dbutzprez on group practice arrangements

56
Some Business Foundations of Physician Group Practices Part 1: Basics of Costs and Revenues David Butz PhD Ross School of Business, University of Michigan CareEvolution DabAnalytics LLC November 2011 id A. Butz. Please do not copy or distribute without written permission.

Upload: davidbutz

Post on 07-May-2015

811 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Some basics of physician group practices

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Some Business Foundations of Physician Group Practices

Part 1: Basics of Costs and Revenues

David Butz PhDRoss School of Business, University of MichiganCareEvolutionDabAnalytics LLCNovember 2011

© David A. Butz. Please do not copy or distribute without written permission.

Page 2: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Disclosure

I am not supported by any commercial entity.

I do not sell any medical goods or products.

I have no relevant financial conflict of interest to disclose.

David Butz received his PhD in Economics from Northwestern University. After eight years on the Economics faculty at UCLA, he moved to Ann Arbor, MI, where he has served in various capacities on the faculty of the University of Michigan’s Business and Medical Schools. Dr. Butz devotes most of his research effort to the economics of health care delivery. Other research interests lie in health care outcomes research, industrial organization, law and economics, antitrust, and supply chain contracting, where he has published numerous peer-reviewed papers.

Page 3: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

3

To buy or not to buy? Bill is thinking of investing $450 to buy and

configure a new iPod. He figures the iPod will last 3 years, which

means $150/year, or $3/week, or 5¢/ song. On these terms, he decides, “Yes! I will get

more than 5¢/ song of enjoyment.”

Buying and Listening to an iPod

To listen or not to listen? After buying, Bill finds himself short of cash. In an

effort to save $3, he goes 1 week without listening.

Good reasoning.

Faulty reasoning.

Page 4: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

4

Health Care:

Fixed Costs But a Variable Cost Business Model

Health care costs are mostly “up front” or ongoing and fixed. Variable costs are modest.

This is also true of many other industries.Bill allocates overhead of 5¢ for each song in

order to account for his $450 up front investment. This is called “cost accounting.”

We pay by the song (“fee-for-service”), so everyone believes that the way to manage costs is to listen to fewer songs!

Page 5: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Distribution of Variable vs Fixed Costs of Hospital Care Rebecca R. Roberts, MD; et al. JAMA. 1999;281644-649.

Results:  In 1993, the hospital had nearly 114,000 emergency department visits, 40,000 hospital admissions, 240,000 inpatient days, and more than 500,000 outpatient clinic visits. The total budget for 1993 was $429.2 million, of which $360.3 million (84%) was fixed and $68.8 million (16%) was variable. Overall, 31.5% of total costs were for support expenses such as utilities, employee benefits, and housekeeping salaries, and 52.4% included direct costs of salary for service center personnel who provide services to individual patients.

5

Page 6: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Tracking and Billing For Costs

6

Alternate Methodology

1. What is the diagnosis? Principle Diagnosis (Prin Dx) Secondary Diagnoses (Many?)

2. What care was delivered? Principle Procedure (Prin Px) Secondary Procedures (Many?)

3. What algorithm defines $? Hospitals: Diagnosis Related

Groups (MS-DRGs) Physicians: Relative Value

Units (RVUs)

Set Charges; Send a Bill

1. Assign costs. >11,000 “Intermediate product

codes” at a large hospital. Figure variable costs and then

allocate overhead Total Cost.

2. “Charge description master.” A list of facility charges. A nearly 1:1 mapping

w/intermediate product codes.

3. Track resources item-by-item; then send a big long bill for each encounter.

Page 7: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Background on Billing and Coding

Coding: Describes/documents both the medical necessity (Dx) of patient care and the actual work done (Px).

Motivations include:An accurate medical recordAn accurate report of services rendered, for fair and

timely reimbursementCompliance – There are heavy financial penalties for

individuals and organizations that violate the basic rulesProfessional Liability – Poor documentation puts

individuals and organizations at considerable riskMore – Research, teaching, operations, public health, …

7

Page 8: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Nomenclature (for Physicians AND Other Providers)

8

Diagnosis (Dx) CodesDescribe medical necessity – why the patient is seen.

ICD-9-CM: International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification.

A 3-, 4-, or 5-digit number.

Note: The Affordable Care Act mandates that all providers move soon to the 10th Revision.

Procedure (Px) CodesDescribe work – what the patient is having done.

CPT: Current Procedural Terminology. Incl. “E&M” codes.

HCPCS: Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System.

A 5-digit number.

APC: Ambulatory Payment Classification for outpatient services done at a hospital.

Page 9: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

The Common Denominator of Reimbursement

Different payers have many different methods to reimburse different provider services.

In every case, though, the provider must document the medical necessity using a “Principle Diagnosis” and perhaps many secondary diagnoses.

And in every case, the provider must document the procedures performed. There is a “Principle Procedure” and perhaps many secondary procedures.

Always, two questions:

1) What is the medical necessity? (Dx)

2) What are the services rendered? (Px)

9

The information is part of the patient’s medical record. The answers may trigger payment to more than one provider, as when a surgical Px yields separate professional fees to the surgeon and anesthesiologist, as well as a payment to the hospital.

Page 10: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Straightforward and Consistent, but w/Exceptions

What if there is no medical necessity? A person who is not sick

seeks out a specific service. Get a flu shot. Donate an

organ. Discuss a problem that isn’t a current illness or injury. Examine a normal newborn. …

In this case, substitute a “V Code” for the usual CPT code, and proceed as usual.

What if we aim to flag/group certain types of patients? A person’s illness is caused

by an external injury. A motor vehicle accident. A

fall. A burn, poisoning, …

In this case, supplement the usual CPT code with an “E code,” and proceed …

10

There are many such cases. Follow up if and only if you must.

Don’t be intimidated when you don’t know some detail.

Page 11: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Physician Nomenclature

11

Relative Value Unit (RVU)A number assigned by CMS to each Px code that reflects the value of the physician services provided, and thus payment.

The sum of three components:

1) Work RVU

2) Practice Expense RVU

3) Professional Liability RVU

Physician productivity is often measured using wRVUs.

Conversion Factor ($)A single number that for each CPT code maps RVUs into dollar payment amounts.

MPFS: Medicare Physician Fee Schedule

Simple methodology: Take the RVU and multiply it by the conversion factor.

Other payers often reimburse as a percentage of MPFS.

Page 12: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

YearConversion

Factor Change 2000 $36.612001 $38.26 4.5%2002 $36.20 -5.4%2003 $36.79 1.6%2004 $37.34 1.5%2005 $37.90 1.5%2006 $37.90 0.0%2007 $37.90 0.0%2008 $38.09 0.5%2009 $36.07 -5.3%2010 $36.87 2.2%2011 $33.98 -7.9%

Physician Nomenclature

12

Conversion Factors ExampleCPT Code 99201

“Office or Other Outpatient Services, New Patient”

