cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom
TRANSCRIPT
Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom:
Clark YJoukovski 11Gottingen 628Eppler 793Naca 0012RAE 104SC 20406NLF 015Whitcomb
Parametric Airfoil Catalog, Part IAn Aerodynamic and Geometric Comparison Between Parametrized and Point Cloud AirfoilsTomas Melin
Copyright c©2013, Tomas Melin
Published by:Fluid and Mechatronic Systems,Department of Management and Engineering,The Institute of Technology,Linkoping University,Linkoping, Sweden
Visit our website at www.iei.liu.se
Printed by:Linkoping UniversityLiU-Tryck581 83 LinkopingSWEDEN
Typeset in LATEX
ISBN: 978-91-7519-656-5First Edition, March 2013
Parametric Airfoil Catalog
Part IArcher A18 to Gottingen 655
An Aerodynamic and Geometric Comparison Between Parametrized and Point Cloud Airfoils.
Tomas Melin
Research AssociateFluid and Mechatronic Systems,
Department of Management and Engineering,The Institute of Technology,
Linkoping University,Linkoping, Sweden
Contents
1 Acknowledgements 1
2 Introduction 1
3 Background 1
4 Method 24.1 Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24.2 Parameterization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24.3 Base change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44.4 Reproducing known airfoils . . . . . . . . 4
5 Discussion 5
6 Software 6
7 Airfoil Catalog 6a18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7a18sm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8a63a108c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9ag03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10ag04 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11ag09 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13ag10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14ag11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15ag12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16ag13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17ag14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18ag16 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19ag17 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20ag18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21ag19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22ag24 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23ag25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24ag26 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25ag27 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26ag35 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27ag36 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28ag37 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29ag38 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30ag44ct02r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31ag45c03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32ag45ct02r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33ag46c03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34ag46ct02r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35ag47c03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36ag47ct02r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37ag455ct02r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38ah21-7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39ah21-9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40ah63k127 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41ah79k132 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42ah79k135 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43ah85l120 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44ah93w145 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45ah93w174 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46ah93w215 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47ah93w257 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48ah6407 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
ah7476 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50ah79100a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51ah79100b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52ah79100c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53ah80129 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54ah80136 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55ah80140 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56ah82150a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57ah82150f . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58ah83150q . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59ah83159 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60ah93156 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61ah93157 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62ah94145 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63ah94156 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64ah95160 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65ames01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66ames02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67ames03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68amsoil1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69amsoil2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70aquilasm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71arad6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72arad10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73arad20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74as5045 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75as5046 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76as5048 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77atr72sm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78avistar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79b29root . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80b29tip . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81b707e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82b737a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83b737b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84b737d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85bacj . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86bacxxx . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87be50 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88boe106 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89bqm34 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90c5a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91c5b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92c5c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93c141a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94c141b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95c141c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96c141d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97c141e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98c141f . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99cast102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100clarkk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101clarkv . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102clarkx . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103clarky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104clarkyh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105clarkysm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106clarkz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107clarym15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108clarym18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
3
cootie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110cr001sm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111curtisc72 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112dae11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113dae21 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114dae31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115dae51 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116davis-corrected . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117davis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118daytonwright6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119defcnd1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120defcnd2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121defcnd3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122df101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123dillner2032c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124doa5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125du8608418 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126e66 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127e67 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128e168 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129e169 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130e171 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131e174 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132e176 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133e178 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134e180 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135e182 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136e184 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137e186 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138e193 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139e195 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140e197 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141e201 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142e203 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143e205 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144e207 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145e209 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146e210 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147e211 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148e212 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149e214 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150e216 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151e220 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152e221 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153e222 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154e224 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155e226 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156e228 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157e230 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158e231 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159e326 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160e327 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161e331 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162e332 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163e334 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164e335 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165e336 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166e337 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167e338 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168e340 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
e341 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170e342 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171e343 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172e360 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173e361 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174e374 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175e385 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176e387 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177e392 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178e393 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179e395 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180e396 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181e397 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182e399 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183e403 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184e417 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185e422 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186e426 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187e428 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188e431 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189e432 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190e433 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191e434 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192e435 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193e471 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194e472 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195e473 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196e474 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197e475 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198e476 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199e477 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200e478 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201e479 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202e502 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203e542 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204e543 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205e544 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206e545 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207e546 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208e548 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209e550 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210e552 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211e554 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212e556 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213e557 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214e558 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215e559 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216e560 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217e561 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218e562 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219e580 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220e583 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221e584 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222e587 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223e591 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224e593 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225e598 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226e603 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227e604 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228e625 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229
e635 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230e636 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231e637 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232e638 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233e639 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234e642 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235e654 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236e655 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237e656 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238e657 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239e662 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240e664 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241e668 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242e682 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 243e694 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244e715 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245e748 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246e793 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247e817 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248e836 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249e837 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250e838 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251e851 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252e852 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253e853 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 254e854 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255e856 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256e857 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257e874 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258e1098 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259e1200 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 260e1210 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261e1211 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262e1212 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263e1212mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264e1213 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265e1214 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266e1230 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267e1233 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268ea61012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269eh0009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270eh1070 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271eh1090 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272eh1590 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273eh2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274eh2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275eiffel385 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276eiffel428 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 277eppler793 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 278falcon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 279fg2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280fg3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281fg4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282fx2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283fx08s176 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284fx66a175 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285fx78k140 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286fx83w160 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 287fx83w227 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 288fx84w097 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289
fx84w127 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290fx84w140 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291fx84w150 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292fx84w175 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 293fx84w218 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294fx05188 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 295fx05191 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 296fx60100 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297fx60100sm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298fx60126 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 299fx60157 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300fx60160 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301fx60177 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302fx61140 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 303fx61147 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 304fx601261 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305fx711530 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 306fxl142k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 307fxm2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308fxs03182 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 309fxs21158 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310giiia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311giiib . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 312giiic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313giiid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 314giiie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315giiif . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316giiig . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317giiih . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 318giiii . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 319giiij . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 320giiik . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321giiil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 322gm15sm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323goe07k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 324goe08k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325goe11k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 326goe14k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327goe15k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328goe16k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 329goe29b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 330goe54 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 331goe55 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 332goe57 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 333goe79 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 334goe81 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 335goe92 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336goe114 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 337goe115 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 338goe116 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339goe117 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340goe118 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341goe121 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 342goe122 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 343goe123 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 344goe124 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 345goe134 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 346goe137 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 347goe140 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 348goe142 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349
goe143 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 350goe144 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 351goe147 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352goe155 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 353goe164 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 354goe165 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 355goe167 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 356goe173 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357goe174 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 358goe176 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 359goe177 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360goe178 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 361goe180 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362goe182 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 363goe184 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364goe190 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 365goe195 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 366goe199 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 367goe210 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 368goe217 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 369goe222 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 370goe223 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371goe225 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372goe226 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373goe227 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 374goe229 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 375goe233 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 376goe234 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 377goe239 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 378goe240 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 379goe242 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380goe255 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 381goe256 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 382goe257 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 383goe264 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 384goe265 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 385goe269 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 386goe276 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 387goe277 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 388goe278 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 389goe279 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 390goe280 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 391goe281 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 392goe282 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 393goe284 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 394goe285 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 395goe286 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 396goe287 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 397goe288 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 398goe289 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 399goe290 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 400goe298 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 401goe300 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 402goe301 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 403goe303 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 404goe304 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 405goe320 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 406goe325 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 407goe326 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 408goe328 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 409
goe329 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 410goe331 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 411goe332 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 412goe335 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 413goe342 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 414goe346 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 415goe358 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 416goe359 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 417goe360 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 418goe361 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 419goe362 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 420goe363 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 421goe364 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 422goe365 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 423goe366 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 424goe367 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 425goe368 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 426goe369 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 427goe371 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 428goe372 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 429goe373 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 430goe374 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 431goe381 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 432goe383 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 433goe385 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 434goe387 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 435goe389 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 436goe392 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 437goe393 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 438goe394 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 439goe395 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 440goe396 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 441goe397 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 442goe398 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 443goe399 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 444goe400 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 445goe402 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 446goe403 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 447goe405 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 448goe409 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 449goe410 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450goe411 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 451goe413 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 452goe414 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 453goe416a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 454goe417 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 455goe418 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 456goe419 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 457goe420 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 458goe423 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 459goe424 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 460goe425 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 461goe426 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 462goe427 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 463goe428 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 464goe430 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 465goe431 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 466goe432 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 467goe433 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 468goe436 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 469
goe437 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 470goe438 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 471goe439 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 472goe442 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 473goe445 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 474goe446 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 475goe447 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 476goe449 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 477goe450 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 478goe456 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 479goe457 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 480goe458 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 481goe459 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 482goe460 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 483goe464 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 484goe477 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 485goe478 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 486goe479 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 487goe480 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 488goe481a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 489goe483 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 490goe484 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 491goe492 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 492goe493 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 493goe494 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 494goe495 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 495goe496 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 496goe497 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 497goe498 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 498goe499 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 499goe500 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500goe501 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 501goe502 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 502goe504 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 503goe506 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 504goe508 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 505goe517 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 506goe526 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 507goe527 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 508goe528 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 509goe529 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 510goe532 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 511goe533 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 512goe534 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 513goe535 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 514goe546 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 515goe547 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 516goe548 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 517goe549 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 518goe550 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 519goe553 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 520goe559 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 521goe563 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 522goe564 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 523goe565 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 524goe567 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 525goe575 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 526goe584 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 527goe591 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 528goe592 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 529
goe595 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 530goe596 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 531goe598 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 532goe599 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 533goe600 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 534goe601 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 535goe602 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 536goe602m . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 537goe604 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 538goe610bm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 539goe611 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 540goe613 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 541goe615 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 542goe617 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 543goe619 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 544goe620 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 545goe621 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 546goe622 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 547goe623 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 548goe624 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 549goe626 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 550goe627 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 551goe628 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 552goe629 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 553goe630 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 554goe645 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 555goe646 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 556goe647 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 557goe648 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 558goe650 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 559goe654 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 560goe655 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 561
1 Acknowledgements
This collection of parametrized airfoils would not havebeen possible without the prior work of several indi-viduals. Many thanks goes to Prof. Michael Selig atUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign for supply-ing the original point cloud airfoil database on whichthis work is based. All my appreciation to Brenda Kul-fan from Boeing for her inspiring work on class function/ shape function transformation technique. My warmthanks tho the research team at Linkoping University:Anton Jonzen, Chetan Nangunoori, Jacob Bjarkmar, Jo-han Karlen, Svante Lothgren and Vijaykumar Govin-darajan.
The author also wishes to thank the sponsors: VIN-NOVA and the industrial partner Saab AB for theirfunding through Nationella Flygtekniska Frsksprogram-met, NFFP5.
2 Introduction
This book is intended to serve as a reference for students,engineers and researchers requiring a parametrized air-foil that can model existing airfoils well as providinga significant design space for optimisation. The pro-posed method covers at least one thousand of the knownprofiles used in aeronautics today, while enabling manymore. The method uses 15 parameters defining a wingprofile. This way many existing airfoils can be mod-elled with close tolerance. In the following volumes,the parametrized airfoils are compared with the origi-nal point cloud data. The comparison is made for ge-ometrical and aerodynamic similarity, but is should benoted that the point clouds used may in some instancesnot be representative for the original airfoil due to roundoff errors, discretisation error and other other unknownerrors. The parametrisation is intended for two dimen-sional airfoils but the method can easily be extended toa three dimensional wing.
The coordinate resolution becomes infinite and point dis-tribution becomes a non-issue by employing a functionalparametric description with built-in smoothing and in-terpolation. In order to facilitate this, some basic as-sumptions regarding the shape of an airfoil are made:The airfoil is assumed to have one distinct top and bot-tom point, the chord line has a length of exactly one,forming the x-axis of the profile, the trailing edge is as-sumed to be either sharp, i.e. with a y-coordinate of zerofor both top and bottom sides, or blunt with the y coor-dinates of the top and bottom trailing edges being sym-metric around the chord line. These assumptions meansthat a lot of historical airfoils needed to be preprocessedbefore they could be parametrized. Preprocessing usu-ally involved rotating the coordinate cloud to form anx-axis from the nose to the trailing edge, scaling to setthe length of the airfoil to exactly unity and finally trun-
cating the trailing edge to make sure that the upper andlower sides both ended at x=1.
3 Background
A fundamental part of aircraft design involves wing air-foil optimization, establishing an outer shape of the wingwhich has good aerodynamic performance for the designmission, good internal volume distribution for fuel andsystems and which also serves as an efficient structuralmember supporting the load of the weight of the air-craft. The underlying idea with this parametrization isto couple an appropriate number of parameters, balanc-ing the need of geometric accuracy with the necessity offew airfoil parameters in order to facilitate en expedientoptimisation, with the intrinsic value of having param-eters that makes sense for a human; such as thickness,camber and trailing edge thickness. Several approachesto parametrization of wing profiles can be found in theliterature.
Airfoils can be described by point clouds as done in mostairfoil libraries [1]. The number of parameters is twiceas large as the number of points used (x and y coordi-nates) and in the case of aerodynamic optimization thisparametrization will most certainly be not well behaved,since no smoothing function is included and must there-fore be employed. Other problems may arise for the factthat the airfoils sometimes are defined with too few co-ordinate points and/or too few decimals, a problem oc-curring especially with old airfoils. On the other hand,the design space that this kind of parametrization allowsrepresenting is extremely large, as any and all shapes canbe reproduced, even degenerate ones.
Airfoils can also be represented by mathematical func-tions. Among the most common representatives of thiscategory are indeed the NACA 4-, 5- and 6-digits for-mulations [2] [3]. Compared to point clouds, they couldbe said to represent the opposite case: they are verywell behaving parametrizations, but they cannot cover avery large design space, since they only provide four tosix parameters respectively to be tuned. The NACA 4digit series is particularly interesting as the parametersare a part of the name of the airfoil. In the case of the5- and 6 digit series, the name is instead constructedfrom the airfoils aerodynamic characteristic and geome-try. Another known set of theoretically defined airfoilsare the Joukowski profiles [4]. Using the conformal map-ping method, airfoils with a round nose and sharp trail-ing edge can be represented. Sadly the method is not torecommend for trying to match known airfoils and thedesign space it describes is quite confined to airfoils withoften poor performances.
More recently a very interesting and powerful represen-tation method, the class function/shape function’ trans-formation CST method was presented by Kulfan[5]. Themethod is based on simple well behaved mathematical
1
functions that allow for increasing the number of pa-rameters at will. Also the formulation is not restrictedto round nose and sharp trailing edge profiles, but candescribe almost any shape.
4 Method
4.1 Model
The envelope of the airfoil is described by a set of para-metric Bezier curves, which are closely related to Bern-stein polynomials. The equation for an n-dimensionalcubic Bezier curve is shown in equation 1. The cubicBezier curve requires the four control points, P0 to P3
in order to be defined. The points P0 to P2 span thefirst control vector, and P2 to P3 span the second con-trol vector, as shown in figure 1. The Bezier is tangentialto the control vectors at the start and endpoints of thecurve. This behaviour will ensure that the leading edgeis tangential with the z-axis and that the curve at toppoint of the airfoil is tangential with the x-axis. The air-
Figure 1: Generic cubic Bezier curve with the four con-trol points P0 to P3 marked. The Bezier is tangentialto the control vectors at the start and endpoints of thecurve.
foil’s top and bottom curves are modelled individuallyby two cubic Bezier curves in parametric form being C1continuous at the defined top and bottom points, as wellas the leading edge. C1 continuity was selected over C2continuity in order to allow curve fitting with many olderairfoils which only exhibit C1 continuity.
B = (1− t)3P0 + 3t(1− t)2P1 + 3t2(1− t)P2 + t3P3 (1)
When modelling modern profiles, the proposed methoddoes allow C2 continuity as well. Figure 2 gives an ex-ample of a transonic wing airfoil, the Lockheed C-5ABL576, and show the outer envelope and the Beziercontrol points and control vectors. The control pointsare numbered clockwise from the bottom side trailingedge. The method of representing an airfoil is straight-forward. For a generic envelope built up by four cu-bic Bezier curves, 13 control points are needed to define
Figure 2: Parametrized transonic wing airfoil withBezier control points and control vectors, and the num-bering of the control points.
the curve, giving 26 variables when both x and y co-ordinates are taken into account. However when somesymmetries and simplifications valid for wing profiles aretaken into account the number of independent parame-ters are reduced to 14. Control point 1 and 13 alwayshave the same x-coordinate, one, and the same absolutevalue of their y-coordinate is also equal as their average,the camber line, must be on the x-axis at the trailingedge. Control points 3,4 and 5 on the bottom side havethe same y-coordinate. The same goes for the top sidecontrol points 9, 10 and 11. The leading edge points 6,7and 8 all have an x-coordinate of zero. Table 1 show thedependent parameters for the control points.
Table 1: Coordinate dependency for the control points.Some always take the value one or zero, while others(a,b,c) always shares the same numerical while (xn yn )are allowed any value.
CoordinatePoint nr. X Y
1 1 a2 x2 y23 x3 b4 x4 b5 x5 b6 0 y67 0 08 0 y89 x9 c
10 x10 c11 x11 c12 x12 y1213 1 −a
The control points for each of the investigated airfoilsare available in this tabulated form in the results sectionof this book.
4.2 Parameterization
Handling the control point coordinates directly whenspecifying an airfoil is not user friendly. The coordi-nates themselves have no obvious relation to shape ofthe airfoil when reviewed alone and the possible rangeof the coordinate values exceed the allowed range fornon-degenerate airfoils. To alleviate this concern, and
2
to reduce the number of free parameters, the followingparameter transformations are done:
The lengths of the control vectors are limited to preventdegenerate cases. For example the upper leading edgecontrol vector needs to be shorter than the distance be-tween the top point and the chord line to prevent leadingedge overshoot. Figure 3 shows the bounding box lim-iting the range of the control vectors. None of the con-trol points are allowed outside of this box, furthermorethe trailing edge control vectors, governed by the twocontrol points nr.2 and nr.12 may never reach furtherforward than points nr.3 and nr.11 respectively. -Shownby the limit lines L1 and L2 in figure 3. Thickness: The
Figure 3: Bounding box of the control vectors, togetherwith the trailing edge vectors forward limits L1 and L2.
x and y coordinates of the top and bottom points (nr.4 and nr.10) are kept as is and named upper thicknessand upper thickness position and similarly for the lowerside. The upper height is parametrized as a factor k4times the maximum allowed upper thickness, 0.15, ac-cording to equation 2. As the lower side is treated in thesame way, this means that the maximum thickness al-lowed with this parametrization is 30% of the chord. Thedifference between the upper and lower thickness thenbecomes the ram thickness. The ram thickness equalsthe airfoil thickness in case the thickness positions areequals. If the upper and lower thickness positions arenot equal, the ram thickness will be slightly larger thanthe traditional airfoil thickness.
y9,10,11 = hu = k5 · 0.15 (2)
Control vectors: The upper leading edge control vec-tor spanned by its start point, the leading edge at [0 0]which is point nr.7, and point nr.8. The length of thisvector is defined as a fraction k1 of the upper thicknesshu, according to equation 3 The constant k1 is then onlyallowed to be in the range [0..1], see figure 4. This en-sures that the part of the profile going from the leadingedge to the top point does not overshoot the top pointsy value.
y8 = k1 · hu (3)
The top side of the airfoil is controlled by three param-eters, shown in figure 5. The top point position Pu isin itself a fraction of the chord length and need not tobe parametrized further, is renamed k3. The two frac-tions k2 and k4 control the lengths of the forward andaft control vectors. The control vector going from thetop point towards the leading edge, i.e. between points
Figure 4: Definition of the leading edge control vectorparameters.
nr.10 to nr.9 has its length limited to a fraction, k2, of thetop point position in the same way in order to preventan overshoot of the profile into negative x-coordinates.Likewise the control vector defined by points 10 to 11,the top to TE vector is a fraction k4 of the length be-tween the upper thickness position (nr.10) and the trail-ing edge (x=1). The trailing edge is defined by five pa-
Figure 5: Definition of the top side control vector pa-rameters.
rameters, some shown in figure 6. The trailing edge gapg, is the distance between the upper and lower side ofthe airfoil at the trailing edge. It is parametrized accord-ing to equation 4, where Gmax is the maximum allowedtrailing edge gap of 5% of the chord.
g = k15 ·Gmax (4)
The release angle α, which is the angle between the cam-ber line tangent and the chord line at the trailing edge,is parametrized similarly according to equation 5. Therelease angle is a fraction k14 times the maximum al-lowed release angle αmax of 0.35 radians ( about 20◦ ).Is should be noted that the release angle may take onboth positive and negative values.
α = k14 · αmax (5)
The boat tail angle β, which is the angle between tan-gents of the upper and lower sides of the airfoil at thetrailing edge is defined in equation 6. It is treated in asimilar way to the release angle. The boat tail angle β isa factor k13 times the maximum allowed boat tail angleβmax of 1 radian ( about 57◦ ).
β = k13 · βmax (6)
Figure 6: Definition of the top side control vector pa-rameters.
3
The length of the upper and lower side trailing edge con-trol vectors together with the trailing edge gap, the boattail angle and the release angle determines the positionof control points nr. 2 and nr. 12. These lengths are arealso parametrized according to equation 7. The lengthof the upper vector, V , is a fraction k11 of the maximumallowed length Vmax. The maximum allowed length is inturn dependent on the bounding box of the airfoil andthe position of the forward limit L1 set by the x-positionof control point nr. 11.
V = k11,12 · Vmax (7)
The parameters of the lower side of the airfoil are de-fined in the same manner as the upper side parameters,numbering the parameters in the same way from 6 to 10.
With the five parameters defining the trailing edge, thenumber of parameters are now reduced to 15. See table2. By the limits of the fractions many degenerate airfoilsare now hard to impossible to generate. By using thechord length as normalizing agent, the parameters arealso dimensionless and fully scalable.
Table 2: Parameter names and order.
Name Parameter Range
Upper sideUpper nose fraction k1 [0..1]Upper forward fraction k2 [0..1]Upper thickness position k3 [0..1]Upper rearward fraction k4 [0..1]Upper thickness k5 [0..1]
Lower sideLower nose fraction k6 [0..1]Lower forward fraction k7 [0..1]Lower thickness position k8 [0..1]Lower rearward fraction k8 [0..1]Lower thickness k10 [0..1]
Trailing edgeUpper length fraction k11 [0..1]Lower length fraction k12 [0..1]Boat tail angle fraction k13 [0..1]Release angle fraction k10 [0..1]Trailing edge gap fraction k10 [0..1]
4.3 Base change
By listing the parameters k1 to k15 when rounded ofto the nearest tenth, a 15 digit number could be usedto present a large set of airfoils. This approach wouldhowever introduce large round off errors which wouldmake the process of modelling known airfoils trouble-some. This is alleviated by changing the base from base10 to base 64. With base 64 the resolution increases
from 10% to 1.6% for each parameter value. Some mod-ification to the new base numbering has to be made asboth zero and one needs to be modelled, and any doubledigit parameter is disallowed. The encoding follows theRFC3548 [6]. The series [0, 1, 2, .., 25, 26, ..., 51, 52, ...63]maps to [A,B,C, .., Z, a, ..., z, 0, ... ]. By rounding thebase 10 multi-decimal parameter towards the closest63:rd as shown in table 3, a reasonable accurate valuecan be stored in a single digit. With this system an air-
Table 3: Base change example.
Parameter 63:rds base 64 error
k1 = 0 0 A 0 %k2 = 0.3333 21 V 0 %k3 = 0.5 32 g 1.6 %k4 = 0.7 44 s -0.3 %k5 = 1 63 0 %
foil with know parameters k1 to k15 can be expressed asa single string. For example will the Naca747a415 profileshown in figure 6 be represented as the string shown intable 4
Table 4: Base 64 representation:
ggaQszVsoTL8DeA
4.4 Reproducing known airfoils
In many design cases it will not be appropriate to startwith a generic airfoil for design optimization. Instead,by employing a known airfoil, whether it is a Clark-Y,NACA0012 or any other known airfoil there is a needof having the traditional airfoil shape expressed in theproposed parameters. Modelling known airfoils requireslightly more work than creating new airfoils.
When fitting known wing profiles to the parametrization,the input data are sometimes in poor condition and inneed of preprocessing. The point cloud must have itsleading edge at [0 0] and the trailing edge cord have toend at [1 0], if the profile has a trailing edge gap, thisshould be symmetrically distributed around the [1 0]. Ifthis is not the case som geometrical rotation, transla-tion and scaling will have to be employed. This meansthat some aerodynamic properties such has zero lift an-gle and stall angle of attack will shift when comparingthe parametrized airfoil with external aero data.
One example of a wing profile that needs preprocessing isthe Clark-Y profile, an older propeller profile today usedfrequently amongst model aircraft builders for its easeof manufacture rather than aerodynamic performance.The coordinate data for the Clark-Y profile, as presented
4
in some databases [7] has the lower side flank parallel tothe x-axis, rather than letting the chord line define thex-axis.
A starting guess of parameters were created by evaluat-ing the profile radius at the leading edge, top and bot-tom, at the upper maximum y- position and at the lowerminimum y-position. Together with the trailing edgegap and the slope of the upper and lower sides of theairfoil at the trailing edge. The radius at these pointsare computed with a three point circle algorithm fromwhich the length of the control vectors can be computedaccording to equation 8, where a is the outgoing controlvector length and h the perpendicular distance to thenext control point as shown in figure 7.
1
r=
2h
3a3(8)
Figure 7: Definition radius parameters.
With the obtained starting guess, a standard optimiza-tion is run in MATLAB to fit the parameter curve to thecorresponding point cloud. The mathematical methodused is the built-in fsolve method, which in this caseutilizes the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. The run isset to minimize the root mean square error of the verti-cal position of the coordinate points between parameterpoints and point cloud.
The optimization is nested in two layers in order to treatthe parameter nature of the Bezier curve. The outer loopsolves for the control parameters governing the curvesegment in question and an inner loop solving for thecurvilinear position parameter vector t, with respect tothe x coordinate. As the original data points may haveany distribution along the x-axis, it cannot be assumedthat the t vector in equation 1 is evenly distributed.
The optimization results is evaluated both from a geo-metrical point of view, were the error of vertical positionof each point is plotted for the profile. The average RMSerror for the profile is a general quality control. The av-erage RMS error was usually in the order of 10−4, ne-cessitating the use of the unit error counts (ects), where1 ects = 10−4. Similarly, the curvature and error incurvature between were evaluated Notably many of theavailable airfoils had very noisy curvature distributions,making an error plot of curvature fitting interesting butnot a good indicator to whether the parametric inter-polation was good or bad. Instead, as long as a good
scatter is found any offset bias or systematic error canbe assumed to be small.
To further investigate the correlation between the orig-inal data point cloud and the parametric wing pro-file, an aerodynamic study was performed utilizing thepanel method XFOIL [8]. The original airfoil and theparametrized airfoil were both subjected to a CL sweepranging from −0.3 to 1 at a Reynolds number of 6 · 106.The drag and moment coefficients were evaluated, as wellas the boundary layer transition point for both profiles.
The proposed parametrization method was tested on aset of over 1100 different airfoils. Results for these pro-files are presented in this report, in the catalog section.For each of the investigated airfoils the reported curva-ture distribution graph is truncated at the leading edgein order to give a better scale of the results for the rest ofthe profile. Each profile is reported on a separate pageconsisting of the following sections
• Full name, if one is available
• Data source, usually the UIUC [1] database, butalso NACA or other sources.
• A geometry plot, showing both a scaled up y-axiswith camber and thickness, as well as an axis equalprofile plot.
• A geometrical data table containing maximumthickness, maximum thickness position etc...
• Coordinates of the Bezier curve control points.
• Base 64 parametrized airfoil name
• A table showing the average errors in position, cur-vature as well as errors in drag- and pitching mo-ment coefficient and transition point position forcontrol point and parameter curves at a standardCL of 0.3
• A graph showing the position and curvature errorover the entire profile.
• A figure showing the error in drag- and pitchingmoment coefficient as well as the error in transitionpoint position for a range of lift coefficients.
5 Discussion
The conducted aerodynamic study covers only someaerodynamic phenomena in the linear domain of lowspeed flight. For a more thorough comparison higer or-der effects needs to be modelled. Notably stall angle ofattack and post-stall behaviour, which cannot be cap-tured well with XFOIL. Likewise High speed shock for-mation similarities and drag rise needs to be assessedbefore this parametric wing profile description can besaid to model the point cloud airfoils in every aspect.
5
The method as described does not require C2 continuityat the top and bottom points. Adding this constraintto the method will reduce the number of free parame-ters with two, and also give a more traditional curvaturecontinuity. However, the geometrical fitting of knownairfoils would suffer in having a higher geometrical er-ror. For most known airfoils tested, the optimized cur-vature is indeed discontinuous, but with a very smallstep. This discontinuity does not appear to have a sig-nificant impact on the aerodynamic performance of theparametrized airfoil.
Some of the airfoils in the catalog have an improper setof control points. In the numerical optimisation usedto compute the control points, some profiles got a zerolength control vector at the trailing edge. While thegeometric representation using the control points works,as well as creating the base 64 string, creating controlpoints from the BM64 string will not work. The zero-length control vector destroys the information about itsorientation.
6 Software
MATLAB code needed for evaluating the airfoils in thedatabase, as well as an electronic version of the databasewill be available at:
Linkoping University:http://www.iei.liu.se/flumes/aircraft-design/
software
and at Redhammer Consulting:http://www.redhammer.se/software
References
[1] Michael Selig, UIUC Airfoil CoordinatesDatabase, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Dept of Aerospace Engineering,Urbana, Illinois, http://www.ae.illinois.edu/m-selig/ads/coord database.html, webpage retrieved2012-01-01
[2] E. N. Jacobs, K. E. Ward, & R. M. Pinkerton Thecharacteristics of 78 related airfoil sections from testsin the variable-density wind tunnel, NACA ReportNo. 460,1933
[3] P. Marzocca. The NACA airfoil series, Clarkson Uni-versity, Retrieved 07-03-2009.
[4] R. Von Mises, Theory of Flight, Dover PublicationsInc., New York, 1959
[5] B. Kulfan, Universal Parametric Geometry Repre-sentation Method, AIAA Journal of Aircraft, vol.45no.1, pp.142-158, 2008
[6] S. Josefsson, Ed., The Base16, Base32, and Base64Data Encodings, Request for Comments: 3548, Net-work Working Group, The Internet Society, 2003.
[7] Louden, F A , Collection of wind-tunnel dataon commonly used wing sections, NACA-TR-331,93R20691,1930
[8] Drela, M, XFOIL - An analysis and design systemfor low Reynolds number airfoils, Proceedings of theConference, Notre Dame, Germany; 5-7 June 1989.pp. 1-12. 1989.
7 Airfoil Catalog
.
6
Profile: a18
Information: Archer A18 F1C free flight airfoil(original)Reference: UIUC
Figure 8: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 5: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.3716 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 3.8388 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.6139 %CUpper nose radius: 0.87604 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.305 degRelease Angle: 8.7462 degNose Incidence: 5.1754 degCamber deflection: 13.9216 deg
Table 6: Controlpoints1 -0.00306950.51761 0.0356890.22225 -0.0174790.075281 -0.0174790 -0.0174790 -0.00279670 00 0.0345950.20492 0.0714540.34893 0.0714540.52472 0.0714540.74869 0.0606221 0.0030695
Table 7: Base 64 representation:faWReK FKH1nJtP
Table 8: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.139 4.145 ectsRMS curvature error: 82.32 81.84 %CD error -6 -6.3 dctsCm error -4 16 mctsUpper transition point 16.75 16.76 %
Figure 9: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 10: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
7
Profile: a18sm
Information: Archer A18 F1C free flight airfoil (smoothed)Reference: UIUC
Figure 11: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 9: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.3004 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 3.8292 % @0.48CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.6139 %CUpper nose radius: 0.80441 %CLower nose radius: 0.7243 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.6557 degRelease Angle: 8.7335 degNose Incidence: 4.6017 degCamber deflection: 13.3351 deg
Table 10: Controlpoints1 -0.00306950.50962 0.0347110.22382 -0.0174790.075281 -0.0174790.026042 -0.0174790 -0.0112140 00 0.0312150.1817 0.0714540.37893 0.0714540.4767 0.0714540.73763 0.0639391 0.0030695
Table 11: Base 64 representation:chYKeopFKH4oKtP
Table 12: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.613 3.97 ectsRMS curvature error: 33.8 33.06 %CD error -0.4 -42.1 dctsCm error -11 38 mctsUpper transition point 1.59 0.11 %
Figure 12: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 13: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
8
Profile: a63a108c
Information: NASA/AMES modification of the NACA 63A-108airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 14: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 13: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.7324 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 0.44446 % @0.17CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.7 %CUpper nose radius: 7.3484 %CLower nose radius: 0.96721 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 2.6362 degRelease Angle: -1.8163 degNose Incidence: 8.1186 degCamber deflection: 6.3023 deg
Table 14: Controlpoints1 -0.00350.67387 -0.0213590.53376 -0.0346250.34988 -0.0346250.043735 -0.0346250 -0.0167930 00 0.0175240.0062687 0.04280.30015 0.04280.65936 0.04280.89177 0.0025591 0.0035
Table 15: Base 64 representation:a-TgSf3WSPUsDsS
Table 16: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.074 5.126 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.5 1.7 dctsCm error 12 19 mctsUpper transition point -1.95 -2.4 %
Figure 15: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 16: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
9
Profile: ag03
Information: Drela AG03 (flat aft bottom) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 17: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 17: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.2362 % @0.24CMaximum Camber: 2.0801 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.12109 %CUpper nose radius: 0.91155 %CLower nose radius: 0.28905 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.2667 degRelease Angle: 2.5067 degNose Incidence: 10.4494 degCamber deflection: 12.9561 deg
Table 18: Controlpoints1 -0.0006050.24106 -0.0114560.14104 -0.0130420.11285 -0.0130420.032851 -0.0130420 -0.00743380 00 0.0189660.062535 0.0512610.28141 0.0512610.45191 0.0512610.6626 0.0353011 0.000605
Table 19: Base 64 representation:YxSPWjsHCGr4HjD
Table 20: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.57 4.651 ectsRMS curvature error: 64.95 Inf %CD error -0.8 2.8 dctsCm error 2 -1 mctsUpper transition point 0.03 -0.11 %
Figure 18: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 19: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
10
Profile: ag04
Information: Drela AG04 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 20: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 21: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.431 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 1.7383 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.134 %CUpper nose radius: 0.11324 %CLower nose radius: 0.38937 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.4372 degRelease Angle: 2.54 degNose Incidence: 4.8897 degCamber deflection: 7.4297 deg
Table 22: Controlpoints1 -0.000670010.41458 -0.00249520.31306 -0.0186190.12471 -0.0186190.037228 -0.0186190 -0.0101540 00 0.00327620.014218 0.0479060.28091 0.0479060.46682 0.0479060.70227 0.0280731 0.00067001
Table 23: Base 64 representation:E8SRUisIOIk2GjD
Table 24: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.772 3.504 ectsRMS curvature error: 78.17 77.96 %CD error 0.1 0 dctsCm error -8 -5 mctsUpper transition point 0 -0.47 %
Figure 21: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 22: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
11
Profile: ag08
Information: Drela AG08 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 23: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 25: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.8158 % @0.2CMaximum Camber: 1.7887 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.1599 %CUpper nose radius: 0.14748 %CLower nose radius: 0.49865 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.5484 degRelease Angle: 2.8292 degNose Incidence: 4.0776 degCamber deflection: 6.9068 deg
Table 26: Controlpoints1 -0.00079950.35178 -0.000176820.25139 -0.0162740.10702 -0.0162740.013992 -0.0162740 -0.00699760 00 0.00375760.014361 0.0452290.2797 0.0452290.46324 0.0452290.75563 0.0247751 0.0007995
Table 27: Base 64 representation:F8SQTc3HKHi2GkE
Table 28: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.235 3.282 ectsRMS curvature error: 53.77 58.42 %CD error -0.2 -0.1 dctsCm error -8 -8 mctsUpper transition point 0.45 0.28 %
Figure 24: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 25: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
12
Profile: ag09
Information: Drela AG09 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 26: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 29: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 4.8323 % @0.19CMaximum Camber: 1.7992 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.1953 %CUpper nose radius: 0.13559 %CLower nose radius: 0.58733 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.3115 degRelease Angle: 2.3245 degNose Incidence: 3.0164 degCamber deflection: 5.3409 deg
Table 30: Controlpoints1 -0.000976520.18565 0.00142280.1208 -0.0129560.053016 -0.0129560.014118 -0.0129560 -0.0074350 00 0.00342040.012943 0.0413110.25799 0.0413110.44519 0.0413110.70899 0.0237791 0.00097652
Table 31: Base 64 representation:F8RQSkuDFGj6FjF
Table 32: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.638 7.178 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.4 1.5 dctsCm error -5 6 mctsUpper transition point 0.05 0.6 %
Figure 27: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 28: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
13
Profile: ag10
Information: Drela AG10 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 29: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 33: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 4.6276 % @0.17CMaximum Camber: 1.6779 % @0.3CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3617 %CUpper nose radius: 0.70733 %CLower nose radius: 1.2777 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.9621 degRelease Angle: 2.2757 degNose Incidence: 4.7855 degCamber deflection: 7.0612 deg
Table 34: Controlpoints1 -0.00180850.19456 0.00233390.13144 -0.0127620.052895 -0.0127620.0020376 -0.0127620 -0.00416610 00 0.0152760.049489 0.0391030.23424 0.0391030.33993 0.0391030.6342 0.0290351 0.0018085
Table 35: Base 64 representation:ZxPJRV9DFFu6EjJ
Table 36: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.221 6.221 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.5 1.4 dctsCm error -12 -2 mctsUpper transition point -0.04 1.08 %
Figure 30: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 31: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
14
Profile: ag11
Information: Drela ag11 AirfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 32: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 37: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.8281 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 2.2378 % @0.3CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.23211 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0233 %CLower nose radius: 0.48629 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.3025 degRelease Angle: 2.7502 degNose Incidence: 11.8638 degCamber deflection: 14.614 deg
Table 38: Controlpoints1 -0.00116050.12818 -0.00726340.12818 -0.00859290.062559 -0.00859290.022776 -0.00859290 -0.00859290 00 0.0171220.042974 0.0514240.27237 0.0514240.49516 0.0514240.80514 0.0213031 0.0011605
Table 39: Base 64 representation:V1RUW oEEEa HkG
Table 40: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.697 3.676 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.7 0.4 dctsCm error -9 -19 mctsUpper transition point 0.35 -0.71 %
Figure 33: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 34: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
15
Profile: ag12
Information: Drela AG12 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 35: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 41: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.2467 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 1.8519 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0942 %CUpper nose radius: 0.29309 %CLower nose radius: 0.39563 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.5704 degRelease Angle: 3.557 degNose Incidence: 5.4867 degCamber deflection: 9.0437 deg
Table 42: Controlpoints1 -0.0004710.58904 0.0122410.32192 -0.0173680.1367 -0.0173680.1121 -0.0173680 -0.0171950 00 0.0076390.029865 0.0474210.27642 0.0474210.33811 0.0474210.50871 0.0464111 0.000471
Table 43: Base 64 representation:K4SFU-MJOH-mElC
Table 44: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.57 4.006 ectsRMS curvature error: 23.77 20 %CD error 0 -1.1 dctsCm error 1 15 mctsUpper transition point -0.08 1.09 %
Figure 36: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 37: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
16
Profile: ag13
Information: Drela AG13 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 38: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 45: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.8377 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 1.9847 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0948 %CUpper nose radius: 0.15829 %CLower nose radius: 0.34629 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.7275 degRelease Angle: 3.7369 degNose Incidence: 6.2355 degCamber deflection: 9.9724 deg
Table 46: Controlpoints1 -0.0004740.54498 0.0144070.31541 -0.0148170.11427 -0.0148170.020217 -0.0148170 -0.00683170 00 0.00372370.01314 0.0466110.28113 0.0466110.49014 0.0466110.8484 0.0153411 0.000474
Table 47: Base 64 representation:F8STUe0HPGVqElC
Table 48: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.746 3.442 ectsRMS curvature error: 21.55 22.19 %CD error -0.4 -0.5 dctsCm error -1 -8 mctsUpper transition point 0.67 1.14 %
Figure 39: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 40: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
17
Profile: ag14
Information: Drela AG14 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 41: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 49: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.3797 % @0.2CMaximum Camber: 2.1006 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0956 %CUpper nose radius: 0.20363 %CLower nose radius: 0.46443 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 2.5983 degRelease Angle: 3.4341 degNose Incidence: 6.6902 degCamber deflection: 10.1242 deg
Table 50: Controlpoints1 -0.0004780.54239 0.0165810.24845 -0.012170.089637 -0.012170.0050921 -0.012170 -0.00397070 00 0.00507530.018974 0.0456110.26974 0.0456110.54821 0.0456110.97943 0.00218141 0.000478
Table 51: Base 64 representation:H6RYTV7GLFDmDlC
Table 52: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.583 4.503 ectsRMS curvature error: 20.49 20.58 %CD error 0 -0.3 dctsCm error 4 18 mctsUpper transition point -0.21 -0.82 %
Figure 42: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 43: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
18
Profile: ag16
Information: Drela AG16 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 44: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 53: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.1257 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 1.8923 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0929 %CUpper nose radius: 0.38526 %CLower nose radius: 0.47317 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.2561 degRelease Angle: 3.9528 degNose Incidence: 4.6057 degCamber deflection: 8.5585 deg
Table 54: Controlpoints1 -0.00046450.62188 0.0115820.35229 -0.0218610.15 -0.0218610.1455 -0.0218610 -0.0214240 00 0.0109420.046612 0.0517210.28899 0.0517210.39848 0.0517210.57165 0.0460971 0.0004645
Table 55: Base 64 representation:O1SKW-CKPJ4kFmC
Table 56: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.504 3.053 ectsRMS curvature error: 16.44 20.4 %CD error 0.1 0.8 dctsCm error -2 -8 mctsUpper transition point -0.56 -2.3 %
Figure 45: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 46: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
19
Profile: ag17
Information: Drela AG17 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 47: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 57: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.4999 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 2.0372 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0939 %CUpper nose radius: 0.33128 %CLower nose radius: 0.38325 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.9266 degRelease Angle: 3.9986 degNose Incidence: 6.0635 degCamber deflection: 10.0621 deg
Table 58: Controlpoints1 -0.00046950.59646 0.0138710.32561 -0.0176460.13694 -0.0176460.11914 -0.0176460 -0.0176460 00 0.00860.033488 0.0500860.28915 0.0500860.42436 0.0500860.611 0.0410941 0.0004695
Table 59: Base 64 representation:L4TMV IJOIzlEmC
Table 60: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.447 5.281 ectsRMS curvature error: 21.13 23.58 %CD error -0.1 -0.5 dctsCm error -2 -13 mctsUpper transition point -0.22 0.69 %
Figure 48: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 49: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
20
Profile: ag18
Information: Drela AG18 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 50: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 61: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.8638 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 2.1825 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0948 %CUpper nose radius: 0.22085 %CLower nose radius: 0.32579 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.6509 degRelease Angle: 4.021 degNose Incidence: 7.2609 degCamber deflection: 11.2819 deg
Table 62: Controlpoints1 -0.0004740.54809 0.0168520.3181 -0.0138040.096885 -0.0138040.072651 -0.0138040 -0.0125620 00 0.00477170.015465 0.0484510.28931 0.0484510.44443 0.0484510.6416 0.0371721 0.000474
Table 63: Base 64 representation:G8TOV5QGQGwpEmC
Table 64: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.397 2.922 ectsRMS curvature error: 20.92 22.8 %CD error 0 -0.2 dctsCm error -2 -11 mctsUpper transition point -0.03 1.38 %
Figure 51: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 52: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
21
Profile: ag19
Information: Drela AG19 profileReference: UIUC
Figure 53: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 65: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.4039 % @0.2CMaximum Camber: 2.2958 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0954 %CUpper nose radius: 0.16958 %CLower nose radius: 0.29661 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.3048 degRelease Angle: 4.1143 degNose Incidence: 8.1149 degCamber deflection: 12.2292 deg
Table 66: Controlpoints1 -0.0004770.53884 0.019350.25592 -0.011470.083848 -0.011470.072714 -0.011470 -0.011470 00 0.00185820.0030542 0.0473060.28942 0.0473060.45507 0.0473060.65678 0.0351381 0.000477
Table 67: Base 64 representation:D-TPU IFMFunEmC
Table 68: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.908 2.946 ectsRMS curvature error: 25.17 27.39 %CD error -0.2 -0.6 dctsCm error -5 -4 mctsUpper transition point 0.97 1.77 %
Figure 54: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 55: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
22
Profile: ag24
Information: AG24 Bubble Dancer DLG by Mark DrelaReference: UIUC
Figure 56: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 69: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.4185 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 2.232 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0971 %CUpper nose radius: 0.48654 %CLower nose radius: 0.47278 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.0698 degRelease Angle: 5.3831 degNose Incidence: 5.9859 degCamber deflection: 11.3689 deg
Table 70: Controlpoints1 -0.00048550.78905 0.0118560.39277 -0.0238060.17708 -0.0238060.11797 -0.0238060 -0.0192830 00 0.0144780.064627 0.062550.31499 0.062550.58855 0.062550.88291 0.015731 0.0004855
Table 71: Base 64 representation:PyUabzVLRKSWFoC
Table 72: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.631 4.258 ectsRMS curvature error: 18.03 20.46 %CD error 0.5 1.1 dctsCm error -5 -2 mctsUpper transition point -0.43 -1.13 %
Figure 57: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 58: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
23
Profile: ag25
Information: AG25 Bubble Dancer DLG by Mark DrelaReference: UIUC
Figure 59: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 73: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.5788 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 2.4182 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0963 %CUpper nose radius: 0.4144 %CLower nose radius: 0.41098 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.3626 degRelease Angle: 5.3241 degNose Incidence: 6.8875 degCamber deflection: 12.2116 deg
Table 74: Controlpoints1 -0.00048150.72414 0.0146650.34085 -0.0190030.1501 -0.0190030.10207 -0.0190030 -0.0167230 00 0.0117770.050208 0.0599260.3156 0.0599260.57181 0.0599260.8617 0.0187031 0.0004815
Table 75: Base 64 representation:N1UYa3UKOIVbFoC
Table 76: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.417 4.012 ectsRMS curvature error: 12.22 12.91 %CD error 0.1 0.4 dctsCm error -2 -2 mctsUpper transition point 0.13 -0.38 %
Figure 60: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 61: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
24
Profile: ag26
Information: AG26 Bubble Dancer DLG by Mark DrelaReference: UIUC
Figure 62: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 77: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.8375 % @0.24CMaximum Camber: 2.5649 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0999 %CUpper nose radius: 0.40075 %CLower nose radius: 0.36598 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.5466 degRelease Angle: 5.0101 degNose Incidence: 7.8733 degCamber deflection: 12.8835 deg
Table 78: Controlpoints1 -0.00049950.62383 0.0174820.31741 -0.0152960.10998 -0.0152960.069288 -0.0152960 -0.0130020 00 0.0102010.038946 0.0574380.31627 0.0574380.50477 0.0574380.72377 0.0358041 0.0004995
Table 79: Base 64 representation:L3USZ1YHPHniFnD
Table 80: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.315 5.753 ectsRMS curvature error: 19.31 19.78 %CD error 0.3 1 dctsCm error 0 -4 mctsUpper transition point -0.44 -1.14 %
Figure 63: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 64: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
25
Profile: ag27
Information: AG27 Bubble Dancer DLG by Mark DrelaReference: UIUC
Figure 65: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 81: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.1212 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 2.6939 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.1035 %CUpper nose radius: 0.066651 %CLower nose radius: 16.9447 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.1799 degRelease Angle: 4.7444 degNose Incidence: 7.2214 degCamber deflection: 11.9658 deg
Table 82: Controlpoints1 -0.000517510.51098 0.0221540.28019 -0.0128950.079122 -0.0128956.636e-005 -0.0128950 -0.00273790 00 0.0018510.0077103 0.0545240.31772 0.0545240.53295 0.0545240.80092 0.0243771 0.00051751
Table 83: Base 64 representation:C9UUXO FOGcqFnD
Table 84: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.371 6.741 ectsRMS curvature error: 22.21 25.4 %CD error 0.4 0.4 dctsCm error 7 7 mctsUpper transition point -0.8 -0.8 %
Figure 66: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 67: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
26
Profile: ag35
Information: AG35 - Not so good fit.Reference: UIUC
Figure 68: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 85: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.7243 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 2.3805 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.24889 %CUpper nose radius: 0.6654 %CLower nose radius: 0.7988 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 41.5742 degRelease Angle: 19.2444 degNose Incidence: 6.3739 degCamber deflection: 25.6183 deg
Table 86: Controlpoints1 -0.00124450.35219 -0.0186910.25219 -0.0224070.17008 -0.0224070.014579 -0.0224070 -0.00881120 00 0.0174630.068748 0.0668620.31591 0.0668620.57871 0.0668620.99811 0.00283151 0.0012445
Table 87: Base 64 representation:RxUZsZ6LGKC2t-G
Table 88: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.47 8.015 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.2 2.1 dctsCm error -58 -84 mctsUpper transition point -0.58 -1.12 %
Figure 69: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 70: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
27
Profile: ag36
Information: AG46Reference: UIUC
Figure 71: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 89: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.1678 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 2.2378 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.26691 %CUpper nose radius: 0.52526 %CLower nose radius: 0.85103 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.4311 degRelease Angle: 3.2997 degNose Incidence: 5.2392 degCamber deflection: 8.5389 deg
Table 90: Controlpoints1 -0.00133460.34869 -0.0174320.24869 -0.0208140.16994 -0.0208140.016336 -0.0208140 -0.00962720 00 0.0148210.062726 0.0627780.31615 0.0627780.42013 0.0627780.6665 0.0482961 0.0013346
Table 91: Base 64 representation:PyUKbe5LGJw2LlH
Table 92: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.899 3.694 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.6 1.2 dctsCm error -2 -16 mctsUpper transition point -1.17 -1.71 %
Figure 72: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 73: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
28
Profile: ag37
Information: N/AReference: N/A
Figure 74: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 93: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.7335 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 2.2045 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.35071 %CUpper nose radius: 0.88948 %CLower nose radius: 0.59804 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.1333 degRelease Angle: 3.8549 degNose Incidence: 8.3885 degCamber deflection: 12.2434 deg
Table 94: Controlpoints1 -0.00175350.35094 -0.0154820.25094 -0.0183450.16989 -0.0183450.026545 -0.0183450 -0.0102880 00 0.0220210.081779 0.0603980.30209 0.0603980.47148 0.0603980.82934 0.0285441 0.0017535
Table 95: Base 64 representation:XuTQaj1LGIs2LlJ
Table 96: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.016 2.592 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.8 1.6 dctsCm error -8 -4 mctsUpper transition point -0.71 -1.6 %
Figure 75: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 76: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
29
Profile: ag38
Information: AG38 - Sequential flat top.Reference: UIUC
Figure 77: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 97: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.09 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 2.1139 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.46973 %CUpper nose radius: 0.96108 %CLower nose radius: 0.65407 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.8477 degRelease Angle: 4.0734 degNose Incidence: 8.5099 degCamber deflection: 12.5833 deg
Table 98: Controlpoints1 -0.00235110.35859 -0.0133570.25859 -0.0158590.15767 -0.0158590.020048 -0.0158590 -0.00883580 00 0.0237230.086492 0.0558320.31472 0.0558320.44798 0.0558320.8073 0.0330071 0.0023511
Table 99: Base 64 representation:btUMYj3KIHk2LmM
Table 100: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.99 2.97 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.3 1 dctsCm error -13 -24 mctsUpper transition point -0.69 -0.7 %
Figure 78: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 79: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
30
Profile: ag44ct02r
Information: Drela AG44ct -02f airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 80: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 101: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.2978 % @0.24CMaximum Camber: 1.9711 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0534 %CUpper nose radius: 0.55571 %CLower nose radius: 0.38892 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.0413 degRelease Angle: 2.521 degNose Incidence: 8.5092 degCamber deflection: 11.0302 deg
Table 102: Controlpoints1 -0.0002670.63271 -0.00347010.34543 -0.0183890.16335 -0.0183890.089844 -0.0183890 -0.0152630 00 0.0125510.042522 0.0556280.27448 0.0556280.41942 0.0556280.51942 0.0468941 0.000267
Table 103: Base 64 representation:O1SNY0sKOI1jHjB
Table 104: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.635 4.322 ectsRMS curvature error: 88.77 75.82 %CD error -0.2 -0.3 dctsCm error 15 10 mctsUpper transition point -0.39 0.95 %
Figure 81: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 82: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
31
Profile: ag45c03
Information: Drela AG45c -03f airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 83: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 105: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.9341 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 2.056 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.089404 %CUpper nose radius: 0.68748 %CLower nose radius: 0.36316 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 2.8362 degRelease Angle: 2.5406 degNose Incidence: 9.1188 degCamber deflection: 11.6595 deg
Table 106: Controlpoints1 -0.000447020.84572 0.00257610.25739 -0.0162720.13659 -0.0162720.084686 -0.0162720 -0.0141560 00 0.0160850.056449 0.0547610.26295 0.0547610.45884 0.0547610.55884 0.0309771 0.00044702
Table 107: Base 64 representation:TxRRX3YJJHzNDjC
Table 108: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.928 4.224 ectsRMS curvature error: 87.7 88.93 %CD error -0.5 -1.1 dctsCm error 20 26 mctsUpper transition point -0.39 -0.02 %
Figure 84: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 85: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
32
Profile: ag45ct02r
Information: Drela AG45ct -02f airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 86: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 109: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.9066 % @0.24CMaximum Camber: 1.877 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0622 %CUpper nose radius: 0.64802 %CLower nose radius: 0.33101 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.9582 degRelease Angle: 2.2012 degNose Incidence: 8.7934 degCamber deflection: 10.9945 deg
Table 110: Controlpoints1 -0.0003110.66001 -0.00196020.3403 -0.0172690.15022 -0.0172690.088631 -0.0172690 -0.0146790 00 0.0155060.055655 0.0528190.26292 0.0528190.44337 0.0528190.54337 0.0376941 0.000311
Table 111: Base 64 representation:TxRQX1aKOH0gGjC
Table 112: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.456 6.225 ectsRMS curvature error: 92.91 75.5 %CD error 0 -0.6 dctsCm error 16 14 mctsUpper transition point -0.82 -0.08 %
Figure 87: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 88: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
33
Profile: ag46c03
Information: Drela AG46c -03f airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 89: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 113: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.0359 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 1.7305 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.079396 %CUpper nose radius: 0.7473 %CLower nose radius: 0.32371 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 2.3184 degRelease Angle: 2.3813 degNose Incidence: 8.6922 degCamber deflection: 11.0735 deg
Table 114: Controlpoints1 -0.000396980.89349 0.00187520.27658 -0.0146890.1229 -0.0146890.077426 -0.0146890 -0.0129260 00 0.0169510.057676 0.0470870.26216 0.0470870.47656 0.0470870.57657 0.0265951 0.00039698
Table 115: Base 64 representation:XxRTU3YILGzJDjC
Table 116: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.853 4.31 ectsRMS curvature error: 86.88 80.23 %CD error -0.8 -1.1 dctsCm error 13 -7 mctsUpper transition point -0.08 0.32 %
Figure 90: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 91: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
34
Profile: ag46ct02r
Information: Drela AG46ct -02f airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 92: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 117: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.0803 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 1.7152 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.0793 %CUpper nose radius: 0.63476 %CLower nose radius: 0.33084 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.1401 degRelease Angle: 2.5804 degNose Incidence: 8.2892 degCamber deflection: 10.8696 deg
Table 118: Controlpoints1 -0.00039650.87999 0.00172020.24385 -0.0152310.1365 -0.0152310.10101 -0.0152310 -0.0149260 00 0.0137020.044364 0.0470850.26215 0.0470850.41713 0.0470850.50752 0.0361341 0.0003965
Table 119: Base 64 representation:T0RNU-RJIG1KEjC
Table 120: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.848 3.968 ectsRMS curvature error: 83.73 77.17 %CD error -0.7 -1.6 dctsCm error 24 22 mctsUpper transition point -0.3 0.13 %
Figure 93: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 94: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
35
Profile: ag47c03
Information: Drela AG47c -03f airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 95: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 121: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.0652 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 1.3685 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.069288 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0218 %CLower nose radius: 0.25118 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.1028 degRelease Angle: 1.7923 degNose Incidence: 9.7223 degCamber deflection: 11.5146 deg
Table 122: Controlpoints1 -0.000346440.72118 -0.000537320.27908 -0.013180.12359 -0.013180.087941 -0.013180 -0.013150 00 0.0117660.029761 0.0386430.2659 0.0386430.48035 0.0386430.58035 0.0200881 0.00034644
Table 123: Base 64 representation:T4RTQ SILGzZDhC
Table 124: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.602 6.302 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.6 -0.3 dctsCm error 21 27 mctsUpper transition point -0.1 -1.19 %
Figure 96: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 97: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
36
Profile: ag47ct02r
Information: Drela AG47ct -02f airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 98: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis-tribution.
