click to edit master text styles second level third level fourth level fifth level click to edit...

Click to edit Master text stylesSecond levelThird level

Fourth levelFifth level

Click to edit Master title style

Ahmed [email protected]

Excellence and Identity

Click to edit Master text stylesSecond levelThird levelFourth levelFifth level


Séminaire « Interfaces université-entreprise et évaluation des enseignements » - Séminaire « Interfaces université-entreprise et évaluation des enseignements » -

Marrakech, 2008Marrakech, 2008

Evaluation des enseignements Evaluation des enseignements par les étudiants et les professeurspar les étudiants et les professeurs

à l’Université Al Akhawaynà l’Université Al Akhawayn





Plan

1. L’Université2. Le système éducatif3. L’évaluation par les étudiants4. L’évaluation par les professeurs5. L’évaluation par d’autres

intervenants





1. Université Al Akhawayn d'Ifrane

Institution d’enseignement supérieur et de recherche scientifique, créée par Dahir:• MAROCAINE, s’inspirant du système éducatif nord-américain;• ETATIQUE gérée comme institution privée; • A but non lucratif;• Dotée de l’autonomie financière et administrative;• Adoptant l’anglais comme principale langue d’enseignement





Organisation Académique

3 écoles préparant à des diplômes de l’Etat MarocainSchool of Business Administration (SBA) School of Science and Engineering (SSE)School of Humanities & Social Sciences (SHSS)

14 diplômes8 Bachelor6 Master2 Master professionnels: International Master in e-Business Management (IMeBM) Executive Master of Business Administration (ExMBA)





Organisation Académique

Centre de LanguesCentre du Développement AcadémiqueCentre de Formation des CadresLaboratoires et Centres de Recherche





2. Système éducatif

SemestrielAutomne: Fin août - mi-décembre.Automne: Fin août - mi-décembre.Printemps: Mi-janvier - mi-mai.Printemps: Mi-janvier - mi-mai.Eté: Début juin - fin juilletEté: Début juin - fin juillet

Système de créditsSystème de crédits1 crédit = 1 heure de cours / semaine1 crédit = 1 heure de cours / semaine

(SCH: Semester Credit Hour)(SCH: Semester Credit Hour)1 heure de cours = 2 ou 3 heures TP1 heure de cours = 2 ou 3 heures TPBachelor (4 ans): 120-140 créditsBachelor (4 ans): 120-140 créditsEtudiant: 15-20 crédits/semestre (15-25 h)Etudiant: 15-20 crédits/semestre (15-25 h)

Nombre d’étudiants par classe





3. Evaluation par les étudiants

Deux évaluations systématiques par semestre (en milieu et en fin de semestre, avec des rapports pour l’enseignant) :

Enseignant Organisation du cours Contenus du cours Pédagogie utilisée Niveau d’apprentissage Evaluation Disponibilité de l’enseignant






Evaluation en milieu de semestre: indicateur pour aider les professeurs

Evaluation en fin de semestre: évaluation de la performance du professeur





AL AKHAWAYN UNIVERSITY IN IFRANE MID-SEMESTER COURSE SURVEY

Summary of Results Faculty Member: Dr. A. Date: 13 Nov. 2006 Course Code: MTH1305 Course Title: Conceptual Math Section: 01 Course Level: Undergraduate Semester Taught: Fall 2006 Number of Students: 33 Number of Responses: 26

Excellent = 5 Very Good = 4 Average = 3 Poor = 2 Very Poor = 1. 5 4 3 2 1 Aver. 1. LEARNING: I do understand and learn the subject matter 11 5 5 1 4 3.69 2. ORGANIZATION: course material clear & well-presented 13 6 2 3 2 3.96 3. GROUP INTERACTION: Students participate in this class. 9 7 6 2 2 3.73 4. ENTHUSIASM: Instructor enthusiastic about teaching this course. 16 6 2 1 1 4.35 5. INDIVIDUAL RAPPORT: Instructor is flexible/ available. 19 5 0 1 1 4.54 6. OVERALL: How this course compare with others I have taken at AUI 9 9 3 2 3 3.73





Suggestions (in order to help me learn better):

Less chapters, more time to go over lessons and correct exercises in class as not everyone has time to go always to office hours, more explanation for students who come from Literature background, more students for tutoring (there is only 1) go slowly throughout the material because it is hard for the beginners to keep on understanding when explanations are fast * he is available and helpful * should try to manage the class atmosphere better * less difficult final exams * explain more in class, not let everything to office hours * test should be easier, teacher should be more flexible in grading tests and quizzes ********* Additional Comments:

The teacher and his class are both excellent but since I come from a letters background my math level is very inferior compared to those who have gotten more training (bac ES and S) * you are a good teacher, we need additional assignments to improve our grades * hopefully, this teacher will take other math courses like 1300 (2), he is too flexible for such courses, excellent * very comprehensive and supportive * perfect * test should be easier ************************ Coordinator’s Signature: Faculty’s Signature:





AL AKHAWAYN UNIVERSITY IN IFRANE FACULTY EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT

Summary of Results Faculty Member: Dr. F. Rank: Status:

Course Code: EGR 3301 Course Title: Engineering Section: 01

Course Level: Undergraduate Semester Taught: Fall 2006

Number of Students: 20 Number of Responses: 17

Section A Students ratings for each question are supposed to have been transformed to numbers on the right individual Faculty Evaluation and Development sheets. For each question, please add up numbers corresponding to individual ratings, then divide by the number of valid responses.

Excellent = 5. Good = 4. Average = 3. Fair = 2. Poor = 1. Frequency of each individual rating is shown in the table.

5 4 3 2 1 Averag. Q1: Teacher's organization and preparation of the course 13 4 0 0 0 4.76 Q2: Teacher's ability to explain the subject-matter 10 7 0 0 0 4.59 Q3: Teacher's style of managing class atmosphere 14 3 0 0 0 4.82 Q4: Teacher's evaluation (including grading) of your work 9 7 1 0 0 4.47 Q5: Teacher's effectiveness in individual consultation 10 5 0 0 1 4.44 Q6: This teacher compared to other teachers you have had 12 5 0 0 0 4.71 Q7: The quality of what you have learnt from this course 9 6 1 1 0 4.35 Total = Q1 + Q2 + Q3 + Q4 + Q5 + Q6 + Q7 32.14 Average = Total/7 4.59





Section B Q1. Comments (Briefly list, or describe, this instructor's strengths as a classroom teacher): The way by which he manages the atmosphere in the class makes students follow * Master materials, good pedagogy * He’s a good instructor * Good explanation excellent * Manages of class atmosphere * Good consultation * Good communication Good class atmosphere * fresh, nice, happy, good character=>good atmosphere of work. * He succeeds to make us interested in the subject and creates a great atmosphere in class. * Very good atmosphere * He always tried to make students participate * well organized- knows how to manage class atmosphere explain well * Instructor that success to give the lecture and explains it very good, and at the same time he is pushing us to like the class * Management of the class atmosphere, Draws our attention of keeps us focus on the subject, interested in what he transmits * He always use good examples to explain the materials, He is excellent in managing the class atmosphere * the instructor is always ready to help students, he also knows how to create a good atmosphere in the class * the instructor is knowledgeable and know exactly his mission and he is doing it well, he is very motivated to works ******************* Q2. Comments (Briefly describe how this instructor could become a more effective classroom teacher). Make slides available to students * less details=>boring * go slower in the beginning of the semester. * Gives us feed backs on our progression, grading, current situation throughout the Semester * I don’t like the questions of the quizzes *********** Q3. If you had a choice, would you take this instructor for another course? Yes (number of yes-s/ number of valid responses): 15/ 17 No (number of no-s/ number of valid responses): 1/ 17 Faculty Member’s Signature: Coordinator’s Signature: Dean’s Signature:






Autres moyens d’évaluation :• Politique des portes ouvertes à tous les niveaux• Réunions avec les représentants des étudiants• Le test de sortie (avant diplomation)





4. Evaluation par les professeurs

• Observation en classe (peer)• Portfolio du cours (rapport évaluatif,

syllabus, copies des examens, copies d’étudiants)

• Comité de l’assurance qualité (UNDP-QAA et accréditation USA)

• Etudes sur la perception des étudiants concernant les programmes académiques (CAD)

• Etudes de l’apprentissage des étudiants dans certains cours (mathématiques, statistiques)





5. Evaluation par d’autres intervenants

• Avis des lauréats• Avis des employeurs• Avis du monde socio-économique





Un campus pour toutes les saisons

Merci

click to edit master text styles second level third level fourth level fifth level click to edit...

Documents

master text styles

international master

master professionnels

enseignements marrakech

tudiants et

recherche page

lenseignant page

identity page