chuuk school repair recommendations

organization [Street Address]

[City], [State] [Postal Code] Phone: [Your Phone] Fax: [Your Fax]

E-‐Mail: [Your E-‐Mail] Web: [Web Address]

Chuuk State

Typhoon Maysak Storm Damage Assessments Schools and Dispensaries

June 2015

Assessments and Report by: Karen Wonders, PE and Phillip Gianan

Chuuk State – TM Storm Damage Assessments 1

June 2015

Table of Contents Introduction 2

Map of Chuuk Lagoon 2

Recommendations 3

Table 1 – Weno Island 3

Photographs – Weno Island 3 – 5

Table 2 – Chuuk Lagoon 6

Photographs – Chuuk Lagoon 6 – 10

Conclusions – A Way Forward 11

Appendix A – Map of Chuuk Lagoon (large)

Appendix B – Repair Cost Estimates

Appendix C – Summary of Materials


June 2015

Introduction During the first week of June 2015, a team consisting of the Director of OEEM and two staff engineers from the Department of Transportation, Communication & Infrastructure, traveled to meet with Chuuk State officials. The team discussed the FSM National Government’s continued support for their ongoing typhoon relief efforts. The goal and mission of this endeavor was to primarily identify schools with relatively minor damages that may be repaired in a timely manner for the beginning of the next school year with the funding, technical and possible logistical assistance of the FSM National Government. For the purpose of this report and so as not to exclude any schools in need, the facilities requiring more extensive repairs are also included for future consideration and are noted with an asterisk ( * ). In addition to the meetings with State officials, the engineers conducted school and dispensary inspections in conjunction with the continuing relief runs in the Chuuk Lagoon. The Indie Trader ship was chartered by IOM and was offered as the vehicle of transportation to the Lagoon islands. This report is a compilation of the inspections conducted in June 2015 as well as those assessments performed in April 2015. Please reference the report titled, ‘Typhoon Maysak Preliminary Storm Damage Assessments of Critical Infrastructure’, for additional support information.

Map of Chuuk Lagoon:

School Dispensary Dock or Sea Wall

(Larger version of map is included in the Appendix)


June 2015

Recommendations In preparation of these recommendations, we attempted to list schools and other facilities in the order of repair magnitude from the most minor to the most critical. Materials, labor, mobilization (i.e., location accessibility) and school population have been considered for the compilation of this list; however, it is only intended to serve as a guide for timing and progress of repair work and not a strict order of completion. Other factors may influence the order and timing of repairs. At this time, only the Chuuk Lagoon has been evaluated. Due to the larger population of students affected and ease of location in relation to acquiring materials, it is suggested to complete repair works on Weno Island first. The following assessed schools have varying degrees of damage: Table 1 – Weno Island:

Name of Facility Summary of Damages Cost Estimate (approximate)

Sapuk Elementary Peak of roof partially removed; power meter support detached $1,000

P&P Elementary Hole in roof over the principal’s office $7,000

* St. Cecilia School Severe damage to upper classroom building roof; covered walkway missing sections of roofing; outdoor student meeting area lost roof cover

$120,000

Mwan Elementary Gutter damage; roofing missing; roof overhang panels missing underside $2,250

Neouo Elementary Internal classroom partitions temporarily propped into place; small amount of roofing damage $4,500

* Critical damages requiring extensive construction effort in order to bring school online before school year

Sapuk – View of roof damage along the peak Sapuk – Power meter detached

from building


June 2015

P&P – Showing hole in roof over principal’s office P&P – View of hole in roof from inside the building

St. Cecilia – Upper classroom building roof damage St. Cecelia – View inside upper classroom building

St. Cecelia – Missing sections of walkway covering St. Cecelia – Student meeting area with missing roof covering


June 2015

Mwan – View of gutter and roof damage Mwan – Missing roofing panels

Neouo – View of pealing roof panel Neouo – Classroom partitions are unstable and temporarily braced


June 2015

Table 2 – Chuuk Lagoon:

Name of Facility Summary of Damages Cost Estimate (approximate)

Etan Island -‐ School Gutters are missing or partially detached $1,300

* Dublon (Tonoas) Island -‐ School

School building destroyed; large hole in roof of principal’s office; solar panel cracked atop toilet facility $41,400

* Uman Island – School and dock

Critical roof damage to a one-‐third of roof; toilet roofing damaged; partial collapse of dock

Dock: $2,000

School: $44,319

* Fefen Island -‐ School Critical roof damage to upper school building; toilet facility destroyed $65,246

Parem Island – School and dock

Minimal roof damage to school; portion of concrete dock collapsed Dock: $11,587

Eot Island – School and dock Small roof damage to school including peak; portion of concrete dock collapsed

Dock: $5,040

School: $32,623

Udot Island – School No school or dispensary damage. Note: the school WiFi tower was damaged and non-‐functioning -‐-‐-‐-‐

