correction ahead: momentum is dying...2019/03/11 · lines in the upper box in chart 2 plot the...
TRANSCRIPT
Cam Hui, CFA | [email protected] Page 1
Confidential — Do not duplicate or distribute without written permission from Pennock Idea Hub
Quantitative & Strategy
CORRECTION AHEAD: MOMENTUM IS DYING
March 11, 2019
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
We have been cautious on the near-term equity market outlook for several weeks (see Here
Comes The Growth Scare and Still Bullish, But Time to Reduce Risk). We reiterate our point for
being bullish and bearish over different time frames. While we believe stock prices will be
higher by year-end, investors should be prepared for some turbulence over the next few
months.
We are now seeing definitive technical evidence of a softer market in the near term.
Momentum is dying, and across a variety of dimensions.
Our base-case scenario calls for a correction of 1–3 months in duration, but without a re-
test of the December lows. The depth of the pullback will be a function of any growth scare
and the details of the U.S.-China trade agreement. As always, we will be data dependent.
We have written before that we are both bullish and bearish on different time frames, and
current circumstances suggest different positioning for traders and investors. Traders with
time horizons of up to three months should be tilted bearishly and prepared to sell or short
into market strength. On the other hand, longer-term oriented investors should view any
market weakness as an opportunity to deploy funds into equities in anticipation of higher
prices later in the year.
Cam Hui, CFA [email protected]
Table of Contents
Momentum Is Dying .............................. 2
Weak Momentum Everywhere .............. 3
Weak Fundamental Momentum ............... 7
Recession Scare Ahead? ........................ 9
Still Bullish ............................................. 12
Buy The Dip, Or Sell The Rip? .............. 16
Cam Hui, CFA | [email protected] Page 2
March 11, 2019
Quantitative & Strategy
Momentum Is Dying
We have been cautious on the near-term equity market outlook for several weeks (see Here
Comes The Growth Scare and Still Bullish, But Time to Reduce Risk). We reiterate our point for being
bullish and bearish over different time frames. While we believe stock prices will be higher by
year-end, investors should be prepared for some turbulence over the next few months.
We are now seeing definitive technical evidence of a softer market in the near term. Momentum
is dying, and across a variety of dimensions. One key technique we use to monitor momentum
is the behaviour of different moving averages. If the shorter moving average starts to roll over
while the longer moving average continues to rise, that’s a sign of fading price momentum.
The chart below depicts the weekly S&P 500 chart, with a MACD histogram on the bottom
panel. Note how MACD, while still strongly positive, is starting to roll over. We find that the
weekly chart is useful for intermediate-term price moves while filtering out the noise from daily
fluctuations.
Exhibit 1: Momentum Rolling Over
Source: Stockcharts
In the past, such episodes have resolved themselves with either a sideways consolidation or
market downdraft. We expect the most likely outcome is a correction that will last 1–3 months,
followed by a resumption of the bull market.
Cam Hui, CFA | [email protected] Page 3
March 11, 2019
Quantitative & Strategy
Weak Momentum Everywhere
Evidence of fading price momentum can be found everywhere. The MACD rollover can be
found in a variety of stock indices. Here is the NASDAQ Composite.
Exhibit 2: NASDAQ Composite
Source: Stockcharts
The small-cap Russell 2000 is also rolling over.
Exhibit 3: Russell 2000
Source: Stockcharts
Cam Hui, CFA | [email protected] Page 4
March 11, 2019
Quantitative & Strategy
The fading price momentum effect can be seen globally. Here are non-U.S. developed market
equities, as measured by EAFE.
Exhibit 4: MSCI EAFE ETF
Source: Stockcharts
Emerging market stocks started to fade several weeks ago, ahead of developed markets.
Exhibit 5: MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Source: Stockcharts
Cam Hui, CFA | [email protected] Page 5
March 11, 2019
Quantitative & Strategy
Risk appetite indicators are also losing momentum. The stock/bond ratio is exhibiting
a pattern of MACD histogram rollover.
Exhibit 6: S&P 500 to Long UST Ratio
Source: Stockcharts
High yield (junk) bond prices, net of interest rate effects, have been highly correlated
with stock prices, and momentum is dying as well in this asset class.
Exhibit 7: HY Prices Highly Correlated To S&P 500
Source: Stockcharts
Cam Hui, CFA | [email protected] Page 6
March 11, 2019
Quantitative & Strategy
Even more ominous is the analysis from John Murphy of Stockcharts, who concluded
the market may have peaked in late 2018 and it may be undergoing a topping process:
LONG-TERM MOMENTUM IS ALSO WEAKENING... The monthly bars in
Chart 2 show the uptrend in the S&P 500 that started exactly ten years ago. And that uptrend
is still intact. The sharp selloff that took place during the fourth quarter of 2018 stayed above
the rising trendline drawn under its 2009, 2011, 2016 lows. That's the good news. What may
not be so good are signs that long-term momentum indicators are starting to weaken. The two
lines in the upper box in Chart 2 plot the monthly Percent Price Oscillator (PPO). [The PPO
is a variation of MACD and measures percentage changes between two moving averages]. The
PPO lines turned negative during the second half of last year when the faster red line fell below
the slower blue line. And they remain negative. [The red histogram bars plotting the difference
between the two PPO lines also remain in negative territory below their zero line (red circle)].
Secondly, and maybe more importantly, the 2018 peak in PPO is lower than the earlier peak
formed at the end of 2014. That's the first time that's happened since the bull market began. In
technical terms, that creates a potential "negative divergence" between the PPO lines and the
S&P 500 which hit a new high last year. That raises the possibility that the ten-year bull market
may have peaked in the fourth quarter of 2018 and is now going through a major topping process.
If the peaking process in stocks has already started, that could start the clock ticking on the nearly
ten-year economic expansion that also started during 2009.
Exhibit 8: Did The S&P 500 Top Out In 2018?
Source: Stockcharts
Cam Hui, CFA | [email protected] Page 7
March 11, 2019
Quantitative & Strategy
Weak Fundamental Momentum
In addition to evidence of fading price momentum, the market is also faced with the prospect
of negative fundamental momentum. The latest update from Yardeni Research Inc. shows that
forward 12-month large cap EPS estimates edged up last week, but within the context of a
multi-week downtrend. The strength in large cap estimates was not confirmed by mid and small
cap estimates, both of which continued to fall.
Exhibit 9: Weakness in Forward EPS Estimates
Source: Yardeni Research, Inc.
Cam Hui, CFA | [email protected] Page 8
March 11, 2019
Quantitative & Strategy
We can see the effects of price and fundamental momentum from two ETFs. The relative
performance of MTUM (black line) represents the returns of a pure price momentum factor.
By contrast, FFTY is the IBD 50, which relies on a composite of fundamental and price
momentum factors to construct its portfolio. As the following chart shows, the relative
performance of both factors have been highly correlated until last fall. Since then, price
momentum has been flat to down during the latest rally, while IBD 50 momentum has begun
to roll over in the last few days.
Exhibit 10: Momentum Factors Are Weak
Source: Stockcharts
Cam Hui, CFA | [email protected] Page 9
March 11, 2019
Quantitative & Strategy
Recession Scare Ahead?
Last Friday’s shockingly weak Employment Report also raises some concerns of fading macro
momentum. While the weak February headline Non-Farm Payroll figure could be attributable
to a data blip, or mean reversion from the strong January report, the internals of the report
show signs of economic weakness. Temporary employment, which has historically led NFP, is
topping out. This suggests that employment will weaken further in the coming months.
Exhibit 11: Temp Jobs Lead Non-Farm Payroll
Source: FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Equally worrisome is the deceleration in construction jobs, which has either been coincident or
led past recessions. That’s not a surprise, as housing is a highly cyclical industry and a key
barometer of economic health.
Cam Hui, CFA | [email protected] Page 10
March 11, 2019
Quantitative & Strategy
Exhibit 12: Construction Job Growth Is Decelerating
Source: FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
The message from the commodity markets is equally downbeat. Despite an apparent recovery
in industrial metal prices, the internals are less bright.
Exhibit 13: An Apparent Recovery in Industrial Metal Prices, But…
Source: Stockcharts
However, IHS Markit observed that global metal users’ PMI has been declining, which is
indicative of a softening manufacturing environment.
Cam Hui, CFA | [email protected] Page 11
March 11, 2019
Quantitative & Strategy
Exhibit 14: Global Metal Users PMI Weakening
Source: HIS Markit
Cam Hui, CFA | [email protected] Page 12
March 11, 2019
Quantitative & Strategy
Still Bullish
Despite these short-term negatives, we remain bullish on equities to year-end, and believe that
any growth scare is only temporary in nature for several reasons.
The first reason is the existence of a Trump Put. Bloomberg reported that Trump believes his
2020 re-election prospects go through the stock market:
President Donald Trump is pushing for U.S. negotiators to close a trade deal with China soon,
concerned that he needs a big win on the international stage — and the stock market bump that
would come with it — in advance of his re-election campaign.
As trade talks with China advance, Trump has noticed the market gains that followed each sign of
progress and expressed concern that the lack an agreement could drag down stocks, according to people
familiar with the matter. He watched U.S. and Asian equities rise on his decision to delay an increase
in tariffs on Chinese goods scheduled for March 1, one of the people said.
Trump has become obsessed with stock prices as a metric of his administration’s success. Even
if the much-anticipated trade deal doesn’t produce a market pop, he may be tempted to take
other means to boost stock prices.
Trump’s fixation on stock-market performance has shaped his assessments of his economic policies.
Top White House staff know to be aware of how markets are performing when summoned to the
Oval Office to speak with Trump because the president often asks: ‘‘What’s happening with the
markets?’’
The second reason is the Powell Put. The minutes of the January FOMC meeting make it clear
that the Fed is monitoring the stock market [emphasis added]:
Following the briefing, participants raised a number of questions about market reports that the
Federal Reserve’s balance sheet runoff and associated “quantitative tightening” had been an important
factor contributing to the selloff in equity markets in the closing months of last year. While respondents
assessed that the reduction of securities held in the SOMA would put some modest upward pressure
on Treasury yields and agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) yields over time, they generally
placed little weight on balance sheet reduction as a prime factor spurring the deterioration in risk
sentiment over that period. However, some other investors reportedly held firmly to the belief that the
runoff of the Federal Reserve’s securities holdings was a factor putting significant downward pressure
on risky asset prices, and the investment decisions of these investors, particularly in thin market
conditions around the year-end, might have had an outsized effect on market prices for a time.
Participants also discussed the hypothesis that investors may have taken some signal about the future path of the federal funds rate based on perceptions that
the Federal Reserve was unwilling to adjust the pace of balance sheet runoff in light of economic and financial developments.
In addition, both the BAML Fund Manager Survey and the compilation of State Street investor
confidence from Callum Thomas of Topdown Charts shows that institutions are already
defensively positioned. While other segments of the markets, such as retail investors, are not
similarly cautious, these readings should put a floor on stock prices in the event of bearish news.
Cam Hui, CFA | [email protected] Page 13
March 11, 2019
Quantitative & Strategy
Exhibit 15: Institutions Are Already Very Defensive
Source: Topdown Charts
Lastly, investors should not ignore the powerful effects of a breadth thrust. If history is any
guide, stock prices are almost invariably higher after a breadth thrust such as the one
experienced in January, even though interim corrections may occur shortly after the event.
Cam Hui, CFA | [email protected] Page 14
March 11, 2019
Quantitative & Strategy
Exhibit 16: Breadth Thrusts Are Long-Term Bullish
Source: Stockcharts
We had highlighted the results of our own historical study in a past report (see Still Bullish, But
Time to Reduce Risk) indicating that excess return (bottom panel) weakens after two months and
then rises thereafter. Moreover, three and six month maximum drawdowns are in the 11-13%
range, indicating the possibility of a interim pullback.
Exhibit 17: Breadth Thrusts Are Long-term Bullish, But Short-term Corrections Possible
Source: Pennock Idea Hub
Cam Hui, CFA | [email protected] Page 15
March 11, 2019
Quantitative & Strategy
We went back 20 years and found very few instances like the one we are encountering today.
There were not many episodes where the weekly MACD histogram had been deeply negative,
rose strongly, and rolled over. In all cases (n=3), the market pulled back. In two of the three
cases, the correction was relatively minor and the market did not re-test its previous low.
Exhibit 18: A Likely Correction Ahead
Source: Stockcharts
Cam Hui, CFA | [email protected] Page 16
March 11, 2019
Quantitative & Strategy
Buy The Dip, Or Sell The Rip?
Our base-case scenario calls for a correction of 1–3 months in duration, but without a re-test
of the December lows. The depth of the pullback will be a function of any growth scare and
the details of the U.S.-China trade agreement. As always, we will be data dependent.
We have written before that we are both bullish and bearish on different time frames, and
current circumstances suggest different positioning for traders and investors. Traders with time
horizons of up to three months should be tilted bearishly, and be prepared to sell or short into
market strength. On the other hand, longer-term oriented investors should view any market
weakness as an opportunity to deploy funds into equities in anticipation of higher prices later
in the year.
Cam Hui, CFA | [email protected] Page 17
March 11, 2019
Quantitative & Strategy
Disclaimer
I, Cam Hui, certify that the views expressed in this commentary accurately reflect my personal views about the subject company (ies). I am
confident in my investment analysis skills, and I may buy or already own shares in those companies under discussion. I prepare and edit
every report published under my name. I depend on my colleagues for constructive criticism on my research methods and conclusions but
final responsibility is my own.
I also certify that I have not and will not be receiving direct or indirect compensation from the subject company(ies) in exchange for publishing
this commentary.
This investment analysis excludes any target price, and is not a recommendation to buy or sell a stock. It is intended to provide a means for
the author to share his experience and perspective exclusively for the benefit of the clients of Pennock Idea Hub (PIH). My articles may
contain statements and projections that are forward-looking in nature, and therefore subject to numerous risks, uncertainties, and
assumptions. The author does not assume any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from or relating to any use of
the information contained in this note.
This information contained in this commentary has been compiled from sources believed to be reliable but no representation or warranty,
express or implied, is made by the author or any other person as to its fairness, accuracy, completeness or correctness.
This article does not constitute an offer or solicitation in any jurisdiction.
Confidential — Do not duplicate or distribute without written permission from Pennock Idea Hub