES: Local B Front Yard.................................................................................................

LOT FENCING GUIDELINES: Permeable............................................................................................................. Semi-Permeable.................................................................................................... Solid......................................................................................................................

12

3

456

Building Setback

Side rear boundary treatment

Front boundary treatment

Back boundary treatment

Side front boundary treatment

Front lot area

505m²

3145m²

Road to Vest inChristchurch City

Council

2847m²


Council

(15.0)

(12.0)

(12.0)

Kiosk5m²

R.O.W

R.O.W

900Copy of B99 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (2004)

7.8

11.4

306m²

504m²

417m²

425m²

Copy of B99 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (2004)

430m²

518m²

10.3

11.7

6.3

608m²

2.5

2.6

E.18668

DATEAMENDMENT

AMENDMENTS :

NO

RT

H

1:250@A1

JOB TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DRAWING No :

CAD FILE :

SCALE :

DRAWING STATUS

1:500@A3

116 Wrights RoadTelephone: 03 379-0793

J:\18668\Planning\18668_STAGE 1 Typologyr2.dwg

NOTES:

1) Areas and dimensions are approximate & subjectto final survey and deposit of plans.

2) Service easements to be created as required.

3) This plan has been prepared for subdivisionconsent purposes only. No liability is accepted ifthe plan is used for any other purpose.

4) Any measurements taken from information whichis not dimensioned on the electronic copy are atthe risk of the recipient.

5) This plan is subject to the granting of subdivisionand/or resource consents and should be treatedas a proposal until such time as the necessaryconsents have been granted by the relevantauthorities.

6) This plan has been prepared for the use of DanneMora Holdings Limited only and no liability isaccepted in relation to any other parties.

Figure A Spatial Representation of a Typical Front Lot

BLOCK AREA SCHEDULEBLOCK

NUMBERBLOCK AREA

(m²) SITES HH AVERAGE SITESIZES

DENSITY(Sites/ha)

1 4864 13 13 374.2 26.72 0 0 0 0 03 1912 6 6 318.7 31.44 4626 12 12 385.5 25.95 5801 10 10 580.1 17.26 5089 17 17 299.4 33.47 8430 24 24 351.3 28.58 5957 17 27 350.4 28.59 5468 16 16 341.8 29.3

10 5895 15 18 393.0 25.411 8448 23 23 367.3 27.212 9254 18 18 514.1 19.513 9839 27 30 364.4 27.414 7112 20 20 355.6 28.115 7393 21 21 352.0 28.416 6333 15 15 422.2 23.717 5194 16 16 324.6 30.8

TOTAL 101615 270 286 358.5 25.4

1:1250@A1 February 20161:2500@A3Residential Typologies Plan

Neighbourhood

DUPLEX (72)

TERRACE (47)

STAND ALONE (134)

APARTMENT (4)

LEGEND

RESERVE

MEADOWLANDS PARK

E.18948 R0

O:\LOGOS\DLS Logo.jpg

For Discussion

Z:\2016 Clients\E16005 Halswell Commons\(2) Site Information & Plans\(2) Consultant Plans\160301_DLS_Neighbourhood Plan R0 dwg pdf\Neighbourhood Plan R0_FS.dwg

Halswell CommonsExemplar

AFFORDABLE LOTS

Block Affordable

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0

5 0

6 4

7 6

8 13

9 5

10 8

11 4

12 0

13 5

14 4

15 5

16 2

17 4

TOTAL 60

J:\18431\LOGOs\Halswell Commons final logo\Halswell_Commons_Final_B&W.jpg

5

N

HENDERSONS ROAD

HALSWELL ROAD

LOCAL B ROAD

Entry Road One(off Hendersons Rd)

Heritage Park/Meadowlands Precinct

1ROUGH AND MILNE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS l EARTHWORK LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Date: 20/12/16 | File E16005

