cssbb instructor sample

Upload: tripuraneni-vidya-sagar

Post on 02-Jun-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    1/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    INTRO-1 (1)

    THESIX SIGMA

    BLACK BELTPRIMER

    by Quality Council of Indiana - All r ights reserved

    Fourth Edition - September, 2014

    Quality Council of Indiana602 West Paris AvenueWest Terre Haute, IN 47885TEL: 800-660-4215FAX: [email protected]://www.qualitycouncil.com

    000

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    2/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    INTRO-7 (2)

    CSSBB Primer Contents

    I. CERTIFICATION OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-1CSSBB EXAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-3CSSBB BODY OF KNOWLEDGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-6

    II. ENTERPRISE-WIDE DEPLOYMENT . . . . . . . . . . . II-1ORGANIZATION-WIDE CONSIDERATIONS . . . . . II-2

    SIX SIGMA/LEAN FUNDAMENTALS . . . . . . . . . II-2IMPROVEMENT METHODOLOGIES . . . . . . . . II-34SYSTEMS AND PROCESSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-42STRATEGIC PLANNING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-47

    LEADERSHIP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-57ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES . . . . . . . . . . II-57ORGANIZATIONAL ROADBLOCKS . . . . . . . . . II-63

    III. PROCESS MANAGEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-1OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-2STAKEHOLDER IMPACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-8CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-11BENCHMARKING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-11BUSINESS MEASURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-15

    PERFORMANCE MEASURES . . . . . . . . . . . . III-15

    FINANCIAL MEASURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-20

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    3/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    III. PROCESS MANAGEMENT II.C.1BUSINESS MEASURES/PERFORMANCE MEASURES

    III-16 (138)

    Business Level Metrics

    Business level metrics are typically f inancial (external)and operational (internal) summaries for shareholdersand management.

    Business (executive) level metrics comprise summariesof detailed operations and financial results reportedmonthly, quarterly, or annually.

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    4/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    III. PROCESS MANAGEMENT II.C.1BUSINESS MEASURES/PERFORMANCE MEASURES

    III-16 (139)

    Operations Level Metrics

    Six sigma provides new metrics for managing complexoperations. Business effectiveness measures track howwell products are meeting customer needs (externalfocus). Breyfogle indicates that they should have a

    longer-term perspective and reflect the total variationthat the customer sees.

    Operational efficiency measures relate to the cost andtime required to produce the products. They providekey linkages between detailed process measures andsummary business results, and help identify importantrelationships and root causes.

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    5/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    V. DEFINE IV.A.1VOICE OF THE CUSTOMER/IDENTIFICATION

    V-7 (320)

    External Customer Segmentation (Contd)

    The consumer customer market differs from thebusiness market as follows:

    C The consumer market has a large number of

    customers

    C The majority of consumer purchases are small inactual dollar amounts

    C The transaction is usually a simple purchase

    C Most consumers are not very knowledgeable about

    the product

    C The supplier does not share proprietary informationwith the consumer

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    6/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    V. DEFINE IV.A.1VOICE OF THE CUSTOMER/IDENTIFICATION

    V-7 (321)

    External Customer Segmentation (Contd)

    In contrast, the business customer acts in the followingmanner:

    C There are a very small number of business

    customers

    C The amount purchased per transaction is quite large

    C The purchase is handled through specializedpersonnel

    C The customer may know more about the

    requirements than the producer

    C The supplier may allow the customer access to allsorts of information

    It is also important to look at the market for the next twoto five years and estimate how it will change and grow.

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    7/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    V. DEFINE IV.A.1VOICE OF THE CUSTOMER/IDENTIFICATION

    V-8 (322)

    Customer Service

    The customer driven company is beginning to emerge inAmerica. The public demands and expects betterquality products and service. One sample programfollows:

    C Listen to the customer and determine needsC Define a service strategyC Set standards of performanceC Select and train the right employeesC Recognize and reward accomplishment

    There is the need to listen to the customer, provide a

    vision, provide training, improve the process, find ordevelop response metrics, and measure the results.

    About 70% of customers who leave a company do sobecause of service quality.

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    8/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    V. DEFINE IV.A.1VOICE OF THE CUSTOMER/IDENTIFICATION

    V-8 (323)

    Customer Retention

    Most organizations spend the bulk of their resources onattaining new customers and smaller amounts onretaining customers. High customer satisfactionnumbers do not necessarily mean the company has

    good customer retention and good customer loyalty. Ithas been found that current customers are worth asmuch as five times more than new customers. The costof retaining a current customer is only one-fourth thecost of acquiring a new customer.

    Another study showed that companies will boost profitsby about 100% by just retaining 5% more of their

    customers.

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    9/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    V. DEFINE IV.A.1VOICE OF THE CUSTOMER/IDENTIFICATION

    V-9 (324)

    Customer Retention (Continued)

    Furlong lists some techniques for getting to knowcustomers better:

    C Dont use your own instincts as dataC

    See the world from the customers sideC People high in the organization are out of touchC Get customers to talkC 90% of unhappy customers wont complainC Do research to retain customersC Determine how satisfied customers areC Conduct research on customer expectationsC Develop a customer profi leC Share the results of customer research studiesC Dont go overboard on the details and measurementC Coordinate and use research effortsC Understand that sometimes research does not help

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    10/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    V. DEFINE IV.A.1VOICE OF THE CUSTOMER/IDENTIFICATION

    V-9 (325)

    Customer Loyalty

    The value of a loyal customer is not measured on thebasis of one gigantic purchase, but rather on his/herlifetime worth. Loyal customers account for a highproportion of sales and profi t growth. Customer

    retention generates repeat sales, and it is cheaper toretain customers. Customer loyalty is something thatmust be demonstrated through an act of execution,trust, or delightful service. Customers become partners.

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    11/30

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    12/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    VI. MEASURE - DATA V.A.2PROCESS CHARACTERISTICS/ANALYSIS TOOLS

    VI-34 (474)

    Circle Diagrams

    On occasion, a circle diagram can help conceptualizethe relationship between work elements in order tooptimize work activities. Shown below is a hypotheticalanalysis of the work load for a shipping employee using

    a Venn (or circle) diagram.

    0.04

    0.06PullingStock0.25

    Packing0.30

    ShippingDataEntry0.20

    MakingCDs0.10

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    13/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    VII. MEASURE - STATISTICS V.E.2PROBABILITY/OTHER DISTRIBUTIONS

    VII-43 (623)

    nm nm m N - n

    = = 1 -N N N N - 1

    5 15n5 5r20

    10

    C C n!P r = note that C =

    C r! n - r !

    5! 15!

    15! 10!10!5!10! 5!10!P r = = = 0.0163 = 1.63%

    20! 5!10! 20!

    10!10!

    Hypergeometric Distribution (Continued)

    From a group of 20 products, 10 are selected at randomfor testing. What is the probability that the 10 selectedcontain the 5 best units?

    N = 20, n = 10, d = 5, (N-d) = 15 and r = 5

    The mean and the variance of the hypergeometricdistribution are:

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    14/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    VII. MEASURE - STATISTICS V.E.2PROBABILITY/OTHER DISTRIBUTIONS

    VII-44 (624)

    Modeling a rate with

    no upper bound for the

    number of successes?

    Poisson

    Fixed number of trials?

    Probability of success

    the same on all trials

    and number of

    successes = 1?

    Start

    Probability of success

    same on all trials?Binomial

    Geometric

    Hypergeometric

    Negative

    Binomial

    Yes

    NoYes

    Yes

    Yes

    No

    No

    No

    Choosing A Discrete Distribution

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    15/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    VII. MEASURE - STATISTICS V.E.2PROBABILITY/OTHER DISTRIBUTIONS

    VII-45 (625)

    Bivariate Normal Distribution

    The joint distribution of two variables is called abivariate distribution. Bivariate distributions may bediscrete or continuous.

    The graphical representation of a bivariate distributionis a three dimensional plot, with the x and y-axisrepresenting the independent variables and the z-axisrepresenting the frequency for discrete data or theprobability for continuous data.

    A special case of the bivariate distribution is thebivariate normal distribution shown below:

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    16/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    VII. MEASURE - STATISTICS V.F.3PROCESS CAPABILITY/CAPABILITY STUDIES

    VII-54 (637)

    Identifying Characteristics

    The identification of characteristics to be measured in aprocess capability study should meet the followingrequirements:

    C

    The characteristic should be indicative of a keyfactor in the quality of the product or process

    C It should be possible to adjust the value of thecharacteristic

    C The operating conditions that affect the measuredcharacteristic should be defined and controlled

    Selecting one, or possibly two, key dimensions providesa manageable method of evaluating the processcapability. The characteristic selected may also bedetermined by the history of the part and the parameterthat has been the most difficult to control.

    Customer purchase order requirements or industrystandards may also determine the characteristics thatare required to be measured.

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    17/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    VII. MEASURE - STATISTICS V.F.3PROCESS CAPABILITY/CAPABILITY STUDIES

    VII-55 (638)

    R

    2

    Rd

    Identifying Specifications/Tolerances

    The process specifications or tolerances are determinedeither by customer requirements, industry standards, orthe organizations engineering department.

    Developing Sampling Plans

    The appropriate sampling plan for conducting processcapability studies depends upon the purpose andwhether there are customer or standards requirementsfor the study.

    If the process is currently running and is in control,control chart data may be used to calculate the processcapability indices. If the process fits a normaldistribution and is in statistical control, then thestandard deviation can be estimated from:

    For new processes a pilot run may be used to estimatethe process capability. A design of experiments can beused to determine the optimum values of the processvariables which yield the lowest process variation.