Table 125: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.0109 % @0.2CMaximum Camber: 1.334 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.069302 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5382 %CLower nose radius: 0.25118 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.7209 degRelease Angle: 2.101 degNose Incidence: 12.7206 degCamber deflection: 14.8216 deg
Table 126: Controlpoints1 -0.000346510.72071 -0.000540820.27896 -0.013180.12358 -0.013180.087959 -0.013180 -0.0131510 00 0.0125210.029276 0.0378670.26588 0.0378670.42966 0.0378670.52966 0.0276451 0.00034651
Table 127: Base 64 representation:V4ROQ SILG0ZEiC
Table 128: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.536 4.959 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf 91.7 %CD error -0.2 0.1 dctsCm error 20 26 mctsUpper transition point -0.8 -1.41 %
Figure 99: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 100: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
37
Profile: ag455ct02r
Information: Drela AG47ct -02f airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 101: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 129: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.4629 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 1.8645 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.084402 %CUpper nose radius: 0.58885 %CLower nose radius: 0.3227 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.5673 degRelease Angle: 2.6828 degNose Incidence: 9.0365 degCamber deflection: 11.7193 deg
Table 130: Controlpoints1 -0.000422010.8476 0.001970.25994 -0.0157030.13673 -0.0157030.080672 -0.0157030 -0.0135050 00 0.0122750.038382 0.0504710.2637 0.0504710.42269 0.0504710.5227 0.0377051 0.00042201
Table 131: Base 64 representation:Q2ROW2aJJH0NEkC
Table 132: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.599 5.74 ectsRMS curvature error: 90.26 94.22 %CD error -0.5 0.2 dctsCm error 17 5 mctsUpper transition point -0.19 -0.29 %
Figure 102: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 103: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
38
Profile: ah21-7
Information: Andrew Hollom AH 21 airfoil (7Reference: UIUC
Figure 104: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 133: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.0217 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 2.2717 % @0.58CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2939 %CLower nose radius: 0.55902 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.5473 degRelease Angle: 12.0864 degNose Incidence: 8.4152 degCamber deflection: 20.5015 deg
Table 134: Controlpoints1 00.94178 0.0079890.53283 -0.0261630.25509 -0.0261630.18366 -0.0261630 -0.0261630 00 0.0451850.23669 0.0657270.39727 0.0657270.48498 0.0657270.7761 0.0657271 0
Table 135: Base 64 representation:raZJc SQYL IKzA
Table 136: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.775 2.128 ectsRMS curvature error: 20.94 22.37 %CD error 0.8 1.7 dctsCm error -4 -5 mctsUpper transition point -0.95 -2.49 %
Figure 105: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 106: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
39
Profile: ah21-9
Information: Andrew Hollom AH 21 airfoil (original 9Reference: UIUC
Figure 107: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 137: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.9745 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 1.7394 % @0.58CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.76099 %CLower nose radius: 0.35479 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.7118 degRelease Angle: 9.1924 degNose Incidence: 6.3248 degCamber deflection: 15.5172 deg
Table 138: Controlpoints1 00.93404 0.00616140.54915 -0.0201630.25509 -0.0201630.1301 -0.0201630 -0.0175420 00 0.0312390.19236 0.0507270.39727 0.0507270.49371 0.0507270.78112 0.0507271 0
Table 139: Base 64 representation:mgZKW3fQZJ JJuA
Table 140: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.251 4.294 ectsRMS curvature error: 18.9 17.93 %CD error 0.8 -0.8 dctsCm error -3 6 mctsUpper transition point -2.39 -3.43 %
Figure 108: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 109: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
40
Profile: ah63k127
Information: Althaus AH 63-K-127/24 airfoil for use with flaps(K)Reference: UIUC
Figure 110: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 141: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.7016 % @0.42CMaximum Camber: 3.754 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.80776 %CLower nose radius: 0.38153 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.2212 degRelease Angle: 6.977 degNose Incidence: 9.7159 degCamber deflection: 16.6929 deg
Table 142: Controlpoints1 00.79049 0.0123240.78992 -0.02630.37059 -0.02630.2483 -0.02630 -0.02630 00 0.0307330.17539 0.100980.43474 0.100980.63509 0.100980.73509 0.0495171 0
Table 143: Base 64 representation:TlcXq VYqLt IqA
Table 144: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.624 6.583 ectsRMS curvature error: 50.43 49.22 %CD error 0.6 0.4 dctsCm error 97 98 mctsUpper transition point -5.44 -5.07 %
Figure 111: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 112: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
41
Profile: ah79k132
Information: Althaus AH 6-407 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 113: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 145: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.2012 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 3.6792 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.56806 %CLower nose radius: 0.83926 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.5694 degRelease Angle: 4.8172 degNose Incidence: 5.8891 degCamber deflection: 10.7062 deg
Table 146: Controlpoints1 00.83607 0.00152340.83607 -0.029240.43474 -0.029240.085303 -0.029240 -0.0218470 00 0.0212560.1193 0.10280.40245 0.10280.65086 0.10280.75086 0.0399141 0
Table 147: Base 64 representation:NsabrvycsMt KnA
Table 148: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.534 8.047 ectsRMS curvature error: 49.62 50.2 %CD error -1 -1 dctsCm error 121 104 mctsUpper transition point -5.15 -4.31 %
Figure 114: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 115: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
42
Profile: ah79k135
Information: Althaus AH 79-K-135/20 airfoil for use with flaps(K)Reference: UIUC
Figure 116: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 149: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.4838 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 3.0551 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.61238 %CLower nose radius: 0.6081 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.9066 degRelease Angle: 4.14 degNose Incidence: 6.2982 degCamber deflection: 10.4382 deg
Table 150: Controlpoints1 00.80797 -0.00104990.80797 -0.036930.37059 -0.036930.30008 -0.036930 -0.0348790 00 0.0223970.12287 0.097960.40245 0.097960.65402 0.097960.75402 0.0371711 0
Table 151: Base 64 representation:Prabp7MYrQt KmA
Table 152: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.873 5.963 ectsRMS curvature error: 52.71 54.14 %CD error -3.7 -4.2 dctsCm error 96 95 mctsUpper transition point -4.73 -4.5 %
Figure 117: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 118: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
43
Profile: ah85l120
Information: Althaus AH 85-L-120/17 symmetrical airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 119: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 153: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.1092 % @0.44CMaximum Camber: -3.4043e-005 % @0.81CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %CUpper nose radius: 0.53477 %CLower nose radius: 0.53477 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.3674 degRelease Angle: 0.00065455 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: 0.00065455 deg
Table 154: Controlpoints1 -0.00080.79081 -0.0171540.75818 -0.060550.43474 -0.060550.17971 -0.060550 -0.0253120 00 0.0253120.17971 0.060550.43474 0.060550.75818 0.060550.79076 0.0171581 0.0008
Table 155: Base 64 representation:blckablcka22KgE
Table 156: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.683 3.57 ectsRMS curvature error: 19.95 17.77 %CD error -1 -0.9 dctsCm error -3 -2 mctsUpper transition point 3.3 3.02 %
Figure 120: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 121: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
44
Profile: ah93w145
Information: Althaus AH 93-W-145 airfoil for use on wind turbines(W)Reference: UIUC
Figure 122: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 157: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.4707 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 3.9019 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.195 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2431 %CLower nose radius: 1.3124 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.7316 degRelease Angle: 10.1715 degNose Incidence: 5.9352 degCamber deflection: 16.1067 deg
Table 158: Controlpoints1 -0.0009750.89902 0.00929250.62672 -0.0352070.22223 -0.0352070.12428 -0.0352070 -0.0329750 00 0.0349180.14712 0.111180.37052 0.111180.49268 0.111180.92002 0.0217151 0.000975
Table 159: Base 64 representation:UmYMu7cOgPMRKvF
Table 160: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.884 4.645 ectsRMS curvature error: 84.55 82.73 %CD error 2.2 1.8 dctsCm error 32 40 mctsUpper transition point -4.49 -4.05 %
Figure 123: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 124: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
45
Profile: ah93w174
Information: Althaus AH 93-W-174 airfoil for use on wind turbines(W)Reference: UIUC
Figure 125: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 161: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.4475 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 3.9126 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7815 %CLower nose radius: 2.0808 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.2892 degRelease Angle: 8.9863 degNose Incidence: 4.2294 degCamber deflection: 13.2157 deg
Table 162: Controlpoints1 00.84886 0.0154630.613 -0.0502720.22221 -0.0502720.18218 -0.0502720 -0.0502720 00 0.0438190.16167 0.12590.33928 0.12590.49336 0.12590.59336 0.0874061 0
Table 163: Base 64 representation:WhWP1 MOgVyZHuA
Table 164: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.753 6.669 ectsRMS curvature error: 78.48 83.07 %CD error -0.3 -0.4 dctsCm error 40 15 mctsUpper transition point -1.06 -0.24 %
Figure 126: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 127: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
46
Profile: ah93w215
Information: N/AReference: UIUC
Figure 128: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 165: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 21.2437 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 3.0646 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.753 %CLower nose radius: 3.3159 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.1904 degRelease Angle: 7.4024 degNose Incidence: 3.0573 degCamber deflection: 10.4597 deg
Table 166: Controlpoints1 00.84803 -0.00183760.5608 -0.0762410.30873 -0.0762410.05013 -0.0762410 -0.0332890 00 0.049450.13324 0.136430.33916 0.136430.42374 0.136430.52374 0.132061 0
Table 167: Base 64 representation:XmVI5c1TXg9WSrA
Table 168: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.18 7.484 ectsRMS curvature error: 95.88 97.91 %CD error 1.4 2.2 dctsCm error -7 -6 mctsUpper transition point -2.4 -3.02 %
Figure 129: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 130: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
47
Profile: ah93w257
Information: Althaus AH 93-W-257 airfoil for use on wind turbines(W)Reference: UIUC
Figure 131: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 169: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 25.6792 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 2.0965 % @0.77CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.77298 %CUpper nose radius: 2.6975 %CLower nose radius: 5.161 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.2101 degRelease Angle: 10.3267 degNose Incidence: -9.5731 degCamber deflection: 0.75361 deg
Table 170: Controlpoints1 -0.00386490.71895 0.0367440.59478 -0.125040.27931 -0.125040.15226 -0.125040 -0.072380 00 0.0553910.17061 0.132980.33881 0.132980.49148 0.132980.59148 0.0939221 0.0038649
Table 171: Base 64 representation:bgWP4ksSc0yrFwT
Table 172: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.099 6.424 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.8 0.9 dctsCm error 8 5 mctsUpper transition point -1.25 -0.01 %
Figure 132: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 133: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
48
Profile: ah6407
Information: Althaus AH 6-407 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 134: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 173: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.5703 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 5.5815 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.7 %CUpper nose radius: 0.27329 %CLower nose radius: 0.28999 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.6106 degRelease Angle: 11.1239 degNose Incidence: 13.1234 degCamber deflection: 24.2473 deg
Table 174: Controlpoints1 -0.00350.44662 0.0724860.14596 -0.007890.02504 -0.007890.010293 -0.007890 -0.00446090 00 0.0076320.03197 0.08480.39962 0.08480.46529 0.08480.70548 0.079281 0.0035
Table 175: Base 64 representation:G6aHjjlCID7oHxS
Table 176: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.06 7.317 ectsRMS curvature error: 20.37 22.91 %CD error -1.4 -1.5 dctsCm error -10 -28 mctsUpper transition point 3.43 4.28 %
Figure 135: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 136: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
49
Profile: ah7476
Information: Althaus AH 7-476 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 137: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 177: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.9405 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 6.3046 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.7 %CUpper nose radius: 0.079989 %CLower nose radius: 0.87837 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.6763 degRelease Angle: 13.5158 degNose Incidence: 8.4496 degCamber deflection: 21.9654 deg
Table 178: Controlpoints1 -0.00350.51304 0.0971460.071788 -0.007940.01254 -0.007940.010072 -0.007940 -0.00767980 00 0.00471470.041684 0.08780.3996 0.08780.65964 0.08780.77348 0.0656991 0.0035
Table 179: Base 64 representation:D4ack9NBEDuhE1S
Table 180: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.241 10.766 ectsRMS curvature error: 34.29 35.59 %CD error -7.8 -60.1 dctsCm error 155 90 mctsUpper transition point -1.25 -0.42 %
Figure 138: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 139: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
50
Profile: ah79100a
Information: Althaus AH 79-100A airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 140: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 181: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.0067 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 3.6581 % @0.54CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.86267 %CLower nose radius: 0.70617 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.9717 degRelease Angle: 8.9858 degNose Incidence: 6.5735 degCamber deflection: 15.5593 deg
Table 182: Controlpoints1 00.66209 0.0355160.42584 -0.025220.17033 -0.025220.12722 -0.025220 -0.0244730 00 0.0257430.11523 0.080650.37059 0.080650.61764 0.080650.84435 0.0330031 0
Table 183: Base 64 representation:UrYZh9QLULalHuA
Table 184: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.745 4.624 ectsRMS curvature error: 39.17 40.9 %CD error -0.8 -1.3 dctsCm error -19 -24 mctsUpper transition point 1.08 1.56 %
Figure 141: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 142: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
51
Profile: ah79100b
Information: Althaus AH 79-100B airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 143: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 185: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.9461 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 6.4433 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.99884 %CLower nose radius: 0.80137 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.0518 degRelease Angle: 20.0535 degNose Incidence: 11.9239 degCamber deflection: 31.9774 deg
Table 186: Controlpoints1 00.74657 0.0752020.25193 -0.010870.03806 -0.010870.019411 -0.010870 -0.00945690 00 0.0307190.14172 0.110150.40245 0.110150.68111 0.110150.96443 0.0155241 0
Table 187: Base 64 representation:Soaeu3fCOFJWI A
Table 188: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.698 6.614 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.9 -1.3 dctsCm error 57 30 mctsUpper transition point 1.67 2.19 %
Figure 144: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 145: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
52
Profile: ah79100c
Information: N/AReference: Althaus AH 79-100C airfoil
Figure 146: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 189: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.0292 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 6.6587 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.99595 %CLower nose radius: 0.6709 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.1488 degRelease Angle: 19.3278 degNose Incidence: 12.2653 degCamber deflection: 31.5931 deg
Table 190: Controlpoints1 00.70972 0.0657030.13254 -0.012840.03806 -0.012840.023978 -0.012840 -0.0112990 00 0.0282340.12006 0.113990.43474 0.113990.54779 0.113990.81454 0.0900631 0
Table 191: Base 64 representation:QtcNw3YCGFyVP-A
Table 192: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.373 7.013 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.8 -3.4 dctsCm error -6 -21 mctsUpper transition point 5.48 5.7 %
Figure 147: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 148: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
53
Profile: ah80129
Information: N/AReference: UIUC
Figure 149: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 193: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.8712 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 4.0554 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.55711 %CLower nose radius: 0.38961 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.7904 degRelease Angle: 1.4418 degNose Incidence: 8.0138 degCamber deflection: 9.4557 deg
Table 194: Controlpoints1 00.78366 -0.0168490.62555 -0.023930.33928 -0.023930.1866 -0.023930 -0.0220160 00 0.0252360.17148 0.10490.40245 0.10490.68227 0.10490.78227 0.0280351 0
Table 195: Base 64 representation:Pkaes6sWcKrsNiA
Table 196: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.563 3.711 ectsRMS curvature error: 61.19 57.21 %CD error -1.4 -0.8 dctsCm error 24 3 mctsUpper transition point -0.16 0.29 %
Figure 150: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 151: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
54
Profile: ah80136
Information: Althaus AH 80-136 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 152: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 197: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.5517 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 3.3823 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.175 %CUpper nose radius: 0.84971 %CLower nose radius: 0.49247 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.0436 degRelease Angle: -3.4963 degNose Incidence: 9.9598 degCamber deflection: 6.4634 deg
Table 198: Controlpoints1 -0.0008750.75494 -0.026710.44631 -0.0340370.37057 -0.0340370.20381 -0.0340370 -0.0258680 00 0.0273420.13197 0.101570.33934 0.101570.5873 0.101570.73833 -0.00357611 0.000875
Table 199: Base 64 representation:RmWYqwsYIPoxGaE
Table 200: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.103 6.286 ectsRMS curvature error: 57.14 58.96 %CD error -2.2 -2.6 dctsCm error 6 2 mctsUpper transition point -1.75 -1.16 %
Figure 153: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 154: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
55
Profile: ah80140
Information: Althaus AH 80-140 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 155: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 201: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.9637 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 4.3499 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.194 %CUpper nose radius: 2.1768 %CLower nose radius: 2.1077 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.2466 degRelease Angle: 4.0124 degNose Incidence: 12.1648 degCamber deflection: 16.1772 deg
Table 202: Controlpoints1 -0.000970.9077 0.000462420.53368 -0.028120.17033 -0.028120.029421 -0.028120 -0.0203320 00 0.0380790.099917 0.113150.33928 0.113150.48726 0.113150.602 0.0507951 0.00097
Table 203: Base 64 representation:WsWOvt0LcMxNHmF
Table 204: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.615 3.506 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.2 -0.6 dctsCm error 10 2 mctsUpper transition point -0.54 -0.11 %
Figure 156: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 157: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
56
Profile: ah82150a
Information: Althaus AH 82-150 A airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 158: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 205: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.9986 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 3.2794 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.71577 %CLower nose radius: 0.70306 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.9398 degRelease Angle: 10.0499 degNose Incidence: 5.8471 degCamber deflection: 15.897 deg
Table 206: Controlpoints1 00.81227 0.0199970.7937 -0.04220.40245 -0.04220.31348 -0.04220 -0.0383310 00 0.0270640.1535 0.107790.40245 0.107790.61113 0.107790.7555 0.0610511 0
Table 207: Base 64 representation:QnaWt5OapSn5JvA
Table 208: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.921 4.923 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.9 -1.7 dctsCm error 10 18 mctsUpper transition point -1.78 -1.77 %
Figure 159: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 160: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
57
Profile: ah82150f
Information: Althaus AH 82-150 F airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 161: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 209: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.9964 % @0.44CMaximum Camber: 3.6294 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.45748 %CLower nose radius: 0.61768 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.0859 degRelease Angle: 10.0925 degNose Incidence: 4.8232 degCamber deflection: 14.9158 deg
Table 210: Controlpoints1 00.90273 0.00859460.90273 -0.038690.43474 -0.038690.2565 -0.038690 -0.03250 00 0.0211590.1468 0.111280.43474 0.111280.6894 0.111280.6894 0.0840141 0
Table 211: Base 64 representation:Mpcsu1ac0R LvA
Table 212: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.741 9.572 ectsRMS curvature error: 37.67 37.88 %CD error -0.3 -1.6 dctsCm error 22 46 mctsUpper transition point -1.79 -1.72 %
Figure 162: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 163: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
58
Profile: ah83150q
Information: Althaus AH 83-150 Q airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 164: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 213: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.999 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 4.1388 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.0317 %CLower nose radius: 0.42547 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.6594 degRelease Angle: 6.3853 degNose Incidence: 18.2383 degCamber deflection: 24.6235 deg
Table 214: Controlpoints1 00.82897 0.0106270.82897 -0.033930.43474 -0.033930.2923 -0.033930 -0.0287940 00 0.0454740.15267 0.116330.37059 0.116330.61432 0.116330.71432 0.0463471 0
Table 215: Base 64 representation:ZlYZx1VcsOu GpA
Table 216: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.976 6.838 ectsRMS curvature error: 44.85 46.45 %CD error -2.8 -2.2 dctsCm error -19 -21 mctsUpper transition point -0.49 -0.06 %
Figure 165: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 166: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
59
Profile: ah83159
Information: Althaus AH 83-159 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 167: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 217: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.9354 % @0.41CMaximum Camber: 3.8498 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1429 %CLower nose radius: 0.5222 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.753 degRelease Angle: 7.8153 degNose Incidence: 11.3271 degCamber deflection: 19.1423 deg
Table 218: Controlpoints1 00.82785 0.0148760.82785 -0.041270.43474 -0.041270.19661 -0.041270 -0.0261630 00 0.035770.16792 0.118160.40245 0.118160.66164 0.118160.76164 0.0450021 0
Table 219: Base 64 representation:TkacxoicsSs GsA
Table 220: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.846 6.277 ectsRMS curvature error: 40.01 41.47 %CD error -1 -2.6 dctsCm error 17 27 mctsUpper transition point 0.33 0.8 %
Figure 168: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 169: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
60
Profile: ah93156
Information: Althaus AH 93-156 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 170: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 221: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.6609 % @0.41CMaximum Camber: 3.8872 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1372 %CLower nose radius: 0.93261 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.0201 degRelease Angle: 6.6573 degNose Incidence: 9.1926 degCamber deflection: 15.8499 deg
Table 222: Controlpoints1 00.88374 0.00334360.88374 -0.0395030.3798 -0.0395030.12024 -0.0395030 -0.0273420 00 0.0303340.12137 0.117160.41464 0.117160.65172 0.117160.75172 0.0512681 0
Table 223: Base 64 representation:RsbaxrrYzRt LqA
Table 224: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.569 5.248 ectsRMS curvature error: 54.35 56.78 %CD error -0.7 -1 dctsCm error 59 52 mctsUpper transition point -1.08 -0.66 %
Figure 171: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 172: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
61
Profile: ah93157
Information: Althaus AH 93-157 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 173: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 225: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.6848 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 3.8126 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.96113 %CLower nose radius: 1.2972 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.1157 degRelease Angle: 7.4427 degNose Incidence: 6.3068 degCamber deflection: 13.7495 deg
Table 226: Controlpoints1 00.87517 0.00519880.87517 -0.0403490.37621 -0.0403490.056429 -0.0403490 -0.022090 00 0.0276770.11955 0.116540.40294 0.116540.63248 0.116540.74479 0.0565821 0
Table 227: Base 64 representation:PsaZxi1YyRr LrA
Table 228: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.57 5.816 ectsRMS curvature error: 33.91 35.24 %CD error -0.3 -0.2 dctsCm error 20 -6 mctsUpper transition point -0.42 0.06 %
Figure 174: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 175: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
62
Profile: ah94145
Information: Althaus AH 94-145 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 176: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 229: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.6578 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 5.6052 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.19609 %CUpper nose radius: 2.1131 %CLower nose radius: 1.3181 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.8755 degRelease Angle: 10.6815 degNose Incidence: 12.552 degCamber deflection: 23.2335 deg
Table 230: Controlpoints1 -0.000980440.87449 0.0149730.48992 -0.0233320.12872 -0.0233320.06195 -0.0233320 -0.0233320 00 0.0522690.19393 0.128680.40753 0.128680.57644 0.128680.66674 0.0848091 0.00098044
Table 231: Base 64 representation:ahaS2 gIbKxQIwF
Table 232: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.079 3.941 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.8 0.9 dctsCm error 26 28 mctsUpper transition point -1.52 -1.64 %
Figure 177: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 178: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
63
Profile: ah94156
Information: Althaus AH 94-156 airfoilReference: N/A
Figure 179: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 233: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.6064 % @0.41CMaximum Camber: 3.7388 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1489 %CLower nose radius: 0.61645 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.5658 degRelease Angle: 5.979 degNose Incidence: 11.4966 degCamber deflection: 17.4757 deg
Table 234: Controlpoints1 00.84042 0.0033320.84042 -0.0406530.40456 -0.0406530.17308 -0.0406530 -0.026670 00 0.0309320.12492 0.115420.41494 0.115420.65601 0.115420.77522 0.0427241 0
Table 235: Base 64 representation:RsbawpkauRp LpA
Table 236: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.417 5.889 ectsRMS curvature error: 42.87 45.29 %CD error 0 0.1 dctsCm error 0 5 mctsUpper transition point 0 -0.73 %
Figure 180: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 181: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
64
Profile: ah95160
Information: Althaus AH 95-160 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 182: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 237: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.026 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 5.6353 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.21609 %CUpper nose radius: 2.5009 %CLower nose radius: 1.668 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.4059 degRelease Angle: 10.2939 degNose Incidence: 12.5123 degCamber deflection: 22.8062 deg
Table 238: Controlpoints1 -0.00108040.87643 0.0121050.53283 -0.028830.17342 -0.028830.069502 -0.028830 -0.02780 00 0.0567870.19341 0.135810.40752 0.135810.58887 0.135810.68887 0.0815251 0.0010804
Table 239: Base 64 representation:bhaU59lLcMvRJwF
Table 240: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.212 3.912 ectsRMS curvature error: 85.1 87.73 %CD error 1 0.9 dctsCm error -14 -14 mctsUpper transition point -0.73 -0.63 %
Figure 183: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 184: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
65
Profile: ames01
Information: NASA/AMES/Hicks A-01 transonic rotorcraft airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 185: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 241: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.3007 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 1.3084 % @0.27CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.599 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3555 %CLower nose radius: 23.731 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.2046 degRelease Angle: -2.3196 degNose Incidence: 7.5651 degCamber deflection: 5.2455 deg
Table 242: Controlpoints1 -0.0029950.91432 -0.0149170.62095 -0.0386580.35 -0.0386580.00061088 -0.0386580 -0.00983090 00 0.0123040.016752 0.0644620.3 0.0644620.71468 0.0644620.79036 0.0150191 0.002995
Table 243: Base 64 representation:M7TlcQ WbQuVNcP
Table 244: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.936 7.448 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.1 -2.1 dctsCm error -14 -42 mctsUpper transition point 3.75 4.93 %
Figure 186: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 187: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
66
Profile: ames02
Information: NASA/AMES/Hicks A-02 transonic rotorcraft airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 188: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 245: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.7314 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 0.45299 % @0.15CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.7 %CUpper nose radius: 6.7948 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 2.4552 degRelease Angle: -1.7146 degNose Incidence: 7.7258 degCamber deflection: 6.0112 deg
Table 246: Controlpoints1 -0.00350.68162 -0.0198630.53154 -0.034620.34988 -0.034620 -0.034620 -0.00945610 00 0.0174360.0067117 0.0427990.30015 0.0427990.65893 0.0427990.89584 0.00261461 0.0035
Table 247: Base 64 representation:a-TgSR WSPUqDsS
Table 248: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.776 3.336 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.9 2.4 dctsCm error -2 -5 mctsUpper transition point -1.88 -2.37 %
Figure 189: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 190: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
67
Profile: ames03
Information: NASA/AMES/Kennelly A-03 transonic rotorcraftairfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 191: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 249: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.9995 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: 1.189 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.6 %CUpper nose radius: 2.1006 %CLower nose radius: 0.66993 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 0.69717 degRelease Angle: -2.5437 degNose Incidence: 11.3671 degCamber deflection: 8.8235 deg
Table 250: Controlpoints1 -0.0030.79009 -0.0136050.69201 -0.038110.37504 -0.038110.27029 -0.038110 -0.0347440 00 0.0532480.20247 0.061890.37494 0.061890.80609 0.061890.80609 -0.00443261 0.003
Table 251: Base 64 representation:2sYra5SYgQ rBcP
Table 252: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.458 8.898 ectsRMS curvature error: 65.79 65.23 %CD error -0.3 -0.4 dctsCm error -23 -22 mctsUpper transition point 0.7 0.54 %
Figure 192: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 193: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
68
Profile: amsoil1
Information: Rutan AMSOIL racer canard airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 194: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 253: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.6165 % @0.41CMaximum Camber: 2.0787 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.442 %CUpper nose radius: 2.1341 %CLower nose radius: 3.4458 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.0719 degRelease Angle: 2.8778 degNose Incidence: 1.2873 degCamber deflection: 4.1651 deg
Table 254: Controlpoints1 -0.002210.8317 -0.00708180.67106 -0.037440.39 -0.037440.053285 -0.037440 -0.0349870 00 0.0735370.38009 0.078840.42 0.078840.64477 0.078840.85288 0.0213531 0.00221
Table 255: Base 64 representation:7GbZh72ZsQbgKkL
Table 256: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.344 4.387 ectsRMS curvature error: 41.17 41.55 %CD error -3.2 -3.3 dctsCm error 2 -3 mctsUpper transition point 3.29 3.83 %
Figure 195: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 196: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
69
Profile: amsoil2
Information: Rutan AMSOIL racer wing airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 197: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 257: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.7688 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 0.96542 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.448 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7928 %CLower nose radius: 4.2782 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.2696 degRelease Angle: 2.2487 degNose Incidence: -2.3895 degCamber deflection: -0.14082 deg
Table 258: Controlpoints1 -0.002240.83883 -0.00895590.64718 -0.04960.38975 -0.04960.025845 -0.04960 -0.027150 00 0.0652890.35663 0.068190.41973 0.068190.65959 0.068190.83604 0.0220331 0.00224
Table 259: Base 64 representation:8Kbasi7ZbVfsKjL
Table 260: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.424 4.49 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -7.3 -7.2 dctsCm error -9 -4 mctsUpper transition point 13.55 13.19 %
Figure 198: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 199: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
70
Profile: aquilasm
Information: AQUILA R/C sailplane airfoilReference: N/A
Figure 200: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 261: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.4192 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 4.0321 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.9408 %CLower nose radius: 0.81541 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.1572 degRelease Angle: 4.4641 degNose Incidence: 12.9924 degCamber deflection: 17.4565 deg
Table 262: Controlpoints1 00.92916 -0.000759840.03333 -0.009470.03333 -0.009470.012857 -0.009470 -0.00836020 00 0.0230150.084455 0.087350.31333 0.087350.51635 0.087350.70872 0.0489671 0
Table 263: Base 64 representation:RuUTk3mCAEmFLmA
Table 264: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.811 2.097 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.4 0.4 dctsCm error 2 15 mctsUpper transition point -0.21 -0.37 %
Figure 201: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 202: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
71
Profile: arad6
Information: Aeronautical Research Association/Bocci-Dowty Ro-tol ARA-D 6Reference: UIUC
Figure 203: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 265: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.0945 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 5.0112 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 1.1 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5979 %CLower nose radius: 0.54266 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.4534 degRelease Angle: 9.6398 degNose Incidence: 14.467 degCamber deflection: 24.1068 deg
Table 266: Controlpoints1 -0.00550.32894 0.058090.13008 -0.0093180.04 -0.0093180.024 -0.0093180 -0.0093180 00 0.0416130.16256 0.0790220.4 0.0790220.45804 0.0790220.70217 0.0790221 0.0055
Table 267: Base 64 representation:hlaGh aDGE wJvc
Table 268: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.829 4.788 ectsRMS curvature error: 11.82 12.91 %CD error 1 1.8 dctsCm error -3 -20 mctsUpper transition point -0.32 -1.04 %
Figure 204: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 205: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
72
Profile: arad10
Information: Aeronautical Research Association/Bocci-Dowty Ro-tol ARA-D 10Reference: UIUC
Figure 206: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 269: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.9606 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 3.9799 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 1.5 %CUpper nose radius: 4.1781 %CLower nose radius: 1.1583 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.9166 degRelease Angle: 6.0144 degNose Incidence: 19.4377 degCamber deflection: 25.4521 deg
Table 270: Controlpoints1 -0.00750.24017 -0.000125250.14017 -0.0216260.07 -0.0216260.0483 -0.0216260 -0.0190310 00 0.0429610.066262 0.0889610.35 0.0889610.40501 0.0889610.62524 0.0835611 0.0075
Table 271: Base 64 representation:fzWFl3UEFJ74Mpm
Table 272: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.789 4.891 ectsRMS curvature error: 96.42 95.85 %CD error -2.2 -1.2 dctsCm error -27 -14 mctsUpper transition point 4.29 2.8 %
Figure 207: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 208: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
73
Profile: arad20
Information: Aeronautical Research Association/Bocci-Dowty Ro-tol ARA-D 20Reference: UIUC
Figure 209: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 273: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 20.0157 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 3.7574 % @0.24CTrailing Edge Gap: 2.5 %CUpper nose radius: 11.7128 %CLower nose radius: 1.9751 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.1567 degRelease Angle: 4.791 degNose Incidence: 32.783 degCamber deflection: 37.5741 deg
Table 274: Controlpoints1 -0.01250.87115 -0.0142710.57122 -0.0631020.3 -0.0631020.1011 -0.0631020 -0.0364860 00 0.114130.185 0.13750.25 0.13750.37054 0.13750.47054 0.109381 0.0125
Table 275: Base 64 representation:0RQK6kpTZb1TMn
Table 276: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.254 5.213 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.3 -0.6 dctsCm error 1 27 mctsUpper transition point 1.07 1.24 %
Figure 210: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 211: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
74
Profile: as5045
Information: AS5045 airfoil Ashok Gopalarathnam/Selig 15Reference: UIUC
Figure 212: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 277: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.9991 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: 1.0235 % @0.22CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.25 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3009 %CLower nose radius: 0.66609 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.7122 degRelease Angle: 4.8927 degNose Incidence: 8.4613 degCamber deflection: 13.354 deg
Table 278: Controlpoints1 -0.001250.75215 0.00756370.65215 -0.065060.3737 -0.065060.17234 -0.065060 -0.0276640 00 0.0270350.08428 0.084940.37478 0.084940.57681 0.084940.67681 0.0452281 0.00125
Table 279: Base 64 representation:UxYVjbhYccwtGnG
Table 280: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.842 6.062 ectsRMS curvature error: 40.84 40.83 %CD error 1.8 1.8 dctsCm error 103 88 mctsUpper transition point -3.47 -3.37 %
Figure 213: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 214: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
75
Profile: as5046
Information: AS5046 airfoil Ashok Gopalarathnam/Selig 16Reference: UIUC
Figure 215: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 281: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.9988 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: 1.0262 % @0.19CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.26801 %CUpper nose radius: 1.12 %CLower nose radius: 0.88518 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.0428 degRelease Angle: 4.8557 degNose Incidence: 7.314 degCamber deflection: 12.1697 deg
Table 282: Controlpoints1 -0.001340.74948 -0.00206460.64948 -0.0704710.37213 -0.0704710.19747 -0.0704710 -0.0341360 00 0.0209860.058983 0.0895280.37639 0.0895280.53882 0.0895280.63882 0.0642271 0.00134
Table 283: Base 64 representation:P1YRlfeYcextLnH
Table 284: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.116 6.988 ectsRMS curvature error: 83.31 81.5 %CD error 1.3 1.3 dctsCm error 138 155 mctsUpper transition point -3.08 -3.43 %
Figure 216: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 217: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
76
Profile: as5048
Information: N/AReference: UIUC
Figure 218: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 285: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.9949 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 1.0723 % @0.73CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.29904 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4229 %CLower nose radius: 1.1707 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.4928 degRelease Angle: 4.4346 degNose Incidence: 5.6368 degCamber deflection: 10.0714 deg
Table 286: Controlpoints1 -0.00149520.71706 -0.0253130.61706 -0.0800730.40594 -0.0800730.19237 -0.0800730 -0.0387490 00 0.0303750.097264 0.0999360.38219 0.0999360.4625 0.0999360.5956 0.0999361 0.0014952
Table 287: Base 64 representation:TvYIqehaWi vUmI
Table 288: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 8.956 9.519 ectsRMS curvature error: 63.48 61.31 %CD error 2.7 2.9 dctsCm error 167 208 mctsUpper transition point -5.19 -5.89 %
Figure 219: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 220: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
77
Profile: atr72sm
Information: ATR 72 wing airfoil (from NTSB report)Reference: UIUC
Figure 221: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 289: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.5823 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 2.8148 % @0.24CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.86638 %CLower nose radius: 2.6243 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.6051 degRelease Angle: 2.8075 degNose Incidence: 10.3448 degCamber deflection: 13.1523 deg
Table 290: Controlpoints1 00.90116 -0.00603670.6469 -0.0452280.32099 -0.0452280.026785 -0.0452280 -0.0216480 00 0.0127510.02815 0.100950.25401 0.100950.51655 0.100950.87227 0.0204821 0
Table 291: Base 64 representation:I4QXqf6VfTRSOkA
Table 292: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.474 5.201 ectsRMS curvature error: 54.51 54.38 %CD error -2.8 -2.4 dctsCm error -14 -10 mctsUpper transition point 2.8 2.37 %
Figure 222: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 223: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
78
Profile: avistar
Information: Hobbico R/C Avistar trainer airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 224: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 293: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.5233 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 2.28 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3211 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3411 %CLower nose radius: 1.5274 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.8512 degRelease Angle: 2.299 degNose Incidence: 2.6839 degCamber deflection: 4.9829 deg
Table 294: Controlpoints1 -0.00160550.80192 -0.0246180.52228 -0.0501380.30602 -0.0501380.16602 -0.0501380 -0.0411160 00 0.036890.15221 0.0952760.34218 0.0952760.57564 0.0952760.78266 0.0447371 0.0016055
Table 295: Base 64 representation:ZjWXozsUUVgeUjI
Table 296: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 8.271 9.849 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -15.1 -15.7 dctsCm error -147 -142 mctsUpper transition point 2.97 3.82 %
Figure 225: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 226: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
79
Profile: b29root
Information: Hobbico R/C Avistar trainer airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 227: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 297: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 21.985 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 1.7319 % @0.29CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.2698 %CLower nose radius: 4.0538 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 26.5107 degRelease Angle: -2.2444 degNose Incidence: -0.38815 degCamber deflection: -2.6325 deg
Table 298: Controlpoints1 00.92574 -0.0205950.59985 -0.0926250.30164 -0.0926250.27108 -0.0926250 -0.0855930 00 0.0634330.18459 0.127230.29943 0.127230.56746 0.127230.66746 0.0647051 0
Table 299: Base 64 representation:gZTY16GTbnwOecA
Table 300: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.119 4.934 ectsRMS curvature error: 13.43 13.36 %CD error 5.1 5.9 dctsCm error 25 26 mctsUpper transition point -5.5 -6.14 %
Figure 228: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 229: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
80
Profile: b29tip
Information: Boeing B-29 tip airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 230: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 301: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.9995 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 2.2285 % @0.3CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.64544 %CLower nose radius: 0.80831 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.9262 degRelease Angle: -1.4983 degNose Incidence: 3.0445 degCamber deflection: 1.5462 deg
Table 302: Controlpoints1 00.81399 -0.0227130.57475 -0.0227130.3001 -0.0227130.081026 -0.0227130 -0.0208960 00 0.0265870.16428 0.0672830.29984 0.0672830.57323 0.0672830.69992 0.0207981 0
Table 303: Base 64 representation:ZsTZs6uTZKs MsA
Table 304: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.314 5.394 ectsRMS curvature error: 26.13 30.99 %CD error 0.1 1.5 dctsCm error 0 7 mctsUpper transition point -3.46 -3.92 %
Figure 231: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 232: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
81
Profile: b707e
Information: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company model 737airfoilsReference: UIUC
Figure 233: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 305: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.9979 % @0.42CMaximum Camber: 1.82 % @0.31CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.23536 %CLower nose radius: 0.12606 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.6067 degRelease Angle: 2.7121 degNose Incidence: 8.7378 degCamber deflection: 11.4499 deg
Table 306: Controlpoints1 00.64605 -0.0191150.54178 -0.0275250.44 -0.0275250.35377 -0.0275250 -0.0172430 00 0.00939950.056307 0.0626790.4 0.0626790.55692 0.0626790.6985 0.0451421 0
Table 307: Base 64 representation:K2aRbnNcMMtwNkA
Table 308: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.933 6.822 ectsRMS curvature error: 96.85 Inf %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %
Figure 234: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 235: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
82
Profile: b737a
Information: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company model 737airfoilsReference: UIUC
Figure 236: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 309: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.3686 % @0.2CMaximum Camber: 0.15564 % @0.03CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.05999 %CUpper nose radius: 4.3013 %CLower nose radius: 3.4956 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.8793 degRelease Angle: 0.97905 degNose Incidence: 3.5236 degCamber deflection: 4.5026 deg
Table 310: Controlpoints1 -0.000299950.74873 -0.0199010.53685 -0.0774310.1967 -0.0774310.086548 -0.0774310 -0.044910 00 0.0358420.0448 0.0762590.19478 0.0762590.47638 0.0762590.66429 0.0380671 0.00029995
Table 311: Base 64 representation:ewMWgkjNbgoiMhC
Table 312: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.65 5.563 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -9.4 -10 dctsCm error -4 15 mctsUpper transition point 2.66 2.47 %
Figure 237: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 238: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
83
Profile: b737b
Information: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company model 737airfoilsReference: UIUC
Figure 239: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 313: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.5246 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 0.77916 % @0.17CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.079996 %CUpper nose radius: 2.9192 %CLower nose radius: 1.5174 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.1562 degRelease Angle: 0.85944 degNose Incidence: 8.6768 degCamber deflection: 9.5363 deg
Table 314: Controlpoints1 -0.000399980.67585 -0.0300060.48586 -0.0560740.31 -0.0560740.1891 -0.0560740 -0.0437380 00 0.0535130.14714 0.0694970.2494 0.0694970.45179 0.0694970.55179 0.0549381 0.00039998
Table 315: Base 64 representation:waQRexZUQYznOhC
Table 316: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.201 6.429 ectsRMS curvature error: 65.81 75.14 %CD error -2.3 -2.2 dctsCm error 25 14 mctsUpper transition point 3.64 3.96 %
Figure 240: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 241: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
84
Profile: b737d
Information: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company model 737airfoilsReference: UIUC
Figure 242: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 317: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.7117 % @0.42CMaximum Camber: 1.5979 % @0.25CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %CUpper nose radius: 0.99822 %CLower nose radius: 0.23237 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.8567 degRelease Angle: 1.7058 degNose Incidence: 11.2342 degCamber deflection: 12.94 deg
Table 318: Controlpoints1 -0.00080.75901 -0.0185930.57822 -0.04040.45 -0.04040.34709 -0.04040 -0.0231880 00 0.0291980.1281 0.06780.35 0.06780.61207 0.06780.71207 0.0393931 0.0008
Table 319: Base 64 representation:coWaskPsPRvkNiE
Table 320: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.845 6.768 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.7 -1.3 dctsCm error -6 14 mctsUpper transition point 1.78 0.17 %
Figure 243: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 244: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
85
Profile: bacj
Information: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company airfoil JReference: UIUC
Figure 245: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 321: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.1097 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 1.6588 % @0.78CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.96445 %CLower nose radius: 1.5021 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.683 degRelease Angle: 8.3534 degNose Incidence: -3.3978 degCamber deflection: 4.9555 deg
Table 322: Controlpoints1 00.76326 0.0166040.67472 -0.0462120.34996 -0.0462120.13648 -0.0462120 -0.036970 00 0.0475090.35104 0.0558920.45005 0.0558920.71762 0.0558920.83436 0.0373131 0
Table 323: Base 64 representation:1OsfYymWgUquKtA
Table 324: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.185 5.847 ectsRMS curvature error: 49.07 49.73 %CD error -24.3 NaN dctsCm error -419 NaN mctsUpper transition point 30.07 NaN %
Figure 246: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 247: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
86
Profile: bacxxx
Information: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company BACXXXEnergy Efficient Transport Program airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 248: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 325: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.2971 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 1.3759 % @0.16CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.08 %CUpper nose radius: 0.90319 %CLower nose radius: 0.28774 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 19.8474 degRelease Angle: 5.2222 degNose Incidence: 12.4306 degCamber deflection: 17.6527 deg
Table 326: Controlpoints1 -0.00040.63713 -0.0302430.53713 -0.04580.35 -0.04580.25733 -0.04580 -0.0222180 00 0.0160370.042713 0.06740.3 0.06740.65 0.06740.87624 0.03391 0.0004
Table 327: Base 64 representation:P2TgsfRWSUgxWoC
Table 328: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.592 5.085 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.8 -1.9 dctsCm error -29 -44 mctsUpper transition point 4.41 4.09 %
Figure 249: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 250: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
87
Profile: be50
Information: Verbitsky BE50 free flight airfoil (original)Reference: UIUC
Figure 251: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 329: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.1585 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 4.0295 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.25998 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4925 %CLower nose radius: 0.60901 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.7578 degRelease Angle: 8.4147 degNose Incidence: 12.4032 degCamber deflection: 20.8179 deg
Table 330: Controlpoints1 -0.00129990.51542 0.04140.25001 -0.0121090.050141 -0.0121090.032592 -0.0121090 -0.0115030 00 0.0353680.12571 0.0721790.3492 0.0721790.55301 0.0721790.82825 0.037161 0.0012999
Table 331: Base 64 representation:foWUf8WDNFgoItH
Table 332: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.931 6.218 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %
Figure 252: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 253: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
88
Profile: boe106
Information: Boeing 106 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 254: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 333: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.0181 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 3.3175 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.04 %CUpper nose radius: 2.5538 %CLower nose radius: 1.001 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.313 degRelease Angle: 4.27 degNose Incidence: 13.9001 degCamber deflection: 18.1701 deg
Table 334: Controlpoints1 -0.00020.82035 -0.0139810.51619 -0.032880.19999 -0.032880.16199 -0.032880 -0.032880 00 0.0536140.17783 0.097880.30002 0.097880.44879 0.097880.57441 0.097881 0.0002
Table 335: Base 64 representation:iaTOp MNZO bTmB
Table 336: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.139 3.539 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %
Figure 255: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 256: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
89
Profile: bqm34
Information: Ryan BQM-34 Firebee wing airfoil (NACA 63-014AW/NACA 0014 nose and thinned to .09899 to account for sweep)Reference: UIUC
Figure 257: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 337: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.8987 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: -2.329e-006 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0351 %CLower nose radius: 1.0351 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.5704 degRelease Angle: -2.3922e-005 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: -2.3922e-005 deg
Table 338: Controlpoints1 00.69256 -0.0284410.52128 -0.0494980.32527 -0.0494980.15938 -0.0494980 -0.0344010 00 0.0344010.15938 0.0494980.32527 0.0494980.52128 0.0494980.69258 0.0284391 0
Table 339: Base 64 representation:rgVTVrgVTVooMgA
Table 340: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.779 1.938 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %
Figure 258: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 259: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
90
Profile: c5a
Information: Lockheed-Georgia C-141 transonic wing airfoils,LOCKHEED C-5A BL0 AIRFOIL.Reference: UIUC
Figure 260: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 341: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.1004 % @0.42CMaximum Camber: 0.70732 % @0.82CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.25781 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1138 %CLower nose radius: 1.3068 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.8002 degRelease Angle: 5.9534 degNose Incidence: -1.389 degCamber deflection: 4.5644 deg
Table 342: Controlpoints1 -0.00128910.86872 -0.00938710.62577 -0.0654090.40037 -0.0654090.26424 -0.0654090 -0.0477490 00 0.041620.22481 0.0660630.44963 0.0660630.52891 0.0660630.78506 0.0604481 0.0012891
Table 343: Base 64 representation:ngsJcuWaYc5WVpG
Table 344: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.861 5.197 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -8.7 -8.3 dctsCm error -18 -8 mctsUpper transition point 17.41 16.31 %
Figure 261: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 262: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
91
Profile: c5b
Information: LOCKHEED C-5A BL488.2 AIRFOILReference: N/A
Figure 263: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 345: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.5452 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 1.2295 % @0.69CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.22038 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0024 %CLower nose radius: 1.2139 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 20.2268 degRelease Angle: 5.1949 degNose Incidence: -0.32199 degCamber deflection: 4.8729 deg
Table 346: Controlpoints1 -0.00110190.75185 -0.0224570.60483 -0.0487390.35028 -0.0487390.21017 -0.0487390 -0.041240 00 0.0338030.17099 0.0674220.44961 0.0674220.63521 0.0674220.82432 0.0491891 0.0011019
Table 347: Base 64 representation:gnsWs1aWZVtnXoG
Table 348: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.399 5.85 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -10.1 -9.9 dctsCm error -21 -37 mctsUpper transition point 21.56 22.09 %
Figure 264: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 265: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
92
Profile: c5c
Information: Lockheed-Georgia C-5A transonic wing airfoils,LOCKHEED C-5A BL576 AIRFOIL.Reference: UIUC
Figure 266: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 349: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.1205 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 1.4176 % @0.64CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.21898 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0064 %CLower nose radius: 1.2654 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 20.9699 degRelease Angle: 5.5991 degNose Incidence: -0.32625 degCamber deflection: 5.2729 deg
Table 350: Controlpoints1 -0.00109490.74354 -0.0230180.57573 -0.043950.35025 -0.043950.20665 -0.043950 -0.0417520 00 0.0342990.17535 0.0679760.44961 0.0679760.56201 0.0679760.79583 0.0599641 0.0010949
Table 351: Base 64 representation:gmsNs8aWWT3mXoG
Table 352: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.39 4.697 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -13.1 -13.2 dctsCm error -58 -72 mctsUpper transition point 29.81 30.84 %
Figure 267: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 268: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
93
Profile: c141a
Information: N/AReference: UIUC
Figure 269: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 353: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.9772 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 1.1473 % @0.64CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.1096 %CUpper nose radius: 1.9453 %CLower nose radius: 1.4474 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 23.0557 degRelease Angle: 3.2498 degNose Incidence: 3.9496 degCamber deflection: 7.1994 deg
Table 354: Controlpoints1 -0.0005480.62161 -0.0556020.44774 -0.0556020.35486 -0.0556020.28365 -0.0556020 -0.0523160 00 0.0715190.39441 0.0744990.40246 0.0744990.68991 0.0744990.84269 0.0420461 0.000548
Table 355: Base 64 representation:8BZef7NWJXj ZlD
Table 356: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.927 5.843 ectsRMS curvature error: 64.08 58.2 %CD error NaN -0.8 dctsCm error NaN -29 mctsUpper transition point NaN 2.29 %
Figure 270: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 271: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
94
Profile: c141b
Information: Lockheed-Georgia C-141 transonic wing airfoils,LOCKHEED C-141 BL113.6 AIRFOIL.Reference: UIUC
Figure 272: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 357: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.6496 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 1.1303 % @0.63CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.1234 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7774 %CLower nose radius: 1.3775 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 22.4177 degRelease Angle: 3.2209 degNose Incidence: 3.5147 degCamber deflection: 6.7357 deg
Table 358: Controlpoints1 -0.0006170.62386 -0.0533990.43873 -0.0533990.35486 -0.0533990.19872 -0.0533990 -0.0427190 00 0.0585970.28977 0.0732460.40246 0.0732460.68562 0.0732460.84203 0.0412651 0.000617
Table 359: Base 64 representation:ySaefycXIXj ZkD
Table 360: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.091 4.324 ectsRMS curvature error: 45.21 44.97 %CD error -2.4 -1.8 dctsCm error -13 1 mctsUpper transition point 4.83 3.19 %
Figure 273: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 274: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
95
Profile: c141c
Information: Lockheed-Georgia C-141 transonic wing airfoils,LOCKHEED C-141 BL426.57 AIRFOIL.Reference: UIUC
Figure 275: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 361: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.9952 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 1.3082 % @0.55CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.1854 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4687 %CLower nose radius: 1.08 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 19.313 degRelease Angle: 3.2163 degNose Incidence: 4.0787 degCamber deflection: 7.295 deg
Table 362: Controlpoints1 -0.0009270.63125 -0.0425510.43421 -0.0425510.35486 -0.0425510.17743 -0.0425510 -0.0357430 00 0.055090.30996 0.0675460.40246 0.0675460.63536 0.0675460.79717 0.047281 0.000927
Table 363: Base 64 representation:zPaZs1gXISs WkF
Table 364: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.594 3.038 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.1 0.7 dctsCm error -1 -5 mctsUpper transition point 0.61 -0.42 %
Figure 276: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 277: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
96
Profile: c141d
Information: LOCKHEED C-141 BL426.57 AIR-FOIL,LOCKHEED C-141 BL610.61 AIRFOIL.Reference: UIUC
Figure 278: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 365: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.774 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 1.5438 % @0.52CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2188 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5674 %CLower nose radius: 1.1922 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 19.6945 degRelease Angle: 4.0733 degNose Incidence: 4.4917 degCamber deflection: 8.565 deg
Table 366: Controlpoints1 -0.0010940.62457 -0.0390560.42511 -0.0390560.35486 -0.0390560.14194 -0.0390560 -0.0335880 00 0.0502320.24147 0.0688110.40246 0.0688110.49109 0.0688110.72679 0.0688111 0.001094
Table 367: Base 64 representation:uaaJs2lXHR WmG
Table 368: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.091 5.505 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -4.7 -4.4 dctsCm error -10 1 mctsUpper transition point 5.92 4.26 %
Figure 279: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 280: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
97
Profile: c141e
Information: Lockheed-Georgia C-141 transonic wing airfoils,LOCKHEED C-141 BL761.11 AIRFOIL.Reference: UIUC
Figure 281: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 369: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.519 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 1.7989 % @0.5CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2546 %CUpper nose radius: 1.8099 %CLower nose radius: 2.3202 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 19.507 degRelease Angle: 4.7901 degNose Incidence: 3.6287 degCamber deflection: 8.4188 deg
Table 370: Controlpoints1 -0.0012730.61072 -0.035080.42647 -0.035080.35486 -0.035080.04072 -0.035080 -0.0250970 00 0.0561820.2616 0.0702270.40246 0.0702270.48212 0.0702270.73421 0.0702271 0.001273
Table 371: Base 64 representation:yWaJet4XHP WnG
Table 372: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.701 3.624 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -5.3 -5.5 dctsCm error -13 -11 mctsUpper transition point 3.83 4.64 %
Figure 282: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 283: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
98
Profile: c141f
Information: Lockheed-Georgia C-141 transonic wing airfoils,LOCKHEED C-141 BL958.89 AIRFOIL.Reference: UIUC
Figure 284: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 373: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.0056 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 2.3067 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3249 %CUpper nose radius: 2.353 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.7485 degRelease Angle: 6.0132 degNose Incidence: 3.1206 degCamber deflection: 9.1338 deg
Table 374: Controlpoints1 -0.00162450.56554 -0.027140.44704 -0.027140.35486 -0.027140 -0.027140 -0.027140 00 0.0583880.21733 0.0729840.40246 0.0729840.60911 0.0729840.81377 0.0528761 0.0016245
Table 375: Base 64 representation:ysaWf XJMt VpI
Table 376: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.513 5.819 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -7.2 -7.5 dctsCm error -29 -26 mctsUpper transition point 16.09 16.78 %
Figure 285: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 286: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
99
Profile: cast102
Information: CAST 10-2/DOA 2 transonic airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 287: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 377: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.1769 % @0.46CMaximum Camber: 1.5445 % @0.71CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.49994 %CUpper nose radius: 0.99643 %CLower nose radius: 0.45969 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.5293 degRelease Angle: 5.5067 degNose Incidence: 9.4502 degCamber deflection: 14.9569 deg
Table 378: Controlpoints1 -0.00249970.80803 -0.00839160.60382 -0.0495870.45577 -0.0495870.3521 -0.0495870 -0.0328490 00 0.0161080.03906 0.0721980.45389 0.0721980.713 0.0721980.80914 0.0457631 0.0024997
Table 379: Base 64 representation:O5sefpPsRVqfQoN
Table 380: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.586 5.394 ectsRMS curvature error: 46.72 45.62 %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %
Figure 288: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 289: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
100
Profile: clarkk
Information: CLARK K airfoil.Reference: UIUC
Figure 290: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 381: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.5688 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 3.291 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.12 %CUpper nose radius: 0.023482 %CLower nose radius: 10.3995 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.7581 degRelease Angle: 5.6263 degNose Incidence: -4.7077 degCamber deflection: 0.91866 deg
Table 382: Controlpoints1 -0.00060.31285 -0.0276310.21285 -0.031770.20125 -0.031770.0078353 -0.031770 -0.0233070 00 0.00179240.020522 0.089620.39647 0.089620.42948 0.089620.64406 0.0860891 0.0006
Table 383: Base 64 representation:B8ZElu9NBO83SoD
Table 384: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.884 7.461 ectsRMS curvature error: 72.31 Inf %CD error -1.9 -1.6 dctsCm error -10 -4 mctsUpper transition point 2.56 2.05 %
Figure 291: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 292: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
101
Profile: clarkv
Information: CLARK V airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 293: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 385: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.6941 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 3.397 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.14 %CUpper nose radius: 0.98557 %CLower nose radius: 1.0949 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 20.0796 degRelease Angle: 7.8072 degNose Incidence: 6.5321 degCamber deflection: 14.3392 deg
Table 386: Controlpoints1 -0.00070.40638 -0.0238430.30638 -0.029580.19998 -0.029580.062887 -0.029580 -0.0214250 00 0.0236590.085191 0.091140.40006 0.091140.54896 0.091140.78633 0.0694961 0.0007
Table 387: Base 64 representation:RxaQmtrNJNw2WsE
Table 388: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.597 3.781 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0 -0.8 dctsCm error -5 -30 mctsUpper transition point 0.47 1.84 %
Figure 294: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 295: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
102
Profile: clarkx
Information: CLARK X airfoil.Reference: UIUC
Figure 296: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 389: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.605 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 3.2982 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.12 %CUpper nose radius: NaN %CLower nose radius: 1.4434 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.7207 degRelease Angle: 5.7105 degNose Incidence: 0.86931 degCamber deflection: 6.5799 deg
Table 390: Controlpoints1 -0.00060.35123 -0.0249540.27038 -0.031890.12017 -0.031890.052159 -0.031890 -0.0224040 00 00.017753 0.089760.39005 0.089760.46426 0.089760.66771 0.080811 0.0006
Table 391: Base 64 representation:A8ZIlsjILO54SoD
Table 392: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.585 6.543 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.7 -1.9 dctsCm error -10 1 mctsUpper transition point 2.56 3.02 %
Figure 297: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 298: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
103
Profile: clarky
Information: CLARK Y airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 299: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 393: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.6912 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.4304 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.11986 %CUpper nose radius: 0.15532 %CLower nose radius: 2.0061 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.579 degRelease Angle: 5.7043 degNose Incidence: 0.94453 degCamber deflection: 6.6489 deg
Table 394: Controlpoints1 -0.00059930.31272 -0.0256230.21272 -0.0302550.16 -0.0302550.038889 -0.0302550 -0.0228060 00 0.0059810.034548 0.0916270.36 0.0916270.46778 0.0916270.66301 0.0814661 0.0005993
Table 395: Base 64 representation:E5XLmvvKEN43RoD
Table 396: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.026 3.361 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 3.5 3.9 dctsCm error 1 -1 mctsUpper transition point -1.74 -1.94 %
Figure 300: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 301: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
104
Profile: clarkyh
Information: CLARK YH AIRFOILReference: UIUC
Figure 302: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 397: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.9776 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 2.4518 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.099978 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1314 %CLower nose radius: 1.2635 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.2997 degRelease Angle: -2.8648 degNose Incidence: 3.5777 degCamber deflection: 0.71292 deg
Table 398: Controlpoints1 -0.000499890.86462 -0.0293110.1593 -0.0379170.15081 -0.0379170.15081 -0.0379170 -0.0356420 00 0.0300470.11969 0.0841320.29834 0.0841320.58504 0.0841320.84365 0.017721 0.00049989
Table 399: Base 64 representation:XlTaj7AKBQYwUbD
Table 400: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.19 4.897 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %
Figure 303: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 304: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
105
Profile: clarkysm
Information: CLARK Y airfoil, Smoothed.Reference: UIUC
Figure 305: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 401: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.7483 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.5162 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5108 %CLower nose radius: 1.2936 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.3641 degRelease Angle: 6.0345 degNose Incidence: 8.134 degCamber deflection: 14.1685 deg
Table 402: Controlpoints1 00.29031 -0.0266130.19535 -0.0287910.14646 -0.0287910.061515 -0.0287910 -0.0230330 00 0.0323660.10401 0.0928690.33924 0.0928690.41297 0.0928690.63343 0.0928691 0
Table 403: Base 64 representation:WrWHnykJEM 6SpA
Table 404: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.573 3.703 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.7 -0.8 dctsCm error -13 -16 mctsUpper transition point 0.52 1.22 %
Figure 306: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 307: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
106
Profile: clarkz
Information: CLARK Z airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 308: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 405: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.7765 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 3.9663 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.12 %CUpper nose radius: 2.4048 %CLower nose radius: 2.2179 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.7157 degRelease Angle: 6.3162 degNose Incidence: 9.3225 degCamber deflection: 15.6387 deg
Table 406: Controlpoints1 -0.00060.21915 -0.0216150.11915 -0.02460.099985 -0.02460.035234 -0.02460 -0.0228250 00 0.049360.15197 0.0980.30006 0.0980.42579 0.0980.61434 0.0981 0.0006
Table 407: Base 64 representation:ggTLp6oGBK 4SpD
Table 408: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.359 5.62 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 2.8 3.8 dctsCm error 5 26 mctsUpper transition point -5.46 -7.43 %
Figure 309: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 310: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
107
Profile: clarym15
Information: CLARK YM15 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 311: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 409: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.8137 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 3.5659 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7016 %CLower nose radius: 2.1275 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 20.108 degRelease Angle: 5.8021 degNose Incidence: 9.7887 degCamber deflection: 15.5908 deg
Table 410: Controlpoints1 -0.00080.44644 -0.0419550.2015 -0.043670.2015 -0.043670.074428 -0.043670 -0.0324910 00 0.0113170.01129 0.108730.39626 0.108730.40722 0.108730.62484 0.107361 0.0008
Table 411: Base 64 representation:H9ZBtvnNAT-8WpE
Table 412: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.656 9.154 ectsRMS curvature error: 83.52 58.49 %CD error -3.1 -3 dctsCm error -17 -29 mctsUpper transition point 5.57 4.76 %
Figure 312: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 313: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
108
Profile: clarym18
Information: CLARK YM18 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 314: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 413: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.0429 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 3.4299 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.18 %CUpper nose radius: 3.4346 %CLower nose radius: 2.8804 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 23.9336 degRelease Angle: 5.6339 degNose Incidence: 9.1999 degCamber deflection: 14.8337 deg
Table 414: Controlpoints1 -0.00090.51316 -0.0549310.25739 -0.058250.202 -0.058250.16301 -0.058250 -0.0559480 00 0.0495250.10712 0.123670.29575 0.123670.42582 0.123670.613 0.123671 0.0009
Table 415: Base 64 representation:aoTM08MNEZ 7boF
Table 416: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.074 3.947 ectsRMS curvature error: 9.34 9.3 %CD error 2.3 2.1 dctsCm error 9 10 mctsUpper transition point -3.58 -3.46 %
Figure 315: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 316: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
109
Profile: cootie
Information: Waco Cootie airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 317: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 417: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.3639 % @0.36CMaximum Camber: 5.43 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.49997 %CUpper nose radius: NaN %CLower nose radius: 0.69559 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.5514 degRelease Angle: 8.0764 degNose Incidence: 11.4326 degCamber deflection: 19.509 deg
Table 418: Controlpoints1 -0.00249990.1931 0.0369730.10208 -0.0107870.025093 -0.0107870.019321 -0.0107870 -0.0107870 00 00.023175 0.0959960.3992 0.0959960.43502 0.0959960.62828 0.0907271 0.0024999
Table 419: Base 64 representation:A7aEo PCFF75MsN
Table 420: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.264 7.933 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0 -3.1 dctsCm error -45 -66 mctsUpper transition point 1.47 2.21 %
Figure 318: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 319: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
110
Profile: cr001sm
Information: Cody Robertson CR 001 R/C hand-launch lowReynolds number airfoil (smoothed)Reference: UIUC
Figure 320: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 421: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.337 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.0776 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.001 %CUpper nose radius: 0.58754 %CLower nose radius: 0.78025 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.93 degRelease Angle: 10.7904 degNose Incidence: 9.1596 degCamber deflection: 19.95 deg
Table 422: Controlpoints1 -5e-0060.5909 0.034530.25595 -0.0100740.054679 -0.0100740.0095165 -0.0100740 -0.00703570 00 0.0175980.079066 0.0748250.37887 0.0748250.64299 0.0748250.93673 0.0190531 5e-006
Table 423: Base 64 representation:PyYbgs0DOEQiNwA
Table 424: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.84 3.203 ectsRMS curvature error: 32.55 32.21 %CD error -0.1 0.5 dctsCm error -4 11 mctsUpper transition point -0.52 -1.45 %
Figure 321: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 322: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
111
Profile: curtisc72
Information: Curtis C-72 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 323: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 425: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.5477 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.7881 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.09994 %CUpper nose radius: 0.20184 %CLower nose radius: 1.6827 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.165 degRelease Angle: 7.466 degNose Incidence: 8.2516 degCamber deflection: 15.7177 deg
Table 426: Controlpoints1 -0.00049970.53097 0.00673340.43097 -0.0281230.15106 -0.0281230.017255 -0.0281230 -0.0139130 00 0.00148750.0016443 0.0929050.39704 0.0929050.40507 0.0929050.63392 0.0921031 0.0004997
Table 427: Base 64 representation:B ZBng4KVM-0PrD
Table 428: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.483 4.599 ectsRMS curvature error: 21.92 21.59 %CD error -0.1 0.4 dctsCm error -5 -1 mctsUpper transition point 0.21 -0.76 %
Figure 324: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 325: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
112
Profile: dae11
Information: Drela DAE11 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 326: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 429: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.8254 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 6.6267 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7324 %CLower nose radius: 1.4733 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.3952 degRelease Angle: 7.4997 degNose Incidence: 14.6256 degCamber deflection: 22.1253 deg
Table 430: Controlpoints1 00.59804 0.0337680.22088 -0.0150660.064895 -0.0150660.018232 -0.0150660 -0.0133820 00 0.0402030.13995 0.128850.38618 0.128850.62241 0.128850.72241 0.0499331 0
Table 431: Base 64 representation:UoZZ24tELGugGrA
Table 432: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.936 4.055 ectsRMS curvature error: 38.38 39.62 %CD error -0.4 -0.2 dctsCm error -1 -13 mctsUpper transition point -0.72 -0.04 %
Figure 327: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 328: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
113
Profile: dae21
Information: Drela DAE21 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 329: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 433: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.7894 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 6.5774 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.1169 %CLower nose radius: 2.4746 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.2589 degRelease Angle: 7.7853 degNose Incidence: 13.8383 degCamber deflection: 21.6236 deg
Table 434: Controlpoints1 00.55989 0.0435860.18619 -0.0150190.041667 -0.0150190.01094 -0.0150190 -0.0134340 00 0.0456120.14742 0.122690.37822 0.122690.64145 0.122690.7625 0.0415131 0
Table 435: Base 64 representation:YmYbz4uDKGpiFsA
Table 436: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.986 3.59 ectsRMS curvature error: 18.12 22.02 %CD error -0.5 -1 dctsCm error -6 4 mctsUpper transition point 0.02 -0.08 %
Figure 330: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 331: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
114
Profile: dae31
Information: Drela DAE31 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 332: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 437: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.0877 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 6.7502 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.9396 %CLower nose radius: 3.3233 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.7207 degRelease Angle: 9.3847 degNose Incidence: 11.4675 degCamber deflection: 20.8523 deg
Table 438: Controlpoints1 00.51552 0.0554080.17167 -0.0159840.029729 -0.0159840.0063793 -0.0159840 -0.0118880 00 0.0411210.13077 0.119910.38109 0.119910.67725 0.119910.79526 0.0444351 0
Table 439: Base 64 representation:WpYfyvxCJHokGuA
Table 440: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.611 3.724 ectsRMS curvature error: 18.95 18.88 %CD error -1.2 -1.5 dctsCm error -5 -1 mctsUpper transition point -0.43 -0.55 %
Figure 333: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 334: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
115
Profile: dae51
Information: Drela DAE51 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 335: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 441: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.3554 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 4.0467 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %CUpper nose radius: 0.77661 %CLower nose radius: 1.2184 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.2533 degRelease Angle: 6.661 degNose Incidence: 7.5361 degCamber deflection: 14.197 deg
Table 442: Controlpoints1 -0.0010.681 0.0187030.30632 -0.0160690.091899 -0.0160690.010108 -0.0160690 -0.00906150 00 0.0231440.10346 0.0856310.38877 0.0856310.63108 0.0856310.85818 0.0254661 0.001
Table 443: Base 64 representation:RuZZkj4GPHZsHqF
Table 444: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.977 4.335 ectsRMS curvature error: 62.33 61.58 %CD error -0.2 0 dctsCm error 2 7 mctsUpper transition point -0.46 -0.79 %
Figure 336: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 337: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
116
Profile: davis-corrected
Information: Davis basic B-24 wing airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 338: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 445: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.9068 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 2.478 % @0.3CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.6159 %CLower nose radius: 1.0665 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.103 degRelease Angle: 0.70178 degNose Incidence: 10.374 degCamber deflection: 11.0758 deg
Table 446: Controlpoints1 00.74361 -0.0307980.48025 -0.0548210.2785 -0.0548210.015888 -0.0548210 -0.0106280 00 0.0512070.15036 0.10430.29591 0.10430.47606 0.10430.69128 0.0447811 0
Table 447: Base 64 representation:ffTQsM7SSXljRgA
Table 448: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.084 5.839 ectsRMS curvature error: 5.16 10.12 %CD error -0.2 -0.4 dctsCm error 0 6 mctsUpper transition point 0.21 0.38 %
Figure 339: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 340: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
117
Profile: davis
Information: Consolidated/Davis airfoil (B-24 wing?)Reference: UIUC
Figure 341: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 449: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.1331 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 3.7124 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: NaN %CLower nose radius: 0.1768 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.2399 degRelease Angle: 7.0195 degNose Incidence: 7.065 degCamber deflection: 14.0845 deg
Table 450: Controlpoints1 00.37608 -0.0119850.28325 -0.0270.15 -0.0270.020128 -0.0270 -0.00487080 00 00.027986 0.09150.4 0.09150.4 0.09150.66851 0.0896881 0
Table 451: Base 64 representation:A7aAmM2KKM-3SqA
Table 452: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.919 6.565 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.8 -4.6 dctsCm error -14 -9 mctsUpper transition point 4.86 5.77 %
Figure 342: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 343: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
118
Profile: daytonwright6
Information: Dayton-Wright 6 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 344: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 453: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.9901 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.6761 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.74808 %CLower nose radius: 1.9586 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 57.2958 degRelease Angle: -20.0535 degNose Incidence: 4.9346 degCamber deflection: -15.1189 deg
Table 454: Controlpoints1 00.99248 -0.00855610.10073 -0.0277810.10073 -0.0277810.053926 -0.0277810 -0.0265350 00 0.0202670.08236 0.116390.29717 0.116390.64251 0.116390.99643 0.000540291 0
Table 455: Base 64 representation:LtTfx8eGAMBU AA
Table 456: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.385 8.269 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 2 2.2 dctsCm error 16 19 mctsUpper transition point -5.04 -5.16 %
Figure 345: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 346: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
119
Profile: defcnd1
Information: Rutan DEFIANT canard BL20 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 347: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 457: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 20.8575 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 4.5106 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.2457 %CLower nose radius: 3.1417 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.87 degRelease Angle: 4.1033 degNose Incidence: 6.6122 degCamber deflection: 10.7155 deg
Table 458: Controlpoints1 00.46285 -0.0454050.36285 -0.0628280.21597 -0.0628280.10335 -0.0628280 -0.0465260 00 0.0371290.09208 0.148110.3227 0.148110.47853 0.148110.57853 0.09761 0
Table 459: Base 64 representation:QtVP-ugOMbz1UmA
Table 460: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.097 4.434 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -4.6 -5.4 dctsCm error 9 3 mctsUpper transition point 1.26 2.2 %
Figure 348: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 349: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
120
Profile: defcnd2
Information: Rutan DEFIANT canard BL110 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 350: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 461: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.7434 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.8084 % @0.28CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.21 %CLower nose radius: 3.3505 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.2094 degRelease Angle: 4.1641 degNose Incidence: 9.6738 degCamber deflection: 13.8378 deg
Table 462: Controlpoints1 00.71148 -0.0198750.61148 -0.0357460.3227 -0.0357460.0044665 -0.0357460 -0.00998840 00 0.0322560.12898 0.111780.28565 0.111780.55891 0.111780.729 0.0589321 0
Table 463: Base 64 representation:SiSYvS-VbPmvSmA
Table 464: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.236 4.498 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 2.8 -2.3 dctsCm error -1 15 mctsUpper transition point -0.14 -0.4 %
Figure 351: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 352: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
121
Profile: defcnd3
Information: Rutan DEFIANT canard BL145 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 353: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 465: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.4833 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 2.3782 % @0.28CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.4474 %CLower nose radius: 0.59619 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 20.0437 degRelease Angle: 7.1964 degNose Incidence: 19.9349 degCamber deflection: 27.1313 deg
Table 466: Controlpoints1 00.5979 -0.0198450.45086 -0.0336450.28565 -0.0336450.2838 -0.0336450 -0.0335860 00 0.0532270.12327 0.0812010.28565 0.0812010.48846 0.0812010.94676 0.01651 0
Table 467: Base 64 representation:pjSSi ASPONuWrA
Table 468: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.487 5.171 ectsRMS curvature error: 52.49 52.98 %CD error -4 -3.1 dctsCm error -16 -26 mctsUpper transition point 4.39 4.03 %
Figure 354: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 355: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
122
Profile: df101
Information: David Fraser DF 101 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 356: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 469: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.0387 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 2.2805 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.007 %CUpper nose radius: 0.49058 %CLower nose radius: 0.43754 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.7781 degRelease Angle: 1.7502 degNose Incidence: 7.084 degCamber deflection: 8.8342 deg
Table 470: Controlpoints1 -3.5e-0050.92563 -0.00401820.33219 -0.0362870.20782 -0.0362870.036598 -0.0362870 -0.0103320 00 0.0113580.039447 0.0765280.33765 0.0765280.63224 0.0765280.91983 0.00926361 3.5e-005
Table 471: Base 64 representation:J4WcgS0NKPOHLiA
Table 472: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.256 4.326 ectsRMS curvature error: 43.63 43.56 %CD error 0.1 -0.5 dctsCm error 36 17 mctsUpper transition point -0.76 1.02 %
Figure 357: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 358: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
123
Profile: 2032c
Information: Dillner 20-32-C low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 359: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 473: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.6448 % @0.19CMaximum Camber: 6.974 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.32 %CUpper nose radius: 0.067588 %CLower nose radius: 0.07681 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.408 degRelease Angle: 14.0477 degNose Incidence: 18.1891 degCamber deflection: 32.2368 deg
Table 474: Controlpoints1 -0.00160.28774 0.0901940.1165 -0.0050.0125 -0.0050.0078115 -0.0050 -0.0020 00 0.0041920.039 0.10480.3 0.10480.55395 0.10480.99635 0.0029841 0.0016
Table 475: Base 64 representation:D3TXsZYBHCBzP2I
Table 476: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.404 8.579 ectsRMS curvature error: 33.82 38.99 %CD error -1.4 -1.1 dctsCm error -43 -37 mctsUpper transition point 3.9 4.28 %
Figure 360: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 361: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
124
Profile: doa5
Information: Dornier A-5 airfoil (reconstruction) (DO 228 wing)Reference: UIUC
Figure 362: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 477: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.2413 % @0.41CMaximum Camber: 2.5397 % @0.76CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.0949 %CLower nose radius: 1.1589 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.0663 degRelease Angle: 7.8135 degNose Incidence: 13.3888 degCamber deflection: 21.2024 deg
Table 478: Controlpoints1 00.78605 0.0216580.6671 -0.063470.4012 -0.063470.38571 -0.063470 -0.054590 00 0.0573730.15954 0.0990.42116 0.0990.75989 0.0990.99457 0.0009431 0
Table 479: Base 64 representation:knbkp2CacbBoFsA
Table 480: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.668 6.113 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -32.9 -32.9 dctsCm error -154 -134 mctsUpper transition point 37.3 36.73 %
Figure 363: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 364: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
125
Profile: du8608418
Information: Deflt University DU 86-084/18 low Reynolds numberairfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 365: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 481: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.4592 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 1.1477 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.65558 %CLower nose radius: 56.5593 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.3556 degRelease Angle: 3.5689 degNose Incidence: 3.0742 degCamber deflection: 6.6431 deg
Table 482: Controlpoints1 00.86009 -0.00279640.86009 -0.0311220.32141 -0.0311220.0079763 -0.0311220 -0.00283450 00 0.0186320.084372 0.0535880.3687 0.0535880.77372 0.0535880.79049 0.00632791 0
Table 483: Base 64 representation:WwYoXG9VyN6 DgA
Table 484: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.366 5.542 ectsRMS curvature error: 56.52 57.73 %CD error -0.4 -1.1 dctsCm error 82 73 mctsUpper transition point -0.3 1.35 %
Figure 366: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 367: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
126
Profile: e66
Information: Eppler E66 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 368: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 485: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.2438 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 4.0357 % @0.52CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5812 %CLower nose radius: 0.37322 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.2636 degRelease Angle: 13.8886 degNose Incidence: 14.8538 degCamber deflection: 28.7425 deg
Table 486: Controlpoints1 00.83892 0.0296740.34008 -0.0216850.13854 -0.0216850.0020778 -0.0216850 -0.00118420 00 0.0371920.15998 0.0880180.37797 0.0880180.74353 0.0880180.98611 0.00543531 0
Table 487: Base 64 representation:bkYllD-JPJEQM5A
Table 488: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.687 5.899 ectsRMS curvature error: 24.51 24.46 %CD error 0.1 0.6 dctsCm error -4 -29 mctsUpper transition point 1.43 1.82 %
Figure 369: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 370: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
127
Profile: e67
Information: Eppler E67 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 371: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 489: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.5255 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 3.7961 % @0.56CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.85248 %CLower nose radius: 0.5936 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.3305 degRelease Angle: 12.3829 degNose Incidence: 6.9678 degCamber deflection: 19.3507 deg
Table 490: Controlpoints1 00.85954 0.0214130.42512 -0.030480.1829 -0.030480.16278 -0.030480 -0.030480 00 0.0199290.089012 0.091570.41937 0.091570.61493 0.091570.86524 0.0443931 0
Table 491: Base 64 representation:OxbWm HMTNfQL1A
Table 492: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.236 2.406 ectsRMS curvature error: 16 15.81 %CD error 2 1.7 dctsCm error 1 -10 mctsUpper transition point -2.41 -1.5 %
Figure 372: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 373: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
128
Profile: e168
Information: Eppler E168 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 374: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 493: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.4415 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 3.8911e-007 % @0.03CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.59202 %CLower nose radius: 0.59202 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.5485 degRelease Angle: 1.9911e-006 degNose Incidence: 8.8091e-006 degCamber deflection: 1.08e-005 deg
Table 494: Controlpoints1 00.6353 -0.030460.43483 -0.062210.26739 -0.062210.04968 -0.062210 -0.0140030 00 0.0140030.04968 0.062210.26739 0.062210.43483 0.062210.6353 0.030461 0
Table 495: Base 64 representation:OzRPbOzRPbooLgA
Table 496: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.327 6.126 ectsRMS curvature error: 52.08 48.38 %CD error 0 0.1 dctsCm error 2 2 mctsUpper transition point -0.05 0.2 %
Figure 375: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 376: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
129
Profile: e169
Information: Eppler E169 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 377: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 497: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.402 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 6.4599e-007 % @0.61CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.92556 %CLower nose radius: 0.92556 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.1409 degRelease Angle: -7.4978e-006 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: -7.4978e-006 deg
Table 498: Controlpoints1 00.63539 -0.0323510.44342 -0.072020.26456 -0.072020.076241 -0.072020 -0.021690 00 0.021690.076241 0.072020.26456 0.072020.44342 0.072020.63539 0.0323511 0
Table 499: Base 64 representation:TtRQfTtRQfppLgA
Table 500: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.659 3.282 ectsRMS curvature error: 35.52 38.16 %CD error -0.2 -0.3 dctsCm error 2 2 mctsUpper transition point -0.18 0.01 %
Figure 378: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 379: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
130
Profile: e171
Information: Eppler E171 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 380: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 501: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.2529 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 2.4257e-006 % @0.57CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.68109 %CLower nose radius: 0.68109 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.8573 degRelease Angle: -1.5801e-005 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: -1.5801e-005 deg
Table 502: Controlpoints1 00.63917 -0.034290.54821 -0.061270.32389 -0.061270.13312 -0.061270 -0.0245850 00 0.0245850.13312 0.061270.32389 0.061270.54821 0.061270.63917 0.034291 0
Table 503: Base 64 representation:alVVaalVVayyMgA
Table 504: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.889 2.568 ectsRMS curvature error: 41.92 42.62 %CD error -0.9 -0.4 dctsCm error 3 4 mctsUpper transition point 1.19 0.22 %
Figure 381: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 382: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
131
Profile: e174
Information: Eppler E174 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 383: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 505: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.9593 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 3.6845 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.4621 %CLower nose radius: -29.6556 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.047 degRelease Angle: 5.7684 degNose Incidence: 2.3288 degCamber deflection: 8.0973 deg
Table 506: Controlpoints1 00.69834 0.0144630.2493 -0.0166510.084722 -0.0166510 -0.0166510 -0.00604980 00 0.0197390.12648 0.0805660.35541 0.0805660.52561 0.0805660.6584 0.0528341 0
Table 507: Base 64 representation:QoXRhX FMHtaHoA
Table 508: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.893 3.847 ectsRMS curvature error: 38.59 39.53 %CD error -1.7 -2 dctsCm error 1 10 mctsUpper transition point -0.28 0.39 %
Figure 384: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 385: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
132
Profile: e176
Information: Eppler E176 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 386: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 509: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.9429 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 3.1746 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.716 %CLower nose radius: 0.78964 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.0419 degRelease Angle: 3.8907 degNose Incidence: 6.1199 degCamber deflection: 10.0106 deg
Table 510: Controlpoints1 00.68212 0.00489830.27673 -0.0175810.12487 -0.0175810.0016532 -0.0175810 -0.00622980 00 0.0226410.12984 0.0759440.3492 0.0759440.55653 0.0759440.73128 0.0319621 0
Table 511: Base 64 representation:TnWUgX-ILImcHlA
Table 512: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.451 6.244 ectsRMS curvature error: 54.69 45.49 %CD error -1.8 -2.1 dctsCm error -4 13 mctsUpper transition point -0.13 -1.21 %
Figure 387: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 388: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
133
Profile: e178
Information: Eppler E178 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 389: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 513: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.7178 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 2.7917 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.66464 %CLower nose radius: 0.44448 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.4151 degRelease Angle: 1.837 degNose Incidence: 6.9287 degCamber deflection: 8.7657 deg
Table 514: Controlpoints1 00.56965 -0.00653930.31071 -0.0189010.17054 -0.0189010.077156 -0.0189010 -0.0151210 00 0.0243970.13433 0.0709780.34251 0.0709780.56915 0.0709780.7696 0.0183131 0
Table 515: Base 64 representation:WmWWeyiLLIhnGiA
Table 516: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.477 2.643 ectsRMS curvature error: 44.18 48.57 %CD error -0.8 -1.3 dctsCm error -8 -11 mctsUpper transition point -0.3 -0.15 %
Figure 390: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 391: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
134
Profile: e180
Information: Eppler E180 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 392: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 517: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.5952 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 2.342 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.90845 %CLower nose radius: 0.31375 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.3582 degRelease Angle: -1.79 degNose Incidence: 9.1677 degCamber deflection: 7.3776 deg
Table 518: Controlpoints1 00.9678 -0.00336680.36502 -0.0210870.22115 -0.0210870.020781 -0.0210870 -0.00659290 00 0.0307270.15589 0.0661250.33525 0.0661250.57543 0.0661250.78797 0.00884611 0
Table 519: Base 64 representation:ehVXcU5OMJgKJsA
Table 520: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.699 3.287 ectsRMS curvature error: 51.43 50.12 %CD error 2.9 2.9 dctsCm error -2 19 mctsUpper transition point -0.94 -2.19 %
Figure 393: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 394: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
135
Profile: e182
Information: Eppler E182 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 395: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 521: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.4787 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 1.5775 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.31678 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.3629 degRelease Angle: -3.6738 degNose Incidence: -1.5139 degCamber deflection: -5.1878 deg
Table 522: Controlpoints1 00.92477 -0.00971120.44072 -0.0275770.2297 -0.0275770.002297 -0.0275770 -0.00764120 00 0.0159850.11237 0.0579460.32793 0.0579460.59081 0.0579460.79401 2.7355e-0051 0
Table 523: Base 64 representation:SpVZZS-PSMgXIaA
Table 524: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.913 4.181 ectsRMS curvature error: 85.76 84.6 %CD error -0.2 -0.4 dctsCm error 12 24 mctsUpper transition point -0.85 -0.6 %
Figure 396: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 397: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
136
Profile: e184
Information: Eppler E184 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 398: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 525: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.3332 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 1.1365 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.5558 %CLower nose radius: 0.7128 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.4188 degRelease Angle: -4.4509 degNose Incidence: 1.1355 degCamber deflection: -3.3154 deg
Table 526: Controlpoints1 00.90801 -0.0151810.49265 -0.0304140.28433 -0.0304140.048832 -0.0304140 -0.01370 00 0.0160690.1052 0.0530080.32108 0.0530080.59184 0.0530080.80538 -0.00775881 0
Table 527: Base 64 representation:TqVaXs0STNfgIWA
Table 528: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.563 3.322 ectsRMS curvature error: 49.76 52.57 %CD error -1.6 -1.8 dctsCm error -21 -27 mctsUpper transition point 2.52 3.3 %
Figure 399: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 400: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
137
Profile: e186
Information: Eppler E186 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 401: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 529: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.2741 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 1.2618 % @0.3CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.44421 %CLower nose radius: 0.55503 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.3655 degRelease Angle: -8.56 degNose Incidence: 2.0769 degCamber deflection: -6.4831 deg
Table 530: Controlpoints1 00.90778 -0.0242670.54162 -0.0388550.33815 -0.0388550.04765 -0.0388550 -0.0132780 00 0.0163380.090141 0.063970.31 0.063970.50527 0.063970.80754 -0.00799021 0
Table 531: Base 64 representation:QsUSbW2WURZnOSA
Table 532: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.29 5.224 ectsRMS curvature error: 92.52 90.05 %CD error -2.6 -1.9 dctsCm error -45 -34 mctsUpper transition point 2.26 0.97 %
Figure 402: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 403: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
138
Profile: e193
Information: Eppler E193 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 404: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 533: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.2635 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 3.4689 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.61428 %CLower nose radius: 7.4648 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.3134 degRelease Angle: 5.259 degNose Incidence: 2.9292 degCamber deflection: 8.1881 deg
Table 534: Controlpoints1 00.65979 0.000607440.29352 -0.0227250.15679 -0.0227250 -0.0227250 -0.00846150 00 0.0236930.13708 0.0848210.3537 0.0848210.43714 0.0848210.53856 0.0848211 0
Table 535: Base 64 representation:SmXIjY KKK fMoA
Table 536: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.867 4.537 ectsRMS curvature error: 61.25 61.92 %CD error -0.4 -0.9 dctsCm error 8 -7 mctsUpper transition point -1.25 -0.04 %
Figure 405: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 406: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
139
Profile: e195
Information: Eppler E195 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 407: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 537: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.8261 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 3.1047 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.92124 %CLower nose radius: 1.0797 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.5095 degRelease Angle: 5.2653 degNose Incidence: 4.0739 degCamber deflection: 9.3392 deg
Table 538: Controlpoints1 00.65381 -0.00594620.43936 -0.0315530.20137 -0.0315530.15274 -0.0315530 -0.02910 00 0.0278960.14611 0.0893060.34979 0.0893060.49641 0.0893060.5916 0.0750381 0
Table 539: Base 64 representation:UkWOl6PNTN1nNnA
Table 540: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.98 4.41 ectsRMS curvature error: 47.07 46.97 %CD error 1.1 -0.7 dctsCm error -10 20 mctsUpper transition point 0.27 -1.44 %
Figure 408: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 409: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
140
Profile: e197
Information: Eppler E197 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 410: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 541: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.4779 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 2.7405 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0894 %CLower nose radius: 0.94109 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.2106 degRelease Angle: 4.7712 degNose Incidence: 5.9484 degCamber deflection: 10.7196 deg
Table 542: Controlpoints1 00.65027 -0.0124340.47902 -0.0421330.24819 -0.0421330.096972 -0.0421330 -0.0223670 00 0.0331380.15675 0.0940.34549 0.0940.52422 0.0940.61951 0.0696621 0
Table 543: Base 64 representation:XiWRnhmQUSyqOmA
Table 544: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.214 3.315 ectsRMS curvature error: 50.51 51.81 %CD error 0.5 0.5 dctsCm error 12 31 mctsUpper transition point -0.65 -1.27 %
Figure 411: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 412: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
141
Profile: e201
Information: Eppler E201 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 413: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 545: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.876 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 3.0041 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.76493 %CLower nose radius: 0.8781 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.1612 degRelease Angle: 5.8243 degNose Incidence: 3.6743 degCamber deflection: 9.4986 deg
Table 546: Controlpoints1 00.69731 0.00128780.46833 -0.0332990.19911 -0.0332990.17945 -0.0332990 -0.0324110 00 0.0271190.14422 0.0881310.35267 0.0881310.4502 0.0881310.60248 0.0801911 0
Table 547: Base 64 representation:UlXKl9GNWO5jMpA
Table 548: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.697 5.158 ectsRMS curvature error: 40.68 41 %CD error 0 -0.7 dctsCm error 19 4 mctsUpper transition point -1.98 -0.76 %
Figure 414: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 415: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
142
Profile: e203
Information: Eppler E203 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 416: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 549: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.6904 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 2.6195 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.97104 %CLower nose radius: 0.67393 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.9273 degRelease Angle: 6.9945 degNose Incidence: 4.1735 degCamber deflection: 11.168 deg
Table 550: Controlpoints1 00.78156 0.00583770.43778 -0.0463850.28703 -0.0463850.03621 -0.0463850 -0.0127550 00 0.0324110.15674 0.0917010.35148 0.0917010.4747 0.0917010.66794 0.0733611 0
Table 551: Base 64 representation:XiWMmS3SOUyZMqA
Table 552: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.956 4.467 ectsRMS curvature error: 44.57 45 %CD error 2.1 2.9 dctsCm error 19 37 mctsUpper transition point -3.37 -5.22 %
Figure 417: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 418: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
143
Profile: e205
Information: Eppler E205 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 419: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 553: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.4126 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 3.0037 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.6292 %CLower nose radius: 0.65545 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.8455 degRelease Angle: 2.2589 degNose Incidence: 6.2382 degCamber deflection: 8.4971 deg
Table 554: Controlpoints1 00.96448 -0.00258560.34473 -0.0248190.16627 -0.0248190.11408 -0.0248190 -0.0221640 00 0.020130.0966 0.0817790.34095 0.0817790.45507 0.0817790.61551 0.0587091 0
Table 555: Base 64 representation:QtWLi4ULOLtHOjA
Table 556: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.567 3.921 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.4 -1.7 dctsCm error 2 21 mctsUpper transition point -0.25 -0.18 %
Figure 420: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 421: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
144
Profile: e207
Information: Eppler E207 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 422: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 557: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.0138 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 2.5228 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.85169 %CLower nose radius: 0.58536 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.1243 degRelease Angle: 3.4197 degNose Incidence: 6.8756 degCamber deflection: 10.2953 deg
Table 558: Controlpoints1 00.5593 -0.0203390.45031 -0.0359980.25292 -0.0359980.05595 -0.0359980 -0.0147760 00 0.0246920.10738 0.0849290.33982 0.0849290.42565 0.0849290.55755 0.0738971 0
Table 559: Base 64 representation:TrWIjaxQRP3yOlA
Table 560: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.134 3.728 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf 92.43 %CD error 0.1 0 dctsCm error 18 16 mctsUpper transition point -0.33 -0.03 %
Figure 423: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 424: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
145
Profile: e209
Information: Eppler E209 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 425: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 561: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.7103 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 2.0358 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1718 %CLower nose radius: 0.44234 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.316 degRelease Angle: 4.6371 degNose Incidence: 8.2244 degCamber deflection: 12.8616 deg
Table 562: Controlpoints1 00.73787 -0.00924940.46671 -0.0490950.29783 -0.0490950.060051 -0.0490950 -0.0133070 00 0.0308860.12211 0.0883610.33846 0.0883610.52542 0.0883610.94719 0.0105471 0
Table 563: Base 64 representation:WoWSlRyTPVIfPnA
Table 564: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.433 2.664 ectsRMS curvature error: 38.05 37.25 %CD error 0.9 0.9 dctsCm error 17 1 mctsUpper transition point -1.59 -0.89 %
Figure 426: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 427: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
146
Profile: e210
Information: Eppler E210 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 428: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 565: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.558 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 4.0981 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4223 %CLower nose radius: 0.75486 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.6278 degRelease Angle: 13.5328 degNose Incidence: 12.1212 degCamber deflection: 25.654 deg
Table 566: Controlpoints1 00.76951 0.0251160.4815 -0.0317170.22079 -0.0317170.17663 -0.0317170 -0.0298140 00 0.0329070.1142 0.10710.36564 0.10710.50871 0.10710.86982 0.0495731 0
Table 567: Base 64 representation:UrXOt7NOVOecQ1A
Table 568: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.496 5.238 ectsRMS curvature error: 29.41 29.05 %CD error 2.2 2.5 dctsCm error 7 18 mctsUpper transition point -1.45 -2.79 %
Figure 429: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 430: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
147
Profile: e211
Information: Eppler E211 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 431: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 569: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.9681 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 2.4883 % @0.59CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.57134 %CLower nose radius: 0.16601 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.621 degRelease Angle: 11.806 degNose Incidence: 6.1622 degCamber deflection: 17.9682 deg
Table 570: Controlpoints1 00.78045 0.0191910.57891 -0.0338170.23841 -0.0338170.021457 -0.0338170 -0.0103610 00 0.0211910.1179 0.0774710.36293 0.0774710.57293 0.0774710.89106 0.0366961 0
Table 571: Base 64 representation:SqXVgU5PsOegPyA
Table 572: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.628 4.874 ectsRMS curvature error: 71.92 71.7 %CD error -0.7 -0.4 dctsCm error 11 12 mctsUpper transition point -2.21 -2.84 %
Figure 432: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 433: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
148
Profile: e212
Information: Eppler E212 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 434: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 573: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.5966 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 2.8357 % @0.59CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.36016 %CLower nose radius: 0.81278 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.4642 degRelease Angle: 15.2873 degNose Incidence: -0.044982 degCamber deflection: 15.2423 deg
Table 574: Controlpoints1 00.8486 0.029580.42564 -0.0348450.18603 -0.0348450.018603 -0.0348450 -0.010040 00 0.013550.07647 0.0756850.36652 0.0756850.63998 0.0756850.92641 0.0260871 0
Table 575: Base 64 representation:LyXcgS5MTPWRJ4A
Table 576: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.42 3.414 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0 0.4 dctsCm error -5 0 mctsUpper transition point -0.87 -2.21 %
Figure 435: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 436: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
149
Profile: e214
Information: Eppler E214 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 437: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 577: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.13 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 4.0814 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3109 %CLower nose radius: 0.5982 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.4079 degRelease Angle: 14.1633 degNose Incidence: 12.4632 degCamber deflection: 26.6266 deg
Table 578: Controlpoints1 00.80272 0.032870.49698 -0.0217440.17753 -0.0217440.015325 -0.0217440 -0.00756840 00 0.0338230.13843 0.0938610.3765 0.0938610.5228 0.0938610.81075 0.0646751 0
Table 579: Base 64 representation:XnYPnW5LZJrZL2A
Table 580: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.149 3.337 ectsRMS curvature error: 27.03 26.96 %CD error 0.6 0.8 dctsCm error 15 23 mctsUpper transition point -1.4 -1.92 %
Figure 438: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 439: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
150
Profile: e216
Information: Eppler E216 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 440: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 581: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.5375 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 5.0547 % @0.57CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.80245 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.2464 degRelease Angle: 19.6525 degNose Incidence: 5.1492 degCamber deflection: 24.8017 deg
Table 582: Controlpoints1 00.77154 0.0613390.34628 -0.0223070.11773 -0.0223070 -0.0223070 -0.00774170 00 0.024590.11303 0.0961340.39681 0.0961340.491 0.0961340.81701 0.0825281 0
Table 583: Base 64 representation:QtZKoW IRK2WK A
Table 584: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.956 8.683 ectsRMS curvature error: 24.4 28.14 %CD error -3.8 -3.4 dctsCm error 64 84 mctsUpper transition point 1.87 1.31 %
Figure 441: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 442: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
151
Profile: e220
Information: Eppler E220 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 443: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 585: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.4738 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: 2.5657 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6367 %CLower nose radius: 0.52191 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.0799 degRelease Angle: -1.8082 degNose Incidence: 12.1166 degCamber deflection: 10.3083 deg
Table 586: Controlpoints1 00.81018 -0.0244780.47535 -0.0320150.31815 -0.0320150.29111 -0.0320150 -0.0318260 00 0.0444770.1813 0.0829720.37713 0.0829720.60808 0.0829720.75586 0.0159231 0
Table 587: Base 64 representation:hgYYi FUPOnwMsA
Table 588: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.404 7.672 ectsRMS curvature error: 31.22 31.18 %CD error 0.2 -1.7 dctsCm error -21 -1 mctsUpper transition point 0.7 0.34 %
Figure 444: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 445: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
152
Profile: e221
Information: Eppler E221 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 446: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 589: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.3884 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 1.9851 % @0.29CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5389 %CLower nose radius: 0.48059 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.044 degRelease Angle: -0.42535 degNose Incidence: 11.5266 degCamber deflection: 11.1012 deg
Table 590: Controlpoints1 00.77468 -0.0195040.41401 -0.0271030.27095 -0.0271030.21347 -0.0271030 -0.0261520 00 0.0404280.15931 0.0667910.281 0.0667910.51272 0.0667910.78405 0.0154671 0
Table 591: Base 64 representation:mcSVc9ORNMctKfA
Table 592: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.823 8.074 ectsRMS curvature error: 34.66 35.79 %CD error 2 0.9 dctsCm error -38 -41 mctsUpper transition point -1.32 -1.74 %
Figure 447: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 448: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
153
Profile: e222
Information: Eppler E222 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 449: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 593: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.1839 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 2.462 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.44736 %CLower nose radius: 0.72606 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.058 degRelease Angle: 10.5293 degNose Incidence: 3.0154 degCamber deflection: 13.5447 deg
Table 594: Controlpoints1 00.86553 0.0153220.46122 -0.0314440.19777 -0.0314440.088143 -0.0314440 -0.0206550 00 0.0150030.075473 0.0731420.35707 0.0731420.63357 0.0731420.93415 0.0171021 0
Table 595: Base 64 representation:NxXcfpiNVNPQJwA
Table 596: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.876 4.42 ectsRMS curvature error: 19.75 20.3 %CD error -0.8 -1.8 dctsCm error -4 -16 mctsUpper transition point -0.75 0.45 %
Figure 450: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 451: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
154
Profile: e224
Information: Eppler E224 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 452: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 597: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.1778 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 1.8184 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.84536 %CLower nose radius: 0.24209 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.8962 degRelease Angle: 6.2109 degNose Incidence: 7.6897 degCamber deflection: 13.9006 deg
Table 598: Controlpoints1 00.88229 0.00568040.48106 -0.0350290.25343 -0.0350290.030412 -0.0350290 -0.00700580 00 0.0215720.082571 0.0677120.34459 0.0677120.46991 0.0677120.67837 0.0547411 0
Table 599: Base 64 representation:UwWMsN3QUPzPIpA
Table 600: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.866 1.653 ectsRMS curvature error: 12.68 12.68 %CD error -0.3 -0.2 dctsCm error -3 -11 mctsUpper transition point 0.74 0.64 %
Figure 453: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 454: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
155
Profile: e226
Information: Eppler E226 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 455: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 601: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.1964 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 0.85356 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.078348 %CLower nose radius: 0.73925 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.2214 degRelease Angle: 1.1434 degNose Incidence: -3.1937 degCamber deflection: -2.0503 deg
Table 602: Controlpoints1 00.86481 -0.0058250.50397 -0.0438440.26657 -0.0438440.031989 -0.0438440 -0.0125560 00 0.00432340.035786 0.0585680.33164 0.0585680.59018 0.0585680.90473 0.00792331 0
Table 603: Base 64 representation:F4VZZS3RVTPRIhA
Table 604: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.985 2.664 ectsRMS curvature error: 19.24 19.81 %CD error 1.7 1.7 dctsCm error 5 5 mctsUpper transition point -3.41 -3.14 %
Figure 456: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 457: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
156
Profile: e228
Information: Eppler E228 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 458: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 605: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.0531 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 0.28126 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.27812 %CLower nose radius: 0.52866 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.4763 degRelease Angle: -3.4669 degNose Incidence: 0.88528 degCamber deflection: -2.5816 deg
Table 606: Controlpoints1 00.61375 -0.0419950.3962 -0.0477210.27946 -0.0477210.073426 -0.0477210 -0.0160870 00 0.00688180.025542 0.0529370.31928 0.0529370.55882 0.0529370.91888 -0.00103181 0
Table 607: Base 64 representation:I6UXXWuSKUM3GaA
Table 608: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.4 4.716 ectsRMS curvature error: 22.31 21.86 %CD error 0.8 0.3 dctsCm error 3 -2 mctsUpper transition point -2.24 -1.45 %
Figure 459: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 460: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
157
Profile: e230
Information: Eppler E230 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 461: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 609: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.9486 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: -0.74331 % @0.78CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1467 %CLower nose radius: 0.010553 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.5667 degRelease Angle: -7.8036 degNose Incidence: 5.6181 degCamber deflection: -2.1856 deg
Table 610: Controlpoints1 00.90314 -0.0198590.55725 -0.0523920.33979 -0.0523920.019005 -0.0523920 -0.00104780 00 0.0309090.12497 0.04770.2601 0.04770.55002 0.04770.8891 -0.00779451 0
Table 611: Base 64 representation:ogRZUB7WVWQYITA
Table 612: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.19 6.128 ectsRMS curvature error: 22.35 23.11 %CD error -6.2 -6.4 dctsCm error 18 17 mctsUpper transition point 6.28 5.81 %
Figure 462: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 463: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
158
Profile: e231
Information: Eppler E231 R/C sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 464: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 613: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.3368 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 2.4603 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.97123 %CLower nose radius: 0.2788 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.7709 degRelease Angle: 2.7977 degNose Incidence: 10.8575 degCamber deflection: 13.6551 deg
Table 614: Controlpoints1 00.88622 -0.00514220.81538 -0.037110.41385 -0.037110.034384 -0.037110 -0.00799430 00 0.0259710.10417 0.086280.39357 0.086280.69916 0.086280.81507 0.0265931 0
Table 615: Base 64 representation:TuZgkO6arQmmMkA
Table 616: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.412 3.049 ectsRMS curvature error: 18.89 18.95 %CD error 28.4 0.3 dctsCm error 1 5 mctsUpper transition point 0.98 -0.29 %
Figure 465: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 466: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
159
Profile: e326
Information: Eppler E326 flying wing airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 467: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 617: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.8623 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 2.1169 % @0.2CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0462 %CLower nose radius: 0.48234 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.515 degRelease Angle: -0.63884 degNose Incidence: 12.2192 degCamber deflection: 11.5804 deg
Table 618: Controlpoints1 00.83659 -0.0212130.78288 -0.0521170.5368 -0.0521170.358 -0.0521170 -0.0339290 00 0.022590.073172 0.0837570.26844 0.0837570.43033 0.0837570.63686 0.0389281 0
Table 619: Base 64 representation:RuROjpVhhWovPfA
Table 620: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.608 4.448 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.3 -0.3 dctsCm error 30 26 mctsUpper transition point 0.32 0.07 %
Figure 468: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 469: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
160
Profile: e327
Information: Eppler E327 flying wing airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 470: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 621: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.097 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 2.5941 % @0.23CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4167 %CLower nose radius: 0.43109 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.6762 degRelease Angle: 1.5267 degNose Incidence: 15.1183 degCamber deflection: 16.645 deg
Table 622: Controlpoints1 00.84205 -0.0132950.80454 -0.0470310.52878 -0.0470310.39797 -0.0470310 -0.0340430 00 0.0285880.086533 0.0902180.27569 0.0902180.41555 0.0902180.56601 0.0599491 0
Table 623: Base 64 representation:UrSMltQhkUvzOiA
Table 624: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.482 5.169 ectsRMS curvature error: 35.82 36.41 %CD error -0.8 -1.5 dctsCm error 28 15 mctsUpper transition point 0.73 2.04 %
Figure 471: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 472: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
161
Profile: e331
Information: Eppler E331 flying wing airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 473: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 625: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.3023 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 2.6529 % @0.23CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5106 %CLower nose radius: 0.24915 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.5303 degRelease Angle: -1.8533 degNose Incidence: 17.6325 degCamber deflection: 15.7792 deg
Table 626: Controlpoints1 00.85832 -0.0214740.81351 -0.0366340.53928 -0.0366340.4341 -0.0366340 -0.0268520 00 0.0287470.082057 0.0822810.26996 0.0822810.43136 0.0822810.69378 0.0263161 0
Table 627: Base 64 representation:WsROiuMilQhwPsA
Table 628: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.148 3.913 ectsRMS curvature error: 37.19 39.18 %CD error -1.3 -0.8 dctsCm error 33 52 mctsUpper transition point 1.91 0.9 %
Figure 474: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 475: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
162
Profile: e332
Information: N/AReference: UIUC
Figure 476: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 629: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.6639 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.0042 % @0.24CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.495 %CLower nose radius: 0.29548 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.4965 degRelease Angle: 0.12538 degNose Incidence: 17.188 degCamber deflection: 17.3133 deg
Table 630: Controlpoints1 00.83514 -0.0191420.83514 -0.0321860.53121 -0.0321860.5259 -0.0321860 -0.0299330 00 0.030780.095057 0.0879670.26714 0.0879670.4365 0.0879670.61102 0.046891 0
Table 631: Base 64 representation:WpRPl7BhpOr PgA
Table 632: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.187 6.43 ectsRMS curvature error: 45.76 47.88 %CD error -3.4 -2.8 dctsCm error 58 38 mctsUpper transition point -0.31 -0.11 %
Figure 477: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 478: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
163
Profile: e334
Information: Eppler E334 flying wing airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 479: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 633: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.1054 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.9453 % @0.28CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5713 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.2097 degRelease Angle: 4.9531 degNose Incidence: 17.5396 degCamber deflection: 22.4927 deg
Table 634: Controlpoints1 00.90387 -0.00025460.90387 -0.0220720.51463 -0.0220720 -0.0220720 -0.0100720 00 0.0313290.093694 0.0999280.29152 0.0999280.36661 0.0999280.47588 0.0929631 0
Table 635: Base 64 representation:UqTHqs gyJ7 LnA
Table 636: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.028 5.49 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.9 -2.4 dctsCm error 14 -4 mctsUpper transition point 1.36 2.53 %
Figure 480: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 481: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
164
Profile: e335
Information: Eppler E335 flying wing airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 482: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 637: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.564 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 2.2936 % @0.21CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.9909 %CLower nose radius: 0.48712 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.3633 degRelease Angle: -1.7861 degNose Incidence: 11.9035 degCamber deflection: 10.1173 deg
Table 638: Controlpoints1 00.91836 -0.0100350.86863 -0.04880.54452 -0.04880.40356 -0.04880 -0.0352640 00 0.0227980.071699 0.0847940.2623 0.0847940.42685 0.0847940.68728 0.024531 0
Table 639: Base 64 representation:RuROjtRitVinNeA
Table 640: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.448 3.555 ectsRMS curvature error: 41.25 41.87 %CD error -1.3 -1.4 dctsCm error 0 12 mctsUpper transition point 1.01 1.35 %
Figure 483: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 484: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
165
Profile: e336
Information: Eppler E336 flying wing airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 485: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 641: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.8563 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 2.7974 % @0.23CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4909 %CLower nose radius: 0.39819 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.3458 degRelease Angle: 0.24389 degNose Incidence: 16.3344 degCamber deflection: 16.5783 deg
Table 642: Controlpoints1 00.90153 -0.0102260.8746 -0.0437640.53648 -0.0437640.46167 -0.0437640 -0.0352110 00 0.0290890.08513 0.0913790.26952 0.0913790.42638 0.0913790.64752 0.0396421 0
Table 643: Base 64 representation:UrROmyJhuTmxOgA
Table 644: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.451 3.961 ectsRMS curvature error: 54.57 54.52 %CD error -2 -1.5 dctsCm error 12 17 mctsUpper transition point 2.19 1.39 %
Figure 486: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 487: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
166
Profile: e337
Information: Eppler E337 flying wing airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 488: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 645: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.2291 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.1226 % @0.25CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.385 %CLower nose radius: 0.44182 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.6411 degRelease Angle: 1.8205 degNose Incidence: 15.9152 degCamber deflection: 17.7356 deg
Table 646: Controlpoints1 00.88641 -0.00893960.87786 -0.039450.52838 -0.039450.51253 -0.039450 -0.0370830 00 0.0283770.087214 0.0968810.27646 0.0968810.4178 0.0968810.57997 0.0600861 0
Table 647: Base 64 representation:TrSNo7ChuRt7OiA
Table 648: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.798 6.478 ectsRMS curvature error: 38.02 38.14 %CD error -0.9 -1.3 dctsCm error 24 11 mctsUpper transition point 0.94 1.85 %
Figure 489: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 490: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
167
Profile: e338
Information: Eppler E338 flying wing airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 491: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 649: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.4203 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 3.6648 % @0.26CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7014 %CLower nose radius: 0.329 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.4107 degRelease Angle: 4.0296 degNose Incidence: 19.294 degCamber deflection: 23.3237 deg
Table 650: Controlpoints1 00.89654 -0.00302660.8955 -0.0341130.52012 -0.0341130.51492 -0.0341130 -0.0320660 00 0.0329710.09584 0.103390.28365 0.103390.38898 0.103390.50059 0.085681 0
Table 651: Base 64 representation:UpSJr7BgxPz-NmA
Table 652: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.326 7.326 ectsRMS curvature error: 49.28 51.45 %CD error -8.8 -10.3 dctsCm error 35 44 mctsUpper transition point 1.58 0.51 %
Figure 492: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 493: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
168
Profile: e340
Information: Eppler E340 flying wing airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 494: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 653: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.6531 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 2.5869 % @0.21CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.4791 %CLower nose radius: 0.556 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.0165 degRelease Angle: -1.2465 degNose Incidence: 18.1132 degCamber deflection: 16.8667 deg
Table 654: Controlpoints1 00.88151 -0.0171910.87024 -0.0522660.54219 -0.0522660.49336 -0.0522660 -0.0418130 00 0.0359750.10192 0.0931660.26141 0.0931660.40379 0.0931660.66698 0.0336021 0
Table 655: Base 64 representation:ZmRMnyGitWj5QeA
Table 656: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.845 5.148 ectsRMS curvature error: 47.89 45.86 %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN 68.34 %
Figure 495: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 496: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
169
Profile: e341
Information: Eppler E341 flying wing airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 497: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 657: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.1003 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 2.8866 % @0.23CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4246 %CLower nose radius: 0.62274 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.5152 degRelease Angle: 0.31021 degNose Incidence: 14.3178 degCamber deflection: 14.6281 deg
Table 658: Controlpoints1 00.88862 -0.0125870.87049 -0.0480430.53421 -0.0480430.52886 -0.0480430 -0.0442110 00 0.0284430.085182 0.0986130.26826 0.0986130.42253 0.0986130.62618 0.0463491 0
Table 659: Base 64 representation:SrRNp6BhtUo2PgA
Table 660: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.46 6.509 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN 68.1 %
Figure 498: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 499: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
170
Profile: e342
Information: Eppler E342 flying wing airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 500: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 661: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.3972 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.3856 % @0.25CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.8637 %CLower nose radius: 0.52878 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.4263 degRelease Angle: 2.1166 degNose Incidence: 17.6821 degCamber deflection: 19.7988 deg
Table 662: Controlpoints1 00.88097 -0.009570.88097 -0.0430610.526 -0.0430610.52074 -0.0430610 -0.0400470 00 0.0345670.09617 0.105320.27526 0.105320.41145 0.105320.58412 0.0646041 0
Table 663: Base 64 representation:VpSMs7BhvSs PjA
Table 664: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.473 6.385 ectsRMS curvature error: 37.48 38.02 %CD error -6.1 -7.4 dctsCm error 54 37 mctsUpper transition point 0.85 1.9 %
Figure 501: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 502: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
171
Profile: e343
Information: N/AReference: UIUC
Figure 503: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 665: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.6096 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.9213 % @0.26CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.2946 %CLower nose radius: 0.4132 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.7481 degRelease Angle: 2.5162 degNose Incidence: 21.1601 degCamber deflection: 23.6763 deg
Table 666: Controlpoints1 00.85846 -0.0132750.85846 -0.0377650.51773 -0.0377650.50738 -0.0377650 -0.0358770 00 0.0401840.10556 0.11190.28232 0.11190.38544 0.11190.49603 0.0924061 0
Table 667: Base 64 representation:XnSJv8BhtQ0 RjA
Table 668: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.417 8.143 ectsRMS curvature error: 48.61 45.34 %CD error -10.1 -11.9 dctsCm error 71 116 mctsUpper transition point 1.27 1.44 %
Figure 504: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 505: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
172
Profile: e360
Information: Eppler E360 rotorcraft airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 506: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 669: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.239 % @0.36CMaximum Camber: 1.5982 % @0.25CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.2765 %CLower nose radius: 0.60935 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.787 degRelease Angle: 1.5602 degNose Incidence: 13.8201 degCamber deflection: 15.3804 deg
Table 670: Controlpoints1 00.79047 -0.0177170.69743 -0.0467050.4198 -0.0467050.22273 -0.0467050 -0.030080 00 0.0458560.13855 0.0764740.32745 0.0764740.48041 0.0764740.58041 0.0586241 0
Table 671: Base 64 representation:lkVPgoebfUzrOiA
Table 672: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.87 3.011 ectsRMS curvature error: 32.71 32.95 %CD error -0.7 -1.4 dctsCm error 4 6 mctsUpper transition point 1.71 2.98 %
Figure 507: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 508: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
173
Profile: e361
Information: Eppler E361 rotorcraft airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 509: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 673: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.1111 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 1.7073 % @0.26CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.3433 %CLower nose radius: 0.59245 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.1071 degRelease Angle: 0.75858 degNose Incidence: 14.3547 degCamber deflection: 15.1133 deg
Table 674: Controlpoints1 00.79081 -0.0193880.69081 -0.0448220.42194 -0.0448220.20869 -0.0448220 -0.028710 00 0.048350.14964 0.0771090.32473 0.0771090.51884 0.0771090.65727 0.0409421 0
Table 675: Base 64 representation:niVSgogbeTtqOgA
Table 676: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.864 2.375 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.9 -1.1 dctsCm error -17 -4 mctsUpper transition point 1.85 1.84 %
Figure 510: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 511: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
174
Profile: e374
Information: Eppler E374 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 512: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 677: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.901 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: 2.3162 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.76754 %CLower nose radius: 0.48463 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.5078 degRelease Angle: 2.3962 degNose Incidence: 7.3419 degCamber deflection: 9.7381 deg
Table 678: Controlpoints1 00.85221 -0.0112620.63969 -0.0317210.31145 -0.0317210.27407 -0.0317210 -0.0317210 00 0.0243990.11634 0.07760.3894 0.07760.51246 0.07760.67286 0.0526931 0
Table 679: Base 64 representation:UsZNg IUfOqaPjA
Table 680: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.705 4.451 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.9 -0.1 dctsCm error -1 1 mctsUpper transition point 0.21 0.28 %
Figure 513: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 514: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
175
Profile: e385
Information: Eppler E385 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 515: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 681: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.5137 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 5.6099 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.64644 %CLower nose radius: 10.4492 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.6441 degRelease Angle: 14.7474 degNose Incidence: 7.9018 degCamber deflection: 22.6492 deg
Table 682: Controlpoints1 00.71024 0.058560.11035 -0.0102340.037628 -0.0102340.00069744 -0.0102340 -0.00697030 00 0.0244570.13879 0.0966310.38304 0.0966310.6317 0.0966310.9757 0.00792731 0
Table 683: Base 64 representation:QoZaor-CFEFVH3A
Table 684: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.167 6.536 ectsRMS curvature error: 44.97 44.28 %CD error NaN -1.9 dctsCm error NaN -9 mctsUpper transition point NaN 1.03 %
Figure 516: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 517: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
176
Profile: e387
Information: Eppler E387 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 518: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 685: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.1591 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 3.5864 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.75179 %CLower nose radius: 2.8281 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.4468 degRelease Angle: 5.7281 degNose Incidence: 4.3926 degCamber deflection: 10.1206 deg
Table 686: Controlpoints1 00.68788 0.012610.26632 -0.0171480.085328 -0.0171480.0025598 -0.0171480 -0.00647630 00 0.019790.12535 0.0809960.35458 0.0809960.51888 0.0809960.65188 0.0542811 0
Table 687: Base 64 representation:QoXQiY9FNHtbHoA
Table 688: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.901 5.151 ectsRMS curvature error: 57.66 Inf %CD error -2 -1.8 dctsCm error 1 -7 mctsUpper transition point -0.28 -0.36 %
Figure 519: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 520: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
177
Profile: e392
Information: Eppler E392 low Reynolds number airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 521: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 689: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.1587 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 4.0063 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4693 %CLower nose radius: 0.15495 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.5507 degRelease Angle: 8.3892 degNose Incidence: 15.7674 degCamber deflection: 24.1567 deg
Table 690: Controlpoints1 00.79476 0.0201740.39078 -0.0166410.1498 -0.0166410.0068968 -0.0166410 -0.00283560 00 0.0410280.17184 0.0896840.36018 0.0896840.43945 0.0896840.55825 0.0871861 0
Table 691: Base 64 representation:sgXIlL8KSH9WGtA
Table 692: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.684 3.924 ectsRMS curvature error: 31.84 34.44 %CD error 2.1 2 dctsCm error 5 -3 mctsUpper transition point -1.09 -0.99 %
Figure 522: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 523: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
178
Profile: e393
Information: Eppler E393 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 524: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 693: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.5321 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 3.9719 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.90714 %CLower nose radius: 0.47538 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.5153 degRelease Angle: 12.1505 degNose Incidence: 9.808 degCamber deflection: 21.9585 deg
Table 694: Controlpoints1 00.79535 0.0283710.46909 -0.024120.18357 -0.024120.14686 -0.024120 -0.0238790 00 0.0308430.1477 0.095580.36746 0.095580.62025 0.095580.98746 0.00369381 0
Table 695: Base 64 representation:VlYao-NMWKCZKzA
Table 696: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.641 4.851 ectsRMS curvature error: 26.74 26.84 %CD error 1.1 1 dctsCm error 12 -11 mctsUpper transition point -2.34 -0.89 %
Figure 525: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 526: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
179
Profile: e395
Information: Eppler E395 human powered aircraft airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 527: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 697: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.3638 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 5.1894 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1961 %CLower nose radius: 0.41983 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.1529 degRelease Angle: 15.0156 degNose Incidence: 10.0101 degCamber deflection: 25.0256 deg
Table 698: Controlpoints1 00.78608 0.0452330.31894 -0.0276140.12626 -0.0276140.025421 -0.0276140 -0.00843510 00 0.0355980.15892 0.1090.38373 0.1090.45768 0.1090.66966 0.107921 0
Table 699: Base 64 representation:VkZIuUyIOM-UH3A
Table 700: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.337 5.152 ectsRMS curvature error: 22.27 21.83 %CD error -1.3 -1 dctsCm error 24 9 mctsUpper transition point 0.06 -0.06 %
Figure 528: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 529: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
180
Profile: e396
Information: Eppler E396 human powered aircraft airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 530: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 701: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.2294 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 5.276 % @0.48CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.84055 %CLower nose radius: 0.77615 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.0471 degRelease Angle: 15.0905 degNose Incidence: 8.7158 degCamber deflection: 23.8063 deg
Table 702: Controlpoints1 00.78202 0.0424510.33105 -0.0285770.12566 -0.0285770.028188 -0.0285770 -0.00882840 00 0.0388990.16305 0.115360.38237 0.115360.47045 0.115360.64435 0.115361 0
Table 703: Base 64 representation:WkYJwUxIPM VI2A
Table 704: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.982 4.491 ectsRMS curvature error: 23.38 23.86 %CD error -0.7 -0.5 dctsCm error 21 37 mctsUpper transition point -0.81 -0.86 %
Figure 531: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 532: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
181
Profile: e397
Information: Eppler E397 human powered aircraft airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 533: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 705: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.5793 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 5.239 % @0.5CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.185 %CLower nose radius: 1.7447 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.3108 degRelease Angle: 14.985 degNose Incidence: 4.2019 degCamber deflection: 19.187 deg
Table 706: Controlpoints1 00.8009 0.0403760.33313 -0.0323590.164 -0.0323590.0072084 -0.0323590 -0.00424470 00 0.0294090.12593 0.11590.42837 0.11590.66121 0.11590.99447 0.00184231 0
Table 707: Base 64 representation:QsbawI8KNOBTI3A
Table 708: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.097 4.805 ectsRMS curvature error: 22.31 22.56 %CD error 1.6 1.1 dctsCm error 20 42 mctsUpper transition point -2.36 -3.14 %
Figure 534: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 535: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
182
Profile: e399
Information: Eppler E399 human powered aircraft airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 536: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 709: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.8924 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 4.981 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6081 %CLower nose radius: 1.2874 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.5934 degRelease Angle: 14.5573 degNose Incidence: 8.2369 degCamber deflection: 22.7942 deg
Table 710: Controlpoints1 00.79946 0.0399290.38619 -0.037580.16455 -0.037580.1629 -0.037580 -0.0334460 00 0.041570.16119 0.121030.37656 0.121030.4389 0.121030.62796 0.119831 0
Table 711: Base 64 representation:WkYGz4BLRQ-VH2A
Table 712: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.359 5.954 ectsRMS curvature error: 25.44 25.33 %CD error 2.7 3.7 dctsCm error 26 54 mctsUpper transition point -0.58 -2.26 %
Figure 537: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 538: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
183
Profile: e403
Information: Eppler E403 general purpose airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 539: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 713: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.848 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 3.2273 % @0.75CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.090138 %CLower nose radius: 1.0849 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.2558 degRelease Angle: 12.8395 degNose Incidence: -1.721 degCamber deflection: 11.1186 deg
Table 714: Controlpoints1 00.78839 0.0400290.65623 -0.0581530.32273 -0.0581530.25319 -0.0581530 -0.0422120 00 0.00558990.051998 0.0929390.47566 0.0929390.79499 0.0929390.94723 0.0141081 0
Table 715: Base 64 representation:E4emntOVgZQmF0A
Table 716: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.797 6.283 ectsRMS curvature error: 21.6 21.72 %CD error 1.2 1.3 dctsCm error 34 66 mctsUpper transition point -2.43 -3.18 %
Figure 540: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 541: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
184
Profile: e417
Information: Eppler E417 general purpose airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 542: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 717: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.1933 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 3.1038 % @0.76CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.16237 %CLower nose radius: 0.90705 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.7701 degRelease Angle: 18.3652 degNose Incidence: -1.7543 degCamber deflection: 16.6109 deg
Table 718: Controlpoints1 00.81861 0.0401480.60804 -0.0568730.36955 -0.0568730.18278 -0.0568730 -0.0329070 00 0.00860560.068417 0.0866490.48091 0.0866490.58571 0.0866490.82796 0.0774971 0
Table 719: Base 64 representation:G2fNkkgYYY4eN9A
Table 720: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.828 4.571 ectsRMS curvature error: 22.75 22.9 %CD error -1.2 -1.4 dctsCm error 19 3 mctsUpper transition point -2.12 -1.87 %
Figure 543: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 544: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
185
Profile: e422
Information: Eppler E422 high lift airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 545: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 721: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.9687 % @0.24CMaximum Camber: 7.1082 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.3674 %CLower nose radius: 6.0013 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.3923 degRelease Angle: 12.6554 degNose Incidence: 20.0345 degCamber deflection: 32.6899 deg
