comparing volatility of three forms of 2,4-d when applied in the field
DESCRIPTION
Comparing Volatility of Three Forms of 2,4-D when Applied in the Field. Culpepper, Richburg, Sosnoskie, Braxton. Future Technology Herbicide Cost of $39/A. Technology of Today Herbicide Cost of $59/A. Sensitivity of Non 2,4-D Resistant Cotton to 2,4-D. 2,4-D resistant. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Comparing Volatility of Three Forms of 2,4-D when Applied in the Field
Culpepper, Richburg, Sosnoskie, Braxton
Future Technology
Herbicide Cost of $39/A
Technology of Today
Herbicide Cost of $59/A
Sensitivity of Non 2,4-D Resistant Cotton to 2,4-D
2,4-D resistant
Sensitivity of Vegetables to 2,4-D
2011 GA Vegetable Facts
• Approximately 200,000 acres
• 40 different vegetables grown
• 3rd largest vegetable producing state for A
• Farm Gate Value: $1,200,000,000
Many of these crops are grown in the same areas often by the same growers.
Off Target Movement Concern
• Physical drift
• Volatility
Off Target Movement Concern
• Physical drift = related to someone most likely not following label recommendations
• Volatility = one can do everything perfect and there can still be a serious issue
Objective
Volatility needs to be eliminated or at least know exactly how far it could move
2,4-D Choline
2,4-D Amine
2,4-D Ester
2,4-D Ester
2,4-D Amine
2,4-D Choline
N 2010Sunbelt Ag Expo
N 2011
2,4-D Ester
2,4-D Amine
2,4-D Choline
Sunbelt Ag Expo
S
SESW
EW
N
NENW
Potted cotton plants placed in all directions @ 5, 10, 20, 40, 80 and 160 ft
Treated area = 90 foot by 90 foot
Potted plants each year = 1728Four plants per location for 48 hrs, 1st 24 h, 2nd 24 h.
S
SESW
EW
N
NENW
N 2011Sunbelt Ag Expo
MethodsMix location: off site
Rate: 2 lb ae/A glyphosate + 2 lb ae/A 2,4-D
Application: FF 11002 DG, 25 PSI, 15 GPA
Time of day: before 10 am
Soil: 88% sand, 12% silt; pre-irrigated
Controls for Methods
Truck ride (2010, 2011): no damage
Herbicide application (2011): no damage
Plant contact (2011): no damage
65
75
85
95
800
930
1100
1230
1400
1530
1700
1830
2000
2130
2300 30 200
330
500
630
9/9/2010 9/10/2010 9/11/2010
2010 Temperature (F)
Max soil temp range 99-103 F; mix of clouds and sun; max sustained wind 8 mph.
Application Sept 9.
8 am 7 am
2011 Temperature (F)
65
75
85
95
Aug. 30 Aug. 31 Sept. 1
Application Aug 30.
Max soil temp ranged 106-113 F; completely sunny; max sustained wind 11 mph.
8 am 7 am
Visual Cotton Injury
Heights
Nodes
Cotton Injury (%) as Influenced by Distance. In-field 48 hours. 2010.
0
20
40
60
80
5345
38
205
0
5 10 40 16020 80
Data pooled over direction.
Distance
= Ester = Amine = Choline
Form x distance (P ≤ 0.05)Ester > Amine, Choline, for all distances
Ester: 5 > 10 > 20 > 40 > 80 > 160Amine: 5 > 10 > 20–160
Amine 5–10 > Choline 5-10
Cotton Injury (%) as Influenced by Distance. In-field 48 hours. 2011.
0
20
40
60
80
7369
58
38
204
5 10 40 16020 80
= Ester
Data pooled over direction.
= Amine
Distance
= Choline
Form x distance (P ≤ 0.05)Ester > Amine, Choline, for all distances
Ester: 5 > 10 > 20 > 40 > 80 > 160Amine: 5 > 10 > 20–160
Amine 5–10 > Choline 5-10
Choline
Ester
Cotton Injury (%) from Ester as Influenced by Distance & Time. 2010.
0
20
40
60
80
5 10 4020 80
= 0-48 h
Data pooled over direction.
= 0-24 h = 24-48 h
Distance (ft)
Time x distance (P ≤ 0.05)0-48 h ≥ 0-24 h ≥ 24-48 h, for all distances
Cotton Injury (%) as Influenced by Duration In-Field. 2011.
0
20
40
60
80
5 10 4020 80
= 0-48 h
Data pooled over direction.
= 0-24 h = 24-48 h
Distance (ft)
Time x distance (P ≤ 0.05)0-48 h ≥ 0-24 h ≥ 24-48 h, for all distances
Cotton Injury (%) by Ester as Influenced by Direction. In-field 48 hours.
0
20
40
60
80
N NE SE NWE
Data pooled over distance
S SW W
Direction
= 2010 = 2011
S
SESW
EW
N
NENW
Application to 2 pm (0 to 5.5 mph)
2 to 5 pm (4-11 mph)
5 to 9 pm (11 to 0 mph)
2011 Wind Direction. Day of Application
Volatility Injury to Cotton: Tunnel Data
20 plants assigned a location number
Cotton Injury (%) as Influenced by Tunnel. 2010.
0
20
40
60
80
Ester Amine Choline
= 0-48 h = 0-24 h = 24-48 h
Data pooled over 20 plants for each herbicide and time interval.
0-48 h: Ester > Amine > Choline0-24 h: Ester > Amine > Choline
24-48 h: Ester > Amine = Choline
Cotton Injury (%) as Influenced by Tunnel. 2011.
0
20
40
60
80
Ester Amine Choline
= 0-48 h
Data pooled over 20 plants for each herbicide and time interval.
= 0-24 h = 24-48 h
0-48 h: Ester > Amine > Choline0-24 h: Ester > Amine = Choline
24-48 h: Ester > Amine = Choline
Conclusions
1. Ester formulation should not be applied in Georgia during similar conditions.
2. Choline formulation offers the lowest potential for off-target movement from volatility.
Comments?