corporate location decision making trends: implications for economic development competitiveness...

24
CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS Presented To: October 17, 2013

Upload: michael-young

Post on 30-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS Presented To: October 17, 2013

CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS:

IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS

Presented To:

October 17, 2013

Page 2: CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS Presented To: October 17, 2013

Operations and Portfolio Strategy

Location Strategy and Optimization

Program Management and Implementation

What? Where? How?

We evaluate process and function to define portfolio and facility STRATEGY and OPERATIONS

We optimize the LOCATION of the preferred scenario and optimize operating costs and conditions

We program the EXECUTION of the location or facility event to

improve operational performance

Client Organization Dynamics Consensus Building Sustainability and Capacity

Evaluation Supply Chain Network Planning Business Process Improvement Outsource vs. Insource Make vs. Buy Strategic Facility Planning

Economic Geography Location Selection and Due

Diligence Labor Analytics and Occupational

Skills Analysis Industry Infrastructure Operating Cost and Operating

Conditions Real Estate Market Analysis Financial Modeling/Decision

Support

Incentive Negotiation Economic Impact Analysis Real Estate Acquisition and

Structuring Project Management Migration Planning and Relocation Post Occupancy Benchmarking

Strategic Consulting Services – What Do We Do?

Page 3: CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS Presented To: October 17, 2013

3

Most Active Industries and Asset Types

Small and Medium Sized Manufacturers

Large Data Centers and Call Centers

Financial Services, Healthcare, Oil & Gas/Energy and Technology Sectors

Business Climate Dynamics (the 3rd Civil War – more on this later)

Foreign Direct Investment (from EU Countries)

Page 4: CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS Presented To: October 17, 2013

4

TRENDS IMPACTING CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING

Page 5: CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS Presented To: October 17, 2013

5

Trends – Capacity Utilization Marked Improvement

Industrial Capacity Utilization – Impacts Expansion and Relocation ActivityHasn’t Quite Recovered to Previous Peak

Source: Federal Reserve, NGKF

676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899000102030405060708091011121360%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

Growth is back; we are in year 4 of recovery, our pipeline is pretty good.

But collapse was so deep that excess capacity remains across most sectors of U.S. economy: factories, mines, labor, housing, commercial real estate

Excess capacity keeps inflation low despite massive public debt and elevated levels of liquidity in financial system (Fed’s balance sheet)

Corporate balance sheets are pristine, and household balance sheets are improving.

Public balance sheets – not so much

Page 6: CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS Presented To: October 17, 2013

6

Trends – GDP Headed in Right Direction (Suspect )

GDP Versus Employment – Impacts Confidence and Certainty Around InvestmentsSecular Trend Toward Increasing Productivity

GDP hit new peak in 2011-Q4 but employment still 2.9M jobs shy of prior peak

Means that businesses have increased productivity (output per hour) – not only manufacturing but virtually all industries

Businesses hiring and spending cautiously with an eye toward maintaining healthy balance sheets and filling key positions with the “right” hires.

Fewer people doing more work….education levels rising…..boomers not retiring

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

$12,200.0

$12,400.0

$12,600.0

$12,800.0

$13,000.0

$13,200.0

$13,400.0

$13,600.0

$13,800.0

124,000

126,000

128,000

130,000

132,000

134,000

136,000

138,000

140,000

GDP Employment

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, NGKF

Page 7: CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS Presented To: October 17, 2013

7

Greater collaboration, innovation, real estate occupancy efficiency and structural cost reduction all asset types – no new investment without lean efforts!

Trends – Workplace Efficiency and Lean Optimization

Process Improvement and Six Sigma Methods

Work Venue Models and Space Standards

Page 8: CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS Presented To: October 17, 2013

8

Trends – Companies Hoarding Cash, Time To Invest?

Cash & Liquid Assets on Corporate Balance Sheets – Impacts Working CapitalBalance Sheets Are Pristine; When Does This Cash Go to Work!

Record low interest rates and easy monetary policy engineered by the Fed has allowed businesses to clean up their debt.

Cash & liquid assets are at record highs for nonfarm, nonfinancial corporations.

Corporations have built reserves against possibility of financial uncertainty and risk.

Businesses are very cautious in hiring and spending.

Why – uncertainty, political gridlock, lack of confidence….no predictability

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

$1,000,000.0

$1,100,000.0

$1,200,000.0

$1,300,000.0

$1,400,000.0

$1,500,000.0

$1,600,000.0

$1,700,000.0

$1,800,000.0

$1,900,000.0

Source: Federal Reserve, NGKF

Page 9: CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS Presented To: October 17, 2013

9

Trends – Second Civil War Returns (Has It Ever Ended?)

States have become more aggressive toward recruiting in neighboring states.

California, NY and Illinois have especially large bull’s-eyes on their backs.

Low taxes and low business and living costs are part of the allure.

But businesses need to consider their relationships with their customers, suppliers, talent pools and CAPX changes before they jump.

Is the Grass Really Greener?

Page 10: CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS Presented To: October 17, 2013

10

Trends – Global Supply Chain Optimization/Backshoring

Risk Minimization in Shorter Supply Chains Companies continue to look closely at

their supply chain in an effort to reduce transportation cost, delivery risk and disruptions in the supply chain.

Some shippers have adopted a network of smaller, more numerous distribution centers closer to customer locations in an effort to minimize over the road distance.

Fuel cost rising; rail is increasingly important in decision making, as companies want more control over uncertain (and fluctuating) transportation costs.

Most backshoring/nearshoring is based on more efficient servicing of the North American market and “cost of quality” dynamics that are closing “payback” scenarios

Source: Establish, Inc./Herbert W. Davis & Company

Cost of Quality Making Backshoring Plausible

Page 11: CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS Presented To: October 17, 2013

11

Trends – Quality of Place, Not Quality of Life

Tell me one community in the U.S. that does not proclaim to have outstanding quality of life.

What really matters in location and real estate decisions these days is quality of place!

Practical• Jobs• Schools• Home Prices• Commute Time• Amenities• Accessibility• Crime

Visceral• Defined Lifestyle

– Urban– Suburban/Edge Cities– Nature and Green Space

• Sociability/Gathering Places• Culture• Climate

Page 12: CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS Presented To: October 17, 2013

12

Trends – Energy Revolution

Employment Change Since Start of RecessionMining & Logging Sector Leading Economy – These Are the Energy Jobs

Mining & logging is small sector, accounting for less than 1% of total nonfarm payroll employment.

But it drives growth in manufacturing, transportation, utilities, and some white collar sectors (e.g. Houston office market).

Natural gas and shale oil discoveries in U.S. are game changers for global energy landscape. Will drive growth in U.S. for years to come.

Regions and cities in the path of growth – Texas, Pittsburgh, North Dakota, parts of WV/OH/PA will be transformed…among others.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, NGKF

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

-30%

-25%

-20%

-15%

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

Mining & Logging ConstructionManufacturing Trade, Trans., Util.Information FinanceProf. & Bus. Svcs. Ed. & HealthLeisure & Hosp. Govt.

Mining & Logging

Construction

Page 13: CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS Presented To: October 17, 2013

13

PERSPECTIVES ONECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS

Page 14: CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS Presented To: October 17, 2013

14

Location Selection Process – Who Wants It!

Location selection is not about inclusion, ultimately its about process of elimination. • What is out of your control? • What can you influence?

Filter 1: Fatal FlawsScreen out locations with fatal flaws e.g. Locations with insufficient connectivity

Filter 2: Serious FlawsRule out Locations with serious flaws e.g. Locations with key attributes but inadequate infrastructure

Filter 3: Controllable FlawsConsider Locations that meet all critical criteria but have manageable issues – flaws that can be remedied or mitigated through negotiations with government officials

Preferred and back-up Locations

Page 15: CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS Presented To: October 17, 2013

15

Evolving Decision Making Methods – More Analytical

Corporate occupiers are making more rational decisions today. Investment is being led by strategic and operational need rather than available real estate or legacy investments.

Operational efficiency and how properties impact both cost and revenue is of paramount importance; all of our clients want to know how the top line is impacted with expansions, relocations, etc.

Companies are asking the CFO, COO, SVPs to risk adjust all decisions; risk management and scenario analysis more prevalent in the Board Room as well as supporting analytics

The critical path of projects has continued to shorten, requires readiness, solid understanding of region and assets at an industry level of granularity

Expectation that best locations will have aligned public/private partnership, know thyself and also the ability to secure creative real estate and incentives solutions.

Page 16: CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS Presented To: October 17, 2013

The ultimate location decision is supported by a comprehensive and objective rating of the finalist location performance against Critical Success Factors as well as implementation risk and operating costs.

Weighted factors related to operating conditions, risks, timing, and costs, etc.

Decision support modeling and stress/sensitivity tested solutions

Comprehensive comparison results identify preferred site

Site 2

Site 1

What Will Never Change – Business Case Rationale

Page 17: CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS Presented To: October 17, 2013

Constantly Score Thyself By Key Success Factors

ScalabilityCapable of appropriate scale for all planned processes and operations (e.g., labor, real estate, utilities).

SustainabilityAble to sustain operations over the long term (e.g., cost structure, talent pool, supply chain, infrastructure support).

Operating CostsDesired total variable operating costs to achieve corporate cost objectives (e.g., labor, facilities, utilities, supply chain, taxes).

InfrastructureReliable physical support infrastructure (e.g., real estate, power, fuel, telecom, water, public transportation, airport, road, rail, seaport).

Pioneering Alignment with company tolerance for pioneering new products or services – risk taking

ImplementationRelative ease in establishing and expanding a new business (e.g., registration, licenses, permits, approvals, etc.).

RiskAchieve risk tolerance thresholds and pass on measures of corporate investment risk (e.g., political, economic, social, natural disaster, access).

Business EnvironmentFlexible regulatory conditions, acceptable protections, fast approval processes, and sufficient business services to sustain and grow operations.

Tax StrategyAlignment with corporate global tax structuring objectives, clear tax rules/ regulations, and provide overall moderate to low tax exposure.

Measure Your Area In Terms of Business Drivers…

Page 18: CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS Presented To: October 17, 2013

18

Be Open To New Measures of Yourself – We Will If You Don’t!

Old Metrics New Metrics

• Local and National Market Access• Community Competitiveness vs Regional

Peers• Job Creation• Unemployment• Private Investment• Average Wage• Tax Revenue• Real Estate Vacancy Rate• Available Developable Land• Operating Costs (Services, Taxes, Utilities)

• Global Market Access• Regional Competiveness vs Global Peers• Gross Regional Product• Talent Recruitment, Retention & Capacity• Local Knowledge Assets• Quality of Place• Business Incubation Services• Venture / Angel Capital• Certified Ready Sites and Buildings• Brand Identity and Image• Structural Costs (Competitiveness,

Comparative Positioning)

Quality of Place Human Capital Differentiation Infrastructure Leverage Globalization

Page 19: CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS Presented To: October 17, 2013

19

What Does Competitiveness Mean in 2013 and Beyond?

• More global competition is inevitable, not less (e.g. Canada about to conclude new free trade agreement with the EU. The U.S. has just started the same process.)

• The competitive climate – and potential of winning global investment – must be kept in perspective. Even great growth in the U.S. (3-4% p.a.) will be slow growth compared to other emerging and developing economies (7-10%)

• The definition of “competitive” is more diverse, less obvious, than ever because it can mean so many things. Yes, affordable. Yes, good infrastructure. Yes, accessible. And so on. But also consider: “culture”; “sustainability”; “regional clusters”; “knowledge-led economies”; “quality of place”; “inter-modal” transportation options, “can do attitudes and stellar responsiveness”; etc.

• State and regional economies should compete on value and they need to understand what there comparative (not competitive) advantage is. They should do more of what they do best and diversify accordingly.

• EDC agencies have to do much better at communicating their value proposition in the form of financial models and comparative indices with their nearest competition; advertise business wins and reasons why the company chose Columbus

• Expectations are high that EDCs will be more consultative and know target industries at a intimate level, and therefore provide solutions upstream and downstream the value chain for new and expanding industry

• Better custom business intelligence about their community that site selectors and occupiers can’t find in 3rd party databases. Tell us some real intelligence, have relationships so you can setup employer interviews and business tours.

• Regional cooperation – shared risk and reward! The data shows regions with strong public/private partnerships have weathered recessions and disruptive events better than most!

Page 20: CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS Presented To: October 17, 2013

20

How Can Economic Developers Best Sell Their Community?

Page 21: CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS Presented To: October 17, 2013

21

Economic Developer Checklist

• Checklist for an Economic Developer– Request for Information

• Only have one chance to make a first impression• Make sure all the information is completed and it is

organized for the consultant to read so they can evaluate your community.

– Deal Killers• Incomplete RFIs – Always complete the RFI• Provide the information asked• Leaving blanks is a negative score – if you can’t get the

accurate information provide a reasoning and follow-up to get the information

Page 22: CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS Presented To: October 17, 2013

22

Economic Developer Checklist

– Field/Site Due Diligence• Did I have the right people there?

– Utilities; Elected officials; Zoning/Building/Planning Department People

• Did I perform a site SWOT analysis?• Did I sell the workforce and quality of life?• If the weather is inclement do I have a contingency

plan?• Have I engaged the owner and broker to see if there are

any outstanding issues?

Page 23: CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS Presented To: October 17, 2013

23

Economic Developer Checklist

– Incentive Negotiations• Did I utilize all the tools in my tool kit?• Did I provide incentives for the company that help the

company?• Did I engage the local elected officials?• Did I reach out to the developer/landlord/broker to see

if there is anything they can do?– Financing; Letter of Credits; Co-Signing of Lease

Page 24: CORPORATE LOCATION DECISION MAKING TRENDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS Presented To: October 17, 2013

24

Questions?

Bradley MigdalManaging Director, ConsultingNewmark Grubb Knight Frank500 West Monroe St., Suite 2900Chicago, IL [email protected]