city of sheridan · 5.08.2019 · park facilities, pathways and open spaces master plan table of...

PARK FACILITIES, PATHWAYS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN

2019

CITY OF SHERIDANCITY OF SHERIDAN

P A R K F A C I L I T I E S , P A T H W A Y S A N D O P E N S P A C E S M A S T E R P L A N

AcknowledgmentsPeaks to Plains Design and PROS Consulting would like to acknowledge the following people who participated in the master planning process.

City Council:Roger Mil ler, Mayor Cl inton Beaver, Counci l PresidentThayer Shafer, Counci l Vice PresidentRichard BridgerPatr ick HendersonAaron LindenJacob Martin

City Staff:Mark Col l insBrian CraigSteve GageSue GoodmanTom O’LearyBrendan PhippsLane Thompson

Consultants:Peaks to Plains DesignJolene Rieck, PLAGordon Lemmel, PLA

PROS Consult ing, Inc.Michael Svetz

ETC Inst itute, Inc.Jason Morado

Pascal Publ ic Relat ionsKel ly Pascal Gould, APR

Project Advisory Committee:Brad BauerJennifer BrownLindsay CraigMikkayla DeBoltTeresa DetimoreBev LeichtnamJim ManorMike McCaffertyNathan Mull inaxCasey OsbornZoi la PerryJacey RepsisCarmen RideoutSeth UlvestadJeannie Weissman

Photo CreditsSheridan Travel & TourismThe Sheridan PressLindsay Craig Photography


Table of ContentsChapter 1 - Executive Summary 1-1 to 1-9

Chapter 2 - Community Involvement 2-1 to 2-17

Chapter 3 - Recommendations, Goals & Objectives 3-1 to 3-9

Chapter 4 - Park Land & Asset Inventory 4-1 to 4-12

Chapter 5 - Operations & Maintenance 5-1 to 5-6

Community Profile Appendix-APark Facilities Asset Rating Appendix-BPark Land and Asset Equity Maps Appendix-CMaintenance Standards Appendix-DLand Acquisition & Divestiture Guidelines Appendix-ECommunity Survey Final Findings Report Appendix-F

EXECUTIVE SUMMARYChapter1

1 - 1P A R K F A C I L I T I E S , P A T H W A Y S A N D

O P E N S P A C E S M A S T E R P L A N

E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y

IntroductionIce Cream. Who knew such a simple treat would become one of the top reasons residents love Sheridan’s park system? The offering of ice cream at Kendrick Park was mentioned in virtually every meeting as a primary destination attraction. Of course, creating a top-notch community park system encompasses more than providing ice cream on a hot day. Sheridan’s Parks, Pathways and Open Spaces are vital to people of all ages. Facilities, programs and well-maintained recreational destinations support and grow local economies, and are central to workforce recruitment and retention.

Similar to streets, buildings, water and sewer lines, maximizing the lifespan of Parks, Pathways and Open Spaces is essential to Sheridan’s long-term quality of life.

Planning Purpose & GoalsThe 2019 Park Facilities, Pathways & Open Spaces Master Plan specifies recommendations for:

• Assessing current and long-term needs• Strategically evaluating new opportunities• Preparing for continued growth• Proactively allocating resources in ways

that exceed community expectations

Our goal is to help the City of Sheridan prioritize capital investments, enhance its approach to operations and maintenance, and develop a strategic “playbook” for the future.

Current Parks, Facilities & Pathways under City of Sheridan ManagementIt’s important to acknowledge present-day responsibilities, budget and staffing before considering future planning and opportunities. Today, the City of Sheridan serves 36,440 residents / 7,076 households within the city limits and surrounding areas. City staff are responsible for managing:

• 353 Acres of Parks, Pathways & Open Spaces• Community forestry inventory: 3,300 trees• 16.26 miles of pathways• 12 passive parks• Kendrick Municipal Golf Course• Cemetery grounds & operations• Weed, pest & mosquito

1 - 2

Current Operations & MaintenanceRevenue Sources (FY 2020)

Parks

• $469,560 (Gen. Fund)• $3,000 (One Cent)• $85,636 (Direct Distribution)

Cemetery

• $161,460 (Gen. Fund) • $70,000 (Direct Distribution)

Arborist / Weed & Pest

• $162,000 (Weed & Pest Control Tax)• $19,250 (Mosquito Control)

Golf Course

• $213,685 (Gen. Fund)• $325,500 (Course Fees)

Staffing (FY 2020) 9 FTEs

City Staffing - Full Time (7)

• Parks Superintendent- 1• Parks - 4• Cemetery - 1• Arborist/Weed & Mosquito - 1

City Staffing - Part-Time Seasonal (12)

• Parks - 6• Cemetery - 3• Arborist/Weed & Mosquito - 3

Capital Investment Budget (FY 2020)• $721,000 Pathway expansion• $158,000 Kendrick Park improvements • $714,000 Blacktooth Park• $127,000 Pickleball courts

Community-Involved PlanningThroughout a period of nine months, we evaluated the needs of citizens who reside within city limits and adjacent areas (SD1 & SD2), and utilize Sheridan’s parks, open spaces and programs. Multiple opportunities for community engagement were made available throughout the planning process. To ensure we gathered accurate feedback reflective of Sheridan’s population, residents from multiple generations and life stages were included.

A Project Advisory Committee comprised of 15 members was established to represent the community. This group met four times, provided feedback on the data collected and worked together to develop community-driven recommendations. Committee members served as an important link to stakeholders not directly involved in the planning process.

Community Meetings provided opportunities for the general public to learn about the process, review data collection, discuss meeting outcomes and preview recommendations. Two of the meetings included opportunities for small break-out sessions that allowed for direct participation in the plan’s development.

2,500 Mail Surveys were distributed to randomly selected households throughout the Sheridan area. We received 439 responses (17.5 percent response rate). This was nearly 50 percent greater than the goal response rate of 300. The diversity of responses aligned with community demographics, thus verifying the results as statistically valid and reliable.

Focus Groups were composed of typically underrepresented demographics in traditional research approaches (under 18 years old and over the age of 55). Because of the strong need to address athletic fields for practices and games, community members affiliated with sports

CAPITAL INVESTMENTOPERATIONS &

MAINTENANCE

TOTAL COST OF

LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT

Ownership



offerings and enhance a community’s unique attributes. Diverse funding sources are typically more available for capital investment projects.

The second bucket is operations and maintenance, which is typically most dependent on annual tax revenues. This category includes repair, replacement and maintenance; staffing; equipment; and support services.

The third and final bucket is lifecycle replacements. Every new capital investment adds to the list of items that require future reinvestment, which never ends. The lifespan of park assets vary significantly, depending upon the quality of the asset, the amount of use it receives and the quality of routine maintenance.


organizations also participated in a focus group discussion.

Online Surveys were distributed to Sheridan College students, allowing us to tap into another important community demographic.

Consideration of GrowthSheridan is expected to grow 3.21 percent over the next five years (.6 percent each year, mirroring the national outlook). Business and industry growth in the North Main corridor is especially vibrant right now. This requires continued attention to quality of life for workforce recruitment and retention. As part of the North Main Interchange Project, new park lands were made available. This acreage needs a purpose and strategy for development. Additionally, the acquisition of land for the Doubleday Sports Complex could provide an opportunity for sport field expansion while meeting other community needs. These opportunities require significant financial resources for programming, administration and maintenance. This plan identifies potential resources and provides recommendations based on community needs and recreation industry best practices.

The Total Cost of OwnershipWhile many understand the need for capital investment, there is less understanding of the long-term cost of operations and maintenance. The total cost of ownership is a prime consideration for sustaining a high quality parks and recreation system. Three “buckets” of expense types comprise the Total Cost of Ownership - and each are necessary for proper allocation of fiscal, human and equipment resources.

The first bucket is capital investments, which provide the opportunity to diversify recreational

1 - 4

Summary of Findings & RecommendationsThis executive summary outlines high-level findings and goals, based on community input, and parks and recreation best practices. A complete report of Recommendations, Goals & Objectives can be found in Chapter 3.

Guiding Principles

• Consider Total Cost of Ownership, industry best practices and benchmarks, and community input when assessing short- and long-term investments

• Align staffing with increasing needs for operations and maintenance associated with new or enhanced assets

• Continue gathering community input related to resource allocation for current park maintenance and completion, and future capital investment

Points of Interest• Sheridan’s park land inventory is generally

sufficient for the population (16.32 acres per 1,000). However, an additional 3.5 maintenance worker FTEs are recommended within the next three years.

• Sheridan’s population is expected to grow .6% annually (U.S. Census Bureau). Based on industry best practices, the community will need 46 additional developed park acres by 2029.

• 92% of households have visited a park, pathway or sports field in the last year (81% is national average). 58% visit at least a few times per month.

• 95% of residents ranked City pathway and trail condition to be good or excellent

• 71% of residents either strongly agree or agree that Kendrick Park Pool should be renovated or rebuilt

Highest ranked recommended improvements: • New walking and biking pathways• Enhance neighborhood & community parks• Purchase land & preserve open space• Repair or Renovate Kendrick Pool• Expand pathway system• Repair existing parks

Highest ranked unmet faci l i ty needs:• Kayak/canoe launch• Indoor exercise facility• Archery/shooting ranges• Cross country skiing courses

Highest ranked unmet program needs:• Outdoor adventure programs• Open swim• Programs & services for adults 55+• Farmers markets & food vendors• Aerobics classes• After school & summer programs and camps



Short-Term Capital Investment Goals (5 yrs or less)Continue investing in the pathways experience. Pathways ranked highest in user satisfaction. Use of pathways is the most popular recreational activity.

Provide addit ional access to and awareness of exist ing opportunit ies for water-based recreation. The community indicated a desire to recreate in water in a outdoor natural setting.

Increase the number and variety of picnic shelters in exist ing parks, and prior it ize the instal lat ion of shelters in new parks.Group socialization is important to the community, and residents want more opportunities to hold events in parks.

Determine the future of Kendrick Park Outdoor Pool . The community recognizes that the existing pool has exceeded its useful lifespan. A new plan needs to reflect current trends in aquatics.

Develop an athlet ic f ie ld system maintenance and uti l izat ion plan.This plan must evaluate the continued use of existing fields, the cost of field reinvestment and implications of new field construction from both capital expense and operational cost perspectives.

Long-Term Capital Investment Goals (5-10 yrs)Implement master plans for recently acquired parks and f inish invest ing in exist ing parks before acquir ing new land.Sheridan’s park land inventory is generally sufficient for the population. The community would like to build out existing amenities before investing in new parks and facilities.

Diversify the types of experiences offered in the pathways and trai ls system. The current system accommodates mostly pedestrians and bicyclists throughout a well-connected system. Consider trails for water and different types of bicycle experiences, such as fat tire bikes and skills courses.

Develop park infrastructure that supports a var iety of community events and park act ivit ies . Residents want to use parks more often for concerts, movies, races, farmers markets and food trucks.

Identify opportunit ies for acquis it ion of open space and conservation lands. Sheridan residents value viewsheds, buffers and protecting sensitive ecosystems. Accordingly, the community should work with stakeholders and community partners to secure open space and conservation lands as opportunities arise.

1 - 6

Life Cycle Replacement GoalsPrior it ize capital improvements related to parks in the City ’s 5-year Capital Improvements Program (CIP) .City staff and elected officials must properly allocate budgets for near- and long-term reinvestments.

El iminate deferred maintenance backlogs within 15 years. Deferred maintenance increases risk and decreases safety. A consistent approach to replacing and repairing park assets will improve service and community satisfaction.

Uti l ize the current City work order management system to track assets and schedule maintenance act ivit ies . Maintenance needs can be clearly communicated to field staff and tracked for completion.

Operations & Maintenance GoalsPolic ies & ProceduresReview and consider changes to third-party (e .g . , Sheridan Recreation Distr ict , Kendrick Golf Course, etc. ) contract agreements that are fair and equitable for both part ies. Communicate expectat ions and conduct annual reviews. Clear performance expectations improve outcomes, efficiencies and long-term partnerships. This also allows for more proactive response to changing environmental, political and financial realities.

Review park rules and regulat ions on an annual basis to ensure al ignment between publ ic expectat ions and operational needs.This best practice recommendation allows for structure and flexibility in managing new and changing user trends.

Staff ingContinual ly evaluate staff ing needs through a task-t ime analysis .Utilize the current City work order management system to provide better insights into seasonal demands for staff.

Invest in continuing education and professional memberships to improve retention, recruitment and implementation of best pract ices.Provide staff more opportunities to perform at progressively higher levels, allowing them to have a greater positive impact on the park system.

Consider merging the Sheridan Recreation Distr ict with the City Parks Divis ion. Both entities want to streamline workflows and improve efficiencies while sharing resources. Potential benefits include aligned mission and vision, improved service, satisfaction, and resource allocation.




Performance BenchmarksIdentify desired level of service for each park. Establ ish performance benchmarks for each. Identifying and communicating performance expectations leads to greater success.

Collect data to measure community use and satisfaction.Implement qualitative and quantitative data collection methodologies across park facilities to ensure continued alignment with the strategic plan.

Fiscal ResourcesCapital ize on funding opportunit ies to ensure the park system maintains high-qual ity service and diverse offer ings.Develop community-driven wish lists to leverage funding opportunities in a nimble manner.

Improve accounting to determine Total Cost of OwnershipTracking labor, equipment, investments and repairs will provide insights into seasonal variations, as well as short- and long-term funding needs.

1 - 8

92% of Sheridan

households have visited

a park or pathway

in the past year.

ConclusionSheridan’s parks and recreation offerings are held in high regard by the community, and usage trends far exceed the national average. Community members feel safe and appreciate the cleanliness of the park system. It is abundantly clear that the parks in Sheridan promote healthy social interaction and are strengthening bonds between families and friends. Physical, emotional and mental health benefits are realized through active recreation facilities and programs, and Sheridan’s offerings are on par with best systems in the region.

Currently, the City of Sheridan’s park acreage aligns with the per capita national average. Strategic completion of current park amenities is a high priority, and pathways are ranked the most valued offering in the parks system. Expanding walking and bicycle pathways prevailed as the top priority for improvement, followed closely by neighborhood park enhancements and open space conservation. In addition, 71% of residents agree or strongly agree that Kendrick Park Pool should be renovated or rebuilt.

Additional opportunities for improved planning and efficiencies as well as growth and diversity of offerings remain. By considering Total Cost of Ownership, future trends in parks and recreation, community input and expanded funding sources, the City of Sheridan’s Park Facilities, Pathways and Open Spaces will continue to be a driving force for quality of life and economic vitality .

The national benchmark for park or pathway use over one year is 81%.

COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

Chapter 2



C O M M U N I T Y I N V O L V E M E N T

Qualitative Data Collection

Focus GroupsFocus groups are used in planning, marketing or evaluation to either improve a specific product or service, or more globally, during the development of strategic plans or mission statements. We gathered feedback from four focus groups. Participants included residents over the age of 55; high schoolers; and stakeholders associated with organized sports. The following summary represents key themes and findings from the focus groups.

The word cloud below reflects the most common words used when describing activities that occur in Sheridan’s parks. The larger the word, the more times the activity was mentioned.

The ideal park vis itAn ideal visit to a park includes activities associated with active uses, such as running, dog walking and pickleball. The community emphasized the importance of lawn and open space for relaxation and socialization. Proximity and wayfinding were important to users of the pathway system. Participants indicated they felt safe in Sheridan’s parks and that they were in generally good repair, allowing children to explore freely.

Participants felt that extended hours into the evening would make the park experience even more ideal, while spreading out peak user periods. Participants also recognized the need for social equity in the parks system for those who are mobility or otherwise impaired. Socialization was cited as a key component to an ideal visit, which occurs throughout our park system.

Running

Frisbee

Tossing a football (non-organiz

Exercise

Dog walking

Pickleball

Mountain biking

Picnicking

Relaxation

Socialization

Safety/Security

Ability to walk to the park

Signage & wayfinding

Accessible

Connectivity

“A trashy park is assumed to be a sketchy park.”

- Focus Group Participant

A c t i v e U s e s i n P a r k s

P a s s i v e U s e s i n P a r k s

P r o x i m i t y a n d W a y f i n d i n g N e e d s

2 - 2

Community members are seeking diverse experiences within the system. This could include multiple experiences in one day or a new experience with each day. Cultural experiences include music (either formal or spontaneous), dances, movies and farmer’s markets.

Perceptions of operat ions and maintenanceParticipants in focus groups shared their perceptions of operations and maintenance. People indicated excitement when new experiences were offered, such as Nordic skiing and pickleball. Again, the parks are perceived to be clean, safe and generally in good repair. One participant noted her perception in general, “A trashy park is assumed to be a sketchy park.” One area for improvement noted by several participants is wayfinding and signage, particularly along the pathway system.

Park capacity issues were noted by several focus groups. There is a high demand for park lands from 4:00 PM until dark. This causes conflicts between active and passive park users. In particular, recreational and organized sports participants are all looking for fields and open lawns. Some sports fields are maintained by volunteer labor which participants noted as a risk.

Organizat ional developmentCommunity members want clarity on who is responsible for overseeing parks and recreation management. The fact that the overall system is managed by multiple entities (e.g., City, Sheridan Recreation District, citizen organizations) leaves no one entity clearly accountable for the system. This can create confusion about how priorities are chosen and how to influence change. Likewise, people are having difficulty identifying who is responsible for funding what aspect of the system.

Opportunities for the visually impaired

Infrastructure for those with balance issues

Risk reduction

Dementia-friendly parks

Unisex restrooms

Benches orientated for conversation

Parking facilities

Diversity in park types or classifications

Multi-generational opportunities

Single-trip diversity (i.e. multiple experiences in one day)

Multiple-trip diversity (i.e. a new experience for each day)

Watch for user conflicts on multi-purpose facilities

River is preferred by teens over the pool

Music

Formal concerts

Individual spontaneous performances

Dances

Movies

Gardening

Farmer’s Market

Lots of people around

Siblings, friends, grandparents, community members

Family picnics

Ice cream

Food trucks

Group exercise

Watching youth sports

People are respectful

Encouraging socialization

Ability to stay home on weekends (versus traveling out of town for tournaments)

Public Art...

“...makes [the parks] look polished.”

- Focus Group Participant

I m p o r t a n c e o f S o c i a l E q u i t y I n P a r k s

I m p o r t a n c e o f D i v e r s e E x p e r i e n c e s

C u l t u r a l A c t i v i t i e s i n P a r k s

S o c i a l I n t e r a c t i o n s O c c u r a t P a r k s




Some participants are also unclear about who is responsible for different aspects of the system. In both the City and Recreation District, paid staff tend to wear many hats (versus staffing specialists in their field). This was indicated as an opportunity for improvement.

Economic impactsPeople recognize that parks and recreation play a significant role in Sheridan’s economy. Hosting tournaments and races attracts visitors to the community while allowing citizens to stay home for the weekend and spend money locally. Cultural events such as farmers markets and festivals provide the diversity of experiences that people are seeking and can be a draw for those not living in the city.

Participants suggested marketing Sheridan’s parks system to tourists because they recognize that visitors are traveling with dogs and are seeking out opportunities for exercise when traveling. They also recognize that Sheridan’s parks and recreation system is a draw for both city and county residents. As a result, the approach to this plan was modified to include households from Sheridan County School District 1.

Key Themes as Reported by Community Meeting Participants

• Parks are clean

• Community involvement

• Benches & sitting areas

• Youth Participation

• Accessibility to nature and wildlife

• Pathways

• Outdoor pool

• Ice cream

• Diversity of experiences

• Multi-use occasions

• Community use is high

2 - 4

Community MeetingsCommunity meetings were opportunities to inform the general public about the project and to provide an opportunity for direct involvement. Four meetings were held throughout the process. Attendees responded to similar questions posed in focus groups, which were integrated into the answers in the previous section.

Meeting participants shared their 10-year vision for the system, which includes multi-purpose and seasonal pathways that are accessible for all. They envision a diversity of experiences within the overall system that encourages multi-generational use. People are moving back to Sheridan for many reasons, one of which is because the parks system enhances quality of life. Water activities are highly regarded; the creek is a recreational draw, and Sheridan has a beloved outdoor pool.




Quantitative Data CollectionStatist ical ly Val id Household SurveyETC Institute administered a needs assessment survey during the first quarter of 2019. The survey was distributed as part of the City’s parks and recreation needs assessment for residents. The survey results directly contributed to the goals and recommendations throughout this plan.

For more than 20 years, ETC Institute has conducted household surveys about parks and recreation issues in more than 400 communities across 49 states. National averages have been developed for numerous strategically important parks and recreation planning and management issues. The results from the household responses for Sheridan were compared to national benchmarks to gain further strategic information.

MethodologyETC Institute mailed a survey packet to a random sample of households in Sheridan County. Each survey packet contained a cover letter, a copy of the survey, and a postage-paid return envelope. Residents who received the survey were given the option of returning the survey by mail or completing it online.

A few days after the surveys were mailed, ETC Institute sent emails and placed phone calls to the households that received the survey to encourage participation. The emails contained a link to the online version of the survey to make it easy for residents to complete the survey. To prevent people from ballot stuffing, everyone who completed the survey online was required to enter their home address prior to submitting the survey. ETC Institute then matched the addresses that were entered online with the addresses that were originally selected for the random sample.

The goal was to obtain completed surveys from at least 300 residents. We exceeded this target by 46 percent with 439 respondents. The overall results for the original mailing to 2,500 households has a 95% level of confidence. The confidence level means that if this survey was repeated 100 times, the results would be the same 95 times. This allows us to extrapolate the responses from 439 households as valid for the entire Sheridan area.

The major findings of the survey are summarized on the following pages. The full Community Survey Final Findings Report is included in Appendix-F.

Visited of any of the City of Sheridan parks, trails, or sports fields in the past 12 months?

by percentage of respondents

Yes92%

No8%

• The national benchmark for visitation of parks = 78%

2 - 6

Park and Faci l i ty Uti l izat ion Ratings• 92% of households used parks, pathways or sports fields over the past 12 months• 72% or households visited at least once a month

The national benchmark for park u tilization is 81%.

Scatterplot graph indicates community survey participation

Frequency of visitation of parks, trails, or sports fields in Sheridan in the past 12 months, on average?

by percentage of respondents who have visited City parks, trails, or sports fields in the past 12-months

At least once a week28%

A few times a month30%

At least once a month

14%

A few times a year27%

Less than once a year2%

Condition of each of the following facilities that have been visited in the past 12 months


7%10%10%

12%13%13%

26%17%

22%15%

21%21%

19%18%

35%36%37%

34%48%

52%

41%39%42%

41%41%

47%36%

48%43%

51%46%46%51%

56%42%

43%47%

50%45%

43%

35%38%35%

36%30%

35%29%

27%24%

30%30%

19%25%

25%17%

18%12%

13%7%4%

14%9%

10%8%

9%4%

6%6%

9%5%4%

8%3%

1%

5%3%

3%2%

3%5%4%3%

6%2%

3%3%3%

6%2%

1%

1%

2%

1%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Linden Sledding HillKendrick Pool

Oatts Fields Complex (6th St.)Washington Park (Coffeen Ave.)

Sheridan Avenue Dog ParkThorne-Rider Park

Elk & Buffalo ExhibitKendrick Golf Course

Black Tooth Park (West 5th St.)Dan Madia Fields Complex

Emerson Park (Sheltered Acres)Thorne-Rider Dog Park

Huntington Dog ParkMarshall Park (Big Horn Ave.)

North Park Natural AreaKendrick Arboretum

Kendrick ParkCemetery

South Park Natural AreaCity Pathways & Trails

Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor

The national benchmark for excellent condition rating of parks, trails, facilities for excellent is 30%.




Park Condit ion Ratings• 95% of residents ranked City pathway and trail conditions to be good or excellent• 93% of residents ranked the condition of South Park Natural Area as good or excellent• 6 of 20 park or pathway destinations were rated above the national benchmark for excellent

The national benchmark for excellent is 31 percent.

Parks and Recreation FacilitiesRespondent Households Have a Need For

by percentage of respondents (multiple choices could be chosen)

4%7%7%

13%15%

21%22%24%24%25%26%26%28%29%30%

33%35%36%

43%44%

46%48%

58%61%

75%80%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

OtherEquestrian trails

Skateboarding parkVolleyball courts

Outdoor basketballTennis/pickleball courts

Environmental education centerFootball/lacrosse/rugby/soccer fields

Baseball/softball fieldsCommunity gardens

Gymnasium (indoor youth sports)Golf course

Off-leash dog parkKayak/canoe launches

Cross country skiing coursesIce rinks

Archery/shooting rangesSplash parks

Off-road bike trails or bike parksPlaygrounds

Outdoor swimming poolsIndoor exercise facility

Picnic sheltersOpen space conservation areas/trails

Neighborhood & community parksWalking & biking trails

2 - 8

Faci l i ty Needs, Unmet Needs and ImportanceRespondents were asked to indicate from a list of facilities/amenities whether or not they had a need. If the respondent indicated a need for the facility, they were then asked to rate how well their needs were being met.

Faci l i ty Needs Eighty percent (80%) indicated a need for pathways. The other high ranking facility needs include:

• Neighborhood and community parks (75%).

• Open space conservation areas (61%)

• Swimming pools/water parks/splash pads (59%).

• Picnic shelters (58%).

The national benchmark for trail needs is 70%

How Well Household Needs Are Being Met for Faci l i t iesBased on the number of households that indicated their needs were only being partly met or not met at 50%, this means that an estimated 1,760 households have an unmet need for kayak/canoe launches.

FacilitiesThat Are Most Important to Respondent Householdsby percentage of respondents who selected the items as one of their top four choices

3%1%2%

3%3%4%5%5%

6%7%8%8%8%9%9%

12%13%14%14%15%

16%20%21%

28%41%

65%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

OtherSkateboarding park

Environmental education centerVolleyball courts

Outdoor basketballEquestrian trails

Gymnasium (indoor youth sports)Tennis/pickleball courts

Football/lacrosse/rugby/soccer fieldsCommunity gardens

Baseball/softball fieldsIce rinks

Splash parksCross country skiing courses

Kayak/canoe launchesGolf course

Archery/shooting rangesOff-road bike trails or bike parks

Indoor exercise facilityOff-leash dog park

PlaygroundsPicnic shelters

Outdoor swimming poolsOpen space conservation areas/trails


Most Important 2nd Most Important 3rd Most Important 4th Most Important

National Benchmark for:Trails 45%

Open Space 21%Outdoor Swimming 17%

Picnic Shelters 14%



Sheridan’s other unmet facility needs include:

• Indoor exercise facility (1,552 households).

• Archery/shooting Ranges (1,525 households).

• Cross country skiing courses (1,504 households).

Faci l i ty Importance Based on the sum of respondents’ top four choices, 65% indicated pathways were the most important to their household.

Other most important facilities include:


• Open space conservation areas/pathways (28%).

• Outdoor swimming pools (21%).

• Picnic shelters (20%).

The national benchmark for trail imp ortance is 42%.


Unmet Needs for Facilitiesby number of households based on an estimated total of 8,469 households in the City of Sheridan, Wyoming

229 259 277

387 415

508 546 558

662 722

754 765 797 815 847

935 1,070

1,183 1,246

1,328 1,334 1,354

1,504 1,525 1,552

1,760

0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000

OtherPlaygrounds

Ice rinksSkateboarding park

Equestrian trailsGolf course

Football/lacrosse/rugby/soccer fieldsNeighborhood & community parks

Baseball/softball fieldsOutdoor basketball

Walking & biking trailsOff-leash dog park

Tennis/pickleball courtsPicnic shelters

Volleyball courtsCommunity gardens

Gymnasium (indoor youth sports)Off-road bike trails or bike parks

Splash parksOutdoor swimming pools

Open space conservation areas/trailsEnvironmental education center

Cross country skiing coursesArchery/shooting ranges

Indoor exercise facilityKayak/canoe launches

Partly Met Not Met

2 - 1 0

Program Needs, Unmet Needs and Importance

Program Needs: Sixty-eight percent (68%) of households indicated an unmet need for farmers markets/food vendors.

Other program needs that ranked high are:

• Picnicking facilities (57% of households).

• Community special events (49% of households).

• Fitness and wellness programs (49% of households).

The national benchmark for special events is 39%.

The national benchmark for adult fitness and wellness pro grams is 46%.

Parks and Recreation Programs that Respondent Households Have a Need Forby percentage of respondents (multiple choices could be chosen)

2%5%

7%8%

10%10%10%12%13%13%13%15%16%17%

21%23%23%24%25%

28%28%

32%34%

41%41%

49%49%

57%68%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

OtherYouth lacrosse programs

Recreation/competitive swim teamsAdult basketball programsYouth volleyball programsAdult volleyball programs

Youth softball programsPrograms for people with special needs

Youth basketball programsYouth football programsYouth baseball programsYouth soccer programs

Tennis/pickleball lessons & leaguesGolf lessons/clinics

Open gymnasium (indoor youth sports)After school/out of school programs & camps

Youth enrichment programsDiverse offering of adult recreation leagues

Youth learn-to-swim programsWater fitness programs/lap swimming

Performing arts programsYoga, Zumba or other aerobic classes

Outdoor adventure programsOpen swim

Programs & services for adults 55+Fitness & wellness programs

Community special eventsPicnic shelters and/or picnic areas

Farmers markets/food vendors

65% of residents indicated pathways were most important

to their household

2 - 1 1P A R K F A C I L I T I E S , P A T H W A Y S A N D


How Well Needs Are Being Met for Programs Based on the number of households who indicated their needs were only being partly met or not met, an estimated 1,923 households would indicate that outdoor adventure programs had the greatest level of unmet need.

Other unmet needs include: • Open Swim (estimated 1,694 households).• Programs and services for adults 55+ (estimated 1,566 households).• Fitness and wellness programs (estimated 1,546 households).


Unmet Needs for Programs by number of households based on an estimated total of 8,469 households in the City of Sheridan, Wyoming

133 195 216 261 261 277 319 345 366 375

468 633 647

713 727

825 841 853 896

1,005 1,022

1,106 1,124

1,209 1,238

1,546 1,566

1,694 1,923

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500


Youth soccer programsRecreation/competitive swim teams

Youth football programsYouth volleyball programsAdult volleyball programsYouth baseball programs

Adult basketball programsYouth basketball programs

Youth softball programsPerforming arts programs

Programs for people with special needsGolf lessons/clinics

Youth learn-to-swim programsOpen gymnasium (indoor youth sports)

Tennis/pickleball lessons & leaguesCommunity special events

Picnic shelters and/or picnic areasYouth enrichment programs

Diverse offering of adult recreation leaguesWater fitness programs/lap swimming

After school/out of school programs & campsYoga, Zumba or other aerobic classes

Farmers markets/food vendorsFitness & wellness programs

Programs & services for adults 55+Open swim

Outdoor adventure programs

Partly Met Not Met

2 - 1 2

Recreation ProgramsThat Are Most Important to Respondent Householdsby percentage of respondents who selected the items as one of their top four choices

2%1%1%1%2%2%3%3%

4%4%5%

6%6%

6%7%7%

8%8%

9%9%10%10%

15%16%

22%24%

26%28%

37%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%

OtherAdult basketball programsYouth lacrosse programs

Recreation/competitive swim teamsYouth volleyball programs

Youth football programsAdult volleyball programs

Youth basketball programsYouth baseball programs

Diverse offering of adult recreation leaguesYouth soccer programs

Programs for people with special needsOpen gymnasium (indoor youth sports)



Youth enrichment programsYoga, Zumba or other aerobic classes

After school/out of school programs & campsYouth learn-to-swim programs

Water fitness programs/lap swimmingOutdoor adventure programs

Open swimPrograms & services for adults 55+

Fitness & wellness programsPicnic shelters and/or picnic areas

Community special eventsFarmers markets/food vendors


National Benchmark for:Special Events 21%

The national benchmark for special events is 21%



Program ImportanceBased on the percentage of households who indicated the program as one of their top four choices, 37% indicated farmers markets/food vendor events were the most important to their household.

Other programs ranked as most important include:

• Community special events (28%).

• Picnicking services (26%).

• Fitness and wellness programs (24%).

• Programs and services for adults 55+ (22%).


Most Important Improvements Overallby percentage of respondents who selected the items as one of their top four choices

2%5%

6%7%

8%

9%

12%

14%

15%16%

16%18%

22%23%

25%

28%

29%

37%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%

The skate park

Expanding playground areas

Improving/expanding dog-friendly facilities

Existing athletic fields

Gymnasium space

Adding multi-use non-motorized trails

Dog parks

Providing creek/water access

Outdoor splash parks

Multi-use sports complex (baseball, soccer, softball, etc.)

Adding trails/walking loops in existing parks

Cross-country skiing/snowshoeing trails

Parks in general

Expanding pathway system

Kendrick Pool

Purchase land to preserve open space

Neighborhood & community parks

New walking/biking trails


2 - 1 4

Potential improvements most wi l l ing to supportRespondents were asked to indicate their level of support for various improvements to the Sheridan parks, pathways, and recreation system.

The most supported improvements include:

• New walking/biking pathways (37%)


• Purchase land to preserve open space (28%).

• Kendrick Pool (25%).

• Expanding pathway system (23%).

• Repair existing parks (22%).

Level of agreement that it is important that Kendrick Pool is renovated or rebuilt.

by percentage of respondents who selected the items as one of their top four choices

Strongly agree48%

Agree23%

Neutral17%

Disagree7%

Strongly disagree3%

Undecided3%



Level of agreement that i t is important to renovate or rebui ld Kendrick Pool 71% of households “strongly agree” or “agree” that the City should renovate or rebuild Kendrick Pool.

Needs Assessment Priority Rankings

The purpose of the Program and Facility Priority Rankings is to provide a ranked list of facility/amenity needs and recreation program needs for the community. This model evaluates both quantitative and qualitative data.

• Quantitative data includes the statistically valid survey, which asked residents to list unmet needs and rank their importance.

• Qualitative data includes resident feedback obtained during community input sessions, stakeholder interviews, staff input, recreation trends, and consultant recommendations.

• A weighted scoring system was used to determine the priorities for facilities and recreation programs.

These weighted scores provide an overall score and priority ranking for the system as a whole. The results of the priority ranking are tabulated into three categories: High Priority (top third), Medium Priority (middle third), and Low Priority (bottom third).


Prioritized NeedsProgram/Service Priority

Farmer's Market/Food VendorsFitness & Wellness ProgramsOutdoor Adventure ProgramsPrograms and Services for Adults 55+Open SwimCommunity Special EventsPicnickingVisiting ParksWater Fitness ProgramsAfter School/Out of School Programs and CampsYouth Enrichment/Learning ProgramsDiverse Offering of Adult Recreation Sports LeaguesTennis & Pickleball Lessons and LeaguesOpen Gymnasium for YouthGolf Lessons & LeaguesPerforming Arts ProgramsPrograms for People with Special NeedsYouth SportsRecreation Competitive Swim Teams

High

Medium

Low

FaciliWalking and Biking TraOpen Space ConservatKayak/Canoe LaunchesIndoor Exercise FacilityOutdoor Swimming PooArchery/Shooting RangCross Country Skiing CNeighborhood and ComOff-Road Bike Trails or Splash ParksEnvironmental EducatioPicnic SheltersGymnasiumsOff-Leash Dog ParksCommunity GardensTennis/Pickleball CourtVolleyball CourtsBaseball/Softball FieldsGolf CourseOutdoor Basketball CouFootball/Lacrosse/RugbPlaygroundsEquestrian TrailsIce RinksSkate Parks

2 - 1 6

Program and Service Rankings

m

Facility/Amenity PriorityWalking and Biking TrailsOpen Space Conservation AreasKayak/Canoe LaunchesIndoor Exercise FacilityOutdoor Swimming PoolsArchery/Shooting RangesCross Country Skiing CoursesNeighborhood and Community ParksOff-Road Bike Trails or Bike ParksSplash ParksEnvironmental Education CenterPicnic SheltersGymnasiumsOff-Leash Dog ParksCommunity GardensTennis/Pickleball CourtsVolleyball CourtsBaseball/Softball FieldsGolf CourseOutdoor Basketball CourtsFootball/Lacrosse/Rugby/Soccer FieldsPlaygroundsEquestrian TrailsIce RinksSkate Parks

High

Low

Medium



Faci l i ty and Amenity Rankings

RECOMMENDATIONS, GOALS & OBJECTIVES

Chapter 3



PhilosophyThe comprehensive master plan should be

viewed in the context of a strategic plan. The strategic plan is cyclic, meaning the goals and objectives are reviewed at a five year (minimum) and ten year (maximum) cycle. Goals express the desired state as reflected from the public engagement process and industry standard best practice recommendations. The objectives provide guidance on how to achieve those goals. Implementation is a process that commences after plan approval by leadership to develop timelines and allocate resources. Leadership is also tasked with developing measurements and key performance indicators (KPI’s). Finally, when success is achieved, it must be communicated to elected officials and the public via press releases, town hall meetings and dedicated celebrations.

Total Cost of OwnershipThe total cost of ownership is a sustainability philosophy that encompasses the big picture of sustaining a parks and recreation system. The cost is the sum of three inputs that are considered for the proper allocation of fiscal, human and equipment resources.

Capital investments provide the opportunity to diversify recreational offerings, showcase a community’s unique attributes and tend to have the greatest access to diverse funding. Life-cycle reinvestment never ends and adds to the list of items that will need future reinvestment. Operation and maintenance costs usually the most dependent on annual tax revenues.

Capital Investment + Life Cycle Replacement + Operations & Maintenance =

TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP

R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S , G O A L S & O B J E C T I V E S

3 - 2

Capital Investment – “Adding to your system”Short-term New Investments (within the next 5 years)Goal : Continue investment in the pathways experience.Objective 1: Add rest stations along existing pathways. A rest station may include a bench, shade or wind protection.

Objective 2: Add new or improve existing trail heads with adequate parking (including accessible parking), restrooms, wayfinding/signage, waste receptacles and seating areas. (Similar to South Park)

Objective 3: Develop a wayfinding plan for the pathways system that incorporates signage, kiosks, printed maps and digital apps.

Goal : Provide addit ional access to and awareness of exist ing opportunit ies for water-based recreation.Objective 1: Develop a canoe/kayak launch area into creeks, ponds and lakes.

Objective 2: Continue access to the local creeks and rivers and promote the access through a targeted marketing campaign. Work with stakeholders and partners to identify who would be the lead entity on the campaign.

Objective 3: Work with program partners to offer canoe/kayak/paddleboard rentals.

Goal : Increase the number and variety of picnic shelters in exist ing parks and prior it ize the instal lat ion of shelters in new parks.Objective 1: Identify parks that can support large groups of people with adequate parking, water and sanitary access, restroom and waste

receptacles. Build large shelters that will accommodate 30 to 50 people.

1a. Provide enhanced services at the large shelters with a butler kitchen and restrooms.

1b. Place large shelters within 100 feet of a parking area or drive access.

1c. Work with the Sheridan Recreation District on developing a reservation-based system and fees.

1d. Evaluate the demand and return on investment for a four-season shelter.

Objective 2: In smaller neighborhood parks, construct medium-sized shelters that accommodate 10-16 people.

Objective 3: In natural areas or at trail heads, construct small shelters that accommodate 4 to 8 people.

Goal : Determine the future of Kendrick Park Pool .Objective 1: Prepare an aquatics feasibility study that evaluates the desirability of the latest trends in outdoor aquatics by Sheridan’s users.

Objective 2: Identify opportunities for outdoor swimming that encompasses multi-generational and all-abilities use.

Objective 3: Collaborate with other aquatic partners (i.e. YMCA, School District) to identify opportunities for unique or separate aquatic experiences and to avoid redundancy of aquatic services provided by others.

Objective 4: Prepare a business plan that reflects operating costs, projected revenues,




concession and rental opportunities. Evaluate the effectiveness of operating into the evening hours for special events.

Goal : Develop an athlet ic f ie ld system uti l izat ion and management plan.Objective 1: Review the utilization and programming of the existing athletic fields to identify if improvements can be made in scheduling efficiencies.

Objective 2: Conduct assessments of physical aspects of existing fields/complexes to evaluate functionality and existing conditions of fields owned by the City of Sheridan. The assessment provides suggestions for possible repair, replacement or modification of each field element to meet the recreational use requirements needed by the community.

Objective 3: Continue evaluation of the Doubleday Sports Complex and its associated master plan with specific emphasis on the Total Cost of Ownership.

3a. Prepare an operational plan that includes maintenance standards, management strategies and staffing organizational structure.

3b. Prepare a comprehensive financial plan that clearly identifies capital and operational revenue sources with five-year proforma, revenue and expenditure models.

3c. If the sports complex is desired as a tournament complex, prepare an economic impact analysis to determine the economic benefit and tourism impact to the Sheridan area.

Long-term New Investments (5 to 10 years)Goal : Diversify the types of experiences offered in the trai ls system.Objective 1: Increase opportunities for

equestrian access. Target south Sheridan areas for equestrian development. Partner with the County, non-profit organizations and landowners on acquiring easements for equestrian trails.

Objective 2: Within existing parks, develop looped pathways that allow for short distance recreation within neighborhoods. Coordinate with health partners to encourage and market short-distance recreation programs.

Objective 3: Develop a bike skills park. The park should target two different skill levels: Beginner skill level would target preschool and elementary school riders. Moderate skill level should target high school and college riders.

Goal : Develop park infrastructure that supports a wide variety of events, and community-oriented park act ivit ies .Objective 1: Invest in A/V technology and WiFi that allows for superior sound and visual quality.

Objective 2: Provide concessions and food truck opportunities at the events.

Objective 3: Identify locations in addition to Kendrick Park to host the events to allow for multiple neighborhood participation.

Goal : Identify opportunit ies for potentia l acquis it ion of open space and conservation lands.Objective 1: Acquire tracts of land for conservation and open space value. Adopt criteria that will be utilized to evaluate the potential acquisition.

Objective 2: Participate in discussions with landowners and non-profit organizations about land acquisition.

3 - 4

Objective 3: Develop resource management plans that address care of the land’s flora and fauna and appropriate levels of recreational use on the land.

Goal : Implement the master plans for new parks, f inish invest ing in exist ing parks before acquir ing new land.Objective 1: Finish developing new parks to a full implementation status, complete with support facilities such as restrooms, shelters, irrigation systems and tree plantings.

Objective 2: Any undeveloped city-owned park without a master plan should have a site-specific master plan developed to guide the implementation.

Life Cycle Replacement – “Life cycle replacement never ends”Goal : Define capital improvements related to parks in the City ’s 5-year capital improvement program (CIP) .Objective 1: Inventory existing park assets with a condition rating system. For each asset, identify the year (or decade) the asset was installed, the value of the replacement and assign years of typical life an asset should serve a system.

Objective 2: Inventory and input new park asset installations into to the CIP schedule.

Goal : El iminate deferred maintenance backlogs within 15 years.Objective 1: Utilizing the CIP, allocate adequate funding to repair the highest priority park assets.

Objective 2: Prioritize backlogs related to risk management and safety repairs first and then replacing/upgrading aging infrastructure based upon highest use as identified by community surveys.

Goal : Uti l ize the current City work-order management system to track assets and schedule maintenance act ivit ies .Objective 1: Effectively and efficiently deploy resources to address maintenance needs and to measure the productivity of the work. The results will provide on-demand accountability of the management of public resources.

Objective 2: Track labor, equipment and material costs to more accurately budget and forecast upcoming needs that results in data-driven decision making.

Operations & MaintenancePolic ies & ProceduresGoal : Review and consider changes to 3rd party (e .g . Sheridan Recreation Distr ict , Kendrick Golf Course, Sheridan Athlet ic Associat ion, etc. ) contract agreements that are fair and equitable for both the City and organizat ion. Objective 1: Clearly delineate revenue sources, capture and reporting.

Objective 2: Set performance expectations with 3rd party contractors and perform frequent reviews of those expectations.

Objective 3: Review programming in the parks and along the pathways to identify possible over-utilization of systems that will result in more frequent repairs and replacements.

Goal : Consider opportunit ies to extend park use later into the evening and throughout the winter. Objective 1: Work with program partners to provide multi-generational programs that utilize the parks beyond their peak time.

Objective 2: Explore options for heated restroom facilities in high-use parks.




Goal : Review park rules and regulat ions on an annual basis to ensure al ignment with publ ic expectat ions.Objective 1: Ensure that all facilities and clean, safe and in good repair.

Objective 2: Review regulations for strategies in the latest risk management recommendations.

Staff ingGoal : Continual ly evaluate staff ing needs through recurrent task-t ime analysis .Objective 1: Track time via the four service lines: general parks, urban forest, cemetery and pathways.

Objective 2: Track time utilizing a work-order management system, such as CityWorks.

Goal : Consider consol idat ing the City Parks Divis ion and the Sheridan Recreation Distr ict into one entity.Objective 1: Conduct workshops between the two agencies to determine the proper alignment of duties and program requirements.

Objective 2: Interview peer communities (i.e. Cody) on the pros and cons of a consolidated department.

Objective 3: Restructure operations and maintenance programs to provide consistency among all parks, rails, open spaces and athletic fields.

Goal : Invest in staff through continuing education and professional memberships to increase retention and recruitment and retention of parks and recreation professionals .Objective 1: Participate in educational opportunities provided by the National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA). One example is Parks and Recreation Maintenance Management School.

Objective 2: Encourage staff to attain additional credentials through NRPA in programs such as Certified Playground Safety Inspectors, Aquatics Facility Operations Managers, Certified Parks and Recreation Professional, etc.

Performance BenchmarksGoal : Identify a desired level of service for the different park offer ings and establ ish performance benchmarks for each.Objective 1: Utilize the 2015 master plan’s recommendations on park descriptions and amenities to establish a level of service for each park currently in the system.

Objective 2: Identify a level of measurement to identify success for each benchmark.

Goal : Communicate performance expectat ions to staff and third-party contractors (e .g . Sheridan Recreation Distr ict , Kendrick Golf Course, Sheridan Athlet ic Associat ion, etc. ) and conduct annual performance reviews.

Objective 1: Ensure that expectations are reasonable and attainable within the realities of human and fiscal resources.

Objective 2: Allow for adjustments to the expectations based upon new information, technologies or changing trends in the industry.

Goal : Implement data col lect ion methodologies to measure vis itor use and sat isfact ion.Objective 1: Install trail counters to measure pedestrian and bicycle use on pathways, peak use hours, days of the week. Use this data to prioritize reinvestment in the system.

Objective 2: Install vehicle counters at parking lots to identify peak hours of use, traffic patterns and estimated use.

3 - 6

Objective 3: After a new installation or renovation, conduct intercept surveys to qualitatively measure user satisfaction and identify any community needs or trends affecting the parks.

Fiscal ResourcesGoal : Capital ize on funding opportunit ies to ensure the park system meets a high-qual ity level of service.Objective 1: Identify donors or foundations that are most interested in funding new capital investment.

Objective 2: Create a policy regarding donor recognition, naming rights and other gifting requirements, such as duration and ability to change names.

Objective 3: Pursue grant opportunities such as Land and Water Conservation Fund, Recreational Trails Program, funds from insurance companies and/or playground grants that allow for both capital and maintenance funding.

Objective 4: Pursue further dedication of public tax funds towards improvements needed in parks and recreation.

Goal : Improve f iscal accounting to determine the true cost of ownership of parks through data-driven report ing.Objective 1: Implement the use of CityWorks to track costs of staffing, equipment and repairs.

Funding OpportunitiesIn order to continue to build and maintain the parks and recreation system, funding should be pursued for operations and capital improvement projects, such as those presented in this plan.

New, sustainable funding sources are essential to implementing a capital improvement plan. There

is substantial potential for increasing revenues for the parks and recreation system while still providing affordable recreation opportunities. The following are high level funding options that should be vetted as the Department develops a one to ten-year capital improvement program in 2019.

Primary Funding OptionsGrantsThe grant market continues to grow annually. Grant writers and researchers are essential if the Department is to pursue grants. Matching dollars are required for most federal grants and many state grants. A detailed listing of grants available to the Department can be found in the Appendix of the plan.

Community Parks Foundation A Parks Foundation is a joint-development funding source with the City of Sheridan. The foundation operates as a non-profit organization, working on behalf of the public agency to raise needed dollars to support its vision and operational needs.

The dollars raised by the foundation are tax-exempt. Foundations promote specific causes, activities, or issues that the City of Sheridan’s Parks and Recreation Department needs to address. They offer a variety of means to fund capital projects, including capital campaigns, gifts catalogs, fundraisers, endowments, sales of park-related memorabilia, etc.

Private donations may be received in the form of cash, securities, land, facilities, recreation equipment, art, or in-kind services.

Capital Improvement FeesMany park and recreation systems add a capital-improvement fee onto an existing user fee when they develop or enhance major recreation facilities. This is usually applied to golf courses,




aquatic facilities, recreation centers, ice rinks, amphitheaters, and special-use facilities like sports complexes. The dollars gained either offset the cost of the capital improvement or the revenue bond that was used to develop or enhance the special-use facility. Once the capital improvement is paid off, the fee typically expires and is discontinued.

Park Development FeesMany municipalities seek developer contributions for park lands and for the creation of pathways that run through the development. The developer perceives the enhanced value such improvements mean for her or his development. Park or trail dedication as a requirement of subdivision development is a reliable means for maintaining equity of access to parks and pathways.

Development Impact FeesFees imposed on a development to help finance the cost of improvements or services. These fees are typically charged on a per dwelling basis.

PartnershipsPartnerships are joint-development funding sources or operational funding sources formed between separate agencies, such as two government entities, a non-profit and a public agency, or a private business and a public agency. Partners jointly develop revenue-producing park and recreation facilities and share risk, operational costs, responsibilities, and asset management based on the strengths of each partner.

Other Funding OptionsFriends Associat ionFriends associations are typically formed to raise money for a single purpose, such as a specific park facility or program that will better the community.

Corporate and Personal GivingCorporate and personal giving involves the City seeking corporate funds or personal gifts through a foundation partner or personal contacts.Lead donations can set the precedent for additional giving over a period of one year up to five years.

DonationsPrivate donations are a popular form of fundraising by public agencies, particularly for facilities and services that are highly visible and valued by the public. Donations can be channeled through a foundation or friends group aligned with the parks and recreation system’s priorities. Donations can be made through one or more of the following methods:

• Donations of cash to a specific park or trail segment by community members and businesses

• Donations of services by large corporations to reduce the cost of park or trail implementation, including equipment and labor to construct and install elements of a specific park or trail

• Reductions in the cost of materials purchased from local businesses that support parks and pathways implementation, and can supply essential products for facilities.

3 - 8

User FeesUser fees are fees paid by a user of recreational facilities or programs to offset the costs of services in operating a park or a recreation facility, or in delivering programs. A perception of “value” needs to be instilled in the community for the benefits the agency is providing to the user for exclusive use. Future fees could be charged by the agency based on cost-recovery goals for the parks and core recreation services, based on the level of exclusivity the user receives compared to the general taxpayer.

Recreation Service FeesThis is a dedicated user fee for the purpose of constructing and maintaining recreation facilities. The fee can apply to all activities that require a reservation. Examples of such activities include adult basketball, volleyball, tennis, and softball leagues, youth baseball, soccer, football and softball leagues, and special-interest classes. The fee allows participants an opportunity to contribute to the upkeep of the facilities.

Park Revolving FundThis is a dedicated fund replenished on an ongoing basis from various funding sources such as grants, sponsorships, advertising, program-user fees, and rental fees within one or more parks. The City could establish a revolving fund to supported maintenance at multiple parks.

Advert is ing Sales Advertising on trash cans, playgrounds, dog parks, pathways, flower pots, and via special events can help pay for operational costs.

Maintenance Endowment Fund This is a fund dedicated exclusively to a park’s maintenance and is funded by a percentage of user fees from programs, events and rentals. The fee is paid by users and is added to a dedicated fund for facility and equipment replacement, such as fitness equipment, water slides, lights, artificial turf, and park-maintenance equipment.

Irrevocable Remainder TrustsThese trusts are established for individuals who typically have more than $1 million in wealth. They agree to leave a portion of their wealth to a park-and-recreation system in a trust fund that grows over time. The system is able to use a portion of the interest to support specific facilities or programs that are designated by the trustee.

Dedicated Sales TaxOne potential funding source for the parks and recreation system is an additional percentage sales tax that is committed to maintaining park sites, infrastructure, recreational fields, and pathways. The advantage of a sales tax is that it collects revenues from both residents and non-residents who do business in Sheridan.

Dedicated Mil lageThis source provides the opportunity for the park-and-recreation system to demonstrate how well it is meeting the community’s needs through a voter-approved millage. In the last five years in the United States, 93% of all park-related bond and millage issues have passed. Communities demonstrate the value of parks when given the opportunity to vote on an increase.

Lease BacksThis is another source of capital funding wherein banks or private placement-fund companies develop a park or recreation attraction or complex by purchasing the land, developing a recreational attraction, and then lease it back to the agency to pay off the land or capital costs over a 30- to 40-year period. Agencies may find this source attractive because typically they can increase operational budgets more easily than finding capital dollars to pay off the lease over a set period of time.




Franchise Fee for Uti l i ty Right-of-WaysMany agencies have sold the development rights below the ground to utility companies for fiber optic lines, water, sewer, electricity lines, and cable conduits on a linear foot basis.

Catering Permits and ServicesThis allows caterers to work in the park-and-recreation system on a permit basis with a set fee or a percentage of food sales returning to the Department. Many Departments have catering-service contracts and receive a percentage (10-15%) from the sale of food and drinks. This may be most suitable for large or special events occurring on publicly-owned properties. Another form of fee income is the temporary business license.

Private Concessionaires operat ing within a Land LeaseContracts with private businesses to provide and operate desirable recreational activities provide compensation to the agency through a land lease. Contractors may include coffee shops, grill and food concessions, small restaurants, ice cream shops, bicycle shops, farmers markets, and small businesses. Land leases are usually based on 15% of the value of the land plus a percentage of gross revenues from the contractor on an annual basis.

Surplus PropertyOne-time revenue from the disposing of surplus City property. This may include undeveloped parcels or under-utilized development spaces that are no longer needed in the system.

PARK LAND & ASSET INVENTORY

Chapter 4



P A R K L A N D & A S S E T I N V E N T O R Y

Park Classification and Design PrinciplesIn developing design principles for parks, it is important that each park be programmed, planned, and designed to meet the needs of its service area and classification within the overall parks and recreation system. The term programming, when used in the context of planning and developing parkland, refers to a list of uses and facilities and does not always include staff-managed recreation programs. The program for a site can include such elements as ball fields, spray parks, shelters, restrooms, game courts, trails, natural resource stewardship, open meadows, nature preserves, and interpretive areas. These are considered lead or support amenities. Local population needs should be considered and accommodated at each type of park.

Every park, regardless of type, should have an established set of outcomes. Park planners and designers align recommendations with those outcomes, including operational and maintenance costs associated with designs.

Each park classification category serves a specific purpose, and the features and facilities in the park must be designed for the number of age segments the park serves, the desired length of stay deemed appropriate, and the uses it has been assigned. Recreation needs and services require different design standards based on the age segments in the area. Many age segments will be accommodated with the park program depending on the classification of the park.

All parks and recreation facilities and amenities are required, by federal law, to adhere to Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

Terminology Used in Classif icat ion and Design PrinciplesLand Usage: The percentage of space identified for either passive use or active use in a park. Active land uses include playgrounds, unprogrammed open space, sport courts, etc. Passive land includes areas for conservation, geologic features and benches.

Programming: Can include active or passive programming. Active means it is organized and planned with pre-registration by the user. Examples of active programming include sports leagues, day camps, and aquatics. Passive programming is self-directed by the user at their own pace. Examples of passive programming includes playground usage, picnicking, disc golf, reading and walking the dog.

Park/Facility Classifications: Includes Pocket Park, Neighborhood Park, Community Park, Regional Park, Sports Complex Facility, Recreation/Special Use Park and Greenbelts and Conservation.

Revenue Facilities: Facilities that have a user charge which could include an access, player, team or permit fee. These could include pools, golf courses, tennis courts, recreation centers, sport field complexes, concession facilities, hospitality centers, reservable shelters, outdoor or indoor theatre space, and special event spaces.

Signature Facility/Amenity: This is an enhanced facility or amenity which is viewed by the community as deserving of special recognition due to its design, location, function, natural resources, etc.

Maintenance Standards: Level 1 is the most intense level of maintenance. Levels 2 and 3 maintenance decrease in intensity and resources.

Design principles for each park classification are included in the following sections.

4 - 2

Pocket ParksA pocket park is a small outdoor space, usually .25 acres to three acres, most often located in an urban area surrounded by commercial buildings or houses. Pocket parks are small spaces that may serve a variety of functions, such as: small event space, play areas for children, spaces for relaxing and socializing, taking lunch breaks, etc. Successful pocket parks have four key qualities: they are accessible; allow people to engage in activities; are comfortable and inviting spaces; and are sociable places. In general, pocket parks offer minimal on site amenities and are not designed to support programmed activities. The service area for pocket parks is usually less than a quarter-mile and they are intended for users within walking distance of the park.

Neighborhood ParkA neighborhood park should be three to 10 acres; however, some neighborhood parks are determined by use and facilities offered, and not by size alone. The service radius for a neighborhood park is one mile. Neighborhood parks should have safe pedestrian access for surrounding residents. Parking is typically not provided for neighborhood parks less than five acres in size, but if included, accounts for less than ten cars and provides for ADA access. Neighborhood parks serve the recreational and social focus of the adjoining neighborhoods and contribute to a distinct neighborhood identity.

• Service radius: 1.0-mile radius.

• Site Selection: On a local or collector street. If near an arterial street, provide natural or artificial barrier. Where possible, next to a school. Encourage location to link subdivisions and linked by trails to other parks.

• Length of stay: One-hour experience or less.

• Amenities: One signature amenity (e.g. playground, spray ground park, sport court, gazebo); no restrooms unless necessary for signature amenity; may include one non-programmed sports field; playgrounds for ages 2-5 and 5-12; no reservable shelters; loop trails; one type of sport court; benches, small picnic shelters next to play areas.

• Landscape Design: Appropriate design to enhance the park theme/use/experience.

• Revenue facilities: none.

• Land usage: 85 percent active/15 percent passive.

• Programming: Typically, none, but a signature amenity may be included which is programmed.

• Maintenance Standards: Provide the highest-level maintenance with available funding. Seek a goal of Level 2 maintenance standards. Some amenities may require Level 1 maintenance.

• Signage: Directional signage and facility/amenity regulations to enhance user experience.

• Parking: Design should include widened on-street parking area adjacent to park. Goal is to maximize usable park space. As necessary, provide 5-10 spaces within park including accessible spaces. Traffic calming devices encouraged next to park.

• Lighting: Security only.

• Size of park: Typically, Three to 10 acres.



Community ParkCommunity parks are intended to be accessible to multiple neighborhoods and should focus on meeting community-based recreational needs, as well as preserving unique landscapes and open spaces. Community parks are generally larger in scale than neighborhood parks, but smaller than regional parks and are designed typically for residents who live within a three-mile radius. When possible, the park may be developed adjacent to a school. Community parks provide recreational opportunities for the entire family and often contain facilities for specific recreational purposes: athletic fields, tennis courts, extreme sports amenity, loop trails, picnic areas, reservable picnic shelters, sports courts, restrooms with drinking fountains, large turfed and landscaped areas and a playground or spray ground. Passive outdoor recreation activities such as meditation, quiet reflection, and wildlife watching also take place at community parks.

Community parks range from 10 to 75 acres depending on the community. Community parks serve a larger area, one-to-three mile radius, and contain more amenities than a Neighborhood park.

• Service radius: One- to three-mile radius.

• Site Selection: On two collector streets minimum and preferably one arterial street. If near an arterial street, provide natural or artificial barrier. Minimal number of residences abutting site. Preference is streets on four sides, or three sides with school or municipal use on fourth side. Encourage trail linkage to other parks.

• Length of stay: Two to three hours experience.

• Amenities: Four signature amenities at a minimum: (e.g., trails, sports fields, large shelters/ pavilions, community playground for ages 2-5 and 5-12 with some shaded elements, recreation center, pool or family aquatic center, sports courts, water feature); public restrooms with drinking fountains, ample parking, and security lighting. Sport Fields and Sport Complexes are typical at this park.

• Revenue facilities: One or more (e.g. pool, sports complex, pavilion).

• Land usage: 65 percent active and 35 percent passive.


• Parking: Sufficient to support the amenities; occupies no more than 10 percent of the park. Design should include widened on-street parking area adjacent to park. Goal is to maximize usable park space. Traffic calming devices encouraged within and next to the park.

• Lighting: Amenity lighting includes sport field light standards.

• Signage: Directional signage and facility/amenity regulations to enhance user experience. May include kiosks in easily identified areas of the facility.

• Landscape Design: Appropriate design to enhance the park theme/use/experience. Enhanced landscaping at park entrances and throughout park.

• Other: Strong appeal to surrounding neighborhoods; loop trail connectivity; linked to regional park, trail or recreation facility.

• Size of park: Typically, 10 to 75 acres.

4 - 4

Regional ParkA regional park functions as a destination location that serves a large area of several communities, residents within a city or county, or across multiple counties. Depending on activities within a regional park, users may travel as many as 60 miles for a visit. Regional parks include recreational opportunities such as soccer, softball, golf, boating, camping, conservation-wildlife viewing and fishing. Although regional parks usually have a combination of passive areas and active facilities, they are likely to be predominantly natural resource-based parks.

A common size for a regional park is 75 to 1,000 acres but some parks can be 2,000 to 5,000 acres in size. A regional park focuses on activities and natural features not included in most types of parks and often based on a specific scenic or recreational opportunity. Facilities could include those found in a community park and have specialized amenities such as an art center, amphitheater, boating facility, golf course, or natural area with interpretive trails. Regional parks can and should promote tourism and economic development, while enhancing the identity of the entire region.

• Service radius: Greater than three miles.

• Site Selection: Prefer location which can preserve natural resources on-site such as wetlands, streams, and other geographic features or sites with significant cultural or historic features. Significantly large parcel of land. Access from public roads capable of handling anticipated traffic.

• Length of stay: Full or multiple day experience.

