CTE Accountability and Planning

Perkins Planning Meeting

March 2013

MSDE/DCCR

Accountability Team

Pat Mikos, Program Manager

George Comegys, CTE Specialist

Matt Koerner, CTE Specialist

Mike Beck, CTE Specialist

This Session:

CTE Accountability 101• Measures and Requirements

What’s in the CTE PQI?• Review of the Reports

• Perkins Plan Development

What’s Next?• Complete 2013 Collection/Reporting

Review of 2013-2014 CTE Data Collection and Reporting

Enrollment FilesApril 30th

Outcome FilesAug. 15th

Update List ASept. 30th

CTE Programs

(CIP & course codes)

Enrollment

(with Concentrators)

End of Year Status

(grad, dropout, tech ach)

MDCTEDATA.ORG

Perkins IV: Secondary Indicators

1. Academic Attainment: Reading/LA and Math

2. Technical Skill Attainment

3. Secondary School Completion

4. Student Graduation Rate

5. Secondary Placement

6. Non-Traditional Participation & Completion

Perkins IV: Postsecondary Indicators

1. Technical Skill Attainment

2. Credential, Certificate, or Diploma

3. Student Retention or Transfer

4. Student Placement

5. Non-Traditional Participation & Completion

CTE Concentrator:

A postsecondary/adult student who completes at least 12 academic or

CTE credits within a single program area sequence that is

comprised of 12 or more academic and technical credits and

terminates in the award of an industry-recognized credential, a

certificate, or a degree

This Session:

What’s in the PQI?• Review of the Reports

CTE Data Analysis

• Program Quality Index (PQI)• Programs by cluster – enrollment, Perkins outcomes

• Local Perkins Accountability Report (LPAR)• Shows three year trend for each measure• Negotiated Targets and the 90% rule

• Data Summary Sheets• Cluster Information – enrollment and graduates • Program Performance – highest & lowest performing

2012 PQI Data Sheet

Perkins Accountability Targets

• State Performance Levels are established by OVAE targets and previous performance

• Local Performance Levels adjusted to baseline performance based on relative performance (quartile) for each measure

• Improvement plans will be required if any of the performance measures are not met (90%)

• 2012: If 90% of target is not met for 3 consecutive years, in the same measure, subsequent action is taken. (2008 was the transition year and is not included in timelines for improvement)

EXAMPLE3P1 3P1

Retention 2013 Growth

or Transfer Target

Howard CC 2.49 3.08

Cecil CC 5.96 7.40

Harford CC 13.81 17.14

Allegany CC 16.40 19.03

Montgomery College 17.62 20.45

College of Southern MD 19.12 22.19

Chesapeake College 21.42 24.86

Frederick CC 25.06 29.08

Prince George's CC 28.84 33.47

Baltimore City CC 36.97 42.91

Hagerstown Jr. 37.95 44.04

Garrett CC 39.31 42.46

Anne Arundel CC 42.27 45.66

CCBC 50.03 54.05

Wor-Wic CC 54.71 59.10

2012 State 30.16 20132013 Target *35.00 % Growth 0.1605

Setting and Negotiating Local Targets

Rate of Growth is 16%

Rate of Growth is

1.5 x 16% = 24%

Rate of Growth is

0.5 x 16% = 8%

Rate of Growth is set by the State Target, set by OVAE

Negotiation of Local Targets

Target is met – Yeh!

Any reason 2012 would not be met?

• TSA – expanding testing areas…

• Eliminating / Adding programs

2011 Target not met – give explanation

• new assessment process

• data collection limitation

• other…

2007 2008 2009 2009 2010Sub Measurement Performance Performance 2009 Performance Local Local

Indicator Definition Percentage Percentage Data Percentage Target Target

Numerator:1S1 # of CTE Concentrators 337

Academic meeting standards on 57.14 62.34 81.60 68.57 83.64Attainment HSA English II 413

Denominator:# of CTE Concentrators

Numerator:1S2 # of CTE Concentrators 383

Academic meeting standards on 69.32 77.95 92.74 81.85 93.90Attainment HSA Algebra 413

Denominator:# of CTE Concentrators

Numerator:2S1 # of CTE Concentrators who 199

Technical met industry standards N/A 85.58 62.38 88.79 76.66Skill 319

Attainment Denominator:# of CTE Concentrators whotook an assessment alignedto CTE and industry standards

LOCAL PERKINS ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT (LPAR)SUMMARY REPORT 2007 - 2009

SECONDARY RECIPIENTS

March May 2012 review of information, negotiation of targets…

Signature line with submission of Perkins Plan _________________

Data Summary Charts/Graphs

Distribution by Cluster - within LEA

CTE Program Performance 1S1,1S2, 2S1, 4S1

100.00

66.70

14.29

27.27 29.41

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

NAF Academy of Finance

County Avg. All CTE Building Property Maintenance

Construction Trades, Masonry Option

Construction Trades, Electrical Option

English HSA - Highest and Lowest Performing Programs, ------ Co. 2012

4%

CTE data collection/reporting challenges

– HSA Pass Rates: • Target program areas with high number of students completing “Bridge Projects”

– TSA Collection:• Increasing support for testing centers • Working with SIS to include indicators for Taking / Passing

– CTE Completer Status:• Scheduling and guidance to support completion• Working with SIS to include CTE Program Completion with USM

– Non-Traditional Program Areas:• Scheduling and guidance to support enrollment and completion

What’s Next?

Review the 2013-14 Specifications Manual for

CTE Data Collection:

• Files may be submitted as “flat file” or Excel

• Race/Ethnicity – new federal guidelines

• Record Layout – full last name and first name

Due Dates

• April 30, 2013 – SY 2011-12 secondary enrollment due

• June 15, 2013 – CTE Concentrator File Posted

• August 15, 2013 – CTE Outcome File Due

• September 30, 2013 – List A Verification (for 2013-14)

• October 30, 2013 – Postsecondary Fall Enrollment