climate variability in the origin countries as a “push” factor on tourist arrivals in the...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Climate Variability in the Origin Countries as a “Push” Factor on Tourist Arrivals in the Philippines](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080501/5750a8231a28abcf0cc65127/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
This article was downloaded by: [UQ Library]On: 21 November 2014, At: 02:34Publisher: RoutledgeInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office:Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism ResearchPublication details, including instructions for authors and subscriptioninformation:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rapt20
Climate Variability in the Origin Countriesas a “Push” Factor on Tourist Arrivals in thePhilippinesVivienne Saverimuttuab & Maria Estela Varuaa
a School of Business, University of Western Sydney, Parramatta, Australiab Australian Institute of Higher Education P/L, Level 4, 451 Pitt Street,Sydney, NSW 2000, AustraliaPublished online: 26 Jun 2013.
To cite this article: Vivienne Saverimuttu & Maria Estela Varua (2014) Climate Variability in the OriginCountries as a “Push” Factor on Tourist Arrivals in the Philippines, Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research,19:7, 846-857, DOI: 10.1080/10941665.2013.806940
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2013.806940
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”)contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and ourlicensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, orsuitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publicationare the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor &Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independentlyverified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for anylosses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilitieswhatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to orarising out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantialor systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, ordistribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and usecan be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
![Page 2: Climate Variability in the Origin Countries as a “Push” Factor on Tourist Arrivals in the Philippines](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080501/5750a8231a28abcf0cc65127/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Climate Variability in the Origin Countries as a“Push” Factor on Tourist Arrivals in the Philippines
Vivienne Saverimuttu1,2∗ and Maria Estela Varua1
1School of Business, University of Western Sydney, Parramatta, Australia2Australian Institute of Higher Education P/L, Level 4, 451 Pitt Street, Sydney, NSW 2000,
Australia
The objective of this paper is to test the impact of climate variability in origin countries as a“push factor” on tourist arrivals, specifically in the Philippines, and to select a suitableproxy to measure climate variability. This paper uses the Southern Oscillation Index(SOI) constructed by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology. Climate variability is stronglylinked to the El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and this link is used by meteorologiststo forecast changes in weather globally. SOI is a widely used indicator of the ENSO and itsbest known extremes are the El Nino (warm phase) and La Nina (cold phase) effects. Thestudy proves to some extent that there is a significant increase in US tourist arrivals inthe Philippines when La Nina-like weather conditions prevail in the USA. Moreimportantly, the SOI proved to be a good measure of climate variability.
Key words: climate variability, tourism, El Nino Southern Oscillation, Philippines
Introduction
Developing nations are increasingly relying on
tourism to finance growth and development
(United Nations World Tourism Organisation
[UNWTO], 2009) and the Republic of the Phi-
lippines is no exception. According to the
UNWTO, between January and June 2012,
international tourist arrivals increased in all
regions of the world despite increasing econ-
omic uncertainty. Comparing growth in
tourist arrivals by region in the same period,
the best results were exhibited by “desti-
nations in South Asia and South-East Asia
(both +9%)”, with arrivals in the Philippines
growing by 12% (2012, p. 4). With tourism
revenues rising in the Philippines since 2002,
the industry has greatly improved the coun-
try’s economic landscape by generating jobs
and business opportunities for Filipinos.
Thus, identifying the significant determinants
of demand for inbound tourism and estimating
Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 2014Vol. 19, No. 7, 846–857, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2013.806940
∗Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
# 2013 Asia Pacific Tourism Association
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UQ
Lib
rary
] at
02:
35 2
1 N
ovem
ber
2014
![Page 3: Climate Variability in the Origin Countries as a “Push” Factor on Tourist Arrivals in the Philippines](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080501/5750a8231a28abcf0cc65127/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
their magnitude would be of particular interest
to decision-makers within this industry in the
Philippines.
In estimating tourism demand for a particu-
lar destination, studies generally focus on econ-
omic explanatory variables such as the income
of tourists, destination costs, travel costs, sub-
stitute prices and exchange rates (Crouch,
1994; Song & Li, 2008; Witt & Witt, 1995).
Although economic explanatory variables
play a key role in determining demand for
travel to a particular destination, some
studies (Cho, 2010; Hamilton, Maddison, &
Tol, 2005a; Hsu, Tsai, & Wu, 2009; Preben-
sen, Skallerud, & Chen, 2010; Stepchenkova
& Eales, 2011; Varua & Saverimuttu, 2012;
Witt & Martin, 1987) have extended their
models to include non-economic qualitative
variables, which affect a tourist’s choice of a
particular destination. These variables include
marketing promotions, political instability,
prior travel to a particular destination and the
impact of climate or weather among others.
Goh, Law, and Mok (2008) in a study of
long-haul tourism demand for Hong Kong
proved that non-economic factors such as
climate and leisure time were stronger determi-
nants of travel to a particular destination com-
pared with economic factors.
In considering non-economic factors,
climate is of particular interest to the tourism
industry as it gives rise to “seasonality” in
tourist arrivals in destination countries.
Recognizing the causes of seasonality is impor-
tant to planners within the tourism industry
because of its “significant implications for
employment and capital investment” (Nadal,
Font, & Rosello, 2004, p. 698). Hylleberg in
Cho (2009, p. 466), exploring seasonality,
identified three causes for tourism demand,
namely the weather, festival and calendar
events. The latter two reflect social norms
and practices and the impact of various holi-
days. However, weather and climate not only
impact the decision to travel to a particular
destination (Kozak, Uysal, & Birkan, 2008),
but are also key factors that affect the travel
experience (Scott & Lemieux, 2010) and as a
result determine subsequent visitation
(Wilson & Becken, 2011). Climate refers to
the meteorological long-term average con-
ditions that are characteristic of a location,
while weather is the state of the atmosphere
in a given climate at a particular point in
time and determines the participation rate
(Moreno, 2010). In addition to choice of des-
tination, climate, in the country of origin as
well as in the destination, can determine the
timing of travel, giving rise to seasonality or
intra-year fluctuations in tourist arrivals at a
particular destination (Goh, 2012; Lim &
McAleer, 2001). Consequently, climate is
both a “push” and “pull” factor in the
tourism and travel industry (Hamilton et al.,
2005a; Scott, McBoyle, & Schwartzentruber,
2004). Hamilton et al. (2005a) found that
people from very hot or very cold countries
travel more (push factor) and tropical
countries attract more tourists (pull factor).
Studies that analyse the impact of weather or
climate on travel (Bigano, Hamilton, & Tol,
2006; Hamilton et al., 2005a; Hamilton,
Maddison, & Tol, 2005b; Wietze & Tol,
2002) mostly focus on destination choice,
recognizing that tourist destinations are
“climate sensitive” (Scott & Lemieux, 2010).
Among these some focus on the impact
climate change would have on previously pre-
ferred destinations (Maddison, 2001; Scott
et al., 2004). According to Eugenio-Martin
and Campos-Soria (2010, p. 745) few studies
take into account the impact of climate in
the country of origin as a determinant to
travel domestically or abroad.
Tourism in the Philippines is “climate
dependent”, as it is the climate itself that
Climate Variability in the Origin Countries 847
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UQ
Lib
rary
] at
02:
35 2
1 N
ovem
ber
2014
![Page 4: Climate Variability in the Origin Countries as a “Push” Factor on Tourist Arrivals in the Philippines](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080501/5750a8231a28abcf0cc65127/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
attracts certain visitors. It is also “weather sen-
sitive” (Amelung, Nicholls, & Viner, 2007), in
that the Philippines has distinct seasons in
climate. Travel warnings generally feature
the risk of flooding during the south-western
monsoon season with moderate to heavy
rains, which peak in the period July–Septem-
ber, during which time most typhoons also
occur. However, the rainfall distribution
during this season is uneven and tourists con-
tinue to arrive even during the monsoon
season, giving rise to steadily increasing
quarter 3 arrivals as depicted in Figure 1.
This is not to say that the prevailing weather
conditions have had little or no impact on
tourist arrivals as it is evident that the
number of tourist arrivals in the Philippines
during quarter 3 (July–September) is generally
lower than during the other quarters and the
reason could be that some tourists, especially
first-time visitors, do take heed of the travel
weather warnings. However, this paper,
while accepting that climate and weather in a
particular destination do contribute to intra-
year fluctuations in tourist arrivals, explores
the possibility that climate and weather in
the origin country are also at play in determin-
ing the seasonal nature of arrivals.
Thus, the purpose of this paper is to test the
impact of climate variability in origin
countries as a “push” factor on tourist arri-
vals, specifically in the Philippines rather
than considering the tropical climate in the
Philippines as a “pull” factor. Traditionally,
the US (20–25%) and Japanese citizens (15–
20%) accounted for the highest number of
visitors to the Philippines. South Korean visi-
tors usually ranked third (10–15%). The
period under review in this study is from
1994 Quarter 1 to 2011 Quarter 2, during
which time the USA ranked first in terms of
visitor arrivals in all years except for the
periods 2006–2008 and 2010–2011 when
South Korea outranked the USA (Philippines
Figure 1. Seasonality in Tourist Arrivals in the Philippines, 1994–2011.
Source: Generated using data from the Philippines Department of Tourism (DOT, 2011).
848 Vivienne Saverimuttu and Maria Estela Varua
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UQ
Lib
rary
] at
02:
35 2
1 N
ovem
ber
2014
![Page 5: Climate Variability in the Origin Countries as a “Push” Factor on Tourist Arrivals in the Philippines](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080501/5750a8231a28abcf0cc65127/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Department of Tourism [DOT]). Hence, the
selected “origin” country for the study is the
USA.
An additional contribution to existing lit-
erature is the choice of the variable selected
to represent climate variability in the country
of origin, namely the Southern Oscillation
Index (SOI). Climate variability has been
associated by many with the El Nino Southern
Oscillation (ENSO). The ENSO and its con-
nection to climate are used by many meteoro-
logical agencies to produce monthly weather
forecasts. Swings in the SOI are associated
with El Nino (sustained negative values of
the SOI) and La Nina (sustained positive
values of the SOI) events. When El Nino con-
ditions (warmer winter/spring) prevail in the
USA, residents are expected to travel less to
warmer climates and when La Nina conditions
(colder winter/spring) prevail, they travel more
(Chiew, Piechota, Dracup, & McMahon,
1998; Kiem & Franks, 2001; McPhaden,
Zebiak, & Glantz, 2006).
The next section is a discussion of the
impact of tourism on the Philippines
economy, especially in the last few years, fol-
lowed by an explanation of the significance
of the ENSO on climate anomalies especially
in the west. The section on the model justifies
and explains other independent (control) vari-
ables considered to provide a comparison of
the significance and strength of the impact of
the climate variable. Variables included in
the model, such as the “Word of Mouth”
(WOM) effect, habit persistence and return
visits by Philippines nationals living abroad
all represented by the lagged dependent vari-
able (push factor), income in the USA (push
factor), and internal conflict (in the Philip-
pines), were identified from the literature
reviewed as having been tested and found to
be significant in other studies (Crouch, 1994;
Prebensen et al., 2010; Song & Li, 2008;
Varua & Saverimuttu, 2012; Witt &
Witt, 1995). This is followed by an analysis
of the results, limitations of the model and
conclusion.
Tourism in the Philippines
The Philippines, with its long sandy beaches,
especially White Beach on Boracay Island,
and its rich natural and cultural heritage is
an ideal destination for those seeking “sun
and sand” holidays or even socio-cultural
experiences (Hendersen, 2011; Smith, Hen-
derson, Chong, Tay, & Jingwen, 2011).
Tourist arrivals have been steadily increasing
since 2002 (Figure 1), after experiencing a
low point during the presidency of Mrs
Gloria Arroyo (2001–2010) due to various
political and internal disturbances. Following
the 2008 global financial crisis (GFC) there
was another dip in tourist arrivals in the Phi-
lippines though it did not fall to previous
lows. This was partly due to the Philippine
DOT’s initiative in cultivating new markets
in China and Taiwan and an increase in the
number of visitors from Russia and France,
which partially offset the decline in numbers
arising from the GFC. Since then there has
been strong growth in the industry.
Tourism is of paramount importance to
individuals, households, the private sector
and governments. According to Stabler,
Papatheodorou, and Sinclair spending on
tourism and tourism-related products has
risen considerably in the world and is an
important component in people’s expenditure
budgets. An increase in tourism expenditure
has a positive impact on the welfare of the
tourists as well as the welfare of the residents
of the destination area, affecting its “income,
employment, government revenue and
balance of payments” (2010, p. 22).
Climate Variability in the Origin Countries 849
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UQ
Lib
rary
] at
02:
35 2
1 N
ovem
ber
2014
![Page 6: Climate Variability in the Origin Countries as a “Push” Factor on Tourist Arrivals in the Philippines](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080501/5750a8231a28abcf0cc65127/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
However, with increased dependence comes
increased vulnerability to any event that
decreases the demand for tourism which
could result in a decrease in living standards
and higher unemployment. An increase in
demand for tourism too could have negative
consequences such as environmental degra-
dation (Gossling, 2002).
The World Travel and Tourism Council
(WTTC) reported that the total spending
within the travel and tourism industry in
2011, by residents and non-residents, was
“PHP (Philippine Peso) 194.7 bn (2% of
gross domestic product, GDP) and is expected
to rise by 9.9% in 2012”. When the “wider
impacts on the economy” are included the
total contribution of the industry increases to
PHP 830.8 bn (8.5% of GDP) in 2011, and
“is expected to grow by 7.8% in 2012”.
These “wider impacts” include the GDP and
jobs supported by travel and tourism invest-
ment spending, government spending on
tourism marketing, aviation administration,
security services, etc., “domestic purchases of
goods and services by sectors directly dealing
with tourists” and the “the GDP and jobs sup-
ported by” the induced spending “of those
who are directly or indirectly employed” by
the tourism industry (WTTC, 2012, pp. 2–
3). The contribution of the industry to employ-
ment in the Philippines too is encouraging in
current terms and future trends as can be
seen from Figure 2.
The Philippines is not the only country in
the Asia Pacific region that is targeting and
encouraging growth in its tourism industry.
In 2011, in Southeast Asia alone, countries
such as Cambodia, Thailand, Malaysia, Singa-
pore, Vietnam and Indonesia all outranked the
Philippines in terms of their tourism industry’s
Figure 2. Philippines: Total Contribution of Travel and Tourism to Employment.
Source: World Travel & Tourism Council (WTTC, 2012, p. 4).