FRONT LANDSCAPE TYPOLOGY | Lot Classification Plan

Front Lot Typology Legend

STAND ALONE HOUSE

• Front Landscape• Refer to page 2

Boundary Legend

Front lot boundary

Exemplar Zone boundary

HENDERSONS ROAD

HALSWELL ROAD

BLOCK AREA SCHEDULEBLOCK

NUMBERBLOCK AREA

(m²) SITES HH AVERAGE SITESIZES

DENSITY(Sites/ha)

1 4864 13 13 374.2 26.72 0 0 0 0 03 1912 6 6 318.7 31.44 4626 12 12 385.5 25.95 5801 10 10 580.1 17.26 5089 17 17 299.4 33.47 8430 24 24 351.3 28.58 5957 17 27 350.4 28.59 5468 16 16 341.8 29.3

10 5895 15 18 393.0 25.411 8448 23 23 367.3 27.212 9254 18 18 514.1 19.513 9839 27 30 364.4 27.414 7112 20 20 355.6 28.115 7393 21 21 352.0 28.416 6333 15 15 422.2 23.717 5194 16 16 324.6 30.8

TOTAL 101615 270 286 358.5 25.4

1:1250@A1 February 20161:2500@A3Residential Typologies Plan

Neighbourhood

DUPLEX (72)

TERRACE (47)

STAND ALONE (134)

APARTMENT (4)

LEGEND

RESERVE

MEADOWLANDS PARK

E.18948 R0

O:\LOGOS\DLS Logo.jpg

For Discussion

Z:\2016 Clients\E16005 Halswell Commons\(2) Site Information & Plans\(2) Consultant Plans\160301_DLS_Neighbourhood Plan R0 dwg pdf\Neighbourhood Plan R0_FS.dwg

Halswell CommonsExemplar

AFFORDABLE LOTS

Block Affordable

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0

5 0

6 4

7 6

8 13

9 5

10 8

11 4

12 0

13 5

14 4

15 5

16 2

17 4

TOTAL 60

J:\18431\LOGOs\Halswell Commons final logo\Halswell_Commons_Final_B&W.jpg

5

HeritagePark

Block Location Map

ROUGH AND MILNE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS l EARTHWORK LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Date: 20/12/16 | File E160052

ID LOCATION TREATMENT (Refer to page 16 for design guidelines)

MAX HEIGHT

FFront onto Street or Reserve No fence or; N/A

Permeable 1.2mHedge 1.2m

SSide Front Hedge or; 1.2m

Permeable 1.2m

RSide Rear onto Neighbour Solid Fence 1.8mSide Rear onto Street Semi-Permeable: Type 2 1.8mSide Rear onto Reserve Semi-Permeable: Type 2 1.8m

B

Back onto Laneway No fence or; N/AHedge; 1.2mPermeable; 1.2mSemi-Permeable: Type 1 1.2m

BOUNDARY TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS

EXAMPLE OF LANDSCAPE TREATMENT

505m²

3145m²


Council

2847m²


Council

(15.0)

(12.0)

(12.0)

Kiosk5m²

R.O.W

R.O.W

900


7.8

11.4

306m²

504m²

417m²

425m²


430m²

518m²

10.3

11.7

6.3

608m²

2.5

2.6

E.18668

DATEAMENDMENT

AMENDMENTS :

NO

RT

H

1:250@A1

JOB TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DRAWING No :

CAD FILE :

SCALE :

DRAWING STATUS

1:500@A3



NOTES:







FRONT LANDSCAPE TYPOLOGY | Stand Alone Front Yard GENERAL PRINCIPLES

• Landscaping will become an extension of the streetscape; enhancing street amenity and softening the built form

• Landscaping is intended to enable passive surveillance through maintaining visual permeability from house to street

• Landscaping is intended to encourage neighbourhood interaction and engagement with the street by serving as a visually shared public/private interface

• Houses shall provide direct and clear access to the street for pedestrians• There must be one tree per lot, see landscape zone treatments table below.

