coal and china’s choices

21
© OECD/IEA 2011 COAL AND COAL AND CHINA’S CHOICES CHINA’S CHOICES Jonathan Sinton Jonathan Sinton China Program Manager China Program Manager International Energy Agency International Energy Agency Washington, D.C., 12 January 2011 Washington, D.C., 12 January 2011

Upload: paiva

Post on 28-Jan-2016

48 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

COAL AND CHINA’S CHOICES. Jonathan Sinton China Program Manager International Energy Agency Washington, D.C., 12 January 2011. Coal, long the big story, is now even bigger. 2010 was a big year for Chinese coal imports. China’s coal imports are a small portion of total consumption. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: COAL AND  CHINA’S CHOICES

© OECD/IEA 2011

COAL AND COAL AND CHINA’S CHOICESCHINA’S CHOICES

Jonathan SintonJonathan SintonChina Program ManagerChina Program ManagerInternational Energy Agency International Energy Agency

Washington, D.C., 12 January 2011Washington, D.C., 12 January 2011

Page 2: COAL AND  CHINA’S CHOICES

© OECD/IEA 2011

Coal, long the big story, is now even bigger

40

1,656

13 52363

-23

2,101

-500

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

GasCoa

l

Renew

ables

and

Was

te

Nucle

ar

Hydro Oil

Total

Gro

wth

be

twe

en

20

00

an

d 2

00

8 [

TW

h]

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

KTon

China incremental consumption

2008

2009

2010 (*Estimate)

(2010-2008)

US 2009 Consumption

Page 3: COAL AND  CHINA’S CHOICES

© OECD/IEA 2011

2010 was a big year for Chinese coal imports

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

14.00

16.00

18.00

Jan-07 Jul-07 Jan-08 Jul-08 Jan-09 Jul-09 Jan-10 Jul-10

China’s Monthly Coal Imports and Exports(million tonnes)

Imports

Exports

0

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

10,000,000

12,000,000

14,000,000

Tons

China monthly imports

steam coal

coking coal

Page 4: COAL AND  CHINA’S CHOICES

© OECD/IEA 2011

China’s coal imports are a small portion of total consumption

Mt coal

Page 5: COAL AND  CHINA’S CHOICES

© OECD/IEA 2011

China may have lots of coal, but it’s no longer dirt cheap

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

220US$/t (6000 kcal/kg net)

McCloskey Asian CIF

NWE Marker MONTHLY CIF

Central Appalachia

Powder River Basin

API#2. 06th Dec 2010

NYMEX QL: CAPP 06-Dec-10

Monthly spot coal pricesQinhuangdao imports CIF

Page 6: COAL AND  CHINA’S CHOICES

© OECD/IEA 2011

Center of production moving west Getting deeper Quality an issue Water too Transport very stretched

source: China5E

Page 7: COAL AND  CHINA’S CHOICES

© OECD/IEA 2011

Is coal cheaper than the alternatives?

Page 8: COAL AND  CHINA’S CHOICES

© OECD/IEA 2011

Longer-term: Longer-term: WEO 2010 WEO 2010 scenariosscenarios Global energy scenarios to 2035 New Policies Scenario is the central scenario in WEO-

2010> assumes cautious implementation of recently announced

commitments & plans, even if yet to be formally adopted > provides benchmark to assess achievements &

limitations of recent developments in climate & energy policy

Current Policies Scenario takes into consideration only those policies that had been formally adopted by mid-2010> equivalent to the Reference Scenario of past Outlooks

The 450 Scenario sets out an energy pathway consistent with the goal of limiting increase in average temperature to 2OC

Page 9: COAL AND  CHINA’S CHOICES

© OECD/IEA 2011

0

2 000

4 000

6 000

8 000

10 000

12 000

14 000

16 000

18 000

Mto

e

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 20302035

World primary energy World primary energy demand by fueldemand by fuelin the New Policies Scenarioin the New Policies Scenario

Fossil fuels maintain a central role in the primary energy mix in the New PoliciesScenario, but their share declines, from 81% in 2008 to 74% in 2035

Other renewables

Biomass

Hydro

Nuclear

Gas

Oil

Coal

WEO-2009 Total:Reference Scenario

Page 10: COAL AND  CHINA’S CHOICES

© OECD/IEA 2011

Recent policy commitments, if Recent policy commitments, if implemented, would make a implemented, would make a differencedifference

Global energy use grows by 36% in 2008-2035, with the OECD share of world demand falling from 44% today to 33% in 2035

World primary energy demand by region in the New Policies Scenario

0

2 000

4 000

6 000

8 000

10 000

12 000

14 000

16 000

18 000

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035

Mto

e Rest of world

China

OECD

WEO-2009:Reference Scenario

Page 11: COAL AND  CHINA’S CHOICES

© OECD/IEA 2011

Other renewables

Biomass

Hydro

Nuclear

Gas

Oil

Coal

WEO-2009 Total:Reference Scenario 0

500

1 000

1 500

2 000

2 500

3 000

3 500

4 000

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030

Mto

e

2035

China primary energy China primary energy demand by fuel in the New demand by fuel in the New Policies ScenarioPolicies Scenario

Total primary energy demand in China grows at 2.1% per year on average in 2008-2035, an overall increase of 75%

Page 12: COAL AND  CHINA’S CHOICES

© OECD/IEA 2011

The power and industry The power and industry sectors remainsectors remainkey drivers of global coal key drivers of global coal demanddemand

