city of arcadia - california state water resources control ...€¦ · city of arcadia resolution...
TRANSCRIPT
City of Arcadia Alternate Compliance PlanDecember 201
Prepared By:
Los Angeles River Watershed Trash TMDL Prepared Pursuant to Resolution No. R15-006
City of Arcadia Resolution No. R15-006 Compliance Approach #3
EExecutive Summary This Alternate Compliance Plan has been prepared with specific application to the California Regional Board, Los Angeles Region Resolution R15-006, commonly referred to as the Los Angeles River Trash TMDL Amendment.
As documented in reports annually submitted to the Regional Board, Arcadia has demonstrated continued compliance with the Trash TMDL (R07-12) since the original effective date in 2008. The Trash TMDL Amendment, adopted in 2015, provides Los Angeles River MS4 permittees with several options to demonstrate compliance with the final WLA. As described in this Report, Arcadia has achieved compliance for the reporting year in accordance with the Amendment.
Background The Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) approved the Trash TMDL for the Los Angeles River watershed on September 19, 2001. This TMDL was subsequently rescinded on July 17, 2006. On September 3, 2008 the current Trash TMDL (Resolution 07-012) became effective. This TMDL established a nine-year schedule for reducing trash discharges from sources along the Los Angeles River to meet the numeric target of zero discharged by September 30, 2016.
An Amendment to the Trash TMDL (Resolution No. 15-006) was approved by the Regional Board on June 11, 2016, and was subsequently approved by the State Water Resources Control Board on November 17, 2015, and the USEPA on June 30, 2016. This Amendment provides five approaches for permittees subject to this TMDL to demonstrate compliance with the final zero trash waste load allocation (WLA). These approaches are:
1. 100% of all conveyances discharging to the Los Angeles River are retrofitted with trash “fullcapture” systems (FCSs).
2. 98% of all catch basins within the agency’s jurisdictional land area in the watershed are retrofitted with FCSs1. This approach requires a report on the technical infeasibility for the remaining catchbasins and a report documenting partial capture devices and institutional control effectiveness.
3. 99% or greater reduction of the baseline load attained through a combination of FCS, partialcapture devices, and institutional controls, calculated using a mass balance approach based on atrash daily generation rate (DGR) study. This approach requires all FCSs, partial capture devices,and institutional controls be properly sized, operated, and maintained. Continued DGR studiesare also required for compliance reassessment.
4. 97% or greater reduction of the baseline load for two or more consecutive years, attained througha combination of FCS, partial capture devices, and institutional controls, and calculated using amass balance approach based on a trash daily generation rate (DGR) study. This approach requires an evaluation of institutional control effectiveness and any potential enhancements, and ademonstration that opportunities to implement partial capture devices have been fully exploited.Continued DGR studies are also required for compliance reassessment.
5. A scientifically based alternative as approved by the Regional Board.
1 98% of all catch basins within the agency’s jurisdictional land area in the watershed are retrofitted with FCS or, alternatively, 98% of the jurisdiction’s drainage area is addressed by FCS and at least 97% of the catch basins (or, alternatively, drainage are) within the agency’s jurisdiction in the subwatershed (the smaller of the HUC-12 equivalent area or tributary subwatershed) are retrofitted with FCS.
1
City of Arcadia Resolution No. R15-006 Compliance Approach #3
Alternative approaches #2 through #5 also require responsible jurisdictions to 1) demonstrate that existing studies of institutional controls and partial capture devices are representative and transferable to the implementing area, 2) provide a schedule for periodic effectiveness demonstrations and evaluations and 3) properly size, operate, and maintain FCSs and partial capture devices consistent with sizing, operation, and maintenance schedules used to determine their effectiveness.
CCompliance Approach The completion of the City of Arcadia’s 201 DGR study has demonstrated the City is in compliance with Approach #3. For the most recent reporting year of 201 -201 Arcadia reported a 99. % compliance level.
Requirements for Compliance Approach #3 and City Compliance Status Pursuant to the Amendment to the Los Angeles River Watershed Trash TMDL, responsible jurisdictions may achieve compliance with the final WLA when they:
“…employ institutional controls or a combination of full capture systems, partial capture systems, and institutional controls [which result in a] reduction of trash from the jurisdiction’s baseline load…between 99% and 100% as calculated using a mass balance approach, and the [trash capture] devices are properly sized, operated, and maintained.”
The City’s WLA reduction is between 99% and 100% City Status: For the most recent reporting year of 201 -201 Arcadia reported a 99. % compliance level. This was verified with the Daily Generation Rate study during the summer of 201 , explained in Attachment A. 2
Summary of Full Capture Systems, Partial Capture Systems, and Institutional Controls The results obtained during the 201 DGR study indicated an effective implementation of institutional control measures such as anti-littering statutes, enhanced street sweeping, catch basin cleaning, trash/recycling pick-up, public outreach, and community clean-up programs. Additionally, the newly adopted Los Angeles County Bag Ban coincides with the City’s Ordinance that prohibits single-use plastic bags. Details on this measure, as well as a quantification of its potential benefits, is included in Attachment C. Summaries of all remaining implemented Institutional Controls are also included in Attachment B3. The City of Arcadia expects a similar reduction through the continued implementation of its plastic bag ban.
The City has installed 23 full-capture screens in city-owned catch basins large enough to accommodate them. The City has also installed ten (10) ARS partial capture systems which are assigned 86% efficiency in catch basins . Together, these capture devices account for approximately 91. % of the city–owned catch basins located in Arcadia.
2 Attachment A City of Arcadia, Daily Generation Rate Study 2013 Attachment B City of Arcadia, Currently Implemented Institutional Controls
2
City of Arcadia Resolution No. R15-006 Compliance Approach #3
CCharacterization Daily Generation Rate The Daily Generation Rate (DGR) method is identified in the 2007 LAR Trash TMDL as a method for measuring the effectiveness of the institutional control measures. This method uses a mass balance approach based on a daily trash generation rate for representative drainage areas in the watershed. The DGR study is broken down into two phases, which consists of: 1) physically collecting the trash, and 2) quantifying the collected materials. Collection routes are selected in different designated land-use areas. Representative study areas are selected to include five priority land-use types:
CommercialHigh/Low Density ResidentialIndustrialPublic Facilities and Educational InstitutionsOpen Space and Recreation
At the conclusion of each route, the trash collected from the streets in the commercial, residential, industrial, public facilities/ educational institutions, and open space/recreation areas is delivered directly to a City facility where the trash is quantified per route.
Quantification The collected trash from each individual land-use area is quantified and classified by weighing 5-gallon buckets and sorting the contents into five categories, according to material type.
Plastic: bags, bottles, jugs, StyrofoamPaper: bags, newspaper, scraps, wrappersGlass: bottles, scraps, broken windowsMetal: aluminum, steel, copperOther: cigarette butts, food, cloth, miscellaneous
The visually estimated composition of the trash loads was averaged for each land-use and is summarized in Table 1.
An estimate of the trash produced for each land-use area was calculated by taking the amount of trash collected and extrapolating that value to the remaining number of curb miles for that land-use area. Table 2 lists the DGRs by land use.
Table 1: Trash Collected by Material Type Land Usage Plastic Paper Glass Metal Other Commercial 4 % 47% 0% % % Residential % 5% 0% 5% % Industrial % 4 % % 5% % Public Facilities/Educational Institutions % % 0% % 1 %
Open Space/ Recreation % 3% % % %
3
City of Arcadia Resolution No. R15-006 Compliance Approach #3
The 201 DGR study showed an annual trash discharge into the City’s storm drain system of lbs. This equates to a 99. % reduction of trash from the City’s baseline WLA. The city will continue to maintain structural and institutional controls and anticipates a compliance level above 99% in the future. Together, the mass balance approach coupled with structural catch basin compliance and institutional control measures demonstrate that the City has effectively met the compliance target of the Los Angeles River Trash TMDL.
CContinued Compliance Following the recommendation in Section 2.2 of the June 15, 2015, LARWQCB Staff Report, Reconsideration of Certain Technical Matters of the Trash TMDLs for the Los Angeles River Watershed and the Ballona Creek Watershed, the City requests to “reduce the frequency of DGR calculations from annually to once every five years as long as there are no reductions in implementation of partial capture devices and institutional controls over the time period and no significant changes in land use that would render the last DGR calculation unrepresentative of current land uses and trash controls within the agency’s jurisdiction.”
The 201 DGR Study coupled with structural catch basin compliance and institutional controls demonstrates that the City of Arcadia has met the compliance target of the Los Angeles River Final Trash TMDL. The City’s continued effort coupled with the current compliance level effectively meets the 100% load reduction.
