commuter rail overview. 2 heritage systems (pre-1985) seattle montréal miami vancouver los angeles...

22
Commuter Rail Overview Commuter Rail Overview

Upload: harrison-smalley

Post on 31-Mar-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Commuter Rail Overview. 2 Heritage Systems (Pre-1985) Seattle Montréal Miami Vancouver Los Angeles Ft Worth Dallas San Diego New Systems (Since 1985)

Commuter Rail OverviewCommuter Rail Overview

Page 2: Commuter Rail Overview. 2 Heritage Systems (Pre-1985) Seattle Montréal Miami Vancouver Los Angeles Ft Worth Dallas San Diego New Systems (Since 1985)

22

““Heritage” Systems (Pre-1985)Heritage” Systems (Pre-1985)““Heritage” Systems (Pre-1985)Heritage” Systems (Pre-1985)

SeattleSeattle

MontréalMontréal

MiamiMiami

VancouverVancouver

Los AngelesLos Angeles

Ft WorthFt Worth DallasDallas

San DiegoSan Diego

““New” Systems (Since 1985)New” Systems (Since 1985)““New” Systems (Since 1985)New” Systems (Since 1985)

SyracuseSyracuse

NashvilleNashvilleAlbuquerqueAlbuquerque

SacramentoSacramento

San JoseSan JoseSan FranciscoSan Francisco

ChicagoChicago NewarkNewarkPhiladelphiaPhiladelphia

BostonBoston

New York CityNew York City

BaltimoreBaltimoreWashington DCWashington DC

TorontoToronto

North American Commuter Rail SystemsNorth American Commuter Rail Systems

Page 3: Commuter Rail Overview. 2 Heritage Systems (Pre-1985) Seattle Montréal Miami Vancouver Los Angeles Ft Worth Dallas San Diego New Systems (Since 1985)

33

• A Form of Rapid TransitA Form of Rapid Transit– Moves people at speeds greater than Moves people at speeds greater than

automobile traffic in a corridorautomobile traffic in a corridor• Typically 35 to 45 mph “commercial” speeds Typically 35 to 45 mph “commercial” speeds

• Focus on Longer-Distance, Regional Travel MarketsFocus on Longer-Distance, Regional Travel Markets• 20- to 50-mile line lengths20- to 50-mile line lengths• Stops typically spaced every one to four milesStops typically spaced every one to four miles• Heavy reliance on park-ride accessHeavy reliance on park-ride access

• Joint Use of Existing Railroad InfrastructureJoint Use of Existing Railroad Infrastructure– Emphasis on fewer, longer trainsEmphasis on fewer, longer trains– FRA vs. FTA regulatory environmentFRA vs. FTA regulatory environment

What is Commuter Rail?What is Commuter Rail?

Page 4: Commuter Rail Overview. 2 Heritage Systems (Pre-1985) Seattle Montréal Miami Vancouver Los Angeles Ft Worth Dallas San Diego New Systems (Since 1985)

44

502 502

Transit Productive CapacityTransit Productive CapacityFrom: Vukan R. VuchicFrom: Vukan R. Vuchic

Urban Public Transportation: Systems & TechnologyUrban Public Transportation: Systems & Technology

What is Commuter Rail?What is Commuter Rail?

Page 5: Commuter Rail Overview. 2 Heritage Systems (Pre-1985) Seattle Montréal Miami Vancouver Los Angeles Ft Worth Dallas San Diego New Systems (Since 1985)

55

Station Spacing: 20 to 30 miles System Extent: 50 to 300 miles+Station Spacing: 20 to 30 miles System Extent: 50 to 300 miles+Maximum Speed: 110 mph Average Speed (with stops): 55 mphMaximum Speed: 110 mph Average Speed (with stops): 55 mph

Light RailLight Rail

Station Spacing: ½ to 1 mile System Extent: 15 to 20 milesStation Spacing: ½ to 1 mile System Extent: 15 to 20 milesMaximum Speed: 65 mph Average Speed (with stops): 25 mphMaximum Speed: 65 mph Average Speed (with stops): 25 mph

903

502

Commuter RailCommuter Rail

Station Spacing: 2 to 4 miles System Extent: 20 to 75 milesStation Spacing: 2 to 4 miles System Extent: 20 to 75 milesMaximum Speed: 79 mph Average Speed (with stops): 45 mphMaximum Speed: 79 mph Average Speed (with stops): 45 mph

Intercity RailIntercity Rail

What is Commuter Rail?What is Commuter Rail?