850 Vivienne Saverimuttu and Maria Estela Varua
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UQ
Lib
rary
] at
02:
35 2
1 N
ovem
ber
2014
![Page 7: Climate Variability in the Origin Countries as a “Push” Factor on Tourist Arrivals in the Philippines](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080501/5750a8231a28abcf0cc65127/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
percentage share of total contribution to GDP.
In addition, the industry’s percentage share of
total contribution in the Philippines ranked
below the world average. The industry’s total
contribution to employment too was less
than the world average and the Philippines
industry ranked below Cambodia, Malaysia
and Thailand. However, the industry’s long-
term percentage growth rate per annum
between 2012 and 2022 is encouraging in
terms of its total contribution to GDP, where
the Philippines, with a growth rate of 5.2%
per annum is ranked above the world
average growth rate and is outranked only
by Indonesia, Thailand, Cambodia and
Vietnam of the countries previously men-
tioned. All these countries in the Southeast
Asian region as well as others in the Asia
Pacific region compete with each other for
“sun and sand” seeking tourists as well as
those seeking a socio-cultural experience.
Thus, climate variability as a “push factor”
as well as a “pull factor” will have an impact
on future growth.
The ENSO Effect on Climate andTourism
Climate is a “natural resource” in terms of the
tourism industry, but at the same time it poses
a risk in that climate variability in a particular
destination could result in a decline in tourist
arrivals as it interferes with tourism activities
related to that particular destination. This
point is recognized in studies that have
explored the impact of climate change on
specific tourist destinations (Aguilo, Alegre,
& Sard, 2005; Falk, 2013; Hamilton & Tol,
2007). However, climate variability in the
country of origin could also induce residents
to travel to warmer locations. Consequently,
climate variability could potentially result in
a win for some tourism-related locations that
market themselves as “sun and sand”
locations. From either perspective, the impact
of climate variability on the tourism industry
is of relevance and therefore the issue is
worth further research.
Climate variability has been associated by
many with the ENSO and the “teleconnec-
tion” between this phenomenon and climate
forms the scientific basis for worldwide long-
range weather forecasts by meteorological
agencies and researchers. In the equatorial
Pacific Ocean, ocean and atmospheric circula-
tion processes interact on a large scale (Chiew
et al., 1998, pp. 138–139), giving rise to unu-
sually warm (El Nino), cold (La Nina) and
neutral phases of the ENSO (Kiem & Franks,
2001). El Nino and La Nina “are associated
with swings in the Southern Oscillation” and
result in changes in precipitation patterns in
the Pacific, which in turn result in changes in
atmospheric circulation and weather patterns
outside of the tropical Pacific, and its effects,
especially those of strong events, are felt glob-
ally (McPhaden et al., 2006, p. 1741). From
Figure 1 it can be seen that the number of
visitor arrivals in the Philippines generally
peaks in quarter 1 (January–March),
coinciding with winter/early spring months in
the USA. Although, the impact of El Nino
and La Nina can vary across the USA, in
general El Nino episodes are associated with
warmer winters in cold climates and La Nina
episodes with colder winters. In areas prone
to hurricanes, with a moderate to strong El
Nino event “hurricanes tend to be reduced in
number and intensity, but are more numerous
and stronger during a La Nina event” (McPha-
den et al., 2006, p. 1741). As a consequence of
the above-described effects of El Nino and La
Nina events on origin countries and the desti-
nation country, the expectation would be for a
significant increase in tourist arrivals in the
Climate Variability in the Origin Countries 851
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UQ
Lib
rary
] at
02:
35 2
1 N
ovem
ber
2014
![Page 8: Climate Variability in the Origin Countries as a “Push” Factor on Tourist Arrivals in the Philippines](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080501/5750a8231a28abcf0cc65127/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Philippines, especially in quarter 1 during La
Nina events. An El Nino event would have
the opposite effect. In the Philippines, El
Nino events are associated with drought con-
ditions (Roberts, Dawe, Falcon, & Naylor,
2009) while La Nina events bring torrential
rain. Although the focus of this paper is not
on the weather in the Philippines, it is interest-
ing to note that the increased rainfall during
La Nina events generally coincides with the
monsoon season in quarter 3.
The Model
An international tourist is a person travelling
to a foreign destination and staying in places
for more than 24 h but less than one consecu-
tive year for leisure, business and other pur-
poses. Tourism demand is measured by the
number of visitor arrivals as it is still the
most popular measure (Song & Li, 2008).
Quarterly time series data, of visitor arrivals
in the Philippines from the USA, which
includes Filipino nationals employed and
residing abroad who return to visit family
and friends, were obtained from the Philip-
pines DOT. Causal relationships initially
explored in this paper include the impact of
the lagged dependent variable, tourist
incomes, inflation calculated as the rate of
change in the Philippines consumer price
index (CPI), internal conflict in the Philippines
and climate variability in the country of origin.