Table 2: Daily Generation Rates by Land Use Land Usage DGR per Curb Mile (lbs/mile)
Commercial 0. Residential 0.0 Industrial 0. Public Facilities/ Educational Institutions 0.2 Open Space/ Recreation 0.1
4
DAILY GENERATION RATE STUDY December 15, 201
Prepared by:
_________________________ 6131 Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite 300
Buena Park, CA 90620 (562) 802-7880
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ………………………………………………………………………………. 2
TMDL Background ………………………………………………………………………………. 2
County Baseline & Waste Load Allocations ………………………………………………………… 3
Daily Generation Rate …………………………………………………………………………… 3
Field Collection …………………………………………………………………………..... 3
Quantification ……………………………………………………………………………… 3
Measuring ………………………………………………………………………………….. 4
Disposal ……………………………………………………………………………………. 4
Results …………………………………………………………………….……………… 4
Characterization …………………………………………………………………………… 4
DGR Per Land-Use Area ……………………………………………………………………. 4
Trash Discharge Levels …………………………………………………………………………… 4
Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………………………. 5
DGR Calculations………………………………………………………………………………… 6
Figures
Area of Study ……………………………………………………………………………… 9
Commercial Area Route …………………………………………………………………… 10
Residential Area Route ……………………………………………………………............ 10
Industrial Area Route ……………………………………………………………………… 11
Public / Educational Facilities Area Route ..………………………………………………… 11
Open Space/ Recreation Area Route .………..…………………………………………….. 12
1
This report summarizes the activities and findings of the Daily Generation Rate (DGR) study, which was conducted in the City of Arcadia (City) during the summer of 201 . The calculated DGR is used to assess the City’s efforts to comply with the Trash Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for the Los Angeles River. The TMDL requires that by September 30, 2016, all municipal permittees reduce trash discharges to the Los Angeles River by 100% from their Baseline Waste Load Allocation (BWLA). However, the 2015 Los Angeles River Trash TMDL Amendment provides permittees several other options to demonstrate compliance. The City’s strategy for compliance is based on Approach #3, which includes all of the following—full exploitation of the capture systems, evaluation of institutional controls, and a waste load allocation (WLA) reduction greater than 99%. The results of the study discussed herein indicate that the City is in compliance with the Trash TMDL for this year.
The Los Angeles River Trash TMDL was adopted by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) in August 2007. Subsequently, in December 2009, the RWQCB voted to incorporate the Los Angeles River Trash TMDL into the Municipal Stormwater Permit to make the numerical trash limits enforceable. The Trash TMDL established a nine-year schedule for reducing trash discharges from sources along the Los Angeles River to meet the numeric target of zero trash in the water. The baseline Waste Load Allocation (WLA) or starting point for reductions, assigned to the City by the Trash TMDL is 93,036 pounds—by September 30, 2016, the TMDL required that all Permittees reduce their Waste Load Allocation (WLA) by 100%. However, an Amendment to the Trash TMDL (Resolution No. 15-006), approved by the Regional Board on June 11, 2016, provides alternate approaches to demonstrate compliance.
The DGR Study consisted of two phases: first the field collection of trash, and then its quantification. Collection routes were selected in different designated land-use areas. Representative study areas were selected to include five priority land-use types:
CommercialHigh/Low Density ResidentialIndustrialPublic Facilities and Educational InstitutionsOpen Space and Recreation
Once the land-use areas were designated, a manual pick-up was performed. To facilitate this process, a pick-up reaching tool was used. Pieces of trash ¼ of an inch and greater were collected, anything smaller than that is not subject to the Trash TMDL.
At the conclusion of each collection activity, the trash collected from the different land use areas was delivered to a City facility where the trash was quantified Picture 1: Trash being collected
2
per route. The collected street litter was placed in separate piles to avoid mixing. Precise curb miles and collection routes are located on pages 11-13 and are summarized in the following table.
This phase took place at a City facility and consisted of evaluating and weighing the trash. The loads of trash were transported from the designated routes and separated into the individual land-use areas.
This study used the definition of litter as defined by the California Government Code Section 68055.1(g):
“Litter means all improperly discarded waste material, including, but not limited to, convenience food, beverage, and other product packages or containers constructed of steel, aluminum, glass, paper, plastic, and other natural and synthetic materials, thrown or deposited on the lands and water of the state, but not including the properly discarded waste of the primary processing of agriculture, mining, logging, sawmilling or manufacturing.”
Since trash was collected using a manual pick-up procedure, the discerning field staff gathered trash as defined above, which avoided the need to sort and separate green waste from anthropogenic trash. The collected trash from each individual land-use area was then manually quantified and classified using the following procedures:
1. Gardening gloves were utilized to grab the trash, from only one specificload, and placed onto 5-gallon buckets.
2. The bucket was suspended from a hand-held device that measured thetotal weight. The weight of the bucket was subtracted.
3. The trash was sorted into five categories, according to material content/type, and approximately quantified(by percent).
Standard safety precautions were followed during the trash weighing process. This process was repeated for the remainder of the loads of trash. Trash collected from each area was quantified separately. All piles were kept separated as a quality control measure to avoid combining the trash from the five different areas.
A digital scale was used to weigh the trash, and a 5-gallon bucket was used to estimate an approximate volume of trash. Each full bucket of anthropogenic trash was analyzed separately and was sorted and characterized by the different type of constituents.
Data collected from the above process is summarized in the following table:
Land Usage Estimated Total
Curb Miles DesignatedCurb Miles
Field Collection Dates
Commercial 19.8 2
Residential 251.8 9
Industrial 6.5 1
Public Facilities/ Education Institutions 7.1 1
Open Space/ Recreation 6.6 1
July –Aug. 2
2 –Aug. th
–Aug. th
July –Aug. 2
July Aug. 2
Table 1: Land Usage Miles
Picture 2: Weighing the trash.
3
The characterization of trash was done by separating it according to the following constituents:
Plastic: bags, bottles, jugs, StyrofoamPaper: bags, newspaper, scraps, wrappersGlass: bottles, scraps, broken windowsMetal: aluminum, steel, copperOther: cigarette butts, food, cloth, miscellaneous
The visually estimated composition of the trash loads was averaged for each land-use and is summarized in the following table:
An estimate of the trash produced for each land-use area was calculated by taking the amount of trash collected for the study and extrapolating that value to the remaining number of curb miles for that land-use area. The DGR was then determined by converting the trash per week (dependent on street sweeper’s schedule) to trash collected per day. The final DGR value represents the amount of the trash generated for the entire city per day.
The annual amount of trash that is being discharged into the storm drain system on a yearly basis was determined using the DGR values and the number of rain events during the year.
Land Usage Designated Curb Miles
Trash (lbs)
Days Since Last Street Sweeping
Commercial 2 1 6
Residential 9 . 9 6
Industrial 1 .
6
Public Facilities/Educational Institutions
1
6
Open Space/ Recreation 1 . 6
Totals 14 4
Table 2: Trash Collected per Land Usage Area
Land Usage Plastic Paper Glass Metal Other
Commercial 4 % 47% 0% % %
Residential % 5% 0% 5% %
Industrial % 4 % % % %
Public Facilities/Educational Institutions % % 0% % 1 %
Open Space/ Recreation % 3% 1% % %
Table 3: Composition
4
The stormwater trash discharge for a given rain eventwas calculated by multiplying the number of days since the last street sweeping by the DGR. The average number days between a rain event and last street sweeping was estimated to be . for all areas since street sweeping takes place weekly. The estimated weight of trash draining to catch basins during rain events was obtained by multiplying the average number of days between a rain event and the last street sweeping by the DGR values. The annual weight of trash draining to the catch basins was estimated by multiplying calculated values by the total number of rain occurrences during the 201 -201 season ( rain events recorded41). These annual values were the estimated amount of trash being discharged into the
storm drain system but does not account for the total amount of trash that was removed by the City and/or the County of Los Angeles Flood Control District during catch basin cleanouts. The final discharge was considered to be the worst-case scenario for the maximum annual weight of trash draining to catch basins from rain events.
Table 5 shows the calculated amount of trash washed into the storm drain system in the 201 -201 season.
Table 5: Stormwater Trash Discharge
The city’s estimated Total Storm Year Trash Discharge was pounds. The baseline waste load allocation for Arcadia is 93,036 pounds, so this accounts for a WLA reduction of 99. %. Since the City’s WLA reduction for the year is greater than 99%, Arcadia fulfills Criterion 1 of Compliance Approach #3
4Value obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Weather Service. Only rain events greater than 0.25 inch were considered
Land Usage Total
Discharge (lbs.)
Commercial 1
Residential
Industrial 1
Public Facilities/Educational Institutions 6
Open Space/ Recreation
Total
Land Usage DGR
(lbs/day)
DGR / Curb Mile
(lbs./mi)
Commercial
Residential .9
Industrial .
Public Facilities/ Educational
. 0.2
Open Space/ Recreation
.
.
Table 4: DGR
5
6
WI= lbs. Weight of trash collected for industrial area during 30-day study
CI= 1.0 mi Total industrial curb miles per round (5 rounds total)
TI= Total industrial curb miles
LS= Number of days of study
Weight (lbs.) per day =
DGR =
WI LS CI TI
lbs./day
WE= lbs. Weight of trash collected for public/educational area during 30-day study
CE= 1.0 mi Total public/educational curb miles per round (5 rounds total)
TE= Total public/educational curb miles
Ls= Number of days of study
Weight (lbs.) per day =
DGR =
WE LS CE TE
lbs./day
7
WO= lbs. Weight of trash collected for open space/rec area during 30-day study
CO= 1 mi Total open space/rec area curb miles per round (5 rounds total)
TO= Total open space/rec curb miles
Ls= Number of days of study
Weight (lbs.) per day = WO LS CO TO
DGR = lbs./day
8
9
Study Mileage: 9.0 curb miles (i.e. survey boths sides of street)
Study Mileage: 2.0 curb miles (i.e. survey both sides of street)
10
Study Mileage: 1.0 curb miles (i.e. survey one side of street)
Study Mileage: 1.0 curb miles (i.e. survey one side of street) 11
Study Mileage: 1.0 curb miles (i.e. survey 0.84 curb miles of one side of street, plus 0.16 curb miles of other side of street)
12
Attachment B- Currently Implemented Institutional Controls
Currently Implemented Institutional Controls Compliance Approach #3 requires “institutional controls shall be deemed in compliance with the final WLA when the reduction of trash from the jurisdiction’s baseline load is between 99% and 100%”. Listed below is an inventory of currently implemented institutional controls. The effectiveness of these institutional controls is demonstrated through the City’s 201 Daily Generation Rate Study.
Proposed Plastic Bag Ban Ordinance The City of Arcadia prohibits single-use plastic bags. The City hosted a Plastic Bag Ban Workshop on Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at the Council Chambers, where the Public Works Services Department provided details of the program and solicited input on the proposed Plastic Bag Ban Ordinance. Several more workshops are proposed to educate the public on the ban.
There is quantitative evidence of the effectiveness of these bans on decreasing trash discharge to the storm drain system. The City of Los Angeles’ “Quantification Study of Institutional Measures for Trash TMDL Compliance 2012-2013” is an assessment of the City of Los Angeles’ institutional measures and their effectiveness. The study discusses the decrease in the percentage of plastics during trash clean-up events since 2009. The ban on plastic bags is believed to have had a substantial impact; “During Year 1 of this Study (summer 2012), over 1,700 single use plastic grocery bags were collected; however, in Year 2 (summer 2013), just over 850 plastic bags were found within the Study areas, representing a 51 percent reduction in number of items. This number is expected to continue to drop as the City complies with the new ordinance.”
The City of Arcadia expects a similar reduction through the continued implementation of its plastic bag ban.
Sweeping The City of Arcadia sweeps the entire city each week, except private streets and streets without a curb and gutter.
Public Outreach The City provides and produces stormwater pollution prevention outreach materials addressing trash pollution through the following: print and social media (brochures, newsletters, bill inserts, and City website), environmental booths during City-sponsored events, and annual business and K-12 school outreach campaigns. During outreach events, city staff demonstrates an interactive enviroscape display that allows residents to see how pollutants such as trash, oils, and pet waste drain to our waterways. Stormwater materials are also distributed annually to local businesses and to all K-12 schools during Earth Day.
Residential Trash Collection The City of Arcadia contracts with Waste Management Inc. for residential and multi-family trash and recycling collection services. Residential trash is collected every Wednesday. Additionally, large bins are available for residents to help dispose of waste from home remodeling, major landscaping, roofing, etc.
1
Attachment B- Currently Implemented Institutional Controls
Household Generated Special Materials Program Waste Management Inc. offers residents of Arcadia a home pick-up collection service for household special items such as used motor oil, old cans of paint, and electronic waste. Through this program, residents can schedule a collection of these materials. Residents are allowed up to 3 collections per year.
Bulky Item Program Waste Management Inc. offers four free bulky item pickups per calendar year for each single-family residential account. Multi-family residents are allowed two free bulky item pickups per calendar year for each multi-family residential account.
Commercial Refuse Collection The City has three permitted commercial haulers to assist with refuse and recycling needs: Republic Services, Waste Management Inc., and Valley Vista Services. Commercial business refuse collection is provided separately from residential refuse collection.
Used Motor Oil Recycling The City of Arcadia has five (5) Used Oil Collection Centers located citywide. In addition, the City provides free used oil containers, funnels and oil change mats to all Arcadia residents at our collection centers and the Public Works Services Department, located at 11800 Goldring Rd, Arcadia
2
Part
7.1.
C(1
)(b)(2
)L.
A. C
ount
y M
S4 P
erm
itC
ity o
f Arc
adia
Annu
al R
epor
t (D
ec-2
017)
Inst
itutio
nal C
ontro
lsSu
mm
ary
Com
plia
nce
Rep
ort
D
ate:
12/
15/2
017
Rep
ortin
g Pe
riod:
201
6-20
17Pr
epar
ed b
y JL
HA
Col
. 1C
ol. 2
Col
. 3C
ol. 4
Col
. 5
Rep
ortin
g Pe
riod
Tota
l Tra
sh
Dis
char
ged
(lb. o
r ga
l.)Ef
fluen
t Lim
itatio
n
(lb. o
r gal
.)C
ompl
ianc
eC
omm
ents
31-O
ct-1
51,
139
3,07
098
.78%
31-O
ct-1
675
60
99.1
9%
31-O
ct-1
752
80
99.4
3%Th
is y
ear's
stu
dy in
dica
tes
that
the
City
is w
ithin
a 9
9.43
per
cent
co
mpl
ianc
e le
vel.
See
atta
ched
Alte
rnat
ive
Com
plia
nce
Plan
.
Bas
elin
e W
aste
Loa
d A
lloca
tion
93,0
36
Nota
tions
:Fo
rmC
ontin
ue to
add
to th
is fo
rm fo
r eac
h an
nual
repo
rting
per
iod
Col
umn
1:R
epor
ting
Perio
d: P
art 7
.1.(C
)(1) o
f Ord
er N
o. 0
1-18
2 as
am
ende
d by
Ord
er N
o. R
4-20
09-0
130
Col
umn
2:As
cal
cula
ted
purs
uant
to P
art 7
.1.(B
)(1)(b
)(2) o
f Ord
er N
o. 0
1-18
2 as
am
ende
d by
Ord
er N
o. R
4-20
09-0
130
Alte
rnat
ive
appr
oach
es p
er P
art 7
.1.(B
)(1)(b
)(3) m
ust b
e ap
prov
ed in
adv
ance
by
the
Exec
utiv
e O
ffice
rC
olum
n 3:
Efflu
ent L
imita
tion
per P
art 7
.1, A
ppen
dix
7-1,
Tab
le 1
a or
1b,
of O
rder
No.
01-
182
as a
men
ded
by O
rder
No.
R4-
2009
-013
0C
olum
n 4:
Com
plia
nce
- Yes
, if t
otal
sto
rm y
ear t
rash
dis
char
ge is
less
than
or e
qual
to a
pplic
able
Inte
rim o
r Fin
al E
fflue
nt L
imita
tion
Col
umn
5:Pr
ovid
e co
mm
ents
, if n
eces
saryTo
tal S
torm
Yea
r Tra
sh D
isch
arge
by
Rep
ortin
g Pe
riod
Form
CI6
948
PCIC
Rep
ort 1
, 8/2
010
Page
1 o
f 13
Part 7.1.C(1)(b)(2)L.A. County MS4 PermitCity of ArcadiaAnnual Report (Dec-2017)
Institutional ControlsTotal Storm Year Trash Discharge
Date: 12/15/2017Reporting Period: 2016-2017
Prepared by JLHA
Arcadia 2.1 NNE, Pasadena 1.8 E
Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 Col. 7 Col. 8
DGR
Date of Last Street
SweepingDate of Storm
EventPrecipitation
Depth Days
Amount of Trash
Recovered from Catch
Basins
Storm Event Trash
Discharge Comments12.9 11/16/16 11/21/16 0.82 4.5 0 58.312.9 11/22/16 11/27/16 0.31 4.4 0 57.012.9 12/13/16 12/16/16 1.95 2.5 0 32.412.9 01/02/17 01/05/17 0.59 3 0 38.812.9 01/04/17 01/09/17 0.80 4.5 0 58.312.9 01/09/17 01/10/17 0.87 0.9 0 11.712.9 01/10/17 01/11/17 2.12 0.9 0 11.712.9 01/11/17 01/12/17 1.32 0.9 0 11.712.9 01/12/17 01/13/17 0.82 0.9 0 11.712.9 01/16/17 01/19/17 0.83 2.8 0 36.312.9 01/19/17 01/20/17 0.54 0.9 0 11.712.9 01/20/17 01/21/17 1.53 1 0 12.912.9 01/21/17 01/23/17 2.88 1.7 0 22.012.9 01/23/17 01/24/17 0.54 0.9 0 11.712.9 02/01/17 02/06/17 0.52 4.5 0 58.312.9 02/22/17 02/26/17 0.31 4 0 51.812.9 02/26/17 02/27/17 0.81 0.9 0 11.712.9 03/20/17 3/22/17 0.26 1.6 0 20.7
Total Storm Year Trash Discharge 528
Notations:Form Add additional rows for storm events, if necessaryRainfall Station Name of rainfall station used, indicate only the L.A. County station number Total Storm Year Trash Discharge = Sum of individual storm event discharges for reporting period (October 1 - September 30).
Col. 1Col. 2 Date of last street sweepingCol. 3Col. 4 Depth of rainfall taken from nearest rainfall station (in.)Col. 5
Col. 6 Amount of trash recovered from catchbasins, if any (lb. or gal.)Col. 7Col. 8 Provide comments, if necessary
Rainfall Station Total Trash Discharged by Storm Event
Storm Event Discharge = Col. 1 x Col. 5 - Col. 7 [trash discharged by the storm event],
Date of storm event with 0.25 inch or more of rainfall
DGR for Jurisdiction from DGR Sampling Data worksheet
Like most cities, the entire City of Arcadia is not swept in one day. Approximately equal parts of the City are swept weekly, Monday through Friday. Thus during any given rain event, different parts of the City were swept between 1 to 7 days previously. Rainfall data was collected from the closest rainfall station. In cases where rainfall station data was missing for a particular storm, the next closest rainfall station was used. Using the DGR of 12.9 lbs, and accounting for the week-long process to clean all areas of the City, the storm event trash discharge equates to an approximate discharge of 29.4 lbs per rain event. This accounts for a total storm year trash discharge of 528 lbs.
Number of days between date of last street sweeping and storm event. For each day of a storm event that generates precipitation greater than 0.25 inch, the Permittee shall calculate a storm event discharge. When more than one storm event occurs prior to the next street sweeping the discharge shall be calculated from the date of the last storm event discharge calculation.
Form CI6948 PCIC Wksht 2, 8/2010 Page 2 of 13
Part
7.1.
C(1
)(b)(2
)L.
