cultural heritage in regional networks regnet ali status report

16
Cultural Heritage in REGional Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks NETworks REGNET REGNET ALI Status Report ALI Status Report

Upload: caroline-warren

Post on 27-Mar-2015

226 views

Category:

Documents


9 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET ALI Status Report

Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworksCultural Heritage in REGional NETworks

REGNETREGNET

ALI Status Report ALI Status Report

Page 2: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET ALI Status Report

October 2001 Project presentation REGNET

2

IndexIndex

Status Report (Alinari)

WP2: generated the last objects and English descriptions: waiting for the uploading to the system.

WP3: starting with the validation:

- Some caveats.

- Analysis of Alinari’s users DB.

- User testers by ALI.

- Ali’s Test methodology and validation set up (little contribution).

Page 3: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET ALI Status Report

October 2001 Project presentation REGNET

3

WP3: validationWP3: validation

Why do projects fail?

- Unclear product & user vision- Not understanding user needs- Failing to appreciate user

validation- Failure to feed back evaluation

findings into design- Problems managing development

process- Non significant user groups choice

for tests

“All products are usable…by their designers”

(E. M. Melchior)

Page 4: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET ALI Status Report

October 2001 Project presentation REGNET

4

User-Centred Product Creation ModelUser-Centred Product Creation Model

Define Vision-Confirm business goals-Involve stakeholders-Develop initial concepts-Plan user validation

Build and implementValidated designUser test & monitor

(input for next release)

Design and prototype

Analyze user requirements-users, context, tasks, scenarios-usability and quality goals

EvaluateTest usability and quality goals

(Vnet5 Copyright)

Page 5: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET ALI Status Report

October 2001 Project presentation REGNET

5

Alinari’s starting contribution to WP3Alinari’s starting contribution to WP3

Analizing the database of registered users (more than 2000 records analized).

Grouping the user testers.

Contacting representative users for interviews (just started).

Setting up different methodologies for the testing phase.

Collect and study other methodologies.

Page 6: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET ALI Status Report

October 2001 Project presentation REGNET

6

Alinari’s User Testers (1/7)Alinari’s User Testers (1/7)

User group name

System Information

User Computer Skills

Further possible tasks

Research Area User

Availability of pictures.

Regular use. Advanced Research by subject, time frame or photographer.

Educational Area

User

Students

Academics School classes

Availability of pictures, books, and photographs.

From minimal to expert.

Special prices.Special offers.Specific subjects according to their study coverage (i.e. history, renaissance art)

Shopping Area User

Availability of pictures, books, and photographs.

Regular use Special prices.Special offers.Nice shipping deals.Special dealing for researchers.

Page 7: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET ALI Status Report

October 2001 Project presentation REGNET

7

Alinari’s User Testers (2/7)Alinari’s User Testers (2/7)

User group name

System Information

User Computer Skills

Further possible tasks

Exhibitions Area User

Photographic exhibitions organized by Alinari.

Regular use. Research of past exhibitions and photographer exhibitions.

Biographies Area User

Bios of important people that made the history of Alinari.

Regular use. Bibliography of biographical books.

Photographer Work User

Alinari photographers and the greatest photographers of the last century.

Regular use. Bibliography about the photographers.

Page 8: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET ALI Status Report

October 2001 Project presentation REGNET

8

Alinari’s User Testers (3/7)Alinari’s User Testers (3/7)

User group name

System Information

User Computer Skills

Further possible tasks

External Archives User

External archive pictures available on line

Regular use History of these archives.Photo samples to see what these archive images look like.

Museum User Alinari exhibition information

Minimal Information on future events and exhibitions.

Catalogue Partner User

Catalogue partner images and publishing

Expert Alinari Partners Forum (museum specialists)

Page 9: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET ALI Status Report

October 2001 Project presentation REGNET

9

Alinari’s User Testers (4/7)Alinari’s User Testers (4/7)

User group name

System Information

User Computer Skills

Further possible tasks

European Projects Groups' User

Information about European projects

Regular use Mapping of the European projects. Past European accomplishments.

Publishers Alinari publishing and picture consultation.

Regular use. Requests for ready-to-use images;.Article consultations.

Journalists Alinari publishing and picture consultation.

Regular use. Special request for available images;Article consultations;

Page 10: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET ALI Status Report

October 2001 Project presentation REGNET

10

Alinari’s User Testers (5/7)Alinari’s User Testers (5/7)

User group name

System Information

User Computer Skills

Further possible tasks

Consultants Alinari publishing and picture consultation

Regular use. Image request for research;Article consultation.

Graphic Designer

Alinari picture consultation

Expert use. Special offer image availability for graphic works.

Web Developer Alinari picture consultation

Expert use. Special offer image availability for developing the web.

Page 11: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET ALI Status Report

October 2001 Project presentation REGNET

11

Alinari’s User Testers (6/7)Alinari’s User Testers (6/7)

User group name

System Information

User Computer Skills

Further possible tasks

Restorer Alinari publishing and picture consultation

Regular use Specific image availability to compare and analyze their restoration work.

B2B Customer Images sold to companies for their specific purposes (i.e. a picture for a shop)

Regular use A section with a list of images that could be useful for each specific business.

B2C Customer Alinari pictures on line

Regular use A section of image free usability, to get familiar with the use of picture picking and buying method.

Page 12: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET ALI Status Report

October 2001 Project presentation REGNET

12

Alinari’s User Testers (7/7)Alinari’s User Testers (7/7)

User group name

System Information

User Computer Skills

Further possible tasks

Brand New user

Alinari pictures and books

Minimal to expert

A rapid accessibility to the picture database, using a simple request form.

Internal User Groups Librarians Scientific Employee Registrar Administration Software engineering Image engineering Internal archive searcher

Pictures, consultation and software sharing

Regular to expert

An easy search form to have easy access to information system.

Page 13: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET ALI Status Report

October 2001 Project presentation REGNET

13

Some direct Methods for testingSome direct Methods for testing

Camera Aided User Testing

Inspection Method MILE (Milano-Lugano Inspection method)

Page 14: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET ALI Status Report

October 2001 Project presentation REGNET

14Methodology: camera aided Methodology: camera aided user tests user tests

- Nothing is more convincing than watching person after person encounter difficulties with the same part of a software or information system.

- The difficult areas that repeat themselves between multiple test participants reveal areas that should be studied and changed by the developers.

- User testing can often uncover very specific areas needing improvement, where focus groups and task analysis often find more general areas needing improvement.

 A trained observer conducts user testing often with the assistance of software

developers. People who are representative of the target audience are asked to perform representative tasks with the software. The observer writes a user testing report listing the problems and offering recommendations based on their findings.

Page 15: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET ALI Status Report

October 2001 Project presentation REGNET

15Inspection method MILE: Inspection method MILE: scenario-based heuristic scenario-based heuristic evaluationevaluation

The review is conducted by a group of experts who are deeply familiar with the concepts of usability in design.

The experts focus on a list of areas in design that have been shown to be troublesome for users.

Usability guidelines are usually derived from studies in human-computer interaction, ergonomics, graphic design, information design, and cognitive psychology.

Some areas that get evaluated are the language used in the system, the amount of recall required of the user at each step in a process, and how the system provides feedback to the user.

In particular, issues such as clarity, consistency, navigation, and error minimization are analyzed. Once the problems are discovered, the experts make recommendations for resolving these issues.

Page 16: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET ALI Status Report

October 2001 Project presentation REGNET

16

All big projects need strong tests