copyright mcgraw-hill/irwin, 2002 chapter 23: pure competition
TRANSCRIPT
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
Very large number of firms, standardized product, new firms can enter or exit from the industry very easily
FOUR MARKET MODELS
Pure Competition
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
One firm is the sole seller of a product, entry of additional producers is blocked, produces a unique product, it makes no effort to differentiate its product.
PureCompetition
FOUR MARKET MODELS
Pure Monopoly
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
PureCompetition
PureMonopoly
FOUR MARKET MODELS
Imperfect Competition
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
Relatively large number of sellers, producing different products, widespread non-price competition, product differentiation.
PureCompetition
PureMonopoly
FOUR MARKET MODELS
Monopolistic Competition
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
Few sellers of an identical product, each is affected by decisions of others.
PureCompetition
PureMonopoly
MonopolisticCompetition
FOUR MARKET MODELS
Oligopoly
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
Perfect Competition
1. Very large numbers
Very large number of independently acting sellers (e.g. farm products, stock market, foreign exchange market.
2. Standardized product
Identical or homogeneous product. As long as the price is the same, consumers will be indifferent about which seller they buy the product from
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
3. Price takers
- Individual firms have no significant control over the market price. Each firm’s quantity is too small to affect the market supply or price.
- Competitive firms are price takers, they cannot affect the price, but adjust their own price to it.
- None of the sellers can ask for a higher price because it will lose all consumers.
- None will sell at a lower price because it will incur a loss.
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
4. Free entry and exit• New firms can freely enter and existing firms can
freely leave the market.• No significant legal, technological, financial, or other
obstacles prohibit new firms from selling their output in the market.
Relevance of pure competition• Pure competition is rare.• It is highly relevant, we can learn much about markets
by studying the pure competition model. • It is meaningful as a starting point for discussing price
and output determination.• Useful to compare with other markets with regard to
efficiency, price and output.
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
RevenueTotal Revenue (TR)• Equals the price times the quantity (TR=P x Q).• Total revenue increases by a constant amount for each
unit sold. Average Revenue (AR)• Revenue per unit sold (AR = TR/Q).• The firm’s demand schedule is its revenue schedule. • Price and average revenue are the same (P=AR).Marginal Revenue (MR)• The change in total revenue due to the change in the
quantity sold by one unit (MR = ΔTR/ Δ Q). • Marginal revenue is constant because price is constant.• Marginal revenue equals the price.
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
Note
Only in a competitive market:
Price = Average revenue = Marginal revenue
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
$131 0 $ 0
Product Price (P)(Average Revenue)
TotalRevenue (TR)
MarginalRevenue (MR)
QuantityDemanded (Q)
DEMAND AS SEEN BY APURELY COMPETITIVE SELLER
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
$131 131
0 1
$ 0131
$131
Product Price (P)(Average Revenue)
TotalRevenue (TR)
MarginalRevenue (MR)
QuantityDemanded (Q)
DEMAND AS SEEN BY APURELY COMPETITIVE SELLER
]
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
$131 131131
0 1 2
$ 0131262
$131131
Product Price (P)(Average Revenue)
TotalRevenue (TR)
MarginalRevenue (MR)
QuantityDemanded (Q)
DEMAND AS SEEN BY APURELY COMPETITIVE SELLER
]]
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
$131 131131131
0 1 23
$ 0131262393
$131131131
Product Price (P)(Average Revenue)
TotalRevenue (TR)
MarginalRevenue (MR)
QuantityDemanded (Q)
DEMAND AS SEEN BY APURELY COMPETITIVE SELLER
]]]
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
$131 131131131131
0 1 234
$ 0131262393524
$131131131131
Product Price (P)(Average Revenue)
TotalRevenue (TR)
MarginalRevenue (MR)
QuantityDemanded (Q)
DEMAND AS SEEN BY APURELY COMPETITIVE SELLER
]]]]
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
$131 131131131131131131131131131131
0 1 23456789
10
$ 0131262393524655786917
104811791310
$131131131131131131131131131131
Product Price (P)(Average Revenue)
TotalRevenue (TR)
MarginalRevenue (MR)
QuantityDemanded (Q)
DEMAND AS SEEN BY APURELY COMPETITIVE SELLER
]]]]]]]]]]
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
$131 131131131131131131131131131131
0 1 23456789
10
$ 0131262393524655786917
104811791310
$131131131131131131131131131131
Product Price (P)(Average Revenue)
TotalRevenue (TR)
MarginalRevenue (MR)
QuantityDemanded (Q)
DEMAND AS SEEN BY APURELY COMPETITIVE SELLER
]]]]]]]]]]
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
Perfectly elastic demand
• A firm cannot obtain a higher price by restricting its output, nor does it need to lower its price to increase its sales volume.
