cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

570

Upload: duongthien

Post on 03-Jan-2017

237 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom
Page 2: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom:

Clark YJoukovski 11Gottingen 628Eppler 793Naca 0012RAE 104SC 20406NLF 015Whitcomb

Parametric Airfoil Catalog, Part IAn Aerodynamic and Geometric Comparison Between Parametrized and Point Cloud AirfoilsTomas Melin

Copyright c©2013, Tomas Melin

Published by:Fluid and Mechatronic Systems,Department of Management and Engineering,The Institute of Technology,Linkoping University,Linkoping, Sweden

Visit our website at www.iei.liu.se

Printed by:Linkoping UniversityLiU-Tryck581 83 LinkopingSWEDEN

Typeset in LATEX

ISBN: 978-91-7519-656-5First Edition, March 2013

Page 3: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Parametric Airfoil Catalog

Part IArcher A18 to Gottingen 655

An Aerodynamic and Geometric Comparison Between Parametrized and Point Cloud Airfoils.

Tomas Melin

Research AssociateFluid and Mechatronic Systems,

Department of Management and Engineering,The Institute of Technology,

Linkoping University,Linkoping, Sweden

Page 4: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Contents

1 Acknowledgements 1

2 Introduction 1

3 Background 1

4 Method 24.1 Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24.2 Parameterization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24.3 Base change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44.4 Reproducing known airfoils . . . . . . . . 4

5 Discussion 5

6 Software 6

7 Airfoil Catalog 6a18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7a18sm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8a63a108c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9ag03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10ag04 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11ag09 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13ag10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14ag11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15ag12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16ag13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17ag14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18ag16 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19ag17 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20ag18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21ag19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22ag24 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23ag25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24ag26 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25ag27 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26ag35 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27ag36 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28ag37 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29ag38 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30ag44ct02r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31ag45c03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32ag45ct02r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33ag46c03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34ag46ct02r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35ag47c03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36ag47ct02r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37ag455ct02r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38ah21-7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39ah21-9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40ah63k127 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41ah79k132 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42ah79k135 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43ah85l120 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44ah93w145 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45ah93w174 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46ah93w215 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47ah93w257 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48ah6407 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

ah7476 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50ah79100a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51ah79100b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52ah79100c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53ah80129 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54ah80136 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55ah80140 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56ah82150a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57ah82150f . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58ah83150q . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59ah83159 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60ah93156 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61ah93157 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62ah94145 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63ah94156 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64ah95160 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65ames01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66ames02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67ames03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68amsoil1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69amsoil2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70aquilasm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71arad6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72arad10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73arad20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74as5045 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75as5046 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76as5048 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77atr72sm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78avistar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79b29root . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80b29tip . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81b707e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82b737a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83b737b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84b737d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85bacj . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86bacxxx . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87be50 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88boe106 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89bqm34 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90c5a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91c5b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92c5c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93c141a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94c141b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95c141c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96c141d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97c141e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98c141f . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99cast102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100clarkk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101clarkv . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102clarkx . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103clarky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104clarkyh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105clarkysm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106clarkz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107clarym15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108clarym18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109

3

Page 5: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

cootie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110cr001sm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111curtisc72 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112dae11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113dae21 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114dae31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115dae51 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116davis-corrected . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117davis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118daytonwright6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119defcnd1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120defcnd2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121defcnd3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122df101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123dillner2032c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124doa5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125du8608418 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126e66 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127e67 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128e168 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129e169 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130e171 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131e174 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132e176 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133e178 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134e180 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135e182 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136e184 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137e186 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138e193 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139e195 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140e197 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141e201 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142e203 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143e205 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144e207 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145e209 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146e210 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147e211 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148e212 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149e214 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150e216 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151e220 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152e221 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153e222 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154e224 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155e226 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156e228 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157e230 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158e231 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159e326 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160e327 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161e331 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162e332 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163e334 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164e335 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165e336 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166e337 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167e338 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168e340 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169

e341 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170e342 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171e343 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172e360 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173e361 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174e374 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175e385 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176e387 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177e392 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178e393 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179e395 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180e396 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181e397 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182e399 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183e403 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184e417 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185e422 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186e426 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187e428 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188e431 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189e432 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190e433 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191e434 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192e435 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193e471 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194e472 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195e473 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196e474 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197e475 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198e476 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199e477 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200e478 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201e479 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202e502 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203e542 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204e543 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205e544 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206e545 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207e546 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208e548 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209e550 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210e552 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211e554 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212e556 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213e557 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214e558 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215e559 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216e560 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217e561 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218e562 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219e580 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220e583 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221e584 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222e587 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223e591 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224e593 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225e598 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226e603 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227e604 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228e625 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229

Page 6: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

e635 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230e636 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231e637 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232e638 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233e639 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234e642 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235e654 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236e655 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237e656 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238e657 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239e662 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240e664 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241e668 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242e682 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 243e694 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244e715 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245e748 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246e793 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247e817 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248e836 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249e837 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250e838 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251e851 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252e852 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253e853 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 254e854 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255e856 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256e857 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257e874 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258e1098 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259e1200 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 260e1210 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261e1211 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262e1212 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263e1212mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264e1213 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265e1214 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266e1230 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267e1233 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268ea61012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269eh0009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270eh1070 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271eh1090 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272eh1590 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273eh2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274eh2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275eiffel385 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276eiffel428 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 277eppler793 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 278falcon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 279fg2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280fg3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281fg4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282fx2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283fx08s176 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284fx66a175 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285fx78k140 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286fx83w160 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 287fx83w227 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 288fx84w097 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289

fx84w127 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290fx84w140 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291fx84w150 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292fx84w175 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 293fx84w218 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294fx05188 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 295fx05191 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 296fx60100 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297fx60100sm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298fx60126 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 299fx60157 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300fx60160 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301fx60177 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302fx61140 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 303fx61147 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 304fx601261 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305fx711530 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 306fxl142k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 307fxm2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308fxs03182 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 309fxs21158 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310giiia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311giiib . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 312giiic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313giiid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 314giiie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315giiif . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316giiig . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317giiih . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 318giiii . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 319giiij . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 320giiik . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321giiil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 322gm15sm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323goe07k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 324goe08k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325goe11k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 326goe14k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327goe15k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328goe16k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 329goe29b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 330goe54 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 331goe55 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 332goe57 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 333goe79 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 334goe81 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 335goe92 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336goe114 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 337goe115 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 338goe116 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339goe117 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340goe118 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341goe121 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 342goe122 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 343goe123 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 344goe124 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 345goe134 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 346goe137 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 347goe140 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 348goe142 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349

Page 7: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

goe143 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 350goe144 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 351goe147 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352goe155 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 353goe164 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 354goe165 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 355goe167 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 356goe173 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357goe174 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 358goe176 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 359goe177 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360goe178 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 361goe180 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362goe182 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 363goe184 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364goe190 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 365goe195 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 366goe199 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 367goe210 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 368goe217 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 369goe222 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 370goe223 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371goe225 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372goe226 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373goe227 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 374goe229 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 375goe233 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 376goe234 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 377goe239 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 378goe240 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 379goe242 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380goe255 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 381goe256 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 382goe257 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 383goe264 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 384goe265 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 385goe269 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 386goe276 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 387goe277 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 388goe278 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 389goe279 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 390goe280 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 391goe281 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 392goe282 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 393goe284 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 394goe285 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 395goe286 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 396goe287 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 397goe288 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 398goe289 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 399goe290 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 400goe298 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 401goe300 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 402goe301 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 403goe303 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 404goe304 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 405goe320 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 406goe325 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 407goe326 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 408goe328 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 409

goe329 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 410goe331 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 411goe332 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 412goe335 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 413goe342 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 414goe346 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 415goe358 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 416goe359 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 417goe360 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 418goe361 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 419goe362 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 420goe363 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 421goe364 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 422goe365 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 423goe366 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 424goe367 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 425goe368 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 426goe369 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 427goe371 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 428goe372 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 429goe373 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 430goe374 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 431goe381 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 432goe383 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 433goe385 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 434goe387 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 435goe389 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 436goe392 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 437goe393 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 438goe394 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 439goe395 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 440goe396 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 441goe397 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 442goe398 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 443goe399 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 444goe400 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 445goe402 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 446goe403 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 447goe405 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 448goe409 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 449goe410 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450goe411 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 451goe413 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 452goe414 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 453goe416a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 454goe417 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 455goe418 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 456goe419 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 457goe420 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 458goe423 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 459goe424 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 460goe425 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 461goe426 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 462goe427 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 463goe428 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 464goe430 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 465goe431 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 466goe432 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 467goe433 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 468goe436 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 469

Page 8: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

goe437 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 470goe438 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 471goe439 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 472goe442 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 473goe445 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 474goe446 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 475goe447 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 476goe449 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 477goe450 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 478goe456 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 479goe457 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 480goe458 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 481goe459 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 482goe460 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 483goe464 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 484goe477 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 485goe478 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 486goe479 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 487goe480 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 488goe481a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 489goe483 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 490goe484 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 491goe492 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 492goe493 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 493goe494 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 494goe495 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 495goe496 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 496goe497 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 497goe498 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 498goe499 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 499goe500 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500goe501 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 501goe502 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 502goe504 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 503goe506 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 504goe508 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 505goe517 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 506goe526 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 507goe527 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 508goe528 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 509goe529 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 510goe532 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 511goe533 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 512goe534 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 513goe535 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 514goe546 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 515goe547 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 516goe548 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 517goe549 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 518goe550 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 519goe553 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 520goe559 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 521goe563 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 522goe564 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 523goe565 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 524goe567 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 525goe575 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 526goe584 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 527goe591 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 528goe592 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 529

goe595 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 530goe596 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 531goe598 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 532goe599 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 533goe600 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 534goe601 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 535goe602 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 536goe602m . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 537goe604 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 538goe610bm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 539goe611 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 540goe613 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 541goe615 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 542goe617 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 543goe619 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 544goe620 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 545goe621 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 546goe622 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 547goe623 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 548goe624 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 549goe626 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 550goe627 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 551goe628 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 552goe629 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 553goe630 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 554goe645 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 555goe646 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 556goe647 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 557goe648 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 558goe650 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 559goe654 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 560goe655 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 561

Page 9: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

1 Acknowledgements

This collection of parametrized airfoils would not havebeen possible without the prior work of several indi-viduals. Many thanks goes to Prof. Michael Selig atUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign for supply-ing the original point cloud airfoil database on whichthis work is based. All my appreciation to Brenda Kul-fan from Boeing for her inspiring work on class function/ shape function transformation technique. My warmthanks tho the research team at Linkoping University:Anton Jonzen, Chetan Nangunoori, Jacob Bjarkmar, Jo-han Karlen, Svante Lothgren and Vijaykumar Govin-darajan.

The author also wishes to thank the sponsors: VIN-NOVA and the industrial partner Saab AB for theirfunding through Nationella Flygtekniska Frsksprogram-met, NFFP5.

2 Introduction

This book is intended to serve as a reference for students,engineers and researchers requiring a parametrized air-foil that can model existing airfoils well as providinga significant design space for optimisation. The pro-posed method covers at least one thousand of the knownprofiles used in aeronautics today, while enabling manymore. The method uses 15 parameters defining a wingprofile. This way many existing airfoils can be mod-elled with close tolerance. In the following volumes,the parametrized airfoils are compared with the origi-nal point cloud data. The comparison is made for ge-ometrical and aerodynamic similarity, but is should benoted that the point clouds used may in some instancesnot be representative for the original airfoil due to roundoff errors, discretisation error and other other unknownerrors. The parametrisation is intended for two dimen-sional airfoils but the method can easily be extended toa three dimensional wing.

The coordinate resolution becomes infinite and point dis-tribution becomes a non-issue by employing a functionalparametric description with built-in smoothing and in-terpolation. In order to facilitate this, some basic as-sumptions regarding the shape of an airfoil are made:The airfoil is assumed to have one distinct top and bot-tom point, the chord line has a length of exactly one,forming the x-axis of the profile, the trailing edge is as-sumed to be either sharp, i.e. with a y-coordinate of zerofor both top and bottom sides, or blunt with the y coor-dinates of the top and bottom trailing edges being sym-metric around the chord line. These assumptions meansthat a lot of historical airfoils needed to be preprocessedbefore they could be parametrized. Preprocessing usu-ally involved rotating the coordinate cloud to form anx-axis from the nose to the trailing edge, scaling to setthe length of the airfoil to exactly unity and finally trun-

cating the trailing edge to make sure that the upper andlower sides both ended at x=1.

3 Background

A fundamental part of aircraft design involves wing air-foil optimization, establishing an outer shape of the wingwhich has good aerodynamic performance for the designmission, good internal volume distribution for fuel andsystems and which also serves as an efficient structuralmember supporting the load of the weight of the air-craft. The underlying idea with this parametrization isto couple an appropriate number of parameters, balanc-ing the need of geometric accuracy with the necessity offew airfoil parameters in order to facilitate en expedientoptimisation, with the intrinsic value of having param-eters that makes sense for a human; such as thickness,camber and trailing edge thickness. Several approachesto parametrization of wing profiles can be found in theliterature.

Airfoils can be described by point clouds as done in mostairfoil libraries [1]. The number of parameters is twiceas large as the number of points used (x and y coordi-nates) and in the case of aerodynamic optimization thisparametrization will most certainly be not well behaved,since no smoothing function is included and must there-fore be employed. Other problems may arise for the factthat the airfoils sometimes are defined with too few co-ordinate points and/or too few decimals, a problem oc-curring especially with old airfoils. On the other hand,the design space that this kind of parametrization allowsrepresenting is extremely large, as any and all shapes canbe reproduced, even degenerate ones.

Airfoils can also be represented by mathematical func-tions. Among the most common representatives of thiscategory are indeed the NACA 4-, 5- and 6-digits for-mulations [2] [3]. Compared to point clouds, they couldbe said to represent the opposite case: they are verywell behaving parametrizations, but they cannot cover avery large design space, since they only provide four tosix parameters respectively to be tuned. The NACA 4digit series is particularly interesting as the parametersare a part of the name of the airfoil. In the case of the5- and 6 digit series, the name is instead constructedfrom the airfoils aerodynamic characteristic and geome-try. Another known set of theoretically defined airfoilsare the Joukowski profiles [4]. Using the conformal map-ping method, airfoils with a round nose and sharp trail-ing edge can be represented. Sadly the method is not torecommend for trying to match known airfoils and thedesign space it describes is quite confined to airfoils withoften poor performances.

More recently a very interesting and powerful represen-tation method, the class function/shape function’ trans-formation CST method was presented by Kulfan[5]. Themethod is based on simple well behaved mathematical

1

Page 10: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

functions that allow for increasing the number of pa-rameters at will. Also the formulation is not restrictedto round nose and sharp trailing edge profiles, but candescribe almost any shape.

4 Method

4.1 Model

The envelope of the airfoil is described by a set of para-metric Bezier curves, which are closely related to Bern-stein polynomials. The equation for an n-dimensionalcubic Bezier curve is shown in equation 1. The cubicBezier curve requires the four control points, P0 to P3

in order to be defined. The points P0 to P2 span thefirst control vector, and P2 to P3 span the second con-trol vector, as shown in figure 1. The Bezier is tangentialto the control vectors at the start and endpoints of thecurve. This behaviour will ensure that the leading edgeis tangential with the z-axis and that the curve at toppoint of the airfoil is tangential with the x-axis. The air-

Figure 1: Generic cubic Bezier curve with the four con-trol points P0 to P3 marked. The Bezier is tangentialto the control vectors at the start and endpoints of thecurve.

foil’s top and bottom curves are modelled individuallyby two cubic Bezier curves in parametric form being C1continuous at the defined top and bottom points, as wellas the leading edge. C1 continuity was selected over C2continuity in order to allow curve fitting with many olderairfoils which only exhibit C1 continuity.

B = (1− t)3P0 + 3t(1− t)2P1 + 3t2(1− t)P2 + t3P3 (1)

When modelling modern profiles, the proposed methoddoes allow C2 continuity as well. Figure 2 gives an ex-ample of a transonic wing airfoil, the Lockheed C-5ABL576, and show the outer envelope and the Beziercontrol points and control vectors. The control pointsare numbered clockwise from the bottom side trailingedge. The method of representing an airfoil is straight-forward. For a generic envelope built up by four cu-bic Bezier curves, 13 control points are needed to define

Figure 2: Parametrized transonic wing airfoil withBezier control points and control vectors, and the num-bering of the control points.

the curve, giving 26 variables when both x and y co-ordinates are taken into account. However when somesymmetries and simplifications valid for wing profiles aretaken into account the number of independent parame-ters are reduced to 14. Control point 1 and 13 alwayshave the same x-coordinate, one, and the same absolutevalue of their y-coordinate is also equal as their average,the camber line, must be on the x-axis at the trailingedge. Control points 3,4 and 5 on the bottom side havethe same y-coordinate. The same goes for the top sidecontrol points 9, 10 and 11. The leading edge points 6,7and 8 all have an x-coordinate of zero. Table 1 show thedependent parameters for the control points.

Table 1: Coordinate dependency for the control points.Some always take the value one or zero, while others(a,b,c) always shares the same numerical while (xn yn )are allowed any value.

CoordinatePoint nr. X Y

1 1 a2 x2 y23 x3 b4 x4 b5 x5 b6 0 y67 0 08 0 y89 x9 c

10 x10 c11 x11 c12 x12 y1213 1 −a

The control points for each of the investigated airfoilsare available in this tabulated form in the results sectionof this book.

4.2 Parameterization

Handling the control point coordinates directly whenspecifying an airfoil is not user friendly. The coordi-nates themselves have no obvious relation to shape ofthe airfoil when reviewed alone and the possible rangeof the coordinate values exceed the allowed range fornon-degenerate airfoils. To alleviate this concern, and

2

Page 11: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

to reduce the number of free parameters, the followingparameter transformations are done:

The lengths of the control vectors are limited to preventdegenerate cases. For example the upper leading edgecontrol vector needs to be shorter than the distance be-tween the top point and the chord line to prevent leadingedge overshoot. Figure 3 shows the bounding box lim-iting the range of the control vectors. None of the con-trol points are allowed outside of this box, furthermorethe trailing edge control vectors, governed by the twocontrol points nr.2 and nr.12 may never reach furtherforward than points nr.3 and nr.11 respectively. -Shownby the limit lines L1 and L2 in figure 3. Thickness: The

Figure 3: Bounding box of the control vectors, togetherwith the trailing edge vectors forward limits L1 and L2.

x and y coordinates of the top and bottom points (nr.4 and nr.10) are kept as is and named upper thicknessand upper thickness position and similarly for the lowerside. The upper height is parametrized as a factor k4times the maximum allowed upper thickness, 0.15, ac-cording to equation 2. As the lower side is treated in thesame way, this means that the maximum thickness al-lowed with this parametrization is 30% of the chord. Thedifference between the upper and lower thickness thenbecomes the ram thickness. The ram thickness equalsthe airfoil thickness in case the thickness positions areequals. If the upper and lower thickness positions arenot equal, the ram thickness will be slightly larger thanthe traditional airfoil thickness.

y9,10,11 = hu = k5 · 0.15 (2)

Control vectors: The upper leading edge control vec-tor spanned by its start point, the leading edge at [0 0]which is point nr.7, and point nr.8. The length of thisvector is defined as a fraction k1 of the upper thicknesshu, according to equation 3 The constant k1 is then onlyallowed to be in the range [0..1], see figure 4. This en-sures that the part of the profile going from the leadingedge to the top point does not overshoot the top pointsy value.

y8 = k1 · hu (3)

The top side of the airfoil is controlled by three param-eters, shown in figure 5. The top point position Pu isin itself a fraction of the chord length and need not tobe parametrized further, is renamed k3. The two frac-tions k2 and k4 control the lengths of the forward andaft control vectors. The control vector going from thetop point towards the leading edge, i.e. between points

Figure 4: Definition of the leading edge control vectorparameters.

nr.10 to nr.9 has its length limited to a fraction, k2, of thetop point position in the same way in order to preventan overshoot of the profile into negative x-coordinates.Likewise the control vector defined by points 10 to 11,the top to TE vector is a fraction k4 of the length be-tween the upper thickness position (nr.10) and the trail-ing edge (x=1). The trailing edge is defined by five pa-

Figure 5: Definition of the top side control vector pa-rameters.

rameters, some shown in figure 6. The trailing edge gapg, is the distance between the upper and lower side ofthe airfoil at the trailing edge. It is parametrized accord-ing to equation 4, where Gmax is the maximum allowedtrailing edge gap of 5% of the chord.

g = k15 ·Gmax (4)

The release angle α, which is the angle between the cam-ber line tangent and the chord line at the trailing edge,is parametrized similarly according to equation 5. Therelease angle is a fraction k14 times the maximum al-lowed release angle αmax of 0.35 radians ( about 20◦ ).Is should be noted that the release angle may take onboth positive and negative values.

α = k14 · αmax (5)

The boat tail angle β, which is the angle between tan-gents of the upper and lower sides of the airfoil at thetrailing edge is defined in equation 6. It is treated in asimilar way to the release angle. The boat tail angle β isa factor k13 times the maximum allowed boat tail angleβmax of 1 radian ( about 57◦ ).

β = k13 · βmax (6)

Figure 6: Definition of the top side control vector pa-rameters.

3

Page 12: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

The length of the upper and lower side trailing edge con-trol vectors together with the trailing edge gap, the boattail angle and the release angle determines the positionof control points nr. 2 and nr. 12. These lengths are arealso parametrized according to equation 7. The lengthof the upper vector, V , is a fraction k11 of the maximumallowed length Vmax. The maximum allowed length is inturn dependent on the bounding box of the airfoil andthe position of the forward limit L1 set by the x-positionof control point nr. 11.

V = k11,12 · Vmax (7)

The parameters of the lower side of the airfoil are de-fined in the same manner as the upper side parameters,numbering the parameters in the same way from 6 to 10.

With the five parameters defining the trailing edge, thenumber of parameters are now reduced to 15. See table2. By the limits of the fractions many degenerate airfoilsare now hard to impossible to generate. By using thechord length as normalizing agent, the parameters arealso dimensionless and fully scalable.

Table 2: Parameter names and order.

Name Parameter Range

Upper sideUpper nose fraction k1 [0..1]Upper forward fraction k2 [0..1]Upper thickness position k3 [0..1]Upper rearward fraction k4 [0..1]Upper thickness k5 [0..1]

Lower sideLower nose fraction k6 [0..1]Lower forward fraction k7 [0..1]Lower thickness position k8 [0..1]Lower rearward fraction k8 [0..1]Lower thickness k10 [0..1]

Trailing edgeUpper length fraction k11 [0..1]Lower length fraction k12 [0..1]Boat tail angle fraction k13 [0..1]Release angle fraction k10 [0..1]Trailing edge gap fraction k10 [0..1]

4.3 Base change

By listing the parameters k1 to k15 when rounded ofto the nearest tenth, a 15 digit number could be usedto present a large set of airfoils. This approach wouldhowever introduce large round off errors which wouldmake the process of modelling known airfoils trouble-some. This is alleviated by changing the base from base10 to base 64. With base 64 the resolution increases

from 10% to 1.6% for each parameter value. Some mod-ification to the new base numbering has to be made asboth zero and one needs to be modelled, and any doubledigit parameter is disallowed. The encoding follows theRFC3548 [6]. The series [0, 1, 2, .., 25, 26, ..., 51, 52, ...63]maps to [A,B,C, .., Z, a, ..., z, 0, ... ]. By rounding thebase 10 multi-decimal parameter towards the closest63:rd as shown in table 3, a reasonable accurate valuecan be stored in a single digit. With this system an air-

Table 3: Base change example.

Parameter 63:rds base 64 error

k1 = 0 0 A 0 %k2 = 0.3333 21 V 0 %k3 = 0.5 32 g 1.6 %k4 = 0.7 44 s -0.3 %k5 = 1 63 0 %

foil with know parameters k1 to k15 can be expressed asa single string. For example will the Naca747a415 profileshown in figure 6 be represented as the string shown intable 4

Table 4: Base 64 representation:

ggaQszVsoTL8DeA

4.4 Reproducing known airfoils

In many design cases it will not be appropriate to startwith a generic airfoil for design optimization. Instead,by employing a known airfoil, whether it is a Clark-Y,NACA0012 or any other known airfoil there is a needof having the traditional airfoil shape expressed in theproposed parameters. Modelling known airfoils requireslightly more work than creating new airfoils.

When fitting known wing profiles to the parametrization,the input data are sometimes in poor condition and inneed of preprocessing. The point cloud must have itsleading edge at [0 0] and the trailing edge cord have toend at [1 0], if the profile has a trailing edge gap, thisshould be symmetrically distributed around the [1 0]. Ifthis is not the case som geometrical rotation, transla-tion and scaling will have to be employed. This meansthat some aerodynamic properties such has zero lift an-gle and stall angle of attack will shift when comparingthe parametrized airfoil with external aero data.

One example of a wing profile that needs preprocessing isthe Clark-Y profile, an older propeller profile today usedfrequently amongst model aircraft builders for its easeof manufacture rather than aerodynamic performance.The coordinate data for the Clark-Y profile, as presented

4

Page 13: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

in some databases [7] has the lower side flank parallel tothe x-axis, rather than letting the chord line define thex-axis.

A starting guess of parameters were created by evaluat-ing the profile radius at the leading edge, top and bot-tom, at the upper maximum y- position and at the lowerminimum y-position. Together with the trailing edgegap and the slope of the upper and lower sides of theairfoil at the trailing edge. The radius at these pointsare computed with a three point circle algorithm fromwhich the length of the control vectors can be computedaccording to equation 8, where a is the outgoing controlvector length and h the perpendicular distance to thenext control point as shown in figure 7.

1

r=

2h

3a3(8)

Figure 7: Definition radius parameters.

With the obtained starting guess, a standard optimiza-tion is run in MATLAB to fit the parameter curve to thecorresponding point cloud. The mathematical methodused is the built-in fsolve method, which in this caseutilizes the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. The run isset to minimize the root mean square error of the verti-cal position of the coordinate points between parameterpoints and point cloud.

The optimization is nested in two layers in order to treatthe parameter nature of the Bezier curve. The outer loopsolves for the control parameters governing the curvesegment in question and an inner loop solving for thecurvilinear position parameter vector t, with respect tothe x coordinate. As the original data points may haveany distribution along the x-axis, it cannot be assumedthat the t vector in equation 1 is evenly distributed.

The optimization results is evaluated both from a geo-metrical point of view, were the error of vertical positionof each point is plotted for the profile. The average RMSerror for the profile is a general quality control. The av-erage RMS error was usually in the order of 10−4, ne-cessitating the use of the unit error counts (ects), where1 ects = 10−4. Similarly, the curvature and error incurvature between were evaluated Notably many of theavailable airfoils had very noisy curvature distributions,making an error plot of curvature fitting interesting butnot a good indicator to whether the parametric inter-polation was good or bad. Instead, as long as a good

scatter is found any offset bias or systematic error canbe assumed to be small.

To further investigate the correlation between the orig-inal data point cloud and the parametric wing pro-file, an aerodynamic study was performed utilizing thepanel method XFOIL [8]. The original airfoil and theparametrized airfoil were both subjected to a CL sweepranging from −0.3 to 1 at a Reynolds number of 6 · 106.The drag and moment coefficients were evaluated, as wellas the boundary layer transition point for both profiles.

The proposed parametrization method was tested on aset of over 1100 different airfoils. Results for these pro-files are presented in this report, in the catalog section.For each of the investigated airfoils the reported curva-ture distribution graph is truncated at the leading edgein order to give a better scale of the results for the rest ofthe profile. Each profile is reported on a separate pageconsisting of the following sections

• Full name, if one is available

• Data source, usually the UIUC [1] database, butalso NACA or other sources.

• A geometry plot, showing both a scaled up y-axiswith camber and thickness, as well as an axis equalprofile plot.

• A geometrical data table containing maximumthickness, maximum thickness position etc...

• Coordinates of the Bezier curve control points.

• Base 64 parametrized airfoil name

• A table showing the average errors in position, cur-vature as well as errors in drag- and pitching mo-ment coefficient and transition point position forcontrol point and parameter curves at a standardCL of 0.3

• A graph showing the position and curvature errorover the entire profile.

• A figure showing the error in drag- and pitchingmoment coefficient as well as the error in transitionpoint position for a range of lift coefficients.

5 Discussion

The conducted aerodynamic study covers only someaerodynamic phenomena in the linear domain of lowspeed flight. For a more thorough comparison higer or-der effects needs to be modelled. Notably stall angle ofattack and post-stall behaviour, which cannot be cap-tured well with XFOIL. Likewise High speed shock for-mation similarities and drag rise needs to be assessedbefore this parametric wing profile description can besaid to model the point cloud airfoils in every aspect.

5

Page 14: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

The method as described does not require C2 continuityat the top and bottom points. Adding this constraintto the method will reduce the number of free parame-ters with two, and also give a more traditional curvaturecontinuity. However, the geometrical fitting of knownairfoils would suffer in having a higher geometrical er-ror. For most known airfoils tested, the optimized cur-vature is indeed discontinuous, but with a very smallstep. This discontinuity does not appear to have a sig-nificant impact on the aerodynamic performance of theparametrized airfoil.

Some of the airfoils in the catalog have an improper setof control points. In the numerical optimisation usedto compute the control points, some profiles got a zerolength control vector at the trailing edge. While thegeometric representation using the control points works,as well as creating the base 64 string, creating controlpoints from the BM64 string will not work. The zero-length control vector destroys the information about itsorientation.

6 Software

MATLAB code needed for evaluating the airfoils in thedatabase, as well as an electronic version of the databasewill be available at:

Linkoping University:http://www.iei.liu.se/flumes/aircraft-design/

software

and at Redhammer Consulting:http://www.redhammer.se/software

References

[1] Michael Selig, UIUC Airfoil CoordinatesDatabase, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Dept of Aerospace Engineering,Urbana, Illinois, http://www.ae.illinois.edu/m-selig/ads/coord database.html, webpage retrieved2012-01-01

[2] E. N. Jacobs, K. E. Ward, & R. M. Pinkerton Thecharacteristics of 78 related airfoil sections from testsin the variable-density wind tunnel, NACA ReportNo. 460,1933

[3] P. Marzocca. The NACA airfoil series, Clarkson Uni-versity, Retrieved 07-03-2009.

[4] R. Von Mises, Theory of Flight, Dover PublicationsInc., New York, 1959

[5] B. Kulfan, Universal Parametric Geometry Repre-sentation Method, AIAA Journal of Aircraft, vol.45no.1, pp.142-158, 2008

[6] S. Josefsson, Ed., The Base16, Base32, and Base64Data Encodings, Request for Comments: 3548, Net-work Working Group, The Internet Society, 2003.

[7] Louden, F A , Collection of wind-tunnel dataon commonly used wing sections, NACA-TR-331,93R20691,1930

[8] Drela, M, XFOIL - An analysis and design systemfor low Reynolds number airfoils, Proceedings of theConference, Notre Dame, Germany; 5-7 June 1989.pp. 1-12. 1989.

7 Airfoil Catalog

.

6

Page 15: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: a18

Information: Archer A18 F1C free flight airfoil(original)Reference: UIUC

Figure 8: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 5: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.3716 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 3.8388 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.6139 %CUpper nose radius: 0.87604 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.305 degRelease Angle: 8.7462 degNose Incidence: 5.1754 degCamber deflection: 13.9216 deg

Table 6: Controlpoints1 -0.00306950.51761 0.0356890.22225 -0.0174790.075281 -0.0174790 -0.0174790 -0.00279670 00 0.0345950.20492 0.0714540.34893 0.0714540.52472 0.0714540.74869 0.0606221 0.0030695

Table 7: Base 64 representation:faWReK FKH1nJtP

Table 8: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.139 4.145 ectsRMS curvature error: 82.32 81.84 %CD error -6 -6.3 dctsCm error -4 16 mctsUpper transition point 16.75 16.76 %

Figure 9: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 10: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

7

Page 16: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: a18sm

Information: Archer A18 F1C free flight airfoil (smoothed)Reference: UIUC

Figure 11: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 9: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.3004 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 3.8292 % @0.48CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.6139 %CUpper nose radius: 0.80441 %CLower nose radius: 0.7243 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.6557 degRelease Angle: 8.7335 degNose Incidence: 4.6017 degCamber deflection: 13.3351 deg

Table 10: Controlpoints1 -0.00306950.50962 0.0347110.22382 -0.0174790.075281 -0.0174790.026042 -0.0174790 -0.0112140 00 0.0312150.1817 0.0714540.37893 0.0714540.4767 0.0714540.73763 0.0639391 0.0030695

Table 11: Base 64 representation:chYKeopFKH4oKtP

Table 12: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.613 3.97 ectsRMS curvature error: 33.8 33.06 %CD error -0.4 -42.1 dctsCm error -11 38 mctsUpper transition point 1.59 0.11 %

Figure 12: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 13: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

8

Page 17: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: a63a108c

Information: NASA/AMES modification of the NACA 63A-108airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 14: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 13: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.7324 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 0.44446 % @0.17CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.7 %CUpper nose radius: 7.3484 %CLower nose radius: 0.96721 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 2.6362 degRelease Angle: -1.8163 degNose Incidence: 8.1186 degCamber deflection: 6.3023 deg

Table 14: Controlpoints1 -0.00350.67387 -0.0213590.53376 -0.0346250.34988 -0.0346250.043735 -0.0346250 -0.0167930 00 0.0175240.0062687 0.04280.30015 0.04280.65936 0.04280.89177 0.0025591 0.0035

Table 15: Base 64 representation:a-TgSf3WSPUsDsS

Table 16: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.074 5.126 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.5 1.7 dctsCm error 12 19 mctsUpper transition point -1.95 -2.4 %

Figure 15: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 16: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

9

Page 18: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag03

Information: Drela AG03 (flat aft bottom) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 17: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 17: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.2362 % @0.24CMaximum Camber: 2.0801 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.12109 %CUpper nose radius: 0.91155 %CLower nose radius: 0.28905 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.2667 degRelease Angle: 2.5067 degNose Incidence: 10.4494 degCamber deflection: 12.9561 deg

Table 18: Controlpoints1 -0.0006050.24106 -0.0114560.14104 -0.0130420.11285 -0.0130420.032851 -0.0130420 -0.00743380 00 0.0189660.062535 0.0512610.28141 0.0512610.45191 0.0512610.6626 0.0353011 0.000605

Table 19: Base 64 representation:YxSPWjsHCGr4HjD

Table 20: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.57 4.651 ectsRMS curvature error: 64.95 Inf %CD error -0.8 2.8 dctsCm error 2 -1 mctsUpper transition point 0.03 -0.11 %

Figure 18: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 19: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

10

Page 19: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag04

Information: Drela AG04 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 20: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 21: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.431 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 1.7383 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.134 %CUpper nose radius: 0.11324 %CLower nose radius: 0.38937 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.4372 degRelease Angle: 2.54 degNose Incidence: 4.8897 degCamber deflection: 7.4297 deg

Table 22: Controlpoints1 -0.000670010.41458 -0.00249520.31306 -0.0186190.12471 -0.0186190.037228 -0.0186190 -0.0101540 00 0.00327620.014218 0.0479060.28091 0.0479060.46682 0.0479060.70227 0.0280731 0.00067001

Table 23: Base 64 representation:E8SRUisIOIk2GjD

Table 24: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.772 3.504 ectsRMS curvature error: 78.17 77.96 %CD error 0.1 0 dctsCm error -8 -5 mctsUpper transition point 0 -0.47 %

Figure 21: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 22: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

11

Page 20: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag08

Information: Drela AG08 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 23: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 25: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.8158 % @0.2CMaximum Camber: 1.7887 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.1599 %CUpper nose radius: 0.14748 %CLower nose radius: 0.49865 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.5484 degRelease Angle: 2.8292 degNose Incidence: 4.0776 degCamber deflection: 6.9068 deg

Table 26: Controlpoints1 -0.00079950.35178 -0.000176820.25139 -0.0162740.10702 -0.0162740.013992 -0.0162740 -0.00699760 00 0.00375760.014361 0.0452290.2797 0.0452290.46324 0.0452290.75563 0.0247751 0.0007995

Table 27: Base 64 representation:F8SQTc3HKHi2GkE

Table 28: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.235 3.282 ectsRMS curvature error: 53.77 58.42 %CD error -0.2 -0.1 dctsCm error -8 -8 mctsUpper transition point 0.45 0.28 %

Figure 24: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 25: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

12

Page 21: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag09

Information: Drela AG09 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 26: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 29: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 4.8323 % @0.19CMaximum Camber: 1.7992 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.1953 %CUpper nose radius: 0.13559 %CLower nose radius: 0.58733 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.3115 degRelease Angle: 2.3245 degNose Incidence: 3.0164 degCamber deflection: 5.3409 deg

Table 30: Controlpoints1 -0.000976520.18565 0.00142280.1208 -0.0129560.053016 -0.0129560.014118 -0.0129560 -0.0074350 00 0.00342040.012943 0.0413110.25799 0.0413110.44519 0.0413110.70899 0.0237791 0.00097652

Table 31: Base 64 representation:F8RQSkuDFGj6FjF

Table 32: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.638 7.178 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.4 1.5 dctsCm error -5 6 mctsUpper transition point 0.05 0.6 %

Figure 27: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 28: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

13

Page 22: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag10

Information: Drela AG10 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 29: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 33: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 4.6276 % @0.17CMaximum Camber: 1.6779 % @0.3CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3617 %CUpper nose radius: 0.70733 %CLower nose radius: 1.2777 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.9621 degRelease Angle: 2.2757 degNose Incidence: 4.7855 degCamber deflection: 7.0612 deg

Table 34: Controlpoints1 -0.00180850.19456 0.00233390.13144 -0.0127620.052895 -0.0127620.0020376 -0.0127620 -0.00416610 00 0.0152760.049489 0.0391030.23424 0.0391030.33993 0.0391030.6342 0.0290351 0.0018085

Table 35: Base 64 representation:ZxPJRV9DFFu6EjJ

Table 36: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.221 6.221 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.5 1.4 dctsCm error -12 -2 mctsUpper transition point -0.04 1.08 %

Figure 30: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 31: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

14

Page 23: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag11

Information: Drela ag11 AirfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 32: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 37: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.8281 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 2.2378 % @0.3CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.23211 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0233 %CLower nose radius: 0.48629 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.3025 degRelease Angle: 2.7502 degNose Incidence: 11.8638 degCamber deflection: 14.614 deg

Table 38: Controlpoints1 -0.00116050.12818 -0.00726340.12818 -0.00859290.062559 -0.00859290.022776 -0.00859290 -0.00859290 00 0.0171220.042974 0.0514240.27237 0.0514240.49516 0.0514240.80514 0.0213031 0.0011605

Table 39: Base 64 representation:V1RUW oEEEa HkG

Table 40: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.697 3.676 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.7 0.4 dctsCm error -9 -19 mctsUpper transition point 0.35 -0.71 %

Figure 33: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 34: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

15

Page 24: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag12

Information: Drela AG12 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 35: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 41: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.2467 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 1.8519 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0942 %CUpper nose radius: 0.29309 %CLower nose radius: 0.39563 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.5704 degRelease Angle: 3.557 degNose Incidence: 5.4867 degCamber deflection: 9.0437 deg

Table 42: Controlpoints1 -0.0004710.58904 0.0122410.32192 -0.0173680.1367 -0.0173680.1121 -0.0173680 -0.0171950 00 0.0076390.029865 0.0474210.27642 0.0474210.33811 0.0474210.50871 0.0464111 0.000471

Table 43: Base 64 representation:K4SFU-MJOH-mElC

Table 44: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.57 4.006 ectsRMS curvature error: 23.77 20 %CD error 0 -1.1 dctsCm error 1 15 mctsUpper transition point -0.08 1.09 %

Figure 36: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 37: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

16

Page 25: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag13

Information: Drela AG13 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 38: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 45: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.8377 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 1.9847 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0948 %CUpper nose radius: 0.15829 %CLower nose radius: 0.34629 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.7275 degRelease Angle: 3.7369 degNose Incidence: 6.2355 degCamber deflection: 9.9724 deg

Table 46: Controlpoints1 -0.0004740.54498 0.0144070.31541 -0.0148170.11427 -0.0148170.020217 -0.0148170 -0.00683170 00 0.00372370.01314 0.0466110.28113 0.0466110.49014 0.0466110.8484 0.0153411 0.000474

Table 47: Base 64 representation:F8STUe0HPGVqElC

Table 48: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.746 3.442 ectsRMS curvature error: 21.55 22.19 %CD error -0.4 -0.5 dctsCm error -1 -8 mctsUpper transition point 0.67 1.14 %

Figure 39: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 40: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

17

Page 26: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag14

Information: Drela AG14 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 41: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 49: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.3797 % @0.2CMaximum Camber: 2.1006 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0956 %CUpper nose radius: 0.20363 %CLower nose radius: 0.46443 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 2.5983 degRelease Angle: 3.4341 degNose Incidence: 6.6902 degCamber deflection: 10.1242 deg

Table 50: Controlpoints1 -0.0004780.54239 0.0165810.24845 -0.012170.089637 -0.012170.0050921 -0.012170 -0.00397070 00 0.00507530.018974 0.0456110.26974 0.0456110.54821 0.0456110.97943 0.00218141 0.000478

Table 51: Base 64 representation:H6RYTV7GLFDmDlC

Table 52: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.583 4.503 ectsRMS curvature error: 20.49 20.58 %CD error 0 -0.3 dctsCm error 4 18 mctsUpper transition point -0.21 -0.82 %

Figure 42: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 43: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

18

Page 27: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag16

Information: Drela AG16 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 44: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 53: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.1257 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 1.8923 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0929 %CUpper nose radius: 0.38526 %CLower nose radius: 0.47317 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.2561 degRelease Angle: 3.9528 degNose Incidence: 4.6057 degCamber deflection: 8.5585 deg

Table 54: Controlpoints1 -0.00046450.62188 0.0115820.35229 -0.0218610.15 -0.0218610.1455 -0.0218610 -0.0214240 00 0.0109420.046612 0.0517210.28899 0.0517210.39848 0.0517210.57165 0.0460971 0.0004645

Table 55: Base 64 representation:O1SKW-CKPJ4kFmC

Table 56: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.504 3.053 ectsRMS curvature error: 16.44 20.4 %CD error 0.1 0.8 dctsCm error -2 -8 mctsUpper transition point -0.56 -2.3 %

Figure 45: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 46: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

19

Page 28: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag17

Information: Drela AG17 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 47: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 57: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.4999 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 2.0372 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0939 %CUpper nose radius: 0.33128 %CLower nose radius: 0.38325 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.9266 degRelease Angle: 3.9986 degNose Incidence: 6.0635 degCamber deflection: 10.0621 deg

Table 58: Controlpoints1 -0.00046950.59646 0.0138710.32561 -0.0176460.13694 -0.0176460.11914 -0.0176460 -0.0176460 00 0.00860.033488 0.0500860.28915 0.0500860.42436 0.0500860.611 0.0410941 0.0004695

Table 59: Base 64 representation:L4TMV IJOIzlEmC

Table 60: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.447 5.281 ectsRMS curvature error: 21.13 23.58 %CD error -0.1 -0.5 dctsCm error -2 -13 mctsUpper transition point -0.22 0.69 %

Figure 48: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 49: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

20

Page 29: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag18

Information: Drela AG18 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 50: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 61: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.8638 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 2.1825 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0948 %CUpper nose radius: 0.22085 %CLower nose radius: 0.32579 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.6509 degRelease Angle: 4.021 degNose Incidence: 7.2609 degCamber deflection: 11.2819 deg

Table 62: Controlpoints1 -0.0004740.54809 0.0168520.3181 -0.0138040.096885 -0.0138040.072651 -0.0138040 -0.0125620 00 0.00477170.015465 0.0484510.28931 0.0484510.44443 0.0484510.6416 0.0371721 0.000474

Table 63: Base 64 representation:G8TOV5QGQGwpEmC

Table 64: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.397 2.922 ectsRMS curvature error: 20.92 22.8 %CD error 0 -0.2 dctsCm error -2 -11 mctsUpper transition point -0.03 1.38 %

Figure 51: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 52: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

21

Page 30: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag19

Information: Drela AG19 profileReference: UIUC

Figure 53: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 65: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.4039 % @0.2CMaximum Camber: 2.2958 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0954 %CUpper nose radius: 0.16958 %CLower nose radius: 0.29661 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.3048 degRelease Angle: 4.1143 degNose Incidence: 8.1149 degCamber deflection: 12.2292 deg

Table 66: Controlpoints1 -0.0004770.53884 0.019350.25592 -0.011470.083848 -0.011470.072714 -0.011470 -0.011470 00 0.00185820.0030542 0.0473060.28942 0.0473060.45507 0.0473060.65678 0.0351381 0.000477

Table 67: Base 64 representation:D-TPU IFMFunEmC

Table 68: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.908 2.946 ectsRMS curvature error: 25.17 27.39 %CD error -0.2 -0.6 dctsCm error -5 -4 mctsUpper transition point 0.97 1.77 %

Figure 54: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 55: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

22

Page 31: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag24

Information: AG24 Bubble Dancer DLG by Mark DrelaReference: UIUC

Figure 56: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 69: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.4185 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 2.232 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0971 %CUpper nose radius: 0.48654 %CLower nose radius: 0.47278 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.0698 degRelease Angle: 5.3831 degNose Incidence: 5.9859 degCamber deflection: 11.3689 deg

Table 70: Controlpoints1 -0.00048550.78905 0.0118560.39277 -0.0238060.17708 -0.0238060.11797 -0.0238060 -0.0192830 00 0.0144780.064627 0.062550.31499 0.062550.58855 0.062550.88291 0.015731 0.0004855

Table 71: Base 64 representation:PyUabzVLRKSWFoC

Table 72: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.631 4.258 ectsRMS curvature error: 18.03 20.46 %CD error 0.5 1.1 dctsCm error -5 -2 mctsUpper transition point -0.43 -1.13 %

Figure 57: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 58: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

23

Page 32: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag25

Information: AG25 Bubble Dancer DLG by Mark DrelaReference: UIUC

Figure 59: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 73: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.5788 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 2.4182 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0963 %CUpper nose radius: 0.4144 %CLower nose radius: 0.41098 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.3626 degRelease Angle: 5.3241 degNose Incidence: 6.8875 degCamber deflection: 12.2116 deg

Table 74: Controlpoints1 -0.00048150.72414 0.0146650.34085 -0.0190030.1501 -0.0190030.10207 -0.0190030 -0.0167230 00 0.0117770.050208 0.0599260.3156 0.0599260.57181 0.0599260.8617 0.0187031 0.0004815

Table 75: Base 64 representation:N1UYa3UKOIVbFoC

Table 76: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.417 4.012 ectsRMS curvature error: 12.22 12.91 %CD error 0.1 0.4 dctsCm error -2 -2 mctsUpper transition point 0.13 -0.38 %

Figure 60: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 61: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

24

Page 33: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag26

Information: AG26 Bubble Dancer DLG by Mark DrelaReference: UIUC

Figure 62: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 77: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.8375 % @0.24CMaximum Camber: 2.5649 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0999 %CUpper nose radius: 0.40075 %CLower nose radius: 0.36598 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.5466 degRelease Angle: 5.0101 degNose Incidence: 7.8733 degCamber deflection: 12.8835 deg

Table 78: Controlpoints1 -0.00049950.62383 0.0174820.31741 -0.0152960.10998 -0.0152960.069288 -0.0152960 -0.0130020 00 0.0102010.038946 0.0574380.31627 0.0574380.50477 0.0574380.72377 0.0358041 0.0004995

Table 79: Base 64 representation:L3USZ1YHPHniFnD

Table 80: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.315 5.753 ectsRMS curvature error: 19.31 19.78 %CD error 0.3 1 dctsCm error 0 -4 mctsUpper transition point -0.44 -1.14 %

Figure 63: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 64: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

25

Page 34: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag27

Information: AG27 Bubble Dancer DLG by Mark DrelaReference: UIUC

Figure 65: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 81: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.1212 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 2.6939 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.1035 %CUpper nose radius: 0.066651 %CLower nose radius: 16.9447 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.1799 degRelease Angle: 4.7444 degNose Incidence: 7.2214 degCamber deflection: 11.9658 deg

Table 82: Controlpoints1 -0.000517510.51098 0.0221540.28019 -0.0128950.079122 -0.0128956.636e-005 -0.0128950 -0.00273790 00 0.0018510.0077103 0.0545240.31772 0.0545240.53295 0.0545240.80092 0.0243771 0.00051751

Table 83: Base 64 representation:C9UUXO FOGcqFnD

Table 84: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.371 6.741 ectsRMS curvature error: 22.21 25.4 %CD error 0.4 0.4 dctsCm error 7 7 mctsUpper transition point -0.8 -0.8 %

Figure 66: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 67: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

26

Page 35: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag35

Information: AG35 - Not so good fit.Reference: UIUC

Figure 68: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 85: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.7243 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 2.3805 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.24889 %CUpper nose radius: 0.6654 %CLower nose radius: 0.7988 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 41.5742 degRelease Angle: 19.2444 degNose Incidence: 6.3739 degCamber deflection: 25.6183 deg

Table 86: Controlpoints1 -0.00124450.35219 -0.0186910.25219 -0.0224070.17008 -0.0224070.014579 -0.0224070 -0.00881120 00 0.0174630.068748 0.0668620.31591 0.0668620.57871 0.0668620.99811 0.00283151 0.0012445

Table 87: Base 64 representation:RxUZsZ6LGKC2t-G

Table 88: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.47 8.015 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.2 2.1 dctsCm error -58 -84 mctsUpper transition point -0.58 -1.12 %

Figure 69: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 70: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

27

Page 36: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag36

Information: AG46Reference: UIUC

Figure 71: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 89: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.1678 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 2.2378 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.26691 %CUpper nose radius: 0.52526 %CLower nose radius: 0.85103 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.4311 degRelease Angle: 3.2997 degNose Incidence: 5.2392 degCamber deflection: 8.5389 deg

Table 90: Controlpoints1 -0.00133460.34869 -0.0174320.24869 -0.0208140.16994 -0.0208140.016336 -0.0208140 -0.00962720 00 0.0148210.062726 0.0627780.31615 0.0627780.42013 0.0627780.6665 0.0482961 0.0013346

Table 91: Base 64 representation:PyUKbe5LGJw2LlH

Table 92: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.899 3.694 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.6 1.2 dctsCm error -2 -16 mctsUpper transition point -1.17 -1.71 %

Figure 72: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 73: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

28

Page 37: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag37

Information: N/AReference: N/A

Figure 74: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 93: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.7335 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 2.2045 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.35071 %CUpper nose radius: 0.88948 %CLower nose radius: 0.59804 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.1333 degRelease Angle: 3.8549 degNose Incidence: 8.3885 degCamber deflection: 12.2434 deg

Table 94: Controlpoints1 -0.00175350.35094 -0.0154820.25094 -0.0183450.16989 -0.0183450.026545 -0.0183450 -0.0102880 00 0.0220210.081779 0.0603980.30209 0.0603980.47148 0.0603980.82934 0.0285441 0.0017535

Table 95: Base 64 representation:XuTQaj1LGIs2LlJ

Table 96: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.016 2.592 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.8 1.6 dctsCm error -8 -4 mctsUpper transition point -0.71 -1.6 %

Figure 75: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 76: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

29

Page 38: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag38

Information: AG38 - Sequential flat top.Reference: UIUC

Figure 77: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 97: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.09 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 2.1139 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.46973 %CUpper nose radius: 0.96108 %CLower nose radius: 0.65407 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.8477 degRelease Angle: 4.0734 degNose Incidence: 8.5099 degCamber deflection: 12.5833 deg

Table 98: Controlpoints1 -0.00235110.35859 -0.0133570.25859 -0.0158590.15767 -0.0158590.020048 -0.0158590 -0.00883580 00 0.0237230.086492 0.0558320.31472 0.0558320.44798 0.0558320.8073 0.0330071 0.0023511

Table 99: Base 64 representation:btUMYj3KIHk2LmM

Table 100: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.99 2.97 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.3 1 dctsCm error -13 -24 mctsUpper transition point -0.69 -0.7 %

Figure 78: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 79: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

30

Page 39: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag44ct02r

Information: Drela AG44ct -02f airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 80: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 101: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.2978 % @0.24CMaximum Camber: 1.9711 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0534 %CUpper nose radius: 0.55571 %CLower nose radius: 0.38892 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.0413 degRelease Angle: 2.521 degNose Incidence: 8.5092 degCamber deflection: 11.0302 deg

Table 102: Controlpoints1 -0.0002670.63271 -0.00347010.34543 -0.0183890.16335 -0.0183890.089844 -0.0183890 -0.0152630 00 0.0125510.042522 0.0556280.27448 0.0556280.41942 0.0556280.51942 0.0468941 0.000267

Table 103: Base 64 representation:O1SNY0sKOI1jHjB

Table 104: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.635 4.322 ectsRMS curvature error: 88.77 75.82 %CD error -0.2 -0.3 dctsCm error 15 10 mctsUpper transition point -0.39 0.95 %

Figure 81: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 82: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

31

Page 40: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag45c03

Information: Drela AG45c -03f airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 83: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 105: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.9341 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 2.056 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.089404 %CUpper nose radius: 0.68748 %CLower nose radius: 0.36316 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 2.8362 degRelease Angle: 2.5406 degNose Incidence: 9.1188 degCamber deflection: 11.6595 deg

Table 106: Controlpoints1 -0.000447020.84572 0.00257610.25739 -0.0162720.13659 -0.0162720.084686 -0.0162720 -0.0141560 00 0.0160850.056449 0.0547610.26295 0.0547610.45884 0.0547610.55884 0.0309771 0.00044702

Table 107: Base 64 representation:TxRRX3YJJHzNDjC

Table 108: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.928 4.224 ectsRMS curvature error: 87.7 88.93 %CD error -0.5 -1.1 dctsCm error 20 26 mctsUpper transition point -0.39 -0.02 %

Figure 84: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 85: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

32

Page 41: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag45ct02r

Information: Drela AG45ct -02f airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 86: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 109: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.9066 % @0.24CMaximum Camber: 1.877 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0622 %CUpper nose radius: 0.64802 %CLower nose radius: 0.33101 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.9582 degRelease Angle: 2.2012 degNose Incidence: 8.7934 degCamber deflection: 10.9945 deg

Table 110: Controlpoints1 -0.0003110.66001 -0.00196020.3403 -0.0172690.15022 -0.0172690.088631 -0.0172690 -0.0146790 00 0.0155060.055655 0.0528190.26292 0.0528190.44337 0.0528190.54337 0.0376941 0.000311

Table 111: Base 64 representation:TxRQX1aKOH0gGjC

Table 112: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.456 6.225 ectsRMS curvature error: 92.91 75.5 %CD error 0 -0.6 dctsCm error 16 14 mctsUpper transition point -0.82 -0.08 %

Figure 87: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 88: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

33

Page 42: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag46c03

Information: Drela AG46c -03f airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 89: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 113: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.0359 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 1.7305 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.079396 %CUpper nose radius: 0.7473 %CLower nose radius: 0.32371 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 2.3184 degRelease Angle: 2.3813 degNose Incidence: 8.6922 degCamber deflection: 11.0735 deg

Table 114: Controlpoints1 -0.000396980.89349 0.00187520.27658 -0.0146890.1229 -0.0146890.077426 -0.0146890 -0.0129260 00 0.0169510.057676 0.0470870.26216 0.0470870.47656 0.0470870.57657 0.0265951 0.00039698

Table 115: Base 64 representation:XxRTU3YILGzJDjC

Table 116: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.853 4.31 ectsRMS curvature error: 86.88 80.23 %CD error -0.8 -1.1 dctsCm error 13 -7 mctsUpper transition point -0.08 0.32 %

Figure 90: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 91: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

34

Page 43: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag46ct02r

Information: Drela AG46ct -02f airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 92: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 117: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.0803 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 1.7152 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0793 %CUpper nose radius: 0.63476 %CLower nose radius: 0.33084 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.1401 degRelease Angle: 2.5804 degNose Incidence: 8.2892 degCamber deflection: 10.8696 deg

Table 118: Controlpoints1 -0.00039650.87999 0.00172020.24385 -0.0152310.1365 -0.0152310.10101 -0.0152310 -0.0149260 00 0.0137020.044364 0.0470850.26215 0.0470850.41713 0.0470850.50752 0.0361341 0.0003965

Table 119: Base 64 representation:T0RNU-RJIG1KEjC

Table 120: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.848 3.968 ectsRMS curvature error: 83.73 77.17 %CD error -0.7 -1.6 dctsCm error 24 22 mctsUpper transition point -0.3 0.13 %

Figure 93: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 94: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

35

Page 44: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag47c03

Information: Drela AG47c -03f airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 95: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 121: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.0652 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 1.3685 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.069288 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0218 %CLower nose radius: 0.25118 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.1028 degRelease Angle: 1.7923 degNose Incidence: 9.7223 degCamber deflection: 11.5146 deg

Table 122: Controlpoints1 -0.000346440.72118 -0.000537320.27908 -0.013180.12359 -0.013180.087941 -0.013180 -0.013150 00 0.0117660.029761 0.0386430.2659 0.0386430.48035 0.0386430.58035 0.0200881 0.00034644

Table 123: Base 64 representation:T4RTQ SILGzZDhC

Table 124: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.602 6.302 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.6 -0.3 dctsCm error 21 27 mctsUpper transition point -0.1 -1.19 %

Figure 96: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 97: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

36

Page 45: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag47ct02r

Information: Drela AG47ct -02f airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 98: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.

Table 125: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.0109 % @0.2CMaximum Camber: 1.334 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.069302 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5382 %CLower nose radius: 0.25118 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.7209 degRelease Angle: 2.101 degNose Incidence: 12.7206 degCamber deflection: 14.8216 deg

Table 126: Controlpoints1 -0.000346510.72071 -0.000540820.27896 -0.013180.12358 -0.013180.087959 -0.013180 -0.0131510 00 0.0125210.029276 0.0378670.26588 0.0378670.42966 0.0378670.52966 0.0276451 0.00034651

Table 127: Base 64 representation:V4ROQ SILG0ZEiC

Table 128: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.536 4.959 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf 91.7 %CD error -0.2 0.1 dctsCm error 20 26 mctsUpper transition point -0.8 -1.41 %

Figure 99: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 100: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

37

Page 46: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ag455ct02r

Information: Drela AG47ct -02f airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 101: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 129: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.4629 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 1.8645 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.084402 %CUpper nose radius: 0.58885 %CLower nose radius: 0.3227 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.5673 degRelease Angle: 2.6828 degNose Incidence: 9.0365 degCamber deflection: 11.7193 deg

Table 130: Controlpoints1 -0.000422010.8476 0.001970.25994 -0.0157030.13673 -0.0157030.080672 -0.0157030 -0.0135050 00 0.0122750.038382 0.0504710.2637 0.0504710.42269 0.0504710.5227 0.0377051 0.00042201

Table 131: Base 64 representation:Q2ROW2aJJH0NEkC

Table 132: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.599 5.74 ectsRMS curvature error: 90.26 94.22 %CD error -0.5 0.2 dctsCm error 17 5 mctsUpper transition point -0.19 -0.29 %

Figure 102: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 103: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

38

Page 47: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah21-7

Information: Andrew Hollom AH 21 airfoil (7Reference: UIUC

Figure 104: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 133: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.0217 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 2.2717 % @0.58CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2939 %CLower nose radius: 0.55902 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.5473 degRelease Angle: 12.0864 degNose Incidence: 8.4152 degCamber deflection: 20.5015 deg

Table 134: Controlpoints1 00.94178 0.0079890.53283 -0.0261630.25509 -0.0261630.18366 -0.0261630 -0.0261630 00 0.0451850.23669 0.0657270.39727 0.0657270.48498 0.0657270.7761 0.0657271 0

Table 135: Base 64 representation:raZJc SQYL IKzA

Table 136: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.775 2.128 ectsRMS curvature error: 20.94 22.37 %CD error 0.8 1.7 dctsCm error -4 -5 mctsUpper transition point -0.95 -2.49 %

Figure 105: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 106: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

39

Page 48: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah21-9

Information: Andrew Hollom AH 21 airfoil (original 9Reference: UIUC

Figure 107: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 137: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.9745 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 1.7394 % @0.58CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.76099 %CLower nose radius: 0.35479 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.7118 degRelease Angle: 9.1924 degNose Incidence: 6.3248 degCamber deflection: 15.5172 deg

Table 138: Controlpoints1 00.93404 0.00616140.54915 -0.0201630.25509 -0.0201630.1301 -0.0201630 -0.0175420 00 0.0312390.19236 0.0507270.39727 0.0507270.49371 0.0507270.78112 0.0507271 0

Table 139: Base 64 representation:mgZKW3fQZJ JJuA

Table 140: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.251 4.294 ectsRMS curvature error: 18.9 17.93 %CD error 0.8 -0.8 dctsCm error -3 6 mctsUpper transition point -2.39 -3.43 %

Figure 108: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 109: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

40

Page 49: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah63k127

Information: Althaus AH 63-K-127/24 airfoil for use with flaps(K)Reference: UIUC

Figure 110: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 141: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.7016 % @0.42CMaximum Camber: 3.754 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.80776 %CLower nose radius: 0.38153 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.2212 degRelease Angle: 6.977 degNose Incidence: 9.7159 degCamber deflection: 16.6929 deg

Table 142: Controlpoints1 00.79049 0.0123240.78992 -0.02630.37059 -0.02630.2483 -0.02630 -0.02630 00 0.0307330.17539 0.100980.43474 0.100980.63509 0.100980.73509 0.0495171 0

Table 143: Base 64 representation:TlcXq VYqLt IqA

Table 144: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.624 6.583 ectsRMS curvature error: 50.43 49.22 %CD error 0.6 0.4 dctsCm error 97 98 mctsUpper transition point -5.44 -5.07 %

Figure 111: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 112: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

41

Page 50: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah79k132

Information: Althaus AH 6-407 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 113: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 145: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.2012 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 3.6792 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.56806 %CLower nose radius: 0.83926 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.5694 degRelease Angle: 4.8172 degNose Incidence: 5.8891 degCamber deflection: 10.7062 deg

Table 146: Controlpoints1 00.83607 0.00152340.83607 -0.029240.43474 -0.029240.085303 -0.029240 -0.0218470 00 0.0212560.1193 0.10280.40245 0.10280.65086 0.10280.75086 0.0399141 0

Table 147: Base 64 representation:NsabrvycsMt KnA

Table 148: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.534 8.047 ectsRMS curvature error: 49.62 50.2 %CD error -1 -1 dctsCm error 121 104 mctsUpper transition point -5.15 -4.31 %

Figure 114: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 115: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

42

Page 51: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah79k135

Information: Althaus AH 79-K-135/20 airfoil for use with flaps(K)Reference: UIUC

Figure 116: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 149: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.4838 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 3.0551 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.61238 %CLower nose radius: 0.6081 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.9066 degRelease Angle: 4.14 degNose Incidence: 6.2982 degCamber deflection: 10.4382 deg

Table 150: Controlpoints1 00.80797 -0.00104990.80797 -0.036930.37059 -0.036930.30008 -0.036930 -0.0348790 00 0.0223970.12287 0.097960.40245 0.097960.65402 0.097960.75402 0.0371711 0

Table 151: Base 64 representation:Prabp7MYrQt KmA

Table 152: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.873 5.963 ectsRMS curvature error: 52.71 54.14 %CD error -3.7 -4.2 dctsCm error 96 95 mctsUpper transition point -4.73 -4.5 %

Figure 117: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 118: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

43

Page 52: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah85l120

Information: Althaus AH 85-L-120/17 symmetrical airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 119: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 153: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.1092 % @0.44CMaximum Camber: -3.4043e-005 % @0.81CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %CUpper nose radius: 0.53477 %CLower nose radius: 0.53477 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.3674 degRelease Angle: 0.00065455 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: 0.00065455 deg

Table 154: Controlpoints1 -0.00080.79081 -0.0171540.75818 -0.060550.43474 -0.060550.17971 -0.060550 -0.0253120 00 0.0253120.17971 0.060550.43474 0.060550.75818 0.060550.79076 0.0171581 0.0008

Table 155: Base 64 representation:blckablcka22KgE

Table 156: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.683 3.57 ectsRMS curvature error: 19.95 17.77 %CD error -1 -0.9 dctsCm error -3 -2 mctsUpper transition point 3.3 3.02 %

Figure 120: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 121: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

44

Page 53: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah93w145

Information: Althaus AH 93-W-145 airfoil for use on wind turbines(W)Reference: UIUC

Figure 122: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 157: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.4707 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 3.9019 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.195 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2431 %CLower nose radius: 1.3124 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.7316 degRelease Angle: 10.1715 degNose Incidence: 5.9352 degCamber deflection: 16.1067 deg

Table 158: Controlpoints1 -0.0009750.89902 0.00929250.62672 -0.0352070.22223 -0.0352070.12428 -0.0352070 -0.0329750 00 0.0349180.14712 0.111180.37052 0.111180.49268 0.111180.92002 0.0217151 0.000975

Table 159: Base 64 representation:UmYMu7cOgPMRKvF

Table 160: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.884 4.645 ectsRMS curvature error: 84.55 82.73 %CD error 2.2 1.8 dctsCm error 32 40 mctsUpper transition point -4.49 -4.05 %

Figure 123: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 124: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

45

Page 54: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah93w174

Information: Althaus AH 93-W-174 airfoil for use on wind turbines(W)Reference: UIUC

Figure 125: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 161: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.4475 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 3.9126 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7815 %CLower nose radius: 2.0808 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.2892 degRelease Angle: 8.9863 degNose Incidence: 4.2294 degCamber deflection: 13.2157 deg

Table 162: Controlpoints1 00.84886 0.0154630.613 -0.0502720.22221 -0.0502720.18218 -0.0502720 -0.0502720 00 0.0438190.16167 0.12590.33928 0.12590.49336 0.12590.59336 0.0874061 0

Table 163: Base 64 representation:WhWP1 MOgVyZHuA

Table 164: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.753 6.669 ectsRMS curvature error: 78.48 83.07 %CD error -0.3 -0.4 dctsCm error 40 15 mctsUpper transition point -1.06 -0.24 %

Figure 126: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 127: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

46

Page 55: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah93w215

Information: N/AReference: UIUC

Figure 128: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 165: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 21.2437 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 3.0646 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.753 %CLower nose radius: 3.3159 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.1904 degRelease Angle: 7.4024 degNose Incidence: 3.0573 degCamber deflection: 10.4597 deg

Table 166: Controlpoints1 00.84803 -0.00183760.5608 -0.0762410.30873 -0.0762410.05013 -0.0762410 -0.0332890 00 0.049450.13324 0.136430.33916 0.136430.42374 0.136430.52374 0.132061 0

Table 167: Base 64 representation:XmVI5c1TXg9WSrA

Table 168: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.18 7.484 ectsRMS curvature error: 95.88 97.91 %CD error 1.4 2.2 dctsCm error -7 -6 mctsUpper transition point -2.4 -3.02 %

Figure 129: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 130: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

47

Page 56: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah93w257

Information: Althaus AH 93-W-257 airfoil for use on wind turbines(W)Reference: UIUC

Figure 131: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 169: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 25.6792 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 2.0965 % @0.77CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.77298 %CUpper nose radius: 2.6975 %CLower nose radius: 5.161 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.2101 degRelease Angle: 10.3267 degNose Incidence: -9.5731 degCamber deflection: 0.75361 deg

Table 170: Controlpoints1 -0.00386490.71895 0.0367440.59478 -0.125040.27931 -0.125040.15226 -0.125040 -0.072380 00 0.0553910.17061 0.132980.33881 0.132980.49148 0.132980.59148 0.0939221 0.0038649

Table 171: Base 64 representation:bgWP4ksSc0yrFwT

Table 172: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.099 6.424 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.8 0.9 dctsCm error 8 5 mctsUpper transition point -1.25 -0.01 %

Figure 132: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 133: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

48

Page 57: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah6407

Information: Althaus AH 6-407 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 134: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 173: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.5703 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 5.5815 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.7 %CUpper nose radius: 0.27329 %CLower nose radius: 0.28999 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.6106 degRelease Angle: 11.1239 degNose Incidence: 13.1234 degCamber deflection: 24.2473 deg

Table 174: Controlpoints1 -0.00350.44662 0.0724860.14596 -0.007890.02504 -0.007890.010293 -0.007890 -0.00446090 00 0.0076320.03197 0.08480.39962 0.08480.46529 0.08480.70548 0.079281 0.0035

Table 175: Base 64 representation:G6aHjjlCID7oHxS

Table 176: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.06 7.317 ectsRMS curvature error: 20.37 22.91 %CD error -1.4 -1.5 dctsCm error -10 -28 mctsUpper transition point 3.43 4.28 %

Figure 135: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 136: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

49

Page 58: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah7476

Information: Althaus AH 7-476 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 137: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 177: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.9405 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 6.3046 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.7 %CUpper nose radius: 0.079989 %CLower nose radius: 0.87837 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.6763 degRelease Angle: 13.5158 degNose Incidence: 8.4496 degCamber deflection: 21.9654 deg

Table 178: Controlpoints1 -0.00350.51304 0.0971460.071788 -0.007940.01254 -0.007940.010072 -0.007940 -0.00767980 00 0.00471470.041684 0.08780.3996 0.08780.65964 0.08780.77348 0.0656991 0.0035

Table 179: Base 64 representation:D4ack9NBEDuhE1S

Table 180: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.241 10.766 ectsRMS curvature error: 34.29 35.59 %CD error -7.8 -60.1 dctsCm error 155 90 mctsUpper transition point -1.25 -0.42 %

Figure 138: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 139: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

50

Page 59: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah79100a

Information: Althaus AH 79-100A airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 140: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 181: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.0067 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 3.6581 % @0.54CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.86267 %CLower nose radius: 0.70617 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.9717 degRelease Angle: 8.9858 degNose Incidence: 6.5735 degCamber deflection: 15.5593 deg

Table 182: Controlpoints1 00.66209 0.0355160.42584 -0.025220.17033 -0.025220.12722 -0.025220 -0.0244730 00 0.0257430.11523 0.080650.37059 0.080650.61764 0.080650.84435 0.0330031 0

Table 183: Base 64 representation:UrYZh9QLULalHuA

Table 184: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.745 4.624 ectsRMS curvature error: 39.17 40.9 %CD error -0.8 -1.3 dctsCm error -19 -24 mctsUpper transition point 1.08 1.56 %

Figure 141: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 142: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

51

Page 60: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah79100b

Information: Althaus AH 79-100B airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 143: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 185: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.9461 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 6.4433 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.99884 %CLower nose radius: 0.80137 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.0518 degRelease Angle: 20.0535 degNose Incidence: 11.9239 degCamber deflection: 31.9774 deg

Table 186: Controlpoints1 00.74657 0.0752020.25193 -0.010870.03806 -0.010870.019411 -0.010870 -0.00945690 00 0.0307190.14172 0.110150.40245 0.110150.68111 0.110150.96443 0.0155241 0

Table 187: Base 64 representation:Soaeu3fCOFJWI A

Table 188: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.698 6.614 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.9 -1.3 dctsCm error 57 30 mctsUpper transition point 1.67 2.19 %

Figure 144: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 145: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

52

Page 61: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah79100c

Information: N/AReference: Althaus AH 79-100C airfoil

Figure 146: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 189: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.0292 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 6.6587 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.99595 %CLower nose radius: 0.6709 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.1488 degRelease Angle: 19.3278 degNose Incidence: 12.2653 degCamber deflection: 31.5931 deg

Table 190: Controlpoints1 00.70972 0.0657030.13254 -0.012840.03806 -0.012840.023978 -0.012840 -0.0112990 00 0.0282340.12006 0.113990.43474 0.113990.54779 0.113990.81454 0.0900631 0

Table 191: Base 64 representation:QtcNw3YCGFyVP-A

Table 192: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.373 7.013 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.8 -3.4 dctsCm error -6 -21 mctsUpper transition point 5.48 5.7 %

Figure 147: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 148: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

53

Page 62: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah80129

Information: N/AReference: UIUC

Figure 149: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 193: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.8712 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 4.0554 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.55711 %CLower nose radius: 0.38961 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.7904 degRelease Angle: 1.4418 degNose Incidence: 8.0138 degCamber deflection: 9.4557 deg

Table 194: Controlpoints1 00.78366 -0.0168490.62555 -0.023930.33928 -0.023930.1866 -0.023930 -0.0220160 00 0.0252360.17148 0.10490.40245 0.10490.68227 0.10490.78227 0.0280351 0

Table 195: Base 64 representation:Pkaes6sWcKrsNiA

Table 196: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.563 3.711 ectsRMS curvature error: 61.19 57.21 %CD error -1.4 -0.8 dctsCm error 24 3 mctsUpper transition point -0.16 0.29 %

Figure 150: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 151: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

54

Page 63: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah80136

Information: Althaus AH 80-136 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 152: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 197: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.5517 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 3.3823 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.175 %CUpper nose radius: 0.84971 %CLower nose radius: 0.49247 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.0436 degRelease Angle: -3.4963 degNose Incidence: 9.9598 degCamber deflection: 6.4634 deg

Table 198: Controlpoints1 -0.0008750.75494 -0.026710.44631 -0.0340370.37057 -0.0340370.20381 -0.0340370 -0.0258680 00 0.0273420.13197 0.101570.33934 0.101570.5873 0.101570.73833 -0.00357611 0.000875

Table 199: Base 64 representation:RmWYqwsYIPoxGaE

Table 200: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.103 6.286 ectsRMS curvature error: 57.14 58.96 %CD error -2.2 -2.6 dctsCm error 6 2 mctsUpper transition point -1.75 -1.16 %

Figure 153: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 154: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

55

Page 64: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah80140

Information: Althaus AH 80-140 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 155: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 201: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.9637 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 4.3499 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.194 %CUpper nose radius: 2.1768 %CLower nose radius: 2.1077 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.2466 degRelease Angle: 4.0124 degNose Incidence: 12.1648 degCamber deflection: 16.1772 deg

Table 202: Controlpoints1 -0.000970.9077 0.000462420.53368 -0.028120.17033 -0.028120.029421 -0.028120 -0.0203320 00 0.0380790.099917 0.113150.33928 0.113150.48726 0.113150.602 0.0507951 0.00097

Table 203: Base 64 representation:WsWOvt0LcMxNHmF

Table 204: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.615 3.506 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.2 -0.6 dctsCm error 10 2 mctsUpper transition point -0.54 -0.11 %

Figure 156: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 157: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

56

Page 65: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah82150a

Information: Althaus AH 82-150 A airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 158: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 205: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.9986 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 3.2794 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.71577 %CLower nose radius: 0.70306 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.9398 degRelease Angle: 10.0499 degNose Incidence: 5.8471 degCamber deflection: 15.897 deg

Table 206: Controlpoints1 00.81227 0.0199970.7937 -0.04220.40245 -0.04220.31348 -0.04220 -0.0383310 00 0.0270640.1535 0.107790.40245 0.107790.61113 0.107790.7555 0.0610511 0

Table 207: Base 64 representation:QnaWt5OapSn5JvA

Table 208: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.921 4.923 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.9 -1.7 dctsCm error 10 18 mctsUpper transition point -1.78 -1.77 %

Figure 159: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 160: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

57

Page 66: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah82150f

Information: Althaus AH 82-150 F airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 161: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 209: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.9964 % @0.44CMaximum Camber: 3.6294 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.45748 %CLower nose radius: 0.61768 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.0859 degRelease Angle: 10.0925 degNose Incidence: 4.8232 degCamber deflection: 14.9158 deg

Table 210: Controlpoints1 00.90273 0.00859460.90273 -0.038690.43474 -0.038690.2565 -0.038690 -0.03250 00 0.0211590.1468 0.111280.43474 0.111280.6894 0.111280.6894 0.0840141 0

Table 211: Base 64 representation:Mpcsu1ac0R LvA

Table 212: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.741 9.572 ectsRMS curvature error: 37.67 37.88 %CD error -0.3 -1.6 dctsCm error 22 46 mctsUpper transition point -1.79 -1.72 %

Figure 162: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 163: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

58

Page 67: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah83150q

Information: Althaus AH 83-150 Q airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 164: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 213: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.999 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 4.1388 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.0317 %CLower nose radius: 0.42547 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.6594 degRelease Angle: 6.3853 degNose Incidence: 18.2383 degCamber deflection: 24.6235 deg

Table 214: Controlpoints1 00.82897 0.0106270.82897 -0.033930.43474 -0.033930.2923 -0.033930 -0.0287940 00 0.0454740.15267 0.116330.37059 0.116330.61432 0.116330.71432 0.0463471 0

Table 215: Base 64 representation:ZlYZx1VcsOu GpA

Table 216: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.976 6.838 ectsRMS curvature error: 44.85 46.45 %CD error -2.8 -2.2 dctsCm error -19 -21 mctsUpper transition point -0.49 -0.06 %

Figure 165: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 166: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

59

Page 68: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah83159

Information: Althaus AH 83-159 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 167: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 217: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.9354 % @0.41CMaximum Camber: 3.8498 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1429 %CLower nose radius: 0.5222 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.753 degRelease Angle: 7.8153 degNose Incidence: 11.3271 degCamber deflection: 19.1423 deg

Table 218: Controlpoints1 00.82785 0.0148760.82785 -0.041270.43474 -0.041270.19661 -0.041270 -0.0261630 00 0.035770.16792 0.118160.40245 0.118160.66164 0.118160.76164 0.0450021 0

Table 219: Base 64 representation:TkacxoicsSs GsA

Table 220: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.846 6.277 ectsRMS curvature error: 40.01 41.47 %CD error -1 -2.6 dctsCm error 17 27 mctsUpper transition point 0.33 0.8 %

Figure 168: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 169: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

60

Page 69: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah93156

Information: Althaus AH 93-156 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 170: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 221: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.6609 % @0.41CMaximum Camber: 3.8872 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1372 %CLower nose radius: 0.93261 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.0201 degRelease Angle: 6.6573 degNose Incidence: 9.1926 degCamber deflection: 15.8499 deg

Table 222: Controlpoints1 00.88374 0.00334360.88374 -0.0395030.3798 -0.0395030.12024 -0.0395030 -0.0273420 00 0.0303340.12137 0.117160.41464 0.117160.65172 0.117160.75172 0.0512681 0

Table 223: Base 64 representation:RsbaxrrYzRt LqA

Table 224: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.569 5.248 ectsRMS curvature error: 54.35 56.78 %CD error -0.7 -1 dctsCm error 59 52 mctsUpper transition point -1.08 -0.66 %

Figure 171: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 172: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

61

Page 70: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah93157

Information: Althaus AH 93-157 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 173: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 225: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.6848 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 3.8126 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.96113 %CLower nose radius: 1.2972 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.1157 degRelease Angle: 7.4427 degNose Incidence: 6.3068 degCamber deflection: 13.7495 deg

Table 226: Controlpoints1 00.87517 0.00519880.87517 -0.0403490.37621 -0.0403490.056429 -0.0403490 -0.022090 00 0.0276770.11955 0.116540.40294 0.116540.63248 0.116540.74479 0.0565821 0

Table 227: Base 64 representation:PsaZxi1YyRr LrA

Table 228: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.57 5.816 ectsRMS curvature error: 33.91 35.24 %CD error -0.3 -0.2 dctsCm error 20 -6 mctsUpper transition point -0.42 0.06 %

Figure 174: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 175: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

62

Page 71: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah94145

Information: Althaus AH 94-145 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 176: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 229: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.6578 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 5.6052 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.19609 %CUpper nose radius: 2.1131 %CLower nose radius: 1.3181 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.8755 degRelease Angle: 10.6815 degNose Incidence: 12.552 degCamber deflection: 23.2335 deg

Table 230: Controlpoints1 -0.000980440.87449 0.0149730.48992 -0.0233320.12872 -0.0233320.06195 -0.0233320 -0.0233320 00 0.0522690.19393 0.128680.40753 0.128680.57644 0.128680.66674 0.0848091 0.00098044

Table 231: Base 64 representation:ahaS2 gIbKxQIwF

Table 232: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.079 3.941 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.8 0.9 dctsCm error 26 28 mctsUpper transition point -1.52 -1.64 %

Figure 177: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 178: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

63

Page 72: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah94156

Information: Althaus AH 94-156 airfoilReference: N/A

Figure 179: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 233: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.6064 % @0.41CMaximum Camber: 3.7388 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1489 %CLower nose radius: 0.61645 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.5658 degRelease Angle: 5.979 degNose Incidence: 11.4966 degCamber deflection: 17.4757 deg

Table 234: Controlpoints1 00.84042 0.0033320.84042 -0.0406530.40456 -0.0406530.17308 -0.0406530 -0.026670 00 0.0309320.12492 0.115420.41494 0.115420.65601 0.115420.77522 0.0427241 0

Table 235: Base 64 representation:RsbawpkauRp LpA

Table 236: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.417 5.889 ectsRMS curvature error: 42.87 45.29 %CD error 0 0.1 dctsCm error 0 5 mctsUpper transition point 0 -0.73 %

Figure 180: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 181: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

64

Page 73: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ah95160

Information: Althaus AH 95-160 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 182: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 237: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.026 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 5.6353 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.21609 %CUpper nose radius: 2.5009 %CLower nose radius: 1.668 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.4059 degRelease Angle: 10.2939 degNose Incidence: 12.5123 degCamber deflection: 22.8062 deg

Table 238: Controlpoints1 -0.00108040.87643 0.0121050.53283 -0.028830.17342 -0.028830.069502 -0.028830 -0.02780 00 0.0567870.19341 0.135810.40752 0.135810.58887 0.135810.68887 0.0815251 0.0010804

Table 239: Base 64 representation:bhaU59lLcMvRJwF

Table 240: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.212 3.912 ectsRMS curvature error: 85.1 87.73 %CD error 1 0.9 dctsCm error -14 -14 mctsUpper transition point -0.73 -0.63 %

Figure 183: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 184: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

65

Page 74: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ames01

Information: NASA/AMES/Hicks A-01 transonic rotorcraft airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 185: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 241: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.3007 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 1.3084 % @0.27CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.599 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3555 %CLower nose radius: 23.731 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.2046 degRelease Angle: -2.3196 degNose Incidence: 7.5651 degCamber deflection: 5.2455 deg

Table 242: Controlpoints1 -0.0029950.91432 -0.0149170.62095 -0.0386580.35 -0.0386580.00061088 -0.0386580 -0.00983090 00 0.0123040.016752 0.0644620.3 0.0644620.71468 0.0644620.79036 0.0150191 0.002995

Table 243: Base 64 representation:M7TlcQ WbQuVNcP

Table 244: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.936 7.448 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.1 -2.1 dctsCm error -14 -42 mctsUpper transition point 3.75 4.93 %

Figure 186: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 187: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

66

Page 75: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ames02

Information: NASA/AMES/Hicks A-02 transonic rotorcraft airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 188: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 245: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.7314 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 0.45299 % @0.15CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.7 %CUpper nose radius: 6.7948 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 2.4552 degRelease Angle: -1.7146 degNose Incidence: 7.7258 degCamber deflection: 6.0112 deg

Table 246: Controlpoints1 -0.00350.68162 -0.0198630.53154 -0.034620.34988 -0.034620 -0.034620 -0.00945610 00 0.0174360.0067117 0.0427990.30015 0.0427990.65893 0.0427990.89584 0.00261461 0.0035

Table 247: Base 64 representation:a-TgSR WSPUqDsS

Table 248: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.776 3.336 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.9 2.4 dctsCm error -2 -5 mctsUpper transition point -1.88 -2.37 %

Figure 189: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 190: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

67

Page 76: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ames03

Information: NASA/AMES/Kennelly A-03 transonic rotorcraftairfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 191: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 249: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.9995 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: 1.189 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.6 %CUpper nose radius: 2.1006 %CLower nose radius: 0.66993 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 0.69717 degRelease Angle: -2.5437 degNose Incidence: 11.3671 degCamber deflection: 8.8235 deg

Table 250: Controlpoints1 -0.0030.79009 -0.0136050.69201 -0.038110.37504 -0.038110.27029 -0.038110 -0.0347440 00 0.0532480.20247 0.061890.37494 0.061890.80609 0.061890.80609 -0.00443261 0.003

Table 251: Base 64 representation:2sYra5SYgQ rBcP

Table 252: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.458 8.898 ectsRMS curvature error: 65.79 65.23 %CD error -0.3 -0.4 dctsCm error -23 -22 mctsUpper transition point 0.7 0.54 %

Figure 192: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 193: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

68

Page 77: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: amsoil1

Information: Rutan AMSOIL racer canard airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 194: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 253: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.6165 % @0.41CMaximum Camber: 2.0787 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.442 %CUpper nose radius: 2.1341 %CLower nose radius: 3.4458 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.0719 degRelease Angle: 2.8778 degNose Incidence: 1.2873 degCamber deflection: 4.1651 deg

Table 254: Controlpoints1 -0.002210.8317 -0.00708180.67106 -0.037440.39 -0.037440.053285 -0.037440 -0.0349870 00 0.0735370.38009 0.078840.42 0.078840.64477 0.078840.85288 0.0213531 0.00221

Table 255: Base 64 representation:7GbZh72ZsQbgKkL

Table 256: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.344 4.387 ectsRMS curvature error: 41.17 41.55 %CD error -3.2 -3.3 dctsCm error 2 -3 mctsUpper transition point 3.29 3.83 %

Figure 195: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 196: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

69

Page 78: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: amsoil2

Information: Rutan AMSOIL racer wing airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 197: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 257: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.7688 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 0.96542 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.448 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7928 %CLower nose radius: 4.2782 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.2696 degRelease Angle: 2.2487 degNose Incidence: -2.3895 degCamber deflection: -0.14082 deg

Table 258: Controlpoints1 -0.002240.83883 -0.00895590.64718 -0.04960.38975 -0.04960.025845 -0.04960 -0.027150 00 0.0652890.35663 0.068190.41973 0.068190.65959 0.068190.83604 0.0220331 0.00224

Table 259: Base 64 representation:8Kbasi7ZbVfsKjL

Table 260: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.424 4.49 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -7.3 -7.2 dctsCm error -9 -4 mctsUpper transition point 13.55 13.19 %

Figure 198: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 199: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

70

Page 79: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: aquilasm

Information: AQUILA R/C sailplane airfoilReference: N/A

Figure 200: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 261: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.4192 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 4.0321 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.9408 %CLower nose radius: 0.81541 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.1572 degRelease Angle: 4.4641 degNose Incidence: 12.9924 degCamber deflection: 17.4565 deg

Table 262: Controlpoints1 00.92916 -0.000759840.03333 -0.009470.03333 -0.009470.012857 -0.009470 -0.00836020 00 0.0230150.084455 0.087350.31333 0.087350.51635 0.087350.70872 0.0489671 0

Table 263: Base 64 representation:RuUTk3mCAEmFLmA

Table 264: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.811 2.097 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.4 0.4 dctsCm error 2 15 mctsUpper transition point -0.21 -0.37 %

Figure 201: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 202: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

71

Page 80: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: arad6

Information: Aeronautical Research Association/Bocci-Dowty Ro-tol ARA-D 6Reference: UIUC

Figure 203: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 265: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.0945 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 5.0112 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 1.1 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5979 %CLower nose radius: 0.54266 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.4534 degRelease Angle: 9.6398 degNose Incidence: 14.467 degCamber deflection: 24.1068 deg

Table 266: Controlpoints1 -0.00550.32894 0.058090.13008 -0.0093180.04 -0.0093180.024 -0.0093180 -0.0093180 00 0.0416130.16256 0.0790220.4 0.0790220.45804 0.0790220.70217 0.0790221 0.0055

Table 267: Base 64 representation:hlaGh aDGE wJvc

Table 268: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.829 4.788 ectsRMS curvature error: 11.82 12.91 %CD error 1 1.8 dctsCm error -3 -20 mctsUpper transition point -0.32 -1.04 %

Figure 204: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 205: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

72

Page 81: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: arad10

Information: Aeronautical Research Association/Bocci-Dowty Ro-tol ARA-D 10Reference: UIUC

Figure 206: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 269: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.9606 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 3.9799 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 1.5 %CUpper nose radius: 4.1781 %CLower nose radius: 1.1583 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.9166 degRelease Angle: 6.0144 degNose Incidence: 19.4377 degCamber deflection: 25.4521 deg

Table 270: Controlpoints1 -0.00750.24017 -0.000125250.14017 -0.0216260.07 -0.0216260.0483 -0.0216260 -0.0190310 00 0.0429610.066262 0.0889610.35 0.0889610.40501 0.0889610.62524 0.0835611 0.0075

Table 271: Base 64 representation:fzWFl3UEFJ74Mpm

Table 272: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.789 4.891 ectsRMS curvature error: 96.42 95.85 %CD error -2.2 -1.2 dctsCm error -27 -14 mctsUpper transition point 4.29 2.8 %

Figure 207: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 208: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

73

Page 82: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: arad20

Information: Aeronautical Research Association/Bocci-Dowty Ro-tol ARA-D 20Reference: UIUC

Figure 209: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 273: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 20.0157 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 3.7574 % @0.24CTrailing Edge Gap: 2.5 %CUpper nose radius: 11.7128 %CLower nose radius: 1.9751 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.1567 degRelease Angle: 4.791 degNose Incidence: 32.783 degCamber deflection: 37.5741 deg

Table 274: Controlpoints1 -0.01250.87115 -0.0142710.57122 -0.0631020.3 -0.0631020.1011 -0.0631020 -0.0364860 00 0.114130.185 0.13750.25 0.13750.37054 0.13750.47054 0.109381 0.0125

Table 275: Base 64 representation:0RQK6kpTZb1TMn

Table 276: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.254 5.213 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.3 -0.6 dctsCm error 1 27 mctsUpper transition point 1.07 1.24 %

Figure 210: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 211: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

74

Page 83: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: as5045

Information: AS5045 airfoil Ashok Gopalarathnam/Selig 15Reference: UIUC

Figure 212: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 277: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.9991 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: 1.0235 % @0.22CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.25 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3009 %CLower nose radius: 0.66609 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.7122 degRelease Angle: 4.8927 degNose Incidence: 8.4613 degCamber deflection: 13.354 deg

Table 278: Controlpoints1 -0.001250.75215 0.00756370.65215 -0.065060.3737 -0.065060.17234 -0.065060 -0.0276640 00 0.0270350.08428 0.084940.37478 0.084940.57681 0.084940.67681 0.0452281 0.00125

Table 279: Base 64 representation:UxYVjbhYccwtGnG

Table 280: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.842 6.062 ectsRMS curvature error: 40.84 40.83 %CD error 1.8 1.8 dctsCm error 103 88 mctsUpper transition point -3.47 -3.37 %

Figure 213: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 214: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

75

Page 84: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: as5046

Information: AS5046 airfoil Ashok Gopalarathnam/Selig 16Reference: UIUC

Figure 215: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 281: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.9988 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: 1.0262 % @0.19CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.26801 %CUpper nose radius: 1.12 %CLower nose radius: 0.88518 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.0428 degRelease Angle: 4.8557 degNose Incidence: 7.314 degCamber deflection: 12.1697 deg

Table 282: Controlpoints1 -0.001340.74948 -0.00206460.64948 -0.0704710.37213 -0.0704710.19747 -0.0704710 -0.0341360 00 0.0209860.058983 0.0895280.37639 0.0895280.53882 0.0895280.63882 0.0642271 0.00134

Table 283: Base 64 representation:P1YRlfeYcextLnH

Table 284: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.116 6.988 ectsRMS curvature error: 83.31 81.5 %CD error 1.3 1.3 dctsCm error 138 155 mctsUpper transition point -3.08 -3.43 %

Figure 216: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 217: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

76

Page 85: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: as5048

Information: N/AReference: UIUC

Figure 218: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 285: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.9949 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 1.0723 % @0.73CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.29904 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4229 %CLower nose radius: 1.1707 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.4928 degRelease Angle: 4.4346 degNose Incidence: 5.6368 degCamber deflection: 10.0714 deg

Table 286: Controlpoints1 -0.00149520.71706 -0.0253130.61706 -0.0800730.40594 -0.0800730.19237 -0.0800730 -0.0387490 00 0.0303750.097264 0.0999360.38219 0.0999360.4625 0.0999360.5956 0.0999361 0.0014952

Table 287: Base 64 representation:TvYIqehaWi vUmI

Table 288: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 8.956 9.519 ectsRMS curvature error: 63.48 61.31 %CD error 2.7 2.9 dctsCm error 167 208 mctsUpper transition point -5.19 -5.89 %

Figure 219: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 220: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

77

Page 86: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: atr72sm

Information: ATR 72 wing airfoil (from NTSB report)Reference: UIUC

Figure 221: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 289: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.5823 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 2.8148 % @0.24CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.86638 %CLower nose radius: 2.6243 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.6051 degRelease Angle: 2.8075 degNose Incidence: 10.3448 degCamber deflection: 13.1523 deg

Table 290: Controlpoints1 00.90116 -0.00603670.6469 -0.0452280.32099 -0.0452280.026785 -0.0452280 -0.0216480 00 0.0127510.02815 0.100950.25401 0.100950.51655 0.100950.87227 0.0204821 0

Table 291: Base 64 representation:I4QXqf6VfTRSOkA

Table 292: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.474 5.201 ectsRMS curvature error: 54.51 54.38 %CD error -2.8 -2.4 dctsCm error -14 -10 mctsUpper transition point 2.8 2.37 %

Figure 222: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 223: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

78

Page 87: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: avistar

Information: Hobbico R/C Avistar trainer airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 224: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 293: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.5233 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 2.28 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3211 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3411 %CLower nose radius: 1.5274 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.8512 degRelease Angle: 2.299 degNose Incidence: 2.6839 degCamber deflection: 4.9829 deg

Table 294: Controlpoints1 -0.00160550.80192 -0.0246180.52228 -0.0501380.30602 -0.0501380.16602 -0.0501380 -0.0411160 00 0.036890.15221 0.0952760.34218 0.0952760.57564 0.0952760.78266 0.0447371 0.0016055

Table 295: Base 64 representation:ZjWXozsUUVgeUjI

Table 296: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 8.271 9.849 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -15.1 -15.7 dctsCm error -147 -142 mctsUpper transition point 2.97 3.82 %

Figure 225: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 226: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

79

Page 88: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: b29root

Information: Hobbico R/C Avistar trainer airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 227: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 297: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 21.985 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 1.7319 % @0.29CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.2698 %CLower nose radius: 4.0538 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 26.5107 degRelease Angle: -2.2444 degNose Incidence: -0.38815 degCamber deflection: -2.6325 deg

Table 298: Controlpoints1 00.92574 -0.0205950.59985 -0.0926250.30164 -0.0926250.27108 -0.0926250 -0.0855930 00 0.0634330.18459 0.127230.29943 0.127230.56746 0.127230.66746 0.0647051 0

Table 299: Base 64 representation:gZTY16GTbnwOecA

Table 300: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.119 4.934 ectsRMS curvature error: 13.43 13.36 %CD error 5.1 5.9 dctsCm error 25 26 mctsUpper transition point -5.5 -6.14 %

Figure 228: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 229: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

80

Page 89: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: b29tip

Information: Boeing B-29 tip airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 230: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 301: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.9995 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 2.2285 % @0.3CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.64544 %CLower nose radius: 0.80831 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.9262 degRelease Angle: -1.4983 degNose Incidence: 3.0445 degCamber deflection: 1.5462 deg

Table 302: Controlpoints1 00.81399 -0.0227130.57475 -0.0227130.3001 -0.0227130.081026 -0.0227130 -0.0208960 00 0.0265870.16428 0.0672830.29984 0.0672830.57323 0.0672830.69992 0.0207981 0

Table 303: Base 64 representation:ZsTZs6uTZKs MsA

Table 304: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.314 5.394 ectsRMS curvature error: 26.13 30.99 %CD error 0.1 1.5 dctsCm error 0 7 mctsUpper transition point -3.46 -3.92 %

Figure 231: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 232: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

81

Page 90: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: b707e

Information: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company model 737airfoilsReference: UIUC

Figure 233: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 305: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.9979 % @0.42CMaximum Camber: 1.82 % @0.31CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.23536 %CLower nose radius: 0.12606 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.6067 degRelease Angle: 2.7121 degNose Incidence: 8.7378 degCamber deflection: 11.4499 deg

Table 306: Controlpoints1 00.64605 -0.0191150.54178 -0.0275250.44 -0.0275250.35377 -0.0275250 -0.0172430 00 0.00939950.056307 0.0626790.4 0.0626790.55692 0.0626790.6985 0.0451421 0

Table 307: Base 64 representation:K2aRbnNcMMtwNkA

Table 308: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.933 6.822 ectsRMS curvature error: 96.85 Inf %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 234: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 235: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

82

Page 91: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: b737a

Information: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company model 737airfoilsReference: UIUC

Figure 236: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 309: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.3686 % @0.2CMaximum Camber: 0.15564 % @0.03CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.05999 %CUpper nose radius: 4.3013 %CLower nose radius: 3.4956 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.8793 degRelease Angle: 0.97905 degNose Incidence: 3.5236 degCamber deflection: 4.5026 deg

Table 310: Controlpoints1 -0.000299950.74873 -0.0199010.53685 -0.0774310.1967 -0.0774310.086548 -0.0774310 -0.044910 00 0.0358420.0448 0.0762590.19478 0.0762590.47638 0.0762590.66429 0.0380671 0.00029995

Table 311: Base 64 representation:ewMWgkjNbgoiMhC

Table 312: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.65 5.563 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -9.4 -10 dctsCm error -4 15 mctsUpper transition point 2.66 2.47 %

Figure 237: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 238: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

83

Page 92: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: b737b

Information: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company model 737airfoilsReference: UIUC

Figure 239: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 313: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.5246 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 0.77916 % @0.17CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.079996 %CUpper nose radius: 2.9192 %CLower nose radius: 1.5174 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.1562 degRelease Angle: 0.85944 degNose Incidence: 8.6768 degCamber deflection: 9.5363 deg

Table 314: Controlpoints1 -0.000399980.67585 -0.0300060.48586 -0.0560740.31 -0.0560740.1891 -0.0560740 -0.0437380 00 0.0535130.14714 0.0694970.2494 0.0694970.45179 0.0694970.55179 0.0549381 0.00039998

Table 315: Base 64 representation:waQRexZUQYznOhC

Table 316: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.201 6.429 ectsRMS curvature error: 65.81 75.14 %CD error -2.3 -2.2 dctsCm error 25 14 mctsUpper transition point 3.64 3.96 %

Figure 240: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 241: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

84

Page 93: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: b737d

Information: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company model 737airfoilsReference: UIUC

Figure 242: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 317: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.7117 % @0.42CMaximum Camber: 1.5979 % @0.25CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %CUpper nose radius: 0.99822 %CLower nose radius: 0.23237 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.8567 degRelease Angle: 1.7058 degNose Incidence: 11.2342 degCamber deflection: 12.94 deg

Table 318: Controlpoints1 -0.00080.75901 -0.0185930.57822 -0.04040.45 -0.04040.34709 -0.04040 -0.0231880 00 0.0291980.1281 0.06780.35 0.06780.61207 0.06780.71207 0.0393931 0.0008

Table 319: Base 64 representation:coWaskPsPRvkNiE

Table 320: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.845 6.768 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.7 -1.3 dctsCm error -6 14 mctsUpper transition point 1.78 0.17 %

Figure 243: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 244: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

85

Page 94: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: bacj

Information: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company airfoil JReference: UIUC

Figure 245: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 321: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.1097 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 1.6588 % @0.78CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.96445 %CLower nose radius: 1.5021 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.683 degRelease Angle: 8.3534 degNose Incidence: -3.3978 degCamber deflection: 4.9555 deg

Table 322: Controlpoints1 00.76326 0.0166040.67472 -0.0462120.34996 -0.0462120.13648 -0.0462120 -0.036970 00 0.0475090.35104 0.0558920.45005 0.0558920.71762 0.0558920.83436 0.0373131 0

Table 323: Base 64 representation:1OsfYymWgUquKtA

Table 324: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.185 5.847 ectsRMS curvature error: 49.07 49.73 %CD error -24.3 NaN dctsCm error -419 NaN mctsUpper transition point 30.07 NaN %

Figure 246: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 247: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

86

Page 95: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: bacxxx

Information: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company BACXXXEnergy Efficient Transport Program airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 248: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 325: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.2971 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 1.3759 % @0.16CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.08 %CUpper nose radius: 0.90319 %CLower nose radius: 0.28774 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 19.8474 degRelease Angle: 5.2222 degNose Incidence: 12.4306 degCamber deflection: 17.6527 deg

Table 326: Controlpoints1 -0.00040.63713 -0.0302430.53713 -0.04580.35 -0.04580.25733 -0.04580 -0.0222180 00 0.0160370.042713 0.06740.3 0.06740.65 0.06740.87624 0.03391 0.0004

Table 327: Base 64 representation:P2TgsfRWSUgxWoC

Table 328: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.592 5.085 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.8 -1.9 dctsCm error -29 -44 mctsUpper transition point 4.41 4.09 %

Figure 249: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 250: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

87

Page 96: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: be50

Information: Verbitsky BE50 free flight airfoil (original)Reference: UIUC

Figure 251: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 329: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.1585 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 4.0295 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.25998 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4925 %CLower nose radius: 0.60901 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.7578 degRelease Angle: 8.4147 degNose Incidence: 12.4032 degCamber deflection: 20.8179 deg

Table 330: Controlpoints1 -0.00129990.51542 0.04140.25001 -0.0121090.050141 -0.0121090.032592 -0.0121090 -0.0115030 00 0.0353680.12571 0.0721790.3492 0.0721790.55301 0.0721790.82825 0.037161 0.0012999

Table 331: Base 64 representation:foWUf8WDNFgoItH

Table 332: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.931 6.218 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 252: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 253: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

88

Page 97: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: boe106

Information: Boeing 106 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 254: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 333: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.0181 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 3.3175 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.04 %CUpper nose radius: 2.5538 %CLower nose radius: 1.001 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.313 degRelease Angle: 4.27 degNose Incidence: 13.9001 degCamber deflection: 18.1701 deg

Table 334: Controlpoints1 -0.00020.82035 -0.0139810.51619 -0.032880.19999 -0.032880.16199 -0.032880 -0.032880 00 0.0536140.17783 0.097880.30002 0.097880.44879 0.097880.57441 0.097881 0.0002

Table 335: Base 64 representation:iaTOp MNZO bTmB

Table 336: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.139 3.539 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 255: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 256: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

89

Page 98: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: bqm34

Information: Ryan BQM-34 Firebee wing airfoil (NACA 63-014AW/NACA 0014 nose and thinned to .09899 to account for sweep)Reference: UIUC

Figure 257: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 337: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.8987 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: -2.329e-006 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0351 %CLower nose radius: 1.0351 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.5704 degRelease Angle: -2.3922e-005 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: -2.3922e-005 deg

Table 338: Controlpoints1 00.69256 -0.0284410.52128 -0.0494980.32527 -0.0494980.15938 -0.0494980 -0.0344010 00 0.0344010.15938 0.0494980.32527 0.0494980.52128 0.0494980.69258 0.0284391 0

Table 339: Base 64 representation:rgVTVrgVTVooMgA

Table 340: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.779 1.938 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 258: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 259: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

90

Page 99: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: c5a

Information: Lockheed-Georgia C-141 transonic wing airfoils,LOCKHEED C-5A BL0 AIRFOIL.Reference: UIUC

Figure 260: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 341: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.1004 % @0.42CMaximum Camber: 0.70732 % @0.82CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.25781 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1138 %CLower nose radius: 1.3068 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.8002 degRelease Angle: 5.9534 degNose Incidence: -1.389 degCamber deflection: 4.5644 deg

Table 342: Controlpoints1 -0.00128910.86872 -0.00938710.62577 -0.0654090.40037 -0.0654090.26424 -0.0654090 -0.0477490 00 0.041620.22481 0.0660630.44963 0.0660630.52891 0.0660630.78506 0.0604481 0.0012891

Table 343: Base 64 representation:ngsJcuWaYc5WVpG

Table 344: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.861 5.197 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -8.7 -8.3 dctsCm error -18 -8 mctsUpper transition point 17.41 16.31 %

Figure 261: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 262: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

91

Page 100: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: c5b

Information: LOCKHEED C-5A BL488.2 AIRFOILReference: N/A

Figure 263: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 345: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.5452 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 1.2295 % @0.69CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.22038 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0024 %CLower nose radius: 1.2139 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 20.2268 degRelease Angle: 5.1949 degNose Incidence: -0.32199 degCamber deflection: 4.8729 deg

Table 346: Controlpoints1 -0.00110190.75185 -0.0224570.60483 -0.0487390.35028 -0.0487390.21017 -0.0487390 -0.041240 00 0.0338030.17099 0.0674220.44961 0.0674220.63521 0.0674220.82432 0.0491891 0.0011019

Table 347: Base 64 representation:gnsWs1aWZVtnXoG

Table 348: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.399 5.85 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -10.1 -9.9 dctsCm error -21 -37 mctsUpper transition point 21.56 22.09 %

Figure 264: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 265: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

92

Page 101: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: c5c

Information: Lockheed-Georgia C-5A transonic wing airfoils,LOCKHEED C-5A BL576 AIRFOIL.Reference: UIUC

Figure 266: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 349: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.1205 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 1.4176 % @0.64CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.21898 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0064 %CLower nose radius: 1.2654 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 20.9699 degRelease Angle: 5.5991 degNose Incidence: -0.32625 degCamber deflection: 5.2729 deg

Table 350: Controlpoints1 -0.00109490.74354 -0.0230180.57573 -0.043950.35025 -0.043950.20665 -0.043950 -0.0417520 00 0.0342990.17535 0.0679760.44961 0.0679760.56201 0.0679760.79583 0.0599641 0.0010949

Table 351: Base 64 representation:gmsNs8aWWT3mXoG

Table 352: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.39 4.697 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -13.1 -13.2 dctsCm error -58 -72 mctsUpper transition point 29.81 30.84 %

Figure 267: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 268: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

93

Page 102: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: c141a

Information: N/AReference: UIUC

Figure 269: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 353: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.9772 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 1.1473 % @0.64CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.1096 %CUpper nose radius: 1.9453 %CLower nose radius: 1.4474 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 23.0557 degRelease Angle: 3.2498 degNose Incidence: 3.9496 degCamber deflection: 7.1994 deg

Table 354: Controlpoints1 -0.0005480.62161 -0.0556020.44774 -0.0556020.35486 -0.0556020.28365 -0.0556020 -0.0523160 00 0.0715190.39441 0.0744990.40246 0.0744990.68991 0.0744990.84269 0.0420461 0.000548

Table 355: Base 64 representation:8BZef7NWJXj ZlD

Table 356: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.927 5.843 ectsRMS curvature error: 64.08 58.2 %CD error NaN -0.8 dctsCm error NaN -29 mctsUpper transition point NaN 2.29 %

Figure 270: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 271: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

94

Page 103: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: c141b

Information: Lockheed-Georgia C-141 transonic wing airfoils,LOCKHEED C-141 BL113.6 AIRFOIL.Reference: UIUC

Figure 272: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 357: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.6496 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 1.1303 % @0.63CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.1234 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7774 %CLower nose radius: 1.3775 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 22.4177 degRelease Angle: 3.2209 degNose Incidence: 3.5147 degCamber deflection: 6.7357 deg

Table 358: Controlpoints1 -0.0006170.62386 -0.0533990.43873 -0.0533990.35486 -0.0533990.19872 -0.0533990 -0.0427190 00 0.0585970.28977 0.0732460.40246 0.0732460.68562 0.0732460.84203 0.0412651 0.000617

Table 359: Base 64 representation:ySaefycXIXj ZkD

Table 360: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.091 4.324 ectsRMS curvature error: 45.21 44.97 %CD error -2.4 -1.8 dctsCm error -13 1 mctsUpper transition point 4.83 3.19 %

Figure 273: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 274: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

95

Page 104: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: c141c

Information: Lockheed-Georgia C-141 transonic wing airfoils,LOCKHEED C-141 BL426.57 AIRFOIL.Reference: UIUC

Figure 275: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 361: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.9952 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 1.3082 % @0.55CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.1854 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4687 %CLower nose radius: 1.08 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 19.313 degRelease Angle: 3.2163 degNose Incidence: 4.0787 degCamber deflection: 7.295 deg

Table 362: Controlpoints1 -0.0009270.63125 -0.0425510.43421 -0.0425510.35486 -0.0425510.17743 -0.0425510 -0.0357430 00 0.055090.30996 0.0675460.40246 0.0675460.63536 0.0675460.79717 0.047281 0.000927

Table 363: Base 64 representation:zPaZs1gXISs WkF

Table 364: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.594 3.038 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.1 0.7 dctsCm error -1 -5 mctsUpper transition point 0.61 -0.42 %

Figure 276: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 277: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

96

Page 105: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: c141d

Information: LOCKHEED C-141 BL426.57 AIR-FOIL,LOCKHEED C-141 BL610.61 AIRFOIL.Reference: UIUC

Figure 278: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 365: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.774 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 1.5438 % @0.52CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2188 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5674 %CLower nose radius: 1.1922 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 19.6945 degRelease Angle: 4.0733 degNose Incidence: 4.4917 degCamber deflection: 8.565 deg

Table 366: Controlpoints1 -0.0010940.62457 -0.0390560.42511 -0.0390560.35486 -0.0390560.14194 -0.0390560 -0.0335880 00 0.0502320.24147 0.0688110.40246 0.0688110.49109 0.0688110.72679 0.0688111 0.001094

Table 367: Base 64 representation:uaaJs2lXHR WmG

Table 368: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.091 5.505 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -4.7 -4.4 dctsCm error -10 1 mctsUpper transition point 5.92 4.26 %

Figure 279: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 280: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

97

Page 106: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: c141e

Information: Lockheed-Georgia C-141 transonic wing airfoils,LOCKHEED C-141 BL761.11 AIRFOIL.Reference: UIUC

Figure 281: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 369: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.519 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 1.7989 % @0.5CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2546 %CUpper nose radius: 1.8099 %CLower nose radius: 2.3202 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 19.507 degRelease Angle: 4.7901 degNose Incidence: 3.6287 degCamber deflection: 8.4188 deg

Table 370: Controlpoints1 -0.0012730.61072 -0.035080.42647 -0.035080.35486 -0.035080.04072 -0.035080 -0.0250970 00 0.0561820.2616 0.0702270.40246 0.0702270.48212 0.0702270.73421 0.0702271 0.001273

Table 371: Base 64 representation:yWaJet4XHP WnG

Table 372: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.701 3.624 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -5.3 -5.5 dctsCm error -13 -11 mctsUpper transition point 3.83 4.64 %

Figure 282: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 283: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

98

Page 107: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: c141f

Information: Lockheed-Georgia C-141 transonic wing airfoils,LOCKHEED C-141 BL958.89 AIRFOIL.Reference: UIUC

Figure 284: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 373: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.0056 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 2.3067 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3249 %CUpper nose radius: 2.353 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.7485 degRelease Angle: 6.0132 degNose Incidence: 3.1206 degCamber deflection: 9.1338 deg

Table 374: Controlpoints1 -0.00162450.56554 -0.027140.44704 -0.027140.35486 -0.027140 -0.027140 -0.027140 00 0.0583880.21733 0.0729840.40246 0.0729840.60911 0.0729840.81377 0.0528761 0.0016245

Table 375: Base 64 representation:ysaWf XJMt VpI

Table 376: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.513 5.819 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -7.2 -7.5 dctsCm error -29 -26 mctsUpper transition point 16.09 16.78 %

Figure 285: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 286: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

99

Page 108: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: cast102

Information: CAST 10-2/DOA 2 transonic airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 287: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 377: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.1769 % @0.46CMaximum Camber: 1.5445 % @0.71CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.49994 %CUpper nose radius: 0.99643 %CLower nose radius: 0.45969 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.5293 degRelease Angle: 5.5067 degNose Incidence: 9.4502 degCamber deflection: 14.9569 deg

Table 378: Controlpoints1 -0.00249970.80803 -0.00839160.60382 -0.0495870.45577 -0.0495870.3521 -0.0495870 -0.0328490 00 0.0161080.03906 0.0721980.45389 0.0721980.713 0.0721980.80914 0.0457631 0.0024997

Table 379: Base 64 representation:O5sefpPsRVqfQoN

Table 380: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.586 5.394 ectsRMS curvature error: 46.72 45.62 %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 288: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 289: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

100

Page 109: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: clarkk

Information: CLARK K airfoil.Reference: UIUC

Figure 290: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 381: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.5688 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 3.291 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.12 %CUpper nose radius: 0.023482 %CLower nose radius: 10.3995 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.7581 degRelease Angle: 5.6263 degNose Incidence: -4.7077 degCamber deflection: 0.91866 deg

Table 382: Controlpoints1 -0.00060.31285 -0.0276310.21285 -0.031770.20125 -0.031770.0078353 -0.031770 -0.0233070 00 0.00179240.020522 0.089620.39647 0.089620.42948 0.089620.64406 0.0860891 0.0006

Table 383: Base 64 representation:B8ZElu9NBO83SoD

Table 384: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.884 7.461 ectsRMS curvature error: 72.31 Inf %CD error -1.9 -1.6 dctsCm error -10 -4 mctsUpper transition point 2.56 2.05 %

Figure 291: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 292: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

101

Page 110: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: clarkv

Information: CLARK V airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 293: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 385: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.6941 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 3.397 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.14 %CUpper nose radius: 0.98557 %CLower nose radius: 1.0949 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 20.0796 degRelease Angle: 7.8072 degNose Incidence: 6.5321 degCamber deflection: 14.3392 deg

Table 386: Controlpoints1 -0.00070.40638 -0.0238430.30638 -0.029580.19998 -0.029580.062887 -0.029580 -0.0214250 00 0.0236590.085191 0.091140.40006 0.091140.54896 0.091140.78633 0.0694961 0.0007

Table 387: Base 64 representation:RxaQmtrNJNw2WsE

Table 388: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.597 3.781 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0 -0.8 dctsCm error -5 -30 mctsUpper transition point 0.47 1.84 %

Figure 294: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 295: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

102

Page 111: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: clarkx

Information: CLARK X airfoil.Reference: UIUC

Figure 296: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 389: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.605 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 3.2982 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.12 %CUpper nose radius: NaN %CLower nose radius: 1.4434 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.7207 degRelease Angle: 5.7105 degNose Incidence: 0.86931 degCamber deflection: 6.5799 deg

Table 390: Controlpoints1 -0.00060.35123 -0.0249540.27038 -0.031890.12017 -0.031890.052159 -0.031890 -0.0224040 00 00.017753 0.089760.39005 0.089760.46426 0.089760.66771 0.080811 0.0006

Table 391: Base 64 representation:A8ZIlsjILO54SoD

Table 392: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.585 6.543 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.7 -1.9 dctsCm error -10 1 mctsUpper transition point 2.56 3.02 %

Figure 297: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 298: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

103

Page 112: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: clarky

Information: CLARK Y airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 299: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 393: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.6912 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.4304 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.11986 %CUpper nose radius: 0.15532 %CLower nose radius: 2.0061 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.579 degRelease Angle: 5.7043 degNose Incidence: 0.94453 degCamber deflection: 6.6489 deg

Table 394: Controlpoints1 -0.00059930.31272 -0.0256230.21272 -0.0302550.16 -0.0302550.038889 -0.0302550 -0.0228060 00 0.0059810.034548 0.0916270.36 0.0916270.46778 0.0916270.66301 0.0814661 0.0005993

Table 395: Base 64 representation:E5XLmvvKEN43RoD

Table 396: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.026 3.361 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 3.5 3.9 dctsCm error 1 -1 mctsUpper transition point -1.74 -1.94 %

Figure 300: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 301: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

104

Page 113: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: clarkyh

Information: CLARK YH AIRFOILReference: UIUC

Figure 302: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 397: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.9776 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 2.4518 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.099978 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1314 %CLower nose radius: 1.2635 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.2997 degRelease Angle: -2.8648 degNose Incidence: 3.5777 degCamber deflection: 0.71292 deg

Table 398: Controlpoints1 -0.000499890.86462 -0.0293110.1593 -0.0379170.15081 -0.0379170.15081 -0.0379170 -0.0356420 00 0.0300470.11969 0.0841320.29834 0.0841320.58504 0.0841320.84365 0.017721 0.00049989

Table 399: Base 64 representation:XlTaj7AKBQYwUbD

Table 400: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.19 4.897 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 303: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 304: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

105

Page 114: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: clarkysm

Information: CLARK Y airfoil, Smoothed.Reference: UIUC

Figure 305: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 401: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.7483 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.5162 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5108 %CLower nose radius: 1.2936 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.3641 degRelease Angle: 6.0345 degNose Incidence: 8.134 degCamber deflection: 14.1685 deg

Table 402: Controlpoints1 00.29031 -0.0266130.19535 -0.0287910.14646 -0.0287910.061515 -0.0287910 -0.0230330 00 0.0323660.10401 0.0928690.33924 0.0928690.41297 0.0928690.63343 0.0928691 0

Table 403: Base 64 representation:WrWHnykJEM 6SpA

Table 404: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.573 3.703 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.7 -0.8 dctsCm error -13 -16 mctsUpper transition point 0.52 1.22 %

Figure 306: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 307: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

106

Page 115: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: clarkz

Information: CLARK Z airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 308: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 405: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.7765 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 3.9663 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.12 %CUpper nose radius: 2.4048 %CLower nose radius: 2.2179 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.7157 degRelease Angle: 6.3162 degNose Incidence: 9.3225 degCamber deflection: 15.6387 deg

Table 406: Controlpoints1 -0.00060.21915 -0.0216150.11915 -0.02460.099985 -0.02460.035234 -0.02460 -0.0228250 00 0.049360.15197 0.0980.30006 0.0980.42579 0.0980.61434 0.0981 0.0006

Table 407: Base 64 representation:ggTLp6oGBK 4SpD

Table 408: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.359 5.62 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 2.8 3.8 dctsCm error 5 26 mctsUpper transition point -5.46 -7.43 %

Figure 309: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 310: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

107

Page 116: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: clarym15

Information: CLARK YM15 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 311: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 409: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.8137 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 3.5659 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7016 %CLower nose radius: 2.1275 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 20.108 degRelease Angle: 5.8021 degNose Incidence: 9.7887 degCamber deflection: 15.5908 deg

Table 410: Controlpoints1 -0.00080.44644 -0.0419550.2015 -0.043670.2015 -0.043670.074428 -0.043670 -0.0324910 00 0.0113170.01129 0.108730.39626 0.108730.40722 0.108730.62484 0.107361 0.0008

Table 411: Base 64 representation:H9ZBtvnNAT-8WpE

Table 412: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.656 9.154 ectsRMS curvature error: 83.52 58.49 %CD error -3.1 -3 dctsCm error -17 -29 mctsUpper transition point 5.57 4.76 %

Figure 312: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 313: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

108

Page 117: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: clarym18

Information: CLARK YM18 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 314: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 413: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.0429 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 3.4299 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.18 %CUpper nose radius: 3.4346 %CLower nose radius: 2.8804 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 23.9336 degRelease Angle: 5.6339 degNose Incidence: 9.1999 degCamber deflection: 14.8337 deg

Table 414: Controlpoints1 -0.00090.51316 -0.0549310.25739 -0.058250.202 -0.058250.16301 -0.058250 -0.0559480 00 0.0495250.10712 0.123670.29575 0.123670.42582 0.123670.613 0.123671 0.0009

Table 415: Base 64 representation:aoTM08MNEZ 7boF

Table 416: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.074 3.947 ectsRMS curvature error: 9.34 9.3 %CD error 2.3 2.1 dctsCm error 9 10 mctsUpper transition point -3.58 -3.46 %

Figure 315: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 316: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

109

Page 118: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: cootie

Information: Waco Cootie airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 317: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 417: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.3639 % @0.36CMaximum Camber: 5.43 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.49997 %CUpper nose radius: NaN %CLower nose radius: 0.69559 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.5514 degRelease Angle: 8.0764 degNose Incidence: 11.4326 degCamber deflection: 19.509 deg

Table 418: Controlpoints1 -0.00249990.1931 0.0369730.10208 -0.0107870.025093 -0.0107870.019321 -0.0107870 -0.0107870 00 00.023175 0.0959960.3992 0.0959960.43502 0.0959960.62828 0.0907271 0.0024999

Table 419: Base 64 representation:A7aEo PCFF75MsN

Table 420: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.264 7.933 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0 -3.1 dctsCm error -45 -66 mctsUpper transition point 1.47 2.21 %

Figure 318: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 319: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

110

Page 119: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: cr001sm

Information: Cody Robertson CR 001 R/C hand-launch lowReynolds number airfoil (smoothed)Reference: UIUC

Figure 320: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 421: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.337 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.0776 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.001 %CUpper nose radius: 0.58754 %CLower nose radius: 0.78025 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.93 degRelease Angle: 10.7904 degNose Incidence: 9.1596 degCamber deflection: 19.95 deg

Table 422: Controlpoints1 -5e-0060.5909 0.034530.25595 -0.0100740.054679 -0.0100740.0095165 -0.0100740 -0.00703570 00 0.0175980.079066 0.0748250.37887 0.0748250.64299 0.0748250.93673 0.0190531 5e-006