wRVU: 0.48

PE-RVU: 0.69

PLI-RVU: 0.04

Total: 1.21

Reimbursement = 1.21 * $33.98

= $41.11

Page 13: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

13

Hospital CountMedian

LOSMedian Charge Hospital Count

Median LOS

Median Charge

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS MEDICAL CENTER 10 5.0 $132,083 MISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 14 4.5 $64,161 EL CAMINO HOSPITAL 19 5.0 $103,964 SCRIPPS GREEN HOSPITAL 18 5.0 $63,726 VALLEYCARE MEDICAL CENTER 13 4.0 $99,539 GROSSMONT HOSPITAL 14 5.0 $63,164 ALTA BATES SUMMIT MED CTR-SUMMIT CAMPUS-HAWTHORNE 17 5.0 $96,851 COMMUNITY HOSPITAL MONTEREY PENINSULA 13 4.0 $59,453 ALTA BATES SUMMIT MED CTR-ALTA BATES CAMPUS 10 5.0 $95,913 SHARP MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 15 4.0 $57,511 CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER 42 5.0 $92,363 EISENHOWER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 33 4.0 $57,403 JOHN MUIR MEDICAL CENTER-WALNUT CREEK CAMPUS 16 4.0 $89,927 SCRIPPS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL - LA JOLLA 15 5.0 $55,670 JOHN MUIR MEDICAL CENTER-CONCORD CAMPUS 14 3.0 $82,750 SADDLEBACK MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER 22 6.0 $55,150 SAN RAMON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 11 5.0 $81,761 HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN 30 5.0 $55,061 SANTA ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL-MONTGOMERY 17 4.0 $80,297 CITY OF HOPE HELFORD CLINICAL RESEARCH HOSPITAL 11 4.0 $52,545 STANFORD HOSPITAL 21 4.0 $77,921 ST. JOSEPH HOSPITAL - ORANGE 26 5.0 $51,482 UCSF MEDICAL CENTER 10 7.5 $76,349 HUNTINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 16 5.0 $51,146 PENINSULA MEDICAL CENTER 18 5.5 $74,200 ST. AGNES MEDICAL CENTER 19 4.0 $49,698 COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL-SAN BUENAVENTURA 12 3.0 $73,680 LONG BEACH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER 13 4.0 $48,839 DOMINICAN HOSPITAL-SANTA CRUZ/SOQUEL 11 4.0 $72,660 SANTA BARBARA COTTAGE HOSPITAL 16 3.5 $46,268 PROVIDENCE SAINT JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER 13 4.0 $70,141 ST. JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER 17 4.0 $41,355 TORRANCE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER 14 5.5 $67,701 CLOVIS COMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTER 18 4.0 $35,861 CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MED CTR-PACIFIC CAMPUS 34 4.0 $65,683

METHODIST HOSPITAL OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 10 4.0 $33,821

ST. JOSEPH'S MEDICAL CENTER OF STOCKTON 12 4.0 $64,828 All CA 2008 hospitals with N 10.

Charges represent “list” prices only. They vary a lot!

Page 14: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Next, One More Bit of Information

Health Care Charges: Big Markups!

14

Source: http://www.medpac.gov/documents/Jun10DataBookEntireReport.pdf

Page 15: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/factsandfigures/2008/pdfs/section1_1.pdf

Corroboration …

Mean Charges:

$29,000

Mean Total Costs:

$9,100

Markup: 219%

15

Page 16: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Time here is too precious to turn over to institutional detail.

How is All of This Reimbursed? Look Here:

16

And this is just for Medicare/Medicaid …

Page 17: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Orthopedic Surgery Plays a Central Inpatient Role

17

These are disproportionately Medicare patients.

Page 18: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

In each case, Medicare provides a nice, short, slick overview.

18

Other third-party payers often but not always follow Medicare’s lead.

Page 19: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities

19

Source: MedPAC, March 2011 Report to Congress, p.211.

Page 20: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Why Not Focus Solely on Our Professional Fees?

Start with your fees, for the same reason that flight attendants tell you to put on your own oxygen mask first.

But re: the big picture, it’s obvious: You’re the QB/steward. Your actions affect outcomes, both clinical and financial.

Knowing costs makes a difference! You have a responsibility to patient, payer, employer, family,

colleagues, and the health system. If there is one fundamental policy issue that enjoys near

unanimity, it is that fee-for-service must go away. As a practical matter, you are the one going forward who will

be called to account for costs.

20

Page 21: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Too much of this remains in Managed Care 2.0!

Managed Care 1.0: Openly Adversarial

“Instead of free choice at the time of illness, employees henceforth were forced to make a choice among competing private health plans that would then have a contractual right to regulate medical treatments the employees and their families received at the time of illness. The preferred term in the industry for this intrusion into the doctor-patient relationship is ‘managing care.’”

Reinhardt, Uwe, “The Predictable Managed Care Kvetch on the Rocky Road from Adolescence to Adulthood,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, Vol. 24, No. 5, October 1999, pages 897 – 910.

“Managed care, as its name implies, involves those methods of financing and delivering health care services that manage, or intervene, in care decisions made by patients or doctors.”

Gaynor, Martin, and Haas-Wilson, Deborah, “Change, Consolidation, and Competition in Health Care Markets,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 13, No. 1, Winter 1999, pages 141-164.

