d3 internal reviewer’s feedback proforma · d3 internal reviewer’s feedback proforma ... d3...
TRANSCRIPT
Applicant Name: Applicant Number: D3 xxxxx – 2016/17 Name of Reviewers:
1 D3 IRFP 2016 -17
D3 Internal Reviewer’s Feedback Proforma
For Fellowship categories the function of the Internal Reviewer is to;
Read and review the application
Provide feedback to the applicant
Make recommendations to the accreditation panel
Applicant Name: Applicant Number: D3 xxxxx – 2016/17 Name of Reviewers:
2 D3 IRFP 2016 -17
HEA Descriptor 3 for Information Note to Reviewers: Applicants should demonstrate a broad understanding of effective approaches to teaching and learning support as key contributions to high quality student learning. Applicants should be able to provide evidence of:-
I. Successful engagement across all five Areas of Activity
II. Appropriate knowledge and understanding across all aspects of Core Knowledge
III. A commitment to all the Professional Values
IV. Successful engagement in appropriate teaching practices related to the Areas of Activity
V. Successful incorporation of subject and pedagogic research and/or scholarship within the above activities, as part of an integrated approach to academic practice
VI. Successful engagement in continuing professional development in relation to teaching, learning, assessment, scholarship and, as appropriate, related academic or professional practices
VII. Successful co-ordination, support, supervision, management and/or mentoring of others (whether individuals and/or teams) in relation to teaching and learning
Dimensions of Practice Applicants must indicate all five Areas of Activity from the Dimensions of Practice. They must also indicate how Descriptor 3’s CK and PV have been integrated.
Applicant Name: Applicant Number: D3 xxxxx – 2016/17 Name of Reviewers:
3 D3 IRFP 2016 -17
UKPSF Dimensions of Practice A1 – A5
Summary of Evidence and its match with the components of the descriptor
Required amendments or further details to reflect the conditions set
Suggestions for further development suggestions on moving to the next level or more general comments for the candidate to consider such as internal or external opportunities/awards, e.g. NTF.)
Area of Activity - Successful engagement across all five Areas of Activity (A1- A5): A1 Design and plan learning activities and/or programmes of study
Reviewers combined comments:
A2 Teach and/or support learning
Reviewers combined comments:
A3 Assess and give feedback to learners
Reviewers combined comments:
A4 Develop effective learning environments and approaches to student support and guidance
Reviewers combined comments:
A5 Engage in continuing professional development in subjects/disciplines and their pedagogy, incorporating research, scholarship and the evaluation of professional practices
Reviewers combined comments:
Applicant Name: Applicant Number: D3 xxxxx – 2016/17 Name of Reviewers:
4 D3 IRFP 2016 -17
UKPSF Dimensions of Practice V1 – V4
Summary of Evidence and its match with the components of the descriptor
Required amendments or further details to reflect the conditions set
Suggestions for further development suggestions on moving to the next level or more general comments for the candidate to consider such as internal or external opportunities/awards, e.g. NTF.)
Professional Values - A commitment to all the Professional Values (V1 – V4): V1 Respect individual learners and diverse learning communities
Reviewers combined comments:
V2 Promote participation in higher education and equality of opportunity for learners
Reviewers combined comments:
V3 Use evidence-informed approaches and the outcomes from research, scholarship and continuing professional development
Reviewers combined comments:
V4 Acknowledge the wider context in which higher education operates recognising the implications for Professional practice
Reviewers combined comments:
Applicant Name: Applicant Number: D3 xxxxx – 2016/17 Name of Reviewers:
5 D3 IRFP 2016 -17
UKPSF Dimensions of Practice K1 – K6
Summary of Evidence and its match with the components of the descriptor
Required amendments or further details to reflect the conditions set
Suggestions for further development suggestions on moving to the next level or more general comments for the candidate to consider such as internal or external opportunities/awards, e.g. NTF.)
Core Knowledge - Appropriate knowledge and understanding across all aspects of Core Knowledge (K1 – K6): K1 The subject material
Reviewers combined comments:
K2 Appropriate methods for teaching and learning in the subject area and at the level of the academic programme
Reviewers combined comments:
K3 How students learn, both generally and within their subject/disciplinary area(s)
Reviewers combined comments:
K4 The use and value of appropriate learning technologies
Reviewers combined comments:
K5 Methods of evaluating the effectiveness of teaching
Reviewers combined comments:
K6 The implications of quality assurance and quality enhancement for academic and professional practice with a particular focus on teaching
Reviewers combined comments:
Applicant Name: Applicant Number: D3 xxxxx – 2016/17 Name of Reviewers:
6 D3 IRFP 2016 -17
Overall Recommendation by the Internal Reviewers.
Successful with no amendments YES or N/A Recommended subject to conditions (R1 Submission) YES or NO
Insert additional comments here:
Conditions are outlined in the ‘Required amendments or further details to reflect the conditions set’ against the specific dimension to be addressed.
Insert additional comments here:
Name (Reviewer 1):
Signature: Date:
Name (Reviewer 1):
Signature: Date:
Name (Reviewer 2):
Signature: Date:
Name (Reviewer 2):
Signature: Date:
Internal Moderator Approval. YES / NO
Internal Moderator’s Signature: Date: