city of lethbridge - for sale by bid process 316 – 5 street south...for sale by bid process 316...

REAL ESTATE & LAND DEVELOPMENT 1

For Sale by Bid Process 316 – 5 Street South

The City of Lethbridge, Real Estate and Land Department, has the following property for sale:

316 – 5 Street South (Lots 14 - 16, Block 31, Plan 4353S)

Site Description

Known as the Oliver Building Site, the subject parcel is approximately 0.089 ha (.22 ac) and is located at 316 - 5 Street South (Lots 14 - 16, Block 31, Plan 4353S). The subject parcel has the current Land Use Bylaw 5700 designation of “Downtown Commercial” (C-D). The City of Lethbridge is currently rezoning the subject parcel to “Direct Control” (D-C) and will be a condition of the final sale. The proposed D-C Bylaw is attached.

Background and Context

Lethbridge’s history virtually began in the downtown which has always been the centre of our community. Lethbridge functions a major service hub for southern Alberta, is the province’s fourth largest city by population (2015 Census – 94,804) and is the third largest by area. Because of its location relative to other major or larger cities, Lethbridge serves as an important regional service centre not only for commercial but for health care, education and government. Downtown Lethbridge provides employment for approximately 8,000 and thus continues to be a focal point for business in the city. Lethbridge has a very strong public sector that provides an underlying stability to the economy of southern Alberta. Lethbridge is one of only a few cities its size in Canada with two post-secondary institutions, the University of Lethbridge and Lethbridge College. The foundation of the Lethbridge is agriculture and food processing, manufacturing, and resource development (oil and gas, renewable energy, etc.). Expansion of the economy will continue to build on the diversity of these wealth generating industries. Although in competition with other city commercial districts, downtown still remains the Heart of the City due to its history as well as its mixture of business, retail, public sector, and cultural activities. As the city continues to grow and new commercial areas are developed in other sections of the City such as Crossings and the West Lethbridge Employment Centre, the downtown will continue to function as the city’s focal point because of its physical location and centralized functions.


Building Description and Historical Background

The two-storey Oliver Building, or Oliver Block as it was once called, has a flat roof, brick cladding, four bays on the second storey articulated by brick pilasters and a brick inscription on the parapet that reads “OLIVER”. The Oliver is significant for its association with early commercial development in Lethbridge. The Oliver was constructed c.1900 when Lethbridge was emerging into a commercial hub in southern Alberta. The building replaced a two-storey wood framed structure that had been used as a movie theatre and for traveling shows. It was built in two phases so that the owner, William Oliver, could continue to operate his business during construction. The Oliver is also significant for its association with William Oliver who moved to the community in 1884 to work for the Alberta Railway and Coal Company. As a prominent early citizen in Lethbridge, he established a brickyard 1887. By 1890 he had entered the general building and construction business and founded Lethbridge’s first sash and door factory. Oliver built and owned the Oliver Block as well as several other buildings in Lethbridge, including Oliver Apartments and the International Order of Odd Fellows Hall. Construction was not the only means by which William Oliver contributed to the growth of Lethbridge. William Oliver served as an alderman prior to being elected mayor for four consecutive years from 1902-1905. As a member of the local Masonic chapter and the International Order of Odd Fellows, William Oliver was an active participant in Lethbridge’s community life and contributed greatly to its success as a city. The Oliver building itself exhibits significant design characteristics. Owing to the City of Lethbridge fire bylaw passed in 1891, types of materials allowed to be used in the commercial district were required to fire resistive. These requirements in turn lead to the construction of many brick and stone buildings, including the brick Oliver. Readily available brick from local brickyards meant that decorative details such as the pilasters and corbelled brick entablature were much easier to incorporate into the building’s design. The Oliver showcases some of the most interesting brick detailing in the downtown area, including the diamond shapes on the pilasters, the decorative brick panels and decorative brick friezes with dentils above the second storey windows, and the continuous corbelled sill beneath the second-storey windows. Revitalization Framework

To enhance the viability, vibrancy and attractiveness of the downtown, a planning framework has been established that will guide the ongoing redevelopment and adaptive reuse of downtown buildings and property. This planning framework has been established according to a long-term vision and an accompanying guiding framework. For the long-term vision to be realized, a multi-faceted implementation strategy has also been created. The strategy consists of a layered approach that involves several interrelated plans and processes which are described below: Heart of Our City Master Plan (HOCMP - 2007) The Master Plan establishes the framework to guide future public improvements and private sector

http://www.lethbridge.ca/Doing-Business/Planning-Development/Planning/Pages/Heart-of-Our-City.aspx


investment and development, to ensure the emergence of a coherent, vibrant, and economically vital downtown.

