critical reasoning and moral theory – day...

15
8/31/15 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3 CS 340 Fall 2015 Ethics and Moral Theories Differences of opinion based caused by different value set Deontology Virtue Religious and Divine Command Utilitarian & Consequentialism Social Contract Justice theory Caring Theory

Upload: hathuy

Post on 06-May-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3cs340.cs.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ethics_day3_2upColor.pdf8/31/15 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3 CS 340 Fall

8/31/15  

1  

Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3

CS 340 Fall 2015

Ethics and Moral Theories

u  Differences of opinion based caused by different value set

u  Deontology

u  Virtue

u  Religious and Divine Command

u  Utilitarian & Consequentialism

u  Social Contract

u  Justice theory

u  Caring Theory

Page 2: Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3cs340.cs.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ethics_day3_2upColor.pdf8/31/15 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3 CS 340 Fall

8/31/15  

2  

Review: “Cultural Relativism goes beyond tolerance, claiming that there is never any acceptable justification for one culture to override the wishes of another.”

A. True B. False

True

False

0%0%

Review: Under which duty is honesty in WD Ross’ prima facie duty list?

A.  Reparation B.  Beneficence C.  Fidelity

Reparation

Beneficence

Fidelity

0%0%0%

Page 3: Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3cs340.cs.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ethics_day3_2upColor.pdf8/31/15 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3 CS 340 Fall

8/31/15  

3  

Luther clip

u  Series 1: Episode 1

u  http://www.bbcamerica.com/luther/videos/first-moments/

Ethics in a Computing Culture 5

Do you agree with what John Luther allowed to happen to Henry? A.  Strongly Agree B.  Agree C.  Somewhat Agree D.  Neutral / Unsure E.  Somewhat Disagree F.  Disagree G.  Strongly Disagree

Strongly  Agree

Agree

Somewhat  Agree

Neutral  /  U

nsure

Somewhat  Disagree

Disagree

Strongly  Disagree

0% 0% 0%0%0%0%0%

Page 4: Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3cs340.cs.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ethics_day3_2upColor.pdf8/31/15 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3 CS 340 Fall

8/31/15  

4  

6) Teleological Ethics: Consequentialism

•  Pages 15-20 •  Telos: Greek for end or purpose •  Actions evaluated by their consequence.

–  Consequentialism: the consequence of an action, not the motivation behind the action, makes an action good or bad

–  Utilitarianism: an action is good if it causes more happiness than a potential, alternative decision*

*Look at the net consequence of behaviors.

u Guiding principle: to increase happiness, a.k.a. utility (satisfies needs and values)

Bentham’s Act Utilitarianism u  “Greatest Happiness Principle”

u  Pleasure and pain analysis

u  Choose course with highest utility for world

u  Look for what promotes “the general good”

u  Bentham said:

u  "An act is right from an ethical point of view if, and only if, the sum total of utilities produced by that act is greater than the sum total utilities produced by another act the agent could have performed in its place."

Bentham (1748-1832)

Page 5: Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3cs340.cs.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ethics_day3_2upColor.pdf8/31/15 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3 CS 340 Fall

8/31/15  

5  

Bentham’s Felicific Calculus for Act Utilitarianism

u  Greatest good for the greatest number, including “depth” of happiness, see page seventeen’s example of confiscating billionaire’s money.

u  Requires a moral calculus of predicted results.

u  Factors considered:

1.Intensity: How strong is the pleasure?

2.Duration: How long will the pleasure last?

3.Certainty or uncertainty: How likely or unlikely is it that the pleasure will occur?

4.Propinquity or remoteness: How soon will the pleasure occur?

5.Fecundity: The probability that the action will be followed by sensations of the same kind.

6.Purity: The probability that it will not be followed by sensations of the opposite kind.

7.Extent: How many people will be affected?

Source: Wikipedia

Rule Utilitarian theory

u  A rule utilitarian suggests the best course is to follow rules unless there is a compelling reason to break the rules.

Rationale: in general people like rules (and are happier to have them) because they know what to expect from others. Rules are often formulated for general good producing best consequences for all. Sometimes justice calls for an actor to violate a rule.

John Stuart Mill:

u  “… justice is a name for certain moral requirements, which, regarded collectively, stand higher in the scale of social utility, and are therefore of more paramount obligation, than any others; though particular cases may occur in which some other social duty is so important, as to overrule any one of the general maxims of justice. Thus, to save a life, it may not only be allowable, but a duty, to steal, or take by force, the necessary food or medicine, or to kidnap, and compel to officiate, the only qualified medical practitioner.”

Mill (1806-1873)

Page 6: Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3cs340.cs.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ethics_day3_2upColor.pdf8/31/15 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3 CS 340 Fall

8/31/15  

6  

Gert’s rules for morality

1.  Do not kill

2.  Do not cause pain

3.  Do not disable

4.  Do not deprive of freedom

5.  Do not deprive of pleasure

6.  Do not deceive

7.  Keep your promises

8.  Do not cheat

9.  Obey the law

10.  Do your duty.

u  In Rule Utilitarian theory, these rules are to be followed UNLESS you have a compelling reason to believe that breaking the rule will result in the highest utility.

Page 7: Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3cs340.cs.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ethics_day3_2upColor.pdf8/31/15 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3 CS 340 Fall

8/31/15  

7  

The “pure” utilitarianism theory is

A.  Act B.  Rule

Act

Rule

0%0%

A utilitarian cares about and considers everyone impacted by her decision.