• Amenities: 10 to 12 amenities to create a signature facility (e.g. golf course, tennis complex, sports complex, lake, regional playground, 3+ reservable picnic shelters, camping, outdoor recreation/extreme sports, recreation center, pool, gardens, trails, zoo, specialty facilities); restrooms with drinking fountains, concessions, restaurant, ample parking, special event site. Sport Fields and Sport Complexes are typical at this park.

• Revenue facilities: Park is designed to produce revenue to offset operational costs.

• Land usage: Up to 50 percent active/50 percent passive.


• Parking: Sufficient for all regular use amenities, but not all special events. Traffic calming devices encouraged within and next to park.


• Signage: Directional signage and facility/amenity regulations to enhance user experience, may include kiosks in easily identified areas of the facility.

• Landscape Design: Appropriate design to enhance the park theme/use/experience. Enhanced landscaping at park entrances and throughout park.

• Other: Linked to major trails systems, public transportation available, concessions, and food and retail sales available. Dedicated site managers on duty. Wi-Fi and telephone/cable TV conduit.

• Size of park: Typically 75 to 1,000 acres.



Sports ComplexSports complexes at community parks, regional parks, and stand-alone sports complexes are developed to provide 4 to 16+ fields or courts in one location. A sports complex may also support extreme sports facilities, such as BMX and skateboarding. They can be single focused or multi-focused and may include indoor or outdoor facilities to serve the needs of both youth and adults. Outdoor fields should be lighted to maximize value and productivity of the complex. Agencies developing sports complexes focus on meeting the needs of residents while also attracting sport tournaments for economic purposes to the community.

Sport field design includes appropriate field distances for each sport’s governing body and support amenities designed to produce revenue to offset operational costs.

Signature sports complexes include enhanced amenities such as artificial turf, multipurpose field benches and bleachers, scoreboards, amplified sound, scorekeeper’s booths, etc. Enhanced amenities would be identified through discussion between City and Schools and or sports associations and dependent upon adequate funding.

• Service radius: Determined by community demand.

• Site Selection: Stand-alone sports complexes are strategically located on or near arterial streets or highways. Refer to community or regional Park sections if sport complex is located within a park. Streets preferred on four sides, or three sides with school or municipal use on fourth side.

• Length of stay: Two-to-three hour experience for single activities. Can be all day for tournaments or special events.

• Amenities: Four to sixteen or more fields or sports courts in one setting; restrooms, ample parking, turf types appropriate for the facility and anticipated usage, and field lighting.

• Revenue facilities: Four or more (e.g. fields, concession stand, picnic pavilion).

• Land usage: 95 percent active and 5 percent passive.

• Programming: Focus on active programming of all amenities.

• Parking: Sufficient to support regular use amenities. Traffic calming devices encouraged within and next to park.


• Signage: Directional signage and facility/amenity regulations to enhance user experience. May include kiosks in easily identified areas of the facility.

• Landscape Design: Appropriate design to enhance the park theme/use/experience. Enhanced landscaping at entrances and throughout complex.

• Size of park: Preferably 20 or more acres for stand-alone complexes.


4 - 6

Recreation/Special Use AreasRecreation/special use areas are those spaces that don’t fall within a typical park classification. A major difference between a special use facility and other parks is that they usually serve a single purpose whereas other park classifications are designed to offer multiple recreation opportunities. It is possible for a special use facility to be located inside another park. Special use facilities generally fall into four categories:

• Cemeteries - burial-ground that is generally viewed as a large public park or ground laid out expressly for the interment of the dead. Cemeteries are normally distinct from churchyards, which are typically consecrated according to one denomination and are attached directly to a single place of worship. Cemeteries can be viewed as historic sites.

• Historic/Cultural/Social Sites – unique local resources offering historical, educational, and cultural opportunities. Examples include historic downtown areas, plaza parks, performing arts parks, arboretums, display gardens, performing arts facilities, indoor theaters, churches, and amphitheaters. Sometimes these are located in community or regional parks.

• Golf Courses – Nine and 18-hole complexes with ancillary facilities such as club houses, driving ranges, program space and learning centers. These facilities are highly maintained and support a wide age range of males and females. Programs are targeted for daily-use play, tournaments, leagues, clinics and special events. Operational costs are offset by daily play, season pass holders, concession stands, driving range fees, tournaments, cart rentals, trail fees, earned income opportunities and sale of pro shop items.

• Indoor Recreation Facilities – specialized or single purpose facilities. Examples include community centers, senior centers and community theaters. These are frequently located in community or regional parks.

• Outdoor Recreation Facilities – Examples include baseball stadiums, aquatic parks, disc golf, skateboard, BMX, and dog parks, which may be located in a park.

• Size of park: Depends upon facilities and activities included. Their diverse character makes it impractical to apply acreage standards.

• Service radius: Depends upon facilities and activities included. Typically serves special user groups while a few serve the entire population.

• Site Selection: Given the variety of potential uses, no specific standards are defined for site selection. As with all park types, the site itself should be located where it is appropriate for its use.

• Length of stay: Varies by facility.

• Amenities: Varies by facility.

• Revenue facilities: Due to nature of certain facilities, revenue may be required for construction and/or annual maintenance. This should be determined at a policy level before the facility is planned and constructed.

• Land usage: Varies by facility.

• Programming: Varies by facility.



• Maintenance Standards: Provide the highest-level maintenance with available funding. Seek a goal of Level 2 maintenance standards. Some amenities (i.e., rose gardens) will require Level 1 maintenance.

• Parking: On-street or off-street parking is provided as appropriate. The best practice is to maximize usable park space. Provide a minimum of five to 10 spaces within the park including accessible spaces. Parking requirements for buildings should follow local zoning and development codes. Traffic calming devices encouraged next to park.

• Lighting: Security or amenity only.

• Signage: Directional and regulation signage to enhance user experience.

• Landscape Design: Appropriate design to enhance the park theme/use/experience.

Open Space/Natural AreasOpen space/natural area parks are undeveloped but may include natural or paved trails. Grasslands under power line corridors are one example; creek areas are another. Open space/natural area parks contain natural resources that can be managed for recreation and natural resource conservation values such as a desire to protect wildlife habitat, water quality and endangered species. Open space/natural area parks also may provide opportunities for nature-based, unstructured, low-impact recreational opportunities such as walking and nature viewing.

• Amenities: May include paved or natural trails, wildlife viewing areas, mountain biking, disc golf, interpretation and education facilities.

• Maintenance standards: Demand-based maintenance with available funding. Biological management practices observed.

• Lighting: None.

• Signage: Interpretive kiosks as deemed appropriate.

• Landscape Design: Generally, none. Some areas may include landscaping, such as entryways or around buildings. In these situations, sustainable design is appropriate.


4 - 8

Level of Service StandardsLevel of Service (LOS) standards are guidelines that define service areas based on population that support investment decisions related to parks, facilities and amenities. LOS standards can and will change over time; as the population increases, the need to acquire additional land and develop parks also increases as will the costs to do so.

The consultant team evaluated LOS standards using a combination of local, regional and national resources, including:

• National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) guidelines.

• Recreation activity participation rates reported by the Sports & Fitness Industry Association’s (SFIA) 2017 Study of Sports.

• Fitness and leisure participation as it applies to activities that occur in the United States and the City of Sheridan.

• Community and stakeholder input and general observations. This information allowed standards to be customized to Sheridan.

These resources provide LOS guidelines based on population to inform and support investment decisions related to parks, facilities and amenities. When coupled with local input these standards help to identify park, facility and amenity gaps and surpluses. The following summary is based on the LOS standards analysis:

• Sheridan currently provides a total LOS of 16.32 acres of developed parks per 1,000 residents based on the City’s current population. When compared to the recommended LOS standards for developed parks at 16.1 acres per 1,000 residents, the City’s parks system, overall, is not deficient of park acreage.

• To keep up with projected population growth and meet the recommended LOS standards, the City will need to add a total of 46 developed park acres to the system by 2029. Additional park acreage is primarily needed in neighborhood and community park classifications.

• The City currently meets 2029 standards for several amenities including: dog parks, outdoor sport courts, outdoor aquatic centers and skate parks, but is deficient in rectangular fields, baseball/softball diamonds and picnic shelters and a variety of other park amenities.

Based on a thorough review of the parks and recreation system and public input, it is recommended that the City pursue further development of specific parks and recreation amenities that meet the needs listed in the High Priority Program and Facility Rankings and address the gaps per park type to increase the current level of service standard for the projected population in 2029.

The table on the following page details the current and recommended LOS for the Sheridan Parks and Recreation System.

Park

Typ

eTo

tal

Inve

ntor

yMe

et S

tand

ard/

Need

Exis

tsMe

et S

tand

ard/

Need

Exis

ts

Mini

Parks

(acre

s)4.7

0

0.1

5

acre

s per

1,000

0.10

acre

s per

1,000

Me

ets S

tanda

rd-

Acre

(s)Me

ets S

tanda

rd-

Acre

(s)Ne

ighbo

rhoo

d Par

ks (a

cres)

26.03

0.8

5

acre

s per

1,000

1.00

acre

s per

1,000

Ne

ed E

xists

5

Ac

re(s)

Need

Exis

ts7

Acre

(s)Co

mmun

ity P

arks

(acre

s)92

.46

3.02

ac

res p

er1,0

00

3.5

0 ac

res p

er1,0

00

Need

Exis

ts15

Ac

re(s)

Need

Exis

ts22

Ac

re(s)

Natur

al Re

sour

ce A

reas

(acre

s)14

6.60

4.7

9

acre

s per

1,000

5.00

acre

s per

1,000

Ne

ed E

xists

6

Ac

re(s)

Need

Exis

ts17

Ac

re(s)

Spec

ial U

se P

arks

(acre

s) (in

clude

s cem

eterie

s)99

.80

3.26

ac

res p

er1,0

00

3.0

0 ac

res p

er1,0

00

Meets

Stan

dard

-

Ac

re(s)

Meets

Stan

dard

-

Ac

re(s)

Spor

ts Co

mplex

es (a

cres)

129.9

0

4.25

ac

res p

er1,0

00

3.5

0 ac

res p

er1,0

00

Meets

Stan

dard

-

Ac

re(s)

Meets

Stan

dard

-

Ac

re(s)

Tota

l Par

k Acr

eage

499.4

9

16.32

ac

res p

er1,0

00

16

.10

ac

res p

er1,0

00

Meet

s Sta

ndar

d26

Ac

re(s

)Ne

ed E

xists

46

Acre

(s)

OUTD

OOR

AMEN

ITIE

SPi

cnic

Shelt

ers

15

1.0

0

field

per

2,040

1.00

field

per

2,000

Ne

ed E

xists

0

Fie

ld(s)

Need

Exis

ts1

Field(

s)Di

amon

d Fiel

d, 60

-ft B

ases

(You

th)3

1.0

0

field

per

10,20

0

1.00

field

per

7,500

Ne

ed E

xists

1

Fie

ld(s)

Need

Exis

ts1

Field(

s)Di

amon

d Fiel

d, 90

-ft B

ases

(Adu

lt & T

een)

2

1.00

fie

ld pe

r15

,300

1.0

0fie

ld pe

r12

,000

Ne

ed E

xists

1

Fie

ld(s)

Need

Exis

ts1

Field(

s)Di

amon

d, So

ftball

65 ft

Fields

(Adu

lt)2

1.0

0

field

per

15,30

0

1.00

field

per

25,00

0

Meets

Stan

dard

-

Fie

ld(s)

Meets

Stan

dard

-

Fie

ld(s)

Recta

ngle

Fields

(all)

17

1.0

0

field

per

1,800

1.00

field

per

1,500

Ne

ed E

xists

3

Fie

ld(s)

Need

Exis

ts5

Field(

s)Di

sc G

olf2

1.0

0

cour

se pe

r20

,400

1.0

0co

urse

per

25,00

0

Meets

Stan

dard

-

Fie

ld(s)

Meets

Stan

dard

-

Fie

ld(s)

Gun,

Shoo

ting &

Arch

ery

1

1.00

sit

e per

30,60

0

1.00

site p

er50

,000

Me

ets S

tanda

rd-

Site(

s)Me

ets S

tanda

rd-

Site(

s)Ba

sketb

all M

ulti-u

se C

ourts

, Outd

oor

24

1.0

0

cour

t per

1,275

1.00

cour

t per

2,500

Me

ets S

tanda

rd-

Cour

t(s)

Meets

Stan

dard

-

Co

urt(s

)Te

nnis/

Pick

leball

Cou

rts16

1.00

co

urt p

er1,9

13

1.0

0co

urt p

er5,0

00

Meets

Stan

dard

-

Fie

ld(s)

Meets

Stan

dard

-

Fie

ld(s)

Play

grou

nds

22

1.0

0

site p

er1,3

91

1.0

0sit

e per

3,000

Me

ets S

tanda

rd-

Site(

s)Me

ets S

tanda

rd-

Site(

s)Do

g Par

ks3

1.0

0

site p

er10

,200

1.0

0sit

e per

7,500

Ne

ed E

xists

1

Si

te(s)

Need

Exis

ts1

Site(

s)Sk

ate pa

rks1

1.0

0

site p

er30

,600

1.0

0sit

e per

50,00

0

Meets

Stan

dard

-

Si

te(s)

Meets

Stan

dard

-

Si

te(s)

Golf (

18-h

ole eq

uivale

nts)

3

1.00

co

urse

per

10,20

0

1.00

cour

se pe

r50

,000

Me

ets S

tanda

rd-

Field(

s)Me

ets S

tanda

rd-

Field(

s)Ou

tdoor

Voll

eyba

ll Cou

rts2

1.0

0

cour

t per

15,30

0

1.00

cour

t per

10,00

0

Need

Exis

ts1

Field(

s)Ne

ed E

xists

1

Fie

ld(s)

Eque

strian

Fac

ilities

1

1.00

sit

e per

30,60

0

1.00

site p

er50

,000

Me

ets S

tanda

rd-

Site(

s)Me

ets S

tanda

rd-

Site(

s)Ou

tdoor

Fam

ily A

quati

cs1

1.0

0

site p

er30

,600

1.0

0sit

e per

50,00

0

Meets

Stan

dard

-

Fie

ld(s)

Meets

Stan

dard

-

Fie

ld(s)

Sher

idan

Lev

el o

f Ser

vice

Sta

ndar

ds

2019

In

vent

ory

Ser

vice L

evels

20

19 S

tand

ards

2029

Sta

ndar

ds

Curre

nt S

ervic

e Lev

elRe

com

men

ded

Deve

lope

d Pa

rk

Serv

ice L

evels

Add

ition

al De

velo

ped

Park

s/Fac

ilities

/Am

eniti

es N

eede

d

Add

ition

al De

velo

ped

Park

s/Fac

ilities

/Am

eniti

es N

eede

d

Levels of Service Stand

ards_She

ridan

PRO

S Ve

rsion 1.xlsx


4 - 1 0

Equity MappingWhile identifying the acreage of land or quantity of park amenities within a community is important, the location of both is equally important to ensure equity throughout the system. Our methodology included locating the center of park lands and locations of park assets. The current level of service is applied as a service area based on current population and population density.

The analysis yielded maps that highlight areas of the community that need a park type and/or amenity. This is an extremely useful tool when making decisions for the acquisition of new land and development of capital improvements. Equity mapping is a tool that is used in conjunction with deeper analysis of neighborhood demographics, land development patterns and public engagement.

This mapping exercise also considers other publicly accessible facilities, such as playgrounds or outdoor basketball at schools. This helps prevent duplication of service offerings by non-city public entities.

Sheridan’s results from the equity mapping exercise indicate that the community generally has sufficient coverage. The community has exceptional access to multiple park types, and the central trail “spine” throughout the community provides walking access to most parks. Coverage deficiencies were identified in park amenities such as picnic shelters and dog parks. South Sheridan tended to have the need for additional amenities including rectangular fields and pickleball/tennis courts. The west side of Sheridan is lacking access to playgrounds.

Equity Maps are included in Appendix-C.

OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE ANALYSIS

Chapter 5



Regular Maintenance RequirementsThe regular maintenance requirements provide calculated unit-based quantification for most major resource requirements, and provide the method through which projections for future resource needs can be developed. Issues not addressed below include major capital repair and replacement actions that are beyond the preventative and responsive nature of regular maintenance.

Objectives of Parks and Recreation MaintenanceThe City’s maintenance efforts are expansive and address diverse aspects of maintaining high quality facilities, amenities and infrastructure for the sake of preserving the integrity of public assets and their meaningful use. Prevailing park and recreation maintenance program objectives are presented below:

• Maintain and improve park system sites, grounds, facilities, and structures to provide optimal and enjoyable use.

• Provide landscaping and general maintenance for a multitude of City amenities, including but not limited to City landscaping beds and turf, urban open spaces, urban forests, and select City buildings and structures.

• Be responsive to maintenance needs of the City open space tracts including, but not limited to access points, trail repair, erosion control, and trash removal.

Many of these objectives go beyond traditional parks and recreation staff responsibilities, but provide an invaluable service to the community. Consultant team assessments demonstrate that maintenance staff are extremely productive given their vast responsibilities and limited resources.

These objectives represent the full scope of expectations the community has for the outcome of parks and recreation maintenance efforts. Keeping each objective in mind, it is important for members of the community, Department management, and City leadership to project future resource requirements for additional sites and facilities.

Levels of Maintenance StandardsPark and recreation maintenance functions are currently organized into a tiered structure of three different tiers of service. These three tiers are referred to as maintenance levels, and each has a unique standard that dictates routine maintenance tasks and their frequency. The appropriate maintenance level is assigned to each park or site which creates the framework for organizing and scheduling tasks and responsibilities at each location. A description of each of the maintenance modes is provided below.

Maintenance Level 1Maintenance Level 1 (Level 1) applies to parks or sites that require the greatest level of effort of highest maintenance standard in the system. These are typically highly developed parks with multiple amenities that are heavily used. Parks maintained under Level 1 are generally regional parks, sports complexes, and specific community parks, with a few exceptions in neighborhood parks and special use facilities.

O P E R A T I O N S & M A I N T E N A N C E A N A L Y S I S

5 - 2

Maintenance Level 2Maintenance Level 2 (Level 2) applies to parks or sites that require a moderate level of effort and maintenance standard in the system. These can include developed and undeveloped parks with amenities that are heavily used. Parks maintained under Level 2 are generally neighborhood parks, special use facilities, city facilities and fire stations, and some community parks.

Maintenance Level 3Maintenance Level 3 (Level 3) applies to parks or sites that require a nominal level of effort and maintenance standard in the system. These generally include undeveloped parks with minimal amenities. Parks and areas maintained under Level 3 are mostly retention basins and natural areas.

We recommend developing maintenance standards that can be applied to all City park and recreation sites whether they are managed directly or in concert with lease holders and other partners. These standards do not have to be stringent, just consistent in order to protect the safety of park users. The maintenance standards below are brief examples of high-level requirements.

• Establish maintenance standards and frequency levels for each type of amenity based on established expectations of the visitors to the parks and to meet customer service requirements for a well-maintained parks system. These standards can also vary by park or asset type, such as day use facilities, community centers, and regional parks.

• Train City staff and partners on maintenance standards and frequency levels for care to meet visitor expectations.

• Upgrade amenities that have the highest level of use first to keep sites highly valued in local communities.

• Seek outside funding and resource support to fund improvements for each park.

• Seek local community engagement in “clean up, fix up” events to keep the parks in prime position to drive strong visitor appeal.

• Inspect sites and facilities on a seasonal basis to evaluate adherence to maintenance standards at a 90% or greater level of compliance.

• Management of forested areas, noxious weeds, and invasive species should be in accordance with the policies and practices detailed by City ordinance, policies of the County, and best practices utilized by other notable forest management agencies (local, state, and federal).

Maintenance AssessmentsParks and amenities that are clean and functioning efficiently are a critical element to delivering high quality programs and services. The City is ultimately responsible for the land and assets in City-owned parks and open spaces. The core lines of service (functions) performed by the Parks Division are numerous as listed on the adjacent table.

Maintenance Standards and Development of Work PlansThrough the review of data and workshops with staff, it was determined that the Parks Division has limited written management plans and routine work plans are more institutional in nature.

Park Division Maintenance Lines of Service

Cemetery Facilities MaintenanceCemetery ForestryCemetery Sidewalks/Trails/Road MaintenanceCitizen InquiriesCustomer ServiceDepartment Special Event SupportDog Park MaintenanceEducation and OutreachEquipment MaintenanceFacility Grounds MaintenanceFuneral ServicesFurniture, Fixtures, Systems (lighting, etc.) Maintenance and RepairGrave Service ManagementIntegrated Pest ManagementIrrigation SystemsLake ManagementLandscape BeautificationMaintenance Yard ManagementNatural Resource/Open SpacePathway and Trail MaintenancePark Building MaintenancePark Permit/Special Event FacilitationPermanent Records ManagementRestroom/Custodial ServicesSnow and Ice RemovalSpecial Event FacilitationStorm Clean‐UpTraffic Safety ManagementTrail ClearingTrash RemovalTree Inspections and ProtectionTree Inventory ManagementTree PlantingTree Pruning and MaintenanceTree RemovalTurf/Grounds ManagementWildlife Exhibit Management




Work Order Management SystemThe Parks Division should make the implementation of a Work Order Management System through CityWorks a high priority. This will assist in the development of maintenance and asset replacement schedules.

ResourcesStaff does not lack the necessary equipment or resources to perform tasks at a high level, however, lack of staff creates hardships when managing turf, trees and landscaping.

Third Party Contracting of ServicesGiven economic fluctuations, it is imperative that the Parks Division continually evaluate capacity and cost of service in the private sector. Currently, staff do not track unit activity costs and therefore cannot analyze the unit cost to perform work internally against the unit cost to perform work by a third-party vendor. Without this level of analysis, the division is unable to determine if it is more effective and efficient to perform work in-house or to contract a vendor.

of maintenance and asset replacement schedules.

Resources: Staff does not lack the necessary equipment or resources to perform tasks at a high level, however, lack of staff creates hardships when managing turf, trees and landscaping.

Third Party Contracting of Services - Given the “varying” cycles of the economy, it is imperative that the division continually evaluates the capacity and cost of service in the private sector. Currently, Parks does not track unit activity costs and therefore cannot analyze the unit cost to perform work internally against the unit cost to perform work by a third-party vendor. Without this level of analysis, the division is unable to determine if it is more effective and efficient to perform work “in-house” or to “contract it out”.

Contracting of Athletic Field Maintenance: The current contract with the Sheridan Recreation District for the maintenance of athletic fields in the City is limited in nature as it does not include maintenance standards or performance measures.

Task Time Analysis: As part of the park maintenance operations analysis, the Sheridan Parks Division conducted a high-level task time analysis of full-time employees in the core areas in which it performs regular routine maintenance. The following chart provides a summary of the results of this effort.

o Only 6% of all labor efforts for general parks and grounds maintenance is attributed to repair and special projects.

# of Staff Hours Spent Per Total Annual Manhours Percentage of TimeMorning Load 6.00 1.25 Weekly 375.00 3%Windshield Time 5.00 5.00 Weekly 1250.00 10%Break 6.00 2.50 Weekly 750.00 6%Athletic Field Maintenance 0.00 0.00 Weekly 0.00 0%Routine Parks Maintenance 5.00 5.00 Weekly 1250.00 10%Routine Facility Maintenance 4.00 2.00 Weekly 400.00 3%Routine Trail Maintenance 1.00 6.00 Weekly 300.00 2%Routine Landscaping Maintenance 2.00 3.64 Weekly 364.00 3%Cemetery Records Maintenance 1.00 8.00 Weekly 400.00 3%Grave Services 2.00 4.00 Weekly 400.00 3%Equipment Repair 3.00 1.00 Weekly 150.00 1%Integrated Pest Management (weed and pest) 1.00 11.00 Weekly 550.00 5%Tree Pruning and Maintenance 2.00 7.00 Weekly 700.00 6%Trail Clearing 0.00 0.00 Weekly 0.00 0%Tree Inspections and Protection 2.00 2.00 Weekly 200.00 2%Irrigation 5.00 6.14 Weekly 1535.00 13%Tree Planting 2.00 40.00 Annually 80.00 1%Snow Removal 6.00 298.00 Annually 1788.00 15%Repair (Parks, Trails, Facilities, 4.00 75.00 Annually 300.00 2%Special Projects (for other Departments/Partners) 5.00 40.00 Annually 200.00 2%Special Event/Park Shelter Rental/Rental Support 5.00 40.00 Annually 200.00 2%Meetings/Training/Misc. 6.00 85.00 Annually 510.00 4%End of Day Unload 6.00 1.25 Weekly 375.00 3%

TOTAL 12077.00 100%

TOTAL ANNUAL "UNPRODUCTIVE TIME" 2750.00 23%

Sheridan Parks Maintenance Task Time Analysis ‐ FULL TIME STAFFTask

5 - 4

Contracting of Athletic Field MaintenanceThe current contract with the Sheridan Recreation District for the maintenance of athletic fields in the City is lacking scope and expectations as it does not include maintenance standards or performance measures.

Task-Time AnalysisAs part of the park maintenance operations analysis, the Sheridan Parks Division conducted a high-level task-time analysis of full-time employees in the core areas in which it performs regular routine maintenance. The following chart provides a summary of the results of this effort.

• Only 6% of all labor efforts for general parks and grounds maintenance is attributed to repair and special projects.

• Overall, approximately 6.16 hours (or 77%) of every 8-hour work day per person is spent performing work in the field. This is well above the best practice guideline of 5.6 hours.




Staff ingThe Parks Division is comprised of 14.15 full-time employee equivalents. Best practice ratio of staff per park acres maintained at a best practice Level 2 maintenance standard for pocket, neighborhood, community, and special parks is 1:20 acres.

With the responsibility of actively managing 353 acres (not including natural resource area acreage and trails), the Division does not have the staffing capacity to manage the developed parks system consistently at a Level 2 maintenance standard as the current ratio of FTEs to park acres is 1:24 acres. Staffing levels are deficient by at least 3.5 FTEs in order to meet the staffing requirements for best practice staff levels. This does not consider maintenance on trails or in natural resource areas.

• This equates to approximately an additional $150,000 - $200,000 annually for parks maintenance personnel.

Parks Maintenance Key RecommendationsNote that key findings are limited to the operations of the City of Sheridan Parks Division only. The maintenance operations of the Sheridan Recreation District was not evaluated in this process.

Implement a Work Order Management SystemA work order system should be used to track life-cycle maintenance requirements that are tied to weekly and monthly work orders. This will help the staff to stay ahead of preventative maintenance while limiting breakdowns. Further, utilizing the system will provide staff “actual cost” data for work being performed.

Systematic Approach to Contracting ServicesThrough the development of management processes, the Parks Division should begin to track unit activity costs through the implementation of a work order management system and in turn, would internally analyze the unit cost to perform work internally against the unit cost to perform work by a third-party vendor.

Parks Divis ion Staff ingIt is recommended that the City add at least 3.5 maintenance worker FTEs within the next three years. There is a need for at least one more Supervisor to adequately manage a staff of this size.

Athletic Field MaintenanceIt is recommended that the City consider taking back the maintenance of athletic fields from the Sheridan Recreation District.

Create Work Plans Based on Maintenance StandardsMaintenance standards are based on a Level (1), (2) and (3) modes (tasks and frequencies of each task) and follow best practices as established by the National Recreation and Park Association.

The division can customize the standards based on the park and recreation values of the Sheridan community and need to be adopted and implemented by staff and followed regardless of whether work is performed by City staff or third-party contractors.

5 - 6

Partnership Recommendations for Park MaintenanceCost Avoidance: Maintenance operations are typically spent in divisions that do not have direct revenue sources to offset expenditures. There are opportunities, however, to reduce expenditures through the following strategies.

• Adopt-a-Trail Programs: These are typically small-grant programs that fund new construction, repair or renovation, maps, trail brochures, and facilities (bike racks, picnic areas, birding equipment, etc.), as well as providing maintenance support. These programs are like the popular “adopt-a-mile” highway programs most states utilize. Adopt-a-trail programs can also take the form of cash contributions in the range of $12,000 to $16,000 per mile to cover operational costs.

• Adopt-a-Park Programs: These are small-grant programs that fund new construction and provide maintenance support. Adopt-A-Park programs can also take the form of cash contributions in the range of $1,000 to $5,000 per acre to cover operational costs.

• Operational Partnerships: Partnerships are operational funding sources formed from two separate agencies, such as two government entities, a non-profit and a public agency, or a private business and a public agency. Two partners jointly share risk, operational costs, responsibilities, and asset management based on the strengths of each partner.

COMMUNITY PROFILE

Appendix-A

C O M M U N I T Y P R O F I L E

When agencies understand their resident’s diverse needs, staff and elected officials can better manage resources, tailoring services and infrastructure provide services and infrastructure tailored to . The community profile is a compilation of several different data sources. Each source has a different use within the profile, but, collectively, provide key insights into the potential of the community’s needs and opportunities.

Census DataThe challenge with updating a plan near the end of a decade is that the baseline census data is almost ten years old. The 2010 census data is extrapolated based upon projections and supplemental census questionnaires that are reflected in American Community Survey estimates. These estimates are generally accurate and are used to benchmark the local community against state and national averages. State and national recreation trends can then be evaluated based upon the differences in demographics. Census data is also utilized in the household survey to ensure alignment of survey participants with the community demographics.

The community profile includes comparisons between two to four different populations. The main population of interest is people who live within the boundary of Sheridan County School District 2. This includes the city limits of Sheridan and rural areas in the County. The comparative populations of interest were people who live within the boundary of Sheridan County School District 1. The project advisory committee recommended this group because these people often utilize Sheridan’s parks and recreation programs, even though they live outside of the city limits. The remaining two comparative demographics is the State of Wyoming and national demographics.

AcronymsSD1 = Sheridan County School District #1

SD2 = Sheridan County School District #2

S CH

OO

LD

I ST R

I CT

1S C

HO

OL

DI S

TRIC

T2

SCH

OO

L D

ISTR

ICT 1

SCH

OO

L D

ISTR

ICT 2

SCHOOL DISTRICT 1

SCHOOL DISTRICT 2

SCH

OO

L D

ISTR

ICT 1

SCH

OO

L D

ISTR

ICT 2

SCH

OO

L D

ISTR

ICT 1

SCH

OO

L D

ISTR

ICT 2

SCH

OO

L D

ISTR

ICT 1

SCH

OO

L D

ISTR

ICT 2

S CH OO L DIS T R I CT 1SCHOOL DIST R ICT 2

SCH

OO

L D

ISTR

ICT 1

SCH

OO

L D

ISTR

ICT 2

SCHO

OL

DIS

TRIC

T1

SCH

OO

L D

ISTR

ICT 2

SCHOOL DISTRICT 1

SCHOOL DISTRICT 2

SCHOOL DISTRICT 2

SCHOOL DISTRICT 3

SCH

OO

L D

ISTR

ICT 2

SCH

OO

L D

ISTR

ICT 3

SCHOOL DISTRICT 2

SCHOOL DISTRICT 3

SCH

OO

L D

ISTR

ICT 2

SCH

OO

L D

ISTR

ICT 3

SCH

OO

L D

ISTR

ICT 2

SCH

OO

L D

ISTR

ICT 3

SCHOOL DISTRICT 2

SCHOOL DISTRICT 3

£¤87

£¤16

£¤87

£¤14

£¤14 £¤14

£¤87

£¤87

§̈¦90

CITY OFSHERIDAN

TOWN OFCLEARMONT

TOWN OFDAYTON

TOWN OFRANCHESTER

STORY

PARKMAN

BIG HORN

0 11,0005,500Feet

LegendPA RK S & SC HOOLSSTUD Y A RE A (SD2)SHE R ID A N SCHO O L DISTRICTSMA JO R R IVERSIN TER STATEUS H IG HWAY

STAT E H I GHWAYCIT IE S & TOWNS

°

Population Highl ightsThe projected increase in population in the next five years is 3.21 percent (approx. .6 annually), with an increase of households at 3.10 percent during the same time frame. This aligns with the projected annual growth for the U.S. population.The average household in the Sheridan area is 2.26 people. That number is expected to slightly increase in the next five years.