21

These are representative of a 1990s consensus that managed care revolved around restricting the prerogatives of physicians and their patients.

This legacy remains.

Page 22: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

The New Yorker, 14 December 2009

“Testing, Testing,” Atul Gawande

“Our fee-for-service system, doling out separate payments for everything and everyone involved in a patient’s care, has all the wrong incentives: it rewards doing more over doing right, it increases paperwork and the duplication of efforts, and it discourages clinicians from working together for the best possible results.”

Source.

22

Page 23: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Investors are right to ask, especially since CMS is the industry’s price leader:

What Does the Future Hold?

23http://www.medpac.gov/documents/Jun10_EntireReport.pdf

Page 24: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Meanwhile, Physician Group Practices Have High Fixed Costs!

Fixed costs are reflected in PE and PLI RVUs Work RVUs

52% Physician time Technical skill and effort required Mental effort, judgment, physician stress, …

Practice Expense RVUs 44% Based on an assessment by CMS of the mostly fixed costs of

running an efficient practice, effectively amortized over many patients. This includes office space, staff, IT, utilities, taxes, etc. If a group practice is small and unable to capture economies of

scale and scope … then this reimbursement is too low.

Professional Liability Insurance RVUs 4% 24

Mean

Page 25: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

If Bill’s iPod costs $150/year and songs are “priced” at 5¢ each.

Economics of Fixed Cost Businesses: Throughput!

25

0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500 2750 3000 3250 3500 3750 4000 4250 4500 4750 5000$0

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

Costs

Revenues ($0.05)

Revenues ($0.04)

Low Utilization:Big Losses

High Utilization:Big Profits

BreakEven

Page 26: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

26

A 3-physician medical oncology practice in Allentown, PA.

Hematology Oncology Associates

Friedman, et al., “Taking the Pulse of a Practice,” Oncology Issues, 2005. Previously private practice group; bought by Lehigh Valley Hospital in 1999. Hospital-based (Dorothy Morgan Cancer Center). Also an office practice: patient visits, labs, nurse, and certified registered

nurse practitioner. The practice subcontracts billing to the hospital.

Productivity Measurement and Compensation: Physicians are “salaried” but strongly incented using wRVUs exclusively. Individual RVU thresholds and group threshold. Bonus based linearly on

RVUs over the threshold, but only if the group threshold is also met. If the practice loses money, the physicians feel some hit in their salaries. “Salaries are therefore reflective of the direct productivity of the physician.” Various hospital obligations, including teaching, committee work, weekend

rounds, and night call. How are these factored into compensation?

Page 27: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Some Business Foundations of Physician Group Practices

Part 2: The Group’s Business Functions

David Butz PhDRoss School of Business, University of MichiganCareEvolutionDabAnalytics LLCNovember 2011

© David A. Butz. Please do not copy or distribute without written permission.

Page 28: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

28

Why do physicians form group practices?

Negotiating leverage with payers. Better night/weekend coverage

ED On-call can be better distributed across a larger group.

More opportunity for professional development. Potentially better infrastructure

Higher levels of support & broader scope, as well. Better capitalization. Better amortized overhead. Better specialization of talents.

Stronger leadership (e.g., an MBA, MHA, …) President/CEO: Represents group to Sr. management, payers, … Manages day-to-day operations of the group. But … Practice leadership is almost uniformly MD.

Page 29: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

29

Conventional Wisdom:

At any given moment …

• Must carry a pager.

• No alcohol.

• Can’t travel far.

• Leisure could be disrupted.

Put differently, what is the cost of the flow of on-call services cardiologists provide?

How much could this really cost?

Consider the cost of taking ED “call” …

The Cost of a Cardiologist’s Capacity

Cost of capacity:

How does ED call affect …

• The capacity of my practice?

• The capacity of my group?

The cost looks quite different.

29

For you as a professional, and for your group, the ultimate question: How best to allocate your limited capacity?

Page 30: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

30

Group Finances & Governance

Business model driven by RVU generation. Ancillary fees are important, but for most groups professional

fees provide the lion’s share of revenue.