TREE

FRONT LANDSCAPE ZONE

SIDE LANDSCAPE ZONE

GENERAL LANDSCAPE ZONE

FRONT BOUNDARY TREATMENT

SIDE FRONT BOUNDARY TREATMENT

BACK BOUNDARY TREATMENT

SIDE REAR BOUNDARY TREATMENT

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS

DRIVEWAY

505m²

3145m²


Council

2847m²


Council

(15.0)

(12.0)

(12.0)

Kiosk5m²

R.O.W

R.O.W

900


7.8

11.4

306m²

504m²

417m²

425m²


430m²

518m²

10.3

11.7

6.3

608m²

2.5

2.6

E.18668

DATEAMENDMENT

AMENDMENTS :

NO

RT

H

1:250@A1

JOB TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DRAWING No :

CAD FILE :

SCALE :

DRAWING STATUS

1:500@A3



NOTES:







LEGEND

S

SF

R

R

B

ID ZONE DESCRIPTION TREATMENT

Tree Must be planted 0.75m minimum from any boundary, and the house be laid out to be a minimum of 2.0m from the tree.

Tree required

Front Landscape Zone Minimum of 1.5m wide measured from front boundary. 100% treatment coverage required.

Low planting

Side Landscape Zone Minimum of 1m wide where possible measured from the front side boundary.

Low plantingMedium plantingLawn

General Landscape Zone Remaining space not covered by the above. Must consist of porous surfaces.

There shall be no parking on the General Landscape zone.

Low plantingMedium plantingLawnPermeable pavingGravel

Refer to plant palette for species lists.

LANDSCAPE ZONE TREATMENTS

505m²

3145m²


Council

2847m²


Council

(15.0)

(12.0)

(12.0)

Kiosk5m²

R.O.W

R.O.W

900


7.8

11.4

306m²

504m²

417m²

425m²


430m²

518m²

10.3

11.7

6.3

608m²

2.5

2.6

E.18668

DATEAMENDMENT

AMENDMENTS :

NO

RT

H

1:250@A1

JOB TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DRAWING No :

CAD FILE :

SCALE :

DRAWING STATUS

1:500@A3



NOTES:







N


PLANT PALETTE | Local B Front YardTREE SPECIES

HEDGE SPECIES

LOW PLANTING

MEDIUM PLANTING

Robinia ‘Lace Lady’

Podocarpus nivalis

Pyrus salicifolia pendula

Coprosma propinqua

Chionochloa flavicans Lomandra tanikaAlchemilla mollis

Malus ioensis plena

Hebe ‘Emerald Green’ Libertia grandiflora Phormium 'Pepe'

Corokia ‘Geentys Green’ Fiejoa ‘Unique’

Uncinia uncinata

Sophora prostrata

Pratia angulata

Pachystegia insignis

Street Planting: Native tree planting to attract native birds and encourage biodiversity.

4 ROUGH AND MILNE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS l EARTHWORK LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Date: 20/12/16 | File E16005

FENCING TYPOLOGY | Lot Fencing: Permeable

OPEN METAL STYLE

Suitable for Front onto Street, Front onto Reserve, Side Front, Back onto Laneway

PERMEABLE FENCE: ACCEPTABLE SOLUTIONS

COLOUR PALETTE

Resene ‘Stack’Resene ‘Uhi’Resene ‘Mahogany’ Resene ‘Thistle’

Inspiration image


FENCING TYPOLOGY | Lot Fencing: Semi-Permeable

SEMI-PERMEABLE FENCE: ACCEPTABLE SOLUTIONS

TYPE 1. TIMBER PICKET STYLE

TYPE 2. HALF HEIGHT TIMBER AND TRELLIS

Suitable for Back onto Laneway.

Suitable for Side Rear onto Street, Side Rear onto Reserve.

Inspiration image

Inspiration image

6 ROUGH AND MILNE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS l EARTHWORK LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Date: 20/12/16 | File E16005

SOLID FENCE: ACCEPTABLE SOLUTIONS

Suitable for Side Rear onto Neighbour.

Suitable for Side Rear onto Neighbour.

SOLID TIMBER STYLE B

SOLID TIMBER STYLE A

FENCING TYPOLOGY | Lot Fencing: Solid

Inspiration image

Inspiration image

christchurch, nz - front lot landscape guidelines: block 5 … · 2018-08-20 · permeable paving...

Documents