closed loop performance laird close and magao team sac review
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Closed Loop Performance Laird Close and MagAO team SAC review](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070409/56649e835503460f94b85189/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Closed Loop Performance
Laird Close and MagAO team
SAC review
![Page 2: Closed Loop Performance Laird Close and MagAO team SAC review](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070409/56649e835503460f94b85189/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Requirement 1: The MagAO system high level VisAO Science
Goal (bright stars)
• To obtain Strelhs of 10% or better in median seeing (0.7) on-axis at 0.8 um.
• This is equivalent to 190 nm rms residual wavefront error.
![Page 3: Closed Loop Performance Laird Close and MagAO team SAC review](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070409/56649e835503460f94b85189/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Results
![Page 4: Closed Loop Performance Laird Close and MagAO team SAC review](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070409/56649e835503460f94b85189/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Results
Achieved “on-sky” 122 nm rms wavefront error at 800 Hz --- much better than 190nm goal
![Page 5: Closed Loop Performance Laird Close and MagAO team SAC review](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070409/56649e835503460f94b85189/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Comparing to Simulations
![Page 6: Closed Loop Performance Laird Close and MagAO team SAC review](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070409/56649e835503460f94b85189/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
ERROR BUDGET
![Page 7: Closed Loop Performance Laird Close and MagAO team SAC review](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070409/56649e835503460f94b85189/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Closing the Loop at 1000 Hz
At 1000 Hz closed loop we can achieve 65 nm rms error in tower ~95nm “on-sky”.NOTE that this is a linear stretch. This is much better than the 190 nm rms
requirement.
![Page 8: Closed Loop Performance Laird Close and MagAO team SAC review](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070409/56649e835503460f94b85189/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
See the movie!
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arjTorNtnCc&context=C4a1ba7aADvjVQa1PpcFNung4fzsYWr1SBl5fXtvLidUbAL4M9VSc=
• Also see a video of how we close the loop here:
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSiFoG8qgKI&context=C4a1917aADvjVQa1PpcFNung4fzsYWrw_ocFrcNJysPjatEvtUZbY=
![Page 9: Closed Loop Performance Laird Close and MagAO team SAC review](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070409/56649e835503460f94b85189/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Comparing to Simulations
![Page 10: Closed Loop Performance Laird Close and MagAO team SAC review](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070409/56649e835503460f94b85189/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Comparing to Simulations
68% “on-sky”
![Page 11: Closed Loop Performance Laird Close and MagAO team SAC review](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070409/56649e835503460f94b85189/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Clio2
• Clio2 can do excellent science with higher wavefront errors. Hence there is a need for Faint Star Performance as well to increase sky-coverage.
![Page 12: Closed Loop Performance Laird Close and MagAO team SAC review](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070409/56649e835503460f94b85189/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Goal 2: The MagAO system high level Clio2 Science Goal (faint stars)
• To obtain Strelhs of 85% or better in median seeing (0.7”) on-axis at 3.8 um (L’) for a R=13 guide star. (or SR>96% at 8um on MIRAC4).
• This is equivalent to 250 nm rms residual wavefront error.
![Page 13: Closed Loop Performance Laird Close and MagAO team SAC review](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070409/56649e835503460f94b85189/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Performance on Faint stars
Here we have in z’ a Strehl of 13% or 210 nm rms error. This would be about 9.5% “on-sky” or 221 nm rms. This is better than the faint star goal of 250 nm rms
![Page 14: Closed Loop Performance Laird Close and MagAO team SAC review](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070409/56649e835503460f94b85189/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Summary:
• Science requirement of <190 nm error for bright guide stars in median seeing is met, and improved on, by a significant margin with <95-122 nm rms achieved (800-1000 Hz, 400 modes) (by almost 2x lower in rms wavefront error).
• Science requirement of <250 nm rms error for faint (R=13) guide stars is met and improved on with typically ~221 nm rms (200 Hz, 150 modes) is achieved.