The lagged dependent variable, which is an
auto-regressive term, was included to rep-
resent habit persistence based on the assump-
tion that a positive travel experience is likely
to trigger a return visit, as the uncertainty
element associated with a particular destina-
tion has been removed (Witt & Witt, 1995).
The likelihood of an increase in visits is also
based on the “Word of Mouth (WOM)”
effect where travel experiences spread
through “blogs” (Prebensen et al., 2010) and
remove the “uncertainty” element for first-
time visitors. Thus, the lagged dependent vari-
able also captures the impact of return visits,
by Philippines nationals residing abroad, to
visit family and friends (Witt & Witt, 1995).
The theory of inter-temporal choice allows
consumption of a good (such as tourism) to
depend on any combination of current,
future and or past income. Tourism purchase
decisions are usually made in advance of
their actual consumption date and thus past
income is assumed to determine the demand
for travel. Therefore, past income is rep-
resented by US real GDP lagged by one
quarter. Unit root tests for tourist arrivals
and US real GDP were non-stationary and
therefore the log of these two variables was
utilized to transform the data, allowing the
use of “multiple least-squares regression”,
which is appropriate for stationary time
series data (Kulendran & Witt, 2001). The
CPI data were non-stationary. Therefore, its
rate of change, the inflation rate, is included
in the model to test the sensitivity of tourists
to prices. A second model omits inflation and
includes all other variables. The conflict vari-
able is an index compiled by the International
Country Risk Guide and represents the nega-
tive publicity and the impact of travel warn-
ings based on internal conflict in the
Philippines during the period under review.
The log of the conflict variable is included in
all three models to be tested.
Finally, there is the issue of seasonal pat-
terns in tourist flows and expenditures,
which are well-known characteristics of inter-
national tourism demand. Climate variability
is one factor that produces these intra-year
fluctuations. Most studies that have estimated
the impact of climate or climate variability on
tourism demand, as either a push factor or a
852 Vivienne Saverimuttu and Maria Estela Varua
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UQ
Lib
rary
] at
02:
35 2
1 N
ovem
ber
2014
![Page 9: Climate Variability in the Origin Countries as a “Push” Factor on Tourist Arrivals in the Philippines](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080501/5750a8231a28abcf0cc65127/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
pull factor, have used temperature or rainfall
as indicators, whereas this paper uses the
SOI as a proxy for climate variability in
origin countries. The SOI and the sea surface
temperature are widely used indicators of
ENSO (Chiew et al., 1998) and the best
known extremes of the SOI are the El Nino
and La Nina effects. As mentioned previously,
the ENSO and its connection to climate are
used by many meteorological agencies to
produce monthly weather forecasts (Kawa-
mura, McKerchar, Spigel, & Jinno, 1998).
Monthly data on the SOI were obtained
from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology.
The Bureau uses the Troup method to calcu-
late SOI. The monthly data were averaged
over three months to compile the quarterly
data. Chiew et al. found that in general the
best results were obtained using “SOI values
averaged over two or three months” (1998,
p. 146). The Augmented Dicky Fuller con-
firmed that the SOI data are stationary.
Model 1
ln(tours)t = b0 + b1 ln (tours)t−1
+ b2 ln (USRGDP)t−1 + b3(PHINF)t
+ b4(CONFL)t + b5(SOI)t + 1t.
Model 2
ln(tours)t = b0 + b1 ln (tours)t−1
+ b2 ln (USRGDP)t−1
+ b4(CONFL)t + b5(SOI)t + 1t,
where ln(tourists)t ¼ log of the number of
foreign tourists arrivals in quarter t,
ln(tourists)t21 ¼ the log of the number of
foreign tourists in quarter (t 2 1),
ln USRGDPt21 ¼ US real GDP in quarter
(t 2 1), PHIINFt ¼ inflation rate in the Philip-
pines in quarter t, CONFLt ¼ index of internal
stability in the Philippines in quarter t and
SOIt ¼ Southern Oscillation Index.
The two models are illustrated above. The
expected sign is positive for the lagged depen-
dent variable which represents the WOM
effect and returning Filipino and foreign tour-
ists. Real US GDP representing income of tour-
ists is also expected to be positive based on
consumption theory. Higher inflation and there-
fore higher prices in the Philippines would act as
a deterrent to inbound tourists and thus the
expected sign is negative. The conflict index is
constructed such that the higher this index, the
lower is the internal conflict and political
unrest resulting in increased tourist arrivals
(Varua & Saverimuttu, 2012). Hence, the
expected sign is positive. For the variable repre-
senting climate variability, sustained negative
values of the SOI are associated with El Nino
episodes and sustained positive values of the
SOI with La Nina episodes. As explained pre-
viously, colder than usual winters and more
numerous and stronger hurricanes in origin
countries are all associated with La Nina and
should result in an increase in the number of
tourist arrivals while the opposite is hypoth-
esized as true for El Nino episodes. Thus, the
expected sign for the SOI variable is positive.