Table 722: Controlpoints1 00.32292 0.0409290.22292 -0.0217560.082488 -0.0217560.0017793 -0.0217560 -0.00865470 00 0.0546290.13294 0.138240.31223 0.138240.50385 0.138240.98553 0.00580171 0
Table 723: Base 64 representation:ZkUS6Z-FKJD3VzA
Table 724: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.303 5.2 ectsRMS curvature error: 55.82 55.94 %CD error -1 -0.9 dctsCm error -28 -10 mctsUpper transition point -2.03 -2.16 %
Figure 546: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 547: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
186
Profile: e426
Information: Eppler E426 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 548: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 725: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.845 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 0.56979 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6555 %CLower nose radius: 2.4191 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.2746 degRelease Angle: 1.7379 degNose Incidence: -2.9282 degCamber deflection: -1.1903 deg
Table 726: Controlpoints1 00.6756 -0.0107580.48286 -0.0503310.17289 -0.0503310.060904 -0.0503310 -0.0313410 00 0.0293860.078244 0.0584580.22861 0.0584580.44872 0.0584580.54326 0.0429751 0
Table 727: Base 64 representation:gpPSZnoLYV0nIiA
Table 728: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.687 7.957 ectsRMS curvature error: 35.4 37.27 %CD error -4 -4.3 dctsCm error 21 1 mctsUpper transition point 3.42 4.22 %
Figure 549: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 550: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
187
Profile: e428
Information: Eppler E428 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 551: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 729: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.1979 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 0.50069 % @0.52CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.044566 %CLower nose radius: 2.0757 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.9263 degRelease Angle: 1.7054 degNose Incidence: -4.2974 degCamber deflection: -2.592 deg
Table 730: Controlpoints1 00.73551 -0.00811680.41365 -0.0544150.17196 -0.0544150.096363 -0.0544150 -0.0365170 00 0.00116070.0045342 0.0580330.22671 0.0580330.45769 0.0580330.55769 0.0400081 0
Table 731: Base 64 representation:B-PTZqcLTXzsIiA
Table 732: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.725 4.271 ectsRMS curvature error: 41.39 39.09 %CD error -2.6 -3 dctsCm error -10 2 mctsUpper transition point 3.46 4.09 %
Figure 552: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 553: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
188
Profile: e431
Information: Eppler E431 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 554: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 733: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.1316 % @0.41CMaximum Camber: 4.2242 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3472 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.1913 degRelease Angle: 13.0692 degNose Incidence: 13.9904 degCamber deflection: 27.0596 deg
Table 734: Controlpoints1 00.85134 0.0221470.7573 -0.0337020.37384 -0.0337020 -0.0337020 -0.00694250 00 0.031490.11041 0.117810.41863 0.117810.48897 0.117810.64718 0.112361 0
Table 735: Base 64 representation:RubIxN YmO8mK0A
Table 736: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.159 5.104 ectsRMS curvature error: 24.63 24.7 %CD error -0.4 0.1 dctsCm error -19 2 mctsUpper transition point 2.86 -2.2 %
Figure 555: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 556: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
189
Profile: e432
Information: Eppler E432 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 557: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 737: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.9831 % @0.36CMaximum Camber: 4.4687 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.161 %CLower nose radius: 0.64345 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.0648 degRelease Angle: 11.9666 degNose Incidence: 17.2474 degCamber deflection: 29.2141 deg
Table 738: Controlpoints1 00.83586 0.0214180.76147 -0.0352410.37349 -0.0352410.18288 -0.0352410 -0.0277210 00 0.046620.15086 0.124610.36457 0.124610.42763 0.124610.58345 0.123381 0
Table 739: Base 64 representation:YlXG0xgYnP-rKyA
Table 740: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.899 4.28 ectsRMS curvature error: 26.55 26.97 %CD error 0.4 1 dctsCm error 23 50 mctsUpper transition point -2.34 -3.67 %
Figure 558: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 559: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
190
Profile: e433
Information: Eppler E433 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 560: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 741: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.2308 % @0.41CMaximum Camber: 3.9499 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1128 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.8253 degRelease Angle: 12.8808 degNose Incidence: 12.3609 degCamber deflection: 25.2416 deg
Table 742: Controlpoints1 00.81816 0.0222240.77695 -0.0319960.3742 -0.0319960.011226 -0.0319960 -0.00943840 00 0.0285910.11019 0.110520.42419 0.110520.55017 0.110520.71803 0.0959551 0
Table 743: Base 64 representation:RubOuT9YoO3zN0A
Table 744: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.127 3.743 ectsRMS curvature error: 24.93 24.89 %CD error 0.2 0 dctsCm error 24 33 mctsUpper transition point -1.93 -1.98 %
Figure 561: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 562: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
191
Profile: e434
Information: Eppler E434 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 563: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 745: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.3205 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 4.3207 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1651 %CLower nose radius: 2.8462 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.0852 degRelease Angle: 8.4131 degNose Incidence: 13.926 degCamber deflection: 22.3392 deg
Table 746: Controlpoints1 00.84516 0.00640990.84516 -0.0239640.28331 -0.0239640.0028104 -0.0239640 -0.00730250 00 0.0283240.10328 0.109750.41053 0.109750.5654 0.109750.7141 0.0737031 0
Table 747: Base 64 representation:QvaRuT-SxKq NtA
Table 748: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.599 3.757 ectsRMS curvature error: 28.56 28.08 %CD error 0 -0.2 dctsCm error 32 8 mctsUpper transition point -1.93 -1.3 %
Figure 564: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 565: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
192
Profile: e435
Information: Eppler E435 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 566: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 749: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.1505 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 4.3918 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4087 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 0.57296 degRelease Angle: 10.1977 degNose Incidence: 12.6764 degCamber deflection: 22.8741 deg
Table 750: Controlpoints1 00.79354 0.0360750.66134 -0.0400720.30936 -0.0400720 -0.0400720 -0.00480870 00 0.0321850.1103 0.123150.42594 0.123150.67779 0.123150.99678 0.000596251 0
Table 751: Base 64 representation:Rubc0I UgRBmBwA
Table 752: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.421 5.955 ectsRMS curvature error: 25.55 24.5 %CD error -2.1 -1.4 dctsCm error 19 35 mctsUpper transition point -2.21 -2.94 %
Figure 567: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 568: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
193
Profile: e471
Information: Eppler E471 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 569: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 753: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.3025 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.7036 % @0.52CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.48145 %CLower nose radius: 0.56069 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.4116 degRelease Angle: 15.2044 degNose Incidence: 8.9907 degCamber deflection: 24.1951 deg
Table 754: Controlpoints1 00.72965 0.0574570.13912 -0.00799010.043432 -0.00799010.0022641 -0.00799010 -0.00317590 00 0.0188890.11116 0.0753720.43838 0.0753720.70359 0.0753720.92451 0.0251271 0
Table 755: Base 64 representation:QvcegZ8DGDVUH4A
Table 756: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.946 4.727 ectsRMS curvature error: 28.58 29.45 %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %
Figure 570: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 571: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
194
Profile: e472
Information: Eppler E472 aerobatic aircraft airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 572: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 757: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.0956 % @0.18CMaximum Camber: 0.058049 % @0.76CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.904 %CLower nose radius: 3.0457 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.4834 degRelease Angle: 0.41407 degNose Incidence: -0.63635 degCamber deflection: -0.22229 deg
Table 758: Controlpoints1 00.94873 -0.0125460.35911 -0.060490.17462 -0.060490.017933 -0.060490 -0.00968910 00 0.00968890.017933 0.060490.17462 0.060490.35904 0.060490.94854 0.0125671 0
Table 759: Base 64 representation:K4LOaK4LOaNNfgA
Table 760: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.241 2.451 ectsRMS curvature error: 45.22 44.85 %CD error 0.2 0.4 dctsCm error 10 8 mctsUpper transition point 0.65 0.8 %
Figure 573: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 574: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
195
Profile: e473
Information: Eppler E473 aerobatic aircraft airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 575: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 761: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.1857 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 0.070905 % @0.77CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.4957 %CLower nose radius: 3.4957 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.6803 degRelease Angle: 0.49724 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: 0.49724 deg
Table 762: Controlpoints1 00.97555 -0.00743360.35965 -0.080950.21239 -0.080950.059483 -0.080950 -0.0238980 00 0.0238980.059483 0.080950.21239 0.080950.35958 0.080950.97521 0.00747971 0
Table 763: Base 64 representation:TtOMiTtOMiGGlgA
Table 764: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.077 5.962 ectsRMS curvature error: 65.82 67.7 %CD error -0.3 -0.6 dctsCm error 7 7 mctsUpper transition point 0.97 1.6 %
Figure 576: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 577: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
196
Profile: e474
Information: Eppler E474 aerobatic aircraft airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 578: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 765: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.0811 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 1.1006e-005 % @0.31CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.45891 %CLower nose radius: 0.45891 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.6449 degRelease Angle: 0.0001455 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: 0.0001455 deg
Table 766: Controlpoints1 00.68837 -0.0455860.31135 -0.070420.21517 -0.070420.016207 -0.070420 -0.00633740 00 0.00633740.016207 0.070420.21517 0.070420.3114 0.070420.68845 0.0455751 0
Table 767: Base 64 representation:G6OIeG6OIeooTgA
Table 768: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.156 4.26 ectsRMS curvature error: 49.4 51.62 %CD error -0.9 -1.2 dctsCm error 12 13 mctsUpper transition point 1.04 1.27 %
Figure 579: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 580: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
197
Profile: e475
Information: Eppler E475 aerobatic aircraft airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 581: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 769: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.9988 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 7.3343e-007 % @0.6CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.99937 %CLower nose radius: 0.99937 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 20.6642 degRelease Angle: -6.1749e-006 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: -6.1749e-006 deg
Table 770: Controlpoints1 00.68066 -0.058220.31521 -0.0750.21656 -0.0750.03637 -0.0750 -0.0155660 00 0.0155660.03637 0.0750.21656 0.0750.3152 0.0750.68065 0.058221 0
Table 771: Base 64 representation:N0OIgN0OIgxxXgA
Table 772: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.569 4.272 ectsRMS curvature error: 87.74 86.55 %CD error -0.2 -0.2 dctsCm error 18 17 mctsUpper transition point 1.11 1.25 %
Figure 582: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 583: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
198
Profile: e476
Information: Eppler E476 aerobatic aircraft airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 584: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 773: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.7273 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 0.075281 % @0.82CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.6425 %CLower nose radius: 0.6425 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.3936 degRelease Angle: 0.55766 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: 0.55766 deg
Table 774: Controlpoints1 00.77434 -0.0256060.60965 -0.083640.31687 -0.083640.09664 -0.083640 -0.0253890 00 0.0253890.09664 0.083640.31687 0.083640.60965 0.083640.77434 0.0256071 0
Table 775: Base 64 representation:TrUbjTrUbjkkOgA
Table 776: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.248 4.578 ectsRMS curvature error: 25.29 23.45 %CD error 0.3 0.7 dctsCm error 10 6 mctsUpper transition point -1.28 -1.3 %
Figure 585: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 586: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
199
Profile: e477
Information: Eppler E477 aerobatic aircraft airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 587: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 777: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.3532 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 0.066277 % @0.82CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.5801 %CLower nose radius: 0.5801 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.5981 degRelease Angle: 0.49174 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: 0.49174 deg
Table 778: Controlpoints1 00.77556 -0.0236180.56591 -0.076770.31651 -0.076770.073466 -0.076770 -0.0194810 00 0.0194810.073466 0.076770.31651 0.076770.56591 0.076770.77556 0.0236181 0
Table 779: Base 64 representation:QwUXgQwUXgggNgA
Table 780: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.258 3.654 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.2 0.5 dctsCm error 5 3 mctsUpper transition point -0.43 -0.43 %
Figure 588: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 589: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
200
Profile: e478
Information: Eppler E478 aerobatic aircraft airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 590: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 781: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.6959 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 0.058753 % @0.79CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0831 %CLower nose radius: 1.0831 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.8789 degRelease Angle: 0.42076 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: 0.42076 deg
Table 782: Controlpoints1 00.69068 -0.0331250.41558 -0.078480.25879 -0.078480.028279 -0.078480 -0.0122170 00 0.0122170.028279 0.078480.25879 0.078480.41561 0.078480.69094 0.0330921 0
Table 783: Base 64 representation:K4ROgK4ROghhOgA
Table 784: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.34 5.567 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.2 -0.3 dctsCm error 3 4 mctsUpper transition point -0.44 -0.37 %
Figure 591: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 592: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
201
Profile: e479
Information: Eppler E479 aerobatic aircraft airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 593: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 785: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.5671 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: -1.7264e-006 % @0.91CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2787 %CLower nose radius: 1.2787 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.132 degRelease Angle: -2.5828e-005 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: -2.5828e-005 deg
Table 786: Controlpoints1 00.70174 -0.0316960.42437 -0.082840.25734 -0.082840.046499 -0.082840 -0.0199090 00 0.0199090.046499 0.082840.25734 0.082840.42437 0.082840.70175 0.0316941 0
Table 787: Base 64 representation:PzQOiPzQOiggOgA
Table 788: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.965 4.369 ectsRMS curvature error: 37.36 38.71 %CD error -0.2 0.5 dctsCm error 3 5 mctsUpper transition point -0.01 -0.62 %
Figure 594: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 595: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
202
Profile: e502
Information: Eppler E502 general purpose airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 596: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 789: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.6852 % @0.44CMaximum Camber: 1.4825 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.6227 %CLower nose radius: 0.56164 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.4665 degRelease Angle: 2.2909 degNose Incidence: 5.1828 degCamber deflection: 7.4736 deg
Table 790: Controlpoints1 00.80744 -0.014960.71704 -0.0641490.47141 -0.0641490.20318 -0.0641490 -0.0275820 00 0.0209290.10552 0.0928990.43276 0.0928990.60968 0.0928990.72129 0.0442641 0
Table 791: Base 64 representation:OvcUncjeebtrPjA
Table 792: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.268 4.287 ectsRMS curvature error: 52.29 53.77 %CD error -0.7 -0.9 dctsCm error 6 -6 mctsUpper transition point -0.66 -0.18 %
Figure 597: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 598: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
203
Profile: e542
Information: Eppler E542 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 599: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 793: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.8771 % @0.42CMaximum Camber: 1.9322 % @0.3CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2469 %CLower nose radius: 0.45718 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.8117 degRelease Angle: 5.7895 degNose Incidence: 10.778 degCamber deflection: 16.5675 deg
Table 794: Controlpoints1 00.80113 -0.00561190.78393 -0.0678630.51272 -0.0678630.19482 -0.0678630 -0.0243680 00 0.0332650.13311 0.10250.39133 0.10250.48273 0.10250.59618 0.0946811 0
Table 795: Base 64 representation:VpZKrXngjs66RoA
Table 796: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.5 4.602 ectsRMS curvature error: 83.07 86.58 %CD error -0.7 -0.9 dctsCm error 56 77 mctsUpper transition point -0.17 -0.1 %
Figure 600: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 601: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
204
Profile: e543
Information: Eppler E543 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 602: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 797: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.281 % @0.42CMaximum Camber: 1.8766 % @0.29CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2671 %CLower nose radius: 0.53687 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.4296 degRelease Angle: 6.8434 degNose Incidence: 10.2916 degCamber deflection: 17.135 deg
Table 798: Controlpoints1 00.79998 0.000448980.75263 -0.0692630.45612 -0.0692630.22493 -0.0692630 -0.0283740 00 0.0334390.13237 0.104150.39354 0.104150.47957 0.104150.59643 0.0973231 0
Table 799: Base 64 representation:VpZJragsie7zPqA
Table 800: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.111 5.181 ectsRMS curvature error: 88.4 95.3 %CD error -0.9 -0.8 dctsCm error 37 41 mctsUpper transition point -0.25 -0.38 %
Figure 603: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 604: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
205
Profile: e544
Information: Eppler E544 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 605: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 801: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.5242 % @0.41CMaximum Camber: 1.8627 % @0.31CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2783 %CLower nose radius: 0.5217 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.3548 degRelease Angle: 7.2115 degNose Incidence: 10.275 degCamber deflection: 17.4864 deg
Table 802: Controlpoints1 00.78796 0.00197650.68796 -0.0700180.44905 -0.0700180.18838 -0.0700180 -0.0255960 00 0.0334520.13131 0.105630.39569 0.105630.47672 0.105630.59672 0.0997181 0
Table 803: Base 64 representation:UqZJsXksce7qPrA
Table 804: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.408 3.355 ectsRMS curvature error: 80.26 83.56 %CD error -0.3 -0.1 dctsCm error 38 58 mctsUpper transition point -0.53 -0.8 %
Figure 606: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 607: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
206
Profile: e545
Information: Eppler E545 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 608: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 805: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.448 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 1.7787 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1206 %CLower nose radius: 0.58565 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.9766 degRelease Angle: 7.0072 degNose Incidence: 9.5961 degCamber deflection: 16.6034 deg
Table 806: Controlpoints1 00.76468 0.00623980.65485 -0.0694620.39248 -0.0694620.1979 -0.0694620 -0.0277970 00 0.0280290.10516 0.105030.39595 0.105030.59676 0.105030.99597 0.000893621 0
Table 807: Base 64 representation:RuZVsagZceBrMqA
Table 808: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.332 4.907 ectsRMS curvature error: 43.16 42.85 %CD error -2.6 -2.4 dctsCm error 36 51 mctsUpper transition point 4.47 3.82 %
Figure 609: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 610: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
207
Profile: e546
Information: Eppler E546 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 611: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 809: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.2813 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 1.7993 % @0.27CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3341 %CLower nose radius: 0.47551 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.6246 degRelease Angle: 6.3036 degNose Incidence: 10.5922 degCamber deflection: 16.8957 deg
Table 810: Controlpoints1 00.77506 -3.4303e-0050.69327 -0.0658930.45223 -0.0658930.18129 -0.0658930 -0.0239730 00 0.0355240.14189 0.0980060.34386 0.0980060.41669 0.0980060.56212 0.0980061 0
Table 811: Base 64 representation:XlWHpXlscc uOpA
Table 812: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.951 3.673 ectsRMS curvature error: 42.84 41.5 %CD error -0.5 -0.4 dctsCm error 53 56 mctsUpper transition point -0.3 -0.45 %
Figure 612: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 613: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
208
Profile: e548
Information: Eppler E548 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 614: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 813: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.4304 % @0.36CMaximum Camber: 2.1083 % @0.27CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5067 %CLower nose radius: 0.66405 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.9135 degRelease Angle: 5.4113 degNose Incidence: 10.9252 degCamber deflection: 16.3365 deg
Table 814: Controlpoints1 00.79784 0.0010150.67995 -0.0682050.45171 -0.0682050.18958 -0.0682050 -0.0277350 00 0.0359730.12609 0.108190.33428 0.108190.42562 0.108190.52562 0.0920251 0
Table 815: Base 64 representation:VnVJtalcas2oMoA
Table 816: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.532 5.761 ectsRMS curvature error: 48.13 46.9 %CD error -0.4 -0.6 dctsCm error 47 52 mctsUpper transition point 0.21 0.63 %
Figure 615: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 616: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
209
Profile: e550
Information: Eppler E550 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 617: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 817: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.2171 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 2.2201 % @0.29CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6229 %CLower nose radius: 0.69196 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.5147 degRelease Angle: 7.2681 degNose Incidence: 11.4914 degCamber deflection: 18.7595 deg
Table 818: Controlpoints1 00.78794 0.00929880.58415 -0.0698310.38703 -0.0698310.17268 -0.0698310 -0.0282240 00 0.0371640.12766 0.112810.33977 0.112810.40638 0.112810.50115 0.106271 0
Table 819: Base 64 representation:VnWGvaiZVe7gLrA
Table 820: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.77 4.451 ectsRMS curvature error: 56.27 62.03 %CD error 0.5 0.4 dctsCm error 49 60 mctsUpper transition point -0.19 -0.33 %
Figure 618: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 619: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
210
Profile: e552
Information: Eppler E552 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 620: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 821: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.4691 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 2.5363 % @0.48CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6702 %CLower nose radius: 0.75124 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.27 degRelease Angle: 8.7648 degNose Incidence: 11.0333 degCamber deflection: 19.7981 deg
Table 822: Controlpoints1 00.78808 0.0171620.4877 -0.0682080.3244 -0.0682080.14103 -0.0682080 -0.0265770 00 0.0377660.12809 0.116640.34506 0.116640.38718 0.116640.4907 0.116641 0
Table 823: Base 64 representation:VnWExZjVPs aJtA
Table 824: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.694 3.706 ectsRMS curvature error: 78.44 72.56 %CD error 0.6 0.6 dctsCm error 47 55 mctsUpper transition point -0.52 -0.79 %
Figure 621: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 622: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
211
Profile: e554
Information: Eppler E554 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 623: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 825: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.1123 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 2.5872 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2375 %CLower nose radius: 0.92597 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.3174 degRelease Angle: 15.1684 degNose Incidence: 9.7871 degCamber deflection: 24.9554 deg
Table 826: Controlpoints1 00.79612 0.0268760.5112 -0.0674180.27395 -0.0674180.17052 -0.0674180 -0.0324450 00 0.0263530.084183 0.114960.3456 0.114960.48084 0.114960.96605 0.014291 0
Table 827: Base 64 representation:PvWNwfYSVsIbR3A
Table 828: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.319 4.915 ectsRMS curvature error: 57.61 58.08 %CD error 1.3 1.2 dctsCm error 0 20 mctsUpper transition point 0.56 -0.03 %
Figure 624: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 625: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
212
Profile: e556
Information: Eppler E556 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 626: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 829: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.9319 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.1109 % @0.64CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2559 %CLower nose radius: 0.78115 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 24.4233 degRelease Angle: 20.0535 degNose Incidence: 8.7103 degCamber deflection: 28.7638 deg
Table 830: Controlpoints1 00.76109 0.0329040.47733 -0.060110.26719 -0.060110.14762 -0.060110 -0.0277260 00 0.0282990.095648 0.101340.36288 0.101340.60923 0.101340.97528 0.0156071 0
Table 831: Base 64 representation:SuXZqesRSaKsb A
Table 832: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.828 4.575 ectsRMS curvature error: 53.58 52.96 %CD error 1.7 1.9 dctsCm error 55 52 mctsUpper transition point -1.88 -2.28 %
Figure 627: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 628: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
213
Profile: e557
Information: Eppler E557 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 629: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 833: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.9636 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.4304 % @0.61CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4183 %CLower nose radius: 0.79037 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 23.5937 degRelease Angle: 20.0535 degNose Incidence: 10.0877 degCamber deflection: 30.1413 deg
Table 834: Controlpoints1 00.73656 0.0382280.47313 -0.0558820.25863 -0.0558820.13792 -0.0558820 -0.0269570 00 0.0308740.10081 0.106550.3697 0.106550.61289 0.106550.96677 0.0206441 0
Table 835: Base 64 representation:TuYZsfeRTYMga A
Table 836: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.931 5.374 ectsRMS curvature error: 50.91 52.47 %CD error 1.2 0.4 dctsCm error 94 102 mctsUpper transition point -2.17 -1.25 %
Figure 630: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 631: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
214
Profile: e558
Information: Eppler E558 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 632: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 837: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.0359 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 3.7619 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.1804 %CLower nose radius: 0.0054948 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 20.8099 degRelease Angle: 15.9318 degNose Incidence: 20.0484 degCamber deflection: 35.9802 deg
Table 838: Controlpoints1 00.76041 0.0231830.36115 -0.0499460.2156 -0.0499460.020816 -0.0499460 -0.000873250 00 0.0533960.13447 0.113460.30568 0.113460.54028 0.113460.9666 0.0165321 0
Table 839: Base 64 representation:ejUWvB5OMVJYX5A
Table 840: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.718 6.984 ectsRMS curvature error: 42.42 42.79 %CD error 0.8 -0.2 dctsCm error 6 -9 mctsUpper transition point -1.45 0.17 %
Figure 633: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 634: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
215
Profile: e559
Information: Eppler E559 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 635: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 841: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.9745 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 4.2563 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.3014 %CLower nose radius: 0.70501 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 20.865 degRelease Angle: 17.8429 degNose Incidence: 14.3102 degCamber deflection: 32.1531 deg
Table 842: Controlpoints1 00.73872 0.0339810.37696 -0.0488530.1669 -0.0488530.066444 -0.0488530 -0.0176720 00 0.0425850.1182 0.116940.31462 0.116940.55698 0.116940.95679 0.0232451 0
Table 843: Base 64 representation:XnUXxXmLQVNbX8A
Table 844: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.886 3.421 ectsRMS curvature error: 49.49 49.5 %CD error 2.1 2.2 dctsCm error 30 19 mctsUpper transition point -2.6 -2.82 %
Figure 636: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 637: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
216
Profile: e560
Information: Eppler E560 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 638: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 845: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.0397 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 4.7741 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7093 %CLower nose radius: 1.246 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 20.7399 degRelease Angle: 20.0535 degNose Incidence: 8.917 degCamber deflection: 28.9706 deg
Table 846: Controlpoints1 00.74068 0.044250.33429 -0.0482150.1575 -0.0482150.066904 -0.0482150 -0.0235740 00 0.0355730.11105 0.12080.32322 0.12080.57217 0.12080.95075 0.0289231 0
Table 847: Base 64 representation:TpVYzfkKNVPZX A
Table 848: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.21 5.966 ectsRMS curvature error: 77.65 74.39 %CD error 0.8 0.3 dctsCm error 47 17 mctsUpper transition point -3.11 -1.7 %
Figure 639: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 640: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
217
Profile: e561
Information: Eppler E561 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 641: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 849: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.876 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 5.0077 % @0.48CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.733 %CLower nose radius: 1.6084 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 21.8828 degRelease Angle: 20.2228 degNose Incidence: 8.596 degCamber deflection: 28.8188 deg
Table 850: Controlpoints1 00.74005 0.0430270.35499 -0.0485070.15686 -0.0485070.090717 -0.0485070 -0.0309720 00 0.0357090.11037 0.128560.32087 0.128560.55927 0.128560.95905 0.0243221 0
Table 851: Base 64 representation:SpVW2obKPVMaY A
Table 852: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.689 4.437 ectsRMS curvature error: 50.75 50.08 %CD error 0.3 -0.3 dctsCm error 28 18 mctsUpper transition point -2.44 -1.28 %
Figure 642: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 643: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
218
Profile: e562
Information: Eppler E562 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 644: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 853: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.0684 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 3.9515 % @0.54CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.128 %CLower nose radius: 0.27367 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 19.7247 degRelease Angle: 18.8722 degNose Incidence: 14.7028 degCamber deflection: 33.5751 deg
Table 854: Controlpoints1 00.77594 0.0355270.38253 -0.0462970.21045 -0.0462970.035851 -0.0462970 -0.00808770 00 0.0425810.12781 0.108220.31889 0.108220.5822 0.108220.9502 0.0273011 0
Table 855: Base 64 representation:ZlUZtL0NOUQXW9A
Table 856: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.434 3.907 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.8 2.2 dctsCm error 24 37 mctsUpper transition point -3.37 -5.38 %
Figure 645: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 646: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
219
Profile: e580
Information: Eppler E580 general purpose airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 647: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 857: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.0665 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 4.2226 % @0.63CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6624 %CLower nose radius: 1.0046 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.5065 degRelease Angle: 16.2775 degNose Incidence: 11.1401 degCamber deflection: 27.4176 deg
Table 858: Controlpoints1 00.78021 0.044630.57832 -0.0449410.30762 -0.0449410.22237 -0.0449410 -0.033370 00 0.0322950.11508 0.116720.37462 0.116720.58931 0.116720.89218 0.0458721 0
Table 859: Base 64 representation:SrYWxvSUZTZgN7A
Table 860: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.574 3.844 ectsRMS curvature error: 24.82 24.87 %CD error 2.6 -2.4 dctsCm error -2 10 mctsUpper transition point 0.74 -0.79 %
Figure 648: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 649: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
220
Profile: e583
Information: Eppler E583 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 650: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 861: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.4779 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 4.4734 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3466 %CLower nose radius: 1.6712 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.8713 degRelease Angle: 11.4885 degNose Incidence: 14.6728 degCamber deflection: 26.1614 deg
Table 862: Controlpoints1 00.86235 0.0158120.82544 -0.0377380.38007 -0.0377380.0038007 -0.0377380 -0.00650720 00 0.0309310.10657 0.127110.40991 0.127110.4843 0.127110.59559 0.119211 0
Table 863: Base 64 representation:QuaI1L-YtQ7xLyA
Table 864: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.64 4.469 ectsRMS curvature error: 40.63 42.55 %CD error 0 0 dctsCm error 13 9 mctsUpper transition point -2.52 -2.76 %
Figure 651: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 652: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
221
Profile: e584
Information: Eppler E584 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 653: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 865: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.6148 % @0.41CMaximum Camber: 4.5031 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4189 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.7557 degRelease Angle: 11.0142 degNose Incidence: 15.1387 degCamber deflection: 26.1528 deg
Table 866: Controlpoints1 00.86417 0.012210.86417 -0.0380830.43588 -0.0380830 -0.0380830 -0.00715070 00 0.032320.11043 0.12810.40923 0.12810.45549 0.12810.57815 0.12811 0
Table 867: Base 64 representation:QuaF2M cwQ NxA
Table 868: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.147 5.21 ectsRMS curvature error: 51.4 51.56 %CD error 1.1 1.9 dctsCm error 30 46 mctsUpper transition point -4.69 -5.35 %
Figure 654: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 655: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
222
Profile: e587
Information: Eppler E587 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 656: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 869: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.6447 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 4.1893 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5798 %CLower nose radius: 0.46007 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 19.0401 degRelease Angle: 20.0535 degNose Incidence: 15.6221 degCamber deflection: 35.6757 deg
Table 870: Controlpoints1 00.81431 0.0345270.66002 -0.0428180.36098 -0.0428180.097876 -0.0428180 -0.0173260 00 0.0355480.11998 0.124290.42639 0.124290.67106 0.124290.98871 0.0064061 0
Table 871: Base 64 representation:Stbb0auXeSDiV A
Table 872: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.195 3.607 ectsRMS curvature error: 63.84 61.95 %CD error 0.7 0.9 dctsCm error 15 24 mctsUpper transition point -2.8 -3.45 %
Figure 657: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 658: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
223
Profile: e591
Information: Eppler E591 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 659: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 873: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.564 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 6.5886 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.6233 %CLower nose radius: 26.1472 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.8003 degRelease Angle: 20.0535 degNose Incidence: 21.8934 degCamber deflection: 41.947 deg
Table 874: Controlpoints1 00.72045 0.0653290.32632 -0.029350.13616 -0.029350.00048855 -0.029350 -0.00922830 00 0.0412310.070378 0.136990.33475 0.136990.57091 0.136990.91541 0.0430171 0
Table 875: Base 64 representation:TyVX5U JONUbP A
Table 876: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.576 8.687 ectsRMS curvature error: 42.96 43.15 %CD error -0.8 -1 dctsCm error 109 113 mctsUpper transition point -0.72 -1.28 %
Figure 660: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 661: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
224
Profile: e593
Information: Eppler E593 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 662: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 877: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.368 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.622 % @0.3CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.8067 %CLower nose radius: -2.0108 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.1089 degRelease Angle: 2.2306 degNose Incidence: 14.7377 degCamber deflection: 16.9683 deg
Table 878: Controlpoints1 00.21169 -0.00445610.13373 -0.0187270.083622 -0.0187270.00083622 -0.0187270 -0.003460 00 0.0401250.13367 0.102770.28427 0.102770.45848 0.102770.57163 0.0358581 0
Table 879: Base 64 representation:ZhSQrM-FDIy5GjA
Table 880: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.083 4.346 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0 0.3 dctsCm error -33 -25 mctsUpper transition point -1.14 -1.18 %
Figure 663: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 664: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
225
Profile: e598
Information: Eppler E598 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 665: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 881: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.2256 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.4652 % @0.31CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6263 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.5067 degRelease Angle: 2.2136 degNose Incidence: 14.2692 degCamber deflection: 16.4828 deg
Table 882: Controlpoints1 00.20039 -0.0075330.11803 -0.0190420.083493 -0.0190420.00083493 -0.0190420 -0.00344430 00 0.0351410.1139 0.100460.28789 0.100460.50506 0.100460.70088 0.0259961 0
Table 883: Base 64 representation:WmSUqM-FCIm5GjA
Table 884: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.367 4.783 ectsRMS curvature error: 61.05 62.44 %CD error 0.8 1.6 dctsCm error -42 -35 mctsUpper transition point -2.03 -3.33 %
Figure 666: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 667: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
226
Profile: e603
Information: Eppler E603 general purpose airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 668: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 885: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 19.0087 % @0.41CMaximum Camber: 3.5427 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.0898 %CLower nose radius: 0.43129 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.4315 degRelease Angle: 10.5002 degNose Incidence: 20.9449 degCamber deflection: 31.4451 deg
Table 886: Controlpoints1 00.80573 0.019680.7492 -0.0598160.43299 -0.0598160.13269 -0.0598160 -0.0195330 00 0.0579930.16327 0.130410.40013 0.130410.51063 0.130410.60259 0.108091 0
Table 887: Base 64 representation:claM3VrcjazxLwA
Table 888: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.321 8.665 ectsRMS curvature error: 55.94 59.91 %CD error NaN 2.6 dctsCm error NaN 26 mctsUpper transition point NaN -0.76 %
Figure 669: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 670: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
227
Profile: e604
Information: Eppler E604 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 671: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 889: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.7887 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 3.4243 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.2304 %CLower nose radius: 0.56113 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.0988 degRelease Angle: 12.4441 degNose Incidence: 16.2446 degCamber deflection: 28.6887 deg
Table 890: Controlpoints1 00.80708 0.0233270.68735 -0.0603430.37322 -0.0603430.14702 -0.0603430 -0.0234520 00 0.0471550.14954 0.127810.41174 0.127810.49878 0.127810.63423 0.11881 0
Table 891: Base 64 representation:YoaJ2ZmYga6mMzA
Table 892: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.26 6.526 ectsRMS curvature error: 26.37 26.6 %CD error 2 2.9 dctsCm error 38 55 mctsUpper transition point -1.51 -2.94 %
Figure 672: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 673: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
228
Profile: e625
Information: Eppler E625 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 674: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 893: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.1716 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 2.7905 % @0.2CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5724 %CLower nose radius: 0.612 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.2806 degRelease Angle: -1.6607 degNose Incidence: 21.3759 degCamber deflection: 19.7152 deg
Table 894: Controlpoints1 00.79792 -0.0369970.70674 -0.0429880.55001 -0.0429880.0055001 -0.0429880 -0.0130840 00 0.0196490.048249 0.092910.24998 0.092910.48812 0.092910.70761 0.0338391 0
Table 895: Base 64 representation:OzQUnT-iWSk2TsA
Table 896: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.064 6.33 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.2 1 dctsCm error -16 -18 mctsUpper transition point -1.03 -0.83 %
Figure 675: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 676: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
229
Profile: e635
Information: Eppler E635 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 677: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 897: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.8624 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 2.7175 % @0.23CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.2521 %CLower nose radius: 0.42107 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.6113 degRelease Angle: -4.0204 degNose Incidence: 18.4469 degCamber deflection: 14.4265 deg
Table 898: Controlpoints1 00.86204 -0.0326890.6347 -0.0361880.54352 -0.0361880.43984 -0.0361880 -0.0296460 00 0.0275230.073792 0.0861590.26146 0.0861590.41634 0.0861590.72773 0.0135151 0
Table 899: Base 64 representation:UtRNkzMiNPe5SXA
Table 900: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.119 4.774 ectsRMS curvature error: 64.9 66.66 %CD error -1.7 -2.2 dctsCm error 15 5 mctsUpper transition point 2.24 3.18 %
Figure 678: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 679: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
230
Profile: e636
Information: Eppler E636 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 680: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 901: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.9793 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 3.1452 % @0.24CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1099 %CLower nose radius: 0.31109 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.958 degRelease Angle: -3.0287 degNose Incidence: 16.5742 degCamber deflection: 13.5455 deg
Table 902: Controlpoints1 00.85338 -0.0285210.63529 -0.0320720.53565 -0.0320720.48072 -0.0320720 -0.0306830 00 0.0232750.073214 0.0910540.269 0.0910540.42519 0.0910540.69568 0.0263581 0
Table 903: Base 64 representation:QuROm8HhOOh4SbA
Table 904: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.687 4.619 ectsRMS curvature error: 53.9 53.08 %CD error -20.4 -19.9 dctsCm error 103 116 mctsUpper transition point 1.83 1.26 %
Figure 681: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 682: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
231
Profile: e637
Information: Eppler E637 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 683: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 905: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.2464 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 3.4698 % @0.26CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.86149 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.3568 degRelease Angle: -0.82565 degNose Incidence: 12.8494 degCamber deflection: 12.0237 deg
Table 906: Controlpoints1 00.82506 -0.0261570.62506 -0.0279230.47367 -0.0279230 -0.0279230 -0.0109970 00 0.0209930.076732 0.0958410.27618 0.0958410.42826 0.0958410.65092 0.0419511 0
Table 907: Base 64 representation:OtSNoZ eSMm7ReA
Table 908: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.485 4.851 ectsRMS curvature error: 93.07 Inf %CD error 6.8 -7.7 dctsCm error -18 25 mctsUpper transition point -1.55 2.36 %
Figure 684: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 685: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
232
Profile: e638
Information: Eppler E638 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 686: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 909: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.4456 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 4.3711 % @0.27CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.7543 %CLower nose radius: 0.12687 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.251 degRelease Angle: 1.8678 degNose Incidence: 26.5125 degCamber deflection: 28.3803 deg
Table 910: Controlpoints1 00.79066 -0.0192640.69066 -0.0204820.51853 -0.0204820.47221 -0.0204820 -0.0187560 00 0.045910.11479 0.105850.28414 0.105850.41442 0.105850.59721 0.0637471 0
Table 911: Base 64 representation:clSMs6GgXJr7QiA
Table 912: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.143 5.416 ectsRMS curvature error: 74.76 78.52 %CD error -0.8 -0.7 dctsCm error 5 9 mctsUpper transition point 2.22 1.86 %
Figure 687: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 688: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
233
Profile: e639
Information: Eppler E639 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 689: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 913: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.6396 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 4.7637 % @0.29CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.1622 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.2658 degRelease Angle: 3.439 degNose Incidence: 22.6124 degCamber deflection: 26.0514 deg
Table 914: Controlpoints1 00.79019 -0.0135450.70798 -0.0161530.51037 -0.0161530 -0.0161530 -0.010060 00 0.0391410.10629 0.110830.29167 0.110830.38737 0.110830.51059 0.0913431 0
Table 915: Base 64 representation:XoTJun gaH01QlA
Table 916: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.102 4.638 ectsRMS curvature error: 87.36 88.6 %CD error 0.9 0.2 dctsCm error 15 9 mctsUpper transition point 1.61 2.78 %
Figure 690: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 691: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
234
Profile: e642
Information: Eppler E642 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 692: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 917: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.0837 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 3.0308 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.78371 %CLower nose radius: 0.80989 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.1881 degRelease Angle: 6.8265 degNose Incidence: 6.7684 degCamber deflection: 13.5949 deg
Table 918: Controlpoints1 00.86902 0.00510630.86769 -0.0451310.40408 -0.0451310.35719 -0.0451310 -0.0434160 00 0.0241080.11124 0.105720.39424 0.105720.57749 0.105720.6273 0.0752891 0
Table 919: Base 64 representation:PtZTs9HaxT3-KqA
Table 920: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.473 5.723 ectsRMS curvature error: 75.88 73.39 %CD error -5.2 -4.5 dctsCm error 7 16 mctsUpper transition point -1.02 -1.58 %
Figure 693: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 694: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
235
Profile: e654
Information: Eppler E654 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 695: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 921: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.1649 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 4.9002 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.2756 %CLower nose radius: 0.8283 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.5786 degRelease Angle: 13.0325 degNose Incidence: 16.6443 degCamber deflection: 29.6769 deg
Table 922: Controlpoints1 00.82128 0.0290850.72128 -0.039730.26246 -0.039730.1307 -0.039730 -0.0268650 00 0.0447220.13184 0.134030.4167 0.134030.55286 0.134030.64546 0.107191 0
Table 923: Base 64 representation:VrbP4qgRnRyoI0A
Table 924: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.21 3.393 ectsRMS curvature error: 40.72 39.54 %CD error 0 -0.2 dctsCm error 20 14 mctsUpper transition point -1.73 -1.52 %
Figure 696: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 697: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
236
Profile: e655
Information: Eppler E655 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 698: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 925: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.3722 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 3.9397 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6311 %CLower nose radius: 1.1655 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.2633 degRelease Angle: 9.7926 degNose Incidence: 10.141 degCamber deflection: 19.9336 deg
Table 926: Controlpoints1 00.79703 0.0165480.72419 -0.0486470.32264 -0.0486470.11519 -0.0486470 -0.0299170 00 0.0366310.1234 0.125830.40804 0.125830.58128 0.125830.66885 0.0882631 0
Table 927: Base 64 representation:TsaT1moVlVyuLvA
Table 928: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.283 6.031 ectsRMS curvature error: 32.41 28.71 %CD error 1.3 1.1 dctsCm error 36 61 mctsUpper transition point -1.3 -1.67 %
Figure 699: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 700: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
237
Profile: e656
Information: Eppler E656 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 701: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 929: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.2437 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 4.8117 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.9021 %CLower nose radius: 0.80307 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.3901 degRelease Angle: 12.106 degNose Incidence: 15.0501 degCamber deflection: 27.1562 deg
Table 930: Controlpoints1 00.87069 0.0202750.75133 -0.0349170.26961 -0.0349170.20101 -0.0349170 -0.0330240 00 0.041490.13575 0.128970.41419 0.128970.58917 0.128970.6729 0.0894921 0
Table 931: Base 64 representation:VqbT28QRpPygHzA
Table 932: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.191 3.762 ectsRMS curvature error: 31.85 30.9 %CD error -0.6 -1.1 dctsCm error 10 -11 mctsUpper transition point -1.04 -0.43 %
Figure 702: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 703: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
238
Profile: e657
Information: Eppler E657 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 704: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 933: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.6331 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 4.6225 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6781 %CLower nose radius: 0.78706 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.9871 degRelease Angle: 12.551 degNose Incidence: 13.5844 degCamber deflection: 26.1354 deg
Table 934: Controlpoints1 00.87669 0.0207620.74974 -0.0339990.26991 -0.0339990.026991 -0.0339990 -0.0119010 00 0.0392510.13771 0.123850.41891 0.123850.63674 0.123850.71517 0.079231 0
Table 935: Base 64 representation:UqbY0W5RpPxgHzA
Table 936: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.708 5.665 ectsRMS curvature error: 33.44 34 %CD error -0.6 -0.8 dctsCm error 10 -1 mctsUpper transition point -0.59 -0.53 %
Figure 705: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 706: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
239
Profile: e662
Information: Eppler E662 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 707: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 937: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.0057 % @0.41CMaximum Camber: 4.1062 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3247 %CLower nose radius: 1.3244 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.4782 degRelease Angle: 14.7445 degNose Incidence: 10.6988 degCamber deflection: 25.4433 deg
Table 938: Controlpoints1 00.86732 0.0270070.83885 -0.035120.32061 -0.035120.0094046 -0.035120 -0.00911250 00 0.0355850.14338 0.11570.42776 0.11570.65477 0.11570.74962 0.0812761 0
Table 939: Base 64 representation:UqbZwR9VwPt0H3A
Table 940: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.325 5.727 ectsRMS curvature error: 53.38 54.44 %CD error -1.9 -1.7 dctsCm error 20 53 mctsUpper transition point -2.15 -2.65 %
Figure 708: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 709: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
240
Profile: e664
Information: Eppler E664 variable geometry sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 710: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 941: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.6073 % @0.42CMaximum Camber: 2.6368 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.95706 %CLower nose radius: 1.1129 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.6783 degRelease Angle: 9.6388 degNose Incidence: 4.1332 degCamber deflection: 13.772 deg
Table 942: Controlpoints1 00.82954 0.0143130.82139 -0.0570030.44556 -0.0570030.43357 -0.0570030 -0.0564240 00 0.0299450.14054 0.109270.40688 0.109270.64027 0.109270.74027 0.0670651 0
Table 943: Base 64 representation:SpaZu-CsqYt8LvA
Table 944: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.554 7.651 ectsRMS curvature error: 41.19 41.11 %CD error -1.5 -0.9 dctsCm error 18 11 mctsUpper transition point -0.88 -0.98 %
Figure 711: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 712: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
241
Profile: e668
Information: Eppler E668 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 713: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 945: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.9895 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 3.9109 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1934 %CLower nose radius: 1.1478 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.122 degRelease Angle: 12.7308 degNose Incidence: 10.9479 degCamber deflection: 23.6787 deg
Table 946: Controlpoints1 00.83791 0.0215060.74848 -0.0330650.27361 -0.0330650.023512 -0.0330650 -0.00902070 00 0.0356250.14029 0.108360.42218 0.108360.68056 0.108360.76158 0.0654541 0
Table 947: Base 64 representation:VqbstR6SpOvoJyA
Table 948: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.079 3.764 ectsRMS curvature error: 29.09 30.79 %CD error 0.4 0.5 dctsCm error 35 31 mctsUpper transition point -2.44 -1.86 %
Figure 714: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 715: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
242
Profile: e682
Information: Eppler E682 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 716: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 949: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.2931 % @0.42CMaximum Camber: 2.9354 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.83032 %CLower nose radius: 0.83956 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.8593 degRelease Angle: 7.7029 degNose Incidence: 5.6696 degCamber deflection: 13.3725 deg
Table 950: Controlpoints1 00.87116 0.00849720.85925 -0.0473520.454 -0.0473520.34671 -0.0473520 -0.0437630 00 0.0276120.13773 0.105760.40324 0.105760.68507 0.105760.7539 0.0506641 0
Table 951: Base 64 representation:Rpaes6PsvUx6JsA
Table 952: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.049 4.98 ectsRMS curvature error: 89.62 90.2 %CD error 4.9 -4.7 dctsCm error -15 9 mctsUpper transition point 2.23 -1.99 %
Figure 717: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 718: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
243
Profile: e694
Information: Eppler E694 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 719: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 953: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.4424 % @0.43CMaximum Camber: 4.8784 % @0.58CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.59763 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.4588 degRelease Angle: 16.0492 degNose Incidence: 4.7981 degCamber deflection: 20.8473 deg
Table 954: Controlpoints1 00.84246 0.0402150.80132 -0.0345260.25315 -0.0345260 -0.0345260 -0.00744270 00 0.0219460.12089 0.123990.49806 0.123990.78561 0.123990.97059 0.00942921 0
Table 955: Base 64 representation:Lvgk0O QuPJyE5A
Table 956: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.76 5.156 ectsRMS curvature error: 60.98 59.89 %CD error -6.3 -6.8 dctsCm error -40 -55 mctsUpper transition point 5.07 5.38 %
Figure 720: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 721: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
244
Profile: e715
Information: Eppler E715 tailplane airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 722: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 957: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.0309 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 2.8042 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3862 %CLower nose radius: 0.62166 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.196 degRelease Angle: 2.6048 degNose Incidence: 9.1654 degCamber deflection: 11.7702 deg
Table 958: Controlpoints1 00.5556 -0.00770450.46628 -0.0501730.24853 -0.0501730.087402 -0.0501730 -0.0190320 00 0.0360850.14091 0.101540.33114 0.101540.52888 0.101540.66042 0.0369081 0
Table 959: Base 64 representation:XkVTqYoQTVt0IjA
Table 960: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.295 5.485 ectsRMS curvature error: 54.14 54.52 %CD error 1.1 1 dctsCm error -34 -11 mctsUpper transition point -1 -1.26 %
Figure 723: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 724: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
245
Profile: e748
Information: Eppler E748 sailplane airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 725: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 961: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 19.6781 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.5304 % @0.57CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.2442 %CLower nose radius: 1.6163 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.0649 degRelease Angle: 18.7652 degNose Incidence: 11.4413 degCamber deflection: 30.2065 deg
Table 962: Controlpoints1 00.75076 0.0494990.42175 -0.0636650.24342 -0.0636650.14681 -0.0636650 -0.0397730 00 0.0401530.10776 0.135420.3154 0.135420.51605 0.135420.92096 0.039061 0
Table 963: Base 64 representation:TpUT5nZQPbScR9A
Table 964: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.784 5.561 ectsRMS curvature error: 38.75 40.14 %CD error 2.3 2.6 dctsCm error 31 39 mctsUpper transition point -2.14 -2.92 %
Figure 726: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 727: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
246
Profile: e793
Information: N/AEppler E793 general purpose airfoil (gyroflugspeed canard canard)Reference: UIUC
Figure 728: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 965: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.6607 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.1351 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.6588 %CLower nose radius: 1.3026 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.9076 degRelease Angle: 15.2339 degNose Incidence: 14.5962 degCamber deflection: 29.8301 deg
Table 966: Controlpoints1 00.78409 0.0275830.38887 -0.0430620.21354 -0.0430620.21354 -0.0430620 -0.041770 00 0.0443520.11098 0.116330.30914 0.116330.55962 0.116330.96624 0.0144621 0
Table 967: Base 64 representation:YoUXx9AOOSIXS4A
Table 968: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.346 5.464 ectsRMS curvature error: 30.69 31.18 %CD error 3.2 3.7 dctsCm error 8 -9 mctsUpper transition point -1.21 -0.63 %
Figure 729: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 730: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
247
Profile: e817
Information: Eppler E817 hydrofoilReference: UIUC
Figure 731: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 969: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.035 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 2.8812 % @0.68CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.45755 %CLower nose radius: 0.27915 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.7895 degRelease Angle: 12.6951 degNose Incidence: 1.5537 degCamber deflection: 14.2489 deg
Table 970: Controlpoints1 00.83328 0.0287980.46246 -0.0444820.23587 -0.0444820.069868 -0.0444820 -0.0114030 00 0.0235520.18185 0.0733970.47424 0.0733970.65317 0.0733970.77119 0.0638421 0
Table 971: Base 64 representation:VmeWfQsPTT3UG0A
Table 972: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.542 3.082 ectsRMS curvature error: 17.93 18.13 %CD error 0.3 -0.3 dctsCm error -2 -4 mctsUpper transition point -0.01 0.22 %
Figure 732: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 733: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
248
Profile: e836
Information: Eppler E836 hydrofoilReference: UIUC
Figure 734: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 973: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.6396 % @0.43CMaximum Camber: -1.0511e-006 % @0.67CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.37976 %CLower nose radius: 0.37976 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.4629 degRelease Angle: -6.2193e-006 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: -6.2193e-006 deg
Table 974: Controlpoints1 00.82365 -0.0161460.65633 -0.06320.42784 -0.06320.090605 -0.06320 -0.0151460 00 0.0151460.090605 0.06320.42784 0.06320.65633 0.06320.82365 0.0161461 0
Table 975: Base 64 representation:PxbabPxbabggMgA
Table 976: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.955 1.182 ectsRMS curvature error: 23.7 24.25 %CD error NaN 0.5 dctsCm error NaN 9 mctsUpper transition point NaN -0.41 %
Figure 735: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 736: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
249
Profile: e837
Information: Eppler E837 hydrofoilReference: UIUC
Figure 737: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 977: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.106 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: 8.423e-007 % @0.92CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.75337 %CLower nose radius: 0.75337 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.1391 degRelease Angle: 1.4002e-005 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: 1.4002e-005 deg
Table 978: Controlpoints1 00.75735 -0.0236620.59753 -0.080530.36943 -0.080530.12886 -0.080530 -0.025440 00 0.025440.12886 0.080530.36943 0.080530.59753 0.080530.75734 0.0236621 0
Table 979: Base 64 representation:UpYXhUpYXhmmMgA
Table 980: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.225 5.268 ectsRMS curvature error: 19.14 19.8 %CD error 0 -0.6 dctsCm error 5 4 mctsUpper transition point 0.18 1.01 %
Figure 738: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 739: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
250
Profile: e838
Information: Eppler E838 hydrofoilReference: UIUC
Figure 740: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 981: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.3675 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: -3.1461e-005 % @0.79CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.96227 %CLower nose radius: 0.96227 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.5673 degRelease Angle: -0.00017386 degNose Incidence: -1.9372e-005 degCamber deflection: -0.00019323 deg
Table 982: Controlpoints1 00.73439 -0.0292480.63876 -0.091840.37177 -0.091840.19576 -0.091840 -0.0354380 00 0.0354380.19576 0.091840.37177 0.091840.63876 0.091840.73439 0.0292461 0
Table 983: Base 64 representation:ZeYbmZeYbmuuOgA
Table 984: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.493 4.196 ectsRMS curvature error: 29.61 29.3 %CD error -0.1 -0.4 dctsCm error 8 8 mctsUpper transition point -1.09 -0.63 %
Figure 741: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 742: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
251
Profile: e851
Information: Eppler E851 propeller airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 743: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 985: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.039 % @0.36CMaximum Camber: 2.2669 % @0.65CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.39918 %CLower nose radius: 0.19014 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.461 degRelease Angle: 9.0981 degNose Incidence: 3.9353 degCamber deflection: 13.0334 deg
Table 986: Controlpoints1 00.79096 0.0159660.49906 -0.0314210.29575 -0.0314210.073223 -0.0314210 -0.00963420 00 0.0214830.17342 0.0622310.4684 0.0622310.54298 0.0622310.74719 0.0622311 0
Table 987: Base 64 representation:WneJbUvTSN bLuA
Table 988: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.8 5.41 ectsRMS curvature error: 26.03 25.47 %CD error -0.1 -0.1 dctsCm error 17 4 mctsUpper transition point -0.07 0.19 %
Figure 744: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 745: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
252
Profile: e852
Information: Eppler E852 propeller airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 746: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 989: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.0587 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 2.7449 % @0.59CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.49929 %CLower nose radius: 0.15367 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.3838 degRelease Angle: 12.5543 degNose Incidence: 5.862 degCamber deflection: 18.4162 deg
Table 990: Controlpoints1 00.794 0.0193360.48725 -0.031340.28915 -0.031340.042363 -0.031340 -0.00658790 00 0.0223560.15015 0.0730860.46796 0.0730860.68283 0.0730860.97163 0.0101851 0
Table 991: Base 64 representation:UqeafN2TSNJaQzA
Table 992: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.602 3.637 ectsRMS curvature error: 39.07 41.05 %CD error 0.4 0.1 dctsCm error 9 11 mctsUpper transition point -1.58 -1.15 %
Figure 747: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 748: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
253
Profile: e853
Information: Eppler E853 propeller airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 749: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 993: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.7248 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 2.8635 % @0.58CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.44709 %CLower nose radius: 0.95534 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.2864 degRelease Angle: 11.7462 degNose Incidence: -0.15402 degCamber deflection: 11.5922 deg
Table 994: Controlpoints1 00.79088 0.0240680.48254 -0.0352240.28146 -0.0352240.080512 -0.0352240 -0.0148040 00 0.0264870.16377 0.0844980.41769 0.0844980.63912 0.0844980.96764 0.0134051 0
Table 995: Base 64 representation:UmbYjbtSSPKaS2A
Table 996: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 ·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.466 2.577 ectsRMS curvature error: 57.36 57.99 %CD error 0.6 0.5 dctsCm error 3 10 mctsUpper transition point -1.28 -1.16 %
Figure 750: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 751: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
254
Profile: e854
Information: Eppler E854 propeller airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 752: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 997: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.4837 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 3.1656 % @0.57CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.60085 %CLower nose radius: 0.7353 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.1236 degRelease Angle: 12.6034 degNose Incidence: 3.991 degCamber deflection: 16.5945 deg
Table 998: Controlpoints1 00.77386 0.0222070.48595 -0.0399150.27571 -0.0399150.08327 -0.0399150 -0.0160330 00 0.0332370.16638 0.0964160.36739 0.0964160.59692 0.0964160.95806 0.0201421 0
Table 999: Base 64 representation:WiYXoasSTRNcW4A
Table 1000: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.839 3.516 ectsRMS curvature error: 43.33 44.67 %CD error 0.6 0.1 dctsCm error 19 13 mctsUpper transition point -2.23 -1.15 %
Figure 753: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 754: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
255
Profile: e856
Information: Eppler E856 propeller airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 755: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1001: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.0511 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 4.1759 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3799 %CLower nose radius: 1.223 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 25.5728 degRelease Angle: 16.8649 degNose Incidence: 9.6367 degCamber deflection: 26.5017 deg
Table 1002: Controlpoints1 00.73583 0.0188370.46776 -0.0536520.25834 -0.0536520.14926 -0.0536520 -0.0348850 00 0.0309160.1039 0.129570.36174 0.129570.50989 0.129570.93229 0.0385451 0
Table 1003: Base 64 representation:PtXP2pbRSXTgs6A
Table 1004: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.275 4.723 ectsRMS curvature error: 38.29 39.56 %CD error 0 -0.3 dctsCm error 40 61 mctsUpper transition point 0.4 0.19 %
Figure 756: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 757: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
256
Profile: e857
Information: Eppler E857 propeller airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 758: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1005: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 20.3356 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 4.827 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 4.6165 %CLower nose radius: 0.5598 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 32.3019 degRelease Angle: 19.9667 degNose Incidence: 25.2762 degCamber deflection: 45.2429 deg
Table 1006: Controlpoints1 00.71664 0.0188990.46478 -0.0565980.24865 -0.0565980.08585 -0.0565980 -0.0184650 00 0.0696060.15742 0.148260.31485 0.148260.51948 0.148260.95126 0.0355631 0
Table 1007: Base 64 representation:egUT-VpQSYPhj A
Table 1008: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.908 6.74 ectsRMS curvature error: 47.08 45.29 %CD error 0.4 0.5 dctsCm error 105 93 mctsUpper transition point -2.22 -2.58 %
Figure 759: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 760: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
257
Profile: e874
Information: Eppler E874 hydrofoilReference: UIUC
Figure 761: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1009: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.8914 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 0.89093 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.2132 %CLower nose radius: 0.30403 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 57.2958 degRelease Angle: 10.1855 degNose Incidence: -2.2629 degCamber deflection: 7.9226 deg
Table 1010: Controlpoints1 00.97627 -0.00792140.37151 -0.0316860.20663 -0.0316860.03144 -0.0316860 -0.00798270 00 0.0139090.1361 0.0480880.28781 0.0480880.46706 0.0480880.99401 0.0048221 0
Table 1011: Base 64 representation:ThSQVQ1NNOGQ wA
Table 1012: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.849 6.555 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1 -9.1 dctsCm error 45 28 mctsUpper transition point -5.06 14.84 %
Figure 762: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 763: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
258
Profile: e1098
Information: Eppler E1098 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 764: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1013: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 19.027 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 3.6806 % @0.55CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4949 %CLower nose radius: 0.62768 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.2101 degRelease Angle: 10.7745 degNose Incidence: 11.3328 degCamber deflection: 22.1073 deg
Table 1014: Controlpoints1 00.80159 0.0214470.53405 -0.0626160.36936 -0.0626160.13161 -0.0626160 -0.0234680 00 0.0392570.15464 0.128190.41054 0.128190.57369 0.128190.67369 0.0897561 0
Table 1015: Base 64 representation:UnaS2YoYRbwbKwA
Table 1016: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.635 6.588 ectsRMS curvature error: 32.95 30.18 %CD error 0 0 dctsCm error 23 59 mctsUpper transition point -0.06 -0.64 %
Figure 765: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 766: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
259
Profile: e1200
Information: Eppler E1200 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 767: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1017: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.9249 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: 3.5095 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.8003 %CLower nose radius: 1.1965 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.6207 degRelease Angle: 10.6589 degNose Incidence: 13.1915 degCamber deflection: 23.8504 deg
Table 1018: Controlpoints1 00.79749 0.0189590.69155 -0.0513310.32296 -0.0513310.23862 -0.0513310 -0.0436280 00 0.0275380.063185 0.118690.40767 0.118690.57888 0.118690.67813 0.0921071 0
Table 1019: Base 64 representation:P1aSy1RViWwpMwA
Table 1020: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.534 4.366 ectsRMS curvature error: 70.43 72.82 %CD error -1.6 -1.3 dctsCm error 21 35 mctsUpper transition point -1.38 -1.74 %
Figure 768: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 769: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
260
Profile: e1210
Information: Eppler E1210 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 770: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1021: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.8942 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 5.183 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.6704 %CLower nose radius: 2.5563 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.1293 degRelease Angle: 7.6243 degNose Incidence: 15.4776 degCamber deflection: 23.1019 deg
Table 1022: Controlpoints1 00.66596 0.0149330.21259 -0.0377610.090536 -0.0377610.076592 -0.0377610 -0.0361290 00 0.0460980.086845 0.128860.24911 0.128860.37717 0.128860.47151 0.118991 0
Table 1023: Base 64 representation:XpQL28KGJQ6bLrA
Table 1024: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.172 3.385 ectsRMS curvature error: 46.9 43.88 %CD error 3 2.4 dctsCm error 39 58 mctsUpper transition point -5.12 -4.57 %
Figure 771: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 772: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
261
Profile: e1211
Information: Eppler E1211 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 773: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1025: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.8356 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 4.4099 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6281 %CLower nose radius: 2.402 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.2644 degRelease Angle: 7.4949 degNose Incidence: 13.1112 degCamber deflection: 20.6061 deg
Table 1026: Controlpoints1 00.69006 0.0154990.28028 -0.0561590.12741 -0.0561590.079956 -0.0561590 -0.0357820 00 0.018170.030418 0.130010.28774 0.130010.46956 0.130010.9947 0.00113981 0
Table 1027: Base 64 representation:J4SQ2oYILYBcKrA
Table 1028: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.245 9.174 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.5 -0.2 dctsCm error 41 50 mctsUpper transition point 2.37 1.24 %
Figure 774: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 775: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
262
Profile: e1212
Information: Eppler E1212 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 776: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1029: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.6421 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 3.2327 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4407 %CLower nose radius: 1.8946 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.1182 degRelease Angle: 5.0066 degNose Incidence: 11.1445 degCamber deflection: 16.1511 deg
Table 1030: Controlpoints1 00.71115 -0.00278540.2777 -0.062470.1791 -0.062470.051939 -0.062470 -0.0256130 00 0.0164570.028198 0.117560.27463 0.117560.40541 0.117560.5987 0.0748521 0
Table 1031: Base 64 representation:J4SMxasLIbqaMnA
Table 1032: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.156 5.495 ectsRMS curvature error: 39.76 39.44 %CD error -3.5 -3.8 dctsCm error 13 -7 mctsUpper transition point 4.26 5.68 %
Figure 777: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 778: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
263
Profile: e1212mod
Information: Eppler E1212 general aviation airfoil (as modified foruse as Quickie wing airfoil)Reference: UIUC
Figure 779: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1033: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.7579 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 2.5911 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.35939 %CLower nose radius: 20.6027 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.1383 degRelease Angle: 2.3515 degNose Incidence: -17.2469 degCamber deflection: -14.8954 deg
Table 1034: Controlpoints1 00.41171 -0.0382250.29549 -0.0694180.14956 -0.0694180.0034898 -0.0694180 -0.0218940 00 0.0108760.049366 0.111310.2507 0.111310.44954 0.111310.63016 0.054751 0
Table 1035: Base 64 representation:GyQRuU-KLeq0OjA
Table 1036: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.824 11.096 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.6 -0.9 dctsCm error 9 -7 mctsUpper transition point -0.72 -1.06 %
Figure 780: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 781: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
264
Profile: e1213
Information: Eppler E1213 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 782: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1037: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.3463 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 2.0805 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: NaN %CLower nose radius: 2.3244 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.6486 degRelease Angle: 1.4126 degNose Incidence: 10.1419 degCamber deflection: 11.5545 deg
Table 1038: Controlpoints1 00.59131 -0.0315310.31085 -0.0689150.19615 -0.0689150.12554 -0.0689150 -0.0441060 00 00 0.105930.26177 0.105930.42272 0.105930.69047 0.0393051 0
Table 1039: Base 64 representation:A ROsoXNJshlNiA
Table 1040: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.291 7.438 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.6 -3.5 dctsCm error 7 -11 mctsUpper transition point 4.14 4.86 %
Figure 783: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 784: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
265
Profile: e1214
Information: Eppler E1214 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 785: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1041: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 19.8279 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 2.142 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.041 %CLower nose radius: 1.9082 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.9828 degRelease Angle: 1.7735 degNose Incidence: 10.8824 degCamber deflection: 12.6559 deg
Table 1042: Controlpoints1 00.56496 -0.0435610.35149 -0.0785740.23914 -0.0785740.095552 -0.0785740 -0.0348650 00 0.0256190.048235 0.11990.2617 0.11990.41555 0.11990.6381 0.0590361 0
Table 1043: Base 64 representation:OzRNyclPJhnqRiA
Table 1044: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.536 4.675 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.6 -2.5 dctsCm error 1 -20 mctsUpper transition point 3.3 3.73 %
Figure 786: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 787: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
266
Profile: e1230
Information: Eppler E1230 general aviation airfoil (Long-EZ andDefiant wing airfoil)Reference: UIUC
Figure 788: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1045: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.4633 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 3.5999 % @0.27CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.02 %CUpper nose radius: 2.3072 %CLower nose radius: -9.0651 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 29.4743 degRelease Angle: 11.3468 degNose Incidence: 15.0769 degCamber deflection: 26.4237 deg
Table 1046: Controlpoints1 -0.00010.64565 -0.0228720.56728 -0.051620.3261 -0.051620 -0.051620 -0.00716780 00 0.0362130.085255 0.123250.2819 0.123250.495 0.123250.9536 0.0231041 0.0001
Table 1047: Base 64 representation:TsST0J VXWMzhxA
Table 1048: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.455 6.487 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.5 1.1 dctsCm error -37 -22 mctsUpper transition point -0.2 -0.5 %
Figure 789: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 790: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
267
Profile: e1233
Information: Eppler E1233 general aviation airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 791: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1049: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.9382 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 4.3938 % @0.29CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.1897 %CLower nose radius: 1.2658 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 25.4584 degRelease Angle: 18.4608 degNose Incidence: 19.5588 degCamber deflection: 38.0196 deg
Table 1050: Controlpoints1 00.79806 0.0202680.70811 -0.0509270.32603 -0.0509270.20325 -0.0509270 -0.0414150 00 0.0463620.10108 0.13860.29843 0.13860.51263 0.13860.94058 0.0359731 0
Table 1051: Base 64 representation:VpTU6zYVjWRrc9A
Table 1052: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.009 4.483 ectsRMS curvature error: 40.71 40.24 %CD error 0.4 0.8 dctsCm error 37 28 mctsUpper transition point -1.47 -2.09 %
Figure 792: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 793: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
268
Profile: ea61012
Information: Eppler EA 6(-1)-012 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 794: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1053: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: -0.022039 % @0.79CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.8182 %CLower nose radius: 1.8182 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.7785 degRelease Angle: 0.0085428 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: 0.0085428 deg
Table 1054: Controlpoints1 00.75489 -0.0144790.65489 -0.060.3 -0.060.297 -0.060 -0.060 00 0.060.297 0.060.3 0.060.6614 0.060.73591 0.015681 0
Table 1055: Base 64 representation:BTga BTgaxsIgA
Table 1056: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.893 6.725 ectsRMS curvature error: 82.39 79.8 %CD error -0.6 -0.1 dctsCm error -8 -7 mctsUpper transition point -0.04 0.03 %
Figure 795: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 796: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
269
Profile: eh0009
Information: John Yost EH 0.0/9.0 for tailless R/C aircraftReference: UIUC
Figure 797: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1057: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.9998 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 0.0001035 % @0.78CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.39093 %CLower nose radius: 0.39093 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.1397 degRelease Angle: -0.0022309 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: -0.0022309 deg
Table 1058: Controlpoints1 00.853 -0.00917690.56137 -0.0450.28711 -0.0450.065485 -0.0450 -0.0130640 00 0.0130640.065485 0.0450.28711 0.0450.56146 0.0450.85345 0.0091371 0
Table 1059: Base 64 representation:TwSZTTwSZTVVIgA
Table 1060: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.591 2.028 ectsRMS curvature error: 49.7 52.64 %CD error -1.1 -1.1 dctsCm error 4 5 mctsUpper transition point 2.07 1.76 %
Figure 798: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 799: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
270
Profile: eh1070
Information: John Yost EH 1.0/7.0 for tailless R/C aircraftReference: UIUC
Figure 800: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1061: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.9849 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 1.0159 % @0.25CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.17121 %CLower nose radius: 0.27381 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.4728 degRelease Angle: 0.13104 degNose Incidence: 3.1089 degCamber deflection: 3.24 deg
Table 1062: Controlpoints1 00.88434 -0.00526280.68221 -0.025510.37566 -0.025510.26248 -0.025510 -0.0247450 00 0.00804140.056653 0.044870.28711 0.044870.47553 0.044870.79851 0.0100921 0
Table 1063: Base 64 representation:LySRT9TYfLZXGgA
Table 1064: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.698 2.509 ectsRMS curvature error: 41.06 40.93 %CD error 0.4 0.5 dctsCm error -4 -17 mctsUpper transition point 0.13 0.26 %
Figure 801: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 802: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
271
Profile: eh1090
Information: John Yost EH 1.0/9.0 for tailless R/C aircraftReference: UIUC
Figure 803: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1065: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.9939 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 0.9944 % @0.26CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.30633 %CLower nose radius: 0.51515 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.6136 degRelease Angle: 0.27741 degNose Incidence: 2.0357 degCamber deflection: 2.3131 deg
Table 1066: Controlpoints1 00.90055 -0.00526310.65957 -0.0353920.34549 -0.0353920.034567 -0.0353920 -0.011250 00 0.010870.057855 0.0547910.28711 0.0547910.48872 0.0547910.82026 0.0112591 0
Table 1067: Base 64 representation:NySSXU5WfPWTHgA
Table 1068: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.811 3.677 ectsRMS curvature error: 34.09 31.52 %CD error -0.5 -0.4 dctsCm error 2 6 mctsUpper transition point 0.69 -0.09 %
Figure 804: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 805: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
272
Profile: eh1590
Information: John Yost EH 1.5/9.0 for tailless R/C aircraftReference: UIUC
Figure 806: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1069: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.0117 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 1.4771 % @0.26CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.26588 %CLower nose radius: 0.54334 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.0031 degRelease Angle: 0.23511 degNose Incidence: 3.3812 degCamber deflection: 3.6164 deg
Table 1070: Controlpoints1 00.89581 -0.00594630.6993 -0.0309630.40631 -0.0309630.18249 -0.0309630 -0.025710 00 0.00995750.055937 0.059720.28711 0.059720.46759 0.059720.78416 0.0140961 0
Table 1071: Base 64 representation:LzSQZ0iagNaWIgA
Table 1072: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.964 4.015 ectsRMS curvature error: 26.63 28.47 %CD error -1.3 -0.9 dctsCm error 1 5 mctsUpper transition point 1.36 -0.08 %
Figure 807: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 808: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
273
Profile: eh2010
Information: John Yost EH 2.0/10 for tailless R/C aircraftReference: UIUC
Figure 809: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1073: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.1387 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 1.9546 % @0.26CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.28625 %CLower nose radius: 0.69696 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.6609 degRelease Angle: -0.089529 degNose Incidence: 4.7351 degCamber deflection: 4.6455 deg
Table 1074: Controlpoints1 00.82176 -0.0137780.70151 -0.0321580.43733 -0.0321580.074452 -0.0321580 -0.0185990 00 0.0101140.053605 0.0701140.28711 0.0701140.45872 0.0701140.76637 0.0173241 0
Table 1075: Base 64 representation:JzSPek0ceOclKgA
Table 1076: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.697 3.259 ectsRMS curvature error: 37.11 37.84 %CD error -1.5 -1.1 dctsCm error 7 11 mctsUpper transition point 1.87 1.09 %
Figure 810: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 811: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
274
Profile: eh2012
Information: John Yost EH 2.0/12 for tailless R/C aircraftReference: UIUC
Figure 812: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1077: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.0145 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 1.9693 % @0.26CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.47346 %CLower nose radius: 0.96598 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.1858 degRelease Angle: 0.35049 degNose Incidence: 4.5071 degCamber deflection: 4.8576 deg
Table 1078: Controlpoints1 00.89887 -0.0075020.70058 -0.041280.40631 -0.041280.18223 -0.041280 -0.0342570 00 0.0132910.055963 0.079620.28711 0.079620.46784 0.079620.78601 0.0185091 0
Table 1079: Base 64 representation:LzSQh0iagSaWKgA
Table 1080: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.287 4.829 ectsRMS curvature error: 40.11 40.84 %CD error -1.7 -1.3 dctsCm error 0 24 mctsUpper transition point 1.86 0.92 %
Figure 813: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 814: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
275
Profile: eiffel385
Information: Eiffel 385 (S.T. Ae) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 815: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1081: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.3346 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 4.4832 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0082 %CLower nose radius: 2.3808 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.3951 degRelease Angle: 8.6073 degNose Incidence: 2.5929 degCamber deflection: 11.2002 deg
Table 1082: Controlpoints1 00.35943 0.0101720.25999 -0.0437260.15248 -0.0437260.12046 -0.0437260 -0.0437260 00 0.0164810.040413 0.1040.39512 0.1040.48506 0.1040.79287 0.0605881 0
Table 1083: Base 64 representation:K4ZKr NKITk2RtA
Table 1084: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.512 8.359 ectsRMS curvature error: 58.38 59.27 %CD error -2.6 -3.1 dctsCm error -11 5 mctsUpper transition point -1.2 -1.35 %
Figure 816: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 817: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
276
Profile: eiffel428
Information: Eiffel 428 (Bleriot) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 818: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1085: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.4051 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: 3.9194 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6815 %CLower nose radius: 1.2029 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.1696 degRelease Angle: 5.3715 degNose Incidence: 9.1368 degCamber deflection: 14.5083 deg
Table 1086: Controlpoints1 00.34009 0.00964480.24009 -0.0146230.025222 -0.0146230.025222 -0.0146230 -0.012430 00 0.0193510.1114 0.085990.39876 0.085990.57528 0.085990.98532 0.00192081 0
Table 1087: Base 64 representation:OtaTk1ACOGC3HmA
Table 1088: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.231 6.604 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -21.7 -19 dctsCm error -56 -88 mctsUpper transition point 45.4 46.67 %
Figure 819: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 820: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
277
Profile: eppler793
Information: Eppler E793 general purpose airfoil (gyroflug speedcanard canard)Reference: UIUC
Figure 821: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1089: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.675 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.0212 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.9085 %CLower nose radius: 1.2467 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.2668 degRelease Angle: 15.2372 degNose Incidence: 11.4383 degCamber deflection: 26.6756 deg
Table 1090: Controlpoints1 00.78214 0.0271510.38684 -0.044630.21372 -0.044630.071076 -0.044630 -0.0243060 00 0.0353310.09811 0.114930.30899 0.114930.56413 0.114930.96865 0.0135471 0
Table 1091: Base 64 representation:UrUYwiqOOTIXS4A
Table 1092: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.873 2.83 ectsRMS curvature error: 29.78 30.25 %CD error 0.1 0.6 dctsCm error 10 -14 mctsUpper transition point -1.96 -0.64 %
Figure 822: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 823: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
278
Profile: falcon
Information: Falcon airfoil used on the Carl Goldberg Falcon 56Mk II R/C powerplaneReference: UIUC
Figure 824: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1093: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.6811 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 1.5626 % @0.25CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2891 %CUpper nose radius: 0.2104 %CLower nose radius: 1.252 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 30.9397 degRelease Angle: 6.3805 degNose Incidence: 4.4081 degCamber deflection: 10.7885 deg
Table 1094: Controlpoints1 -0.00144550.92306 -0.0137550.63286 -0.0534290.34201 -0.0534290.34201 -0.0534290 -0.0534290 00 0.00562480.022556 0.0836790.30614 0.0836790.52357 0.0836790.98961 0.00561071 0.0014455
Table 1095: Base 64 representation:E6UUj AWcXDPipH
Table 1096: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.6 7.774 ectsRMS curvature error: 98.32 Inf %CD error -3.3 -3.7 dctsCm error -92 -97 mctsUpper transition point 4.58 5.93 %
Figure 825: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 826: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
279
Profile: fg2
Information: Fage & Collins 2 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 827: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1097: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.1903 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.3339 % @0.31CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.19911 %CLower nose radius: 0.79056 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 21.7231 degRelease Angle: 5.0005 degNose Incidence: 8.5988 degCamber deflection: 13.5993 deg
Table 1098: Controlpoints1 00.92737 -0.00745550.012527 -0.00825870.012527 -0.00825870.010022 -0.00825870 -0.00726770 00 0.00756910.043159 0.074290.29976 0.074290.52254 0.074290.90544 0.0268671 0
Table 1099: Base 64 representation:H2TUg3NBAEX5YnA
Table 1100: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.125 9.097 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 2.3 NaN dctsCm error 72 NaN mctsUpper transition point -6.69 NaN %
Figure 828: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 829: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
280
Profile: fg3
Information: Fage & Collins 3 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 830: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1101: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.1823 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 4.2728 % @0.3CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.062179 %CLower nose radius: 0.79494 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 22.0368 degRelease Angle: 4.1604 degNose Incidence: 10.0746 degCamber deflection: 14.2351 deg
Table 1102: Controlpoints1 00.95005 -0.00600780.93982 -0.00827750.012515 -0.00827750.010012 -0.00827750 -0.00728420 00 0.00437050.046081 0.093640.29983 0.093640.66525 0.093640.93994 0.0162941 0
Table 1103: Base 64 representation:D1Tgn3NB7EL0ZmA
Table 1104: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.02 8.797 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.6 -3.7 dctsCm error -69 -40 mctsUpper transition point 7.02 5.94 %
Figure 831: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 832: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
281
Profile: fg4
Information: Fage & Collins 4 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 833: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1105: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.7579 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 4.7055 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.4066 %CLower nose radius: 2.2038 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 55.7064 degRelease Angle: 14.3048 degNose Incidence: 15.9488 degCamber deflection: 30.2536 deg
Table 1106: Controlpoints1 00.95213 -0.0115360.025248 -0.0196860.025248 -0.0196860.020427 -0.0196860 -0.0173240 00 0.0460710.093459 0.110740.29864 0.110740.62827 0.110740.97621 0.0215381 0
Table 1107: Base 64 representation:brTeu3MCAIMl92A
Table 1108: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.725 9.556 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 42.8 -24.7 dctsCm error -371 -388 mctsUpper transition point 35.02 35.05 %
Figure 834: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 835: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
282
Profile: fx2
Information: Wortmann FX 2 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 836: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1109: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 20.5061 % @0.46CMaximum Camber: 3.7385 % @0.71CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5549 %CLower nose radius: 0.89292 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.995 degRelease Angle: 11.6761 degNose Incidence: 7.4578 degCamber deflection: 19.134 deg
Table 1110: Controlpoints1 00.79549 0.0185350.66207 -0.075850.43474 -0.075850.16685 -0.075850 -0.0315160 00 0.0473760.21652 0.130150.5 0.130150.76658 0.130150.78608 0.0702241 0
Table 1111: Base 64 representation:Xjgh3bmcag6mPyA
Table 1112: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.215 6.899 ectsRMS curvature error: 74.1 75.21 %CD error -2.7 -2.7 dctsCm error 46 47 mctsUpper transition point -0.87 -0.89 %
Figure 837: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 838: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
283
Profile: fx08s176
Information: Wortmann FX 08-S-176 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 839: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1113: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.6259 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 5.6556 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0246 %CLower nose radius: 0.352 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.2203 degRelease Angle: 8.9896 degNose Incidence: 16.7193 degCamber deflection: 25.7089 deg
Table 1114: Controlpoints1 00.8581 0.0121140.84911 -0.032450.5 -0.032450.35042 -0.032450 -0.0286760 00 0.030420.13548 0.144620.37059 0.144620.51294 0.144620.55989 0.102411 0
Table 1115: Base 64 representation:NoYO94TgsO57JuA
Table 1116: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.032 6.001 ectsRMS curvature error: 69.16 70.37 %CD error 1.2 1.4 dctsCm error 92 92 mctsUpper transition point -2.02 -2.06 %
Figure 840: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 841: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
284
Profile: fx66a175
Information: Wortmann FX 66-17A-175 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 842: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1117: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.5293 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 4.1479 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0901 %CLower nose radius: 0.36939 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.7942 degRelease Angle: 9.0065 degNose Incidence: 12.7673 degCamber deflection: 21.7737 deg
Table 1118: Controlpoints1 00.60081 0.0128150.48785 -0.046830.30866 -0.046830.095945 -0.046830 -0.0147290 00 0.0285850.14053 0.128890.33928 0.128890.40879 0.128890.5088 0.114071 0
Table 1119: Base 64 representation:OkWH2UrURU4xNrA
Table 1120: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.787 6.268 ectsRMS curvature error: 43.49 46.2 %CD error 0.1 -0.2 dctsCm error 43 30 mctsUpper transition point -0.77 0.04 %
Figure 843: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 844: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
285
Profile: fx78k140
Information: Wortmann FX 78-K-140/20 airfoil for use with flaps(K)Reference: UIUC
Figure 845: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1121: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.0943 % @0.43CMaximum Camber: 4.3794 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.58512 %CLower nose radius: 0.47352 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.5986 degRelease Angle: -1.1627 degNose Incidence: 8.2143 degCamber deflection: 7.0516 deg
Table 1122: Controlpoints1 00.76435 -0.026690.52748 -0.026690.40245 -0.026690.17215 -0.026690 -0.0233120 00 0.0249260.15928 0.114270.43474 0.114270.6908 0.114270.7908 0.015131 0
Table 1123: Base 64 representation:Oocsw3kaNLq MeA
Table 1124: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.576 5.576 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.2 0.4 dctsCm error 43 31 mctsUpper transition point -1.51 -1.22 %
Figure 846: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 847: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
286
Profile: fx83w160
Information: Wortmann FX 83-W-160 airfoil for use on wind tur-bines (W)Reference: UIUC
Figure 848: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1125: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.0651 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 3.8308 % @0.63CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.4454 %CLower nose radius: 2.0512 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.1497 degRelease Angle: 12.8508 degNose Incidence: 5.0952 degCamber deflection: 17.946 deg
Table 1126: Controlpoints1 00.73482 0.0221560.53705 -0.055590.25 -0.055590.175 -0.055590 -0.0494750 00 0.0591610.21469 0.110620.43474 0.110620.66596 0.110620.87375 0.0482751 0
Table 1127: Base 64 representation:hgcau4TQYYckS0A
Table 1128: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.216 5.018 ectsRMS curvature error: 33.95 33.07 %CD error -1 -1.4 dctsCm error 13 3 mctsUpper transition point 0.57 0.64 %
Figure 849: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 850: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
287
Profile: fx83w227
Information: Wortmann FX 83-W-227 airfoil for use on wind tur-bines (W)Reference: UIUC
Figure 851: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1129: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 22.6366 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 3.4419 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.3466 %CLower nose radius: 2.6212 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 28.175 degRelease Angle: 6.5453 degNose Incidence: 3.8599 degCamber deflection: 10.4052 deg
Table 1130: Controlpoints1 00.70151 -0.039520.55432 -0.079790.30866 -0.079790.025706 -0.079790 -0.0211940 00 0.0429650.118 0.14720.37059 0.14720.55955 0.14720.79991 0.0753411 0
Table 1131: Base 64 representation:TrYT-R6UXhgqfqA
Table 1132: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.021 3.241 ectsRMS curvature error: 53.12 56.89 %CD error -0.8 -1.7 dctsCm error 61 42 mctsUpper transition point 0.5 1.08 %
Figure 852: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 853: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
288
Profile: fx84w097
Information: Wortmann FX 84-W-097 airfoil for use on wind tur-bines (W)Reference: UIUC
Figure 854: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1133: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.8081 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 2.782 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.76206 %CLower nose radius: 0.79182 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 0.49482 degRelease Angle: 4.8726 degNose Incidence: 4.4999 degCamber deflection: 9.3725 deg
Table 1134: Controlpoints1 00.9496 0.00407780.53802 -0.022980.17033 -0.022980.08073 -0.022980 -0.0206440 00 0.0272480.14614 0.076590.33928 0.076590.60639 0.076590.81271 0.0167811 0
Table 1135: Base 64 representation:XjWag4hLcKeHBnA
Table 1136: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.356 4.413 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.3 NaN dctsCm error -15 NaN mctsUpper transition point -0.74 NaN %
Figure 855: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 856: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
289
Profile: fx84w127
Information: Wortmann FX 84-W-127 airfoil for use on wind tur-bines (W)Reference: UIUC
Figure 857: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1137: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.8028 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 3.7217 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1293 %CLower nose radius: 1.1598 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 2.8886 degRelease Angle: 5.8742 degNose Incidence: 5.8469 degCamber deflection: 11.721 deg
Table 1138: Controlpoints1 00.89811 0.00789360.59627 -0.029160.19562 -0.029160.092572 -0.029160 -0.0267540 00 0.0337810.15158 0.100840.37059 0.100840.63129 0.100840.85509 0.0186111 0
Table 1139: Base 64 representation:VlYbq6hNgMZQDpA
Table 1140: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.75 4.324 ectsRMS curvature error: 14.1 16.19 %CD error 0 -0.3 dctsCm error -5 -23 mctsUpper transition point -0.11 0.84 %
Figure 858: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 859: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
290
Profile: fx84w140
Information: Wortmann FX 84-W-140 airfoil for use on wind tur-bines (W)Reference: UIUC
Figure 860: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1141: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.137 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 4.1826 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3888 %CLower nose radius: 1.3319 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.5071 degRelease Angle: 7.0244 degNose Incidence: 6.8365 degCamber deflection: 13.8608 deg
Table 1142: Controlpoints1 00.88002 0.0100130.62575 -0.03130.19562 -0.03130.084843 -0.03130 -0.0274470 00 0.0392580.16646 0.11210.37059 0.11210.64603 0.11210.84239 0.0257471 0
Table 1143: Base 64 representation:WiYcv3jNhNcVFqA
Table 1144: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.028 4.066 ectsRMS curvature error: 15.1 15.32 %CD error -0.1 -0.3 dctsCm error -5 -16 mctsUpper transition point -0.1 0.38 %
Figure 861: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 862: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
291
Profile: fx84w150
Information: Wortmann FX 84-W-150 airfoil for use on wind tur-bines (W)Reference: UIUC
Figure 863: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1145: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.0347 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 4.1854 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5722 %CLower nose radius: 1.5098 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.0066 degRelease Angle: 6.8907 degNose Incidence: 6.8611 degCamber deflection: 13.7518 deg
Table 1146: Controlpoints1 00.8751 0.00958260.63663 -0.0354090.22226 -0.0354090.097096 -0.0354090 -0.0312620 00 0.0416720.16568 0.116630.37044 0.116630.64568 0.116630.84501 0.0256421 0
Table 1147: Base 64 representation:XiYcx4jOhPcWGqA
Table 1148: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.912 2.745 ectsRMS curvature error: 13.79 13.52 %CD error -0.1 -0.2 dctsCm error -4 -24 mctsUpper transition point -0.19 0.62 %
Figure 864: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 865: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
292
Profile: fx84w175
Information: Wortmann FX 84-W-175 airfoil for use on wind tur-bines (W)Reference: UIUC
Figure 866: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1149: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.6521 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 4.3429 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.126 %CLower nose radius: 2.2464 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.1985 degRelease Angle: 7.5827 degNose Incidence: 6.0916 degCamber deflection: 13.6743 deg
Table 1150: Controlpoints1 00.86672 0.0104510.63809 -0.046940.25 -0.046940.095618 -0.046940 -0.0378420 00 0.0486260.16683 0.131140.37059 0.131140.65235 0.131140.84394 0.0294371 0
Table 1151: Base 64 representation:YiYs3znQgUsYHrA
Table 1152: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.081 2.237 ectsRMS curvature error: 15.7 15.78 %CD error 0.1 -0.1 dctsCm error -3 -22 mctsUpper transition point -0.26 0.77 %
Figure 867: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 868: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
293
Profile: fx84w218
Information: Wortmann FX 84-W-218 airfoil for use on wind tur-bines (W)Reference: UIUC
Figure 869: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1153: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 21.9295 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 3.2472 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.4774 %CLower nose radius: 4.062 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.142 degRelease Angle: 4.2946 degNose Incidence: 3.6545 degCamber deflection: 7.9491 deg
Table 1154: Controlpoints1 00.86875 0.00394960.61464 -0.079450.27886 -0.079450.22387 -0.079450 -0.0778610 00 0.0531250.12174 0.141210.37059 0.141210.62008 0.141210.87784 0.0147091 0
Table 1155: Base 64 representation:YqYZ7-NSehVWGmA
Table 1156: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.041 3.507 ectsRMS curvature error: 16.41 18.63 %CD error -0.5 -0.8 dctsCm error -1 1 mctsUpper transition point 0.91 1.36 %
Figure 870: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 871: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
294
Profile: fx05188
Information: Wortmann FX 05-188 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 872: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1157: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.8134 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 2.652 % @0.52CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6557 %CLower nose radius: 1.1612 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.9138 degRelease Angle: 11.7544 degNose Incidence: 7.1987 degCamber deflection: 18.9531 deg
Table 1158: Controlpoints1 00.79808 0.027650.70014 -0.06950.37059 -0.06950.21418 -0.06950 -0.0403650 00 0.0427930.1659 0.119340.43474 0.119340.57148 0.119340.68966 0.08731 0
Table 1159: Base 64 representation:XncPykbYhetqJyA
Table 1160: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.77 7.204 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.8 -0.9 dctsCm error 82 94 mctsUpper transition point -2.79 -2.82 %
Figure 873: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 874: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
295
Profile: fx05191
Information: N/AReference: UIUC
Figure 875: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1161: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 19.1131 % @0.41CMaximum Camber: 2.6191 % @0.53CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6681 %CLower nose radius: 1.1359 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.3751 degRelease Angle: 11.357 degNose Incidence: 7.2674 degCamber deflection: 18.6245 deg
Table 1162: Controlpoints1 00.80433 0.0211510.74223 -0.070830.37059 -0.070830.24656 -0.070830 -0.0432110 00 0.0453780.18517 0.120910.43474 0.120910.64558 0.120910.8136 0.0553731 0
Table 1163: Base 64 representation:YkcYzmVYlehwMxA
Table 1164: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.88 7.2 ectsRMS curvature error: 44.55 44.89 %CD error -2.7 -2.9 dctsCm error 90 93 mctsUpper transition point 1 1.45 %
Figure 876: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 877: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
296
Profile: fx60100
Information: Wortmann FX 60-100 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 878: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1165: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.9129 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 3.563 % @0.56CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4835 %CLower nose radius: 0.19502 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 2.5018 degRelease Angle: 9.185 degNose Incidence: 15.0321 degCamber deflection: 24.2171 deg
Table 1166: Controlpoints1 00.69471 0.0425470.46866 -0.025030.17033 -0.025030.060987 -0.025030 -0.00890460 00 0.0326220.1076 0.078980.37059 0.078980.64801 0.078980.93926 0.0111881 0
Table 1167: Base 64 representation:asYchXoLXLLkDuA
Table 1168: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.725 4.21 ectsRMS curvature error: 83.19 84.02 %CD error -7.4 -10 dctsCm error 5 1 mctsUpper transition point 14.51 14.87 %
Figure 879: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 880: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
297
Profile: fx60100sm
Information: Wortmann FX 60-100 airfoil (smoothed)Reference: UIUC
Figure 881: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1169: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.9666 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 3.4915 % @0.56CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.9876 %CLower nose radius: 0.44583 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 1.9441 degRelease Angle: 9.4462 degNose Incidence: 10.2841 degCamber deflection: 19.7304 deg
Table 1170: Controlpoints1 00.72145 0.0415010.42251 -0.0263220.19566 -0.0263220.074937 -0.0263220 -0.0149240 00 0.0233550.082845 0.0779060.37048 0.0779060.65119 0.0779060.93824 0.0113551 0
Table 1171: Base 64 representation:TxYsgjmNSLLfCuA
Table 1172: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.341 3.441 ectsRMS curvature error: 36.06 40.04 %CD error -2.5 -2.1 dctsCm error 2 0 mctsUpper transition point -0.82 0.22 %
Figure 882: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 883: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
298
Profile: fx60126
Information: Wortmann FX 60-126 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 884: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1173: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.6182 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 3.5665 % @0.56CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.199 %CLower nose radius: 0.19488 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.2762 degRelease Angle: 9.6214 degNose Incidence: 15.2039 degCamber deflection: 24.8253 deg
Table 1174: Controlpoints1 00.7228 0.0388760.43664 -0.037510.22221 -0.037510.01966 -0.037510 -0.00505410 00 0.0428850.12545 0.09160.33928 0.09160.6124 0.09160.88488 0.0229181 0
Table 1175: Base 64 representation:enWamJ5OSQTfEvA
Table 1176: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 0.994 2.426 ectsRMS curvature error: 97.16 87.78 %CD error -8.6 -8.4 dctsCm error 0 0 mctsUpper transition point 7.73 8.12 %
Figure 885: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 886: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
299
Profile: fx60157
Information: Wortmann FX 60-157 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 887: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1177: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.6449 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: 2.6422 % @0.75CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.3582 %CLower nose radius: 0.51979 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.6382 degRelease Angle: 16.2517 degNose Incidence: 16.4923 degCamber deflection: 32.744 deg
Table 1178: Controlpoints1 00.83795 0.0342460.73795 -0.055370.33933 -0.055370.17384 -0.055370 -0.0245440 00 0.0411580.10775 0.101510.40243 0.101510.54351 0.101510.77259 0.0853441 0
Table 1179: Base 64 representation:auaPqcfWmY1nK5A
Table 1180: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.047 5.745 ectsRMS curvature error: 63.74 64.12 %CD error -28.2 -29.4 dctsCm error -88 -72 mctsUpper transition point 24.72 25.18 %
Figure 888: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 889: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
300
Profile: fx60160
Information: Wortmann FX 60-160 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 890: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1181: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.5934 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: 3.0886 % @0.6CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3853 %CLower nose radius: 0.91262 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.0002 degRelease Angle: 10.3537 degNose Incidence: 7.7988 degCamber deflection: 18.1526 deg
Table 1182: Controlpoints1 00.71257 0.0193610.66062 -0.050.3 -0.050.264 -0.050 -0.0400780 00 0.0398070.17158 0.107250.4 0.107250.61623 0.107250.87448 0.0380241 0
Table 1183: Base 64 representation:YkaXtyITgVX1PwA
Table 1184: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.44 6.327 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -8.9 -8.7 dctsCm error -19 -29 mctsUpper transition point -1.16 -0.06 %
Figure 891: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 892: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
301
Profile: fx60177
Information: Wortmann FX 60-177 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 893: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1185: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.7118 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 2.6853 % @0.79CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.4124 %CLower nose radius: 0.31225 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 0 degRelease Angle: 11.8416 degNose Incidence: 21.5095 degCamber deflection: 33.3511 deg
Table 1186: Controlpoints1 00.83055 0.0355290.73985 -0.066630.37056 -0.066630.1154 -0.066630 -0.0154990 00 0.0494790.10762 0.110620.40243 0.110620.76683 0.110620.99767 0.000488881 0
Table 1187: Base 64 representation:suamuPrYlcBpAyA
Table 1188: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.711 5.867 ectsRMS curvature error: 35.9 37.61 %CD error -4.4 -4.5 dctsCm error 45 51 mctsUpper transition point 1.73 2.2 %
Figure 894: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 895: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
302
Profile: fx61140
Information: Wortmann FX 61-140 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 896: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1189: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.9829 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 2.4525 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.88241 %CLower nose radius: 0.27124 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.3149 degRelease Angle: 20.0535 degNose Incidence: 12.0133 degCamber deflection: 32.0669 deg
Table 1190: Controlpoints1 00.79833 0.0388220.68279 -0.045390.33928 -0.045390.13509 -0.045390 -0.015630 00 0.0244750.10182 0.094440.33928 0.094440.5121 0.094440.96312 0.0206221 0
Table 1191: Base 64 representation:RsWRnWmWgTOoU A
Table 1192: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.418 5.996 ectsRMS curvature error: 20.76 20.46 %CD error 0.1 1 dctsCm error 87 70 mctsUpper transition point -1.28 -0.27 %
Figure 897: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 898: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
303
Profile: fx61147
Information: Wortmann FX 61-147 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 899: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1193: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.7659 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 3.184 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5545 %CLower nose radius: 0.26575 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.504 degRelease Angle: 17.1443 degNose Incidence: 16.7492 degCamber deflection: 33.8936 deg
Table 1194: Controlpoints1 00.78946 0.0386120.68075 -0.041990.33933 -0.041990.12858 -0.041990 -0.0150930 00 0.0353090.1203 0.105670.33933 0.105670.50446 0.105670.9119 0.0390341 0
Table 1195: Base 64 representation:VoWQsXnWgSYpP7A
Table 1196: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.29 4.448 ectsRMS curvature error: 27.04 27.52 %CD error 7.4 6 dctsCm error 71 60 mctsUpper transition point -2.85 -2.05 %
Figure 900: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 901: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
304
Profile: fx601261
Information: Wortmann FX 60-126/1 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 902: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1197: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.6105 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 3.9448 % @0.54CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.093852 %CLower nose radius: 0.66713 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 1.6114 degRelease Angle: 11.4151 degNose Incidence: 11.1691 degCamber deflection: 22.5842 deg
Table 1198: Controlpoints1 00.76179 0.044620.42201 -0.034260.19558 -0.034260.12425 -0.034260 -0.0235080 00 0.00258930.020108 0.095770.33933 0.095770.58402 0.095770.79042 0.0453931 0
Table 1199: Base 64 representation:C7WYorXNSPgaCxA
Table 1200: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.121 8.974 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 37.6 NaN dctsCm error 16 NaN mctsUpper transition point 11.95 NaN %
Figure 903: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 904: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
305
Profile: fx711530
Information: Wortmann FX 71-L-150/30 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 905: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1201: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: -0.00011002 % @0.59CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.947 %CLower nose radius: 1.947 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.1343 degRelease Angle: 0.00084225 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: 0.00084225 deg
Table 1202: Controlpoints1 00.68176 -0.0226230.58176 -0.0750.33928 -0.0750.2101 -0.0750 -0.0522220 00 0.0522220.2101 0.0750.33928 0.0750.58171 0.0750.68171 0.0226371 0
Table 1203: Base 64 representation:sYWXgsYWXgwwJgA
Table 1204: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.572 3.862 ectsRMS curvature error: 76.83 76.94 %CD error -17.8 -17.3 dctsCm error -26 -26 mctsUpper transition point 27.74 26.96 %
Figure 906: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 907: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
306
Profile: fxl142k
Information: Wortmann FX LIII-142 K 25 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 908: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1205: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.1999 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: -1.2692e-005 % @0.58CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4285 %CLower nose radius: 1.4285 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.663 degRelease Angle: -7.8036e-006 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: -7.8036e-006 deg
Table 1206: Controlpoints1 00.61543 -0.0325070.51543 -0.0710.30861 -0.0710.12123 -0.0710 -0.0339780 00 0.0339780.12123 0.0710.30861 0.0710.51542 0.0710.61542 0.0325071 0
Table 1207: Base 64 representation:fmUTefmUTeyyLgA
Table 1208: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.841 3.796 ectsRMS curvature error: 81.78 80.86 %CD error -12 -11.9 dctsCm error -27 -26 mctsUpper transition point 18.73 18.17 %
Figure 909: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 910: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
307
Profile: fxm2
Information: Wortmann FX M2 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 911: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1209: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.6614 % @0.2CMaximum Camber: 4.5886 % @0.3CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 5.6095 %CLower nose radius: 0.79546 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.4252 degRelease Angle: 10.8419 degNose Incidence: 28.4103 degCamber deflection: 39.2521 deg
Table 1210: Controlpoints1 00.67041 0.0412240.01704 -0.00980.01704 -0.00980.01704 -0.00980 -0.00980 00 0.088090.205 0.088090.25 0.088090.3885 0.088090.83372 0.0431711 0
Table 1211: Base 64 representation:MQMl ABAEfVIxA
Table 1212: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.539 8.604 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -9.9 -9.6 dctsCm error 3 -7 mctsUpper transition point 18.76 18.97 %
Figure 912: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 913: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
308
Profile: fxs03182
Information: Wortmann FX S 03-182 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 914: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1213: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.2327 % @0.42CMaximum Camber: 2.8826 % @0.54CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7005 %CLower nose radius: 0.43915 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.1831 degRelease Angle: 12.3948 degNose Incidence: 12.558 degCamber deflection: 24.9527 deg
Table 1214: Controlpoints1 00.84281 0.0243440.6183 -0.064090.40243 -0.064090.13826 -0.064090 -0.0201190 00 0.0475930.1998 0.118520.43469 0.118520.53843 0.118520.63843 0.103591 0
Table 1215: Base 64 representation:aicMyUpaXb3aIzA
Table 1216: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.388 6.635 ectsRMS curvature error: 47.23 46.77 %CD error -21.3 -21.3 dctsCm error -5 -15 mctsUpper transition point 1.33 1.64 %
Figure 915: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 916: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
309
Profile: fxs21158
Information: Wortmann FX S 02/1-158 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 917: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1217: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.7592 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.5183 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1823 %CLower nose radius: 0.59184 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.8767 degRelease Angle: 7.3769 degNose Incidence: 10.7245 degCamber deflection: 18.1013 deg
Table 1218: Controlpoints1 00.64987 0.0241060.51662 -0.044310.27891 -0.044310.21597 -0.044310 -0.0291920 00 0.0357150.16183 0.113550.30861 0.113550.43144 0.113550.53144 0.0895111 0
Table 1219: Base 64 representation:UeULvpOSVT0tIrA
Table 1220: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.893 6.062 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -28.8 -29.1 dctsCm error 23 2 mctsUpper transition point 23.08 23.79 %
Figure 918: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 919: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
310
Profile: giiia
Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoilsReference: UIUC
Figure 920: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1221: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.0192 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: 0.74886 % @0.2CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.03588 %CUpper nose radius: 0.55796 %CLower nose radius: 0.8303 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.1887 degRelease Angle: -1.2032 degNose Incidence: 1.8757 degCamber deflection: 0.67245 deg
Table 1222: Controlpoints1 -0.00017940.74724 -0.0438280.53789 -0.0511240.4529 -0.0511240.3488 -0.0511240 -0.043940 00 0.015220.062276 0.060880.29655 0.060880.56882 0.060880.78882 0.0275741 0.0001794
Table 1223: Base 64 representation:QyTYa2OsKVf2TeB
Table 1224: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.228 8.17 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -5.2 -5.6 dctsCm error -44 -69 mctsUpper transition point 10.87 11.95 %
Figure 921: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 922: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
311
Profile: giiib
Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoils, GIIIBL45 AIRFOIL.Reference: UIUC
Figure 923: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1225: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.4799 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 0.81403 % @0.24CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.03692 %CUpper nose radius: NaN %CLower nose radius: 0.74176 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.5363 degRelease Angle: -1.4028 degNose Incidence: 2.0826 degCamber deflection: 0.67978 deg
Table 1226: Controlpoints1 -0.00018460.72097 -0.0427380.50755 -0.0458030.45216 -0.0458030.34364 -0.0458030 -0.0412230 00 00.0034718 0.0598280.34718 0.0598280.58185 0.0598280.86986 0.0135531 0.0001846
Table 1227: Base 64 representation:A-WXa5PsGUU7QeB
Table 1228: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.075 6.04 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.4 -1.8 dctsCm error 1 -15 mctsUpper transition point 4.78 5.18 %
Figure 924: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 925: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
312
Profile: giiic
Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoils,GIIIBL75 AIRFOIL.Reference: UIUC
Figure 926: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1229: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.9587 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 0.9238 % @0.27CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.03694 %CUpper nose radius: 0.445 %CLower nose radius: 0.6325 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.1312 degRelease Angle: -0.97949 degNose Incidence: 2.527 degCamber deflection: 1.5475 deg
Table 1230: Controlpoints1 -0.00018470.86984 -0.016270.66668 -0.0417230.45167 -0.0417230.36515 -0.0417230 -0.0392390 00 0.0131610.058381 0.0585240.34767 0.0585240.61048 0.0585240.78487 0.0193321 0.0001847
Table 1231: Base 64 representation:O0WaZ7MsZSiZOeB
Table 1232: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.877 3.288 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.1 -1.3 dctsCm error 5 4 mctsUpper transition point 1.38 1.8 %
Figure 927: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 928: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
313
Profile: giiid
Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoils, GIIIBL86 AIRFOIL.Reference: UIUC
Figure 929: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1233: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.7337 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 0.95819 % @0.28CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.03694 %CUpper nose radius: 0.51389 %CLower nose radius: 0.59112 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.7485 degRelease Angle: -0.76884 degNose Incidence: 2.7792 degCamber deflection: 2.0103 deg
Table 1234: Controlpoints1 -0.00018470.80766 -0.0225850.64271 -0.0401170.45149 -0.0401170.36275 -0.0401170 -0.0378090 00 0.0162210.0768 0.0578110.34786 0.0578110.62076 0.0578110.74382 0.0230731 0.0001847
Table 1235: Base 64 representation:SxWbZ7NsWRqjNfB
Table 1236: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.993 4.377 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.2 -1.1 dctsCm error 8 -6 mctsUpper transition point 1.35 1.69 %
Figure 930: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 931: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
314
Profile: giiie
Information: N/AReference: UIUC
Figure 932: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1237: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.812 % @0.42CMaximum Camber: 1.1048 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.03598 %CUpper nose radius: 0.47458 %CLower nose radius: 0.39128 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.8331 degRelease Angle: 0.5339 degNose Incidence: 4.112 degCamber deflection: 4.6459 deg
Table 1238: Controlpoints1 -0.00017990.83825 -0.0139970.64672 -0.0336330.50087 -0.0336330.39433 -0.0336330 -0.0320720 00 0.0165830.086915 0.054910.39859 0.054910.58937 0.054910.71805 0.0295671 0.0001799
Table 1239: Base 64 representation:TxaUX8OgTOrsMgB
Table 1240: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.97 6.121 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.1 -0.1 dctsCm error 4 -8 mctsUpper transition point -0.78 -1.22 %
Figure 933: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 934: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
315
Profile: giiif
Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoils,BL145.Reference: UIUC
Figure 935: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1241: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.257 % @0.43CMaximum Camber: 1.2094 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.03698 %CUpper nose radius: 0.4781 %CLower nose radius: 0.23383 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.7196 degRelease Angle: 1.1637 degNose Incidence: 5.8441 degCamber deflection: 7.0077 deg
Table 1242: Controlpoints1 -0.00018490.76582 -0.0173660.63699 -0.0302910.5006 -0.0302910.40548 -0.0302910 -0.0251410 00 0.0195130.11945 0.0529660.39896 0.0529660.58306 0.0529660.70169 0.0342971 0.0001849
Table 1243: Base 64 representation:YsaUX0MgRNtoMhB
Table 1244: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.677 6.163 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.9 -1.6 dctsCm error 3 -13 mctsUpper transition point -0.04 2.51 %
Figure 936: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 937: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
316
Profile: giiig
Information: N/AReference: UIUC
Figure 938: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1245: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.282 % @0.43CMaximum Camber: 1.2133 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.03598 %CUpper nose radius: 0.52453 %CLower nose radius: 0.23245 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.7094 degRelease Angle: 1.1905 degNose Incidence: 6.3674 degCamber deflection: 7.5579 deg
Table 1246: Controlpoints1 -0.00017990.77954 -0.0162310.63601 -0.030350.50055 -0.030350.38042 -0.030350 -0.024280 00 0.0201890.11656 0.0531290.39904 0.0531290.58517 0.0531290.7197 0.032341 0.0001799
Table 1247: Base 64 representation:YsaUXyPgRNqmMhB
Table 1248: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.585 5.156 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.9 -1.9 dctsCm error -2 -13 mctsUpper transition point -2.91 3.65 %
Figure 939: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 940: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
317
Profile: giiih
Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoils, Warn-CuspeReference: UIUC
Figure 941: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1249: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.3518 % @0.43CMaximum Camber: 1.2161 % @0.31CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.036 %CUpper nose radius: 0.61695 %CLower nose radius: 0.23843 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.5004 degRelease Angle: 1.2826 degNose Incidence: 7.2574 degCamber deflection: 8.5401 deg
Table 1250: Controlpoints1 -0.000180.76189 -0.0166950.66189 -0.0304860.45046 -0.0304860.43244 -0.0304860 -0.0262180 00 0.0209530.10675 0.0534420.3992 0.0534420.59178 0.0534420.7667 0.0268971 0.00018
Table 1251: Base 64 representation:ZuaVX2DsZNksMhB
Table 1252: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.619 4.945 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0 -1.2 dctsCm error 0 -3 mctsUpper transition point 0 0.51 %
Figure 942: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 943: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
318
Profile: giiii
Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoilsReference: UIUC
Figure 944: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1253: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.4351 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 1.2997 % @0.29CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.036 %CUpper nose radius: 0.99504 %CLower nose radius: 0.27278 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.7191 degRelease Angle: 1.3341 degNose Incidence: 9.4321 degCamber deflection: 10.7662 deg
Table 1254: Controlpoints1 -0.000180.73291 -0.0189760.63264 -0.0304580.4502 -0.0304580.4412 -0.0304580 -0.0283260 00 0.0335230.1694 0.0547210.34964 0.0547210.59022 0.0547210.75962 0.0283911 0.00018
Table 1255: Base 64 representation:mgWYX7BsVNluMhB
Table 1256: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.967 5.026 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.7 -1.2 dctsCm error 3 15 mctsUpper transition point 2.41 0.71 %
Figure 945: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 946: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
319
Profile: giiij
Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoilsReference: UIUC
Figure 947: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1257: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.5076 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 1.3578 % @0.29CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.036 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2521 %CLower nose radius: 0.2908 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.2312 degRelease Angle: 1.1868 degNose Incidence: 11.0551 degCamber deflection: 12.2419 deg
Table 1258: Controlpoints1 -0.000180.74777 -0.0175030.62909 -0.0299750.45 -0.0299750.38507 -0.0299750 -0.0273230 00 0.0366810.16118 0.0557770.35 0.0557770.59753 0.0557770.88002 0.013431 0.00018
Table 1259: Base 64 representation:piWYY5JsVNTrLhB
Table 1260: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.836 5.794 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.4 -0.3 dctsCm error 7 6 mctsUpper transition point -1.4 -0.66 %
Figure 948: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 949: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
320
Profile: giiik
Information: N/AReference: UIUC
Figure 950: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1261: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.5504 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 1.4284 % @0.29CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.036 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5485 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.5788 degRelease Angle: 1.4761 degNose Incidence: 7.5575 degCamber deflection: 9.0335 deg
Table 1262: Controlpoints1 -0.000180.75889 -0.0162510.62808 -0.0291390.44979 -0.0291390 -0.0291390 -0.0125520 00 0.0550040.29308 0.056950.30041 0.056950.55872 0.056950.76324 0.0282681 0.00018
Table 1263: Base 64 representation:9CTYYc sVMhoMiB
Table 1264: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.054 5.377 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0 -3.2 dctsCm error 0 -13 mctsUpper transition point 0 -0.05 %
Figure 951: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 952: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
321
Profile: giiil
Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoilsReference: UIUC
Figure 953: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1265: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.5696 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 1.5039 % @0.29CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.036 %CUpper nose radius: 1.682 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.2536 degRelease Angle: 1.3686 degNose Incidence: 8.2125 degCamber deflection: 9.581 deg
Table 1266: Controlpoints1 -0.000180.75379 -0.0163530.62813 -0.0284580.44967 -0.0284580 -0.0284580 -0.0132480 00 0.0572330.29212 0.0578110.30067 0.0578110.559 0.0578110.82466 0.0201431 0.00018
Table 1267: Base 64 representation:-CTYZe sVMZpLhB
Table 1268: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.339 5.702 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %
Figure 954: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 955: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
322
Profile: gm15sm
Information: Gilbert Morris GM15 F1C class free flight flapperairfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 956: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1269: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.6981 % @0.2CMaximum Camber: 4.7697 % @0.48CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.007 %CUpper nose radius: 0.30221 %CLower nose radius: 0.43938 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.8712 degRelease Angle: 10.5697 degNose Incidence: 6.1966 degCamber deflection: 16.7663 deg
Table 1270: Controlpoints1 -3.5e-0050.45337 0.0683820.271 -0.0119220.054677 -0.0119220.041845 -0.0119220 -0.0110710 00 0.0127320.080455 0.0736290.37889 0.0736290.51216 0.0736290.7924 0.0518161 3.5e-005
Table 1271: Base 64 representation:LxYOf6PDPFsvIwA
Table 1272: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.261 4.858 ectsRMS curvature error: 42.69 43.41 %CD error -0.6 -1.4 dctsCm error 18 19 mctsUpper transition point 0.45 1.07 %
Figure 957: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 958: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
323
Profile: goe07k
Information: Gottingen 7K airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 959: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1273: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.0274 % @0.48CMaximum Camber: 4.5482 % @0.53CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.74148 %CLower nose radius: 1.4225 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 32.6586 degRelease Angle: 8.709 degNose Incidence: 8.7756 degCamber deflection: 17.4846 deg
Table 1274: Controlpoints1 00.97515 -0.00553130.15 -0.013620.15 -0.013620 -0.013620 -0.00698360 00 0.0326460.2156 0.100450.5 0.100450.81872 0.100450.98921 0.00382771 0
Table 1275: Base 64 representation:Vjgoqg KAGEajlA
Table 1276: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.386 3.657 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.4 -2.3 dctsCm error -167 -164 mctsUpper transition point 3.3 3.33 %
Figure 960: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 961: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
324
Profile: goe08k
Information: Gottingen 8K airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 962: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1277: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.97 % @0.48CMaximum Camber: 6.0907 % @0.53CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3249 %CLower nose radius: 3.0331 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 28.0749 degRelease Angle: 10.3132 degNose Incidence: 11.5523 degCamber deflection: 21.8655 deg
Table 1278: Controlpoints1 00.85596 -0.00778580.218 -0.018470.15 -0.018470 -0.018470 -0.00910750 00 0.0434910.21414 0.135550.5 0.135550.82283 0.135550.98973 0.0050381 0
Table 1279: Base 64 representation:Vkgo5g KFIEbgyA
Table 1280: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.309 6.667 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -5.2 -4.7 dctsCm error -256 -259 mctsUpper transition point 4.37 4.27 %
Figure 963: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 964: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
325
Profile: goe11k
Information: Gottingen 11K airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 965: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1281: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.6429 % @0.44CMaximum Camber: 2.6614 % @0.53CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.73767 %CLower nose radius: 0.67303 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.6342 degRelease Angle: 17.2322 degNose Incidence: 3.9146 degCamber deflection: 21.1468 deg
Table 1282: Controlpoints1 01 00.415 -0.016090.1 -0.016090.057699 -0.016090 -0.016090 00 0.0340840.23623 0.064450.5 0.064450.505 0.064450.83253 0.064451 0
Table 1283: Base 64 representation:hhgBb bGWH AJ7A
Table 1284: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.174 8.405 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.7 2.7 dctsCm error -48 -31 mctsUpper transition point -3.34 -5.38 %
Figure 966: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 967: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
326
Profile: goe14k
Information: Gottingen 14K airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 968: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1285: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.1887 % @0.48CMaximum Camber: 2.6132 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1186 %CLower nose radius: 0.80102 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 57.2958 degRelease Angle: 0 degNose Incidence: 5.0593 degCamber deflection: 5.0593 deg
Table 1286: Controlpoints1 00.93447 -0.03580.426 -0.03580.3 -0.03580.228 -0.03580 -0.03580 00 0.0447590.26864 0.0870.5 0.0870.505 0.0870.84075 0.0871 0
Table 1287: Base 64 representation:gegBk PTMP gA
Table 1288: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.558 5.403 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 7.3 5.3 dctsCm error 268 245 mctsUpper transition point -17.45 -16.31 %
Figure 969: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 970: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
327
Profile: goe15k
Information: Gottingen 15K airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 971: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1289: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.2642 % @0.48CMaximum Camber: 3.2502 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7486 %CLower nose radius: 1.335 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 57.2958 degRelease Angle: 5.615 degNose Incidence: 5.7423 degCamber deflection: 11.3573 deg
Table 1290: Controlpoints1 00.89474 -0.044750.496 -0.044750.3 -0.044750.225 -0.044750 -0.044750 00 0.0560290.2693 0.108750.5 0.108750.505 0.108750.84036 0.108751 0
Table 1291: Base 64 representation:gegBt QTST oA
Table 1292: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.959 8.222 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -6.3 5.9 dctsCm error -351 357 mctsUpper transition point 10.82 -10.45 %
Figure 972: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 973: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
328
Profile: goe16k
Information: Gottingen 16K airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 974: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1293: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.2785 % @0.47CMaximum Camber: 4.0669 % @0.53CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.5664 %CLower nose radius: 1.4634 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 57.2958 degRelease Angle: 9.3965 degNose Incidence: 9.9691 degCamber deflection: 19.3656 deg
Table 1294: Controlpoints1 00.84509 -0.05410.587 -0.05410.3 -0.05410.225 -0.05410 -0.05410 00 0.0676530.26751 0.13160.5 0.13160.565 0.13160.83183 0.13161 0
Table 1295: Base 64 representation:gegI3 QTaX uA
Table 1296: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 9.969 10.27 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.3 -0.7 dctsCm error 200 214 mctsUpper transition point 1.01 0.8 %
Figure 975: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 976: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
329
Profile: goe29b
Information: Gottingen 29B airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 977: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1297: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.0309 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 6.3362 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.28 %CUpper nose radius: 3.1603 %CLower nose radius: 1.7628 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.6432 degRelease Angle: 7.8473 degNose Incidence: 16.5006 degCamber deflection: 24.3479 deg
Table 1298: Controlpoints1 -0.00140.16918 0.0586810.069181 -0.019530.02536 -0.019530.023668 -0.019530 -0.018340 00 0.00224080.018677 0.112040.29792 0.112040.51372 0.112040.86004 0.0280841 0.0014
Table 1299: Base 64 representation:B7TUv7ECDIS4HrH
Table 1300: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.244 6.439 ectsRMS curvature error: 63.07 68.32 %CD error -1.9 -3.3 dctsCm error -34 -49 mctsUpper transition point 3.57 3.71 %
Figure 978: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 979: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
330
Profile: goe54
Information: Gottingen 54 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 980: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1301: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.3305 % @0.2CMaximum Camber: 3.0407 % @0.23CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.35 %CUpper nose radius: 3.075 %CLower nose radius: 1.0185 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 1.7694 degRelease Angle: 3.4157 degNose Incidence: 18.3506 degCamber deflection: 21.7663 deg
Table 1302: Controlpoints1 -0.001750.11049 0.0160320.01258 -0.00990.01258 -0.00990.003774 -0.00990 -0.006930 00 0.066280.19945 0.066950.19945 0.066950.32062 0.066950.42062 0.0408481 0.00175
Table 1303: Base 64 representation:-ANKsssBAE25DjJ
Table 1304: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.879 8.924 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 67.9 -11 dctsCm error -21 14 mctsUpper transition point -6.34 7.25 %
Figure 981: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 982: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
331
Profile: goe55
Information: Gottingen 55 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 983: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1305: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.8437 % @0.15CMaximum Camber: 2.2525 % @0.23CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.75 %CUpper nose radius: 1.8261 %CLower nose radius: 0.88268 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 0.28648 degRelease Angle: 3.4377 degNose Incidence: 9.5389 degCamber deflection: 12.9767 deg
Table 1306: Controlpoints1 -0.003750.46885 0.00687420.059728 -0.016810.05023 -0.016810.031444 -0.016810 -0.016810 00 0.0420460.14522 0.050940.1993 0.050940.22853 0.050940.99229 0.00398151 0.00375
Table 1307: Base 64 representation:0RNCW YDBHBjBiT
Table 1308: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.049 3.375 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.9 -4 dctsCm error 21 22 mctsUpper transition point 9.42 10.01 %
Figure 984: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 985: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
332
Profile: goe57
Information: Gottingen 57 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 986: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1309: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.427 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 5.0874 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.17 %CUpper nose radius: NaN %CLower nose radius: 0.81989 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.6801 degRelease Angle: 8.3867 degNose Incidence: 5.4808 degCamber deflection: 13.8675 deg
Table 1310: Controlpoints1 -0.000850.19219 0.0562990.074135 -0.011720.02513 -0.011720.01935 -0.011720 -0.011720 00 00.033321 0.081530.29909 0.081530.41803 0.081530.64277 0.081531 0.00085
Table 1311: Base 64 representation:A4TLi PCDF 3KtE
Table 1312: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.502 5.602 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -17.8 -8.9 dctsCm error -7 -12 mctsUpper transition point 22.4 21.62 %
Figure 987: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 988: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
333
Profile: goe79
Information: Gottingen 79 (Pfalz 11) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 989: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1313: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.5536 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 6.2117 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.56 %CUpper nose radius: 4.0106 %CLower nose radius: 1.3568 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.9154 degRelease Angle: 7.8752 degNose Incidence: 21.2597 degCamber deflection: 29.135 deg
Table 1314: Controlpoints1 -0.00280.11115 0.0774020.047518 -0.011090.01259 -0.011090.003777 -0.011090 -0.0077630 00 0.0418120.09769 0.089310.29925 0.089310.36933 0.089310.53558 0.089311 0.0028
Table 1315: Base 64 representation:eqTGlssBCF 7GsO
Table 1316: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.574 5.809 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point -14.78 NaN %
Figure 990: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 991: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
334
Profile: goe81
Information: Gottingen 81 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 992: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1317: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.3085 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 5.992 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.27 %CUpper nose radius: 2.6931 %CLower nose radius: 1.018 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.771 degRelease Angle: 8.7894 degNose Incidence: 20.6926 degCamber deflection: 29.482 deg
Table 1318: Controlpoints1 -0.001350.16048 0.0647390.060482 -0.009890.01259 -0.009890.008495 -0.009890 -0.0039560 00 0.0437630.14352 0.100190.29913 0.100190.43393 0.100190.59565 0.100191 0.00135
Table 1319: Base 64 representation:cgTMqaVBDE 4KuH
Table 1320: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.086 5.559 ectsRMS curvature error: 76.62 80.55 %CD error NaN -145.8 dctsCm error NaN -24 mctsUpper transition point NaN 1.01 %
Figure 993: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 994: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
335
Profile: goe92
Information: Gottingen 92 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 995: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1321: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.1008 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 4.8889 % @0.31CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %CUpper nose radius: 2.0213 %CLower nose radius: 0.71994 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.4933 degRelease Angle: 6.631 degNose Incidence: 26.8413 degCamber deflection: 33.4723 deg
Table 1322: Controlpoints1 -0.00080.1704 0.0303250.028863 -0.004850.01252 -0.004850.010981 -0.004850 -0.000970 00 00.03288 0.099330.29959 0.099330.56724 0.099330.99567 0.00164351 0.0008
Table 1323: Base 64 representation:A4TYpNIBBCB2KqE
Table 1324: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.645 6.626 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -7 -6.6 dctsCm error -46 -23 mctsUpper transition point 11.71 10.83 %
Figure 996: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 997: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
336
Profile: goe114
Information: Gottingen 114 (MVA MK.1) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 998: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1325: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.0747 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 2.8786 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.82 %CLower nose radius: 0.77013 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.329 degRelease Angle: 5.5483 degNose Incidence: 3.8044 degCamber deflection: 9.3527 deg
Table 1326: Controlpoints1 00.40118 0.0103780.30118 -0.02820.201 -0.02820.03951 -0.02820 00 00 0.0030140.13612 0.077620.39726 0.077620.56524 0.077620.72654 0.0555691 0
Table 1327: Base 64 representation:CpZSgAyNIMt2MpA
Table 1328: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.368 3.103 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN -1.3 dctsCm error NaN -12 mctsUpper transition point NaN 3.32 %
Figure 999: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1000: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
337
Profile: goe115
Information: Gottingen 115 (MVA MK.2) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1001: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1329: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.2606 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 3.3047 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3121 %CLower nose radius: 1.046 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.1053 degRelease Angle: 5.5947 degNose Incidence: 5.5042 degCamber deflection: 11.0989 deg
Table 1330: Controlpoints1 00.40265 0.0130050.30265 -0.026030.15081 -0.026030.095112 -0.026030 -0.015260 00 0.0150570.12606 0.083340.39735 0.083340.44135 0.083340.60035 0.0765111 0
Table 1331: Base 64 representation:MrZFjlYKLL62LpA
Table 1332: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.364 6.234 ectsRMS curvature error: 78.08 77.54 %CD error -8.1 -8.1 dctsCm error -8 10 mctsUpper transition point 0.59 0.28 %
Figure 1002: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1003: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
338
Profile: goe116
Information: Gottingen 116 (MVA MK.3) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1004: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1333: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.9872 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 3.8872 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.35 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1729 %CLower nose radius: 0.8917 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.5 degRelease Angle: 6.1516 degNose Incidence: 5.9889 degCamber deflection: 12.1405 deg
Table 1334: Controlpoints1 -0.001750.36222 0.0104640.12215 -0.025450.10067 -0.025450.038936 -0.025450 -0.00317630 00 0.0161370.14874 0.087380.3977 0.087380.52192 0.087380.62192 0.0729571 0.00175
Table 1335: Base 64 representation:MnZNkImGCL0tLpJ
Table 1336: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.899 4.071 ectsRMS curvature error: 68.17 77.62 %CD error 0.1 0.6 dctsCm error 1 0 mctsUpper transition point 0.22 -0.11 %
Figure 1005: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1006: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
339
Profile: goe117
Information: Gottingen 117 (MVA MK.4) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1007: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1337: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.1897 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 4.4574 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3721 %CLower nose radius: 0.99385 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.138 degRelease Angle: 6.3517 degNose Incidence: 7.8735 degCamber deflection: 14.2252 deg
Table 1338: Controlpoints1 00.30207 0.0207050.22286 -0.017630.10035 -0.017630.10035 -0.017630 -0.0172770 00 0.0168160.15151 0.089310.39825 0.089310.39825 0.089310.62881 0.0843351 0
Table 1339: Base 64 representation:MnZAl-AGJI74MrA
Table 1340: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.251 7.198 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.8 -1.6 dctsCm error 11 18 mctsUpper transition point -0.66 -1.34 %
Figure 1008: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1009: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
340
Profile: goe118
Information: Gottingen 118 (MVA MK.7) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1010: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1341: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.2482 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 5.8781 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.21 %CUpper nose radius: 0.0099716 %CLower nose radius: 0.08668 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.3965 degRelease Angle: 9.3965 degNose Incidence: 7.1671 degCamber deflection: 16.5636 deg
Table 1342: Controlpoints1 -0.001050.36871 0.0432130.11189 -0.00870.05007 -0.00870.05007 -0.00870 -0.0052050 00 0.00259840.10156 0.099410.3992 0.099410.59099 0.099410.97971 0.00610061 0.00105
Table 1343: Base 64 representation:CvaUplADEEDsLuF
Table 1344: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.263 5.435 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN -0.5 dctsCm error NaN -11 mctsUpper transition point NaN 1.92 %
Figure 1011: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1012: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
341
Profile: goe121
Information: N/AReference: UIUC
Figure 1013: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1345: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.5645 % @0.2CMaximum Camber: 4.4737 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %CUpper nose radius: 0.50145 %CLower nose radius: 0.91344 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.8801 degRelease Angle: 7.4786 degNose Incidence: 4.4551 degCamber deflection: 11.9337 deg
Table 1346: Controlpoints1 -0.0010.2258 0.0468760.1258 -0.014490.05021 -0.014490.021424 -0.014490 -0.014490 00 0.017770.094453 0.075240.29893 0.075240.32198 0.075240.63243 0.075241 0.001
Table 1347: Base 64 representation:PrTCg kDFG 4JrF
Table 1348: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.058 6.94 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -7.8 -7.3 dctsCm error 52 54 mctsUpper transition point 12.67 12.33 %
Figure 1014: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1015: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
342
Profile: goe122
Information: Gottingen 122 (MVA H.2) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1016: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1349: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.3966 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.05 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.25 %CUpper nose radius: 0.82018 %CLower nose radius: NaN %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.2465 degRelease Angle: 4.0106 degNose Incidence: 13.2896 degCamber deflection: 17.3002 deg
Table 1350: Controlpoints1 -0.001250.23031 0.0173910.13031 -0.007620.01255 -0.007620.012161 -0.007620 -0.0007620 00 0.0223630.091466 0.077130.2995 0.077130.55573 0.077130.89466 0.0135011 0.00125
Table 1351: Base 64 representation:TrTXgGCBIDP4GmG
Table 1352: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.776 4.529 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.3 -5.5 dctsCm error -30 -27 mctsUpper transition point 6.32 5.66 %
Figure 1017: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1018: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
343
Profile: goe123
Information: Gottingen 123 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1019: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1353: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.037 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 5.3415 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %CUpper nose radius: NaN %CLower nose radius: 0.94746 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.9901 degRelease Angle: 7.2766 degNose Incidence: 12.0421 degCamber deflection: 19.3187 deg
Table 1354: Controlpoints1 -0.0010.10138 0.0710430.083127 -0.00888250.012491 -0.00888250.0074947 -0.00888250 -0.00612890 00 00.00029886 0.08360.40008 0.08360.64875 0.08360.99649 0.00171931 0.001
Table 1355: Base 64 representation:A abjraBFEB-IsF
Table 1356: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 10.325 11.534 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.8 NaN dctsCm error -83 NaN mctsUpper transition point -1.75 34.16 %
Figure 1020: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1021: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
344
Profile: goe124
Information: Gottingen 124 (MVA H.4) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1022: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1357: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.0108 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 5.4663 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.5 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7123 %CLower nose radius: 0.70647 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.0248 degRelease Angle: 7.4232 degNose Incidence: 12.3585 degCamber deflection: 19.7817 deg
Table 1358: Controlpoints1 -0.00250.32344 0.0496870.078552 -0.010890.01259 -0.010890.005036 -0.010890 -0.0043560 00 0.0428540.16088 0.093240.29921 0.093240.56071 0.093240.66071 0.064991 0.0025
Table 1359: Base 64 representation:seTYnalBEFwuHrN
Table 1360: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.349 5.421 ectsRMS curvature error: 48.91 51.11 %CD error 6.6 NaN dctsCm error 29 NaN mctsUpper transition point -0.65 NaN %
Figure 1023: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1024: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
345
Profile: goe134
Information: Gottingen 134 (MVA H.12) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1025: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1361: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.2065 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.0984 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.90001 %CUpper nose radius: 2.3233 %CLower nose radius: 0.93703 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.1995 degRelease Angle: 6.4246 degNose Incidence: 19.1729 degCamber deflection: 25.5975 deg
Table 1362: Controlpoints1 -0.00450010.73862 -0.00564660.01246 -0.00884620.01246 -0.00884620.0049841 -0.00884620 -0.00530770 00 0.027660.092109 0.0869190.30039 0.0869190.58597 0.0869190.93942 0.0188281 0.0045001
Table 1363: Base 64 representation:UrTakllBAELRPqX
Table 1364: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.058 2.753 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.6 -2.2 dctsCm error -5 -5 mctsUpper transition point -2.8 -3.66 %
Figure 1026: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1027: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
346
Profile: goe137
Information: Gottingen 137 (MVA H.15) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1028: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1365: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.4501 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.0025 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.29 %CUpper nose radius: 1.8632 %CLower nose radius: 0.14017 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.3522 degRelease Angle: 6.0606 degNose Incidence: 21.2808 degCamber deflection: 27.3414 deg
Table 1366: Controlpoints1 -0.001450.23027 0.0149480.13027 -0.011210.07512 -0.011210.027728 -0.011210 -0.011210 00 0.0239690.1027 0.087060.29908 0.087060.40958 0.087060.54887 0.087061 0.00145
Table 1367: Base 64 representation:SpTKk nFEF 4LpH
Table 1368: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.388 5.376 ectsRMS curvature error: 54.28 54.78 %CD error -2.2 -2.7 dctsCm error -24 -16 mctsUpper transition point 2.73 2.04 %
Figure 1029: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1030: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
347
Profile: goe140
Information: Gottingen 140 (MVA H.17) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1031: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1369: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.3067 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 5.1206 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.58 %CUpper nose radius: 0.031033 %CLower nose radius: 1.2034 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.9588 degRelease Angle: 7.4485 degNose Incidence: 6.881 degCamber deflection: 14.3295 deg
Table 1370: Controlpoints1 -0.00290.37151 0.0373780.0251 -0.011380.0251 -0.011380.012889 -0.011380 -0.011380 00 0.00307190.045613 0.09680.29916 0.09680.53924 0.09680.98627 0.00522871 0.0029
Table 1371: Base 64 representation:C1TWo fCAFCoHqP
Table 1372: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 8.143 9.994 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2 -4.2 dctsCm error -37 -19 mctsUpper transition point 4.66 4.07 %
Figure 1032: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1033: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
348
Profile: goe142
Information: Gottingen 142 (MVA H.19) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1034: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1373: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.245 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 3.807 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %CUpper nose radius: 0.52396 %CLower nose radius: 0.61642 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.2144 degRelease Angle: 5.4255 degNose Incidence: 8.7989 degCamber deflection: 14.2244 deg
Table 1374: Controlpoints1 -0.0010.17992 0.0250340.079916 -0.009390.02509 -0.009390.020674 -0.009390 -0.00921720 00 0.0149860.064293 0.068760.29937 0.068760.5874 0.068760.88053 0.0199921 0.001
Table 1375: Base 64 representation:OxTas-LCEET4IoF
Table 1376: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.836 4.485 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.1 0 dctsCm error -12 4 mctsUpper transition point -0.77 -1.74 %
Figure 1035: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1036: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
349
Profile: goe143
Information: Gottingen 143 (MVA H.20) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1037: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1377: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.1027 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 4.0669 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.29 %CUpper nose radius: -0.48563 %CLower nose radius: 1.8393 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.9015 degRelease Angle: 5.615 degNose Incidence: 3.6791 degCamber deflection: 9.2941 deg
Table 1378: Controlpoints1 -0.001450.34282 0.0199160.064372 -0.014070.02518 -0.014070.024928 -0.014070 -0.0112990 00 00.015033 0.074770.29903 0.074770.57999 0.074770.9958 0.00202261 0.00145
Table 1379: Base 64 representation:A8TagyBCDGBsHnH
Table 1380: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.371 5.874 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.6 -1.6 dctsCm error -23 -3 mctsUpper transition point 4.15 3.38 %
Figure 1038: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1039: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
350
Profile: goe144
Information: Gottingen 144 (MVA H.21) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1040: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1381: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.7039 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 4.4619 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6285 %CLower nose radius: 0.49962 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.5988 degRelease Angle: 6.6459 degNose Incidence: 15.052 degCamber deflection: 21.6979 deg
Table 1382: Controlpoints1 00.2039 0.0410790.15923 -0.014250.05021 -0.014250.05021 -0.014250 -0.0126240 00 0.0173220.087396 0.081380.29878 0.081380.59401 0.081380.94084 0.0170791 0
Table 1383: Base 64 representation:OsTbi4ADHGN8PuA
Table 1384: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.026 6.061 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.6 1.7 dctsCm error -16 6 mctsUpper transition point -1.35 -2.03 %
Figure 1041: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1042: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
351
Profile: goe147
Information: Gottingen 147 (MVA H.6) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1043: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1385: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.087 % @0.18CMaximum Camber: 3.6984 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.33 %CUpper nose radius: 0.57005 %CLower nose radius: 0.11162 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.1154 degRelease Angle: 4.3602 degNose Incidence: 15.8753 degCamber deflection: 20.2355 deg
Table 1386: Controlpoints1 -0.001650.21288 0.023120.11288 -0.015850.07524 -0.015850.02259 -0.015850 -0.00410 00 0.0043020.00487 0.070790.29891 0.070790.36619 0.070790.46619 0.0664171 0.00165
Table 1387: Base 64 representation:E-TGeRsFDH74GmI
Table 1388: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.939 9.825 ectsRMS curvature error: 95 Inf %CD error -6.1 -6.9 dctsCm error -19 -24 mctsUpper transition point 15 14.69 %
Figure 1044: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1045: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
352
Profile: goe155
Information: Gottingen 155 (SSW D.1) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1046: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1389: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.0686 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 5.2356 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.4 %CUpper nose radius: 0.61304 %CLower nose radius: 0.4038 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.365 degRelease Angle: 5.9729 degNose Incidence: 9.282 degCamber deflection: 15.2548 deg
Table 1390: Controlpoints1 -0.0020.13521 0.0477180.13521 -0.008220.01255 -0.008220.00502 -0.008220 -0.0049320 00 0.0216430.11462 0.086990.29945 0.086990.65446 0.086990.75446 0.0393771 0.002
Table 1391: Base 64 representation:QnTgkllBIEs GpK
Table 1392: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.442 9.176 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 58.4 -3.1 dctsCm error 61 -83 mctsUpper transition point 6.49 -5.38 %
Figure 1047: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1048: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
353
Profile: goe164
Information: Gottingen 164 (MVA MK.10) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1049: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1393: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.1256 % @0.18CMaximum Camber: 6.2828 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.11 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2329 %CLower nose radius: 0.23637 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.1933 degRelease Angle: 10.1414 degNose Incidence: 19.2087 degCamber deflection: 29.3501 deg
Table 1394: Controlpoints1 -0.000550.31624 0.0829380.20458 -0.010310.07511 -0.010310.059944 -0.010310 -0.010310 00 0.0276760.093194 0.102050.29892 0.102050.66864 0.102050.92452 0.0218071 0.00055
Table 1395: Base 64 representation:RrThr NFJEP2KxD
Table 1396: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.473 8.265 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -6.4 -4.7 dctsCm error 58 65 mctsUpper transition point 11.09 9.57 %
Figure 1050: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1051: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
354
Profile: goe165
Information: Gottingen 165 (MVA MK.11) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1052: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1397: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.1218 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 5.3915 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.12 %CUpper nose radius: 0.33121 %CLower nose radius: 0.15463 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.3025 degRelease Angle: 11.0581 degNose Incidence: 15.541 degCamber deflection: 26.5991 deg
Table 1398: Controlpoints1 -0.000600590.50871 0.0764020.40674 -0.0234380.15625 -0.0234380.097656 -0.0234380 -0.00952150 00 0.0112790.060303 0.103120.29688 0.103120.67041 0.103120.9073 0.0241931 0.00060059
Table 1399: Base 64 representation:HyThraYKTKS0GyD
Table 1400: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 8.25 9.385 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -9.1 -9.1 dctsCm error 70 70 mctsUpper transition point 14.44 14.45 %
Figure 1053: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1054: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
355
Profile: goe167
Information: Gottingen 167 (V.Karman PROP.2) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1055: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1401: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.2219 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.487 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.9 %CUpper nose radius: 1.958 %CLower nose radius: 1.1099 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.1375 degRelease Angle: 6.7485 degNose Incidence: 15.069 degCamber deflection: 21.8175 deg
Table 1402: Controlpoints1 -0.00450.3729 0.00296490.02509 -0.012010.02509 -0.012010.01957 -0.012010 -0.012010 00 0.0340520.15936 0.09580.29926 0.09580.44868 0.09580.54868 0.0831131 0.0045
Table 1403: Base 64 representation:XeTOo OCAF2oKoX
Table 1404: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.203 4.597 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.8 0 dctsCm error -7 -9 mctsUpper transition point -1.89 -2.11 %
Figure 1056: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1057: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
356
Profile: goe173
Information: Gottingen 173 (Albatros 6020) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1058: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1405: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.7948 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 5.8597 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.18 %CUpper nose radius: 0.36885 %CLower nose radius: -9.4477e-006 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.6203 degRelease Angle: 8.0214 degNose Incidence: 17.1298 degCamber deflection: 25.1512 deg
Table 1406: Controlpoints1 -0.00090.25163 0.0542050.08886 -0.005440.01253 -0.005440.011273 -0.005440 -0.0016320 00 0.012090.059444 0.096480.29956 0.096480.62993 0.096480.9963 0.00167521 0.0009
Table 1407: Base 64 representation:IyTeoTGBFCB0JsF
Table 1408: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.094 5.075 ectsRMS curvature error: 69.48 84.37 %CD error -1.3 1.2 dctsCm error 31 51 mctsUpper transition point -1.61 -2.74 %
Figure 1059: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1060: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
357
Profile: goe174
Information: Gottingen 174 (Albatros 5020) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1061: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1409: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.5583 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 5.56 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.29 %CUpper nose radius: 0.91341 %CLower nose radius: Inf %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.4485 degRelease Angle: 7.4485 degNose Incidence: 14.3491 degCamber deflection: 21.7976 deg
Table 1410: Controlpoints1 -0.001450.25978 0.0430160.17626 -0.008120.01255 -0.008120.003765 -0.008120 -0.0056840 00 0.022340.08196 0.096720.29935 0.096720.58747 0.096720.90603 0.0204991 0.00145
Table 1411: Base 64 representation:PtTaossBLDP5JrH
Table 1412: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.052 7.265 ectsRMS curvature error: 59.68 60.93 %CD error 2.4 -7.6 dctsCm error 68 72 mctsUpper transition point -1.07 -1.62 %
Figure 1062: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1063: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
358
Profile: goe176
Information: Gottingen 176 (Albatros 7020) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1064: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1413: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.2323 % @0.19CMaximum Camber: 5.5542 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.23 %CUpper nose radius: 13.433 %CLower nose radius: 0.18926 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.3339 degRelease Angle: 8.709 degNose Incidence: 15.2675 degCamber deflection: 23.9765 deg
Table 1414: Controlpoints1 -0.001150.3791 0.0505030.25357 -0.015680.10025 -0.015680.043985 -0.015680 -0.00744960 00 00.032823 0.099420.29839 0.099420.61966 0.099420.94256 0.0140551 0.00115
Table 1415: Base 64 representation:A4TspejGLHK0JtG
Table 1416: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.696 8.374 ectsRMS curvature error: 66.66 65.68 %CD error -8.6 -9.6 dctsCm error 92 100 mctsUpper transition point 16.83 16.31 %
Figure 1065: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1066: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
359
Profile: goe177
Information: Gottingen 177 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1067: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1417: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.5578 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 4.9866 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %CUpper nose radius: 0.19815 %CLower nose radius: 0.11096 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.9283 degRelease Angle: 7.6838 degNose Incidence: 12.2156 degCamber deflection: 19.8994 deg
Table 1418: Controlpoints1 -0.0010.24282 0.0415930.14282 -0.00860.049991 -0.00860.021496 -0.00860 -0.005160 00 0.00968190.07096 0.08640.30009 0.08640.51426 0.08640.89447 0.0237161 0.001
Table 1419: Base 64 representation:HwTUkljDGER4KsF
Table 1420: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.501 6.476 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -4.4 -4.8 dctsCm error -26 -44 mctsUpper transition point 8.84 8.5 %
Figure 1068: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1069: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
360
Profile: goe178
Information: Gottingen 178 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1070: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1421: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.4025 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 3.9389 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6702 %CLower nose radius: 1.0938 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.9352 degRelease Angle: 6.4879 degNose Incidence: 11.6762 degCamber deflection: 18.1641 deg
Table 1422: Controlpoints1 -0.00150.42475 0.0264530.10402 -0.0143250.049979 -0.0143250.026688 -0.0143250 -0.0117520 00 0.017530.102 0.086050.30013 0.086050.32635 0.086050.56548 0.079971 0.0015
Table 1423: Base 64 representation:NpTCk0eDEG6oIqI
Table 1424: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.007 4.176 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1 1.7 dctsCm error -16 -22 mctsUpper transition point 0.33 -0.45 %
Figure 1071: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1072: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
361
Profile: goe180
Information: Gottingen 180 (MVA H.26) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1073: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1425: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.7645 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 4.4116 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.25 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2431 %CLower nose radius: 1.045 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.5371 degRelease Angle: 5.9015 degNose Incidence: 12.3688 degCamber deflection: 18.2702 deg
Table 1426: Controlpoints1 -0.001250.33164 0.0178030.13232 -0.0124130.049985 -0.0124130.006695 -0.0124130 -0.00682940 00 0.030170.10983 0.0870250.30011 0.0870250.61899 0.0870250.9362 0.0126951 0.00125
Table 1427: Base 64 representation:WoTski2DGFLwKpG
Table 1428: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.604 5.446 ectsRMS curvature error: 57.3 52.88 %CD error -2.4 -2 dctsCm error 77 96 mctsUpper transition point 2.29 1.42 %
Figure 1074: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1075: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
362
Profile: goe182
Information: Gottingen 182 (MVA H.27) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1076: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1429: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.1444 % @0.19CMaximum Camber: 5.3328 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.15 %CUpper nose radius: 0.26931 %CLower nose radius: 0.60932 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.5875 degRelease Angle: 8.1776 degNose Incidence: 13.3448 degCamber deflection: 21.5224 deg
Table 1430: Controlpoints1 -0.000750.34348 0.0495810.18683 -0.014280.0502 -0.014280.028614 -0.014280 -0.014280 00 0.00807950.036359 0.095360.29864 0.095360.47444 0.095360.85516 0.031461 0.00075
Table 1431: Base 64 representation:F3TQo cDJGVzIsE
Table 1432: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.834 8.108 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -4.8 -4.3 dctsCm error -74 -82 mctsUpper transition point 12.11 11.9 %
Figure 1077: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1078: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
363
Profile: goe184
Information: Gottingen 184 (MVA H.29) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1079: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1433: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.3137 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 5.178 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.22 %CUpper nose radius: 2.2956 %CLower nose radius: 1.0213 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.3782 degRelease Angle: 7.0307 degNose Incidence: 16.6305 degCamber deflection: 23.6613 deg
Table 1434: Controlpoints1 -0.00110.23061 0.0424440.13061 -0.013870.0502 -0.013870.046184 -0.013870 -0.013870 00 0.0308130.11408 0.091660.29866 0.091660.37535 0.091660.55489 0.091661 0.0011
Table 1435: Base 64 representation:WnTHm FDFG 4JrG
Table 1436: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.959 6.999 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.3 -2.4 dctsCm error -16 -35 mctsUpper transition point 2.07 2.22 %
Figure 1080: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1081: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
364
Profile: goe190
Information: Gottingen 190 (MVA MK.18) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1082: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1437: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.123 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 5.7206 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.294 %CLower nose radius: 1.3449 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.8771 degRelease Angle: 10.5061 degNose Incidence: 17.846 degCamber deflection: 28.3521 deg
Table 1438: Controlpoints1 00.39477 0.0733580.39477 -0.029380.15103 -0.029380.14479 -0.029380 -0.0290620 00 0.0513650.15318 0.107630.29621 0.107630.59315 0.107630.90789 0.0366981 0
Table 1439: Base 64 representation:ffTbt-DKSNW R2A
Table 1440: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.101 6.468 ectsRMS curvature error: 65.12 66.77 %CD error 3.2 3.2 dctsCm error -82 -81 mctsUpper transition point -3.49 -3.34 %
Figure 1083: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1084: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
365
Profile: goe195
Information: Gottingen 195 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1085: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1441: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.4849 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.7827 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %CUpper nose radius: 2.2551 %CLower nose radius: 1.1821 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.7093 degRelease Angle: 8.727 degNose Incidence: 15.8639 degCamber deflection: 24.591 deg
Table 1442: Controlpoints1 -0.0010.43374 0.0598650.27718 -0.0157950.074984 -0.0157950.0073146 -0.0157950 -0.00969550 00 0.01620.052663 0.08740.40009 0.08740.40009 0.08740.69183 0.0799571 0.001
Table 1443: Base 64 representation:M3aAkm5FOH5xJwF
Table 1444: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.084 6.171 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.1 -2.8 dctsCm error -37 -49 mctsUpper transition point 4.07 4.3 %
Figure 1086: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1087: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
366
Profile: goe199
Information: Gottingen 199 (L.F.G. 5406) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1088: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1445: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.5277 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 5.1059 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 1.1 %CUpper nose radius: 0.63811 %CLower nose radius: 0.83734 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.6995 degRelease Angle: 6.86 degNose Incidence: 12.8572 degCamber deflection: 19.7172 deg
Table 1446: Controlpoints1 -0.00550.13553 0.039960.035525 -0.008360.01252 -0.008360.011268 -0.008360 -0.0066880 00 0.0161750.061499 0.088470.29974 0.088470.52159 0.088470.64193 0.0732211 0.0055
Table 1447: Base 64 representation:MyTUlyGBBEz4Jqc
Table 1448: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.266 10.362 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 28.9 16 dctsCm error -116 -121 mctsUpper transition point 7.35 5.63 %
Figure 1089: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1090: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
367
Profile: goe210
Information: Gottingen 210 (DAIMLER) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1091: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1449: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.3236 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 4.4934 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0723 %CLower nose radius: -1.0158e-005 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.0474 degRelease Angle: 6.589 degNose Incidence: 18.1449 degCamber deflection: 24.7339 deg
Table 1450: Controlpoints1 -0.00080.29207 0.0300140.069981 -0.005740.01253 -0.005740.01022 -0.005740 -0.00063140 00 0.0104790.015361 0.07620.39962 0.07620.62796 0.07620.9705 0.00636691 0.0008
Table 1451: Base 64 representation:J9aYgHMBECFwJqE
Table 1452: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.216 7.303 ectsRMS curvature error: 52.77 52.36 %CD error -2.4 -3.6 dctsCm error 25 12 mctsUpper transition point 2.51 2.97 %
Figure 1092: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1093: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
368
Profile: goe217
Information: Gottingen 217 (MVA MK.12) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1094: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1453: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 19.1848 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 6.4451 % @0.59CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.74 %CUpper nose radius: 11.4589 %CLower nose radius: 1.6354 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.0952 degRelease Angle: 16.4622 degNose Incidence: 34.7006 degCamber deflection: 51.1628 deg
Table 1454: Controlpoints1 -0.00370.55312 0.0905920.54396 -0.047680.15266 -0.047680.15266 -0.047680 -0.0365060 00 0.144790.29167 0.149270.29167 0.149270.44205 0.149270.81234 0.0757721 0.0037
Table 1455: Base 64 representation:9ATO wAKeUg-K6T
Table 1456: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 8.613 9.941 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.4 1.4 dctsCm error -115 -136 mctsUpper transition point -5.17 -4.23 %
Figure 1095: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1096: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
369
Profile: goe222
Information: Gottingen 222 (MVA H.33) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1097: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1457: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.1758 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 7.1173 % @0.53CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4232 %CLower nose radius: 0.9792 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.9267 degRelease Angle: 16.5271 degNose Incidence: 17.3769 degCamber deflection: 33.904 deg
Table 1458: Controlpoints1 -0.00150.62274 0.0553110.34859 -0.043180.20231 -0.043180.045894 -0.043180 -0.0173090 00 0.0233790.057608 0.150.39179 0.150.60315 0.150.81145 0.0873891 0.0015
Table 1459: Base 64 representation:K2ZW awNMSkkS6I
Table 1460: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 8.68 10.541 ectsRMS curvature error: 33.94 35.46 %CD error -2.8 -2.5 dctsCm error -8 0 mctsUpper transition point 2.82 2.7 %
Figure 1098: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1099: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
370
Profile: goe223
Information: Gottingen 223 (MVA H.34) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1100: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1461: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.5405 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 5.9037 % @0.54CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %CUpper nose radius: -0.066341 %CLower nose radius: 0.84704 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 24.5075 degRelease Angle: 19.1941 degNose Incidence: 14.0783 degCamber deflection: 33.2724 deg
Table 1462: Controlpoints1 -0.0010.61158 0.0423450.49695 -0.04830.20314 -0.04830.18248 -0.04830 -0.0321010 00 00.025197 0.143890.39065 0.143890.60703 0.143890.99772 0.00242891 0.001
Table 1463: Base 64 representation:A7ZX8qHNYVBws-F
Table 1464: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.916 8.84 ectsRMS curvature error: 59.94 61.69 %CD error -7.8 -8.2 dctsCm error -64 -49 mctsUpper transition point 10.75 11.16 %
Figure 1101: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1102: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
371
Profile: goe225
Information: Gottingen 225 (MVA H.35) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1103: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1465: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.9069 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 7.7503 % @0.5CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.6 %CUpper nose radius: 1.723 %CLower nose radius: 1.0738 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 2.7844 degRelease Angle: 13.5592 degNose Incidence: 16.0875 degCamber deflection: 29.6466 deg
Table 1466: Controlpoints1 -0.0030.53906 0.0963810.30873 -0.023250.07551 -0.023250.055877 -0.023250 -0.023250 00 0.0301520.079151 0.13060.39714 0.13060.67673 0.13060.96112 0.0133821 0.003
Table 1467: Base 64 representation:PyZe3 RFQKIqD1P
Table 1468: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.828 6.649 ectsRMS curvature error: 59.18 60.47 %CD error 2.5 2.8 dctsCm error -13 -6 mctsUpper transition point -4.94 -5.17 %
Figure 1104: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1105: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
372
Profile: goe226
Information: Gottingen 226 (MVA H.36) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1106: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1469: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.1374 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 8.3427 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %CUpper nose radius: 4.3691 %CLower nose radius: 1.2804 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.943 degRelease Angle: 14.1116 degNose Incidence: 23.6366 degCamber deflection: 37.7482 deg
Table 1470: Controlpoints1 -0.0010.44575 0.0971890.34575 -0.024570.07563 -0.024570.051428 -0.024570 -0.024570 00 0.0167850.04426 0.139610.39644 0.139610.63335 0.139610.93094 0.0204371 0.001
Table 1471: Base 64 representation:I4ZZ7 UFTKM1G0F
Table 1472: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 11.047 12.016 ectsRMS curvature error: 75.48 78.02 %CD error 2.9 3 dctsCm error 19 38 mctsUpper transition point 2.42 2.08 %
Figure 1107: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1108: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
373
Profile: goe227
Information: Gottingen 227 (MVA H.37) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1109: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1473: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.3591 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 7.6239 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %CUpper nose radius: 0.42932 %CLower nose radius: 1.4515 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.116 degRelease Angle: 17.1706 degNose Incidence: 8.5119 degCamber deflection: 25.6824 deg
Table 1474: Controlpoints1 -0.00150.63246 0.0909060.33311 -0.0269330.07496 -0.0269330.05622 -0.0269330 -0.0269330 00 0.0136530.065123 0.140.40021 0.140.44819 0.140.62415 0.141 0.0015
Table 1475: Base 64 representation:G1aF7 QFSL iH7I
Table 1476: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.79 7.059 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.4 0.4 dctsCm error -8 -11 mctsUpper transition point 4.14 4.25 %
Figure 1110: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1111: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
374
Profile: goe229
Information: Gottingen 229 (MVA H.39) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1112: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1477: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.922 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 6.1376 % @0.53CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %CUpper nose radius: 3.0098 %CLower nose radius: 2.0474 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.8676 degRelease Angle: 12.2937 degNose Incidence: 11.8435 degCamber deflection: 24.1372 deg
Table 1478: Controlpoints1 -0.0010.60957 0.0427250.50957 -0.048980.20326 -0.048980.15029 -0.048980 -0.0262140 00 00.0055094 0.148440.39013 0.148440.41218 0.148440.61814 0.144381 0.001
Table 1479: Base 64 representation:A-ZC-hRNZV9yQ1F
Table 1480: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 13.132 14.261 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -27.7 -27.6 dctsCm error -53 -45 mctsUpper transition point 44.12 43.6 %
Figure 1113: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1114: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
375
Profile: goe233
Information: Gottingen 233 (MVA CA4) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1115: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1481: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.7496 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 7.8877 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.31 %CUpper nose radius: 2.204 %CLower nose radius: 0.77354 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 2.5611 degRelease Angle: 14.3239 degNose Incidence: 17.2799 degCamber deflection: 31.6038 deg
Table 1482: Controlpoints1 -0.001550.45733 0.141070.35733 -0.021030.10046 -0.021030.080368 -0.021030 -0.021030 00 0.0421910.12115 0.11940.39741 0.11940.64 0.11940.9964 0.00249611 0.00155
Table 1483: Base 64 representation:XrZay NGSJB1A3I
Table 1484: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.584 7.214 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.8 -4.4 dctsCm error -85 -84 mctsUpper transition point 1.12 1.08 %
Figure 1116: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1117: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
376
Profile: goe234
Information: Gottingen 234 (MVA CA5) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1118: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1485: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.8625 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 9.0649 % @0.53CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.74 %CUpper nose radius: 1.8451 %CLower nose radius: 0.88889 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 1.6043 degRelease Angle: 17.1314 degNose Incidence: 18.3166 degCamber deflection: 35.4481 deg
Table 1486: Controlpoints1 -0.00370.46328 0.153550.38183 -0.026010.10067 -0.026010.10067 -0.026010 -0.025230 00 0.0312440.083326 0.136590.39649 0.136590.65505 0.136590.99655 0.00481641 0.0037
Table 1487: Base 64 representation:PyZb59AGULB3C7T
Table 1488: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 8.074 12.062 ectsRMS curvature error: 83.73 85.33 %CD error -1.2 -0.5 dctsCm error -95 -70 mctsUpper transition point -3.25 -4 %
Figure 1119: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1120: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
377
Profile: goe239
Information: Gottingen 239 (MVA H.31) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1121: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1489: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.3629 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 6.1959 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.42 %CUpper nose radius: 3.035 %CLower nose radius: 1.2375 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.7892 degRelease Angle: 10.3286 degNose Incidence: 17.069 degCamber deflection: 27.3976 deg
Table 1490: Controlpoints1 -0.00210.40964 0.0539390.30827 -0.018930.07534 -0.018930.052217 -0.018930 -0.018930 00 0.0104850.032486 0.109840.398 0.109840.398 0.109840.66809 0.100041 0.0021
Table 1491: Base 64 representation:G6ZAu UFQI52MxL
Table 1492: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.568 6.84 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.1 0.2 dctsCm error 21 23 mctsUpper transition point 1.86 1.35 %
Figure 1122: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1123: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
378
Profile: goe240
Information: Gottingen 240 (KOLLER) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1124: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1493: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.8803 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 5.1087 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.22 %CUpper nose radius: NaN %CLower nose radius: NaN %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.1312 degRelease Angle: 8.2783 degNose Incidence: 15.0447 degCamber deflection: 23.323 deg
Table 1494: Controlpoints1 -0.00110.19924 0.0438480.11289 -0.008510.01256 -0.008510.012083 -0.008510 -0.0034040 00 00.0039936 0.08530.39936 0.08530.54205 0.08530.83662 0.0398531 0.0011
Table 1495: Base 64 representation:A-aPjaCBHEs5LsG
Table 1496: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.266 11.526 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -6.8 -6.9 dctsCm error -70 -69 mctsUpper transition point 6.95 7.25 %
Figure 1125: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1126: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
379
Profile: goe242
Information: Gottingen 242 (MVA PR.2) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1127: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1497: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.9379 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 7.5325 % @0.54CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.4 %CUpper nose radius: 0.53148 %CLower nose radius: 0.52671 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.101 degRelease Angle: 17.7839 degNose Incidence: 20.5214 degCamber deflection: 38.3052 deg
Table 1498: Controlpoints1 -0.0020.62788 0.106350.52788 -0.023660.1506 -0.023660.1506 -0.023660 -0.0229960 00 0.0127340.045766 0.14660.39626 0.14660.39626 0.14660.59196 0.145171 0.002
Table 1499: Base 64 representation:G4ZA-9AKcK-xD8K
Table 1500: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.715 6.972 ectsRMS curvature error: 28.91 28 %CD error -1.2 -0.6 dctsCm error -20 -11 mctsUpper transition point -0.94 -1.73 %
Figure 1128: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1129: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
380
Profile: goe255
Information: Gottingen 255 (MVA CA.6) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1130: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1501: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.4154 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 4.8452 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.50001 %CUpper nose radius: 3.1878 %CLower nose radius: 1.4709 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.4744 degRelease Angle: 8.2144 degNose Incidence: 14.3019 degCamber deflection: 22.5163 deg
Table 1502: Controlpoints1 -0.00250.52938 -0.0143540.42938 -0.0516910.20358 -0.0516910.070113 -0.0516910 -0.0155860 00 00.016801 0.138750.39038 0.138750.41516 0.138750.6077 0.134141 0.0025
Table 1503: Base 64 representation:A8ZD6TpNSW90WtN
Table 1504: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.811 4.188 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.2 -2.5 dctsCm error -10 -6 mctsUpper transition point 3.03 3.5 %
Figure 1131: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1132: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
381
Profile: goe256
Information: Gottingen 256 (JUNKERS E) airfoiReference: UIUC
Figure 1133: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1505: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.9444 % @0.36CMaximum Camber: 4.6763 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.25 %CUpper nose radius: 3.2247 %CLower nose radius: 4.3846 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 22.0788 degRelease Angle: 5.5593 degNose Incidence: 8.9405 degCamber deflection: 14.4998 deg
Table 1506: Controlpoints1 -0.001250.85827 -0.0263340.20114 -0.036510.20114 -0.036510.06526 -0.036510 -0.036510 00 00.011467 0.125880.39607 0.125880.60644 0.125880.85921 0.0457721 0.00125
Table 1507: Base 64 representation:A9ZW1 qNAQXtflG
Table 1508: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.713 9.403 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.9 -2.7 dctsCm error 27 45 mctsUpper transition point 6.57 5.54 %
Figure 1134: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1135: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
382
Profile: goe257
Information: Gottingen 257 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1136: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1509: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.925 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.0478 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 1.28 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6687 %CLower nose radius: 0.9912 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.988 degRelease Angle: 6.8861 degNose Incidence: 14.213 degCamber deflection: 21.0991 deg
Table 1510: Controlpoints1 -0.00640.21791 0.00425650.09667 -0.009560.01253 -0.009560.011666 -0.009560 -0.0004780 00 0.0237040.12331 0.084960.29973 0.084960.42382 0.084960.53882 0.084961 0.0064
Table 1511: Base 64 representation:SlTLjDEBFE 2Kog
Table 1512: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.482 3.708 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.4 -5.8 dctsCm error -31 -39 mctsUpper transition point 3.67 2.66 %
Figure 1137: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1138: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
383
Profile: goe264
Information: Gottingen 264 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1139: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1513: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.6938 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 5.5683 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.64 %CUpper nose radius: 0.64463 %CLower nose radius: 0.68903 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.9551 degRelease Angle: 6.7228 degNose Incidence: 7.9901 degCamber deflection: 14.7129 deg
Table 1514: Controlpoints1 -0.00320.18439 0.0645040.084389 -0.010960.02615 -0.010960.02615 -0.010960 -0.0103020 00 0.0235270.12879 0.088020.28926 0.088020.63109 0.088020.94279 0.0119551 0.0032
Table 1515: Base 64 representation:RjTfl7ACEFK4EqQ
Table 1516: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.785 8.832 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 3 0.3 dctsCm error -9 -33 mctsUpper transition point -6.13 -4.43 %
Figure 1140: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1141: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
384
Profile: goe265
Information: Gottingen 265 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1142: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1517: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.5622 % @0.13CMaximum Camber: 7.2624 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.21 %CUpper nose radius: 2.2796 %CLower nose radius: 0.51072 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.3545 degRelease Angle: 9.1079 degNose Incidence: 22.0725 degCamber deflection: 31.1804 deg
Table 1518: Controlpoints1 -0.001050.13955 0.0959320.13955 -0.009780.02509 -0.009780.02509 -0.009780 -0.00924270 00 0.0371830.090979 0.106980.29904 0.106980.40649 0.106980.52192 0.10081 0.00105
Table 1519: Base 64 representation:WsTKt7ACIE7 GuF
Table 1520: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.001 9.494 ectsRMS curvature error: 52.85 60.76 %CD error -0.2 -2 dctsCm error -61 -55 mctsUpper transition point 1.1 0.53 %
Figure 1143: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1144: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
385
Profile: goe269
Information: Gottingen 269 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1145: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1521: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.0889 % @0.2CMaximum Camber: 4.9198 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.58 %CUpper nose radius: 2.1235 %CLower nose radius: 1.1645 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.9384 degRelease Angle: 7.0501 degNose Incidence: 13.8146 degCamber deflection: 20.8647 deg
Table 1522: Controlpoints1 -0.00290.18391 0.0541380.083914 -0.01350.02517 -0.01350.02517 -0.01350 -0.0128250 00 0.0335480.12223 0.082460.29902 0.082460.43725 0.082460.55584 0.0802171 0.0029
Table 1523: Base 64 representation:alTNi8ACEG94HqP
Table 1524: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.105 7.954 ectsRMS curvature error: 40.95 40.89 %CD error -0.1 0 dctsCm error -21 -15 mctsUpper transition point -1.23 -1.52 %
Figure 1146: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1147: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
386
Profile: goe276
Information: Gottingen 276 (DAIMLER VII) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1148: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1525: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.6678 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 3.8774 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.8 %CUpper nose radius: 1.8361 %CLower nose radius: 0.66746 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.1143 degRelease Angle: 7.2811 degNose Incidence: 15.3118 degCamber deflection: 22.5929 deg
Table 1526: Controlpoints1 -0.0040.37009 0.0225990.01255 -0.008830.01255 -0.008830.00502 -0.008830 -0.0035320 00 0.0115530.051041 0.076620.29959 0.076620.29959 0.076620.66993 0.076621 0.004
Table 1527: Base 64 representation:K0TAgalBAE oLrU
Table 1528: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.412 5.468 ectsRMS curvature error: 68.01 70.09 %CD error 75 -60.7 dctsCm error -2 37 mctsUpper transition point 4.82 3.6 %
Figure 1149: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1150: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
387
Profile: goe277
Information: Gottingen 277 (DAIMLER VIII) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1151: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1529: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.1321 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.0152 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.32 %CUpper nose radius: 2.0059 %CLower nose radius: 0.98717 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.368 degRelease Angle: 6.4175 degNose Incidence: 17.9788 degCamber deflection: 24.3963 deg
Table 1530: Controlpoints1 -0.00160.25682 0.0161780.081652 -0.010370.02509 -0.010370.020005 -0.010370 -0.0082960 00 0.0185980.076462 0.085590.29923 0.085590.51619 0.085590.80419 0.0433071 0.0016
Table 1531: Base 64 representation:OvTUkyNCEEgzMqI
Table 1532: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.86 6.136 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -4.6 -5 dctsCm error -9 8 mctsUpper transition point 3.38 2.99 %
Figure 1152: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1153: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
388
Profile: goe278
Information: Gottingen 278 (DAIMLER IX) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1154: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1533: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.4334 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 3.7758 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %CUpper nose radius: 2.3007 %CLower nose radius: 0.89633 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.4513 degRelease Angle: 6.0834 degNose Incidence: 19.5893 degCamber deflection: 25.6726 deg
Table 1534: Controlpoints1 -0.0010.12761 0.019420.027607 -0.008210.01256 -0.008210.003768 -0.008210 -0.0057470 00 0.0302250.111 0.079790.29942 0.079790.61757 0.079790.85834 0.0310631 0.001
Table 1535: Base 64 representation:YnTshssBBEY4MqF
Table 1536: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.266 6.932 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 11.4 7 dctsCm error -19 -9 mctsUpper transition point 4.28 2.61 %
Figure 1155: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1156: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
389
Profile: goe279
Information: Gottingen 279 (DAIMLER X) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1157: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1537: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.4413 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.7096 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.37 %CUpper nose radius: 1.9881 %CLower nose radius: NaN %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.766 degRelease Angle: 7.9453 degNose Incidence: 21.7037 degCamber deflection: 29.649 deg
Table 1538: Controlpoints1 -0.001850.16152 0.0283420.037592 -0.005650.01252 -0.005650.011847 -0.005650 -0.00062150 00 0.0378550.10812 0.084150.29968 0.084150.32785 0.084150.66565 0.084151 0.00185
Table 1539: Base 64 representation:soTDjHDBCC 3NsJ
Table 1540: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.399 5.659 ectsRMS curvature error: 47.14 45.85 %CD error 4.2 -0.2 dctsCm error 47 61 mctsUpper transition point -3.67 -3.88 %
Figure 1158: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1159: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
390
Profile: goe280
Information: Gottingen 280 (DAIMLER XI) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1160: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1541: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.1632 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 4.4821 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.8 %CUpper nose radius: NaN %CLower nose radius: 0.0077883 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.2506 degRelease Angle: 7.4485 degNose Incidence: 20.2021 degCamber deflection: 27.6505 deg
Table 1542: Controlpoints1 -0.0040.53809 0.0195780.01252 -0.006670.01252 -0.006670.010368 -0.006670 -0.00073370 00 00.00071735 0.085110.29977 0.085110.64864 0.085110.99649 0.0046941 0.004
Table 1543: Base 64 representation:A TgjHLBADBeJqU
Table 1544: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 14.329 15.823 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -19.1 -21 dctsCm error -70 -58 mctsUpper transition point 3.56 2.77 %
Figure 1161: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1162: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
391
Profile: goe281
Information: Gottingen 281 (DAIMLER XII)Reference: UIUC
Figure 1163: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1545: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.0487 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.525 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.52 %CUpper nose radius: 0.23127 %CLower nose radius: 0.84938 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.0867 degRelease Angle: 7.0741 degNose Incidence: 9.0933 degCamber deflection: 16.1674 deg
Table 1546: Controlpoints1 -0.00260.30304 0.0221130.037172 -0.008430.01255 -0.008430.011295 -0.008430 -0.00750270 00 0.00940940.057424 0.085070.2995 0.085070.35785 0.085070.61588 0.085071 0.0026
Table 1547: Base 64 representation:HzTFj4GBCE tLrN
Table 1548: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.284 8.063 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -59.1 4.9 dctsCm error 4 -39 mctsUpper transition point -6.63 -6.3 %
Figure 1164: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1165: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
392
Profile: goe282
Information: Gottingen 282 (DAIMLER XIII)Reference: UIUC
Figure 1166: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1549: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.4156 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.3098 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.64 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3071 %CLower nose radius: 0.30781 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.8808 degRelease Angle: 8.3943 degNose Incidence: 17.5684 degCamber deflection: 25.9627 deg
Table 1550: Controlpoints1 -0.00320.24972 0.0277240.14971 -0.015130.0752 -0.015130.050627 -0.015130 -0.0148360 00 0.0182670.068705 0.094650.29878 0.094650.64258 0.094650.91447 0.0271451 0.0032
Table 1551: Base 64 representation:MwTfn-VFFGR3PuQ
Table 1552: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.294 6.458 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.2 1.3 dctsCm error 2 14 mctsUpper transition point -2.15 -3.18 %
Figure 1167: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1168: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
393
Profile: goe284
Information: Gottingen 284 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1169: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1553: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.7117 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 4.987 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.59 %CUpper nose radius: 5.1796 %CLower nose radius: 2.1007 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.9088 degRelease Angle: 6.7187 degNose Incidence: 21.669 degCamber deflection: 28.3877 deg
Table 1554: Controlpoints1 -0.002950.32439 -0.0366140.22439 -0.045370.10232 -0.045370.021812 -0.045370 -0.0164760 00 0.0636470.14947 0.137390.29297 0.137390.49955 0.137390.59955 0.105621 0.00295
Table 1555: Base 64 representation:efTT6XxHJTy3ToP
Table 1556: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.135 5.874 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 2.5 1.7 dctsCm error -20 -4 mctsUpper transition point -5.07 -4.38 %
Figure 1170: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1171: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
394
Profile: goe285
Information: Gottingen 285 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1172: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1557: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.7952 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 3.6729 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %CUpper nose radius: 1.8901 %CLower nose radius: 1.5298 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.2752 degRelease Angle: 0.83283 degNose Incidence: 9.5201 degCamber deflection: 10.3529 deg
Table 1558: Controlpoints1 -0.00150.95059 -0.00871290.09996 -0.026780.09996 -0.026780.060326 -0.026780 -0.026780 00 0.0354330.099642 0.095360.30014 0.095360.61092 0.095360.98871 0.00348531 0.0015
Table 1559: Base 64 representation:YqTco ZGALCSUhI
Table 1560: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.855 5.673 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.6 -2.4 dctsCm error 25 27 mctsUpper transition point 3.75 3.1 %
Figure 1173: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1174: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
395
Profile: goe286
Information: Gottingen 286 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1175: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1561: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.2573 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.1761 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.5 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1088 %CLower nose radius: 1.6584 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.3132 degRelease Angle: 5.615 degNose Incidence: 10.8485 degCamber deflection: 16.4635 deg
Table 1562: Controlpoints1 -0.00250.2808 0.00325370.099784 -0.014090.05017 -0.014090.0091633 -0.014090 -0.0100650 00 0.0236580.075722 0.087750.29893 0.087750.54244 0.087750.99542 0.00337051 0.0025
Table 1563: Base 64 representation:RvTWktzDDGByMoN
Table 1564: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.889 6.135 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -16.4 -14.9 dctsCm error -88 -61 mctsUpper transition point 31.31 30.58 %
Figure 1176: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1177: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
396
Profile: goe287
Information: Gottingen 287 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1178: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1565: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.7121 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 4.9458 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.5 %CUpper nose radius: 5.6267 %CLower nose radius: 0.93603 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.3715 degRelease Angle: 5.64 degNose Incidence: 9.0312 degCamber deflection: 14.6712 deg
Table 1566: Controlpoints1 -0.00250.42436 0.0243220.044578 -0.01040.02508 -0.01040.01552 -0.01040 -0.01040 00 00.019962 0.092630.39925 0.092630.5059 0.092630.65129 0.0553141 0.0025
Table 1567: Base 64 representation:A8aLn YCBEsmHoN
Table 1568: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 12.135 13.25 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.2 -4.2 dctsCm error -150 -152 mctsUpper transition point 5.74 5.99 %
Figure 1179: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1180: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
397
Profile: goe288
Information: Gottingen 288 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1181: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1569: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.6174 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 5.4663 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.59 %CUpper nose radius: 2.2319 %CLower nose radius: 2.6696 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.3543 degRelease Angle: 9.5547 degNose Incidence: 7.63 degCamber deflection: 17.1847 deg
Table 1570: Controlpoints1 -0.002950.48152 0.0185770.37723 -0.045520.15238 -0.045520.066157 -0.045520 -0.0343140 00 0.0408830.11233 0.136530.29285 0.136530.38478 0.136530.55565 0.136531 0.00295
Table 1571: Base 64 representation:TmTI5vjKRT 0QuP
Table 1572: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.502 7.749 ectsRMS curvature error: 17.15 17.13 %CD error 1.1 0.7 dctsCm error 15 34 mctsUpper transition point -4.68 -4.17 %
Figure 1182: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1183: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
398
Profile: goe289
Information: Gottingen 289 (MVA 289) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1184: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1573: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.7769 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 5.9481 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0866 %CLower nose radius: 2.1444 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.487 degRelease Angle: 8.7149 degNose Incidence: 5.4238 degCamber deflection: 14.1386 deg
Table 1574: Controlpoints1 00.4392 0.00271010.3392 -0.034450.1 -0.034450.078185 -0.034450 -0.0322020 00 0.0372340.13383 0.141650.3 0.141650.39548 0.141650.58841 0.141651 0
Table 1575: Base 64 representation:RiTJ77OGRP 1VvA
Table 1576: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.534 5.449 ectsRMS curvature error: 34.37 35.56 %CD error 0.9 0.5 dctsCm error 9 4 mctsUpper transition point -5.35 -6.04 %
Figure 1185: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1186: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
399
Profile: goe290
Information: Gottingen 290 (MVA 290) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1187: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1577: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.5903 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 3.72 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.60001 %CUpper nose radius: 2.915 %CLower nose radius: 2.1561 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.7537 degRelease Angle: 5.0696 degNose Incidence: 10.2326 degCamber deflection: 15.3022 deg
Table 1578: Controlpoints1 -0.0030.42064 -0.0415550.32064 -0.0528710.20361 -0.0528710.18497 -0.0528710 -0.0515640 00 0.0505510.1315 0.124740.29146 0.124740.35523 0.124740.50977 0.124741 0.003
Table 1579: Base 64 representation:aiTG09GNJX 2UnP
Table 1580: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.186 7.085 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.9 -4.3 dctsCm error 2 -1 mctsUpper transition point -2.53 -1.77 %
Figure 1188: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1189: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
400
Profile: goe298
Information: Gttingen 298 profileReference: UIUC
Figure 1190: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1581: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.3785 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 4.5086 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.59 %CUpper nose radius: 5.3414 %CLower nose radius: 3.8661 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.1425 degRelease Angle: 1.7081 degNose Incidence: 9.6178 degCamber deflection: 11.3258 deg
Table 1582: Controlpoints1 -0.002950.25031 -0.00115970.1404 -0.041220.07671 -0.041220.04219 -0.041220 -0.0329760 00 0.056430.096138 0.1040.39569 0.1040.53718 0.1040.97546 0.0043561 0.00295
Table 1583: Base 64 representation:ivZPrysFESD3EiP
Table 1584: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 8.714 13.641 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.2 -3.1 dctsCm error 31 63 mctsUpper transition point 5.44 4.57 %
Figure 1191: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1192: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
401
Profile: goe300
Information: Gottingen 300 (Friedrichshafen G20) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1193: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1585: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.8583 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 6.5118 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.18 %CUpper nose radius: 2.8897 %CLower nose radius: 3.1318e-006 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.2588 degRelease Angle: 9.0311 degNose Incidence: 27.5136 degCamber deflection: 36.5447 deg
Table 1586: Controlpoints1 -0.00090.13587 0.0580370.054241 -0.00977250.024991 -0.00977250.024728 -0.00977250 -0.00129310 00 0.0523210.13626 0.108730.3001 0.108730.39901 0.108730.57262 0.108731 0.0009
Table 1587: Base 64 representation:fiTJtIBCCE 5LuF
Table 1588: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 10.078 12.537 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 3 -1.3 dctsCm error -90 -98 mctsUpper transition point 3.49 3.2 %
Figure 1194: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1195: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
402
Profile: goe301
Information: Gottingen 301 (Friedrichshafen G 13) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1196: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1589: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.1197 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 6.4196 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %CUpper nose radius: 2.8586 %CLower nose radius: 0.79986 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.8862 degRelease Angle: 9.2067 degNose Incidence: 21.376 degCamber deflection: 30.5827 deg
Table 1590: Controlpoints1 -0.00150.2602 0.0471660.043501 -0.011440.02512 -0.011440.023242 -0.011440 -0.0111330 00 0.0513810.13853 0.113740.28864 0.113740.64039 0.113740.90019 0.0275921 0.0015
Table 1591: Base 64 representation:sgSgw9FCBFSxMuI
Table 1592: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.531 7.869 ectsRMS curvature error: 40.61 42.27 %CD error 5.9 6.1 dctsCm error 98 107 mctsUpper transition point -11.97 -14.32 %
Figure 1197: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1198: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
403
Profile: goe303
Information: Gottingen 303 (Friedrichshafen G03) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1199: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1593: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.6089 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 5.8597 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.45 %CUpper nose radius: 0.55702 %CLower nose radius: 0.8414 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.6917 degRelease Angle: 9.5986 degNose Incidence: 17.8247 degCamber deflection: 27.4233 deg
Table 1594: Controlpoints1 -0.002250.23937 0.0343220.13937 -0.012240.02513 -0.012240.02513 -0.012240 -0.0118730 00 0.00458640.0056645 0.106290.39891 0.106290.44031 0.106290.7105 0.0876991 0.00225
Table 1595: Base 64 representation:D-aEs9ACHF04PvL
Table 1596: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.178 10.011 ectsRMS curvature error: 39.57 43.27 %CD error 1 -1 dctsCm error -40 -61 mctsUpper transition point -1.32 -0.44 %
Figure 1200: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1201: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
404
Profile: goe304
Information: Gottingen 304 (Friedrichshafen G02) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1202: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1597: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.822 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 6.2931 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.23 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6762 %CLower nose radius: 1.4524 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.1982 degRelease Angle: 10.1388 degNose Incidence: 15.5525 degCamber deflection: 25.6913 deg
Table 1598: Controlpoints1 -0.001150.22239 0.0537660.074824 -0.015630.02523 -0.015630.020436 -0.015630 -0.0154740 00 0.0178290.028446 0.106520.39842 0.106520.51668 0.106520.77501 0.0666781 0.00115
Table 1599: Base 64 representation:L6ZNs-MCDHn1OvG
Table 1600: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.015 9.481 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 2.5 -0.3 dctsCm error -36 -13 mctsUpper transition point -1.61 -1.88 %
Figure 1203: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1204: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
405
Profile: goe320
Information: Gottingen 320 (Hansa-Brandenburg II.1) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1205: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1601: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.5694 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 6.1371 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.53 %CUpper nose radius: -Inf %CLower nose radius: 3.0681 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.0108 degRelease Angle: 7.138 degNose Incidence: 21.7854 degCamber deflection: 28.9234 deg
Table 1602: Controlpoints1 -0.002650.108 0.0149850.066083 -0.020730.02538 -0.020730.020592 -0.020730 -0.0205230 00 0.00133980.0059542 0.123520.29771 0.123520.57719 0.123520.64789 0.084871 0.00265
Table 1603: Base 64 representation:B-TZ0-MCDJ08NrN
Table 1604: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.565 8.367 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -9.9 -12.7 dctsCm error -55 -61 mctsUpper transition point 21.67 21.58 %
Figure 1206: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1207: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
406
Profile: goe325
Information: Gottingen 325 (Pfalz 54) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1208: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1605: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.2472 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.6289 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %CUpper nose radius: 0.29177 %CLower nose radius: 0.70881 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.676 degRelease Angle: 7.0166 degNose Incidence: 9.7361 degCamber deflection: 16.7527 deg
Table 1606: Controlpoints1 -0.00150.19674 0.022040.084994 -0.00981750.024985 -0.00981750.017149 -0.00981750 -0.0090020 00 0.0106910.058756 0.087250.30013 0.087250.35865 0.087250.66049 0.0758651 0.0015
Table 1607: Base 64 representation:IyTFk6UCEE33MqI
Table 1608: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.393 5.569 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 2 5.7 dctsCm error -21 -2 mctsUpper transition point -0.07 -0.69 %
Figure 1209: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1210: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
407
Profile: goe326
Information: Gottingen 326 (Pfalz 55) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1211: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1609: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.2286 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.7031 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1593 %CLower nose radius: 0.71345 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.8853 degRelease Angle: 6.2262 degNose Incidence: 12.5111 degCamber deflection: 18.7373 deg
Table 1610: Controlpoints1 -0.00150.1926 0.0236420.083433 -0.01060.02509 -0.01060.022159 -0.01060 -0.0102660 00 0.0288340.10757 0.087720.2992 0.087720.50868 0.087720.6542 0.0666451 0.0015
Table 1611: Base 64 representation:VoTTk9HCEFv3KpI
Table 1612: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.075 7.903 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -5.1 -5.8 dctsCm error -32 -37 mctsUpper transition point 2.6 1.27 %
Figure 1212: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1213: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
408
Profile: goe328
Information: Gottingen 328 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1214: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1613: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.3002 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.2627 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.5 %CUpper nose radius: 0.68633 %CLower nose radius: 1.3982 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.3635 degRelease Angle: 5.3792 degNose Incidence: 3.4067 degCamber deflection: 8.7859 deg
Table 1614: Controlpoints1 -0.00250.14033 0.0154690.04983 -0.0146820.024963 -0.0146820.015413 -0.0146820 -0.0146820 00 0.0232750.1184 0.083750.30021 0.083750.5236 0.083750.63985 0.0631631 0.0025
Table 1615: Base 64 representation:SmTUj YCCGv5JoN
Table 1616: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.5 5.214 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.6 -3.7 dctsCm error -15 -3 mctsUpper transition point 3.74 2.86 %
Figure 1215: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1216: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
409
Profile: goe329
Information: Gottingen 329 (Pfalz 58) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1217: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1617: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.2322 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 5.525 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.6 %CUpper nose radius: 0.93221 %CLower nose radius: 1.911 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.6316 degRelease Angle: 7.4796 degNose Incidence: 7.4949 degCamber deflection: 14.9744 deg
Table 1618: Controlpoints1 -0.0030.15344 0.0215890.062811 -0.012680.01262 -0.012680.011232 -0.012680 -0.0114120 00 0.0273760.1206 0.106130.29896 0.106130.55007 0.106130.74047 0.0643281 0.003
Table 1619: Base 64 representation:RlTXs5HBDFk5NrP
Table 1620: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.117 5.429 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 32.5 -23.6 dctsCm error -23 32 mctsUpper transition point 1.42 -1.82 %