Comparatively, Wyoming’s population is decreasing in population from its peak in 2015.

Study area encompassed Sheridan County School District 2. However, comparisons were made to populations living in Sheridan County School District 1

25,553

10,887

26,373

11,220

5,047

2,029

5,286

2,126

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

Population Households

SD2 (2018) SD2 (2023) SD 1 (2018) SD 1 (2023)

Population and household estimates from US Census Bureau & ESRI Community Analyst

5.9% 5.8% 6.6% 6.4% 7.2% 7.8%

11.8% 11.7% 11.3% 11.3% 11.3% 11.4%

11.9% 12.1% 9.8% 9.5% 13.2% 13.1%

12.0% 11.4%9.0% 8.6%

13.9% 13.7%

23.0% 22.6%24.0% 23.3%

25.5% 23.8%

15.0% 13.1% 18.1%15.5%

13.0% 14.0%

20.3% 23.4% 21.1% 25.6%15.9% 16.2%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2018Estimate

(SD2)

2023Projection

(SD2)

2018Estimate

(SD1)

2023Projection

(SD1)

2018Estimate (US)

2018 Estimate(WY)

Population by Age Segment

<5 6-14 15-24 25-34 35-54 55-64 65+

94.5%93.8%

94.3% 94.6%

1.1%1.2%

2.3%2.4%

0.9%1.1%

0.5%0.6%

1.9% 2.1% 2.1%1.4%

90%

91%

92%

93%

94%

95%

96%

97%

98%

99%

100%

2018 Estimate(SD2)

2023 Projection(SD2)



Population by Race

2 of More RacesSome Other Race AlonePacific Islander AloneAsian AloneAmerican Indian AloneBlack AloneWhite Alone

60%

30%

10%

60%

30%

10%

59%

28%

13%

56%

33%

11%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied Vacant

2018 2023 Wyoming Avg. National Avg.



Age SegmentationAge cohorts are broken out into seven categories: Age 5 and under, 6-14, 15-24, 25-34, 35-54, 55-64, and 65 and older. Sheridan is an older community, with the median age of 42.4 years of age compared with 36.8 years for the state of Wyoming and 38.3 years in the nation. The 65+ age cohort is expected to increase in the next five years, but the 55-64 is expected to decline. All other age cohorts are relatively stable.

EthnicitySheridan is primarily comprised of white only ethnicity. However, American Indian and Asian populations are predicted to increase slightly in the next five years. The Hispanic population is also expected to increase slightly in the next five years.

HousingSixty percent of Sheridan’s units are owner-occupied, which is slightly higher than the state and national averages. This is not surprising considering that a high percentage of respondents to the household survey indicated that they had lived in the community for more than 25 years, indicating a stable housing population.

US Census Bureau & ESRI Community Analyst


Housing information from the US Census Bureau & ESRI Community Analyst

$29,624$32,316 $30,875 $31,950

$51,552

$63,322$58,486 $58,100

$0

$10,000

$20,000

$30,000

$40,000

$50,000

$60,000

$70,000

SD2(2018)

SD 1(2018)

Wyoming U.S.A.

Comparative Income Characteristics

Per Capita Income Median Household Income


IncomeThe median household income varies depending on whether the household is located within Sheridan County School District 1 or 2. Household income in SD1 is much higher than the state, national and SD2 average. For the study area, median household income is expected to increase 14.4 percent in the next five years. Per capita income, which is more along local, state and national averages is expected to increase 13.5 percent in the same time frame.

Market Potential IndexThe market potential index (MPI) measures the probable demand for a product or service within a geographic area. The MPI shows the likelihood that an adult resident of the area will participate in certain activities when compared to the national average. Evaluating the MPI provides insight into the life-cycle stages of outdoor recreation (emerging, stable and declining), which helps anticipate changes in need and demand for amenities, services and events.

Sports & LeisureThe Sheridan area is far more likely to participate in the top ten sports and leisure activities than the national average. However, households in SD1 far exceeded the likelihood of participation in rifle hunting, canoeing/kayaking, birdwatching, boating (power) and overnight camping. Other activities both were likely to participate in include fishing, archery, target shooting, golfing and hunting.

FitnessFitness activities that Sheridan-area households are more likely to participate in include yoga, jogging/running, aerobics, swimming and walking. This information is important for recreation program providers, although providing facilities for pedestrian and aquatics is noted.

General SportsThe Sheridan community is slightly below the national average in general sports participation. Activities nearing the national average are golf, frisbee and basketball. Other “ball” sports fell below the national average for participation.

128

120

117

116

116

116

115

113

111

109

129

189

131

164

150

127

153

139

118

120

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

Freshwater Fishing

Rifle Hunting

Archery

Canoeing/Kayaking

Birdwatching

Target Shooting

Boating (power)

Overnight Camping

Golf

Hunting (shotgun)

Top 10 Sport & Leisure Activities in Study Area (by MPI)

SD 2 MPISD 1 MPI

Information from US Census Bureau, ESRI Community Analyst

89

98

96

102

106

107

95

76

82

110

108

90

120

115

99

67

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Pilates

Yoga

Jogging/Running

Aerobics

Swimming

Walking

Weight Lifting

Zumba

SD 2 SD 1Information from US Census Bureau, ESRI Community Analyst

Top Sports & Leisure Activities (MPI)

Top Fitness Activities in Study Area (MPI)


111

108

102

101

98

97

97

94

85

79

79

118

101

85

79

89

65

88

85

86

95

83

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Golf

Frisbee

Basketball

Bowling

Tennis

Baseball

Football

Softball

Volleyball

Ice Skating

Soccer

SD 2 SD 1


128

120

117

116

116

115

109

104

104

103

129

189

131

164

127

153

120

95

137

140

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

Freshwater Fishing

Rifle Hunting

Archery

Canoeing/Kayaking

Target Shooting

Power Boating

Hunting (shotgun)

Bicycling

Horseback Riding

Backpacking

SD 2 SD 1Information from US Census Bureau, ESRI Community Analyst

Top General Sports Activities (MPI)

Top Outdoor Sports Activities (MPI)

34.9%

21.2%

10.9%

2.0%

0.7%

31.8%

52.2%

12.4%

2.3%

4.8%

8.0%

1.6%

7.8%

Old & Newcomers

Midlife Constants

Green Acres

The Great Outdoors

Savvy Suburbanites

SD 2 SD 1 U.S. Housholds


Top Sheridan-area Tapestry Segments

Tapestry SegmentationTapestry segmentation is a compilation of 67 distinctive segments of America’s neighborhoods based on socioeconomic and demographic composition. Tapestry Segments are classified into 14 LifeMode groups. LifeMode groups represent markets that share a common experience – born in the same generation or a significant demographic trait, like affluence. The Sheridan area has five distinct LifeMode groups, however distinct differences exist between households in SD1 and SD2.

Market research is the primary use for evaluating tapestry segmentation. By knowing your customer’s interests, desires and needs, strategic investment can provide greater customer and citizen satisfaction. Common uses for this data include siting of new parks, determining park assets, aligning recreational programs and setting fees. Agencies that know their customers can align planning and forecasting with the development of new activities and services.


Old & Newcomer Cit izensAlmost 35 percent of SD2 households fit into this category. They prefer convenience over consumerism and economy over acquisition. They are more likely to be renters just beginning their careers or retirees. They tend to support charities and are environmentally conscious. They tend to be more comfortable with buying the latest technology than buying a car. They are price aware and are coupon clippers but are open to impulse buys.

Midlife ConstraintsJust over 21 percent of SD2 households fit into this LifeMode. They tend to be seniors who are approaching or at retirement with an above average net worth. They like to live in smaller communities, and their lifestyle is more country than urban. They are generous, but not spendthrifts who tend to opt for convenience and comfort but not cutting edge. They acknowledge that technology has its uses, but bells and whistles are a bother. They are attentive to price, but not at the expense of quality, and they prefer to buy American. Radio and newspaper are media of choice after TV.

Green AcresPeople in this segment like country living and self-reliance, and they are avid do-it-yourselfers. They are often gardeners and own the correct tools for every DIY project. They are self-described conservatives and like to hunt, fish, ride motorcycles, hike, camp and golf. They are cautious consumes with a focus on quality and durability. They are comfortable with technology as a tool rather than a trend. Significantly, 10.9 percent of SD2 households and 31.8 percent of SD1 households fall into this category.

Great OutdoorsThe majority of this LifeMode are married and live in small towns and rural communities. They enjoy the rustic appeal and are very DIY oriented. Sixty percent hold a degree and live in communities with very low unemployment rates. They can service their own cars and prefer to work on their own home improvement projects. They prefer domestic travel over abroad. Just 2 percent of SD2 households fall into this category and an incredible 52.2% of SD1 households fall into this category.

Savvy SuburbanitesThese households tend to be married with no or older children. Approximately 91 percent live in owner-occupied single-family homes. They live in areas with a lower unemployment rate and high labor force participation. They are well-connected consumers that appreciate technology and make liberal use of it for everything from shopping to banking. They focus on quality products and are informed shoppers that research prior to purchasing. Only .7 percent of SD2 households and 12.4 percent of SD1 households fall into this category.

PARK FACILITIES ASSET RATING

Appendix-B

Park Assets Asset Rating Park Rating Comments

South Park

Parking Fair

Good

- South Park serves well as a natural area - Plans are underway to pave road into the park.The parking lot will be double chip sealed also.

Landscaping Excellent Fencing GoodPathways GoodRestrooms Excellent Seating GoodWater Tr. Access NABoardwalk GoodBridges Good

Emerson

Parking Fair

Fair

Park could benefit from:- Permanent restrooms- Additional green space and shelter(s)- Irrigation system is at end of useful life.

- Tennis court is cracked - Exposed irrigation ditch

Landscaping GoodFencing Fair/ GoodPathways PoorPlayground FairTennis Court PoorShelter GoodDisc Golf GoodSeating FairWater Tr. Access PoorIrrigation System Poor

Marshall

Parking Excellent *

Good * Parking lot resurfacing to be done summer 2019- Several dated sections of fencing

Landscaping Fair/ GoodFencing FairRestrooms GoodPlayground FairSoccer Fields GoodHorse Shoe Pits GoodSeating GoodIrrigation System Fair

WestMontana Dog Park/

Huntington

Parking Fair

Good- Newer soft surface pathway has been added - Park is basic but serves well for its purpose and given its constraints

Landscaping GoodFencing ExcellentSeating FairPathways Excellent

Municipal Cemetery

Office/Shop Excellent

Fair/ GoodIrrigation System FairRoads Fair/ GoodFences FairSignage Fair

LindenSledding Hill

Fences Fair/ GoodFair - Stair set has newer handrails but will require a new

walkway within the next 5-8 years.Walkway Fair

Excellent Amenity is new and/or working at peak efficiency | 10 to 20 year replacement scheduleGood Amenity has been recently replaced or working efficiently | 10 to 15 year replacement scheduleFair Amenity is functioning, but requires frequent repairs and/or maintenance | Less than 5 year replacement schedulePoor Amenity has reached life expectancy, requiring significant repair or replacement | Less than 2 year replacement scheduleVery Poor Amenity is failing, becoming a safety hazard and requires constant repair | Immediate replacement schedule


Washington

Parking Poor

Fair

- Irrigation is reaching the end of it's useful life.

This area has great potential and would improve the look of Sheridan on the Coffeen Avenue gateway. Serious consideration into revamping Washington Park is needed.

Landscaping GoodFencing PoorPathways FairShelter 1 GoodShelter 2 GoodPlayground PoorBasketball Court PoorBackstop PoorDump Station GoodSeating GoodIrrigation System FairBridge GoodRestrooms Poor

Kendrick

Parking Good

Good

- Expressed concern of park users parking in residential spaces along Bellvue

Park could benefit from:- Improvements for all ability levels- Reservation space 6 has potential for further development and improvement- Restroom location poses a potential safety risk and restrooms could benefit from a relocation in the future

Kendrick Park is the keystone park of Sheridan. It recievesthe most utilization and community support. It needs continued care and improved to serve as the benchmarkfor parks in Sheridan.

Landscaping GoodFencing GoodPathways GoodRestrooms GoodPlayground GoodShelter 1 GoodShelter 2 GoodShelter 3 GoodShelter 4 GoodBandshell Fair/ PoorTennis Courts FairIce Cream Stand FairHorse Shoes GoodSeating GoodIrrigation System GoodWater Tr. Access FairBridges Good

Crook's Fountain/

Mill

Landscaping Excellent

Good- Water trail access here needs to be carefully considered to avoid unnecessary risk- Bridge is structurally sound but will need new walkway in the future

Pathways ExcellentFountain GoodSeating GoodIrrigation System ExcellentWater Tr. Acess Poor Bridge Fair

Lions Club

Parking Good

Good

* New fencing for the park side along Sheridan Ave. is underway

- Playground is in need of replacement

Landscaping GoodFencing Excellent *Playground PoorBasketball Court GoodDog Park GoodSeating ExcellentIrrigation System Good


Rotary

Parking Very Poor

Poor Park is in poor shape. Consideration needs to be taken to revamp or reutilize the space.

Landscaping PoorPathway GoodFencing PoorSeating Poor

Black Tooth

Parking Good

Fair

- Soccer field was dangerous (holes, exposed sprinkler/ utilities, sunken irrigation line)- Poorly maintained

Park could benefit from:- Fields need to be better maintained and made safer for sports play. Consider expert consultation and field overhaul- Stripe parking lot- Replaced portable toilets with permanent restroom

Landscaping GoodFencing ExcellentPathways GoodSoccer Fields PoorSeating Very PoorIrrigation System GoodRestrooms Very Poor

Oatt's Memorial

Parking Good

Poor

- Dugouts have chipped paint, damaged roof, and are in general disrepair.- Sidewalk is cracked and uneven- Parking lot is in good shape but needs to be restriped. The area should be studied to better utilize the park.- Bleachers are unstable and in disrepair.- Fields are uneven, and unsafe (tripping hazards, exposed fencing and utility boxes, gravel infield)- Fencing is falling apart and poses a risk to safety- Utilities are patched together with extension cords and spray foam- Park was not well maintained (mowing, trash/ dog waste)- Playground was dated and edging was a tripping hazard- Basketball courts in disrepair and need to be removed- Maintanence shed on site is in general disrepair

Landscaping GoodFencing PoorPathways PoorRestrooms Very PoorPlayground Very PoorBasketball Court Very PoorBaseball Field 1 PoorBaseball Field 2 PoorBaseball Field 3 PoorSeating PoorIrrigation System PoorScoreboard PoorLights GoodBatting Cage PoorPaths Poor

Hume DrawNatural Area

Pathways Good

Good- New parking lot- Work with Game and Fish could establish a better fishing option- Grants available to build a dock

Ponds PoorSeating GoodBridges GoodSignage FairParking ExcellentFishing Access Good

North Heights

Landscaping Poor

Fair- Irrigation system is getting dated and needs an overhaul or replacement- Park is far from perfect but serves well as a less utilzed pocket park

Fencing FairPlayground FairSeating FairIrrigation System Fair/ Poor


Thorne Rider

Parking- DM Fair

Fair

Key: DM (upper section of park) TR (lower section of park)BR (Babe Ruth)

- DM lower parking lot needs striping and resurfacing- DM upper parking lot is in good condition but needs striping handicap stalls- Skatepark has cracks and a build up of debris- DM playground is aged and the edging is a risk- Fencing is in disrepair and dangerous- Restrooms are missing a drinking fountain and the garbage cans have been poorly modified- The park is poorly maintained and grass clippings, dirt, and other obsturctions are left out- DM seating is unstable and in general disrepair- Food forest fence is in poor condition- Lawns need sprayed to rid of noxious weeds - Playground 3 shelters are worn and pose a risk- Barbed wire fencing gives park an ugly and univiting border- Drainage behind the tennis courts is subpar and puddles and mudholes are prevalent- Babe Ruth Field in particular is in poor condition and its fencing, backstop, and dugouts need repair- Babe Ruth Press Box has chipped paint, worn signs, and siding that is falling off

Overall Thorne Rider Park offers the community many unique opportunities and ammenties. However, this facility is poorly maintained and the park is suffering.

Parking- TR GoodLandscaping- DM PoorLandscaping- TR GoodFencing- DM PoorFencing- TR FairPathways GoodRestrooms GoodPlayground (DM) PoorPlayground (River) GoodPlayground 3 FairBaseball Field (BR) PoorBaseball Field 2 FairTennis Courts GoodDan Media Field FairSkatepark FairSeating Very PoorIrrigation System- DM PoorIrrigation System- TR PoorWater Tr. Access PoorBridge PoorScoreboard GoodShelter- DM GoodShelters- TR PoorLights GoodPress Box PoorBasketball Court Good

Thorne Rider

Dog Park

Parking Good

Good - Very basic park but serves its purpose wellLandscaping FairFencing ExcellentSeating Good

North Park

Parking Excellent *

Good/ Excellent

* New parking lot slated for fall 2019- Natural area

Landscaping GoodPathways ExcellentSeating GoodBridges Excellent

Poplar Grove

Playground Excellent

Excellent- Brand new park- Due to its location its maintance and preservation will positivity affect locals and vistors alike- Basic seating could be added to enhance the park

Irrigation System ExcellentLandscaping ExcellentFences Excellent

PARK LAND & ASSET EQUITY MAPS

Appendix-C

Kendrick Park

Gateway Park

EQ UI TY M A PS | C UR REN T L EVEL OF SERVICESH ER ID A N P ARK S & REC REA T IO N MASTER PLAN UPDATE

LegendInterstateUSState HighwayParkCities & Towns

1 I N C H = 8 ,00 0 FEETPA G E 1 O F 5

Current Service Level of 2.85Acres per 1,000 PeopleCommunity Park

Equity maps are developed using aspatial analysis tool developed by:Joel Clark, GIS [email protected]

Rotary Park 1

Mill Park

Crook'sCampaignFountain

PoplarGrove Park

ScottAdditionPark 1

ScottAdditionPark 2

ScottAdditionPark 3



1 I N C H = 6 ,00 0 FEETPA G E 2 O F 5

Pocket ParkCurrent Service Level of 0.15 Acres per 1,000 People


North HeightsOpen Space (East)

South Park

North Park

Hume Draw andMavrakis Pond

North HeightsOpen Space

(West)



1 I N C H = 7 ,00 0 FEETPA G E 3 O F 5

Current Service Level of 4.79Acres per 1,000 PeopleNatural Open Space


OattsMemorialPark

ShelteredAcres Park

LionsClub Park

Marshall Park

Rotary Park 2

LindenSled Hill

WashingtonPark

NorthHeightsPark



1 I N C H = 4 ,00 0 FEETPA G E 4 O F 5

Current Service Level of 0.85Acres per 1,000 PeopleNeighborhood Park


Thorne-RiderPark

Black ToothPark Fields

Double DaySportsComplex



1 I N C H = 1 0,0 00 FEETPA G E 5 O F 5

Current Service Level of 4.25Acres per 1,000 PeopleSports Complex


OattsMemorialPark


LegendParkInterstateUS HighwayState HighwaySheridan_CityLimits

OwnershipSheridan

1 I N C H = 7 ,00 0 FEETPA G E 1 O F 15

Ball Diamond (60-ft bases)Current Level of Serviceof 1 Field per 10,200

Thorne-RiderPark



OwnershipSheridan

1 I N C H = 7 ,00 0 FEETPA G E 2 O F 15

Ball Diamond (90-ft bases)Current Level of Serviceof 1 Field per 15,300

ShelteredAcres Park

SheridanHigh School



OwnershipSheridanOther

1 I N C H = 7 ,00 0 FEETPA G E 3 O F 15

Disc GolfCurrent Level of Serviceof 1 Site per 20,400

LionsClub Park

Thorne-RiderPark

HuntingtonDog Park



OwnershipSheridan

1 I N C H = 7 ,00 0 FEETPA G E 4 O F 15

Dog Park/Off Leash AreaCurrent Level of Serviceof 1 Site per 10,200

Thorne-RiderPark



OwnershipSheridan

1 I N C H = 7 ,00 0 FEETPA G E 5 O F 15

Equestrian FacilityCurrent Level of Serviceof 1 Site per 30,600

KendrickMunicipalGolf Course

HiddenBridgeGolf Club




1 I N C H = 7 ,00 0 FEETPA G E 6 O F 15

Golf CourseCurrent Level of Serviceof 1 Hole per 567

OattsMemorialPark

Thorne-RiderPark

LionsClub Park

WashingtonPark

Kendrick Park

Holy NamesCatholic School

CoffeenElementary

HighlandParkElementary

Woodland ParkElementary

MeadowlarkElementary

SagebrushElementary

Sheridan JH




1 I N C H = 7 ,00 0 FEETPA G E 7 O F 15

Outdoor Sports Court (Basketball)Current Level of Serviceof 1 Court per 1,275

Thorne-RiderPark

Mill ParkRotary Park 2

SheridanAvenueDog Park

ShelteredAcres Park

WashingtonPark

Marshall Park

Kendrick Park



OwnershipSheridan

1 I N C H = 7 ,00 0 FEETPA G E 8 O F 15

Picnic ShelterCurrent Level of Serviceof 1 Site per 2,040

OattsMemorialPark

Thorne-RiderPark

WashingtonPark

ShelteredAcres Park

Kendrick Park

Marshall Park

SheridanAvenueDog Park

PoplarGrove Park

NorthHeights

Park

Holy NamesCatholicSchool

CoffeenElementary

HighlandParkElementary



SagebrushElementary




1 I N C H = 7 ,00 0 FEETPA G E 9 O F 15

PlaygroundCurrent Level of Serviceof 1 Site per 1,391

Thorne-RiderParkBlack Tooth

Park Fields

Marshall Park

ShelteredAcres Park

Holy NamesCatholicSchool

CoffeenElementary

Highland ParkElementary



SagebrushElementary

SheridanHighSchool Sheridan JH




1 I N C H = 7 ,00 0 FEETPA G E 1 0 OF 15

Rectangle FieldCurrent Level of Serviceof 1 Field per 1,800

Thorne-RiderPark



OwnershipSheridan

1 I N C H = 7 ,00 0 FEETPA G E 1 1 OF 15

Sand Volleyball CourtCurrent Level of Serviceof 1 Court per 15,300


LegendInterstateUS HighwayState HighwaySheridan_CityLimits

OwnershipOther

1 I N C H = 7 ,00 0 FEETPA G E 1 2 OF 15

Shooting RangeCurrent Level of Serviceof 1 Site per 30,600

Thorne-RiderPark



OwnershipSheridan

1 I N C H = 7 ,00 0 FEETPA G E 1 3 OF 15

SkateparkCurrent Level of Serviceof 1 Site per 30,600

Kendrick Park



OwnershipSheridan

1 I N C H = 7 ,00 0 FEETPA G E 1 4 OF 15

Swimming Pool (outdoor)Current Level of Serviceof 1 Site per 30,600

Thorne-RiderPark

Kendrick Park

ShelteredAcres Park

SheridanHigh School




1 I N C H = 7 ,00 0 FEETPA G E 1 5 OF 15

Tennis / Pickleball CourtCurrent Level of Serviceof 1 Court per 1,913

MAINTENANCE STANDARDS

Appendix-D

GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE STANDARDS

GENERAL PARKS MAINTENANCEBoth the frequency and timeframe vary for each level.

Task Frequency Frequency Frequency

Turf

Mow/Trim/Blow Clippings 1x/5 days 1x/7 to 10 days 1 or 2x/year

Aerate 2x/year 1x/year As needed

Overseed 1x/year As needed Not performed

Fertilize 2 to 4x/year 1x/year Not performed

Apply weed control 1x/year and as needed As needed As needed

Trim Shrubs 1x/month and as needed

1x/year As needed

Pick up trash prior to mowing 1x/5 days 1x/10 days 1x/10 days

Control pests As needed As needed As needed

Manage leaves 2x/year and as needed 2x/year and as needed 1x/year

Line Trim 1x/week 1x/week Monthly

Edge 1x/month 1x/year As needed

Pavilion/Shelters

Clean and sweep 1x/week As needed As needed

Remove and/or replace Garbage Bags and Trash cans

Daily As needed As needed

Paint Pavilion 1x/year 1x/2 years As needed

Power wash 1x/week 2x/year As needed

Inspect Electrical System Limited to Power Supply

1x/year 1x/year 1x/year

Inspect Picnic Tables 1x/week 1x/week or as needed Monthly

Restrooms

Clean and restock 2x/day (weekdays); 2x/day (weekends)

1x/day (weekdays); 2x/day (weekends)

Daily

Odor removal 7x/week 7x/week Weekly

Repair vandalism As needed As needed As needed

Remove and/or replace Garbage Bags and Trash cans

7x/week 7x/week 2x/week

Mechanical Inspection (plumbing) 1x/month 1x/month 1x/month

Schedule Lighting, Mechanical Systems 1x/week 1x/week 1x/year

Seasonal start‐up and close‐up 2x/year 2x/year 1x/year

Fence

Inspect 1x/week1x/year and following storms

1x/year and following storms

Repair As needed As needed As needed

Replace As needed As needed As needed

Repaint As needed As needed As needed

Vegetation Control 1x/year and as needed 1x/year and as needed 1x/year and as needed

Mulching

Apply Mulch 2x/year 1x/year As needed

Weed Control 2x/year 1x/year As needed

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3

General Park Maintenance Standards

PLAYGROUNDS MAINTENANCE STANDARDS

FLORAL MAINTENANCE STANDARDS

PLAYGROUNDSThe difference in levels is the frequency of the task. Timeframes are the same for every level.


Inspect and document Weekly Monthly (7x/year) Bi‐Monthly(4x/year)

Major Annual Inspection Annually Annually Annually

Repair As needed Monthly As needed

Clean and pickup trash Daily Weekly Weekly

Remove graffiti As needed As needed As needed

Inspect water fountains, where applicable Weekly Monthly As needed

Rake fiber mulch Weekly Monthly Monthly

Seal rubberized, poured in place Annually Annually Every 2 years

Supplementing Fiber Mulch Annually Every two years As needed

Replace Every 15 years Every 15 years As needed

Inspect for Pests/Bees/etc Weekly Monthly As needed


FLORALBoth the frequency and timeframe vary for each level.


Plant landscape flowers (perennial) 2x/year 1x/year 1x/year

Flowerbed preparation 1‐2x/year 1x/year 1x/year

Mulch 1x/year and as needed 1x/year 1x/year

Aeration, Fertilizer, Weed Control 1x/2 weeks or as needed 1x/monthly Annually

Create floral display 3x/year 1‐2x/year As needed/requested

Clean weeds from beds 1x/week or as needed Monthly 2x/year

Prune and deadhead flowers 1x/week Monthly Bi‐Monthly

Edge Beds 1x/year and as needed Every 2 years Every 2 years

Cut back ornamental grasses and plants 1x/year 1x/year Annually

Water (hand watering) As needed As needed As needed

Inspect and adjust irrigation heads 1x/week Monthly As needed

Replace/supplement Bulbs 1x/2 years 1x/3 years 1x/3 years

Level 1 Level 3Level 2

PLAYGROUNDS MAINTENANCE STANDARDS

FLORAL MAINTENANCE STANDARDS

PLAYGROUNDSThe difference in levels is the frequency of the task. Timeframes are the same for every level.


Inspect and document Weekly Monthly (7x/year) Bi‐Monthly(4x/year)

Major Annual Inspection Annually Annually Annually

Repair As needed Monthly As needed

Clean and pickup trash Daily Weekly Weekly

Remove graffiti As needed As needed As needed

Inspect water fountains, where applicable Weekly Monthly As needed

Rake fiber mulch Weekly Monthly Monthly

Seal rubberized, poured in place Annually Annually Every 2 years

Supplementing Fiber Mulch Annually Every two years As needed

Replace Every 15 years Every 15 years As needed

Inspect for Pests/Bees/etc Weekly Monthly As needed


FLORALBoth the frequency and timeframe vary for each level.


Plant landscape flowers (perennial) 2x/year 1x/year 1x/year

Flowerbed preparation 1‐2x/year 1x/year 1x/year

Mulch 1x/year and as needed 1x/year 1x/year

Aeration, Fertilizer, Weed Control 1x/2 weeks or as needed 1x/monthly Annually

Create floral display 3x/year 1‐2x/year As needed/requested

Clean weeds from beds 1x/week or as needed Monthly 2x/year

Prune and deadhead flowers 1x/week Monthly Bi‐Monthly

Edge Beds 1x/year and as needed Every 2 years Every 2 years

Cut back ornamental grasses and plants 1x/year 1x/year Annually

Water (hand watering) As needed As needed As needed

Inspect and adjust irrigation heads 1x/week Monthly As needed

Replace/supplement Bulbs 1x/2 years 1x/3 years 1x/3 years

Level 1 Level 3Level 2

Playground Maintenance Standards

Floral Maintenance Standards

GENERAL GROUNDS MAINTENANCE STANDARDS

GROUNDS MAINTENANCEBoth the frequency and timeframe vary for each level.


General Maintenance

Mow/Trim/Blow Clippings 1x/5 days 1x/7 to 10 days 1 or 2x/year

Aerate 2x/year 1x/year As needed

Overseed 1x/year As needed Not performed

Fertilize 2 to 4x/year 1x/year Not performed

Apply weed control 1x/year and as needed As needed As needed

Trim Shrubs 1x/month and as needed

1x/year As needed

Pick up trash prior to mowing 1x/5 days 1x/10 days 1x/10 days

Control pests As needed As needed As needed

Manage leaves 2x/year and as needed 2x/year and as needed 1x/year

Line Trim 1x/week 1x/week Monthly

Edge 1x/month 1x/year As needed

Monuments

Inspect 1x/week4x/year and following storms

1x/year and following storms

Repair As needed As needed As needed

Replace As needed As needed As needed

Graffiti Removal As needed As needed As needed

Vegetation/Weed Control 4x/year 2x/year 1x/year and as needed

Mulching

Apply Mulch 2x/year 1x/year As needed

Weed Control 2x/year 1x/year As needed


General Grounds Maintenance Standards

NATURAL TURF ATHLETIC FIELDS MAINTENANCE STANDARDS

PATHWAYS/TRAILS MAINTENANCE STANDARDS

The difference in levels is the frequency of the task. Timeframes are the same for every level.


Clean and sweep Once/week Once/month As needed

Minor Surface Repair Within 1 week of deficiency noted

Within 1 month fo deficiency noted

Annually

Minor Edge Repair Within 1 week of deficiency noted

Within 1 month of deficiency noted

Annually

Major Inspection Monthly Twice/year Annually

Clean and sweep Weekly Monthly As needed

Striped/Marked Yearly Every two years As needed

Mowed on both sides Twice Monthly Monthly Twice/year

Check/Repair signs Monthly Twice/year Annually

Overlays As needed As needed As needed

Crack sealing Annually Every two years As needed

Trim/Prune Tree Overhang Twice/year Annually As needed

Spray weed control Monthly Twice/year Annually


PATHWAYS/TRAILS

Both the frequency and timeframe vary for each level.