A. C
ount
y M
S4 P
erm
itC
ity o
f Arc
adia
Annu
al R
epor
t (D
ec-2
017)
Inst
itutio
nal C
ontro
ls
Wor
kshe
et -
DG
R S
ampl
ing
Dat
a D
ate:
12/
15/2
017
Prep
ared
by
JLH
A
Col
. 1C
ol. 2
Col
. 3C
ol. 4
Col
. 5C
ol. 6
Col
. 7C
ol. 8
Col
. 9C
ol. 1
0
Land
Use
Cat
egor
y
Tota
l Are
a w
ithin
Ju
risdi
ctio
n
Rep
rese
ntat
ive
Area
for D
GR
C
alcu
latio
n
Dat
e of
Las
t St
reet
Sw
eepi
ngD
ate
of D
GR
Sa
mpl
ing
Leng
th o
f C
olle
ctio
n Pe
riod
Tras
h C
olle
ctio
n fro
m
Rep
rese
ntat
ive
Area
(lb.
or
gal.)
Tras
h C
lean
ed
Out
from
C
atch
basi
n(s)
w
ithin
the
Rep
rese
ntat
ive
Area
(lb.
or g
al.)
Tota
l Am
ount
of
Tra
sh
Gen
erat
ed in
re
pres
enta
tive
area
Tota
l Tra
sh G
ener
ated
with
in
Rep
rese
ntat
ive
Area
Com
mer
cial
19
.82
07/2
5/17
7/31
/17
63.
310
3.31
08/0
1/17
8/7/
176
3.50
03.
5008
/08/
178/
14/1
76
0.94
00.
9408
/15/
178/
21/1
76
0.94
00.
9408
/22/
178/
28/1
76
1.31
01.
31To
tal D
ays:
303.
30
Hig
h/Lo
w D
ensi
ty
Res
iden
tial
251.
89
07/2
7/17
8/2/
176
0.25
00.
25
08/0
3/17
8/9/
176
0.31
00.
31
08/1
0/17
8/16
/17
61.
310
1.31
08/1
7/17
8/23
/17
62.
060
2.06
08/2
4/17
8/30
/17
60.
250
0.25
3.91
Tota
l Day
s:30
Indu
stria
l6.
51
07/2
7/17
8/2/
176
2.63
02.
6308
/03/
178/
9/17
63.
440
3.44
08/1
0/17
8/16
/17
62.
690
2.69
08/1
7/17
8/23
/17
63.
190
3.19
08/2
4/17
8/30
/17
63.
560
3.56
Tota
l Day
s:30
3.36
Publ
ic/E
duca
tiona
l Fa
cilit
ies
7.1
107
/25/
177/
31/1
76
0.44
00.
4408
/01/
178/
7/17
61.
000
1.00
08/0
8/17
8/14
/17
61.
810
1.81
08/1
5/17
8/21
/17
62.
380
2.38
08/2
2/17
8/28
/17
61.
380
1.38
1.66
Tota
l Day
s:30
Ope
n Sp
ace/
Rec
6.6
107
/25/
177/
31/1
76
0.31
00.
3108
/01/
178/
7/17
60.
880
0.88
08/0
8/17
8/14
/17
60.
380
0.38
08/1
5/17
8/21
/17
60.
690
0.69
08/2
2/17
8/28
/17
61.
060
1.06
0.73
Tota
l Day
s:30
Tota
l Are
a29
1.8
14To
tal T
rash
(lbs
)40
.012
.95
Note
s:* T
otal
col
lect
ion
perio
d m
ust e
qual
30
days
for e
ach
repr
esen
tativ
e la
nd u
se a
rea.
Col
. 1La
nd U
se C
ateg
ory
- Cat
egor
ies
base
d on
Bas
elin
e M
onito
ring
Prog
ram
con
duct
ed b
y LA
CD
PW b
asel
ine
mon
itorin
g gr
oup.
Alte
rnat
ivel
y, d
escr
ibe
land
use
type
as
desi
gnat
ed b
y th
e C
ity.
Col
. 2To
tal a
rea
of s
aid
land
use
with
in ju
risdi
ctio
n (fi
ll in
onc
e in
gra
y-hi
ghlig
hted
row
for e
ach
land
use
cat
egor
y). T
otal
are
a m
ay b
e ac
coun
ted
for u
sing
oth
er a
ppro
ved
mea
sure
men
t uni
ts, e
.g. c
urb
mile
s.C
ol. 3
Rep
rese
ntat
ive
area
for D
GR
cal
cula
tion
(fill
in o
nce
in g
ray-
high
light
ed ro
w fo
r eac
h la
nd u
se c
ateg
ory)
. Rep
rese
ntat
ive
area
may
be
acco
unte
d fo
r usi
ng o
ther
app
rove
d m
easu
rem
ent
units
, e.g
. cur
b m
iles.
Col
lect
ivel
y, th
e ar
eas
used
for D
GR
cal
cula
tion
shou
ld b
e re
pres
enta
tive,
pro
porti
onal
ly, o
f the
land
use
s w
ithin
the
juris
dict
ion
and
mus
t be
appr
oved
by
the
EO p
rior t
o th
e 30
-day
col
lect
ion
perio
d.C
ol. 4
Dat
e of
last
stre
et s
wee
ping
Col
. 5D
ate
of D
GR
sam
plin
g (d
irect
mea
sure
men
t of d
epos
ited
trash
) - T
he D
GR
col
lect
ion
perio
d(s)
mus
t fal
l bet
wee
n Ju
ne 2
2nd
and
Sept
embe
r 22n
dC
ol. 6
Leng
th o
f Col
lect
ion
Perio
d in
day
s - T
he D
GR
col
lect
ion
perio
d m
ust b
e 30
day
s, to
tal,
for e
ach
repr
esen
tativ
e la
nd u
se a
rea
Col
. 7Tr
ash
colle
ctio
n fro
m re
pres
enta
tive
area
thro
ugh
stre
et s
wee
ping
or o
ther
met
hod,
lb. o
r gal
.C
ol. 8
Tras
h cl
eane
d ou
t fro
m c
atch
basi
ns w
ithin
the
repr
esen
tativ
e ar
ea (l
b. o
r gal
.). T
rash
acc
umul
ated
in th
e C
Bs d
urin
g th
e D
GR
col
lect
ion
perio
d m
ust b
e in
clud
ed in
the
tota
l tra
sh g
ener
ated
.W
here
CBs
are
clo
sed
off s
uch
that
no
trash
can
ent
er th
em fo
r the
pur
pose
of D
GR
sam
plin
g, th
is v
alue
will
be
zero
(0).
Col
. 9To
tal a
mou
nt o
f tra
sh g
ener
ated
in re
pres
enta
tive
area
(sum
of C
ol. 7
and
Col
. 8),
lb. o
r gal
.C
ol. 1
0To
tal T
rash
Gen
erat
ed w
ithin
Rep
rese
ntat
ive
Area
(est
imat
ed in
30
day
perio
d)C
ol. 1
1Pr
ovid
e co
mm
ents
, if n
eces
sary
Not
e: S
ampl
ing
mus
t be
cond
ucte
d du
ring
any
30-d
ay p
erio
d, s
tarti
ng J
une
22nd
thro
ugh
Sept
embe
r 22n
d of
eac
h ye
ar.
DGR
(lbs/
day)
Tras
h C
olle
ctio
n fo
r Cal
cula
tion
of D
aily
Gen
erat
ion
Rat
e, D
GR
Col
. 11
Com
men
ts
Com
mer
cial
are
as s
wep
t wee
kly.
DG
R s
ampl
ing
colle
cted
by
hand
(Mon
day)
, and
prio
r to
stre
et
swee
ping
act
iviti
es (T
uesd
ay).
Res
iden
tial a
rea
swep
t wee
kly.
DG
R s
ampl
ing
colle
cted
by
hand
(Wed
nesd
ay),
and
prio
r to
stre
et
swee
ping
act
iviti
es (T
hurs
day)
.
Indu
stria
l are
a sw
ept w
eekl
y. D
GR
sam
plin
g co
llect
ed b
y ha
nd (W
edne
sday
), an
d pr
ior t
o st
reet
sw
eepi
ng a
ctiv
ities
(Thu
rsda
y).
Publ
ic &
Edu
catio
nal f
acilit
y ar
eas
swep
t wee
kly.
DG
R s
ampl
ing
colle
cted
by
hand
(Mon
day)
, and
pr
ior t
o st
reet
sw
eepi
ng a
ctiv
ities
(Tue
sday
).
Ope
n Sp
ace
& R
ecre
atio
nal a
reas
sw
ept w
eekl
y. D
GR
sam
plin
g co
llect
ed b
y ha
nd (M
onda
y), a
nd
prio
r to
stre
et s
wee
ping
act
iviti
es (T
uesd
ay).
Form
CI6
948
PCIC
Wks
ht 3
, 8/2
010
Page
3 o
f 13
Part
7.1.
C(1
)(a)-
L.A.
Cou
nty
MS4
Per
mit
City
of A
rcad
iaAn
nual
Rep
ort (
Dec
-201
7)
Com
plia
nce
Sum
mar
y R
epor
t:C
ertif
ied
Full
Cap
ture
Sys
tem
sD
ate:
12/
15/2
017
Rep
ortin
g Ye
ar: 2
016-
2017
Prep
ared
by:
JLH
A
Col
. 1C
ol. 2
Col
. 3C
ol. 4
Col
. 5C
ol. 6
Col
. 7C
ol. 8
Col
. 9C
ol. 1
0
Rep
ortin
g Pe
riod
Tota
l Are
a
Tota
l Are
a se
rved
by
FCD
s
Perc
enta
ge
of A
rea
serv
ed b
y FC
Ds
Tota
l #
City
-O
wne
d C
BsTo
tal #
CBs
ser
ved
by F
CD
s an
d PC
Ds
Perc
enta
ge o
f C
Bs s
erve
d by
FC
Ds
and
PCD
s
Req
uire
d Tr
ash
Abat
emen
t (%
)C
ompl
ianc
eC
omm
ents
31-O
ct-1
526
123
0 FC
D (8
8%)
10
PC
D (3
%)
91%
96.7
%Ye
s
FCD
CB
loca
tions
add
ress
100
% o
f Tra
sh, c
aptu
ring
88%
(=1.
00x0
.88)
PC
D C
B lo
catio
ns a
ddre
ss 8
6% o
f Tra
sh, c
aptu
ring
3% (=
0.86
x0.0
4)
31-O
ct-1
626
523
4 FC
D (8
8%)
10
PC
D (3
%)
91.5
5%10
0%Ye
s
FCD
CB
loca
tions
add
ress
100
% o
f Tra
sh, c
aptu
ring
88%
(=1.
00x0
.88)
PC
D C
B lo
catio
ns a
ddre
ss 8
6% o
f Tra
sh, c
aptu
ring
3% (=
0.86
x0.0
4)
31-O
ct-1
726
523
4 FC
D (8
8%)
10
PC
D (3
%)
91.5
5%10
0%Ye
s
A to
tal o
f 234
CPS
full
capt
ure
syst
ems
are
thro
ugho
ut th
e C
ity. T
he C
ity h
as a
lso
inst
alle
d te
n AR
S pa
rtial
cap
ture
sys
tem
s w
hich
are
ass
igne
d 86
pe
rcen
t effi
cien
t in
catc
h ba
sins
. Tog
ethe
r, th
ese
capt
ure
devi
ces
acco
unt f
or a
ppro
xim
atel
y 91
.55
perc
ent o
f the
city
-ow
ned
catc
h ba
sins
loca
ted
in
Arca
dia
(88.
3% fr
om F
CD
and
3.2
5% fr
om P
CD
).
Nota
tions
:Fo
rmEi
ther
repo
rt co
mpl
ianc
e us
ing
land
are
a se
rved
by
FCD
s (C
olum
ns 2
thro
ugh
4) o
r num
ber o
f cat
chba
sins
ser
ved
by F
CD
s (C
olum
ns 5
thro
ugh
7).
Con
tinue
to a
dd to
this
form
for e
ach
annu
al re
porti
ng p
erio
dC
olum
n 1:
Rep
ortin
g Pe
riod:
Par
t 7.1
.(C)(1
) of O
rder
No.
01-
182
as a
men
ded
by O
rder
No.
R4-
2009
-013
0C
olum
n 2:
Tota
l lan
d ar
ea o
f jur
isdi
ctio
n (s
quar
e ki
lom
eter
s)C
olum
n 3:
Tota
l lan
d ar
ea o
f jur
isdi
ctio
n se
rved
by
certi
fied
full
capt
ure
devi
ces
(squ
are
kilo
met
ers)
Col
umn
4:Pe
rcen
tage
of t
otal
land
are
a of
juris
dict
ion
serv
ed b
y FC
Ds
(Col
. 4/C
ol. 3
)C
olum
n 5:
Tota
l num
ber o
f cat
chba
sins
(CBs
) with
in ju
risdi
ctio
nC
olum
n 6:
Tota
l num
ber o
f cat
chba
sins
(CBs
) ser
ved
by F
CD
s w
ithin
juris
dict
ion
Col
umn
7:Pe
rcen
tage
of C
Bs s
erve
d by
FC
Ds
with
in ju
risdi
ctio
n (C
ol. 6
/Col
. 5)
Col
umn
8:R
equi
red
Tras
h Ab
atem
ent:
Part
7.1,
App
endi
x 7-
1 of
Ord
er N
o. 0
1-18
2 as
am
ende
d by
Ord
er N
o. R
4-20
09-0
130
Col
umn
9:C
ompl
ianc
e: Y
es, i
f Col
. 4 o
r Col
. 7 is
gre
ater
than
Col
. 8; N
o, if
Col
. 4 o
r Col
. 7 is
less
than
Col
. 8C
olum
n 10
:Pr
ovid
e co
mm
ents
, if n
eces
sary
Form
CI6
948
FCS
Rep
ort 1
, 8/2
010
Page
4 o
f 13
L.A.
Cou
nty
MS4
Per
mit
City
of A
rcad
iaAn
nual
Rep
ort:
Dec
201
7R
epor
ting
year
: FY
2016
-201
7Pr
epar
ed b
y: J
LHA
Col
. 1C
ol. 2
Col
. 4C
ol. 5
Col
. 6C
ol. 9
Tota
l Tra
sh
Dis
char
ged
(lbs.
)Eq
uiva
lent
C
ompl
ianc
e
Tota
l # C
Bs
serv
ed b
y FC
Ds
and
PCD
s
Perc
enta
ge o
f C
Bs s
erve
dby
FC
Ds
/ PC
Ds
Req
uire
d Tr
ash
Abat
emen
t (%
)31
-10-
1431
-10-
15
31-1
0-16
765
99.1
9%23
4 FC
D (8
8%)
10
PC
D (3
%)
91.5
5%Ye
s
31-1
0-17
528
99.4
3%23
4 FC
D (8
8%)
10
PC
D (3
%)
91.5
5%Ye
s
Nota
tions
:
Form
Col
umn
1:C
olum
n 2:
Col
umn
3:C
olum
n 4:
Col
umn
5:C
olum
n 6:
Col
umn
7:C
olum
n 8:
Col
umn
9:C
olum
n 10
:
Col
. 3C
ol. 7
Col
. 8C
ol. 1
0
Rep
ortin
g Pe
riod
Stru
ctur
al C
ontro
l Mea
sure
Tota
l C
ombi
ned
Com
plia
nce
Com
plia
nce
Met
Com
men
ts
Efflu
ent
Lim
itatio
n
010
0%99
.93%
Tota
l num
ber o
f cat
chba
sins
, tot
al n
umbe
r of (
CBs
) ser
ved
by F
CD
/PC
Ds
with
in ju
risdi
ctio
n
Stru
ctur
al C
ontro
l Mea
sure
: Eith
er re
port
com
plia
nce
usin
g la
nd a
rea
serv
ed b
y FC
D/P
CD
s or
num
ber o
f cat
chba
sins
ser
ved
by F
CD
/PC
Ds.
Rep
ortin
g Pe
riod:
Par
t 7.1
.(C)(1
) of O
rder
No.
01-
182
as a
men
ded
by O
rder
No.
R4-
2009
-013
0As
cal
cula
ted
purs
uant
to P
art 7
.1.(B
)(1)(b
)(2) o
f Ord
er N
o. 0
1-18
2 as
am
ende
d by
Ord
er N
o. R
4-20
09-0
130
Alte
rnat
ive
appr
oach
es p
er P
art 7
.1.(B
)(1)(b
)(3) m
ust b
e ap
prov
ed in
adv
ance
by
the
Exec
utiv
e O
ffice
rEf
fluen
t Lim
itatio
n pe
r Par
t 7.1
, App
endi
x 7-
1, T
able
1a
or 1
b, o
f Ord
er N
o. 0
1-18
2 as
am
ende
d by
Ord
er N
o. R
4-20
09-0
130
Com
plia
nce
= 1-
(Col
. 2 /
Base
line
Was
te L
oad
Allo
catio
n)
Perc
enta
ge o
f CBs
ser
ved
by F
CD
/PC
Ds
with
in ju
risdi
ctio
nR
equi
red
Tras
h Ab
atem
ent:
Part
7.1,
App
endi
x 7-
1 of
Ord
er N
o. 0
1-18
2 as
am
ende
d by
Ord
er N
o. R
4-20
09-0
130
Prov
ide
com
men
ts, i
f nec
essa
ry
010
0%99
.95%
A to
tal o
f 234
CPS
full
capt
ure
syst
ems
are
thro
ugho
ut th
e C
ity. T
he C
ity h
as a
lso
inst
alle
d te
n AR
S pa
rtial
cap
ture
sys
tem
s w
hich
are
ass
igne
d 86
per
cent
effi
cien
t in
catc
h ba
sins
. Tog
ethe
r, th
ese
capt
ure
devi
ces
acco
unt f
or a
ppro
xim
atel
y 91
.55
perc
ent o
f the
city
-ow
ned
catc
h ba
sins
lo
cate
d in
Arc
adia
(88.
3% fr
om F
CD
and
3.
25%
from
PC
D).
Tota
l Com
bine
d C
ompl
ianc
e =
(Col
. 6) +
(1.0
-Col
.6)*
(Col
.4)
FCD
Com
plia
nce:
Yes
, if C
ol. 8
is g
reat
er th
an C
ol. 7
Part
7.1
C(1
)(a) -
L.
A. C
ount
y M
S4 P
erm
itC
ity o
f Arc
adia
Annu
al R
epor
t (D
ec-2
017)
Cer
tifie
d Fu
ll C
aptu
re S
yste
ms
Dat
abas
eD
ate
: 12/
15/2
017
Rep
ortin
g ye
ar: 2
016-
2017
Prep
ared
by:
JLH
A
Col
. 1C
ol. 2
Col
. 3C
ol. 4
Col
. 5C
ol. 6
Col
. 7C
ol. 8
Col
. 9C
ol. 1
0C
ol. 1
1C
ertif
ied
FCD
(s)
Inst
alle
dFC
D L
ocat
ion
Nea
rest
Cro
ss S
treet
FCD
Ow
ner
FCD
M
aint
aine
d By
FCD
In
stal
latio
n D
ate
CB
ID N
o.
Serv
ed b
y FC
DC
B Ty
peC
B O
wne
rC
B M
aint
aine
d By
Freq
uenc
y of
FC
D
Mai
nten
ance
and
oth
er
O&M
com
men
tsC
PS14
10 G
reen
oaks
Driv
eC
ITY
CIT
Y1
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
1014
Ora
ngeg
rove
CIT
YC
ITY
2C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS10
55 W
. Foo
thill
CIT
YC
ITY
12C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS11
15 W
. Foo
thill
CIT
YC
ITY
1C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
ly
CPS
East
boun
d Fo
othi
ll ea
st o
f Her
itage
Oak
s (9
8'Ea
st in
Rig
ht o
f W
ay)
CIT
YC
ITY
4C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
ly
CPS
Foot
hill
north
side
acr
oss
from
Her
itage
Oak
sC
ITY
CIT
Y6
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
1036
Raf
ael D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y20
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
1030
Her
itage
Oak
s D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y21
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
1024
Whi
sper
ing
Oak
s D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y22
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
1024
El C
abal
lo D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y23
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
1024
Lom
a Ve
rde
Dr.
CIT
YC
ITY
24C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS10
16 D
on R
icar
do D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y25
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
1023
Don
Pab
lo D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y26
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
830
Sing
ingw
ood
CIT
YC
ITY
4C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS84
1 Si
ngin
gwoo
d D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y5
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
800
Ham
pton
at t
he A
rcad
ia W
ash
CIT
YC
ITY
6C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS82
7 H
ampt
on R
d. a
t the
Arc
adia
Was
hC
ITY
CIT
Y7
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
N/E
cor
ner B
aldw
in a
t Glo
riaC
ITY
CIT
Y9
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
N/W
cor
ner B
aldw
in a
t Ham
pton
CIT
YC
ITY
10C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS70
4 H
ampt
onC
ITY
CIT
Y11
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
1301
Bal
dwin
(on
Ham
pton
)C
ITY
CIT
Y12
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
N/W
cor
ner B
aldw
in /
Anok
iaC
ITY
CIT
Y13
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
Bald
win
at A
noak
iaC
ITY
CIT
Y14
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
Bald
win
at A
noak
iaC
ITY
CIT
Y15
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
ARS
East
Wes
t Ora
nge
Gro
ve P
ark
CIT
YC
ITY
16C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS93
5 Fa
llenl
eaf
CIT
YC
ITY
1C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS92
0 Fa
llenl
eaf
CIT
YC
ITY
2C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS73
0 Ka
ther
ine
Lane
CIT
YC
ITY
3C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSN
/E c
orne
r Bal
dwin
/ Ar
bola
daC
ITY
CIT
Y4
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
N/E
cor
ner B
aldw
in /
Foot
hill
CIT
YC
ITY
5C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
ly
Form
CI6
948
FCS
Dat
abas
e 1,
8/2
010
Page
6 o
f 13
Part
7.1
C(1
)(a) -
L.
A. C
ount
y M
S4 P
erm
itC
ity o
f Arc
adia
Annu
al R
epor
t (D
ec-2
017)
Cer
tifie
d Fu
ll C
aptu
re S
yste
ms
Dat
abas
eD
ate
: 12/
15/2
017
Rep
ortin
g ye
ar: 2
016-
2017
Prep
ared
by:
JLH
A
CPS
N/W
cor
ner B
aldw
in /
Foot
hill
CIT
YC
ITY
6C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSN
/W c
orne
r Foo
thill
/ Bal
dwin
CIT
YC
ITY
7C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
ly
CPS
S/W
cor
ner F
ooth
ill / B
aldw
inC
ITY
CIT
Y8
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
Nor
th s
ide
Foot
hill
betw
een
Old
R
anch
/Don
Dia
blo
CIT
YC
ITY
9C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
ly
CPS
1032
Don
Rob
les
Dr.
CIT
YC
ITY
15C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS10
24 D
on A
lvar
ado
Dr.
CIT
YC
ITY
16C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS10
24 D
on D
iabl
o D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y17
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
1024
Old
Ran
ch R
d.C
ITY
CIT
Y18
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
1024
Eng
lish
Oak
Rd
CIT
YC
ITY
19C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS72
5 C
arria
ge H
ouse
Dr.
CIT
YC
ITY
20C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS72
5 C
arrri
age
Hou
se D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y21
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
719
Car
riage
Hou
se D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y22
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
701
Car
riage
Hou
se D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y23
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
726
Car
riage
Hou
se D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y24
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
728
Car
riage
Hou
se D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y25
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
732
Car
riage
Hou
se D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y26
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
1109
Eng
lem
ann
Ct.
CIT
YC
ITY
27C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS75
3 C
arria
ge H
ouse
Dr.
CIT
YC
ITY
28C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS76
3 C
arria
ge H
ouse
Dr.
CIT
YC
ITY
29C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS12
01 O
akla
wn
Rd.
CIT
YC
ITY
1C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS12
00 O
akla
wn
Rd.
x2
drai
nsC
ITY
CIT
Y2
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
1200
Oak
law
n R
d. x
2 dr
ains
CIT
YC
ITY
3C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS47
6 Ar
bola
da/O
ne a
cros
s fro
m 4
76C
ITY
CIT
Y4
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
476
Arbo
lada
/One
acr
oss
from
476
CIT
YC
ITY
5C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS50
1 Fo
othi
llC
ITY
CIT
Y6
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
501
Foot
hill
CIT
YC
ITY
7C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSN
/W C
orne
r on
Foot
hill
at A
rbol
ada
CIT
YC
ITY
8C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyAR
S43
1 W
. Foo
thill
CIT
YC
ITY
9C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyAR
S34
4 W
. Foo
thill
CIT
YC
ITY
10C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS10
20 L
oma
Lisa
Lan
eC
ITY
CIT
Y11
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
1032
Woo
dacr
e La
neC
ITY
CIT
Y12
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
1014
San
Car
los
Rd.
CIT
YC
ITY
13C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS10
22 A
sder
Lan
eC
ITY
CIT
Y14
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
1014
Bur
nell
Oak
s La
neC
ITY
CIT
Y15
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
290
Sier
ra O
aks
Dr.
CIT
YC
ITY
16C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
ly
Form
CI6
948
FCS
Dat
abas
e 1,
8/2
010
Page
7 o
f 13
Part
7.1
C(1
)(a) -
L.
A. C
ount
y M
S4 P
erm
itC
ity o
f Arc
adia
Annu
al R
epor
t (D
ec-2
017)
Cer
tifie
d Fu
ll C
aptu
re S
yste
ms
Dat
abas
eD
ate
: 12/
15/2
017
Rep
ortin
g ye
ar: 2
016-
2017
Prep
ared
by:
JLH
A
CPS
1026
Lea
ndra
Lan
eC
ITY
CIT
Y17
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
1018
Mer
ry O
ak L
ane
CIT
YC
ITY
18C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS10
17 O
akda
le L
ane
CIT
YC
ITY
19C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
ly
CPS
1015
Cyr
us L
ane
CIT
YC
ITY
20C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS10
18 R
anch
o R
d.C
ITY
CIT
Y21
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
Col
orad
o Pl
. @ E
ast W
ash
CIT
YC
ITY
2C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSN
/W C
orne
r Hun
tingt
on D
r at C
ivic
Cen
ter
CIT
YC
ITY
1C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS23
4 C
ampu
s D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y2
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
290
Cam
pus
Dr.
(W/O
El M
onte
)C
ITY
CIT
Y3
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
290
Cam
pus
Dr.
(W/O
El M
onte
)C
ITY
CIT
Y4
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
376
W H
untin
gton
Dr
CIT
YC
ITY
5C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSAc
ross
from
376
W. H
untin
gton
Driv
eC
ITY
CIT
Y6
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
Wes
tsid
e H
untin
gton
D
r N/O
388
W (e
ast
boun
d H
untin
gton
Dr.)
CIT
YC
ITY
1C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
ly
CPS
Wes
tsid
e H
untin
gton
Dr S
/W e
ntra
nce
CIT
YC
ITY
7C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS18
10 A
nita
Cre
stC
ITY
CIT
Y1
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
1809
Ani
ta C
rest
CIT
YC
ITY
2C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS14
1 Lo
raly
n D
r. (1
36 p
rope
rty li
ne)
CIT
YC
ITY
3C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS12
3 W
Sie
rra M
adre
Blv
d.C
ITY
CIT
Y1
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
S/W
cor
. Sie
rra M
adre
Blv
d. &
Oak
have
nC
ITY
CIT
Y2
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
N/E
Cor
ner W
Sie
rra M
adre
at 1
706
La R
amad
aC
ITY
CIT
Y3
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
1700
N. L
a R
amad
a Av
e. N
/W c
orne
r ac
ross
from
170
6C
ITY
CIT
Y4
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
1611
Oak
have
n D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y5
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
1631
La
Ram
ada
Ave.
CIT
YC
ITY
6C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS16
30 O
akw
ood
Ave.
CIT
YC
ITY
31C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS16
31 O
akw
ood
Ave.
CIT
YC
ITY
32C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS13
43 O
akw
ood
Dr.
CIT
YC
ITY
1C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS36
Ont
are
Rd.
CIT
YC
ITY
2C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS23
0 W
Hac
iend
a - A
cros
s St
reet
from
CIT
YC
ITY
5C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSS/
O 2
10 F
rwy
Cen
ter M
edia
n (e
asts
ide)
CIT
YC
ITY
11C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyAR
SS/
O 2
10 F
rwy
Cen
ter M
edia
n (w
ests
ide)
CIT
YC
ITY
12C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSS/
side
Foo
thill
at W
ash
betw
een
Ran
cho/
Rod
eoC
ITY
CIT
Y21
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
11 E
. For
est (
wes
t of S
anta
Ani
ta) 1
22 W
est o
f 11
EC
ITY
CIT
Y1
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
Form
CI6
948
FCS
Dat
abas
e 1,
8/2
010
Page
8 o
f 13
Part
7.1
C(1
)(a) -
L.