• Demand curve faced by the individual competitive firm is perfectly elastic at the market price
• Note that competitive market demand curve is a downward sloping curve.
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
DEMAND, MARGINAL REVENUE, AND TOTALREVENUE IN PURE COMPETITION
TR
D = MR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1179
1048
917
786
655
524
393
262
131
0
Pri
ce
an
d r
ev
enu
e
Quantity Demanded (sold)
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
SHORT RUN PROFIT MAXIMIZATION
Two Approaches...
First: Total-Revenue -Total Cost Approach:
The Decision Rule:Produce in the short-run if you can realize:
1- A profit (or)2- A loss less than the fixed cost
The Decision Process:• Should the firm produce? If YES,• What quantity should be produced? and,• What profit or loss will be realized?
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
TotalCost
0 1 23456789
10
TotalProduct
TotalFixedCost
TotalVariable
CostTotal
Revenue Profit
$ 100 100 100100100100100100100100100
$ 090
170240300370450540649780930
$ 100190270340400470550640749880
1030
Price: $131
- $100- 59
- 8+ 53
+ 124+ 185+ 236+ 277+ 299+ 299+ 280
TOTAL REVENUE-TOTAL COST APPROACH
$ 0131262393524655786917
104811791310
Can you see the
profit maxim
ization?
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
TotalCost
0 1 23456789
10
TotalProduct
TotalFixedCost
TotalVariable
CostTotal
Revenue Profit
$ 100 100 100100100100100100100100100
$ 090
170240300370450540649780930
$ 100190270340400470550640749880
1030
Price: $131
- $100- 59
- 8+ 53
+ 124+ 185+ 236+ 277+ 299+ 299+ 280
TOTAL REVENUE-TOTAL COST APPROACH
$ 0131262393524655786917
104811791310
Graphing Total
Cost & Revenue
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
$1,8001,7001,6001,5001,4001,3001,2001,1001,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0
To
tal r
eve
nu
e a
nd
to
tal c
ost
TotalRevenue
TotalCost
MaximumEconomic
Profits$299
Break-Even Point(Normal Profit)
Break-Even Point(Normal Profit)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
TOTAL REVENUE-TOTAL COST APPROACH
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
SHORT RUN PROFIT MAXIMIZATIONTwo Approaches...
First: Total-Revenue -Total Cost Approach
Three Characteristics:• The rule applies only if producing is preferred to
shutting down (otherwise the firm will shut down)
• Rule applies to all markets• Rule can be restated as: P=MC
Second Approach:Marginal-Revenue Marginal-Cost Approach
MR = MC Rule
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
MR = MC rule
In the short run, the firm will maximize profit or
minimize losses by producing the output at which
marginal revenue equals marginal cost.
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
AverageTotalCost
0 1 23456789
10
TotalProduct
AverageFixedCost
AverageVariable
Cost
Price =MarginalRevenue
TotalEconomicProfit/Loss
$100.00
50.00 33.3325.0020.0016.6714.2912.5011.1110.00
$90.0085.0080.0075.0074.0075.0077.1481.2586.6793.00
$190.00135.00113.33100.00
94.0091.6791.4393.7597.78
103.00
- $100- 59
- 8+ 53
+ 124+ 185+ 236+ 277+ 299+ 299+ 280
MARGINAL REVENUE-MARGINAL COST APPROACH
$ 131131131131131131131131131131
MarginalCost
90807060708090
110131150
Thesame profitmaximizing
result!
