crafting an end-to-end pharma grc strategy

7
Crafting an End-to-End Pharma GRC Strategy Understanding the most appropriate regulatory compliance solution extends beyond pure technological functionalities; it requires intimate understanding of policies and procedures required to achieve meaningful compliance with regulations, worldwide. to tools. This compliance strategy could comprise processes, a roadmap, operating procedures, etc. GRC Technology Investment Drivers Corporate boards and senior executives of pharma majors are seeking greater visibility and insight into the effectiveness of controls and compliance across their organizations to ensure commitment to investors and to gain customer confidence. Key factors influencing the recent growth of GRC include: Business transformation and SAP consolida- tion programs, primarily to protect invest- ments in existing IT systems and tools. Global shared service centers and control centers for better utilization of resources and to ensure transparency in financial control across organizations. Increased regulatory requirements, along with the persistent pressure to reduce the cost of compliance and assurance. Demand for integrated compliance tools to address widespread needs of different compliance groups within the organization Executive Summary The pharmaceuticals industry and related businesses are mandated to comply with diverse regulatory standards in different countries. This includes the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) in the U.S., and good manufacturing practice (GMP), good laboratory practice (GLP), good pharmacy practice, etc. in the U.S. and elsewhere. Hence, spending on governance, risk management, and compliance (GRC) tools is necessary. This white paper details pharma-specific key business processes and suitable GRC technolo- gies available in the market. GRC Market Dynamics With steady year-over-year growth, GRC tools are delivering increasing benefits to pharmaceuticals companies seeking to streamline and automate their compliance processes, worldwide. To prop- erly leverage GRC, pharma companies must see GRC as more than a tool or technology. Technol- ogy without proper direction is not going to help most companies anyway. What they need is a direction/approach toward compliance in addition cognizant 20-20 insights | june 2013 Cognizant 20-20 Insights

Upload: cognizant

Post on 03-Sep-2014

2.739 views

Category:

Technology


7 download

DESCRIPTION

For pharmaceuticals facing increasing oversight and regulatory constraints, governance, risk management and compliance (GRC) tools are playing a more critical role, sometimes in combination with ERP. We compare Approva Bizights and SAP GRC 10 software tools while offering a framework for choosing a suitable GRC package.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Crafting an End-to-End Pharma GRC Strategy

Crafting an End-to-End Pharma GRC StrategyUnderstanding the most appropriate regulatory compliance solution extends beyond pure technological functionalities; it requires intimate understanding of policies and procedures required to achieve meaningful compliance with regulations, worldwide.

to tools. This compliance strategy could comprise processes, a roadmap, operating procedures, etc.

GRC Technology Investment DriversCorporate boards and senior executives of pharma majors are seeking greater visibility and insight into the effectiveness of controls and compliance across their organizations to ensure commitment to investors and to gain customer confidence. Key factors influencing the recent growth of GRC include:

• Business transformation and SAP consolida-tion programs, primarily to protect invest-ments in existing IT systems and tools.

• Global shared service centers and control centers for better utilization of resources and to ensure transparency in financial control across organizations.

• Increased regulatory requirements, along with the persistent pressure to reduce the cost of compliance and assurance.

• Demand for integrated compliance tools to address widespread needs of different compliance groups within the organization

Executive SummaryThe pharmaceuticals industry and related businesses are mandated to comply with diverse regulatory standards in different countries. This includes the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) in the U.S., and good manufacturing practice (GMP), good laboratory practice (GLP), good pharmacy practice, etc. in the U.S. and elsewhere. Hence, spending on governance, risk management, and compliance (GRC) tools is necessary.

This white paper details pharma-specific key business processes and suitable GRC technolo-gies available in the market.

GRC Market DynamicsWith steady year-over-year growth, GRC tools are delivering increasing benefits to pharmaceuticals companies seeking to streamline and automate their compliance processes, worldwide. To prop-erly leverage GRC, pharma companies must see GRC as more than a tool or technology. Technol-ogy without proper direction is not going to help most companies anyway. What they need is a direction/approach toward compliance in addition

cognizant 20-20 insights | june 2013

• Cognizant 20-20 Insights

Page 2: Crafting an End-to-End Pharma GRC Strategy

cognizant 20-20 insights 2

Security and segregation of duties:

• Facilitate automated testing of system access controls.

• Facilitate automated testing of segregation of duties.

Audit lifecycle management:

• Document independent audit activities.

• Provide quality assurance over compliance activities.

• Report results.

• Track exceptions and remediation activities.