Athletic Fields ‐ Baseball / Softball / Soccer / Multi‐use

Mow grass at 1.5‐2" height per mowing 3x/week 2x/week 1x/week

Overseed Twice/year Once/year Once/year

Fertilizer 3x/year 2x/year 1x/year

Line/Field Prep As needed As Needed As Needed

Aerate 2x/year 1x/year 1x/year

Pick up trash and clean during events Twice Daily Daily 1x/week

Inspect bleachers /scoreboards / security lighting/fencing

Monthly 2x/year 2x/year

Water ( 1 inch / week) Daily As Needed As Needed

Paint Backstops Every 2 years Every 3 years Every 5 years

Set up recreational amenties Daily Daily Daily


NATURAL TURF ATHLETIC FIELDSNATURAL TURF ATHLETIC FIELDS MAINTENANCE STANDARDS

PATHWAYS/TRAILS MAINTENANCE STANDARDS



Clean and sweep Once/week Once/month As needed

Minor Surface Repair Within 1 week of deficiency noted

Within 1 month fo deficiency noted

Annually

Minor Edge Repair Within 1 week of deficiency noted

Within 1 month of deficiency noted

Annually

Major Inspection Monthly Twice/year Annually

Clean and sweep Weekly Monthly As needed

Striped/Marked Yearly Every two years As needed

Mowed on both sides Twice Monthly Monthly Twice/year

Check/Repair signs Monthly Twice/year Annually

Overlays As needed As needed As needed

Crack sealing Annually Every two years As needed

Trim/Prune Tree Overhang Twice/year Annually As needed

Spray weed control Monthly Twice/year Annually


PATHWAYS/TRAILS

Both the frequency and timeframe vary for each level.


Athletic Fields ‐ Baseball / Softball / Soccer / Multi‐use

Mow grass at 1.5‐2" height per mowing 3x/week 2x/week 1x/week

Overseed Twice/year Once/year Once/year

Fertilizer 3x/year 2x/year 1x/year

Line/Field Prep As needed As Needed As Needed

Aerate 2x/year 1x/year 1x/year

Pick up trash and clean during events Twice Daily Daily 1x/week

Inspect bleachers /scoreboards / security lighting/fencing

Monthly 2x/year 2x/year

Water ( 1 inch / week) Daily As Needed As Needed

Paint Backstops Every 2 years Every 3 years Every 5 years

Set up recreational amenties Daily Daily Daily


NATURAL TURF ATHLETIC FIELDS

Natural Turf Athletic Fields Maintenance Standards

Pathways/Trails Maintenance Standards

Athletic Field Maintenance Standards The following best practice maintenance standards are desired for athletic fields:

Task Frequency Timeframe

Athletic Fields ‐ Baseball / Softball / Soccer / Multi‐use ‐ Level 1Goal: To provide a high‐quality and safe field that encourages greater use among the community for practice, games and tournamentsMow/Trim (1 1/2") March 1 through March 31 1x/7 days Growing SeasonMow/Trim (2") April 1 through October 31 1x/7 days Growing SeasonMow/Trim (2")November 1 through November 30 1x/7 days Growing SeasonMow/Trim (2") December 1 through February 28 1x/ 7 days Growing SeasonOverseed 1x/year Spring, SummerFertilizer 3x/year Spring, Summer, FallAerate 3x/year Spring, Summer, FallDrag / Line fields for games 7x/week Year RoundPick up trash and clean during events 7x/day Year RoundInspect bleachers /scoreboards / security lighting 1x/week Year RoundWater ( 1 inch / week) As needed Year Round

Concession Building ‐ Level 1 MaintenanceGoal: Provide a clean, inviting area to eat.Clean, sweep, vacuum 7x/week Year‐roundRemove and/or replace Garbage Bags and Trash cans 7x/week Year‐roundClean and stock restrooms 7x/week Year‐roundClean windows 1x/week Year‐roundCheck Lighting 7x/week Year‐roundCheck Heating / Cooling 7x/week Year‐roundClean and wipe tables 7x/week Year‐roundCheck and clean storage areas 1x/week Year‐roundWash areas outside concession stands 7x/week Year‐roundUpdate and paint signage 1x/year Year‐roundClean Patio 7x/week Year‐roundMajor Mechanical System Inspection (Preventative Maintenance) 1x/month Year‐roundSchedule Lighting, Mechanical Systems 1x/week Year‐roundInspect furniture 1x/week Year‐round

Athletic Fields Maintenance Standards

NATURAL AREA/OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE STANDARDS



Tracking Invasives Annually Every 2 years As needed

Inventory/Map Natural Community Annually Every 2 years As needed

Inventory/ Map Native Plants Annually Every 2 years As needed

Wildlife Inventory Annually Every 2 years As needed

Species Introduction/ Translocation Annually Every 2 years As needed

GPS/ GIS Bi‐annually Every 2 years As needed

Ground‐truth As needed Every 2 years As needed

Photomonitoring 4x/year 2x/year Every 2 years

Treatment Monitoring project‐specific project‐specific project‐specific

Cutback/Herbicide 2x/year 2x/year Annually

Plant/ Seed Annually Annually As needed

Collect Seed Annually Every 2 years As needed

Create Burn Break Annually As needed As needed

Brushhogging Annually Annually Annually

Tree Removal Annually As needed As needed

Prescribe Burn 3‐yr rotation or as needed

As needed As needed

Install/ Repair Nestbox Annually Every 2 years As needed

Install/Remove/Replace Signage Annually As needed As needed

Perimeter Walk 2x/year Annually Annually

Perimeter Clearing Monthly Annually Annually

Remove Trash Monthly Bi‐Monthly 3x per year

Close Trail As needed As needed As needed

Weedeat trail shoulders Monthly 3x per year 2x/year

Suspend Mowing As needed As needed As needed

Mitigate Dam As needed As needed As needed

Mulch/ Compost As needed As needed As needed

Transport/ Deliver Materials As needed As needed As needed

Inventory/ Repair Field Equipment 2x/year 1x/year As needed

Stock First‐Aid Supplies 2x/year 2x/year Annually

Chip As needed As needed As needed

Clean Casting Pond As needed As needed As needed

Install Erosion Control As needed As needed As needed

Install/ Remove Fencing As needed As needed As needed


NATURAL AREAS/OPEN SPACE


Natural Areas/Open Space Maintenance Standards

The following best practice maintenance standards are desired for public golf courses:

Task Frequency Timeframe

Golf ‐ Bunker (Level 1 Maintenance)Goal: To provide a quality obstacle to enhance the golf experienceRake 7x/week March ‐ NovemberSupplement sand 1x/annually March ‐ NovemberRemove water and check drains As needed March ‐ NovemberCut edges 1x/month and as needed March ‐ November

Golf ‐ Bunker (Level 2 Maintenance)Goal: To provide a quality obstacle to enhance the golf experienceRake 3 ‐ 5x/week and as needed March ‐ NovemberSupplement sand 1x/annually March ‐ NovemberRemove water and check drains As needed March ‐ NovemberCut edges 1 ‐ 2x/year and as needed March ‐ November

Golf ‐ Fairways (Level 1 Maintenance)Goal: To provide a quality surface to hit the golf ball ofMow, blow trimmings 3 or 4x/week As neededRepair holes and divots 7x/week As neededAerate 1x/year As neededOverseed 1x/year As neededFertilizer 3x/year As neededApply Pre‐emergent, fungicide 1x/month SeasonallyApply pesticide 1x/year JuneAdjust flags/signs 1x/week SeasonallySweep cart paths 2x/year and as needed SeasonallyInspect markers 1x/week SeasonallyPaint Tee markers 1x/year Sping

Water As required for green, smooth playing surface (1"/week)

Seasonally

Manage leaves 2x/year and as needed Fall

Golf ‐ Greens (Level 1 Maintenance)Goal: To provide a quality putting surface for golfers to enjoyMow, blow as necessary 7x/week SeasonallyCollars mowed 3x/week SeasonallyAerate up to 3x/year SeasonallyLightly Top‐dressed 1x/2 weeks or as needed SeasonallyOverseed 3x/year SeasonallyFertilizer 1x/2 weeks SeasonallyWater As required for green playing surface SeasonallyManage leaves/debris 2x/year and as needed FallVerticut 3x/year Growing SeasonRoll As required for green playing surface Growing SeasonChange cups 7x/week SeasonallyApply pesticide 1x/week or as needed Growing Season

Golf ‐ Heather (Level 3 Maintenance)Goal: Eliminate invasive species and enjoy a weed‐free surface Mow 1x/year SeasonallyApply herbicide 1x/year or as needed SeasonallySign 1x/year Seasonally

Golf ‐ Roughs (Level 2 Maintenance)Goal: To provide a semi‐level hitting surface for golfing playabilityMow 2x/week SeasonallyOverseed As needed SeasonallyTrim Trees 1x/year and as needed SeasonallyApply herbicide/pesticide 1x/year JuneFertilizer 1x/year SeasonallyManage leaves 2x/year and as needed FallVegetation Control 3x/year growing season

Golf ‐ Tees (Level 1 Maintenance)Goal: To provide a quality hitting surface for golfers to tee of fromPick up tees 3x/week and daily by rangers SeasonallyMow 3x/week SeasonallyReplace divots with grass and sand 7x/week SeasonallyBlow 7x/week SeasonallyMove markers 7x/week SeasonallyInspect signs 7x/week SeasonallyRepair signs As needed SeasonallyCheck and replenish ball washer fluids 7x/week SeasonallyEmpty trash cans 7x/week SeasonallyAerate 5x/year SeasonallyOverseed 2x/year and as needed SeasonallyFertilizer 1x/month SeasonallyPre‐emergence 1x/year Spring or FallWater 7x/week SeasonallyManage leaves 2x/year and as needed Fall

Golf Course Maintenance Standards

LAND ACQUISITION & DIVESTITURE GUIDELINES

Appendix-E

Land Acquisition and Divestiture Guidelines Acquisition CriteriaA challenge found in many municipal regulations is that the design standards for what constitutes high-quality park lands are not adequately detailed. This ambiguity can result in the designation of lands that are largely unusable as public parks. Land that does not meet the criteria for the type of park should not be accepted, and the City should utilize the “Payment In-Lieu” of park land dedication.

The following criteria is intended to improve the quality of donated park lands as usable public parks with meaningful recreational value.

Recreation ParksIf the parcel is intended to become a recreation park, it should provide a benefit to the area that surrounds it. The following questions can help determine the value of the parcel. These questions are relative to the park’s classification (pocket, neighborhood, community, or regional) and general location (rural or urban).

Basic Attr ibutes1. Is the land of an appropriate size and shape?

2. Is the character of the land (topography, drainage, soils, etc.) appropriate?

3. Does the land have inherent economic value comparable to the lands adjoining it?

4. Is this land suitable, upon development, to provide the recreation experiences designated for the area?

5. Would the use of this land (as specified by its classification) harm the natural environment?

Location1. Is the land situated appropriately?

2. Would this land contribute to the equitable distribution of parks in the planning region?

Access1. After completion, would this land, upon casual

observation, be easily identifiable as a public park?

2. Will the land be appropriately accessible to the public?

Developments1. Is the supporting infrastructure (utilities,

access, etc.) available in the form and scale needed?

2. Is the land free of infrastructure (high-tension power lines, sewage lagoons, etc.) that would limit appropriate park uses?

3. Is the land free of easements (drainage, effluent disposal, mineral extraction, motorized access, etc.) that would limit appropriate park uses?

4. Does the land have any special cultural or historical significance?

Hazards and Costs1. Are there physical hazards, limitations or

restrictions that would hinder the intended use of the land?

2. Would the benefits offered by this land outweigh the potential liabilities?

3. Would the benefits offered by this land outweigh foreseeable maintenance costs?

L A N D A C Q U I S I T I O N & D I V E S T I T U R E G U I D E L I N E S

Contribution to the Park System1. Does the land complement other nearby park

lands?

2. Does the land serve as a linkage or corridor to other park lands?

3. Do non-motorized travel-ways exist between this park and residences, schools, and other parks and open space?

Harmonious Existence with the Bui lt Environment1. Would the use of this land (as specified by its

classification) conflict with adjacent land use?

2. Does adjacent land use conflict with the intended uses of this land?

Conservation ParksIf the parcel is intended to become a conservation park, it should provide for the protection of important natural values. The following questions can help determine the value of the parcel:

Physical Landform1. Does the land contain a riparian area?

2. Does the land contain unique geomorphic features?

3. Is the landform essentially in its natural state, or can it be returned to such a state?

Flora and Fauna1. Does the land serve an important biological

purpose in the area?

2. Is the majority of the vegetation native to the area?

3. Does the land contain habitat unique to the area?

4. Does a diversity of plant species exist on the site?

5. Does a diversity of animal species exist on the site?

6. Is the land large enough and of high-enough quality to provide self-contained habitat?

7. Does the land provide for wildlife linkages to other habitat areas?

8. Do any sensitive or rare plant or animal species live on or use this land?

9. Does the land buffer adjacent lands that contain sensitive or rare plants or animals?

10. Is the habitat largely unaltered from its natural state, or can it be restored to such a state?

Human Uses1. Will human use of this land harm the natural

habitat?

2. If the land is intended to serve as a non-motorized linkage to other areas, is it suitable for such a purpose?

3. Does the land provide educational opportunities?

4. Is the land threatened by other uses?

Contribution to the Conservation Land System1. Is the land in an area identified as having

important natural resources?

2. Does the land link other conservation lands?

3. Does the land contribute to the diversity of conservation lands in the area?

L A N D A C Q U I S I T I O N & D I V E S T I T U R E G U I D E L I N E S

Harmonious Existence with the Bui lt Environment1. Does (or will) adjacent land use degrade the

naturalness of the land?2. Will it be possible to prevent intrusions from

undesirable plants, domestic animals, and other threats?

Divesting CriteriaAnother challenge associated with many municipal regulations is that the criteria for disposal of park lands are not adequately detailed. This ambiguity has resulted in the designation of lands that are largely unusable as public parks. The following criteria is intended to provide guidelines for the divestiture of park lands that do not have meaningful recreational value.

Recreation ParksIf the parcel is intended to remain a recreation park, it should provide a benefit to the area surrounding it. The following questions can help determine if the parcel has value as a park. These questions are relative to the park’s classification (pocket, neighborhood, community, or regional) and general location (rural or urban).

Basic Attr ibutes1. Is the land of an appropriate size and shape?

2. Is the character of the land (topography, drainage, soils, etc.) appropriate?

3. Does the land have inherent economic value comparable to the lands adjoining it?

4. Is this land suitable for the recreation experiences intended for the area?

5. Is the use of the land causing harm to the natural environment?

Location1. Is the land situated appropriately?

2. Does the land contribute to the equitable distribution of parks in the planning region?

Access1. Is the land, upon casual observation, easily

identifiable as a public park?

2. Is the land appropriately accessible to the public?

Developments1. Is the supporting infrastructure (utilities,

access, etc.) available in the appropriate form and scale needed?

2. Is the land free of infrastructure (high-tension power lines, sewage lagoons, etc.) that would limit appropriate park uses?

3. Is the land free of easements (drainage, effluent disposal, mineral extraction, motorized access, etc.) that would limit appropriate park uses?

4. Does the land have any special cultural or historical significance?

Hazards and Costs1. Are there physical hazards, limitations or

restrictions that hinder the use of the land?

2. Do the benefits offered by this land outweigh the potential liabilities?

3. Do the benefits offered by this land outweigh current and future maintenance costs?

4. Is the park continually subjected to criminal uses or occupation?

Contribution to the Park System1. Does the land complement other nearby

parklands?

2. Does the land serve as a linkage or corridor to other park lands?

3. Do non-motorized travel-ways exist between this park and residences, schools, and other parks and open space?

Harmonious Existence with Bui lt Environment1. Does the use of this land (as specified by its

classification) conflict with adjacent land use?

2. Does adjacent land use conflict with the uses of this land?

Conservation ParksIf the parcel is a conservation park, it should provide for the protection of important natural values. The questions that follow can help determine the value of the parcel.

Physical Landform1. Does the land contain a riparian area?

2. Does the land contain unique geomorphic features?

3. Is the landform essentially in its natural state, or can it be returned to such a state?

Flora and Fauna1. Does the land serve an important biological

purpose in the area?

2. Is the majority of the vegetation native to the area?

3. Does it contain habitat unique to the area?

4. Does a diversity of plant species exist on the site?

5. Does a diversity of animal species exist on the site?

6. Is the land large enough and of high-enough quality to provide self-contained habitat?

7. Does the land provide for wildlife linkages to other habitat areas?

8. Do any sensitive or rare plant or animal species live on or use this land?

9. Does the land buffer adjacent lands that contain sensitive or rare plants or animals?

10. Is the habitat largely unaltered from its natural state, or can it be restored to such a state?

Human Uses1. Does human use of this land harm the natural

habitat?

2. Does the land serve as a non-motorized linkage to other areas?

3. Does the land provide educational opportunities?

4. Is the land threatened by other uses?

Contribution to the Conservation Land System1. Is the land in an area identified as having

important resources?

2. Does the land link other conservation lands?

3. Does the land contribute to the diversity of conservation lands in the area?

Harmonious Existence with Bui lt Environment1. Does adjacent land use degrade the

naturalness of the land?

2. Is it possible to prevent intrusions from undesirable plants, domestic animals, and other threats?

Appendix-FCOMMUNITY SURVEY FINAL FINDINGS REPORT

…helping organizations make better decisions since 1982

Submitted to the City of Sheridan, Wyoming ETC Institute 725 W. Frontier Lane, Olathe, Kansas 66061

March 2019

City of Sheridan Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update 2019 Community Survey

Final Findings Report

2019

Contents

Executive Summary ....................................................................... i

Section 1: Charts and Graphs ....................................................... 1

Section 2: Priority Investment Rating ......................................... 31

Section 3: Benchmarking Analysis .............................................. 40

Section 4: Tabular Data .............................................................. 46

Section 5: Survey Instrument ..................................................... 96

City of Sheridan Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update 2019 Community Survey

Executive Summary OverviewETC Institute administered a Parks and Recreation Survey for the City of Sheridan in the winter of 2019. The City of Sheridan is beginning to update the Parks and Recreation Master Plan that will be used by the City’s representatives to improve and/or update Parks and Recreation features. The data collected from the survey will be used to objectively assess leisure and recreation needs in the community. The survey and its results will guide the City of Sheridan in establishing priorities for the future improvement of parks, recreation facilities, programs, and services within the community that best represent residents’ needs.

Methodology ETC Institute mailed a survey packet to a random sample of households in the City of Sheridan. Each survey packet contained a cover letter, a copy of the survey, and a postage‐paid return envelope. Residents who received the survey were given the option of returning the survey by mail or completing it online at www.SheridanSurvey.org.

Ten days after the surveys were mailed, ETC Institute sent emails and placed phone calls to the households that received the survey to encourage participation. The emails contained a link to the online version of the survey to make it easy for residents to complete. To prevent people who were not residents of the City of Sheridan from participating, everyone who completed the survey online was required to enter their home address prior to submitting the survey. ETC Institute then matched the addresses that were entered online with the addresses that were originally selected for the random sample. If the address from a survey completed online did not match one of the addresses selected for the sample, the online survey was not counted.

The goal was to obtain completed surveys from at least 300 residents. The goal was exceeded with a total of 439 residents completing the survey. The overall results for the sample of 439 households have a precision of at least +/‐4.7% at the 95% level of confidence.

This report contains the following:

Charts showing the overall results of the survey (Section 1) Priority Investment Rating (PIR) that identifies priorities for facilities and programs

(Section 2) Benchmarking analysis comparing the City’s results to national results (Section 3) Tabular data showing the overall results for all questions on the survey (Section 4) A copy of the survey instrument (Section 5)

The major findings of the survey are summarized on the following pages.

City of Sheridan Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update 2019 Community Survey Final Findings

Page i

Facility Needs and PrioritiesFacility Needs: Respondents were asked to identify if their household had a need for 25 recreation facilities and rate how well their needs for each were currently being met. Based on this analysis, ETC Institute was able to estimate the number of households in the community that had the greatest “unmet” need for various facilities.

The top four recreation facilities with the highest percentage of households that indicated a need for the facility were: walking and biking trails (80%), neighborhood and community parks (75%) open space conservation areas/trails (61%), and picnic shelters (58%). ETC Institute estimates a total of 6,792 households out of the 8,469 households in the City of Sheridan have a need for walking and biking trails, an estimated total of 6,343 households out of the 8,469 households in the City of Sheridan have a need for neighborhood and community parks, and an estimated total of 5,149 households out of the 8,469 households in the City of Sheridan have a need for open space conservation areas/trails. ETC Institute estimates a total of 1,760 households out of the 8,469 households in the City of Sheridan have unmet needs for kayak/canoe launches, an estimated 1,552 households out of the 8,469 households in the City of Sheridan have unmet needs for an indoor exercise facility, an estimated 1,525 households out of the 8,469 households in the City of Sheridan have unmet needs for archery/shoot ranges, and an estimated total of 1,504 households out of the 8,469 households in the City of Sheridan have unmet needs for cross country skiing courses. The estimated number of households that have unmet needs for each of the 25 facilities that were assessed is shown in the chart below.


Page ii

Facility Importance: In addition to assessing the needs for each facility, ETC Institute also assessed the importance that residents placed on each facility. Based on the sum of respondents’ top four choices, the four most important facilities to residents were:

1. walking and biking trails (65%),2. neighborhood and community parks (41%),3. open space conservation areas/trails (28%), and4. outdoor swimming pools (21%).

The percentage of residents who selected each facility as one of their top four choices is shown in the chart below.

Priorities for Facility Investments. The Priority Investment Rating (PIR) was developed by ETC Institute to provide organizations with an objective tool for evaluating the priority that should be placed on Parks and Recreation investments. The Priority Investment Rating (PIR) equally weights (1) the importance that residents place on facilities and (2) how many residents have unmet needs for the facility. [Details regarding the methodology for this analysis are provided in Section 2 of this report.]


Page iii

Based the Priority Investment Rating (PIR), the following six facilities were rated as high priorities for investment:

Walking & biking trails (PIR=142.8) Open space conservation areas/trails (PIR=118.6) Kayak/canoe launches (PIR=114.4) Indoor exercise facility (PIR=109.2) Outdoor swimming pools (PIR=107.6) Archery/shooting ranges (PIR=106.6)

The chart below shows the Priority Investment Rating (PIR) for each of the 25 facilities that were assessed on the survey.

Program Needs and Priorities Program Needs. Respondents were also asked to identify if their household had a need for 28 recreational programs and rate how well their needs for each program were currently being met. Based on this analysis, ETC Institute was able to estimate the number of households in the community that had “unmet” needs for each program.

The four programs with the highest percentage of households that had needs were: farmers markets/food vendors (68%), picnic shelters and/or picnic areas (57%), community special events (49%), and fitness and wellness programs (49%). ETC Institute estimates a total of 5,784


Page iv

households out of the 8,469 households in the City of Sheridan have a need for farmers markets/food vendors, a total of 4,819 households out of the 8,469 households in the City of Sheridan have a need for picnic shelters and/or picnic areas, an estimated total of 4,184 households out of the 8,469 households in the City of Sheridan have a need for community special events, and an estimated total of 4,167 households out of the 8,469 households in the City of Sheridan have a need for fitness and wellness programs. ETC Institute estimates a total of 1,923 households out of the 8,469 households in the City of Sheridan have unmet needs for outdoor adventure programs, an estimated total of 1,694 households in the City of Sheridan have unmet needs for open swim, an estimated total of 1,566 households out of the 8,469 households in the City of Sheridan have unmet needs for programs and services for adults 55 years or older, and an estimated total of 1,546 households out of the 8,469 households in the City of Sheridan have unmet needs for fitness and wellness programs. The estimated number of households that have unmet needs for each of the 28 programs that were assessed is shown in the chart below.

Program Importance. In addition to assessing the needs for each program, ETC Institute also assessed the importance that residents placed on each program. Based on the sum of respondents’ top four choices, the five most important programs to residents were:

1. farmers markets/food vendors (37%),2. community special events (28%),3. picnic shelters and/or picnic areas (26%),4. fitness & wellness programs (24%), and5. programs & services for adults 55+ (22%).


Page v

The percentage of residents who selected each program/activity as one of their top four choices is shown in the chart below.

Priorities for Program Investments. Based on the Priority Investment Rating (PIR), which was described briefly on Page iii of this Executive Summary and is described in more detail in Section 2 of this report, the following seven programs were rated as “high priorities” for investment:

Farmers markets/food vendors (PIR=164.4) Fitness & wellness programs (PIR=145.3) Outdoor adventure programs (PIR=141.6) Programs & services for adults 55+ (PIR=140.9) Open swim (PIR=130.8) Community special events (PIR=119.9) Picnic shelters and/or picnic areas (PIR=115.9)

The chart at the top of the following page shows the Priority Investment Rating (PIR) for each of the 28 programs that were rated.


Page vi

Additional Findings Most (92%) of respondent households have visited the City of Sheridan parks, trails, and/or sports fields in the past 12‐months. Of these respondents (92%), twenty‐eight percent (28%) of the respondent households indicated they visit, on average, “at least once a week,” 30% of respondents indicated they visit, on average, “a few times a month,” 14% of respondents indicated they visit, on average, “at least once a month,” 27% of respondents indicated they visit, on average, “a few times a year,” and 2% of respondents indicated they visit, on average, “less than once a year.”

The facilities with the highest ratings, for their overall condition, based on the combined sum of “excellent” and “good” responses among residents who had an opinion, were: City pathways and trails (95%), South Park Natural Area (93%), Cemetery (84%), and Kendrick Park (84%). The facilities with the lowest ratings, based on the combined percentages of “poor” and “very poor” responses among residents who had an opinion, were: Linden Sledding Hill (17%), Sheridan Avenue Dog Park (16%), Thorne‐Rider Dog Park (14%), and Oatts Fields Complex on 6th Street (14%).

Respondents were asked from a list of seven various reasons to why they had not visited the facilities in question and thirty‐percent (30%) of respondent households indicated the facilities are “too far from residence.”


Page vii

The highest levels of importance for the improvement or enhancement of existing facilities in the City, based on the combined percentages of “very important” and “important” responses among residents who had an opinion, were: parks in general (78%), expanding pathway system (73%), adding trails/walking loops in existing parks (61%), and Kendrick Pool (61%). The facilities with the lowest levels of importance for improvement or enhancement, based on the combined percentages of “not important” and “not at all important” responses among residents who had an opinion, were: improving/expanding dog‐friendly facilities (37%) and the skate park (52%).

The highest levels of importance for the development of new facilities, based on the combined percentages of “very important” and “important” responses among residents who had an opinion, were: new walking/biking trails (68%), neighborhood and community parks (67%), and purchase land to preserve open space (63%). The lowest levels of importance for the development of new facilities, based on the combined percentages of “not important” and “not at all important” responses among residents who had an opinion, were: dog parks (36%) and gymnasium space (27%).

The facilities that respondent households indicated were most important to them to be improved or developed, based on the sum of respondents’ top four choices, were: new walking/biking trails (37%), neighborhood and community parks (29%), purchase land to preserve open space (28%), and Kendrick Pool (25%).

The highest levels of agreement with various statements regarding the potential benefits of Sheridan’s parks and recreation system, based on the combined percentages of “strongly agree” and “agree” responses among residents who had an opinion, were: makes Sheridan a more desirable place to live (91%), improves my household’s physical health and fitness (86%), improves my household’s mental health and reduces stress (85%), and provides clean/aesthetically pleasing landscaping along public streets (84%).

Almost three‐quarters (71%) of respondent households either “strongly agree” (48%) or “agree” (23%) that it is important that Kendrick Pool is renovated or rebuilt.

The highest rated potential park improvements, that respondent households indicated were the highest priority to them, were: a renovated or rebuilt outdoor swimming pool in Kendrick Park (59%) and a new community park in North Sheridan (17%).


Page viii

Recommendations To ensure the City of Sheridan meets the needs and expectations of the community, ETC Institute recommends that the Parks and Recreation Department sustain and/or improve the performance in areas that were identified as “high priorities” by the Priority Investment Rating (PIR). The facilities and programs with the highest PIR ratings are listed below.

Facility Priorities o Walking & biking trails (PIR=142.8)o Open space conservation areas/trails (PIR=118.6) o Kayak/canoe launches (PIR=114.4)o Indoor exercise facility (PIR=109.2)o Outdoor swimming pools (PIR=107.6)o Archery/shooting ranges (PIR=106.6)

Program Priorities o Farmers markets/food vendors (PIR=164.4)o Fitness & wellness programs (PIR=145.3)o Outdoor adventure programs (PIR=141.6)o Programs & services for adults 55+ (PIR=140.9)o Open swim (PIR=130.8)o Community special events (PIR=119.9)o Picnic shelters and/or picnic areas (PIR=115.9)


Page ix

Section 1 Charts and Graphs


Page 1

The City of Sheridan Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update 2019

Community SurveyCharts and Graphs of

Overall Results



Page 2

Q1. Have you or any members of your household visited any of the City of Sheridan parks, trails, or sports fields in the past 12 months?


Yes92%

No8%


Page 3

Q1a. If YES to Question 1, how often have you or members of your household visited parks, trails, or sports fields in Sheridan in the past 12 months, on

average?by percentage of respondents who have visited City parks, trails, or sports fields in the past 12‐months (without “don’t know”)

At least once a week28%

A few times a month30%

At least once a month14%

A few times a year27%

Less than once a year2%


Page 4

Q2. Please rate the condition of each of the following facilities that you have visited in the past 12 months using a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 means "excellent" and 1 means "very poor."

by percentage of respondents (without “haven’t visited facility”)

7%10%10%12%13%13%

26%17%

22%15%

21%21%19%18%

35%36%37%

34%48%52%

41%39%42%

41%41%

47%36%

48%43%

51%46%46%51%56%

42%43%

47%50%

45%43%

35%38%35%

36%30%

35%29%27%

24%30%30%

19%25%

25%17%18%12%13%

7%4%

14%9%10%

8%9%

4%6%6%

9%5%4%

8%3%

1%

5%3%

3%2%

3%5%4%3%

6%2%3%3%3%

6%2%

1%

1%

2%

1%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Linden Sledding HillKendrick Pool

Oatts Fields Complex (6th St.)Washington Park (Coffeen Ave.)