Table 423: Base 64 representation:PyYbgs0DOEQiNwA

Table 424: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.84 3.203 ectsRMS curvature error: 32.55 32.21 %CD error -0.1 0.5 dctsCm error -4 11 mctsUpper transition point -0.52 -1.45 %

Figure 321: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 322: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

111

Page 120: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: curtisc72

Information: Curtis C-72 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 323: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 425: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.5477 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.7881 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.09994 %CUpper nose radius: 0.20184 %CLower nose radius: 1.6827 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.165 degRelease Angle: 7.466 degNose Incidence: 8.2516 degCamber deflection: 15.7177 deg

Table 426: Controlpoints1 -0.00049970.53097 0.00673340.43097 -0.0281230.15106 -0.0281230.017255 -0.0281230 -0.0139130 00 0.00148750.0016443 0.0929050.39704 0.0929050.40507 0.0929050.63392 0.0921031 0.0004997

Table 427: Base 64 representation:B ZBng4KVM-0PrD

Table 428: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.483 4.599 ectsRMS curvature error: 21.92 21.59 %CD error -0.1 0.4 dctsCm error -5 -1 mctsUpper transition point 0.21 -0.76 %

Figure 324: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 325: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

112

Page 121: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: dae11

Information: Drela DAE11 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 326: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 429: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.8254 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 6.6267 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7324 %CLower nose radius: 1.4733 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.3952 degRelease Angle: 7.4997 degNose Incidence: 14.6256 degCamber deflection: 22.1253 deg

Table 430: Controlpoints1 00.59804 0.0337680.22088 -0.0150660.064895 -0.0150660.018232 -0.0150660 -0.0133820 00 0.0402030.13995 0.128850.38618 0.128850.62241 0.128850.72241 0.0499331 0

Table 431: Base 64 representation:UoZZ24tELGugGrA

Table 432: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.936 4.055 ectsRMS curvature error: 38.38 39.62 %CD error -0.4 -0.2 dctsCm error -1 -13 mctsUpper transition point -0.72 -0.04 %

Figure 327: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 328: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

113

Page 122: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: dae21

Information: Drela DAE21 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 329: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 433: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.7894 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 6.5774 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.1169 %CLower nose radius: 2.4746 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.2589 degRelease Angle: 7.7853 degNose Incidence: 13.8383 degCamber deflection: 21.6236 deg

Table 434: Controlpoints1 00.55989 0.0435860.18619 -0.0150190.041667 -0.0150190.01094 -0.0150190 -0.0134340 00 0.0456120.14742 0.122690.37822 0.122690.64145 0.122690.7625 0.0415131 0

Table 435: Base 64 representation:YmYbz4uDKGpiFsA

Table 436: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.986 3.59 ectsRMS curvature error: 18.12 22.02 %CD error -0.5 -1 dctsCm error -6 4 mctsUpper transition point 0.02 -0.08 %

Figure 330: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 331: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

114

Page 123: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: dae31

Information: Drela DAE31 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 332: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 437: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.0877 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 6.7502 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.9396 %CLower nose radius: 3.3233 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.7207 degRelease Angle: 9.3847 degNose Incidence: 11.4675 degCamber deflection: 20.8523 deg

Table 438: Controlpoints1 00.51552 0.0554080.17167 -0.0159840.029729 -0.0159840.0063793 -0.0159840 -0.0118880 00 0.0411210.13077 0.119910.38109 0.119910.67725 0.119910.79526 0.0444351 0

Table 439: Base 64 representation:WpYfyvxCJHokGuA

Table 440: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.611 3.724 ectsRMS curvature error: 18.95 18.88 %CD error -1.2 -1.5 dctsCm error -5 -1 mctsUpper transition point -0.43 -0.55 %

Figure 333: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 334: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

115

Page 124: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: dae51

Information: Drela DAE51 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 335: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 441: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.3554 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 4.0467 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %CUpper nose radius: 0.77661 %CLower nose radius: 1.2184 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.2533 degRelease Angle: 6.661 degNose Incidence: 7.5361 degCamber deflection: 14.197 deg

Table 442: Controlpoints1 -0.0010.681 0.0187030.30632 -0.0160690.091899 -0.0160690.010108 -0.0160690 -0.00906150 00 0.0231440.10346 0.0856310.38877 0.0856310.63108 0.0856310.85818 0.0254661 0.001

Table 443: Base 64 representation:RuZZkj4GPHZsHqF

Table 444: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.977 4.335 ectsRMS curvature error: 62.33 61.58 %CD error -0.2 0 dctsCm error 2 7 mctsUpper transition point -0.46 -0.79 %

Figure 336: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 337: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

116

Page 125: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: davis-corrected

Information: Davis basic B-24 wing airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 338: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 445: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.9068 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 2.478 % @0.3CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.6159 %CLower nose radius: 1.0665 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.103 degRelease Angle: 0.70178 degNose Incidence: 10.374 degCamber deflection: 11.0758 deg

Table 446: Controlpoints1 00.74361 -0.0307980.48025 -0.0548210.2785 -0.0548210.015888 -0.0548210 -0.0106280 00 0.0512070.15036 0.10430.29591 0.10430.47606 0.10430.69128 0.0447811 0

Table 447: Base 64 representation:ffTQsM7SSXljRgA

Table 448: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.084 5.839 ectsRMS curvature error: 5.16 10.12 %CD error -0.2 -0.4 dctsCm error 0 6 mctsUpper transition point 0.21 0.38 %

Figure 339: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 340: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

117

Page 126: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: davis

Information: Consolidated/Davis airfoil (B-24 wing?)Reference: UIUC

Figure 341: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 449: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.1331 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 3.7124 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: NaN %CLower nose radius: 0.1768 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.2399 degRelease Angle: 7.0195 degNose Incidence: 7.065 degCamber deflection: 14.0845 deg

Table 450: Controlpoints1 00.37608 -0.0119850.28325 -0.0270.15 -0.0270.020128 -0.0270 -0.00487080 00 00.027986 0.09150.4 0.09150.4 0.09150.66851 0.0896881 0

Table 451: Base 64 representation:A7aAmM2KKM-3SqA

Table 452: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.919 6.565 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.8 -4.6 dctsCm error -14 -9 mctsUpper transition point 4.86 5.77 %

Figure 342: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 343: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

118

Page 127: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: daytonwright6

Information: Dayton-Wright 6 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 344: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 453: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.9901 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.6761 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.74808 %CLower nose radius: 1.9586 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 57.2958 degRelease Angle: -20.0535 degNose Incidence: 4.9346 degCamber deflection: -15.1189 deg

Table 454: Controlpoints1 00.99248 -0.00855610.10073 -0.0277810.10073 -0.0277810.053926 -0.0277810 -0.0265350 00 0.0202670.08236 0.116390.29717 0.116390.64251 0.116390.99643 0.000540291 0

Table 455: Base 64 representation:LtTfx8eGAMBU AA

Table 456: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.385 8.269 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 2 2.2 dctsCm error 16 19 mctsUpper transition point -5.04 -5.16 %

Figure 345: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 346: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

119

Page 128: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: defcnd1

Information: Rutan DEFIANT canard BL20 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 347: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 457: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 20.8575 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 4.5106 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.2457 %CLower nose radius: 3.1417 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.87 degRelease Angle: 4.1033 degNose Incidence: 6.6122 degCamber deflection: 10.7155 deg

Table 458: Controlpoints1 00.46285 -0.0454050.36285 -0.0628280.21597 -0.0628280.10335 -0.0628280 -0.0465260 00 0.0371290.09208 0.148110.3227 0.148110.47853 0.148110.57853 0.09761 0

Table 459: Base 64 representation:QtVP-ugOMbz1UmA

Table 460: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.097 4.434 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -4.6 -5.4 dctsCm error 9 3 mctsUpper transition point 1.26 2.2 %

Figure 348: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 349: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

120

Page 129: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: defcnd2

Information: Rutan DEFIANT canard BL110 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 350: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 461: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.7434 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.8084 % @0.28CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.21 %CLower nose radius: 3.3505 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.2094 degRelease Angle: 4.1641 degNose Incidence: 9.6738 degCamber deflection: 13.8378 deg

Table 462: Controlpoints1 00.71148 -0.0198750.61148 -0.0357460.3227 -0.0357460.0044665 -0.0357460 -0.00998840 00 0.0322560.12898 0.111780.28565 0.111780.55891 0.111780.729 0.0589321 0

Table 463: Base 64 representation:SiSYvS-VbPmvSmA

Table 464: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.236 4.498 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 2.8 -2.3 dctsCm error -1 15 mctsUpper transition point -0.14 -0.4 %

Figure 351: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 352: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

121

Page 130: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: defcnd3

Information: Rutan DEFIANT canard BL145 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 353: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 465: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.4833 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 2.3782 % @0.28CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.4474 %CLower nose radius: 0.59619 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 20.0437 degRelease Angle: 7.1964 degNose Incidence: 19.9349 degCamber deflection: 27.1313 deg

Table 466: Controlpoints1 00.5979 -0.0198450.45086 -0.0336450.28565 -0.0336450.2838 -0.0336450 -0.0335860 00 0.0532270.12327 0.0812010.28565 0.0812010.48846 0.0812010.94676 0.01651 0

Table 467: Base 64 representation:pjSSi ASPONuWrA

Table 468: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.487 5.171 ectsRMS curvature error: 52.49 52.98 %CD error -4 -3.1 dctsCm error -16 -26 mctsUpper transition point 4.39 4.03 %

Figure 354: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 355: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

122

Page 131: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: df101

Information: David Fraser DF 101 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 356: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 469: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.0387 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 2.2805 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.007 %CUpper nose radius: 0.49058 %CLower nose radius: 0.43754 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.7781 degRelease Angle: 1.7502 degNose Incidence: 7.084 degCamber deflection: 8.8342 deg

Table 470: Controlpoints1 -3.5e-0050.92563 -0.00401820.33219 -0.0362870.20782 -0.0362870.036598 -0.0362870 -0.0103320 00 0.0113580.039447 0.0765280.33765 0.0765280.63224 0.0765280.91983 0.00926361 3.5e-005

Table 471: Base 64 representation:J4WcgS0NKPOHLiA

Table 472: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.256 4.326 ectsRMS curvature error: 43.63 43.56 %CD error 0.1 -0.5 dctsCm error 36 17 mctsUpper transition point -0.76 1.02 %

Figure 357: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 358: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

123

Page 132: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: 2032c

Information: Dillner 20-32-C low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 359: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 473: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.6448 % @0.19CMaximum Camber: 6.974 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.32 %CUpper nose radius: 0.067588 %CLower nose radius: 0.07681 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.408 degRelease Angle: 14.0477 degNose Incidence: 18.1891 degCamber deflection: 32.2368 deg

Table 474: Controlpoints1 -0.00160.28774 0.0901940.1165 -0.0050.0125 -0.0050.0078115 -0.0050 -0.0020 00 0.0041920.039 0.10480.3 0.10480.55395 0.10480.99635 0.0029841 0.0016

Table 475: Base 64 representation:D3TXsZYBHCBzP2I

Table 476: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.404 8.579 ectsRMS curvature error: 33.82 38.99 %CD error -1.4 -1.1 dctsCm error -43 -37 mctsUpper transition point 3.9 4.28 %

Figure 360: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 361: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

124

Page 133: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: doa5

Information: Dornier A-5 airfoil (reconstruction) (DO 228 wing)Reference: UIUC

Figure 362: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 477: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.2413 % @0.41CMaximum Camber: 2.5397 % @0.76CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.0949 %CLower nose radius: 1.1589 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.0663 degRelease Angle: 7.8135 degNose Incidence: 13.3888 degCamber deflection: 21.2024 deg

Table 478: Controlpoints1 00.78605 0.0216580.6671 -0.063470.4012 -0.063470.38571 -0.063470 -0.054590 00 0.0573730.15954 0.0990.42116 0.0990.75989 0.0990.99457 0.0009431 0

Table 479: Base 64 representation:knbkp2CacbBoFsA

Table 480: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.668 6.113 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -32.9 -32.9 dctsCm error -154 -134 mctsUpper transition point 37.3 36.73 %

Figure 363: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 364: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

125

Page 134: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: du8608418

Information: Deflt University DU 86-084/18 low Reynolds numberairfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 365: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 481: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.4592 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 1.1477 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.65558 %CLower nose radius: 56.5593 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.3556 degRelease Angle: 3.5689 degNose Incidence: 3.0742 degCamber deflection: 6.6431 deg

Table 482: Controlpoints1 00.86009 -0.00279640.86009 -0.0311220.32141 -0.0311220.0079763 -0.0311220 -0.00283450 00 0.0186320.084372 0.0535880.3687 0.0535880.77372 0.0535880.79049 0.00632791 0

Table 483: Base 64 representation:WwYoXG9VyN6 DgA

Table 484: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.366 5.542 ectsRMS curvature error: 56.52 57.73 %CD error -0.4 -1.1 dctsCm error 82 73 mctsUpper transition point -0.3 1.35 %

Figure 366: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 367: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

126

Page 135: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e66

Information: Eppler E66 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 368: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 485: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.2438 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 4.0357 % @0.52CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5812 %CLower nose radius: 0.37322 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.2636 degRelease Angle: 13.8886 degNose Incidence: 14.8538 degCamber deflection: 28.7425 deg

Table 486: Controlpoints1 00.83892 0.0296740.34008 -0.0216850.13854 -0.0216850.0020778 -0.0216850 -0.00118420 00 0.0371920.15998 0.0880180.37797 0.0880180.74353 0.0880180.98611 0.00543531 0

Table 487: Base 64 representation:bkYllD-JPJEQM5A

Table 488: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.687 5.899 ectsRMS curvature error: 24.51 24.46 %CD error 0.1 0.6 dctsCm error -4 -29 mctsUpper transition point 1.43 1.82 %

Figure 369: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 370: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

127

Page 136: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e67

Information: Eppler E67 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 371: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 489: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.5255 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 3.7961 % @0.56CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.85248 %CLower nose radius: 0.5936 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.3305 degRelease Angle: 12.3829 degNose Incidence: 6.9678 degCamber deflection: 19.3507 deg

Table 490: Controlpoints1 00.85954 0.0214130.42512 -0.030480.1829 -0.030480.16278 -0.030480 -0.030480 00 0.0199290.089012 0.091570.41937 0.091570.61493 0.091570.86524 0.0443931 0

Table 491: Base 64 representation:OxbWm HMTNfQL1A

Table 492: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.236 2.406 ectsRMS curvature error: 16 15.81 %CD error 2 1.7 dctsCm error 1 -10 mctsUpper transition point -2.41 -1.5 %

Figure 372: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 373: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

128

Page 137: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e168

Information: Eppler E168 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 374: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 493: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.4415 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 3.8911e-007 % @0.03CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.59202 %CLower nose radius: 0.59202 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.5485 degRelease Angle: 1.9911e-006 degNose Incidence: 8.8091e-006 degCamber deflection: 1.08e-005 deg

Table 494: Controlpoints1 00.6353 -0.030460.43483 -0.062210.26739 -0.062210.04968 -0.062210 -0.0140030 00 0.0140030.04968 0.062210.26739 0.062210.43483 0.062210.6353 0.030461 0

Table 495: Base 64 representation:OzRPbOzRPbooLgA

Table 496: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.327 6.126 ectsRMS curvature error: 52.08 48.38 %CD error 0 0.1 dctsCm error 2 2 mctsUpper transition point -0.05 0.2 %

Figure 375: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 376: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

129

Page 138: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e169

Information: Eppler E169 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 377: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 497: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.402 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 6.4599e-007 % @0.61CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.92556 %CLower nose radius: 0.92556 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.1409 degRelease Angle: -7.4978e-006 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: -7.4978e-006 deg

Table 498: Controlpoints1 00.63539 -0.0323510.44342 -0.072020.26456 -0.072020.076241 -0.072020 -0.021690 00 0.021690.076241 0.072020.26456 0.072020.44342 0.072020.63539 0.0323511 0

Table 499: Base 64 representation:TtRQfTtRQfppLgA

Table 500: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.659 3.282 ectsRMS curvature error: 35.52 38.16 %CD error -0.2 -0.3 dctsCm error 2 2 mctsUpper transition point -0.18 0.01 %

Figure 378: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 379: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

130

Page 139: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e171

Information: Eppler E171 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 380: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 501: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.2529 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 2.4257e-006 % @0.57CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.68109 %CLower nose radius: 0.68109 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.8573 degRelease Angle: -1.5801e-005 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: -1.5801e-005 deg

Table 502: Controlpoints1 00.63917 -0.034290.54821 -0.061270.32389 -0.061270.13312 -0.061270 -0.0245850 00 0.0245850.13312 0.061270.32389 0.061270.54821 0.061270.63917 0.034291 0

Table 503: Base 64 representation:alVVaalVVayyMgA

Table 504: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.889 2.568 ectsRMS curvature error: 41.92 42.62 %CD error -0.9 -0.4 dctsCm error 3 4 mctsUpper transition point 1.19 0.22 %

Figure 381: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 382: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

131

Page 140: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e174

Information: Eppler E174 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 383: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 505: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.9593 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 3.6845 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.4621 %CLower nose radius: -29.6556 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.047 degRelease Angle: 5.7684 degNose Incidence: 2.3288 degCamber deflection: 8.0973 deg

Table 506: Controlpoints1 00.69834 0.0144630.2493 -0.0166510.084722 -0.0166510 -0.0166510 -0.00604980 00 0.0197390.12648 0.0805660.35541 0.0805660.52561 0.0805660.6584 0.0528341 0

Table 507: Base 64 representation:QoXRhX FMHtaHoA

Table 508: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.893 3.847 ectsRMS curvature error: 38.59 39.53 %CD error -1.7 -2 dctsCm error 1 10 mctsUpper transition point -0.28 0.39 %

Figure 384: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 385: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

132

Page 141: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e176

Information: Eppler E176 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 386: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 509: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.9429 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 3.1746 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.716 %CLower nose radius: 0.78964 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.0419 degRelease Angle: 3.8907 degNose Incidence: 6.1199 degCamber deflection: 10.0106 deg

Table 510: Controlpoints1 00.68212 0.00489830.27673 -0.0175810.12487 -0.0175810.0016532 -0.0175810 -0.00622980 00 0.0226410.12984 0.0759440.3492 0.0759440.55653 0.0759440.73128 0.0319621 0

Table 511: Base 64 representation:TnWUgX-ILImcHlA

Table 512: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.451 6.244 ectsRMS curvature error: 54.69 45.49 %CD error -1.8 -2.1 dctsCm error -4 13 mctsUpper transition point -0.13 -1.21 %

Figure 387: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 388: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

133

Page 142: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e178

Information: Eppler E178 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 389: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 513: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.7178 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 2.7917 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.66464 %CLower nose radius: 0.44448 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.4151 degRelease Angle: 1.837 degNose Incidence: 6.9287 degCamber deflection: 8.7657 deg

Table 514: Controlpoints1 00.56965 -0.00653930.31071 -0.0189010.17054 -0.0189010.077156 -0.0189010 -0.0151210 00 0.0243970.13433 0.0709780.34251 0.0709780.56915 0.0709780.7696 0.0183131 0

Table 515: Base 64 representation:WmWWeyiLLIhnGiA

Table 516: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.477 2.643 ectsRMS curvature error: 44.18 48.57 %CD error -0.8 -1.3 dctsCm error -8 -11 mctsUpper transition point -0.3 -0.15 %

Figure 390: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 391: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

134

Page 143: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e180

Information: Eppler E180 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 392: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 517: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.5952 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 2.342 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.90845 %CLower nose radius: 0.31375 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.3582 degRelease Angle: -1.79 degNose Incidence: 9.1677 degCamber deflection: 7.3776 deg

Table 518: Controlpoints1 00.9678 -0.00336680.36502 -0.0210870.22115 -0.0210870.020781 -0.0210870 -0.00659290 00 0.0307270.15589 0.0661250.33525 0.0661250.57543 0.0661250.78797 0.00884611 0

Table 519: Base 64 representation:ehVXcU5OMJgKJsA

Table 520: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.699 3.287 ectsRMS curvature error: 51.43 50.12 %CD error 2.9 2.9 dctsCm error -2 19 mctsUpper transition point -0.94 -2.19 %

Figure 393: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 394: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

135

Page 144: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e182

Information: Eppler E182 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 395: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 521: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.4787 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 1.5775 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.31678 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.3629 degRelease Angle: -3.6738 degNose Incidence: -1.5139 degCamber deflection: -5.1878 deg

Table 522: Controlpoints1 00.92477 -0.00971120.44072 -0.0275770.2297 -0.0275770.002297 -0.0275770 -0.00764120 00 0.0159850.11237 0.0579460.32793 0.0579460.59081 0.0579460.79401 2.7355e-0051 0

Table 523: Base 64 representation:SpVZZS-PSMgXIaA

Table 524: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.913 4.181 ectsRMS curvature error: 85.76 84.6 %CD error -0.2 -0.4 dctsCm error 12 24 mctsUpper transition point -0.85 -0.6 %

Figure 396: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 397: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

136

Page 145: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e184

Information: Eppler E184 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 398: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 525: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.3332 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 1.1365 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.5558 %CLower nose radius: 0.7128 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.4188 degRelease Angle: -4.4509 degNose Incidence: 1.1355 degCamber deflection: -3.3154 deg

Table 526: Controlpoints1 00.90801 -0.0151810.49265 -0.0304140.28433 -0.0304140.048832 -0.0304140 -0.01370 00 0.0160690.1052 0.0530080.32108 0.0530080.59184 0.0530080.80538 -0.00775881 0

Table 527: Base 64 representation:TqVaXs0STNfgIWA

Table 528: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.563 3.322 ectsRMS curvature error: 49.76 52.57 %CD error -1.6 -1.8 dctsCm error -21 -27 mctsUpper transition point 2.52 3.3 %

Figure 399: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 400: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

137

Page 146: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e186

Information: Eppler E186 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 401: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 529: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.2741 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 1.2618 % @0.3CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.44421 %CLower nose radius: 0.55503 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.3655 degRelease Angle: -8.56 degNose Incidence: 2.0769 degCamber deflection: -6.4831 deg

Table 530: Controlpoints1 00.90778 -0.0242670.54162 -0.0388550.33815 -0.0388550.04765 -0.0388550 -0.0132780 00 0.0163380.090141 0.063970.31 0.063970.50527 0.063970.80754 -0.00799021 0

Table 531: Base 64 representation:QsUSbW2WURZnOSA

Table 532: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.29 5.224 ectsRMS curvature error: 92.52 90.05 %CD error -2.6 -1.9 dctsCm error -45 -34 mctsUpper transition point 2.26 0.97 %

Figure 402: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 403: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

138

Page 147: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e193

Information: Eppler E193 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 404: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 533: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.2635 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 3.4689 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.61428 %CLower nose radius: 7.4648 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.3134 degRelease Angle: 5.259 degNose Incidence: 2.9292 degCamber deflection: 8.1881 deg

Table 534: Controlpoints1 00.65979 0.000607440.29352 -0.0227250.15679 -0.0227250 -0.0227250 -0.00846150 00 0.0236930.13708 0.0848210.3537 0.0848210.43714 0.0848210.53856 0.0848211 0

Table 535: Base 64 representation:SmXIjY KKK fMoA

Table 536: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.867 4.537 ectsRMS curvature error: 61.25 61.92 %CD error -0.4 -0.9 dctsCm error 8 -7 mctsUpper transition point -1.25 -0.04 %

Figure 405: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 406: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

139

Page 148: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e195

Information: Eppler E195 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 407: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 537: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.8261 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 3.1047 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.92124 %CLower nose radius: 1.0797 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.5095 degRelease Angle: 5.2653 degNose Incidence: 4.0739 degCamber deflection: 9.3392 deg

Table 538: Controlpoints1 00.65381 -0.00594620.43936 -0.0315530.20137 -0.0315530.15274 -0.0315530 -0.02910 00 0.0278960.14611 0.0893060.34979 0.0893060.49641 0.0893060.5916 0.0750381 0

Table 539: Base 64 representation:UkWOl6PNTN1nNnA

Table 540: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.98 4.41 ectsRMS curvature error: 47.07 46.97 %CD error 1.1 -0.7 dctsCm error -10 20 mctsUpper transition point 0.27 -1.44 %

Figure 408: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 409: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

140

Page 149: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e197

Information: Eppler E197 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 410: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 541: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.4779 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 2.7405 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0894 %CLower nose radius: 0.94109 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.2106 degRelease Angle: 4.7712 degNose Incidence: 5.9484 degCamber deflection: 10.7196 deg

Table 542: Controlpoints1 00.65027 -0.0124340.47902 -0.0421330.24819 -0.0421330.096972 -0.0421330 -0.0223670 00 0.0331380.15675 0.0940.34549 0.0940.52422 0.0940.61951 0.0696621 0

Table 543: Base 64 representation:XiWRnhmQUSyqOmA

Table 544: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.214 3.315 ectsRMS curvature error: 50.51 51.81 %CD error 0.5 0.5 dctsCm error 12 31 mctsUpper transition point -0.65 -1.27 %

Figure 411: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 412: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

141

Page 150: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e201

Information: Eppler E201 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 413: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 545: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.876 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 3.0041 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.76493 %CLower nose radius: 0.8781 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.1612 degRelease Angle: 5.8243 degNose Incidence: 3.6743 degCamber deflection: 9.4986 deg

Table 546: Controlpoints1 00.69731 0.00128780.46833 -0.0332990.19911 -0.0332990.17945 -0.0332990 -0.0324110 00 0.0271190.14422 0.0881310.35267 0.0881310.4502 0.0881310.60248 0.0801911 0

Table 547: Base 64 representation:UlXKl9GNWO5jMpA

Table 548: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.697 5.158 ectsRMS curvature error: 40.68 41 %CD error 0 -0.7 dctsCm error 19 4 mctsUpper transition point -1.98 -0.76 %

Figure 414: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 415: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

142

Page 151: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e203

Information: Eppler E203 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 416: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 549: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.6904 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 2.6195 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.97104 %CLower nose radius: 0.67393 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.9273 degRelease Angle: 6.9945 degNose Incidence: 4.1735 degCamber deflection: 11.168 deg

Table 550: Controlpoints1 00.78156 0.00583770.43778 -0.0463850.28703 -0.0463850.03621 -0.0463850 -0.0127550 00 0.0324110.15674 0.0917010.35148 0.0917010.4747 0.0917010.66794 0.0733611 0

Table 551: Base 64 representation:XiWMmS3SOUyZMqA

Table 552: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.956 4.467 ectsRMS curvature error: 44.57 45 %CD error 2.1 2.9 dctsCm error 19 37 mctsUpper transition point -3.37 -5.22 %

Figure 417: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 418: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

143

Page 152: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e205

Information: Eppler E205 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 419: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 553: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.4126 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 3.0037 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.6292 %CLower nose radius: 0.65545 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.8455 degRelease Angle: 2.2589 degNose Incidence: 6.2382 degCamber deflection: 8.4971 deg

Table 554: Controlpoints1 00.96448 -0.00258560.34473 -0.0248190.16627 -0.0248190.11408 -0.0248190 -0.0221640 00 0.020130.0966 0.0817790.34095 0.0817790.45507 0.0817790.61551 0.0587091 0

Table 555: Base 64 representation:QtWLi4ULOLtHOjA

Table 556: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.567 3.921 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.4 -1.7 dctsCm error 2 21 mctsUpper transition point -0.25 -0.18 %

Figure 420: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 421: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

144

Page 153: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e207

Information: Eppler E207 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 422: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 557: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.0138 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 2.5228 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.85169 %CLower nose radius: 0.58536 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.1243 degRelease Angle: 3.4197 degNose Incidence: 6.8756 degCamber deflection: 10.2953 deg

Table 558: Controlpoints1 00.5593 -0.0203390.45031 -0.0359980.25292 -0.0359980.05595 -0.0359980 -0.0147760 00 0.0246920.10738 0.0849290.33982 0.0849290.42565 0.0849290.55755 0.0738971 0

Table 559: Base 64 representation:TrWIjaxQRP3yOlA

Table 560: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.134 3.728 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf 92.43 %CD error 0.1 0 dctsCm error 18 16 mctsUpper transition point -0.33 -0.03 %

Figure 423: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 424: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

145

Page 154: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e209

Information: Eppler E209 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 425: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 561: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.7103 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 2.0358 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1718 %CLower nose radius: 0.44234 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.316 degRelease Angle: 4.6371 degNose Incidence: 8.2244 degCamber deflection: 12.8616 deg

Table 562: Controlpoints1 00.73787 -0.00924940.46671 -0.0490950.29783 -0.0490950.060051 -0.0490950 -0.0133070 00 0.0308860.12211 0.0883610.33846 0.0883610.52542 0.0883610.94719 0.0105471 0

Table 563: Base 64 representation:WoWSlRyTPVIfPnA

Table 564: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.433 2.664 ectsRMS curvature error: 38.05 37.25 %CD error 0.9 0.9 dctsCm error 17 1 mctsUpper transition point -1.59 -0.89 %

Figure 426: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 427: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

146

Page 155: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e210

Information: Eppler E210 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 428: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 565: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.558 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 4.0981 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4223 %CLower nose radius: 0.75486 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.6278 degRelease Angle: 13.5328 degNose Incidence: 12.1212 degCamber deflection: 25.654 deg

Table 566: Controlpoints1 00.76951 0.0251160.4815 -0.0317170.22079 -0.0317170.17663 -0.0317170 -0.0298140 00 0.0329070.1142 0.10710.36564 0.10710.50871 0.10710.86982 0.0495731 0

Table 567: Base 64 representation:UrXOt7NOVOecQ1A

Table 568: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.496 5.238 ectsRMS curvature error: 29.41 29.05 %CD error 2.2 2.5 dctsCm error 7 18 mctsUpper transition point -1.45 -2.79 %

Figure 429: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 430: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

147

Page 156: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e211

Information: Eppler E211 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 431: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 569: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.9681 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 2.4883 % @0.59CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.57134 %CLower nose radius: 0.16601 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.621 degRelease Angle: 11.806 degNose Incidence: 6.1622 degCamber deflection: 17.9682 deg

Table 570: Controlpoints1 00.78045 0.0191910.57891 -0.0338170.23841 -0.0338170.021457 -0.0338170 -0.0103610 00 0.0211910.1179 0.0774710.36293 0.0774710.57293 0.0774710.89106 0.0366961 0

Table 571: Base 64 representation:SqXVgU5PsOegPyA

Table 572: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.628 4.874 ectsRMS curvature error: 71.92 71.7 %CD error -0.7 -0.4 dctsCm error 11 12 mctsUpper transition point -2.21 -2.84 %

Figure 432: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 433: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

148

Page 157: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e212

Information: Eppler E212 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 434: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 573: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.5966 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 2.8357 % @0.59CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.36016 %CLower nose radius: 0.81278 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.4642 degRelease Angle: 15.2873 degNose Incidence: -0.044982 degCamber deflection: 15.2423 deg

Table 574: Controlpoints1 00.8486 0.029580.42564 -0.0348450.18603 -0.0348450.018603 -0.0348450 -0.010040 00 0.013550.07647 0.0756850.36652 0.0756850.63998 0.0756850.92641 0.0260871 0

Table 575: Base 64 representation:LyXcgS5MTPWRJ4A

Table 576: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.42 3.414 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0 0.4 dctsCm error -5 0 mctsUpper transition point -0.87 -2.21 %

Figure 435: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 436: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

149

Page 158: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e214

Information: Eppler E214 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 437: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 577: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.13 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 4.0814 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3109 %CLower nose radius: 0.5982 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.4079 degRelease Angle: 14.1633 degNose Incidence: 12.4632 degCamber deflection: 26.6266 deg

Table 578: Controlpoints1 00.80272 0.032870.49698 -0.0217440.17753 -0.0217440.015325 -0.0217440 -0.00756840 00 0.0338230.13843 0.0938610.3765 0.0938610.5228 0.0938610.81075 0.0646751 0

Table 579: Base 64 representation:XnYPnW5LZJrZL2A

Table 580: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.149 3.337 ectsRMS curvature error: 27.03 26.96 %CD error 0.6 0.8 dctsCm error 15 23 mctsUpper transition point -1.4 -1.92 %

Figure 438: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 439: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

150

Page 159: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e216

Information: Eppler E216 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 440: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 581: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.5375 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 5.0547 % @0.57CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.80245 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.2464 degRelease Angle: 19.6525 degNose Incidence: 5.1492 degCamber deflection: 24.8017 deg

Table 582: Controlpoints1 00.77154 0.0613390.34628 -0.0223070.11773 -0.0223070 -0.0223070 -0.00774170 00 0.024590.11303 0.0961340.39681 0.0961340.491 0.0961340.81701 0.0825281 0

Table 583: Base 64 representation:QtZKoW IRK2WK A

Table 584: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.956 8.683 ectsRMS curvature error: 24.4 28.14 %CD error -3.8 -3.4 dctsCm error 64 84 mctsUpper transition point 1.87 1.31 %

Figure 441: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 442: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

151

Page 160: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e220

Information: Eppler E220 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 443: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 585: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.4738 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: 2.5657 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6367 %CLower nose radius: 0.52191 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.0799 degRelease Angle: -1.8082 degNose Incidence: 12.1166 degCamber deflection: 10.3083 deg

Table 586: Controlpoints1 00.81018 -0.0244780.47535 -0.0320150.31815 -0.0320150.29111 -0.0320150 -0.0318260 00 0.0444770.1813 0.0829720.37713 0.0829720.60808 0.0829720.75586 0.0159231 0

Table 587: Base 64 representation:hgYYi FUPOnwMsA

Table 588: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.404 7.672 ectsRMS curvature error: 31.22 31.18 %CD error 0.2 -1.7 dctsCm error -21 -1 mctsUpper transition point 0.7 0.34 %

Figure 444: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 445: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

152

Page 161: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e221

Information: Eppler E221 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 446: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 589: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.3884 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 1.9851 % @0.29CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5389 %CLower nose radius: 0.48059 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.044 degRelease Angle: -0.42535 degNose Incidence: 11.5266 degCamber deflection: 11.1012 deg

Table 590: Controlpoints1 00.77468 -0.0195040.41401 -0.0271030.27095 -0.0271030.21347 -0.0271030 -0.0261520 00 0.0404280.15931 0.0667910.281 0.0667910.51272 0.0667910.78405 0.0154671 0

Table 591: Base 64 representation:mcSVc9ORNMctKfA

Table 592: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.823 8.074 ectsRMS curvature error: 34.66 35.79 %CD error 2 0.9 dctsCm error -38 -41 mctsUpper transition point -1.32 -1.74 %

Figure 447: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 448: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

153

Page 162: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e222

Information: Eppler E222 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 449: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 593: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.1839 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 2.462 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.44736 %CLower nose radius: 0.72606 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.058 degRelease Angle: 10.5293 degNose Incidence: 3.0154 degCamber deflection: 13.5447 deg

Table 594: Controlpoints1 00.86553 0.0153220.46122 -0.0314440.19777 -0.0314440.088143 -0.0314440 -0.0206550 00 0.0150030.075473 0.0731420.35707 0.0731420.63357 0.0731420.93415 0.0171021 0

Table 595: Base 64 representation:NxXcfpiNVNPQJwA

Table 596: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.876 4.42 ectsRMS curvature error: 19.75 20.3 %CD error -0.8 -1.8 dctsCm error -4 -16 mctsUpper transition point -0.75 0.45 %

Figure 450: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 451: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

154

Page 163: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e224

Information: Eppler E224 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 452: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 597: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.1778 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 1.8184 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.84536 %CLower nose radius: 0.24209 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.8962 degRelease Angle: 6.2109 degNose Incidence: 7.6897 degCamber deflection: 13.9006 deg

Table 598: Controlpoints1 00.88229 0.00568040.48106 -0.0350290.25343 -0.0350290.030412 -0.0350290 -0.00700580 00 0.0215720.082571 0.0677120.34459 0.0677120.46991 0.0677120.67837 0.0547411 0

Table 599: Base 64 representation:UwWMsN3QUPzPIpA

Table 600: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.866 1.653 ectsRMS curvature error: 12.68 12.68 %CD error -0.3 -0.2 dctsCm error -3 -11 mctsUpper transition point 0.74 0.64 %

Figure 453: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 454: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

155

Page 164: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e226

Information: Eppler E226 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 455: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 601: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.1964 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 0.85356 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.078348 %CLower nose radius: 0.73925 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.2214 degRelease Angle: 1.1434 degNose Incidence: -3.1937 degCamber deflection: -2.0503 deg

Table 602: Controlpoints1 00.86481 -0.0058250.50397 -0.0438440.26657 -0.0438440.031989 -0.0438440 -0.0125560 00 0.00432340.035786 0.0585680.33164 0.0585680.59018 0.0585680.90473 0.00792331 0

Table 603: Base 64 representation:F4VZZS3RVTPRIhA

Table 604: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.985 2.664 ectsRMS curvature error: 19.24 19.81 %CD error 1.7 1.7 dctsCm error 5 5 mctsUpper transition point -3.41 -3.14 %

Figure 456: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 457: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

156

Page 165: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e228

Information: Eppler E228 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 458: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 605: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.0531 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 0.28126 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.27812 %CLower nose radius: 0.52866 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.4763 degRelease Angle: -3.4669 degNose Incidence: 0.88528 degCamber deflection: -2.5816 deg

Table 606: Controlpoints1 00.61375 -0.0419950.3962 -0.0477210.27946 -0.0477210.073426 -0.0477210 -0.0160870 00 0.00688180.025542 0.0529370.31928 0.0529370.55882 0.0529370.91888 -0.00103181 0

Table 607: Base 64 representation:I6UXXWuSKUM3GaA

Table 608: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.4 4.716 ectsRMS curvature error: 22.31 21.86 %CD error 0.8 0.3 dctsCm error 3 -2 mctsUpper transition point -2.24 -1.45 %

Figure 459: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 460: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

157

Page 166: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e230

Information: Eppler E230 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 461: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 609: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.9486 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: -0.74331 % @0.78CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1467 %CLower nose radius: 0.010553 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.5667 degRelease Angle: -7.8036 degNose Incidence: 5.6181 degCamber deflection: -2.1856 deg

Table 610: Controlpoints1 00.90314 -0.0198590.55725 -0.0523920.33979 -0.0523920.019005 -0.0523920 -0.00104780 00 0.0309090.12497 0.04770.2601 0.04770.55002 0.04770.8891 -0.00779451 0

Table 611: Base 64 representation:ogRZUB7WVWQYITA

Table 612: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.19 6.128 ectsRMS curvature error: 22.35 23.11 %CD error -6.2 -6.4 dctsCm error 18 17 mctsUpper transition point 6.28 5.81 %

Figure 462: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 463: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

158

Page 167: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e231

Information: Eppler E231 R/C sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 464: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 613: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.3368 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 2.4603 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.97123 %CLower nose radius: 0.2788 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.7709 degRelease Angle: 2.7977 degNose Incidence: 10.8575 degCamber deflection: 13.6551 deg

Table 614: Controlpoints1 00.88622 -0.00514220.81538 -0.037110.41385 -0.037110.034384 -0.037110 -0.00799430 00 0.0259710.10417 0.086280.39357 0.086280.69916 0.086280.81507 0.0265931 0

Table 615: Base 64 representation:TuZgkO6arQmmMkA

Table 616: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.412 3.049 ectsRMS curvature error: 18.89 18.95 %CD error 28.4 0.3 dctsCm error 1 5 mctsUpper transition point 0.98 -0.29 %

Figure 465: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 466: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

159

Page 168: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e326

Information: Eppler E326 flying wing airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 467: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 617: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.8623 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 2.1169 % @0.2CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0462 %CLower nose radius: 0.48234 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.515 degRelease Angle: -0.63884 degNose Incidence: 12.2192 degCamber deflection: 11.5804 deg

Table 618: Controlpoints1 00.83659 -0.0212130.78288 -0.0521170.5368 -0.0521170.358 -0.0521170 -0.0339290 00 0.022590.073172 0.0837570.26844 0.0837570.43033 0.0837570.63686 0.0389281 0

Table 619: Base 64 representation:RuROjpVhhWovPfA

Table 620: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.608 4.448 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.3 -0.3 dctsCm error 30 26 mctsUpper transition point 0.32 0.07 %

Figure 468: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 469: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

160

Page 169: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e327

Information: Eppler E327 flying wing airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 470: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 621: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.097 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 2.5941 % @0.23CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4167 %CLower nose radius: 0.43109 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.6762 degRelease Angle: 1.5267 degNose Incidence: 15.1183 degCamber deflection: 16.645 deg

Table 622: Controlpoints1 00.84205 -0.0132950.80454 -0.0470310.52878 -0.0470310.39797 -0.0470310 -0.0340430 00 0.0285880.086533 0.0902180.27569 0.0902180.41555 0.0902180.56601 0.0599491 0

Table 623: Base 64 representation:UrSMltQhkUvzOiA

Table 624: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.482 5.169 ectsRMS curvature error: 35.82 36.41 %CD error -0.8 -1.5 dctsCm error 28 15 mctsUpper transition point 0.73 2.04 %

Figure 471: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 472: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

161

Page 170: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e331

Information: Eppler E331 flying wing airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 473: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 625: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.3023 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 2.6529 % @0.23CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5106 %CLower nose radius: 0.24915 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.5303 degRelease Angle: -1.8533 degNose Incidence: 17.6325 degCamber deflection: 15.7792 deg

Table 626: Controlpoints1 00.85832 -0.0214740.81351 -0.0366340.53928 -0.0366340.4341 -0.0366340 -0.0268520 00 0.0287470.082057 0.0822810.26996 0.0822810.43136 0.0822810.69378 0.0263161 0

Table 627: Base 64 representation:WsROiuMilQhwPsA

Table 628: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.148 3.913 ectsRMS curvature error: 37.19 39.18 %CD error -1.3 -0.8 dctsCm error 33 52 mctsUpper transition point 1.91 0.9 %

Figure 474: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 475: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

162

Page 171: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e332

Information: N/AReference: UIUC

Figure 476: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 629: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.6639 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.0042 % @0.24CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.495 %CLower nose radius: 0.29548 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.4965 degRelease Angle: 0.12538 degNose Incidence: 17.188 degCamber deflection: 17.3133 deg

Table 630: Controlpoints1 00.83514 -0.0191420.83514 -0.0321860.53121 -0.0321860.5259 -0.0321860 -0.0299330 00 0.030780.095057 0.0879670.26714 0.0879670.4365 0.0879670.61102 0.046891 0

Table 631: Base 64 representation:WpRPl7BhpOr PgA

Table 632: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.187 6.43 ectsRMS curvature error: 45.76 47.88 %CD error -3.4 -2.8 dctsCm error 58 38 mctsUpper transition point -0.31 -0.11 %

Figure 477: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 478: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

163

Page 172: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e334

Information: Eppler E334 flying wing airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 479: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 633: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.1054 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.9453 % @0.28CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5713 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.2097 degRelease Angle: 4.9531 degNose Incidence: 17.5396 degCamber deflection: 22.4927 deg

Table 634: Controlpoints1 00.90387 -0.00025460.90387 -0.0220720.51463 -0.0220720 -0.0220720 -0.0100720 00 0.0313290.093694 0.0999280.29152 0.0999280.36661 0.0999280.47588 0.0929631 0

Table 635: Base 64 representation:UqTHqs gyJ7 LnA

Table 636: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.028 5.49 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.9 -2.4 dctsCm error 14 -4 mctsUpper transition point 1.36 2.53 %

Figure 480: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 481: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

164

Page 173: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e335

Information: Eppler E335 flying wing airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 482: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 637: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.564 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 2.2936 % @0.21CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.9909 %CLower nose radius: 0.48712 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.3633 degRelease Angle: -1.7861 degNose Incidence: 11.9035 degCamber deflection: 10.1173 deg

Table 638: Controlpoints1 00.91836 -0.0100350.86863 -0.04880.54452 -0.04880.40356 -0.04880 -0.0352640 00 0.0227980.071699 0.0847940.2623 0.0847940.42685 0.0847940.68728 0.024531 0

Table 639: Base 64 representation:RuROjtRitVinNeA

Table 640: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.448 3.555 ectsRMS curvature error: 41.25 41.87 %CD error -1.3 -1.4 dctsCm error 0 12 mctsUpper transition point 1.01 1.35 %

Figure 483: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 484: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

165

Page 174: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e336

Information: Eppler E336 flying wing airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 485: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 641: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.8563 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 2.7974 % @0.23CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4909 %CLower nose radius: 0.39819 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.3458 degRelease Angle: 0.24389 degNose Incidence: 16.3344 degCamber deflection: 16.5783 deg

Table 642: Controlpoints1 00.90153 -0.0102260.8746 -0.0437640.53648 -0.0437640.46167 -0.0437640 -0.0352110 00 0.0290890.08513 0.0913790.26952 0.0913790.42638 0.0913790.64752 0.0396421 0

Table 643: Base 64 representation:UrROmyJhuTmxOgA

Table 644: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.451 3.961 ectsRMS curvature error: 54.57 54.52 %CD error -2 -1.5 dctsCm error 12 17 mctsUpper transition point 2.19 1.39 %

Figure 486: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 487: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

166

Page 175: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e337

Information: Eppler E337 flying wing airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 488: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 645: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.2291 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.1226 % @0.25CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.385 %CLower nose radius: 0.44182 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.6411 degRelease Angle: 1.8205 degNose Incidence: 15.9152 degCamber deflection: 17.7356 deg

Table 646: Controlpoints1 00.88641 -0.00893960.87786 -0.039450.52838 -0.039450.51253 -0.039450 -0.0370830 00 0.0283770.087214 0.0968810.27646 0.0968810.4178 0.0968810.57997 0.0600861 0

Table 647: Base 64 representation:TrSNo7ChuRt7OiA

Table 648: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.798 6.478 ectsRMS curvature error: 38.02 38.14 %CD error -0.9 -1.3 dctsCm error 24 11 mctsUpper transition point 0.94 1.85 %

Figure 489: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 490: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

167

Page 176: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e338

Information: Eppler E338 flying wing airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 491: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 649: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.4203 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 3.6648 % @0.26CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7014 %CLower nose radius: 0.329 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.4107 degRelease Angle: 4.0296 degNose Incidence: 19.294 degCamber deflection: 23.3237 deg

Table 650: Controlpoints1 00.89654 -0.00302660.8955 -0.0341130.52012 -0.0341130.51492 -0.0341130 -0.0320660 00 0.0329710.09584 0.103390.28365 0.103390.38898 0.103390.50059 0.085681 0

Table 651: Base 64 representation:UpSJr7BgxPz-NmA

Table 652: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.326 7.326 ectsRMS curvature error: 49.28 51.45 %CD error -8.8 -10.3 dctsCm error 35 44 mctsUpper transition point 1.58 0.51 %

Figure 492: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 493: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

168

Page 177: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e340

Information: Eppler E340 flying wing airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 494: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 653: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.6531 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 2.5869 % @0.21CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.4791 %CLower nose radius: 0.556 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.0165 degRelease Angle: -1.2465 degNose Incidence: 18.1132 degCamber deflection: 16.8667 deg

Table 654: Controlpoints1 00.88151 -0.0171910.87024 -0.0522660.54219 -0.0522660.49336 -0.0522660 -0.0418130 00 0.0359750.10192 0.0931660.26141 0.0931660.40379 0.0931660.66698 0.0336021 0

Table 655: Base 64 representation:ZmRMnyGitWj5QeA

Table 656: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.845 5.148 ectsRMS curvature error: 47.89 45.86 %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN 68.34 %

Figure 495: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 496: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

169

Page 178: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e341

Information: Eppler E341 flying wing airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 497: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 657: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.1003 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 2.8866 % @0.23CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4246 %CLower nose radius: 0.62274 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.5152 degRelease Angle: 0.31021 degNose Incidence: 14.3178 degCamber deflection: 14.6281 deg

Table 658: Controlpoints1 00.88862 -0.0125870.87049 -0.0480430.53421 -0.0480430.52886 -0.0480430 -0.0442110 00 0.0284430.085182 0.0986130.26826 0.0986130.42253 0.0986130.62618 0.0463491 0

Table 659: Base 64 representation:SrRNp6BhtUo2PgA

Table 660: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.46 6.509 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN 68.1 %

Figure 498: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 499: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

170

Page 179: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e342

Information: Eppler E342 flying wing airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 500: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 661: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.3972 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.3856 % @0.25CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.8637 %CLower nose radius: 0.52878 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.4263 degRelease Angle: 2.1166 degNose Incidence: 17.6821 degCamber deflection: 19.7988 deg

Table 662: Controlpoints1 00.88097 -0.009570.88097 -0.0430610.526 -0.0430610.52074 -0.0430610 -0.0400470 00 0.0345670.09617 0.105320.27526 0.105320.41145 0.105320.58412 0.0646041 0

Table 663: Base 64 representation:VpSMs7BhvSs PjA

Table 664: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.473 6.385 ectsRMS curvature error: 37.48 38.02 %CD error -6.1 -7.4 dctsCm error 54 37 mctsUpper transition point 0.85 1.9 %

Figure 501: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 502: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

171

Page 180: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e343

Information: N/AReference: UIUC

Figure 503: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 665: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.6096 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.9213 % @0.26CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.2946 %CLower nose radius: 0.4132 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.7481 degRelease Angle: 2.5162 degNose Incidence: 21.1601 degCamber deflection: 23.6763 deg

Table 666: Controlpoints1 00.85846 -0.0132750.85846 -0.0377650.51773 -0.0377650.50738 -0.0377650 -0.0358770 00 0.0401840.10556 0.11190.28232 0.11190.38544 0.11190.49603 0.0924061 0

Table 667: Base 64 representation:XnSJv8BhtQ0 RjA

Table 668: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.417 8.143 ectsRMS curvature error: 48.61 45.34 %CD error -10.1 -11.9 dctsCm error 71 116 mctsUpper transition point 1.27 1.44 %

Figure 504: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 505: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

172

Page 181: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e360

Information: Eppler E360 rotorcraft airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 506: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 669: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.239 % @0.36CMaximum Camber: 1.5982 % @0.25CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.2765 %CLower nose radius: 0.60935 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.787 degRelease Angle: 1.5602 degNose Incidence: 13.8201 degCamber deflection: 15.3804 deg

Table 670: Controlpoints1 00.79047 -0.0177170.69743 -0.0467050.4198 -0.0467050.22273 -0.0467050 -0.030080 00 0.0458560.13855 0.0764740.32745 0.0764740.48041 0.0764740.58041 0.0586241 0

Table 671: Base 64 representation:lkVPgoebfUzrOiA

Table 672: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.87 3.011 ectsRMS curvature error: 32.71 32.95 %CD error -0.7 -1.4 dctsCm error 4 6 mctsUpper transition point 1.71 2.98 %

Figure 507: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 508: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

173

Page 182: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e361

Information: Eppler E361 rotorcraft airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 509: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 673: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.1111 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 1.7073 % @0.26CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.3433 %CLower nose radius: 0.59245 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.1071 degRelease Angle: 0.75858 degNose Incidence: 14.3547 degCamber deflection: 15.1133 deg

Table 674: Controlpoints1 00.79081 -0.0193880.69081 -0.0448220.42194 -0.0448220.20869 -0.0448220 -0.028710 00 0.048350.14964 0.0771090.32473 0.0771090.51884 0.0771090.65727 0.0409421 0

Table 675: Base 64 representation:niVSgogbeTtqOgA

Table 676: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.864 2.375 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.9 -1.1 dctsCm error -17 -4 mctsUpper transition point 1.85 1.84 %

Figure 510: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 511: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

174

Page 183: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e374

Information: Eppler E374 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 512: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 677: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.901 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: 2.3162 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.76754 %CLower nose radius: 0.48463 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.5078 degRelease Angle: 2.3962 degNose Incidence: 7.3419 degCamber deflection: 9.7381 deg

Table 678: Controlpoints1 00.85221 -0.0112620.63969 -0.0317210.31145 -0.0317210.27407 -0.0317210 -0.0317210 00 0.0243990.11634 0.07760.3894 0.07760.51246 0.07760.67286 0.0526931 0

Table 679: Base 64 representation:UsZNg IUfOqaPjA

Table 680: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.705 4.451 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.9 -0.1 dctsCm error -1 1 mctsUpper transition point 0.21 0.28 %

Figure 513: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 514: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

175

Page 184: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e385

Information: Eppler E385 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 515: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 681: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.5137 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 5.6099 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.64644 %CLower nose radius: 10.4492 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.6441 degRelease Angle: 14.7474 degNose Incidence: 7.9018 degCamber deflection: 22.6492 deg

Table 682: Controlpoints1 00.71024 0.058560.11035 -0.0102340.037628 -0.0102340.00069744 -0.0102340 -0.00697030 00 0.0244570.13879 0.0966310.38304 0.0966310.6317 0.0966310.9757 0.00792731 0

Table 683: Base 64 representation:QoZaor-CFEFVH3A

Table 684: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.167 6.536 ectsRMS curvature error: 44.97 44.28 %CD error NaN -1.9 dctsCm error NaN -9 mctsUpper transition point NaN 1.03 %

Figure 516: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 517: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

176

Page 185: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e387

Information: Eppler E387 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 518: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 685: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.1591 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 3.5864 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.75179 %CLower nose radius: 2.8281 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.4468 degRelease Angle: 5.7281 degNose Incidence: 4.3926 degCamber deflection: 10.1206 deg

Table 686: Controlpoints1 00.68788 0.012610.26632 -0.0171480.085328 -0.0171480.0025598 -0.0171480 -0.00647630 00 0.019790.12535 0.0809960.35458 0.0809960.51888 0.0809960.65188 0.0542811 0

Table 687: Base 64 representation:QoXQiY9FNHtbHoA

Table 688: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.901 5.151 ectsRMS curvature error: 57.66 Inf %CD error -2 -1.8 dctsCm error 1 -7 mctsUpper transition point -0.28 -0.36 %

Figure 519: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 520: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

177

Page 186: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e392

Information: Eppler E392 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 521: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 689: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.1587 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 4.0063 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4693 %CLower nose radius: 0.15495 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.5507 degRelease Angle: 8.3892 degNose Incidence: 15.7674 degCamber deflection: 24.1567 deg

Table 690: Controlpoints1 00.79476 0.0201740.39078 -0.0166410.1498 -0.0166410.0068968 -0.0166410 -0.00283560 00 0.0410280.17184 0.0896840.36018 0.0896840.43945 0.0896840.55825 0.0871861 0

Table 691: Base 64 representation:sgXIlL8KSH9WGtA

Table 692: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.684 3.924 ectsRMS curvature error: 31.84 34.44 %CD error 2.1 2 dctsCm error 5 -3 mctsUpper transition point -1.09 -0.99 %

Figure 522: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 523: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

178

Page 187: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e393

Information: Eppler E393 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 524: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 693: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.5321 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 3.9719 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.90714 %CLower nose radius: 0.47538 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.5153 degRelease Angle: 12.1505 degNose Incidence: 9.808 degCamber deflection: 21.9585 deg

Table 694: Controlpoints1 00.79535 0.0283710.46909 -0.024120.18357 -0.024120.14686 -0.024120 -0.0238790 00 0.0308430.1477 0.095580.36746 0.095580.62025 0.095580.98746 0.00369381 0

Table 695: Base 64 representation:VlYao-NMWKCZKzA

Table 696: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.641 4.851 ectsRMS curvature error: 26.74 26.84 %CD error 1.1 1 dctsCm error 12 -11 mctsUpper transition point -2.34 -0.89 %

Figure 525: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 526: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

179

Page 188: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e395

Information: Eppler E395 human powered aircraft airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 527: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 697: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.3638 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 5.1894 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1961 %CLower nose radius: 0.41983 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.1529 degRelease Angle: 15.0156 degNose Incidence: 10.0101 degCamber deflection: 25.0256 deg

Table 698: Controlpoints1 00.78608 0.0452330.31894 -0.0276140.12626 -0.0276140.025421 -0.0276140 -0.00843510 00 0.0355980.15892 0.1090.38373 0.1090.45768 0.1090.66966 0.107921 0

Table 699: Base 64 representation:VkZIuUyIOM-UH3A

Table 700: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.337 5.152 ectsRMS curvature error: 22.27 21.83 %CD error -1.3 -1 dctsCm error 24 9 mctsUpper transition point 0.06 -0.06 %

Figure 528: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 529: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

180

Page 189: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e396

Information: Eppler E396 human powered aircraft airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 530: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 701: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.2294 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 5.276 % @0.48CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.84055 %CLower nose radius: 0.77615 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.0471 degRelease Angle: 15.0905 degNose Incidence: 8.7158 degCamber deflection: 23.8063 deg

Table 702: Controlpoints1 00.78202 0.0424510.33105 -0.0285770.12566 -0.0285770.028188 -0.0285770 -0.00882840 00 0.0388990.16305 0.115360.38237 0.115360.47045 0.115360.64435 0.115361 0

Table 703: Base 64 representation:WkYJwUxIPM VI2A

Table 704: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.982 4.491 ectsRMS curvature error: 23.38 23.86 %CD error -0.7 -0.5 dctsCm error 21 37 mctsUpper transition point -0.81 -0.86 %

Figure 531: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 532: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

181

Page 190: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e397

Information: Eppler E397 human powered aircraft airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 533: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 705: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.5793 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 5.239 % @0.5CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.185 %CLower nose radius: 1.7447 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.3108 degRelease Angle: 14.985 degNose Incidence: 4.2019 degCamber deflection: 19.187 deg

Table 706: Controlpoints1 00.8009 0.0403760.33313 -0.0323590.164 -0.0323590.0072084 -0.0323590 -0.00424470 00 0.0294090.12593 0.11590.42837 0.11590.66121 0.11590.99447 0.00184231 0

Table 707: Base 64 representation:QsbawI8KNOBTI3A

Table 708: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.097 4.805 ectsRMS curvature error: 22.31 22.56 %CD error 1.6 1.1 dctsCm error 20 42 mctsUpper transition point -2.36 -3.14 %

Figure 534: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 535: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

182

Page 191: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e399

Information: Eppler E399 human powered aircraft airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 536: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 709: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.8924 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 4.981 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6081 %CLower nose radius: 1.2874 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.5934 degRelease Angle: 14.5573 degNose Incidence: 8.2369 degCamber deflection: 22.7942 deg

Table 710: Controlpoints1 00.79946 0.0399290.38619 -0.037580.16455 -0.037580.1629 -0.037580 -0.0334460 00 0.041570.16119 0.121030.37656 0.121030.4389 0.121030.62796 0.119831 0

Table 711: Base 64 representation:WkYGz4BLRQ-VH2A

Table 712: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.359 5.954 ectsRMS curvature error: 25.44 25.33 %CD error 2.7 3.7 dctsCm error 26 54 mctsUpper transition point -0.58 -2.26 %

Figure 537: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 538: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

183

Page 192: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e403

Information: Eppler E403 general purpose airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 539: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 713: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.848 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 3.2273 % @0.75CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.090138 %CLower nose radius: 1.0849 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.2558 degRelease Angle: 12.8395 degNose Incidence: -1.721 degCamber deflection: 11.1186 deg

Table 714: Controlpoints1 00.78839 0.0400290.65623 -0.0581530.32273 -0.0581530.25319 -0.0581530 -0.0422120 00 0.00558990.051998 0.0929390.47566 0.0929390.79499 0.0929390.94723 0.0141081 0

Table 715: Base 64 representation:E4emntOVgZQmF0A

Table 716: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.797 6.283 ectsRMS curvature error: 21.6 21.72 %CD error 1.2 1.3 dctsCm error 34 66 mctsUpper transition point -2.43 -3.18 %

Figure 540: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 541: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

184

Page 193: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e417

Information: Eppler E417 general purpose airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 542: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 717: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.1933 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 3.1038 % @0.76CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.16237 %CLower nose radius: 0.90705 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.7701 degRelease Angle: 18.3652 degNose Incidence: -1.7543 degCamber deflection: 16.6109 deg

Table 718: Controlpoints1 00.81861 0.0401480.60804 -0.0568730.36955 -0.0568730.18278 -0.0568730 -0.0329070 00 0.00860560.068417 0.0866490.48091 0.0866490.58571 0.0866490.82796 0.0774971 0

Table 719: Base 64 representation:G2fNkkgYYY4eN9A

Table 720: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.828 4.571 ectsRMS curvature error: 22.75 22.9 %CD error -1.2 -1.4 dctsCm error 19 3 mctsUpper transition point -2.12 -1.87 %

Figure 543: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 544: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

185

Page 194: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e422

Information: Eppler E422 high lift airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 545: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 721: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.9687 % @0.24CMaximum Camber: 7.1082 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.3674 %CLower nose radius: 6.0013 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.3923 degRelease Angle: 12.6554 degNose Incidence: 20.0345 degCamber deflection: 32.6899 deg