Romanum Island – Dispensary

Minimal roof damage to dispensary. Note: the radio tower is bent over due to the storm $1,500

Patta Island – School 2-‐classroom plus storage room school building lost roof and portions of siding $14,902

* Onei Island – School and dispensary

Critical loss of entire roof on 2-‐story school; first floor mold on ceilings; loss of half of dispensary roof

Dispensary: $10,018

School: $68,933 Fanapanges Island – Dispensary

Small roof damage to dispensary $5,000

* Critical damages requiring extensive construction effort in order to bring school online before school year

Etan – Missing gutters on school building Etan – Gutters missing that feed rain water catchment tanks


June 2015

Dublon – School building damaged and unable to use; walls are propped up to prevent collapse

Dublon – Roof damage over principal’s office

Uman – Sapou – Roof damage to one-‐third of school building

Uman – Sapou – View of roof damage from underside

Fefen – Inaka – Views of serious roof damage from the front of the building < from inside the classroom <<


June 2015

Parem – School building roof damage and underside of roof overhang

Eot – Loss of roof panels on school building << Cracking in floor inside classroom <

Udot – WiFi antennae leaning and non-‐functioning << Romanum – Roof damage on dispensary <


June 2015

Patta – Loss of roof for two-‐classroom school building Patta – View from inside classroom; roof damage

Onei – Bokuku – Upper floor of school building with no roof

Onei – Missing roof panels on dispensary

Fanapanges – Damaged roof on dispensary Fanapanges – Missing sections of dispensary roof overhang


June 2015

Conclusions – A Way Forward The FSM National Government wishes to assist in the typhoon recovery effort sustained from Typhoon Maysak. In an effort to provide immediate support and assistance to those public facilities in need of repairs, the Department of Transportation, Communication & Infrastructure should work in conjunction with the Office of Emergency and Environmental Management to discuss logical procedures to move forward and to arrange the procurement of materials recommended in this report. These materials would then be delivered by national government marine vessels to the appropriate islands and facilities and, under TC&I or Chuuk State Planning supervision, request local volunteers to assist with the repairs to the schools and, if possible, the affected dispensaries as well. The majority of these facilities are on private or leased land and therefore, would require the cooperation of the landowners. Another option is to bid the work out to local contractors to procure materials and repair the schools in time for the start of the next school year. This option would require additional time to prepare bid documents as well as advertising the project(s). Contractors have more professional expertise and theoretically, would produce a higher quality product. Land ownership issues may cause delays although in the interest of repairing the public-‐use facilities, this would seem to be unlikely, however, the possibility exists. TC&I is available for further assistance for the mission to repair schools and other facilities damaged by Typhoon Maysak. We stand ready to provide our expertise as required in light of the pending of the new school year.


June 2015

APPENDIX A

MAP of CHUUK LAGOON


June 2015

School Dispensary Dock or Sea Wall


June 2015

APPENDIX B

REPAIR COST ESTIMATES


June 2015

TOTA

L COS

T

DOCK

DISP

ENSA

RYCO

MM

UNIT

Y HA

LLM

UNIC

IPAL

HA

LLSC

HOOL

SEA

WAL

LPU

BLIC

TO

ILET

(US $

)

1 1.1

SAPU

K1,

000.

001.

2M

WAN

2,

250.

001.

3NE

UOU

4,50

0.00

1.4

ST. C

ECILI

A E/

S12

0,00

0.00

1.5

P & P

ELEM

. SCH

L7,

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

0013

4,75

0.00

0.00

0.00

134,

750.

00

2 2.1

INAK

A65

,245

.58

65,2

45.5

80.

000.

000.

000.

0065

,245

.58

0.00

0.00

65,2

45.5

8

3 3.1

PARE

M11

,587

.00

11,5

87.0

011

,587

.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

11,5

87.0

0

410

,017

.56

68,9

32.6

778

,950

.23

0.00

10,0

17.5

60.

000.

0068

,932

.67

0.00

0.00

78,9

50.2

3

5SA

PETA

14,9

01.5

214

,901

.52

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

14,9

01.5

20.

000.

0014

,901

.52

61,

500.

001,

500.

000.

000.

000.

000.

001,

500.

000.

000.

001,

500.

00

75,

000.

0030

,000

.00

35,0

00.0

00.

005,

000.

000.

0030

,000

.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

35,0

00.0

0

SUBJ

ECT :

COS

T SUM

MAR

Y OF T

YPHO

ON M

AYSA

K DA

MAG

E ASS

ESSM

ENT F

OR C

HUUK

STAT

E

S.N.

