cocate - corrosion of pipe steelco2pipehaz.eu/main_download/events/workshop_pdfs_22... · cocate -...
TRANSCRIPT
02/05/2012
COCATE - Corrosion of pipe steel
Autoclave tests for pipe steels and coatingsand coatingsX. Zhang, J. Zevenbergen, M. Spruijt
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
1
Content
1. Introduction2. Objective3. Approach methods4 Results4. Results
Corrosion of steelsCoatings on carbon steelgImpedance measurementsCross section analysis Pull-off testCoatings with artificial scratches
5. Conclusions5. Conclusions6. Future work
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
2
1. IntroductionFlue gases contain CO2, O2, SOx, NOx, H2O etc. Pipe materials: carbon steel, stainless steel?Questions: corrosion rate, possible solution?
Pool A
Pipes
Pool CLe Havre Rotterdam
p
Pool B
Pipelines/ships
Pipes
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
3
2. Objective
Obtain corrosion data for steels in CO2 flue gas conditionsSearch for solutions (e.g. coatings)
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
4
Why does CO2 cause corrosion?
Dry CO2 does not cause corrosion. Wet CO2 does.CO2 + H2O → H2CO3
Fe + CO2 + H2O → FeCO3 + H2
Cathodic reactions:2H2CO3 + 2e- → H2 + 2HCO3
-2 3 2 3
2HCO3- + 2e- → H2 + CO3
2-
2H+ + 2e- → H2
Anodic reaction:Fe → Fe2+ + 2e-Fe → Fe 2e
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
5
3. Approach methodsSimulation: to get parameters and estimate corrosion rates
Experimental investigation: autoclave testsSet 1 (measuring the pH value and corrosion rate for metals):
1 Stream CTPbp (CO2+ NO2 O2 N2 + H2O) (1 65 bar 65 C )1. Stream CTPbp (CO2+ NO2, O2, N2 + H2O) (1.65 bar, 65 C )
2. Stream 7Bp (CO2 + NO2, O2, N2, SO2 + H2O) (1.2 bar, 49 C)
3. CO2 + H2O (100 bar, 60 C)( )
Set 2 (Testing coating performance):
Media: CO2 + 3.5% NaCl
Temperature in corrosive media Tc = 60 C
Pressure in autoclave P = 100 barPressure in autoclave P 100 bar
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
6
4. Results
4.1 Calculation using NORSOK Model 506Empirical corrosion rate (CRt) model for carbon steel in water containing CO2 at different temperatures
and wall shear stresses (S)and wall shear stresses (S).
t: 20 - 150 C
CRt = Kt fCO2 0.62 (S/19) 0.146 + 0.0324 log(fCO2) f(pH)t (mm/year)
t: 15 C
CRt = Kt fCO2 0.36 (S/19) 0.146 + 0.0324 log(fCO2) f(pH)t
t 5 Ct: 5 C
CRt = Kt fCO2 0.36 f(pH)t
fCO2: the fugacity of CO2 in bar,
f(pH)t : pH factor at temperature t.
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
7
Calculation using NORSOK M-506 model
Pool 2_ stream CTPbpPressure = 1.643 bar, Shear stress = 1 Pa, CO2 = 11.32 mole%
Molar fraction
Vapour phase
Aqueous phase
2
2.5
3
3.5
te /
(mm
/yea
r)
pH=4 pH=5
mole frac CO2 0.109004 0.113150 0.000044
mole frac H2O 0.183007 0.151925 0.999943
mole frac NO2 0.000060 0.000062 0.000002
mole frac SO2 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
0
0.5
1
1.5
0 50 100 150 200
Cor
rosi
on ra
pH 5 pH=6 mole frac N2O 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
mole frac CO 0.000002 0.000002 0.000000
mole frac CH4 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
l f O2 0 019001 0 019724 0 000000Temperature / (°C) mole frac O2 0.019001 0.019724 0.000000
mole frac N2 0.688926 0.715138 0.000010
Pipe inner diameter (mm) 212 7
pH: 4.4Pipe inner diameter (mm) 212.7
Pipe thickness (mm) 3.2
Temperature © 64.72
Pressure (bar) 1.643
Corrosion rate: 2.7 mm/year(Impurities are not considered in the calculation.)
