cuckmere estuary options modelling study cuckmere pathfinder project scott ferguson landscape,...
TRANSCRIPT
Cuckmere Estuary Options Modelling Study
Cuckmere Pathfinder ProjectScott Ferguson
Landscape, Visitors, Heritage and Economy of the Cuckmere:Evidence Presentation Stage 2 (Public Event)
Introduction
• Objectives - what is it we’re trying to achieve?• Approach - how have gone about it?• Options - what it is we’ve modelled?• Outcome - what are the results and how can
we use them?
Cuckmere Pathfinder Project Capita Symonds
What is it we’re trying to achieve from this study?
• Flows and water levels• Changes in habitats• Existing assets• Flood risk• Knock on effects or secondary impacts
Understanding of how future management of the river will affect:
Cuckmere Pathfinder Project Capita Symonds
How have gone about ?
• Defined options (including do nothing), what they mean and how they will be implemented and over what time span
• Built a hydrodynamic computer model to allow iterative model runs to assess change
• Using the model output to prepare visual interpretations of the estuary behaviour and how key features may change.
Cuckmere Pathfinder Project Capita Symonds
Modelling• 2-D numerical modelling – how does it work?
Cuckmere Pathfinder Project Capita Symonds
Modelling
• 2-D numerical modelling – how does it work?
W ater leve lca lcu la tion po in t
ZU
ZHZV
ZC
u Velocity
v Velocity
Every cell has:
ZC = Elevation at cell centre for storage;ZU = Right Edge Elevation for flows to right;ZV = Top Edge Elevation for flows to top;ZH = Corner elevations (no role
hydraulically)
Cuckmere Pathfinder Project Capita Symonds
Modelling
• Why a 2-D model?• What is included and how?• What’s not included and does it matter?• What outputs do we get from the model?• How do we decide on the future land form?
Cuckmere Pathfinder Project Capita Symonds
What it is we’ve modelled?
Base case: Do nothing – no further maintenance or improvements of existing embankments or structures.
Cuckmere Pathfinder Project Capita Symonds
Baseline
•Key Features
•Representation in model
• Likely outcome of ‘do nothing’• Current land levels (Cells A, B and C)
• Role of the beach
What it is we’ve modelled?
Option A: Partial breach managed realignment
Cuckmere Pathfinder Project Capita Symonds
Option A
Key Features:– Existing embankments– Maintained
embankments– River channel– Breaches
• Representation in model
• Likely long term outcome
• Current land levels (Cells A, B and C)
• Role of the beach
What it is we’ve modelled?
Option B: Full breach managed realignment
Cuckmere Pathfinder Project Capita Symonds
Option B
Key Features: – Existing embankments– New embankments– Controlled breaches,– Additional embankments– Excavated tidal lagoon
• Representation in model
• Likely long term outcome
• Beach and river mouth
What it is we’ve modelled?
Option C: Engineered reactivation of meanders and saltmarsh creeks
Cuckmere Pathfinder Project Capita Symonds
Option C
• Key Features: – Engineered diversion,– Excavate meanders ,– Fill cut– Engineered tidal creeks
• Representation in model
• Likely long term outcome
• Beach and river mouth
What it is we’ve modelled?
Options D, E and F: Maintain or improve the defences
Option D, E and F
Key Features: – Existing embankments– D is maintain– E is maintain and raise– F is maintain and partially
raise
• Representation in model
• Likely long term outcome
• Beach and river mouth
What are the results and how can we use them?
• Series of flood maps showing depth and extent of inundation
• Detailed velocity maps• Time series data showing how water depth
and velocities vary throughout a flood event • Use of simple rules to define land form• Use of simple rules to determine land cover –
i.e. habitat (mud or saltmarsh or tidal grazing)
Cuckmere Pathfinder Project Capita Symonds
Baseline – 2060 Spring Tide Velocity Contours
Baseline – 2060 100 year Fluvial flood event
Baseline – 2060 100 year Tidal flood event
Baseline – 2060 100 year Combined Tidal & Fluvial flood event
Baseline – 2060 100 year flood event
Baseline – 2060 Potential Habitat
River Mouth Flows – Defended & Undefended
(Q - Cumecs)
Cuckmere Pathfinder Project Capita Symonds
ResultsThree main outcomes:
1. Fully defended where the estuary will remain very much as it is at present - options D, E and F and do nothing for the short term.
2. Fully natural where much of the estuary becomes an active inter tidal zone - options B and C initially, with do nothing eventually
3. Partially defended with a mix of habitats – Options A, and in the medium term for ‘do nothing’ and long term for option D, once the embankments start to fail
Cuckmere Pathfinder Project Capita Symonds
Land form type 1
Land form type 2
Land form type 3
Secondary Results
Results of the modelling and visualisation project also used for:
1. Assessing the effect on the landscape2. Assessing the potential impact on visitor
numbers in future3. Assessing economic impact4. Assessing the effect on assets such as
heritage assets.
Cuckmere Pathfinder Project Capita Symonds
Final Key Points1. None of the Estuary options will impact on
flood risk upstream (as long as the river mouth stays clear)
2. The tight bend downstream of Exceat Bridge for option C
3. Flooding of the A2594. Importance of estuary option in determining
requirements for the beach management5. Importance of beach in determining the
future of the estuary
Cuckmere Pathfinder Project Capita Symonds