1. Integrated Community Sustainability Plan /Municipal Development Plan (ICSP/MDP - 2010)

The ICSP/MDP reinforces the role of the Downtown within the context of the entire community. Being the principal plan for the City’s long term growth, the ICSP/MDP also specifies goals for the downtown which include:

• to revitalize and redevelop the downtown as the cultural, economic and civic heart of the City and region;

• to promote and facilitate residential development downtown; • to encourage the development of commercial, institutional and transit services that support

the downtown residential community; • to continue to strengthen the public realm in the downtown; • to influence downtown development through good urban design and architecture; • to recognize and conserve significant historical resources; and • to encourage major cultural facilities to locate downtown.

2. Downtown Area Redevelopment Plan (DARP) Bylaw 5807 – 2013

In alignment with the HOCMP and the ICSP/MDP, the DARP is intended to provide a more detailed planning framework, inclusive of supporting policies that will both guide and regulate the next 10 years of development in the downtown. Essentially the DARP:

• encourages development that provides an appropriate mixture of retail, service, entertainment, office, hotel and residential activities;

• promotes the adaptive re-use of buildings including those with historic and architectural significance; and

• promotes the creation of a superior urban environment for downtown residents; and • addresses negative impacts attendant with land use change and construction.

3. Land Use By-law 5700 - 2011

The Land Use Bylaw (LUB) has established the development permit application process to obtain approval for a wide range of potential land uses that encompass a variety of commercial, residential, institutional, cultural and recreational uses.

The City of Lethbridge is currently rezoning the subject parcel to D-C (Direct Control) District which captures the vision of the Downtown Area Redevelopment Plan and the Heart of Our City Master Plan. The land use encompasses a variety of uses but also gives direction as to the building design requirements for the redevelopment of the subject parcel.

http://www.lethbridge.ca/Doing-Business/Planning-Development/Documents/Intermunicipal%20Development%20Plan.pdf

http://www.lethbridge.ca/Doing-Business/Planning-Development/Planning/Documents/DARP%20-%20Bylaw%205807.pdf

http://www.lethbridge.ca/City-Government/Bylaws/Documents/Land%20Use%20Bylaw%205700.pdf


4. Main Street Program

The Alberta Main Street Program has played an integral role in the revitalization of the downtown commercial district. Over the years, owners of the project buildings have invested millions into the rehabilitation and restoration of the interiors and exteriors of their buildings. As a result, they have been able to secure long-term tenants who have made the downtown a more economically viable place to do business.

Ongoing funding of the Main Street Program is provided through the Downtown BRZ/Main Street Office to further assist in the rehabilitation and on-going preservation of downtown buildings.

Supporting Documents The following documents are attached:

• Hazardous Materials Survey – Schedule 1 • Condition Assessment – Schedule 2 • Land Title Certificate – Schedule 3 • Encumbrances – Caveat – Schedule 4

Other Information

Additional photos of the building are available on www.lethbridge.ca/commercial .

Opportunity to View the Building and Property

Prospective purchasers and their consultants will be granted the opportunity for a guided tour of the property by appointment only. Due to the extent of hazardous materials and deteriorated building conditions, precautions will be utilized to protect persons that enter the building and the number of persons permitted to enter the building will be limited. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) will be made available by the City for those persons whom have legitimate business. The PPE is mandatory and those persons not complying with this requirement will not be given access to the building. Opportunity to view the building and property will be by appointment, contact: Michael Kelly General Manager Real Estate and Land Development 2nd Floor, City Hall 910 – 4th Avenue South Lethbridge, Alberta T1J 0P6 [email protected] 403-320-3194/403-320-3905

http://www.downtownlethbridge.com/content-main.asp?CatID=4



http://www.lethbridge.ca/commercial

mailto:[email protected]