Sheridan Avenue Dog ParkThorne‐Rider Park

Elk & Buffalo ExhibitKendrick Golf Course

Black Tooth Park (West 5th St.)Dan Madia Fields Complex

Emerson Park (Sheltered Acres)Thorne‐Rider Dog ParkHuntington Dog Park

Marshall Park (Big Horn Ave.)North Park Natural Area

Kendrick ArboretumKendrick Park

CemeterySouth Park Natural AreaCity Pathways & Trails

Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor


Page 5

Q3. If your household has NOT visited ANY facilities listed above in question 2 in the past 12 months, please CHECK ALL of the following reasons you have

NOT visited.by percentage of respondents (multiple choices could be chosen)

22%

19%

5%

5%

8%

11%

14%

16%

30%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

None

Other

Lack of nearby parking

Lack of accessibility for mobility‐impaired

Not aware of parks or trails locations

Use facilities provided by private or other providers

Lack of features we want to use

Use parks/trails/facilities in other communities

Too far from residence


Page 6

Q4. Parks and Recreation FacilitiesRespondent Households Have a Need Forby percentage of respondents (multiple choices could be chosen)

4%7%7%

13%15%

21%22%24%24%25%26%26%28%29%30%

33%35%36%

43%44%46%48%

58%61%

75%80%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%







Off‐leash dog parkKayak/canoe launches



Off‐road bike trails or bike parksPlaygrounds





Page 7

Q4. Estimated Number of Households that Have a Need for Facilitiesby number of households based on an estimated total of 8,469 households in the City of Sheridan, Wyoming

330576601

1,1351,296

1,7361,8892,0072,0242,1002,2022,2362,3542,4142,524

2,7952,9733,032

3,6503,7013,8624,031

4,8785,149

6,3436,792

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000







Off‐leash dog parkKayak/canoe launches



Off‐road bike trails or bike parksPlaygrounds





Page 8

Q4. How Well Facilities Meet the Needs to Respondent Households by percentage of respondents with a need for recreation facilities

8%15%13%12%13%18%

13%18%19%24%24%

31%32%31%

23%31%33%

29%38%

35%45%

38%51%

72%47%48%

23%11%14%16%15%

18%27%

26%30%

27%31%

25%27%31%

42%37%35%

39%34%39%

33%46%

38%18%

44%45%

15%38%41%

20%34%

43%43%39%30%31%

40%27%

29%25%

28%28%28%

23%23%24%18%

15%10%8%8%7%

54%36%32%

52%38%

21%17%16%

21%18%

6%18%13%14%

7%5%5%

9%4%

2%

5%1%

2%

2%

1%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

OtherVolleyball courts

Kayak/canoe launchesEquestrian trails

Environmental education centerSkateboarding park

Cross country skiing coursesOutdoor basketball

Archery/shooting rangesGymnasium (indoor youth sports)

Tennis/pickleball courtsCommunity gardens

Splash parksIndoor exercise facility

Outdoor swimming poolsBaseball/softball fields

Off‐leash dog parkOff‐road bike trails or bike parks

Football/lacrosse/rugby/soccer fieldsOpen space conservation areas/trails

Golf coursePicnic shelters

Walking & biking trailsIce rinks

Neighborhood & community parksPlaygrounds

Fully Met Mostly Met Partly Met Not Met


Page 9

Q4. Estimated Number of Households Whose Needs for Facilities are Being Partly Met or Not Metby number of households based on an estimated total of 8,469 households in the City of Sheridan, Wyoming

229 259 277

387 415

508 546 558

662 722 754 765 797 815 847

935 1,070

1,183 1,246

1,328 1,334 1,354

1,504 1,525 1,552

1,760

0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000

OtherPlaygrounds





Walking & biking trailsOff‐leash dog park



Gymnasium (indoor youth sports)Off‐road bike trails or bike parks



Cross country skiing coursesArchery/shooting rangesIndoor exercise facilityKayak/canoe launches

Partly Met Not Met


Page 10

Q5. FacilitiesThat Are Most Important to Respondent Householdsby percentage of respondents who selected the items as one of their top four choices

3%1%2%

3%3%4%5%5%6%7%8%8%8%9%9%

12%13%14%14%15%16%

20%21%

28%41%

65%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%









Archery/shooting rangesOff‐road bike trails or bike parks

Indoor exercise facilityOff‐leash dog park






Page 11

Q6. Parks and Recreation Programs that Respondent Households Have a Need Forby percentage of respondents (multiple choices could be chosen)

2%5%7%8%10%10%10%12%13%13%13%15%16%17%

21%23%23%24%25%28%28%

32%34%

41%41%

49%49%

57%68%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%


Recreation/competitive swim teamsAdult basketball programsYouth volleyball programsAdult volleyball programsYouth softball programs

Programs for people with special needsYouth basketball programs

Youth football programsYouth baseball programsYouth soccer programs




Youth learn‐to‐swim programsWater fitness programs/lap swimming



Programs & services for adults 55+Fitness & wellness programsCommunity special events

Picnic shelters and/or picnic areasFarmers markets/food vendors


Page 12

Q6. Estimated Number of Households that Have a Need for Various Recreation Programsby number of households based on an estimated total of 8,469 households in the City of Sheridan, Wyoming

178 390 601 711 872 872 872 982 1,084 1,084 1,118 1,253 1,313 1,406

1,736 1,914 1,948 2,024 2,100 2,337 2,371

2,735 2,896

3,472 3,472

4,167 4,184

4,819 5,784

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000


Recreation/competitive swim teamsAdult basketball programsYouth volleyball programsAdult volleyball programsYouth softball programs

Programs for people with special needsYouth basketball programs

Youth football programsYouth baseball programsYouth soccer programs




Youth learn‐to‐swim programsWater fitness programs/lap swimming



Programs & services for adults 55+Fitness & wellness programsCommunity special events

Picnic shelters and/or picnic areasFarmers markets/food vendors


Page 13

Q6. How Well Respondent Household’s Recreation Program Needs Are Being Metby percentage of respondents with a need for recreation programs

13%2%

11%9%13%

7%12%

21%13%12%10%

17%10%

21%16%17%20%23%22%23%25%

20%26%26%

37%36%

20%32%

41%

13%31%

23%27%

28%39%

36%27%

36%37%40%

34%43%

32%39%39%37%

40%42%43%40%49%

44%47%

39%43%

60%49%

42%

41%43%

52%50%

32%39%42%42%41%

25%39%

28%33%

37%33%

27%31%

24%29%33%

22%20%

23%15%

20%19%14%16%

75%25%23%

13%9%

22%12%9%9%9%

25%10%

20%14%

9%12%

17%6%

12%6%

2%

10%11%

3%9%

2%

2%

4%2%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

OtherOutdoor adventure programs

Programs for people with special needsTennis/pickleball lessons & leagues

After school/out of school programs & campsYouth softball programs

Youth enrichment programsAdult basketball programs

Golf lessons/clinicsDiverse offering of adult recreation leagues

Youth lacrosse programsOpen swim

Open gymnasium (indoor youth sports)Water fitness programs/lap swimming

Programs & services for adults 55+Yoga, Zumba or other aerobic classesRecreation/competitive swim teams

Fitness & wellness programsAdult volleyball programs

Youth learn‐to‐swim programsYouth basketball programsYouth volleyball programsYouth baseball programsPerforming arts programsYouth football programs

Farmers markets/food vendorsCommunity special events

Picnic shelters and/or picnic areasYouth soccer programs

Fully Met Mostly Met Partly Met Not Met


Page 14

Q6. Estimated Number of Households Whose Needs for Recreation Programs are Being Partly Met or Not Metby number of households based on an estimated total of 8,469 households in the City of Sheridan, Wyoming

133 195 216 261 261 277 319 345 366 375 468

633 647 713 727

825 841 853 896

1,005 1,022 1,106 1,124 1,209 1,238

1,546 1,566

1,694 1,923

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500

OtherYouth lacrosse programsYouth soccer programs

Recreation/competitive swim teamsYouth football programs

Youth volleyball programsAdult volleyball programsYouth baseball programs




Youth learn‐to‐swim programsOpen gymnasium (indoor youth sports)








Partly Met Not Met


Page 15

Q7. Recreation ProgramsThat Are Most Important to Respondent Householdsby percentage of respondents who selected the items as one of their top four choices

2%1%1%1%2%2%3%3%4%4%5%6%6%6%7%7%

8%8%9%9%10%10%

15%16%

22%24%

26%28%

37%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%


Recreation/competitive swim teamsYouth volleyball programsYouth football programsAdult volleyball programs







After school/out of school programs & campsYouth learn‐to‐swim programs







Page 16

Q8. How important to you, or any members of your household, is the improvement or enhancement of the following existing facilities?

by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 1 to 5 on a 5‐point scale (without “undecided”)

5%

16%

14%

18%

22%

27%

37%

30%

38%

44%

11%

22%

28%

27%

28%

32%

24%

31%

35%

34%

33%

27%

40%

36%

30%

27%

24%

25%

16%

16%

24%

18%

11%

9%

8%

7%

8%

8%

6%

3%

28%

19%

7%

10%

11%

7%

7%

5%

5%

3%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

The skate park

Improving/expanding dog‐friendly facilities

Expanding playground areas

Existing athletic fields

Adding multi‐use non‐motorized trails

Providing creek/water access

Kendrick Pool

Adding trails/walking loops in existing parks

Expanding pathway system

Parks in general

Very Important Important Neutral Not Important Not At All Important


Page 17

Q9. How important to you, or any members of your household, is the development of the following new facilities?


11%

13%

14%

16%

15%

34%

28%

32%

18%

19%

26%

24%

28%

29%

39%

36%

44%

32%

36%

34%

34%

23%

20%

19%

16%

17%

14%

12%

11%

7%

8%

7%

11%

19%

11%

14%

12%

8%

5%

5%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Gymnasium space

Dog parks

Outdoor splash parks

Multi‐use sports complex (baseball, soccer, softball, etc.)

Cross‐country skiing/snowshoeing trails

Purchase land to preserve open space

Neighborhood & community parks

New walking/biking trails

Very Important Important Neutral Not Important Not At All Important


Page 18

Q10. Which FOUR improvements/developments from the list in Questions 8 and 9 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and members of your household?

by percentage of respondents who selected the items as one of their top four choices

2%5%

6%7%

8%9%

12%14%

15%16%16%

18%22%23%

25%28%

29%37%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%

The skate parkExpanding playground areas

Improving/expanding dog‐friendly facilitiesExisting athletic fields

Gymnasium spaceAdding multi‐use non‐motorized trails

Dog parksProviding creek/water access

Outdoor splash parksMulti‐use sports complex (baseball, soccer, softball, etc.)

Adding trails/walking loops in existing parksCross‐country skiing/snowshoeing trails

Parks in generalExpanding pathway system

Kendrick PoolPurchase land to preserve open space

Neighborhood & community parksNew walking/biking trails



Page 19

Q11. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements regarding the potential benefits of Sheridan's parks and recreation system.


28%

28%

32%

31%

33%

31%

34%

46%

36%

41%

48%

49%

60%

27%

34%

32%

37%

37%

43%

41%

34%

46%

43%

37%

37%

31%

38%

32%

30%

27%

25%

22%

21%

16%

15%

14%

13%

12%

8%

5%

5%

5%

5%

3%

3%

2%

2%

3%

2%

2%

2%

0.2%

2%

1%

1%

1%

1%

1%

2%

2%

1%

1%

1%

1%

1%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Increases my household's property value

Helps to reduce crime & keep kids out of trouble

Promotes tourism to community & region

Positively impacts economic/business development

Helps to attract new residents & businesses

Provides opportunities for diverse experiences

Provides positive social interactions for my household

Preserves open space & protects environment

Is age‐friendly & accessible to all age groups

Provides clean/aesthetically pleasing landscaping along public streets

Improves my household's mental health & reduces stress

Improves my household's physical health & fitness

Makes Sheridan a more desirable place to live

Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree


Page 20

Q12. Kendrick Pool was constructed in 1937 and is approaching the end of its useful life. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statement. "It is important to

our household that Kendrick Pool is renovated or rebuilt."by percentage of respondents who selected the items as one of their top four choices

Strongly agree48%

Agree23%

Neutral17%

Disagree7%

Strongly disagree3%

Undecided3%


Page 21

Q13. Please rank the following potential park improvements listed below from 1 to 5, with 1 being your household's most preferred/highest priority,

and 5 being your least preferred/lowest priority?by percentage of respondents

12%

12%

11%

17%

59%

8%

21%

25%

35%

16%

18%

39%

30%

18%

8%

36%

26%

31%

25%

9%

26%

1%

4%

5%

8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Other

A new multi‐use sports complex at Doubleday

Indoor gymnasium(s)

A new community park in North Sheridan (e.g. Gateway Park)

A renovated or rebuilt outdoor swimming pool in Kendrick Park

Most Preferred/Highest Priority 2 3 4 Least Preferred/Lowest Priority


Page 22

Demographics



Page 23

Q14. Including yourself, how many people in your household are in the following age groups?


Under age 5 years6%Ages 5‐9 years

6%Ages 10‐14 years

8%

Ages 15‐19 years7%

Ages 20‐24 years4%Ages 25‐34

years9%Ages 35‐44

years13%




Ages 75+ years4%


Page 24

Q15. How many years have you lived in the Sheridan area?by percentage of respondents (without “not provided”)

Less than 1 year3%

1 to 5 years8% 6 to 10

years10%

11 to 25 years24%

25+ years55%


Page 25

Q16. Does your household own a dog? by percentage of respondents (without “not provided”)

Yes59%

No41%


Page 26

Q16a. If "Yes," how many dogs?by percentage of respondent households that owns at least one dog

1 Dog56%

2 Dogs33%

3+ Dogs12%


Page 27

Q17. Do you own or rent your home? by percentage of respondents (without “not provided”)

Own86%

Rent14%


Page 28

Q18. Your gender:by percentage of respondents (without “not provided”)

Male49%

Female51%


Page 29

Q19. What is your total annual household income?by percentage of respondents

Under $25K7%

$25K to $49,99919%

$50K to $74,99918%

$75K to $99,99923%

$100K to $149,99917%

$150K+8%

Not provided

10%


Page 30

Section 2 Priority Investment Rating


Page 31

Priority Investment Rating City Sheridan, Wyoming

The Priority Investment Rating (PIR) was developed by ETC Institute to provide governments with an objective tool for evaluating the priority that should be placed on parks and recreation investments. The Priority Investment Rating was developed by ETC Institute to identify the facilities and programs residents think should receive the highest priority for investment. The priority investment rating reflects the importance residents place on items (sum of top 4 choices) and the unmet needs (needs that are only being partly or not met) for each facility/program relative to the facility/program that rated the highest overall. Since decisions related to future investments should consider both the level of unmet need and the importance of facilities and programs, the PIR weights each of these components equally.

The PIR reflects the sum of the Unmet Needs Rating and the Importance Rating as shown in the equation below:

PIR = UNR + IR

For example, suppose the Unmet Needs Rating for community special events is 44.4 (out of 100) and the Importance Rating for community special events is 75.5 (out of 100), the Priority Investment Rating for community special events is 119.9 (out of 200). How to Analyze the Charts:

High Priority Areas are those with a PIR of at least 100. A rating of 100 or above generally indicates there is a relatively high level of unmet need and residents generally think it is important to fund improvements in these areas. Improvements in this area are likely to have a positive impact on the greatest number of households.

Medium Priority Areas are those with a PIR of 50‐99. A rating in this range generally indicates there is a medium to high level of unmet need or a significant percentage of residents generally think it is important to fund improvements in these areas.

Low Priority Areas are those with a PIR below 50. A rating in this range generally indicates there is a relatively low level of unmet need and residents do not think it is important to fund improvements in these areas. Improvements may be warranted if the needs of very specialized populations are being targeted.

The following pages show the Unmet Needs Rating, Importance Rating, and Priority Investment Rating for facilities and programs.


Page 32

The City of Sheridan Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update 2019

Community SurveyPriority Investment Ratings Facilities and Programs



Page 33

Unmet Needs Rating for Recreation Facilitiesthe rating for the item with the most unmet need=100

the rating of all other items reflects the relative amount of unmet need for each item compared to the item with the most unmet need

13.014.715.7

22.023.6

28.831.031.7

37.641.042.843.545.346.348.1

53.160.8

67.270.8

75.575.877.0

85.586.788.2

100.0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

OtherPlaygrounds





Walking & biking trailsOff‐leash dog park



Gymnasium (indoor youth sports)Off‐road bike trails or bike parks



Cross country skiing coursesArchery/shooting rangesIndoor exercise facilityKayak/canoe launches


Page 34

Importance Rating for Recreation Facilitiesthe rating for the item with the most unmet need=100


4.31.43.53.84.15.76.97.49.510.711.712.012.113.314.4

18.919.921.021.022.724.7

30.432.1

42.862.7

100.0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120









Archery/shooting rangesOff‐road bike trails or bike parks

Indoor exercise facilityOff‐leash dog park





Page 35

Top Priorities for Investment for Recreation FacilitiesBased on the Priority Investment Rating

High Priority (100+)

Medium Priority(50‐99)

Low Priority (0‐49)

17.323.427.729.2

39.440.5

45.247.749.351.952.7

63.966.267.7

76.780.582.9

88.294.598.8

106.6107.6109.2

114.4118.6

142.8

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160


Ice rinksEquestrian trails

PlaygroundsFootball/lacrosse/rugby/soccer fields

Outdoor basketballGolf course

Baseball/softball fieldsVolleyball courts

Tennis/pickleball courtsCommunity gardensOff‐leash dog park

Gymnasium (indoor youth sports)Picnic shelters

Environmental education centerSplash parks

Off‐road bike trails or bike parksNeighborhood & community parks

Cross country skiing coursesArchery/shooting rangesOutdoor swimming pools

Indoor exercise facilityKayak/canoe launches

Open space conservation areas/trailsWalking & biking trails


Page 36

Unmet Needs Rating for Recreation Programsthe rating for the item with the most unmet need=100


6.910.111.213.613.614.416.618.019.019.5

24.432.933.737.137.8

42.943.844.446.6

52.353.1

57.558.4

62.964.4

80.481.4

88.1100.0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

OtherYouth lacrosse programsYouth soccer programs


Youth volleyball programsAdult volleyball programsYouth baseball programs




Youth learn‐to‐swim programsOpen gymnasium (indoor youth sports)









Page 37

Importance Rating for Recreation Programsthe rating for the item with the most unmet need=100


4.31.61.63.34.65.26.88.210.911.112.814.914.917.417.917.922.022.324.225.026.428.3

41.642.7

59.564.9

69.375.5

100.0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120


Recreation/competitive swim teamsYouth volleyball programsYouth football programsAdult volleyball programs







After school/out of school programs & campsYouth learn‐to‐swim programs






Page 38

Top Priorities for Investment for Recreation ProgramsBased on the Priority Investment Rating

High Priority (100+)

Medium Priority(50‐99)

Low Priority (0‐49)

11.311.816.818.719.020.723.424.027.728.8

42.348.654.955.057.861.164.164.3

74.583.485.787.1

115.9119.9

130.8140.9141.6145.3

164.4

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200



Youth volleyball programsAdult basketball programsAdult volleyball programs

Youth soccer programsYouth basketball programsYouth baseball programsYouth softball programs

Programs for people with special needsPerforming arts programs

Golf lessons/clinicsOpen gymnasium (indoor youth sports)

Tennis/pickleball lessons & leaguesYouth learn‐to‐swim programs

Diverse offering of adult recreation leaguesYouth enrichment programs

After school/out of school programs & campsWater fitness programs/lap swimmingYoga, Zumba or other aerobic classes

Picnic shelters and/or picnic areasCommunity special events


Outdoor adventure programsFitness & wellness programs

Farmers markets/food vendors


Page 39

Section 3 Benchmarking Analysis


Page 40

Benchmarking Summary Report City of Sheridan, Wyoming

Since 1998, ETC Institute has conducted household surveys for needs assessments, feasibility studies, customer satisfaction, fees and charges comparisons, and other parks and recreation issues in more than 400 communities in 49 states across the country.

The results of these surveys has provided an unparalleled data base of information to compare responses from household residents in client communities to “National Averages” and therefore provide a unique tool to “assist organizations in better decision making.”

Communities within the data base include a full‐range of municipal and county governments from 20,000 in population through over 1 million in population. They include communities in warm weather climates and cold weather climates, mature communities and some of the fastest growing cities and counties in the country. “National Averages” have been developed for numerous strategically important parks and recreation planning and management issues including: customer satisfaction and usage of parks and programs; methods for receiving marketing information; reasons that prevent members of households from using parks and recreation facilities more often; priority recreation programs, parks, facilities and trails to improve or develop; priority programming spaces to have in planned community centers and aquatic facilities; potential attendance for planned indoor community centers and outdoor aquatic centers; etc. Results from household responses for Sheridan, Wyoming were compared to National Benchmarks to gain further strategic information. A summary of all tabular comparisons are shown on the following page.

Note: The benchmarking data contained in this report is protected intellectual property. Any reproduction of the benchmarking information in this report by persons or organizations not directly affiliated with the City of Sheridan is not authorized without written consent from ETC Institute.


Page 41

National Average Sheridan 2019

Have you or members of your household visited any City/County/Park District facilities over the past year?

Yes 78% 92%No 22% 8%

Reasons preventing the use of parks and recreation facilities and programs more Too far from residence 14% 30%

Use facilities in other Cities/Park Districts 11% 16%Use services of other agencies 9% 11%

I do not know location of facilities 15% 8%Lack of accessibility (Not accessible for people w disabilities) 3% 5%

Lack of parking 8% 5%

Benchmarking for Sheridan, Wyoming


Page 42



Recreation programs that respondent households have a need for Special events 39% 49%

Seniors/Adult programs for 55 years and older 25% 41%Water fitness programs 27% 28%

Youth Learn to Swim programs 22% 25%Adult sports programs 23% 24%

Youth summer camp programs 19% 23%Youth sports programs 22% 21%

Golf lessons and leagues (Golf lessons) 16% 17%Tennis lessons and leagues 15% 16%

Programs for people with disabilities 10% 12%

Most important recreation programs (sum of top choices)

Special events 21% 28%Seniors/Adult programs for 55 years and older 16% 22%

Water fitness programs 11% 10%Youth Learn to Swim programs 11% 10%Youth summer camp programs 8% 9%

Golf lessons and leagues 7% 7%Tennis lessons and leagues 5% 6%

Programs for people with special needs/disabled 4% 6%Youth sports programs 12% 6%Adult sports programs 10% 4%


Page 43



Parks and recreation facilities that respondent households have a need for Walking & Biking Trails 70% 80%

Natural areas/wildlife habitats (Greenspace and natural areas) 54% 61%Picnic Areas and Shelters 49% 58%

Indoor Fitness and Exercise Facilities 47% 48%Outdoor Swimming Pools/Aquatic Center 41% 46%

Playground Equipment 41% 44%Unpaved hiking/walking/mountain biking trails 54% 43%

Splash park/pad 25% 36%Indoor Ice-Skating Rinks 23% 33%

Boat Facilities/Paddle Boats 27% 29%Off-Leash Dog Park 30% 28%18 Hole Golf Course 23% 26%

Indoor Gyms/Multi-Purpose Rec Center 29% 26%Community Gardens 31% 25%

Baseball/Softball Fields 12% 24%Outdoor field space (football, lacrosse, rugby, soccer) 21% 24%

Tennis Courts 21% 21%Outdoor basketball/multi-use courts 20% 15%

Volleyball courts 16% 13%Skateboarding Park/Area 11% 7%Equestrian Facility/Trails 9% 7%


Page 44



Most important parks and recreation facilities (sum of top choices)Walking & Biking Trails 45% 65%

Natural areas/wildlife habitats (Greenspace and natural areas) 21% 28%Outdoor Swimming Pools/Aquatic Facilities 17% 21%

Picnic Areas and Shelters 14% 20%Playground Equipment 18% 16%

Off-Leash Dog Park 15% 15%Indoor Fitness and Exercise Facilities 20% 14%

Unpaved hiking/walking/mountain bike trails 30% 14%18 Hole Golf Course 9% 12%

Boat Facilities/Paddle Boats 10% 9%Splash park/pad 8% 8%

Indoor Ice-Skating Rinks 7% 8%Baseball/Softball Fields 3% 8%

Community Gardens 9% 7%Outdoor field space (football, lacrosse, rugby, soccer) 7% 6%

Tennis Courts 6% 5%Indoor Gyms/Multi-Purpose Rec Centers 10% 5%

Equestrian Facility/Trails 2% 4%Outdoor basketball/multi-use courts 4% 3%

Volleyball courts 2% 3%Skateboarding Area 2% 1%


Page 45

Section 4 Tabular Data


Page 46

Q1. Have you or any members of your household visited any of the City of Sheridan parks, trails, or sports fields in the past 12 months? Q1. Have you visited any City parks, trails, or sports fields in past 12 months Number Percent Yes 402 91.6 % No 37 8.4 % Total 439 100.0 % Q1a. If YES to Question 1, how often have you or members of your household visited parks, trails, or sports fields in Sheridan in the past 12 months, on average? Q1a. How often have you visited parks, trails, or sports fields in Sheridan in past 12 months Number Percent At least once a week 113 28.1 % A few times a month 118 29.4 % At least once a month 55 13.7 % A few times a year 107 26.6 % Less than once a year 6 1.5 % Don't know 3 0.7 % Total 402 100.0 % WITHOUT “DON’T KNOW” Q1a. If YES to Question 1, how often have you or members of your household visited parks, trails, or sports fields in Sheridan in the past 12 months, on average? (without "don't know") Q1a. How often have you visited parks, trails, or sports fields in Sheridan in past 12 months Number Percent At least once a week 113 28.3 % A few times a month 118 29.6 % At least once a month 55 13.8 % A few times a year 107 26.8 % Less than once a year 6 1.5 % Total 399 100.0 %


Page 47

Q2. Please rate the condition of each of the following facilities that you have visited in the past 12 months using a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 means "excellent" and 1 means "very poor." (N=402) Haven't visited Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor facility Q2-1. Kendrick Park 34.3% 43.5% 10.9% 3.0% 1.5% 6.7% Q2-2. Marshall Park (Big Horn Ave.) 8.5% 26.4% 11.9% 0.2% 0.2% 52.7% Q2-3. Thorne- Rider Park 6.7% 24.4% 18.2% 2.0% 1.0% 47.8% Q2-4. Kendrick Pool 4.7% 17.9% 17.7% 4.0% 2.2% 53.5% Q2-5. Cemetery 17.2% 25.1% 6.7% 1.0% 0.2% 49.8% Q2-6. Kendrick Golf Course 4.5% 12.9% 7.2% 1.5% 0.7% 73.1% Q2-7. Dan Madia Fields Complex 4.2% 13.9% 8.2% 1.2% 0.0% 72.4% Q2-8. Emerson Park (Sheltered Acres) 9.0% 19.9% 12.9% 1.7% 0.0% 56.5% Q2-9. Huntington Dog Park 4.7% 12.7% 6.2% 0.7% 0.5% 75.1% Q2-10. South Park Natural Area 28.1% 26.1% 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 41.8% Q2-11. City Pathways & Trails 41.5% 34.1% 3.5% 0.2% 0.0% 20.6% Q2-12. Oatts Fields Complex (6th St.) 1.7% 7.5% 6.2% 1.7% 0.7% 82.1%


Page 48

Q2. Please rate the condition of each of the following facilities that you have visited in the past 12 months using a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 means "excellent" and 1 means "very poor." Haven't visited Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor facility Q2-13. Black Tooth Park (West 5th St.) 5.7% 11.2% 6.2% 2.2% 0.7% 73.9% Q2-14. Sheridan Avenue Dog Park 3.2% 10.0% 7.2% 2.2% 1.5% 75.9% Q2-15. North Park Natural Area 12.2% 14.4% 6.0% 1.7% 0.2% 65.4% Q2-16. Linden Sledding Hill 1.7% 9.7% 8.5% 3.2% 0.7% 76.1% Q2-17. Kendrick Arboretum 10.9% 12.9% 5.5% 1.0% 0.0% 69.7% Q2-18. Thorne- Rider Dog Park 3.5% 7.7% 3.2% 1.2% 1.0% 83.3% Q2-19. Elk & Buffalo Exhibit 17.2% 24.1% 19.2% 3.7% 2.2% 33.6% Q2-20. Washington Park (Coffeen Ave.) 6.0% 20.1% 17.7% 3.7% 1.5% 51.0%


Page 49

WITHOUT “HAVEN’T VISITED FACILITY” Q2. Please rate the condition of each of the following facilities that you have visited in the past 12 months using a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 means "excellent" and 1 means "very poor." (without "haven't visited facility") (N=402) Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor Q2-1. Kendrick Park 36.8% 46.7% 11.7% 3.2% 1.6% Q2-2. Marshall Park (Big Horn Ave.) 17.9% 55.8% 25.3% 0.5% 0.5% Q2-3. Thorne-Rider Park 12.9% 46.7% 34.8% 3.8% 1.9% Q2-4. Kendrick Pool 10.2% 38.5% 38.0% 8.6% 4.8% Q2-5. Cemetery 34.2% 50.0% 13.4% 2.0% 0.5% Q2-6. Kendrick Golf Course 16.7% 48.1% 26.9% 5.6% 2.8% Q2-7. Dan Madia Fields Complex 15.3% 50.5% 29.7% 4.5% 0.0% Q2-8. Emerson Park (Sheltered Acres) 20.6% 45.7% 29.7% 4.0% 0.0% Q2-9. Huntington Dog Park 19.0% 51.0% 25.0% 3.0% 2.0% Q2-10. South Park Natural Area 48.3% 44.9% 6.8% 0.0% 0.0% Q2-11. City Pathways & Trails 52.4% 42.9% 4.4% 0.3% 0.0% Q2-12. Oatts Fields Complex (6th St.) 9.7% 41.7% 34.7% 9.7% 4.2% Q2-13. Black Tooth Park (West 5th St.) 21.9% 42.9% 23.8% 8.6% 2.9% Q2-14. Sheridan Avenue Dog Park 13.4% 41.2% 29.9% 9.3% 6.2% Q2-15. North Park Natural Area 35.3% 41.7% 17.3% 5.0% 0.7% Q2-16. Linden Sledding Hill 7.3% 40.6% 35.4% 13.5% 3.1% Q2-17. Kendrick Arboretum 36.1% 42.6% 18.0% 3.3% 0.0% Q2-18. Thorne-Rider Dog Park 20.9% 46.3% 19.4% 7.5% 6.0% Q2-19. Elk & Buffalo Exhibit 25.8% 36.3% 28.8% 5.6% 3.4% Q2-20. Washington Park (Coffeen Ave.) 12.2% 41.1% 36.0% 7.6% 3.0%


Page 50

Q3. If your household has NOT visited ANY facilities listed above in question 2 in the past 12 months, please CHECK ALL of the following reasons you have NOT visited. Q3. Reasons why your household has not visited any facilities Number Percent Use parks/trails/facilities in other communities 6 16.2 % Use facilities provided by private or other providers 4 10.8 % Too far from residence 11 29.7 % Lack of features we want to use 5 13.5 % Lack of nearby parking 2 5.4 % Lack of accessibility for mobility-impaired 2 5.4 % Not aware of parks or trails locations 3 8.1 % Other 7 18.9 % None 8 21.6 % Total 48 WITHOUT “NONE” Q3. If your household has NOT visited ANY facilities listed above in question 2 in the past 12 months, please CHECK ALL of the following reasons you have NOT visited. (without "none") Q3. Reasons why your household has not visited any facilities Number Percent Use parks/trails/facilities in other communities 6 20.7 % Use facilities provided by private or other providers 4 13.8 % Too far from residence 11 37.9 % Lack of features we want to use 5 17.2 % Lack of nearby parking 2 6.9 % Lack of accessibility for mobility-impaired 2 6.9 % Not aware of parks or trails locations 3 10.3 % Other 7 24.1 % Total 40 Q3-10. Other Q3-10. Other Number Percent TOO BUSY WORKING ON MY RANCH 1 14.3 % Didn't know they existed 1 14.3 % I work on my farm 1 14.3 % We have our own open area 1 14.3 % Just don't think of those locations 1 14.3 % LACK OF TIME 1 14.3 % Out in Bighorn's 1 14.3 % Total 7 100.0 %