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
AverageTotalCost
0 1 23456789
10
TotalProduct
AverageFixedCost
AverageVariable
Cost
Price =MarginalRevenue
TotalEconomicProfit/Loss
$100.00
50.00 33.3325.0020.0016.6714.2912.5011.1110.00
$90.0085.0080.0075.0074.0075.0077.1481.2586.6793.00
$190.00135.00113.33100.00
94.0091.6791.4393.7597.78
103.00
- $100- 59
- 8+ 53
+ 124+ 185+ 236+ 277+ 299+ 299+ 280
MARGINAL REVENUE-MARGINAL COST APPROACH
$ 131131131131131131131131131131
MarginalCost
90807060708090
110131150
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
Two Ways to Calculate Profit
First: Calculate total profit
TR = P x Q
TC = ATC x Q
Π = TR – TC
Second: calculate profit per unitΠ /Q = TR/Q – TC/QΠ /Q = P (or AR) – ATC Π = (Π /Q) x Q
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
$200
150
100
50
0
Co
st a
nd
Rev
enu
e
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MC
MR
AVCATC
Economic Profit
$131.00
$97.78
MARGINAL REVENUE-MARGINAL COST APPROACH
Profit Maximization Position
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
$200
150
100
50
0
Co
st a
nd
Rev
enu
e
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MC
MR
AVCATC
Economic Profit
$131.00
$97.78
MARGINAL REVENUE-MARGINAL COST APPROACH
MR = MCOptimumSolution
Profit Maximization Position
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
The MR=MC rule still applies
If the price is lowered from $131 to $81
…But the MR = MC point changes
Note: π = π per unit x Q
MARGINAL REVENUE-MARGINAL COST APPROACH
Loss Minimization Position
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
$200
150
100
50
0
Co
st a
nd
Rev
enu
e
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MC
MRAVCATC
Economic Loss
$81.00$91.67
MARGINAL REVENUE-MARGINAL COST APPROACH
Loss Minimization Position
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
$200
150
100
50
0
Co
st a
nd
Rev
enu
e
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MC
MR
AVCATC
$71.00
Short-Run Shut Down Point
Minimum AVCis the Shut-Down
Point
MARGINAL REVENUE-MARGINAL COST APPROACH
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
Marginal Cost & Short-Run Supply
PriceQuantitySupplied
Maximum Profit (+)Or Minimum Loss (-)
Observe the impact upon profitability as price is changed
$151 131 111 91 81 71 61
10987600
$+480+299
+138 -3
-64 -100 -100
MARGINAL REVENUE-MARGINAL COST APPROACH
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
Co
st a
nd
Rev
enu
e, (
do
llar
s) MC
MR1
AVC
ATC
Quantity Supplied
MR2
MR3
MR4
MR5
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
Marginal Cost & Short-Run Supply
Do notProduce –
Below AVC
MARGINAL REVENUE-MARGINAL COST APPROACH
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
Co
st a
nd
Rev
enu
e, (
do
llar
s)MC
MR1
Quantity Supplied
MR2
MR3
MR4
MR5
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
Marginal Cost & Short-Run SupplyYields theShort-Run
Supply Curve
Supply
NoProductionBelow AVC
MARGINAL REVENUE-MARGINAL COST APPROACH
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
Marginal Cost & Short-Run Supply
AVC2
MC2
Higher Costs Move theSupply Curve to the LeftC
ost
an
d R
even
ue,
(d
oll
ars)
MC1
AVC1
Quantity Supplied
S1
S2
MARGINAL REVENUE-MARGINAL COST APPROACH
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
Marginal Cost & Short-Run Supply
AVC2
MC2
Lower Costs Movethe Supply Curve
to the Right
Co
st a
nd
Rev
enu
e, (
do
llar
s)MC1
AVC1
Quantity Supplied
S1
S2
MARGINAL REVENUE-MARGINAL COST APPROACH
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
P
Q
S=MC
AVC
ATC
8
D
P
Q8000
D
S= MC’s
IndustryFirm(price taker)
EconomicProfit
$111$111
SHORT RUN COMPETITIVE EQUILIBRIUMThe Competitive Firm “Takes” its Price from the Industry Equilibrium
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
P
Q
S=MC
AVC
ATC
8
D
P
Q8000
D
S= MC’s
IndustryFirm(price taker)
EconomicProfit
$111$111
SHORT RUN COMPETITIVE EQUILIBRIUMThe Competitive Firm “Takes” it’s Price from the Industry Equilibrium
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
PROFIT MAXIMIZATION IN THE LONG-RUN
Assumptions...• Entry and Exit Only: the only long run adjustment is the entry and exit of firms. • Identical Costs: all firms in the industry have identical cost curves.• Constant-Cost Industry: entry and exit does not affect resource prices.