A. True B. False

True

False

0%0%

Page 8: Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3cs340.cs.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ethics_day3_2upColor.pdf8/31/15 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3 CS 340 Fall

8/31/15  

8  

Contractarianism

u  Born into a “State of Nature”

u  Perpetual conflict

u  In Leviathan by Hobbes, life w/o gov’t is pondered and declared to be “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short”

u  w/o rules, complete entitlement to everything

Ethics in a Computing Culture

15

– Thomas Hobbes 1588-1679

Contractarianism cont’d

u  To overcome, accede to social contract for mutual benefit.

u  promote the common interests of society in order to promote their own self-interests

Ethics in a Computing

Culture16

Page 9: Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3cs340.cs.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ethics_day3_2upColor.pdf8/31/15 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3 CS 340 Fall

8/31/15  

9  

The Social Contract is an _____ contract.

A.  explicit B.  implicit

17 Ethics in a Computing Culture explicit

implicit

0%0%

Game Theory

Question: “Is the person’s self-interest really maximized by acting for the public good?”

Pages 24-26

Modeling of scenarios of conflict and cooperation between rational decision makers.

Game Theory Core Concepts:

u  Dominant Strategy

u  Dominated Strategy

u  Nash Equilibrium

u  Prisoner’s Dilemma

u  Simultaneous Game

Ethics in a Computing

Culture18

Learn from a Ninja: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdWmVbX6jok

Page 10: Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3cs340.cs.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ethics_day3_2upColor.pdf8/31/15 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3 CS 340 Fall

8/31/15  

10  

Computer Modeling of the Prisoner’s Dilemma (page 25)

•  Multiple iterations, as opposed to a one shot, would model closer to the real world.

u  Winning Strategy from modeling experiments:

1.  Cooperate in the first round

2.  Thereafter, do whatever the opponent did in the previous round.

u  Long term view (cooperation in the long run benefits everyone, social contract takes this view p. 26)

u  Less clear that cooperating is best with a one shot or terminal deal.

u  Our original Golden Balls shows this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3Uos2fzIJ0

Ethics in a Computing

Culture19

In game theory when you have a strategy that always produces the better result it’s called the_____.

A.  Dominant strategy B.  Dominated strategy

20 Ethics in a Computing Culture Dominant  strategy

Dominated  strategy

0%0%

Page 11: Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3cs340.cs.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ethics_day3_2upColor.pdf8/31/15 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3 CS 340 Fall

8/31/15  

11  

When every player in the game plays his dominant strategy this is called the

A.  Nash Equilibrium B.  Simultaneous Game

21 Ethics in a Computing Culture Nash  Equilibrium

Simultaneous  Game

0%0%

In Prisoner’s Dilemma, the stay quiet option would be an example of

A.  Dominant Strategy B.  Dominated Strategy

22 Ethics in a Computing Culture Dominant  Strategy

Dominated  Strategy

0%0%

Page 12: Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3cs340.cs.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ethics_day3_2upColor.pdf8/31/15 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3 CS 340 Fall

8/31/15  

12  

Golden Balls: Nick and Abraham

u  The one where Nick promises Abraham that he is going to steal

u  Makes it less of a simultaneous game

Ethics in a Computing Culture 23

http://davidweinberger.sys-con.com/node/2256940/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoner's_dilemma

Contractarianism

u  As opposed to placing value on duty or outcome, the focus shifts to individual rights

u  Ex. John Locke’s fundamental rights (life, liberty, property)

u  What is a right?

u  Negative right:

u  w/o gov’t interference

u  examples?

u  Positive:

u  obligation to provide/help

u  examples?

Page 13: Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3cs340.cs.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ethics_day3_2upColor.pdf8/31/15 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3 CS 340 Fall

8/31/15  

13  

A ____ right says the government should not interfere.

A.  Positive B.  Negative

25 Ethics in a Computing Culture Positive

Negative

0%0%

Rawl’s Justice Theory�

u  Moral theory to ensure fairness in society as a whole.

•  John Rawls argues that these principles of “justice as fairness” underlie all just societies

1.  Impartiality

2.  Universality

Ethics in a Computing Culture 26

Page 14: Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3cs340.cs.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ethics_day3_2upColor.pdf8/31/15 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3 CS 340 Fall

8/31/15  

14  

Justice Theory cont’d

Two qualities of Just societies throughout time: 1.   Impartiality: the quality that every person is treated equally and no one

is given preferential treatment in the theory 2.   Universality

Page 27 •  Everyone has as much freedom as possible. u  Any inequalities are justified only if

u  Everyone has a fair chance to obtain the better position u  Inequalities provide the greatest benefit to least advantaged.

Ethics in a Computing

Culture27

Ethics of Justice (continued)

u  According to Rawl’s Theory of Justice, in order for a society to be just:

u  Everyone has an equal opportunity to reach desirable positions in society.

u  All socio-economic differences are of the most benefit to the least advantaged.

u  Rawl’s Veil of Ignorance: a test of whether rules are fair. u  Idea: What if you got to choose your social contract

before you were born, but you did not know your lot in life, would you consider the rules to be fair?

28 Ethics in a Computing

Culture

Page 15: Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3cs340.cs.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ethics_day3_2upColor.pdf8/31/15 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral theory – day 3 CS 340 Fall

8/31/15  

15  

Reconciling Ethical Approaches

u  Let each approach shed light on different aspects of an ethical problem

Normative guidance:

u  Autonomy

u  Non-maleficence

u  Beneficence

u  Justice

Which normative principle relates to “do no harm”?

A.  Autonomy B.  Beneficence C.  Non-maleficence

D.  Justice

30 Ethics in a Computing Culture

Autonomy

Beneficence

Non-­‐m

aleficence

Justice

0% 0%0%0%