classical vs keynesian consumption function multiplier

54
Combined Chapters – Chapter 11 and 12 Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Post on 19-Dec-2015

258 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Combined Chapters – Chapter 11 and 12

Classical vs KeynesianConsumption Function

Multiplier

Page 2: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Chapter 11 Classical vs. Keynesian

Page 3: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

CLASSICAL BELIEVES:Markets will behave according to S&D.

In other words. S&D will respond accordingly to “Inflationary Gap, Recessionary Gap, and long run stability when all curves intersect.

Page 4: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

SAY’S LAWEconomists agree Says law works in Barter

economy and disagree about if it works in a money economy.

Supply creates its own demand… baker bakes enough bread to trade for what he wants.That works.

Classical economics believes it works in money economy and here is why.

Page 5: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

The Classical Model (cont'd) Assumptions of the classical model

◦ Pure competition exists.

◦ Wages and prices are flexible.

◦ People are motivated by self-interest.

◦ People cannot be fooled by money illusion.

Page 6: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

The Classical Model Consequences of The Assumptions

◦ If the role of government in the economy is minimal,

◦ If pure competition prevails, and all prices and wages are flexible,

◦ If people are self-interested, and do not experience money illusion,

◦ Then problems in the macroeconomy will be temporary and the market will correct itself.

Page 7: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Classical TheoryClassical economists believed that prices,

wages and interest rates are flexible. Say’s law says when economy produces a

certain level of real GDP, it also generates the income needed to purchase that level of real GDP.) hence, always capable of achieving the natural level of GDP.

Fallacy here: no guarantee that the income received will be used to purchase g & s.----some will be saved.

But theory would be redeemed, if the savings goes into equal needed amounts of investment.

Page 8: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Believed all markets competitive- (S&D * Key) – adjust to surplus and shortage….

If oversupply of labor, wage rates drop and S&D of labor will be in sinc.

What holds for wages also applies to prices.

Prices adjust quickly to surplus or shortages

Equilibrium established again.

Classical belief on wages and prices

Page 9: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Key: Wage rates and prices will adjust quickly to surplus or shortage

1) In recession- unemployment rate higher than natural rate.

2) Surplus exists in labor market3) Drives down wage rate

++++++++++++++4) In inflationary gap, unemployment lower

than natural rate5) Shortage exists in labor market 6) Drives up the wage rate

Page 10: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Lower wage rate –firms hire more workers SRAS shifts to right until recessionary gap is

gone.

Page 11: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

BOTH THEORIES CLASSICAL AND KEYNESIAN DO AGREE……

TWO THINGS WE CAN DO WITH DISPOSABLE INCOME-

SPEND OR SAVE!We all know that consumption is 2/3 (or

more) of GDP

Page 12: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

***Classical theorists say, the funds from aggregate savings eventually borrowed and turned into investment expenditures which are a component of real GDP BUT…. What if no or low savings?

Theory breaks down here – have to have equal amounts of investment for savings.

(the idea here is that savings leads to investment) This is true… but it probably won’t do it by itself. Needs assistance through monetary or perhaps fiscal policy.

Page 13: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

The Classical View of the CreditMarket

In classical theory, the interest rate is flexible and adjusts so that saving equals investment.If saving increases and the saving curve shifts rightward the increase in saving eventually puts pressure on the interest rate and moves it downward. A new equilibrium is established where once again the amount households save equals the amount firms invest.

Page 14: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Long-run Equilibrium

The condition where the Real GDP the economy is producing is equal to the Natural Real GDP and the unemployment rate is equal to the natural unemployment rate.

Page 15: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Economy and Labor Market

Page 16: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Self Regulating EconomyClosing the Inflationary (Expansionary) Gap

The economy is at P1 and Real GDP of $11 trillion.

Because Real GDP is greater than Natural Real GDP ($10 trillion), the economy is in an inflationary gap and the unemployment rate is lower than the natural unemployment rate.

Page 17: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Self Regulating EconomyClosing the Inflationary (Expansionary) Gap

Wage rates rise, and the short-run aggregate supply curve shifts from SRAS1 to SRAS2.

As the price level rises, the real balance, interest rate, and international trade effects decrease the quantity demanded of Real GDP.

Ultimately, the economy moves into long-run equilibrium at point 2.

Page 18: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Then what happened? Why the Great Depression?

25% unemploymentBanks closedProduction ceasedDrought hitStocks worthlessNo money for purchasesNo jobsBleak!

ASADAD 1

AS 1

GDP

PRICE

LEVEL

Page 19: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Bottom Line

Classical viewpoint- not possible to overproduce goods because

the production of those goods would always generate a demand that was sufficient to purchase the goods.

(what would they say about the recent inventories of our auto industry?)