Table 722: Controlpoints1 00.32292 0.0409290.22292 -0.0217560.082488 -0.0217560.0017793 -0.0217560 -0.00865470 00 0.0546290.13294 0.138240.31223 0.138240.50385 0.138240.98553 0.00580171 0

Table 723: Base 64 representation:ZkUS6Z-FKJD3VzA

Table 724: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.303 5.2 ectsRMS curvature error: 55.82 55.94 %CD error -1 -0.9 dctsCm error -28 -10 mctsUpper transition point -2.03 -2.16 %

Figure 546: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 547: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

186

Page 195: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e426

Information: Eppler E426 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 548: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 725: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.845 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 0.56979 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6555 %CLower nose radius: 2.4191 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.2746 degRelease Angle: 1.7379 degNose Incidence: -2.9282 degCamber deflection: -1.1903 deg

Table 726: Controlpoints1 00.6756 -0.0107580.48286 -0.0503310.17289 -0.0503310.060904 -0.0503310 -0.0313410 00 0.0293860.078244 0.0584580.22861 0.0584580.44872 0.0584580.54326 0.0429751 0

Table 727: Base 64 representation:gpPSZnoLYV0nIiA

Table 728: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.687 7.957 ectsRMS curvature error: 35.4 37.27 %CD error -4 -4.3 dctsCm error 21 1 mctsUpper transition point 3.42 4.22 %

Figure 549: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 550: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

187

Page 196: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e428

Information: Eppler E428 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 551: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 729: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.1979 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 0.50069 % @0.52CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.044566 %CLower nose radius: 2.0757 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.9263 degRelease Angle: 1.7054 degNose Incidence: -4.2974 degCamber deflection: -2.592 deg

Table 730: Controlpoints1 00.73551 -0.00811680.41365 -0.0544150.17196 -0.0544150.096363 -0.0544150 -0.0365170 00 0.00116070.0045342 0.0580330.22671 0.0580330.45769 0.0580330.55769 0.0400081 0

Table 731: Base 64 representation:B-PTZqcLTXzsIiA

Table 732: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.725 4.271 ectsRMS curvature error: 41.39 39.09 %CD error -2.6 -3 dctsCm error -10 2 mctsUpper transition point 3.46 4.09 %

Figure 552: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 553: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

188

Page 197: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e431

Information: Eppler E431 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 554: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 733: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.1316 % @0.41CMaximum Camber: 4.2242 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3472 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.1913 degRelease Angle: 13.0692 degNose Incidence: 13.9904 degCamber deflection: 27.0596 deg

Table 734: Controlpoints1 00.85134 0.0221470.7573 -0.0337020.37384 -0.0337020 -0.0337020 -0.00694250 00 0.031490.11041 0.117810.41863 0.117810.48897 0.117810.64718 0.112361 0

Table 735: Base 64 representation:RubIxN YmO8mK0A

Table 736: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.159 5.104 ectsRMS curvature error: 24.63 24.7 %CD error -0.4 0.1 dctsCm error -19 2 mctsUpper transition point 2.86 -2.2 %

Figure 555: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 556: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

189

Page 198: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e432

Information: Eppler E432 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 557: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 737: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.9831 % @0.36CMaximum Camber: 4.4687 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.161 %CLower nose radius: 0.64345 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.0648 degRelease Angle: 11.9666 degNose Incidence: 17.2474 degCamber deflection: 29.2141 deg

Table 738: Controlpoints1 00.83586 0.0214180.76147 -0.0352410.37349 -0.0352410.18288 -0.0352410 -0.0277210 00 0.046620.15086 0.124610.36457 0.124610.42763 0.124610.58345 0.123381 0

Table 739: Base 64 representation:YlXG0xgYnP-rKyA

Table 740: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.899 4.28 ectsRMS curvature error: 26.55 26.97 %CD error 0.4 1 dctsCm error 23 50 mctsUpper transition point -2.34 -3.67 %

Figure 558: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 559: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

190

Page 199: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e433

Information: Eppler E433 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 560: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 741: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.2308 % @0.41CMaximum Camber: 3.9499 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1128 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.8253 degRelease Angle: 12.8808 degNose Incidence: 12.3609 degCamber deflection: 25.2416 deg

Table 742: Controlpoints1 00.81816 0.0222240.77695 -0.0319960.3742 -0.0319960.011226 -0.0319960 -0.00943840 00 0.0285910.11019 0.110520.42419 0.110520.55017 0.110520.71803 0.0959551 0

Table 743: Base 64 representation:RubOuT9YoO3zN0A

Table 744: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.127 3.743 ectsRMS curvature error: 24.93 24.89 %CD error 0.2 0 dctsCm error 24 33 mctsUpper transition point -1.93 -1.98 %

Figure 561: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 562: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

191

Page 200: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e434

Information: Eppler E434 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 563: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 745: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.3205 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 4.3207 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1651 %CLower nose radius: 2.8462 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.0852 degRelease Angle: 8.4131 degNose Incidence: 13.926 degCamber deflection: 22.3392 deg

Table 746: Controlpoints1 00.84516 0.00640990.84516 -0.0239640.28331 -0.0239640.0028104 -0.0239640 -0.00730250 00 0.0283240.10328 0.109750.41053 0.109750.5654 0.109750.7141 0.0737031 0

Table 747: Base 64 representation:QvaRuT-SxKq NtA

Table 748: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.599 3.757 ectsRMS curvature error: 28.56 28.08 %CD error 0 -0.2 dctsCm error 32 8 mctsUpper transition point -1.93 -1.3 %

Figure 564: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 565: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

192

Page 201: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e435

Information: Eppler E435 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 566: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 749: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.1505 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 4.3918 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4087 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 0.57296 degRelease Angle: 10.1977 degNose Incidence: 12.6764 degCamber deflection: 22.8741 deg

Table 750: Controlpoints1 00.79354 0.0360750.66134 -0.0400720.30936 -0.0400720 -0.0400720 -0.00480870 00 0.0321850.1103 0.123150.42594 0.123150.67779 0.123150.99678 0.000596251 0

Table 751: Base 64 representation:Rubc0I UgRBmBwA

Table 752: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.421 5.955 ectsRMS curvature error: 25.55 24.5 %CD error -2.1 -1.4 dctsCm error 19 35 mctsUpper transition point -2.21 -2.94 %

Figure 567: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 568: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

193

Page 202: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e471

Information: Eppler E471 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 569: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 753: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.3025 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.7036 % @0.52CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.48145 %CLower nose radius: 0.56069 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.4116 degRelease Angle: 15.2044 degNose Incidence: 8.9907 degCamber deflection: 24.1951 deg

Table 754: Controlpoints1 00.72965 0.0574570.13912 -0.00799010.043432 -0.00799010.0022641 -0.00799010 -0.00317590 00 0.0188890.11116 0.0753720.43838 0.0753720.70359 0.0753720.92451 0.0251271 0

Table 755: Base 64 representation:QvcegZ8DGDVUH4A

Table 756: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.946 4.727 ectsRMS curvature error: 28.58 29.45 %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 570: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 571: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

194

Page 203: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e472

Information: Eppler E472 aerobatic aircraft airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 572: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 757: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.0956 % @0.18CMaximum Camber: 0.058049 % @0.76CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.904 %CLower nose radius: 3.0457 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.4834 degRelease Angle: 0.41407 degNose Incidence: -0.63635 degCamber deflection: -0.22229 deg

Table 758: Controlpoints1 00.94873 -0.0125460.35911 -0.060490.17462 -0.060490.017933 -0.060490 -0.00968910 00 0.00968890.017933 0.060490.17462 0.060490.35904 0.060490.94854 0.0125671 0

Table 759: Base 64 representation:K4LOaK4LOaNNfgA

Table 760: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.241 2.451 ectsRMS curvature error: 45.22 44.85 %CD error 0.2 0.4 dctsCm error 10 8 mctsUpper transition point 0.65 0.8 %

Figure 573: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 574: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

195

Page 204: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e473

Information: Eppler E473 aerobatic aircraft airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 575: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 761: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.1857 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 0.070905 % @0.77CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.4957 %CLower nose radius: 3.4957 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.6803 degRelease Angle: 0.49724 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: 0.49724 deg

Table 762: Controlpoints1 00.97555 -0.00743360.35965 -0.080950.21239 -0.080950.059483 -0.080950 -0.0238980 00 0.0238980.059483 0.080950.21239 0.080950.35958 0.080950.97521 0.00747971 0

Table 763: Base 64 representation:TtOMiTtOMiGGlgA

Table 764: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.077 5.962 ectsRMS curvature error: 65.82 67.7 %CD error -0.3 -0.6 dctsCm error 7 7 mctsUpper transition point 0.97 1.6 %

Figure 576: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 577: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

196

Page 205: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e474

Information: Eppler E474 aerobatic aircraft airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 578: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 765: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.0811 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 1.1006e-005 % @0.31CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.45891 %CLower nose radius: 0.45891 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.6449 degRelease Angle: 0.0001455 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: 0.0001455 deg

Table 766: Controlpoints1 00.68837 -0.0455860.31135 -0.070420.21517 -0.070420.016207 -0.070420 -0.00633740 00 0.00633740.016207 0.070420.21517 0.070420.3114 0.070420.68845 0.0455751 0

Table 767: Base 64 representation:G6OIeG6OIeooTgA

Table 768: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.156 4.26 ectsRMS curvature error: 49.4 51.62 %CD error -0.9 -1.2 dctsCm error 12 13 mctsUpper transition point 1.04 1.27 %

Figure 579: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 580: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

197

Page 206: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e475

Information: Eppler E475 aerobatic aircraft airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 581: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 769: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.9988 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 7.3343e-007 % @0.6CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.99937 %CLower nose radius: 0.99937 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 20.6642 degRelease Angle: -6.1749e-006 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: -6.1749e-006 deg

Table 770: Controlpoints1 00.68066 -0.058220.31521 -0.0750.21656 -0.0750.03637 -0.0750 -0.0155660 00 0.0155660.03637 0.0750.21656 0.0750.3152 0.0750.68065 0.058221 0

Table 771: Base 64 representation:N0OIgN0OIgxxXgA

Table 772: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.569 4.272 ectsRMS curvature error: 87.74 86.55 %CD error -0.2 -0.2 dctsCm error 18 17 mctsUpper transition point 1.11 1.25 %

Figure 582: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 583: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

198

Page 207: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e476

Information: Eppler E476 aerobatic aircraft airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 584: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 773: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.7273 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 0.075281 % @0.82CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.6425 %CLower nose radius: 0.6425 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.3936 degRelease Angle: 0.55766 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: 0.55766 deg

Table 774: Controlpoints1 00.77434 -0.0256060.60965 -0.083640.31687 -0.083640.09664 -0.083640 -0.0253890 00 0.0253890.09664 0.083640.31687 0.083640.60965 0.083640.77434 0.0256071 0

Table 775: Base 64 representation:TrUbjTrUbjkkOgA

Table 776: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.248 4.578 ectsRMS curvature error: 25.29 23.45 %CD error 0.3 0.7 dctsCm error 10 6 mctsUpper transition point -1.28 -1.3 %

Figure 585: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 586: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

199

Page 208: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e477

Information: Eppler E477 aerobatic aircraft airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 587: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 777: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.3532 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 0.066277 % @0.82CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.5801 %CLower nose radius: 0.5801 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.5981 degRelease Angle: 0.49174 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: 0.49174 deg

Table 778: Controlpoints1 00.77556 -0.0236180.56591 -0.076770.31651 -0.076770.073466 -0.076770 -0.0194810 00 0.0194810.073466 0.076770.31651 0.076770.56591 0.076770.77556 0.0236181 0

Table 779: Base 64 representation:QwUXgQwUXgggNgA

Table 780: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.258 3.654 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.2 0.5 dctsCm error 5 3 mctsUpper transition point -0.43 -0.43 %

Figure 588: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 589: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

200

Page 209: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e478

Information: Eppler E478 aerobatic aircraft airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 590: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 781: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.6959 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 0.058753 % @0.79CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0831 %CLower nose radius: 1.0831 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.8789 degRelease Angle: 0.42076 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: 0.42076 deg

Table 782: Controlpoints1 00.69068 -0.0331250.41558 -0.078480.25879 -0.078480.028279 -0.078480 -0.0122170 00 0.0122170.028279 0.078480.25879 0.078480.41561 0.078480.69094 0.0330921 0

Table 783: Base 64 representation:K4ROgK4ROghhOgA

Table 784: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.34 5.567 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.2 -0.3 dctsCm error 3 4 mctsUpper transition point -0.44 -0.37 %

Figure 591: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 592: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

201

Page 210: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e479

Information: Eppler E479 aerobatic aircraft airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 593: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 785: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.5671 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: -1.7264e-006 % @0.91CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2787 %CLower nose radius: 1.2787 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.132 degRelease Angle: -2.5828e-005 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: -2.5828e-005 deg

Table 786: Controlpoints1 00.70174 -0.0316960.42437 -0.082840.25734 -0.082840.046499 -0.082840 -0.0199090 00 0.0199090.046499 0.082840.25734 0.082840.42437 0.082840.70175 0.0316941 0

Table 787: Base 64 representation:PzQOiPzQOiggOgA

Table 788: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.965 4.369 ectsRMS curvature error: 37.36 38.71 %CD error -0.2 0.5 dctsCm error 3 5 mctsUpper transition point -0.01 -0.62 %

Figure 594: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 595: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

202

Page 211: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e502

Information: Eppler E502 general purpose airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 596: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 789: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.6852 % @0.44CMaximum Camber: 1.4825 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.6227 %CLower nose radius: 0.56164 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.4665 degRelease Angle: 2.2909 degNose Incidence: 5.1828 degCamber deflection: 7.4736 deg

Table 790: Controlpoints1 00.80744 -0.014960.71704 -0.0641490.47141 -0.0641490.20318 -0.0641490 -0.0275820 00 0.0209290.10552 0.0928990.43276 0.0928990.60968 0.0928990.72129 0.0442641 0

Table 791: Base 64 representation:OvcUncjeebtrPjA

Table 792: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.268 4.287 ectsRMS curvature error: 52.29 53.77 %CD error -0.7 -0.9 dctsCm error 6 -6 mctsUpper transition point -0.66 -0.18 %

Figure 597: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 598: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

203

Page 212: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e542

Information: Eppler E542 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 599: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 793: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.8771 % @0.42CMaximum Camber: 1.9322 % @0.3CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2469 %CLower nose radius: 0.45718 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.8117 degRelease Angle: 5.7895 degNose Incidence: 10.778 degCamber deflection: 16.5675 deg

Table 794: Controlpoints1 00.80113 -0.00561190.78393 -0.0678630.51272 -0.0678630.19482 -0.0678630 -0.0243680 00 0.0332650.13311 0.10250.39133 0.10250.48273 0.10250.59618 0.0946811 0

Table 795: Base 64 representation:VpZKrXngjs66RoA

Table 796: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.5 4.602 ectsRMS curvature error: 83.07 86.58 %CD error -0.7 -0.9 dctsCm error 56 77 mctsUpper transition point -0.17 -0.1 %

Figure 600: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 601: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

204

Page 213: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e543

Information: Eppler E543 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 602: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 797: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.281 % @0.42CMaximum Camber: 1.8766 % @0.29CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2671 %CLower nose radius: 0.53687 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.4296 degRelease Angle: 6.8434 degNose Incidence: 10.2916 degCamber deflection: 17.135 deg

Table 798: Controlpoints1 00.79998 0.000448980.75263 -0.0692630.45612 -0.0692630.22493 -0.0692630 -0.0283740 00 0.0334390.13237 0.104150.39354 0.104150.47957 0.104150.59643 0.0973231 0

Table 799: Base 64 representation:VpZJragsie7zPqA

Table 800: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.111 5.181 ectsRMS curvature error: 88.4 95.3 %CD error -0.9 -0.8 dctsCm error 37 41 mctsUpper transition point -0.25 -0.38 %

Figure 603: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 604: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

205

Page 214: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e544

Information: Eppler E544 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 605: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 801: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.5242 % @0.41CMaximum Camber: 1.8627 % @0.31CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2783 %CLower nose radius: 0.5217 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.3548 degRelease Angle: 7.2115 degNose Incidence: 10.275 degCamber deflection: 17.4864 deg

Table 802: Controlpoints1 00.78796 0.00197650.68796 -0.0700180.44905 -0.0700180.18838 -0.0700180 -0.0255960 00 0.0334520.13131 0.105630.39569 0.105630.47672 0.105630.59672 0.0997181 0

Table 803: Base 64 representation:UqZJsXksce7qPrA

Table 804: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.408 3.355 ectsRMS curvature error: 80.26 83.56 %CD error -0.3 -0.1 dctsCm error 38 58 mctsUpper transition point -0.53 -0.8 %

Figure 606: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 607: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

206

Page 215: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e545

Information: Eppler E545 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 608: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 805: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.448 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 1.7787 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1206 %CLower nose radius: 0.58565 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.9766 degRelease Angle: 7.0072 degNose Incidence: 9.5961 degCamber deflection: 16.6034 deg

Table 806: Controlpoints1 00.76468 0.00623980.65485 -0.0694620.39248 -0.0694620.1979 -0.0694620 -0.0277970 00 0.0280290.10516 0.105030.39595 0.105030.59676 0.105030.99597 0.000893621 0

Table 807: Base 64 representation:RuZVsagZceBrMqA

Table 808: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.332 4.907 ectsRMS curvature error: 43.16 42.85 %CD error -2.6 -2.4 dctsCm error 36 51 mctsUpper transition point 4.47 3.82 %

Figure 609: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 610: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

207

Page 216: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e546

Information: Eppler E546 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 611: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 809: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.2813 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 1.7993 % @0.27CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3341 %CLower nose radius: 0.47551 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.6246 degRelease Angle: 6.3036 degNose Incidence: 10.5922 degCamber deflection: 16.8957 deg

Table 810: Controlpoints1 00.77506 -3.4303e-0050.69327 -0.0658930.45223 -0.0658930.18129 -0.0658930 -0.0239730 00 0.0355240.14189 0.0980060.34386 0.0980060.41669 0.0980060.56212 0.0980061 0

Table 811: Base 64 representation:XlWHpXlscc uOpA

Table 812: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.951 3.673 ectsRMS curvature error: 42.84 41.5 %CD error -0.5 -0.4 dctsCm error 53 56 mctsUpper transition point -0.3 -0.45 %

Figure 612: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 613: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

208

Page 217: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e548

Information: Eppler E548 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 614: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 813: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.4304 % @0.36CMaximum Camber: 2.1083 % @0.27CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5067 %CLower nose radius: 0.66405 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.9135 degRelease Angle: 5.4113 degNose Incidence: 10.9252 degCamber deflection: 16.3365 deg

Table 814: Controlpoints1 00.79784 0.0010150.67995 -0.0682050.45171 -0.0682050.18958 -0.0682050 -0.0277350 00 0.0359730.12609 0.108190.33428 0.108190.42562 0.108190.52562 0.0920251 0

Table 815: Base 64 representation:VnVJtalcas2oMoA

Table 816: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.532 5.761 ectsRMS curvature error: 48.13 46.9 %CD error -0.4 -0.6 dctsCm error 47 52 mctsUpper transition point 0.21 0.63 %

Figure 615: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 616: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

209

Page 218: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e550

Information: Eppler E550 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 617: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 817: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.2171 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 2.2201 % @0.29CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6229 %CLower nose radius: 0.69196 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.5147 degRelease Angle: 7.2681 degNose Incidence: 11.4914 degCamber deflection: 18.7595 deg

Table 818: Controlpoints1 00.78794 0.00929880.58415 -0.0698310.38703 -0.0698310.17268 -0.0698310 -0.0282240 00 0.0371640.12766 0.112810.33977 0.112810.40638 0.112810.50115 0.106271 0

Table 819: Base 64 representation:VnWGvaiZVe7gLrA

Table 820: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.77 4.451 ectsRMS curvature error: 56.27 62.03 %CD error 0.5 0.4 dctsCm error 49 60 mctsUpper transition point -0.19 -0.33 %

Figure 618: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 619: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

210

Page 219: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e552

Information: Eppler E552 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 620: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 821: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.4691 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 2.5363 % @0.48CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6702 %CLower nose radius: 0.75124 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.27 degRelease Angle: 8.7648 degNose Incidence: 11.0333 degCamber deflection: 19.7981 deg

Table 822: Controlpoints1 00.78808 0.0171620.4877 -0.0682080.3244 -0.0682080.14103 -0.0682080 -0.0265770 00 0.0377660.12809 0.116640.34506 0.116640.38718 0.116640.4907 0.116641 0

Table 823: Base 64 representation:VnWExZjVPs aJtA

Table 824: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.694 3.706 ectsRMS curvature error: 78.44 72.56 %CD error 0.6 0.6 dctsCm error 47 55 mctsUpper transition point -0.52 -0.79 %

Figure 621: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 622: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

211

Page 220: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e554

Information: Eppler E554 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 623: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 825: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.1123 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 2.5872 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2375 %CLower nose radius: 0.92597 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.3174 degRelease Angle: 15.1684 degNose Incidence: 9.7871 degCamber deflection: 24.9554 deg

Table 826: Controlpoints1 00.79612 0.0268760.5112 -0.0674180.27395 -0.0674180.17052 -0.0674180 -0.0324450 00 0.0263530.084183 0.114960.3456 0.114960.48084 0.114960.96605 0.014291 0

Table 827: Base 64 representation:PvWNwfYSVsIbR3A

Table 828: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.319 4.915 ectsRMS curvature error: 57.61 58.08 %CD error 1.3 1.2 dctsCm error 0 20 mctsUpper transition point 0.56 -0.03 %

Figure 624: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 625: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

212

Page 221: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e556

Information: Eppler E556 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 626: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 829: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.9319 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.1109 % @0.64CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2559 %CLower nose radius: 0.78115 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 24.4233 degRelease Angle: 20.0535 degNose Incidence: 8.7103 degCamber deflection: 28.7638 deg

Table 830: Controlpoints1 00.76109 0.0329040.47733 -0.060110.26719 -0.060110.14762 -0.060110 -0.0277260 00 0.0282990.095648 0.101340.36288 0.101340.60923 0.101340.97528 0.0156071 0

Table 831: Base 64 representation:SuXZqesRSaKsb A

Table 832: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.828 4.575 ectsRMS curvature error: 53.58 52.96 %CD error 1.7 1.9 dctsCm error 55 52 mctsUpper transition point -1.88 -2.28 %

Figure 627: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 628: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

213

Page 222: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e557

Information: Eppler E557 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 629: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 833: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.9636 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.4304 % @0.61CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4183 %CLower nose radius: 0.79037 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 23.5937 degRelease Angle: 20.0535 degNose Incidence: 10.0877 degCamber deflection: 30.1413 deg

Table 834: Controlpoints1 00.73656 0.0382280.47313 -0.0558820.25863 -0.0558820.13792 -0.0558820 -0.0269570 00 0.0308740.10081 0.106550.3697 0.106550.61289 0.106550.96677 0.0206441 0

Table 835: Base 64 representation:TuYZsfeRTYMga A

Table 836: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.931 5.374 ectsRMS curvature error: 50.91 52.47 %CD error 1.2 0.4 dctsCm error 94 102 mctsUpper transition point -2.17 -1.25 %

Figure 630: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 631: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

214

Page 223: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e558

Information: Eppler E558 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 632: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 837: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.0359 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 3.7619 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.1804 %CLower nose radius: 0.0054948 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 20.8099 degRelease Angle: 15.9318 degNose Incidence: 20.0484 degCamber deflection: 35.9802 deg

Table 838: Controlpoints1 00.76041 0.0231830.36115 -0.0499460.2156 -0.0499460.020816 -0.0499460 -0.000873250 00 0.0533960.13447 0.113460.30568 0.113460.54028 0.113460.9666 0.0165321 0

Table 839: Base 64 representation:ejUWvB5OMVJYX5A

Table 840: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.718 6.984 ectsRMS curvature error: 42.42 42.79 %CD error 0.8 -0.2 dctsCm error 6 -9 mctsUpper transition point -1.45 0.17 %

Figure 633: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 634: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

215

Page 224: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e559

Information: Eppler E559 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 635: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 841: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.9745 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 4.2563 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.3014 %CLower nose radius: 0.70501 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 20.865 degRelease Angle: 17.8429 degNose Incidence: 14.3102 degCamber deflection: 32.1531 deg

Table 842: Controlpoints1 00.73872 0.0339810.37696 -0.0488530.1669 -0.0488530.066444 -0.0488530 -0.0176720 00 0.0425850.1182 0.116940.31462 0.116940.55698 0.116940.95679 0.0232451 0

Table 843: Base 64 representation:XnUXxXmLQVNbX8A

Table 844: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.886 3.421 ectsRMS curvature error: 49.49 49.5 %CD error 2.1 2.2 dctsCm error 30 19 mctsUpper transition point -2.6 -2.82 %

Figure 636: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 637: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

216

Page 225: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e560

Information: Eppler E560 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 638: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 845: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.0397 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 4.7741 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7093 %CLower nose radius: 1.246 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 20.7399 degRelease Angle: 20.0535 degNose Incidence: 8.917 degCamber deflection: 28.9706 deg

Table 846: Controlpoints1 00.74068 0.044250.33429 -0.0482150.1575 -0.0482150.066904 -0.0482150 -0.0235740 00 0.0355730.11105 0.12080.32322 0.12080.57217 0.12080.95075 0.0289231 0

Table 847: Base 64 representation:TpVYzfkKNVPZX A

Table 848: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.21 5.966 ectsRMS curvature error: 77.65 74.39 %CD error 0.8 0.3 dctsCm error 47 17 mctsUpper transition point -3.11 -1.7 %

Figure 639: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 640: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

217

Page 226: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e561

Information: Eppler E561 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 641: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 849: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.876 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 5.0077 % @0.48CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.733 %CLower nose radius: 1.6084 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 21.8828 degRelease Angle: 20.2228 degNose Incidence: 8.596 degCamber deflection: 28.8188 deg

Table 850: Controlpoints1 00.74005 0.0430270.35499 -0.0485070.15686 -0.0485070.090717 -0.0485070 -0.0309720 00 0.0357090.11037 0.128560.32087 0.128560.55927 0.128560.95905 0.0243221 0

Table 851: Base 64 representation:SpVW2obKPVMaY A

Table 852: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.689 4.437 ectsRMS curvature error: 50.75 50.08 %CD error 0.3 -0.3 dctsCm error 28 18 mctsUpper transition point -2.44 -1.28 %

Figure 642: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 643: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

218

Page 227: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e562

Information: Eppler E562 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 644: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 853: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.0684 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 3.9515 % @0.54CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.128 %CLower nose radius: 0.27367 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 19.7247 degRelease Angle: 18.8722 degNose Incidence: 14.7028 degCamber deflection: 33.5751 deg

Table 854: Controlpoints1 00.77594 0.0355270.38253 -0.0462970.21045 -0.0462970.035851 -0.0462970 -0.00808770 00 0.0425810.12781 0.108220.31889 0.108220.5822 0.108220.9502 0.0273011 0

Table 855: Base 64 representation:ZlUZtL0NOUQXW9A

Table 856: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.434 3.907 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.8 2.2 dctsCm error 24 37 mctsUpper transition point -3.37 -5.38 %

Figure 645: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 646: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

219

Page 228: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e580

Information: Eppler E580 general purpose airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 647: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 857: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.0665 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 4.2226 % @0.63CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6624 %CLower nose radius: 1.0046 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.5065 degRelease Angle: 16.2775 degNose Incidence: 11.1401 degCamber deflection: 27.4176 deg

Table 858: Controlpoints1 00.78021 0.044630.57832 -0.0449410.30762 -0.0449410.22237 -0.0449410 -0.033370 00 0.0322950.11508 0.116720.37462 0.116720.58931 0.116720.89218 0.0458721 0

Table 859: Base 64 representation:SrYWxvSUZTZgN7A

Table 860: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.574 3.844 ectsRMS curvature error: 24.82 24.87 %CD error 2.6 -2.4 dctsCm error -2 10 mctsUpper transition point 0.74 -0.79 %

Figure 648: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 649: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

220

Page 229: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e583

Information: Eppler E583 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 650: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 861: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.4779 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 4.4734 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3466 %CLower nose radius: 1.6712 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.8713 degRelease Angle: 11.4885 degNose Incidence: 14.6728 degCamber deflection: 26.1614 deg

Table 862: Controlpoints1 00.86235 0.0158120.82544 -0.0377380.38007 -0.0377380.0038007 -0.0377380 -0.00650720 00 0.0309310.10657 0.127110.40991 0.127110.4843 0.127110.59559 0.119211 0

Table 863: Base 64 representation:QuaI1L-YtQ7xLyA

Table 864: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.64 4.469 ectsRMS curvature error: 40.63 42.55 %CD error 0 0 dctsCm error 13 9 mctsUpper transition point -2.52 -2.76 %

Figure 651: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 652: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

221

Page 230: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e584

Information: Eppler E584 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 653: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 865: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.6148 % @0.41CMaximum Camber: 4.5031 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4189 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.7557 degRelease Angle: 11.0142 degNose Incidence: 15.1387 degCamber deflection: 26.1528 deg

Table 866: Controlpoints1 00.86417 0.012210.86417 -0.0380830.43588 -0.0380830 -0.0380830 -0.00715070 00 0.032320.11043 0.12810.40923 0.12810.45549 0.12810.57815 0.12811 0

Table 867: Base 64 representation:QuaF2M cwQ NxA

Table 868: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.147 5.21 ectsRMS curvature error: 51.4 51.56 %CD error 1.1 1.9 dctsCm error 30 46 mctsUpper transition point -4.69 -5.35 %

Figure 654: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 655: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

222

Page 231: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e587

Information: Eppler E587 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 656: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 869: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.6447 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 4.1893 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5798 %CLower nose radius: 0.46007 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 19.0401 degRelease Angle: 20.0535 degNose Incidence: 15.6221 degCamber deflection: 35.6757 deg

Table 870: Controlpoints1 00.81431 0.0345270.66002 -0.0428180.36098 -0.0428180.097876 -0.0428180 -0.0173260 00 0.0355480.11998 0.124290.42639 0.124290.67106 0.124290.98871 0.0064061 0

Table 871: Base 64 representation:Stbb0auXeSDiV A

Table 872: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.195 3.607 ectsRMS curvature error: 63.84 61.95 %CD error 0.7 0.9 dctsCm error 15 24 mctsUpper transition point -2.8 -3.45 %

Figure 657: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 658: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

223

Page 232: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e591

Information: Eppler E591 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 659: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 873: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.564 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 6.5886 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.6233 %CLower nose radius: 26.1472 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.8003 degRelease Angle: 20.0535 degNose Incidence: 21.8934 degCamber deflection: 41.947 deg

Table 874: Controlpoints1 00.72045 0.0653290.32632 -0.029350.13616 -0.029350.00048855 -0.029350 -0.00922830 00 0.0412310.070378 0.136990.33475 0.136990.57091 0.136990.91541 0.0430171 0

Table 875: Base 64 representation:TyVX5U JONUbP A

Table 876: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.576 8.687 ectsRMS curvature error: 42.96 43.15 %CD error -0.8 -1 dctsCm error 109 113 mctsUpper transition point -0.72 -1.28 %

Figure 660: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 661: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

224

Page 233: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e593

Information: Eppler E593 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 662: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 877: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.368 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.622 % @0.3CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.8067 %CLower nose radius: -2.0108 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.1089 degRelease Angle: 2.2306 degNose Incidence: 14.7377 degCamber deflection: 16.9683 deg

Table 878: Controlpoints1 00.21169 -0.00445610.13373 -0.0187270.083622 -0.0187270.00083622 -0.0187270 -0.003460 00 0.0401250.13367 0.102770.28427 0.102770.45848 0.102770.57163 0.0358581 0

Table 879: Base 64 representation:ZhSQrM-FDIy5GjA

Table 880: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.083 4.346 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0 0.3 dctsCm error -33 -25 mctsUpper transition point -1.14 -1.18 %

Figure 663: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 664: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

225

Page 234: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e598

Information: Eppler E598 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 665: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 881: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.2256 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.4652 % @0.31CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6263 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.5067 degRelease Angle: 2.2136 degNose Incidence: 14.2692 degCamber deflection: 16.4828 deg

Table 882: Controlpoints1 00.20039 -0.0075330.11803 -0.0190420.083493 -0.0190420.00083493 -0.0190420 -0.00344430 00 0.0351410.1139 0.100460.28789 0.100460.50506 0.100460.70088 0.0259961 0

Table 883: Base 64 representation:WmSUqM-FCIm5GjA

Table 884: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.367 4.783 ectsRMS curvature error: 61.05 62.44 %CD error 0.8 1.6 dctsCm error -42 -35 mctsUpper transition point -2.03 -3.33 %

Figure 666: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 667: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

226

Page 235: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e603

Information: Eppler E603 general purpose airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 668: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 885: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 19.0087 % @0.41CMaximum Camber: 3.5427 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.0898 %CLower nose radius: 0.43129 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.4315 degRelease Angle: 10.5002 degNose Incidence: 20.9449 degCamber deflection: 31.4451 deg

Table 886: Controlpoints1 00.80573 0.019680.7492 -0.0598160.43299 -0.0598160.13269 -0.0598160 -0.0195330 00 0.0579930.16327 0.130410.40013 0.130410.51063 0.130410.60259 0.108091 0

Table 887: Base 64 representation:claM3VrcjazxLwA

Table 888: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.321 8.665 ectsRMS curvature error: 55.94 59.91 %CD error NaN 2.6 dctsCm error NaN 26 mctsUpper transition point NaN -0.76 %

Figure 669: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 670: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

227

Page 236: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e604

Information: Eppler E604 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 671: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 889: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.7887 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 3.4243 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.2304 %CLower nose radius: 0.56113 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.0988 degRelease Angle: 12.4441 degNose Incidence: 16.2446 degCamber deflection: 28.6887 deg

Table 890: Controlpoints1 00.80708 0.0233270.68735 -0.0603430.37322 -0.0603430.14702 -0.0603430 -0.0234520 00 0.0471550.14954 0.127810.41174 0.127810.49878 0.127810.63423 0.11881 0

Table 891: Base 64 representation:YoaJ2ZmYga6mMzA

Table 892: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.26 6.526 ectsRMS curvature error: 26.37 26.6 %CD error 2 2.9 dctsCm error 38 55 mctsUpper transition point -1.51 -2.94 %

Figure 672: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 673: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

228

Page 237: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e625

Information: Eppler E625 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 674: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 893: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.1716 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 2.7905 % @0.2CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5724 %CLower nose radius: 0.612 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.2806 degRelease Angle: -1.6607 degNose Incidence: 21.3759 degCamber deflection: 19.7152 deg

Table 894: Controlpoints1 00.79792 -0.0369970.70674 -0.0429880.55001 -0.0429880.0055001 -0.0429880 -0.0130840 00 0.0196490.048249 0.092910.24998 0.092910.48812 0.092910.70761 0.0338391 0

Table 895: Base 64 representation:OzQUnT-iWSk2TsA

Table 896: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.064 6.33 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.2 1 dctsCm error -16 -18 mctsUpper transition point -1.03 -0.83 %

Figure 675: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 676: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

229

Page 238: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e635

Information: Eppler E635 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 677: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 897: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.8624 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 2.7175 % @0.23CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.2521 %CLower nose radius: 0.42107 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.6113 degRelease Angle: -4.0204 degNose Incidence: 18.4469 degCamber deflection: 14.4265 deg

Table 898: Controlpoints1 00.86204 -0.0326890.6347 -0.0361880.54352 -0.0361880.43984 -0.0361880 -0.0296460 00 0.0275230.073792 0.0861590.26146 0.0861590.41634 0.0861590.72773 0.0135151 0

Table 899: Base 64 representation:UtRNkzMiNPe5SXA

Table 900: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.119 4.774 ectsRMS curvature error: 64.9 66.66 %CD error -1.7 -2.2 dctsCm error 15 5 mctsUpper transition point 2.24 3.18 %

Figure 678: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 679: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

230

Page 239: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e636

Information: Eppler E636 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 680: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 901: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.9793 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 3.1452 % @0.24CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1099 %CLower nose radius: 0.31109 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.958 degRelease Angle: -3.0287 degNose Incidence: 16.5742 degCamber deflection: 13.5455 deg

Table 902: Controlpoints1 00.85338 -0.0285210.63529 -0.0320720.53565 -0.0320720.48072 -0.0320720 -0.0306830 00 0.0232750.073214 0.0910540.269 0.0910540.42519 0.0910540.69568 0.0263581 0

Table 903: Base 64 representation:QuROm8HhOOh4SbA

Table 904: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.687 4.619 ectsRMS curvature error: 53.9 53.08 %CD error -20.4 -19.9 dctsCm error 103 116 mctsUpper transition point 1.83 1.26 %

Figure 681: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 682: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

231

Page 240: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e637

Information: Eppler E637 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 683: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 905: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.2464 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 3.4698 % @0.26CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.86149 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.3568 degRelease Angle: -0.82565 degNose Incidence: 12.8494 degCamber deflection: 12.0237 deg

Table 906: Controlpoints1 00.82506 -0.0261570.62506 -0.0279230.47367 -0.0279230 -0.0279230 -0.0109970 00 0.0209930.076732 0.0958410.27618 0.0958410.42826 0.0958410.65092 0.0419511 0

Table 907: Base 64 representation:OtSNoZ eSMm7ReA

Table 908: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.485 4.851 ectsRMS curvature error: 93.07 Inf %CD error 6.8 -7.7 dctsCm error -18 25 mctsUpper transition point -1.55 2.36 %

Figure 684: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 685: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

232

Page 241: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e638

Information: Eppler E638 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 686: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 909: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.4456 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 4.3711 % @0.27CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.7543 %CLower nose radius: 0.12687 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.251 degRelease Angle: 1.8678 degNose Incidence: 26.5125 degCamber deflection: 28.3803 deg

Table 910: Controlpoints1 00.79066 -0.0192640.69066 -0.0204820.51853 -0.0204820.47221 -0.0204820 -0.0187560 00 0.045910.11479 0.105850.28414 0.105850.41442 0.105850.59721 0.0637471 0

Table 911: Base 64 representation:clSMs6GgXJr7QiA

Table 912: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.143 5.416 ectsRMS curvature error: 74.76 78.52 %CD error -0.8 -0.7 dctsCm error 5 9 mctsUpper transition point 2.22 1.86 %

Figure 687: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 688: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

233

Page 242: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e639

Information: Eppler E639 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 689: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 913: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.6396 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 4.7637 % @0.29CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.1622 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.2658 degRelease Angle: 3.439 degNose Incidence: 22.6124 degCamber deflection: 26.0514 deg

Table 914: Controlpoints1 00.79019 -0.0135450.70798 -0.0161530.51037 -0.0161530 -0.0161530 -0.010060 00 0.0391410.10629 0.110830.29167 0.110830.38737 0.110830.51059 0.0913431 0

Table 915: Base 64 representation:XoTJun gaH01QlA

Table 916: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.102 4.638 ectsRMS curvature error: 87.36 88.6 %CD error 0.9 0.2 dctsCm error 15 9 mctsUpper transition point 1.61 2.78 %

Figure 690: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 691: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

234

Page 243: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e642

Information: Eppler E642 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 692: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 917: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.0837 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 3.0308 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.78371 %CLower nose radius: 0.80989 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.1881 degRelease Angle: 6.8265 degNose Incidence: 6.7684 degCamber deflection: 13.5949 deg

Table 918: Controlpoints1 00.86902 0.00510630.86769 -0.0451310.40408 -0.0451310.35719 -0.0451310 -0.0434160 00 0.0241080.11124 0.105720.39424 0.105720.57749 0.105720.6273 0.0752891 0

Table 919: Base 64 representation:PtZTs9HaxT3-KqA

Table 920: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.473 5.723 ectsRMS curvature error: 75.88 73.39 %CD error -5.2 -4.5 dctsCm error 7 16 mctsUpper transition point -1.02 -1.58 %

Figure 693: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 694: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

235

Page 244: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e654

Information: Eppler E654 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 695: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 921: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.1649 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 4.9002 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.2756 %CLower nose radius: 0.8283 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.5786 degRelease Angle: 13.0325 degNose Incidence: 16.6443 degCamber deflection: 29.6769 deg

Table 922: Controlpoints1 00.82128 0.0290850.72128 -0.039730.26246 -0.039730.1307 -0.039730 -0.0268650 00 0.0447220.13184 0.134030.4167 0.134030.55286 0.134030.64546 0.107191 0

Table 923: Base 64 representation:VrbP4qgRnRyoI0A

Table 924: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.21 3.393 ectsRMS curvature error: 40.72 39.54 %CD error 0 -0.2 dctsCm error 20 14 mctsUpper transition point -1.73 -1.52 %

Figure 696: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 697: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

236

Page 245: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e655

Information: Eppler E655 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 698: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 925: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.3722 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 3.9397 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6311 %CLower nose radius: 1.1655 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.2633 degRelease Angle: 9.7926 degNose Incidence: 10.141 degCamber deflection: 19.9336 deg

Table 926: Controlpoints1 00.79703 0.0165480.72419 -0.0486470.32264 -0.0486470.11519 -0.0486470 -0.0299170 00 0.0366310.1234 0.125830.40804 0.125830.58128 0.125830.66885 0.0882631 0

Table 927: Base 64 representation:TsaT1moVlVyuLvA

Table 928: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.283 6.031 ectsRMS curvature error: 32.41 28.71 %CD error 1.3 1.1 dctsCm error 36 61 mctsUpper transition point -1.3 -1.67 %

Figure 699: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 700: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

237

Page 246: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e656

Information: Eppler E656 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 701: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 929: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.2437 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 4.8117 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.9021 %CLower nose radius: 0.80307 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.3901 degRelease Angle: 12.106 degNose Incidence: 15.0501 degCamber deflection: 27.1562 deg

Table 930: Controlpoints1 00.87069 0.0202750.75133 -0.0349170.26961 -0.0349170.20101 -0.0349170 -0.0330240 00 0.041490.13575 0.128970.41419 0.128970.58917 0.128970.6729 0.0894921 0

Table 931: Base 64 representation:VqbT28QRpPygHzA

Table 932: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.191 3.762 ectsRMS curvature error: 31.85 30.9 %CD error -0.6 -1.1 dctsCm error 10 -11 mctsUpper transition point -1.04 -0.43 %

Figure 702: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 703: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

238

Page 247: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e657

Information: Eppler E657 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 704: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 933: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.6331 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 4.6225 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6781 %CLower nose radius: 0.78706 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.9871 degRelease Angle: 12.551 degNose Incidence: 13.5844 degCamber deflection: 26.1354 deg

Table 934: Controlpoints1 00.87669 0.0207620.74974 -0.0339990.26991 -0.0339990.026991 -0.0339990 -0.0119010 00 0.0392510.13771 0.123850.41891 0.123850.63674 0.123850.71517 0.079231 0

Table 935: Base 64 representation:UqbY0W5RpPxgHzA

Table 936: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.708 5.665 ectsRMS curvature error: 33.44 34 %CD error -0.6 -0.8 dctsCm error 10 -1 mctsUpper transition point -0.59 -0.53 %

Figure 705: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 706: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

239

Page 248: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e662

Information: Eppler E662 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 707: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 937: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.0057 % @0.41CMaximum Camber: 4.1062 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3247 %CLower nose radius: 1.3244 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.4782 degRelease Angle: 14.7445 degNose Incidence: 10.6988 degCamber deflection: 25.4433 deg

Table 938: Controlpoints1 00.86732 0.0270070.83885 -0.035120.32061 -0.035120.0094046 -0.035120 -0.00911250 00 0.0355850.14338 0.11570.42776 0.11570.65477 0.11570.74962 0.0812761 0

Table 939: Base 64 representation:UqbZwR9VwPt0H3A

Table 940: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.325 5.727 ectsRMS curvature error: 53.38 54.44 %CD error -1.9 -1.7 dctsCm error 20 53 mctsUpper transition point -2.15 -2.65 %

Figure 708: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 709: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

240

Page 249: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e664

Information: Eppler E664 variable geometry sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 710: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 941: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.6073 % @0.42CMaximum Camber: 2.6368 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.95706 %CLower nose radius: 1.1129 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.6783 degRelease Angle: 9.6388 degNose Incidence: 4.1332 degCamber deflection: 13.772 deg

Table 942: Controlpoints1 00.82954 0.0143130.82139 -0.0570030.44556 -0.0570030.43357 -0.0570030 -0.0564240 00 0.0299450.14054 0.109270.40688 0.109270.64027 0.109270.74027 0.0670651 0

Table 943: Base 64 representation:SpaZu-CsqYt8LvA

Table 944: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.554 7.651 ectsRMS curvature error: 41.19 41.11 %CD error -1.5 -0.9 dctsCm error 18 11 mctsUpper transition point -0.88 -0.98 %

Figure 711: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 712: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

241

Page 250: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e668

Information: Eppler E668 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 713: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 945: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.9895 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 3.9109 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1934 %CLower nose radius: 1.1478 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.122 degRelease Angle: 12.7308 degNose Incidence: 10.9479 degCamber deflection: 23.6787 deg

Table 946: Controlpoints1 00.83791 0.0215060.74848 -0.0330650.27361 -0.0330650.023512 -0.0330650 -0.00902070 00 0.0356250.14029 0.108360.42218 0.108360.68056 0.108360.76158 0.0654541 0

Table 947: Base 64 representation:VqbstR6SpOvoJyA

Table 948: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.079 3.764 ectsRMS curvature error: 29.09 30.79 %CD error 0.4 0.5 dctsCm error 35 31 mctsUpper transition point -2.44 -1.86 %

Figure 714: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 715: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

242

Page 251: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e682

Information: Eppler E682 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 716: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 949: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.2931 % @0.42CMaximum Camber: 2.9354 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.83032 %CLower nose radius: 0.83956 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.8593 degRelease Angle: 7.7029 degNose Incidence: 5.6696 degCamber deflection: 13.3725 deg

Table 950: Controlpoints1 00.87116 0.00849720.85925 -0.0473520.454 -0.0473520.34671 -0.0473520 -0.0437630 00 0.0276120.13773 0.105760.40324 0.105760.68507 0.105760.7539 0.0506641 0

Table 951: Base 64 representation:Rpaes6PsvUx6JsA

Table 952: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.049 4.98 ectsRMS curvature error: 89.62 90.2 %CD error 4.9 -4.7 dctsCm error -15 9 mctsUpper transition point 2.23 -1.99 %

Figure 717: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 718: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

243

Page 252: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e694

Information: Eppler E694 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 719: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 953: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.4424 % @0.43CMaximum Camber: 4.8784 % @0.58CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.59763 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.4588 degRelease Angle: 16.0492 degNose Incidence: 4.7981 degCamber deflection: 20.8473 deg

Table 954: Controlpoints1 00.84246 0.0402150.80132 -0.0345260.25315 -0.0345260 -0.0345260 -0.00744270 00 0.0219460.12089 0.123990.49806 0.123990.78561 0.123990.97059 0.00942921 0

Table 955: Base 64 representation:Lvgk0O QuPJyE5A

Table 956: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.76 5.156 ectsRMS curvature error: 60.98 59.89 %CD error -6.3 -6.8 dctsCm error -40 -55 mctsUpper transition point 5.07 5.38 %

Figure 720: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 721: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

244

Page 253: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e715

Information: Eppler E715 tailplane airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 722: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 957: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.0309 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 2.8042 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3862 %CLower nose radius: 0.62166 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.196 degRelease Angle: 2.6048 degNose Incidence: 9.1654 degCamber deflection: 11.7702 deg

Table 958: Controlpoints1 00.5556 -0.00770450.46628 -0.0501730.24853 -0.0501730.087402 -0.0501730 -0.0190320 00 0.0360850.14091 0.101540.33114 0.101540.52888 0.101540.66042 0.0369081 0

Table 959: Base 64 representation:XkVTqYoQTVt0IjA

Table 960: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.295 5.485 ectsRMS curvature error: 54.14 54.52 %CD error 1.1 1 dctsCm error -34 -11 mctsUpper transition point -1 -1.26 %

Figure 723: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 724: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

245

Page 254: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e748

Information: Eppler E748 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 725: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 961: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 19.6781 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.5304 % @0.57CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.2442 %CLower nose radius: 1.6163 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.0649 degRelease Angle: 18.7652 degNose Incidence: 11.4413 degCamber deflection: 30.2065 deg

Table 962: Controlpoints1 00.75076 0.0494990.42175 -0.0636650.24342 -0.0636650.14681 -0.0636650 -0.0397730 00 0.0401530.10776 0.135420.3154 0.135420.51605 0.135420.92096 0.039061 0

Table 963: Base 64 representation:TpUT5nZQPbScR9A

Table 964: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.784 5.561 ectsRMS curvature error: 38.75 40.14 %CD error 2.3 2.6 dctsCm error 31 39 mctsUpper transition point -2.14 -2.92 %

Figure 726: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 727: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

246

Page 255: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e793

Information: N/AEppler E793 general purpose airfoil (gyroflugspeed canard canard)Reference: UIUC

Figure 728: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 965: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.6607 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.1351 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.6588 %CLower nose radius: 1.3026 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.9076 degRelease Angle: 15.2339 degNose Incidence: 14.5962 degCamber deflection: 29.8301 deg

Table 966: Controlpoints1 00.78409 0.0275830.38887 -0.0430620.21354 -0.0430620.21354 -0.0430620 -0.041770 00 0.0443520.11098 0.116330.30914 0.116330.55962 0.116330.96624 0.0144621 0

Table 967: Base 64 representation:YoUXx9AOOSIXS4A

Table 968: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.346 5.464 ectsRMS curvature error: 30.69 31.18 %CD error 3.2 3.7 dctsCm error 8 -9 mctsUpper transition point -1.21 -0.63 %

Figure 729: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 730: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

247

Page 256: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e817

Information: Eppler E817 hydrofoilReference: UIUC

Figure 731: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 969: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.035 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 2.8812 % @0.68CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.45755 %CLower nose radius: 0.27915 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.7895 degRelease Angle: 12.6951 degNose Incidence: 1.5537 degCamber deflection: 14.2489 deg

Table 970: Controlpoints1 00.83328 0.0287980.46246 -0.0444820.23587 -0.0444820.069868 -0.0444820 -0.0114030 00 0.0235520.18185 0.0733970.47424 0.0733970.65317 0.0733970.77119 0.0638421 0

Table 971: Base 64 representation:VmeWfQsPTT3UG0A

Table 972: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.542 3.082 ectsRMS curvature error: 17.93 18.13 %CD error 0.3 -0.3 dctsCm error -2 -4 mctsUpper transition point -0.01 0.22 %

Figure 732: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 733: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

248

Page 257: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e836

Information: Eppler E836 hydrofoilReference: UIUC

Figure 734: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 973: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.6396 % @0.43CMaximum Camber: -1.0511e-006 % @0.67CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.37976 %CLower nose radius: 0.37976 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.4629 degRelease Angle: -6.2193e-006 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: -6.2193e-006 deg

Table 974: Controlpoints1 00.82365 -0.0161460.65633 -0.06320.42784 -0.06320.090605 -0.06320 -0.0151460 00 0.0151460.090605 0.06320.42784 0.06320.65633 0.06320.82365 0.0161461 0

Table 975: Base 64 representation:PxbabPxbabggMgA

Table 976: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.955 1.182 ectsRMS curvature error: 23.7 24.25 %CD error NaN 0.5 dctsCm error NaN 9 mctsUpper transition point NaN -0.41 %

Figure 735: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 736: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

249

Page 258: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e837

Information: Eppler E837 hydrofoilReference: UIUC

Figure 737: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 977: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.106 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: 8.423e-007 % @0.92CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.75337 %CLower nose radius: 0.75337 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.1391 degRelease Angle: 1.4002e-005 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: 1.4002e-005 deg

Table 978: Controlpoints1 00.75735 -0.0236620.59753 -0.080530.36943 -0.080530.12886 -0.080530 -0.025440 00 0.025440.12886 0.080530.36943 0.080530.59753 0.080530.75734 0.0236621 0

Table 979: Base 64 representation:UpYXhUpYXhmmMgA

Table 980: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.225 5.268 ectsRMS curvature error: 19.14 19.8 %CD error 0 -0.6 dctsCm error 5 4 mctsUpper transition point 0.18 1.01 %

Figure 738: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 739: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

250

Page 259: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e838

Information: Eppler E838 hydrofoilReference: UIUC

Figure 740: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 981: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.3675 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: -3.1461e-005 % @0.79CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.96227 %CLower nose radius: 0.96227 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.5673 degRelease Angle: -0.00017386 degNose Incidence: -1.9372e-005 degCamber deflection: -0.00019323 deg

Table 982: Controlpoints1 00.73439 -0.0292480.63876 -0.091840.37177 -0.091840.19576 -0.091840 -0.0354380 00 0.0354380.19576 0.091840.37177 0.091840.63876 0.091840.73439 0.0292461 0

Table 983: Base 64 representation:ZeYbmZeYbmuuOgA

Table 984: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.493 4.196 ectsRMS curvature error: 29.61 29.3 %CD error -0.1 -0.4 dctsCm error 8 8 mctsUpper transition point -1.09 -0.63 %

Figure 741: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 742: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

251

Page 260: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e851

Information: Eppler E851 propeller airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 743: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 985: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.039 % @0.36CMaximum Camber: 2.2669 % @0.65CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.39918 %CLower nose radius: 0.19014 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.461 degRelease Angle: 9.0981 degNose Incidence: 3.9353 degCamber deflection: 13.0334 deg

Table 986: Controlpoints1 00.79096 0.0159660.49906 -0.0314210.29575 -0.0314210.073223 -0.0314210 -0.00963420 00 0.0214830.17342 0.0622310.4684 0.0622310.54298 0.0622310.74719 0.0622311 0

Table 987: Base 64 representation:WneJbUvTSN bLuA

Table 988: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.8 5.41 ectsRMS curvature error: 26.03 25.47 %CD error -0.1 -0.1 dctsCm error 17 4 mctsUpper transition point -0.07 0.19 %

Figure 744: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 745: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

252

Page 261: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e852

Information: Eppler E852 propeller airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 746: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 989: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.0587 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 2.7449 % @0.59CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.49929 %CLower nose radius: 0.15367 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.3838 degRelease Angle: 12.5543 degNose Incidence: 5.862 degCamber deflection: 18.4162 deg

Table 990: Controlpoints1 00.794 0.0193360.48725 -0.031340.28915 -0.031340.042363 -0.031340 -0.00658790 00 0.0223560.15015 0.0730860.46796 0.0730860.68283 0.0730860.97163 0.0101851 0

Table 991: Base 64 representation:UqeafN2TSNJaQzA

Table 992: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.602 3.637 ectsRMS curvature error: 39.07 41.05 %CD error 0.4 0.1 dctsCm error 9 11 mctsUpper transition point -1.58 -1.15 %

Figure 747: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 748: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

253

Page 262: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e853

Information: Eppler E853 propeller airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 749: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 993: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.7248 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 2.8635 % @0.58CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.44709 %CLower nose radius: 0.95534 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.2864 degRelease Angle: 11.7462 degNose Incidence: -0.15402 degCamber deflection: 11.5922 deg

Table 994: Controlpoints1 00.79088 0.0240680.48254 -0.0352240.28146 -0.0352240.080512 -0.0352240 -0.0148040 00 0.0264870.16377 0.0844980.41769 0.0844980.63912 0.0844980.96764 0.0134051 0

Table 995: Base 64 representation:UmbYjbtSSPKaS2A

Table 996: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.466 2.577 ectsRMS curvature error: 57.36 57.99 %CD error 0.6 0.5 dctsCm error 3 10 mctsUpper transition point -1.28 -1.16 %

Figure 750: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 751: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

254

Page 263: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e854

Information: Eppler E854 propeller airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 752: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 997: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.4837 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 3.1656 % @0.57CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.60085 %CLower nose radius: 0.7353 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.1236 degRelease Angle: 12.6034 degNose Incidence: 3.991 degCamber deflection: 16.5945 deg

Table 998: Controlpoints1 00.77386 0.0222070.48595 -0.0399150.27571 -0.0399150.08327 -0.0399150 -0.0160330 00 0.0332370.16638 0.0964160.36739 0.0964160.59692 0.0964160.95806 0.0201421 0

Table 999: Base 64 representation:WiYXoasSTRNcW4A

Table 1000: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.839 3.516 ectsRMS curvature error: 43.33 44.67 %CD error 0.6 0.1 dctsCm error 19 13 mctsUpper transition point -2.23 -1.15 %

Figure 753: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 754: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

255

Page 264: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e856

Information: Eppler E856 propeller airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 755: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1001: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.0511 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 4.1759 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3799 %CLower nose radius: 1.223 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 25.5728 degRelease Angle: 16.8649 degNose Incidence: 9.6367 degCamber deflection: 26.5017 deg

Table 1002: Controlpoints1 00.73583 0.0188370.46776 -0.0536520.25834 -0.0536520.14926 -0.0536520 -0.0348850 00 0.0309160.1039 0.129570.36174 0.129570.50989 0.129570.93229 0.0385451 0

Table 1003: Base 64 representation:PtXP2pbRSXTgs6A

Table 1004: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.275 4.723 ectsRMS curvature error: 38.29 39.56 %CD error 0 -0.3 dctsCm error 40 61 mctsUpper transition point 0.4 0.19 %

Figure 756: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 757: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

256

Page 265: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e857

Information: Eppler E857 propeller airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 758: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1005: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 20.3356 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 4.827 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 4.6165 %CLower nose radius: 0.5598 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 32.3019 degRelease Angle: 19.9667 degNose Incidence: 25.2762 degCamber deflection: 45.2429 deg

Table 1006: Controlpoints1 00.71664 0.0188990.46478 -0.0565980.24865 -0.0565980.08585 -0.0565980 -0.0184650 00 0.0696060.15742 0.148260.31485 0.148260.51948 0.148260.95126 0.0355631 0

Table 1007: Base 64 representation:egUT-VpQSYPhj A

Table 1008: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.908 6.74 ectsRMS curvature error: 47.08 45.29 %CD error 0.4 0.5 dctsCm error 105 93 mctsUpper transition point -2.22 -2.58 %

Figure 759: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 760: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

257

Page 266: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e874

Information: Eppler E874 hydrofoilReference: UIUC

Figure 761: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1009: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.8914 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 0.89093 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.2132 %CLower nose radius: 0.30403 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 57.2958 degRelease Angle: 10.1855 degNose Incidence: -2.2629 degCamber deflection: 7.9226 deg

Table 1010: Controlpoints1 00.97627 -0.00792140.37151 -0.0316860.20663 -0.0316860.03144 -0.0316860 -0.00798270 00 0.0139090.1361 0.0480880.28781 0.0480880.46706 0.0480880.99401 0.0048221 0

Table 1011: Base 64 representation:ThSQVQ1NNOGQ wA

Table 1012: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.849 6.555 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1 -9.1 dctsCm error 45 28 mctsUpper transition point -5.06 14.84 %

Figure 762: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 763: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

258

Page 267: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e1098

Information: Eppler E1098 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 764: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1013: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 19.027 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 3.6806 % @0.55CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4949 %CLower nose radius: 0.62768 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.2101 degRelease Angle: 10.7745 degNose Incidence: 11.3328 degCamber deflection: 22.1073 deg

Table 1014: Controlpoints1 00.80159 0.0214470.53405 -0.0626160.36936 -0.0626160.13161 -0.0626160 -0.0234680 00 0.0392570.15464 0.128190.41054 0.128190.57369 0.128190.67369 0.0897561 0

Table 1015: Base 64 representation:UnaS2YoYRbwbKwA

Table 1016: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.635 6.588 ectsRMS curvature error: 32.95 30.18 %CD error 0 0 dctsCm error 23 59 mctsUpper transition point -0.06 -0.64 %

Figure 765: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 766: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

259

Page 268: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e1200

Information: Eppler E1200 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 767: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1017: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.9249 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: 3.5095 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.8003 %CLower nose radius: 1.1965 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.6207 degRelease Angle: 10.6589 degNose Incidence: 13.1915 degCamber deflection: 23.8504 deg

Table 1018: Controlpoints1 00.79749 0.0189590.69155 -0.0513310.32296 -0.0513310.23862 -0.0513310 -0.0436280 00 0.0275380.063185 0.118690.40767 0.118690.57888 0.118690.67813 0.0921071 0

Table 1019: Base 64 representation:P1aSy1RViWwpMwA

Table 1020: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.534 4.366 ectsRMS curvature error: 70.43 72.82 %CD error -1.6 -1.3 dctsCm error 21 35 mctsUpper transition point -1.38 -1.74 %

Figure 768: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 769: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

