comparison between total physical response (tpr) …

18
COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR) METHOD AND DIRECT METHOD TO IMPROVE STUDENT VOCABULARY THESIS By: INTAR YUAN ANINDITA 201510100311182 ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG 2020

Upload: others

Post on 11-Apr-2022

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR) …

COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR)

METHOD AND DIRECT METHOD TO IMPROVE STUDENT

VOCABULARY

THESIS

By:

INTAR YUAN ANINDITA

201510100311182

ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION

UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG

2020

Page 2: COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR) …

COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR)

METHOD AND DIRECT METHOD TO IMPROVE STUDENT

VOCABULARY

THESIS

This thesis is submitted to meet one of the requirements to achieve

Sarjana Degree in English Language Education

By:

INTAR YUAN ANINDITA

201510100311182

ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION

UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG

2020

Page 3: COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR) …

iii

This thesis was written by Intar Yuan Anindita and was approved on July 28,

2020

By:

Advisor II,

Khoiriyah, S.Pd., M.A.

Advisor I,

Triastama Wiraatmaja, S.S., M.Si.

Page 4: COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR) …

iv

Page 5: COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR) …

v

MOTTO AND DEDICATIONS

MOTTO

“Don’t hope for those who still wish for it.

Don’t ask those who are already wondering.”

-Author-

DEDICATIONS

I dedicate this thesis to:

1. my beloved parents

2. my amazing siblings

3. my unpredictable friends

Page 6: COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR) …

vi

AUTHOR’S DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY

I hereby declare that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of

my own work and has not been submitted to any other University or Institution.

I certify that, to the best of knowledge, my thesis does not infringe upon

anyone’s copyright nor violate any proprietary rights and that any ideas,

techniques, quotations or any other material from work of other people included in

my thesis, published or otherwise, are fully acknowledged in accordance with the

standard referencing practices.

I also declare that this is a true copy of my thesis, as approved by my

thesis committee and the English Language Education Department office.

Page 7: COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR) …

viii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Alhamdulillaah, all praise to Allah SWT, the most gracious and merciful who

provides strengthness and peace. This thesis would not finish without His

permission. Blessing and greetings are for Prophet Muhammad SAW who has

guided us into the brightness pathway.

The researcher would like to say the deepest gratitude to everyone who helped

directly or indirectly in finishing the thesis.

1. Ayah and Ibu; two angels that I can see them. Words are too poor to

express your beautiful kindness. I am glad to have you both in this world.

Thank you for your mentality supports.

2. Triastama Wiraatmaja, S.S., M.Si. as the first advisor who has spent a lot

of time -giving guidance and valuable suggestion patiently. The researcher

would like to say his sincere thanks for all advice he gave.

3. Khoiriyah, S.Pd., M.A. as the second advisor who kindly helped in

looking for solutions when I got confused in doing this research. The

researcher would never forget her kindness.

4. All ELED lecturers and staff especially for Mr. Sudiran, Mr. Puji

Sumarsono, Mrs. Santi Prasetyowati, and Mr. Prihadi who has given your

beautiful time to guiding us handling administration especially in the

COVID-19 era. May Allah SWT keep your family safe and comfortable.

5. My sister & brother-in-law, my brother & sister-in-law, thanks for your

support.

Page 8: COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR) …

ix

6. UKM Tapak Suci, ESA PROGRESIO, Office of Mechanical Engineering

Departent, and Laboratory of AutoCAD, thank you to let the researcher

gets an amazing experience there.

7. ELED 2015, especially for H class, thank you for accompanied the

researcher.

8. All my friends, especially kaka nopa, nudsaba, cioo, resti, mutek, azka,

and holil as co-advisor.

Finally, the researcher hopes that this thesis will be useful for the readers as

the reference for the next researcher to cinduct study related to learning English

for young learners.

Malang, July 28, 2020

Intar Yuan Anindita

Page 9: COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR) …

x

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Approval .................................................................................................... iii

Mottos and Dedications ............................................................................. iv

Letter of Authority ..................................................................................... v

Abstract ...................................................................................................... vii

Acknowledgments ...................................................................................... viii

Table of Contents ....................................................................................... x

List of Tables .............................................................................................. xii

List of Appendices ..................................................................................... xiii

CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Study ......................................................... 1

1.2 Research Questions ................................................................. 3

1.3 The Purpose of the Study ........................................................ 3

1.4 The Significance of the Study ................................................. 3

1.5 The Scope and Limitation of the Study ................................... 4

1.6 Definition of Key Terms ......................................................... 4

CHAPTER II: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1 Teaching English as A Foreign Literature .............................. 6

2.2 Teaching English for Young Learners .................................... 7

2.3 Total Physical Response (TPR) Method ................................. 8

2.3.1 Procedure of Using Total Physical Response

(TPR) Method ........................................................... 8

2.3.2 Advantages of Total Physical Response

(TPR) Method ........................................................... 11

2.3.3 Disadvantages of Total Physical Response

(TPR) Method ........................................................... 12

2.4 Direct Method ......................................................................... 13

2.4.1 Procedure of Using Direct Method ........................... 13

2.4.2 Advantages of Direct Method ................................... 14

2.4.3 Disadvantages of Direct Method ............................... 14

Page 10: COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR) …

xi

2.5 Vocabulary .............................................................................. 16

2.5.1 Types of Vocabulary ................................................. 16

2.5.2 Teaching Vocabulary ................................................ 17

2.5.3 Measuring Vocabulary .............................................. 18

CHAPTER III: RESEARCH METHOD

3.1 Research Design ...................................................................... 20

3.2 Population and Sample ............................................................ 21

3.2.1 Population ................................................................. 21

3.2.2 Sample ....................................................................... 21

3.3 Research Instrument ................................................................ 22

3.3.1 Observation Take a Notes ......................................... 22

3.3.2 Test ............................................................................ 23

3.4 Data Collection ........................................................................ 26

3.5 Data Analysis .......................................................................... 27

CHAPTER IV: FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

4.1 Findings ................................................................................... 30

4.1.1 The Result of Pre-test ................................................ 30

4.1.2 Treatment .................................................................. 31

4.1.3 The Post-test Result of Total Physical Response

(TPR) Method and Direct Method ............................ 32

4.1.4 The Analysis of Hypothesis by Using Mann

Whitney Test ............................................................. 33

4.2 Discussion ............................................................................... 35

CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS

5.1 Conclusion ............................................................................... 39

5.2 Suggestions .............................................................................. 39

REFERENCES

APPENDICES

Page 11: COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR) …

xii

LIST OF TABLES

Table 4.1 The Result of Pre-test ............................................................... 31

Table 4.2 The Result of Post-test Total Physical Response

(TPR) Method and Direct Method .......................................... 33

Table 4.3 The Result of Mann Whitney Test ........................................... 34

Page 12: COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR) …

xiii

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix I The worksheet for the pre-test

Appendix II The score of pre-test

Appendix III The result of the pre-test analyzed by SPSS 17

Appendix IV The worksheet of TPR Method Post-test

Appendix V The worksheet of Direct Method Post-test

Appendix VI Vocabulary that was taught

Appendix VII The score of post-test between TPR and Direct Method

Appendix VIII The result of the Post-test analyzed by SPSS 17

Appendix IX Documentation

Page 13: COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR) …

42

REFERENCES

Alqahtani, M. (2015). The Importance of Vocabulary in Language Learning and

How to be Taught. International Journal of Teaching and Education. Vol.

III: 21-34. Retrieved from:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299356634_The_importance_of_vo

cabulary_in_language_learning_and_how_to_be_taught#:~:text=According%

20to%20Alqahtani%20(2015)%20%2C,impedes%20successful%20communi

cation%20and%20writing.

Ary, Donald., Cheser Jacobs, Lucy., Sorensen, Chris., & Razavieh, Asghar.

(2010). Introduction to Research in Education. USA: Cengage Learning.

Barnhart, Cynthia A. (2008). The Facts on File Student’s Dictionary of American

English. Facts on File, Inc.

https://www.englishindo.com/2011/12/vocabulary-is-definition-of-

vocabulary.html accessed on 8th of July 2019

Baker, L. (2006). Observation: A Complex Research Method. Library Trends,

55(1), 171-189. Doi: 10.1353/lib.2006.0045

Broadhurst, K., Holt, K., & Diherty, P. (2012). Accomplishing Parental

Engagement in Child Protection Practice?: A Qualitative analysis of parent-

professional interaction in pre-proceedings work under the Public Law

Outline. Qualitative Social Work, 11(5), 517-534. Accessed November 13,

2019, from https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325011401471

Page 14: COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR) …

43

Broughton, Geoffrey., Brumfit, Christopher., Flavell, Roger., Hill, Peter., and

Pincas, Anita., (2003). Teaching English as a Foreign Language, London:

Routledge Education Books, ISBN 0-203-41254-0

Brown, H. Douglas. (2003). Language Assessment Principles and Classroom

Practices. San Frasisco. California. Longman.

Brown, H. Douglas. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (Fifth

Edition). New York: Longman

Brown, H. Douglas. (2014). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching A

Course in Second Language Acquisition (Sixth Edition). New York: Pearson

Education

Cameron, Lynne. (2001). Teaching Languages to Young Learners. United

Kingdom: Cambridge University Press

Colorin Colorado. (n.d.). Using Informal Assessment for English Language

Learners. Retrieved June 26, 2020 from

https://www.colorincolorado.org/article/using-informal-assessent-english-

language-learners

Creswell, John W. (2014). Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed

Methods Approaches (Fourth Edition). United State of America: Sage

Publication.

David. (2017). What is The Different Between Population and Sample?. Accessed

November 20, 2019, from https://www.statisticssolutions.com/what-is-the-

difference-between-population-and-sample/

Page 15: COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR) …

44

Fadillah, Misra. (2011). The Effectiveness Of Teaching Vocabulary Through Total

Physical Response Method. Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis. UIN,

Jakarta. Retrieved from: http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id on June 2020

Freeman, Diane Larsen., & Anderson, Marti. (2000). Techniques & Principles in

Language Teaching (2nd ed.). United Kingdom: Oxford University Press

Graves, M. (2006). The Vocabulary Book: Learning & Instruction. Newark, DE:

International Reading Association

Harmer, Jeremy. (2001). The Practice Of English Language Teaching. London:

Longman.

Harmer, Jeremy. (2001). Grammar Activities. Harlow: England Pearson

Education.

Harmer, Jeremy. (2010). How to Teach English (New Edition). United Kingdom:

Ocelot Publishing, Oxford

Hidayati, Nur. (2019). A Study On Johnson’s Teaching Method In Smith’s Movie

Dangerous Minds. Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis. UMM, Malang.

Hiebert, Elfrida H., & Kamil, Michael L. (2005). Teaching and Learning

Vocabulary: Bringing Research to Practice. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence

Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers

Hwang, W. Y., Shih, T. K., Yeh, S. C., Chou, K. C., Ma, Z. H., & Sommool, W.

(2014) Recognition based physical response to facilitate EFL learning.

Educational Technology and Society, 17(4), 432-445.

Ishtiaq, Muhammad. ( 2019). Book Review Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research

Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approches (4th ed.).

Page 16: COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR) …

45

Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Canadian Center of Science and Education,

Vol.12, No.5. http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n5p40

Kabir, Syed Muhammad Sajjad. (2016). Methods of Data Collection

Lehr, F., Osborn, J.,& Hiebert, E. (2004). Focus on Vocabulary. Honolulu, HI:

Pacific Resources for Education and Learning

Meara, P.,& Fitzpatrick, T. (2000). Lex30: An Improved Method Of Assessing

Productive Vocabulary In An L2. System, 28, 19-

30.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.76.4.482

Nursakinah, Uswatun. (2017). Improving Student’s Vocabulary Mastery Through

Total Physical Response Method At 5th Grade Of SDI Daarul Fikri Dau

Malang. Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis. UMM, Malang.

Penny Ur. (1991). A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory.

Cabridge University Press.

Qureshi, Firoz. (2016). Population and Sample. Accessed November 19, 2019,

from https://www.slideshare.net/FIROZQURESHI/population-and-sample-

63359946

Richard, Jack C.,& Renandya, Willy A. (2002). Methodology in Language

Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, Jack C.,& Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman Dictionary Of Language

Teaching and Applied Linguistics. In Longman Dictionary. Retrieved from:

http://images.pcmac.org/Uploads/JeffersonCountySchools/JeffersonCountyS

chools/Departments/DocumentsSubCategories/Documents/English%20-

Page 18: COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR) …

47