- 750- 500- 250 0 250 500 750 1 0001 250

Other*

Coal-to-liquids

Industry

Power generation

Mtce

OECD

China

India

Indonesia

Other non-OECD

Change in primary coal demand by sector and region in New Policies Scenario, 2008-2035

Demand in power generation accounts for almost 60% of the increase in global coal demand, while another 30% of the demand growth comes from the industry sector

Page 13: COAL AND  CHINA’S CHOICES

© OECD/IEA 2011

Coal remains the backbone of Coal remains the backbone of global electricity generationglobal electricity generation

A drop in coal-fired generation in the OECD is offset by big increases elsewhere, especially China, where 600 GW of new capacity exceeds the current coal-fired capacity of the US, EU & Japan

0

2 000

4 000

6 000

8 000

10 000

12 000

1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2035

TW

h China

India

Other non-OECD

OECD

Coal-fired electricity generation by region in the New Policies Scenario

Page 14: COAL AND  CHINA’S CHOICES

© OECD/IEA 2011

The 450 Scenario:The 450 Scenario: A A roadmap from 3.5 roadmap from 3.5C to 2C to 2C C

The 450 Scenario sets out an energy pathway consistent with limiting the increase in temperature to 2C

Assumes vigorous implementation of Copenhagen Accord pledges to 2020 & much stronger action thereafter

The failure of the Copenhagen Accord pledges: > As many lack transparency, there is 3.9 Gt of

uncertainty over the level of abatement pledged to 2020

> As many lack ambition, the cost of achieving the 2 C goal has increased by $1 trillion in 2010-2030 compared with WEO-2009

Page 15: COAL AND  CHINA’S CHOICES

© OECD/IEA 2011

The 450 Scenario: The 450 Scenario: Abatement by technology Abatement by technology

In moving from the New Policies Scenario to the 450 Scenario, more expensive abatement options such as CCS play a growing role

World energy-related CO2 emission savings by technology in the 450 Scenario relative to the New

Policies Scenario

20

25

30

35

40

45

2008 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035

Gt

Efficiency 50%

Renewables 18%

Biofuels 4%

Nuclear 9%

CCS 20%

Share of cumulative abatement

between 2010-2035

42.6 Gt

35.4 Gt

21.7 Gt

Current Policies Scenario

450 Scenario

New Policies Scenario

13.7 Gt

7.1 Gt

Page 16: COAL AND  CHINA’S CHOICES

© OECD/IEA 2011

China abatement in the 450 China abatement in the 450 Scenario Scenario

In moving from the New Policies Scenario to the 450 Scenario, China starts to rely more on CCS as room for further abatement from lower-cost

options becomes limited

China energy-related CO2 emission savings in the 450 Scenario

relative to the New Policies Scenario

Efficiency 50%

Renewables 18%

Biofuels 1%

Nuclear 8%

CCS 23%

Share of cumulative abatement

between 2010-2035

12.6 Gt

5.2 Gt

5.0 Gt

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

2008 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035

Gt

Current PoliciesScenario

450 Scenario

10.1 Gt

2.4 GtNew Policies

Scenario

Page 17: COAL AND  CHINA’S CHOICES

© OECD/IEA 2011

Low-carbon technologies account for 78% of China’s power generation by 2035 in the 450 Scenario, up from 19% today

Share of China electricity generation by type and scenario

Additional low-carbon generationin 450 Scenario

Low-carbon generation in the NPS

Fossil-fuel fired generation

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035

in the 450 Scenario

Power generation in China Power generation in China in the 450 Scenario in the 450 Scenario

Page 18: COAL AND  CHINA’S CHOICES

© OECD/IEA 2011

Bigger and more efficient Bigger and more efficient power plants in non-OECDpower plants in non-OECD

The average efficiency of coal-fired generation plants in the non-OECD countries risesfrom 33% in 2008 to 40% by 2035

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2008 2020 2035 2008 2020 2035

OECD Non-OECD

Sh

are

of

coal genera

tion

25%

29%

33%

37%

41%

45%

Effi

ciency Coal with CCS

IGCC

Ultrasupercritical

Supercritical

Subcritical

Average efficiency(right axis)

Coal-fired electricity generation by technology and region in the New Policies Scenario

Page 19: COAL AND  CHINA’S CHOICES

© OECD/IEA 2011

WEO 2010 WEO 2010 Implications for ChinaImplications for China

China's role in global energy is set to expand further & its policies will have major implications for global energy trends & prospects for limiting climate change

A greater role for gas in China could contribute greatly to reducing CO2 emissions

China's role as leader in manufacturing, deploying—and increasingly in developing—low-carbon technologies can drive down costs, to the benefits of all countries

Growing interconnectedness & China's increasing weight in the energy market links its energy security to global energy security

Page 20: COAL AND  CHINA’S CHOICES

© OECD/IEA 2011

Courtesy: IEA Clean Coal Centre

Typical, old 200 MWe plant in China

Page 21: COAL AND  CHINA’S CHOICES

© OECD/IEA 2011

Huaneng Qinbei Power Plant 2x600MWe SC Huaneng Yuhuan Power Plant 2x1000MWe USC

Shanghai Waigaoqiao Power Plant 2x900MWe SC + 2x1000MWe USC

Shandong Zouxian Power Plant 2x600MWe + 2x1000MWe

Selection of supercritical (SC) and ultra-supercritical (USC) power plants constructed in China over the past decade