Velocity (m/s) 19.44
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
8
Stream Pool 4-7Bp
Pressure = 1.15 bar, Shear stress = 1 Pa, CO2 = 8.566 mole%
2.5
)
mole frac CO2 0.084238 0.085662 0.000029
Molar fraction
Vapour phase
Aqueous phase
1
1.5
2
on ra
te /
(mm
/yea
r)
pH=4 pH=5 pH=6
mole frac H2O 0.116490 0.101548 0.999952
mole frac NO2 0.000164 0.000167 0.000008
mole frac SO2 0.000114 0.000116 0.000002
mole frac N2O 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
0
0.5
0 50 100 150 200
Temperature / (°C)
Cor
rosi
o pH 6 mole frac N2O 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
mole frac CO 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
mole frac CH4 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
mole frac O2 0.087870 0.089356 0.000001
l f N2 0 711124 0 723150 0 000008Temperature / ( C) mole frac N2 0.711124 0.723150 0.000008
Pipe inner diameter (mm) 901.6
Pipe thickness (mm) 6.4pH: 4.5Temperature © 48.83
Pressure (bar) 1.15
Velocity (m/s) 21.02Corrosion rate: 1.7 mm/year(Impurities are not considered in the calculation.)
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
9
4. Results
4.1 Calculation using NORSOK Model 5064.2 Experimental results
4.2.1 Corrosion of steels
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
10
Experimental set-up
Gas mixture container
Heating system Stirring controller Autoclave
Sample mounting
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
11
2. Corrosion of Carbon steel
S355 in flue 7Bp (1.2 bar, 49 C)pH 5.5Day 6: Corr rate: 0.2 mm/y
Corrosion rate analysisCorrosion rate analysis
-4
-3
Log(
Cur
rent
/A)
-5
4
Potential -0.9 -0.8 -0.7 -0.6 -0.5
V
-6
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
12
2. Corrosion of steelsS335 steel in the CO2 CTP gas flue solution
(1.65 bar, 65°C, pH during CO2 charging: 4.7-5.3)
Corrosion current density in CTP flue
3 0E-05
3.5E-05
4.0E-05
1.0E-05
1.5E-05
2.0E-05
2.5E-05
3.0E-05
i (A
/cm
^2) CS1
CS2
CS3
Time(day) CS1 CS2 CS3 Average (mm/y)
0.0E+00
5.0E-06
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Time (day)Corrosion rate ( y) g ( y)3 0.23 0.14 0.11 0.16 4 0.29 0.20 0.11 0.20 5 0.37 0.23 0.23 0.28 6 0.41 0.29 0.19 0.30 7 0.41 0.29 0.20 0.30
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
13
Corrosion for carbon steel
CO2 + H2O (600ml)100 bar 60 CDay 6, Corrosion rate: 0.02 mm/y
Corrosion rate analysis
-5
-4
Log(
Cur
rent
/A)
-7
-6
Potential -60 -40 -20 0
mV
-8
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
14
Corrosion of stainless steel 316S
in flue 7Bp (1.2 bar, 49 C)pH 5.5Corr rate: 0.00005 mm/y
Corrosion rate analysis
-5
-4
og(C
urre
nt /A
)
8
-7
-6
Potential
Lo
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6
V
-9
-8
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
15
4. Results
4.1 Calculation using NORSOK Model 5064.2 Experimental results
4.2.1 Corrosion of steels4 2 2 Coatings on carbon steel4.2.2 Coatings on carbon steel
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
16
4.2.2 Coatings on carbon steel
A hitA: white, ~ 360 µm
B: off-white, ~1060 µm
C: grey, ~ 1150 µm
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
17
4. Results
4.1 Calculation using NORSOK Model 5064.2 Experimental results
4.2.1 Corrosion of steels4 2 2 Coatings on carbon steel4.2.2 Coatings on carbon steel4.2.3 Impedance measurements4.2.4 Cross section analysis y4.2.5 Pull-off test4.2.6 Coatings with artificial scratches
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
18
4.2.3 Impedance measurements
Impedance plots for three coatings in the CO2 plus 3.5% NaCl at 60ºC and 100 bar.
