cultural - history interrogation

Upload: bsimoneaux

Post on 30-May-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Cultural - History Interrogation

    1/3

    My question is about the nature of the second inquiry or the definition of Cultural-Historical

    interrogation. What is interrogation and how what are the different methods that we can teach it.

    According to Miami plan Cultural-Historical Interrogation is in-depth interrogation of the historical

    and cultural contexts shaping the production and the reception of texts. All texts are composed and

    read by persons situated in particular contexts that change over timeand those distributions and

    circulations change their meanings. We have what in literary criticism is called Old Historicism, the approach which sees text as a

    product of specific culture or history.

    Second we have the notion of writer as the one who shape a text under the influence of the

    specific time and place s/he lives in.

    How are digital technologies -- such as the Internet, the World Wide Web, cell phones, wireless

    technology, etc. -- changing the way we write and communicate with each other and the way we learn?

    http://wiki.lib.muohio.edu/composition/index.php/112_Team-25

    The questions which are here on wiki sound sociological and anthropological rather than literary. They

    are either concerned with the influence of modern media on society or with the role of society in the

    formation of our understanding of media and text. In other words they want to know HOW MODERN

    READER READS A TEXT. What are the social and digital forces which shape and reshape his reading?

    Now back to our main question what is the second enquiry looking for what we can gather from this

    scattered objective is reader-response criticism. How a reader reads a text and what does that reading tell

    about the reader and his society?

    So we are at the point where Miamis plans two objectives are in front of us:

    1- A reading based on Old Historicist approach which tries to situate the text in a historical

    background

    2- A reader-response criticism which instead of readers psyche is involved in tracing the cultural-

    historical context of such reading, in the other words, an Old Historical reading again. It is old in

    the sense that it looks at one element (namely history or culture) as superior to another (namely

    text or reader).

    What I would like to do among the introductory activities to inquiry #2 is to introduce what literary

    criticism calls New Historical Approach or Cultural Poetics which challenges or goes against what they

    call Old Historicism.

    As an introductory activity we read a literary text (for example Act I of ShakespearesKing Learbased on

    its cultural and ideological backgrounds for example based on Elizabethan concept of cosmic order and

    Great Chain of Being). There are references in this act which shows connection to culture and traditions

    of society of time (These late eclipses in the sun and moon portend no good to us. Though the wisdom of

    nature can reason it thus and thus, yet nature finds itself scourged by the sequent effects, love cools,

    friendship falls off, brothers divide).

    http://wiki.lib.muohio.edu/composition/index.php/112_Team-25http://wiki.lib.muohio.edu/composition/index.php/112_Team-25http://wiki.lib.muohio.edu/composition/index.php/112_Team-25
  • 8/14/2019 Cultural - History Interrogation

    2/3

    Old Historicism New Historicism; Cultural Poetics

    History as written is an accurate view of what

    is really occurred.

    1- History is subjective.

    2- It is one of many discourses or ways of seeing

    the world.

    3- History is shaped by the people who lived it. History serves as a background to literature 1- The interrelatedness of all human activities

    The historical background of the text is only

    secondarily important, for it is the aesthetic

    object, the text that mirrors the history of its

    time.

    1- This approach is trying to address Foucaults

    tireless questioning of the nature of literature,

    history, culture, and society.

    By applying the historical context to the texts

    the critic believes that he or she can formulate

    a more accurate interpretation of texts than if

    s/he did not know such historical context.

    1- Viewing a text as culture in action, these critics

    blur the distinction between an artistic

    production and any other kind of social

    production or event.1- As all of society is intricately interwoven, so are

    critics and texts, both to each other and in the

    culture. Since all critics are influenced by the

    culture in which they live, New Historicists

    believe that they cannot escape public and

    private cultural influences.1- The social concerns of the author, of the

    historical times evidenced in the work, and of

    other cultural elements exhibited in the text

    before we can device a valid interpretation.

    1- Following Foucault history for New Historicist

    becomes that complex interrelationship of a

    variety of discourses, the various ways-artistic,

    social, political, and so on-that people think and

    talk about their world.

    1- Cultural Poetics critics believe that all texts are

    really social documents that reflect but also, and

    more importantly, respond to their historical

    situation. Historical periods evidences a single, political

    worldview

    1- To unlock textual meaning a Cultural Poetic

    critic investigates three areas of concerns: the

    life of the author, the social rules and dictates

    found within a text, and a reflection of a

    works historical situation as evidenced in the

    text.

    After learning all these I continue by analyzing a short story by Hawthorn based on New Historical

    approach where Hawthorn is concerned with Puritan history. And the question will be what social forces

    are at work here? What ideological forces are at work? How the authors standpoint is different from the

  • 8/14/2019 Cultural - History Interrogation

    3/3

    historical records and how he presented this in his work? What factors made the authors response

    different from the historical evidences? Other questions:

    http://wiki.lib.muohio.edu/composition/index.php/English_698/Elham%2C_Chanon%2C_Brent

    %2C_Amir%2C_Ben

    Work Cited:

    Bressler, Charles E. Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice.

    Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1994.

    http://wiki.lib.muohio.edu/composition/index.php/English_698/Elham%2C_Chanon%2C_Brent%2C_Amir%2C_Benhttp://wiki.lib.muohio.edu/composition/index.php/English_698/Elham%2C_Chanon%2C_Brent%2C_Amir%2C_Benhttp://wiki.lib.muohio.edu/composition/index.php/English_698/Elham%2C_Chanon%2C_Brent%2C_Amir%2C_Benhttp://wiki.lib.muohio.edu/composition/index.php/English_698/Elham%2C_Chanon%2C_Brent%2C_Amir%2C_Ben