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    18/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    VII. MEASURE - STATISTICS V.F.3PROCESS CAPABILITY/CAPABILITY STUDIES

    VII-56 (639)

    Verifying Stability and Normality

    If only common causes of variation are present in aprocess, then the output of the process forms adistribution that is stable over time and is predictable.If special causes of variation are present, the process

    output is not stable over time.

    The Figure below depicts an unstable process with bothprocess average and variation out-of-control. Theprocess may also be unstable if either the processaverage or variation is out-of-control.

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    19/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    VII. MEASURE - STATISTICS V.F.3PROCESS CAPABILITY/CAPABILITY STUDIES

    VII-57 (640)

    Verifying Stability and Normality (Contd)

    The validity of the normality assumption may be testedusing the chi square hypothesis test. To perform thistest, the data is partitioned into data ranges. Thenumber of data points in each range is then compared

    with the number predicted from a normal distribution.

    Continuous data may be tested using a variety ofgoodness-of-fit tests.

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    20/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    VII. MEASURE - STATISTICS V.F.3PROCESS CAPABILITY/CAPABILITY STUDIES

    VII-58 (641)

    68.27%

    95.45%

    99.73%

    :-3F :-2F :-1F : :+1F :+2F :+3F

    The Normal Distribution

    When all special causes of variation are eliminated,many variable data processes, when sampled andplotted, produce a bell-shaped distribution. If the baseof the histogram is divided into six (6) equal lengths

    (three on each side of the average), the amount of datain each interval exhibits the following percentages:

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    21/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    VII. MEASURE - STATISTICS V.F.3PROCESS CAPABILITY/CAPABILITY STUDIES

    VII-58 (642)

    LOWER UPPER

    X - LSL USL - XZ Z

    S S

    X -Z =

    The Z Value

    The area outside of specification for a normal curve canbe determined by a Z value.

    The Z transformation formula is:

    This transformation will convert the original values tothe number of standard deviations away from the mean.

    The result allows one to use a single standard normaltable to describe areas under the curve (probability ofoccurrence).

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    22/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    VII. MEASURE - STATISTICS V.F.3PROCESS CAPABILITY/CAPABILITY STUDIES

    VII-59 (643)

    0 1.0

    0 1.0

    Z Value (Continued)

    There are several ways to display the normal(standardized) distribution:

    1. As a number under the curve, up to the Z value.

    P(Z = - to 1) = 0.8413

    2. As a number beyond the Z value.

    P(Z =1 to + ) = 0.1587

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    23/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    VII. MEASURE - STATISTICS V.F.3PROCESS CAPABILITY/CAPABILITY STUDIES

    VII-59 (644)

    Z Value (Continued)

    3. As a number under the curve, and at a distance fromthe mean.

    P(Z = 0 to 1) = 0.3413

    The standard normal table in this Primer uses thesecond method of calculating the probability ofoccurrence.

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    24/30

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    25/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    VII. MEASURE - STATISTICS V.F.1PROCESS CAPABILITY / CAPABILITY INDICES

    VII-62 (646)

    Capability Index Failure Rates

    There is a direct link between the calculated Cp(and Ppvalues) with the standard normal (Z value) table. A Cpof1.0 is the loss suffered at a Z value of 3.0 (doubled, sincethe table is one sided). Refer to the Table below.

    CpZ

    valueppm

    0.33 1.00 317,311

    0.67 2.00 45,500

    1.00 3.00 2,700

    1.10 3.30 967

    1.20 3.60 318

    1.30 3.90 96

    1.33 4.00 63

    1.40 4.20 27

    1.50 4.50 6.8

    1.60 4.80 1.61.67 5.00 0.57

    1.80 5.40 0.067

    2.00 6.00 0.002

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    26/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    VII. MEASURE - STATISTICS V.F.1PROCESS CAPABILITY / CAPABILITY INDICES

    VII-62 (647)

    Index Failure Rates (Continued)

    In the prior Table, ppm equals parts per million ofnonconformance (or failure) when the process:

    C Is centered on XC

    Has a two-tailed specificationC Is normally distributedC Has no significant shifts in average or dispersion

    When the Cp, Cpk, Pp, and Ppkvalues are 1.0 or less, Zvalues and the standard normal table can be used todetermine failure rates. With the drive for increasinglydependable products, there is a need for failure rates in

    the Cprange of 1.5 to 2.0.