260

Page 269: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e1210

Information: Eppler E1210 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 770: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1021: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.8942 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 5.183 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.6704 %CLower nose radius: 2.5563 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.1293 degRelease Angle: 7.6243 degNose Incidence: 15.4776 degCamber deflection: 23.1019 deg

Table 1022: Controlpoints1 00.66596 0.0149330.21259 -0.0377610.090536 -0.0377610.076592 -0.0377610 -0.0361290 00 0.0460980.086845 0.128860.24911 0.128860.37717 0.128860.47151 0.118991 0

Table 1023: Base 64 representation:XpQL28KGJQ6bLrA

Table 1024: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.172 3.385 ectsRMS curvature error: 46.9 43.88 %CD error 3 2.4 dctsCm error 39 58 mctsUpper transition point -5.12 -4.57 %

Figure 771: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 772: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

261

Page 270: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e1211

Information: Eppler E1211 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 773: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1025: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.8356 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 4.4099 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6281 %CLower nose radius: 2.402 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.2644 degRelease Angle: 7.4949 degNose Incidence: 13.1112 degCamber deflection: 20.6061 deg

Table 1026: Controlpoints1 00.69006 0.0154990.28028 -0.0561590.12741 -0.0561590.079956 -0.0561590 -0.0357820 00 0.018170.030418 0.130010.28774 0.130010.46956 0.130010.9947 0.00113981 0

Table 1027: Base 64 representation:J4SQ2oYILYBcKrA

Table 1028: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.245 9.174 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.5 -0.2 dctsCm error 41 50 mctsUpper transition point 2.37 1.24 %

Figure 774: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 775: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

262

Page 271: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e1212

Information: Eppler E1212 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 776: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1029: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.6421 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 3.2327 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4407 %CLower nose radius: 1.8946 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.1182 degRelease Angle: 5.0066 degNose Incidence: 11.1445 degCamber deflection: 16.1511 deg

Table 1030: Controlpoints1 00.71115 -0.00278540.2777 -0.062470.1791 -0.062470.051939 -0.062470 -0.0256130 00 0.0164570.028198 0.117560.27463 0.117560.40541 0.117560.5987 0.0748521 0

Table 1031: Base 64 representation:J4SMxasLIbqaMnA

Table 1032: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.156 5.495 ectsRMS curvature error: 39.76 39.44 %CD error -3.5 -3.8 dctsCm error 13 -7 mctsUpper transition point 4.26 5.68 %

Figure 777: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 778: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

263

Page 272: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e1212mod

Information: Eppler E1212 general aviation airfoil (as modified foruse as Quickie wing airfoil)Reference: UIUC

Figure 779: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1033: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.7579 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 2.5911 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.35939 %CLower nose radius: 20.6027 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.1383 degRelease Angle: 2.3515 degNose Incidence: -17.2469 degCamber deflection: -14.8954 deg

Table 1034: Controlpoints1 00.41171 -0.0382250.29549 -0.0694180.14956 -0.0694180.0034898 -0.0694180 -0.0218940 00 0.0108760.049366 0.111310.2507 0.111310.44954 0.111310.63016 0.054751 0

Table 1035: Base 64 representation:GyQRuU-KLeq0OjA

Table 1036: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.824 11.096 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.6 -0.9 dctsCm error 9 -7 mctsUpper transition point -0.72 -1.06 %

Figure 780: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 781: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

264

Page 273: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e1213

Information: Eppler E1213 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 782: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1037: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.3463 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 2.0805 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: NaN %CLower nose radius: 2.3244 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.6486 degRelease Angle: 1.4126 degNose Incidence: 10.1419 degCamber deflection: 11.5545 deg

Table 1038: Controlpoints1 00.59131 -0.0315310.31085 -0.0689150.19615 -0.0689150.12554 -0.0689150 -0.0441060 00 00 0.105930.26177 0.105930.42272 0.105930.69047 0.0393051 0

Table 1039: Base 64 representation:A ROsoXNJshlNiA

Table 1040: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.291 7.438 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.6 -3.5 dctsCm error 7 -11 mctsUpper transition point 4.14 4.86 %

Figure 783: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 784: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

265

Page 274: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e1214

Information: Eppler E1214 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 785: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1041: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 19.8279 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 2.142 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.041 %CLower nose radius: 1.9082 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.9828 degRelease Angle: 1.7735 degNose Incidence: 10.8824 degCamber deflection: 12.6559 deg

Table 1042: Controlpoints1 00.56496 -0.0435610.35149 -0.0785740.23914 -0.0785740.095552 -0.0785740 -0.0348650 00 0.0256190.048235 0.11990.2617 0.11990.41555 0.11990.6381 0.0590361 0

Table 1043: Base 64 representation:OzRNyclPJhnqRiA

Table 1044: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.536 4.675 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.6 -2.5 dctsCm error 1 -20 mctsUpper transition point 3.3 3.73 %

Figure 786: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 787: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

266

Page 275: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e1230

Information: Eppler E1230 general aviation airfoil (Long-EZ andDefiant wing airfoil)Reference: UIUC

Figure 788: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1045: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.4633 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 3.5999 % @0.27CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.02 %CUpper nose radius: 2.3072 %CLower nose radius: -9.0651 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 29.4743 degRelease Angle: 11.3468 degNose Incidence: 15.0769 degCamber deflection: 26.4237 deg

Table 1046: Controlpoints1 -0.00010.64565 -0.0228720.56728 -0.051620.3261 -0.051620 -0.051620 -0.00716780 00 0.0362130.085255 0.123250.2819 0.123250.495 0.123250.9536 0.0231041 0.0001

Table 1047: Base 64 representation:TsST0J VXWMzhxA

Table 1048: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.455 6.487 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.5 1.1 dctsCm error -37 -22 mctsUpper transition point -0.2 -0.5 %

Figure 789: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 790: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

267

Page 276: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: e1233

Information: Eppler E1233 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 791: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1049: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.9382 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 4.3938 % @0.29CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.1897 %CLower nose radius: 1.2658 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 25.4584 degRelease Angle: 18.4608 degNose Incidence: 19.5588 degCamber deflection: 38.0196 deg

Table 1050: Controlpoints1 00.79806 0.0202680.70811 -0.0509270.32603 -0.0509270.20325 -0.0509270 -0.0414150 00 0.0463620.10108 0.13860.29843 0.13860.51263 0.13860.94058 0.0359731 0

Table 1051: Base 64 representation:VpTU6zYVjWRrc9A

Table 1052: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.009 4.483 ectsRMS curvature error: 40.71 40.24 %CD error 0.4 0.8 dctsCm error 37 28 mctsUpper transition point -1.47 -2.09 %

Figure 792: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 793: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

268

Page 277: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: ea61012

Information: Eppler EA 6(-1)-012 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 794: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1053: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: -0.022039 % @0.79CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.8182 %CLower nose radius: 1.8182 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.7785 degRelease Angle: 0.0085428 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: 0.0085428 deg

Table 1054: Controlpoints1 00.75489 -0.0144790.65489 -0.060.3 -0.060.297 -0.060 -0.060 00 0.060.297 0.060.3 0.060.6614 0.060.73591 0.015681 0

Table 1055: Base 64 representation:BTga BTgaxsIgA

Table 1056: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.893 6.725 ectsRMS curvature error: 82.39 79.8 %CD error -0.6 -0.1 dctsCm error -8 -7 mctsUpper transition point -0.04 0.03 %

Figure 795: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 796: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

269

Page 278: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: eh0009

Information: John Yost EH 0.0/9.0 for tailless R/C aircraftReference: UIUC

Figure 797: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1057: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.9998 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 0.0001035 % @0.78CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.39093 %CLower nose radius: 0.39093 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.1397 degRelease Angle: -0.0022309 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: -0.0022309 deg

Table 1058: Controlpoints1 00.853 -0.00917690.56137 -0.0450.28711 -0.0450.065485 -0.0450 -0.0130640 00 0.0130640.065485 0.0450.28711 0.0450.56146 0.0450.85345 0.0091371 0

Table 1059: Base 64 representation:TwSZTTwSZTVVIgA

Table 1060: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.591 2.028 ectsRMS curvature error: 49.7 52.64 %CD error -1.1 -1.1 dctsCm error 4 5 mctsUpper transition point 2.07 1.76 %

Figure 798: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 799: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

270

Page 279: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: eh1070

Information: John Yost EH 1.0/7.0 for tailless R/C aircraftReference: UIUC

Figure 800: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1061: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.9849 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 1.0159 % @0.25CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.17121 %CLower nose radius: 0.27381 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.4728 degRelease Angle: 0.13104 degNose Incidence: 3.1089 degCamber deflection: 3.24 deg

Table 1062: Controlpoints1 00.88434 -0.00526280.68221 -0.025510.37566 -0.025510.26248 -0.025510 -0.0247450 00 0.00804140.056653 0.044870.28711 0.044870.47553 0.044870.79851 0.0100921 0

Table 1063: Base 64 representation:LySRT9TYfLZXGgA

Table 1064: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.698 2.509 ectsRMS curvature error: 41.06 40.93 %CD error 0.4 0.5 dctsCm error -4 -17 mctsUpper transition point 0.13 0.26 %

Figure 801: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 802: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

271

Page 280: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: eh1090

Information: John Yost EH 1.0/9.0 for tailless R/C aircraftReference: UIUC

Figure 803: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1065: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.9939 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 0.9944 % @0.26CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.30633 %CLower nose radius: 0.51515 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.6136 degRelease Angle: 0.27741 degNose Incidence: 2.0357 degCamber deflection: 2.3131 deg

Table 1066: Controlpoints1 00.90055 -0.00526310.65957 -0.0353920.34549 -0.0353920.034567 -0.0353920 -0.011250 00 0.010870.057855 0.0547910.28711 0.0547910.48872 0.0547910.82026 0.0112591 0

Table 1067: Base 64 representation:NySSXU5WfPWTHgA

Table 1068: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.811 3.677 ectsRMS curvature error: 34.09 31.52 %CD error -0.5 -0.4 dctsCm error 2 6 mctsUpper transition point 0.69 -0.09 %

Figure 804: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 805: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

272

Page 281: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: eh1590

Information: John Yost EH 1.5/9.0 for tailless R/C aircraftReference: UIUC

Figure 806: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1069: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.0117 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 1.4771 % @0.26CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.26588 %CLower nose radius: 0.54334 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.0031 degRelease Angle: 0.23511 degNose Incidence: 3.3812 degCamber deflection: 3.6164 deg

Table 1070: Controlpoints1 00.89581 -0.00594630.6993 -0.0309630.40631 -0.0309630.18249 -0.0309630 -0.025710 00 0.00995750.055937 0.059720.28711 0.059720.46759 0.059720.78416 0.0140961 0

Table 1071: Base 64 representation:LzSQZ0iagNaWIgA

Table 1072: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.964 4.015 ectsRMS curvature error: 26.63 28.47 %CD error -1.3 -0.9 dctsCm error 1 5 mctsUpper transition point 1.36 -0.08 %

Figure 807: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 808: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

273

Page 282: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: eh2010

Information: John Yost EH 2.0/10 for tailless R/C aircraftReference: UIUC

Figure 809: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1073: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.1387 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 1.9546 % @0.26CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.28625 %CLower nose radius: 0.69696 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.6609 degRelease Angle: -0.089529 degNose Incidence: 4.7351 degCamber deflection: 4.6455 deg

Table 1074: Controlpoints1 00.82176 -0.0137780.70151 -0.0321580.43733 -0.0321580.074452 -0.0321580 -0.0185990 00 0.0101140.053605 0.0701140.28711 0.0701140.45872 0.0701140.76637 0.0173241 0

Table 1075: Base 64 representation:JzSPek0ceOclKgA

Table 1076: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.697 3.259 ectsRMS curvature error: 37.11 37.84 %CD error -1.5 -1.1 dctsCm error 7 11 mctsUpper transition point 1.87 1.09 %

Figure 810: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 811: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

274

Page 283: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: eh2012

Information: John Yost EH 2.0/12 for tailless R/C aircraftReference: UIUC

Figure 812: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1077: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.0145 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 1.9693 % @0.26CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.47346 %CLower nose radius: 0.96598 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.1858 degRelease Angle: 0.35049 degNose Incidence: 4.5071 degCamber deflection: 4.8576 deg

Table 1078: Controlpoints1 00.89887 -0.0075020.70058 -0.041280.40631 -0.041280.18223 -0.041280 -0.0342570 00 0.0132910.055963 0.079620.28711 0.079620.46784 0.079620.78601 0.0185091 0

Table 1079: Base 64 representation:LzSQh0iagSaWKgA

Table 1080: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.287 4.829 ectsRMS curvature error: 40.11 40.84 %CD error -1.7 -1.3 dctsCm error 0 24 mctsUpper transition point 1.86 0.92 %

Figure 813: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 814: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

275

Page 284: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: eiffel385

Information: Eiffel 385 (S.T. Ae) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 815: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1081: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.3346 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 4.4832 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0082 %CLower nose radius: 2.3808 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.3951 degRelease Angle: 8.6073 degNose Incidence: 2.5929 degCamber deflection: 11.2002 deg

Table 1082: Controlpoints1 00.35943 0.0101720.25999 -0.0437260.15248 -0.0437260.12046 -0.0437260 -0.0437260 00 0.0164810.040413 0.1040.39512 0.1040.48506 0.1040.79287 0.0605881 0

Table 1083: Base 64 representation:K4ZKr NKITk2RtA

Table 1084: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.512 8.359 ectsRMS curvature error: 58.38 59.27 %CD error -2.6 -3.1 dctsCm error -11 5 mctsUpper transition point -1.2 -1.35 %

Figure 816: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 817: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

276

Page 285: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: eiffel428

Information: Eiffel 428 (Bleriot) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 818: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1085: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.4051 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: 3.9194 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6815 %CLower nose radius: 1.2029 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.1696 degRelease Angle: 5.3715 degNose Incidence: 9.1368 degCamber deflection: 14.5083 deg

Table 1086: Controlpoints1 00.34009 0.00964480.24009 -0.0146230.025222 -0.0146230.025222 -0.0146230 -0.012430 00 0.0193510.1114 0.085990.39876 0.085990.57528 0.085990.98532 0.00192081 0

Table 1087: Base 64 representation:OtaTk1ACOGC3HmA

Table 1088: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.231 6.604 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -21.7 -19 dctsCm error -56 -88 mctsUpper transition point 45.4 46.67 %

Figure 819: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 820: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

277

Page 286: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: eppler793

Information: Eppler E793 general purpose airfoil (gyroflug speedcanard canard)Reference: UIUC

Figure 821: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1089: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.675 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.0212 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.9085 %CLower nose radius: 1.2467 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.2668 degRelease Angle: 15.2372 degNose Incidence: 11.4383 degCamber deflection: 26.6756 deg

Table 1090: Controlpoints1 00.78214 0.0271510.38684 -0.044630.21372 -0.044630.071076 -0.044630 -0.0243060 00 0.0353310.09811 0.114930.30899 0.114930.56413 0.114930.96865 0.0135471 0

Table 1091: Base 64 representation:UrUYwiqOOTIXS4A

Table 1092: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.873 2.83 ectsRMS curvature error: 29.78 30.25 %CD error 0.1 0.6 dctsCm error 10 -14 mctsUpper transition point -1.96 -0.64 %

Figure 822: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 823: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

278

Page 287: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: falcon

Information: Falcon airfoil used on the Carl Goldberg Falcon 56Mk II R/C powerplaneReference: UIUC

Figure 824: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1093: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.6811 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 1.5626 % @0.25CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2891 %CUpper nose radius: 0.2104 %CLower nose radius: 1.252 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 30.9397 degRelease Angle: 6.3805 degNose Incidence: 4.4081 degCamber deflection: 10.7885 deg

Table 1094: Controlpoints1 -0.00144550.92306 -0.0137550.63286 -0.0534290.34201 -0.0534290.34201 -0.0534290 -0.0534290 00 0.00562480.022556 0.0836790.30614 0.0836790.52357 0.0836790.98961 0.00561071 0.0014455

Table 1095: Base 64 representation:E6UUj AWcXDPipH

Table 1096: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.6 7.774 ectsRMS curvature error: 98.32 Inf %CD error -3.3 -3.7 dctsCm error -92 -97 mctsUpper transition point 4.58 5.93 %

Figure 825: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 826: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

279

Page 288: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fg2

Information: Fage & Collins 2 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 827: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1097: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.1903 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.3339 % @0.31CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.19911 %CLower nose radius: 0.79056 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 21.7231 degRelease Angle: 5.0005 degNose Incidence: 8.5988 degCamber deflection: 13.5993 deg

Table 1098: Controlpoints1 00.92737 -0.00745550.012527 -0.00825870.012527 -0.00825870.010022 -0.00825870 -0.00726770 00 0.00756910.043159 0.074290.29976 0.074290.52254 0.074290.90544 0.0268671 0

Table 1099: Base 64 representation:H2TUg3NBAEX5YnA

Table 1100: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.125 9.097 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 2.3 NaN dctsCm error 72 NaN mctsUpper transition point -6.69 NaN %

Figure 828: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 829: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

280

Page 289: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fg3

Information: Fage & Collins 3 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 830: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1101: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.1823 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 4.2728 % @0.3CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.062179 %CLower nose radius: 0.79494 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 22.0368 degRelease Angle: 4.1604 degNose Incidence: 10.0746 degCamber deflection: 14.2351 deg

Table 1102: Controlpoints1 00.95005 -0.00600780.93982 -0.00827750.012515 -0.00827750.010012 -0.00827750 -0.00728420 00 0.00437050.046081 0.093640.29983 0.093640.66525 0.093640.93994 0.0162941 0

Table 1103: Base 64 representation:D1Tgn3NB7EL0ZmA

Table 1104: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.02 8.797 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.6 -3.7 dctsCm error -69 -40 mctsUpper transition point 7.02 5.94 %

Figure 831: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 832: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

281

Page 290: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fg4

Information: Fage & Collins 4 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 833: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1105: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.7579 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 4.7055 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.4066 %CLower nose radius: 2.2038 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 55.7064 degRelease Angle: 14.3048 degNose Incidence: 15.9488 degCamber deflection: 30.2536 deg

Table 1106: Controlpoints1 00.95213 -0.0115360.025248 -0.0196860.025248 -0.0196860.020427 -0.0196860 -0.0173240 00 0.0460710.093459 0.110740.29864 0.110740.62827 0.110740.97621 0.0215381 0

Table 1107: Base 64 representation:brTeu3MCAIMl92A

Table 1108: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.725 9.556 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 42.8 -24.7 dctsCm error -371 -388 mctsUpper transition point 35.02 35.05 %

Figure 834: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 835: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

282

Page 291: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fx2

Information: Wortmann FX 2 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 836: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1109: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 20.5061 % @0.46CMaximum Camber: 3.7385 % @0.71CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5549 %CLower nose radius: 0.89292 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.995 degRelease Angle: 11.6761 degNose Incidence: 7.4578 degCamber deflection: 19.134 deg

Table 1110: Controlpoints1 00.79549 0.0185350.66207 -0.075850.43474 -0.075850.16685 -0.075850 -0.0315160 00 0.0473760.21652 0.130150.5 0.130150.76658 0.130150.78608 0.0702241 0

Table 1111: Base 64 representation:Xjgh3bmcag6mPyA

Table 1112: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.215 6.899 ectsRMS curvature error: 74.1 75.21 %CD error -2.7 -2.7 dctsCm error 46 47 mctsUpper transition point -0.87 -0.89 %

Figure 837: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 838: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

283

Page 292: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fx08s176

Information: Wortmann FX 08-S-176 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 839: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1113: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.6259 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 5.6556 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0246 %CLower nose radius: 0.352 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.2203 degRelease Angle: 8.9896 degNose Incidence: 16.7193 degCamber deflection: 25.7089 deg

Table 1114: Controlpoints1 00.8581 0.0121140.84911 -0.032450.5 -0.032450.35042 -0.032450 -0.0286760 00 0.030420.13548 0.144620.37059 0.144620.51294 0.144620.55989 0.102411 0

Table 1115: Base 64 representation:NoYO94TgsO57JuA

Table 1116: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.032 6.001 ectsRMS curvature error: 69.16 70.37 %CD error 1.2 1.4 dctsCm error 92 92 mctsUpper transition point -2.02 -2.06 %

Figure 840: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 841: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

284

Page 293: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fx66a175

Information: Wortmann FX 66-17A-175 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 842: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1117: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.5293 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 4.1479 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0901 %CLower nose radius: 0.36939 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.7942 degRelease Angle: 9.0065 degNose Incidence: 12.7673 degCamber deflection: 21.7737 deg

Table 1118: Controlpoints1 00.60081 0.0128150.48785 -0.046830.30866 -0.046830.095945 -0.046830 -0.0147290 00 0.0285850.14053 0.128890.33928 0.128890.40879 0.128890.5088 0.114071 0

Table 1119: Base 64 representation:OkWH2UrURU4xNrA

Table 1120: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.787 6.268 ectsRMS curvature error: 43.49 46.2 %CD error 0.1 -0.2 dctsCm error 43 30 mctsUpper transition point -0.77 0.04 %

Figure 843: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 844: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

285

Page 294: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fx78k140

Information: Wortmann FX 78-K-140/20 airfoil for use with flaps(K)Reference: UIUC

Figure 845: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1121: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.0943 % @0.43CMaximum Camber: 4.3794 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.58512 %CLower nose radius: 0.47352 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.5986 degRelease Angle: -1.1627 degNose Incidence: 8.2143 degCamber deflection: 7.0516 deg

Table 1122: Controlpoints1 00.76435 -0.026690.52748 -0.026690.40245 -0.026690.17215 -0.026690 -0.0233120 00 0.0249260.15928 0.114270.43474 0.114270.6908 0.114270.7908 0.015131 0

Table 1123: Base 64 representation:Oocsw3kaNLq MeA

Table 1124: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.576 5.576 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.2 0.4 dctsCm error 43 31 mctsUpper transition point -1.51 -1.22 %

Figure 846: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 847: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

286

Page 295: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fx83w160

Information: Wortmann FX 83-W-160 airfoil for use on wind tur-bines (W)Reference: UIUC

Figure 848: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1125: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.0651 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 3.8308 % @0.63CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.4454 %CLower nose radius: 2.0512 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.1497 degRelease Angle: 12.8508 degNose Incidence: 5.0952 degCamber deflection: 17.946 deg

Table 1126: Controlpoints1 00.73482 0.0221560.53705 -0.055590.25 -0.055590.175 -0.055590 -0.0494750 00 0.0591610.21469 0.110620.43474 0.110620.66596 0.110620.87375 0.0482751 0

Table 1127: Base 64 representation:hgcau4TQYYckS0A

Table 1128: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.216 5.018 ectsRMS curvature error: 33.95 33.07 %CD error -1 -1.4 dctsCm error 13 3 mctsUpper transition point 0.57 0.64 %

Figure 849: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 850: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

287

Page 296: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fx83w227

Information: Wortmann FX 83-W-227 airfoil for use on wind tur-bines (W)Reference: UIUC

Figure 851: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1129: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 22.6366 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 3.4419 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.3466 %CLower nose radius: 2.6212 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 28.175 degRelease Angle: 6.5453 degNose Incidence: 3.8599 degCamber deflection: 10.4052 deg

Table 1130: Controlpoints1 00.70151 -0.039520.55432 -0.079790.30866 -0.079790.025706 -0.079790 -0.0211940 00 0.0429650.118 0.14720.37059 0.14720.55955 0.14720.79991 0.0753411 0

Table 1131: Base 64 representation:TrYT-R6UXhgqfqA

Table 1132: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.021 3.241 ectsRMS curvature error: 53.12 56.89 %CD error -0.8 -1.7 dctsCm error 61 42 mctsUpper transition point 0.5 1.08 %

Figure 852: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 853: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

288

Page 297: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fx84w097

Information: Wortmann FX 84-W-097 airfoil for use on wind tur-bines (W)Reference: UIUC

Figure 854: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1133: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.8081 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 2.782 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.76206 %CLower nose radius: 0.79182 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 0.49482 degRelease Angle: 4.8726 degNose Incidence: 4.4999 degCamber deflection: 9.3725 deg

Table 1134: Controlpoints1 00.9496 0.00407780.53802 -0.022980.17033 -0.022980.08073 -0.022980 -0.0206440 00 0.0272480.14614 0.076590.33928 0.076590.60639 0.076590.81271 0.0167811 0

Table 1135: Base 64 representation:XjWag4hLcKeHBnA

Table 1136: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.356 4.413 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.3 NaN dctsCm error -15 NaN mctsUpper transition point -0.74 NaN %

Figure 855: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 856: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

289

Page 298: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fx84w127

Information: Wortmann FX 84-W-127 airfoil for use on wind tur-bines (W)Reference: UIUC

Figure 857: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1137: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.8028 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 3.7217 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1293 %CLower nose radius: 1.1598 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 2.8886 degRelease Angle: 5.8742 degNose Incidence: 5.8469 degCamber deflection: 11.721 deg

Table 1138: Controlpoints1 00.89811 0.00789360.59627 -0.029160.19562 -0.029160.092572 -0.029160 -0.0267540 00 0.0337810.15158 0.100840.37059 0.100840.63129 0.100840.85509 0.0186111 0

Table 1139: Base 64 representation:VlYbq6hNgMZQDpA

Table 1140: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.75 4.324 ectsRMS curvature error: 14.1 16.19 %CD error 0 -0.3 dctsCm error -5 -23 mctsUpper transition point -0.11 0.84 %

Figure 858: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 859: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

290

Page 299: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fx84w140

Information: Wortmann FX 84-W-140 airfoil for use on wind tur-bines (W)Reference: UIUC

Figure 860: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1141: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.137 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 4.1826 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3888 %CLower nose radius: 1.3319 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.5071 degRelease Angle: 7.0244 degNose Incidence: 6.8365 degCamber deflection: 13.8608 deg

Table 1142: Controlpoints1 00.88002 0.0100130.62575 -0.03130.19562 -0.03130.084843 -0.03130 -0.0274470 00 0.0392580.16646 0.11210.37059 0.11210.64603 0.11210.84239 0.0257471 0

Table 1143: Base 64 representation:WiYcv3jNhNcVFqA

Table 1144: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.028 4.066 ectsRMS curvature error: 15.1 15.32 %CD error -0.1 -0.3 dctsCm error -5 -16 mctsUpper transition point -0.1 0.38 %

Figure 861: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 862: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

291

Page 300: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fx84w150

Information: Wortmann FX 84-W-150 airfoil for use on wind tur-bines (W)Reference: UIUC

Figure 863: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1145: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.0347 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 4.1854 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5722 %CLower nose radius: 1.5098 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.0066 degRelease Angle: 6.8907 degNose Incidence: 6.8611 degCamber deflection: 13.7518 deg

Table 1146: Controlpoints1 00.8751 0.00958260.63663 -0.0354090.22226 -0.0354090.097096 -0.0354090 -0.0312620 00 0.0416720.16568 0.116630.37044 0.116630.64568 0.116630.84501 0.0256421 0

Table 1147: Base 64 representation:XiYcx4jOhPcWGqA

Table 1148: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.912 2.745 ectsRMS curvature error: 13.79 13.52 %CD error -0.1 -0.2 dctsCm error -4 -24 mctsUpper transition point -0.19 0.62 %

Figure 864: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 865: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

292

Page 301: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fx84w175

Information: Wortmann FX 84-W-175 airfoil for use on wind tur-bines (W)Reference: UIUC

Figure 866: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1149: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.6521 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 4.3429 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.126 %CLower nose radius: 2.2464 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.1985 degRelease Angle: 7.5827 degNose Incidence: 6.0916 degCamber deflection: 13.6743 deg

Table 1150: Controlpoints1 00.86672 0.0104510.63809 -0.046940.25 -0.046940.095618 -0.046940 -0.0378420 00 0.0486260.16683 0.131140.37059 0.131140.65235 0.131140.84394 0.0294371 0

Table 1151: Base 64 representation:YiYs3znQgUsYHrA

Table 1152: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.081 2.237 ectsRMS curvature error: 15.7 15.78 %CD error 0.1 -0.1 dctsCm error -3 -22 mctsUpper transition point -0.26 0.77 %

Figure 867: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 868: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

293

Page 302: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fx84w218

Information: Wortmann FX 84-W-218 airfoil for use on wind tur-bines (W)Reference: UIUC

Figure 869: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1153: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 21.9295 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 3.2472 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.4774 %CLower nose radius: 4.062 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.142 degRelease Angle: 4.2946 degNose Incidence: 3.6545 degCamber deflection: 7.9491 deg

Table 1154: Controlpoints1 00.86875 0.00394960.61464 -0.079450.27886 -0.079450.22387 -0.079450 -0.0778610 00 0.0531250.12174 0.141210.37059 0.141210.62008 0.141210.87784 0.0147091 0

Table 1155: Base 64 representation:YqYZ7-NSehVWGmA

Table 1156: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.041 3.507 ectsRMS curvature error: 16.41 18.63 %CD error -0.5 -0.8 dctsCm error -1 1 mctsUpper transition point 0.91 1.36 %

Figure 870: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 871: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

294

Page 303: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fx05188

Information: Wortmann FX 05-188 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 872: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1157: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.8134 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 2.652 % @0.52CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6557 %CLower nose radius: 1.1612 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.9138 degRelease Angle: 11.7544 degNose Incidence: 7.1987 degCamber deflection: 18.9531 deg

Table 1158: Controlpoints1 00.79808 0.027650.70014 -0.06950.37059 -0.06950.21418 -0.06950 -0.0403650 00 0.0427930.1659 0.119340.43474 0.119340.57148 0.119340.68966 0.08731 0

Table 1159: Base 64 representation:XncPykbYhetqJyA

Table 1160: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.77 7.204 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.8 -0.9 dctsCm error 82 94 mctsUpper transition point -2.79 -2.82 %

Figure 873: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 874: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

295

Page 304: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fx05191

Information: N/AReference: UIUC

Figure 875: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1161: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 19.1131 % @0.41CMaximum Camber: 2.6191 % @0.53CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6681 %CLower nose radius: 1.1359 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.3751 degRelease Angle: 11.357 degNose Incidence: 7.2674 degCamber deflection: 18.6245 deg

Table 1162: Controlpoints1 00.80433 0.0211510.74223 -0.070830.37059 -0.070830.24656 -0.070830 -0.0432110 00 0.0453780.18517 0.120910.43474 0.120910.64558 0.120910.8136 0.0553731 0

Table 1163: Base 64 representation:YkcYzmVYlehwMxA

Table 1164: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.88 7.2 ectsRMS curvature error: 44.55 44.89 %CD error -2.7 -2.9 dctsCm error 90 93 mctsUpper transition point 1 1.45 %

Figure 876: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 877: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

296

Page 305: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fx60100

Information: Wortmann FX 60-100 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 878: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1165: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.9129 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 3.563 % @0.56CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4835 %CLower nose radius: 0.19502 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 2.5018 degRelease Angle: 9.185 degNose Incidence: 15.0321 degCamber deflection: 24.2171 deg

Table 1166: Controlpoints1 00.69471 0.0425470.46866 -0.025030.17033 -0.025030.060987 -0.025030 -0.00890460 00 0.0326220.1076 0.078980.37059 0.078980.64801 0.078980.93926 0.0111881 0

Table 1167: Base 64 representation:asYchXoLXLLkDuA

Table 1168: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.725 4.21 ectsRMS curvature error: 83.19 84.02 %CD error -7.4 -10 dctsCm error 5 1 mctsUpper transition point 14.51 14.87 %

Figure 879: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 880: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

297

Page 306: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fx60100sm

Information: Wortmann FX 60-100 airfoil (smoothed)Reference: UIUC

Figure 881: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1169: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.9666 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 3.4915 % @0.56CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.9876 %CLower nose radius: 0.44583 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 1.9441 degRelease Angle: 9.4462 degNose Incidence: 10.2841 degCamber deflection: 19.7304 deg

Table 1170: Controlpoints1 00.72145 0.0415010.42251 -0.0263220.19566 -0.0263220.074937 -0.0263220 -0.0149240 00 0.0233550.082845 0.0779060.37048 0.0779060.65119 0.0779060.93824 0.0113551 0

Table 1171: Base 64 representation:TxYsgjmNSLLfCuA

Table 1172: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.341 3.441 ectsRMS curvature error: 36.06 40.04 %CD error -2.5 -2.1 dctsCm error 2 0 mctsUpper transition point -0.82 0.22 %

Figure 882: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 883: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

298

Page 307: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fx60126

Information: Wortmann FX 60-126 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 884: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1173: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.6182 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 3.5665 % @0.56CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.199 %CLower nose radius: 0.19488 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.2762 degRelease Angle: 9.6214 degNose Incidence: 15.2039 degCamber deflection: 24.8253 deg

Table 1174: Controlpoints1 00.7228 0.0388760.43664 -0.037510.22221 -0.037510.01966 -0.037510 -0.00505410 00 0.0428850.12545 0.09160.33928 0.09160.6124 0.09160.88488 0.0229181 0

Table 1175: Base 64 representation:enWamJ5OSQTfEvA

Table 1176: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.994 2.426 ectsRMS curvature error: 97.16 87.78 %CD error -8.6 -8.4 dctsCm error 0 0 mctsUpper transition point 7.73 8.12 %

Figure 885: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 886: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

299

Page 308: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fx60157

Information: Wortmann FX 60-157 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 887: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1177: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.6449 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: 2.6422 % @0.75CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.3582 %CLower nose radius: 0.51979 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.6382 degRelease Angle: 16.2517 degNose Incidence: 16.4923 degCamber deflection: 32.744 deg

Table 1178: Controlpoints1 00.83795 0.0342460.73795 -0.055370.33933 -0.055370.17384 -0.055370 -0.0245440 00 0.0411580.10775 0.101510.40243 0.101510.54351 0.101510.77259 0.0853441 0

Table 1179: Base 64 representation:auaPqcfWmY1nK5A

Table 1180: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.047 5.745 ectsRMS curvature error: 63.74 64.12 %CD error -28.2 -29.4 dctsCm error -88 -72 mctsUpper transition point 24.72 25.18 %

Figure 888: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 889: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

300

Page 309: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fx60160

Information: Wortmann FX 60-160 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 890: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1181: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.5934 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: 3.0886 % @0.6CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3853 %CLower nose radius: 0.91262 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.0002 degRelease Angle: 10.3537 degNose Incidence: 7.7988 degCamber deflection: 18.1526 deg

Table 1182: Controlpoints1 00.71257 0.0193610.66062 -0.050.3 -0.050.264 -0.050 -0.0400780 00 0.0398070.17158 0.107250.4 0.107250.61623 0.107250.87448 0.0380241 0

Table 1183: Base 64 representation:YkaXtyITgVX1PwA

Table 1184: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.44 6.327 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -8.9 -8.7 dctsCm error -19 -29 mctsUpper transition point -1.16 -0.06 %

Figure 891: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 892: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

301

Page 310: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fx60177

Information: Wortmann FX 60-177 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 893: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1185: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.7118 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 2.6853 % @0.79CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.4124 %CLower nose radius: 0.31225 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 0 degRelease Angle: 11.8416 degNose Incidence: 21.5095 degCamber deflection: 33.3511 deg

Table 1186: Controlpoints1 00.83055 0.0355290.73985 -0.066630.37056 -0.066630.1154 -0.066630 -0.0154990 00 0.0494790.10762 0.110620.40243 0.110620.76683 0.110620.99767 0.000488881 0

Table 1187: Base 64 representation:suamuPrYlcBpAyA

Table 1188: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.711 5.867 ectsRMS curvature error: 35.9 37.61 %CD error -4.4 -4.5 dctsCm error 45 51 mctsUpper transition point 1.73 2.2 %

Figure 894: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 895: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

302

Page 311: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fx61140

Information: Wortmann FX 61-140 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 896: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1189: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.9829 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 2.4525 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.88241 %CLower nose radius: 0.27124 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.3149 degRelease Angle: 20.0535 degNose Incidence: 12.0133 degCamber deflection: 32.0669 deg

Table 1190: Controlpoints1 00.79833 0.0388220.68279 -0.045390.33928 -0.045390.13509 -0.045390 -0.015630 00 0.0244750.10182 0.094440.33928 0.094440.5121 0.094440.96312 0.0206221 0

Table 1191: Base 64 representation:RsWRnWmWgTOoU A

Table 1192: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.418 5.996 ectsRMS curvature error: 20.76 20.46 %CD error 0.1 1 dctsCm error 87 70 mctsUpper transition point -1.28 -0.27 %

Figure 897: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 898: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

303

Page 312: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fx61147

Information: Wortmann FX 61-147 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 899: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1193: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.7659 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 3.184 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5545 %CLower nose radius: 0.26575 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.504 degRelease Angle: 17.1443 degNose Incidence: 16.7492 degCamber deflection: 33.8936 deg

Table 1194: Controlpoints1 00.78946 0.0386120.68075 -0.041990.33933 -0.041990.12858 -0.041990 -0.0150930 00 0.0353090.1203 0.105670.33933 0.105670.50446 0.105670.9119 0.0390341 0

Table 1195: Base 64 representation:VoWQsXnWgSYpP7A

Table 1196: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.29 4.448 ectsRMS curvature error: 27.04 27.52 %CD error 7.4 6 dctsCm error 71 60 mctsUpper transition point -2.85 -2.05 %

Figure 900: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 901: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

304

Page 313: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fx601261

Information: Wortmann FX 60-126/1 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 902: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1197: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.6105 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 3.9448 % @0.54CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.093852 %CLower nose radius: 0.66713 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 1.6114 degRelease Angle: 11.4151 degNose Incidence: 11.1691 degCamber deflection: 22.5842 deg

Table 1198: Controlpoints1 00.76179 0.044620.42201 -0.034260.19558 -0.034260.12425 -0.034260 -0.0235080 00 0.00258930.020108 0.095770.33933 0.095770.58402 0.095770.79042 0.0453931 0

Table 1199: Base 64 representation:C7WYorXNSPgaCxA

Table 1200: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.121 8.974 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 37.6 NaN dctsCm error 16 NaN mctsUpper transition point 11.95 NaN %

Figure 903: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 904: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

305

Page 314: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fx711530

Information: Wortmann FX 71-L-150/30 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 905: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1201: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: -0.00011002 % @0.59CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.947 %CLower nose radius: 1.947 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.1343 degRelease Angle: 0.00084225 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: 0.00084225 deg

Table 1202: Controlpoints1 00.68176 -0.0226230.58176 -0.0750.33928 -0.0750.2101 -0.0750 -0.0522220 00 0.0522220.2101 0.0750.33928 0.0750.58171 0.0750.68171 0.0226371 0

Table 1203: Base 64 representation:sYWXgsYWXgwwJgA

Table 1204: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.572 3.862 ectsRMS curvature error: 76.83 76.94 %CD error -17.8 -17.3 dctsCm error -26 -26 mctsUpper transition point 27.74 26.96 %

Figure 906: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 907: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

306

Page 315: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fxl142k

Information: Wortmann FX LIII-142 K 25 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 908: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1205: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.1999 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: -1.2692e-005 % @0.58CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4285 %CLower nose radius: 1.4285 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.663 degRelease Angle: -7.8036e-006 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: -7.8036e-006 deg

Table 1206: Controlpoints1 00.61543 -0.0325070.51543 -0.0710.30861 -0.0710.12123 -0.0710 -0.0339780 00 0.0339780.12123 0.0710.30861 0.0710.51542 0.0710.61542 0.0325071 0

Table 1207: Base 64 representation:fmUTefmUTeyyLgA

Table 1208: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.841 3.796 ectsRMS curvature error: 81.78 80.86 %CD error -12 -11.9 dctsCm error -27 -26 mctsUpper transition point 18.73 18.17 %

Figure 909: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 910: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

307

Page 316: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fxm2

Information: Wortmann FX M2 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 911: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1209: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.6614 % @0.2CMaximum Camber: 4.5886 % @0.3CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 5.6095 %CLower nose radius: 0.79546 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.4252 degRelease Angle: 10.8419 degNose Incidence: 28.4103 degCamber deflection: 39.2521 deg

Table 1210: Controlpoints1 00.67041 0.0412240.01704 -0.00980.01704 -0.00980.01704 -0.00980 -0.00980 00 0.088090.205 0.088090.25 0.088090.3885 0.088090.83372 0.0431711 0

Table 1211: Base 64 representation:MQMl ABAEfVIxA

Table 1212: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.539 8.604 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -9.9 -9.6 dctsCm error 3 -7 mctsUpper transition point 18.76 18.97 %

Figure 912: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 913: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

308

Page 317: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fxs03182

Information: Wortmann FX S 03-182 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 914: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1213: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.2327 % @0.42CMaximum Camber: 2.8826 % @0.54CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7005 %CLower nose radius: 0.43915 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.1831 degRelease Angle: 12.3948 degNose Incidence: 12.558 degCamber deflection: 24.9527 deg

Table 1214: Controlpoints1 00.84281 0.0243440.6183 -0.064090.40243 -0.064090.13826 -0.064090 -0.0201190 00 0.0475930.1998 0.118520.43469 0.118520.53843 0.118520.63843 0.103591 0

Table 1215: Base 64 representation:aicMyUpaXb3aIzA

Table 1216: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.388 6.635 ectsRMS curvature error: 47.23 46.77 %CD error -21.3 -21.3 dctsCm error -5 -15 mctsUpper transition point 1.33 1.64 %

Figure 915: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 916: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

309

Page 318: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: fxs21158

Information: Wortmann FX S 02/1-158 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 917: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1217: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.7592 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.5183 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1823 %CLower nose radius: 0.59184 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.8767 degRelease Angle: 7.3769 degNose Incidence: 10.7245 degCamber deflection: 18.1013 deg

Table 1218: Controlpoints1 00.64987 0.0241060.51662 -0.044310.27891 -0.044310.21597 -0.044310 -0.0291920 00 0.0357150.16183 0.113550.30861 0.113550.43144 0.113550.53144 0.0895111 0

Table 1219: Base 64 representation:UeULvpOSVT0tIrA

Table 1220: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.893 6.062 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -28.8 -29.1 dctsCm error 23 2 mctsUpper transition point 23.08 23.79 %

Figure 918: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 919: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

310

Page 319: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: giiia

Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoilsReference: UIUC

Figure 920: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1221: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.0192 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: 0.74886 % @0.2CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.03588 %CUpper nose radius: 0.55796 %CLower nose radius: 0.8303 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.1887 degRelease Angle: -1.2032 degNose Incidence: 1.8757 degCamber deflection: 0.67245 deg

Table 1222: Controlpoints1 -0.00017940.74724 -0.0438280.53789 -0.0511240.4529 -0.0511240.3488 -0.0511240 -0.043940 00 0.015220.062276 0.060880.29655 0.060880.56882 0.060880.78882 0.0275741 0.0001794

Table 1223: Base 64 representation:QyTYa2OsKVf2TeB

Table 1224: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.228 8.17 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -5.2 -5.6 dctsCm error -44 -69 mctsUpper transition point 10.87 11.95 %

Figure 921: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 922: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

311

Page 320: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: giiib

Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoils, GIIIBL45 AIRFOIL.Reference: UIUC

Figure 923: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1225: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.4799 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 0.81403 % @0.24CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.03692 %CUpper nose radius: NaN %CLower nose radius: 0.74176 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.5363 degRelease Angle: -1.4028 degNose Incidence: 2.0826 degCamber deflection: 0.67978 deg

Table 1226: Controlpoints1 -0.00018460.72097 -0.0427380.50755 -0.0458030.45216 -0.0458030.34364 -0.0458030 -0.0412230 00 00.0034718 0.0598280.34718 0.0598280.58185 0.0598280.86986 0.0135531 0.0001846

Table 1227: Base 64 representation:A-WXa5PsGUU7QeB

Table 1228: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.075 6.04 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.4 -1.8 dctsCm error 1 -15 mctsUpper transition point 4.78 5.18 %

Figure 924: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 925: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

312

Page 321: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: giiic

Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoils,GIIIBL75 AIRFOIL.Reference: UIUC

Figure 926: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1229: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.9587 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 0.9238 % @0.27CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.03694 %CUpper nose radius: 0.445 %CLower nose radius: 0.6325 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.1312 degRelease Angle: -0.97949 degNose Incidence: 2.527 degCamber deflection: 1.5475 deg

Table 1230: Controlpoints1 -0.00018470.86984 -0.016270.66668 -0.0417230.45167 -0.0417230.36515 -0.0417230 -0.0392390 00 0.0131610.058381 0.0585240.34767 0.0585240.61048 0.0585240.78487 0.0193321 0.0001847

Table 1231: Base 64 representation:O0WaZ7MsZSiZOeB

Table 1232: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.877 3.288 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.1 -1.3 dctsCm error 5 4 mctsUpper transition point 1.38 1.8 %

Figure 927: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 928: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

313

Page 322: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: giiid

Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoils, GIIIBL86 AIRFOIL.Reference: UIUC

Figure 929: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1233: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.7337 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 0.95819 % @0.28CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.03694 %CUpper nose radius: 0.51389 %CLower nose radius: 0.59112 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.7485 degRelease Angle: -0.76884 degNose Incidence: 2.7792 degCamber deflection: 2.0103 deg

Table 1234: Controlpoints1 -0.00018470.80766 -0.0225850.64271 -0.0401170.45149 -0.0401170.36275 -0.0401170 -0.0378090 00 0.0162210.0768 0.0578110.34786 0.0578110.62076 0.0578110.74382 0.0230731 0.0001847

Table 1235: Base 64 representation:SxWbZ7NsWRqjNfB

Table 1236: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.993 4.377 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.2 -1.1 dctsCm error 8 -6 mctsUpper transition point 1.35 1.69 %

Figure 930: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 931: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

314

Page 323: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: giiie

Information: N/AReference: UIUC

Figure 932: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1237: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.812 % @0.42CMaximum Camber: 1.1048 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.03598 %CUpper nose radius: 0.47458 %CLower nose radius: 0.39128 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.8331 degRelease Angle: 0.5339 degNose Incidence: 4.112 degCamber deflection: 4.6459 deg

Table 1238: Controlpoints1 -0.00017990.83825 -0.0139970.64672 -0.0336330.50087 -0.0336330.39433 -0.0336330 -0.0320720 00 0.0165830.086915 0.054910.39859 0.054910.58937 0.054910.71805 0.0295671 0.0001799

Table 1239: Base 64 representation:TxaUX8OgTOrsMgB

Table 1240: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.97 6.121 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.1 -0.1 dctsCm error 4 -8 mctsUpper transition point -0.78 -1.22 %

Figure 933: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 934: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

315

Page 324: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: giiif

Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoils,BL145.Reference: UIUC

Figure 935: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1241: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.257 % @0.43CMaximum Camber: 1.2094 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.03698 %CUpper nose radius: 0.4781 %CLower nose radius: 0.23383 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.7196 degRelease Angle: 1.1637 degNose Incidence: 5.8441 degCamber deflection: 7.0077 deg

Table 1242: Controlpoints1 -0.00018490.76582 -0.0173660.63699 -0.0302910.5006 -0.0302910.40548 -0.0302910 -0.0251410 00 0.0195130.11945 0.0529660.39896 0.0529660.58306 0.0529660.70169 0.0342971 0.0001849

Table 1243: Base 64 representation:YsaUX0MgRNtoMhB

Table 1244: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.677 6.163 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.9 -1.6 dctsCm error 3 -13 mctsUpper transition point -0.04 2.51 %

Figure 936: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 937: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

316

Page 325: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: giiig

Information: N/AReference: UIUC

Figure 938: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1245: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.282 % @0.43CMaximum Camber: 1.2133 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.03598 %CUpper nose radius: 0.52453 %CLower nose radius: 0.23245 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.7094 degRelease Angle: 1.1905 degNose Incidence: 6.3674 degCamber deflection: 7.5579 deg

Table 1246: Controlpoints1 -0.00017990.77954 -0.0162310.63601 -0.030350.50055 -0.030350.38042 -0.030350 -0.024280 00 0.0201890.11656 0.0531290.39904 0.0531290.58517 0.0531290.7197 0.032341 0.0001799

Table 1247: Base 64 representation:YsaUXyPgRNqmMhB

Table 1248: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.585 5.156 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.9 -1.9 dctsCm error -2 -13 mctsUpper transition point -2.91 3.65 %

Figure 939: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 940: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

317

Page 326: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: giiih

Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoils, Warn-CuspeReference: UIUC

Figure 941: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1249: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.3518 % @0.43CMaximum Camber: 1.2161 % @0.31CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.036 %CUpper nose radius: 0.61695 %CLower nose radius: 0.23843 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.5004 degRelease Angle: 1.2826 degNose Incidence: 7.2574 degCamber deflection: 8.5401 deg

Table 1250: Controlpoints1 -0.000180.76189 -0.0166950.66189 -0.0304860.45046 -0.0304860.43244 -0.0304860 -0.0262180 00 0.0209530.10675 0.0534420.3992 0.0534420.59178 0.0534420.7667 0.0268971 0.00018

Table 1251: Base 64 representation:ZuaVX2DsZNksMhB

Table 1252: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.619 4.945 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0 -1.2 dctsCm error 0 -3 mctsUpper transition point 0 0.51 %

Figure 942: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 943: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

318

Page 327: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: giiii

Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoilsReference: UIUC

Figure 944: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1253: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.4351 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 1.2997 % @0.29CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.036 %CUpper nose radius: 0.99504 %CLower nose radius: 0.27278 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.7191 degRelease Angle: 1.3341 degNose Incidence: 9.4321 degCamber deflection: 10.7662 deg

Table 1254: Controlpoints1 -0.000180.73291 -0.0189760.63264 -0.0304580.4502 -0.0304580.4412 -0.0304580 -0.0283260 00 0.0335230.1694 0.0547210.34964 0.0547210.59022 0.0547210.75962 0.0283911 0.00018

Table 1255: Base 64 representation:mgWYX7BsVNluMhB

Table 1256: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.967 5.026 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.7 -1.2 dctsCm error 3 15 mctsUpper transition point 2.41 0.71 %

Figure 945: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 946: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

319

Page 328: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: giiij

Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoilsReference: UIUC

Figure 947: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1257: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.5076 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 1.3578 % @0.29CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.036 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2521 %CLower nose radius: 0.2908 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.2312 degRelease Angle: 1.1868 degNose Incidence: 11.0551 degCamber deflection: 12.2419 deg

Table 1258: Controlpoints1 -0.000180.74777 -0.0175030.62909 -0.0299750.45 -0.0299750.38507 -0.0299750 -0.0273230 00 0.0366810.16118 0.0557770.35 0.0557770.59753 0.0557770.88002 0.013431 0.00018

Table 1259: Base 64 representation:piWYY5JsVNTrLhB

Table 1260: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.836 5.794 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.4 -0.3 dctsCm error 7 6 mctsUpper transition point -1.4 -0.66 %

Figure 948: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 949: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

320

Page 329: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: giiik

Information: N/AReference: UIUC

Figure 950: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1261: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.5504 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 1.4284 % @0.29CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.036 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5485 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.5788 degRelease Angle: 1.4761 degNose Incidence: 7.5575 degCamber deflection: 9.0335 deg

Table 1262: Controlpoints1 -0.000180.75889 -0.0162510.62808 -0.0291390.44979 -0.0291390 -0.0291390 -0.0125520 00 0.0550040.29308 0.056950.30041 0.056950.55872 0.056950.76324 0.0282681 0.00018

Table 1263: Base 64 representation:9CTYYc sVMhoMiB

Table 1264: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.054 5.377 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0 -3.2 dctsCm error 0 -13 mctsUpper transition point 0 -0.05 %

Figure 951: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 952: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

321

Page 330: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: giiil

Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoilsReference: UIUC

Figure 953: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1265: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.5696 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 1.5039 % @0.29CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.036 %CUpper nose radius: 1.682 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.2536 degRelease Angle: 1.3686 degNose Incidence: 8.2125 degCamber deflection: 9.581 deg

Table 1266: Controlpoints1 -0.000180.75379 -0.0163530.62813 -0.0284580.44967 -0.0284580 -0.0284580 -0.0132480 00 0.0572330.29212 0.0578110.30067 0.0578110.559 0.0578110.82466 0.0201431 0.00018

Table 1267: Base 64 representation:-CTYZe sVMZpLhB

Table 1268: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.339 5.702 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 954: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 955: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

322

Page 331: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: gm15sm

Information: Gilbert Morris GM15 F1C class free flight flapperairfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 956: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1269: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.6981 % @0.2CMaximum Camber: 4.7697 % @0.48CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.007 %CUpper nose radius: 0.30221 %CLower nose radius: 0.43938 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.8712 degRelease Angle: 10.5697 degNose Incidence: 6.1966 degCamber deflection: 16.7663 deg

Table 1270: Controlpoints1 -3.5e-0050.45337 0.0683820.271 -0.0119220.054677 -0.0119220.041845 -0.0119220 -0.0110710 00 0.0127320.080455 0.0736290.37889 0.0736290.51216 0.0736290.7924 0.0518161 3.5e-005

Table 1271: Base 64 representation:LxYOf6PDPFsvIwA

Table 1272: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.261 4.858 ectsRMS curvature error: 42.69 43.41 %CD error -0.6 -1.4 dctsCm error 18 19 mctsUpper transition point 0.45 1.07 %

Figure 957: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 958: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

323

Page 332: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe07k

Information: Gottingen 7K airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 959: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1273: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.0274 % @0.48CMaximum Camber: 4.5482 % @0.53CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.74148 %CLower nose radius: 1.4225 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 32.6586 degRelease Angle: 8.709 degNose Incidence: 8.7756 degCamber deflection: 17.4846 deg

Table 1274: Controlpoints1 00.97515 -0.00553130.15 -0.013620.15 -0.013620 -0.013620 -0.00698360 00 0.0326460.2156 0.100450.5 0.100450.81872 0.100450.98921 0.00382771 0

Table 1275: Base 64 representation:Vjgoqg KAGEajlA

Table 1276: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.386 3.657 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.4 -2.3 dctsCm error -167 -164 mctsUpper transition point 3.3 3.33 %

Figure 960: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 961: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

324

Page 333: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe08k

Information: Gottingen 8K airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 962: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1277: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.97 % @0.48CMaximum Camber: 6.0907 % @0.53CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3249 %CLower nose radius: 3.0331 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 28.0749 degRelease Angle: 10.3132 degNose Incidence: 11.5523 degCamber deflection: 21.8655 deg

Table 1278: Controlpoints1 00.85596 -0.00778580.218 -0.018470.15 -0.018470 -0.018470 -0.00910750 00 0.0434910.21414 0.135550.5 0.135550.82283 0.135550.98973 0.0050381 0

Table 1279: Base 64 representation:Vkgo5g KFIEbgyA

Table 1280: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.309 6.667 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -5.2 -4.7 dctsCm error -256 -259 mctsUpper transition point 4.37 4.27 %

Figure 963: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 964: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

325

Page 334: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe11k

Information: Gottingen 11K airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 965: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1281: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.6429 % @0.44CMaximum Camber: 2.6614 % @0.53CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.73767 %CLower nose radius: 0.67303 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.6342 degRelease Angle: 17.2322 degNose Incidence: 3.9146 degCamber deflection: 21.1468 deg

Table 1282: Controlpoints1 01 00.415 -0.016090.1 -0.016090.057699 -0.016090 -0.016090 00 0.0340840.23623 0.064450.5 0.064450.505 0.064450.83253 0.064451 0

Table 1283: Base 64 representation:hhgBb bGWH AJ7A

Table 1284: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.174 8.405 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.7 2.7 dctsCm error -48 -31 mctsUpper transition point -3.34 -5.38 %

Figure 966: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 967: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

326

Page 335: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe14k

Information: Gottingen 14K airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 968: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1285: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.1887 % @0.48CMaximum Camber: 2.6132 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1186 %CLower nose radius: 0.80102 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 57.2958 degRelease Angle: 0 degNose Incidence: 5.0593 degCamber deflection: 5.0593 deg

Table 1286: Controlpoints1 00.93447 -0.03580.426 -0.03580.3 -0.03580.228 -0.03580 -0.03580 00 0.0447590.26864 0.0870.5 0.0870.505 0.0870.84075 0.0871 0

Table 1287: Base 64 representation:gegBk PTMP gA

Table 1288: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.558 5.403 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 7.3 5.3 dctsCm error 268 245 mctsUpper transition point -17.45 -16.31 %

Figure 969: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 970: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

327

Page 336: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe15k

Information: Gottingen 15K airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 971: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1289: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.2642 % @0.48CMaximum Camber: 3.2502 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7486 %CLower nose radius: 1.335 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 57.2958 degRelease Angle: 5.615 degNose Incidence: 5.7423 degCamber deflection: 11.3573 deg

Table 1290: Controlpoints1 00.89474 -0.044750.496 -0.044750.3 -0.044750.225 -0.044750 -0.044750 00 0.0560290.2693 0.108750.5 0.108750.505 0.108750.84036 0.108751 0

Table 1291: Base 64 representation:gegBt QTST oA

Table 1292: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.959 8.222 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -6.3 5.9 dctsCm error -351 357 mctsUpper transition point 10.82 -10.45 %

Figure 972: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 973: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

328

Page 337: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe16k

Information: Gottingen 16K airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 974: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1293: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.2785 % @0.47CMaximum Camber: 4.0669 % @0.53CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.5664 %CLower nose radius: 1.4634 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 57.2958 degRelease Angle: 9.3965 degNose Incidence: 9.9691 degCamber deflection: 19.3656 deg

Table 1294: Controlpoints1 00.84509 -0.05410.587 -0.05410.3 -0.05410.225 -0.05410 -0.05410 00 0.0676530.26751 0.13160.5 0.13160.565 0.13160.83183 0.13161 0

Table 1295: Base 64 representation:gegI3 QTaX uA

Table 1296: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 9.969 10.27 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.3 -0.7 dctsCm error 200 214 mctsUpper transition point 1.01 0.8 %

Figure 975: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 976: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

329

Page 338: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe29b

Information: Gottingen 29B airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 977: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1297: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.0309 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 6.3362 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.28 %CUpper nose radius: 3.1603 %CLower nose radius: 1.7628 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.6432 degRelease Angle: 7.8473 degNose Incidence: 16.5006 degCamber deflection: 24.3479 deg

Table 1298: Controlpoints1 -0.00140.16918 0.0586810.069181 -0.019530.02536 -0.019530.023668 -0.019530 -0.018340 00 0.00224080.018677 0.112040.29792 0.112040.51372 0.112040.86004 0.0280841 0.0014

Table 1299: Base 64 representation:B7TUv7ECDIS4HrH

Table 1300: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.244 6.439 ectsRMS curvature error: 63.07 68.32 %CD error -1.9 -3.3 dctsCm error -34 -49 mctsUpper transition point 3.57 3.71 %

Figure 978: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 979: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

330

Page 339: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe54

Information: Gottingen 54 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 980: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1301: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.3305 % @0.2CMaximum Camber: 3.0407 % @0.23CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.35 %CUpper nose radius: 3.075 %CLower nose radius: 1.0185 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 1.7694 degRelease Angle: 3.4157 degNose Incidence: 18.3506 degCamber deflection: 21.7663 deg

Table 1302: Controlpoints1 -0.001750.11049 0.0160320.01258 -0.00990.01258 -0.00990.003774 -0.00990 -0.006930 00 0.066280.19945 0.066950.19945 0.066950.32062 0.066950.42062 0.0408481 0.00175

Table 1303: Base 64 representation:-ANKsssBAE25DjJ

Table 1304: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.879 8.924 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 67.9 -11 dctsCm error -21 14 mctsUpper transition point -6.34 7.25 %

Figure 981: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 982: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

331

Page 340: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe55

Information: Gottingen 55 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 983: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1305: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.8437 % @0.15CMaximum Camber: 2.2525 % @0.23CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.75 %CUpper nose radius: 1.8261 %CLower nose radius: 0.88268 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 0.28648 degRelease Angle: 3.4377 degNose Incidence: 9.5389 degCamber deflection: 12.9767 deg

Table 1306: Controlpoints1 -0.003750.46885 0.00687420.059728 -0.016810.05023 -0.016810.031444 -0.016810 -0.016810 00 0.0420460.14522 0.050940.1993 0.050940.22853 0.050940.99229 0.00398151 0.00375

Table 1307: Base 64 representation:0RNCW YDBHBjBiT

Table 1308: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.049 3.375 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.9 -4 dctsCm error 21 22 mctsUpper transition point 9.42 10.01 %

Figure 984: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 985: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

332

Page 341: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe57

Information: Gottingen 57 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 986: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1309: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.427 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 5.0874 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.17 %CUpper nose radius: NaN %CLower nose radius: 0.81989 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.6801 degRelease Angle: 8.3867 degNose Incidence: 5.4808 degCamber deflection: 13.8675 deg

Table 1310: Controlpoints1 -0.000850.19219 0.0562990.074135 -0.011720.02513 -0.011720.01935 -0.011720 -0.011720 00 00.033321 0.081530.29909 0.081530.41803 0.081530.64277 0.081531 0.00085