Results and Analysis
A summary of the results is present in Table 1.
The diagnostic tests carried out indicate that
both models are robust with no serial corre-
lation or omitted variable bias. The main
purpose of this paper was to test the impact
of climate variability in origin countries on
tourist arrivals in the Philippines using a suit-
able proxy to represent climate variability.
The climate change variable, represented by
the SOI, has proven to be more than adequate
in that the quarterly data on SOI when tested
Climate Variability in the Origin Countries 853
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UQ
Lib
rary
] at
02:
35 2
1 N
ovem
ber
2014
![Page 10: Climate Variability in the Origin Countries as a “Push” Factor on Tourist Arrivals in the Philippines](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080501/5750a8231a28abcf0cc65127/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
proved to be stationary. More importantly the
expected sign of the variable was positive in
both models as hypothesized and statistically
significant at 5%, indicating an increase in
US visitors to the Philippines when La Nina
events occurred in the USA during the period
1994–2011. This result implies that climate
variability in origin countries is an important
“push” factor to motivate tourists towards
travel and tourism activities.
The results of the control variables con-
sidered indicate that they are consistent with
the literature reviewed. The coefficients of
the lagged dependent variable were significant
at 1% and positive in both models, indicating
the strong possibility of return visits and the
positive impact of the WOM effect. The
income variable (ln USRGDPt21) was also
positive and statistically significant at 5% in
both models. In general, the income results
suggest that tourists’ anticipated income and
the decision to travel are influenced by their
income in the previous quarter.
The coefficients in both models indicate that
although the climate variable had a statisti-
cally significant impact on US tourist arrivals
in the Philippines, the impact of the WOM
effect and tourist income was stronger. The
conflict variable confirmed the expected posi-
tive sign but was significant only at 10% in
both models. This paper uses the multiple
least-squares regression technique to estimate
the coefficients whereas a state space model
was employed by Varua and Saverimuttu
(2012), and the level of significance for the
conflict variable was higher.
Although the model only explains approxi-
mately 72% (adjusted R2) of the variation in
US tourist arrivals in the Philippines, the
Ramsay reset test confirms that the model
has the right functional form and that there
is no bias from omitted variables. It must be
noted however that tourists are also sensitive
to prices, either in the form of transportation
costs (airfares) or the cost of living (accommo-
dation, meals, etc.) in the destination country.
Table 1 Multiple Regression Analysis on Tourist Arrivals
Model 1 Model 2
Constant 20.7105 (0.686) 20.6794 (0.693)
ln(tourists)t21 0.7630 (0.000)∗∗∗ 0.7618 (0.000)∗∗∗
ln(USRGDP)t21 0.3521 (0.046)∗∗ 0.3504 (0.044)∗∗
PHINFt 20.1100 (0.910)
ln CONFLt 0.0245 (0.095)∗ 0.0241 (0.089)∗
SOIt 0.0027 (0.027)∗∗ 0.0027 (0.025)∗∗
Adj. R2 0.71 0.72
F-stat 35.08 44.53
BG-LM test (p_value) 0.3623 0.3693
Ramsay RESET test (p_value) 0.2900 0.2778
( ) represents the p_value.∗Significant at 10%.∗∗Significant at 5%.∗∗∗Significant at 1%.
854 Vivienne Saverimuttu and Maria Estela Varua
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UQ
Lib
rary
] at
02:
35 2
1 N
ovem
ber
2014
![Page 11: Climate Variability in the Origin Countries as a “Push” Factor on Tourist Arrivals in the Philippines](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080501/5750a8231a28abcf0cc65127/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
In the absence of reliable historical data on air-
fares the travel cost was omitted. The inflation
rate was used as a proxy for the cost of
tourism-related goods. The inflation rate had
the correct sign but was not significant and
was therefore omitted in model 2. Exchange
rates are also sometimes used “as the sole rep-
resentation of tourists’ living costs” (Witt &
Witt, 1995). The exchange rate itself (the
amount of pesos per dollar) was non-station-
ary. Therefore, the change in exchange rate
was substituted for the inflation rate. Increases
in the exchange rate resulting in more pesos
per US dollar should have a positive influence
on tourist arrivals. However, the result was
negative and not significant. The Philippines
is a cheaper location than the USA. In
addition, the peso is weaker than the dollar.
Perhaps this accounts for the reduced sensi-
tivity of demand for tourism and tourism-
related goods to prices at this particular
location. Other possible variables that were
excluded were “pull” factors such as market-
ing and promotions, not “push” factors,
which may account for the unexplained
variation.
Conclusion
The primary contribution of this paper was to
test the impact of climate variability in origin
countries as a “push” factor on tourist arri-
vals, specifically in the Philippines. Both
models indicate that climate variability in
origin countries was a significant determinant
of tourism demand for the Philippines during
the period 1994–2011. From the literature
reviewed, significant explanatory variables
were included as control variables to test the
strength of the climate variable. These vari-
ables, the WOM effect and tourists’ income
also proved significant determinants of US
tourist arrivals in the Philippines during this
period. Furthermore, the coefficients indicate
that the impact of these variables on US
tourist arrivals in the Philippines was stronger
than that of the climate variable. However,
weather forecasting techniques are becoming
more sophisticated and increasing in accuracy.