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    27/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    X. CONTROL VIII.A.4SPC/CONTROL CHART SELECTION

    X-12 (937)

    Averages

    Ranges

    01

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    Date Start 1/12/10

    Time

    SampleMeasurement

    Total

    TimeTimeTimeTimeTime

    Average xRange R

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    1/12 1/13

    7:05 7:10 7:35 8:10 8:15 9:10 9:12 9:33 11:40 11:43 12:05 13:05 13:55 14:20 14:55 7:00 7:55 9:0013:45 9:12 9:32

    12

    12

    13

    15

    12

    64

    12.8

    15

    17

    16

    17

    18

    83

    16.6

    13

    18

    14

    15

    74

    14.8

    14

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

    10

    12

    11

    11

    54

    10.8

    10

    13 1515 1515 1622 16

    17

    16 17 19 16 16 17 19

    14

    16 16

    13 16 1515

    16 15

    12

    1211

    15

    15

    15

    15

    14

    14

    14.4

    72 66

    17

    17

    17

    17

    17

    14

    14

    16

    16

    1618

    18

    77 74 85 81 82

    16

    16

    16 16

    16

    16

    15 15

    15 15 15 15 15

    15

    1717

    17

    17

    17

    17

    17 17 17

    1717

    1719 19

    15

    1518

    18

    18

    18

    14

    14

    1414

    13

    16

    16

    13

    3 3 35 2 4 1 5 8 3 3 32 2 4 4 4 4 435

    79 79 83 8385 80 82 76 85 74

    13.2 15.4 14.8 16.2 16.4 15.8 15.8 16.6 16.6 16 16.4 15.2 14.8

    special

    specialspecial

    special10.5

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

    Removal TorquesVariable:

    Product Name: Tablets Process Closure Department

    Specification Limits: LSL = 10 LBS USL = 22 LBS Units of Measure: LBS

    Operator Bill

    Chart No. 1

    UCL =17.5X

    X = 15.4

    LCL =13.3X

    UCL = 7.6R

    LCL = 0R

    R = 3.6

    run

    X- R Control Chart

    This start up process smoothed out from data set 10 on.The chart would need new control limits from that point.

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    28/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    X. CONTROL VIII.A.6SPC/CONTROL CHART ANALYSIS

    X-35 (962)

    (Rule 2) 4 out of 5points in zone B

    (Rule 4) 8 or more consecutivepoints on one side of center line

    (Rule 1) A pointbeyond the control limit

    Comment: Some authorities say 7 or more consecutive points for both Rules 4 and 5.

    (Rule 6) Stratification15 or more points in zone C

    (Rule 7) Mixture orsystematic variation

    Zone A

    UCL

    Zone B

    Zone C

    Zone C

    Zone B

    Zone A

    UCL

    Zone A

    UCL

    Zone B

    Zone C

    Zone C

    Zone B

    Zone A

    UCL

    Zone A

    UCL

    Zone B

    Zone C

    Zone C

    Zone B

    Zone A

    UCL(Rule 3) 2out of 3 pointsin zone A

    (Rule 5) A trend is 6

    or more consecutive pointsincreasing or decreasing

    Control Chart Interpretation

    Five Common Rules

    Other Unusual Patterns

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    29/30

  • 8/10/2019 Cssbb Instructor Sample

    30/30

    QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIANACSSBB 2014

    XII. APPENDIX

    XII-12 (1059)

    x

    R

    R

    X S Charts

    CL x A S

    UCL B SLCL B S

    3

    4

    3

    x

    R

    R

    X R Charts

    CL x A R

    UCL D RLCL D R

    2

    4

    3

    Approximate capability

    R

    d

    2

    Table IX - Control Chart Factors

    CHART FORAVERAGES

    CHART FOR STANDARDDEVIATIONS

    CHART FOR RANGES

    SampleObservations

    Control limitFactors

    CenterLine

    Factors

    Control LimitFactors

    CenterLine

    Factors

    Control LimitFactors

    n A2 A3 c4 B3 B4 d2 D3 D4

    2 1.880 2.659 0.7979 0 3.267 1.128 0 3.267

    3 1.023 1.954 0.8862 0 2.568 1.693 0 2.574

    4 0.729 1.628 0.9213 0 2.266 2.059 0 2.282

    5 0.577 1.427 0.9400 0 2.089 2.326 0 2.114

    6 0.483 1.287 0.9515 0.030 1.970 2.534 0 2.004

    7 0.419 1.182 0.9594 0.118 1.882 2.704 0.076 1.924

    8 0.373 1.099 0.9650 0.185 1.815 2.847 0.136 1.864

    9 0.337 1.032 0.9693 0.239 1.761 2.970 0.184 1.816

    10 0.308 0.975 0.9727 0.284 1.716 3.078 0.223 1.777

    15 0.223 0.789 0.9823 0.428 1.572 3.472 0.347 1.653

    20 0.180 0.680 0.9869 0.510 1.490 3.735 0.415 1.585

    25 0.153 0.606 0.9896 0.565 1.435 3.931 0.459 1.541

    Approximate capability

    S

    c

    4