Table 1311: Base 64 representation:A4TLi PCDF 3KtE

Table 1312: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.502 5.602 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -17.8 -8.9 dctsCm error -7 -12 mctsUpper transition point 22.4 21.62 %

Figure 987: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 988: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

333

Page 342: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe79

Information: Gottingen 79 (Pfalz 11) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 989: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1313: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.5536 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 6.2117 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.56 %CUpper nose radius: 4.0106 %CLower nose radius: 1.3568 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.9154 degRelease Angle: 7.8752 degNose Incidence: 21.2597 degCamber deflection: 29.135 deg

Table 1314: Controlpoints1 -0.00280.11115 0.0774020.047518 -0.011090.01259 -0.011090.003777 -0.011090 -0.0077630 00 0.0418120.09769 0.089310.29925 0.089310.36933 0.089310.53558 0.089311 0.0028

Table 1315: Base 64 representation:eqTGlssBCF 7GsO

Table 1316: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.574 5.809 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point -14.78 NaN %

Figure 990: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 991: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

334

Page 343: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe81

Information: Gottingen 81 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 992: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1317: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.3085 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 5.992 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.27 %CUpper nose radius: 2.6931 %CLower nose radius: 1.018 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.771 degRelease Angle: 8.7894 degNose Incidence: 20.6926 degCamber deflection: 29.482 deg

Table 1318: Controlpoints1 -0.001350.16048 0.0647390.060482 -0.009890.01259 -0.009890.008495 -0.009890 -0.0039560 00 0.0437630.14352 0.100190.29913 0.100190.43393 0.100190.59565 0.100191 0.00135

Table 1319: Base 64 representation:cgTMqaVBDE 4KuH

Table 1320: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.086 5.559 ectsRMS curvature error: 76.62 80.55 %CD error NaN -145.8 dctsCm error NaN -24 mctsUpper transition point NaN 1.01 %

Figure 993: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 994: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

335

Page 344: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe92

Information: Gottingen 92 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 995: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1321: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.1008 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 4.8889 % @0.31CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %CUpper nose radius: 2.0213 %CLower nose radius: 0.71994 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.4933 degRelease Angle: 6.631 degNose Incidence: 26.8413 degCamber deflection: 33.4723 deg

Table 1322: Controlpoints1 -0.00080.1704 0.0303250.028863 -0.004850.01252 -0.004850.010981 -0.004850 -0.000970 00 00.03288 0.099330.29959 0.099330.56724 0.099330.99567 0.00164351 0.0008

Table 1323: Base 64 representation:A4TYpNIBBCB2KqE

Table 1324: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.645 6.626 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -7 -6.6 dctsCm error -46 -23 mctsUpper transition point 11.71 10.83 %

Figure 996: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 997: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

336

Page 345: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe114

Information: Gottingen 114 (MVA MK.1) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 998: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1325: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.0747 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 2.8786 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.82 %CLower nose radius: 0.77013 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.329 degRelease Angle: 5.5483 degNose Incidence: 3.8044 degCamber deflection: 9.3527 deg

Table 1326: Controlpoints1 00.40118 0.0103780.30118 -0.02820.201 -0.02820.03951 -0.02820 00 00 0.0030140.13612 0.077620.39726 0.077620.56524 0.077620.72654 0.0555691 0

Table 1327: Base 64 representation:CpZSgAyNIMt2MpA

Table 1328: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.368 3.103 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN -1.3 dctsCm error NaN -12 mctsUpper transition point NaN 3.32 %

Figure 999: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1000: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

337

Page 346: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe115

Information: Gottingen 115 (MVA MK.2) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1001: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1329: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.2606 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 3.3047 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3121 %CLower nose radius: 1.046 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.1053 degRelease Angle: 5.5947 degNose Incidence: 5.5042 degCamber deflection: 11.0989 deg

Table 1330: Controlpoints1 00.40265 0.0130050.30265 -0.026030.15081 -0.026030.095112 -0.026030 -0.015260 00 0.0150570.12606 0.083340.39735 0.083340.44135 0.083340.60035 0.0765111 0

Table 1331: Base 64 representation:MrZFjlYKLL62LpA

Table 1332: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.364 6.234 ectsRMS curvature error: 78.08 77.54 %CD error -8.1 -8.1 dctsCm error -8 10 mctsUpper transition point 0.59 0.28 %

Figure 1002: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1003: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

338

Page 347: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe116

Information: Gottingen 116 (MVA MK.3) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1004: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1333: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.9872 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 3.8872 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.35 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1729 %CLower nose radius: 0.8917 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.5 degRelease Angle: 6.1516 degNose Incidence: 5.9889 degCamber deflection: 12.1405 deg

Table 1334: Controlpoints1 -0.001750.36222 0.0104640.12215 -0.025450.10067 -0.025450.038936 -0.025450 -0.00317630 00 0.0161370.14874 0.087380.3977 0.087380.52192 0.087380.62192 0.0729571 0.00175

Table 1335: Base 64 representation:MnZNkImGCL0tLpJ

Table 1336: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.899 4.071 ectsRMS curvature error: 68.17 77.62 %CD error 0.1 0.6 dctsCm error 1 0 mctsUpper transition point 0.22 -0.11 %

Figure 1005: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1006: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

339

Page 348: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe117

Information: Gottingen 117 (MVA MK.4) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1007: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1337: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.1897 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 4.4574 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3721 %CLower nose radius: 0.99385 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.138 degRelease Angle: 6.3517 degNose Incidence: 7.8735 degCamber deflection: 14.2252 deg

Table 1338: Controlpoints1 00.30207 0.0207050.22286 -0.017630.10035 -0.017630.10035 -0.017630 -0.0172770 00 0.0168160.15151 0.089310.39825 0.089310.39825 0.089310.62881 0.0843351 0

Table 1339: Base 64 representation:MnZAl-AGJI74MrA

Table 1340: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.251 7.198 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.8 -1.6 dctsCm error 11 18 mctsUpper transition point -0.66 -1.34 %

Figure 1008: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1009: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

340

Page 349: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe118

Information: Gottingen 118 (MVA MK.7) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1010: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1341: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.2482 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 5.8781 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.21 %CUpper nose radius: 0.0099716 %CLower nose radius: 0.08668 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.3965 degRelease Angle: 9.3965 degNose Incidence: 7.1671 degCamber deflection: 16.5636 deg

Table 1342: Controlpoints1 -0.001050.36871 0.0432130.11189 -0.00870.05007 -0.00870.05007 -0.00870 -0.0052050 00 0.00259840.10156 0.099410.3992 0.099410.59099 0.099410.97971 0.00610061 0.00105

Table 1343: Base 64 representation:CvaUplADEEDsLuF

Table 1344: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.263 5.435 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN -0.5 dctsCm error NaN -11 mctsUpper transition point NaN 1.92 %

Figure 1011: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1012: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

341

Page 350: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe121

Information: N/AReference: UIUC

Figure 1013: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1345: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.5645 % @0.2CMaximum Camber: 4.4737 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %CUpper nose radius: 0.50145 %CLower nose radius: 0.91344 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.8801 degRelease Angle: 7.4786 degNose Incidence: 4.4551 degCamber deflection: 11.9337 deg

Table 1346: Controlpoints1 -0.0010.2258 0.0468760.1258 -0.014490.05021 -0.014490.021424 -0.014490 -0.014490 00 0.017770.094453 0.075240.29893 0.075240.32198 0.075240.63243 0.075241 0.001

Table 1347: Base 64 representation:PrTCg kDFG 4JrF

Table 1348: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.058 6.94 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -7.8 -7.3 dctsCm error 52 54 mctsUpper transition point 12.67 12.33 %

Figure 1014: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1015: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

342

Page 351: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe122

Information: Gottingen 122 (MVA H.2) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1016: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1349: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.3966 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.05 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.25 %CUpper nose radius: 0.82018 %CLower nose radius: NaN %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.2465 degRelease Angle: 4.0106 degNose Incidence: 13.2896 degCamber deflection: 17.3002 deg

Table 1350: Controlpoints1 -0.001250.23031 0.0173910.13031 -0.007620.01255 -0.007620.012161 -0.007620 -0.0007620 00 0.0223630.091466 0.077130.2995 0.077130.55573 0.077130.89466 0.0135011 0.00125

Table 1351: Base 64 representation:TrTXgGCBIDP4GmG

Table 1352: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.776 4.529 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.3 -5.5 dctsCm error -30 -27 mctsUpper transition point 6.32 5.66 %

Figure 1017: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1018: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

343

Page 352: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe123

Information: Gottingen 123 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1019: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1353: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.037 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 5.3415 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %CUpper nose radius: NaN %CLower nose radius: 0.94746 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.9901 degRelease Angle: 7.2766 degNose Incidence: 12.0421 degCamber deflection: 19.3187 deg

Table 1354: Controlpoints1 -0.0010.10138 0.0710430.083127 -0.00888250.012491 -0.00888250.0074947 -0.00888250 -0.00612890 00 00.00029886 0.08360.40008 0.08360.64875 0.08360.99649 0.00171931 0.001

Table 1355: Base 64 representation:A abjraBFEB-IsF

Table 1356: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 10.325 11.534 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.8 NaN dctsCm error -83 NaN mctsUpper transition point -1.75 34.16 %

Figure 1020: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1021: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

344

Page 353: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe124

Information: Gottingen 124 (MVA H.4) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1022: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1357: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.0108 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 5.4663 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.5 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7123 %CLower nose radius: 0.70647 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.0248 degRelease Angle: 7.4232 degNose Incidence: 12.3585 degCamber deflection: 19.7817 deg

Table 1358: Controlpoints1 -0.00250.32344 0.0496870.078552 -0.010890.01259 -0.010890.005036 -0.010890 -0.0043560 00 0.0428540.16088 0.093240.29921 0.093240.56071 0.093240.66071 0.064991 0.0025

Table 1359: Base 64 representation:seTYnalBEFwuHrN

Table 1360: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.349 5.421 ectsRMS curvature error: 48.91 51.11 %CD error 6.6 NaN dctsCm error 29 NaN mctsUpper transition point -0.65 NaN %

Figure 1023: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1024: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

345

Page 354: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe134

Information: Gottingen 134 (MVA H.12) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1025: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1361: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.2065 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.0984 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.90001 %CUpper nose radius: 2.3233 %CLower nose radius: 0.93703 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.1995 degRelease Angle: 6.4246 degNose Incidence: 19.1729 degCamber deflection: 25.5975 deg

Table 1362: Controlpoints1 -0.00450010.73862 -0.00564660.01246 -0.00884620.01246 -0.00884620.0049841 -0.00884620 -0.00530770 00 0.027660.092109 0.0869190.30039 0.0869190.58597 0.0869190.93942 0.0188281 0.0045001

Table 1363: Base 64 representation:UrTakllBAELRPqX

Table 1364: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.058 2.753 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.6 -2.2 dctsCm error -5 -5 mctsUpper transition point -2.8 -3.66 %

Figure 1026: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1027: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

346

Page 355: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe137

Information: Gottingen 137 (MVA H.15) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1028: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1365: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.4501 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.0025 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.29 %CUpper nose radius: 1.8632 %CLower nose radius: 0.14017 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.3522 degRelease Angle: 6.0606 degNose Incidence: 21.2808 degCamber deflection: 27.3414 deg

Table 1366: Controlpoints1 -0.001450.23027 0.0149480.13027 -0.011210.07512 -0.011210.027728 -0.011210 -0.011210 00 0.0239690.1027 0.087060.29908 0.087060.40958 0.087060.54887 0.087061 0.00145

Table 1367: Base 64 representation:SpTKk nFEF 4LpH

Table 1368: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.388 5.376 ectsRMS curvature error: 54.28 54.78 %CD error -2.2 -2.7 dctsCm error -24 -16 mctsUpper transition point 2.73 2.04 %

Figure 1029: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1030: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

347

Page 356: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe140

Information: Gottingen 140 (MVA H.17) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1031: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1369: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.3067 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 5.1206 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.58 %CUpper nose radius: 0.031033 %CLower nose radius: 1.2034 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.9588 degRelease Angle: 7.4485 degNose Incidence: 6.881 degCamber deflection: 14.3295 deg

Table 1370: Controlpoints1 -0.00290.37151 0.0373780.0251 -0.011380.0251 -0.011380.012889 -0.011380 -0.011380 00 0.00307190.045613 0.09680.29916 0.09680.53924 0.09680.98627 0.00522871 0.0029

Table 1371: Base 64 representation:C1TWo fCAFCoHqP

Table 1372: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 8.143 9.994 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2 -4.2 dctsCm error -37 -19 mctsUpper transition point 4.66 4.07 %

Figure 1032: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1033: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

348

Page 357: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe142

Information: Gottingen 142 (MVA H.19) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1034: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1373: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.245 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 3.807 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %CUpper nose radius: 0.52396 %CLower nose radius: 0.61642 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.2144 degRelease Angle: 5.4255 degNose Incidence: 8.7989 degCamber deflection: 14.2244 deg

Table 1374: Controlpoints1 -0.0010.17992 0.0250340.079916 -0.009390.02509 -0.009390.020674 -0.009390 -0.00921720 00 0.0149860.064293 0.068760.29937 0.068760.5874 0.068760.88053 0.0199921 0.001

Table 1375: Base 64 representation:OxTas-LCEET4IoF

Table 1376: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.836 4.485 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.1 0 dctsCm error -12 4 mctsUpper transition point -0.77 -1.74 %

Figure 1035: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1036: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

349

Page 358: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe143

Information: Gottingen 143 (MVA H.20) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1037: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1377: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.1027 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 4.0669 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.29 %CUpper nose radius: -0.48563 %CLower nose radius: 1.8393 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.9015 degRelease Angle: 5.615 degNose Incidence: 3.6791 degCamber deflection: 9.2941 deg

Table 1378: Controlpoints1 -0.001450.34282 0.0199160.064372 -0.014070.02518 -0.014070.024928 -0.014070 -0.0112990 00 00.015033 0.074770.29903 0.074770.57999 0.074770.9958 0.00202261 0.00145

Table 1379: Base 64 representation:A8TagyBCDGBsHnH

Table 1380: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.371 5.874 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.6 -1.6 dctsCm error -23 -3 mctsUpper transition point 4.15 3.38 %

Figure 1038: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1039: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

350

Page 359: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe144

Information: Gottingen 144 (MVA H.21) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1040: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1381: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.7039 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 4.4619 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6285 %CLower nose radius: 0.49962 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.5988 degRelease Angle: 6.6459 degNose Incidence: 15.052 degCamber deflection: 21.6979 deg

Table 1382: Controlpoints1 00.2039 0.0410790.15923 -0.014250.05021 -0.014250.05021 -0.014250 -0.0126240 00 0.0173220.087396 0.081380.29878 0.081380.59401 0.081380.94084 0.0170791 0

Table 1383: Base 64 representation:OsTbi4ADHGN8PuA

Table 1384: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.026 6.061 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.6 1.7 dctsCm error -16 6 mctsUpper transition point -1.35 -2.03 %

Figure 1041: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1042: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

351

Page 360: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe147

Information: Gottingen 147 (MVA H.6) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1043: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1385: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.087 % @0.18CMaximum Camber: 3.6984 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.33 %CUpper nose radius: 0.57005 %CLower nose radius: 0.11162 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.1154 degRelease Angle: 4.3602 degNose Incidence: 15.8753 degCamber deflection: 20.2355 deg

Table 1386: Controlpoints1 -0.001650.21288 0.023120.11288 -0.015850.07524 -0.015850.02259 -0.015850 -0.00410 00 0.0043020.00487 0.070790.29891 0.070790.36619 0.070790.46619 0.0664171 0.00165

Table 1387: Base 64 representation:E-TGeRsFDH74GmI

Table 1388: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.939 9.825 ectsRMS curvature error: 95 Inf %CD error -6.1 -6.9 dctsCm error -19 -24 mctsUpper transition point 15 14.69 %

Figure 1044: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1045: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

352

Page 361: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe155

Information: Gottingen 155 (SSW D.1) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1046: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1389: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.0686 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 5.2356 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.4 %CUpper nose radius: 0.61304 %CLower nose radius: 0.4038 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.365 degRelease Angle: 5.9729 degNose Incidence: 9.282 degCamber deflection: 15.2548 deg

Table 1390: Controlpoints1 -0.0020.13521 0.0477180.13521 -0.008220.01255 -0.008220.00502 -0.008220 -0.0049320 00 0.0216430.11462 0.086990.29945 0.086990.65446 0.086990.75446 0.0393771 0.002

Table 1391: Base 64 representation:QnTgkllBIEs GpK

Table 1392: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.442 9.176 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 58.4 -3.1 dctsCm error 61 -83 mctsUpper transition point 6.49 -5.38 %

Figure 1047: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1048: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

353

Page 362: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe164

Information: Gottingen 164 (MVA MK.10) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1049: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1393: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.1256 % @0.18CMaximum Camber: 6.2828 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.11 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2329 %CLower nose radius: 0.23637 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.1933 degRelease Angle: 10.1414 degNose Incidence: 19.2087 degCamber deflection: 29.3501 deg

Table 1394: Controlpoints1 -0.000550.31624 0.0829380.20458 -0.010310.07511 -0.010310.059944 -0.010310 -0.010310 00 0.0276760.093194 0.102050.29892 0.102050.66864 0.102050.92452 0.0218071 0.00055

Table 1395: Base 64 representation:RrThr NFJEP2KxD

Table 1396: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.473 8.265 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -6.4 -4.7 dctsCm error 58 65 mctsUpper transition point 11.09 9.57 %

Figure 1050: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1051: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

354

Page 363: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe165

Information: Gottingen 165 (MVA MK.11) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1052: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1397: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.1218 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 5.3915 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.12 %CUpper nose radius: 0.33121 %CLower nose radius: 0.15463 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.3025 degRelease Angle: 11.0581 degNose Incidence: 15.541 degCamber deflection: 26.5991 deg

Table 1398: Controlpoints1 -0.000600590.50871 0.0764020.40674 -0.0234380.15625 -0.0234380.097656 -0.0234380 -0.00952150 00 0.0112790.060303 0.103120.29688 0.103120.67041 0.103120.9073 0.0241931 0.00060059

Table 1399: Base 64 representation:HyThraYKTKS0GyD

Table 1400: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 8.25 9.385 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -9.1 -9.1 dctsCm error 70 70 mctsUpper transition point 14.44 14.45 %

Figure 1053: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1054: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

355

Page 364: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe167

Information: Gottingen 167 (V.Karman PROP.2) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1055: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1401: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.2219 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.487 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.9 %CUpper nose radius: 1.958 %CLower nose radius: 1.1099 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.1375 degRelease Angle: 6.7485 degNose Incidence: 15.069 degCamber deflection: 21.8175 deg

Table 1402: Controlpoints1 -0.00450.3729 0.00296490.02509 -0.012010.02509 -0.012010.01957 -0.012010 -0.012010 00 0.0340520.15936 0.09580.29926 0.09580.44868 0.09580.54868 0.0831131 0.0045

Table 1403: Base 64 representation:XeTOo OCAF2oKoX

Table 1404: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.203 4.597 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.8 0 dctsCm error -7 -9 mctsUpper transition point -1.89 -2.11 %

Figure 1056: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1057: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

356

Page 365: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe173

Information: Gottingen 173 (Albatros 6020) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1058: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1405: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.7948 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 5.8597 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.18 %CUpper nose radius: 0.36885 %CLower nose radius: -9.4477e-006 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.6203 degRelease Angle: 8.0214 degNose Incidence: 17.1298 degCamber deflection: 25.1512 deg

Table 1406: Controlpoints1 -0.00090.25163 0.0542050.08886 -0.005440.01253 -0.005440.011273 -0.005440 -0.0016320 00 0.012090.059444 0.096480.29956 0.096480.62993 0.096480.9963 0.00167521 0.0009

Table 1407: Base 64 representation:IyTeoTGBFCB0JsF

Table 1408: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.094 5.075 ectsRMS curvature error: 69.48 84.37 %CD error -1.3 1.2 dctsCm error 31 51 mctsUpper transition point -1.61 -2.74 %

Figure 1059: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1060: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

357

Page 366: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe174

Information: Gottingen 174 (Albatros 5020) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1061: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1409: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.5583 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 5.56 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.29 %CUpper nose radius: 0.91341 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.4485 degRelease Angle: 7.4485 degNose Incidence: 14.3491 degCamber deflection: 21.7976 deg

Table 1410: Controlpoints1 -0.001450.25978 0.0430160.17626 -0.008120.01255 -0.008120.003765 -0.008120 -0.0056840 00 0.022340.08196 0.096720.29935 0.096720.58747 0.096720.90603 0.0204991 0.00145

Table 1411: Base 64 representation:PtTaossBLDP5JrH

Table 1412: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.052 7.265 ectsRMS curvature error: 59.68 60.93 %CD error 2.4 -7.6 dctsCm error 68 72 mctsUpper transition point -1.07 -1.62 %

Figure 1062: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1063: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

358

Page 367: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe176

Information: Gottingen 176 (Albatros 7020) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1064: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1413: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.2323 % @0.19CMaximum Camber: 5.5542 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.23 %CUpper nose radius: 13.433 %CLower nose radius: 0.18926 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.3339 degRelease Angle: 8.709 degNose Incidence: 15.2675 degCamber deflection: 23.9765 deg

Table 1414: Controlpoints1 -0.001150.3791 0.0505030.25357 -0.015680.10025 -0.015680.043985 -0.015680 -0.00744960 00 00.032823 0.099420.29839 0.099420.61966 0.099420.94256 0.0140551 0.00115

Table 1415: Base 64 representation:A4TspejGLHK0JtG

Table 1416: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.696 8.374 ectsRMS curvature error: 66.66 65.68 %CD error -8.6 -9.6 dctsCm error 92 100 mctsUpper transition point 16.83 16.31 %

Figure 1065: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1066: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

359

Page 368: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe177

Information: Gottingen 177 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1067: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1417: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.5578 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 4.9866 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %CUpper nose radius: 0.19815 %CLower nose radius: 0.11096 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.9283 degRelease Angle: 7.6838 degNose Incidence: 12.2156 degCamber deflection: 19.8994 deg

Table 1418: Controlpoints1 -0.0010.24282 0.0415930.14282 -0.00860.049991 -0.00860.021496 -0.00860 -0.005160 00 0.00968190.07096 0.08640.30009 0.08640.51426 0.08640.89447 0.0237161 0.001

Table 1419: Base 64 representation:HwTUkljDGER4KsF

Table 1420: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.501 6.476 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -4.4 -4.8 dctsCm error -26 -44 mctsUpper transition point 8.84 8.5 %

Figure 1068: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1069: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

360

Page 369: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe178

Information: Gottingen 178 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1070: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1421: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.4025 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 3.9389 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6702 %CLower nose radius: 1.0938 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.9352 degRelease Angle: 6.4879 degNose Incidence: 11.6762 degCamber deflection: 18.1641 deg

Table 1422: Controlpoints1 -0.00150.42475 0.0264530.10402 -0.0143250.049979 -0.0143250.026688 -0.0143250 -0.0117520 00 0.017530.102 0.086050.30013 0.086050.32635 0.086050.56548 0.079971 0.0015

Table 1423: Base 64 representation:NpTCk0eDEG6oIqI

Table 1424: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.007 4.176 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1 1.7 dctsCm error -16 -22 mctsUpper transition point 0.33 -0.45 %

Figure 1071: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1072: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

361

Page 370: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe180

Information: Gottingen 180 (MVA H.26) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1073: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1425: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.7645 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 4.4116 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.25 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2431 %CLower nose radius: 1.045 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.5371 degRelease Angle: 5.9015 degNose Incidence: 12.3688 degCamber deflection: 18.2702 deg

Table 1426: Controlpoints1 -0.001250.33164 0.0178030.13232 -0.0124130.049985 -0.0124130.006695 -0.0124130 -0.00682940 00 0.030170.10983 0.0870250.30011 0.0870250.61899 0.0870250.9362 0.0126951 0.00125

Table 1427: Base 64 representation:WoTski2DGFLwKpG

Table 1428: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.604 5.446 ectsRMS curvature error: 57.3 52.88 %CD error -2.4 -2 dctsCm error 77 96 mctsUpper transition point 2.29 1.42 %

Figure 1074: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1075: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

362

Page 371: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe182

Information: Gottingen 182 (MVA H.27) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1076: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1429: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.1444 % @0.19CMaximum Camber: 5.3328 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.15 %CUpper nose radius: 0.26931 %CLower nose radius: 0.60932 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.5875 degRelease Angle: 8.1776 degNose Incidence: 13.3448 degCamber deflection: 21.5224 deg

Table 1430: Controlpoints1 -0.000750.34348 0.0495810.18683 -0.014280.0502 -0.014280.028614 -0.014280 -0.014280 00 0.00807950.036359 0.095360.29864 0.095360.47444 0.095360.85516 0.031461 0.00075

Table 1431: Base 64 representation:F3TQo cDJGVzIsE

Table 1432: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.834 8.108 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -4.8 -4.3 dctsCm error -74 -82 mctsUpper transition point 12.11 11.9 %

Figure 1077: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1078: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

363

Page 372: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe184

Information: Gottingen 184 (MVA H.29) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1079: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1433: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.3137 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 5.178 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.22 %CUpper nose radius: 2.2956 %CLower nose radius: 1.0213 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.3782 degRelease Angle: 7.0307 degNose Incidence: 16.6305 degCamber deflection: 23.6613 deg

Table 1434: Controlpoints1 -0.00110.23061 0.0424440.13061 -0.013870.0502 -0.013870.046184 -0.013870 -0.013870 00 0.0308130.11408 0.091660.29866 0.091660.37535 0.091660.55489 0.091661 0.0011

Table 1435: Base 64 representation:WnTHm FDFG 4JrG

Table 1436: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.959 6.999 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.3 -2.4 dctsCm error -16 -35 mctsUpper transition point 2.07 2.22 %

Figure 1080: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1081: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

364

Page 373: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe190

Information: Gottingen 190 (MVA MK.18) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1082: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1437: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.123 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 5.7206 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.294 %CLower nose radius: 1.3449 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.8771 degRelease Angle: 10.5061 degNose Incidence: 17.846 degCamber deflection: 28.3521 deg

Table 1438: Controlpoints1 00.39477 0.0733580.39477 -0.029380.15103 -0.029380.14479 -0.029380 -0.0290620 00 0.0513650.15318 0.107630.29621 0.107630.59315 0.107630.90789 0.0366981 0

Table 1439: Base 64 representation:ffTbt-DKSNW R2A

Table 1440: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.101 6.468 ectsRMS curvature error: 65.12 66.77 %CD error 3.2 3.2 dctsCm error -82 -81 mctsUpper transition point -3.49 -3.34 %

Figure 1083: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1084: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

365

Page 374: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe195

Information: Gottingen 195 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1085: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1441: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.4849 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.7827 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %CUpper nose radius: 2.2551 %CLower nose radius: 1.1821 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.7093 degRelease Angle: 8.727 degNose Incidence: 15.8639 degCamber deflection: 24.591 deg

Table 1442: Controlpoints1 -0.0010.43374 0.0598650.27718 -0.0157950.074984 -0.0157950.0073146 -0.0157950 -0.00969550 00 0.01620.052663 0.08740.40009 0.08740.40009 0.08740.69183 0.0799571 0.001

Table 1443: Base 64 representation:M3aAkm5FOH5xJwF

Table 1444: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.084 6.171 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.1 -2.8 dctsCm error -37 -49 mctsUpper transition point 4.07 4.3 %

Figure 1086: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1087: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

366

Page 375: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe199

Information: Gottingen 199 (L.F.G. 5406) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1088: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1445: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.5277 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 5.1059 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 1.1 %CUpper nose radius: 0.63811 %CLower nose radius: 0.83734 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.6995 degRelease Angle: 6.86 degNose Incidence: 12.8572 degCamber deflection: 19.7172 deg

Table 1446: Controlpoints1 -0.00550.13553 0.039960.035525 -0.008360.01252 -0.008360.011268 -0.008360 -0.0066880 00 0.0161750.061499 0.088470.29974 0.088470.52159 0.088470.64193 0.0732211 0.0055

Table 1447: Base 64 representation:MyTUlyGBBEz4Jqc

Table 1448: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.266 10.362 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 28.9 16 dctsCm error -116 -121 mctsUpper transition point 7.35 5.63 %

Figure 1089: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1090: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

367

Page 376: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe210

Information: Gottingen 210 (DAIMLER) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1091: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1449: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.3236 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 4.4934 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0723 %CLower nose radius: -1.0158e-005 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.0474 degRelease Angle: 6.589 degNose Incidence: 18.1449 degCamber deflection: 24.7339 deg

Table 1450: Controlpoints1 -0.00080.29207 0.0300140.069981 -0.005740.01253 -0.005740.01022 -0.005740 -0.00063140 00 0.0104790.015361 0.07620.39962 0.07620.62796 0.07620.9705 0.00636691 0.0008

Table 1451: Base 64 representation:J9aYgHMBECFwJqE

Table 1452: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.216 7.303 ectsRMS curvature error: 52.77 52.36 %CD error -2.4 -3.6 dctsCm error 25 12 mctsUpper transition point 2.51 2.97 %

Figure 1092: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1093: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

368

Page 377: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe217

Information: Gottingen 217 (MVA MK.12) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1094: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1453: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 19.1848 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 6.4451 % @0.59CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.74 %CUpper nose radius: 11.4589 %CLower nose radius: 1.6354 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.0952 degRelease Angle: 16.4622 degNose Incidence: 34.7006 degCamber deflection: 51.1628 deg

Table 1454: Controlpoints1 -0.00370.55312 0.0905920.54396 -0.047680.15266 -0.047680.15266 -0.047680 -0.0365060 00 0.144790.29167 0.149270.29167 0.149270.44205 0.149270.81234 0.0757721 0.0037

Table 1455: Base 64 representation:9ATO wAKeUg-K6T

Table 1456: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 8.613 9.941 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.4 1.4 dctsCm error -115 -136 mctsUpper transition point -5.17 -4.23 %

Figure 1095: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1096: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

369

Page 378: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe222

Information: Gottingen 222 (MVA H.33) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1097: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1457: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.1758 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 7.1173 % @0.53CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4232 %CLower nose radius: 0.9792 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.9267 degRelease Angle: 16.5271 degNose Incidence: 17.3769 degCamber deflection: 33.904 deg

Table 1458: Controlpoints1 -0.00150.62274 0.0553110.34859 -0.043180.20231 -0.043180.045894 -0.043180 -0.0173090 00 0.0233790.057608 0.150.39179 0.150.60315 0.150.81145 0.0873891 0.0015

Table 1459: Base 64 representation:K2ZW awNMSkkS6I

Table 1460: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 8.68 10.541 ectsRMS curvature error: 33.94 35.46 %CD error -2.8 -2.5 dctsCm error -8 0 mctsUpper transition point 2.82 2.7 %

Figure 1098: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1099: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

370

Page 379: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe223

Information: Gottingen 223 (MVA H.34) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1100: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1461: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.5405 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 5.9037 % @0.54CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %CUpper nose radius: -0.066341 %CLower nose radius: 0.84704 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 24.5075 degRelease Angle: 19.1941 degNose Incidence: 14.0783 degCamber deflection: 33.2724 deg

Table 1462: Controlpoints1 -0.0010.61158 0.0423450.49695 -0.04830.20314 -0.04830.18248 -0.04830 -0.0321010 00 00.025197 0.143890.39065 0.143890.60703 0.143890.99772 0.00242891 0.001

Table 1463: Base 64 representation:A7ZX8qHNYVBws-F

Table 1464: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.916 8.84 ectsRMS curvature error: 59.94 61.69 %CD error -7.8 -8.2 dctsCm error -64 -49 mctsUpper transition point 10.75 11.16 %

Figure 1101: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1102: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

371

Page 380: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe225

Information: Gottingen 225 (MVA H.35) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1103: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1465: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.9069 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 7.7503 % @0.5CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.6 %CUpper nose radius: 1.723 %CLower nose radius: 1.0738 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 2.7844 degRelease Angle: 13.5592 degNose Incidence: 16.0875 degCamber deflection: 29.6466 deg

Table 1466: Controlpoints1 -0.0030.53906 0.0963810.30873 -0.023250.07551 -0.023250.055877 -0.023250 -0.023250 00 0.0301520.079151 0.13060.39714 0.13060.67673 0.13060.96112 0.0133821 0.003

Table 1467: Base 64 representation:PyZe3 RFQKIqD1P

Table 1468: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.828 6.649 ectsRMS curvature error: 59.18 60.47 %CD error 2.5 2.8 dctsCm error -13 -6 mctsUpper transition point -4.94 -5.17 %

Figure 1104: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1105: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

372

Page 381: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe226

Information: Gottingen 226 (MVA H.36) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1106: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1469: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.1374 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 8.3427 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %CUpper nose radius: 4.3691 %CLower nose radius: 1.2804 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.943 degRelease Angle: 14.1116 degNose Incidence: 23.6366 degCamber deflection: 37.7482 deg

Table 1470: Controlpoints1 -0.0010.44575 0.0971890.34575 -0.024570.07563 -0.024570.051428 -0.024570 -0.024570 00 0.0167850.04426 0.139610.39644 0.139610.63335 0.139610.93094 0.0204371 0.001

Table 1471: Base 64 representation:I4ZZ7 UFTKM1G0F

Table 1472: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 11.047 12.016 ectsRMS curvature error: 75.48 78.02 %CD error 2.9 3 dctsCm error 19 38 mctsUpper transition point 2.42 2.08 %

Figure 1107: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1108: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

373

Page 382: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe227

Information: Gottingen 227 (MVA H.37) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1109: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1473: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.3591 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 7.6239 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %CUpper nose radius: 0.42932 %CLower nose radius: 1.4515 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.116 degRelease Angle: 17.1706 degNose Incidence: 8.5119 degCamber deflection: 25.6824 deg

Table 1474: Controlpoints1 -0.00150.63246 0.0909060.33311 -0.0269330.07496 -0.0269330.05622 -0.0269330 -0.0269330 00 0.0136530.065123 0.140.40021 0.140.44819 0.140.62415 0.141 0.0015

Table 1475: Base 64 representation:G1aF7 QFSL iH7I

Table 1476: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.79 7.059 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.4 0.4 dctsCm error -8 -11 mctsUpper transition point 4.14 4.25 %

Figure 1110: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1111: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

374

Page 383: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe229

Information: Gottingen 229 (MVA H.39) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1112: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1477: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.922 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 6.1376 % @0.53CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %CUpper nose radius: 3.0098 %CLower nose radius: 2.0474 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.8676 degRelease Angle: 12.2937 degNose Incidence: 11.8435 degCamber deflection: 24.1372 deg

Table 1478: Controlpoints1 -0.0010.60957 0.0427250.50957 -0.048980.20326 -0.048980.15029 -0.048980 -0.0262140 00 00.0055094 0.148440.39013 0.148440.41218 0.148440.61814 0.144381 0.001

Table 1479: Base 64 representation:A-ZC-hRNZV9yQ1F

Table 1480: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 13.132 14.261 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -27.7 -27.6 dctsCm error -53 -45 mctsUpper transition point 44.12 43.6 %

Figure 1113: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1114: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

375

Page 384: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe233

Information: Gottingen 233 (MVA CA4) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1115: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1481: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.7496 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 7.8877 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.31 %CUpper nose radius: 2.204 %CLower nose radius: 0.77354 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 2.5611 degRelease Angle: 14.3239 degNose Incidence: 17.2799 degCamber deflection: 31.6038 deg

Table 1482: Controlpoints1 -0.001550.45733 0.141070.35733 -0.021030.10046 -0.021030.080368 -0.021030 -0.021030 00 0.0421910.12115 0.11940.39741 0.11940.64 0.11940.9964 0.00249611 0.00155

Table 1483: Base 64 representation:XrZay NGSJB1A3I

Table 1484: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.584 7.214 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.8 -4.4 dctsCm error -85 -84 mctsUpper transition point 1.12 1.08 %

Figure 1116: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1117: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

376

Page 385: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe234

Information: Gottingen 234 (MVA CA5) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1118: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1485: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.8625 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 9.0649 % @0.53CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.74 %CUpper nose radius: 1.8451 %CLower nose radius: 0.88889 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 1.6043 degRelease Angle: 17.1314 degNose Incidence: 18.3166 degCamber deflection: 35.4481 deg

Table 1486: Controlpoints1 -0.00370.46328 0.153550.38183 -0.026010.10067 -0.026010.10067 -0.026010 -0.025230 00 0.0312440.083326 0.136590.39649 0.136590.65505 0.136590.99655 0.00481641 0.0037

Table 1487: Base 64 representation:PyZb59AGULB3C7T

Table 1488: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 8.074 12.062 ectsRMS curvature error: 83.73 85.33 %CD error -1.2 -0.5 dctsCm error -95 -70 mctsUpper transition point -3.25 -4 %

Figure 1119: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1120: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

377

Page 386: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe239

Information: Gottingen 239 (MVA H.31) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1121: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1489: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.3629 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 6.1959 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.42 %CUpper nose radius: 3.035 %CLower nose radius: 1.2375 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.7892 degRelease Angle: 10.3286 degNose Incidence: 17.069 degCamber deflection: 27.3976 deg

Table 1490: Controlpoints1 -0.00210.40964 0.0539390.30827 -0.018930.07534 -0.018930.052217 -0.018930 -0.018930 00 0.0104850.032486 0.109840.398 0.109840.398 0.109840.66809 0.100041 0.0021

Table 1491: Base 64 representation:G6ZAu UFQI52MxL

Table 1492: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.568 6.84 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.1 0.2 dctsCm error 21 23 mctsUpper transition point 1.86 1.35 %

Figure 1122: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1123: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

378

Page 387: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe240

Information: Gottingen 240 (KOLLER) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1124: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1493: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.8803 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 5.1087 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.22 %CUpper nose radius: NaN %CLower nose radius: NaN %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.1312 degRelease Angle: 8.2783 degNose Incidence: 15.0447 degCamber deflection: 23.323 deg

Table 1494: Controlpoints1 -0.00110.19924 0.0438480.11289 -0.008510.01256 -0.008510.012083 -0.008510 -0.0034040 00 00.0039936 0.08530.39936 0.08530.54205 0.08530.83662 0.0398531 0.0011

Table 1495: Base 64 representation:A-aPjaCBHEs5LsG

Table 1496: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.266 11.526 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -6.8 -6.9 dctsCm error -70 -69 mctsUpper transition point 6.95 7.25 %

Figure 1125: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1126: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

379

Page 388: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe242

Information: Gottingen 242 (MVA PR.2) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1127: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1497: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.9379 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 7.5325 % @0.54CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.4 %CUpper nose radius: 0.53148 %CLower nose radius: 0.52671 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.101 degRelease Angle: 17.7839 degNose Incidence: 20.5214 degCamber deflection: 38.3052 deg

Table 1498: Controlpoints1 -0.0020.62788 0.106350.52788 -0.023660.1506 -0.023660.1506 -0.023660 -0.0229960 00 0.0127340.045766 0.14660.39626 0.14660.39626 0.14660.59196 0.145171 0.002

Table 1499: Base 64 representation:G4ZA-9AKcK-xD8K

Table 1500: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.715 6.972 ectsRMS curvature error: 28.91 28 %CD error -1.2 -0.6 dctsCm error -20 -11 mctsUpper transition point -0.94 -1.73 %

Figure 1128: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1129: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

380

Page 389: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe255

Information: Gottingen 255 (MVA CA.6) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1130: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1501: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.4154 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 4.8452 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.50001 %CUpper nose radius: 3.1878 %CLower nose radius: 1.4709 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.4744 degRelease Angle: 8.2144 degNose Incidence: 14.3019 degCamber deflection: 22.5163 deg

Table 1502: Controlpoints1 -0.00250.52938 -0.0143540.42938 -0.0516910.20358 -0.0516910.070113 -0.0516910 -0.0155860 00 00.016801 0.138750.39038 0.138750.41516 0.138750.6077 0.134141 0.0025

Table 1503: Base 64 representation:A8ZD6TpNSW90WtN

Table 1504: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.811 4.188 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.2 -2.5 dctsCm error -10 -6 mctsUpper transition point 3.03 3.5 %

Figure 1131: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1132: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

381

Page 390: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe256

Information: Gottingen 256 (JUNKERS E) airfoiReference: UIUC

Figure 1133: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1505: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.9444 % @0.36CMaximum Camber: 4.6763 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.25 %CUpper nose radius: 3.2247 %CLower nose radius: 4.3846 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 22.0788 degRelease Angle: 5.5593 degNose Incidence: 8.9405 degCamber deflection: 14.4998 deg

Table 1506: Controlpoints1 -0.001250.85827 -0.0263340.20114 -0.036510.20114 -0.036510.06526 -0.036510 -0.036510 00 00.011467 0.125880.39607 0.125880.60644 0.125880.85921 0.0457721 0.00125

Table 1507: Base 64 representation:A9ZW1 qNAQXtflG

Table 1508: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.713 9.403 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.9 -2.7 dctsCm error 27 45 mctsUpper transition point 6.57 5.54 %

Figure 1134: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1135: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

382

Page 391: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe257

Information: Gottingen 257 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1136: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1509: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.925 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.0478 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 1.28 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6687 %CLower nose radius: 0.9912 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.988 degRelease Angle: 6.8861 degNose Incidence: 14.213 degCamber deflection: 21.0991 deg

Table 1510: Controlpoints1 -0.00640.21791 0.00425650.09667 -0.009560.01253 -0.009560.011666 -0.009560 -0.0004780 00 0.0237040.12331 0.084960.29973 0.084960.42382 0.084960.53882 0.084961 0.0064

Table 1511: Base 64 representation:SlTLjDEBFE 2Kog

Table 1512: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.482 3.708 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.4 -5.8 dctsCm error -31 -39 mctsUpper transition point 3.67 2.66 %

Figure 1137: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1138: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

383

Page 392: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe264

Information: Gottingen 264 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1139: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1513: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.6938 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 5.5683 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.64 %CUpper nose radius: 0.64463 %CLower nose radius: 0.68903 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.9551 degRelease Angle: 6.7228 degNose Incidence: 7.9901 degCamber deflection: 14.7129 deg

Table 1514: Controlpoints1 -0.00320.18439 0.0645040.084389 -0.010960.02615 -0.010960.02615 -0.010960 -0.0103020 00 0.0235270.12879 0.088020.28926 0.088020.63109 0.088020.94279 0.0119551 0.0032

Table 1515: Base 64 representation:RjTfl7ACEFK4EqQ

Table 1516: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.785 8.832 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 3 0.3 dctsCm error -9 -33 mctsUpper transition point -6.13 -4.43 %

Figure 1140: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1141: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

384

Page 393: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe265

Information: Gottingen 265 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1142: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1517: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.5622 % @0.13CMaximum Camber: 7.2624 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.21 %CUpper nose radius: 2.2796 %CLower nose radius: 0.51072 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.3545 degRelease Angle: 9.1079 degNose Incidence: 22.0725 degCamber deflection: 31.1804 deg

Table 1518: Controlpoints1 -0.001050.13955 0.0959320.13955 -0.009780.02509 -0.009780.02509 -0.009780 -0.00924270 00 0.0371830.090979 0.106980.29904 0.106980.40649 0.106980.52192 0.10081 0.00105

Table 1519: Base 64 representation:WsTKt7ACIE7 GuF

Table 1520: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.001 9.494 ectsRMS curvature error: 52.85 60.76 %CD error -0.2 -2 dctsCm error -61 -55 mctsUpper transition point 1.1 0.53 %

Figure 1143: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1144: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

385

Page 394: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe269

Information: Gottingen 269 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1145: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1521: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.0889 % @0.2CMaximum Camber: 4.9198 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.58 %CUpper nose radius: 2.1235 %CLower nose radius: 1.1645 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.9384 degRelease Angle: 7.0501 degNose Incidence: 13.8146 degCamber deflection: 20.8647 deg

Table 1522: Controlpoints1 -0.00290.18391 0.0541380.083914 -0.01350.02517 -0.01350.02517 -0.01350 -0.0128250 00 0.0335480.12223 0.082460.29902 0.082460.43725 0.082460.55584 0.0802171 0.0029

Table 1523: Base 64 representation:alTNi8ACEG94HqP

Table 1524: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.105 7.954 ectsRMS curvature error: 40.95 40.89 %CD error -0.1 0 dctsCm error -21 -15 mctsUpper transition point -1.23 -1.52 %

Figure 1146: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1147: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

386

Page 395: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe276

Information: Gottingen 276 (DAIMLER VII) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1148: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1525: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.6678 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 3.8774 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.8 %CUpper nose radius: 1.8361 %CLower nose radius: 0.66746 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.1143 degRelease Angle: 7.2811 degNose Incidence: 15.3118 degCamber deflection: 22.5929 deg

Table 1526: Controlpoints1 -0.0040.37009 0.0225990.01255 -0.008830.01255 -0.008830.00502 -0.008830 -0.0035320 00 0.0115530.051041 0.076620.29959 0.076620.29959 0.076620.66993 0.076621 0.004

Table 1527: Base 64 representation:K0TAgalBAE oLrU

Table 1528: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.412 5.468 ectsRMS curvature error: 68.01 70.09 %CD error 75 -60.7 dctsCm error -2 37 mctsUpper transition point 4.82 3.6 %

Figure 1149: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1150: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

387

Page 396: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe277

Information: Gottingen 277 (DAIMLER VIII) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1151: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1529: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.1321 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.0152 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.32 %CUpper nose radius: 2.0059 %CLower nose radius: 0.98717 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.368 degRelease Angle: 6.4175 degNose Incidence: 17.9788 degCamber deflection: 24.3963 deg

Table 1530: Controlpoints1 -0.00160.25682 0.0161780.081652 -0.010370.02509 -0.010370.020005 -0.010370 -0.0082960 00 0.0185980.076462 0.085590.29923 0.085590.51619 0.085590.80419 0.0433071 0.0016

Table 1531: Base 64 representation:OvTUkyNCEEgzMqI

Table 1532: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.86 6.136 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -4.6 -5 dctsCm error -9 8 mctsUpper transition point 3.38 2.99 %

Figure 1152: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1153: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

388

Page 397: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe278

Information: Gottingen 278 (DAIMLER IX) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1154: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1533: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.4334 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 3.7758 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %CUpper nose radius: 2.3007 %CLower nose radius: 0.89633 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.4513 degRelease Angle: 6.0834 degNose Incidence: 19.5893 degCamber deflection: 25.6726 deg

Table 1534: Controlpoints1 -0.0010.12761 0.019420.027607 -0.008210.01256 -0.008210.003768 -0.008210 -0.0057470 00 0.0302250.111 0.079790.29942 0.079790.61757 0.079790.85834 0.0310631 0.001

Table 1535: Base 64 representation:YnTshssBBEY4MqF

Table 1536: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.266 6.932 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 11.4 7 dctsCm error -19 -9 mctsUpper transition point 4.28 2.61 %

Figure 1155: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1156: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

389

Page 398: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe279

Information: Gottingen 279 (DAIMLER X) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1157: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1537: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.4413 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.7096 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.37 %CUpper nose radius: 1.9881 %CLower nose radius: NaN %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.766 degRelease Angle: 7.9453 degNose Incidence: 21.7037 degCamber deflection: 29.649 deg

Table 1538: Controlpoints1 -0.001850.16152 0.0283420.037592 -0.005650.01252 -0.005650.011847 -0.005650 -0.00062150 00 0.0378550.10812 0.084150.29968 0.084150.32785 0.084150.66565 0.084151 0.00185

Table 1539: Base 64 representation:soTDjHDBCC 3NsJ

Table 1540: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.399 5.659 ectsRMS curvature error: 47.14 45.85 %CD error 4.2 -0.2 dctsCm error 47 61 mctsUpper transition point -3.67 -3.88 %

Figure 1158: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1159: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

390

Page 399: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe280

Information: Gottingen 280 (DAIMLER XI) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1160: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1541: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.1632 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 4.4821 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.8 %CUpper nose radius: NaN %CLower nose radius: 0.0077883 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.2506 degRelease Angle: 7.4485 degNose Incidence: 20.2021 degCamber deflection: 27.6505 deg

Table 1542: Controlpoints1 -0.0040.53809 0.0195780.01252 -0.006670.01252 -0.006670.010368 -0.006670 -0.00073370 00 00.00071735 0.085110.29977 0.085110.64864 0.085110.99649 0.0046941 0.004

Table 1543: Base 64 representation:A TgjHLBADBeJqU

Table 1544: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 14.329 15.823 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -19.1 -21 dctsCm error -70 -58 mctsUpper transition point 3.56 2.77 %

Figure 1161: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1162: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

391

Page 400: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe281

Information: Gottingen 281 (DAIMLER XII)Reference: UIUC

Figure 1163: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1545: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.0487 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.525 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.52 %CUpper nose radius: 0.23127 %CLower nose radius: 0.84938 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.0867 degRelease Angle: 7.0741 degNose Incidence: 9.0933 degCamber deflection: 16.1674 deg

Table 1546: Controlpoints1 -0.00260.30304 0.0221130.037172 -0.008430.01255 -0.008430.011295 -0.008430 -0.00750270 00 0.00940940.057424 0.085070.2995 0.085070.35785 0.085070.61588 0.085071 0.0026

Table 1547: Base 64 representation:HzTFj4GBCE tLrN

Table 1548: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.284 8.063 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -59.1 4.9 dctsCm error 4 -39 mctsUpper transition point -6.63 -6.3 %

Figure 1164: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1165: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

392

Page 401: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe282

Information: Gottingen 282 (DAIMLER XIII)Reference: UIUC

Figure 1166: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1549: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.4156 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.3098 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.64 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3071 %CLower nose radius: 0.30781 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.8808 degRelease Angle: 8.3943 degNose Incidence: 17.5684 degCamber deflection: 25.9627 deg

Table 1550: Controlpoints1 -0.00320.24972 0.0277240.14971 -0.015130.0752 -0.015130.050627 -0.015130 -0.0148360 00 0.0182670.068705 0.094650.29878 0.094650.64258 0.094650.91447 0.0271451 0.0032

Table 1551: Base 64 representation:MwTfn-VFFGR3PuQ

Table 1552: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.294 6.458 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.2 1.3 dctsCm error 2 14 mctsUpper transition point -2.15 -3.18 %

Figure 1167: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1168: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

393

Page 402: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe284

Information: Gottingen 284 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1169: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1553: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.7117 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 4.987 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.59 %CUpper nose radius: 5.1796 %CLower nose radius: 2.1007 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.9088 degRelease Angle: 6.7187 degNose Incidence: 21.669 degCamber deflection: 28.3877 deg

Table 1554: Controlpoints1 -0.002950.32439 -0.0366140.22439 -0.045370.10232 -0.045370.021812 -0.045370 -0.0164760 00 0.0636470.14947 0.137390.29297 0.137390.49955 0.137390.59955 0.105621 0.00295

Table 1555: Base 64 representation:efTT6XxHJTy3ToP

Table 1556: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.135 5.874 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 2.5 1.7 dctsCm error -20 -4 mctsUpper transition point -5.07 -4.38 %

Figure 1170: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1171: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

394

Page 403: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe285

Information: Gottingen 285 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1172: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1557: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.7952 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 3.6729 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %CUpper nose radius: 1.8901 %CLower nose radius: 1.5298 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.2752 degRelease Angle: 0.83283 degNose Incidence: 9.5201 degCamber deflection: 10.3529 deg

Table 1558: Controlpoints1 -0.00150.95059 -0.00871290.09996 -0.026780.09996 -0.026780.060326 -0.026780 -0.026780 00 0.0354330.099642 0.095360.30014 0.095360.61092 0.095360.98871 0.00348531 0.0015

Table 1559: Base 64 representation:YqTco ZGALCSUhI

Table 1560: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.855 5.673 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.6 -2.4 dctsCm error 25 27 mctsUpper transition point 3.75 3.1 %

Figure 1173: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1174: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

395

Page 404: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe286

Information: Gottingen 286 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1175: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1561: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.2573 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.1761 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.5 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1088 %CLower nose radius: 1.6584 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.3132 degRelease Angle: 5.615 degNose Incidence: 10.8485 degCamber deflection: 16.4635 deg

Table 1562: Controlpoints1 -0.00250.2808 0.00325370.099784 -0.014090.05017 -0.014090.0091633 -0.014090 -0.0100650 00 0.0236580.075722 0.087750.29893 0.087750.54244 0.087750.99542 0.00337051 0.0025

Table 1563: Base 64 representation:RvTWktzDDGByMoN

Table 1564: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.889 6.135 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -16.4 -14.9 dctsCm error -88 -61 mctsUpper transition point 31.31 30.58 %

Figure 1176: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1177: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

396

Page 405: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe287

Information: Gottingen 287 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1178: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1565: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.7121 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 4.9458 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.5 %CUpper nose radius: 5.6267 %CLower nose radius: 0.93603 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.3715 degRelease Angle: 5.64 degNose Incidence: 9.0312 degCamber deflection: 14.6712 deg

Table 1566: Controlpoints1 -0.00250.42436 0.0243220.044578 -0.01040.02508 -0.01040.01552 -0.01040 -0.01040 00 00.019962 0.092630.39925 0.092630.5059 0.092630.65129 0.0553141 0.0025

Table 1567: Base 64 representation:A8aLn YCBEsmHoN

Table 1568: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 12.135 13.25 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.2 -4.2 dctsCm error -150 -152 mctsUpper transition point 5.74 5.99 %

Figure 1179: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1180: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

397

Page 406: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe288

Information: Gottingen 288 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1181: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1569: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.6174 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 5.4663 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.59 %CUpper nose radius: 2.2319 %CLower nose radius: 2.6696 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.3543 degRelease Angle: 9.5547 degNose Incidence: 7.63 degCamber deflection: 17.1847 deg

Table 1570: Controlpoints1 -0.002950.48152 0.0185770.37723 -0.045520.15238 -0.045520.066157 -0.045520 -0.0343140 00 0.0408830.11233 0.136530.29285 0.136530.38478 0.136530.55565 0.136531 0.00295

Table 1571: Base 64 representation:TmTI5vjKRT 0QuP

Table 1572: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.502 7.749 ectsRMS curvature error: 17.15 17.13 %CD error 1.1 0.7 dctsCm error 15 34 mctsUpper transition point -4.68 -4.17 %

Figure 1182: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1183: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

398

Page 407: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe289

Information: Gottingen 289 (MVA 289) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1184: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1573: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.7769 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 5.9481 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0866 %CLower nose radius: 2.1444 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.487 degRelease Angle: 8.7149 degNose Incidence: 5.4238 degCamber deflection: 14.1386 deg

Table 1574: Controlpoints1 00.4392 0.00271010.3392 -0.034450.1 -0.034450.078185 -0.034450 -0.0322020 00 0.0372340.13383 0.141650.3 0.141650.39548 0.141650.58841 0.141651 0

Table 1575: Base 64 representation:RiTJ77OGRP 1VvA

Table 1576: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.534 5.449 ectsRMS curvature error: 34.37 35.56 %CD error 0.9 0.5 dctsCm error 9 4 mctsUpper transition point -5.35 -6.04 %

Figure 1185: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1186: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

399

Page 408: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe290

Information: Gottingen 290 (MVA 290) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1187: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1577: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.5903 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 3.72 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.60001 %CUpper nose radius: 2.915 %CLower nose radius: 2.1561 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.7537 degRelease Angle: 5.0696 degNose Incidence: 10.2326 degCamber deflection: 15.3022 deg

Table 1578: Controlpoints1 -0.0030.42064 -0.0415550.32064 -0.0528710.20361 -0.0528710.18497 -0.0528710 -0.0515640 00 0.0505510.1315 0.124740.29146 0.124740.35523 0.124740.50977 0.124741 0.003

Table 1579: Base 64 representation:aiTG09GNJX 2UnP

Table 1580: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.186 7.085 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.9 -4.3 dctsCm error 2 -1 mctsUpper transition point -2.53 -1.77 %

Figure 1188: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1189: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

400

Page 409: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe298

Information: Gttingen 298 profileReference: UIUC

Figure 1190: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1581: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.3785 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 4.5086 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.59 %CUpper nose radius: 5.3414 %CLower nose radius: 3.8661 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.1425 degRelease Angle: 1.7081 degNose Incidence: 9.6178 degCamber deflection: 11.3258 deg

Table 1582: Controlpoints1 -0.002950.25031 -0.00115970.1404 -0.041220.07671 -0.041220.04219 -0.041220 -0.0329760 00 0.056430.096138 0.1040.39569 0.1040.53718 0.1040.97546 0.0043561 0.00295

Table 1583: Base 64 representation:ivZPrysFESD3EiP

Table 1584: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 8.714 13.641 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.2 -3.1 dctsCm error 31 63 mctsUpper transition point 5.44 4.57 %

Figure 1191: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1192: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

401

Page 410: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe300

Information: Gottingen 300 (Friedrichshafen G20) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1193: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1585: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.8583 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 6.5118 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.18 %CUpper nose radius: 2.8897 %CLower nose radius: 3.1318e-006 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.2588 degRelease Angle: 9.0311 degNose Incidence: 27.5136 degCamber deflection: 36.5447 deg

Table 1586: Controlpoints1 -0.00090.13587 0.0580370.054241 -0.00977250.024991 -0.00977250.024728 -0.00977250 -0.00129310 00 0.0523210.13626 0.108730.3001 0.108730.39901 0.108730.57262 0.108731 0.0009

Table 1587: Base 64 representation:fiTJtIBCCE 5LuF

Table 1588: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 10.078 12.537 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 3 -1.3 dctsCm error -90 -98 mctsUpper transition point 3.49 3.2 %

Figure 1194: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1195: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

402

Page 411: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe301

Information: Gottingen 301 (Friedrichshafen G 13) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1196: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1589: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.1197 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 6.4196 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %CUpper nose radius: 2.8586 %CLower nose radius: 0.79986 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.8862 degRelease Angle: 9.2067 degNose Incidence: 21.376 degCamber deflection: 30.5827 deg

Table 1590: Controlpoints1 -0.00150.2602 0.0471660.043501 -0.011440.02512 -0.011440.023242 -0.011440 -0.0111330 00 0.0513810.13853 0.113740.28864 0.113740.64039 0.113740.90019 0.0275921 0.0015

Table 1591: Base 64 representation:sgSgw9FCBFSxMuI

Table 1592: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.531 7.869 ectsRMS curvature error: 40.61 42.27 %CD error 5.9 6.1 dctsCm error 98 107 mctsUpper transition point -11.97 -14.32 %

Figure 1197: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1198: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

403

Page 412: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe303

Information: Gottingen 303 (Friedrichshafen G03) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1199: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1593: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.6089 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 5.8597 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.45 %CUpper nose radius: 0.55702 %CLower nose radius: 0.8414 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.6917 degRelease Angle: 9.5986 degNose Incidence: 17.8247 degCamber deflection: 27.4233 deg

Table 1594: Controlpoints1 -0.002250.23937 0.0343220.13937 -0.012240.02513 -0.012240.02513 -0.012240 -0.0118730 00 0.00458640.0056645 0.106290.39891 0.106290.44031 0.106290.7105 0.0876991 0.00225

Table 1595: Base 64 representation:D-aEs9ACHF04PvL

Table 1596: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.178 10.011 ectsRMS curvature error: 39.57 43.27 %CD error 1 -1 dctsCm error -40 -61 mctsUpper transition point -1.32 -0.44 %

Figure 1200: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1201: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

404

Page 413: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe304

Information: Gottingen 304 (Friedrichshafen G02) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1202: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1597: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.822 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 6.2931 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.23 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6762 %CLower nose radius: 1.4524 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.1982 degRelease Angle: 10.1388 degNose Incidence: 15.5525 degCamber deflection: 25.6913 deg

Table 1598: Controlpoints1 -0.001150.22239 0.0537660.074824 -0.015630.02523 -0.015630.020436 -0.015630 -0.0154740 00 0.0178290.028446 0.106520.39842 0.106520.51668 0.106520.77501 0.0666781 0.00115

Table 1599: Base 64 representation:L6ZNs-MCDHn1OvG

Table 1600: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.015 9.481 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 2.5 -0.3 dctsCm error -36 -13 mctsUpper transition point -1.61 -1.88 %

Figure 1203: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1204: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

405

Page 414: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe320

Information: Gottingen 320 (Hansa-Brandenburg II.1) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1205: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1601: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.5694 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 6.1371 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.53 %CUpper nose radius: -Inf %CLower nose radius: 3.0681 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.0108 degRelease Angle: 7.138 degNose Incidence: 21.7854 degCamber deflection: 28.9234 deg

Table 1602: Controlpoints1 -0.002650.108 0.0149850.066083 -0.020730.02538 -0.020730.020592 -0.020730 -0.0205230 00 0.00133980.0059542 0.123520.29771 0.123520.57719 0.123520.64789 0.084871 0.00265

