colloque lille2017 sequence8-3-activating group keeping of horses_ventorp_en
TRANSCRIPT
Activating group keeping of horses- a modern housing system för improving
welfare and reducing costsMichael Ventorp
Swedish University of Agricultural Science/ Hushållningssällskapet (consult company) - Sweden
Lille – February 22nd, 23rd, 24th 2017Livestock housing : let’s build the future 2
Contents
1. Housing systems for horses2. Describing of the activating group keeping system3. Advantage and disadvantage of the system; and
comparisons with other systems, recommendations
Lille – February 22nd, 23rd, 24th 2017Livestock housing : let’s build the future 3
Equine housing systems
Individual In Groups
STALL
SINGLE BOX
INSULATEDSTABLE
UNINSULAT-ED STABLE
GROUP-BOX
FREE- RANGED
Lille – February 22nd, 23rd, 24th 2017Livestock housing : let’s build the future 4
Free-ranged horses/Loose housing outdoors
AVANTAGES WITH LOOSE HOUSING:• Natural behaviour• Fresh air and voluntary movement • Cheap buildings• Working time saving• …………………..AND, OF COURSE, DISVANTAGES:• …………………..• Problem at restricted feeding
Lille – February 22nd, 23rd, 24th 2017Livestock housing : let’s build the future 5
Activating group housing
Lille – February 22nd, 23rd, 24th 2017Livestock housing : let’s build the future 6
Activating group housing
Lille – February 22nd, 23rd, 24th 2017Livestock housing : let’s build the future 7
Concentrate feed station
Lille – February 22nd, 23rd, 24th 2017Livestock housing : let’s build the future 8
Activating group housing
Handling stable
Roughage feed station
Lying hall
Foto Michael Ventorp
Lille – February 22nd, 23rd, 24th 2017Livestock housing : let’s build the future 9
Activating group housing
Foto Michael Ventorp
Detour to concentrate feed station
Rolling area
Concentrate feed station
Lille – February 22nd, 23rd, 24th 2017Livestock housing : let’s build the future 10
Rolling Area
• 1st level– 2nd level
• 3rd level
• 1st level
FOTO: Birgitta Friberg Sjöberg
Lille – February 22nd, 23rd, 24th 2017Livestock housing : let’s build the future 11
Basic roughage feed station
Foto: Åsa Foglé
Lille – February 22nd, 23rd, 24th 2017Livestock housing : let’s build the future 12
Activating?
Mean daily activity in activating group housing (Stable A1 and A2)
The results indicated that the activity of horses is affected by space and functional areas. Although providing more space increases activity, it will not have a long-term effect like feeding system.
(Rose-Meierhöfer, et al., 2010)
Lille – February 22nd, 23rd, 24th 2017Livestock housing : let’s build the future 13
Working time saving?
Average working hour per horse and year distributed into different working ope-rations within three horse housing systems: activating group-housing (with automatic feed stations). traditional group-housing and single boxes. Three horse farms were used and each farm had all three housing system.
(von Borstel et al., 2010)
Lille – February 22nd, 23rd, 24th 2017Livestock housing : let’s build the future 14
Performance
• No difference between horses in activating group housing and horses in single boxes regarding:
– Racing, show jumping and dressage results– Body condition (fat and muscles)– Hoof quality– However, a bit poorer “quality” of the coat (i.e
marks of bites and rugs, dirtier) (Kjellberg, 2016; Connysson, 2016)
Lille – February 22nd, 23rd, 24th 2017Livestock housing : let’s build the future 15
Problems? and advices!
• Stress: At 54 m2 paddock area per horse, Hoffmann (2008) found that the avarage stress (cortisol and heart frequenz) was lower in group kept horses vs. in single boxes; however, 30 % of the horses had higher levels. Plan for at least 200 – 300 m2 paddock area per horse – the lager the better.
• The horses on footings of gravel wear horse-shoes in great exstent. Use natural gravel instead of crushed stone.
Lille – February 22nd, 23rd, 24th 2017Livestock housing : let’s build the future 16
Problems? and advices!
• Aggressive behaviour: Agnostic behaviour are generally few; however, often occur in the area behind the feed stations (at the entrance), the waiting zone. Plan large free area behind the stations; especially, behind concentrate feed station.
• Frequent agnostic behaviour is correlated to number of visits per horse in feed stations. Zeitler-Feicht et al. (2010, 2011) proposed reducered number of programmed meals of concentrates (from 20 to 10).
Lille – February 22nd, 23rd, 24th 2017Livestock housing : let’s build the future 17
Problems? and advices!
• Eating rate of roughage (kg dry matter per minute) has great variation both within horse and between occasion (and feed). Measure eating rate of each horse 5 times per horse before programming eating time for every single horse.
• Calculate that it takes in average 1 week to teach a horse the feeding station. The exit door is often the problem for the horse to learn.
Lille – February 22nd, 23rd, 24th 2017Livestock housing : let’s build the future 18
Paddock trail system – the future?
• 1st level– 2nd level
• 3rd level
• 1st level
Lille – February 22nd, 23rd, 24th 2017Livestock housing : let’s build the future 19
References
• Connysson, M., 2016. Travskolan Wången/PhD-student SLU. Personal message• Hoffman, G., 2008. Bewegungsaktivität und Stressbelastung bei Pferden in
Auslaufhaltungssystemen mit verschiedenen Bewegungssangeboten. Diss. Justus-Liebig-Universität. Deutsche Veterinärmedizinische Gesellschaft Service GmbH, Gießen
• Hoffmann, G., A. Bentke, S. Rose-Meierhöfer, W. Berg, P. Mazetti, & G.H. Hardarson, 2012. Influence of an active stable system on the behavior and body condition of Icelandic horses. Animal 6:10, pp 1684-1693
• Kjellberg, L., 2016. Ridskolan Strömsholm/PhD-student SLU. Personal message• Rose-Meierhöfer, S., S. Klaer, C. Ammon, R. Brunsch & G. Hoffmann, 2010. Activity
behavior of horses housed in different open barn systems. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 30:11, pp 624-634
Lille – February 22nd, 23rd, 24th 2017Livestock housing : let’s build the future 20
References
• von Borstel, U.K, L. Kassebaum, K. Ladewig & M. Gauly, 2010. Arbeitszeitaufwand in der Pferdehaltung: ein Vergleich von Einzelboxen-, Laufstall- und Bewegungs-stallhaltung. Züchtungskunde, 82:6, pp 417–427
• Zeitler-Feicht, M.H, S. Streit & L. Dempfle, 2010. Tiergerechtheit von Futterabruf-stationen in der Gruppenhaltung von Pferden. Teil 1: Fressstände versus Abruf-automaten. Tierärztliche Praxis Großtiere 6/2010
• Zeitler-Feicht, M.H, S. Streit & L. Dempfle, 2011. Tiergerechtheit von Futterabruf-stationen in der Gruppenhaltung von Pferden. Teil 2: Abrufautomaten im Vergleich. Tierärztliche Praxis Großtiere 1/2011