climate prediction as a multiscale problem: from the ... · climate prediction as a multiscale...

34
Climate prediction as a multiscale problem: from the diurnal scale to the multidecadal climate variability Pedro Leite da Silva Dias Laboratório Nacional de Computação Científica/MCTI Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciêncas Atmosféricas/USP

Upload: trancong

Post on 29-Sep-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Climate prediction as a multiscale problem: from the diurnal scale to the multidecadal climate variability

Pedro Leite da Silva Dias Laboratório Nacional de Computação Científica/MCTI

Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciêncas Atmosféricas/USP

1. Goal : are models able reproduce interaction between diurnal/synoptic, intraseasonal, annual, interannual and decadal variability.

2. High resolution models is a solution - seamless prediction - costly!

1. Multiscaling modeling - understanding scale interactions –

non linear effects 1. Going from the diurnal to intraseasonal with atmospheric

models 2. Possible decadal signal in an atmospheric model with

parameterized diurnal heating 3. Simplified couples atmosphere/ocean models: 3 scale

interaction 2. Future.

Outline

Complexities of SAMS: significant variability at different time scales

The Last Millenium in South America

LIAMCA

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000-7.5-7.0-6.5-6.0-5.5-5.0-4.5-4.0

Wet

Wet

Dry

δOSouthernBrazil

Years A.D

-7.6-7.8-8.0-8.2-8.4 δO C h i n a

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000-0.5-1.0-1.5-2.0-2.5-3.0-3.5-4.0

δOFN1Nordeste

LIAMCA

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000-7.5-7.0-6.5-6.0-5.5-5.0-4.5-4.0

Wet

Wet

Dry

δOSouthernBrazil

Years A.D

-7.6-7.8-8.0-8.2-8.4 δO C h i n a

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000-0.5-1.0-1.5-2.0-2.5-3.0-3.5-4.0

δOFN1Nordeste

LIAMCA

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000-7.5-7.0-6.5-6.0-5.5-5.0-4.5-4.0

Wet

Wet

Dry

δOSouthernBrazil

Years A.D

-7.6-7.8-8.0-8.2-8.4 δO C h i n a

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000-0.5-1.0-1.5-2.0-2.5-3.0-3.5-4.0

δOFN1Nordeste

LIAMCA

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000-7.5

-7.0

-6.5

-6.0

-5.5

-5.0

-4.5

-4.0

Wet

Wet

Dry

δ18O

Sout

hern

Braz

il

Years A.D

-7.6

-7.8

-8.0

-8.2

-8.4

δ18O

China

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000-0.5

-1.0

-1.5

-2.0

-2.5

-3.0

-3.5

-4.0

δ18O

FN1

Nor

dest

e

China

NE Brasil

SE Brasil

Dry

Wet

Cruz et al. 2011

Interesting point: •Mud data in Plata => Picomyo and Bermejo River - NW Argentina/Bolivia – summer rain

•Biased towards western part of the Plata •Need marker for the eastern •Different regimes E/W Plata Basin

Work in collaboration with IRD, INPE, USP, UFF,LNCC…

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

1 13 25 37 49 61

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

Northern Amazonia Rainfall Index (NAR)

Southern Amazonia Rainfall Index (SAR)

A

B

Marengo 2004

Composite annual rainfall departures from the 1972-91 mean for El Niño years for Amazonia

Intraseasonal variabilty

Precipitation anomaly

Herdies et al. 2001

(shaded)

Mean moisture flux and divergence in active and non active phases of the SACZ – 20-60 days.

Diurnal Variability

A general problem with >15d forecasts and seasonal forecasts: • lack of power in the intraseasonal time scale

Power spectra of meridional wind at 40S , 60W – CPTEC – From seasonal forecasting model

S. Ferraz and P. Silva Dias – prep.

Observations IPSL 2L24

Another general problem: decadal variability

Atlantic – obs X model

Observação

(dados de Mantua et al., 1997)

IPSL 2L24

Decadal variability PDO – obs X model

Another problem with low resolution models:

Clouds in the Amazon

GOES-10 26-27 April 2007

Model CATT-BRAMS 17.5 km 3.5 km

Freitas et al. preparation

The Model for Prediction Across Scales • We are well advanced on developing the

next-generation Model for Prediction Across Scales

• Based on high spectral models or unstructured Voronoi (hexagonal) meshes and selective grid refinement (e.g., OLAM) with finite volume differencing scheme.