Page 51

Q4. Please indicate if you or any member of your household has a need for each of the facilities listed below. (N=439) Yes No Q4-1. Neighborhood & community parks 74.9% 25.1% Q4-2. Off-road bike trails or bike parks 43.1% 56.9% Q4-3. Community gardens 24.8% 75.2% Q4-4. Walking & biking trails 80.2% 19.8% Q4-5. Equestrian trails 6.8% 93.2% Q4-6. Off-leash dog park 27.8% 72.2% Q4-7. Skateboarding park 7.1% 92.9% Q4-8. Baseball/softball fields 23.9% 76.1% Q4-9. Picnic shelters 57.6% 42.4% Q4-10. Football/lacrosse/rugby/soccer fields 23.7% 76.3% Q4-11. Tennis/pickleball courts 20.5% 79.5% Q4-12. Kayak/canoe launches 28.5% 71.5% Q4-13. Outdoor basketball 15.3% 84.7% Q4-14. Volleyball courts 13.4% 86.6% Q4-15. Outdoor swimming pools 45.6% 54.4% Q4-16. Splash parks 35.8% 64.2% Q4-17. Playgrounds 43.7% 56.3% Q4-18. Gymnasium (indoor youth sports) 26.0% 74.0% Q4-19. Open space conservation areas/ trails 60.8% 39.2% Q4-20. Environmental education center 22.3% 77.7% Q4-21. Golf course 26.4% 73.6%


Page 52

Q4. Please indicate if you or any member of your household has a need for each of the facilities listed below. Yes No Q4-22. Archery/shooting ranges 35.1% 64.9% Q4-23. Indoor exercise facility 47.6% 52.4% Q4-24. Ice rinks 33.0% 67.0% Q4-25. Cross country skiing courses 29.8% 70.2% Q4-26. Other 3.9% 96.1%


Page 53

Q4. If "Yes," please indicate how well your needs are currently being met for this type of facility. (N=413) Fully met Mostly met Partly met Not met Q4-1. Neighborhood & community parks 47.2% 44.0% 7.5% 1.3% Q4-2. Off-road bike trails or bike parks 29.1% 38.5% 23.1% 9.3% Q4-3. Community gardens 30.7% 24.8% 26.7% 17.8% Q4-4. Walking & biking trails 51.2% 37.7% 9.6% 1.5% Q4-5. Equestrian trails 12.0% 16.0% 20.0% 52.0% Q4-6. Off-leash dog park 32.5% 35.0% 27.5% 5.0% Q4-7. Skateboarding park 17.9% 17.9% 42.9% 21.4% Q4-8. Baseball/softball fields 30.7% 36.6% 27.7% 5.0% Q4-9. Picnic shelters 37.5% 45.8% 15.4% 1.3% Q4-10. Football/lacrosse/rugby/soccer fields 38.4% 34.3% 23.2% 4.0% Q4-11. Tennis/pickleball courts 23.5% 30.6% 40.0% 5.9% Q4-12. Kayak/canoe launches 12.7% 14.4% 40.7% 32.2% Q4-13. Outdoor basketball 18.0% 26.2% 39.3% 16.4% Q4-14. Volleyball courts 14.5% 10.9% 38.2% 36.4% Q4-15. Outdoor swimming pools 23.4% 42.2% 27.6% 6.8% Q4-16. Splash parks 31.8% 27.2% 28.5% 12.6% Q4-17. Playgrounds 48.1% 44.9% 7.0% 0.0% Q4-18. Gymnasium (indoor youth sports) 24.3% 27.0% 30.6% 18.0% Q4-19. Open space conservation areas/ trails 34.9% 39.2% 24.3% 1.6% Q4-20. Environmental education center 13.0% 15.2% 33.7% 38.0%


Page 54

Q4. If "Yes," please indicate how well your needs are currently being met for this type of facility. Fully met Mostly met Partly met Not met Q4-21. Golf course 44.5% 32.7% 18.2% 4.5% Q4-22. Archery/shooting ranges 19.2% 29.5% 30.1% 21.2% Q4-23. Indoor exercise facility 31.0% 30.5% 24.5% 14.0% Q4-24. Ice rinks 72.3% 17.7% 7.8% 2.1% Q4-25. Cross country skiing courses 12.9% 27.4% 42.7% 16.9% Q4-26. Other 7.7% 23.1% 15.4% 53.8% Q4-26. Other Q4-26. Other Number Percent Disc golf course 2 11.8 % Indoor track 2 11.8 % Winter indoor pool 1 5.9 % Updated softball or baseball complex 1 5.9 % DOCTORS 1 5.9 % MAKERSPACE 1 5.9 % FRISBEE GOLF 1 5.9 % AN AREA FOR US YOUNG ADULTS THAT DRIVE 1 5.9 % STRIP CLUB 1 5.9 % Green spaces in the downtown area 1 5.9 % Fishing ponds 1 5.9 % Wildlife observation 1 5.9 % Gym space, equestrian paths 1 5.9 % REC CENTER 1 5.9 % SNOW SHOEING 1 5.9 % Total 17 100.0 %


Page 55

Q5. Which FOUR facilities from the list in Question 4 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and members of your household? Q5. Top choice Number Percent Neighborhood & community parks 82 18.7 % Off-road bike trails or bike parks 14 3.2 % Community gardens 4 0.9 % Walking & biking trails 136 31.0 % Equestrian trails 7 1.6 % Off-leash dog park 16 3.6 % Baseball/softball fields 12 2.7 % Picnic shelters 8 1.8 % Football/lacrosse/rugby/soccer fields 6 1.4 % Tennis/pickleball courts 5 1.1 % Kayak/canoe launches 3 0.7 % Outdoor basketball 1 0.2 % Volleyball courts 1 0.2 % Outdoor swimming pools 14 3.2 % Splash parks 1 0.2 % Playgrounds 12 2.7 % Gymnasium (indoor youth sports) 4 0.9 % Open space conservation areas/trails 12 2.7 % Golf course 17 3.9 % Archery/shooting ranges 8 1.8 % Indoor exercise facility 14 3.2 % Ice rinks 9 2.1 % Cross country skiing courses 3 0.7 % Other 6 1.4 % None chosen 44 10.0 % Total 439 100.0 %


Page 56

Q5. Which FOUR facilities from the list in Question 4 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and members of your household? Q5. 2nd choice Number Percent Neighborhood & community parks 45 10.3 % Off-road bike trails or bike parks 17 3.9 % Community gardens 11 2.5 % Walking & biking trails 100 22.8 % Equestrian trails 2 0.5 % Off-leash dog park 23 5.2 % Skateboarding park 1 0.2 % Baseball/softball fields 9 2.1 % Picnic shelters 21 4.8 % Football/lacrosse/rugby/soccer fields 7 1.6 % Tennis/pickleball courts 9 2.1 % Kayak/canoe launches 9 2.1 % Outdoor basketball 3 0.7 % Volleyball courts 5 1.1 % Outdoor swimming pools 16 3.6 % Splash parks 5 1.1 % Playgrounds 16 3.6 % Gymnasium (indoor youth sports) 7 1.6 % Open space conservation areas/trails 30 6.8 % Environmental education center 3 0.7 % Golf course 14 3.2 % Archery/shooting ranges 8 1.8 % Indoor exercise facility 8 1.8 % Ice rinks 4 0.9 % Cross country skiing courses 11 2.5 % Other 4 0.9 % None chosen 51 11.6 % Total 439 100.0 %


Page 57

Q5. Which FOUR facilities from the list in Question 4 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and members of your household? Q5. 3rd choice Number Percent Neighborhood & community parks 28 6.4 % Off-road bike trails or bike parks 8 1.8 % Community gardens 8 1.8 % Walking & biking trails 37 8.4 % Equestrian trails 3 0.7 % Off-leash dog park 9 2.1 % Skateboarding park 3 0.7 % Baseball/softball fields 9 2.1 % Picnic shelters 33 7.5 % Football/lacrosse/rugby/soccer fields 7 1.6 % Tennis/pickleball courts 5 1.1 % Kayak/canoe launches 18 4.1 % Outdoor basketball 5 1.1 % Volleyball courts 3 0.7 % Outdoor swimming pools 32 7.3 % Splash parks 15 3.4 % Playgrounds 28 6.4 % Gymnasium (indoor youth sports) 5 1.1 % Open space conservation areas/trails 41 9.3 % Environmental education center 2 0.5 % Golf course 11 2.5 % Archery/shooting ranges 17 3.9 % Indoor exercise facility 17 3.9 % Ice rinks 9 2.1 % Cross country skiing courses 7 1.6 % Other 2 0.5 % None chosen 77 17.5 % Total 439 100.0 %


Page 58

Q5. Which FOUR facilities from the list in Question 4 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and members of your household? Q5. 4th choice Number Percent Neighborhood & community parks 24 5.5 % Off-road bike trails or bike parks 21 4.8 % Community gardens 8 1.8 % Walking & biking trails 13 3.0 % Equestrian trails 4 0.9 % Off-leash dog park 17 3.9 % Baseball/softball fields 3 0.7 % Picnic shelters 25 5.7 % Football/lacrosse/rugby/soccer fields 7 1.6 % Tennis/pickleball courts 2 0.5 % Kayak/canoe launches 11 2.5 % Outdoor basketball 3 0.7 % Volleyball courts 2 0.5 % Outdoor swimming pools 30 6.8 % Splash parks 14 3.2 % Playgrounds 15 3.4 % Gymnasium (indoor youth sports) 4 0.9 % Open space conservation areas/trails 40 9.1 % Environmental education center 5 1.1 % Golf course 12 2.7 % Archery/shooting ranges 24 5.5 % Indoor exercise facility 21 4.8 % Ice rinks 12 2.7 % Cross country skiing courses 17 3.9 % None chosen 105 23.9 % Total 439 100.0 %


Page 59

SUM OF THE TOP FOUR CHOICES Q5. Which FOUR facilities from the list in Question 4 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and members of your household? (top 4) Q5. Top choice Number Percent Neighborhood & community parks 179 40.8 % Off-road bike trails or bike parks 60 13.7 % Community gardens 31 7.1 % Walking & biking trails 286 65.1 % Equestrian trails 16 3.6 % Off-leash dog park 65 14.8 % Skateboarding park 4 0.9 % Baseball/softball fields 33 7.5 % Picnic shelters 87 19.8 % Football/lacrosse/rugby/soccer fields 27 6.2 % Tennis/pickleball courts 21 4.8 % Kayak/canoe launches 41 9.3 % Outdoor basketball 12 2.7 % Volleyball courts 11 2.5 % Outdoor swimming pools 92 21.0 % Splash parks 35 8.0 % Playgrounds 71 16.2 % Gymnasium (indoor youth sports) 20 4.6 % Open space conservation areas/trails 123 28.0 % Environmental education center 10 2.3 % Golf course 54 12.3 % Archery/shooting ranges 57 13.0 % Indoor exercise facility 60 13.7 % Ice rinks 34 7.7 % Cross country skiing courses 38 8.7 % Other 12 2.7 % None chosen 44 10.0 % Total 1523


Page 60

Q6. Please indicate if you or any member of your household has a need for each of the programs listed below. (N=439) Yes No Q6-1. Tennis/pickleball lessons & leagues 15.5% 84.5% Q6-2. Programs for people with special needs 11.6% 88.4% Q6-3. Community special events 49.4% 50.6% Q6-4. Golf lessons/clinics 16.6% 83.4% Q6-5. Outdoor adventure programs 34.2% 65.8% Q6-6. Youth learn-to-swim programs 24.8% 75.2% Q6-7. Water fitness programs/lap swimming 27.6% 72.4% Q6-8. Recreation/competitive swim teams 7.1% 92.9% Q6-9. Youth enrichment programs 23.0% 77.0% Q6-10. After school/out of school programs & camps 22.6% 77.4% Q6-11. Youth basketball programs 12.8% 87.2% Q6-12. Adult basketball programs 8.4% 91.6% Q6-13. Youth volleyball programs 10.3% 89.7% Q6-14. Adult volleyball programs 10.3% 89.7% Q6-15. Youth soccer programs 14.8% 85.2% Q6-16. Youth baseball programs 13.2% 86.8% Q6-17. Youth softball programs 10.3% 89.7% Q6-18. Performing arts programs 28.0% 72.0% Q6-19. Youth football programs 12.8% 87.2% Q6-20. Youth lacrosse programs 4.6% 95.4%


Page 61

Q6. Please indicate if you or any member of your household has a need for each of the programs listed below. Yes No Q6-21. Fitness & wellness programs 49.2% 50.8% Q6-22. Yoga, Zumba or other aerobic classes 32.3% 67.7% Q6-23. Open swim 41.0% 59.0% Q6-24. Open gymnasium (indoor youth sports) 20.5% 79.5% Q6-25. Picnic shelters and/or picnic areas 56.9% 43.1% Q6-26. Programs & services for adults 55+ 41.0% 59.0% Q6-27. Farmers markets/food vendors 68.3% 31.7% Q6-28. Diverse offering of adult recreation leagues 23.9% 76.1% Q6-29. Other 2.1% 97.9%


Page 62

Q6. If "Yes," please indicate how well your needs are currently being met for this type of program. (N=389) Fully met Mostly met Partly met Not met Q6-1. Tennis/pickleball lessons & leagues 9.4% 26.6% 51.6% 12.5% Q6-2. Programs for people with special needs 11.4% 22.7% 43.2% 22.7% Q6-3. Community special events 19.9% 59.7% 18.9% 1.5% Q6-4. Golf lessons/clinics 13.0% 36.2% 42.0% 8.7% Q6-5. Outdoor adventure programs 2.1% 31.4% 41.4% 25.0% Q6-6. Youth learn-to-swim programs 22.8% 42.6% 28.7% 5.9% Q6-7. Water fitness programs/lap swimming 21.1% 31.6% 33.3% 14.0% Q6-8. Recreation/competitive swim teams 20.0% 36.7% 26.7% 16.7% Q6-9. Youth enrichment programs 12.4% 36.1% 39.2% 12.4% Q6-10. After school/out of school programs & camps 13.0% 28.3% 50.0% 8.7% Q6-11. Youth basketball programs 25.0% 40.4% 32.7% 1.9% Q6-12. Adult basketball programs 21.2% 27.3% 42.4% 9.1% Q6-13. Youth volleyball programs 19.5% 48.8% 22.0% 9.8% Q6-14. Adult volleyball programs 22.0% 41.5% 24.4% 12.2% Q6-15. Youth soccer programs 40.6% 42.2% 15.6% 1.6% Q6-16. Youth baseball programs 25.5% 43.6% 20.0% 10.9% Q6-17. Youth softball programs 7.3% 39.0% 31.7% 22.0% Q6-18. Performing arts programs 25.9% 47.4% 23.3% 3.4% Q6-19. Youth football programs 37.0% 38.9% 14.8% 9.3% Q6-20. Youth lacrosse programs 10.0% 40.0% 25.0% 25.0%


Page 63

Q6. If "Yes," please indicate how well your needs are currently being met for this type of program. Fully met Mostly met Partly met Not met Q6-21. Fitness & wellness programs 23.3% 39.6% 31.2% 5.9% Q6-22. Yoga, Zumba or other aerobic classes 17.1% 38.8% 32.6% 11.6% Q6-23. Open swim 17.1% 34.1% 39.0% 9.8% Q6-24. Open gymnasium (indoor youth sports) 9.8% 42.7% 28.0% 19.5% Q6-25. Picnic shelters and/or picnic areas 32.0% 49.4% 14.3% 4.3% Q6-26. Programs & services for adults 55+ 16.3% 38.6% 36.6% 8.5% Q6-27. Farmers markets/food vendors 35.7% 43.0% 19.9% 1.5% Q6-28. Diverse offering of adult recreation leagues 12.4% 37.1% 41.2% 9.3% Q6-29. Other 12.5% 12.5% 0.0% 75.0%


Page 64

Q6-29. Other Q6-29. Other Number Percent YEAR ROUND HOCKEY PROGRAM 1 11.1 % HOSPITAL 1 11.1 % MAKERSPACE 1 11.1 % XC SKIING 1 11.1 % PATHWAYS TRAIL FROM COLLEGE TO TOWN OF BIG HORN 1 11.1 % Indoor play area for children/young adults 1 11.1 % HANDICAP ACCESSIBILITY TO KENDRICK PARK 1 11.1 % BIKING 1 11.1 % FLEXIBILITY CLASSES/EVENTS 1 11.1 % Total 9 100.0 %


Page 65

Q7. Which FOUR programs from the list in Question 6 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and members of your household? Q7. Top choice Number Percent Tennis/pickleball lessons & leagues 14 3.2 % Programs for people with special needs 11 2.5 % Community special events 50 11.4 % Golf lessons/clinics 9 2.1 % Outdoor adventure programs 20 4.6 % Youth learn-to-swim programs 16 3.6 % Water fitness programs/lap swimming 14 3.2 % Recreation/competitive swim teams 2 0.5 % Youth enrichment programs 9 2.1 % After school/out of school programs & camps 11 2.5 % Youth basketball programs 4 0.9 % Adult basketball programs 1 0.2 % Youth volleyball programs 2 0.5 % Adult volleyball programs 3 0.7 % Youth soccer programs 5 1.1 % Youth baseball programs 9 2.1 % Youth softball programs 3 0.7 % Performing arts programs 13 3.0 % Youth football programs 2 0.5 % Fitness & wellness programs 29 6.6 % Yoga, Zumba or other aerobic classes 4 0.9 % Open swim 12 2.7 % Open gymnasium (indoor youth sports) 3 0.7 % Picnic shelters and/or picnic areas 28 6.4 % Programs & services for adults 55+ 22 5.0 % Farmers markets/food vendors 32 7.3 % Diverse offering of adult recreation leagues 6 1.4 % Other 7 1.6 % None chosen 98 22.3 % Total 439 100.0 %


Page 66

Q7. Which FOUR programs from the list in Question 6 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and members of your household? Q7. 2nd choice Number Percent Tennis/pickleball lessons & leagues 3 0.7 % Programs for people with special needs 2 0.5 % Community special events 31 7.1 % Golf lessons/clinics 7 1.6 % Outdoor adventure programs 20 4.6 % Youth learn-to-swim programs 18 4.1 % Water fitness programs/lap swimming 9 2.1 % Recreation/competitive swim teams 3 0.7 % Youth enrichment programs 12 2.7 % After school/out of school programs & camps 9 2.1 % Youth basketball programs 3 0.7 % Adult basketball programs 1 0.2 % Youth volleyball programs 2 0.5 % Adult volleyball programs 4 0.9 % Youth soccer programs 6 1.4 % Youth baseball programs 3 0.7 % Youth softball programs 4 0.9 % Performing arts programs 13 3.0 % Youth football programs 2 0.5 % Youth lacrosse programs 1 0.2 % Fitness & wellness programs 29 6.6 % Yoga, Zumba or other aerobic classes 19 4.3 % Open swim 21 4.8 % Open gymnasium (indoor youth sports) 5 1.1 % Picnic shelters and/or picnic areas 36 8.2 % Programs & services for adults 55+ 25 5.7 % Farmers markets/food vendors 31 7.1 % Diverse offering of adult recreation leagues 3 0.7 % None chosen 117 26.7 % Total 439 100.0 %


Page 67

Q7. Which FOUR programs from the list in Question 6 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and members of your household? Q7. 3rd choice Number Percent Tennis/pickleball lessons & leagues 5 1.1 % Programs for people with special needs 5 1.1 % Community special events 23 5.2 % Golf lessons/clinics 5 1.1 % Outdoor adventure programs 15 3.4 % Youth learn-to-swim programs 5 1.1 % Water fitness programs/lap swimming 13 3.0 % Youth enrichment programs 7 1.6 % After school/out of school programs & camps 10 2.3 % Youth basketball programs 3 0.7 % Adult basketball programs 1 0.2 % Youth volleyball programs 2 0.5 % Adult volleyball programs 4 0.9 % Youth soccer programs 5 1.1 % Youth softball programs 2 0.5 % Performing arts programs 21 4.8 % Youth football programs 2 0.5 % Youth lacrosse programs 1 0.2 % Fitness & wellness programs 28 6.4 % Yoga, Zumba or other aerobic classes 6 1.4 % Open swim 26 5.9 % Open gymnasium (indoor youth sports) 6 1.4 % Picnic shelters and/or picnic areas 22 5.0 % Programs & services for adults 55+ 29 6.6 % Farmers markets/food vendors 45 10.3 % Diverse offering of adult recreation leagues 4 0.9 % None chosen 144 32.8 % Total 439 100.0 %


Page 68

Q7. Which FOUR programs from the list in Question 6 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and members of your household? Q7. 4th choice Number Percent Tennis/pickleball lessons & leagues 6 1.4 % Programs for people with special needs 6 1.4 % Community special events 18 4.1 % Golf lessons/clinics 8 1.8 % Outdoor adventure programs 12 2.7 % Youth learn-to-swim programs 4 0.9 % Water fitness programs/lap swimming 9 2.1 % Youth enrichment programs 8 1.8 % After school/out of school programs & camps 10 2.3 % Youth basketball programs 3 0.7 % Youth volleyball programs 1 0.2 % Youth soccer programs 5 1.1 % Youth baseball programs 3 0.7 % Youth softball programs 1 0.2 % Performing arts programs 7 1.6 % Youth football programs 4 0.9 % Youth lacrosse programs 1 0.2 % Fitness & wellness programs 19 4.3 % Yoga, Zumba or other aerobic classes 10 2.3 % Open swim 10 2.3 % Open gymnasium (indoor youth sports) 10 2.3 % Picnic shelters and/or picnic areas 26 5.9 % Programs & services for adults 55+ 20 4.6 % Farmers markets/food vendors 53 12.1 % Diverse offering of adult recreation leagues 5 1.1 % None chosen 180 41.0 % Total 439 100.0 %


Page 69

SUM OF THE TOP FOUR CHOICES Q7. Which FOUR programs from the list in Question 6 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and members of your household? (top 4) Q7. Top choice Number Percent Tennis/pickleball lessons & leagues 28 6.4 % Programs for people with special needs 24 5.5 % Community special events 122 27.8 % Golf lessons/clinics 29 6.6 % Outdoor adventure programs 67 15.3 % Youth learn-to-swim programs 43 9.8 % Water fitness programs/lap swimming 45 10.3 % Recreation/competitive swim teams 5 1.1 % Youth enrichment programs 36 8.2 % After school/out of school programs & camps 40 9.1 % Youth basketball programs 13 3.0 % Adult basketball programs 3 0.7 % Youth volleyball programs 7 1.6 % Adult volleyball programs 11 2.5 % Youth soccer programs 21 4.8 % Youth baseball programs 15 3.4 % Youth softball programs 10 2.3 % Performing arts programs 54 12.3 % Youth football programs 10 2.3 % Youth lacrosse programs 3 0.7 % Fitness & wellness programs 105 23.9 % Yoga, Zumba or other aerobic classes 39 8.9 % Open swim 69 15.7 % Open gymnasium (indoor youth sports) 24 5.5 % Picnic shelters and/or picnic areas 112 25.5 % Programs & services for adults 55+ 96 21.9 % Farmers markets/food vendors 161 36.7 % Diverse offering of adult recreation leagues 18 4.1 % Other 7 1.6 % None chosen 98 22.3 % Total 1315


Page 70

Q8. How important to you, or any members of your household, is the improvement or enhancement of the following existing facilities? (N=439) Very Not at all important Important Neutral Not important important Undecided Q8-1. Parks in general 41.5% 32.3% 15.5% 2.5% 2.5% 5.7% Q8-2. Existing athletic fields 15.7% 23.7% 31.9% 7.5% 8.9% 12.3% Q8-3. Expanding pathway system 35.1% 31.7% 15.0% 5.7% 4.1% 8.4% Q8-4. Adding trails/ walking loops in existing parks 28.0% 28.5% 23.2% 7.5% 5.0% 7.7% Q8-5. Kendrick Pool 33.9% 21.6% 21.6% 7.5% 6.4% 8.9% Q8-6. Expanding playground areas 12.5% 24.8% 36.2% 10.3% 6.2% 10.0% Q8-7. Improving/ expanding dog-friendly facilities 13.9% 19.4% 23.5% 15.5% 16.4% 11.4% Q8-8. Providing creek/ water access 24.1% 28.0% 23.5% 6.2% 6.4% 11.8% Q8-9. The skate park 4.1% 9.1% 28.7% 21.0% 23.9% 13.2% Q8-10. Adding multi- use non-motorized trails 19.4% 24.6% 26.4% 7.3% 9.8% 12.5% Q8-11. Other 76.9% 11.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.5%


Page 71

WITHOUT “UNDECIDED” Q8. How important to you, or any members of your household, is the improvement or enhancement of the following existing facilities? (without "undecided") (N=439) Not at all Very important Important Neutral Not important important Q8-1. Parks in general 44.0% 34.3% 16.4% 2.7% 2.7% Q8-2. Existing athletic fields 17.9% 27.0% 36.4% 8.6% 10.1% Q8-3. Expanding pathway system 38.3% 34.6% 16.4% 6.2% 4.5% Q8-4. Adding trails/ walking loops in existing parks 30.4% 30.9% 25.2% 8.1% 5.4% Q8-5. Kendrick Pool 37.3% 23.8% 23.8% 8.3% 7.0% Q8-6. Expanding playground areas 13.9% 27.6% 40.3% 11.4% 6.8% Q8-7. Improving/ expanding dog- friendly facilities 15.7% 21.9% 26.5% 17.5% 18.5% Q8-8. Providing creek/water access 27.4% 31.8% 26.6% 7.0% 7.2% Q8-9. The skate park 4.7% 10.5% 33.1% 24.1% 27.6% Q8-10. Adding multi- use non-motorized trails 22.1% 28.1% 30.2% 8.3% 11.2% Q8-11. Other 87.0% 13.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


Page 72

Q8-11. Other Q8-11. Other Number Percent GOLF COURSE 2 7.7 % Indoor track 1 3.8 % FIRE AND AMBULANCE SERVICES 1 3.8 % TRAILS WEST AND NORTH OF CITY 1 3.8 % Tennis courts 1 3.8 % TAKING CARE OF WHAT WE HAVE 1 3.8 % Improving Elk and Buffalo area 1 3.8 % REMOVE SNOW ON WALKING PATHS ON WEEKENDS 1 3.8 % COMPETITIVE SWIMMING POOL 1 3.8 % FISHING ACCESS/INFO 1 3.8 % EXTENDING PATHWAYS TO TOWN OF BIG HORN 1 3.8 % RETURN ACCESS ROAD SYSTEM AT KENDRICK PARK 1 3.8 % Develop park behind North Heights Dr 1 3.8 % Improve Goose Creek access beauty and natural areas 1 3.8 % Archery, gun ranges 1 3.8 % Kendrick Golf Course 1 3.8 % Air travel in and out of Sheridan 1 3.8 % Walking path to woodland Park School 1 3.8 % Thorne Rider Stadium 1 3.8 % Equestrian trails 1 3.8 % Handicap areas 1 3.8 % MOTORIZED TRAILS 1 3.8 % MORE TENNIS COURTS 1 3.8 % PARK WATER USAGE MANAGEMENT 1 3.8 % PERFORMING ARTS VENUES (KENDRICK AND WHITNEY) 1 3.8 % Total 26 100.0 %


Page 73

Q9. How important to you, or any members of your household, is the development of the following new facilities? (N=439) Very Not at all important Important Neutral Not important important Undecided Q9-1. Purchase land to preserve open space 30.1% 25.7% 20.5% 6.2% 7.1% 10.5% Q9-2. Neighborhood & community parks 26.2% 35.8% 18.5% 7.3% 4.6% 7.7% Q9-3. Multi-use sports complex (baseball, soccer, softball, etc.) 14.4% 21.4% 30.5% 10.7% 12.5% 10.5% Q9-4. Dog parks 11.4% 17.3% 28.5% 15.5% 16.6% 10.7% Q9-5. New walking/ biking trails 30.1% 33.5% 18.0% 6.4% 5.0% 7.1% Q9-6. Gymnasium space 9.3% 16.2% 39.4% 13.9% 10.0% 11.2% Q9-7. Cross-country skiing/snowshoeing trails 13.2% 25.5% 30.5% 10.0% 10.7% 10.0% Q9-8. Outdoor splash parks 12.1% 23.5% 32.1% 12.3% 9.6% 10.5% Q9-9. Other 82.4% 11.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.9%


Page 74

WITHOUT “UNDECIDED” Q9. How important to you, or any members of your household, is the development of the following new facilities? (without "undecided") (N=439) Not at all Very important Important Neutral Not important important Q9-1. Purchase land to preserve open space 33.6% 28.8% 22.9% 6.9% 7.9% Q9-2. Neighborhood & community parks 28.4% 38.8% 20.0% 7.9% 4.9% Q9-3. Multi-use sports complex (baseball, soccer, softball, etc.) 16.0% 23.9% 34.1% 12.0% 14.0% Q9-4. Dog parks 12.8% 19.4% 31.9% 17.3% 18.6% Q9-5. New walking/ biking trails 32.4% 36.0% 19.4% 6.9% 5.4% Q9-6. Gymnasium space 10.5% 18.2% 44.4% 15.6% 11.3% Q9-7. Cross-country skiing/snowshoeing trails 14.7% 28.4% 33.9% 11.1% 11.9% Q9-8. Outdoor splash parks 13.5% 26.2% 35.9% 13.7% 10.7% Q9-9. Other 87.5% 12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


Page 75

Q9-9. Other Q9-9. Other Number Percent Equestrian trails 2 11.8 % Indoor track 1 5.9 % Indoor pool 1 5.9 % TRAILL OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS 1 5.9 % GOLF COURSE 1 5.9 % CONVENTION CENTER 1 5.9 % PLAYGROUND TOYS FOR HANDICAPPED KIDS 1 5.9 % Shooting ranges 1 5.9 % OUTDOOR VOLLEYBALL COURTS 1 5.9 % Air travel by Delta from Sheridan to SLC or MSP 1 5.9 % MAKING ACTIVITIES MORE AFFORDABLE 1 5.9 % OUTDOOR ICE RINK 1 5.9 % MT LAKE TRAILS OFF ROAD 1 5.9 % INDOOR WALKING TRACK 1 5.9 % UPDATED OUTDOOR POOL 1 5.9 % INDOOR AQUATIC CENTER 1 5.9 % Total 17 100.0 %


Page 76

Q10. Which FOUR improvements/developments from the list in Questions 8 and 9 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and members of your household? Q10. Top choice Number Percent Parks in general 47 10.7 % Existing athletic fields 3 0.7 % Expanding pathway system 27 6.2 % Adding trails/walking loops in existing parks 15 3.4 % Kendrick Pool 47 10.7 % Expanding playground areas 4 0.9 % Improving/expanding dog-friendly facilities 10 2.3 % Providing creek/water access 7 1.6 % The skate park 1 0.2 % Adding multi-use non-motorized trails 6 1.4 % Other 8 1.8 % Purchase land to preserve open space 56 12.8 % Neighborhood & community parks 29 6.6 % Multi-use sports complex (baseball, soccer, softball, etc.) 16 3.6 % Dog parks 10 2.3 % New walking/biking trails 39 8.9 % Gymnasium space 8 1.8 % Cross-country skiing/snowshoeing trails 9 2.1 % Outdoor splash parks 9 2.1 % Other 9 2.1 % None chosen 79 18.0 % Total 439 100.0 %