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
19
After autoclave test (for 60 days)(white) (off-white) (grey)
In 3.5% NaCl solution charged with CO2 to 100 bar atIn 3.5% NaCl solution charged with CO2 to 100 bar at 60 C
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
20
4. Results
4.1 Calculation using NORSOK Model 5064.2 Experimental results
4.2.1 Corrosion of steels4 2 2 Coatings on carbon steel4.2.2 Coatings on carbon steel4.2.3 Impedance measurements4.2.4 Cross section analysis y
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
21
Cross section analysis: coating AdelaminationColour: white
Thickness: ~ 360 µm
After exposure for 60 daysBefore the test
The white coating showed delamination at the coating/metal interface after the test.
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
22
Cross section analysis: coating B
Colour: off-white; Thickness: ~1060 µm
Off-white coating did not show delamination after the test
After exposure for 60 daysBefore the test
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
23
Cross section analysis: coating CColour: grey; Thickness: ~ 1150 µm
Blisters are found in the coating, but not at the coating/metal interface
After exposure for 60 daysBefore the test
ste s a e ou d t e coat g, but ot at t e coat g/ eta te ace
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
24
4. Results
4.1 Calculation using NORSOK Model 5064.2 Experimental results
4.2.1 Corrosion of steels4 2 2 Coatings on carbon steel4.2.2 Coatings on carbon steel4.2.3 Impedance measurements4.2.4 Cross section analysis y4.2.5 Pull-off test
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
25
Pull-off test before and after the autoclave test
White coating
A3 before exposure, (break in the coating)
A2 after exposure, (break at the coating/metal
interface)
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
26
Pull-off test
B3 before exposure, (break in the coating)
B2 after exposure, (break at the coating/metal
interface)
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
27
Pull-off test
C3 b f C2 ftC3 before exposure, (break in the coating)
C2 after exposure, (break partly it the coating)
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
28
Pull-off strength test
Sample Before exposure
(MPa)
After exposure
(MPa)
Breaking place
(MPa) (MPa)
Coating A 22.4 4.5 coating/metal
interfaceinterface
Coating B 20.1 8.4 40% coating
Coating C 10.4 9.0 In coating
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
29
4. Results
4.1 Calculation using NORSOK Model 5064.2 Experimental results
4.2.1 Corrosion of steels4 2 2 Coatings on carbon steel4.2.2 Coatings on carbon steel4.2.3 Impedance measurements4.2.4 Cross section analysis y4.2.5 Pull-off test4.2.6 Coatings with artificial scratches
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
30
Coating with an artificial scratch
Coating A Coating B Coating C
After test in autoclave at 100bar and 60°CAfter test in autoclave at 100bar and 60 C.
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
31
5. ConclusionsThe corrosion rates calculated using NORSOK M-506 model are higher than
that measured from experiments.
The measured corrosion rate for carbon steel S355 in the flue gas environment
is higher (about 0.3 mm/y) than in CO2 saturated water at 100 bar and 60 C
(about 0 02mm/y) within 6 days(about 0.02mm/y) within 6 days.
The stainless steel has a very low general corrosion rate in the flue gas
environment.
The off-white coating (B) performs better than the other two, which can be a
good candidate for the application in the pipes to against the CO2 corrosion.
2-5-2012Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de presentatie
32
6. Future work
Mass loss test for carbon steel in the gas flue 7BpSurface analysis to check localized corrosionAutoclave tests for coating B in different thicknessAutoclave tests for coatings on CS/SS welds to simulate the coatingsAutoclave tests for coatings on CS/SS welds to simulate the coatings at joints of different materials.