• To be utilized for weather, regional and global climate applications.

• Finite volume versions allows for non-hydrostatic (< 10 km horizontal resolution)

• Work towards exascale computing

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Top image is an example of the grid, with the telescope to high resolution over North America Next is an aquaplanet simulation Bottom is a supercell simulation at 500 m resolution

Nonlinearities: Interaction among different time scales ….

Model Equations:

(1)

N =

u(x,y,t)

v(x,y,t)

Φ(x,y,t)

ξ =

Zonal and meridional Componentes of wind and geopotencial

0 0 FΦ(x,y,t)

F= --u∂u/∂x +v∂u/∂y

u∂v/∂x + v∂v/∂y

u∂φ/∂x +v∂φ/∂y + φ∇.V

Boundary conditions

Zonal periodicity: ξ (x+Lx,y,t)= ξ(x,y,t) (2)

ξ(x,y,t)→0 as y→±∞ (3)

• Shallow-Water model on the equatorial β-plane in the nondimension

form:

Linear operator Forcing terms Nonlinear

terms

Raupp, C. F. M. and Silva Dias, P. L. 2004,2005

Effect of basic flow of January climatology – Stationary mass source

Effect of basic flow of January climatology Source Modulation

00.5

11.5

22.5

33.5

0 2 3 4 6 7 8 10 11 12 14 15 16 18 19 20 22 23

Hour

Sour

ce a

mpl

itude

Question: is it possible for an inertio-gravity wave mode to significantly interact with a Rossby mode so as to lead the latter to undergo significant amplitude modulation?

Governing Equations –simple model with parameterized heat source

Two-layer incompressible equatorial primitive equations:

1111000 divVVVVpyV

tV

−∇•−=∇++∂∂ ⊥

0div 0 =V

0110111 VVVVpyV

tV

∇•−∇•−=∇++∂∂ ⊥

1010

22

2

11

2gπdiv pVS

TcNHV

tp

p

∇•−−=+∂∂

(1a)

(1b)

(1c)

(1d)

N ⇒ Brunt-Vaissala frequency (N ≈ 10-2 s-1 ⇒ Typical tropospheric value)

H ⇒ Top height of the Troposphere (H ≈ 16Km in the tropics);

g ⇒ gravity acceleration (g ≈ 10 ms-2 )

Cp ⇒ thermal capacity of dry air at constant pressure (Cp= 1004J/KKg);

T0 ≈ 15º C (reference value of temperature)

S1 ⇒ thermal forcing (parametric heat source)

Barotropic mode

First baroclinic mode

Example of nonlinear Resonance: Energy in gravity waves (diurnal) interacting with Rossby waves (synoptic) under proper large scale background field => intraseasonal modulation

Nonlinearity => energy transfer among scales Dynamics of resonant interaction through advection terms •Examples:

•Interaction between slow ( O(5-7days) ) and fast modes ( O(1 day or less) ) => intraseasonal scales (20-60 days) Raupp and Silva Dias. (2004,2005,2006, 2008)

•Importance of diurnal variation leading to energy in intraseasonal time scales (Raupp and Silva Dias, 2009,2010)

•Coupled ocean/atmosphere simplified models: interaction between intraseasonal scale ( O(20-60d) ) with interannual (El Nino/La Nina) - O (2-3 yr) => decadal/multidecadal time scales (Enver et al. 2009,2011)

Multiscaling modeling

model for studying multiscaling : from MJO to

Multidecadal variability

Search for Resonant Nonlinear

Interactions - physics coupling

Enver Ramirez ,Carlos Raupp and Pedro L. Silva Dias

Multiscale Perturbative Method

Resonant Nonlinear Interactions

Simplified coupled model resonant interaction: atmospheric Kelvin (moist)(green), Rossby atmosphere (dry – green) and ocean Kelvin (blue)

Simplified models are quite useful for understanding basic interaction mechanisms of the

ocean/atmosphere!!

Clearly show mechanisms responsible for diurnal to decadal variability!!!!!

Conclusion

From Enver, Silva Dias and Raupp (2012 – in preparation)

Thanks!!!

[email protected]