Page 6: Commuter Rail Overview. 2 Heritage Systems (Pre-1985) Seattle Montréal Miami Vancouver Los Angeles Ft Worth Dallas San Diego New Systems (Since 1985)

66

• Most cost-effective transit mode in areas of Most cost-effective transit mode in areas of lower residential densitieslower residential densities

Focus on Regional Travel MarketsFocus on Regional Travel Markets

SourceSource:: Delaware Transit CorporationDelaware Transit CorporationFive-Year Business Management PlanFive-Year Business Management Plan(2001)(2001)

Page 7: Commuter Rail Overview. 2 Heritage Systems (Pre-1985) Seattle Montréal Miami Vancouver Los Angeles Ft Worth Dallas San Diego New Systems (Since 1985)

77

• Heavy reliance on park-ride accessHeavy reliance on park-ride access

Focus on Regional Travel MarketsFocus on Regional Travel Markets

Page 8: Commuter Rail Overview. 2 Heritage Systems (Pre-1985) Seattle Montréal Miami Vancouver Los Angeles Ft Worth Dallas San Diego New Systems (Since 1985)

88

• Moderate influence on transit supportive land usesModerate influence on transit supportive land uses

RapidRapidRailRail

LightLightRailRail

CommuterCommuterRailRail

BusBus DemandDemandManagementManagement

HIGHHIGHStrongStrong

need forneed forsupportivesupportive

policiespolicies HIGHHIGHZone of Zone of

influence influence narrower narrower

than than rapid railrapid rail

MODERATEMODERATEInfluence Influence

proportionalproportionalto serviceto service

LOWLOWSupportiveSupportive

but not but not induciveinducive

LOWLOWSupportiveSupportive

but notbut not inducive inducive

INFLUENCE

HI

LO

Focus on Regional Travel MarketsFocus on Regional Travel Markets

Page 9: Commuter Rail Overview. 2 Heritage Systems (Pre-1985) Seattle Montréal Miami Vancouver Los Angeles Ft Worth Dallas San Diego New Systems (Since 1985)

99

Joint Use of Railroad InfrastructureJoint Use of Railroad Infrastructure

Sharing railroad Sharing railroad facilities can:facilities can:• Reduce start-up Reduce start-up and on-going and on-going O&M costsO&M costs

• Restrict service Restrict service frequencies and frequencies and growthgrowth–Often results Often results in fewer, in fewer, longer trainslonger trains

Page 10: Commuter Rail Overview. 2 Heritage Systems (Pre-1985) Seattle Montréal Miami Vancouver Los Angeles Ft Worth Dallas San Diego New Systems (Since 1985)

1010

Joint Use of Railroad InfrastructureJoint Use of Railroad Infrastructure

Shared facilities with railroads results in FRA regulation:Shared facilities with railroads results in FRA regulation:• Prescriptive safety, operating & rolling stock requirementsPrescriptive safety, operating & rolling stock requirements

–Results in larger, heavier rolling stock than other modesResults in larger, heavier rolling stock than other modes–Leads to less frequent, longer train service strategyLeads to less frequent, longer train service strategy

Page 11: Commuter Rail Overview. 2 Heritage Systems (Pre-1985) Seattle Montréal Miami Vancouver Los Angeles Ft Worth Dallas San Diego New Systems (Since 1985)

1111

Multiple Rolling Choices Multiple Rolling Choices • Locomotive-Hauled or Locomotive-Hauled or

Self-Propelled (“MU”) Self-Propelled (“MU”) CoachesCoaches

• Electric or “Diesel”Electric or “Diesel”– ““Diesel” actuallyDiesel” actually

“Diesel-Electric”“Diesel-Electric”• FRA Compliant FRA Compliant

or Notor Not

Commuter Rail Rolling StockCommuter Rail Rolling Stock

Page 12: Commuter Rail Overview. 2 Heritage Systems (Pre-1985) Seattle Montréal Miami Vancouver Los Angeles Ft Worth Dallas San Diego New Systems (Since 1985)

1212

Locomotive with Superliner CoachesLocomotive with Superliner Coaches(Intercity Amtrak Train)(Intercity Amtrak Train)Locomotive with Superliner CoachesLocomotive with Superliner Coaches(Intercity Amtrak Train)(Intercity Amtrak Train)

Commuter Rail Rolling StockCommuter Rail Rolling Stock

Page 13: Commuter Rail Overview. 2 Heritage Systems (Pre-1985) Seattle Montréal Miami Vancouver Los Angeles Ft Worth Dallas San Diego New Systems (Since 1985)

1313

Locomotive withLocomotive withSingle Level Push-PullSingle Level Push-PullCoachesCoaches

Locomotive withLocomotive withSingle Level Push-PullSingle Level Push-PullCoachesCoaches

Commuter Rail Rolling StockCommuter Rail Rolling Stock

Page 14: Commuter Rail Overview. 2 Heritage Systems (Pre-1985) Seattle Montréal Miami Vancouver Los Angeles Ft Worth Dallas San Diego New Systems (Since 1985)

1414

Locomotive withLocomotive with“Bi-Level” Push-Pull Coaches“Bi-Level” Push-Pull CoachesLocomotive withLocomotive with“Bi-Level” Push-Pull Coaches“Bi-Level” Push-Pull Coaches

Commuter Rail Rolling StockCommuter Rail Rolling Stock

Page 15: Commuter Rail Overview. 2 Heritage Systems (Pre-1985) Seattle Montréal Miami Vancouver Los Angeles Ft Worth Dallas San Diego New Systems (Since 1985)

1515

Locomotive withLocomotive with““Tri-Level” Push-Pull CoachesTri-Level” Push-Pull Coaches

Locomotive withLocomotive with““Tri-Level” Push-Pull CoachesTri-Level” Push-Pull Coaches

Commuter Rail Rolling StockCommuter Rail Rolling Stock

Page 16: Commuter Rail Overview. 2 Heritage Systems (Pre-1985) Seattle Montréal Miami Vancouver Los Angeles Ft Worth Dallas San Diego New Systems (Since 1985)

1616

Diesel-Electric or Diesel-Electric or Electric LocomotivesElectric LocomotivesDiesel-Electric or Diesel-Electric or Electric LocomotivesElectric Locomotives

Commuter Rail Rolling StockCommuter Rail Rolling Stock

Page 17: Commuter Rail Overview. 2 Heritage Systems (Pre-1985) Seattle Montréal Miami Vancouver Los Angeles Ft Worth Dallas San Diego New Systems (Since 1985)

1717

Self-Propelled Electric CoachesSelf-Propelled Electric Coaches(“EMU”)(“EMU”)

Self-Propelled Electric CoachesSelf-Propelled Electric Coaches(“EMU”)(“EMU”)

Commuter Rail Rolling StockCommuter Rail Rolling Stock

Page 18: Commuter Rail Overview. 2 Heritage Systems (Pre-1985) Seattle Montréal Miami Vancouver Los Angeles Ft Worth Dallas San Diego New Systems (Since 1985)

1818

Self-Propelled Diesel CoachesSelf-Propelled Diesel Coaches(“DMU”)(“DMU”)

Self-Propelled Diesel CoachesSelf-Propelled Diesel Coaches(“DMU”)(“DMU”)

Commuter Rail Rolling StockCommuter Rail Rolling Stock

Page 19: Commuter Rail Overview. 2 Heritage Systems (Pre-1985) Seattle Montréal Miami Vancouver Los Angeles Ft Worth Dallas San Diego New Systems (Since 1985)

1919

Self-Propelled Diesel Coaches (“DMU”)Self-Propelled Diesel Coaches (“DMU”)• Single-LevelSingle-Level• Bi-LevelBi-Level

Self-Propelled Diesel Coaches (“DMU”)Self-Propelled Diesel Coaches (“DMU”)• Single-LevelSingle-Level• Bi-LevelBi-Level

Commuter Rail Rolling StockCommuter Rail Rolling Stock

Page 20: Commuter Rail Overview. 2 Heritage Systems (Pre-1985) Seattle Montréal Miami Vancouver Los Angeles Ft Worth Dallas San Diego New Systems (Since 1985)

2020

Commuter Rail Rolling StockCommuter Rail Rolling Stock

Non-Compliant DMUsNon-Compliant DMUs• Allowable, but…Allowable, but…• Involved FRA ProcessInvolved FRA Process• Constrained ServiceConstrained Service

Option for Light Branch LinesOption for Light Branch Lines• South Jersey, OttawaSouth Jersey, Ottawa

Austin, San DiegoAustin, San Diego

Page 21: Commuter Rail Overview. 2 Heritage Systems (Pre-1985) Seattle Montréal Miami Vancouver Los Angeles Ft Worth Dallas San Diego New Systems (Since 1985)

2121

It depends…It depends…

What’s the What’s the best choice?best choice?

Commuter RailCommuter Rail

Page 22: Commuter Rail Overview. 2 Heritage Systems (Pre-1985) Seattle Montréal Miami Vancouver Los Angeles Ft Worth Dallas San Diego New Systems (Since 1985)

Commuter Rail OverviewCommuter Rail Overview