Page 77

Q10. Which FOUR improvements/developments from the list in Questions 8 and 9 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and members of your household? Q10. 2nd choice Number Percent Parks in general 20 4.6 % Existing athletic fields 15 3.4 % Expanding pathway system 40 9.1 % Adding trails/walking loops in existing parks 20 4.6 % Kendrick Pool 35 8.0 % Expanding playground areas 6 1.4 % Improving/expanding dog-friendly facilities 7 1.6 % Providing creek/water access 14 3.2 % The skate park 2 0.5 % Adding multi-use non-motorized trails 8 1.8 % Other 1 0.2 % Purchase land to preserve open space 22 5.0 % Neighborhood & community parks 43 9.8 % Multi-use sports complex (baseball, soccer, softball, etc.) 20 4.6 % Dog parks 13 3.0 % New walking/biking trails 36 8.2 % Gymnasium space 4 0.9 % Cross-country skiing/snowshoeing trails 19 4.3 % Outdoor splash parks 16 3.6 % Other 2 0.5 % None chosen 96 21.9 % Total 439 100.0 %


Page 78

Q10. Which FOUR improvements/developments from the list in Questions 8 and 9 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and members of your household? Q10. 3rd choice Number Percent Parks in general 19 4.3 % Existing athletic fields 6 1.4 % Expanding pathway system 20 4.6 % Adding trails/walking loops in existing parks 15 3.4 % Kendrick Pool 14 3.2 % Expanding playground areas 7 1.6 % Improving/expanding dog-friendly facilities 4 0.9 % Providing creek/water access 25 5.7 % The skate park 2 0.5 % Adding multi-use non-motorized trails 9 2.1 % Purchase land to preserve open space 25 5.7 % Neighborhood & community parks 31 7.1 % Multi-use sports complex (baseball, soccer, softball, etc.) 19 4.3 % Dog parks 18 4.1 % New walking/biking trails 54 12.3 % Gymnasium space 8 1.8 % Cross-country skiing/snowshoeing trails 20 4.6 % Outdoor splash parks 17 3.9 % Other 1 0.2 % None chosen 125 28.5 % Total 439 100.0 %


Page 79

Q10. Which FOUR improvements/developments from the list in Questions 8 and 9 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and members of your household? Q10. 4th choice Number Percent Parks in general 12 2.7 % Existing athletic fields 5 1.1 % Expanding pathway system 12 2.7 % Adding trails/walking loops in existing parks 18 4.1 % Kendrick Pool 12 2.7 % Expanding playground areas 4 0.9 % Improving/expanding dog-friendly facilities 7 1.6 % Providing creek/water access 13 3.0 % The skate park 4 0.9 % Adding multi-use non-motorized trails 15 3.4 % Purchase land to preserve open space 19 4.3 % Neighborhood & community parks 25 5.7 % Multi-use sports complex (baseball, soccer, softball, etc.) 13 3.0 % Dog parks 12 2.7 % New walking/biking trails 32 7.3 % Gymnasium space 17 3.9 % Cross-country skiing/snowshoeing trails 30 6.8 % Outdoor splash parks 22 5.0 % Other 1 0.2 % None chosen 166 37.8 % Total 439 100.0 %


Page 80

SUM OF THE TOP FOUR CHOICES Q10. Which FOUR improvements/developments from the list in Questions 8 and 9 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and members of your household? (top 4) Q10. Top choice Number Percent Parks in general 98 22.3 % Existing athletic fields 29 6.6 % Expanding pathway system 99 22.6 % Adding trails/walking loops in existing parks 68 15.5 % Kendrick Pool 108 24.6 % Expanding playground areas 21 4.8 % Improving/expanding dog-friendly facilities 28 6.4 % Providing creek/water access 59 13.4 % The skate park 9 2.1 % Adding multi-use non-motorized trails 38 8.7 % Other 9 2.1 % Purchase land to preserve open space 122 27.8 % Neighborhood & community parks 128 29.2 % Multi-use sports complex (baseball, soccer, softball, etc.) 68 15.5 % Dog parks 53 12.1 % New walking/biking trails 161 36.7 % Gymnasium space 37 8.4 % Cross-country skiing/snowshoeing trails 78 17.8 % Outdoor splash parks 64 14.6 % Other 13 3.0 % None chosen 79 18.0 % Total 1369


Page 81

Q11. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements regarding the potential benefits of Sheridan's parks and recreation system. (N=439) Strongly Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree disagree Undecided Q11-1. Improves my household's physical health & fitness 45.8% 34.9% 11.2% 1.4% 0.9% 5.9% Q11-2. Improves my household's mental health & reduces stress 44.2% 34.4% 12.1% 1.4% 0.9% 7.1% Q11-3. Makes Sheridan a more desirable place to live 57.2% 30.1% 7.3% 0.2% 0.9% 4.3% Q11-4. Preserves open space & protects environment 43.5% 31.7% 15.0% 2.1% 1.6% 6.2% Q11-5. Helps to reduce crime & keep kids out of trouble 25.7% 31.4% 29.2% 4.3% 1.1% 8.2% Q11-6. Increases my household's property value 25.3% 24.4% 34.2% 4.3% 1.4% 10.5% Q11-7. Provides positive social interactions for my household 31.4% 37.8% 19.6% 2.1% 1.4% 7.7% Q11-8. Provides clean/ aesthetically pleasing landscaping along public streets 38.3% 40.1% 13.0% 1.6% 1.1% 5.9% Q11-9. Helps to attract new residents & businesses 30.5% 34.9% 23.7% 3.2% 1.1% 6.6% Q11-10. Promotes tourism to community & region 29.4% 29.6% 27.1% 4.3% 1.1% 8.4%


Page 82

Q11. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements regarding the potential benefits of Sheridan's parks and recreation system. Strongly Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree disagree Undecided Q11-11. Positively impacts economic/ business development 27.8% 33.5% 24.1% 4.6% 1.1% 8.9% Q11-12. Is age- friendly & accessible to all age groups 33.5% 42.8% 14.4% 2.7% 0.7% 5.9% Q11-13. Provides opportunities for diverse experiences 28.5% 39.4% 20.5% 2.7% 0.9% 8.0%


Page 83

WITHOUT “UNDECIDED” Q11. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements regarding the potential benefits of Sheridan's parks and recreation system. (without "undecided") (N=439) Strongly Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree disagree Q11-1. Improves my household's physical health & fitness 48.7% 37.0% 11.9% 1.5% 1.0% Q11-2. Improves my household's mental health & reduces stress 47.5% 37.0% 13.0% 1.5% 1.0% Q11-3. Makes Sheridan a more desirable place to live 59.8% 31.4% 7.6% 0.2% 1.0% Q11-4. Preserves open space & protects environment 46.4% 33.7% 16.0% 2.2% 1.7% Q11-5. Helps to reduce crime & keep kids out of trouble 28.0% 34.2% 31.8% 4.7% 1.2% Q11-6. Increases my household's property value 28.2% 27.2% 38.2% 4.8% 1.5% Q11-7. Provides positive social interactions for my household 34.1% 41.0% 21.2% 2.2% 1.5% Q11-8. Provides clean/aesthetically pleasing landscaping along public streets 40.7% 42.6% 13.8% 1.7% 1.2% Q11-9. Helps to attract new residents & businesses 32.7% 37.3% 25.4% 3.4% 1.2% Q11-10. Promotes tourism to community & region 32.1% 32.3% 29.6% 4.7% 1.2% Q11-11. Positively impacts economic/ business development 30.5% 36.8% 26.5% 5.0% 1.3% Q11-12. Is age-friendly & accessible to all age groups 35.6% 45.5% 15.3% 2.9% 0.7% Q11-13. Provides opportunities for diverse experiences 30.9% 42.8% 22.3% 3.0% 1.0%


Page 84

Q12. Kendrick Pool was constructed in 1937 and is approaching the end of its useful life. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statement. "It is important to our household that Kendrick Pool is renovated or rebuilt." Q12. It is important to our household that Kendrick Pool is renovated or rebuilt Number Percent Strongly agree 210 47.8 % Agree 99 22.6 % Neutral 75 17.1 % Disagree 29 6.6 % Strongly disagree 13 3.0 % Undecided 13 3.0 % Total 439 100.0 % WITHOUT “UNDECIDED” Q12. Kendrick Pool was constructed in 1937 and is approaching the end of its useful life. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statement. "It is important to our household that Kendrick Pool is renovated or rebuilt." (without "undecided") Q12. It is important to our household that Kendrick Pool is renovated or rebuilt Number Percent Strongly agree 210 49.3 % Agree 99 23.2 % Neutral 75 17.6 % Disagree 29 6.8 % Strongly disagree 13 3.1 % Total 426 100.0 %


Page 85

Q13. Please rank the following potential park improvements listed below from 1 to 5, with 1 being your household's most preferred/highest priority, and 5 being your least preferred/lowest priority? (N=439) Most Least preferred/ preferred/ highest lowest priority 2 3 4 priority Q13-1. A renovated or rebuilt outdoor swimming pool in Kendrick Park 58.8% 16.3% 7.8% 9.0% 8.0% Q13-2. A new community park in North Sheridan (e.g. Gateway Park) 16.8% 34.7% 17.9% 25.3% 5.2% Q13-3. Indoor gymnasium(s) 11.3% 24.7% 29.7% 30.6% 3.8% Q13-4. A new multi-use sports complex at Doubleday 12.3% 21.2% 39.4% 25.7% 1.4% Q13-5. Other 11.8% 7.9% 18.4% 35.5% 26.3%


Page 86

Q13-5. Other Q13-5. Other Number Percent Cross-country skiing area, in or near town 1 1.4 % Increased patrol of pathways and parks to insure safety 1 1.4 % More walking/biking trails 1 1.4 % Indoor water park 1 1.4 % Improved walking trail system 1 1.4 % Outdoor ice skating 1 1.4 % Fix tennis courts 1 1.4 % MORE WALKING TRAILS 1 1.4 % Add trail system (bike trail connections) 1 1.4 % CONNECT INFO CENTER TO PARKS AND TRAILS 1 1.4 % XC SKI TRAILS 1 1.4 % Expand pathway on Big Horn Avenue to Mountain Shadows Blvd 1 1.4 % Land purchase of multi-use general population 1 1.4 % Elk & Buffalo Pasture & Park 1 1.4 % Develop kid-friendly water access for catch&release fishing in town 1 1.4 % CREEK ACCESS FOR KAYAKS 1 1.4 % INCORPORATE A COMPETITIVE POOL INTO KENDRICK 1 1.4 % EXPAND BIKING TRAILS 1 1.4 % MORE OFF-STREET PATHWAY TRAILS 1 1.4 % MAKERSPACE 1 1.4 % IMPROVED GOLF COURSE 1 1.4 % EXPAND PAVING TRAIL SYSTEM 1 1.4 % AREA FOR YOUNG ADULTS THAT DRIVE TO HAVE FUN 1 1.4 % Walking trails 1 1.4 % Mountain bike trails 1 1.4 % CONVENTION CENTER 1 1.4 % TRASH 1 1.4 % BIKE PATH FROM BIG HORN TO SHERIDAN TRAIL SYSTEM 1 1.4 % ENHANCED HANDICAP PARK 1 1.4 % BIKE TRAIL SYSTEM 1 1.4 % DOG FRIENDLY OFF LEASH AREAS 1 1.4 % Make a park where it designates already 1 1.4 % Non paved single track bike trails 1 1.4 % Archery and fire arms ranges 1 1.4 % Better bike lanes 1 1.4 % An intellectual center 1 1.4 % Improve greens at Kendrick Golf Course 1 1.4 % Improve drainage in Blacktooth Park and add concessions 1 1.4 % Improve trail system 1 1.4 %


Page 87

Q13-5. Other Q13-5. Other Number Percent Competitive swimming program 1 1.4 % Air service to and from Sheridan 1 1.4 % A place to have youth activities 1 1.4 % Upgrade landscaping of Kendrick Golf Course 1 1.4 % Equestrian trails 1 1.4 % More walking trails 1 1.4 % Fully linked walking/biking trails 1 1.4 % Area for handicapped persons 1 1.4 % Kendrick Golf Course improvements 1 1.4 % SKATE PARK 1 1.4 % EVENT NOTIFICATION 1 1.4 % MOST NEEDED AT ALL LOCATIONS IS RESTROOMS 1 1.4 % MORE TENNIS COURTS 1 1.4 % Kendrick Golf Course needs better improvement 1 1.4 % PUT KENDRICK PARK BACK 1 1.4 % MULTI-USE TRAILS/MOUNTAIN BIKE TRAILS 1 1.4 % TENNIS COURTS AT DOUBLEDAY 1 1.4 % PUT KENDRICK PARK BACK TO FULL CIRCLE ACCESS TO VEHICLES 1 1.4 % OPEN LEASH DOG TRAILS 1 1.4 % PUT KENDRICK PARK BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL CONFIGURATION 1 1.4 % CLEAN BATHROOMS 1 1.4 % OUTDOOR BASKETBALL COURTS 1 1.4 % WALKING FROM SHERIDAN COLLEGE TO CITY LIMITS SOUTH 1 1.4 % MORE NATURAL AREAS IN PARKS 1 1.4 % HORSE TRAILS 1 1.4 % INDOOR AQUATIC CENTER 1 1.4 % PARKING & EASY ACCESS TO KENDRICK PARK BAND SHELL 1 1.4 % Cross country trail system 1 1.4 % Cross country skiing 1 1.4 % Canoe/kayak access 1 1.4 % Total 69 100.0 %


Page 88

Q14. Including yourself, how many people in your household are in the following age groups? Mean Sum number 2.6 1135 Under age 5 0.2 66 Ages 5-9 0.2 73 Ages 10-14 0.2 87 Ages 15-19 0.2 74 Ages 20-24 0.1 43 Ages 25-34 0.2 104 Ages 35-44 0.3 142 Ages 45-54 0.4 157 Ages 55-64 0.4 187 Ages 65-74 0.4 155 Ages 75+ 0.1 47


Page 89

Q15. How many years have you lived in the Sheridan area? Q15. How many years have you lived in Sheridan area Number Percent Less than 1 year 13 3.0 % 1 to 5 years 36 8.2 % 6 to 10 years 43 9.8 % 11 to 25 years 103 23.5 % 25+ years 238 54.2 % Not provided 6 1.4 % Total 439 100.0 % WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” Q15. How many years have you lived in the Sheridan area? (without "not provided") Q15. How many years have you lived in Sheridan area Number Percent Less than 1 year 13 3.0 % 1 to 5 years 36 8.3 % 6 to 10 years 43 9.9 % 11 to 25 years 103 23.8 % 25+ years 238 55.0 % Total 433 100.0 %


Page 90

Q16. Does your household own a dog? Q16. Does your household own a dog Number Percent Yes 256 58.3 % No 180 41.0 % Not provided 3 0.7 % Total 439 100.0 % WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” Q16. Does your household own a dog? (without "not provided") Q16. Does your household own a dog Number Percent Yes 256 58.7 % No 180 41.3 % Total 436 100.0 %


Page 91

Q16a. If "Yes," how many dogs? Q16a. How many dogs Number Percent 1 Dog 142 55.5 % 2 Dogs 84 32.8 % 3+ Dogs 30 11.7 % Total 256 100.0 %


Page 92

Q17. Do you own or rent your home? Q17. Do you own or rent your home Number Percent Own 374 85.2 % Rent 62 14.1 % Not provided 3 0.7 % Total 439 100.0 % WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” Q17. Do you own or rent your home? (without "not provided") Q17. Do you own or rent your home Number Percent Own 374 85.8 % Rent 62 14.2 % Total 436 100.0 %


Page 93

Q18. Your gender: Q18. Your gender Number Percent Male 214 48.7 % Female 222 50.6 % Not provided 3 0.7 % Total 439 100.0 % WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” Q18. Your gender: (without "not provided") Q18. Your gender Number Percent Male 214 49.1 % Female 222 50.9 % Total 436 100.0 %


Page 94

Q19. What is your total annual household income? Q19. Your total annual household income Number Percent Under $25K 29 6.6 % $25K to $49,999 81 18.5 % $50K to $74,999 77 17.5 % $75K to $99,999 102 23.2 % $100K to $149,999 75 17.1 % $150K+ 33 7.5 % Not provided 42 9.6 % Total 439 100.0 % WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” Q19. What is your total annual household income? (without "not provided") Q19. Your total annual household income Number Percent Under $25K 29 7.3 % $25K to $49,999 81 20.4 % $50K to $74,999 77 19.4 % $75K to $99,999 102 25.7 % $100K to $149,999 75 18.9 % $150K+ 33 8.3 % Total 397 100.0 %


Page 95

Section 5 Survey Instrument


Page 96

CITY OF SHERIDAN

55 Grinnell Plaza P.O. Box 848 Sheridan, Wyoming 82801

January 2019

Dear Sheridan-area Resident:

----+♦♦ W YO M I N G ♦♦---

phone: 307.675-4202 fax: 307.674.7289

www.sheridanwy.net

One of the hallmarks of a thriving community is a great network of parks and recreation facilities. Sheridcm is fortunate to have a wide diversity of park lands and facilities, which offer easy access for the enjoyment of the great outdoors and for recreation. We need your help to plan for our next generation of parks and recreational opportunities. To be responsive to the needs and desires of our community, the city of Sheridan has contracted with a professional research firm to conduct a scientific study of Sheridan-area households to help us understand and measure our citizens' preferences.

The survey will be administered to a randomly selected sample of households in the Sheridan area. I am writing to let you know that your address has been selected for participation, and that soon you will be receiving a survey in the mail from ETC Institute of Olathe, Kansas. The survey is confidential and independent; no one's individual responses will be shared with any city officials or staff. All responses will be reported in aggregate form after tabulation by our survey contractor and their data processing partner in Kansas.

Our goal for the selected sample is to render the results as "statistically valid," which means that each household has been randomly selected and will represent the diversity and demographics of Sheridan as a whole. Therefore, it is very important for you to complete and return the questionnaire when you receive your survey packet. Even if you consider yourself a non-user of the City's park facilities, your participation is still very important.

Please return your completed survey as soon as possible in the enclosed postage-paid

envelope addressed to ETC Institute. If you would like to take the survey online, the

website address is www.sheridansurvey.org.

Once we have collected the survey responses, the City of Sheridan will host community meetings to present the survey results. Thank you in advance for your participation. If you have any questions, please contact our consultant, Jolene Rick with Peaks to Plains Design at ( 406) 294-9499 or [email protected].

�a

�

Mayor Roger Miller City of Sheridan 307.675.4202 [email protected]


Page 97

Sheridan Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update 2019 Community Survey

Your input will be used to assess community recreation and parks needs and priorities for the City of Sheridan. If you prefer, you may complete the survey on-line at www.sheridansurvey.org. Your responses will remain anonymous and confidential. We sincerely appreciate your time and input!

1. Have you or any members of your household visited any of the City of Sheridan parks, trails, orsports fields in the past 12 months?____(1) Yes [answer Q1a] ____(2) No [Skip to Q2]

1a. If "Yes" to Question 1, how often have you or members of your household visited parks, trails,or sports fields in Sheridan in the past 12 months, on average? ____(1) At least once a week ____(2) A few times a month ____(3) At least once a month

____(4) A few times a year ____(5) Less than once a year ____(9) Don't know

2. Please rate the condition of each of the following facilities that you have visited in the past 12months using a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 means "Excellent" and 1 means "Very Poor".

Facility Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor Haven’t Visited Facility

01. Kendrick Park 5 4 3 2 1 9 02. Marshall Park (Big Horn Ave.) 5 4 3 2 1 9 03. Thorne-Rider Park 5 4 3 2 1 9 04. Kendrick Pool 5 4 3 2 1 9 05. Cemetery 5 4 3 2 1 9 06. Kendrick Golf Course 5 4 3 2 1 9 07. Dan Madia Fields Complex 5 4 3 2 1 9 08. Emerson Park (Sheltered Acres) 5 4 3 2 1 9 09. Huntington Dog Park 5 4 3 2 1 9 10. South Park Natural Area 5 4 3 2 1 9 11. City Pathways & Trails 5 4 3 2 1 9 12. Oatts Fields Complex (6th St.) 5 4 3 2 1 9 13. Black Tooth Park (West 5th St.) 5 4 3 2 1 9 14. Sheridan Avenue Dog Park 5 4 3 2 1 9 15. North Park Natural Area 5 4 3 2 1 9 16. Linden Sledding Hill 5 4 3 2 1 9 17. Kendrick Arboretum 5 4 3 2 1 9 18. Thorne-Rider Dog Park 5 4 3 2 1 9 19. Elk & Buffalo Exhibit 5 4 3 2 1 9 20. Washington Park (Coffeen Ave.) 5 4 3 2 1 9

3. If your household has NOT visited ANY facilities listed above in question 2 in the past 12 months,please CHECK ALL of the following reasons you have NOT visited. [Check all that apply]____(01) Use parks/trails/facilities in other communities ____(02) Use facilities provided by private or other

providers ____(03) Too far from residence ____(04) Maintenance/needs improvement ____(05) Lack of features we want to use

____(06) Lack of nearby parking ____(07) Do not feel safe ____(08) Lack of accessibility for mobility-impaired ____(09) Not aware of parks or trails locations ____(10) Other: ________________________ ____(11) None


Page 98

4. Please indicate if you or any member of your household has a need for each of the facilities listedbelow by circling either "Yes" or "No." If "Yes," please indicate how well your needs are currentlybeing met for this type of facility.

Type of Facility Do you have a need

for this facility?

If you have a need, how well are your needs currently being met?

Fully Met Mostly Met Partly Met Not Met 01. Neighborhood & community parks Yes No 4 3 2 1 02. Off-road bike trails or bike parks Yes No 4 3 2 1 03. Community gardens Yes No 4 3 2 1 04. Walking and biking trails Yes No 4 3 2 1 05. Equestrian trails Yes No 4 3 2 1 06. Off-leash dog park Yes No 4 3 2 1 07. Skateboarding park Yes No 4 3 2 1 08. Baseball/softball fields Yes No 4 3 2 1 09. Picnic shelters Yes No 4 3 2 1 10. Football/lacrosse/rugby/soccer fields Yes No 4 3 2 1 11. Tennis/pickleball courts Yes No 4 3 2 1 12. Kayak/canoe launches Yes No 4 3 2 1 13. Outdoor basketball Yes No 4 3 2 1 14. Volleyball courts Yes No 4 3 2 1 15. Outdoor swimming pools Yes No 4 3 2 1 16. Splash parks Yes No 4 3 2 1 17. Playgrounds Yes No 4 3 2 1 18. Gymnasium (indoor youth sports) Yes No 4 3 2 1 19. Open space conservation areas/trails Yes No 4 3 2 1 20. Environmental education center Yes No 4 3 2 1 21. Golf course Yes No 4 3 2 1 22. Archery/shooting ranges Yes No 4 3 2 1 23. Indoor exercise facility Yes No 4 3 2 1 24. Ice rinks Yes No 4 3 2 1 25. Cross country skiing courses Yes No 4 3 2 1 26. Other: ___________________________________ Yes No 4 3 2 1

5. Which FOUR facilities from the list in Question 4 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and members ofyour household? [Write in your answers below using the numbers from the list in Question 4, or circle"NONE."]

1st: ____ 2nd: ____ 3rd: ____ 4th: ____ NONE


Page 99

6. Please indicate if you or any member of your household has a need for each of the programs listedbelow by circling either "Yes" or "No." If "Yes," please indicate how well your needs are currentlybeing met for this type of program.

Type of Program Do you have a need

for this program?

If you have a need, how well are your needs currently being met?

Fully Met Mostly Met Partly Met Not Met 01. Tennis/pickleball lessons and leagues Yes No 4 3 2 1 02. Programs for people with special needs Yes No 4 3 2 1 03. Community special events Yes No 4 3 2 1 04. Golf lessons/clinics Yes No 4 3 2 1 05. Outdoor adventure programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 06. Youth learn-to-swim programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 07. Water fitness programs/Lap swimming Yes No 4 3 2 1 08. Recreation/competitive swim teams Yes No 4 3 2 1 09. Youth enrichment programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 10. After school/out of school programs and camps Yes No 4 3 2 1 11. Youth basketball programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 12. Adult basketball programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 13. Youth volleyball programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 14. Adult volleyball programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 15. Youth soccer programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 16. Youth baseball programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 17. Youth softball programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 18. Performing arts programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 19. Youth football programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 20. Youth lacrosse programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 21. Fitness and wellness programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 22. Yoga, Zumba or other aerobic classes Yes No 4 3 2 1 23. Open swim Yes No 4 3 2 1 24. Open gymnasium (indoor youth sports) Yes No 4 3 2 1 25. Picnic shelters and/or picnic areas Yes No 4 3 2 1 26. Programs and services for adults 55+ Yes No 4 3 2 1 27. Farmers markets/food vendors Yes No 4 3 2 1 28. Diverse offering of adult recreation leagues Yes No 4 3 2 1 29. Other: ___________________________________ Yes No 4 3 2 1

7. Which FOUR programs from the list in Question 6 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and members ofyour household? [Write in your answers below using the numbers from the list in Question 6, or circle"NONE."]

1st: ____ 2nd: ____ 3rd: ____ 4th: ____ NONE


Page 100

8. How important to you, or any members of your household, is the improvement or enhancement ofthe following existing facilities?

Improvements to Existing Facilities Very Important

Important Neutral Not

Important Not at All Important

Undecided

01. Parks, in general 5 4 3 2 1 9 02. Existing athletic fields 5 4 3 2 1 9 03. Expanding the pathway system 5 4 3 2 1 9 04. Adding trails/walking loops in existing parks 5 4 3 2 1 9 05. Kendrick Pool 5 4 3 2 1 9 06. Expanding playground areas 5 4 3 2 1 9 07. Improving/expanding dog-friendly facilities 5 4 3 2 1 9 08. Providing creek/water access 5 4 3 2 1 9 09. The skate park 5 4 3 2 1 9 10. Adding multi-use non-motorized trails 5 4 3 2 1 9 11. Other: ___________________________ 5 4 3 2 1 9

9. How important to you, or any members of your household, is the development of the following newfacilities?

Developing New Facilities Very Important

Important Neutral Not

Important Not at All Important

Undecided

12. Purchase land to preserve open space 5 4 3 2 1 9 13. Neighborhood & community parks 5 4 3 2 1 9 14. Multi-use sports complex (baseball, soccer, softball, etc.) 5 4 3 2 1 9 15. Dog parks 5 4 3 2 1 9 16. New walking/biking trails 5 4 3 2 1 9 17. Gymnasium space 5 4 3 2 1 9 18. Cross-country skiing/snowshoeing trails 5 4 3 2 1 9 19. Outdoor splash parks 5 4 3 2 1 9 20. Other :______________________ 5 4 3 2 1 9

10. Which FOUR improvements/developments from the list in Questions 8 and 9 are MOST IMPORTANTto you and members of your household? [Write-in your answers below using the numbers from the listin Questions 8 and 9, or circle "NONE".]

1st: ____ 2nd: ____ 3rd: ____ 4th: ____ NONE


Page 101

11. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements regarding the potentialbenefits of Sheridan’s parks and recreation system.

The parks and recreation system in Sheridan……… Strongly Agree

Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree

Undecided

01. Improves my household’s physical health and fitness 5 4 3 2 1 9 02. Improves my household’s mental health and reduces stress 5 4 3 2 1 9 03. Makes Sheridan a more desirable place to live 5 4 3 2 1 9 04. Preserves open space and protects the environment 5 4 3 2 1 9 05. Helps to reduce crime and keep kids out of trouble 5 4 3 2 1 9 06. Increases my household’s property value 5 4 3 2 1 9 07. Provides positive social interactions for my household 5 4 3 2 1 9

08. Provides clean/aesthetically pleasing landscaping along public streets

5 4 3 2 1 9

09. Helps to attract new residents and businesses 5 4 3 2 1 9 10. Promotes tourism to the community and region 5 4 3 2 1 9 11. Positively impacts economic/business development 5 4 3 2 1 9 12. Is age-friendly and accessible to all age groups 5 4 3 2 1 9 13. Provides opportunities for diverse experiences 5 4 3 2 1 9

12. Kendrick Pool was constructed in 1937 and is approaching the end of its useful life. Please indicateyour level of agreement with the following statement. “It is important to our household thatKendrick Pool is renovated or rebuilt.”____(5) Strongly Agree ____(4) Agree

____(3) Neutral ____(2) Disagree

____(1) Strongly Disagree____(9) Undecided

13. Please rank the following potential park improvements listed below from 1 to 5, with 1 being yourhousehold’s most preferred/highest priority, and 5 being your least preferred/lowest priority?_____ A renovated or rebuilt outdoor swimming pool in Kendrick Park_____ A new community park in North Sheridan (e.g. Gateway Park)_____ Indoor gymnasium(s)_____ A new multi-use sports complex at Doubleday_____ Other: ________________________________________________

These final questions will be used to classify your anonymous answers. Your completed questionnaire will be tabulated by an independent data processing firm, contracted to the City of Sheridan.

14. Including yourself, how many people in your household are in the following age groups: (Pleasewrite the appropriate number in the blank after each age group)Under age 5: ____ Ages 5-9: ____ Ages 10-14: ____

Ages 15-19: ____ Ages 20-24: ____ Ages 25-34: ____

Ages 35-44: ____ Ages 45-54: ____ Ages 55-64: ____

Ages 65-74: ____ Ages 75+: ____

15. How many years have you lived in the Sheridan area?____(1) Less than 1 year ____(2) 1 to 5 years

____(3) 6 to 10 years____(4) 11 to 25 years

____(5) More than 25 years

16. Does your household own a dog? ____(1) Yes [answer Q16a] ____(2) No [Skip to Q17]

16a. If “Yes”, how many dogs? ____(1) 1 Dog ____(2) 2 Dogs ____(3) 3+ Dogs


Page 102

17. Do you own or rent your home? ____(1) Own ____(2) Rent

18. Your gender: ____(1) Male ____(2) Female

19. What is your total annual household income?____(1) Under $25,000____(2) $25,000 to $49,999____(3) $50,000 to $74,999

____(4) $75,000 to $99,999 ____(5) $100,000 to $149,999 ____(6) $150,000 or more

This concludes the survey – Thank you for your time! Please return your completed survey in the enclosed return-reply envelope addressed to:

ETC Institute, 725 W. Frontier Circle, Olathe, KS 66061

Your responses will remain completely confidential. The address information to the right will ONLY be used to help identify areas with special interests. Thank you.


Page 103

L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E / P L A N N I N G / C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G

Peaks to Plains DesignPC

Connecting People to Their Environment

404 North 31 Street, Suite 405Billings, Montana 59101www.peakstoplains.com

(406) 294-9499

city of sheridan · 5.08.2019 · park facilities, pathways and open spaces master plan table of...

Documents