A. C
ount
y M
S4 P
erm
itC
ity o
f Arc
adia
Annu
al R
epor
t (D
ec-2
017)
Cer
tifie
d Fu
ll C
aptu
re S
yste
ms
Dat
abas
eD
ate
: 12/
15/2
017
Rep
ortin
g ye
ar: 2
016-
2017
Prep
ared
by:
JLH
A
CPS
N/E
Cor
. On
Sant
a An
ita a
t 210
Fre
eway
CIT
YC
ITY
5C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSSa
nta
Anita
at 2
10 F
reew
ayC
ITY
CIT
Y8
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
N/W
Foo
thill
/ Ran
cho
CIT
YC
ITY
14C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
ly
CPS
N/W
Foo
thill
/ Ran
cho
CIT
YC
ITY
15C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSS/
W F
ooth
ill / R
anch
oC
ITY
CIT
Y16
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
S/W
Foo
thill
/ Ran
cho
CIT
YC
ITY
17C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSN
/sid
e Fo
othi
ll at
Was
h be
twee
n R
anch
o/R
odeo
CIT
YC
ITY
19C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSS/
side
Foo
thill
at W
ash
betw
een
Ran
cho/
Rod
eoC
ITY
CIT
Y20
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
823
Rod
eoC
ITY
CIT
Y22
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
Tind
alo
CIT
YC
ITY
23C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSR
anch
o R
oad
CIT
YC
ITY
24C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSR
anch
o R
oad
CIT
YC
ITY
25C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSR
anch
o R
oad
at F
ooth
illC
ITY
CIT
Y26
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
Ran
cho
Roa
dC
ITY
CIT
Y27
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
Ran
cho
Roa
d at
Foo
thill
CIT
YC
ITY
28C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS20
1 W
. Col
orad
o Pl
CIT
YC
ITY
1C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSC
olor
ado
Blvd
. Wes
t of S
anta
Ros
aC
ITY
CIT
Y2
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
Col
orad
o Bl
vd. W
est o
f San
ta R
osa
CIT
YC
ITY
3C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSC
olor
ado
Blvd
. Wes
t of S
anta
Ros
aC
ITY
CIT
Y4
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
Col
orad
o Bl
vd. W
est o
f San
ta R
osa
CIT
YC
ITY
5C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS20
1 W
. Col
orad
o Pl
CIT
YC
ITY
35C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSC
olor
ado
Blvd
. W.o
f S.A
. und
er R
/R o
verp
ass
CIT
YC
ITY
7C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS35
Cor
nell
Dr.
& W
inds
or R
dC
ITY
CIT
Y9
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
501
N. S
anta
Ani
taC
ITY
CIT
Y17
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
501
N. S
anta
Ani
taC
ITY
CIT
Y19
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
500
N. S
anta
Ani
taC
ITY
CIT
Y20
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
500
N. S
anta
Ani
taC
ITY
CIT
Y21
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
N/W
cor
ner o
n Sa
nta
Anita
at S
anta
Cla
raC
ITY
CIT
Y22
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
N/E
Cor
ner o
n Sa
nta
Anita
at S
anta
Cla
raC
ITY
CIT
Y27
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
250
W. H
untin
gton
Dr.
CIT
YC
ITY
7C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS24
0 W
. Hun
tingt
on D
r (w
estb
ound
)C
ITY
CIT
Y1
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
240
W. H
untin
gton
Dr (
wes
tbou
nd)
CIT
YC
ITY
2C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSS/
W c
or. C
olor
ado
Pl &
Hun
tingt
on D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y37
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
240
W. H
untin
gton
Driv
eC
ITY
CIT
Y3
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
240
W. H
untin
gton
Driv
eC
ITY
CIT
Y4
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
250
W. H
untin
gton
Dr.
CIT
YC
ITY
5C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
ly
Form
CI6
948
FCS
Dat
abas
e 1,
8/2
010
Page
9 o
f 13
Part
7.1
C(1
)(a) -
L.
A. C
ount
y M
S4 P
erm
itC
ity o
f Arc
adia
Annu
al R
epor
t (D
ec-2
017)
Cer
tifie
d Fu
ll C
aptu
re S
yste
ms
Dat
abas
eD
ate
: 12/
15/2
017
Rep
ortin
g ye
ar: 2
016-
2017
Prep
ared
by:
JLH
A
CPS
250
W. H
untin
gton
Dr.
CIT
YC
ITY
6C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS12
5 C
olor
ado
Plac
eC
ITY
CIT
Y36
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
N/W
cor
ner o
n C
ivic
Cen
ter H
untin
gon
Dr
CIT
YC
ITY
1C
ITY
CIT
Y
Annu
ally
CPS
On
Hun
tingt
on D
r at C
ivic
Cen
ter
CIT
YC
ITY
2C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS22
1 W
. LeR
oyC
ITY
CIT
Y1
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
220
W. L
eRoy
CIT
YC
ITY
2C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSN
orm
an a
t San
ta A
nita
CIT
YC
ITY
3C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS15
11 W
. Azu
re W
ay a
t San
ta A
nita
Ter
race
CIT
YC
ITY
1C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSN
/E C
orne
r on
Azur
e W
ay a
t San
ta A
nita
Ter
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y2
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
N/E
cor
ner E
l Mon
te a
t Lon
gden
Ave
.C
ITY
CIT
Y1
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
N/W
cor
ner E
l Mon
te a
t Lon
gden
Ave
.C
ITY
CIT
Y2
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
S/W
cor
ner L
ongd
en A
ve. a
t El M
onte
CIT
YC
ITY
3C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS20
5 W
. Lon
gden
CIT
YC
ITY
4C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS17
8 W
. Lon
gden
CIT
YC
ITY
5C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS16
5 Ar
thur
CIT
YC
ITY
6C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSW
est o
n Az
ure
at A
rthur
Ave
CIT
YC
ITY
7C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSEa
st o
n Ar
thur
at A
zure
CIT
YC
ITY
8C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyAR
S45
Arth
urC
ITY
CIT
Y13
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
44 A
rthur
CIT
YC
ITY
14C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS16
7 W
. Lon
gley
Way
CIT
YC
ITY
1C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyAR
S18
5 W
. Pal
mC
ITY
CIT
Y2
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
2227
Can
yon
Rd.
CIT
YC
ITY
8C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS22
27 C
anyo
n R
d.C
ITY
CIT
Y9
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
2240
Can
yon
Rd.
CIT
YC
ITY
10C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS22
40 C
anyo
n R
d.C
ITY
CIT
Y11
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
2225
Hig
hlan
d Vi
sta
Dr.
CIT
YC
ITY
12C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS22
20 H
ighl
and
Vist
a D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y13
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
2011
Hig
hlan
d O
aks
Dr.
CIT
YC
ITY
3C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS20
00 H
ighl
and
Oak
s D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y4
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
2011
Can
yon
Rd.
CIT
YC
ITY
5C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS20
00 C
anyo
n R
d.C
ITY
CIT
Y6
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
2001
Car
olw
ood
Dr.
CIT
YC
ITY
7C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS N
/W c
or. C
arol
woo
d D
r & o
n El
kins
Ave
.C
ITY
CIT
Y8
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
N/E
cor
. Can
yon
Rd.
& o
n El
kins
Ave
CIT
YC
ITY
9C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSN
/W c
or. H
ighl
and
Oak
s Pl
. & E
lkin
s Av
e.C
ITY
CIT
Y10
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
2001
Oak
s Pl
ace
CIT
YC
ITY
11C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
ly
Form
CI6
948
FCS
Dat
abas
e 1,
8/2
010
Page
10
of 1
3
Part
7.1
C(1
)(a) -
L.
A. C
ount
y M
S4 P
erm
itC
ity o
f Arc
adia
Annu
al R
epor
t (D
ec-2
017)
Cer
tifie
d Fu
ll C
aptu
re S
yste
ms
Dat
abas
eD
ate
: 12/
15/2
017
Rep
ortin
g ye
ar: 2
016-
2017
Prep
ared
by:
JLH
A
CPS
2000
Oak
s Pl
ace
CIT
YC
ITY
12C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS21
28 C
anyo
n R
d.C
ITY
CIT
Y14
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
2200
N. H
ighl
and
Oak
s D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y16
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
2011
N. H
ighl
and
Oak
s D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y17
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
1801
Hig
hlan
d O
aks
Dr.
CIT
YC
ITY
1C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
ly
CPS
1800
Hig
hlan
d O
aks
Dr.
CIT
YC
ITY
2C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSN
/W C
orne
r Hig
hlan
d O
aks
Dr &
Dos
hier
Ave
CIT
YC
ITY
3C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS16
22 H
ighl
and
Oak
s D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y1
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
N/W
cor
. Hig
hlan
d O
aks
Dr.
& Vi
rgin
ia D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y2
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
N/W
cor
. Hig
hlan
d O
aks
Dr.
& Vi
rgin
ia D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y3
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
S/W
cor
. 161
9 H
ighl
and
Oak
s D
r. &
Virg
inia
Dr.
CIT
YC
ITY
4C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS16
24 N
. Wils
on A
ve.
CIT
YC
ITY
5C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS16
25 N
. Wils
on A
ve.
CIT
YC
ITY
6C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS12
00 H
ighl
and
Oak
sC
ITY
CIT
Y1
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
N/W
Cor
ner S
ycam
ore/
Hig
hlan
d O
aks
CIT
YC
ITY
2C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSN
/W c
or. 1
201
Oak
glen
Ave
. & S
ycam
ore
Ave.
CIT
YC
ITY
3C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS12
63 O
akgl
en A
ve.