Table 1603: Base 64 representation:B-TZ0-MCDJ08NrN

Table 1604: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.565 8.367 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -9.9 -12.7 dctsCm error -55 -61 mctsUpper transition point 21.67 21.58 %

Figure 1206: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1207: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

406

Page 415: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe325

Information: Gottingen 325 (Pfalz 54) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1208: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1605: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.2472 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.6289 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %CUpper nose radius: 0.29177 %CLower nose radius: 0.70881 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.676 degRelease Angle: 7.0166 degNose Incidence: 9.7361 degCamber deflection: 16.7527 deg

Table 1606: Controlpoints1 -0.00150.19674 0.022040.084994 -0.00981750.024985 -0.00981750.017149 -0.00981750 -0.0090020 00 0.0106910.058756 0.087250.30013 0.087250.35865 0.087250.66049 0.0758651 0.0015

Table 1607: Base 64 representation:IyTFk6UCEE33MqI

Table 1608: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.393 5.569 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 2 5.7 dctsCm error -21 -2 mctsUpper transition point -0.07 -0.69 %

Figure 1209: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1210: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

407

Page 416: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe326

Information: Gottingen 326 (Pfalz 55) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1211: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1609: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.2286 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.7031 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1593 %CLower nose radius: 0.71345 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.8853 degRelease Angle: 6.2262 degNose Incidence: 12.5111 degCamber deflection: 18.7373 deg

Table 1610: Controlpoints1 -0.00150.1926 0.0236420.083433 -0.01060.02509 -0.01060.022159 -0.01060 -0.0102660 00 0.0288340.10757 0.087720.2992 0.087720.50868 0.087720.6542 0.0666451 0.0015

Table 1611: Base 64 representation:VoTTk9HCEFv3KpI

Table 1612: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.075 7.903 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -5.1 -5.8 dctsCm error -32 -37 mctsUpper transition point 2.6 1.27 %

Figure 1212: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1213: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

408

Page 417: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe328

Information: Gottingen 328 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1214: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1613: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.3002 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.2627 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.5 %CUpper nose radius: 0.68633 %CLower nose radius: 1.3982 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.3635 degRelease Angle: 5.3792 degNose Incidence: 3.4067 degCamber deflection: 8.7859 deg

Table 1614: Controlpoints1 -0.00250.14033 0.0154690.04983 -0.0146820.024963 -0.0146820.015413 -0.0146820 -0.0146820 00 0.0232750.1184 0.083750.30021 0.083750.5236 0.083750.63985 0.0631631 0.0025

Table 1615: Base 64 representation:SmTUj YCCGv5JoN

Table 1616: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.5 5.214 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.6 -3.7 dctsCm error -15 -3 mctsUpper transition point 3.74 2.86 %

Figure 1215: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1216: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

409

Page 418: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe329

Information: Gottingen 329 (Pfalz 58) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1217: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1617: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.2322 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 5.525 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.6 %CUpper nose radius: 0.93221 %CLower nose radius: 1.911 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.6316 degRelease Angle: 7.4796 degNose Incidence: 7.4949 degCamber deflection: 14.9744 deg

Table 1618: Controlpoints1 -0.0030.15344 0.0215890.062811 -0.012680.01262 -0.012680.011232 -0.012680 -0.0114120 00 0.0273760.1206 0.106130.29896 0.106130.55007 0.106130.74047 0.0643281 0.003

Table 1619: Base 64 representation:RlTXs5HBDFk5NrP

Table 1620: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.117 5.429 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 32.5 -23.6 dctsCm error -23 32 mctsUpper transition point 1.42 -1.82 %

Figure 1218: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1219: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

410

Page 419: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe331

Information: Gottingen 331 (Pfalz 60) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1220: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1621: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.5941 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 6.8609 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.26 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5775 %CLower nose radius: 1.394 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.7943 degRelease Angle: 10.243 degNose Incidence: 22.0959 degCamber deflection: 32.3389 deg

Table 1622: Controlpoints1 -0.00130.13146 0.0418760.031459 -0.010880.01261 -0.010880.012484 -0.010880 -0.0107710 00 0.012760.015483 0.121570.39882 0.121570.42477 0.121570.63756 0.116551 0.0013

Table 1623: Base 64 representation:H9aDz-BBBF84RwH

Table 1624: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.707 10.752 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -15.6 NaN dctsCm error -33 NaN mctsUpper transition point 1.14 NaN %

Figure 1221: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1222: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

411

Page 420: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe332

Information: Gottingen 332 (Pfalz 61) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1223: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1625: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.5061 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 6.4167 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %CUpper nose radius: 0.25194 %CLower nose radius: 1.0995 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 34.3775 degRelease Angle: 19.6525 degNose Incidence: 12.737 degCamber deflection: 32.3894 deg

Table 1626: Controlpoints1 -0.00150.32819 0.0274050.11797 -0.016220.05025 -0.016220.019308 -0.016220 -0.016220 00 0.00655290.035894 0.121170.39812 0.121170.59399 0.121170.98259 0.0145441 0.0015

Table 1627: Base 64 representation:D5ZVz mDFHHwl I

Table 1628: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.01 5.608 ectsRMS curvature error: 73.75 77.13 %CD error 0.7 1.2 dctsCm error 18 4 mctsUpper transition point 0.1 -0.73 %

Figure 1224: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1225: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

412

Page 421: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe335

Information: Gottingen 335 (D.F.W.) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1226: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1629: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.2281 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.526 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.44446 %CLower nose radius: 0.78142 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.3012 degRelease Angle: 7.3956 degNose Incidence: 10.2731 degCamber deflection: 17.6687 deg

Table 1630: Controlpoints1 00.13875 0.0387990.13005 -0.007310.025 -0.007310.014376 -0.007310 -0.00723690 00 0.0159750.08613 0.081250.3 0.081250.37547 0.081250.59788 0.081251 0

Table 1631: Base 64 representation:NtTHi-bCHD -KqA

Table 1632: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.072 7.639 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 15.4 -16 dctsCm error -6 27 mctsUpper transition point -8.38 7.21 %

Figure 1227: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1228: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

413

Page 422: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe342

Information: Gottingen 342 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1229: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1633: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.2517 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 6.1915 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %CUpper nose radius: 0.92859 %CLower nose radius: 0.75319 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.8967 degRelease Angle: 10.5822 degNose Incidence: 13.4924 degCamber deflection: 24.0747 deg

Table 1634: Controlpoints1 -0.00150.31744 0.0899830.034013 -0.00791870.012488 -0.00791870.011193 -0.00791870 -0.00615230 00 0.0197740.063162 0.08660.40013 0.08660.50886 0.08660.66127 0.0830131 0.0015

Table 1635: Base 64 representation:P1aMkxHBBD8sHwI

Table 1636: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.138 4.646 ectsRMS curvature error: 27.8 28.03 %CD error NaN 88.1 dctsCm error NaN 56 mctsUpper transition point 32.55 -4.42 %

Figure 1230: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1231: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

414

Page 423: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe346

Information: Gottingen 346 (Friedrichshafen-Staaken) airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1232: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1637: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.7887 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 3.771 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.35 %CUpper nose radius: 0.52892 %CLower nose radius: 1.19 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.2031 degRelease Angle: 5.9065 degNose Incidence: 7.4364 degCamber deflection: 13.3428 deg

Table 1638: Controlpoints1 -0.001750.094516 0.0267840.024775 -0.009990.01258 -0.009990.012328 -0.009990 -0.00989010 00 0.0050470.0092574 0.066640.39944 0.066640.4833 0.066640.67331 0.0594011 0.00175

Table 1639: Base 64 representation:F-aJc-BBBE46JpJ

Table 1640: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.951 9.356 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN 16.7 dctsCm error NaN -62 mctsUpper transition point 47.1 8.26 %

Figure 1233: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1234: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

415

Page 424: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe358

Information: Gottingen 358 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1235: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1641: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.9294 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 5.609 % @0.52CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.32 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7952 %CLower nose radius: 1.0398 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.2441 degRelease Angle: 11.863 degNose Incidence: 10.6421 degCamber deflection: 22.5051 deg

Table 1642: Controlpoints1 -0.00160.44764 0.0783990.39324 -0.024010.099962 -0.024010.063483 -0.024010 -0.0209780 00 0.0439950.16172 0.096570.30016 0.096570.38729 0.096570.6572 0.096571 0.0016

Table 1643: Base 64 representation:seTIo3XGVK 5IyI

Table 1644: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.327 5.156 ectsRMS curvature error: 35.06 35.4 %CD error 0 0.6 dctsCm error -29 -30 mctsUpper transition point -0.25 -1.33 %

Figure 1236: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1237: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

416

Page 425: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe359

Information: Gottingen 359 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1238: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1645: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.0938 % @0.24CMaximum Camber: 5.7649 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.15 %CUpper nose radius: 0.56337 %CLower nose radius: 2.0224e-005 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.4258 degRelease Angle: 6.1973 degNose Incidence: 14.0295 degCamber deflection: 20.2268 deg

Table 1646: Controlpoints1 -0.000750.14028 0.0515980.14028 -0.00741940.012494 -0.00741940.010486 -0.00741940 -0.00011180 00 0.0187350.08403 0.0970250.30007 0.0970250.61229 0.0970250.99612 0.00135791 0.00075

Table 1647: Base 64 representation:MtTsoBKBIDB GpE

Table 1648: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.467 7.72 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 6.9 -1.4 dctsCm error 50 51 mctsUpper transition point -3.95 -4.55 %

Figure 1239: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1240: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

417

Page 426: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe360

Information: Gottingen 360 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1241: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1649: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.7669 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 5.8386 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.21 %CUpper nose radius: 0.92516 %CLower nose radius: 1.2657 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.1579 degRelease Angle: 6.5675 degNose Incidence: 11.5775 degCamber deflection: 18.1449 deg

Table 1650: Controlpoints1 -0.001050.099013 0.0302330.035516 -0.010480.0126 -0.010480.01008 -0.010480 -0.00922240 00 0.0250580.1018 0.107060.29898 0.107060.56596 0.107060.82773 0.0349941 0.00105

Table 1651: Base 64 representation:PpTYt3NBBEZ7KqF

Table 1652: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.424 8.513 ectsRMS curvature error: 74.85 75.96 %CD error 43 36.5 dctsCm error -14 -16 mctsUpper transition point 3.77 -3.07 %

Figure 1242: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1243: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

418

Page 427: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe361

Information: Gottingen 361 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1244: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1653: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.7216 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 5.5814 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.17619 %CLower nose radius: 0.82158 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.804 degRelease Angle: 8.2741 degNose Incidence: 8.0368 degCamber deflection: 16.311 deg

Table 1654: Controlpoints1 00.34409 0.0674590.057931 -0.008410.0125 -0.008410.01 -0.008410 -0.00740080 00 0.00867040.064003 0.087250.3 0.087250.59331 0.087250.9612 0.00731521 0

Table 1655: Base 64 representation:GxTbk3NBDEGsFsA

Table 1656: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.992 5.696 ectsRMS curvature error: 90.08 85.46 %CD error -0.8 6.7 dctsCm error -25 -24 mctsUpper transition point 3.81 2.68 %

Figure 1245: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1246: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

419

Page 428: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe362

Information: Gottingen 362 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1247: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1657: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.6417 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 5.3052 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5858 %CLower nose radius: 0.051094 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.8451 degRelease Angle: 8.4111 degNose Incidence: 19.2358 degCamber deflection: 27.647 deg

Table 1658: Controlpoints1 00.3514 0.0623230.14166 -0.005850.025 -0.005850.008773 -0.005850 -0.00172870 00 0.0392720.14588 0.08330.3 0.08330.39579 0.08330.59103 0.0819711 0

Table 1659: Base 64 representation:egTJjTpCIC-vHtA

Table 1660: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.761 7.6 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.6 2.7 dctsCm error -30 -28 mctsUpper transition point -0.94 -1.22 %

Figure 1248: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1249: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

420

Page 429: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe363

Information: Gottingen 363 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1250: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1661: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.0102 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 5.6788 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.11 %CUpper nose radius: 0.80406 %CLower nose radius: 0.52159 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.8286 degRelease Angle: 8.4326 degNose Incidence: 20.9052 degCamber deflection: 29.3378 deg

Table 1662: Controlpoints1 -0.000550.27471 0.025010.1673 -0.014930.07523 -0.014930.051601 -0.014930 -0.0133950 00 0.0132620.032812 0.109840.29829 0.109840.56373 0.109840.75604 0.065221 0.00055

Table 1663: Base 64 representation:I4TYu4UFGGl3OtD

Table 1664: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.919 7.69 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -7.3 -7.1 dctsCm error -10 -12 mctsUpper transition point 13.33 13.53 %

Figure 1251: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1252: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

421

Page 430: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe364

Information: Gottingen 364 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1253: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1665: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.9015 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 6.5007 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 4.0046 %CLower nose radius: 0.35239 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.0814 degRelease Angle: 8.8591 degNose Incidence: 28.2032 degCamber deflection: 37.0623 deg

Table 1666: Controlpoints1 00.19755 0.0324870.097553 -0.007910.0125 -0.007910.0068122 -0.007910 -0.00400050 00 0.0540.10922 0.11910.3 0.11910.44618 0.11910.65408 0.095281 0

Table 1667: Base 64 representation:soTNygsBGDy4PtA

Table 1668: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.703 7.216 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.9 -4 dctsCm error -45 -11 mctsUpper transition point 1.09 -0.45 %

Figure 1254: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1255: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

422

Page 431: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe365

Information: Gottingen 365 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1256: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1669: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.7057 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 5.1228 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.2532 %CLower nose radius: 0.82568 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.9764 degRelease Angle: 7.3863 degNose Incidence: 20.945 degCamber deflection: 28.3314 deg

Table 1670: Controlpoints1 00.12491 -0.00919230.026247 -0.010240.02511 -0.010240.013123 -0.010240 -0.00849920 00 0.036990.091088 0.109640.29885 0.109640.53276 0.109640.68496 0.0866271 0

Table 1671: Base 64 representation:WrTVu0fCAEy5SrA

Table 1672: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.213 6.453 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 3.3 0.4 dctsCm error 22 25 mctsUpper transition point -6.68 -8.51 %

Figure 1257: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1258: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

423

Page 432: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe366

Information: Gottingen 366 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1259: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1673: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.1888 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 7.2187 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %CUpper nose radius: 3.4342 %CLower nose radius: 2.6543 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.9201 degRelease Angle: 11.1957 degNose Incidence: 16.5136 degCamber deflection: 27.7093 deg

Table 1674: Controlpoints1 -0.00150.20547 0.0295170.03978 -0.01680.01276 -0.01680.010208 -0.01680 -0.013440 00 0.0581280.14758 0.137520.29787 0.137520.51442 0.137520.69987 0.111661 0.0015

Table 1675: Base 64 representation:bgTU6yNBCHz0UxI

Table 1676: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.628 5.439 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -191.8 NaN dctsCm error 63 NaN mctsUpper transition point -10.2 NaN %

Figure 1260: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1261: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

424

Page 433: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe367

Information: Gottingen 367 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1262: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1677: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.2696 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 4.5953 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.32 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7669 %CLower nose radius: 2.4886 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.3072 degRelease Angle: 6.9749 degNose Incidence: 5.9475 degCamber deflection: 12.9224 deg

Table 1678: Controlpoints1 -0.00160.93579 -0.00292110.83244 -0.037580.10097 -0.037580.067069 -0.037580 -0.0333570 00 0.0328020.091345 0.127170.39671 0.127170.61898 0.127170.96137 0.0120441 0.0016

Table 1679: Base 64 representation:RwZY14VGzQGZSqI

Table 1680: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.421 5.583 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -6 -5.5 dctsCm error -29 -23 mctsUpper transition point 7.47 6.76 %

Figure 1263: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1264: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

425

Page 434: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe368

Information: Gottingen 368 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1265: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1681: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.2974 % @0.17CMaximum Camber: 3.7096 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: -Inf %CLower nose radius: 0.1362 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.2051 degRelease Angle: 5.2111 degNose Incidence: 17.5778 degCamber deflection: 22.789 deg

Table 1682: Controlpoints1 00.1942 0.0226290.1457 -0.015720.07527 -0.015720.055331 -0.015720 -0.00708790 00 0.000689320.0089634 0.071580.29878 0.071580.46427 0.071580.95791 0.00652611 0

Table 1683: Base 64 representation:B9TPfsRFFHG7IoA

Table 1684: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 9.465 10.442 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -4.6 -4.3 dctsCm error -16 -31 mctsUpper transition point 10.19 9.94 %

Figure 1266: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1267: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

426

Page 435: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe369

Information: Gottingen 369 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1268: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1685: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.8831 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 5.3543 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.7469 %CLower nose radius: 0.00047573 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.0923 degRelease Angle: 6.5577 degNose Incidence: 28.1874 degCamber deflection: 34.7451 deg

Table 1686: Controlpoints1 00.095197 0.0555220.061125 -0.00098750.012501 -0.00098750.012299 -0.00098750 -0.00019750 00 0.0598860.19584 0.08280.29992 0.08280.4509 0.08280.52399 0.0805441 0

Table 1687: Base 64 representation:tWTOiNBBDA99HqA

Table 1688: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.339 7.588 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.8 NaN dctsCm error -12 NaN mctsUpper transition point 2.07 NaN %

Figure 1269: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1270: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

427

Page 436: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe371

Information: Gttingen 371 AirfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1271: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1689: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.0085 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 4.5465 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2408 %CLower nose radius: 0.66627 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.1859 degRelease Angle: 7.0192 degNose Incidence: 13.1755 degCamber deflection: 20.1947 deg

Table 1690: Controlpoints1 00.22683 0.0327610.14092 -0.007420.01255 -0.007420.01004 -0.007420 -0.0066780 00 0.0351490.14936 0.079450.29948 0.079450.46147 0.079450.62758 0.0765291 0

Table 1691: Base 64 representation:cgTPh5NBID95KqA

Table 1692: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.432 6.053 ectsRMS curvature error: 34.92 36.89 %CD error -4.2 -9.8 dctsCm error 10 28 mctsUpper transition point 5.5 4.8 %

Figure 1272: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1273: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

428

Page 437: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe372

Information: Gttingen 372 ProfileReference: UIUC

Figure 1274: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1693: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.0951 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 4.2968 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.029119 %CLower nose radius: 0.53134 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.1261 degRelease Angle: 7.1181 degNose Incidence: 1.374 degCamber deflection: 8.4921 deg

Table 1694: Controlpoints1 00.27444 0.0387250.1357 -0.011920.05014 -0.011920.010028 -0.011920 -0.005960 00 0.00362950.067859 0.072590.39917 0.072590.42901 0.072590.64579 0.0700151 0

Table 1695: Base 64 representation:D0aDfgyDGF91JrA

Table 1696: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.339 4.481 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.6 NaN dctsCm error -38 NaN mctsUpper transition point 4.95 NaN %

Figure 1275: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1276: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

429

Page 438: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe373

Information: Gttingen 373 ProfileReference: UIUC

Figure 1277: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1697: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.5944 % @0.24CMaximum Camber: 5.0853 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.42147 %CLower nose radius: 1.8942 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.2361 degRelease Angle: 7.2929 degNose Incidence: 8.2961 degCamber deflection: 15.589 deg

Table 1698: Controlpoints1 00.21053 0.0507050.022759 -0.009870.0126 -0.009870.00378 -0.009870 -0.0069090 00 0.0128450.05872 0.082990.29917 0.082990.35524 0.082990.56948 0.082991 0

Table 1699: Base 64 representation:KyTFissBBE zIrA

Table 1700: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.899 5.061 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN -65.7 dctsCm error NaN 15 mctsUpper transition point NaN 0.18 %

Figure 1278: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1279: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

430

Page 439: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe374

Information: Gttingen 374 profileReference: UIUC

Figure 1280: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1701: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.6411 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 4.4309 % @0.3CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.473 %CLower nose radius: 0.30378 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.5858 degRelease Angle: 5.9005 degNose Incidence: 17.7723 degCamber deflection: 23.6728 deg

Table 1702: Controlpoints1 00.022395 0.0274360.022395 -0.003940.01252 -0.003940.003756 -0.003940 -0.0027580 00 0.0109070.037729 0.07750.29961 0.07750.33543 0.07750.58492 0.0746361 0

Table 1703: Base 64 representation:J3TDgssBBC9 KpA

Table 1704: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.956 8.86 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 4 -0.5 dctsCm error -35 -39 mctsUpper transition point 3.74 3.16 %

Figure 1281: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1282: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

431

Page 440: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe381

Information: Gttingen 381Reference: UIUC

Figure 1283: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1705: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.7682 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 5.586 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %CUpper nose radius: 0.091186 %CLower nose radius: 0.17082 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.2804 degRelease Angle: 6.7586 degNose Incidence: 11.7689 degCamber deflection: 18.5275 deg

Table 1706: Controlpoints1 -0.00080.074652 0.0577170.033645 -0.005340.01252 -0.005340.00626 -0.005340 -0.002670 00 0.00603530.05093 0.089480.29959 0.089480.61732 0.089480.88026 0.0216961 0.0008

Table 1707: Base 64 representation:E0TslggBBCU8HqE

Table 1708: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 9.044 9.729 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 56.6 -4 dctsCm error -14 -30 mctsUpper transition point 5.41 5.34 %

Figure 1284: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1285: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

432

Page 441: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe383

Information: Gottingen 383 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1286: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1709: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 20.1888 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.9227 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.32001 %CUpper nose radius: 7.083 %CLower nose radius: 10.6884 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 21.6699 degRelease Angle: 5.9322 degNose Incidence: 20.5927 degCamber deflection: 26.5249 deg

Table 1710: Controlpoints1 -0.00160.65527 -0.0311710.49708 -0.0525310.20466 -0.0525310.0027949 -0.0525310 -0.0141120 00 0.0981180.20388 0.149960.28668 0.149960.5177 0.149960.6177 0.116781 0.0016

Table 1711: Base 64 representation:pSSV R-NYWyrYpI

Table 1712: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.511 6.624 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.9 2.1 dctsCm error -5 0 mctsUpper transition point -7.18 -7.75 %

Figure 1287: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1288: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

433

Page 442: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe385

Information: Gottingen 385 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1289: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1713: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.8934 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 4.15 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.42 %CUpper nose radius: 0.96711 %CLower nose radius: 0.69449 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.4112 degRelease Angle: 5.2183 degNose Incidence: 12.7174 degCamber deflection: 17.9358 deg

Table 1714: Controlpoints1 -0.00210.12369 -0.00955280.02509 -0.010390.02509 -0.010390.023316 -0.010390 -0.010390 00 0.0240440.089664 0.090840.29923 0.090840.41803 0.090840.54021 0.090841 0.0021

Table 1715: Base 64 representation:RsTLm FCAE 5NoL

Table 1716: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.133 5.161 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.8 -1.8 dctsCm error -16 -24 mctsUpper transition point 2.42 1.89 %

Figure 1290: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1291: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

434

Page 443: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe387

Information: Gottingen 387 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1292: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1717: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.9015 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 5.483 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.6524 %CLower nose radius: 4.8328 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.8505 degRelease Angle: 7.4367 degNose Incidence: 15.9356 degCamber deflection: 23.3723 deg

Table 1718: Controlpoints1 00.33849 -0.0114140.23849 -0.027950.1 -0.027950.0052404 -0.027950 -0.0129940 00 0.0584670.14039 0.127650.3 0.127650.43832 0.127650.55075 0.127651 0

Table 1719: Base 64 representation:shTN1e8GKM 3TrA

Table 1720: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.549 5.216 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1 -0.9 dctsCm error -36 -46 mctsUpper transition point -0.51 -1.01 %

Figure 1293: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1294: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

435

Page 444: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe389

Information: Gottingen 389 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1295: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1721: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.4259 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 3.9925 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.21 %CUpper nose radius: 0.86353 %CLower nose radius: 1.191 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.333 degRelease Angle: 6.3975 degNose Incidence: 6.9206 degCamber deflection: 13.318 deg

Table 1722: Controlpoints1 -0.001050.39392 0.00139310.27082 -0.019180.10039 -0.019180.021484 -0.019180 -0.0130610 00 0.0255960.11381 0.090610.29817 0.090610.40673 0.090610.62062 0.0856021 0.00105

Table 1723: Base 64 representation:SnTKmrxGMI70OpF

Table 1724: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.479 4.884 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.7 -0.8 dctsCm error 17 37 mctsUpper transition point 2.08 1.56 %

Figure 1296: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1297: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

436

Page 445: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe392

Information: Gottingen 392 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1298: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1725: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.9366 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 4.836 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.0045356 %CLower nose radius: 0.12774 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.7899 degRelease Angle: 12.0552 degNose Incidence: 6.3331 degCamber deflection: 18.3883 deg

Table 1726: Controlpoints1 00.58345 0.0229990.30099 -0.01190.15 -0.01190.11866 -0.01190 -0.0100530 00 0.00168150.09351 0.09660.4 0.09660.57583 0.09660.92796 0.0275821 0

Table 1727: Base 64 representation:BwaTo1NKLFSlUyA

Table 1728: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.535 5.513 ectsRMS curvature error: 71.96 69.03 %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1299: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1300: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

437

Page 446: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe393

Information: Gottingen 393 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1301: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1729: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.2277 % @0.24CMaximum Camber: 4.0578 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.13 %CUpper nose radius: 0.96849 %CLower nose radius: 1.7509 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.7154 degRelease Angle: 4.2643 degNose Incidence: 6.8687 degCamber deflection: 11.133 deg

Table 1730: Controlpoints1 -0.000650.15186 0.0349950.070451 -0.012930.05017 -0.012930.011092 -0.012930 -0.0113780 00 0.025960.10437 0.070990.29905 0.070990.43282 0.070990.53282 0.0507581 0.00065

Table 1731: Base 64 representation:XpTMe3xDBG05EmD

Table 1732: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 8.54 10.952 ectsRMS curvature error: 91.73 95.63 %CD error -0.3 0.6 dctsCm error -119 -139 mctsUpper transition point 3.19 3.05 %

Figure 1302: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1303: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

438

Page 447: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe394

Information: Gottingen 394 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1304: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1733: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.0591 % @0.19CMaximum Camber: 5.8436 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.15 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2492 %CLower nose radius: 0.74737 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 2.5124 degRelease Angle: 7.5294 degNose Incidence: 10.725 degCamber deflection: 18.2544 deg

Table 1734: Controlpoints1 -0.000750.23875 0.0829330.14058 -0.011220.02513 -0.011220.019566 -0.011220 -0.00987360 00 0.0374410.16833 0.084860.29905 0.084860.64591 0.084860.65679 0.0537941 0.00075

Table 1735: Base 64 representation:ccTgj3OCIF94DrE

Table 1736: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.722 10.136 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1 -0.1 dctsCm error -63 -65 mctsUpper transition point -2.41 -3.16 %

Figure 1305: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1306: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

439

Page 448: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe395

Information: Gottingen 395 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1307: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1737: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.1672 % @0.12CMaximum Camber: 6.9883 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.15 %CUpper nose radius: 1.072 %CLower nose radius: 0.70554 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.7148 degRelease Angle: 9.7627 degNose Incidence: 11.4391 degCamber deflection: 21.2018 deg

Table 1738: Controlpoints1 -0.000750.21489 0.108270.17059 -0.010940.02511 -0.010940.021835 -0.010940 -0.0101340 00 0.0294220.12113 0.094970.39901 0.094970.6214 0.094970.72676 0.0569391 0.00075

Table 1739: Base 64 representation:UsaYo6ICKFt8EvE

Table 1740: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 9.631 13.103 ectsRMS curvature error: 95.3 Inf %CD error -1.5 4.4 dctsCm error -20 -27 mctsUpper transition point 1.02 1.1 %

Figure 1308: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1309: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

440

Page 449: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe396

Information: Gottingen 396 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1310: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1741: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 4.8735 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 5.6094 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.23575 %CLower nose radius: 0.15617 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.7566 degRelease Angle: 8.8548 degNose Incidence: 10.0467 degCamber deflection: 18.9015 deg

Table 1742: Controlpoints1 00.22204 0.0745870.12887 -0.003960.0125 -0.003960.0034259 -0.003960 -0.00188860 00 0.0129150.10613 0.08020.4 0.08020.59918 0.08020.85843 0.0306951 0

Table 1743: Base 64 representation:KuaVhftBICY4ItA

Table 1744: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.817 12.179 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.4 -3.1 dctsCm error -113 -101 mctsUpper transition point 4.7 4.8 %

Figure 1311: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1312: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

441

Page 450: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe397

Information: Gottingen 397 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1313: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1745: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.1462 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 3.8917 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.43066 %CLower nose radius: 0.41407 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.2804 degRelease Angle: 5.4493 degNose Incidence: 5.2984 degCamber deflection: 10.7477 deg

Table 1746: Controlpoints1 00.15949 0.0338920.098916 -0.007420.0125 -0.007420.0050897 -0.007420 -0.00374830 00 0.0191940.12832 0.06460.4 0.06460.48549 0.06460.62364 0.0568481 0

Table 1747: Base 64 representation:TqaJcglBGD37HoA

Table 1748: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.728 6.287 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1314: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1315: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

442

Page 451: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe398

Information: Gottingen 398 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1316: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1749: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.8849 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.855 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 4.6124 %CLower nose radius: 0.88874 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.16 degRelease Angle: 7.3088 degNose Incidence: 24.1491 degCamber deflection: 31.4579 deg

Table 1750: Controlpoints1 00.40538 -0.0131950.25755 -0.02580.15 -0.02580.087 -0.02580 -0.0227040 00 0.0716780.16709 0.11690.3 0.11690.45638 0.11690.6386 0.102871 0

Table 1751: Base 64 representation:mcTOx3bKIL3yTrA

Table 1752: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.031 4.707 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 2.2 2.9 dctsCm error -52 -33 mctsUpper transition point 0.84 -0.79 %

Figure 1317: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1318: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

443

Page 452: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe399

Information: Gottingen 399 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1319: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1753: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.9305 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.1927 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.78557 %CLower nose radius: 0.26656 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.6276 degRelease Angle: 6.1849 degNose Incidence: 9.4645 degCamber deflection: 15.6494 deg

Table 1754: Controlpoints1 00.20721 0.0258990.10951 -0.00930.02507 -0.00930.011596 -0.00930 -0.00453960 00 0.0289640.16019 0.07590.29939 0.07590.47792 0.07590.63552 0.0675431 0

Table 1755: Base 64 representation:YeTQgfhCGE44KpA

Table 1756: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.897 5.951 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.2 NaN dctsCm error -52 NaN mctsUpper transition point -1.35 NaN %

Figure 1320: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1321: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

444

Page 453: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe400

Information: Gottingen 400 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1322: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1757: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.2388 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 4.7808 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.08 %CUpper nose radius: 0.94009 %CLower nose radius: 1.175 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.0672 degRelease Angle: 6.0315 degNose Incidence: 6.6319 degCamber deflection: 12.6634 deg

Table 1758: Controlpoints1 -0.00040.2082 0.0549390.12677 -0.012670.024995 -0.012670.024992 -0.012670 -0.0120370 00 0.0271850.11792 0.076930.30003 0.076930.47384 0.076930.56863 0.0615251 0.0004

Table 1759: Base 64 representation:XmTQg8ACHFz5FpC

Table 1760: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.372 10.667 ectsRMS curvature error: 71.98 73.55 %CD error -0.3 0.5 dctsCm error -92 -73 mctsUpper transition point 1.52 1 %

Figure 1323: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1324: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

445

Page 454: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe402

Information: Gottingen 402 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1325: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1761: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.8344 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 5.6931 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.82092 %CLower nose radius: 7.8343e-006 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.5388 degRelease Angle: 6.8826 degNose Incidence: 18.2916 degCamber deflection: 25.1742 deg

Table 1762: Controlpoints1 00.12013 0.055560.078913 -0.004930.0125 -0.004930.011205 -0.004930 -0.000606770 00 0.020950.080198 0.09080.3 0.09080.56649 0.09080.97118 0.00516011 0

Table 1763: Base 64 representation:PuTYmIHBECE8HqA

Table 1764: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.218 6.897 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 2.9 -0.4 dctsCm error -5 3 mctsUpper transition point -0.1 -0.55 %

Figure 1326: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1327: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

446

Page 455: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe403

Information: Gottingen 403 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1328: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1765: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.7443 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 4.27 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.13582 %CLower nose radius: 0.32985 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.7623 degRelease Angle: 6.5412 degNose Incidence: 4.2673 degCamber deflection: 10.8085 deg

Table 1766: Controlpoints1 00.25933 0.0344120.14177 -0.009970.0501 -0.009970.031675 -0.009970 -0.009970 00 0.0101660.11413 0.075140.29921 0.075140.40232 0.075140.59149 0.075141 0

Table 1767: Base 64 representation:JnTJg YDGE 2JqA

Table 1768: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.8 4.009 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.7 2 dctsCm error -3 3 mctsUpper transition point -1.2 -2.24 %

Figure 1329: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1330: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

447

Page 456: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe405

Information: Gottingen 405 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1331: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1769: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.0564 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 6.508 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.038292 %CLower nose radius: 0.46764 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.0051 degRelease Angle: 10.5091 degNose Incidence: 12.4431 degCamber deflection: 22.9522 deg

Table 1770: Controlpoints1 00.25061 0.0328050.14203 -0.01480.075 -0.01480.049258 -0.01480 -0.01480 00 0.00218950.044978 0.11990.4 0.11990.44806 0.11990.66284 0.112891 0

Table 1771: Base 64 representation:B4aFy WFFG73SwA

Table 1772: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.115 7.693 ectsRMS curvature error: 29.9 29.75 %CD error 5.3 0.4 dctsCm error -19 -31 mctsUpper transition point -0.97 -0.37 %

Figure 1332: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1333: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

448

Page 457: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe409

Information: Gottingen 409 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1334: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1773: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.6576 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: -0.12769 % @0.04CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5858 %CLower nose radius: 2.076 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.0583 degRelease Angle: -5.2803 degNose Incidence: -2.7304 degCamber deflection: -8.0107 deg

Table 1774: Controlpoints1 00.64362 -0.058420.42276 -0.06350.4 -0.06350.34335 -0.06350 -0.06350 00 0.0484730.22811 0.06350.3 0.06350.70908 0.06350.96173 -0.00083571 0

Table 1775: Base 64 representation:wPTkb JaCbI6JXA

Table 1776: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.404 5.271 ectsRMS curvature error: 43.36 43.66 %CD error -7.8 -7.8 dctsCm error 45 56 mctsUpper transition point 10.32 10.01 %

Figure 1335: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1336: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

449

Page 458: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe410

Information: Gottingen 410 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1337: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1777: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.1 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: -5.8149e-007 % @0.94CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.917 %CLower nose radius: 2.917 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.927 degRelease Angle: -1.3457e-005 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: -1.3457e-005 deg

Table 1778: Controlpoints1 00.78865 -0.0164980.44556 -0.08050.3 -0.08050.027951 -0.08050 -0.0225090 00 0.0225090.027951 0.08050.3 0.08050.44556 0.08050.7886 0.0165021 0

Table 1779: Base 64 representation:S5TNhS5TNhYYKgA

Table 1780: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.579 5.948 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -4.8 -4.4 dctsCm error -4 -3 mctsUpper transition point 6.73 6.32 %

Figure 1338: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1339: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

450

Page 459: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe411

Information: Gottingen 411 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1340: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1781: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.2 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: -0.0091147 % @0.93CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.088551 %CLower nose radius: 0.088551 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 0 degRelease Angle: -0.43625 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: -0.43625 deg

Table 1782: Controlpoints1 00.9991 -6.8401e-0060.68234 -0.0660.3 -0.0660.073127 -0.0660 -0.00657040 00 0.00657040.073127 0.0660.3 0.0660.68234 0.0660.99682 -2.4187e-0051 0

Table 1783: Base 64 representation:GvTicGvTicBAAfA

Table 1784: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.058 4.568 ectsRMS curvature error: 31.81 32.03 %CD error -5.5 2.4 dctsCm error -14 14 mctsUpper transition point 7.42 -6.29 %

Figure 1341: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1342: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

451

Page 460: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe413

Information: Gottingen 413 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1343: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1785: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.5159 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 4.6018 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %CUpper nose radius: 3.6724 %CLower nose radius: 6.6392 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.5479 degRelease Angle: 8.4417 degNose Incidence: 4.4003 degCamber deflection: 12.842 deg

Table 1786: Controlpoints1 -0.00080.72698 0.0190950.29494 -0.049630.14996 -0.049630.0096499 -0.049630 -0.0201710 00 0.0643420.1691 0.123550.3001 0.123550.56336 0.123550.68618 0.0716121 0.0008

Table 1787: Base 64 representation:gcTY0a7KLVtZKtE

Table 1788: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.079 5.153 ectsRMS curvature error: 58.08 57.71 %CD error -1.2 -0.3 dctsCm error 6 10 mctsUpper transition point -6.09 -7.1 %

Figure 1344: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1345: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

452

Page 461: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe414

Information: Gottingen 414 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1346: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1789: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.2978 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 5.2326 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.21 %CUpper nose radius: 0.0016212 %CLower nose radius: 0.43332 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.2078 degRelease Angle: 8.6647 degNose Incidence: 6.9485 degCamber deflection: 15.6132 deg

Table 1790: Controlpoints1 -0.001050.35163 -0.00601950.26023 -0.025350.10072 -0.025350.022889 -0.025350 -0.0083850 00 0.000624920.048875 0.117910.39667 0.117910.42608 0.117910.6477 0.113951 0.00105

Table 1791: Base 64 representation:A3ZDxVwGLL93UtF

Table 1792: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.047 8.447 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -9.4 -9 dctsCm error -68 -81 mctsUpper transition point 12 11.12 %

Figure 1347: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1348: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

453

Page 462: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe416a

Information: Gottingen 416A airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1349: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1793: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.6911 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 1.3532 % @0.63CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.27 %CUpper nose radius: 0.98012 %CLower nose radius: 0.049095 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.178 degRelease Angle: 3.3666 degNose Incidence: 11.7504 degCamber deflection: 15.117 deg

Table 1794: Controlpoints1 -0.001350.58764 -0.00654960.49271 -0.0500610.30381 -0.0500610.096562 -0.0500610 -0.00562180 00 0.0281240.12105 0.0668610.2949 0.0668610.5612 0.0668610.85388 0.0204721 0.00135

Table 1795: Base 64 representation:blTYsHrTRVVzJlH

Table 1796: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.495 6.12 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.9 -0.9 dctsCm error -11 -31 mctsUpper transition point 1.62 2.44 %

Figure 1350: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1351: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

454

Page 463: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe417

Information: Gottingen 417 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1352: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1797: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.7871 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 6.0741 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.54844 %CLower nose radius: 9.6905e-006 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.0024 degRelease Angle: 9.5776 degNose Incidence: 16.7286 degCamber deflection: 26.3061 deg

Table 1798: Controlpoints1 00.12039 0.0781380.11095 -0.005920.0125 -0.005920.011977 -0.005920 -8.716e-0050 00 0.0149380.061033 0.088450.3 0.088450.41323 0.088450.64731 0.088451 0

Table 1799: Base 64 representation:LyTKlBDBGD -KvA

Table 1800: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.999 8.437 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -13.7 -15.9 dctsCm error -36 -53 mctsUpper transition point 2.8 2.1 %

Figure 1353: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1354: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

455

Page 464: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe418

Information: Gottingen 418 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1355: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1801: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.6486 % @0.24CMaximum Camber: 4.9479 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 5.1921 %CLower nose radius: 3.8831 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.1492 degRelease Angle: 7.0599 degNose Incidence: 11.9042 degCamber deflection: 18.9641 deg

Table 1802: Controlpoints1 00.24746 0.00637490.14746 -0.034220.075 -0.034220.045235 -0.034220 -0.0277180 00 0.0832320.20014 0.11110.3 0.11110.38792 0.11110.54651 0.111 0

Table 1803: Base 64 representation:vVTIuzZFFP-3PrA

Table 1804: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.265 6.278 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1 -0.3 dctsCm error -12 -24 mctsUpper transition point 1 -0.04 %

Figure 1356: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1357: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

456

Page 465: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe419

Information: Gottingen 419 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1358: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1805: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.608 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 3.9462 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 4.1458e-005 %CLower nose radius: 0.17586 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.8862 degRelease Angle: 7.2801 degNose Incidence: 4.0323 degCamber deflection: 11.3124 deg

Table 1806: Controlpoints1 00.11662 0.0283330.10917 -0.00487490.025025 -0.00487490.0081427 -0.00487490 -0.00308980 00 0.000141140.072076 0.0674990.39967 0.0674990.60802 0.0674990.90822 0.0207221 0

Table 1807: Base 64 representation:AzaWsoqCGCU-MrA

Table 1808: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.879 7.741 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 45.8 -1 dctsCm error 12 25 mctsUpper transition point 3.16 3.23 %

Figure 1359: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1360: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

457

Page 466: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe420

Information: Gottingen 420 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1361: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1809: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.8 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.2452 % @0.5CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.2268 %CLower nose radius: 3.2536 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.0077 degRelease Angle: 7.8854 degNose Incidence: 5.3485 degCamber deflection: 13.2338 deg

Table 1810: Controlpoints1 00.73561 -0.000546880.36884 -0.06040.2 -0.06040.13209 -0.06040 -0.0535260 00 0.0593330.16065 0.131150.3 0.131150.59637 0.131150.70436 0.0841561 0

Table 1811: Base 64 representation:seTb34WNOaubSsA

Table 1812: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.695 7.115 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 4.6 4.8 dctsCm error 62 78 mctsUpper transition point -11.83 -12.24 %

Figure 1362: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1363: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

458

Page 467: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe423

Information: Gottingen 423 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1364: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1813: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.9924 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: 5.0724 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %CUpper nose radius: 2.5566 %CLower nose radius: 3.0794 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 23.1945 degRelease Angle: 7.4099 degNose Incidence: 5.8643 degCamber deflection: 13.2741 deg

Table 1814: Controlpoints1 -0.00080.84323 -0.0122770.43543 -0.038930.15095 -0.038930.057169 -0.038930 -0.0342580 00 0.0539420.17072 0.135340.39671 0.135340.46533 0.135340.69196 0.106911 0.0008

Table 1815: Base 64 representation:ajZH53nKVRxTarE

Table 1816: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.67 7.207 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.3 -0.8 dctsCm error -52 -44 mctsUpper transition point 0.55 -0.42 %

Figure 1365: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1366: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

459

Page 468: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe424

Information: Gottingen 424 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1367: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1817: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 20.0069 % @0.36CMaximum Camber: 4.7639 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %CUpper nose radius: 0.76731 %CLower nose radius: 0.95124 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 25.5181 degRelease Angle: 7.0652 degNose Incidence: 19.4551 degCamber deflection: 26.5203 deg

Table 1818: Controlpoints1 -0.000800020.65105 -0.0355920.47039 -0.0535110.30532 -0.0535110.21266 -0.0535110 -0.0367230 00 0.0129610.032842 0.147430.38538 0.147430.42345 0.147430.70635 0.106661 0.00080002

Table 1819: Base 64 representation:G6ZE-rTUPXtpsrE

Table 1820: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.146 6.536 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.5 -3.4 dctsCm error 0 -12 mctsUpper transition point -0.26 0.47 %

Figure 1368: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1369: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

460

Page 469: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe425

Information: Gottingen 425 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1370: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1821: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.9602 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 4.4564 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.11 %CUpper nose radius: 2.7728 %CLower nose radius: 6.9395 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.3378 degRelease Angle: 5.586 degNose Incidence: 12.8413 degCamber deflection: 18.4272 deg

Table 1822: Controlpoints1 -0.000550.566 -0.0125440.466 -0.036780.20197 -0.036780.0022275 -0.036780 -0.0105190 00 0.0592760.19008 0.123810.29337 0.123810.5314 0.123810.6314 0.0839891 0.00055

Table 1823: Base 64 representation:fXTW0S-NVQxzQoD

Table 1824: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.964 7.1 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 3.2 3.1 dctsCm error -6 -18 mctsUpper transition point -7.24 -7.09 %

Figure 1371: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1372: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

461

Page 470: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe426

Information: Gottingen 426 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1373: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1825: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.6278 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 4.4709 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.425 %CLower nose radius: 4.9278 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.0943 degRelease Angle: 7.818 degNose Incidence: 4.6862 degCamber deflection: 12.5042 deg

Table 1826: Controlpoints1 00.72362 0.0133760.44154 -0.02650.2 -0.02650.01359 -0.02650 -0.021130 00 0.0383910.15515 0.11150.3 0.11150.48573 0.11150.58573 0.0946161 0

Table 1827: Base 64 representation:WfTRvy7NTL1gLsA

Table 1828: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.196 6.004 ectsRMS curvature error: 37.57 37.1 %CD error 2.8 3.1 dctsCm error -10 -8 mctsUpper transition point -3.96 -4.52 %

Figure 1374: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1375: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

462

Page 471: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe427

Information: Gottingen 427 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1376: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1829: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 4.5848 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 5.2875 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.36927 %CLower nose radius: 6.4613e-006 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.4311 degRelease Angle: 9.3147 degNose Incidence: 11.6696 degCamber deflection: 20.9844 deg

Table 1830: Controlpoints1 00.13119 0.0698910.13119 -0.00444370.01252 -0.00444370.011129 -0.00444370 -2.1895e-0050 00 0.0155270.097932 0.0757990.39966 0.0757990.42181 0.0757990.72166 0.0695541 0

Table 1831: Base 64 representation:NvaCgAHBIC6 LuA

Table 1832: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.216 9.084 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.3 -0.1 dctsCm error 19 -29 mctsUpper transition point -0.07 2.23 %

Figure 1377: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1378: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

463

Page 472: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe428

Information: Gottingen 428 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1379: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1833: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.9581 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 5.2091 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.63886 %CLower nose radius: 0.17985 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.4008 degRelease Angle: 8.0777 degNose Incidence: 13.5643 degCamber deflection: 21.642 deg

Table 1834: Controlpoints1 00.30291 0.0411370.15694 -0.00680.025 -0.00680.010674 -0.00680 -0.00357740 00 0.0217470.11104 0.09040.3 0.09040.44772 0.09040.65318 0.0786571 0

Table 1835: Base 64 representation:PnTOmhkCJD30LsA

Table 1836: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.016 6.394 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1 2.8 dctsCm error 4 -3 mctsUpper transition point -2.9 -4.15 %

Figure 1380: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1381: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

464

Page 473: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe430

Information: Gottingen 430 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1382: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1837: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.3279 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 4.8778 % @0.53CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.22 %CUpper nose radius: 0.43273 %CLower nose radius: 2.0588 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.666 degRelease Angle: 12.2581 degNose Incidence: 0.86185 degCamber deflection: 13.1199 deg

Table 1838: Controlpoints1 -0.00110.65613 0.046770.37527 -0.039340.10172 -0.039340.076868 -0.039340 -0.0324810 00 0.0114670.045577 0.107510.39529 0.107510.448 0.107510.66553 0.100751 0.0011

Table 1839: Base 64 representation:H4ZGt0QHTR7iKzG

Table 1840: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.871 5.724 ectsRMS curvature error: 31 30.67 %CD error -6.6 -6.8 dctsCm error -20 -8 mctsUpper transition point 6 5.87 %

Figure 1383: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1384: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

465

Page 474: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe431

Information: Gottingen 431 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1385: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1841: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.5696 % @0.2CMaximum Camber: 7.2849 % @0.53CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.032883 %CLower nose radius: 0.32999 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.6936 degRelease Angle: 15.9288 degNose Incidence: 15.1582 degCamber deflection: 31.087 deg

Table 1842: Controlpoints1 00.54469 0.0933130.22809 -0.02430.1 -0.02430.055803 -0.02430 -0.011080 00 0.00235440.025287 0.11730.4 0.11730.55964 0.11730.70748 0.108061 0

Table 1843: Base 64 representation:B7aRxscGJK6lK5A

Table 1844: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.624 8.643 ectsRMS curvature error: 46.36 45.07 %CD error -1.8 -1.7 dctsCm error -28 -46 mctsUpper transition point 3.83 4.28 %

Figure 1386: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1387: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

466

Page 475: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe432

Information: Gottingen 432 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1388: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1845: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.6998 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 4.3382 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2953 %CLower nose radius: 0.22162 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.3083 degRelease Angle: 7.9562 degNose Incidence: 17.4752 degCamber deflection: 25.4314 deg

Table 1846: Controlpoints1 00.29832 0.0282080.21287 -0.008770.025 -0.008770.020233 -0.008770 -0.00546740 00 0.0239320.066329 0.08020.3 0.08020.42242 0.08020.75482 0.0593631 0

Table 1847: Base 64 representation:TxTLhnMCMEu4NsA

Table 1848: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.673 6.489 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2 -2.2 dctsCm error -44 -16 mctsUpper transition point 4.64 3.44 %

Figure 1389: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1390: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

467

Page 476: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe433

Information: Gottingen 433 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1391: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1849: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.6271 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 4.8521 % @0.52CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %CUpper nose radius: 4.3429 %CLower nose radius: 3.0567 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.3182 degRelease Angle: 10.7795 degNose Incidence: 9.8432 degCamber deflection: 20.6227 deg

Table 1850: Controlpoints1 -0.00080.66117 0.0355320.4094 -0.05480.15364 -0.05480.072211 -0.05480 -0.038360 00 0.0729240.18368 0.127460.29154 0.127460.51341 0.127460.60633 0.109521 0.0008

Table 1851: Base 64 representation:kYTU1shKTX2kKwE

Table 1852: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.434 8.148 ectsRMS curvature error: 48.61 47.23 %CD error 5.8 2 dctsCm error -11 -10 mctsUpper transition point -10.67 -4.93 %

Figure 1392: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1393: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

468

Page 477: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe436

Information: Gottingen 436 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1394: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1853: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.0315 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 3.7774 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4606 %CLower nose radius: 1.6546 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.4159 degRelease Angle: 5.7826 degNose Incidence: 7.1589 degCamber deflection: 12.9415 deg

Table 1854: Controlpoints1 00.19742 -0.0199690.09742 -0.022830.075 -0.022830.04725 -0.022830 -0.022830 00 0.0312990.1006 0.09250.3 0.09250.43256 0.09250.66564 0.0771361 0

Table 1855: Base 64 representation:WqTMm YFCK04QoA

Table 1856: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.549 5.622 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.9 -0.9 dctsCm error -10 15 mctsUpper transition point 4.13 3.29 %

Figure 1395: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1396: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

469

Page 478: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe437

Information: Gottingen 437 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1397: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1857: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.1094 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 4.7948 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.38449 %CLower nose radius: 0.0037659 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.0867 degRelease Angle: 7.6751 degNose Incidence: 11.3715 degCamber deflection: 19.0466 deg

Table 1858: Controlpoints1 00.26139 0.0404130.15547 -0.006830.025 -0.006830.0092825 -0.006830 -0.000482740 00 0.0166120.10766 0.08210.3 0.08210.482 0.08210.69669 0.065681 0

Table 1859: Base 64 representation:NoTRiFnCJDy3KrA

Table 1860: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.913 4.188 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1 2 dctsCm error -18 0 mctsUpper transition point -2.28 -3.36 %

Figure 1398: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1399: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

470

Page 479: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe438

Information: Gottingen 438 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1400: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1861: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.0369 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 3.7747 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6151 %CLower nose radius: 1.4848 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.2694 degRelease Angle: 5.7245 degNose Incidence: 8.158 degCamber deflection: 13.8826 deg

Table 1862: Controlpoints1 00.225 -0.0190780.125 -0.022740.05057 -0.022740.040456 -0.022740 -0.0200110 00 0.0333360.10321 0.092440.29769 0.092440.42529 0.092440.64365 0.0813471 0

Table 1863: Base 64 representation:XpTMm3NDFK34QoA

Table 1864: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.627 5.88 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.4 -0.2 dctsCm error -3 7 mctsUpper transition point -0.78 -1.13 %

Figure 1401: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1402: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

471

Page 480: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe439

Information: Gottingen 439 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1403: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1865: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.9136 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 5.2367 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.5772 %CLower nose radius: 0.026077 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.4661 degRelease Angle: 7.8249 degNose Incidence: 13.4336 degCamber deflection: 21.2586 deg

Table 1866: Controlpoints1 00.24318 0.040880.18588 -0.00730.025 -0.00730.0096113 -0.00730 -0.00129260 00 0.0204350.10853 0.09040.3 0.09040.44825 0.09040.63886 0.0804471 0

Table 1867: Base 64 representation:OoTOmLmCLD46LsA

Table 1868: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.773 7.612 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.3 3.7 dctsCm error 15 19 mctsUpper transition point -3.28 -4.35 %

Figure 1404: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1405: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

472

Page 481: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe442

Information: Gottingen 442 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1406: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1869: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.7015 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 4.3281 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5272 %CLower nose radius: 0.22053 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.0072 degRelease Angle: 7.8282 degNose Incidence: 17.9762 degCamber deflection: 25.8044 deg

Table 1870: Controlpoints1 00.30055 0.0283930.20846 -0.008770.02508 -0.008770.020358 -0.008770 -0.00547080 00 0.0278510.08064 0.080190.29928 0.080190.40626 0.080190.73506 0.0627841 0

Table 1871: Base 64 representation:WuTKhnMCMEx4MsA

Table 1872: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.832 4.802 ectsRMS curvature error: 47.67 48.23 %CD error 0 -0.7 dctsCm error 39 -43 mctsUpper transition point 0.02 -0.2 %

Figure 1407: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1408: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

473

Page 482: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe445

Information: Gottingen 445 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1409: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1873: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.4 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: -1.1189e-006 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.20219 %CLower nose radius: 0.20219 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.6656 degRelease Angle: -1.4606e-005 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: -1.4606e-005 deg

Table 1874: Controlpoints1 00.76656 -0.021790.45132 -0.0320.4 -0.0320.104 -0.0320 -0.011840 00 0.011840.104 0.0320.4 0.0320.45131 0.0320.76655 0.0217911 0

Table 1875: Base 64 representation:YuaFOYuaFOrrMgA

Table 1876: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.555 4.201 ectsRMS curvature error: 25.89 26.52 %CD error -1.5 -1.3 dctsCm error -1 -2 mctsUpper transition point 0.47 0.5 %

Figure 1410: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1411: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

474

Page 483: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe446

Information: Gottingen 446 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1412: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1877: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.8255 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 6.3749 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.32 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2127 %CLower nose radius: 2.0122 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.1647 degRelease Angle: 11.0492 degNose Incidence: 6.6961 degCamber deflection: 17.7453 deg

Table 1878: Controlpoints1 -0.00160.3446 0.0209070.13192 -0.023820.05056 -0.023820.031135 -0.023820 -0.0209290 00 0.0287880.10251 0.126890.39703 0.126890.61449 0.126890.86175 0.0522771 0.0016

Table 1879: Base 64 representation:PuZX13ZDFKavUxI

Table 1880: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.55 5.185 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.2 -0.9 dctsCm error 1 19 mctsUpper transition point -0.49 -1.43 %

Figure 1413: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1414: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

475

Page 484: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe447

Information: Gottingen 447 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1415: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1881: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.6224 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 7.9444 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.32 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3659 %CLower nose radius: 2.114 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.9683 degRelease Angle: 12.6037 degNose Incidence: 10.5191 degCamber deflection: 23.1228 deg

Table 1882: Controlpoints1 -0.00160.24548 0.0527430.14548 -0.019810.05039 -0.019810.019044 -0.019810 -0.0174330 00 0.0316420.10995 0.141830.39721 0.141830.49416 0.141830.67999 0.1251 0.0016

Table 1883: Base 64 representation:OtZK83nDGI34TzI

Table 1884: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.006 9.765 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 2.9 4.4 dctsCm error -10 12 mctsUpper transition point -1.05 -2.3 %

Figure 1416: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1417: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

476

Page 485: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe449

Information: Gottingen 449 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1418: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1885: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.0506 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 5.3879 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.7671 %CLower nose radius: 1.8432 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 21.5381 degRelease Angle: 9.3317 degNose Incidence: 15.0816 degCamber deflection: 24.4133 deg

Table 1886: Controlpoints1 00.90754 -0.00231990.4616 -0.03660.15 -0.03660.084421 -0.03660 -0.0322080 00 0.0403430.088226 0.13840.4 0.13840.49875 0.13840.6701 0.120731 0

Table 1887: Base 64 representation:TxaL63cKXQ3LYuA

Table 1888: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.052 5.257 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.2 -0.6 dctsCm error 7 -4 mctsUpper transition point 3.81 4.42 %

Figure 1419: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1420: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

477

Page 486: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe450

Information: Gottingen 450 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1421: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1889: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.7531 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 5.2139 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.21 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0657 %CLower nose radius: 1.0622 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.7471 degRelease Angle: 9.0734 degNose Incidence: 10.293 degCamber deflection: 19.3664 deg

Table 1890: Controlpoints1 -0.001050.33125 0.0304860.16759 -0.011240.02512 -0.011240.013816 -0.011240 -0.00989120 00 0.0289320.11782 0.095270.399 0.095270.45193 0.095270.67952 0.0896071 0.00105

Table 1891: Base 64 representation:TsaGo3sCJF7yOuF

Table 1892: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.781 5.072 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.1 1.8 dctsCm error -18 -35 mctsUpper transition point 2.63 3.25 %

Figure 1422: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1423: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

478

Page 487: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe456

Information: Gottingen 456 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1424: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1893: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.2615 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 5.2122 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.0052411 %CLower nose radius: 0.1414 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.8638 degRelease Angle: 9.1033 degNose Incidence: 8.4692 degCamber deflection: 17.5725 deg

Table 1894: Controlpoints1 00.3538 0.047130.1701 -0.007940.07506 -0.007940.051791 -0.007940 -0.00698720 00 0.00145530.060617 0.0870.39935 0.0870.44016 0.0870.66798 0.0829991 0

Table 1895: Base 64 representation:B1aEk3UFHD8xLuA

Table 1896: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.046 3.919 ectsRMS curvature error: 36.85 45.31 %CD error -0.7 0 dctsCm error -13 -14 mctsUpper transition point 1.3 1.89 %

Figure 1425: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1426: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

479

Page 488: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe457

Information: Gottingen 457 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1427: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1897: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.8231 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 4.2234 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2019 %CLower nose radius: 0.67779 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.0727 degRelease Angle: 8.296 degNose Incidence: 13.873 degCamber deflection: 22.1691 deg

Table 1898: Controlpoints1 00.33601 0.0262010.16551 -0.010830.05012 -0.010830.019397 -0.010830 -0.0093620 00 0.0248590.077125 0.079910.29909 0.079910.36238 0.079910.73573 0.067521 0

Table 1899: Base 64 representation:UuTGh2mDIF1yNsA

Table 1900: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.564 4.433 ectsRMS curvature error: 87.77 88.92 %CD error 2.1 1.7 dctsCm error -13 -8 mctsUpper transition point -2.72 -3.07 %

Figure 1428: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1429: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

480

Page 489: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe458

Information: Gottingen 458 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1430: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1901: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.2615 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 5.2122 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.0052411 %CLower nose radius: 0.0071116 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.8638 degRelease Angle: 9.1033 degNose Incidence: 8.9843 degCamber deflection: 18.0877 deg

Table 1902: Controlpoints1 00.3538 0.047130.1701 -0.007940.07506 -0.007940.0010649 -0.007940 -4.267e-0050 00 0.00145530.060617 0.0870.39935 0.0870.44016 0.0870.67143 0.0821371 0

Table 1903: Base 64 representation:B1aEkA-FHD7xLuA

Table 1904: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.027 4.065 ectsRMS curvature error: 37.23 44.84 %CD error -0.4 -51.1 dctsCm error -10 25 mctsUpper transition point 1.01 0.05 %

Figure 1431: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1432: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

481

Page 490: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe459

Information: Gottingen 459 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1433: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1905: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.7 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 1.199e-005 % @0.89CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3727 %CLower nose radius: 1.3727 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.9222 degRelease Angle: 0.0022627 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: 0.0022627 deg

Table 1906: Controlpoints1 00.98632 -0.00227990.64816 -0.06350.3 -0.06350.10323 -0.06350 -0.0307360 00 0.0307360.10323 0.06350.3 0.06350.64816 0.06350.98639 0.00226931 0

Table 1907: Base 64 representation:fpTgbfpTgbCCVgA

Table 1908: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.046 3.589 ectsRMS curvature error: 28.96 28.83 %CD error -5.8 -5.6 dctsCm error -21 -21 mctsUpper transition point 7.74 7.55 %

Figure 1434: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1435: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

482

Page 491: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe460

Information: Gottingen 460 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1436: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1909: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 20.5 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: -7.1172e-006 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.8239 %CLower nose radius: 2.8239 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 27.4565 degRelease Angle: -2.8766e-005 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: -2.8766e-005 deg

