deans’ council october 13, 2011

22
Deans’ Council October 13, 2011 Achieving the Dream Update Math Reading Apprenticeship

Upload: cricket

Post on 06-Feb-2016

23 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Achieving the Dream Update Math Reading Apprenticeship. Deans’ Council October 13, 2011. Math: Project Definition. Uniformity and sequencing of math courses from MA 095 to MA 107. Math: Project Definition. Uniformity Common Syllabi Common Course Schedules - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Deans’ Council October 13, 2011

Deans’ Council

October 13, 2011

Achieving the Dream Update

Math

Reading Apprenticeship

Page 2: Deans’ Council October 13, 2011

MATH: PROJECT DEFINITION

Uniformity and sequencing of math courses from MA 095 to MA 107

Page 3: Deans’ Council October 13, 2011

MATH: PROJECT DEFINITION

Uniformity

Common Syllabi

Common Course Schedules

Minimum set of required common assignments

Uniform final exit assessments

Page 4: Deans’ Council October 13, 2011

MATH: PROJECT DEFINITION

Sequencing

Pre assessments to determine readiness

Item analysis to determine achievement gaps

Faculty training to address gap areas

Page 5: Deans’ Council October 13, 2011

PROGRESS TO DATE: MA 095/096/097

Uniformity: All common elements in place prior to start of AtD

Page 6: Deans’ Council October 13, 2011

PROGRESS TO DATE: MA 096/097

Sequencing

Completed the 096/097 item analysis for Winter

11

Shared results of analysis with Department

Took the following action based on analysis:

Revised the final

Explored solutions to teaching and learning issues

raised by item analysis

Creation of supplemental worksheets to address

learning issues raised by item analysis in progress

Page 7: Deans’ Council October 13, 2011

PROGRESS TO DATE: MA 098

Uniformity Hired MA 098 Coordinator Created a common syllabus, course schedule

and assignments for MA 098 Common final exam for MA 098 is being created.

Sequencing New textbook selection team charged with

improving sequence from 096 to 107.

Page 8: Deans’ Council October 13, 2011

MATH PROGRESS TO DATE: MA 107

Uniformity: Preliminary discussions related to common exit questions begun.

Sequencing: Two volunteer faculty managing pre and

post assessmentsPre assessment developed and

administeredPre-assessment results compiled and

report written

Page 9: Deans’ Council October 13, 2011

MATH: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS MA 095/096

Electronic pre assessment does not work well with this population

Pre assessment quantified extent of incoming student weakness with whole numbers: will inform curriculum development.

MA 096 and 097: Item analysis of final revealed areas of instruction to stress for increased performance

Page 10: Deans’ Council October 13, 2011

MATH: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS MA 107

Pre-assessment results show that students coming from our MA 104 classes performed at the same level as those who did not come from our MA 104 classes.

Pre-assessment results show the following areas need more attention: identifying slope, squaring binomials, simplifying expressions, and order of operations.

Page 11: Deans’ Council October 13, 2011

MATH: CHALLENGES This is very time consuming work--25 hours

to compile the data for MA 096/097 and write the report. This does not include planning and delivering the training based on results, and revising the finals based on results.

The perception that academic freedom conflicts with common practices needs to be worked through.

Finding times when all adjuncts can attend training is challenging.

Page 12: Deans’ Council October 13, 2011

MATH: CONSULTANT FEEDBACK Suggested considering exit assessment

versus common final Suggested using sampling for item analysis

to simplify process—would allow time to engage in deeper analysis of kinds of mistakes

Suggested that free writes would suffice for qualitative data

We are on track and doing well.

Page 13: Deans’ Council October 13, 2011

MATH: NEXT STEPS

MA 095: Implement item analysis of common final

MA 096.097: Repeat item analysis of common final

MA 098: Implement item analysis for common final

MA 107: Repeat pre assessment in Winter 11

MA 107: Implement item analysis of exit assessment

Evaluate results of all common finals/exit assessments Disseminate results and address any changes to common

final based on those results

Address teaching issues raised by all assessments

Page 14: Deans’ Council October 13, 2011

QUESTIONS?

Page 15: Deans’ Council October 13, 2011

READING: PROJECT DEFINITION

Improve reading ability for all students by training faculty to use Reading Apprenticeship model.

Implement first in all developmental courses including MA and CO.

In second year, scale up to gateway courses.

Page 16: Deans’ Council October 13, 2011

WHAT IS READING APPRENTICESHIP?

Reading Apprenticeship embeds reading instruction in content learning.

RA instructors regularly engage students in discussions that increase awareness of how they read and think about what they read.

RA instructors make visible through modeling their own reading strategies as experts in their disciplines.

RA is appropriate for instructors in all disciplines.

Page 17: Deans’ Council October 13, 2011

READING: PROGRESS TO DATE

Winter 2011: Introduction to RA delivered at AFP learning day

Winter 2011: Reading faculty given more in-depth introduction to RA

August 2011: All reading adjuncts given three hours of training in RA

Sept. 29-Oct. 1, 2011: RA training by experts from West Ed delivered to 32 faculty, including all full time faculty whose full appointment is in developmental education. Training included ideas for immediate implementation

Page 18: Deans’ Council October 13, 2011

READING: PROGRESS TO DATE

Sept. 29-Oct. 1, 2011: RA training by experts from West Ed delivered to 32 faculty, including all full time faculty whose full appointment is in developmental education. Training included ideas for immediate implementation.

October 7: All full time English Department faculty given two hour introduction to RA at their annual learning day.

Survey (student and faculty perceptions of RA) development in progress.

2011-2012 English Department professional reading group for reading instructors selects RA as focus.

Follow up for first trained cohort planned for Nov. 4.

Page 19: Deans’ Council October 13, 2011

READING: CONSULTANT FEEDBACK

The rationale for selecting RA for an AtD project is sound.

We were encouraged to scale up the project.

The consultants suggested we talk with Biology to be aware of their thinking as it relates to reading the textbook in biology.

The consultants suggested we think about pairing RD 098 with gateway courses.

Page 20: Deans’ Council October 13, 2011

READING: CHALLENGES

Gateway faculty are less likely than developmental faculty to give up three days for training. The training experience for them may need to be modified.

Reaching even the majority of adjuncts teaching developmental courses is challenging.

Training faculty on this scale—three days of introduction and then systematic follow up---is extremely time consuming. GRCC needs at least one, preferably two or more, in-house trainers. Two faculty plan to apply for an IIPD to get this training.

Page 21: Deans’ Council October 13, 2011

READING: NEXT STEPS

Continue working with trained cohort to assist with implementation and to assess strengths and areas for improvement.

Survey faculty and students as to their perceptions of the value of RA.

Gather data at end of Fall semester to determine impact.

Incorporate RA into a new iteration of our GED program.

Page 22: Deans’ Council October 13, 2011

QUESTIONS?