Additional Information

If the City, for any reason, determines that it is necessary to provide additional information, the information will be communicated by way of email and posted to the City website, www.lethbridge.ca/commercial. In order to receive notice of any additional information, please register your interest by sending an email to [email protected] and requesting confirmation the registration has been received. Submission and Evaluation Guidelines

The City of Lethbridge is accepting bids for this property on or before 4:00 p.m. on Thursday March 24, 2016. The City intends to review all bids within a four-week period and reserves the right to reject any or all. If no bids are accepted, the City will continue to accept bids until a suitable offer is received and accepted. Bid Content

To be considered, the submitted bid must contain the following: • The offered purchase price and payment of a 5% refundable deposit. • Any conditions attached to the offer. • The name and contact information of individual/agent authorized to answer questions about the

bid. Correspondence will only be directed to the appointed contact.

Bids must be delivered to: Michael Kelly General Manager Real Estate and Land Development 2nd Floor, City Hall 910 – 4th Avenue South Lethbridge, Alberta T1J 0P6 [email protected] 403-320-3194/403-320-3905 Bid Evaluation Criteria

The bid(s) will be evaluated on the following criteria:

1. The offered purchase price and any conditions attached.

Real Estate Agents

No sales commission will be paid by the City of Lethbridge.

http://www.lethbridge.ca/commercial




Terms and Conditions

The City of Lethbridge reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to not accept any bid, to negotiate with one or more parties who submit bids, or to negotiate the terms of any bid.

1. The proposed Direct Control District (attached) is a condition of the seller. The final Direct Control Bylaw for this property is subject to the approval of City Council. The attached draft will be submitted to Council however the final terms of the D-C will only be determined after a public hearing and decision of City Council.

2. The City of Lethbridge reserves the right to not accept the highest offered price, but rather accept the bid, that in the opinion of the City represents the optimal combination of price and conditions.

3. All submissions become the property of the City of Lethbridge. The City reserves the right to not release to the public, information about submissions.

4. Reserve Price $9,500.

Disclaimers

The information in this package and otherwise made available to interested parties is for information purposes only and is believed to be accurate. The City and its consultants do not accept responsibility for the accuracy of the information and accept no liability for any errors or omissions.

The City of Lethbridge makes no warranties whatsoever regarding the suitability of the development site for any purpose.

Sherlock Environmental Services Ltd. Project SES08825, 12/12/2008 Page i

Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................1

2.0 REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES ..............................................................................................................1

3.0 SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY .....................................................................................................................3

3.1 Scope ..........................................................................................................................................................3

3.2 Methodology ...............................................................................................................................................3

4.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY RESULTS ...................................................................................................................4

4.1 Mechanical System Insulation ....................................................................................................................4

4.2 Floor Tile .....................................................................................................................................................4

4.3 Sheet Flooring ............................................................................................................................................6

4.4 Transite Panels ...........................................................................................................................................6

5.0 OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ..............................................................................................................7

5.1 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) ..............................................................................................................7

5.2 Lead ............................................................................................................................................................7

5.3 Mould ..........................................................................................................................................................7

6.0 ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT ...........................................................................................................................8

7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................... 10

8.0 CLOSURE ................................................................................................................................................... 11

Appendix A - Hazardous Materials Survey Summary, Laboratory Analysis Report

Sherlock Environmental Services Ltd. Project SES08825, 12/12/2008 Page 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Sherlock Environmental Services Ltd. (Sherlock Environmental) was commissioned by Mr. Dean Romeril of the City of Lethbridge, to carry out sampling of suspected asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and prepare management recommendations for the north section of the Oliver Building, Lethbridge, Alberta. This report provides the results of the survey and management recommendations. It is understood that the structure of the building in the northwest corner has become unstable, and the City requires the information on hazardous materials in this portion of the building to prepare the building section for safe demolition, or to safely manage the debris in the event of additional structural failure.

2.0 REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES

In Alberta, exposure to asbestos is regulated under the Occupational Health and Safety Act, 1989, and in particular, Part 3 "Asbestos" of the Chemical Hazards Regulation under the Act. Section 2 of the Act requires that "Every employer shall ensure, as far as it is reasonably practicable for him to do so,

(a) the health and safety of

(i) workers engaged in the work of that employer, and

(ii) those workers not engaged in the work of that employer but present at the work site at which that work is being carried out, and

(b) that the workers engaged in the work of that employer are aware of their responsibilities and duties under this Act and the regulations.”

The Alberta Asbestos Abatement Manual Exposure Assessment Algorithm lists eight major factors which assist in evaluating the condition of a particular installation. Assessment and determination of health risk should be conducted by competent personnel, trained in the evaluation of potential asbestos exposure risk. Only partial reliance should be placed on checklists and algorithms, a great deal depends upon the judgement of the investigator.

(1) Condition of Material The condition of the asbestos-containing materials may indicate how easily fibres can cause contamination by being released into the area. An assessment of the condition considers the quality of the installation, adhesion of the material to the underlying substrate, deterioration, vandalism and/or damage.


(2) Water Damage Water can dislodge, delaminate and disturb friable asbestos-containing materials that are otherwise in good condition. Water can carry fibres as slurry to other areas where evaporation leaves a collection of fibres that can be released into the air. (3) Exposed Surface Area The exposed surface area of friable material affects potential fibre fallout levels and the possibility for contact and damage. Visible friable material is considered to be exposed. Maintenance personnel frequently access the space above suspended ceilings to service or maintain electrical or communications equipment, or adjust the ventilation system. In most cases, this space is considered an exposed surface. Areas with louvers, grids or other open ceiling systems should be considered exposed. (4) Accessibility Accessibility is one of the most important indicators of exposure potential. If the asbestos-containing material can be reached, it is accessible and subject to accidental or intentional contact and damage. Friable material is considered accessible if it is close to heating, ventilation, lighting and plumbing systems requiring maintenance or repair. In schools, the behaviour of the student population should be considered in evaluating accessibility. Damage is the most obvious factor. For example, students involved in sport activities may accidentally damage material on the walls and ceiling of a gymnasium. Material that is easily accessible is also subject to damage by vandalism. (5) Activity and Movement This factor combines the effects of general causes that may result in contact with, or damage to, friable material. These causes include air movement, maintenance activities, vibration (from machinery or other sources) and activity levels of students or building workers. This factor is also an indication of the potential for future exposure. (6) Air Plenum or Direct Air Stream According to the Alberta Building Code, asbestos materials are not permitted to be located in supply or return air plenums. Action is required by building owners if asbestos-containing materials are found in these areas. (7) Friability The material in question must be touched to evaluate its friability. The easier it is to crumble, the more friable the material and the greater the potential for asbestos fibre release and contamination. Sprayed asbestos material is generally more friable than most trowelled


materials or mechanically installed insulation. (8) Asbestos Content To calculate total asbestos content, the percentage content for each type of asbestos present in a given sample should be summed. While all asbestos-containing materials present an exposure potential, those with a high percentage of asbestos content can release more fibres. A material containing less than 1% asbestos by weight is not considered to be an asbestos-containing material. If any amount of crocidolite asbestos is found, it must be removed on an “immediate” basis as its use is prohibited by the Alberta Building Code.

3.0 SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY

3.1 Scope

The survey carried out by Sherlock Environmental consisted of the following:

Visual survey of the north 3rd of the building to identify potential ACMs;

Field sampling and laboratory analyses of suspected ACM types;

Interpretation of the laboratory analyses data; and,

Preparation of the survey and management recommendations report.

3.2 Methodology The field survey consisted of visually identifying and sampling potential ACMs throughout the north 3rd of the site building. The above work was carried out by James Abramenko of Sherlock Environmental on December 8, 2008. Upon entry into each area, a visual review of potential ACMs was performed. Information pertaining to the potential ACMs, including their quantities, nature, condition, accessibility and location, were documented. It should be noted that the survey of ACMs carried out at the site was non-intrusive and did not include materials which may be enclosed in wall cavities or other non-accessible areas, or materials that required destructive sampling. Sampling of different types of suspected ACMs was conducted in accordance with asbestos sampling protocols outlined in Safe Handling of Asbestos and included the following: .1 misting friable materials prior to sampling with a fine spray of soapy water; .2 repairing friable material sample locations with a metallic sample label; .3 enclosing the samples in sealed and labelled sample bags;


.4 re-misting the immediate sample location;

.5 cleaning of sampling equipment before and after each sampling event with disposable wipes; and,

.6 removing all sampling associated wastes in seal sampling bags. All potential ACM samples collected were sent to Enviro-Works Inc. of Edmonton, AB, for analysis of bulk asbestos content. Enviro-Works Inc. is a Canadian Association for Environmental Analytical Laboratories accredited laboratory.

