comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

31
Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence Natalia S. Gavrilova Leonid A. Gavrilov Center on Aging, NORC/University of Chicago, 1155 East 60th Street, Chicago, IL 60637

Upload: astro

Post on 19-Mar-2016

31 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence. Natalia S. Gavrilova Leonid A. Gavrilov Center on Aging, NORC/University of Chicago, 1155 East 60th Street, Chicago, IL 60637. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

Comparative analysis of parameters of human

senescence

Natalia S. GavrilovaLeonid A. Gavrilov

Center on Aging, NORC/University of Chicago, 1155 East 60th Street, Chicago, IL 60637

Page 2: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

The idea of this study has been suggested by Fedor Severin in order to test whether aging is programmed or not.

Page 3: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

The idea of this study is to compare variability for traits, which are known to be determined by the developmental program (such as ages at sexual maturity) with variability of traits related to aging (such as ages at menopause and death).

Page 4: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

One of the arguments used by the opponents of programmed aging is a too high variation in individual lifespans compared to the observed variation of programmed events (such as the age of sexual maturation). The main goal of this study was to

test the validity of this argument.

Page 5: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

Measures of variability Absolute measure – standard

deviation For distribution of lifespan,

demographers often calculate standard deviation at age 10 – SD10 (Edwards & Tuljapurkar 2005).

Relative measure – coefficient of variation. Equals the standard deviation divided by the mean

Page 6: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

Historical Changes in Mortality Swedish Females

Age0 20 40 60 80 100

Log

(Haz

ard

Rat

e)

0.0001

0.001

0.01

0.1

1

1925196019801999

Data source: Human Mortality Database

Page 7: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

Age at onset of menarche is an example of characteristic determined by developmental program

Page 8: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

Age at onset of menarche was declining in the XX century. Norway data.Source: "Age of Menarche in Norway [Chart]," in Children and Youth in History, Item #207, http://chnm.gmu.edu/cyh/primary-sources/207 (accessed February 13, 2010). Annotated by Stephen Robertson

Page 9: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

Similar results are obtained for Korean girls

Source: Age at menarche in a Korean population: secular trends and influencing factors. Geum Joon Cho et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS 169 1 89-94 JAN 2010

Page 10: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

Declining of the menarche age decelerated in developed countries now. Helm P, Grolund L (1998) A halt in

the secular trend towards earlier menarche in Denmark. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 77:198–200

Similar results obtained for Finland and Iceland

Mean age 13.00 years, SD 1.15 years for Danish girls in 1996

Page 11: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

What studies tell us about the variation of menarche age?

Page 12: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

Mean age at menarche, its standard deviation and coefficient of variation for European women (The EPIC Study)

Country Birth years Mean age at menarche (SD)

Coefficient of variation (CV)

France 1921-1956 12.84 (1.40) 10.9%Italy 1920-1962 12.54 (1.46) 11.6%Spain 1925-1961 12.91 (1.56) 12.1%United Kingdom 1918-1963 12.89 (1.54) 12.0%Greece 1920-1964 13.19 (1.52) 11.5%

Source: Onland-Moret et al., American Journal of Epidemiology 2005 162(7):623-632

Page 13: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

Mean age at menarche, its standard deviation and coefficient of variation for European women (continue)Country Birth years Mean age at

menarche (SD)

Coefficient of variation (CV)

The Netherlands 1924-1962 13.28 (1.56) 11.8%Germany 1926-1963 13.16 (1.48) 11.2%Sweden 1923-1950 13.59 (1.41) 10.4%Denmark 1929-1947 13.56 (1.53) 11.3%Greece 1920-1964 13.19 (1.52) 11.5%

Source: Onland-Moret et al., American Journal of Epidemiology 2005 162(7):623-632

Page 14: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

Age at menarche in other countries Iran: Mean age (SD) in the urban

areas was 12.4 (1.1) years and in rural areas it was 12.6 (1.1) years (Delavar and Hajian-Tilaki, 2008)

Korea: Mean age at menarche of girls born between 1986 and 1995 was 13.10 (1.49) (Cho et al. , 2010)

Page 15: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

What about boys? Third National Health and Nutrition

Examination Survey (NHANES III) Sexual maturity stages based on the

recommendations of Tanner were assigned to each maturity indicator

Pubic hair development using stages from 1 (immaturity) to 5 (complete maturity)

Genitalia development using stages from 1 (immaturity) to 5 (complete maturity)

Page 16: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

Mean age (SD) of some characteristics of sexual maturation for U.S. boys (NHANES study)Characteristic Non-Hispanic

whitesNon-Hispanic blacks

Mexican Americans

Pubic hair development, stage 5

16.84 (1.50) 16.67 (1.23) 17.14 (1.45)

Genitalia development, stage 5

16.64 (1.64) 16.42 (1.43) 16.85 (1.92)

Source: Sun et al., PEDIATRICS, 2002, 110: 911-919

Page 17: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

Age at natural menopause as a marker of reproductive aging

Page 18: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

Mean age (SD) at natural menopause

Population Mean age (SD) at

menopause, years

Source

South Korean women 46.9 (4.9) Hong et al., MATURITAS, 2007

Viennese women aged 47 to 68

49.2 (3.6) Kirchengast et al., International Journal of Anthropology , 1999

Mexico: Puebla Mexico city

46.7 (4.77)46.5 (5.00)

Sievert, Hautaniemi, Human Biology, 2003

Black women in South Africa: rural urban

49.5 (4.7)48.9 (4.2)

Walker et al., International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2005

Page 19: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

Our results using the MIDUS study

Page 20: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

National survey conducted in 1994/95 Americans aged 25-74

core national sample (N=3,485) city oversamples (N=957)

Additional samples: twins, siblings Subsample used in this study: women having

natural menopause (no surgeries affecting the age at menopause) aged 60-74

Page 21: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

A 30-40 minute telephone survey A 114 page mail surveyNumber of respondents: 4,242 Number of respondents: 3,690

Page 22: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

Women Aged 25-74 (n=2,087)AGE 25-54 68.8 55-64 19.8 65-74 11.4RACE/ETHNICITY White 86.9 African-American 7.7 Other 8.9RELATIONSHIP STATUS Married 54.2 Other intimate relationship 4.7

MIDUS SAMPLE POPULATION DISTRIBUTIONS (%)

Page 23: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

DISTRIBUTION OF AGE AT MENARCHE IN THE MIDUS SAMPLE

0.1

.2.3

Den

sity

8 10 12 14 16 18age of menarche

Page 24: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

DISTRIBUTION OF AGE AT MENOPAUSE IN THE MIDUS SAMPLE

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8D

ensi

ty

20 30 40 50 60 70age of menopause

Page 25: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

DISTRIBUTION OF AGE AT DEATH, SWEDISH FEMALES, 1995

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4D

ensi

ty

0 50 100age

Data source: Human Mortality Database

Page 26: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

Variation for characteristics of human aging and development

Characteristic

Mean age (SD) years

Coefficient of

variation

Source

Age at onset of menarche

12.9 (1.6) 12.4% MIDUS data

Age at onset of menopause

49.7 (5.2) 10.5% MIDUS data

Age at death 78.7 (16.1)

20.5% USA, women, 1995. Human mortality database

Page 27: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

Variation of age at onset of menarche and age at death (in 2005)Country Mean age

(SD) for onset of

menarche

CV%

Mean age (SD) at death

CV%

France 12.84 (1.40) 10.9 83.3 (13.8)

16.6

Italy 12.54 (1.46) 11.6 83.3 (13.1)

15.7

Sweden 13.59 (1.41) 10.4 82.3 (12.9)

15.7

UK 12.89 (1.54) 12.0 80.2 (14.0)

17.5

USA 12.9 (1.60) 12.4 78.7 (16.1)

20.5

Page 28: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

Variation of age at onset of menarche and age at death (in 2005) after 10 years

Country Mean age (SD) for onset of

menarche

CV%

Mean age

(SD10) at death

after 10

CV10%

France 12.84 (1.40) 10.9 83.7 (12.7)

15.2

Italy 12.54 (1.46) 11.6 83.7 (11.9)

14.2

Sweden 13.59 (1.41) 10.4 82.5 (12.0)

14.5

UK 12.89 (1.54) 12.0 81.2 (12.6)

15.5

USA 12.9 (1.60) 12.4 79.4 (14.3)

18.0

Page 29: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

Mean Values and Standard Deviations for Human Developmental Characteristics

Page 30: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

Conclusions Standard deviations for age at onset

of menarche are about 10 times lower than standard deviations for ages at death

Coefficients of variation for ages at onset of menarche and ages at death for contemporary populations are of the same order of magnitude

Page 31: Comparative analysis of parameters of human senescence

For More Information and Updates Visit Our Website: http://longevity-science.org

You are Welcome to Post Your Comments at our Blog:

http://longevity-science.blogspot.com/