continuous stakeholder feedback: methodologies for improving adoption and user-friendliness of...
TRANSCRIPT
Continuous Stakeholder Feedback: Methodologies for Improving Adoption
and User-friendliness of Climate Variability Forecasts
Norman E. BreuerVictor E. Cabrera
Peter E. HildebrandMarch 2004
The Southeast Climate Consortium
A multidisciplinary, multi-institutional initiative among the UF, FSU, UM, AU, UG, and UAH for research, extension, education, and training related to climate-based management of agriculture and natural resources.
Working at the Interface
Forest Reserve
Small-scaleFarmers
PlantationsClimate Water
Agriculture
People
The Southeast Climate Consortium
Immediate Objective
Development of a climate-based Decision Support System for farmers available via the Internet
The Southeast Climate Consortium
• Target Audience:
The Cooperative Extension Service and through them, to all stakeholders in AL, FL & GA
• Funding: NOAA - Office of Global Programs and the Risk Management Agency of the U. S.D.A.
The SECC Decision Support System
Problem with DSSs*:• non adoption
• short-term use
Due to:• deterministic nature
• exaggerated expectations
• other
*McCown, et al. 2002 Agricultural Systems 74
The Southeast Climate Consortium
• Florida, Georgia, Alabama
• Agricultural Production1.Peanuts
2.Tomato
3. Livestock
4. Potato
• Water 1.Quality
2.Quantity
UsersSpecific and
Diverseneeds
End products
Whole FarmModels
TestingPrototypeproducts
ParticipatoryRural Appraisals
Participatory Methodology
Calibration and Validation
Crop models
Climate
models
Participatory Methodology
Adapted fromBastidas 2001
Feedback Loops
Time
Ado
ptio
n
With constant interaction among research, extension andfarmer, diffusion can “take off”sooner and continue longer
Rogers 1995 modified by J. Ashby, pers. Comm. 2003
Participatory Rural Appraisal: Sondeo
• Multidisciplinary team
• Rapid appraisal
• Open ended interviews
• Preliminary insight
Participatory Modeling
• Understanding the farm system
• Preliminary modeling – LP, Dynamic, etc.
• Calibration with stakeholders
• Final modeling
• Validation with independent stakeholders
Working with Farmers
Beef Cattle in North Central Florida
• 38 Ranchers preliminary phase
• 12 Ranchers validation phase
• Hypothetical 400-acre ranch
• Management Options– Stocking rate– Ryegrass planting– Hay purchase
• Economic Output
Beef Cattle in North Central Florida
170
190
210
230
250
270
290
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
YEARS
WINTER
WINTER AVERAGEAverage number of cows in winter = 150
σ = 19.86
μ = 244.27
NIÑA
NIÑO
MO
DE
LE
D H
ER
D S
IZE
(H
EA
D)
Figure 4. Modeled herd size over 40 years of known climate effect.
Beef Cattle in North Central Florida
185,000
190,000
195,000
200,000
205,000
210,000
215,000
220,000
NIÑA NIÑA NIÑANEUTRAL
NIÑA NIÑO NEUTRALNIÑA
NIÑO NIÑA NEUTRALNEUTRAL
NEUTRALNIÑO
NIÑONEUTRAL
NIÑO NIÑO
FIRST AND SECOND YEAR CLIMATE FORECAST
GR
OS
S M
AT
GIN
+ H
ER
D V
AL
UE
(U
S$)
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
FR
EQ
UE
NC
Y
Figure 3. Two-year economic output values for nine scenarios tested and probability of occurrence.
Dairy Farms in North Florida
• 21 farmers preliminary phase• 6 focus groups• 3 farmers expected validation phase• Individual farms modeled: dynamic and LP• Novel inclusions
– Markov-Chain cow flow modeling– Environmental interaction (nitrate leaching)– Crop models
• Economic Output
Dairy Farms in North West FloridaPrototype
Dairy Farms in North West Florida
Dairy Farms in North West Florida
Dairy Farms in North West FloridaOptimization
Conclusions
• It is possible to develop models with stakeholder involvement
• With participation:- User friendliness
- trustworthiness - better performance with less need for initial input data set• Enhances probability of adoption and use of
climate-based tools and products• Will be added to tools section of SECC DSS