Group/physician productivity: measured by RVU’s. Must have organizational by-laws & principles of

governance and professional expectation. Compensation and staffing arrangements (e.g., ED call) Business functions Group access guidelines Professionalism Medical records Compliance

Page 31: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

31

The Medical Staff and its By-Laws

Physicians are “Self-Governing” Policies and Governance Procedures Credentialing and Privileging Levels of Appointment

Active Honorary Consulting Affiliate

The Medical Staff’s Relationship with the Hospital Hospital Rules and Regulations Physicians’ Rights and Responsibilities

Most prominent: ED call obligations & Professional Liability Insurance Administrative Responsibilities, etc Due Process

Page 32: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

32

Physician-Led Health System Infrastructure

Departments/Sections Formal Programs: Trauma,

Transplant, Bariatrics, … Centers: Cancer, Stroke,

Spine, Cardiovascular, … Women’s Health Ancillary Services

Blood Bank Respiratory Therapy Transport Dialysis Housecleaning Dietary And the list goes on …

Standing Committees Conflict of Interest Compliance Risk Management IRB Formulary Committee Medical Device Committee, … Materials Management Central Sterile Supply Capital Budget Planning Mortality & Morbidity Disciplinary Committees Privileging And much more …

Page 33: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

33

Clinical Programs, Verified Centers, & Regional Systems

Ex: Trauma Accreditation by the American College of Surgeons Rigorous standards

Patient registries Explicit staffing requirements with job descriptions Governance (Quality Assurance, Accountability, Feedback loops) Documentation, beginning with patient registries Protocols Call schedules Structured outreach and education Specific training requirements Re-accreditation every 3 years, including site visits by reviewers Pre- and post-hospital requirements. Much more

Regional and often statewide, inclusive systems of care.

Page 34: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Management Functions Run the Gamut

Human Resources Payroll Benefits

Medical / Dental / Vision 401K

Life Insurance

34

Billing/Claims Processing/Collections Billing

Scheduling Registration Insurance verification Medic+ A/R Collections

Claims Processing Adjudication Processing Reporting

Collections Mail telephone techniques Aging analysis Monthly collection reports

General Accounting General ledger Standard, reporting Day end journal

entries of deposits CME tracking Bank reconciliations Revenue allocation

reporting at month end Group purchasing

Source: Rocky Mountain MSO

Page 35: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Management Functions Run the Gamut Human Resources

Training Recruitment

Place ads Screen applicants Set up interviews Check references

Policies & Procedures Evaluation/Merit System Background Checks Counseling

35

Credentialing & Licensing/Malpractice

Credentialing/CME Licensing & renewals Medical Malpractice

Managed Care Contracting Contract analysis Contract negotiations Contract

management Sub-capitation

Marketing Satisfaction surveys Patient retention

strategies Direct mailing Building ads Press releases Brochures Phone book listings

Source: Rocky Mountain MSO

Office Operations Medical records Coding Supplies Ancillary ordering,

tracking On-call telephone

service Patient

appointments Patient triage Health information Prevention

Page 36: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Intermediaries Include:

36

Management Service Organizations Provide services to

physicians and their practices.

Administrative tasks, including billing, IT, compliance, etc.

Can also provide group purchasing of services, supplies and benefits.

Group Purchasing OrganizationsGPOs are organizations that act as purchasing intermediaries that negotiate contracts between their customers—health care providers—and vendors of medical products. GPOs’ sources of revenue include contract administrative fees, other fees obtained from vendors, and fees resulting from direct charges to customers. According to a 2009 study, on average, GPO contracts account for about 73 percent of nonlabor purchases that hospitals make.

Source: Group Purchasing Organizations: Services Provided to Customers and Initiatives Regarding Their Business Practices, General Accounting Office, August 2010, Page 4.

Page 37: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Employed Physicians and System Alliances

Employed PhysiciansWhy have an independent physician group at all?

Why not have the hospital buy them out and run them. This could align incentives and reduce overhead costs.

37

Pennant Health Alliance Physician/hospital network

“Sponsors:” 9 hospitals and 100+ outpatient venues.

UMHS, 6 Trinity hospitals, Metro Health Hospital in Wyoming, MI.

Services emphasize supply chain, IT, and revenue cycle.

Streamlining business processes, reducing costs, increasing revenue and providing the best health care for our patients.

Support and strengthen independent MI providers.

Page 38: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Intermediaries Include:

38

Patient-Hospital Organization Longstanding and tested. A separate legal entity

formed by physicians and at least one hospital for purposes of joint contracting.

The PHO objective, in other words, is to negotiate contracts with third-party payers to provide both physician and hospital services.

Independent Practice AssociationA single- or multi-specialty association of otherwise independent physicians for purposes that may include some or all of the following: Contracting among the other IPA

physicians, with independent physicians, with health systems, and with payers.

Care coordination and guided referrals. Modest administrative services.

Page 39: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

39

Physicians contract via the group HMOs & Physician Groups have multiple partnersFixed patient fee (PMPM) Commit to as little as a fee scheduleLittle autonomy, but … guaranteed patient flow and …

Physicians are salaried HMO employees A loose physician arrangementNo financial risk and no upside The IPA negotiates on behalf of physiciansStable lifestyle The IPA provides other nominal services The physician maintains considerable autonomy

Physicians are salaried hospital employees

No financial risk and no upsideStable lifestyle

Practices/Depts. are "owned" by the hospital.Physicians are salaried.Stable lifestyle

Independent Group Practices

Independent Group Practice/Network Model HMO

Independent Practice Association (IPA)

Captive Group Practices

Integrated Delivery Systems

Hospital-Based Practices

Group-Model HMOs

Staff-Model HMOs

Status Quo: Physicians Organize in Many Ways

Page 40: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Professional Liability Insurance (PLI)

Historically, procured by the group through the commercial insurance market.

Administratively, the group stands as intermediary between physician, plaintiffs, defendants, insurer, hospital.

The physician is just one interested party among many.Larger groups (hospitals, as well) are now forming group

captives, or more formally, risk retention groups (RRGs).The group and its physician members are self-insured, up

to a point, with insurance and re-insurance to hedge against the largest claims.

The legal, financial, regulatory, and management hurdles are substantial. The potential, though, is huge!

40

Page 41: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Which Services Matter Most to Orthopedic Groups?

41

Imaging, procedures, etc. matter, but isn’t growth still hospital-based?

Page 42: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Community-Based Group Practices Even more business-focused, RVU-driven, referral-

based: available, affable, and then able. The medical staff may be quite “diverse.” Side deals may abound; trust may be short.

Dr. Smith has a nice deal as trauma director. Who still takes ED call and who has managed to opt out? Your colleague, Dr. Lee, is a terrific surgeon (or not), but she does 250 of

the total 450 cases, and at 61 years old shows no signs of slowing down. You are splitting up the residual with others.

Your group and most others have relationships and admitting privileges at multiple hospitals, as well as interests in various other venues. Your interests, attention, and physical presence may be more divided. Care may be more difficult to coordinate.

42

Page 43: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

43

A 3-physician medical oncology practice in Allentown, PA.

Hematology Oncology Associates

Friedman, et al., “Taking the Pulse of a Practice,” Oncology Issues, 2005. Previously private practice group; bought by Lehigh Valley Hospital in 1999. Hospital-based (Dorothy Morgan Cancer Center). Also an office practice: patient visits, labs, nurse, and certified registered

nurse practitioner. The practice subcontracts billing to the hospital.

Productivity Measurement and Compensation: Physicians are “salaried” but strongly incented using wRVUs exclusively. Individual RVU thresholds and group threshold. Bonus based linearly on

RVUs over the threshold, but only if the group threshold is also met. If the practice loses money, the physicians feel some hit in their salaries. “Salaries are therefore reflective of the direct productivity of the physician.” Various hospital obligations, including teaching, committee work, weekend

rounds, and night call. How are these factored into compensation?

Page 44: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

What do we make of the trend of hospitals buying up group practices?

Employing a Physician is a ≥$500K Investment

Hospitals lose $150,000 to $250,000 per year over the first 3 years of employing a physician — owing in part to a slow ramp-up period as physicians establish themselves or transition their practices and adapt to management changes. The losses decrease by approximately 50% after 3 years but do persist thereafter.