MUN

ICIP

ALIT

YVI

LLAG

E/

LOCA

TION

FACI

LITY/

INFR

ASTR

UCTU

RERE

MAR

KS

WEN

O

Subt

otal

(PAR

EM):

Subt

otal

(FEF

AN):

PARE

M

Subt

otal

(WEN

O):

FEFA

N

ONEI

Subt

otal

(ONE

I):

PAAT

ASu

btot

al (P

AATA

):

ROM

ANUM

Subt

otal

(ROM

ANUM

):

FANA

PANG

ESSu

btot

al (F

ANA

PANG

ES):


June 2015

TOTA

L COS

T

DOCK

DISP

ENSA

RYCO

MM

UNIT

Y HA

LLM

UNIC

IPAL

HA

LLSC

HOOL

SEA

WAL

LPU

BLIC

TO

ILET

(US $

)S.N

.M

UNIC

IPAL

ITY

VILL

AGE/

LO

CATI

ON

FACI

LITY/

INFR

ASTR

UCTU

RERE

MAR

KS

WEN

O8

5,04

0.00

32,6

23.0

037

,663

.00

5,04

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

32,6

23.0

00.

000.

0037

,663

.00

9 9.1

SAPO

U2,

000.

0044

,318

.92

46,3

18.9

22,

000.

000.

000.

000.

0044

,318

.92

0.00

0.00

46,3

18.9

2

10 10.1

ETAN

1,34

0.00

1,34

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1,34

0.00

0.00

0.00

1,34

0.00

11 11.1

DUBL

ON41

,400

.00

41,4

00.0

00.

000.

000.

000.

0041

,400

.00

0.00

0.00

41,4

00.0

0

18,6

27.0

015

,017

.56

0.00

30,0

00.0

040

5,01

1.69

0.00

0.00

468,

656.

25

Subt

otal

(EOT

):EO

T

TOTA

L COS

T (US

$):

DUBL

ON

Subt

otal

(DUB

LON)

:

UMAN

Subt

otal

(UM

AN):

ETAN Subt

otal

(ETA

N):


June 2015

APPENDIX C

SUMMARY OF MATERIALS


June 2015

TOTA

L

One

i El

em.

Schl

One

i Di

sp.

Inak

a El

em

Sch,

Fe

fen

Sap

ou

Elem

Sc

h,

Uman

Sap

eta

Elem

. Sc

hool

, Pa

ata

Sap

uk

Elem

. Sc

h,

Wen

o

Mwa

n El

em

Sch,

W

eno

Neu

ou

Elem

Sc

h.,

Wen

o

St.

Ceci

lia

Elem

. Sc

h,

Wen

o

P&P

El

em

Sch,

W

eno

Eot

El

emSc

h,

Eot

Dub

lon

Elem

. Sc

h,

Dubl

on E

tan

Elem

. Sc

h.

Par

em

Elem

Sc

h

(App

rox.

quan

tity)

U

nit

Cost

T

otal

Cost

(U

S $)

11.

1ba

g28

28

10

.50

294.0

01.

2cu

.yd2

2 40

.00

80.00

1.3

cu.yd

4 4

80.0

0 32

0.00

1.4

pc.

50

50

15.7

4 78

7.00

1.5

pc.

31

31

5.24

16

2.44

1.6

lb.20

20

1.

65

33.00

1.7

pc.

20

20

13.6

4 27

2.80

1.8

pc.

12

12

12.0

0 14

4.00

1.9

lb.6

6 1.

75

10.50

2,103

.74

2

2.1

pc.

120

112

56

20

168

120

20

616

25.1

9 15

,517.0

4

2.2

pc.

45

42

21

54

63

45

15

285

13.6

4 3,8

87.40

2.3

pc.

15

9 15

8

9 21

15

92

31

.49

2,897

.08

2.4

pc.

115

54

125

63

33

161

115

666

13.6

4 9,0

84.24

2.5

pc.

42

9 42

21

4

59

42

5 22

4 8.

39

1,879

.36

2.6

pc.

7 7

3 3

10

7 37

41

.99

1,553

.63

2.7

lb70

0 30

70

0 40

0 20

0 85

0 70

0 50

3,6

30

1.75

6,3

52.50

4

1,171

.25

3

3.1

pc.

360

358

179

504

`36

0 20

1,7

61

8.39

14

,774.7

9

3.2

pc.

105

110

55

14

147

105

6 53

6 32

.00

17,15

2.00

CWN

asso

rted

SUBT

OTAL

:

CEIL

ING/

PAR

TITI

ON W

ORKS

2"x 2

"x16'T

reat

ed L

umbe

r

(ceil

ing jo

ist)

Plyw

ood

1/4

x 4 x

8 Tr

eate

d/

Hard

iflex

2"x 6

"X16

' Tre

ated

Lum

ber

(Top

/bot

tom

chor

d)2"

x 4"X

16' T

reat

ed L

umbe

r (we

b m

embe

rs)

2"x1

0"X1

6' Tr

eate

d Lu

mbe

r (fa

scia

bd.)