Page 20: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Keynesian Ideas

The classical approach fell into disrepute during the economic decline of the 30’s. Real GDP fell by more than 30% 1930-33

In 1939- per capital income was still 10% less than in 1929.

*U.S. began to embrace John Maynard Keynes’s theory of stimulating the economy through aggregate demand (Lord Keynes) had studied classical economics and wrote his famous General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. (which was a complete rebuttal of the classical theory)

Page 21: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Keynesian in a Nutshell

Page 22: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Keynes’s View of Say’s Lawin a Money Economy

According to Keynes, a decrease in consumption and subsequent increase in saving may not be matched by an equal increase in investment. Thus, a decrease in total expenditures may occur.

To learn more about John Maynard Keynes, click his photo above.

Page 23: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

The Economy Gets “Stuck” in aRecessionary Gap

If the economy is in a recessionary gap at point 1, Keynes held that wage rates may not fall. The economy may be stuck in the recessionary gap.

Page 24: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Keynesian Economics and the Keynesian Short-Run Aggregate Supply Curve (cont'd)

Real GDP and the price level, 1934–1940

◦ Keynes argued that in a depressed economy, increased aggregate spending can increase output without raising prices.

◦ Data showing the U.S. recovery from the Great Depression seem to bear this out.

◦ In such circumstances, real GDP is demand driven.

Page 25: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Keynesian Economics was the answer to Classical economic theories and the suggested way to “jump-start” the economy again… pull out of the depression.

Idea: Government enters the economy.Stimulates the economy through Aggregate

Demand.Fiscal policy would move the production

engine by stimulating “spending.” increased employment, jobs would be

filled, production would begin people would purchase with money they

earned from jobs.

Page 26: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Classical vs. Keynes I

Page 27: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

A Question of How Long It Takes forWage Rates and Prices to Fall

Suppose the economy is in a recessionary gap at point 1.

Wage rates are $10 per hour, and the price level is P1.

The issue may not be whether wage rates and the price level fall, but how long they take to reach long-run levels

The speed at which wage rate falls is a keyTo whether Keynesian or Classical theory Is more valid. Answers never for sure.

Page 28: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Keynes rejected the classical notion of self-adjustment, (????) and he predicted things would get worse once a spending shortfall emerged.

Example: Business expectations of future sales worsens. Business investment is cut back. Unsold capital goods begins to pile up (includes

office equip. machinery, airplanes, etc.) *this is an “undesired” change… Worsened sales expectations causes decline in

investment spending that shifts the AD curve to the left leading to pileups of unwanted inventory.

Page 29: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Example: Are the U.S. and European SRAS Curves Horizontal?

New Keynesians contend that the SRAS is essentially flat.

Based on research, they contend SRAS is horizontal because firms adjust their prices about once a year.

If the SRAS schedule were really horizontal, how could the price level ever increase?

Page 30: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Keynesian Theory

AS

LRAS

PRICE

LEVEL

Real GDP OutputKeynesian Theory

AD unstable, prices and wages are inflexible AD no effect on prices until LRAS

AD 1 AD 2 AD 3 *PriceGoes up

Page 31: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Figure 11-9 Real GDP Determination with Fixed versus Flexible Prices

Page 32: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Keynes rejected the classical notion of self-adjustment, (????) and he predicted things would get worse once a spending shortfall emerged.

Example: Business expectations of future sales worsens. Business investment is cut back. Unsold capital goods begins to pile up (includes

office equip. machinery, airplanes, etc.) *this is an “undesired” change… Worsened sales expectations causes decline in

investment spending that shifts the AD curve to the left leading to pileups of unwanted inventory.

Page 34: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Chapter 12- Consumption, Real GDP, Multiplier

Page 35: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Consumption Function I

The consumption function is the relationship between consumption (household sector spending) and disposable income.

In the consumption function, consumption is directly related to disposable income and is positive even at zero disposable income:

Page 36: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

The 45-Degree Line

The 45-degree line represents all points where consumption and income are exactly equal.

C = YD

Page 37: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

U.S. Consumption and Income

DISPOSABLE INCOME (billions of dollars per year)

$1000 2000 3000 4000

Actual consumer spending

6000

5000

4000

3000

2000

1000

0 5000 6000 7000

45°

$7000

198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997

19981999

2000

CONS

UMPT

ION

(billi

ons

of d

olla

rs p

er y

ear)

C = YD

Page 38: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Autonomous Income

Have you ever known people who spend money with out any income?

2. When disposable income is 0 and consumption still exists (food, clothing, shelter- basics) this is autonomous consumption

3. Whether one has to dig into one’s savings, go on welfare, or else beg, borrow or steal, or call mom, one will spend that minimum amount

Page 39: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

How does this work?