Thus, estimating the impact of colder winters
(which at least in Europe appear to be occur-
ring more frequently) on tourist arrivals in
“sun and sand” locations such as the Philip-
pines would be of importance to planners in
the tourism industry. Tourism literature may
need to focus more (than in the past) on
climate variability in the country of origin as
the necessary impetus for residents of an
affected location to travel to another location
to avoid extreme weather patterns, especially
if it was predictable. Theoretically, the model
does have its limitations due to the exclusion
of some explanatory variables. However, the
Ramsay reset test confirms that the model
has the right functional form and that there
is no bias from omitted variables.
Additionally, this study uses the SOI as
proxy to represent climate variability in
origin countries. Other studies that have
tested the impact of climate variability on
tourism either as a “push” or “pull” factor
have used proxies such as rainfall and temp-
erature. Climate variability is strongly linked
to the ENSO and this link is widely used by
meteorologists to forecast the changes in
weather globally. The SOI, constructed by
the Australian Bureau of Meteorology, is a
widely used indicator of the ENSO and the
best known extremes of the SOI are the El
Nino (warm phase) and La Nina (cold phase)
effects and historical data are readily available
for researchers. In conclusion, this paper
proves to some extent that there is a significant
increase in tourist arrivals in the Philippines
when La Nina (colder) winters prevail in the
Climate Variability in the Origin Countries 855
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UQ
Lib
rary
] at
02:
35 2
1 N
ovem
ber
2014
![Page 12: Climate Variability in the Origin Countries as a “Push” Factor on Tourist Arrivals in the Philippines](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080501/5750a8231a28abcf0cc65127/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
USA. More importantly, the SOI proved to be
a more than adequate proxy for measuring the
impact of climate variability on tourism
demand.
References
Aguilo, E., Alegre, J., & Sard, M. (2005). The persistence
of the sun and sand tourism model. Tourism Manage-
ment, 26, 219–231.
Amelung, B., Nicholls, S., & Viner, D. (2007). Impli-
cations of global climate change for tourism flows and
seasonality. Journal of Travel Research, 45, 285–296.
Bigano, A., Hamilton, J. M., & Tol, S. J. (2006). The
impact of climate on holiday destination choice. Cli-
matic Change, 76, 389–406.
Chiew, F.H. S., Piechota, T. C., Dracup, J. A., &
McMahon, T. A. (1998). El Nino/Southern Oscillation
and Australian rainfall, streamflow and drought: Links
and potential for forecasting. Journal of Hydrology,
204, 138–149.
Cho, V. (2009). A study on the temporal dynamics of
tourism demand in the Asia Pacific Region. Inter-
national Journal of Tourism Research, 11, 465–485.
Cho, V. (2010). A study of the non-economic determi-
nants of tourism demand. International Journal of
Tourism Research, 12, 307–320.
Crouch, G. I. (1994). The study of international tourism
demand: A survey of practice. Journal of Travel
Research, 32(4), 41–57.
DOT. (2011). Tourism statistics. Manila: Department of
Tourism.
Eugenio-Martin, J. L., & Campos-Soria, J. A. (2010).
Climate in the region of origin and destination choice
in outbound tourism demand. Tourism Management,
31, 744–753.
Falk, M. (2013). Impact of long-term weather on domestic
and foreign winter tourism demand. International
Journal of Tourism Research, 15, 1–17.
Goh, C. (2012). Exploring impact of climate on tourism
demand. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(4),
1859–1883.
Goh, C., Law, R., & Mok, H. M. K. (2008). Analyzing
and forecasting tourism demand: A rough sets
approach. Journal of Travel Research, 46(3), 327–338.
Gossling, S. (2002). Global environmental consequences
of tourism. Global Environmental Change, 12,
283–302.
Hamilton, J. M., & Tol, R. S. J. (2007). The impact of
climate on tourism in Germany, the UK and Ireland: A
simulation study. Regional Environmental Change, 7,
161–172. doi:10.1007/s10113–007–0036–2
Hamilton, J. M., Maddison, D. J., & Tol, R. S. J. (2005a).
Climate change and international tourism: A simulation
study. Global Environmental Change, 15, 253–256.
Hamilton, J. M., Maddison, D. J., & Tol, R.S. J. (2005b).
Effects of climate change on international tourism.
Climate Research, 29, 245–254.
Hendersen, J. C. (2011). Tourism development and poli-
tics in the Philippines. Tourismos: An International
Multidisciplinary Journal of Tourism, 6(2), 159–173.
Hsu, T., Tsai, Y., & Wu, H. (2009). The preference analy-
sis for tourist choice of destination: A case study of
Taiwan. Tourism Management, 30, 288–297.