Table 1910: Controlpoints1 00.5872 -0.100850.39947 -0.10250.3 -0.10250.1059 -0.10250 -0.044650 00 0.044650.1059 0.10250.3 0.10250.3995 0.10250.58722 0.100841 0

Table 1911: Base 64 representation:coTJrcoTJr–fgA

Table 1912: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.782 4.551 ectsRMS curvature error: 39.38 40.08 %CD error -6.4 -6.2 dctsCm error -26 -6 mctsUpper transition point 7.66 7.4 %

Figure 1437: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1438: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

483

Page 492: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe464

Information: Gottingen 464 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1439: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1913: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.0441 % @0.07CMaximum Camber: 9.8669 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 4.5909 %CLower nose radius: 0.37633 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.0187 degRelease Angle: 13.6193 degNose Incidence: 32.2149 degCamber deflection: 45.8342 deg

Table 1914: Controlpoints1 00.1404 0.176610.10605 -0.006320.02504 -0.006320.01592 -0.006320 -0.006320 00 0.0565550.1045 0.122090.29915 0.122090.53513 0.122090.79126 0.0583951 0

Table 1915: Base 64 representation:epTWz XCFDf9E1A

Table 1916: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 12.542 11.851 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 29.5 NaN dctsCm error -6 NaN mctsUpper transition point 0.73 NaN %

Figure 1440: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1441: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

484

Page 493: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe477

Information: Gottingen 477 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1442: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1917: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.8518 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 4.9035 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.6439 %CLower nose radius: 0.25607 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.4336 degRelease Angle: 6.7365 degNose Incidence: 12.0033 degCamber deflection: 18.7398 deg

Table 1918: Controlpoints1 00.29472 0.0125530.19472 -0.015180.05 -0.015180.015208 -0.015180 -0.00509530 00 0.0165750.064 0.09750.4 0.09750.63519 0.09750.74957 0.0553051 0

Table 1919: Base 64 representation:L1aZpVsDKGr3NqA

Table 1920: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.864 9.864 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.6 3.3 dctsCm error -14 -1 mctsUpper transition point 6.88 -6.83 %

Figure 1443: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1444: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

485

Page 494: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe478

Information: Gottingen 478 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1445: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1921: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.4047 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.2504 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.5244 %CLower nose radius: 3.718 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.3845 degRelease Angle: 6.8221 degNose Incidence: 7.7601 degCamber deflection: 14.5822 deg

Table 1922: Controlpoints1 00.2613 -0.024120.1613 -0.03360.10129 -0.03360.026509 -0.03360 -0.0256330 00 0.0709030.21396 0.107890.29585 0.107890.5092 0.107890.65798 0.0949431 0

Table 1923: Base 64 representation:pSTTtwuGEO33TqA

Table 1924: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.512 6.399 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 3.9 3.5 dctsCm error 28 14 mctsUpper transition point -7.2 -6.65 %

Figure 1446: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1447: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

486

Page 495: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe479

Information: Gottingen 479 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1448: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1925: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.6665 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 3.9638 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.6313 %CLower nose radius: 1.1611 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.6944 degRelease Angle: 6.517 degNose Incidence: 13.6169 degCamber deflection: 20.1339 deg

Table 1926: Controlpoints1 00.48541 -0.00745690.23489 -0.025050.1 -0.025050.058288 -0.025050 -0.0212410 00 0.0563190.18082 0.096850.3 0.096850.44391 0.096850.64691 0.0871461 0

Table 1927: Base 64 representation:kZTNo1bGKL5qQqA

Table 1928: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.481 5.862 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 3.8 3.1 dctsCm error 0 -10 mctsUpper transition point -5.79 -6.4 %

Figure 1449: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1450: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

487

Page 496: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe480

Information: Gottingen 480 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1451: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1929: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.3935 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 5.5227 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.014695 %CLower nose radius: 1.8476 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.4179 degRelease Angle: 8.2503 degNose Incidence: 7.8731 degCamber deflection: 16.1234 deg

Table 1930: Controlpoints1 00.31014 0.0185630.18176 -0.023720.05 -0.023720.045678 -0.023720 -0.023720 00 0.000954570.0093012 0.11070.4 0.11070.43315 0.11070.60753 0.104861 0

Table 1931: Base 64 representation:B-aEu GDJK81PsA

Table 1932: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.43 6.027 ectsRMS curvature error: 55.95 54.51 %CD error 0.8 0.3 dctsCm error -17 -11 mctsUpper transition point -1.14 0.44 %

Figure 1452: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1453: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

488

Page 497: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe481a

Information: Gottingen 481A airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1454: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1933: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.063 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 5.4983 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.1707 %CLower nose radius: 4.8043 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 34.1692 degRelease Angle: 16.1771 degNose Incidence: 5.0422 degCamber deflection: 21.2194 deg

Table 1934: Controlpoints1 00.23653 -0.0120930.13653 -0.043880.07706 -0.043880.060116 -0.043880 -0.043880 00 0.0103920.007462 0.128520.39396 0.128520.4426 0.128520.85532 0.09491 0

Table 1935: Base 64 representation:F-ZF2 OFETu4l5A

Table 1936: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.117 7.619 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -4.1 -4.5 dctsCm error -115 -133 mctsUpper transition point 3.38 3.15 %

Figure 1455: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1456: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

489

Page 498: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe483

Information: Gottingen 483 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1457: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1937: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.4595 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 5.6616 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.39771 %CLower nose radius: 0.1773 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.0825 degRelease Angle: 8.091 degNose Incidence: 12.394 degCamber deflection: 20.485 deg

Table 1938: Controlpoints1 00.20916 0.0768420.12771 -0.004880.025 -0.004880.0087049 -0.004880 -0.00320770 00 0.016580.10368 0.08150.3 0.08150.51585 0.08150.62562 0.0702821 0

Table 1939: Base 64 representation:NpTUippCHC25GsA

Table 1940: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.431 9.543 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.3 -0.5 dctsCm error -65 -69 mctsUpper transition point 4.14 3.55 %

Figure 1458: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1459: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

490

Page 499: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe484

Information: Gottingen 484 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1460: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1941: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.2361 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 5.0047 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.96156 %CLower nose radius: 0.96712 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.3193 degRelease Angle: 10.9065 degNose Incidence: 5.9595 degCamber deflection: 16.866 deg

Table 1942: Controlpoints1 00.46516 0.0585450.11813 -0.01220.025 -0.01220.014585 -0.01220 -0.01220 00 0.0373540.21766 0.07930.4 0.07930.4692 0.07930.73594 0.0735581 0

Table 1943: Base 64 representation:esaHh bCGF6mKxA

Table 1944: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.663 5.104 ectsRMS curvature error: 55.82 57.54 %CD error 0.1 -4.2 dctsCm error -16 -28 mctsUpper transition point -0.51 -1.26 %

Figure 1461: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1462: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

491

Page 500: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe492

Information: Gottingen 492 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1463: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1945: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.3765 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 3.4136 % @0.48CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.24426 %CLower nose radius: 0.33578 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.5069 degRelease Angle: 6.9081 degNose Incidence: 2.5294 degCamber deflection: 9.4375 deg

Table 1946: Controlpoints1 00.51101 0.0226730.25155 -0.011560.07514 -0.011560.018251 -0.011560 -0.00612310 00 0.0174630.18727 0.064490.39919 0.064490.67918 0.064490.91125 0.0175111 0

Table 1947: Base 64 representation:RhaechvFMFSpKqA

Table 1948: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.534 5.472 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 2.8 NaN dctsCm error 0 NaN mctsUpper transition point -8.92 NaN %

Figure 1464: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1465: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

492

Page 501: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe493

Information: Gottingen 493 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1466: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1949: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.0037 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 3.3647 % @0.52CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6168 %CLower nose radius: 0.63881 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.4406 degRelease Angle: 7.3991 degNose Incidence: 8.6015 degCamber deflection: 16.0006 deg

Table 1950: Controlpoints1 00.63438 -0.00843260.52062 -0.0476610.20336 -0.0476610.053349 -0.0476610 -0.0150730 00 0.0421070.16449 0.106170.39251 0.106170.64788 0.106170.90264 0.0281371 0

Table 1951: Base 64 representation:ZkZbsUuNZUSwTrA

Table 1952: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.22 6.373 ectsRMS curvature error: 27.13 25.94 %CD error 0 -0.3 dctsCm error -9 -25 mctsUpper transition point 2.78 2.75 %

Figure 1467: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1468: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

493

Page 502: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe494

Information: Gottingen 494 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1469: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1953: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.0418 % @0.24CMaximum Camber: 5.0647 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.41384 %CLower nose radius: 2.5087e-005 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.985 degRelease Angle: 10.7964 degNose Incidence: 5.5993 degCamber deflection: 16.3956 deg

Table 1954: Controlpoints1 00.47044 0.0772910.20266 -0.007410.01255 -0.007410.0094048 -0.007410 -3.966e-0050 00 0.0226290.1896 0.07130.3995 0.07130.51948 0.07130.71076 0.0683151 0

Table 1955: Base 64 representation:UhaNeAQBMD8qGwA

Table 1956: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.197 5.388 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1470: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1471: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

494

Page 503: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe495

Information: Gottingen 495 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1472: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1957: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.963 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 5.0142 % @0.48CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.95855 %CLower nose radius: 0.39724 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.3159 degRelease Angle: 11.0725 degNose Incidence: 10.7026 degCamber deflection: 21.7751 deg

Table 1958: Controlpoints1 00.52739 0.0615040.2202 -0.010920.05 -0.010920.039398 -0.010920 -0.0102150 00 0.0330140.17056 0.08060.4 0.08060.68439 0.08060.96395 0.00947731 0

Table 1959: Base 64 representation:akaeh7ODLFHmIxA

Table 1960: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.309 5.002 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf 60.57 %CD error -0.5 0.7 dctsCm error -1 1 mctsUpper transition point -1.45 -1.27 %

Figure 1473: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1474: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

495

Page 504: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe496

Information: Gottingen 496 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1475: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1961: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.0015 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 5.0093 % @0.48CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.83845 %CLower nose radius: 1.0624 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.2621 degRelease Angle: 11.3473 degNose Incidence: 6.6097 degCamber deflection: 17.957 deg

Table 1962: Controlpoints1 00.58165 0.0492650.26833 -0.023130.075 -0.023130.07107 -0.023130 -0.0224360 00 0.0209870.078797 0.09450.4 0.09450.53229 0.09450.79624 0.0583441 0

Table 1963: Base 64 representation:OyaOn9DFNKnkKxA

Table 1964: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.685 5.159 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.1 0.4 dctsCm error 15 4 mctsUpper transition point -1.9 -1.09 %

Figure 1476: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1477: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

496

Page 505: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe497

Information: Gottingen 497 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1478: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1965: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.5862 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 5.3095 % @0.5CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3695 %CLower nose radius: 1.0747 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.8622 degRelease Angle: 11.2296 degNose Incidence: 10.1177 degCamber deflection: 21.3473 deg

Table 1966: Controlpoints1 00.57559 0.0430990.33857 -0.03180.1 -0.03180.040958 -0.03180 -0.017130 00 0.0246920.066777 0.10880.4 0.10880.50112 0.10880.69366 0.0916781 0

Table 1967: Base 64 representation:P0aLthlGRO1oMxA

Table 1968: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.267 7.345 ectsRMS curvature error: 15.17 15.19 %CD error -1.2 -1.6 dctsCm error 8 -12 mctsUpper transition point 2.24 3.32 %

Figure 1479: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1480: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

497

Page 506: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe498

Information: Gottingen 498 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1481: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1969: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.7897 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 5.5312 % @0.48CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 5.9243 %CLower nose radius: 1.9432 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.1856 degRelease Angle: 12.2578 degNose Incidence: 21.4246 degCamber deflection: 33.6824 deg

Table 1970: Controlpoints1 00.62668 0.0337450.35019 -0.040970.15203 -0.040970.10034 -0.040970 -0.0360540 00 0.0678220.11647 0.127990.39367 0.127990.4509 0.127990.70265 0.104431 0

Table 1971: Base 64 representation:hsZG23WKPRzkQzA

Table 1972: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.625 7.348 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.9 2.4 dctsCm error 3 15 mctsUpper transition point 0.35 -0.16 %

Figure 1482: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1483: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

498

Page 507: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe499

Information: Gottingen 499 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1484: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1973: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.8817 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 5.8822 % @0.52CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.24471 %CLower nose radius: 1.637 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.8213 degRelease Angle: 13.3239 degNose Incidence: 1.0355 degCamber deflection: 14.3594 deg

Table 1974: Controlpoints1 00.55805 0.0852110.1782 -0.011880.05 -0.011880.010015 -0.011880 -0.0104540 00 0.0152190.14198 0.0870.4 0.0870.60306 0.0870.74565 0.0716591 0

Table 1975: Base 64 representation:LoaWk3yDJF0hF1A

Table 1976: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.069 3.961 ectsRMS curvature error: 28.14 28.96 %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1485: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1486: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

499

Page 508: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe500

Information: Gottingen 501 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1487: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1977: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.0024 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 6.0345 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2684 %CLower nose radius: 0.91273 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.0411 degRelease Angle: 12.2481 degNose Incidence: 9.7698 degCamber deflection: 22.0179 deg

Table 1978: Controlpoints1 00.63338 0.0694560.23128 -0.018960.075 -0.018960.04575 -0.018960 -0.0166850 00 0.0349630.14456 0.10420.4 0.10420.68792 0.10420.90134 0.0241761 0

Table 1979: Base 64 representation:Voafr3ZFLIUfDzA

Table 1980: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.663 8.901 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.8 -1 dctsCm error -83 -97 mctsUpper transition point 4.2 4.98 %

Figure 1488: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1489: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

500

Page 509: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe501

Information: Gottingen 501 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1490: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1981: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.6763 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 6.405 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.3664 %CLower nose radius: 0.99543 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.251 degRelease Angle: 12.4332 degNose Incidence: 15.9795 degCamber deflection: 28.4127 deg

Table 1982: Controlpoints1 00.57676 0.0580350.27342 -0.026550.1 -0.026550.082257 -0.026550 -0.0233640 00 0.0424860.11442 0.12030.4 0.12030.63377 0.12030.85968 0.0430581 0

Table 1983: Base 64 representation:XtaZy3LGMLZkKzA

Table 1984: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.941 8.196 ectsRMS curvature error: 44.3 46.48 %CD error 1.5 1.3 dctsCm error 19 -2 mctsUpper transition point 1.49 2.23 %

Figure 1491: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1492: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

501

Page 510: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe502

Information: Gottingen 502 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1493: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1985: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.8113 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 6.0923 % @0.48CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.287 %CLower nose radius: 2.9421 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.4106 degRelease Angle: 12.9736 degNose Incidence: 9.0953 degCamber deflection: 22.0688 deg

Table 1986: Controlpoints1 00.56117 0.0404640.32185 -0.043340.10219 -0.043340.089122 -0.043340 -0.041810 00 0.0502930.11543 0.132860.39329 0.132860.44956 0.132860.69621 0.114671 0

Table 1987: Base 64 representation:YsZG49IHQS2oR0A

Table 1988: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.976 6.584 ectsRMS curvature error: 26.64 28.43 %CD error -3.4 -2.6 dctsCm error 18 44 mctsUpper transition point -1.49 -2.38 %

Figure 1494: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1495: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

502

Page 511: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe504

Information: Gottingen 504 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1496: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1989: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.6971 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 5.4202 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.12961 %CLower nose radius: 0.70888 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 22.5557 degRelease Angle: 8.149 degNose Incidence: 15.7364 degCamber deflection: 23.8854 deg

Table 1990: Controlpoints1 00.34472 -0.0358190.24472 -0.042370.20233 -0.042370.094796 -0.042370 -0.0211660 00 0.00382760.035741 0.141570.39222 0.141570.39486 0.141570.59989 0.141111 0

Table 1991: Base 64 representation:C5ZA7ghNDS 3ZsA

Table 1992: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.081 9 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -7.6 -7.5 dctsCm error 6 8 mctsUpper transition point 0.42 0.14 %

Figure 1497: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1498: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

503

Page 512: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe506

Information: Gottingen 506 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1499: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1993: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.535 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.6641 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0733 %CLower nose radius: 0.41006 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 20.2841 degRelease Angle: 9.7686 degNose Incidence: 16.2716 degCamber deflection: 26.0402 deg

Table 1994: Controlpoints1 00.97466 -0.000165140.29866 -0.041280.20219 -0.041280.071595 -0.041280 -0.013990 00 0.0240310.080708 0.126540.29329 0.126540.55403 0.126540.68846 0.112841 0

Table 1995: Base 64 representation:MtTY1WoNIS4CXvA

Table 1996: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.54 5.508 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -10.9 -11.4 dctsCm error -85 -69 mctsUpper transition point 5.12 5.59 %

Figure 1500: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1501: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

504

Page 513: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe508

Information: Gottingen 508 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1502: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 1997: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.3467 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 5.6531 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.12771 %CLower nose radius: 2.8569 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.6575 degRelease Angle: 5.0173 degNose Incidence: 12.1159 degCamber deflection: 17.1332 deg

Table 1998: Controlpoints1 00.28422 -0.0288920.18422 -0.03490.1 -0.03490.026343 -0.03490 -0.0223990 00 0.00192730.0043628 0.13740.4 0.13740.57983 0.13740.95612 0.00960511 0

Table 1999: Base 64 representation:B-aT6ouGGPH3QnA

Table 2000: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.918 7.366 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.4 -1.5 dctsCm error -16 -48 mctsUpper transition point 2.83 3.21 %

Figure 1503: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1504: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

505

Page 514: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe517

Information: Gottingen 517 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1505: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2001: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.0825 % @0.36CMaximum Camber: 4.5653 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 16.0872 %CLower nose radius: 0.34038 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.903 degRelease Angle: 6.8639 degNose Incidence: 17.3247 degCamber deflection: 24.1886 deg

Table 2002: Controlpoints1 00.18236 0.0273010.082356 -0.007120.05 -0.007120.0185 -0.007120 -0.00647920 00 0.00302288.52e-005 0.0810.4 0.0810.42669 0.0810.65926 0.071281 0

Table 2003: Base 64 representation:C aDi5nDCD34LqA

Table 2004: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 11.097 11.503 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.2 -1.4 dctsCm error -62 -74 mctsUpper transition point 2.83 3.64 %

Figure 1506: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1507: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

506

Page 515: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe526

Information: Gottingen 526 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1508: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2005: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.6394 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 3.929 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.2883 %CLower nose radius: 1.9606 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 21.0606 degRelease Angle: 2.9537 degNose Incidence: 11.8645 degCamber deflection: 14.8182 deg

Table 2006: Controlpoints1 00.96689 -0.00440360.14088 -0.030130.10086 -0.030130.053786 -0.030130 -0.0265140 00 0.0663110.20059 0.101470.29711 0.101470.51825 0.101470.62761 0.0892941 0

Table 2007: Base 64 representation:pVTUq3eGDN3JYkA

Table 2008: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.185 8.066 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.4 1.5 dctsCm error -4 -6 mctsUpper transition point -2.03 -2.26 %

Figure 1509: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1510: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

507

Page 516: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe527

Information: Gottingen 527 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1511: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2009: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.6101 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 5.7653 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 5.0074 %CLower nose radius: 1.6318 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.9261 degRelease Angle: 8.0999 degNose Incidence: 23.1923 degCamber deflection: 31.2923 deg

Table 2010: Controlpoints1 00.54786 -0.0068120.30712 -0.030410.15113 -0.030410.065831 -0.030410 -0.0267610 00 0.0693630.14412 0.139410.29484 0.139410.45 0.139410.5958 0.124061 0

Table 2011: Base 64 representation:ggTO63jKMN4pUsA

Table 2012: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.954 4.667 ectsRMS curvature error: 37.93 38.53 %CD error 5.3 4.9 dctsCm error 19 15 mctsUpper transition point -4.41 -3.75 %

Figure 1512: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1513: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

508

Page 517: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe528

Information: Gottingen 528 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1514: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2013: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.5163 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 6.1503 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.46 %CLower nose radius: 0.81932 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.5891 degRelease Angle: 9.0304 degNose Incidence: 22.9772 degCamber deflection: 32.0077 deg

Table 2014: Controlpoints1 00.40207 0.0233450.22281 -0.014250.05021 -0.014250.034028 -0.014250 -0.0136330 00 0.0609060.16082 0.122470.29816 0.122470.45061 0.122470.61977 0.107771 0

Table 2015: Base 64 representation:gsTOz8VDMG3wPuA

Table 2016: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.361 3.894 ectsRMS curvature error: 42.85 42.95 %CD error 1.4 1.6 dctsCm error 13 8 mctsUpper transition point -3.47 -4.01 %

Figure 1515: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1516: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

509

Page 518: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe529

Information: Gottingen 529 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1517: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2017: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.7099 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 5.7202 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3626 %CLower nose radius: 0.93778 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.1157 degRelease Angle: 7.7564 degNose Incidence: 13.807 degCamber deflection: 21.5634 deg

Table 2018: Controlpoints1 00.16896 0.0319050.14554 -0.011920.05014 -0.011920.0176 -0.011920 -0.010490 00 0.0353590.13763 0.104940.29879 0.104940.45093 0.104940.60978 0.0923471 0

Table 2019: Base 64 representation:WiTOs3pDGF39MsA

Table 2020: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.462 8.145 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 5.4 5.9 dctsCm error 15 6 mctsUpper transition point -7.86 -7.73 %

Figure 1518: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1519: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

510

Page 519: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe532

Information: Gottingen 532 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1520: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2021: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.6371 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.8395 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 5.2606 %CLower nose radius: 1.783 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.2972 degRelease Angle: 8.1155 degNose Incidence: 24.9651 degCamber deflection: 33.0806 deg

Table 2022: Controlpoints1 00.60927 0.0236710.35353 -0.020980.15 -0.020980.015694 -0.020980 -0.0136580 00 0.0870390.21602 0.110050.3 0.110050.5339 0.110050.97097 0.00657571 0

Table 2023: Base 64 representation:ySTVup4KPJEmKsA

Table 2024: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.436 3.809 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.6 -0.4 dctsCm error 4 6 mctsUpper transition point 2.21 1.68 %

Figure 1521: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1522: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

511

Page 520: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe533

Information: Gottingen 533 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1523: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2025: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.7119 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.6818 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.9369 %CLower nose radius: 2.5084 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.348 degRelease Angle: 8.7806 degNose Incidence: 17.2046 degCamber deflection: 25.9851 deg

Table 2026: Controlpoints1 00.64976 0.0251460.54976 -0.02470.15 -0.02470.0088058 -0.02470 -0.0121350 00 0.0507410.1315 0.11460.3 0.11460.40868 0.11460.56898 0.103121 0

Table 2027: Base 64 representation:cjTKwf7KeL5xKtA

Table 2028: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.357 4.974 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.9 0.9 dctsCm error 1 6 mctsUpper transition point -1.2 -1.57 %

Figure 1524: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1525: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

512

Page 521: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe534

Information: Gottingen 534 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1526: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2029: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.9698 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 5.2917 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 7.9379 %CLower nose radius: 1.4719 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.9801 degRelease Angle: 6.5324 degNose Incidence: 28.8842 degCamber deflection: 35.4166 deg

Table 2030: Controlpoints1 00.41547 0.0413080.35797 -0.031410.10112 -0.031410.077862 -0.031410 -0.0276410 00 0.0523560.051799 0.1160.29588 0.1160.48924 0.1160.98742 0.0019971 0

Table 2031: Base 64 representation:s0TSw3PGSNC5GqA

Table 2032: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.59 10.494 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.6 0.1 dctsCm error -57 -49 mctsUpper transition point 3.11 3.6 %

Figure 1527: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1528: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

513

Page 522: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe535

Information: Gottingen 535 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1529: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2033: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.3279 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 5.7638 % @0.48CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 7.0072 %CLower nose radius: 2.9551 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.8894 degRelease Angle: 12.2529 degNose Incidence: 22.7142 degCamber deflection: 34.9671 deg

Table 2034: Controlpoints1 00.53508 0.0513950.43508 -0.036280.15 -0.036280.044924 -0.036280 -0.029750 00 0.0816420.14268 0.132450.3 0.132450.50254 0.132450.84787 0.0500121 0

Table 2035: Base 64 representation:mhTT4zsKVPY0NzA

Table 2036: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.843 8.773 ectsRMS curvature error: 25.62 25.67 %CD error 2.8 3 dctsCm error -73 -77 mctsUpper transition point 0.93 1 %

Figure 1530: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1531: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

514

Page 523: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe546

Information: Gottingen 546 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1532: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2037: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.3117 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 3.583 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3964 %CLower nose radius: 0.99106 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.4682 degRelease Angle: 7.5656 degNose Incidence: 9.7541 degCamber deflection: 17.3197 deg

Table 2038: Controlpoints1 00.63349 0.00851890.36135 -0.02320.2 -0.02320.030976 -0.02320 -0.0143060 00 0.0338170.12684 0.08510.4 0.08510.48328 0.08510.71043 0.0711231 0

Table 2039: Base 64 representation:ZraJjm1NNK0kOrA

Table 2040: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.302 5.005 ectsRMS curvature error: 34.91 35.01 %CD error 0.6 0.2 dctsCm error 13 15 mctsUpper transition point 0.75 1.39 %

Figure 1533: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1534: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

515

Page 524: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe547

Information: Gottingen 547 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1535: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2041: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.651 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 3.9894 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.91167 %CLower nose radius: 2.3505 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.4817 degRelease Angle: 7.6477 degNose Incidence: 3.5241 degCamber deflection: 11.1717 deg

Table 2042: Controlpoints1 00.51497 0.00767720.32844 -0.025050.15074 -0.025050.008459 -0.025050 -0.0115130 00 0.0300380.14845 0.090220.39734 0.090220.71326 0.090220.98531 0.00376951 0

Table 2043: Base 64 representation:VnZhls7KNLDtPrA

Table 2044: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.88 6.078 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.6 -2.7 dctsCm error -5 20 mctsUpper transition point 5.31 4.69 %

Figure 1536: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1537: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

516

Page 525: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe548

Information: Gottingen 548 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1538: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2045: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.0079 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 2.3043 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.47894 %CLower nose radius: 0.40726 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 19.1946 degRelease Angle: 5.6274 degNose Incidence: 2.8622 degCamber deflection: 8.4896 deg

Table 2046: Controlpoints1 00.71896 -0.0195030.4425 -0.03980.3 -0.03980.014008 -0.03980 -0.00616710 00 0.0188930.11179 0.08160.4 0.08160.57696 0.08160.79543 0.0556741 0

Table 2047: Base 64 representation:PtaTiK8TNRrgVoA

Table 2048: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.971 4.193 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -7.2 -7.8 dctsCm error -29 -54 mctsUpper transition point 11.67 13.49 %

Figure 1539: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1540: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

517

Page 526: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe549

Information: Gottingen 549 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1541: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2049: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.951 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.6347 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5235 %CLower nose radius: 1.2778 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.1206 degRelease Angle: 6.8916 degNose Incidence: 10.6745 degCamber deflection: 17.5661 deg

Table 2050: Controlpoints1 00.59735 0.00232840.38642 -0.02710.2 -0.02710.049548 -0.02710 -0.0205440 00 0.0373410.13728 0.114350.3 0.114350.4666 0.114350.56186 0.10481 0

Table 2051: Base 64 representation:ViTPwwvNPM6pPqA

Table 2052: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.298 6.025 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.4 0.5 dctsCm error 7 14 mctsUpper transition point -4.34 -5.55 %

Figure 1542: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1543: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

518

Page 527: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe550

Information: Gottingen 550 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1544: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2053: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.7252 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 4.3127 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.45895 %CLower nose radius: 2.0742 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.4315 degRelease Angle: 9.6428 degNose Incidence: 0.61801 degCamber deflection: 10.2608 deg

Table 2054: Controlpoints1 00.52158 0.0160970.22678 -0.041650.15 -0.041650.097151 -0.041650 -0.0366520 00 0.0108850.038725 0.10060.4 0.10060.55096 0.10060.8856 0.0357591 0

Table 2055: Base 64 representation:H5aQq3XKGSXnRvA

Table 2056: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.582 5.829 ectsRMS curvature error: 37.96 39.91 %CD error -1.3 -1.8 dctsCm error -6 -27 mctsUpper transition point 2.48 3.55 %

Figure 1545: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1546: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

519

Page 528: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe553

Information: Gottingen 553 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1547: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2057: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.7025 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.6835 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.2285 %CLower nose radius: 2.2375 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.3704 degRelease Angle: 8.7108 degNose Incidence: 18.4949 degCamber deflection: 27.2058 deg

Table 2058: Controlpoints1 00.64332 0.0251020.54332 -0.024670.15079 -0.024670.0097709 -0.024670 -0.0120730 00 0.0534690.13283 0.114480.29634 0.114480.40487 0.114480.55796 0.105281 0

Table 2059: Base 64 representation:eiTKwf7KeL6xKtA

Table 2060: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.396 5.21 ectsRMS curvature error: 32.55 35.2 %CD error 0.8 0.8 dctsCm error -3 -5 mctsUpper transition point -0.09 -0.03 %

Figure 1548: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1549: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

520

Page 529: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe559

Information: Gottingen 559 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1550: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2061: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.15 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.4253 % @0.31CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: NaN %CLower nose radius: NaN %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.5014 degRelease Angle: 4.5254 degNose Incidence: 5.223 degCamber deflection: 9.7484 deg

Table 2062: Controlpoints1 00.98069 -0.000581650.53892 -0.02150.3 -0.02150.15831 -0.02150 00 00 00.17352 0.090.3 0.090.377 0.090.52713 0.091 0

Table 2063: Base 64 representation:AbTHlAeTWJ DOmA

Table 2064: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.542 4.513 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1551: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1552: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

521

Page 530: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe563

Information: Gottingen 563 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1553: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2065: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.8253 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 2.251 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.4452 %CLower nose radius: 1.036 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.7512 degRelease Angle: 4.3884 degNose Incidence: 3.378 degCamber deflection: 7.7664 deg

Table 2066: Controlpoints1 00.38375 -0.0213820.35681 -0.025140.15089 -0.025140.085013 -0.025140 -0.0242310 00 0.00486070.0079602 0.065620.39767 0.065620.65461 0.065620.9476 0.00996161 0

Table 2067: Base 64 representation:F-Zbc9cKQLK8OmA

Table 2068: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.902 3.384 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.2 -2.8 dctsCm error -23 -16 mctsUpper transition point 5.56 3.69 %

Figure 1554: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1555: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

522

Page 531: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe564

Information: Gottingen 564 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1556: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2069: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.1922 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 2.6881 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.42033 %CLower nose radius: 0.72805 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.0631 degRelease Angle: 5.7262 degNose Incidence: 5.9427 degCamber deflection: 11.6688 deg

Table 2070: Controlpoints1 00.21663 -0.0178510.11663 -0.020780.075 -0.020780.056931 -0.020780 -0.0166230 00 0.00514210.0071308 0.06720.4 0.06720.49203 0.06720.75449 0.0555881 0

Table 2071: Base 64 representation:F-aKsyPFDJ04QoA

Table 2072: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.333 5.331 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -7.8 -7.9 dctsCm error -21 -16 mctsUpper transition point 18.43 19.23 %

Figure 1557: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1558: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

523

Page 532: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe565

Information: Gottingen 565 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1559: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2073: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.3533 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 2.8363 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.3008 %CLower nose radius: 0.82423 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.9982 degRelease Angle: 5.8661 degNose Incidence: 5.6044 degCamber deflection: 11.4705 deg

Table 2074: Controlpoints1 00.54393 0.00292180.32779 -0.021270.15 -0.021270.071727 -0.021270 -0.0198530 00 0.00318120.0050464 0.067780.4 0.067780.44648 0.067780.67999 0.0643231 0

Table 2075: Base 64 representation:D-aFs7gKNJ8qMpA

Table 2076: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.802 3.838 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -5.5 -4.5 dctsCm error -26 -44 mctsUpper transition point 10.52 11.83 %

Figure 1560: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1561: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

524

Page 533: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe567

Information: Gottingen 567 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1562: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2077: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.6411 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 5.2856 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6935 %CLower nose radius: 1.8452 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.3003 degRelease Angle: 11.7228 degNose Incidence: 6.9141 degCamber deflection: 18.6369 deg

Table 2078: Controlpoints1 00.5812 0.0371750.39909 -0.038020.15175 -0.038020.086909 -0.038020 -0.0326970 00 0.0356060.11229 0.119650.3945 0.119650.57378 0.119650.92927 0.0234921 0

Table 2079: Base 64 representation:TtZTy2bKTQNsPyA

Table 2080: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.26 4.953 ectsRMS curvature error: 30.43 29.39 %CD error -1.2 -1 dctsCm error 9 34 mctsUpper transition point 2.08 1.72 %

Figure 1563: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1564: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

525

Page 534: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe575

Information: Gottingen 575 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1565: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2081: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.5929 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 3.449 % @0.31CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.507 %CLower nose radius: 1.7016 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 56.4143 degRelease Angle: 4.8128 degNose Incidence: 14.5648 degCamber deflection: 19.3777 deg

Table 2082: Controlpoints1 00.93376 -0.0286550.39844 -0.034020.15056 -0.034020.079008 -0.034020 -0.0299380 00 0.0541940.12562 0.102420.29831 0.102420.45684 0.102420.87456 0.0815231 0

Table 2083: Base 64 representation:hkTOr3eKTPy1-nA

Table 2084: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 10.887 13.646 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -5 -4.8 dctsCm error 96 111 mctsUpper transition point -0.3 -0.58 %

Figure 1566: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1567: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

526

Page 535: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe584

Information: Gottingen 584 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1568: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2085: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.465 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 4.9515 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1926 %CLower nose radius: 1.6905 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.1056 degRelease Angle: 4.4555 degNose Incidence: 11.6019 degCamber deflection: 16.0574 deg

Table 2086: Controlpoints1 00.3095 -0.00719870.19252 -0.024750.1 -0.024750.042091 -0.024750 -0.021780 00 0.0169190.036 0.1110.4 0.1110.5695 0.1110.9707 0.00490821 0

Table 2087: Base 64 representation:K5aSu3kGHLE2LmA

Table 2088: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.294 6.825 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.1 -0.4 dctsCm error -4 -23 mctsUpper transition point 0.48 1.43 %

Figure 1569: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1570: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

527

Page 536: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe591

Information: Gottingen 591 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1571: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2089: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.2112 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 5.0131 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4909 %CLower nose radius: 0.76161 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.6143 degRelease Angle: 7.5957 degNose Incidence: 14.0771 degCamber deflection: 21.6728 deg

Table 2090: Controlpoints1 00.22425 0.00390710.19841 -0.016190.075 -0.016190.039978 -0.016190 -0.0142470 00 0.035180.12452 0.105250.3 0.105250.47137 0.105250.65198 0.092621 0

Table 2091: Base 64 representation:VkTQs3eFJH39QrA

Table 2092: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.759 3.537 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.4 3.7 dctsCm error -23 29 mctsUpper transition point 7.98 -9.01 %

Figure 1572: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1573: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

528

Page 537: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe592

Information: Gottingen 592 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1574: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2093: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.2311 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 7.5287 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 5.6773 %CLower nose radius: 1.9485 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.8665 degRelease Angle: 10.8289 degNose Incidence: 24.1998 degCamber deflection: 35.0287 deg

Table 2094: Controlpoints1 00.39777 0.0304620.11604 -0.021360.05048 -0.021360.027199 -0.021360 -0.0187970 00 0.0825930.18023 0.145430.39673 0.145430.63647 0.145430.90805 0.0312341 0

Table 2095: Base 64 representation:jiZZ93eDEJQrSxA

Table 2096: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.943 6.544 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 5.3 5.8 dctsCm error -51 -36 mctsUpper transition point 0.96 0.15 %

Figure 1575: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1576: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

529

Page 538: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe595

Information: Gottingen 595 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1577: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2097: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.596 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 3.0018 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.86283 %CLower nose radius: 0.33205 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.8682 degRelease Angle: 5.8918 degNose Incidence: 10.3607 degCamber deflection: 16.2525 deg

Table 2098: Controlpoints1 00.66036 -0.00914490.3613 -0.01940.2 -0.01940.053318 -0.01940 -0.0108640 00 0.0283070.1363 0.07740.3 0.07740.51104 0.07740.71245 0.0681121 0

Table 2099: Base 64 representation:XiTTgjuNNI3hRpA

Table 2100: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.434 4.053 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.1 NaN dctsCm error 13 NaN mctsUpper transition point -2.65 NaN %

Figure 1578: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1579: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

530

Page 539: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe596

Information: Gottingen 596 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1580: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2101: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.779 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 3.9798 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5321 %CLower nose radius: 3.7316 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.9831 degRelease Angle: 5.7285 degNose Incidence: 8.7444 degCamber deflection: 14.4729 deg

Table 2102: Controlpoints1 00.28631 -0.0032760.18631 -0.015720.075 -0.015720.0066667 -0.015720 -0.0128780 00 0.039860.15555 0.08810.3 0.08810.44095 0.08810.62629 0.0775281 0

Table 2103: Base 64 representation:sfTNlz5FIH33NoA

Table 2104: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.213 4.863 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 3.1 3.5 dctsCm error -6 1 mctsUpper transition point -4.59 -5.23 %

Figure 1581: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1582: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

531

Page 540: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe598

Information: Gottingen 598 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1583: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2105: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.5844 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 0.944 % @0.48CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %CUpper nose radius: 0.16906 %CLower nose radius: 0.44077 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.8762 degRelease Angle: 1.7448 degNose Incidence: -1.1447 degCamber deflection: 0.60005 deg

Table 2106: Controlpoints1 -0.0010.55502 -0.0180430.45502 -0.024610.30097 -0.024610.15961 -0.024610 -0.0216570 00 0.00928330.076464 0.041730.39835 0.041730.52623 0.041730.71681 0.0291811 0.001

Table 2107: Base 64 representation:OzZOS3eTOLrzJiF

Table 2108: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.48 4.965 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 10.2 -9.5 dctsCm error 2 -14 mctsUpper transition point -9.71 9.41 %

Figure 1584: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1585: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

532

Page 541: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe599

Information: Gottingen 599 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1586: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2109: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.9962 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 1.5375 % @0.53CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.35 %CUpper nose radius: 0.85769 %CLower nose radius: 0.66161 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.8798 degRelease Angle: 5.6716 degNose Incidence: 2.9409 degCamber deflection: 8.6125 deg

Table 2110: Controlpoints1 -0.001750.60387 -0.024370.42467 -0.03740.30218 -0.03740.030917 -0.03740 -0.0116780 00 0.0304220.16582 0.063580.3963 0.063580.66301 0.063580.95624 0.0131571 0.00175

Table 2111: Base 64 representation:fkZcbU4TLQMrUoJ

Table 2112: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.923 3.437 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -16.1 -16 dctsCm error -23 -10 mctsUpper transition point 30.85 30.19 %

Figure 1587: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1588: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

533

Page 542: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe600

Information: Gottingen 600 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1589: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2113: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.0974 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 1.8839 % @0.5CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.50001 %CUpper nose radius: 0.44598 %CLower nose radius: 0.60506 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.3661 degRelease Angle: 2.83 degNose Incidence: 4.2678 degCamber deflection: 7.0978 deg

Table 2114: Controlpoints1 -0.00250.59974 -0.0329690.43151 -0.049450.30383 -0.049450.012905 -0.049450 -0.0072150 00 0.00969320.031601 0.0825010.3936 0.0825010.58682 0.0825010.78074 0.0412131 0.0025

Table 2115: Base 64 representation:I6ZUiJ8TMVhsQkN

Table 2116: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.927 3.268 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -7 -6.6 dctsCm error -6 3 mctsUpper transition point 10.86 10 %

Figure 1590: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1591: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

534

Page 543: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe601

Information: Gottingen 601 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1592: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2117: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.1819 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 2.4672 % @0.53CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0805 %CLower nose radius: 1.4831 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 21.392 degRelease Angle: 4.9908 degNose Incidence: 3.4864 degCamber deflection: 8.4772 deg

Table 2118: Controlpoints1 00.48327 -0.0516240.40699 -0.0603910.30605 -0.0603910.042429 -0.0603910 -0.0204820 00 0.0210540.06154 0.102470.38976 0.102470.48997 0.102470.66108 0.0951821 0

Table 2119: Base 64 representation:N1ZLrW2UJa63YnA

Table 2120: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.488 4.903 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -8.9 -9.1 dctsCm error -15 -19 mctsUpper transition point 8.31 8.71 %

Figure 1593: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1594: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

535

Page 544: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe602

Information: Gottingen 602 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1595: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2121: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.8066 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 3.5012 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.014459 %CLower nose radius: 0.54295 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.7508 degRelease Angle: 7.8519 degNose Incidence: 6.7974 degCamber deflection: 14.6493 deg

Table 2122: Controlpoints1 00.79537 0.00527440.27546 -0.020.2 -0.020.11029 -0.020 -0.019980 00 0.0015770.0258 0.0830.4 0.0830.406 0.0830.67592 0.082171 0

Table 2123: Base 64 representation:B7aBi sNGJ-SOsA

Table 2124: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.516 6.945 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.1 3.5 dctsCm error -12 13 mctsUpper transition point 6.81 -7.61 %

Figure 1596: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1597: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

536

Page 545: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe602m

Information: Gottingen 602 airfoil, modified.Reference: UIUC

Figure 1598: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2125: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.4909 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 3.8273 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 4.9258e-005 %CLower nose radius: 0.50541 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.7521 degRelease Angle: 8.3513 degNose Incidence: 7.1366 degCamber deflection: 15.4879 deg

Table 2126: Controlpoints1 00.588 0.017810.33957 -0.019250.15 -0.019250.10976 -0.019250 -0.0192310 00 8.3e-0050.020978 0.0830.4 0.0830.40006 0.0830.67297 0.0829171 0

Table 2127: Base 64 representation:A8aAi RKOI nNtA

Table 2128: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.236 6.152 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.7 -3.6 dctsCm error -8 -21 mctsUpper transition point 4.1 5.7 %

Figure 1599: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1600: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

537

Page 546: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe604

Information: N/AReference: UIUC

Figure 1601: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2129: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.9037 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 5.403 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.3832 %CLower nose radius: 0.872 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.3085 degRelease Angle: 6.3346 degNose Incidence: 24.1738 degCamber deflection: 30.5084 deg

Table 2130: Controlpoints1 00.28263 -0.0353320.28263 -0.038830.15196 -0.038830.061905 -0.038830 -0.018970 00 0.0416470.076902 0.142790.29279 0.142790.34936 0.142790.48983 0.141381 0

Table 2131: Base 64 representation:TuTF8flKKR- UpA

Table 2132: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.73 3.937 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.7 -1.2 dctsCm error -13 -12 mctsUpper transition point 1.14 1.39 %

Figure 1602: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1603: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

538

Page 547: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe610bm

Information: Gottingen 610-B MOD airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1604: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2133: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.7887 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 5.504 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.80001 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1105 %CLower nose radius: 0.025139 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.1986 degRelease Angle: 8.6599 degNose Incidence: 15.0736 degCamber deflection: 23.7335 deg

Table 2134: Controlpoints1 -0.0040.40484 0.0539430.11505 -0.00695990.012472 -0.00695990.011561 -0.00695990 -0.0013920 00 0.0332750.14956 0.0918990.30037 0.0918990.45415 0.0918990.59079 0.0891841 0.004

Table 2135: Base 64 representation:XgTOmNFBHD9qHtU

Table 2136: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.588 5.276 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -4.1 -14.4 dctsCm error -50 -69 mctsUpper transition point 5.49 4.75 %

Figure 1605: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1606: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

539

Page 548: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe611

Information: Gottingen 611 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1607: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2137: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.9 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 5.7967 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.65 %CUpper nose radius: 2.4238 %CLower nose radius: 0.507 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.3616 degRelease Angle: 8.4137 degNose Incidence: 23.4299 degCamber deflection: 31.8436 deg

Table 2138: Controlpoints1 -0.003250.6009 -0.00511040.033368 -0.007880.02504 -0.007880.02504 -0.007880 -0.007880 00 0.0463110.13273 0.122420.29942 0.122420.43171 0.122420.6125 0.122421 0.00325

Table 2139: Base 64 representation:YjTMz ACBD aTtQ

Table 2140: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.912 8.356 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.7 -3.2 dctsCm error 18 21 mctsUpper transition point 0.02 -0.88 %

Figure 1608: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1609: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

540

Page 549: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe613

Information: Gottingen 613 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1610: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2141: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.3127 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.0834 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.11338 %CLower nose radius: 2.5059 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.7613 degRelease Angle: 7.0137 degNose Incidence: 6.0939 degCamber deflection: 13.1076 deg

Table 2142: Controlpoints1 00.98166 -0.000277490.075 -0.014340.075 -0.014340.00975 -0.014340 -0.0127630 00 0.005930.046524 0.092150.3 0.092150.4617 0.092150.69511 0.0810921 0

Table 2143: Base 64 representation:E1TPm43FAG3BSqA

Table 2144: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.132 2.92 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 4.7 5.1 dctsCm error 8 14 mctsUpper transition point -4.75 -5.73 %

Figure 1611: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1612: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

541

Page 550: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe615

Information: Gottingen 615 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1613: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2145: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.8004 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 5.4901 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.7584 %CLower nose radius: 1.5274 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.2411 degRelease Angle: 8.592 degNose Incidence: 20.7371 degCamber deflection: 29.3292 deg

Table 2146: Controlpoints1 00.40147 0.00492540.28221 -0.022830.10061 -0.022830.033522 -0.022830 -0.0184750 00 0.0528510.11148 0.121860.29677 0.121860.50774 0.121860.70713 0.0879341 0

Table 2147: Base 64 representation:cnTTzzqGNKt0StA

Table 2148: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.444 4.759 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 3 3.3 dctsCm error 1 13 mctsUpper transition point -3.86 -4.02 %

Figure 1614: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1615: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

542

Page 551: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe617

Information: Gottingen 617 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1616: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2149: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.85 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 2.175 % @0.31CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.5353 %CLower nose radius: 1.3376 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 21.7334 degRelease Angle: 1.63 degNose Incidence: 10.0605 degCamber deflection: 11.6905 deg

Table 2150: Controlpoints1 00.74468 -0.0415210.41199 -0.04750.3 -0.04750.19977 -0.04750 -0.0422070 00 0.0539640.17229 0.0910.3 0.0910.40676 0.0910.58941 0.0911 0

Table 2151: Base 64 representation:lbTKm4VTKU 3YiA

Table 2152: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.535 3.774 ectsRMS curvature error: 33.61 33.09 %CD error -3.9 -3.9 dctsCm error 26 27 mctsUpper transition point -1.07 -0.99 %

Figure 1617: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1618: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

543

Page 552: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe619

Information: Gottingen 619 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1619: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2153: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.0172 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 4.5141 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3023 %CLower nose radius: 1.6761 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.531 degRelease Angle: 7.9394 degNose Incidence: 8.0381 degCamber deflection: 15.9774 deg

Table 2154: Controlpoints1 00.41365 0.00177930.27057 -0.038170.15172 -0.038170.069791 -0.038170 -0.0305360 00 0.0249090.071463 0.108780.29511 0.108780.43609 0.108780.62079 0.106631 0

Table 2155: Base 64 representation:PwTNtyiKJQ-yRsA

Table 2156: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.905 5.97 ectsRMS curvature error: 37.32 35.48 %CD error 5.4 4.5 dctsCm error 42 53 mctsUpper transition point -11.09 -9.72 %

Figure 1620: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1621: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

544

Page 553: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe620

Information: Gottingen 620 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1622: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2157: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.3256 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 5.9987 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: NaN %CLower nose radius: 2.4341 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 20.112 degRelease Angle: 10.5586 degNose Incidence: 14.1872 degCamber deflection: 24.7458 deg

Table 2158: Controlpoints1 00.4974 0.00440940.32798 -0.042780.15 -0.042780.071759 -0.042780 -0.0341240 00 00 0.14210.4 0.14210.45712 0.14210.65239 0.130761 0

Table 2159: Base 64 representation:A aG8ygKNS6vWwA

Table 2160: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.589 7.733 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.2 -1.7 dctsCm error -25 -51 mctsUpper transition point 0.96 1.29 %

Figure 1623: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1624: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

545

Page 554: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe621

Information: Gottingen 621 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1625: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2161: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.8467 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 5.0574 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.6559 %CLower nose radius: 2.2293 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.6158 degRelease Angle: 7.8495 degNose Incidence: 13.6601 degCamber deflection: 21.5096 deg

Table 2162: Controlpoints1 00.4046 -0.00476340.3046 -0.03760.15171 -0.03760.091867 -0.03760 -0.036950 00 0.00835760.003945 0.120950.3945 0.120950.56341 0.120950.80605 0.0561921 0

Table 2163: Base 64 representation:E-ZSz-ZKMQc2TsA

Table 2164: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.449 8.588 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.3 -0.9 dctsCm error -52 -40 mctsUpper transition point 1.26 0.66 %

Figure 1626: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1627: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

546

Page 555: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe622

Information: Gottingen 622 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1628: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2165: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.8896 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 2.4231 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %CUpper nose radius: 0.042416 %CLower nose radius: 0.55735 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.6651 degRelease Angle: 4.0267 degNose Incidence: 5.8562 degCamber deflection: 9.8828 deg

Table 2166: Controlpoints1 -0.0010.36193 -0.0155450.22649 -0.019350.14998 -0.019350.064492 -0.019350 -0.015480 00 0.000457720.00074092 0.06320.40006 0.06320.44206 0.06320.68688 0.0526071 0.001

Table 2167: Base 64 representation:A aEbyjKGI00MmF

Table 2168: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.123 4.849 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.9 -1.2 dctsCm error 9 4 mctsUpper transition point 6.22 6.8 %

Figure 1629: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1630: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

547

Page 556: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe623

Information: Gottingen 623 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1631: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2169: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.8184 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 3.8391 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %CUpper nose radius: 0.2303 %CLower nose radius: 0.7993 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.7922 degRelease Angle: 5.6723 degNose Incidence: 11.9929 degCamber deflection: 17.6653 deg

Table 2170: Controlpoints1 -0.00150.35953 -0.0207740.25953 -0.02640.09996 -0.02640.097961 -0.02640 -0.0225260 00 0.00350530.0080029 0.09690.40015 0.09690.44214 0.09690.65412 0.0817891 0.0015

Table 2171: Base 64 representation:C-aEo2BGLL12RoI

Table 2172: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.781 8.238 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1632: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1633: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

548

Page 557: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe624

Information: Gttingen 624 profileReference: UIUC

Figure 1634: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2173: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.0243 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 5.1922 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.5 %CUpper nose radius: 3.9311 %CLower nose radius: 1.7777 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.1756 degRelease Angle: 6.452 degNose Incidence: 17.8655 degCamber deflection: 24.3175 deg

Table 2174: Controlpoints1 -0.00250.31693 -0.0279740.20692 -0.0328750.14992 -0.0328750.073868 -0.0328750 -0.0295870 00 0.0632960.15287 0.131250.30033 0.131250.53144 0.131250.66206 0.0933031 0.0025

Table 2175: Base 64 representation:ffTV35gKEOt2TqN

Table 2176: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.862 3.921 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 4.4 4.7 dctsCm error -5 -17 mctsUpper transition point -3.53 -4.11 %

Figure 1635: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1636: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

549

Page 558: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe626

Information: Gottingen 626 profileReference: UIUC

Figure 1637: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2177: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.6655 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 5.0677 % @0.52CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.9859 %CLower nose radius: 2.0026 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.9051 degRelease Angle: 11.6728 degNose Incidence: 13.2096 degCamber deflection: 24.8824 deg

Table 2178: Controlpoints1 00.53192 0.0386490.30922 -0.0551210.15372 -0.0551210.098449 -0.0551210 -0.0362540 00 0.0632180.1504 0.12070.29185 0.12070.62107 0.12070.92335 0.0258341 0

Table 2179: Base 64 representation:hfTeypXKMYNqQyA

Table 2180: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.48 9.078 ectsRMS curvature error: 25.19 26.44 %CD error -0.1 -0.6 dctsCm error 25 42 mctsUpper transition point -5.31 -4.7 %

Figure 1638: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1639: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

550

Page 559: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe627

Information: Gottingen 627 airfoil.Reference: UIUC

Figure 1640: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2181: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.75 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 4.075 % @0.3CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.3567 %CLower nose radius: 0.59427 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 24.7012 degRelease Angle: 6.7348 degNose Incidence: 26.9862 degCamber deflection: 33.721 deg

Table 2182: Controlpoints1 00.92345 -0.00752760.63555 -0.0380.3 -0.0380.043836 -0.0380 -0.0131780 00 0.0111930.0079746 0.11950.3 0.11950.42456 0.11950.72182 0.096251 0

Table 2183: Base 64 representation:G9TLyW2TfQzNcqA

Table 2184: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.326 2.858 ectsRMS curvature error: 31.01 30.04 %CD error -5.4 -4.9 dctsCm error -10 -5 mctsUpper transition point 4.21 3.73 %

Figure 1641: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1642: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

551

Page 560: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe628

Information: Gottingen 628 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1643: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2185: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.8909 % @0.24CMaximum Camber: 5.6016 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 4.7296 %CLower nose radius: 0.92484 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.399 degRelease Angle: 8.9365 degNose Incidence: 23.5194 degCamber deflection: 32.4559 deg

Table 2186: Controlpoints1 00.42264 0.0124660.32264 -0.040970.15203 -0.040970.031852 -0.040970 -0.0140140 00 0.0568840.10263 0.134520.29334 0.134520.38089 0.134520.5498 0.134521 0

Table 2187: Base 64 representation:bpTI4WyKNR 2RuA

Table 2188: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.231 7.061 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -5.5 -5.6 dctsCm error -11 -33 mctsUpper transition point 0.2 1.29 %

Figure 1644: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1645: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

552

Page 561: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe629

Information: Gottingen 629 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1646: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2189: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.4989 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 2.8081 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7125 %CLower nose radius: 2.0487 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.4406 degRelease Angle: 5.3557 degNose Incidence: 3.7759 degCamber deflection: 9.1316 deg

Table 2190: Controlpoints1 00.30746 -0.0467820.20746 -0.047830.15287 -0.047830.091722 -0.047830 -0.0353940 00 0.0251240.055289 0.093660.39438 0.093660.42466 0.093660.67191 0.0853151 0

Table 2191: Base 64 representation:R2ZDnuaKEU5-VoA

Table 2192: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.963 6.302 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 2.2 -1.8 dctsCm error 8 13 mctsUpper transition point -1.25 0.48 %

Figure 1647: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1648: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

553

Page 562: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe630

Information: Gottingen 630 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1649: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2193: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.6338 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 7.6414 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.4127 %CLower nose radius: 1.0454 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.6383 degRelease Angle: 10.9817 degNose Incidence: 18.653 degCamber deflection: 29.6347 deg

Table 2194: Controlpoints1 00.30028 0.0509230.13391 -0.015110.02523 -0.015110.018922 -0.015110 -0.0114840 00 0.0467710.136 0.137120.29787 0.137120.43823 0.137120.57294 0.137121 0

Table 2195: Base 64 representation:WiTN6wQCHG zPxA

Table 2196: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.378 6.993 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.4 -2.1 dctsCm error -35 -27 mctsUpper transition point 1.1 1.02 %

Figure 1650: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1651: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

554

Page 563: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe645

Information: Gottingen 645 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1652: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2197: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.6249 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 4.8147 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.1827 %CLower nose radius: 0.80858 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.3761 degRelease Angle: 7.1071 degNose Incidence: 17.5123 degCamber deflection: 24.6194 deg

Table 2198: Controlpoints1 00.39448 -0.0008550.29447 -0.040130.15195 -0.040130.03747 -0.040130 -0.0142120 00 0.0308510.065409 0.122260.29407 0.122260.34505 0.122260.52019 0.122261 0

Table 2199: Base 64 representation:QxTFzXvKLR 2QrA

Table 2200: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.097 3.495 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -5.5 -6.3 dctsCm error 2 -14 mctsUpper transition point 3.86 5.06 %

Figure 1653: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1654: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

555

Page 564: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe646

Information: Gottingen 646 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1655: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2201: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.3072 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.5139 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.0222 %CLower nose radius: 2.8636 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.2175 degRelease Angle: 11.1111 degNose Incidence: 11.0429 degCamber deflection: 22.1541 deg

Table 2202: Controlpoints1 00.68669 0.0109540.3518 -0.0605310.20472 -0.0605310.11669 -0.0605310 -0.0484240 00 0.0290620.041921 0.130410.38982 0.130410.44636 0.130410.71479 0.105051 0

Table 2203: Base 64 representation:O4ZG3ycNMazfUxA

Table 2204: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.675 5.427 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.2 0 dctsCm error -16 -21 mctsUpper transition point 0.16 0.51 %

Figure 1656: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1657: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

556

Page 565: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe647

Information: Gottingen 647 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1658: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2205: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.4068 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 5.3607 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6395 %CLower nose radius: 1.2996 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.7112 degRelease Angle: 7.9165 degNose Incidence: 19.8113 degCamber deflection: 27.7278 deg

Table 2206: Controlpoints1 00.42028 -0.00444310.32028 -0.035480.15153 -0.035480.13891 -0.035480 -0.0346920 00 0.0216350.042827 0.133150.29428 0.133150.4829 0.133150.74281 0.075071 0

Table 2207: Base 64 representation:K2TR4-FKNPj2TsA

Table 2208: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.746 4.847 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.1 -2.3 dctsCm error -34 -22 mctsUpper transition point 5.46 5.9 %

Figure 1659: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1660: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

557

Page 566: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe648

Information: Gottingen 648 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1661: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2209: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.2491 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 3.9212 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 4.1775 %CLower nose radius: 1.1244 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.7617 degRelease Angle: 7.5686 degNose Incidence: 23.4967 degCamber deflection: 31.0653 deg

Table 2210: Controlpoints1 00.66863 -0.0075910.44201 -0.038880.20214 -0.038880.022856 -0.038880 -0.0130890 00 0.0328770.038811 0.114650.2937 0.114650.54274 0.114650.81738 0.053921 0

Table 2211: Base 64 representation:S3TXwW4NTRelUrA

Table 2212: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.318 6.337 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -5.2 -5.4 dctsCm error -35 -40 mctsUpper transition point 8.01 8.73 %

Figure 1662: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1663: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

558

Page 567: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe650

Information: Gottingen 650 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1664: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2213: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.5372 % @0.24CMaximum Camber: 4.4697 % @0.52CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7204 %CLower nose radius: 2.006 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.6575 degRelease Angle: 9.7611 degNose Incidence: 8.6494 degCamber deflection: 18.4106 deg

Table 2214: Controlpoints1 00.4829 0.0219660.358 -0.042320.15214 -0.042320.08419 -0.042320 -0.0338560 00 0.0121510.012872 0.102940.3948 0.102940.43364 0.102940.67868 0.0987881 0

Table 2215: Base 64 representation:I9ZErysKQS8zQvA

Table 2216: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.833 6.125 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.4 0.3 dctsCm error -43 -29 mctsUpper transition point 0.73 -0.72 %

Figure 1665: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1666: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

559

Page 568: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe654

Information: Gottingen 654 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1667: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2217: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.5631 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 5.2101 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.044596 %CLower nose radius: 2.9032 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.4757 degRelease Angle: 7.2529 degNose Incidence: 11.5667 degCamber deflection: 18.8196 deg

Table 2218: Controlpoints1 00.50832 0.000129070.37001 -0.02450.15 -0.02450.012176 -0.02450 -0.0153510 00 0.0030360.031003 0.1240.3 0.1240.363 0.1240.53446 0.120321 0

Table 2219: Base 64 representation:C4TG0n6KRK9xQrA

Table 2220: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.765 4.257 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.5 1.4 dctsCm error 18 31 mctsUpper transition point -2.32 -2.73 %

Figure 1668: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1669: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

560

Page 569: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom

Profile: goe655

Information: Gottingen 655 airfoilReference: UIUC

Figure 1670: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.

Table 2221: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.0017 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 4.3998 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.049897 %CLower nose radius: 1.0208 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.0995 degRelease Angle: 7.1052 degNose Incidence: 14.2551 degCamber deflection: 21.3604 deg

Table 2222: Controlpoints1 00.4776 -0.00861230.33077 -0.030720.15 -0.030720.1267 -0.030720 -0.0293640 00 0.00251520.019017 0.112550.3 0.112550.53312 0.112550.82782 0.0466351 0

Table 2223: Base 64 representation:B7TVv8KKONbxSrA

Table 2224: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106

Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.461 2.433 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.3 -1.9 dctsCm error -17 -16 mctsUpper transition point 6.84 6.11 %

Figure 1671: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 1672: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.

561

Page 570: Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom