competing visions of teaching: does “good practice” lead to good practice? adam lefstein...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: competing visions of teaching: does “good practice” lead to good practice? adam lefstein adaml@netvision.net.il august 20, 2004](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ddb5503460f94ad239b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: competing visions of teaching: does “good practice” lead to good practice? adam lefstein adaml@netvision.net.il august 20, 2004](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ddb5503460f94ad239b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
competing visions of teaching: does “good practice” lead to
good practice?
adam lefstein
august 20, 2004
![Page 3: competing visions of teaching: does “good practice” lead to good practice? adam lefstein adaml@netvision.net.il august 20, 2004](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ddb5503460f94ad239b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The only uniformity of practice that the Board of Education desire to see in the teaching of Public Elementary Schools is that each teacher shall think for himself, and work out for himself such methods of teaching as may use his powers to the best advantage and be best suited to the particular needs and conditions of the school.
-- Primary Education: Suggestions for the consideration of teachers (1918)
![Page 4: competing visions of teaching: does “good practice” lead to good practice? adam lefstein adaml@netvision.net.il august 20, 2004](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ddb5503460f94ad239b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Between 1997 and 2001, the government led from the centre and on key issues – literacy, numeracy or school failure for example – was unapologetically prescriptive… Until the mid-1980s what happened in schools and classrooms was left almost entirely to the teachers to decide. However, at the time no means were in place to ensure effective practice was identified, disseminated and universally adopted. -- Michael Barber, “The Next Stage for Large Scale Reform in England: From Good to Great” (2002)
![Page 5: competing visions of teaching: does “good practice” lead to good practice? adam lefstein adaml@netvision.net.il august 20, 2004](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ddb5503460f94ad239b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
why are visions important?
they bind together…
a way of thinking,
a way of looking at the world,
a way of speaking,
a way of imagining the world, and
a way of acting.
![Page 6: competing visions of teaching: does “good practice” lead to good practice? adam lefstein adaml@netvision.net.il august 20, 2004](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ddb5503460f94ad239b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
methodism – explaining recent trends in anglo-american education
• “good” or “best practice”
• evidence-based practice – “what works”
• centrally mandated, standardized testing
• accountability regimes
• highly prescriptive curricular materials
![Page 7: competing visions of teaching: does “good practice” lead to good practice? adam lefstein adaml@netvision.net.il august 20, 2004](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ddb5503460f94ad239b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
methodism – key figures
a. certainty
b. objectivity
c. method
d. calculability
e. efficiency
f. control
![Page 8: competing visions of teaching: does “good practice” lead to good practice? adam lefstein adaml@netvision.net.il august 20, 2004](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ddb5503460f94ad239b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
At the dawn of the 21st century, education is finally being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the 20th century. The scientific revolution that utterly transformed medicine, agriculture, transportation, technology, and other fields early in the 20th century almost completely bypassed the field of education…Applications of the findings of educational research remain haphazard, and that evidence is respected only occasionally, and only if it happens to correspond to current educational or political fashions. -- Robert Slavin, AERA Presidential address (2002)
![Page 9: competing visions of teaching: does “good practice” lead to good practice? adam lefstein adaml@netvision.net.il august 20, 2004](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ddb5503460f94ad239b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
methodism in action: the rationalisation of literacy teaching
Technical teaching methods
Reform policy:
standards and assessment
prescriptive curricula
monitoring and management
Student reading skills
Scientific research
Certain / reliable knowledge (“what
works”)
![Page 10: competing visions of teaching: does “good practice” lead to good practice? adam lefstein adaml@netvision.net.il august 20, 2004](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ddb5503460f94ad239b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: competing visions of teaching: does “good practice” lead to good practice? adam lefstein adaml@netvision.net.il august 20, 2004](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ddb5503460f94ad239b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
methodism in action: the rationalisation of literacy teaching
Technical teaching methods
Reform policy:
standards and assessment
prescriptive curricula
monitoring and management
Student reading skills
Scientific research
Certain / reliable knowledge (“what
works”)
![Page 12: competing visions of teaching: does “good practice” lead to good practice? adam lefstein adaml@netvision.net.il august 20, 2004](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ddb5503460f94ad239b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
criticisms of methodism
?• limitations of research in human sciences
• teaching not reducible to method:– centrality of context– complexity and “messiness” of practice– importance of tacit knowledge
• narrowing educational aims
• harmful side effects: – deprofessionalization: teacher as technician– objectification
![Page 13: competing visions of teaching: does “good practice” lead to good practice? adam lefstein adaml@netvision.net.il august 20, 2004](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ddb5503460f94ad239b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
[T]he most important rule in education [is that] a great teacher is more important than anything else… Think about what a great teacher can do with outdated teaching methods, that a mediocre teacher cannot do with the best brain-engineered methods fresh from the research laboratory. Teaching, after all, is an interaction between people, between teachers and learners. -- Peter Temes, Against school reform (and in praise of great teaching), 2002
subjectivism
![Page 14: competing visions of teaching: does “good practice” lead to good practice? adam lefstein adaml@netvision.net.il august 20, 2004](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ddb5503460f94ad239b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Reflection-on-action
Administrative constraints
Professional community
Academic knowledge
Teacher horizon
Classroom experience
Plans and anticipations
subjectivism: teaching as reflective practice
![Page 15: competing visions of teaching: does “good practice” lead to good practice? adam lefstein adaml@netvision.net.il august 20, 2004](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ddb5503460f94ad239b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
criticisms of subjectivism
?• can teachers be trusted?
• inefficiency: reinventing the wheel
• confining teachers to their own horizons
• the problem of change
• who sets educational goals?
![Page 16: competing visions of teaching: does “good practice” lead to good practice? adam lefstein adaml@netvision.net.il august 20, 2004](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ddb5503460f94ad239b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Methodism Subjectivism
Focus of attention Commonality Difference
Nature of knowledge (and reality)
Certainty (predictability) Messiness (contingency)
Source of authority Universally valid Science Individual Experience
Teaching activity is fundamentally…
Instruction Interaction (relationships)
Teaching oriented toward…
Objectives, creating uniformity
Opportunities, difference
Improving teaching Top-down, regulation Bottom-up, autonomy
Theory – practice relationship
Theory dictates practice “Practice makes practice”
What makes a good teacher?
(Objective) Method (Subjective) Character
![Page 17: competing visions of teaching: does “good practice” lead to good practice? adam lefstein adaml@netvision.net.il august 20, 2004](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ddb5503460f94ad239b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
which vision is the right one?
?• not a good question
• moving beyond the dichotomy; rethinking:– method – teaching as design– teachers’ occupational structures– facilitated collaboration and deliberation– accountability regime and testing –
individual feedback for teaching– educational research as conversation
![Page 19: competing visions of teaching: does “good practice” lead to good practice? adam lefstein adaml@netvision.net.il august 20, 2004](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ddb5503460f94ad239b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Percentage reaching Level 4 or above at KS2
50
60
70
80
90
100
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Year
NLSstarts
NNSstarts
Science
English
Mathematics
![Page 20: competing visions of teaching: does “good practice” lead to good practice? adam lefstein adaml@netvision.net.il august 20, 2004](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ddb5503460f94ad239b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
at a glance
1) competing visions of teaching and its regulation
a) methodism: “good practice”
b) subjectivism: “reflective practice”
2) beyond the methodism / subjectivism dichotomy
![Page 21: competing visions of teaching: does “good practice” lead to good practice? adam lefstein adaml@netvision.net.il august 20, 2004](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ddb5503460f94ad239b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)