For hospitals to break even, newly hired PCPs must generate at least 30% more visits, and new specialists 25% more referrals, than they do at the outset. After 3 years, hospitals expect to begin making money on employed physicians when they account for the value of all care, tests, and referrals.

Kocher R. and Sahni N.R. Hospitals' Race to Employ Physicians - The Logic Behind a Money-Losing Proposition N Engl J Med 2011; 364:1790 – 1793, 05/12/ 2011. 44

Page 45: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Some Business Foundations of Physician Group Practices

Part 3: What the Future May Hold

David Butz PhDRoss School of Business, University of MichiganCareEvolutionDabAnalytics LLCNovember 2011

© David A. Butz. Please do not copy or distribute without written permission.

Page 46: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

4646

Front/Center: What Sway Do Group Practices Have?

Still true going forward?

Page 47: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

What Do We Mean by “Fragmented?”

Donald Berwick: “A common criticism of U.S. health care is the fragmented nature of its payment and delivery systems. Because in many settings no single group of participants — physicians, hospitals, public or private payers, or employers — takes full responsibility for guiding the health of a patient or community, care is distributed across many sites, and integration among them may be deficient. Fragmentation leads to waste and duplication — and unnecessarily high costs.”“Launching Accountable Care Organizations — The Proposed Rule for the Medicare Shared Savings Program,” NEJM, 31 March 2011.

47

Page 48: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Conventional Wisdom from NEJM, Dec. 30, 2010, R. Kocher and N. Sahni,

“Physicians versus Hospitals as Leaders …”“Much of [the US’s high health care] cost derives from high rates of unnecessary hospitalizations and potentially avoidable complications, and these, in turn, are partially driven by fee-for-service incentives that fail to adequately reward coordinated care that effectively prevents illness.”

“The desired consequence of these changes is enhanced tertiary prevention, leading to substantial reductions in unnecessarily expensive specialty referrals and tests and avoidable complications. …

“Achievement of this level of care coordination will require the development of larger integrated delivery organizations — preferably, accountable care organizations (ACOs) that incorporate primary care practices structured as patient-centered medical homes and that can support new investments in information systems and care teams and can maintain service hours resembling those of retailers. A move toward ACOs will mean major changes in the structure of physicians’ practices, …”

48

Page 49: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Thomas L. Greaney, New England Journal of Medicine, December 22, 2010.

“Accountable Care Organizations – The Fork in the Road”

“ACOs offer a much-needed vehicle for integrating health care delivery and reducing the well-documented shortcomings of the system that are attributable to payment and organizational features that reward high volume rather than low cost or high quality.”

49

Page 50: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Avery Johnson, Wall Street Journal, March 28, 2011

“The Model of the Future?”

“The health-care law promoted accountable-care organizations. But it's hard to know what they are.”

"An ACO is like a unicorn; everyone thinks they know what one is, but no one has ever seen one," says Gene Lindsey, President and Chief Executive of Atrius Health.

Elliott Fisher, the Dartmouth Medical School professor who helped coin the term ACO, and who worked with members of Congress to draft the ACO concept into the health-care law, concedes that "there are some really important questions about whether this will work."

But, Dr. Fisher adds: "I think it's the best hope we have.”

50

Page 51: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

51

Health care’s greatest bottleneck will be MDs

1910: The Flexner Report leads to many medical schools closing.

1965: The push to train more physicians begins. By 1980, the number of graduates roughly doubled.

40 years of rapid workforce growth. 1980 – 2010: No appreciable increase in the number

of US-trained MD graduates (allopathic).

Going forward, US-trained MDs reaching retirement age will almost offset new allopathic graduates. An abrupt near-steady state.

Page 52: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Revisiting Operations Management

Each year, starting circa 1970, roughly 16,000 physicians have entered the “workforce pipeline” by graduating from allopathic medical schools (throughput). They spend four decades practicing before reaching retirement age (flow time). If there is no attrition at all during these four decades, it follows that in 2010, with the pipeline full, the size of the US-trained, allopathic physician workforce (i.e., inventory) is roughly ____ physicians.