Investment in specific modules depends on budget decisions from various units. As no single person “owns” four module deployments, there should be proper alignment among different stakeholders to buy one solution for all of their requirements. Hence, selection of a GRC vendor is a process that should be orchestrated carefully to avoid redundant solutions and to achieve cost savings. (See GRC Tools and Vendor Consideration Process further down on how to make this happen.)

All of the above mentioned regulations/frame-work can be centrally configured in GRC, as shown in Figure 2, next page.

GRC Technology Vendor OverviewGRC vendors can be classified into three main categories:

• GRC integrated with ERP solutions: SAP and Oracle are the only integrated GRC solutions available. SAP’s GRC 10 is tightly integrated

and to consolidate disparate indicators and standards for judging compliance across the organization.

• Pharma companies are under enormous pressure since they need to assure clinical trials and drug manufacturing quality stan-dards to consumers/government, in addition to finance-related assurance to stakeholders. Pharma businesses expect – and are ready – to invest in GRC solutions that address all of their requirements. This eventually created a wave of innovation among GRC vendors.

GRC Technology OverviewToday’s compliance departments need an inte-grated solution to address various stakeholder requirements. Figure 1 highlights the different modules. What follows is a detailed assessment of the specific functionalities required.

Enterprise risk management:

• Perform business risk assessments.

• Prioritize risks and prepare mitigation plans.

• Actively monitor changes in risk profile.

• Report incidents.

Policies and control repository:

• Map policy requirements to processes, risks and controls.

• Maintain a repository of test scripts/data.

• Automatically report on results.

• Track exception and remediation plans.

Components of GRC

GRC Central Repository

Policies and Control

Repository

Enterprise Risk

Management

Security and Segregation

of Duties

Audit Lifecycle

Management

Figure 1

Page 3: Crafting an End-to-End Pharma GRC Strategy

cognizant 20-20 insights 3

with SAP’s ERP solutions in terms of design and architecture, which ensures more auto-mated operations at a reduced cost and strong systems performance.

• GRC-focused solutions: These solutions lack ERP integration and process automation. Hence, their performance and automation pales in comparison with GRC solutions inte-grated with ERP.

• GRC niche solutions: This category includes proven solutions from companies such as Approva. For example, Approva’s Bizrights is a leading product in the European market and is positioned as a hybrid solution between integrated and GRC-focused offerings in terms of benefits.

What follows is a discussion of vendor considerations and an assessment of SAP GRC and Approva One (the latest version of Approva Bizrights), two solutions with which we have vast experience implementing for numerous pharma companies.

GRC Tools and Vendor Consideration ProcessFigure 3, next page, depicts a typical pharma company’s organizational hierarchy.

There are many questions to help understand your organization’s GRC needs. We list some of the more important ones below:

What is the value proposition you anticipate from GRC?

• Do you need a single source risk and control solution?

• It is nothing but a centralized repository of risks and controls across all regulations.

Solution benefits:

• Easy communication to audit stakeholders.

• Reliable change control.

• Automated updates to control set.

• Systematic allocation of ownership and accountability.

GRC Technology

Cross-Functional GRC Capability

Global Compliance Platform

• Multiple compliance frameworks.• Business objectives.• Organizational hierarchy.• Risk and response catalog.• Account groups and financial

assertions.• Policies and procedures

(lifecycle management).• Entity level controls catalog.• Process and controls repository.• Control objectives catalog.

2. Maintenance of “central” evaluation templates:• Assessment plans (survey library).• Manual test plans.• Automated test scripts.

3. Cross-compliance planning and reporting platform:• Centralized planning and

monitoring of ongoing compliance activities.

• Holistic view of compliance activities across multiple frameworks.

1. Maintenance of central master data structures:

Compliance Framework SoX

Compliance Framework – UK Bribery Act

Compliance Framework – COBIT

Compliance Framework – Contract

1. Assignment of relevant central master data (ability to allow or prevent local modifications).

2. Assignment of relevant control evaluation templates (standardization of testing/assessment procedures).

3. Compliance-specific reporting platform and evidence repository.

4. Ability to allow or prevent “shared evaluations” with other compliance framework(s).

5. Compliance-specific roles and authorization model.

Figure 2

Page 4: Crafting an End-to-End Pharma GRC Strategy

cognizant 20-20 insights 4

• Formalization of control framework.

• Reduced controls.

Do you need a tool to address cross-functional control and compliance framework require-ments?Your organization might require a tool to manage diversified compliance requirements such as financial control framework (FCF), IS control framework and SOX control framework under one single roof.

Solution benefits:

• Reduced rework and duplication of compliance data.