2"x 4

"X16

' Tre

ated

Lum

ber

(pur

lins)

2"x 2

"x16'T

reat

ed L

umbe

r (p

urlin

co

nnec

tor)

Plyw

ood

1/2"

x 4'

x 8' tr

eate

d (g

usse

t plat

e)

Tie w

ire #

16

2"x 4

"x16'

Form

lum

ber

Plyw

ood

1/2"

x 4'

x 8' U

ntrea

ted

CWN

Asso

rted

SUBT

OTAL

: R

OOF

FRAM

ING

WOR

KS

CONC

RETE

WOR

KSCe

men

t Typ

e 1

Whit

e Sa

nd

Grav

el 3/

4#

5x20

' RSB

# 3x

20' R

SB

Subj

ect :

SUM

MARY

OF

MATE

RIAL

S

S.N.

DESC

RIPT

ION

Unit

Mun

icipa

lity o

r Villa

ge/ In

frast

ruct

ure

1


June 2015

TOTA

L

One

i El

em.

Schl

One

i Di

sp. In

aka

Elem

Sc

h, Fe

fen

Sap

ou

Elem

Sc

h, Um

an

Sap

eta

Elem

. Sc

hool

, Pa

ata

Sap

uk

Elem

. Sc

h, W

eno

Mwa

n El

em

Sch,

Wen

o

Neu

ou

Elem

Sc

h.,

Wen

o

St.

Cecil

ia El

em.

Sch,

Wen

o

P&P

El

em

Sch,

Wen

o

Eot

El

emSc

h, Eo

t

Dub

lon

Elem

. Sc

h, Du

blon

Eta

n El

em.

Sch.

Par

em

Elem

Sc

h

(App

rox.

quan

tity)

Unit

Co

st T

otal

Cost

(US

$) S.

N.DE

SCRI

PTIO

NUn

it

Mun

icipa

lity or

Villa

ge/ In

frastr

uctu

re

3.3

pc.

48

48

48

68

48

260

4.19

1,0

89.40

3.4

Insec

t Scr

een 4

'ft

48

48

48

68

48

260

2.85

74

1.00

3.5

lb50

50

30

70

50

25

0 1.

75

437.5

0

3.6

lb30

30

20

42

30

15

2 1.

75

266.0

0

3.7

lb30

30

15

42

30

14

7 1.

85

271.9

5

3

4,732

.64

44.

1lf

1,42

2 1,

000

20

1,42

2 3,8

64

3.50

13

,524.0

0

4.2

pc.

10

9 1

10

30

35.0

0 1,0

50.00

4.3

pc.

18

18

18

54

40.0

0 2,1

60.00

4.4

pc.

10

10

10

30

35.0

0 1,0

50.00

4.5

pc.

34

34

68

20.9

9 1,4

27.32

4.

6pc

.17

10

13

4 10

17

15

20

3 23

.09

4,687

.27

4.7

pc.

40

17

134

17

15

223

26.2

4 5,8

51.52

4.

8pc

.8

10

18

35.0

0 63

0.00

4.9

pc.

5 4

4 10

4

17

5 3

52

35.0

0 1,8

20.00

4.

10lb

100

20

100

25

20

5 4

4 12

0 4

20

100

522

2.00

1,0

44.00

4.

11pc

.24

30

24

78

55

.00

4,290

.00

4.12

lf76

18

40

30

0 10

0 10

54

4 4.

50

2,448

.00

4.13

pc.

12

4 12

12

4

4 4

4 15

4

5 12

92

7.

50

690.0

0

40,6

72.11

11

8,679

.74

7,120

.78

12

5,800

.52

SUBT

OTAL

:

TOTA

L COS

T :

TOTA

L SAL

ES T

AX 6%

:

TOTA

L MAT

ERIA

L COS

T (U

S $)

:

GI S

ide F

lashin

g Ga

.26

x 10'

GI R

idge

Cap

Ga.2

6 x 1

0'

Roof

ing N

ails

PVC

3" D

owns

pout

Plas

tic G

utter

& a

cces

sorie

sSi

licon

e Se

alants

Pre-

paint

ed R

idge

Cap

10' x

Ga

.26

Pre-

paint

ed G

utter

10'

x Ga.

26

Pre-

paint

ed S

ide F

lashin

g 10

' x

Ga. 2

6GI

Cor

r. Ro

of G

a.26

x 8'

GI C

orr.

Roof

Ga.

26 x

10'

GI C

orr.

Roof

Ga.

26 x

12'

CWN

Finish

ing N

ail

Conc

rete

Nail

SUBT

OTAL

:RO

OFIN

G W

ORKS

Pre-

paint

ed R

oof G

a.26

1"x 2

"x16'

Lum

ber

2

chuuk school repair recommendations

Documents