40 Years

640,000 US-MDs when full.16K/Yr

1970 2010

52

Page 53: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Elevate the Workforce

The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health, Institute of Medicine, Nov 17, 2010.http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2010/The-Future-of-Nursing-Leading-Change-Advancing-Health/Recommendations.aspx?page=1

Recommendation 1: Remove scope-of-practice barriers. Advanced practice nurses should be able to practice to the full extent of their education and training.

Recommendation 2: Expand opportunities for nurses to lead and diffuse collaborative improvement efforts.

Recommendation 3: Implement nurse residency programs.

Recommendation 4: Increase the proportion of nurses with a baccalaureate degree to 80 percent by 2020.

53

Page 54: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Elevate the Workforce

The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health, Institute of Medicine, Nov 17, 2010.http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2010/The-Future-of-Nursing-Leading-Change-Advancing-Health/Recommendations.aspx?page=1

Recommendation 5: Double the number of nurses with a doctorate by 2020.

Recommendation 6: Ensure that nurses engage in lifelong learning.

Recommendation 7: prepare and enable nurses to lead change to advance health.

Recommendation 8: Build an infrastructure for the collection and analysis of interprofessional health care workforce data.

54

Page 55: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

“The Family Health Team [FHT] model [introduced in 2004] is designed to expand the capacity of primary care through development of interdisciplinary teams and to improve the breadth and quality of care through incentives provided by a blended payment model. Today, about 720 physicians in 150 FHTs serve more than 1 million patients. [emphasis added.]

“Physicians have responsibility for a defined panel of patients and are assisted by other health professionals, such as nurses, nurse practitioners, psychologists, pharmacists, social workers, and health educators. A typical physician panel includes about 1400 patients, smaller than a typical U.S. practice. Inclusion of a nurse practitioner adds 800 patients to the expected practice size.

55

“Patient-Centered Medical Homes in Ontario”Walter W. Rosser, M.D., Jack M. Colwill, M.D., Jan Kasperski, R.N., M.H.Sc., and Lynn Wilson, M.D.

New England Journal of Medicine, January 6, 2010. 10.1056/NEJMp0911519

“Physician payment is based on age- and sex-based capitation that is calculated from Ontario’s fee-for-service experience. Additional fees are provided for services deemed to require added emphasis ……

“Since income is not based primarily on physician visits, practices can explore broader roles for team members … The total number of visits per patient has not declined, but more visits appear to be occurring with team members other than the primary physician.

One effect that is already obvious is an increase of approximately 40% in physicians’ incomes: the average net income for a family physician has increased from $180,000 (Canadian) in 2004 to $250,000 within FHTs …

Page 56: DButzPrez on Group Practice Arrangements

Consider reading this article while replacing every occurrence of “patient-centered” with “capacity-centered.” Is the meaning much the same? Put differently, does a capacity-centered business model provide the economic foundation that enables a patient-centered medical home?

“Per capita, Canada has one third fewer active physicians than the United States, 15% more primary care physicians, and half as many specialists. Consequently, the heavy responsibilities of Canadian specialists promote shared care with family physicians, and specialists rarely see patients without referral. … Ontario’s large investment in FHTs signifies its commitment to enhancing the capacity and quality of primary care. [emphasis added.]

Ontario continues to convert fee-for-service practices to patient-centered medical homes, so far with positive results, including more graduates entering family medicine.

56

“Patient-Centered Medical Homes in Ontario”Walter W. Rosser, M.D., Jack M. Colwill, M.D., Jan Kasperski, R.N., M.H.Sc., and Lynn Wilson, M.D.

New England Journal of Medicine, January 6, 2010. 10.1056/NEJMp0911519

For a different perspective on medical homes:

The Patient Centered Medical Home (Robert Graham Center, November 2007)

http://www.graham-center.org/PreBuilt/PCMH.pdf

The analysis does not presume any particular focus either on “capacity” or on the importance of management principles. On the contrary, there is a sense that medical homes “counter market dynamics” that otherwise obstruct equity, efficiency, and quality.