Kawamura, A., McKerchar, A. I., Spigel, R. H., & Jinno,
K. (1998). Chaotic characteristics of the Southern Oscil-
lation Index time series. Journal of Hydrology, 204,
168–181.
Kiem, A. S., & Franks, S. W. (2001). On the identification
of ENSO-induced rainfall and runoff variability: A com-
parison of methods and indices. Hydrological Sciences
Journal, 46(5), 715–727.
Kozak, N., Uysal, M., & Birkan, I. (2008). An analysis of
cities based on tourism supply and climatic conditions in
Turkey. Tourism Geographies: An International Journal
of Tourism Space, Place & Environment, 10(1), 81–97.
Kulendran, N., & Witt, F. F. (2001). Cointegration versus
least squares regression. Annals of Tourism Research,
28(2), 291–311.
Lim, C., & McAleer, M. (2001). Monthly seasonal vari-
ations: Asian tourism to Australia. Annals of Tourism
Research, 28(1), 68–82.
Maddison, D. (2001). In search of warmer climates? The
impact of climate change on flows of British tourists.
Climatic Change, 49, 193–208.
McPhaden, M. J., Zebiak, S. E., & Glantz, M. H. (2006).
ENSO as an integrating concept in Earth Science.
Science, 314, 1740–1745.
Moreno, A. (2010). Mediterranean tourism and climate
change: A survey based study. Tourism & Hospitality
Planning & Development, 7(3), 253–265.
Nadal, J. R., Font, A. R., & Rosello, A. S. (2004). The
economic determinants of seasonal patterns. Annals of
Tourism Research, 31(3), 697–711.
Prebensen, N., Skallerud, K., & Chen, J. S. (2010).
Tourism motivation with sun and sand destinations:
Satisfaction and the wom-effect. Journal of Travel &
Tourism Marketing, 27(8), 858–873.
856 Vivienne Saverimuttu and Maria Estela Varua
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UQ
Lib
rary
] at
02:
35 2
1 N
ovem
ber
2014
![Page 13: Climate Variability in the Origin Countries as a “Push” Factor on Tourist Arrivals in the Philippines](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080501/5750a8231a28abcf0cc65127/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Roberts, M. G., Dawe, D., Falcon, W. P., & Naylor, R. L.
(2009). El Nino Southern Oscillation impacts on rice
production in Luzon, the Philippines. Notes and corre-
spondence. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Clima-
tology, 48, 1718–1724.
Scott, D., & Lemieux, C. (2010). Weather and climate
information for tourism. Procedia Environmental
Sciences, 1, 146–183.
Scott, D., McBoyle, G., & Schwartzentruber, M. (2004).
Climate change and the distribution of climatic
resources for tourism in North America. Climate
Research, 27, 105–117.
Smith, R. A., Henderson, J. C., Chong, V., Tay, C., &
Jingwen, Y. (2011). The development and manage-
ment of beach resorts: Boracay Island, the Philippines.
Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 16(2),
229–245.
Song, H., & Li, G. (2008). Tourism demand modelling
and forecasting – A review of recent research.
Tourism Management, 29, 203–220.
Stabler, M. J., Papatheodorou, A., & Sinclair, M. T.
(2010). The economics of tourism (2nd ed.). London:
Routledge.
Stepchenkova, S., & Eales, J. S. (2011). Destination image
as quantified media messages: The effect of news on
tourism demand. Journal of Travel Research, 50(2),
198–212.
United Nations World Tourism Organization. (2009).
From Davos to Copenhagen and beyond: Advancing
tourism’s response to climate change. UNWTO back-
ground paper. Madrid: Author.
United Nations World Tourism Organization. (2012, Sep-
tember). UNWTO World Tourism Barometer 10
(pp. 1–29). Madrid: Author.
Varua, M. E., & Saverimuttu, V. (2012). The impact of
political unrest or internal conflict on inbound tourism
in the Republic of the Philippines. International
Journal of Development and Conflict, 2(1), 1250003-
1–1250003-11.
Wietze, L., & Tol, R. S. J. (2002). Impact of climate on
tourism demand. Climatic Change, 55, 429–449.
Wilson, J., & Becken, S. (2011). Perceived deficiencies in
the provision of climate and weather information for
tourism: A New Zealand media analysis. New
Zealand Geographer, 67, 148–160.
Witt, S. F., & Martin, C. A. (1987). International tourism
demand models – Inclusion of marketing variables.
Tourism Management, 8(1), 33–40.
Witt, S. F., & Witt, C. A. (1995). Forecasting tourism
demand: A review of empirical research. International
Journal of Forecasting, 11, 447–475.
World Travel & Tourism Council (2012). Travel &
tourism: Economic impact 2012 Philippines. London:
Author.
Climate Variability in the Origin Countries 857
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UQ
Lib
rary
] at
02:
35 2
1 N
ovem
ber
2014