Figure 1218: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1219: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
410
Profile: goe331
Information: Gottingen 331 (Pfalz 60) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1220: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1621: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.5941 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 6.8609 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.26 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5775 %CLower nose radius: 1.394 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.7943 degRelease Angle: 10.243 degNose Incidence: 22.0959 degCamber deflection: 32.3389 deg
Table 1622: Controlpoints1 -0.00130.13146 0.0418760.031459 -0.010880.01261 -0.010880.012484 -0.010880 -0.0107710 00 0.012760.015483 0.121570.39882 0.121570.42477 0.121570.63756 0.116551 0.0013
Table 1623: Base 64 representation:H9aDz-BBBF84RwH
Table 1624: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.707 10.752 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -15.6 NaN dctsCm error -33 NaN mctsUpper transition point 1.14 NaN %
Figure 1221: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1222: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
411
Profile: goe332
Information: Gottingen 332 (Pfalz 61) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1223: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1625: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.5061 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 6.4167 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %CUpper nose radius: 0.25194 %CLower nose radius: 1.0995 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 34.3775 degRelease Angle: 19.6525 degNose Incidence: 12.737 degCamber deflection: 32.3894 deg
Table 1626: Controlpoints1 -0.00150.32819 0.0274050.11797 -0.016220.05025 -0.016220.019308 -0.016220 -0.016220 00 0.00655290.035894 0.121170.39812 0.121170.59399 0.121170.98259 0.0145441 0.0015
Table 1627: Base 64 representation:D5ZVz mDFHHwl I
Table 1628: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.01 5.608 ectsRMS curvature error: 73.75 77.13 %CD error 0.7 1.2 dctsCm error 18 4 mctsUpper transition point 0.1 -0.73 %
Figure 1224: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1225: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
412
Profile: goe335
Information: Gottingen 335 (D.F.W.) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1226: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1629: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.2281 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.526 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.44446 %CLower nose radius: 0.78142 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.3012 degRelease Angle: 7.3956 degNose Incidence: 10.2731 degCamber deflection: 17.6687 deg
Table 1630: Controlpoints1 00.13875 0.0387990.13005 -0.007310.025 -0.007310.014376 -0.007310 -0.00723690 00 0.0159750.08613 0.081250.3 0.081250.37547 0.081250.59788 0.081251 0
Table 1631: Base 64 representation:NtTHi-bCHD -KqA
Table 1632: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.072 7.639 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 15.4 -16 dctsCm error -6 27 mctsUpper transition point -8.38 7.21 %
Figure 1227: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1228: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
413
Profile: goe342
Information: Gottingen 342 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1229: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1633: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.2517 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 6.1915 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %CUpper nose radius: 0.92859 %CLower nose radius: 0.75319 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.8967 degRelease Angle: 10.5822 degNose Incidence: 13.4924 degCamber deflection: 24.0747 deg
Table 1634: Controlpoints1 -0.00150.31744 0.0899830.034013 -0.00791870.012488 -0.00791870.011193 -0.00791870 -0.00615230 00 0.0197740.063162 0.08660.40013 0.08660.50886 0.08660.66127 0.0830131 0.0015
Table 1635: Base 64 representation:P1aMkxHBBD8sHwI
Table 1636: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.138 4.646 ectsRMS curvature error: 27.8 28.03 %CD error NaN 88.1 dctsCm error NaN 56 mctsUpper transition point 32.55 -4.42 %
Figure 1230: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1231: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
414
Profile: goe346
Information: Gottingen 346 (Friedrichshafen-Staaken) airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1232: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1637: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.7887 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 3.771 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.35 %CUpper nose radius: 0.52892 %CLower nose radius: 1.19 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.2031 degRelease Angle: 5.9065 degNose Incidence: 7.4364 degCamber deflection: 13.3428 deg
Table 1638: Controlpoints1 -0.001750.094516 0.0267840.024775 -0.009990.01258 -0.009990.012328 -0.009990 -0.00989010 00 0.0050470.0092574 0.066640.39944 0.066640.4833 0.066640.67331 0.0594011 0.00175
Table 1639: Base 64 representation:F-aJc-BBBE46JpJ
Table 1640: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.951 9.356 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN 16.7 dctsCm error NaN -62 mctsUpper transition point 47.1 8.26 %
Figure 1233: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1234: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
415
Profile: goe358
Information: Gottingen 358 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1235: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1641: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.9294 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 5.609 % @0.52CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.32 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7952 %CLower nose radius: 1.0398 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.2441 degRelease Angle: 11.863 degNose Incidence: 10.6421 degCamber deflection: 22.5051 deg
Table 1642: Controlpoints1 -0.00160.44764 0.0783990.39324 -0.024010.099962 -0.024010.063483 -0.024010 -0.0209780 00 0.0439950.16172 0.096570.30016 0.096570.38729 0.096570.6572 0.096571 0.0016
Table 1643: Base 64 representation:seTIo3XGVK 5IyI
Table 1644: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.327 5.156 ectsRMS curvature error: 35.06 35.4 %CD error 0 0.6 dctsCm error -29 -30 mctsUpper transition point -0.25 -1.33 %
Figure 1236: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1237: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
416
Profile: goe359
Information: Gottingen 359 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1238: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1645: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.0938 % @0.24CMaximum Camber: 5.7649 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.15 %CUpper nose radius: 0.56337 %CLower nose radius: 2.0224e-005 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.4258 degRelease Angle: 6.1973 degNose Incidence: 14.0295 degCamber deflection: 20.2268 deg
Table 1646: Controlpoints1 -0.000750.14028 0.0515980.14028 -0.00741940.012494 -0.00741940.010486 -0.00741940 -0.00011180 00 0.0187350.08403 0.0970250.30007 0.0970250.61229 0.0970250.99612 0.00135791 0.00075
Table 1647: Base 64 representation:MtTsoBKBIDB GpE
Table 1648: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.467 7.72 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 6.9 -1.4 dctsCm error 50 51 mctsUpper transition point -3.95 -4.55 %
Figure 1239: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1240: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
417
Profile: goe360
Information: Gottingen 360 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1241: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1649: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.7669 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 5.8386 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.21 %CUpper nose radius: 0.92516 %CLower nose radius: 1.2657 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.1579 degRelease Angle: 6.5675 degNose Incidence: 11.5775 degCamber deflection: 18.1449 deg
Table 1650: Controlpoints1 -0.001050.099013 0.0302330.035516 -0.010480.0126 -0.010480.01008 -0.010480 -0.00922240 00 0.0250580.1018 0.107060.29898 0.107060.56596 0.107060.82773 0.0349941 0.00105
Table 1651: Base 64 representation:PpTYt3NBBEZ7KqF
Table 1652: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.424 8.513 ectsRMS curvature error: 74.85 75.96 %CD error 43 36.5 dctsCm error -14 -16 mctsUpper transition point 3.77 -3.07 %
Figure 1242: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1243: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
418
Profile: goe361
Information: Gottingen 361 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1244: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1653: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.7216 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 5.5814 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.17619 %CLower nose radius: 0.82158 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.804 degRelease Angle: 8.2741 degNose Incidence: 8.0368 degCamber deflection: 16.311 deg
Table 1654: Controlpoints1 00.34409 0.0674590.057931 -0.008410.0125 -0.008410.01 -0.008410 -0.00740080 00 0.00867040.064003 0.087250.3 0.087250.59331 0.087250.9612 0.00731521 0
Table 1655: Base 64 representation:GxTbk3NBDEGsFsA
Table 1656: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.992 5.696 ectsRMS curvature error: 90.08 85.46 %CD error -0.8 6.7 dctsCm error -25 -24 mctsUpper transition point 3.81 2.68 %
Figure 1245: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1246: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
419
Profile: goe362
Information: Gottingen 362 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1247: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1657: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.6417 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 5.3052 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5858 %CLower nose radius: 0.051094 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.8451 degRelease Angle: 8.4111 degNose Incidence: 19.2358 degCamber deflection: 27.647 deg
Table 1658: Controlpoints1 00.3514 0.0623230.14166 -0.005850.025 -0.005850.008773 -0.005850 -0.00172870 00 0.0392720.14588 0.08330.3 0.08330.39579 0.08330.59103 0.0819711 0
Table 1659: Base 64 representation:egTJjTpCIC-vHtA
Table 1660: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.761 7.6 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.6 2.7 dctsCm error -30 -28 mctsUpper transition point -0.94 -1.22 %
Figure 1248: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1249: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
420
Profile: goe363
Information: Gottingen 363 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1250: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1661: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.0102 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 5.6788 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.11 %CUpper nose radius: 0.80406 %CLower nose radius: 0.52159 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.8286 degRelease Angle: 8.4326 degNose Incidence: 20.9052 degCamber deflection: 29.3378 deg
Table 1662: Controlpoints1 -0.000550.27471 0.025010.1673 -0.014930.07523 -0.014930.051601 -0.014930 -0.0133950 00 0.0132620.032812 0.109840.29829 0.109840.56373 0.109840.75604 0.065221 0.00055
Table 1663: Base 64 representation:I4TYu4UFGGl3OtD
Table 1664: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.919 7.69 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -7.3 -7.1 dctsCm error -10 -12 mctsUpper transition point 13.33 13.53 %
Figure 1251: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1252: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
421
Profile: goe364
Information: Gottingen 364 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1253: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1665: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.9015 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 6.5007 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 4.0046 %CLower nose radius: 0.35239 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.0814 degRelease Angle: 8.8591 degNose Incidence: 28.2032 degCamber deflection: 37.0623 deg
Table 1666: Controlpoints1 00.19755 0.0324870.097553 -0.007910.0125 -0.007910.0068122 -0.007910 -0.00400050 00 0.0540.10922 0.11910.3 0.11910.44618 0.11910.65408 0.095281 0
Table 1667: Base 64 representation:soTNygsBGDy4PtA
Table 1668: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.703 7.216 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.9 -4 dctsCm error -45 -11 mctsUpper transition point 1.09 -0.45 %
Figure 1254: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1255: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
422
Profile: goe365
Information: Gottingen 365 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1256: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1669: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.7057 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 5.1228 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.2532 %CLower nose radius: 0.82568 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.9764 degRelease Angle: 7.3863 degNose Incidence: 20.945 degCamber deflection: 28.3314 deg
Table 1670: Controlpoints1 00.12491 -0.00919230.026247 -0.010240.02511 -0.010240.013123 -0.010240 -0.00849920 00 0.036990.091088 0.109640.29885 0.109640.53276 0.109640.68496 0.0866271 0
Table 1671: Base 64 representation:WrTVu0fCAEy5SrA
Table 1672: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.213 6.453 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 3.3 0.4 dctsCm error 22 25 mctsUpper transition point -6.68 -8.51 %
Figure 1257: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1258: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
423
Profile: goe366
Information: Gottingen 366 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1259: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1673: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.1888 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 7.2187 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %CUpper nose radius: 3.4342 %CLower nose radius: 2.6543 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.9201 degRelease Angle: 11.1957 degNose Incidence: 16.5136 degCamber deflection: 27.7093 deg
Table 1674: Controlpoints1 -0.00150.20547 0.0295170.03978 -0.01680.01276 -0.01680.010208 -0.01680 -0.013440 00 0.0581280.14758 0.137520.29787 0.137520.51442 0.137520.69987 0.111661 0.0015
Table 1675: Base 64 representation:bgTU6yNBCHz0UxI
Table 1676: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.628 5.439 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -191.8 NaN dctsCm error 63 NaN mctsUpper transition point -10.2 NaN %
Figure 1260: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1261: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
424
Profile: goe367
Information: Gottingen 367 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1262: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1677: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.2696 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 4.5953 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.32 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7669 %CLower nose radius: 2.4886 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.3072 degRelease Angle: 6.9749 degNose Incidence: 5.9475 degCamber deflection: 12.9224 deg
Table 1678: Controlpoints1 -0.00160.93579 -0.00292110.83244 -0.037580.10097 -0.037580.067069 -0.037580 -0.0333570 00 0.0328020.091345 0.127170.39671 0.127170.61898 0.127170.96137 0.0120441 0.0016
Table 1679: Base 64 representation:RwZY14VGzQGZSqI
Table 1680: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.421 5.583 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -6 -5.5 dctsCm error -29 -23 mctsUpper transition point 7.47 6.76 %
Figure 1263: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1264: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
425
Profile: goe368
Information: Gottingen 368 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1265: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1681: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.2974 % @0.17CMaximum Camber: 3.7096 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: -Inf %CLower nose radius: 0.1362 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.2051 degRelease Angle: 5.2111 degNose Incidence: 17.5778 degCamber deflection: 22.789 deg
Table 1682: Controlpoints1 00.1942 0.0226290.1457 -0.015720.07527 -0.015720.055331 -0.015720 -0.00708790 00 0.000689320.0089634 0.071580.29878 0.071580.46427 0.071580.95791 0.00652611 0
Table 1683: Base 64 representation:B9TPfsRFFHG7IoA
Table 1684: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 9.465 10.442 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -4.6 -4.3 dctsCm error -16 -31 mctsUpper transition point 10.19 9.94 %
Figure 1266: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1267: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
426
Profile: goe369
Information: Gottingen 369 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1268: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1685: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.8831 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 5.3543 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.7469 %CLower nose radius: 0.00047573 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.0923 degRelease Angle: 6.5577 degNose Incidence: 28.1874 degCamber deflection: 34.7451 deg
Table 1686: Controlpoints1 00.095197 0.0555220.061125 -0.00098750.012501 -0.00098750.012299 -0.00098750 -0.00019750 00 0.0598860.19584 0.08280.29992 0.08280.4509 0.08280.52399 0.0805441 0
Table 1687: Base 64 representation:tWTOiNBBDA99HqA
Table 1688: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.339 7.588 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.8 NaN dctsCm error -12 NaN mctsUpper transition point 2.07 NaN %
Figure 1269: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1270: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
427
Profile: goe371
Information: Gttingen 371 AirfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1271: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1689: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.0085 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 4.5465 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2408 %CLower nose radius: 0.66627 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.1859 degRelease Angle: 7.0192 degNose Incidence: 13.1755 degCamber deflection: 20.1947 deg
Table 1690: Controlpoints1 00.22683 0.0327610.14092 -0.007420.01255 -0.007420.01004 -0.007420 -0.0066780 00 0.0351490.14936 0.079450.29948 0.079450.46147 0.079450.62758 0.0765291 0
Table 1691: Base 64 representation:cgTPh5NBID95KqA
Table 1692: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.432 6.053 ectsRMS curvature error: 34.92 36.89 %CD error -4.2 -9.8 dctsCm error 10 28 mctsUpper transition point 5.5 4.8 %
Figure 1272: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1273: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
428
Profile: goe372
Information: Gttingen 372 ProfileReference: UIUC
Figure 1274: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1693: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.0951 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 4.2968 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.029119 %CLower nose radius: 0.53134 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.1261 degRelease Angle: 7.1181 degNose Incidence: 1.374 degCamber deflection: 8.4921 deg
Table 1694: Controlpoints1 00.27444 0.0387250.1357 -0.011920.05014 -0.011920.010028 -0.011920 -0.005960 00 0.00362950.067859 0.072590.39917 0.072590.42901 0.072590.64579 0.0700151 0
Table 1695: Base 64 representation:D0aDfgyDGF91JrA
Table 1696: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.339 4.481 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.6 NaN dctsCm error -38 NaN mctsUpper transition point 4.95 NaN %
Figure 1275: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1276: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
429
Profile: goe373
Information: Gttingen 373 ProfileReference: UIUC
Figure 1277: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1697: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.5944 % @0.24CMaximum Camber: 5.0853 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.42147 %CLower nose radius: 1.8942 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.2361 degRelease Angle: 7.2929 degNose Incidence: 8.2961 degCamber deflection: 15.589 deg
Table 1698: Controlpoints1 00.21053 0.0507050.022759 -0.009870.0126 -0.009870.00378 -0.009870 -0.0069090 00 0.0128450.05872 0.082990.29917 0.082990.35524 0.082990.56948 0.082991 0
Table 1699: Base 64 representation:KyTFissBBE zIrA
Table 1700: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.899 5.061 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN -65.7 dctsCm error NaN 15 mctsUpper transition point NaN 0.18 %
Figure 1278: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1279: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
430
Profile: goe374
Information: Gttingen 374 profileReference: UIUC
Figure 1280: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1701: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.6411 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 4.4309 % @0.3CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.473 %CLower nose radius: 0.30378 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.5858 degRelease Angle: 5.9005 degNose Incidence: 17.7723 degCamber deflection: 23.6728 deg
Table 1702: Controlpoints1 00.022395 0.0274360.022395 -0.003940.01252 -0.003940.003756 -0.003940 -0.0027580 00 0.0109070.037729 0.07750.29961 0.07750.33543 0.07750.58492 0.0746361 0
Table 1703: Base 64 representation:J3TDgssBBC9 KpA
Table 1704: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.956 8.86 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 4 -0.5 dctsCm error -35 -39 mctsUpper transition point 3.74 3.16 %
Figure 1281: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1282: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
431
Profile: goe381
Information: Gttingen 381Reference: UIUC
Figure 1283: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1705: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.7682 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 5.586 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %CUpper nose radius: 0.091186 %CLower nose radius: 0.17082 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.2804 degRelease Angle: 6.7586 degNose Incidence: 11.7689 degCamber deflection: 18.5275 deg
Table 1706: Controlpoints1 -0.00080.074652 0.0577170.033645 -0.005340.01252 -0.005340.00626 -0.005340 -0.002670 00 0.00603530.05093 0.089480.29959 0.089480.61732 0.089480.88026 0.0216961 0.0008
Table 1707: Base 64 representation:E0TslggBBCU8HqE
Table 1708: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 9.044 9.729 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 56.6 -4 dctsCm error -14 -30 mctsUpper transition point 5.41 5.34 %
Figure 1284: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1285: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
432
Profile: goe383
Information: Gottingen 383 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1286: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1709: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 20.1888 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.9227 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.32001 %CUpper nose radius: 7.083 %CLower nose radius: 10.6884 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 21.6699 degRelease Angle: 5.9322 degNose Incidence: 20.5927 degCamber deflection: 26.5249 deg
Table 1710: Controlpoints1 -0.00160.65527 -0.0311710.49708 -0.0525310.20466 -0.0525310.0027949 -0.0525310 -0.0141120 00 0.0981180.20388 0.149960.28668 0.149960.5177 0.149960.6177 0.116781 0.0016
Table 1711: Base 64 representation:pSSV R-NYWyrYpI
Table 1712: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.511 6.624 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.9 2.1 dctsCm error -5 0 mctsUpper transition point -7.18 -7.75 %
Figure 1287: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1288: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
433
Profile: goe385
Information: Gottingen 385 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1289: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1713: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.8934 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 4.15 % @0.34CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.42 %CUpper nose radius: 0.96711 %CLower nose radius: 0.69449 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.4112 degRelease Angle: 5.2183 degNose Incidence: 12.7174 degCamber deflection: 17.9358 deg
Table 1714: Controlpoints1 -0.00210.12369 -0.00955280.02509 -0.010390.02509 -0.010390.023316 -0.010390 -0.010390 00 0.0240440.089664 0.090840.29923 0.090840.41803 0.090840.54021 0.090841 0.0021
Table 1715: Base 64 representation:RsTLm FCAE 5NoL
Table 1716: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.133 5.161 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.8 -1.8 dctsCm error -16 -24 mctsUpper transition point 2.42 1.89 %
Figure 1290: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1291: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
434
Profile: goe387
Information: Gottingen 387 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1292: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1717: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.9015 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 5.483 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.6524 %CLower nose radius: 4.8328 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.8505 degRelease Angle: 7.4367 degNose Incidence: 15.9356 degCamber deflection: 23.3723 deg
Table 1718: Controlpoints1 00.33849 -0.0114140.23849 -0.027950.1 -0.027950.0052404 -0.027950 -0.0129940 00 0.0584670.14039 0.127650.3 0.127650.43832 0.127650.55075 0.127651 0
Table 1719: Base 64 representation:shTN1e8GKM 3TrA
Table 1720: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.549 5.216 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1 -0.9 dctsCm error -36 -46 mctsUpper transition point -0.51 -1.01 %
Figure 1293: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1294: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
435
Profile: goe389
Information: Gottingen 389 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1295: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1721: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.4259 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 3.9925 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.21 %CUpper nose radius: 0.86353 %CLower nose radius: 1.191 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.333 degRelease Angle: 6.3975 degNose Incidence: 6.9206 degCamber deflection: 13.318 deg
Table 1722: Controlpoints1 -0.001050.39392 0.00139310.27082 -0.019180.10039 -0.019180.021484 -0.019180 -0.0130610 00 0.0255960.11381 0.090610.29817 0.090610.40673 0.090610.62062 0.0856021 0.00105
Table 1723: Base 64 representation:SnTKmrxGMI70OpF
Table 1724: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.479 4.884 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.7 -0.8 dctsCm error 17 37 mctsUpper transition point 2.08 1.56 %
Figure 1296: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1297: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
436
Profile: goe392
Information: Gottingen 392 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1298: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1725: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.9366 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 4.836 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.0045356 %CLower nose radius: 0.12774 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.7899 degRelease Angle: 12.0552 degNose Incidence: 6.3331 degCamber deflection: 18.3883 deg
Table 1726: Controlpoints1 00.58345 0.0229990.30099 -0.01190.15 -0.01190.11866 -0.01190 -0.0100530 00 0.00168150.09351 0.09660.4 0.09660.57583 0.09660.92796 0.0275821 0
Table 1727: Base 64 representation:BwaTo1NKLFSlUyA
Table 1728: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.535 5.513 ectsRMS curvature error: 71.96 69.03 %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %
Figure 1299: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1300: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
437
Profile: goe393
Information: Gottingen 393 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1301: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1729: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.2277 % @0.24CMaximum Camber: 4.0578 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.13 %CUpper nose radius: 0.96849 %CLower nose radius: 1.7509 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.7154 degRelease Angle: 4.2643 degNose Incidence: 6.8687 degCamber deflection: 11.133 deg
Table 1730: Controlpoints1 -0.000650.15186 0.0349950.070451 -0.012930.05017 -0.012930.011092 -0.012930 -0.0113780 00 0.025960.10437 0.070990.29905 0.070990.43282 0.070990.53282 0.0507581 0.00065
Table 1731: Base 64 representation:XpTMe3xDBG05EmD
Table 1732: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 8.54 10.952 ectsRMS curvature error: 91.73 95.63 %CD error -0.3 0.6 dctsCm error -119 -139 mctsUpper transition point 3.19 3.05 %
Figure 1302: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1303: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
438
Profile: goe394
Information: Gottingen 394 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1304: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1733: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.0591 % @0.19CMaximum Camber: 5.8436 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.15 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2492 %CLower nose radius: 0.74737 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 2.5124 degRelease Angle: 7.5294 degNose Incidence: 10.725 degCamber deflection: 18.2544 deg
Table 1734: Controlpoints1 -0.000750.23875 0.0829330.14058 -0.011220.02513 -0.011220.019566 -0.011220 -0.00987360 00 0.0374410.16833 0.084860.29905 0.084860.64591 0.084860.65679 0.0537941 0.00075
Table 1735: Base 64 representation:ccTgj3OCIF94DrE
Table 1736: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.722 10.136 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1 -0.1 dctsCm error -63 -65 mctsUpper transition point -2.41 -3.16 %
Figure 1305: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1306: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
439
Profile: goe395
Information: Gottingen 395 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1307: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1737: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.1672 % @0.12CMaximum Camber: 6.9883 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.15 %CUpper nose radius: 1.072 %CLower nose radius: 0.70554 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.7148 degRelease Angle: 9.7627 degNose Incidence: 11.4391 degCamber deflection: 21.2018 deg
Table 1738: Controlpoints1 -0.000750.21489 0.108270.17059 -0.010940.02511 -0.010940.021835 -0.010940 -0.0101340 00 0.0294220.12113 0.094970.39901 0.094970.6214 0.094970.72676 0.0569391 0.00075
Table 1739: Base 64 representation:UsaYo6ICKFt8EvE
Table 1740: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 9.631 13.103 ectsRMS curvature error: 95.3 Inf %CD error -1.5 4.4 dctsCm error -20 -27 mctsUpper transition point 1.02 1.1 %
Figure 1308: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1309: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
440
Profile: goe396
Information: Gottingen 396 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1310: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1741: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 4.8735 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 5.6094 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.23575 %CLower nose radius: 0.15617 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.7566 degRelease Angle: 8.8548 degNose Incidence: 10.0467 degCamber deflection: 18.9015 deg
Table 1742: Controlpoints1 00.22204 0.0745870.12887 -0.003960.0125 -0.003960.0034259 -0.003960 -0.00188860 00 0.0129150.10613 0.08020.4 0.08020.59918 0.08020.85843 0.0306951 0
Table 1743: Base 64 representation:KuaVhftBICY4ItA
Table 1744: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.817 12.179 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.4 -3.1 dctsCm error -113 -101 mctsUpper transition point 4.7 4.8 %
Figure 1311: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1312: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
441
Profile: goe397
Information: Gottingen 397 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1313: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1745: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.1462 % @0.38CMaximum Camber: 3.8917 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.43066 %CLower nose radius: 0.41407 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.2804 degRelease Angle: 5.4493 degNose Incidence: 5.2984 degCamber deflection: 10.7477 deg
Table 1746: Controlpoints1 00.15949 0.0338920.098916 -0.007420.0125 -0.007420.0050897 -0.007420 -0.00374830 00 0.0191940.12832 0.06460.4 0.06460.48549 0.06460.62364 0.0568481 0
Table 1747: Base 64 representation:TqaJcglBGD37HoA
Table 1748: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.728 6.287 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %
Figure 1314: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1315: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
442
Profile: goe398
Information: Gottingen 398 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1316: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1749: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.8849 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.855 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 4.6124 %CLower nose radius: 0.88874 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.16 degRelease Angle: 7.3088 degNose Incidence: 24.1491 degCamber deflection: 31.4579 deg
Table 1750: Controlpoints1 00.40538 -0.0131950.25755 -0.02580.15 -0.02580.087 -0.02580 -0.0227040 00 0.0716780.16709 0.11690.3 0.11690.45638 0.11690.6386 0.102871 0
Table 1751: Base 64 representation:mcTOx3bKIL3yTrA
Table 1752: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.031 4.707 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 2.2 2.9 dctsCm error -52 -33 mctsUpper transition point 0.84 -0.79 %
Figure 1317: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1318: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
443
Profile: goe399
Information: Gottingen 399 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1319: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1753: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.9305 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.1927 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.78557 %CLower nose radius: 0.26656 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.6276 degRelease Angle: 6.1849 degNose Incidence: 9.4645 degCamber deflection: 15.6494 deg
Table 1754: Controlpoints1 00.20721 0.0258990.10951 -0.00930.02507 -0.00930.011596 -0.00930 -0.00453960 00 0.0289640.16019 0.07590.29939 0.07590.47792 0.07590.63552 0.0675431 0
Table 1755: Base 64 representation:YeTQgfhCGE44KpA
Table 1756: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.897 5.951 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.2 NaN dctsCm error -52 NaN mctsUpper transition point -1.35 NaN %
Figure 1320: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1321: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
444
Profile: goe400
Information: Gottingen 400 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1322: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1757: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.2388 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 4.7808 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.08 %CUpper nose radius: 0.94009 %CLower nose radius: 1.175 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.0672 degRelease Angle: 6.0315 degNose Incidence: 6.6319 degCamber deflection: 12.6634 deg
Table 1758: Controlpoints1 -0.00040.2082 0.0549390.12677 -0.012670.024995 -0.012670.024992 -0.012670 -0.0120370 00 0.0271850.11792 0.076930.30003 0.076930.47384 0.076930.56863 0.0615251 0.0004
Table 1759: Base 64 representation:XmTQg8ACHFz5FpC
Table 1760: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.372 10.667 ectsRMS curvature error: 71.98 73.55 %CD error -0.3 0.5 dctsCm error -92 -73 mctsUpper transition point 1.52 1 %
Figure 1323: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1324: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
445
Profile: goe402
Information: Gottingen 402 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1325: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1761: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.8344 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 5.6931 % @0.32CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.82092 %CLower nose radius: 7.8343e-006 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.5388 degRelease Angle: 6.8826 degNose Incidence: 18.2916 degCamber deflection: 25.1742 deg
Table 1762: Controlpoints1 00.12013 0.055560.078913 -0.004930.0125 -0.004930.011205 -0.004930 -0.000606770 00 0.020950.080198 0.09080.3 0.09080.56649 0.09080.97118 0.00516011 0
Table 1763: Base 64 representation:PuTYmIHBECE8HqA
Table 1764: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.218 6.897 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 2.9 -0.4 dctsCm error -5 3 mctsUpper transition point -0.1 -0.55 %
Figure 1326: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1327: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
446
Profile: goe403
Information: Gottingen 403 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1328: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1765: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.7443 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 4.27 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.13582 %CLower nose radius: 0.32985 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.7623 degRelease Angle: 6.5412 degNose Incidence: 4.2673 degCamber deflection: 10.8085 deg
Table 1766: Controlpoints1 00.25933 0.0344120.14177 -0.009970.0501 -0.009970.031675 -0.009970 -0.009970 00 0.0101660.11413 0.075140.29921 0.075140.40232 0.075140.59149 0.075141 0
Table 1767: Base 64 representation:JnTJg YDGE 2JqA
Table 1768: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.8 4.009 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.7 2 dctsCm error -3 3 mctsUpper transition point -1.2 -2.24 %
Figure 1329: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1330: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
447
Profile: goe405
Information: Gottingen 405 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1331: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1769: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.0564 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 6.508 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.038292 %CLower nose radius: 0.46764 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.0051 degRelease Angle: 10.5091 degNose Incidence: 12.4431 degCamber deflection: 22.9522 deg
Table 1770: Controlpoints1 00.25061 0.0328050.14203 -0.01480.075 -0.01480.049258 -0.01480 -0.01480 00 0.00218950.044978 0.11990.4 0.11990.44806 0.11990.66284 0.112891 0
Table 1771: Base 64 representation:B4aFy WFFG73SwA
Table 1772: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.115 7.693 ectsRMS curvature error: 29.9 29.75 %CD error 5.3 0.4 dctsCm error -19 -31 mctsUpper transition point -0.97 -0.37 %
Figure 1332: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1333: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
448
Profile: goe409
Information: Gottingen 409 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1334: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1773: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.6576 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: -0.12769 % @0.04CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5858 %CLower nose radius: 2.076 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.0583 degRelease Angle: -5.2803 degNose Incidence: -2.7304 degCamber deflection: -8.0107 deg
Table 1774: Controlpoints1 00.64362 -0.058420.42276 -0.06350.4 -0.06350.34335 -0.06350 -0.06350 00 0.0484730.22811 0.06350.3 0.06350.70908 0.06350.96173 -0.00083571 0
Table 1775: Base 64 representation:wPTkb JaCbI6JXA
Table 1776: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.404 5.271 ectsRMS curvature error: 43.36 43.66 %CD error -7.8 -7.8 dctsCm error 45 56 mctsUpper transition point 10.32 10.01 %
Figure 1335: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1336: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
449
Profile: goe410
Information: Gottingen 410 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1337: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1777: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.1 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: -5.8149e-007 % @0.94CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.917 %CLower nose radius: 2.917 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.927 degRelease Angle: -1.3457e-005 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: -1.3457e-005 deg
Table 1778: Controlpoints1 00.78865 -0.0164980.44556 -0.08050.3 -0.08050.027951 -0.08050 -0.0225090 00 0.0225090.027951 0.08050.3 0.08050.44556 0.08050.7886 0.0165021 0
Table 1779: Base 64 representation:S5TNhS5TNhYYKgA
Table 1780: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.579 5.948 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -4.8 -4.4 dctsCm error -4 -3 mctsUpper transition point 6.73 6.32 %
Figure 1338: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1339: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
450
Profile: goe411
Information: Gottingen 411 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1340: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1781: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.2 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: -0.0091147 % @0.93CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.088551 %CLower nose radius: 0.088551 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 0 degRelease Angle: -0.43625 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: -0.43625 deg
Table 1782: Controlpoints1 00.9991 -6.8401e-0060.68234 -0.0660.3 -0.0660.073127 -0.0660 -0.00657040 00 0.00657040.073127 0.0660.3 0.0660.68234 0.0660.99682 -2.4187e-0051 0
Table 1783: Base 64 representation:GvTicGvTicBAAfA
Table 1784: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.058 4.568 ectsRMS curvature error: 31.81 32.03 %CD error -5.5 2.4 dctsCm error -14 14 mctsUpper transition point 7.42 -6.29 %
Figure 1341: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1342: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
451
Profile: goe413
Information: Gottingen 413 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1343: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1785: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.5159 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 4.6018 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %CUpper nose radius: 3.6724 %CLower nose radius: 6.6392 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.5479 degRelease Angle: 8.4417 degNose Incidence: 4.4003 degCamber deflection: 12.842 deg
Table 1786: Controlpoints1 -0.00080.72698 0.0190950.29494 -0.049630.14996 -0.049630.0096499 -0.049630 -0.0201710 00 0.0643420.1691 0.123550.3001 0.123550.56336 0.123550.68618 0.0716121 0.0008
Table 1787: Base 64 representation:gcTY0a7KLVtZKtE
Table 1788: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.079 5.153 ectsRMS curvature error: 58.08 57.71 %CD error -1.2 -0.3 dctsCm error 6 10 mctsUpper transition point -6.09 -7.1 %
Figure 1344: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1345: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
452
Profile: goe414
Information: Gottingen 414 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1346: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1789: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.2978 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 5.2326 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.21 %CUpper nose radius: 0.0016212 %CLower nose radius: 0.43332 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.2078 degRelease Angle: 8.6647 degNose Incidence: 6.9485 degCamber deflection: 15.6132 deg
Table 1790: Controlpoints1 -0.001050.35163 -0.00601950.26023 -0.025350.10072 -0.025350.022889 -0.025350 -0.0083850 00 0.000624920.048875 0.117910.39667 0.117910.42608 0.117910.6477 0.113951 0.00105
Table 1791: Base 64 representation:A3ZDxVwGLL93UtF
Table 1792: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.047 8.447 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -9.4 -9 dctsCm error -68 -81 mctsUpper transition point 12 11.12 %
Figure 1347: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1348: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
453
Profile: goe416a
Information: Gottingen 416A airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1349: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1793: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.6911 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 1.3532 % @0.63CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.27 %CUpper nose radius: 0.98012 %CLower nose radius: 0.049095 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.178 degRelease Angle: 3.3666 degNose Incidence: 11.7504 degCamber deflection: 15.117 deg
Table 1794: Controlpoints1 -0.001350.58764 -0.00654960.49271 -0.0500610.30381 -0.0500610.096562 -0.0500610 -0.00562180 00 0.0281240.12105 0.0668610.2949 0.0668610.5612 0.0668610.85388 0.0204721 0.00135
Table 1795: Base 64 representation:blTYsHrTRVVzJlH
Table 1796: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.495 6.12 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.9 -0.9 dctsCm error -11 -31 mctsUpper transition point 1.62 2.44 %
Figure 1350: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1351: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
454
Profile: goe417
Information: Gottingen 417 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1352: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1797: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.7871 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 6.0741 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.54844 %CLower nose radius: 9.6905e-006 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.0024 degRelease Angle: 9.5776 degNose Incidence: 16.7286 degCamber deflection: 26.3061 deg
Table 1798: Controlpoints1 00.12039 0.0781380.11095 -0.005920.0125 -0.005920.011977 -0.005920 -8.716e-0050 00 0.0149380.061033 0.088450.3 0.088450.41323 0.088450.64731 0.088451 0
Table 1799: Base 64 representation:LyTKlBDBGD -KvA
Table 1800: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.999 8.437 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -13.7 -15.9 dctsCm error -36 -53 mctsUpper transition point 2.8 2.1 %
Figure 1353: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1354: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
455
Profile: goe418
Information: Gottingen 418 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1355: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1801: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.6486 % @0.24CMaximum Camber: 4.9479 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 5.1921 %CLower nose radius: 3.8831 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.1492 degRelease Angle: 7.0599 degNose Incidence: 11.9042 degCamber deflection: 18.9641 deg
Table 1802: Controlpoints1 00.24746 0.00637490.14746 -0.034220.075 -0.034220.045235 -0.034220 -0.0277180 00 0.0832320.20014 0.11110.3 0.11110.38792 0.11110.54651 0.111 0
Table 1803: Base 64 representation:vVTIuzZFFP-3PrA
Table 1804: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.265 6.278 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1 -0.3 dctsCm error -12 -24 mctsUpper transition point 1 -0.04 %
Figure 1356: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1357: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
456
Profile: goe419
Information: Gottingen 419 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1358: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1805: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.608 % @0.39CMaximum Camber: 3.9462 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 4.1458e-005 %CLower nose radius: 0.17586 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.8862 degRelease Angle: 7.2801 degNose Incidence: 4.0323 degCamber deflection: 11.3124 deg
Table 1806: Controlpoints1 00.11662 0.0283330.10917 -0.00487490.025025 -0.00487490.0081427 -0.00487490 -0.00308980 00 0.000141140.072076 0.0674990.39967 0.0674990.60802 0.0674990.90822 0.0207221 0
Table 1807: Base 64 representation:AzaWsoqCGCU-MrA
Table 1808: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.879 7.741 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 45.8 -1 dctsCm error 12 25 mctsUpper transition point 3.16 3.23 %
Figure 1359: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1360: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
457
Profile: goe420
Information: Gottingen 420 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1361: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1809: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.8 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.2452 % @0.5CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.2268 %CLower nose radius: 3.2536 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.0077 degRelease Angle: 7.8854 degNose Incidence: 5.3485 degCamber deflection: 13.2338 deg
Table 1810: Controlpoints1 00.73561 -0.000546880.36884 -0.06040.2 -0.06040.13209 -0.06040 -0.0535260 00 0.0593330.16065 0.131150.3 0.131150.59637 0.131150.70436 0.0841561 0
Table 1811: Base 64 representation:seTb34WNOaubSsA
Table 1812: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.695 7.115 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 4.6 4.8 dctsCm error 62 78 mctsUpper transition point -11.83 -12.24 %
Figure 1362: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1363: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
458
Profile: goe423
Information: Gottingen 423 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1364: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1813: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.9924 % @0.37CMaximum Camber: 5.0724 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %CUpper nose radius: 2.5566 %CLower nose radius: 3.0794 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 23.1945 degRelease Angle: 7.4099 degNose Incidence: 5.8643 degCamber deflection: 13.2741 deg
Table 1814: Controlpoints1 -0.00080.84323 -0.0122770.43543 -0.038930.15095 -0.038930.057169 -0.038930 -0.0342580 00 0.0539420.17072 0.135340.39671 0.135340.46533 0.135340.69196 0.106911 0.0008
Table 1815: Base 64 representation:ajZH53nKVRxTarE
Table 1816: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.67 7.207 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.3 -0.8 dctsCm error -52 -44 mctsUpper transition point 0.55 -0.42 %
Figure 1365: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1366: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
459
Profile: goe424
Information: Gottingen 424 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1367: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1817: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 20.0069 % @0.36CMaximum Camber: 4.7639 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %CUpper nose radius: 0.76731 %CLower nose radius: 0.95124 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 25.5181 degRelease Angle: 7.0652 degNose Incidence: 19.4551 degCamber deflection: 26.5203 deg
Table 1818: Controlpoints1 -0.000800020.65105 -0.0355920.47039 -0.0535110.30532 -0.0535110.21266 -0.0535110 -0.0367230 00 0.0129610.032842 0.147430.38538 0.147430.42345 0.147430.70635 0.106661 0.00080002
Table 1819: Base 64 representation:G6ZE-rTUPXtpsrE
Table 1820: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.146 6.536 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.5 -3.4 dctsCm error 0 -12 mctsUpper transition point -0.26 0.47 %
Figure 1368: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1369: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
460
Profile: goe425
Information: Gottingen 425 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1370: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1821: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.9602 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 4.4564 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.11 %CUpper nose radius: 2.7728 %CLower nose radius: 6.9395 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.3378 degRelease Angle: 5.586 degNose Incidence: 12.8413 degCamber deflection: 18.4272 deg
Table 1822: Controlpoints1 -0.000550.566 -0.0125440.466 -0.036780.20197 -0.036780.0022275 -0.036780 -0.0105190 00 0.0592760.19008 0.123810.29337 0.123810.5314 0.123810.6314 0.0839891 0.00055
Table 1823: Base 64 representation:fXTW0S-NVQxzQoD
Table 1824: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.964 7.1 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 3.2 3.1 dctsCm error -6 -18 mctsUpper transition point -7.24 -7.09 %
Figure 1371: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1372: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
461
Profile: goe426
Information: Gottingen 426 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1373: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1825: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.6278 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 4.4709 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.425 %CLower nose radius: 4.9278 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.0943 degRelease Angle: 7.818 degNose Incidence: 4.6862 degCamber deflection: 12.5042 deg
Table 1826: Controlpoints1 00.72362 0.0133760.44154 -0.02650.2 -0.02650.01359 -0.02650 -0.021130 00 0.0383910.15515 0.11150.3 0.11150.48573 0.11150.58573 0.0946161 0
Table 1827: Base 64 representation:WfTRvy7NTL1gLsA
Table 1828: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.196 6.004 ectsRMS curvature error: 37.57 37.1 %CD error 2.8 3.1 dctsCm error -10 -8 mctsUpper transition point -3.96 -4.52 %
Figure 1374: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1375: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
462
Profile: goe427
Information: Gottingen 427 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1376: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1829: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 4.5848 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: 5.2875 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.36927 %CLower nose radius: 6.4613e-006 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.4311 degRelease Angle: 9.3147 degNose Incidence: 11.6696 degCamber deflection: 20.9844 deg
Table 1830: Controlpoints1 00.13119 0.0698910.13119 -0.00444370.01252 -0.00444370.011129 -0.00444370 -2.1895e-0050 00 0.0155270.097932 0.0757990.39966 0.0757990.42181 0.0757990.72166 0.0695541 0
Table 1831: Base 64 representation:NvaCgAHBIC6 LuA
Table 1832: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.216 9.084 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.3 -0.1 dctsCm error 19 -29 mctsUpper transition point -0.07 2.23 %
Figure 1377: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1378: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
463
Profile: goe428
Information: Gottingen 428 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1379: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1833: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.9581 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 5.2091 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.63886 %CLower nose radius: 0.17985 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.4008 degRelease Angle: 8.0777 degNose Incidence: 13.5643 degCamber deflection: 21.642 deg
Table 1834: Controlpoints1 00.30291 0.0411370.15694 -0.00680.025 -0.00680.010674 -0.00680 -0.00357740 00 0.0217470.11104 0.09040.3 0.09040.44772 0.09040.65318 0.0786571 0
Table 1835: Base 64 representation:PnTOmhkCJD30LsA
Table 1836: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.016 6.394 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1 2.8 dctsCm error 4 -3 mctsUpper transition point -2.9 -4.15 %
Figure 1380: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1381: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
464
Profile: goe430
Information: Gottingen 430 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1382: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1837: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.3279 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 4.8778 % @0.53CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.22 %CUpper nose radius: 0.43273 %CLower nose radius: 2.0588 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.666 degRelease Angle: 12.2581 degNose Incidence: 0.86185 degCamber deflection: 13.1199 deg
Table 1838: Controlpoints1 -0.00110.65613 0.046770.37527 -0.039340.10172 -0.039340.076868 -0.039340 -0.0324810 00 0.0114670.045577 0.107510.39529 0.107510.448 0.107510.66553 0.100751 0.0011
Table 1839: Base 64 representation:H4ZGt0QHTR7iKzG
Table 1840: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.871 5.724 ectsRMS curvature error: 31 30.67 %CD error -6.6 -6.8 dctsCm error -20 -8 mctsUpper transition point 6 5.87 %
Figure 1383: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1384: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
465
Profile: goe431
Information: Gottingen 431 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1385: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1841: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.5696 % @0.2CMaximum Camber: 7.2849 % @0.53CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.032883 %CLower nose radius: 0.32999 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.6936 degRelease Angle: 15.9288 degNose Incidence: 15.1582 degCamber deflection: 31.087 deg
Table 1842: Controlpoints1 00.54469 0.0933130.22809 -0.02430.1 -0.02430.055803 -0.02430 -0.011080 00 0.00235440.025287 0.11730.4 0.11730.55964 0.11730.70748 0.108061 0
Table 1843: Base 64 representation:B7aRxscGJK6lK5A
Table 1844: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.624 8.643 ectsRMS curvature error: 46.36 45.07 %CD error -1.8 -1.7 dctsCm error -28 -46 mctsUpper transition point 3.83 4.28 %
Figure 1386: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1387: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
466
Profile: goe432
Information: Gottingen 432 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1388: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1845: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.6998 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 4.3382 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2953 %CLower nose radius: 0.22162 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.3083 degRelease Angle: 7.9562 degNose Incidence: 17.4752 degCamber deflection: 25.4314 deg
Table 1846: Controlpoints1 00.29832 0.0282080.21287 -0.008770.025 -0.008770.020233 -0.008770 -0.00546740 00 0.0239320.066329 0.08020.3 0.08020.42242 0.08020.75482 0.0593631 0
Table 1847: Base 64 representation:TxTLhnMCMEu4NsA
Table 1848: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.673 6.489 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2 -2.2 dctsCm error -44 -16 mctsUpper transition point 4.64 3.44 %
Figure 1389: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1390: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
467
Profile: goe433
Information: Gottingen 433 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1391: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1849: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.6271 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 4.8521 % @0.52CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %CUpper nose radius: 4.3429 %CLower nose radius: 3.0567 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.3182 degRelease Angle: 10.7795 degNose Incidence: 9.8432 degCamber deflection: 20.6227 deg
Table 1850: Controlpoints1 -0.00080.66117 0.0355320.4094 -0.05480.15364 -0.05480.072211 -0.05480 -0.038360 00 0.0729240.18368 0.127460.29154 0.127460.51341 0.127460.60633 0.109521 0.0008
Table 1851: Base 64 representation:kYTU1shKTX2kKwE
Table 1852: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.434 8.148 ectsRMS curvature error: 48.61 47.23 %CD error 5.8 2 dctsCm error -11 -10 mctsUpper transition point -10.67 -4.93 %
Figure 1392: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1393: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
468
Profile: goe436
Information: Gottingen 436 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1394: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1853: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.0315 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 3.7774 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4606 %CLower nose radius: 1.6546 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.4159 degRelease Angle: 5.7826 degNose Incidence: 7.1589 degCamber deflection: 12.9415 deg
Table 1854: Controlpoints1 00.19742 -0.0199690.09742 -0.022830.075 -0.022830.04725 -0.022830 -0.022830 00 0.0312990.1006 0.09250.3 0.09250.43256 0.09250.66564 0.0771361 0
Table 1855: Base 64 representation:WqTMm YFCK04QoA
Table 1856: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.549 5.622 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.9 -0.9 dctsCm error -10 15 mctsUpper transition point 4.13 3.29 %
Figure 1395: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1396: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
469
Profile: goe437
Information: Gottingen 437 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1397: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1857: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.1094 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 4.7948 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.38449 %CLower nose radius: 0.0037659 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.0867 degRelease Angle: 7.6751 degNose Incidence: 11.3715 degCamber deflection: 19.0466 deg
Table 1858: Controlpoints1 00.26139 0.0404130.15547 -0.006830.025 -0.006830.0092825 -0.006830 -0.000482740 00 0.0166120.10766 0.08210.3 0.08210.482 0.08210.69669 0.065681 0
Table 1859: Base 64 representation:NoTRiFnCJDy3KrA
Table 1860: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.913 4.188 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1 2 dctsCm error -18 0 mctsUpper transition point -2.28 -3.36 %
Figure 1398: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1399: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
470
Profile: goe438
Information: Gottingen 438 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1400: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1861: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.0369 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 3.7747 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6151 %CLower nose radius: 1.4848 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.2694 degRelease Angle: 5.7245 degNose Incidence: 8.158 degCamber deflection: 13.8826 deg
Table 1862: Controlpoints1 00.225 -0.0190780.125 -0.022740.05057 -0.022740.040456 -0.022740 -0.0200110 00 0.0333360.10321 0.092440.29769 0.092440.42529 0.092440.64365 0.0813471 0
Table 1863: Base 64 representation:XpTMm3NDFK34QoA
Table 1864: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.627 5.88 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.4 -0.2 dctsCm error -3 7 mctsUpper transition point -0.78 -1.13 %
Figure 1401: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1402: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
471
Profile: goe439
Information: Gottingen 439 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1403: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1865: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.9136 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 5.2367 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.5772 %CLower nose radius: 0.026077 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.4661 degRelease Angle: 7.8249 degNose Incidence: 13.4336 degCamber deflection: 21.2586 deg
Table 1866: Controlpoints1 00.24318 0.040880.18588 -0.00730.025 -0.00730.0096113 -0.00730 -0.00129260 00 0.0204350.10853 0.09040.3 0.09040.44825 0.09040.63886 0.0804471 0
Table 1867: Base 64 representation:OoTOmLmCLD46LsA
Table 1868: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.773 7.612 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.3 3.7 dctsCm error 15 19 mctsUpper transition point -3.28 -4.35 %
Figure 1404: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1405: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
472
Profile: goe442
Information: Gottingen 442 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1406: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1869: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.7015 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 4.3281 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5272 %CLower nose radius: 0.22053 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.0072 degRelease Angle: 7.8282 degNose Incidence: 17.9762 degCamber deflection: 25.8044 deg
Table 1870: Controlpoints1 00.30055 0.0283930.20846 -0.008770.02508 -0.008770.020358 -0.008770 -0.00547080 00 0.0278510.08064 0.080190.29928 0.080190.40626 0.080190.73506 0.0627841 0
Table 1871: Base 64 representation:WuTKhnMCMEx4MsA
Table 1872: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.832 4.802 ectsRMS curvature error: 47.67 48.23 %CD error 0 -0.7 dctsCm error 39 -43 mctsUpper transition point 0.02 -0.2 %
Figure 1407: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1408: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
473
Profile: goe445
Information: Gottingen 445 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1409: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1873: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.4 % @0.4CMaximum Camber: -1.1189e-006 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.20219 %CLower nose radius: 0.20219 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.6656 degRelease Angle: -1.4606e-005 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: -1.4606e-005 deg
Table 1874: Controlpoints1 00.76656 -0.021790.45132 -0.0320.4 -0.0320.104 -0.0320 -0.011840 00 0.011840.104 0.0320.4 0.0320.45131 0.0320.76655 0.0217911 0
Table 1875: Base 64 representation:YuaFOYuaFOrrMgA
Table 1876: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.555 4.201 ectsRMS curvature error: 25.89 26.52 %CD error -1.5 -1.3 dctsCm error -1 -2 mctsUpper transition point 0.47 0.5 %
Figure 1410: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1411: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
474
Profile: goe446
Information: Gottingen 446 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1412: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1877: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.8255 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 6.3749 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.32 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2127 %CLower nose radius: 2.0122 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.1647 degRelease Angle: 11.0492 degNose Incidence: 6.6961 degCamber deflection: 17.7453 deg
Table 1878: Controlpoints1 -0.00160.3446 0.0209070.13192 -0.023820.05056 -0.023820.031135 -0.023820 -0.0209290 00 0.0287880.10251 0.126890.39703 0.126890.61449 0.126890.86175 0.0522771 0.0016
Table 1879: Base 64 representation:PuZX13ZDFKavUxI
Table 1880: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.55 5.185 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.2 -0.9 dctsCm error 1 19 mctsUpper transition point -0.49 -1.43 %
Figure 1413: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1414: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
475
Profile: goe447
Information: Gottingen 447 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1415: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1881: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.6224 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 7.9444 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.32 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3659 %CLower nose radius: 2.114 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.9683 degRelease Angle: 12.6037 degNose Incidence: 10.5191 degCamber deflection: 23.1228 deg
Table 1882: Controlpoints1 -0.00160.24548 0.0527430.14548 -0.019810.05039 -0.019810.019044 -0.019810 -0.0174330 00 0.0316420.10995 0.141830.39721 0.141830.49416 0.141830.67999 0.1251 0.0016
Table 1883: Base 64 representation:OtZK83nDGI34TzI
Table 1884: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.006 9.765 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 2.9 4.4 dctsCm error -10 12 mctsUpper transition point -1.05 -2.3 %
Figure 1416: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1417: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
476
Profile: goe449
Information: Gottingen 449 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1418: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1885: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.0506 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 5.3879 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.7671 %CLower nose radius: 1.8432 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 21.5381 degRelease Angle: 9.3317 degNose Incidence: 15.0816 degCamber deflection: 24.4133 deg
Table 1886: Controlpoints1 00.90754 -0.00231990.4616 -0.03660.15 -0.03660.084421 -0.03660 -0.0322080 00 0.0403430.088226 0.13840.4 0.13840.49875 0.13840.6701 0.120731 0
Table 1887: Base 64 representation:TxaL63cKXQ3LYuA
Table 1888: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.052 5.257 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.2 -0.6 dctsCm error 7 -4 mctsUpper transition point 3.81 4.42 %
Figure 1419: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1420: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
477
Profile: goe450
Information: Gottingen 450 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1421: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1889: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.7531 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 5.2139 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.21 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0657 %CLower nose radius: 1.0622 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.7471 degRelease Angle: 9.0734 degNose Incidence: 10.293 degCamber deflection: 19.3664 deg
Table 1890: Controlpoints1 -0.001050.33125 0.0304860.16759 -0.011240.02512 -0.011240.013816 -0.011240 -0.00989120 00 0.0289320.11782 0.095270.399 0.095270.45193 0.095270.67952 0.0896071 0.00105
Table 1891: Base 64 representation:TsaGo3sCJF7yOuF
Table 1892: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.781 5.072 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.1 1.8 dctsCm error -18 -35 mctsUpper transition point 2.63 3.25 %
Figure 1422: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1423: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
478
Profile: goe456
Information: Gottingen 456 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1424: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1893: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.2615 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 5.2122 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.0052411 %CLower nose radius: 0.1414 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.8638 degRelease Angle: 9.1033 degNose Incidence: 8.4692 degCamber deflection: 17.5725 deg
Table 1894: Controlpoints1 00.3538 0.047130.1701 -0.007940.07506 -0.007940.051791 -0.007940 -0.00698720 00 0.00145530.060617 0.0870.39935 0.0870.44016 0.0870.66798 0.0829991 0
Table 1895: Base 64 representation:B1aEk3UFHD8xLuA
Table 1896: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.046 3.919 ectsRMS curvature error: 36.85 45.31 %CD error -0.7 0 dctsCm error -13 -14 mctsUpper transition point 1.3 1.89 %
Figure 1425: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1426: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
479
Profile: goe457
Information: Gottingen 457 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1427: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1897: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.8231 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 4.2234 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2019 %CLower nose radius: 0.67779 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.0727 degRelease Angle: 8.296 degNose Incidence: 13.873 degCamber deflection: 22.1691 deg
Table 1898: Controlpoints1 00.33601 0.0262010.16551 -0.010830.05012 -0.010830.019397 -0.010830 -0.0093620 00 0.0248590.077125 0.079910.29909 0.079910.36238 0.079910.73573 0.067521 0
Table 1899: Base 64 representation:UuTGh2mDIF1yNsA
Table 1900: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.564 4.433 ectsRMS curvature error: 87.77 88.92 %CD error 2.1 1.7 dctsCm error -13 -8 mctsUpper transition point -2.72 -3.07 %
Figure 1428: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1429: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
480
Profile: goe458
Information: Gottingen 458 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1430: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1901: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.2615 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 5.2122 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.0052411 %CLower nose radius: 0.0071116 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.8638 degRelease Angle: 9.1033 degNose Incidence: 8.9843 degCamber deflection: 18.0877 deg
Table 1902: Controlpoints1 00.3538 0.047130.1701 -0.007940.07506 -0.007940.0010649 -0.007940 -4.267e-0050 00 0.00145530.060617 0.0870.39935 0.0870.44016 0.0870.67143 0.0821371 0
Table 1903: Base 64 representation:B1aEkA-FHD7xLuA
Table 1904: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.027 4.065 ectsRMS curvature error: 37.23 44.84 %CD error -0.4 -51.1 dctsCm error -10 25 mctsUpper transition point 1.01 0.05 %
Figure 1431: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1432: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
481
Profile: goe459
Information: Gottingen 459 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1433: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1905: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.7 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 1.199e-005 % @0.89CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3727 %CLower nose radius: 1.3727 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.9222 degRelease Angle: 0.0022627 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: 0.0022627 deg
Table 1906: Controlpoints1 00.98632 -0.00227990.64816 -0.06350.3 -0.06350.10323 -0.06350 -0.0307360 00 0.0307360.10323 0.06350.3 0.06350.64816 0.06350.98639 0.00226931 0
Table 1907: Base 64 representation:fpTgbfpTgbCCVgA
Table 1908: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.046 3.589 ectsRMS curvature error: 28.96 28.83 %CD error -5.8 -5.6 dctsCm error -21 -21 mctsUpper transition point 7.74 7.55 %
Figure 1434: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1435: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
482
Profile: goe460
Information: Gottingen 460 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1436: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1909: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 20.5 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: -7.1172e-006 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.8239 %CLower nose radius: 2.8239 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 27.4565 degRelease Angle: -2.8766e-005 degNose Incidence: 0 degCamber deflection: -2.8766e-005 deg
Table 1910: Controlpoints1 00.5872 -0.100850.39947 -0.10250.3 -0.10250.1059 -0.10250 -0.044650 00 0.044650.1059 0.10250.3 0.10250.3995 0.10250.58722 0.100841 0
Table 1911: Base 64 representation:coTJrcoTJr–fgA
Table 1912: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.782 4.551 ectsRMS curvature error: 39.38 40.08 %CD error -6.4 -6.2 dctsCm error -26 -6 mctsUpper transition point 7.66 7.4 %
Figure 1437: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1438: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
483
Profile: goe464
Information: Gottingen 464 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1439: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1913: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.0441 % @0.07CMaximum Camber: 9.8669 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 4.5909 %CLower nose radius: 0.37633 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.0187 degRelease Angle: 13.6193 degNose Incidence: 32.2149 degCamber deflection: 45.8342 deg
Table 1914: Controlpoints1 00.1404 0.176610.10605 -0.006320.02504 -0.006320.01592 -0.006320 -0.006320 00 0.0565550.1045 0.122090.29915 0.122090.53513 0.122090.79126 0.0583951 0
Table 1915: Base 64 representation:epTWz XCFDf9E1A
Table 1916: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 12.542 11.851 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 29.5 NaN dctsCm error -6 NaN mctsUpper transition point 0.73 NaN %
Figure 1440: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1441: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
484
Profile: goe477
Information: Gottingen 477 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1442: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1917: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.8518 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 4.9035 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.6439 %CLower nose radius: 0.25607 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.4336 degRelease Angle: 6.7365 degNose Incidence: 12.0033 degCamber deflection: 18.7398 deg
Table 1918: Controlpoints1 00.29472 0.0125530.19472 -0.015180.05 -0.015180.015208 -0.015180 -0.00509530 00 0.0165750.064 0.09750.4 0.09750.63519 0.09750.74957 0.0553051 0
Table 1919: Base 64 representation:L1aZpVsDKGr3NqA
Table 1920: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.864 9.864 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.6 3.3 dctsCm error -14 -1 mctsUpper transition point 6.88 -6.83 %