• Effective utilization of controls: Linkage of key controls to multiple regulation risks.

• Linkage to organization policies and procedures.

Would you like to automate the control self-assessment cycle?This means you can enter control validation procedures and results within GRC. The entire lifecycle of self-assessment, from self-assurance to control effectiveness reporting, would then be automated with the help of GRC.

Solution benefits:

• Effective risk assessment and scoping.

• Roll-forward capability.

• Automatic communication.

• Status reporting and escalation management.

Does your organization desire sophisticated reporting and remediation trend analysis?This is necessary for organizations that are not happy with the reporting features of their current compliance tool. GRC provides much improved reporting on violations and helps predict remediation trends.

Solution benefits:

• Reduced reliance on off-line progress.

• Flexible visibility of control operation and remediation progress.

• Targeted remediation effort.

Has your organization had to confront con-cerns voiced by the business that it is being over-audited?This means that synergy and alignment is required among different compliance-relevant procedures performed by multiple lines of defense.

Solution benefits:

• Efficient effort and reduced duplication.

Does your organization require the complete insight of continuous monitoring: data, control and transactions?This question concerns whether the business needs thorough monitoring on transactions being done through the ERP systems against pre-configured rules. For example, monitoring to be done on the purchase module will yield the following insights:

• Who performed more purchases?

• Was it appropriately approved?

• Were purchases realized into inventories?

Pharma Industry Organizatonal Hierarchy

Pharma PLC

R&D Finance Operationsand IS

Commercial Global Compliance

Regional Audit Group

Group Internal Audit

Figure 3

Page 5: Crafting an End-to-End Pharma GRC Strategy

cognizant 20-20 insights 5

Solution benefits:

• Automated testing of controls is performed by GRC.

• Continuous monitoring of GRC offers “detec-tive” controls. Detective controls are the rule set/processes in place that detect violations only after the control breach. For example, if the organization decides that purchase requi-sitions worth more than $10,000 require three levels of approval, then any purchase worth more than $10,000 yet containing only two levels of approval will be flagged as a violation. This feature helps organizations discover how many violations occur within a particular time

frame, the reasons they occur and a possible means for mitigating this issue.

Is your organization looking for integrated security and SOD along with GRC?This means that automated user provisioning to ERP is required after segregation of duties analysis from GRC.

Solution benefits:

• Reduce SOD analysis effort.

• Automated user provisioning reduces effort from the security team and it improves reli-ance on complex SOD compliance.

Comparing Approva One vs. SAP GRC

Figure 4

Approva One seamlessly sup-ports ERP products such as SAP, Oracle, PeopleSoft and CGI. It has rule templates ready for the same. Any other third-party CRM systems and HR systems can also be included within Approva One with additional custom configuration effort.

SAP GRC 10 seamlessly supports only SAP products. Though there are provisions given like non-SAP adapters for GRC or integration through IDM, etc. these are not proven.

Approva One comes with two modules: Authorization Insight and Process Insight.

Authorization Insight: Responsible for rule book design, exception management, mitigation controls, continuous monitoring and risk analysis.

Process Insight:Responsible for audit lifecycle management like SOX frame-work design, design effective-ness review, internal audit planning and testing of controls, etc.

SAP GRC 10 comes with modules for access control and process control, but as an integrated solution (in contrast with predecessor releases) also has a risk management module.

Access Control: Access control simplifies the remediation and mitigation process with the help of process control components. It allows central management of firefighter IDs, streamlines the temporary super-user access log review by adding workflow capabilities and has business role concepts.

Process Control:This helps to define and set up automated monitoring of controls and workflow alerts including transactional record and configuration changes at SAP ERP. SAP Business Objects GRC 10 version provides capabilities around content lifecycle management that allows the import and export of risks and controls together by enhancing the integration with AC and PC into a single enterprise risk management platform that provides summarized views representing the different organizational risks and related automated, manual and security controls from a business process perspective.

Risk Management:SAP GRC 10 has a separate module called risk management, in contrast to Approva. This deals with risk assessment and risk prioritization. SAP risk management enables an enterprise-wide risk management process as mandated by certain legal requirements and recommended by best-practice management frameworks. SAP risk management uses the various work cen-ters of the GRC, in which you can carry out all risk management activities. The process control component of GRC 10 complements risk management. SAP bifurcated the risk management aspect of GRC into a separate module to give better visibility to executive management who actually require a bird’s eye view of enterprise risks and its mitigation controls.

Page 6: Crafting an End-to-End Pharma GRC Strategy

cognizant 20-20 insights 6

» IT infrastructure.» Controls maturity.» Lines of defense model.