Income is low- households tend to Dissave..(borrow from savings or borrow from other sources)

Income increases- household aggregate income eventually equals and exceeds current consumption

Page 40: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

The Keynesian model assumes that there is a positive relationship between consumption and income.

3 6 9

Planned ConsumptionExpenditures(trillions of dollars)

Real Disposable Income(trillions of dollars)

6

9

12

3

12

45º

45º Line

C

Saving

Dis-saving

•However, as income increases, consumption increases by a smaller amount.• Thus, the slope of the consumption function (line C) is less than 1• (less than the slope of the 45° line).

Page 41: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Disposable IncomeYd= C+S

If we spend… cannot save. If we spend… more activity (production)

takes place in the economy… potential to increase GDP

What happens if we do not save at all?

Page 42: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

What is the deciding factor on whether you spend or not?

Income Keynes felt we could learn a lot about

consumption by focusing on the relationship between income and spending.

He said income and consumer spending rise in tandem..

If you know how much income consumers have to spend (Yd), you can predict what they will spend

Page 43: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Keyne’s Consumption Function

Keynes referred to this as “fundamental law” that men are disposed as a rule and on the average, to increase their consumption as their income increases, but not by as much as the increase in their income.

*1)At low levels of aggregate income, the consumption expenditures of households will exceed their disposable income (when household income is low, households dissave- they either borrow or draw from past savings to purchase consumption goods

Page 44: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

45 Degree Line

45 Degree Line

$50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

C = YD

Saving

DissavingConsumption Function

C = $50 + 0.75YD

A

CD

E

B

G

Page 45: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Keynes Cont.

As with most theories, Keynes asks us to assume away a lot of the problem.

We will assume there is a specific employment level of output. NARU is present when full-employment capacity is attained.

Wages and prices are completely inflexible until full employment is reached

Government’s taxing, spending and monetary policies are constant.

Page 46: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Keynes said that the economy needs to be directed to full-employment through aggregate expenditures.(C + I + G + X-M )

Page 47: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Co

nsu

mp

tio

nS

avi

ng

o

o45

o

C0

S0

Disposable Income

Disposable Income

C1

S1

TERMINOLOGY, SHIFTS, & STABILITY

Increases inConsumptionMeans…

A DecreaseIn Saving

Page 48: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

A sluggish economyThere are a number of ways to jump-start

the economy…Fiscally: taxing & spending.Should the classical or Keynesian approach

be used…. Or should an eclectic approach be used?

Page 49: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

What really is the multiplier?

The multiplier is based on two concepts already covered:

1.GDP is the nation’s expenditure on all the final goods and services produced during the year at market prices.

2.GDP=C+I+G+(X-M) = Aggregate Demand

Page 50: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

Obviously if C goes up the entire GDP will go up also. When there is any change in spending- it will have a multiplied effect on GDP

*When money is spent by one person, it becomes someone else’s income.

When someone spends a dollar, perhaps someone who received that dollar would spend 80 cents and of that 80 cents received by the next person perhaps 64 cents…

If we add up all the spending

generated by that one dollar, it will add up to four or five or six times that dollar…

Hence, the name “multiplier.”

Page 51: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

The multiplier tells us the extent to which the rate of total spending will change in response to an initial change in the flow of expenditure.

Multiplier =1

1 - MPC

Any change in spending (C, I, or G.) will set off a chain reaction,Leading to a multiplied change in GDP. If $1 million investment resulted in $4 million additional income, the multiplier would be 4

Page 52: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

The Multiplier Process

1. $100 billion in unsold goods appear

3. Income reduced by $100 billion 4. Consumption reduced by $75 billion

5. Sales fall $75 billion6. Further cutbacks in employment or wages

7. Income reduced by $75 billion more

8. Consumption reduced by $56.25 billion more

Factor markets

Product markets

Business firms

Households

9. And so on

2. Cutbacks in employment or wages

Page 53: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier

ExpenditureStage

Additional

Income(Dollars)

Marginal

Propensity

To Consume

Additional

Consumption(Dollars)

For simplicity (here) it is assumed that all additions to income are either spent domestically or saved.

1,000,000 750,000 562,500 421,875 316,406 237,305 177,979 133,484 100,113 75,085

225,253

750,000 562,500 421,875 316,406 237,305 177,979 133,484 100,113 75,085 56,314

168,939

Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5 Round 6 Round 7 Round 8 Round 9 Round 10

3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4

Total 4,000,000 3,000,000 3/4

All Others

The Multiplier Principle

• The multiplier concept is fundamentally based upon the proportion of additional income that households choose to spend on consumption: the marginal propensity to consume (here assumed to be 75% 3/4).• Here, a $1,000,000 injection is spent, received as payment, saved and spent, received as payment, saved and spent … etc. … until . . . effectively, $4 million is spent in the economy.

Page 54: Classical vs Keynesian Consumption Function Multiplier