CIT
YC
ITY
4C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSS/
O 1
266
Oak
glen
Ave
.C
ITY
CIT
Y5
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
1312
N. H
ighl
and
Oak
s D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y6
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
N/W
cor
132
1 H
ighl
and
Oak
s/W
oodl
and
Ave
CIT
YC
ITY
7C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS14
9 E.
Syc
amor
eC
ITY
CIT
Y8
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
150
E. S
ycam
ore
CIT
YC
ITY
9C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSN
/W c
or. S
ycam
ore
Ave
& O
akha
ven
Rd.
CIT
YC
ITY
10C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSN
/E c
or. S
ycam
ore
Ave.
& O
akha
ven
Rd.
CIT
YC
ITY
11C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS12
57 O
akha
ven
Rd
CIT
YC
ITY
16C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSN
/E C
orne
r Oak
have
n R
d/W
hisp
erin
g Pi
ne D
rC
ITY
CIT
Y17
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
S/E
Cor
ner O
akha
ven
Rd/
Whi
sper
ing
Pine
Dr
CIT
YC
ITY
18C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSS/
E C
orne
r Oak
have
n R
d/W
hisp
erin
g Pi
ne D
rC
ITY
CIT
Y19
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
201
Whi
sper
ing
Pine
sC
ITY
CIT
Y20
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
Whi
sper
ing
Pine
s Su
mm
it/W
hisp
.Pin
es D
rC
ITY
CIT
Y22
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
Whi
sper
ing
Pine
s Su
mm
it/W
hisp
.Pin
es D
rC
ITY
CIT
Y23
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
317
Whi
sper
ing
Pine
s D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y25
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
317
Whi
sper
ing
Pine
s D
r.C
ITY
CIT
Y26
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
166
Cou
ntry
Oak
s C
ircle
CIT
YC
ITY
1C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS70
5 C
ount
ry O
aks
Circ
leC
ITY
CIT
Y2
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
811
N. W
igw
am A
ve.
CIT
YC
ITY
4C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
ly
Form
CI6
948
FCS
Dat
abas
e 1,
8/2
010
Page
11
of 1
3
Part
7.1
C(1
)(a) -
L.
A. C
ount
y M
S4 P
erm
itC
ity o
f Arc
adia
Annu
al R
epor
t (D
ec-2
017)
Cer
tifie
d Fu
ll C
aptu
re S
yste
ms
Dat
abas
eD
ate
: 12/
15/2
017
Rep
ortin
g ye
ar: 2
016-
2017
Prep
ared
by:
JLH
A
CPS
142
E. H
aven
CIT
YC
ITY
5C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS60
5 Lo
rena
at N
ewm
anC
ITY
CIT
Y3
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
144
E. N
ewm
anC
ITY
CIT
Y4
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
ARS
N/W
Col
orad
o on
Sec
ond
CIT
YC
ITY
5C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyAR
SN
/E C
olor
ado
on S
econ
dC
ITY
CIT
Y6
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
Sant
a C
lara
-bet
wee
n Fi
fth a
nd S
econ
dC
ITY
CIT
Y7
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
Sant
a C
lara
-bet
wee
n Fi
fth a
nd S
econ
dC
ITY
CIT
Y8
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
N/W
Cor
ner o
n Sa
nta
Cla
ra a
t Sec
ond
Ave.
CIT
YC
ITY
13C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSN
/W C
orne
r on
Seco
nd a
t San
ta C
lara
CIT
YC
ITY
14C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS16
14 S
. Wes
ley
Lane
CIT
YC
ITY
2C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS12
41 N
inth
CIT
YC
ITY
2C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS12
37 N
inth
CIT
YC
ITY
3C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS12
40 N
inth
CIT
YC
ITY
4C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS12
36 N
inth
CIT
YC
ITY
5C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS11
28 S
. Nin
th A
ve.
CIT
YC
ITY
6C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS11
21 S
. Nin
th A
ve.
CIT
YC
ITY
7C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS91
1 D
erek
Driv
eC
ITY
CIT
Y8
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
ARS
701
E. P
amel
aC
ITY
CIT
Y2
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
917
E. C
amin
o R
eal
CIT
YC
ITY
3C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS92
0 E
Cam
ino
Rea
lC
ITY
CIT
Y4
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
831
E. C
amin
o G
rove
Ave
.C
ITY
CIT
Y20
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
1931
Tul
ip L
ane
CIT
YC
ITY
1C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyAR
S24
24 S
. Eig
hth
Ave
CIT
YC
ITY
1C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSN
/W C
orne
r Eig
hth
at S
andr
aC
ITY
CIT
Y2
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
2446
Eig
hth
CIT
YC
ITY
3C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSN
/E c
or. C
lark
St.
& Pe
ck R
d.C
ITY
CIT
Y1
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
N/E
cor
. Cla
rk S
t. &
Peck
Rd.
CIT
YC
ITY
2C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSN
/E c
or. C
lark
St &
Pec
k R
d.C
ITY
CIT
Y3
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
S/E
cor.
Cla
rk S
t. &
Peck
Rd.
CIT
YC
ITY
4C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSS/
E co
r. C
lark
St.
& Pe
ck R
d.C
ITY
CIT
Y5
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
5460
S. P
eck
Rd.
CIT
YC
ITY
6C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSN
/E P
eck
Rd.
/ G
oldr
ing
CIT
YC
ITY
7C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS55
37 R
eck
Rd.
CIT
YC
ITY
8C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PSN
/E c
or. C
lark
St.
& Pe
ck R
d.C
ITY
CIT
Y9
CIT
YC
ITY
Annu
ally
CPS
S. s
ide
of L
ower
Azu
sa-E
.of 1
2300
L.A
zusa
CIT
YC
ITY
1C
ITY
CIT
YAn
nual
lyC
PS98
01 E
Lem
on A
veLA
CFC
DLA
CFC
DAn
nual
ly
Form
CI6
948
FCS
Dat
abas
e 1,
8/2
010
Page
12
of 1
3
Part
7.1
C(1
)(a) -
L.
A. C
ount
y M
S4 P
erm
itC
ity o
f Arc
adia
Annu
al R
epor
t (D
ec-2
017)
Cer
tifie
d Fu
ll C
aptu
re S
yste
ms
Dat
abas
eD
ate
: 12/
15/2
017
Rep
ortin
g ye
ar: 2
016-
2017
Prep
ared
by:
JLH
A
CPS
97
59 E
Lem
on A
veLA
CFC
DLA
CFC
DAn
nual
lyC
PS65
02 T
empl
e C
ity B
lvd
LAC
FCD
LAC
FCD
Annu
ally
CPS
9553
-959
9 E
Cam
ino
Rea
l Ave
LAC
FCD
LAC
FCD
Annu
ally
Qua
ntity
Dev
ice
Type
234
CPS
10AR
SQ
uant
ityC
atch
Bas
in In
vent
ory
10C
Bs
w/P
CD
(8
6% e
ffici
ency
)23
4C
Bs
w/F
CD
(1
00%
effi
cien
cy)
265
Tota
l CB
s
Nota
tions
:Fo
rmIn
sert
addi
tiona
l row
s, a
s ne
cess
ary
Col
umn
1:In
dica
te c
ertif
ied
full
capt
ure
devi
ce (F
CD
) ins
talle
dC
olum
n 2:
Nam
e FC
D s
treet
loca
tion
and
indi
cate
whe
ther
: WS
- wes
t sid
e; E
S - e
ast s
ide;
NS
- nor
th s
ide;
SS
- sou
th s
ide
Col
umn
3:N
ame
the
near
est c
ross
stre
et lo
catio
n of
the
FCD
C
olum
n 4:
FCD
Ow
ned
by: C
o - C
ount
y of
L.A
.; Fl
ood
- L.A
. Cou
nty
Floo
d C
ontro
l Dis
trict
; Ci -
City
; Ca
- Cal
trans
; Pr -
Priv
ate;
Oth
- O
ther
sC
olum
n 5:
FCD
Mai
ntai
ned
by: C
o - C
ount
y of
L.A
.; Fl
ood
- L.A
. Cou
nty
Floo
d C
ontro
l Dis
trict
; Ci -
City
; Ca
- Cal
trans
; Pr -
Priv
ate;
Oth
- O
ther
sC
olum
n 6:
Prov
ide
the
date
whe
n FC
D w
as in
stal
led
Col
umn
7:In
dica
te C
ount
y or
City
ass
igne
d ca
tch
basi
n (C
B) id
entif
icat
ion
(ID) n
umbe
rsC
olum
n 8:
Type
of C
B ba
sed
on S
tand
ard
Plan
for P
ublic
Wor
ks C
onst
ruct
ion
from
Gre
enbo
ok C
omm
ittee
, Pub
lic W
orks
Sta
ndar
ds, I
nc. (
i.e.,
300-
2; 3
01-2
; 302
-2; 3
03-2
; etc
.)C
olum
n 9:
CB
Ow
ned
by: C
o - C
ount
y of
L.A
.; Fl
ood
- L.A
. Cou
nty
Floo
d C
ontro
l Dis
trict
; Ci -
City
; Ca
- Cal
trans
; Pr -
Priv
ate;
Oth
- O
ther
sC
olum
n 10
:C
B m
aint
aine
d by
: Co
- Cou
nty
of L
.A.;
Floo
d - L
.A. C
ount
y Fl
ood
Con
trol D
istri
ct; C
i - C
ity; C
a - C
altra
ns; P
r - P
rivat
e; O
th -
Oth
ers
Col
umn
11:
Indi
cate
freq
uenc
y of
FC
D m
aint
enan
ce (e
.g. i
nspe
ctio
n &
clea
nout
: 1x/
3 m
o., 1
x/6
mo.
, 1x
Nov
., 1x
Jan
., 1x
Aug
., et
c.)
Form
CI6
948
FCS
Dat
abas
e 1,
8/2
010
Page
13
of 1
3