Approva One Bizrights and SAP Business Objects GRC-10 are good packages to consider among many strong GRC solutions on the market.

In its latest release, Approva One offers innovations such as a provision to follow up on SOD remediation and a user interface for end-to-end mitigation processes. Approva continues to concentrate on its core strengths (i.e., it is easy to operate, flexible, supports a wide range of financial systems and has lower procurement and operating costs).

SAP Business Objects GRC-10 has been nicely upgraded. From a technical perspective, SAP GRC has moved from the Java programming language to ABAP. This core change allows centralized support across all its components. The SAP GRC solution’s new platform improves change management processes by leveraging existing transport systems, background job scheduling, archiving and other standard SAP features. SAP Roadmap for GRC promises continuous innova-tions by releasing updated GRC functionalities and patches, which bodes well for its customer base. On the other hand, Approva, as noted earlier, has also improved the capabilities of its Approva One offering, with additional updates expected. Hence, these two products are worthy of consideration for pharma GRC requirements.

Other questions to resolve include:

• Do you know the ratings/pros and cons of various compliance tools in the market?

» Before you start researching GRC solutions, ensure that you read recent analysis from Forrester and Gartner – the two top market research companies.

• What needs to be considered before con-stituting the program to identify a suitable GRC vendor?

» Key users of compliance are in finance. But be sure to include other key stakeholders/representatives in the GRC program, accord-ing to their weight in compliance needs.

» Primarily target your organization’s ERP environment. But be sure to include all tools that fall within the compliance ring.

» Elicit needs for different control repositories.

» Get inputs from local, regional integrated assurance teams on current compliance manual processes or tools.

» Perform an overall assessment of current compliance tools and processes.

In a nutshell, GRC vendor selection always starts with:

• An in-depth self-assessment of your compliance requirements.

• An assessment of the underlying business environment, covering:

References

• Gartner’s French Caldwell, Tom Scholtz, John Hagerty, "Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Governance, Risk and Compliance Platforms," July 13 2011, pp. 9-14, http://fm.sap.com/data/UPLOAD/files/ Gartner_Magic_Quadrant_for_EGRC_(July_2011)%5B1%5D.pdf.

• Forrester’s Chris McClean with Stephanie Balaouras and Nicholas M. Hayes, "Enterprise Governance, Risk, and Compliance Platforms, Q4 2011," Dec 2 2011, pp. 9-10, http://www.protiviti.co.in/en-US/Documents/About-Us/The-Forrester-Wave-Enterprise-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance- Platforms-Q4-2011.pdf.

About the AuthorKarthikeyan Muniappan is a Senior SAP Consultant in Cognizant’s Enterprise Application Systems Practice and is a member of its SAP basis Sub-practice. He won an innovation award in 2011 from Cognizant and SAP India for his contribution to SOX/SOD compliance and the relevant toolset. Karthik has a master of engineering degree from Anna University in computer science and engineering. He can be reached at [email protected].

Page 7: Crafting an End-to-End Pharma GRC Strategy

About Cognizant

Cognizant (NASDAQ: CTSH) is a leading provider of information technology, consulting, and business process outsourcing services, dedicated to helping the world’s leading companies build stronger businesses. Headquartered in Teaneck, New Jersey (U.S.), Cognizant combines a passion for client satisfaction, technology innovation, deep industry and business process expertise, and a global, collaborative workforce that embodies the future of work. With over 50 delivery centers worldwide and approximately 162,700 employees as of March 31, 2013, Cognizant is a member of the NASDAQ-100, the S&P 500, the Forbes Global 2000, and the Fortune 500 and is ranked among the top performing and fastest growing companies in the world.

Visit us online at www.cognizant.com for more information.

World Headquarters

500 Frank W. Burr Blvd.Teaneck, NJ 07666 USAPhone: +1 201 801 0233Fax: +1 201 801 0243Toll Free: +1 888 937 3277Email: [email protected]

European Headquarters

1 Kingdom StreetPaddington CentralLondon W2 6BDPhone: +44 (0) 207 297 7600Fax: +44 (0) 207 121 0102Email: [email protected]

India Operations Headquarters

#5/535, Old Mahabalipuram RoadOkkiyam Pettai, ThoraipakkamChennai, 600 096 IndiaPhone: +91 (0) 44 4209 6000Fax: +91 (0) 44 4209 6060Email: [email protected]

© Copyright 2013, Cognizant. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the express written permission from Cognizant. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. All other trademarks mentioned herein are the property of their respective owners.