Figure 1443: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1444: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
485
Profile: goe478
Information: Gottingen 478 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1445: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1921: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.4047 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.2504 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.5244 %CLower nose radius: 3.718 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.3845 degRelease Angle: 6.8221 degNose Incidence: 7.7601 degCamber deflection: 14.5822 deg
Table 1922: Controlpoints1 00.2613 -0.024120.1613 -0.03360.10129 -0.03360.026509 -0.03360 -0.0256330 00 0.0709030.21396 0.107890.29585 0.107890.5092 0.107890.65798 0.0949431 0
Table 1923: Base 64 representation:pSTTtwuGEO33TqA
Table 1924: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.512 6.399 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 3.9 3.5 dctsCm error 28 14 mctsUpper transition point -7.2 -6.65 %
Figure 1446: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1447: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
486
Profile: goe479
Information: Gottingen 479 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1448: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1925: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.6665 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 3.9638 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.6313 %CLower nose radius: 1.1611 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.6944 degRelease Angle: 6.517 degNose Incidence: 13.6169 degCamber deflection: 20.1339 deg
Table 1926: Controlpoints1 00.48541 -0.00745690.23489 -0.025050.1 -0.025050.058288 -0.025050 -0.0212410 00 0.0563190.18082 0.096850.3 0.096850.44391 0.096850.64691 0.0871461 0
Table 1927: Base 64 representation:kZTNo1bGKL5qQqA
Table 1928: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.481 5.862 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 3.8 3.1 dctsCm error 0 -10 mctsUpper transition point -5.79 -6.4 %
Figure 1449: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1450: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
487
Profile: goe480
Information: Gottingen 480 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1451: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1929: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.3935 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 5.5227 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.014695 %CLower nose radius: 1.8476 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.4179 degRelease Angle: 8.2503 degNose Incidence: 7.8731 degCamber deflection: 16.1234 deg
Table 1930: Controlpoints1 00.31014 0.0185630.18176 -0.023720.05 -0.023720.045678 -0.023720 -0.023720 00 0.000954570.0093012 0.11070.4 0.11070.43315 0.11070.60753 0.104861 0
Table 1931: Base 64 representation:B-aEu GDJK81PsA
Table 1932: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.43 6.027 ectsRMS curvature error: 55.95 54.51 %CD error 0.8 0.3 dctsCm error -17 -11 mctsUpper transition point -1.14 0.44 %
Figure 1452: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1453: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
488
Profile: goe481a
Information: Gottingen 481A airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1454: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1933: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.063 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 5.4983 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.1707 %CLower nose radius: 4.8043 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 34.1692 degRelease Angle: 16.1771 degNose Incidence: 5.0422 degCamber deflection: 21.2194 deg
Table 1934: Controlpoints1 00.23653 -0.0120930.13653 -0.043880.07706 -0.043880.060116 -0.043880 -0.043880 00 0.0103920.007462 0.128520.39396 0.128520.4426 0.128520.85532 0.09491 0
Table 1935: Base 64 representation:F-ZF2 OFETu4l5A
Table 1936: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.117 7.619 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -4.1 -4.5 dctsCm error -115 -133 mctsUpper transition point 3.38 3.15 %
Figure 1455: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1456: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
489
Profile: goe483
Information: Gottingen 483 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1457: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1937: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.4595 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 5.6616 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.39771 %CLower nose radius: 0.1773 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 5.0825 degRelease Angle: 8.091 degNose Incidence: 12.394 degCamber deflection: 20.485 deg
Table 1938: Controlpoints1 00.20916 0.0768420.12771 -0.004880.025 -0.004880.0087049 -0.004880 -0.00320770 00 0.016580.10368 0.08150.3 0.08150.51585 0.08150.62562 0.0702821 0
Table 1939: Base 64 representation:NpTUippCHC25GsA
Table 1940: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.431 9.543 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.3 -0.5 dctsCm error -65 -69 mctsUpper transition point 4.14 3.55 %
Figure 1458: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1459: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
490
Profile: goe484
Information: Gottingen 484 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1460: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1941: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.2361 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 5.0047 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.96156 %CLower nose radius: 0.96712 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.3193 degRelease Angle: 10.9065 degNose Incidence: 5.9595 degCamber deflection: 16.866 deg
Table 1942: Controlpoints1 00.46516 0.0585450.11813 -0.01220.025 -0.01220.014585 -0.01220 -0.01220 00 0.0373540.21766 0.07930.4 0.07930.4692 0.07930.73594 0.0735581 0
Table 1943: Base 64 representation:esaHh bCGF6mKxA
Table 1944: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.663 5.104 ectsRMS curvature error: 55.82 57.54 %CD error 0.1 -4.2 dctsCm error -16 -28 mctsUpper transition point -0.51 -1.26 %
Figure 1461: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1462: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
491
Profile: goe492
Information: Gottingen 492 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1463: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1945: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.3765 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 3.4136 % @0.48CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.24426 %CLower nose radius: 0.33578 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 8.5069 degRelease Angle: 6.9081 degNose Incidence: 2.5294 degCamber deflection: 9.4375 deg
Table 1946: Controlpoints1 00.51101 0.0226730.25155 -0.011560.07514 -0.011560.018251 -0.011560 -0.00612310 00 0.0174630.18727 0.064490.39919 0.064490.67918 0.064490.91125 0.0175111 0
Table 1947: Base 64 representation:RhaechvFMFSpKqA
Table 1948: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.534 5.472 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 2.8 NaN dctsCm error 0 NaN mctsUpper transition point -8.92 NaN %
Figure 1464: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1465: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
492
Profile: goe493
Information: Gottingen 493 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1466: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1949: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.0037 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 3.3647 % @0.52CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6168 %CLower nose radius: 0.63881 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.4406 degRelease Angle: 7.3991 degNose Incidence: 8.6015 degCamber deflection: 16.0006 deg
Table 1950: Controlpoints1 00.63438 -0.00843260.52062 -0.0476610.20336 -0.0476610.053349 -0.0476610 -0.0150730 00 0.0421070.16449 0.106170.39251 0.106170.64788 0.106170.90264 0.0281371 0
Table 1951: Base 64 representation:ZkZbsUuNZUSwTrA
Table 1952: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.22 6.373 ectsRMS curvature error: 27.13 25.94 %CD error 0 -0.3 dctsCm error -9 -25 mctsUpper transition point 2.78 2.75 %
Figure 1467: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1468: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
493
Profile: goe494
Information: Gottingen 494 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1469: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1953: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 5.0418 % @0.24CMaximum Camber: 5.0647 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.41384 %CLower nose radius: 2.5087e-005 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.985 degRelease Angle: 10.7964 degNose Incidence: 5.5993 degCamber deflection: 16.3956 deg
Table 1954: Controlpoints1 00.47044 0.0772910.20266 -0.007410.01255 -0.007410.0094048 -0.007410 -3.966e-0050 00 0.0226290.1896 0.07130.3995 0.07130.51948 0.07130.71076 0.0683151 0
Table 1955: Base 64 representation:UhaNeAQBMD8qGwA
Table 1956: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.197 5.388 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %
Figure 1470: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1471: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
494
Profile: goe495
Information: Gottingen 495 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1472: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1957: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.963 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 5.0142 % @0.48CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.95855 %CLower nose radius: 0.39724 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.3159 degRelease Angle: 11.0725 degNose Incidence: 10.7026 degCamber deflection: 21.7751 deg
Table 1958: Controlpoints1 00.52739 0.0615040.2202 -0.010920.05 -0.010920.039398 -0.010920 -0.0102150 00 0.0330140.17056 0.08060.4 0.08060.68439 0.08060.96395 0.00947731 0
Table 1959: Base 64 representation:akaeh7ODLFHmIxA
Table 1960: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.309 5.002 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf 60.57 %CD error -0.5 0.7 dctsCm error -1 1 mctsUpper transition point -1.45 -1.27 %
Figure 1473: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1474: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
495
Profile: goe496
Information: Gottingen 496 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1475: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1961: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.0015 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 5.0093 % @0.48CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.83845 %CLower nose radius: 1.0624 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.2621 degRelease Angle: 11.3473 degNose Incidence: 6.6097 degCamber deflection: 17.957 deg
Table 1962: Controlpoints1 00.58165 0.0492650.26833 -0.023130.075 -0.023130.07107 -0.023130 -0.0224360 00 0.0209870.078797 0.09450.4 0.09450.53229 0.09450.79624 0.0583441 0
Table 1963: Base 64 representation:OyaOn9DFNKnkKxA
Table 1964: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.685 5.159 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.1 0.4 dctsCm error 15 4 mctsUpper transition point -1.9 -1.09 %
Figure 1476: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1477: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
496
Profile: goe497
Information: Gottingen 497 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1478: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1965: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.5862 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 5.3095 % @0.5CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3695 %CLower nose radius: 1.0747 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.8622 degRelease Angle: 11.2296 degNose Incidence: 10.1177 degCamber deflection: 21.3473 deg
Table 1966: Controlpoints1 00.57559 0.0430990.33857 -0.03180.1 -0.03180.040958 -0.03180 -0.017130 00 0.0246920.066777 0.10880.4 0.10880.50112 0.10880.69366 0.0916781 0
Table 1967: Base 64 representation:P0aLthlGRO1oMxA
Table 1968: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.267 7.345 ectsRMS curvature error: 15.17 15.19 %CD error -1.2 -1.6 dctsCm error 8 -12 mctsUpper transition point 2.24 3.32 %
Figure 1479: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1480: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
497
Profile: goe498
Information: Gottingen 498 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1481: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1969: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.7897 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 5.5312 % @0.48CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 5.9243 %CLower nose radius: 1.9432 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.1856 degRelease Angle: 12.2578 degNose Incidence: 21.4246 degCamber deflection: 33.6824 deg
Table 1970: Controlpoints1 00.62668 0.0337450.35019 -0.040970.15203 -0.040970.10034 -0.040970 -0.0360540 00 0.0678220.11647 0.127990.39367 0.127990.4509 0.127990.70265 0.104431 0
Table 1971: Base 64 representation:hsZG23WKPRzkQzA
Table 1972: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.625 7.348 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.9 2.4 dctsCm error 3 15 mctsUpper transition point 0.35 -0.16 %
Figure 1482: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1483: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
498
Profile: goe499
Information: Gottingen 499 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1484: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1973: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.8817 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 5.8822 % @0.52CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.24471 %CLower nose radius: 1.637 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.8213 degRelease Angle: 13.3239 degNose Incidence: 1.0355 degCamber deflection: 14.3594 deg
Table 1974: Controlpoints1 00.55805 0.0852110.1782 -0.011880.05 -0.011880.010015 -0.011880 -0.0104540 00 0.0152190.14198 0.0870.4 0.0870.60306 0.0870.74565 0.0716591 0
Table 1975: Base 64 representation:LoaWk3yDJF0hF1A
Table 1976: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.069 3.961 ectsRMS curvature error: 28.14 28.96 %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %
Figure 1485: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1486: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
499
Profile: goe500
Information: Gottingen 501 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1487: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1977: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.0024 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 6.0345 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.2684 %CLower nose radius: 0.91273 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 3.0411 degRelease Angle: 12.2481 degNose Incidence: 9.7698 degCamber deflection: 22.0179 deg
Table 1978: Controlpoints1 00.63338 0.0694560.23128 -0.018960.075 -0.018960.04575 -0.018960 -0.0166850 00 0.0349630.14456 0.10420.4 0.10420.68792 0.10420.90134 0.0241761 0
Table 1979: Base 64 representation:Voafr3ZFLIUfDzA
Table 1980: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.663 8.901 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.8 -1 dctsCm error -83 -97 mctsUpper transition point 4.2 4.98 %
Figure 1488: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1489: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
500
Profile: goe501
Information: Gottingen 501 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1490: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1981: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.6763 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 6.405 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.3664 %CLower nose radius: 0.99543 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.251 degRelease Angle: 12.4332 degNose Incidence: 15.9795 degCamber deflection: 28.4127 deg
Table 1982: Controlpoints1 00.57676 0.0580350.27342 -0.026550.1 -0.026550.082257 -0.026550 -0.0233640 00 0.0424860.11442 0.12030.4 0.12030.63377 0.12030.85968 0.0430581 0
Table 1983: Base 64 representation:XtaZy3LGMLZkKzA
Table 1984: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.941 8.196 ectsRMS curvature error: 44.3 46.48 %CD error 1.5 1.3 dctsCm error 19 -2 mctsUpper transition point 1.49 2.23 %
Figure 1491: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1492: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
501
Profile: goe502
Information: Gottingen 502 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1493: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1985: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.8113 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 6.0923 % @0.48CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.287 %CLower nose radius: 2.9421 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.4106 degRelease Angle: 12.9736 degNose Incidence: 9.0953 degCamber deflection: 22.0688 deg
Table 1986: Controlpoints1 00.56117 0.0404640.32185 -0.043340.10219 -0.043340.089122 -0.043340 -0.041810 00 0.0502930.11543 0.132860.39329 0.132860.44956 0.132860.69621 0.114671 0
Table 1987: Base 64 representation:YsZG49IHQS2oR0A
Table 1988: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.976 6.584 ectsRMS curvature error: 26.64 28.43 %CD error -3.4 -2.6 dctsCm error 18 44 mctsUpper transition point -1.49 -2.38 %
Figure 1494: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1495: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
502
Profile: goe504
Information: Gottingen 504 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1496: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1989: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.6971 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 5.4202 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.12961 %CLower nose radius: 0.70888 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 22.5557 degRelease Angle: 8.149 degNose Incidence: 15.7364 degCamber deflection: 23.8854 deg
Table 1990: Controlpoints1 00.34472 -0.0358190.24472 -0.042370.20233 -0.042370.094796 -0.042370 -0.0211660 00 0.00382760.035741 0.141570.39222 0.141570.39486 0.141570.59989 0.141111 0
Table 1991: Base 64 representation:C5ZA7ghNDS 3ZsA
Table 1992: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.081 9 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -7.6 -7.5 dctsCm error 6 8 mctsUpper transition point 0.42 0.14 %
Figure 1497: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1498: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
503
Profile: goe506
Information: Gottingen 506 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1499: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1993: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.535 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.6641 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0733 %CLower nose radius: 0.41006 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 20.2841 degRelease Angle: 9.7686 degNose Incidence: 16.2716 degCamber deflection: 26.0402 deg
Table 1994: Controlpoints1 00.97466 -0.000165140.29866 -0.041280.20219 -0.041280.071595 -0.041280 -0.013990 00 0.0240310.080708 0.126540.29329 0.126540.55403 0.126540.68846 0.112841 0
Table 1995: Base 64 representation:MtTY1WoNIS4CXvA
Table 1996: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.54 5.508 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -10.9 -11.4 dctsCm error -85 -69 mctsUpper transition point 5.12 5.59 %
Figure 1500: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1501: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
504
Profile: goe508
Information: Gottingen 508 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1502: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 1997: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.3467 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 5.6531 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.12771 %CLower nose radius: 2.8569 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.6575 degRelease Angle: 5.0173 degNose Incidence: 12.1159 degCamber deflection: 17.1332 deg
Table 1998: Controlpoints1 00.28422 -0.0288920.18422 -0.03490.1 -0.03490.026343 -0.03490 -0.0223990 00 0.00192730.0043628 0.13740.4 0.13740.57983 0.13740.95612 0.00960511 0
Table 1999: Base 64 representation:B-aT6ouGGPH3QnA
Table 2000: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.918 7.366 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.4 -1.5 dctsCm error -16 -48 mctsUpper transition point 2.83 3.21 %
Figure 1503: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1504: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
505
Profile: goe517
Information: Gottingen 517 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1505: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2001: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.0825 % @0.36CMaximum Camber: 4.5653 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 16.0872 %CLower nose radius: 0.34038 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.903 degRelease Angle: 6.8639 degNose Incidence: 17.3247 degCamber deflection: 24.1886 deg
Table 2002: Controlpoints1 00.18236 0.0273010.082356 -0.007120.05 -0.007120.0185 -0.007120 -0.00647920 00 0.00302288.52e-005 0.0810.4 0.0810.42669 0.0810.65926 0.071281 0
Table 2003: Base 64 representation:C aDi5nDCD34LqA
Table 2004: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 11.097 11.503 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.2 -1.4 dctsCm error -62 -74 mctsUpper transition point 2.83 3.64 %
Figure 1506: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1507: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
506
Profile: goe526
Information: Gottingen 526 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1508: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2005: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.6394 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 3.929 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.2883 %CLower nose radius: 1.9606 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 21.0606 degRelease Angle: 2.9537 degNose Incidence: 11.8645 degCamber deflection: 14.8182 deg
Table 2006: Controlpoints1 00.96689 -0.00440360.14088 -0.030130.10086 -0.030130.053786 -0.030130 -0.0265140 00 0.0663110.20059 0.101470.29711 0.101470.51825 0.101470.62761 0.0892941 0
Table 2007: Base 64 representation:pVTUq3eGDN3JYkA
Table 2008: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.185 8.066 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.4 1.5 dctsCm error -4 -6 mctsUpper transition point -2.03 -2.26 %
Figure 1509: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1510: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
507
Profile: goe527
Information: Gottingen 527 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1511: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2009: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.6101 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 5.7653 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 5.0074 %CLower nose radius: 1.6318 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.9261 degRelease Angle: 8.0999 degNose Incidence: 23.1923 degCamber deflection: 31.2923 deg
Table 2010: Controlpoints1 00.54786 -0.0068120.30712 -0.030410.15113 -0.030410.065831 -0.030410 -0.0267610 00 0.0693630.14412 0.139410.29484 0.139410.45 0.139410.5958 0.124061 0
Table 2011: Base 64 representation:ggTO63jKMN4pUsA
Table 2012: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.954 4.667 ectsRMS curvature error: 37.93 38.53 %CD error 5.3 4.9 dctsCm error 19 15 mctsUpper transition point -4.41 -3.75 %
Figure 1512: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1513: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
508
Profile: goe528
Information: Gottingen 528 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1514: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2013: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.5163 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 6.1503 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.46 %CLower nose radius: 0.81932 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.5891 degRelease Angle: 9.0304 degNose Incidence: 22.9772 degCamber deflection: 32.0077 deg
Table 2014: Controlpoints1 00.40207 0.0233450.22281 -0.014250.05021 -0.014250.034028 -0.014250 -0.0136330 00 0.0609060.16082 0.122470.29816 0.122470.45061 0.122470.61977 0.107771 0
Table 2015: Base 64 representation:gsTOz8VDMG3wPuA
Table 2016: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.361 3.894 ectsRMS curvature error: 42.85 42.95 %CD error 1.4 1.6 dctsCm error 13 8 mctsUpper transition point -3.47 -4.01 %
Figure 1515: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1516: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
509
Profile: goe529
Information: Gottingen 529 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1517: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2017: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.7099 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 5.7202 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3626 %CLower nose radius: 0.93778 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.1157 degRelease Angle: 7.7564 degNose Incidence: 13.807 degCamber deflection: 21.5634 deg
Table 2018: Controlpoints1 00.16896 0.0319050.14554 -0.011920.05014 -0.011920.0176 -0.011920 -0.010490 00 0.0353590.13763 0.104940.29879 0.104940.45093 0.104940.60978 0.0923471 0
Table 2019: Base 64 representation:WiTOs3pDGF39MsA
Table 2020: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.462 8.145 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 5.4 5.9 dctsCm error 15 6 mctsUpper transition point -7.86 -7.73 %
Figure 1518: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1519: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
510
Profile: goe532
Information: Gottingen 532 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1520: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2021: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.6371 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.8395 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 5.2606 %CLower nose radius: 1.783 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.2972 degRelease Angle: 8.1155 degNose Incidence: 24.9651 degCamber deflection: 33.0806 deg
Table 2022: Controlpoints1 00.60927 0.0236710.35353 -0.020980.15 -0.020980.015694 -0.020980 -0.0136580 00 0.0870390.21602 0.110050.3 0.110050.5339 0.110050.97097 0.00657571 0
Table 2023: Base 64 representation:ySTVup4KPJEmKsA
Table 2024: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.436 3.809 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.6 -0.4 dctsCm error 4 6 mctsUpper transition point 2.21 1.68 %
Figure 1521: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1522: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
511
Profile: goe533
Information: Gottingen 533 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1523: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2025: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.7119 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.6818 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.9369 %CLower nose radius: 2.5084 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.348 degRelease Angle: 8.7806 degNose Incidence: 17.2046 degCamber deflection: 25.9851 deg
Table 2026: Controlpoints1 00.64976 0.0251460.54976 -0.02470.15 -0.02470.0088058 -0.02470 -0.0121350 00 0.0507410.1315 0.11460.3 0.11460.40868 0.11460.56898 0.103121 0
Table 2027: Base 64 representation:cjTKwf7KeL5xKtA
Table 2028: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.357 4.974 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.9 0.9 dctsCm error 1 6 mctsUpper transition point -1.2 -1.57 %
Figure 1524: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1525: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
512
Profile: goe534
Information: Gottingen 534 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1526: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2029: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.9698 % @0.21CMaximum Camber: 5.2917 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 7.9379 %CLower nose radius: 1.4719 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 4.9801 degRelease Angle: 6.5324 degNose Incidence: 28.8842 degCamber deflection: 35.4166 deg
Table 2030: Controlpoints1 00.41547 0.0413080.35797 -0.031410.10112 -0.031410.077862 -0.031410 -0.0276410 00 0.0523560.051799 0.1160.29588 0.1160.48924 0.1160.98742 0.0019971 0
Table 2031: Base 64 representation:s0TSw3PGSNC5GqA
Table 2032: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 6.59 10.494 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.6 0.1 dctsCm error -57 -49 mctsUpper transition point 3.11 3.6 %
Figure 1527: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1528: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
513
Profile: goe535
Information: Gottingen 535 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1529: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2033: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.3279 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 5.7638 % @0.48CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 7.0072 %CLower nose radius: 2.9551 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.8894 degRelease Angle: 12.2529 degNose Incidence: 22.7142 degCamber deflection: 34.9671 deg
Table 2034: Controlpoints1 00.53508 0.0513950.43508 -0.036280.15 -0.036280.044924 -0.036280 -0.029750 00 0.0816420.14268 0.132450.3 0.132450.50254 0.132450.84787 0.0500121 0
Table 2035: Base 64 representation:mhTT4zsKVPY0NzA
Table 2036: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.843 8.773 ectsRMS curvature error: 25.62 25.67 %CD error 2.8 3 dctsCm error -73 -77 mctsUpper transition point 0.93 1 %
Figure 1530: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1531: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
514
Profile: goe546
Information: Gottingen 546 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1532: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2037: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.3117 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 3.583 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3964 %CLower nose radius: 0.99106 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.4682 degRelease Angle: 7.5656 degNose Incidence: 9.7541 degCamber deflection: 17.3197 deg
Table 2038: Controlpoints1 00.63349 0.00851890.36135 -0.02320.2 -0.02320.030976 -0.02320 -0.0143060 00 0.0338170.12684 0.08510.4 0.08510.48328 0.08510.71043 0.0711231 0
Table 2039: Base 64 representation:ZraJjm1NNK0kOrA
Table 2040: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.302 5.005 ectsRMS curvature error: 34.91 35.01 %CD error 0.6 0.2 dctsCm error 13 15 mctsUpper transition point 0.75 1.39 %
Figure 1533: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1534: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
515
Profile: goe547
Information: Gottingen 547 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1535: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2041: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.651 % @0.31CMaximum Camber: 3.9894 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.91167 %CLower nose radius: 2.3505 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.4817 degRelease Angle: 7.6477 degNose Incidence: 3.5241 degCamber deflection: 11.1717 deg
Table 2042: Controlpoints1 00.51497 0.00767720.32844 -0.025050.15074 -0.025050.008459 -0.025050 -0.0115130 00 0.0300380.14845 0.090220.39734 0.090220.71326 0.090220.98531 0.00376951 0
Table 2043: Base 64 representation:VnZhls7KNLDtPrA
Table 2044: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.88 6.078 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.6 -2.7 dctsCm error -5 20 mctsUpper transition point 5.31 4.69 %
Figure 1536: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1537: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
516
Profile: goe548
Information: Gottingen 548 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1538: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2045: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.0079 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 2.3043 % @0.51CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.47894 %CLower nose radius: 0.40726 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 19.1946 degRelease Angle: 5.6274 degNose Incidence: 2.8622 degCamber deflection: 8.4896 deg
Table 2046: Controlpoints1 00.71896 -0.0195030.4425 -0.03980.3 -0.03980.014008 -0.03980 -0.00616710 00 0.0188930.11179 0.08160.4 0.08160.57696 0.08160.79543 0.0556741 0
Table 2047: Base 64 representation:PtaTiK8TNRrgVoA
Table 2048: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.971 4.193 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -7.2 -7.8 dctsCm error -29 -54 mctsUpper transition point 11.67 13.49 %
Figure 1539: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1540: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
517
Profile: goe549
Information: Gottingen 549 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1541: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2049: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.951 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.6347 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5235 %CLower nose radius: 1.2778 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.1206 degRelease Angle: 6.8916 degNose Incidence: 10.6745 degCamber deflection: 17.5661 deg
Table 2050: Controlpoints1 00.59735 0.00232840.38642 -0.02710.2 -0.02710.049548 -0.02710 -0.0205440 00 0.0373410.13728 0.114350.3 0.114350.4666 0.114350.56186 0.10481 0
Table 2051: Base 64 representation:ViTPwwvNPM6pPqA
Table 2052: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.298 6.025 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.4 0.5 dctsCm error 7 14 mctsUpper transition point -4.34 -5.55 %
Figure 1542: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1543: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
518
Profile: goe550
Information: Gottingen 550 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1544: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2053: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.7252 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 4.3127 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.45895 %CLower nose radius: 2.0742 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.4315 degRelease Angle: 9.6428 degNose Incidence: 0.61801 degCamber deflection: 10.2608 deg
Table 2054: Controlpoints1 00.52158 0.0160970.22678 -0.041650.15 -0.041650.097151 -0.041650 -0.0366520 00 0.0108850.038725 0.10060.4 0.10060.55096 0.10060.8856 0.0357591 0
Table 2055: Base 64 representation:H5aQq3XKGSXnRvA
Table 2056: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.582 5.829 ectsRMS curvature error: 37.96 39.91 %CD error -1.3 -1.8 dctsCm error -6 -27 mctsUpper transition point 2.48 3.55 %
Figure 1545: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1546: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
519
Profile: goe553
Information: Gottingen 553 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1547: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2057: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.7025 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.6835 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.2285 %CLower nose radius: 2.2375 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 9.3704 degRelease Angle: 8.7108 degNose Incidence: 18.4949 degCamber deflection: 27.2058 deg
Table 2058: Controlpoints1 00.64332 0.0251020.54332 -0.024670.15079 -0.024670.0097709 -0.024670 -0.0120730 00 0.0534690.13283 0.114480.29634 0.114480.40487 0.114480.55796 0.105281 0
Table 2059: Base 64 representation:eiTKwf7KeL6xKtA
Table 2060: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.396 5.21 ectsRMS curvature error: 32.55 35.2 %CD error 0.8 0.8 dctsCm error -3 -5 mctsUpper transition point -0.09 -0.03 %
Figure 1548: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1549: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
520
Profile: goe559
Information: Gottingen 559 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1550: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2061: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.15 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 3.4253 % @0.31CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: NaN %CLower nose radius: NaN %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.5014 degRelease Angle: 4.5254 degNose Incidence: 5.223 degCamber deflection: 9.7484 deg
Table 2062: Controlpoints1 00.98069 -0.000581650.53892 -0.02150.3 -0.02150.15831 -0.02150 00 00 00.17352 0.090.3 0.090.377 0.090.52713 0.091 0
Table 2063: Base 64 representation:AbTHlAeTWJ DOmA
Table 2064: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.542 4.513 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %
Figure 1551: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1552: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
521
Profile: goe563
Information: Gottingen 563 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1553: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2065: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.8253 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 2.251 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.4452 %CLower nose radius: 1.036 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.7512 degRelease Angle: 4.3884 degNose Incidence: 3.378 degCamber deflection: 7.7664 deg
Table 2066: Controlpoints1 00.38375 -0.0213820.35681 -0.025140.15089 -0.025140.085013 -0.025140 -0.0242310 00 0.00486070.0079602 0.065620.39767 0.065620.65461 0.065620.9476 0.00996161 0
Table 2067: Base 64 representation:F-Zbc9cKQLK8OmA
Table 2068: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.902 3.384 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.2 -2.8 dctsCm error -23 -16 mctsUpper transition point 5.56 3.69 %
Figure 1554: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1555: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
522
Profile: goe564
Information: Gottingen 564 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1556: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2069: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.1922 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 2.6881 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.42033 %CLower nose radius: 0.72805 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.0631 degRelease Angle: 5.7262 degNose Incidence: 5.9427 degCamber deflection: 11.6688 deg
Table 2070: Controlpoints1 00.21663 -0.0178510.11663 -0.020780.075 -0.020780.056931 -0.020780 -0.0166230 00 0.00514210.0071308 0.06720.4 0.06720.49203 0.06720.75449 0.0555881 0
Table 2071: Base 64 representation:F-aKsyPFDJ04QoA
Table 2072: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.333 5.331 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -7.8 -7.9 dctsCm error -21 -16 mctsUpper transition point 18.43 19.23 %
Figure 1557: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1558: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
523
Profile: goe565
Information: Gottingen 565 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1559: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2073: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 8.3533 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 2.8363 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.3008 %CLower nose radius: 0.82423 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.9982 degRelease Angle: 5.8661 degNose Incidence: 5.6044 degCamber deflection: 11.4705 deg
Table 2074: Controlpoints1 00.54393 0.00292180.32779 -0.021270.15 -0.021270.071727 -0.021270 -0.0198530 00 0.00318120.0050464 0.067780.4 0.067780.44648 0.067780.67999 0.0643231 0
Table 2075: Base 64 representation:D-aFs7gKNJ8qMpA
Table 2076: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.802 3.838 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -5.5 -4.5 dctsCm error -26 -44 mctsUpper transition point 10.52 11.83 %
Figure 1560: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1561: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
524
Profile: goe567
Information: Gottingen 567 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1562: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2077: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.6411 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 5.2856 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6935 %CLower nose radius: 1.8452 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.3003 degRelease Angle: 11.7228 degNose Incidence: 6.9141 degCamber deflection: 18.6369 deg
Table 2078: Controlpoints1 00.5812 0.0371750.39909 -0.038020.15175 -0.038020.086909 -0.038020 -0.0326970 00 0.0356060.11229 0.119650.3945 0.119650.57378 0.119650.92927 0.0234921 0
Table 2079: Base 64 representation:TtZTy2bKTQNsPyA
Table 2080: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.26 4.953 ectsRMS curvature error: 30.43 29.39 %CD error -1.2 -1 dctsCm error 9 34 mctsUpper transition point 2.08 1.72 %
Figure 1563: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1564: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
525
Profile: goe575
Information: Gottingen 575 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1565: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2081: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.5929 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 3.449 % @0.31CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.507 %CLower nose radius: 1.7016 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 56.4143 degRelease Angle: 4.8128 degNose Incidence: 14.5648 degCamber deflection: 19.3777 deg
Table 2082: Controlpoints1 00.93376 -0.0286550.39844 -0.034020.15056 -0.034020.079008 -0.034020 -0.0299380 00 0.0541940.12562 0.102420.29831 0.102420.45684 0.102420.87456 0.0815231 0
Table 2083: Base 64 representation:hkTOr3eKTPy1-nA
Table 2084: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 10.887 13.646 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -5 -4.8 dctsCm error 96 111 mctsUpper transition point -0.3 -0.58 %
Figure 1566: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1567: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
526
Profile: goe584
Information: Gottingen 584 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1568: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2085: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.465 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 4.9515 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1926 %CLower nose radius: 1.6905 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.1056 degRelease Angle: 4.4555 degNose Incidence: 11.6019 degCamber deflection: 16.0574 deg
Table 2086: Controlpoints1 00.3095 -0.00719870.19252 -0.024750.1 -0.024750.042091 -0.024750 -0.021780 00 0.0169190.036 0.1110.4 0.1110.5695 0.1110.9707 0.00490821 0
Table 2087: Base 64 representation:K5aSu3kGHLE2LmA
Table 2088: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.294 6.825 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.1 -0.4 dctsCm error -4 -23 mctsUpper transition point 0.48 1.43 %
Figure 1569: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1570: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
527
Profile: goe591
Information: Gottingen 591 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1571: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2089: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.2112 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 5.0131 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.4909 %CLower nose radius: 0.76161 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.6143 degRelease Angle: 7.5957 degNose Incidence: 14.0771 degCamber deflection: 21.6728 deg
Table 2090: Controlpoints1 00.22425 0.00390710.19841 -0.016190.075 -0.016190.039978 -0.016190 -0.0142470 00 0.035180.12452 0.105250.3 0.105250.47137 0.105250.65198 0.092621 0
Table 2091: Base 64 representation:VkTQs3eFJH39QrA
Table 2092: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.759 3.537 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.4 3.7 dctsCm error -23 29 mctsUpper transition point 7.98 -9.01 %
Figure 1572: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1573: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
528
Profile: goe592
Information: Gottingen 592 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1574: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2093: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.2311 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 7.5287 % @0.43CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 5.6773 %CLower nose radius: 1.9485 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.8665 degRelease Angle: 10.8289 degNose Incidence: 24.1998 degCamber deflection: 35.0287 deg
Table 2094: Controlpoints1 00.39777 0.0304620.11604 -0.021360.05048 -0.021360.027199 -0.021360 -0.0187970 00 0.0825930.18023 0.145430.39673 0.145430.63647 0.145430.90805 0.0312341 0
Table 2095: Base 64 representation:jiZZ93eDEJQrSxA
Table 2096: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.943 6.544 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 5.3 5.8 dctsCm error -51 -36 mctsUpper transition point 0.96 0.15 %
Figure 1575: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1576: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
529
Profile: goe595
Information: Gottingen 595 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1577: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2097: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.596 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 3.0018 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.86283 %CLower nose radius: 0.33205 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.8682 degRelease Angle: 5.8918 degNose Incidence: 10.3607 degCamber deflection: 16.2525 deg
Table 2098: Controlpoints1 00.66036 -0.00914490.3613 -0.01940.2 -0.01940.053318 -0.01940 -0.0108640 00 0.0283070.1363 0.07740.3 0.07740.51104 0.07740.71245 0.0681121 0
Table 2099: Base 64 representation:XiTTgjuNNI3hRpA
Table 2100: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.434 4.053 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.1 NaN dctsCm error 13 NaN mctsUpper transition point -2.65 NaN %
Figure 1578: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1579: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
530
Profile: goe596
Information: Gottingen 596 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1580: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2101: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.779 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 3.9798 % @0.36CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.5321 %CLower nose radius: 3.7316 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.9831 degRelease Angle: 5.7285 degNose Incidence: 8.7444 degCamber deflection: 14.4729 deg
Table 2102: Controlpoints1 00.28631 -0.0032760.18631 -0.015720.075 -0.015720.0066667 -0.015720 -0.0128780 00 0.039860.15555 0.08810.3 0.08810.44095 0.08810.62629 0.0775281 0
Table 2103: Base 64 representation:sfTNlz5FIH33NoA
Table 2104: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.213 4.863 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 3.1 3.5 dctsCm error -6 1 mctsUpper transition point -4.59 -5.23 %
Figure 1581: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1582: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
531
Profile: goe598
Information: Gottingen 598 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1583: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2105: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 6.5844 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 0.944 % @0.48CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %CUpper nose radius: 0.16906 %CLower nose radius: 0.44077 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 7.8762 degRelease Angle: 1.7448 degNose Incidence: -1.1447 degCamber deflection: 0.60005 deg
Table 2106: Controlpoints1 -0.0010.55502 -0.0180430.45502 -0.024610.30097 -0.024610.15961 -0.024610 -0.0216570 00 0.00928330.076464 0.041730.39835 0.041730.52623 0.041730.71681 0.0291811 0.001
Table 2107: Base 64 representation:OzZOS3eTOLrzJiF
Table 2108: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.48 4.965 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 10.2 -9.5 dctsCm error 2 -14 mctsUpper transition point -9.71 9.41 %
Figure 1584: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1585: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
532
Profile: goe599
Information: Gottingen 599 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1586: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2109: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.9962 % @0.35CMaximum Camber: 1.5375 % @0.53CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.35 %CUpper nose radius: 0.85769 %CLower nose radius: 0.66161 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.8798 degRelease Angle: 5.6716 degNose Incidence: 2.9409 degCamber deflection: 8.6125 deg
Table 2110: Controlpoints1 -0.001750.60387 -0.024370.42467 -0.03740.30218 -0.03740.030917 -0.03740 -0.0116780 00 0.0304220.16582 0.063580.3963 0.063580.66301 0.063580.95624 0.0131571 0.00175
Table 2111: Base 64 representation:fkZcbU4TLQMrUoJ
Table 2112: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.923 3.437 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -16.1 -16 dctsCm error -23 -10 mctsUpper transition point 30.85 30.19 %
Figure 1587: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1588: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
533
Profile: goe600
Information: Gottingen 600 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1589: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2113: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.0974 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 1.8839 % @0.5CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.50001 %CUpper nose radius: 0.44598 %CLower nose radius: 0.60506 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.3661 degRelease Angle: 2.83 degNose Incidence: 4.2678 degCamber deflection: 7.0978 deg
Table 2114: Controlpoints1 -0.00250.59974 -0.0329690.43151 -0.049450.30383 -0.049450.012905 -0.049450 -0.0072150 00 0.00969320.031601 0.0825010.3936 0.0825010.58682 0.0825010.78074 0.0412131 0.0025
Table 2115: Base 64 representation:I6ZUiJ8TMVhsQkN
Table 2116: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.927 3.268 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -7 -6.6 dctsCm error -6 3 mctsUpper transition point 10.86 10 %
Figure 1590: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1591: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
534
Profile: goe601
Information: Gottingen 601 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1592: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2117: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.1819 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 2.4672 % @0.53CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.0805 %CLower nose radius: 1.4831 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 21.392 degRelease Angle: 4.9908 degNose Incidence: 3.4864 degCamber deflection: 8.4772 deg
Table 2118: Controlpoints1 00.48327 -0.0516240.40699 -0.0603910.30605 -0.0603910.042429 -0.0603910 -0.0204820 00 0.0210540.06154 0.102470.38976 0.102470.48997 0.102470.66108 0.0951821 0
Table 2119: Base 64 representation:N1ZLrW2UJa63YnA
Table 2120: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.488 4.903 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -8.9 -9.1 dctsCm error -15 -19 mctsUpper transition point 8.31 8.71 %
Figure 1593: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1594: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
535
Profile: goe602
Information: Gottingen 602 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1595: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2121: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.8066 % @0.32CMaximum Camber: 3.5012 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.014459 %CLower nose radius: 0.54295 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 12.7508 degRelease Angle: 7.8519 degNose Incidence: 6.7974 degCamber deflection: 14.6493 deg
Table 2122: Controlpoints1 00.79537 0.00527440.27546 -0.020.2 -0.020.11029 -0.020 -0.019980 00 0.0015770.0258 0.0830.4 0.0830.406 0.0830.67592 0.082171 0
Table 2123: Base 64 representation:B7aBi sNGJ-SOsA
Table 2124: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.516 6.945 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -3.1 3.5 dctsCm error -12 13 mctsUpper transition point 6.81 -7.61 %
Figure 1596: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1597: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
536
Profile: goe602m
Information: Gottingen 602 airfoil, modified.Reference: UIUC
Figure 1598: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2125: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 9.4909 % @0.29CMaximum Camber: 3.8273 % @0.47CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 4.9258e-005 %CLower nose radius: 0.50541 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 11.7521 degRelease Angle: 8.3513 degNose Incidence: 7.1366 degCamber deflection: 15.4879 deg
Table 2126: Controlpoints1 00.588 0.017810.33957 -0.019250.15 -0.019250.10976 -0.019250 -0.0192310 00 8.3e-0050.020978 0.0830.4 0.0830.40006 0.0830.67297 0.0829171 0
Table 2127: Base 64 representation:A8aAi RKOI nNtA
Table 2128: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.236 6.152 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.7 -3.6 dctsCm error -8 -21 mctsUpper transition point 4.1 5.7 %
Figure 1599: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1600: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
537
Profile: goe604
Information: N/AReference: UIUC
Figure 1601: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2129: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.9037 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 5.403 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.3832 %CLower nose radius: 0.872 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.3085 degRelease Angle: 6.3346 degNose Incidence: 24.1738 degCamber deflection: 30.5084 deg
Table 2130: Controlpoints1 00.28263 -0.0353320.28263 -0.038830.15196 -0.038830.061905 -0.038830 -0.018970 00 0.0416470.076902 0.142790.29279 0.142790.34936 0.142790.48983 0.141381 0
Table 2131: Base 64 representation:TuTF8flKKR- UpA
Table 2132: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.73 3.937 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.7 -1.2 dctsCm error -13 -12 mctsUpper transition point 1.14 1.39 %
Figure 1602: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1603: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
538
Profile: goe610bm
Information: Gottingen 610-B MOD airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1604: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2133: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.7887 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 5.504 % @0.4CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.80001 %CUpper nose radius: 1.1105 %CLower nose radius: 0.025139 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 6.1986 degRelease Angle: 8.6599 degNose Incidence: 15.0736 degCamber deflection: 23.7335 deg
Table 2134: Controlpoints1 -0.0040.40484 0.0539430.11505 -0.00695990.012472 -0.00695990.011561 -0.00695990 -0.0013920 00 0.0332750.14956 0.0918990.30037 0.0918990.45415 0.0918990.59079 0.0891841 0.004
Table 2135: Base 64 representation:XgTOmNFBHD9qHtU
Table 2136: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.588 5.276 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -4.1 -14.4 dctsCm error -50 -69 mctsUpper transition point 5.49 4.75 %
Figure 1605: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1606: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
539
Profile: goe611
Information: Gottingen 611 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1607: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2137: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.9 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 5.7967 % @0.33CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.65 %CUpper nose radius: 2.4238 %CLower nose radius: 0.507 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.3616 degRelease Angle: 8.4137 degNose Incidence: 23.4299 degCamber deflection: 31.8436 deg
Table 2138: Controlpoints1 -0.003250.6009 -0.00511040.033368 -0.007880.02504 -0.007880.02504 -0.007880 -0.007880 00 0.0463110.13273 0.122420.29942 0.122420.43171 0.122420.6125 0.122421 0.00325
Table 2139: Base 64 representation:YjTMz ACBD aTtQ
Table 2140: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.912 8.356 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.7 -3.2 dctsCm error 18 21 mctsUpper transition point 0.02 -0.88 %
Figure 1608: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1609: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
540
Profile: goe613
Information: Gottingen 613 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1610: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2141: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 10.3127 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 4.0834 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.11338 %CLower nose radius: 2.5059 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.7613 degRelease Angle: 7.0137 degNose Incidence: 6.0939 degCamber deflection: 13.1076 deg
Table 2142: Controlpoints1 00.98166 -0.000277490.075 -0.014340.075 -0.014340.00975 -0.014340 -0.0127630 00 0.005930.046524 0.092150.3 0.092150.4617 0.092150.69511 0.0810921 0
Table 2143: Base 64 representation:E1TPm43FAG3BSqA
Table 2144: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.132 2.92 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 4.7 5.1 dctsCm error 8 14 mctsUpper transition point -4.75 -5.73 %
Figure 1611: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1612: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
541
Profile: goe615
Information: Gottingen 615 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1613: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2145: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.8004 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 5.4901 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.7584 %CLower nose radius: 1.5274 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.2411 degRelease Angle: 8.592 degNose Incidence: 20.7371 degCamber deflection: 29.3292 deg
Table 2146: Controlpoints1 00.40147 0.00492540.28221 -0.022830.10061 -0.022830.033522 -0.022830 -0.0184750 00 0.0528510.11148 0.121860.29677 0.121860.50774 0.121860.70713 0.0879341 0
Table 2147: Base 64 representation:cnTTzzqGNKt0StA
Table 2148: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.444 4.759 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 3 3.3 dctsCm error 1 13 mctsUpper transition point -3.86 -4.02 %
Figure 1614: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1615: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
542
Profile: goe617
Information: Gottingen 617 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1616: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2149: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.85 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 2.175 % @0.31CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.5353 %CLower nose radius: 1.3376 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 21.7334 degRelease Angle: 1.63 degNose Incidence: 10.0605 degCamber deflection: 11.6905 deg
Table 2150: Controlpoints1 00.74468 -0.0415210.41199 -0.04750.3 -0.04750.19977 -0.04750 -0.0422070 00 0.0539640.17229 0.0910.3 0.0910.40676 0.0910.58941 0.0911 0
Table 2151: Base 64 representation:lbTKm4VTKU 3YiA
Table 2152: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.535 3.774 ectsRMS curvature error: 33.61 33.09 %CD error -3.9 -3.9 dctsCm error 26 27 mctsUpper transition point -1.07 -0.99 %
Figure 1617: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1618: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
543
Profile: goe619
Information: Gottingen 619 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1619: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2153: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.0172 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 4.5141 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.3023 %CLower nose radius: 1.6761 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.531 degRelease Angle: 7.9394 degNose Incidence: 8.0381 degCamber deflection: 15.9774 deg
Table 2154: Controlpoints1 00.41365 0.00177930.27057 -0.038170.15172 -0.038170.069791 -0.038170 -0.0305360 00 0.0249090.071463 0.108780.29511 0.108780.43609 0.108780.62079 0.106631 0
Table 2155: Base 64 representation:PwTNtyiKJQ-yRsA
Table 2156: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.905 5.97 ectsRMS curvature error: 37.32 35.48 %CD error 5.4 4.5 dctsCm error 42 53 mctsUpper transition point -11.09 -9.72 %
Figure 1620: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1621: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
544
Profile: goe620
Information: Gottingen 620 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1622: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2157: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 17.3256 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 5.9987 % @0.46CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: NaN %CLower nose radius: 2.4341 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 20.112 degRelease Angle: 10.5586 degNose Incidence: 14.1872 degCamber deflection: 24.7458 deg
Table 2158: Controlpoints1 00.4974 0.00440940.32798 -0.042780.15 -0.042780.071759 -0.042780 -0.0341240 00 00 0.14210.4 0.14210.45712 0.14210.65239 0.130761 0
Table 2159: Base 64 representation:A aG8ygKNS6vWwA
Table 2160: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.589 7.733 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.2 -1.7 dctsCm error -25 -51 mctsUpper transition point 0.96 1.29 %
Figure 1623: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1624: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
545
Profile: goe621
Information: Gottingen 621 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1625: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2161: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.8467 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 5.0574 % @0.45CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.6559 %CLower nose radius: 2.2293 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.6158 degRelease Angle: 7.8495 degNose Incidence: 13.6601 degCamber deflection: 21.5096 deg
Table 2162: Controlpoints1 00.4046 -0.00476340.3046 -0.03760.15171 -0.03760.091867 -0.03760 -0.036950 00 0.00835760.003945 0.120950.3945 0.120950.56341 0.120950.80605 0.0561921 0
Table 2163: Base 64 representation:E-ZSz-ZKMQc2TsA
Table 2164: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 7.449 8.588 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -1.3 -0.9 dctsCm error -52 -40 mctsUpper transition point 1.26 0.66 %
Figure 1626: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1627: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
546
Profile: goe622
Information: Gottingen 622 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1628: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2165: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 7.8896 % @0.33CMaximum Camber: 2.4231 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %CUpper nose radius: 0.042416 %CLower nose radius: 0.55735 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 10.6651 degRelease Angle: 4.0267 degNose Incidence: 5.8562 degCamber deflection: 9.8828 deg
Table 2166: Controlpoints1 -0.0010.36193 -0.0155450.22649 -0.019350.14998 -0.019350.064492 -0.019350 -0.015480 00 0.000457720.00074092 0.06320.40006 0.06320.44206 0.06320.68688 0.0526071 0.001
Table 2167: Base 64 representation:A aEbyjKGI00MmF
Table 2168: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.123 4.849 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.9 -1.2 dctsCm error 9 4 mctsUpper transition point 6.22 6.8 %
Figure 1629: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1630: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
547
Profile: goe623
Information: Gottingen 623 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1631: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2169: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 11.8184 % @0.34CMaximum Camber: 3.8391 % @0.41CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %CUpper nose radius: 0.2303 %CLower nose radius: 0.7993 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.7922 degRelease Angle: 5.6723 degNose Incidence: 11.9929 degCamber deflection: 17.6653 deg
Table 2170: Controlpoints1 -0.00150.35953 -0.0207740.25953 -0.02640.09996 -0.02640.097961 -0.02640 -0.0225260 00 0.00350530.0080029 0.09690.40015 0.09690.44214 0.09690.65412 0.0817891 0.0015
Table 2171: Base 64 representation:C-aEo2BGLL12RoI
Table 2172: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.781 8.238 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error NaN NaN dctsCm error NaN NaN mctsUpper transition point NaN NaN %
Figure 1632: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1633: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
548
Profile: goe624
Information: Gttingen 624 profileReference: UIUC
Figure 1634: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2173: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.0243 % @0.28CMaximum Camber: 5.1922 % @0.37CTrailing Edge Gap: 0.5 %CUpper nose radius: 3.9311 %CLower nose radius: 1.7777 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.1756 degRelease Angle: 6.452 degNose Incidence: 17.8655 degCamber deflection: 24.3175 deg
Table 2174: Controlpoints1 -0.00250.31693 -0.0279740.20692 -0.0328750.14992 -0.0328750.073868 -0.0328750 -0.0295870 00 0.0632960.15287 0.131250.30033 0.131250.53144 0.131250.66206 0.0933031 0.0025
Table 2175: Base 64 representation:ffTV35gKEOt2TqN
Table 2176: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.862 3.921 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 4.4 4.7 dctsCm error -5 -17 mctsUpper transition point -3.53 -4.11 %
Figure 1635: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1636: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
549
Profile: goe626
Information: Gottingen 626 profileReference: UIUC
Figure 1637: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2177: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.6655 % @0.22CMaximum Camber: 5.0677 % @0.52CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.9859 %CLower nose radius: 2.0026 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.9051 degRelease Angle: 11.6728 degNose Incidence: 13.2096 degCamber deflection: 24.8824 deg
Table 2178: Controlpoints1 00.53192 0.0386490.30922 -0.0551210.15372 -0.0551210.098449 -0.0551210 -0.0362540 00 0.0632180.1504 0.12070.29185 0.12070.62107 0.12070.92335 0.0258341 0
Table 2179: Base 64 representation:hfTeypXKMYNqQyA
Table 2180: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.48 9.078 ectsRMS curvature error: 25.19 26.44 %CD error -0.1 -0.6 dctsCm error 25 42 mctsUpper transition point -5.31 -4.7 %
Figure 1638: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1639: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
550
Profile: goe627
Information: Gottingen 627 airfoil.Reference: UIUC
Figure 1640: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2181: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.75 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 4.075 % @0.3CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.3567 %CLower nose radius: 0.59427 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 24.7012 degRelease Angle: 6.7348 degNose Incidence: 26.9862 degCamber deflection: 33.721 deg
Table 2182: Controlpoints1 00.92345 -0.00752760.63555 -0.0380.3 -0.0380.043836 -0.0380 -0.0131780 00 0.0111930.0079746 0.11950.3 0.11950.42456 0.11950.72182 0.096251 0
Table 2183: Base 64 representation:G9TLyW2TfQzNcqA
Table 2184: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.326 2.858 ectsRMS curvature error: 31.01 30.04 %CD error -5.4 -4.9 dctsCm error -10 -5 mctsUpper transition point 4.21 3.73 %
Figure 1641: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1642: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
551
Profile: goe628
Information: Gottingen 628 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1643: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2185: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.8909 % @0.24CMaximum Camber: 5.6016 % @0.42CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 4.7296 %CLower nose radius: 0.92484 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 15.399 degRelease Angle: 8.9365 degNose Incidence: 23.5194 degCamber deflection: 32.4559 deg
Table 2186: Controlpoints1 00.42264 0.0124660.32264 -0.040970.15203 -0.040970.031852 -0.040970 -0.0140140 00 0.0568840.10263 0.134520.29334 0.134520.38089 0.134520.5498 0.134521 0
Table 2187: Base 64 representation:bpTI4WyKNR 2RuA
Table 2188: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.231 7.061 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -5.5 -5.6 dctsCm error -11 -33 mctsUpper transition point 0.2 1.29 %
Figure 1644: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1645: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
552
Profile: goe629
Information: Gottingen 629 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1646: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2189: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.4989 % @0.3CMaximum Camber: 2.8081 % @0.44CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7125 %CLower nose radius: 2.0487 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.4406 degRelease Angle: 5.3557 degNose Incidence: 3.7759 degCamber deflection: 9.1316 deg
Table 2190: Controlpoints1 00.30746 -0.0467820.20746 -0.047830.15287 -0.047830.091722 -0.047830 -0.0353940 00 0.0251240.055289 0.093660.39438 0.093660.42466 0.093660.67191 0.0853151 0
Table 2191: Base 64 representation:R2ZDnuaKEU5-VoA
Table 2192: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.963 6.302 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 2.2 -1.8 dctsCm error 8 13 mctsUpper transition point -1.25 0.48 %
Figure 1647: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1648: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
553
Profile: goe630
Information: Gottingen 630 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1649: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2193: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 12.6338 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 7.6414 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.4127 %CLower nose radius: 1.0454 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 13.6383 degRelease Angle: 10.9817 degNose Incidence: 18.653 degCamber deflection: 29.6347 deg
Table 2194: Controlpoints1 00.30028 0.0509230.13391 -0.015110.02523 -0.015110.018922 -0.015110 -0.0114840 00 0.0467710.136 0.137120.29787 0.137120.43823 0.137120.57294 0.137121 0
Table 2195: Base 64 representation:WiTN6wQCHG zPxA
Table 2196: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.378 6.993 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 0.4 -2.1 dctsCm error -35 -27 mctsUpper transition point 1.1 1.02 %
Figure 1650: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1651: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
554
Profile: goe645
Information: Gottingen 645 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1652: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2197: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.6249 % @0.23CMaximum Camber: 4.8147 % @0.39CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 2.1827 %CLower nose radius: 0.80858 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.3761 degRelease Angle: 7.1071 degNose Incidence: 17.5123 degCamber deflection: 24.6194 deg
Table 2198: Controlpoints1 00.39448 -0.0008550.29447 -0.040130.15195 -0.040130.03747 -0.040130 -0.0142120 00 0.0308510.065409 0.122260.29407 0.122260.34505 0.122260.52019 0.122261 0
Table 2199: Base 64 representation:QxTFzXvKLR 2QrA
Table 2200: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.097 3.495 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -5.5 -6.3 dctsCm error 2 -14 mctsUpper transition point 3.86 5.06 %
Figure 1653: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1654: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
555
Profile: goe646
Information: Gottingen 646 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1655: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2201: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 18.3072 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 4.5139 % @0.49CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 3.0222 %CLower nose radius: 2.8636 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 18.2175 degRelease Angle: 11.1111 degNose Incidence: 11.0429 degCamber deflection: 22.1541 deg
Table 2202: Controlpoints1 00.68669 0.0109540.3518 -0.0605310.20472 -0.0605310.11669 -0.0605310 -0.0484240 00 0.0290620.041921 0.130410.38982 0.130410.44636 0.130410.71479 0.105051 0
Table 2203: Base 64 representation:O4ZG3ycNMazfUxA
Table 2204: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 4.675 5.427 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.2 0 dctsCm error -16 -21 mctsUpper transition point 0.16 0.51 %
Figure 1656: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1657: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
556
Profile: goe647
Information: Gottingen 647 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1658: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2205: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 16.4068 % @0.25CMaximum Camber: 5.3607 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.6395 %CLower nose radius: 1.2996 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.7112 degRelease Angle: 7.9165 degNose Incidence: 19.8113 degCamber deflection: 27.7278 deg
Table 2206: Controlpoints1 00.42028 -0.00444310.32028 -0.035480.15153 -0.035480.13891 -0.035480 -0.0346920 00 0.0216350.042827 0.133150.29428 0.133150.4829 0.133150.74281 0.075071 0
Table 2207: Base 64 representation:K2TR4-FKNPj2TsA
Table 2208: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 2.746 4.847 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.1 -2.3 dctsCm error -34 -22 mctsUpper transition point 5.46 5.9 %
Figure 1659: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1660: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
557
Profile: goe648
Information: Gottingen 648 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1661: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2209: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 15.2491 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 3.9212 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 4.1775 %CLower nose radius: 1.1244 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 17.7617 degRelease Angle: 7.5686 degNose Incidence: 23.4967 degCamber deflection: 31.0653 deg
Table 2210: Controlpoints1 00.66863 -0.0075910.44201 -0.038880.20214 -0.038880.022856 -0.038880 -0.0130890 00 0.0328770.038811 0.114650.2937 0.114650.54274 0.114650.81738 0.053921 0
Table 2211: Base 64 representation:S3TXwW4NTRelUrA
Table 2212: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 3.318 6.337 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -5.2 -5.4 dctsCm error -35 -40 mctsUpper transition point 8.01 8.73 %
Figure 1662: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1663: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
558
Profile: goe650
Information: Gottingen 650 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1664: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2213: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 13.5372 % @0.24CMaximum Camber: 4.4697 % @0.52CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 1.7204 %CLower nose radius: 2.006 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.6575 degRelease Angle: 9.7611 degNose Incidence: 8.6494 degCamber deflection: 18.4106 deg
Table 2214: Controlpoints1 00.4829 0.0219660.358 -0.042320.15214 -0.042320.08419 -0.042320 -0.0338560 00 0.0121510.012872 0.102940.3948 0.102940.43364 0.102940.67868 0.0987881 0
Table 2215: Base 64 representation:I9ZErysKQS8zQvA
Table 2216: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 5.833 6.125 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -0.4 0.3 dctsCm error -43 -29 mctsUpper transition point 0.73 -0.72 %
Figure 1665: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1666: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
559
Profile: goe654
Information: Gottingen 654 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1667: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2217: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.5631 % @0.27CMaximum Camber: 5.2101 % @0.35CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.044596 %CLower nose radius: 2.9032 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 14.4757 degRelease Angle: 7.2529 degNose Incidence: 11.5667 degCamber deflection: 18.8196 deg
Table 2218: Controlpoints1 00.50832 0.000129070.37001 -0.02450.15 -0.02450.012176 -0.02450 -0.0153510 00 0.0030360.031003 0.1240.3 0.1240.363 0.1240.53446 0.120321 0
Table 2219: Base 64 representation:C4TG0n6KRK9xQrA
Table 2220: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.765 4.257 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error 1.5 1.4 dctsCm error 18 31 mctsUpper transition point -2.32 -2.73 %
Figure 1668: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1669: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
560
Profile: goe655
Information: Gottingen 655 airfoilReference: UIUC
Figure 1670: Wing profile with camber and thicknessdistribution.
Table 2221: Geometrical propertiesMaximum Thickness: 14.0017 % @0.26CMaximum Camber: 4.3998 % @0.38CTrailing Edge Gap: 0 %CUpper nose radius: 0.049897 %CLower nose radius: 1.0208 %CBoat-Tail Angle: 16.0995 degRelease Angle: 7.1052 degNose Incidence: 14.2551 degCamber deflection: 21.3604 deg
Table 2222: Controlpoints1 00.4776 -0.00861230.33077 -0.030720.15 -0.030720.1267 -0.030720 -0.0293640 00 0.00251520.019017 0.112550.3 0.112550.53312 0.112550.82782 0.0466351 0
Table 2223: Base 64 representation:B7TVv8KKONbxSrA
Table 2224: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64RMS position error: 1.461 2.433 ectsRMS curvature error: Inf Inf %CD error -2.3 -1.9 dctsCm error -17 -16 mctsUpper transition point 6.84 6.11 %
Figure 1671: Error distribution of vertical position andcurvature of the parameter curve.
Figure 1672: Error distribution of drag- and pitchingmoment, as well as the error of top and bottom transitionpoints.
561