4.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY RESULTS

The results of the laboratory analysis indicate that of the 12 bulk samples submitted for analysis, four samples provided positive results, indicating the presence of asbestos (>1%). The following sub-sections present a summary of the findings for each type of building material found to contain asbestos. A copy of the laboratory analyses report is included in Appendix A.

4.1 Mechanical System Insulation

The mechanical system piping in this area of the building was insulated in horse hair and canvas. The boiler, located in the northwest corner of the basement (Photo 1) is covered in an insulation material that was found to contain >75% chrysotile asbestos. All boiler insulation materials were observed to be in poor condition, removal of these materials in accordance with the Alberta Asbestos Abatement Manual would be preferred prior to the demolition of the building. In the event of a structural collapse prior to abatement an emergency procedure for the boiler insulation would be required (Section 7).

4.2 Floor Tile A nine by nine inch floor tile located on the 2nd floor was found to contain 1 to 5% Chrysotile asbestos (Photo 2). Removal of these materials would be preferred prior to demolition of the building. The tiles may be left in place during demolition if; an acceptance from Section 34 of the Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Code is granted and acceptance is granted by the destination landfill. In the event of a structural collapse prior to abatement it is likely that acceptance from OHS and the landfill would be granted.


Photo 1: Boiler Insulation

Photo 2: Floor Tile, 2nd Floor


4.3 Sheet Flooring

A small quantity of sheet floor (>75% Chrysotile) is located in the main to 2nd floor staircase. Removal of these materials would be preferred prior to demolition of the building. In the event of a structural collapse prior to abatement an emergency procedure for the sheet flooring would be required (Section 7).

4.4 Transite Panels

A black panel located in the front entrance was found to contain 25 to 50% chrysotile asbestos (Photo 3). Removal of this material would be preferred prior to demolition of the building. In the event of a structural collapse prior to abatement an emergency procedure for the panels would be required (Section 7).

Photo 3: Black Asbestos Cement Panel, Front Entrance


5.0 OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

5.1 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) The past use of PCBs in electrical equipment such as transformers, fluorescent lamp ballasts, and capacitors was common. The federal Environmental Contaminants Act, 1976, prohibited the use of PCBs in heat transfer and electrical equipment installed after September 1, 1977, and in transformers and capacitors installed after July 1, 1980. In addition, storage and disposal of PCB waste materials is regulated. The site building contained a few fluorescent light fixtures. Each ballast should be inspected for PCB content prior to disposal. The Environment Canada Report EPS 2/CC/2, Identification of Lamp Ballasts Containing PCBs, can be used as a reference document for this task.

5.2 Lead In 1976, the lead content in interior paint was limited to 0.5% by weight under the federal Hazardous Products Act. Lead is also associated with plumbing solder and old pipes as well as other lead based products such as wall shielding (x-ray rooms). Twelve qualitative on-site tests of painted surfaces revealed the presence of lead paint on the tin ceiling panels, main floor (Photo 4). Analysis of the tin ceiling paint indicated the presence of 45100 mg/Kg of lead. Removal and proper disposal/recycling of this material would be preferred prior to demolition of the building. In the event of a structural collapse prior to abatement an emergency procedure for the ceiling panels would be required (Section 7).

5.3 Mould Visible mould or other indicators of mould were not observed at the site.


Photo 4: Tin Ceiling Panels, Main Floor.

6.0 ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT

The Control and Management of Friable Asbestos identifies the condition, friability, accessibility and asbestos content of ACMs as factors which determine the potential exposure of building occupants to airborne asbestos fibres. The condition of the ACM may indicate the extent of contamination and the likelihood of future contamination. This factor is defined as a combination of the quality of installation, adhesion of the material to the underlying surface, material deterioration and damage. Friability of a material is a concern. The more friable an ACM, the greater potential there is for release of fibres and contamination. Material which is accessible is subject to damage. Consideration must be given to the proximity of friable material to building heating, ventilation, lighting and plumbing systems which may require repair and activity in the area.


The level of worker activity in the area is also a consideration when attempting to assess potential exposure to airborne fibres. A high percentage of asbestos fibres means that more fibres can be released to the environment. To arrive at the total asbestos content, the percentage of each type of asbestos present in the material is added together. The following rating table (Table 1) is used as a guide for evaluation of the ACMs noted in the site building.

Table 1 - Rating Table

FACTOR RATING DESCRIPTION Accessibility High (H)

Medium (M) Low (L)

Accessible in high activity areas. Accessible in low activity areas or beyond occupants reach. Enclosed.

Condition High (H) Medium (M) Low (L)

Severe damage. Mild-moderate damage. Good condition.

Friability High (H) Medium (M) Low (L)

Easily breaks apart. Mild-moderate friability. Non-friable, firmly bound.

Each of the ACMs identified has been rated according to Table 1. The ratings are included in the shaded area of the summary table in Appendix A. The following Table 2 provides a decision guide for the management of the identified ACMs. Table 2 - Decision Table

Less than 20% asbestos Greater than 20% asbestos

Immediate Control Control Required No Control

2 Highs or 3 Mediums 1 High or 2 Mediums 1 Medium or 3 Lows

1 High or 2 Mediums 1 Medium 3 Lows


7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the information gathered and observations made during this survey and the results of the laboratory analyses, the survey has revealed the presence of asbestos containing boiler insulation, sheet flooring, transite panels and floor tile. Lead paint was identified on the tin ceiling panels. It would be preferable to remove and properly dispose of these materials prior to demolition of the structure. Building safety would need to be addressed prior to any abatement activities. In the event of a structural collapse prior to the completion of hazardous materials abatement, an emergency abatement procedure would be required. In general the emergency procedure should include:

Notification to OHS for input and acceptance;

Site safety assessment;

Waste handling by machine only;

Air monitoring on and adjacent to the site, before during and after the clearing process;

Water should be used for dust control (may be waived if freezing will create a hazard, however dust control must still be considered);

Application for acceptance to OHS and the landfill to treat the floor tile as general waste;

Separation by machine of the tin ceiling panels, sheet flooring and asbestos cement panels;

Abatement and disposal of tin ceiling panels, sheet flooring and asbestos cement panels by a qualified hazardous materials abatement contractor;

Use machinery to clear the general debris from the boiler room area;

Make the boiler room area safe for an asbestos abatement crew;

Have the boiler wrapped, labelled and readied for transport by a qualified asbestos abatement crew; and,

Transport and dispose of the boiler in accordance with all applicable regulations.


8.0 CLOSURE

This report has been prepared for the benefit of The City of Lethbridge. The report may not be relied upon by any other person or entity without the consent of The City of Lethbridge. The asbestos locations and conclusions provided are based on information obtained from visual inspection and limited sampling carried out, at the specific test locations. The results can only be extrapolated to an undefined area around the test locations. The conclusions presented represent the best judgement of the assessor based on the non-destructive sampling carried out. Due to the nature of the investigation and the limited data available, the assessor cannot warrant against undiscovered asbestos containing materials. Sherlock Environmental certifies that to the best of our knowledge, the information presented is accurate. Should additional information become available, Sherlock Environmental requests that this information be brought to our attention so that we may re-assess the conclusions presented. SHERLOCK ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LTD.

James Abramenko, C.Tech Environmental Specialist

APPENDIX A

HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SURVEY SUMMARY LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT

COST ESTIMATE PRE-DEMOLITION PROCEEDURE Description Location Hazard Cost Estimate*

Boiler Insulation Boiler Room >75% Chrysotile $25,000

Floor Tile 2nd

Floor 1 to 5% Chrysotile $15,000

Sheet Floor Stair to 2nd

Floor >75% Chrysotile $2,000

Asbestos Cement Panel Main Entrance 25 to 50% Chrysotile $2,000

Ballasts Random Potential PCBs $1,000

Tin Ceiling Panels Main Floor 45100 mg/Kg Lead $15,000

Inspection and Monitoring

$3,500

Total $63,500

* Estimates for Budgetary Purposes Only, Costs in the Asbestos Industry Tend to Fluctuate, Use at own Risk

COST ESTIMATE EMERGENCY PROCEEDURE Description Location Hazard Cost Estimate**

Boiler Insulation Boiler Room >75% Chrysotile $15,000

Floor Tile 2nd

Floor 1 to 5% Chrysotile $0

Sheet Floor Stair to 2nd

Floor >75% Chrysotile $4,000

Asbestos Cement Panel Main Entrance 25 to 50% Chrysotile $4,000

Ballasts Random Potential PCBs $2,000

Tin Ceiling Panels Main Floor 45100 mg/Kg Lead $20,000

Inspection and Monitoring

$7,000

Extra Demolition and Administration

$20,000

Total $72,000

** Estimates for Budgetary Purposes Only, Costs in the Asbestos Industry Tend to Fluctuate, Use at own Risk. Final Emergency Procedure Costs will be Dependent on, Site Conditions, Weather, Seasonal and Holiday Costs.

Date

Analyzed

EWI.

Log #Sample

#

Client Sample

Information Phases Asbestos Type %

Other Materials

Detected

Dec 10-08 27458 1 boiler cover 100% Grey fibrous mix Chrysotile >75 NFM

Dec 10-08 27459 2 plaster basement

100% Grey/White

cementitious mass ND NFM

Dec 10-08 27460 3 plaster main floor

100% Grey/White


Dec 10-08 27461 4 drywall joint kitchen 100% White chalky mix ND P, NFM

Dec 10-08 27462 5 blue floor tile kitchen 100% Blue tile ND NFM

Dec 10-08 27463 6 white floor tile kitchen 100% White tile ND NFM

CLIENT: Sherlock Environmental Services

PROJECT: SES08825

Bulk (ACM) Identification: Methodology U.S. 40 Code Of Federal Regulations Chapter I (7-1-87 edition) Part 763, Subpart F, Appendix A, PLM

1224 Klarvatten Crt NW

Edmonton, Alberta T5Z 3N4

Ph: (780) 457-4652

Fax: (780) 473-0767

www.enviro-works.com

NFM=Non Fibrous Material

V=Vermiculite Mica

ND=None Detected

GF=Glass Fibre

P=Perlite

MW=Mineral Wool

SF=Synthetic Fibre Enviro-Works Inc. is a member of the AIHA BAPAT Quality Control Program 14/12/20084:43 PMSES08825_bulk_1-12

Date

Analyzed

EWI.

Log #Sample

#

Client Sample


Other Materials

Detected


PROJECT: SES08825




Ph: (780) 457-4652

Fax: (780) 473-0767


Dec 10-08 27464 7 sheet floor main floor bath

50% White vinyl sheet

50% Grey fibrous

backing

ND

ND

NFM

Cellulose

Dec 10-08 27465 8 ceiling tile 2nd floor

100% Brown compressed

fibrous mat ND Cellulose

Dec 10-08 27466 9 9X9 floor tile 2nd floor 100% Grey tile Chrysotile 1-5 NFM

Dec 10-08 27467 10 plaster 2nd floor

100% Grey/White


Dec 10-08 27468 11 sheet floor stairs

50% Beige vinyl sheet

50% Grey fibrous

backing

ND

Chrysotile >75

NFM

NFM


V=Vermiculite Mica

ND=None Detected

GF=Glass Fibre

P=Perlite

MW=Mineral Wool


Date

Analyzed

EWI.

Log #Sample

#

Client Sample


Other Materials

Detected


PROJECT: SES08825




Ph: (780) 457-4652

Fax: (780) 473-0767


Dec 10-08 27469 12 main entrance panels

100% Grey cementitious

fibrous sheet Chrysotile 25-50 NFM


V=Vermiculite Mica

ND=None Detected

GF=Glass Fibre

P=Perlite

MW=Mineral Wool