Goal...Price = Minimum ATC
Zero Economic Profit Model
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
Temporary Profits and the Reestablishment Of Long-Run Equilibrium
S1
MCATC
P
Q100
P
Q100,000
IndustryFirm(price taker)
$60
50
40
$60
50
40
PROFIT MAXIMIZATION IN THE LONG-RUN
MR
D1
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
An increase in demand increases profits…
MR
D1
MCATC
P
Q100
P
Q100,000
IndustryFirm(price taker)
$60
50
40
$60
50
40
PROFIT MAXIMIZATION IN THE LONG-RUN
D2
EconomicProfits
S1
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
New Competitors increase supply and lower Prices decrease economic profits
MR
D1
MCATC
P
Q100
P
Q100,000
IndustryFirm(price taker)
$60
50
40
$60
50
40
PROFIT MAXIMIZATION IN THE LONG-RUN
D2
Zero EconomicProfits
S1
S2
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
Decreases in demand, Losses and the Reestablishment of Long-Run Equilibrium
S1
MCATC
P
Q100
P
Q100,000
IndustryFirm(price taker)
$60
50
40
$60
50
40
PROFIT MAXIMIZATION IN THE LONG-RUN
D1
MR
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
A decrease in demand creates losses…
MR
D1
MCATC
P
Q100
P
Q100,000
IndustryFirm(price taker)
$60
50
40
$60
50
40
PROFIT MAXIMIZATION IN THE LONG-RUN
D2
EconomicLosses
S1
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
MR
D1
MCATC
P
Q100
P
Q100,000
IndustryFirm(price taker)
$60
50
40
$60
50
40
PROFIT MAXIMIZATION IN THE LONG-RUN
D2
Return to ZeroEconomic Profits
S1
S3
Competitors with losses decrease supply and prices return to zero economic profits
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
LONG-RUN SUPPLY IN ACONSTANT COST INDUSTRY
Constant Cost Industry
Perfectly Elastic Long-Run Supply: entry and exit will set the price back to its original level
Graphically...
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
P
Q
=$50 S
D1
Z1
Q1
D2
Z2
Q2Q3
D3
Z3
100,000 110,00090,000
LONG-RUN SUPPLY IN ACONSTANT COST INDUSTRY
P1
P2
P3
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
P
Q
=$50 S
D1
Z1
Q1
D2
Z2
Q2Q3
D3
Z3
100,000 110,00090,000
LONG-RUN SUPPLY IN ACONSTANT COST INDUSTRY
P1
P2
P3
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
P
Q
$555045
S
D1
Y1
Q1
D2
Y2
Q2Q3
D3
Y3
100,000 110,00090,000
LONG-RUN SUPPLY IN ANINCREASING COST INDUSTRY
P1
P2
P3
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
P
Q
$555045
S
D1
Y1
Q1
D2
Y2
Q2Q3
D3
Y3
100,000 110,00090,000
P1
P2
P3
LONG-RUN SUPPLY IN ANINCREASING COST INDUSTRY
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
P
Q
$555045
S
D1
Y1
Q1
D2
Y2
Q2Q3
D3
Y3
100,000 110,00090,000
P1
P2
P3
LONG-RUN SUPPLY IN ANINCREASING COST INDUSTRY
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002
P MR
Q
MCATC
Quantity
Pri
ce
Price = MC = Minimum ATC(normal profit)
LONG-RUN EQUILIBRIUM FOR A COMPETITIVE FIRM