decision and direction of election: ihsno v. utno

Upload: peter-c-cook

Post on 05-Jul-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/15/2019 Decision and Direction of Election: IHSNO v. UTNO

    1/17

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

    BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

    REGION 15

    VOICES FOR INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND

    EDUCATION INC. D/B/A INTERNATIONAL

    HIGH SCHOOL OF NEW ORLEANS

    Employer

    and

    ase 15 RC 175505

    UNITED TEACHERS OF NEW ORLEANS

    LOCAL 527 LFT AFT

    Petitioner

    DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION

    Upon a Petition filed under Section 9 c) of the National Labor Relations Act Act), as

    amend ed, a hearing was held before a Hearing Officer of the National Labor Relations Board

    (Board) in New Orleans, Louisiana, on May 13, 2016. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b)

    of the Act, the Board h as delegated its authority in this proceeding to the undersigne d, and I

    hereby make the following findings.

    I.

    umm ary of Findings

    The only issue in this proceeding is whether the Board has jurisdiction over Voices for

    International Business and Education, Inc. d/b/a International High School of New Orleans

    (Employer), the operator of a charter public school. As explained more fully below, I find the

    Board has jurisdiction.

    The Issue

    The Em ployer asserts the Board does not have jurisdiction over it because Section 2 2) of

    the Act exempts from the Board's jurisdiction any State or political subdivision thereof' and the

    Employer is a political subdivision of the State of Louisiana. The United Teachers of New

    Orleans, Local 527, LFT, AFT Petitioner) claims the Employer is not a political subdivision of

    the State but, rather, is a private non-profit corporation subject to the Board's jurisdiction. As

    explained more fully below, I find the Employer is not a political subdivision of the State, and

    the Board has jurisdiction.

    III Facts

    In 2009, the Em ployer began operating the International High School of New Orleans

    IHS), pursuant to a contract with the Louisiana Board of E lementary and Secondary Education

    ( School Board ). The IHS consists of grades nine through twelve and is contained on one

    campus in the City of New Orleans, State of Louisiana. The employees of the IHS are employed

    by and paid by the Em ployer.

  • 8/15/2019 Decision and Direction of Election: IHSNO v. UTNO

    2/17

    Voices for International Business and

    Education, Inc. d/b/a International High

    School of New O rleans

    Case 15-RC-175505

    On M ay 4, 2016, the Petitioner filed the petition to represent certain employees of the

    Employer.

    A The Charter Law

    In 1997, the L ouisiana Legislature passed the L ouisiana Charter School Dem onstration

    Programs Law. La. R.S. 17:3971 ( Charter Law ). The general purpose of the Charter Law is to

    allow local school authorities to enter into contracts with nonprofit corporations to operate public

    schools, pursuant to the terms of the Charter Law. See La. R.S. 17:3983(A)(1) ( Any of the

    following may form a nonprofit corporation for the purpose of proposing a charter as provided in

    this Subsection. ) and La. R.S. 17:3983(A)(4)(a) ( A local school board and a local charter

    authorizer may enter into any charter it finds valid, complete, financially well-structured, and

    educationally sound. ). See also La. R.S. 17:3972(B)(1) ( The purposes of this Chapter shall

    be to provide opportunities for educators and others interested in educating pupils to form,

    operate, or be employed w ithin a charter school with each such school designed to accom plish

    one or more of the following objectives. ). Finally, Section 3972 of the Charter Law,

    Subsection (A), states:

    It is the intention of the legislature in enacting this Chapter to

    authorize experimentation by city and parish school boards by

    authorizing the creation of innovative kinds of independent public

    schools for pupils. Further, it is the intention of the legislature to

    provide a framework for such experimentation by the creation of

    such schools, a means for all persons with valid ideas and

    motivation to participate in the experiment, and a mechanism by

    which experiment results can be analyzed, the positive results

    repeated or replicated, if appropriate, and the negative results

    identified and eliminated. Finally, it is the intention of the

    legislature that the best interests of at-risk pupils shall be the

    overriding consideration in implementing the provisions of this

    Chapter.

    Section 3991 of the C harter Law, Subsection (A)(1)(a), requires that, with one exception

    not applicable here, the operator of a charter school must be organized as a nonprofit

    corporation under applicable state and federal laws. Subsection (A)(2) states:

    Consistent with the provisions of this Chapter, a charter school and

    its officers and employees may exercise any power and perform

    any function necessary, requisite, or proper for the management of

    the charter school not denied by its charter, the provisions of this

    Chapter, or other laws applicable to the charter school.

    2

  • 8/15/2019 Decision and Direction of Election: IHSNO v. UTNO

    3/17

    Voices for International Business and

    Education, Inc. d/b/a International High

    School of New Orleans

    Case 15-RC-175505

    Finally, Section 3991 o f the Charter Law, Subsection (A)(1)(b), prohibits board m embers

    of charter schools from receiving com pensation; Subsection (a)(1)(c)(i) prohibits charter schools

    from em ploying any me mber of its board; Subsection (A)(1)(c)(ii) states that not more than

    twenty percent of the board members may be members of the same immediate family. The

    Charter Law contains no provisions for appointing or removing board m embers.

    B. The Employer s Articles of Incorporation

    On August 7, 2 009, Articles of Incorporation were filed with the L ouisiana Secretary of

    State creating the Employer as a Louisiana nonprofit corporation (Employer Exhibit 4). Article

    V (Board of Directors), states that the Board memb ers are respons ible for the overall policy and

    direction and shall delegate respons ibility for day-to-day operations to the head of school and

    Voices for International Business and Education, Inc. (VIBE) committees. Further, it states that

    all Board Mem bers will approve by a majority vote, new mem bers, officers and committee

    chairs. The original Board Members were named in the Articles and were private individuals.

    All the Board M embers are elected for one-year terms, but may be re-elected. Under the

    Employer's by-laws effective November 19, 2014, at Article III, Section 3.5, a Board Member

    may be removed w ith or without cause by a three-fourths vote of the remaining Board

    Mem bers, and a Board Member shall be removed if he has three unexcused absences from the

    board m eetings during the year.

    C.

    The Charter Agreement

    The m ost recent charter between the Emp loyer and the School Board was signed by the

    Em ployer on August 19, 2015, and by the School Board on March 5, 2015 (Employer Exhibit

    1 .

    Section 1.1.1 refers to the Board Members as (Charter Operator). Section 1.1.5 requires

    the Employer to maintain itself as a nonprofit corporation. Section 1.1.6 prohibits members of

    the Emp loyer's board from receiving any compensation (other than reimbursement of actual

    expenses). Section 4.1.1 states:

    The Charter Operator shall employ and contract with necessary personnel. It

    shall implement a personnel policy that addresses such issues as hiring of

    personnel, terms of employment, and compensation consistent with that

    contained in the Charter Application. The parties agree that teachers and other

    staff employed by the Charter Operator are not employees of BESE or the LDE.

    The C harter Operator shall complete and subm it to the LDE the Collective

    Bargaining Option Form , incorporated herein as E xhibit G.

    Exhibit G indicates the Emp loyer would not follow any collective bargaining agreements

    entered into by the local school district where the Employer is located. Exhibit F indicates the

    Employer would not participate in the Teachers' Retirement System of Louisiana and the

    Louisiana School Employees' Retirement System.

    3

  • 8/15/2019 Decision and Direction of Election: IHSNO v. UTNO

    4/17

    Voices for International Business and

    Education, Inc. d/b/a International High

    School of New Orleans

    Case 15-RC-175505

    IV

    nalysis and Findings

    I find the Employer is not a subdivision of the State and is subject to the Board's

    jurisdiction. The-United States Congress excluded government entities from the Board's

    jurisdiction. Section 2(2) of the Act excludes from the definition of employer the United States

    or any wholly owned G overnment corporation, or any Federal Reserve Bank, or any State or

    political subdivision thereof. An entity may be considered a political subdivision if it meets

    either

    of two standards: 1) it was created directly by the State so as to constitute a department or

    administrative arm of the governm ent; or 2) it is administered by individuals who are responsible

    to public officials or to the general electorate.

    NLRB v. Natural Gas U tility district of Hawkins

    County

    402 US 600, 604-05 (1971). Here, the Employer satisfies neither of the standards.

    A Creation of the Employer

    The Em ployer was not created directly by the State but by private individuals. The Board

    finds that entities created by an act of legislation to have been created directly by the State. The

    Board has even found that entities created by an act of the judiciary to have been created directly

    by the State. State Bar of New Mexico

    346 NLRB 862 (1990) (New Mexico's Supreme Court

    enactment of rule creating state bar association amounted to direct creation by State). However,

    entities created by private individuals are not created directly by the State, even if they are

    created with the collaboration of the State to serve a public function on behalf of the State.

    Chicago Mathem atics Science Academ y Charter School, Inc.,

    359 NLRB No. 41, slip op. p. 6

    (2012) ( Chicago M athematics ) (Board found organization operating charter school created by

    incorporators of organization, not legislature). For example, in Regional Med ical Center at

    Memphis,

    343 NLRB 346 (2004), the Board found the entity operating the county's public

    hospital to have been created by private individuals and not created by the county. In that case,

    after private individuals created a non-profit corporation to operate the hospital, the county

    dissolved the county ho spital authority and executed a contract with the no n-profit corporation to

    operate the hospital. Because the non-profit corporation w as created by individuals, the Board

    found it was not created directly by the county. Id.

    at 358.

    In

    Chicago Mathematics supra

    the Board found that the operator of a Ch icago charter

    public school was not created directly by the state but, rather, by the individuals who created the

    non-profit corporation that operated the school. In that case, it was argued that the State of

    Illinois created the entity through the enactm ent of the Charter Schools Law , which allowed the

    existence of charter schools. However, the Board, found that the statute simply permitted local

    school authorities to enter into contracts with private entities to adm inister public schools and

    that the entities were created by the individuals who incorporated them. Thus, the Board found

    the entity administering the charter school was not created d irectly by the State.

    Similarly, in the current matter, the Em ployer was created by the individual(s) who

    incorporated it in 2009, not by the State. The Employer was created when its Articles of

    Incorporation were filed with the Louisiana Secretary of State. Its continued existence as a legal

    4

  • 8/15/2019 Decision and Direction of Election: IHSNO v. UTNO

    5/17

    Voices for International Business and

    Education, Inc. d/b/a International High

    School of New O rleans

    Case 15-RC-175505

    entity depends on its adherence to the corporation laws of the State of Louisiana and the

    willingness of its board. Even if the Employer ceased operating the International High School of

    New Orleans, or if the Ch arter Law were repealed in its entirety, the Em ployer would continue

    existing as a legal entity until its board authorized its dissolution.

    The E mployer states that the Em ployer is a publicly chartered school under Louisiana

    Law. In support thereof, language in the Charter Law to establish the Employer states that it was

    created directly by the State (Section 3972, Subsection (A), emphasis added):

    It is the intention of the legislature in enacting this Chapter to

    authorize experimentation by• city and parish school boards by

    authorizing the creation of innovative kinds of independent public

    schools for pupils. Further, it is the intention of the legislature to

    provide a framework for such experimentation

    by the creation of

    such schools a means for all persons with valid ideas and

    motivation to participate in the experiment.

    How ever, the plain me aning of the language, and its placement in the section of the

    Charter Law setting forth the law's purpose and intent, is to explain the purpose of allowing such

    schools as those described, not to create them. Now here in the Charter Law is an

    , agency,

    department, commission, public benefit corporation, or any other entity, created. It was not

    until August 7, 2009, by the filing of the Employer's Articles of Incorporation, that the Employer

    was created. Therefore, the Employer was not created .directly by the State.

    B Administration of the Employer

    The Employer is not administered by the State. In determining whether an entity is

    administered by individuals who are responsible to public officials or the general electorate,

    the Board looks at whether a majority of those individuals are appointed by or subject to

    removal by public officials.

    Chicago Mathematics

    359 NL RB No. 41, slip op. pp. 7-8 (2012).

    In

    Chicago Mathematics

    the Board found that all of the board's directors, who had complete

    control over the operations of the charter school (within the parameters of Illinois' Charter

    School Law and its charter with the local school authority), could be appointed and rem oved

    only by the board itself. Thus, the individuals administering the school were not responsible to

    public officials or to the general elec torate.

    Similarly, in the instant case, the evidence does not indicate that any of the Board

    Mem bers are appointed by or subject to removal by public officials.

    Chicago Mathematics

    supra

    Under the terms of the Employer's Articles of Incorporation, board members are selected

    1

    By contrast, note the original language of Section 3 of the National Labor Relations Act: There is hereby created

    as an independent agency in the Executive branch of the government, a board, to be known as the National Labor

    Relations Board, which shall be composed of..

    55 -

  • 8/15/2019 Decision and Direction of Election: IHSNO v. UTNO

    6/17

    Voices for International Business and

    Education, Inc. d/b/a International High

    School of New Orleans

    Case 15-RC-175505

    by current members (the initial members were named in the Articles of Incorporation). Neither

    the Charter Law nor the Employer's charter with the School Board authorizes someone (e.g., a

    public official or the general electorate) to remove a board member. The record contains no

    evidence of any other law or authority allowing som eone to appoint or remove a board mem ber.

    Additionally, there is no evidence that a board mem ber has ever been appointed and /or removed

    by a pu blic official or the general electorate.

    Further, other than setting standards and guidelines, both the Charter Law and the

    Employer's charter grant the Employer's board complete control over the operations of the

    school, including hiring and firing. Consequently, it cannot be said that any of the individuals

    with any control over the administration of the school may be removed by public officials or the

    general electorate. Therefore, the Employer is not administered by individuals who are

    responsible to pu blic officials or the general electorate.

    V onclusion

    I

    find that the Board has jurisdiction over the Employer. The Employer was not created

    by the State and is not administered by the State and, consequently, is not a political subdivision

    of the State within the meaning of Section 2(2) of the Act. Therefore, the Employer is a private

    entity over which the Board has jurisdiction.'

    Further, based upon the entire record in this matter, including stipulations of the parties, I

    also conclude and find as follows:

    The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are

    hereby affirmed.

    The E mployer is a private nonprofit corporation established in 2009 for the purpose of

    operating a public nine through 12 charter school. The Employer has an office and place of

    business in the City of New Orleans, State of Louisiana. During the year preceding the filing of

    the petition, a representative period, the Employer, in the conduct of its operations, derived gross

    annual revenue in excess of 1 million. During the same period, the Employer purchased and

    received goods and supplies and materials in excess of 50,000 directly from points located

    outside the State of Louisiana.

    A question affecting com merce exists concerning the representation of certain employees

    of the Em ployer within the meaning of Section 9(c)(1) and Section 2(6) and (7) of the A ct.

    The Petitioner is a labor organization within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the Act.

    2

    No evidence was presented suggesting the Employer is any of the types of private entities over which the Board

    either has no jurisdiction or has chosen not to exercise jurisdiction.

    6

  • 8/15/2019 Decision and Direction of Election: IHSNO v. UTNO

    7/17

    Voices for International Business and

    Education, Inc. d/b/a International High

    School of New Orleans

    Case 15-RC-175505

    The Em ployer is engaged in comm erce within the meaning of the Act, and it will

    effectuate the purposes of the Ac t to assert jurisdiction herein.

    There is no con tract bar, or any other bar, to an election. There is no history of collective

    bargaining between the Petitioner and the Employer.

    Certain of the employees, as described in V oting Group A , below, are professional

    employees w ithin the meaning of Section 2 12) of the Act.

    DIRE TION OF ELE TION

    The N ational Labor Relations Board w ill conduct a secret ballot election among the

    employees in the unit found appropriate above. Employees will vote whether or not they wish to

    be represented for purposes of collective bargaining by United Teachers of New Orleans, Local

    527, LFT, AFT,

    Based on the parties agreement that a

    onotone

    election is desired, the parties will be

    accorded a onotone

    election.

    Sonotone Corp.

    90 NLRB 123 (1950). Accordingly, I shall direct

    separate elections in the following voting groups:

    Included in Voting Group A: All full-time and regular part-time

    professional employees, including teachers, full-time substitute

    teachers, teacher-department chairs, special education

    coordinator/department chair, social workers, nurses, counselors,

    remediation specialists, ESL coordinator, and behavior

    interventionists employed at the Employer s New Orleans campus;

    Excluded from V oting Group A: paraprofessionals, in-school

    suspension aides, child-specific aides, teacher aides, head of

    schoo l, principal, chief of staff, administrative assistant,

    administrative consultant, dean of students, director of student

    support, IB coo rdinator, marketing and recruiting m anager, data

    manager, security guards, academic instructional coach, all other

    administrative employees, all other managerial employees, all

    other employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.

    Included in Voting Group B: Paraprofessionals, in-school

    suspension aides, child-specific aides, and teacher aides employed

    at the Employer s New Orleans campus; Excluded from Voting

    Group B: All professional employees, head of school, principal,

    chief of staff, administrative assistant, administrative consultant,

    dean of students, director of student support, TB coordinator,

    marketing and recruiting manager, data manager, security guards,

    7

  • 8/15/2019 Decision and Direction of Election: IHSNO v. UTNO

    8/17

    Voices for International Business and

    Education, Inc. d/b/a International High

    School of New O rleans

    Case 15-RC-175505

    academic instructional coach, all other administrative employees,

    all other managerial employees, all other employees, guards and

    supervisors as defined in the Act.

    The em ployees in the professional Voting Group A will be asked two questions on their

    ballots:

    1

    Do you desire to be included in the sam e unit as non-professional employees of the

    Em ployer for the purpose of collective bargaining?

    2. Do y ou desire to be represented for purposes of c ollective bargaining by United

    Teachers of New Orleans, Local 527, LFT, AFT?

    If a m ajority of the professional employees in Vo ting Group A vote yes to the first

    question, indicating a desire to be included in a unit w ith the non-professional em ployees, they

    will be included. Their vote on the second question will then be counted with the votes of the

    non-professional emp loyees voting in Voting Group B to decide whether to select Petitioner as

    the representative for the entire combined unit. The Petitioner has indicated its willingness to

    represent the professional employees separately if those emp loyees vote for separate

    representation. Thus, if the professional employees in Voting Group A do not vote for inclusion,

    they will constitute a separate unit.

    The ultimate determination will be based on the results of the elections. However, the

    following findings are made with regard to the appropriate units:

    1. If the professional employees vote for inclusion in a unit with the non-professional

    employees, it is found that the following employees will constitute a unit appropriate for

    the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 b) of the Act:

    Included: All full-time and regular part-time professional

    employees, including teachers, full-time substitute teachers,

    teacher-department chairs, special education

    coordinator/department chair, social workers, nurses, counselors,

    remediation specialists, ESL coordinator, and behavior

    interventionists, paraprofessionals, in-school suspension aides,

    child-specific aides, and teacher aides employed at the Employer s

    New Orleans camp us; Excluded: head of school, principal, chief of

    staff, administrative assistant, administrative consultant, dean of

    students, director of student support, IB coordinator, marketing and

    recruiting manager, data m anager, security guards, academic

    instructional coach, all other administrative employees, all other

    manage rial employees, all other emp loyees, guards and supervisors

    as defined in the Act.

    8

  • 8/15/2019 Decision and Direction of Election: IHSNO v. UTNO

    9/17

    Voices for International Business and

    Education, Inc. d/b/a International High

    School of New Orleans

    Case 15-RC-175505

    2. If the professional employees vote against inclusion in the unit with the non-professional

    employees, it is found that the following units are appropriate for the purposes of

    collective bargaining within the m eaning of Section 9 b) of the Act:

    Included in Voting Group A: Included in Voting G roup A: All full-

    time and regular part-time p rofessional employees, including

    teachers, full-time substitute teachers, teacher-department chairs,

    special education coordinator/department chair, social w orkers,

    nurses, counselors, remediation specialists, ESL coordinator, and

    behavior interventionists employed at the Employer s New Orleans

    campu s; Excluded from Voting G roup A: paraprofessionals, in-

    school suspension aides, ch ild-specific aides, teacher aides, head of

    school, principal, chief of staff, administrative assistant,

    administrative consultant, dean of students, director of student

    support, IB coordinator, marketing and recruiting m anager, data

    manager, security guards, academ ic instructional coach, all other

    administrative employees, all other managerial em ployees, all

    other employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.

    Included in Voting Group B: Paraprofessionals, in-school

    suspension aides, child-specific aides, and teacher aides employed

    at the Employer s New Orleans campus; Excluded from Voting

    Group B: All professional employees, head of school, principal,

    chief of staff, administrative assistant, administrative consultant,

    dean of students, director of student support, IB coordinator,

    marketing and recruiting manager, data manager, security guards,

    academic instructional coach, all other administrative employees,

    all other managerial employees, all other employees, guards and

    supervisors as defined in the Act.

    A

    lection Details

    The election will be held on the following date, at the following times and places. A pre-

    election conference will take place on Friday, May 27, 2016, at 8:00 am, in the teachers lounge

    at the Employer s facility located at 727 Carondelet Street, New Orleans, Louisiana.

    Election Date:

    ay 27, 2016

    Election Time:

    :30 am — 11:30 am

    9

  • 8/15/2019 Decision and Direction of Election: IHSNO v. UTNO

    10/17

    Voices for International Business and

    Education, Inc. d/b/a International High

    School of New O rleans

    Case 15-RC-175505

    Election Locations:

    Employer s Facility

    Teachers Lounge

    727 Carondelet Street

    New Orleans, Louisiana

    The counting of the ballots will take place at 11:45 am on May 27, 2016, in the Teachers

    Lounge at the Employer s facility located at 727 Carondelet Street, New Orleans, Louisiana.

    B Voting Eligibility

    Eligible to vote are those in the unit who were emp loyed during the payroll period ending

    April 29, 2016, including employees who did not work during that period because they w ere ill,

    on vacation, or temporarily laid off.

    Employees eng aged in an economic strike, who have retained their status as strikers and

    who have not been permanently replaced, are also eligible to vote. In addition, in an economic

    strike that comm enced less than 12 m onths before the election date, employees engaged in such

    strike who have retained their status as strikers but who have been permanently replaced, as well

    as their replacements, are eligible to vote. Unit employees in the military services of the United

    States may vote if they appear in person at the polls.

    Ineligible to vote are (1) employees who have quit or been d ischarged for cause since the

    designated payroll period; (2) striking employees wh o have been discharged for cause since the

    strike began and who have not been rehired or reinstated before the election date; and (3)

    employees who are engaged in an economic strike that began more than 12 mo nths before the

    election date and who have been permanently replaced.

    C

    Voter List

    As required by Section 102.67(1) of the B oard s Rules and Regulations, the Em ployer

    must provide the Regional Director and parties named in this decision a list of the full names,

    work locations, shifts, job classifications, and contact information (including home addresses,

    available personal em ail addresses, and available hom e and personal cell telephone n umbers) of

    all eligible voters.

    To be timely filed and served, the list must be

    re eived

    by the regional director and the

    parties by Monday, May 23, 2016. The list must be accompanied by a certificate of service

    showing service on all parties.

    The region will no longer serve the voter list

    Unless the Employer certifies that it does not possess the capacity to produce the list in

    the required form, the list must be p rovided in a table in a M icrosoft Word file (.doc or do cx) or a

    file that is compatible with Microsoft Word (.doc or docx). The first column of the list must

    begin with each employee s last name and the list must be alphabetized (overall or by

    department) by last name. Because the list will be used during the election, the font size of the

    10

  • 8/15/2019 Decision and Direction of Election: IHSNO v. UTNO

    11/17

    Voices for International Business and

    Educ ation Inc. d/b/a International High

    School of New Orleans

    Case 15-RC-175505

    list must be the equivalent of Times New Roman 10 or larger. That font does not need to be

    used but the font must be that size or larger. A sample, optional form for the list is provided on

    the N LRB website at ww w.nlrb.gov/what-we-do/conduct-elections/representation-case-rules-

    effective-april-14-2015.

    W hen feasible the list shall be filed electronically with the Region and served

    electronically on the other parties named in this decision. The list may be electronically filed

    with the Region by using the E-filing system on the Agency s website at www.nlrb.gov

    . Once

    the website is accessed click on

    E-File Documents

    enter the NLRB Case Number, and follow

    the detailed instructions.

    Failure to comply w ith the above requirements will be grounds for setting aside the

    election whenever proper and timely objections are filed. However, the Employer may not

    object to the failure to file or serve the list within the specified time or in the proper format if it is

    responsible for the failure.

    No party shall use the voter list for purposes other than the representation proceeding

    Board proceedings arising from it and related matters.

    D. osting of Notices of Election

    Pursuant to Section 102.67(k) of the Board s Rules, the Employer must post copies of the

    Notice of Election accompanying this Decision in conspicuous places including all places where

    notices to employees in the unit found appropriate are customarily posted. The Notice must be

    posted so all pages of the Notice are simultaneously visible. In addition, if the Employer

    customarily com municates electronically with some or all of the em ployees in the unit found

    appropriate the Employer m ust also distribute the Notice of Election electronically to those

    employees. The Employer must post copies of the Notice at least 3 full working days prior to

    12:01 a.m. of the day of the election and copies must rem ain posted until the end of the election.

    For purposes of posting working day mean s an entire 24-hour period excluding Saturdays

    Sundays and holidays. How ever a party shall be estopped from objecting to the nonposting of

    notices if it is responsible for the nonposting and likewise shall be estopped from objecting to

    the nondistribution of notices if it is responsible for the nondistribution. Failure to follow the

    posting requirements set forth above will be grounds for setting aside the election if proper and

    timely objections are filed.

    RIGHT TO REQUEST REVIEW

    Pursuant to Section 102.67 of the Board s Rules and Regulations, a request for review

    may b e filed with the Board at any time following the issuance of this Decision until 14 days

    after a final disposition of the proceeding by the Regional Director. Accordingly, a party is not

    precluded from filing a request for review of this decision after the election on the grounds that it

  • 8/15/2019 Decision and Direction of Election: IHSNO v. UTNO

    12/17

    Voices for International Business and

    Education Inc. d/b/a International High

    School of New Orleans

    Case 15-RC-175505

    did not file a request for review of this Decision prior to the election. The request for review

    must conform to the requirements of Section 102.67 of the Board s Rules and Regulations.

    A request for review may be E-Filed through the Agency s website but may not be filed

    by facsimile. To E-File the request for review, go to www.nlrb.gov

    , select E-File Documents,

    enter the NLRB Case Number, and follow the detailed instructions. If not E-Filed, the request

    for review should be addressed to the Executive Secretary National Labor Relations Board

    1015 Half Street SE, Washington, DC 20570-0001. A party filing a request for review must

    serve a copy of the request on the other parties and file a copy with the Regional Director. A

    certificate of service must be filed w ith the Board together with the request for review.

    Neither the filing of a request for review nor the Board s granting a request for review

    will stay the election in this matter unless specifically ordered by the Board.

    Dated: May 19, 2016

    n N

    M. Kathleen

    athleen McKinney

    Regional D irector

    National Labor Relations Board

    Region 15

    600 South Maestri Place, Floor 7

    New Orleans, Louisiana 70130-3414

    - 12 -

  • 8/15/2019 Decision and Direction of Election: IHSNO v. UTNO

    13/17

    Form NLRB 707

    (4-2015)

    Uni ted S ta tes o f Am er ica

    Nat iona l Labor Re lat ions Bo ard

    NOTICE OF EL ECTION

    PURPOSE OF ELECTION: This e lec t ion is to d etermine the representat ive, i f any, des ired b y th e e l ig ib le

    employees for purposes of collective bargaining with their employer. A majority of the valid ballots cast will

    determine the results of the election. Only one valid representation election may be held in a 12-month period.

    SECRET BAL LOT: The e lect ion w i l l be b y SECRET ba llo t und er the superv is ion o f the Regional D irector o f the

    National Labor Relations Board NLRB). A sample of the official ballot is shown on the next page of this Notice.

    Voters will be allowed to vote without interference, restraint, or coercion. Electioneering wil l not be permitted

    at or near the polling place. Violations of these rules should be reported immediately to an NLRB agent. Your

    at tent ion is ca l led to Sect ion 12 o f the Nat iona l Labor Relat ions A ct wh ich pro v ides: ANY PERSON WHO SHALL

    WILLFULL Y RESIST, PREVENT, IMPEDE, OR INTERFERE WITH A NY MEM BER OF THE BOA RD OR A NY OF ITS AGENTS

    OR AG ENCIES IN THE PERFORMA NCE OF DUTIES PURSUANT TO THIS ACT SHAL L B E PUNISHED B Y A FINE OF NOT

    MORE THAN 5,000 OR BY IMPRISONMENT FOR NOT MORE THAN ONE YEAR, OR BOTH.

    ELIGIBILITY RULES: Employ ees e l ig ib le to vote are those descr ibed u nder the VOTING UNIT on the next page and

    include employees who d id not work during the designated payroll period because they were ill or on vacation

    or temporarily laid off, and also inc lude employees in the military service of the United States who appear in

    person at the polls. Employees who have quit or been discharged for cause since the designated payroll period

    and who have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of this election are

    ot

    eligible to vote.

    SPECIAL ASSISTANCE: Any emp loyee or o ther part ic ipant in th is e lect ion w ho h as a handicap or needs specia l

    ass is tance such as a s ign langu age in terpreter to part ic ipate in th is e lect ion sh ould n ot i fy an NLRB Of f ice as soon

    as possib le and request the necessary assistanc e.

    PROCESS OF VOTING: Upon arr iva l a t the vot ing p lace, voters sh ould proceed to the Bo ard agent and ident i fy

    themselves by stating their name. The Board agent will hand a ballot to each eligible voter. Voters will enter the

    voting booth and mark their ballot i n secret. DO NOT SIGN YOUR BALLOT, Fold the ballot before leaving the

    voting booth, then personally deposit it in a ballot box under the supervision of the Board agent and leave the

    pol l ing area.

    CHALLENG E OF VOTERS: If you r e l ig ib i l i ty to vote is ch a l lenged, you w i l l be a l lowed to vote a cha l lenged ba l lo t .

    Although you may believe you are eligible to vote, the polling area is not the place to resolve the issue. Give the

    Board agent your name and any other information you are asked to provide. After you receive a ballot, go to the

    voting booth, mark your ballo t and fold it so as to keep the mark secret. DO NOT SIGN YOUR BALLOT. Return to

    the Board agent who will ask you to place your ballot in a challenge envelope, seal the envelope, place it in the

    ballot box, and leave the polling area. Your eligibility will be resolved later, if necessary.

    AUTHORIZED OBSERVERS: Each party may d esignate an equal nu mber o f observers, th is num ber to be

    determined by the NLRB. These observers a) act as checkers at the voting place and at the counting of ballots;

    (b) ass is t in ident i fy ing vo ters; (c) cha l lenge voters and b a l lo ts ; and (d) o therwise assis t the NLRB.

    WARNING: This is the only official notice of this election and must not be defaced by anyone. Any markings that you may see on any sample ballot or

    anywhere on this notice have been made by someone other than the National Labor Relations Board, and have not been put there by the National Labor

    Relations Board. The National Labor Relations Board is an agency of the United State s Government, and does not endorse any choice in the election.

    Page 1 of 5

  • 8/15/2019 Decision and Direction of Election: IHSNO v. UTNO

    14/17

    Form NLRB-707

    4-2015)

    Uni ted States o f Am er ica

    National Labor Relations Board

    NOTICE OF ELECTION

    VOTING UNITS

    VOTING GROUP - UNIT A:

    Included in Voting Group A: All full-time and regular part-time professional employees, including teachers, full-time substitute

    teachers, teacher-department chairs, special education coordinator/department chair, social workers, nurses, counselors,

    remediation specialists, ESL coordinator, and behavior interventionists employed at the Employer s New Orleans campus;

    Excluded from Voting Group A: paraprofessionals, in-school suspension aides, child-specific aides, teacher aides, head of school,

    principal, chief of staff, administrative assistant, administrative consultant, dean of students, director of student support, IS

    coordinator, marketing and recruiting manager, data manager, security guards, academic instructional coach, all other

    administrative employees, all other managerial employees, all other employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.

    Ballot for Voting Group Unit A

    UNITED STATES OF A MERICA

    National Labor Relations Board

    15-RC-175505

    OFFICI L SECRET B LLOT

    For certain employees of

    VOICES FOR INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND EDUCATION, INC. D/B/A INTERNATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

    OF NEW ORLEANS

    Do you wish to be included with nonprofessional employees in a unit

    for the purposes of collective bargaining?

    MARK AN X ' IN T. Q

    i

     i Yragg

    i

    aga

    — -

    D

    u s

    111

     

    0 T

    U

    EW

    D

     

    TEA C

    H E r

    c oeFn t f o o  p u • sN s

    s

    f c   I l e c t i v 7

    T

    AFT?

    b a

    L

    gF

    ainin

    M - K AN ' ;a

    r

    7 A

    E OF YOUR CHOICE

    01

    NO

    1

    DO NOT SIGN THIS BALLOT. Fold and drop in the ball ot box.

    If you spoil this ballot, return it to the Board Agent for a new one.

    The

    National Labor Relations Board does not endorse any choice in this election. Any markings that you may see on any sample ballot

    have not been put there by the National Labor Relations Board.

    I f a majority of the professional emplo yees voting in Unit A vote Yes to the f irst question, indicating their desire to be included in a unit w ith non-professional

    employ ees, they wil l b e so included, and their votes on the second question w il l be cou nted together with the votes of the non-professional emplo yees in Unit B

    to decide the question concerning representation for the overal l unit consist ing of the employ ees in Units A and B . If on the other hand, a majority of the

    professional employees voting in Unit A do not vote Yes to the f irst question, their bal lots wi l l be counted separately to decide the question concerning

    representation In a separate Unit A.

    WARNING: This is the only official notice of this election and must not be defaced by anyone. Any markings that you may see on any sample ballot or

    anywhere on this notice have been made by someone other than the National Labor Relations Board, and have not been put there by the National Labor

    Relations Board. The National Labor Relations Board is an agency of the United States Government, and does not endorse any choice in the election.

    Page 2 of 5

  • 8/15/2019 Decision and Direction of Election: IHSNO v. UTNO

    15/17

    FT

    UNITED STATES OF A MERICA

    National Labor Relations Board

    15 RC 175505

    OFFICIAL SECRET BALLOT

    F

    in

    -;. ;e

    ESS A

    OOL 0

    EDUC

    EW 0

    ATI

    SIOICES F

    m

    nimismazzazana

    e s

    f col lec

    LOC

    DO NOT SIGN THIS BALLOT Fo ld and

    drop in th e ba l lo t box .

    I f you sp o i l th i s ba l lo t re tu rn i t to the Board Ag ent fo r a new one.

    The National Labor Relations Board does not endorse any choice in this election. Any markings that you may see on any

    sample ballot have not been put there by the National Labor Relations Board.

    Fo rm NLRB 707

    4-2015)

    United States of Am erica

    National Labor R elations Board

    NOTICE OF ELECTION

    VOTING GROUP — UNIT B :

    Included in Voting Group B: Paraprofessionals, in-school suspension aides, child-specific aides, and teacher aides

    employed at the Employer s New Orleans campus; Excluded from Voting Group B: All professional employees, head of

    school, principal, chief of staff, administrative assistant, administrative consultant, dean of students, director of

    student support, IB coordinator, marketing and recruiting manager, data manager, security guards, academic

    instructional coach, all other administrative employees, all other managerial employees, all other employees, guards

    and supervisors as defined in the Act.

    Ballot for Voting Group - Unit B

    WARNING: This is the only official notice of this election and must not be defaced by anyone. Any markings that you may see on any sample ballot or

    nywhere

    on this notice have been made by someone other than the National Labor Relations Board, and have not been put there by the National Labor

    Relations Board. The National Labor Relations Board is an agency of the United States Government, and does not endorse any choice in the election.

    Page 3 of 5

  • 8/15/2019 Decision and Direction of Election: IHSNO v. UTNO

    16/17

    Form NLRB-707

    (4-2015)

    Re c4

    P

    United States of Amer ica

    National Labor Relat ions B oard

    NOTICE OF ELECTION

    DATE TIME AND PLACE OF ELECTION

    Friday, May 27, 2016

    8:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m .

    Teachers Lounge

    727 Carondelet Street,

    New Orleans, LA

    EMPLOYEES ARE FREE TO VOTE AT A NY TIME THE POLLS ARE OPEN

    WARNING: This is the only official notice of this election and must not be defaced by anyone. Any markings that you may see on any sample ballot or

    anywhere on this notice have been made by someone other than the National Labor Relations Board, and have not been put there by the National Lab

    Relations Board. The National Labor Relations Board is an agency of the United States Government, and does not endorse any choice in the election

    Page 4 of 5

  • 8/15/2019 Decision and Direction of Election: IHSNO v. UTNO

    17/17

    Form NLRB 707

    (4-2015)

    RE(4)?

    U n i t e d S t a t es o f A m e r i c a

    N a t io n a l L a b o r R e l at i o n s B o a r d

    N OTICE OF EL ECTION

    RIGHTS OF EMPLOYEES - FEDERAL LAW GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO:

    • F o r m , j o i n , o r a s s i s t a u n i o n

    • C h o o s e r e p r e s e n t a t iv e s t o b a r g a i n w i t h y o u r e m p l o y e r o n y o u r b e h a l f

    • A c t t o g e t h e r w i th o t h e r e m p l o y e e s f o r y o u r b e n e f it a n d p r o t e c t io n

    C h o o s e n o t t o e n g a g e i n a n y o f t h e s e p r o t e c t e d a c t iv i t ie s

    In a S t a t e w h e re s u c h a g r e em e n t s a r e p e r m i t t e d , t h e U n i o n a n d E m p l o y e r m a y e n t e r i n t o a l a w f u l u n i o n -

    s e c u r i ty a g r e e m e n t r e q u ir i n g e m p l o y e e s t o p a y p e r i o d i c d u e s a n d i n i ti a ti o n f e e s . N o n m e m b e r s w h o i n f o r m

    t h e U n i o n t h a t t h e y o b j e c t t o t h e u s e o f t h e i r p a ym e n t s f o r n o n r e p r e s e n t a ti o n a l p u r p o s e s m a y b e r e q u i r ed t o

    p a y o n l y t h e ir s h a r e o f t h e U n i o n s c o s t s o f r e p r e s e n t a t i o n a l a c t iv i t ie s ( s u c h a s c o l l e c t i ve b a r g a i n i n g , c o n t r a c t

    a d m i n i s t r a t i o n , a n d g r i e v a n c e a d j u s t m e n t ) .

    It is the responsibility of the National Labor Relations Board to protect employees in

    the exercise of these rights.

    T h e B o a r d w a n t s a l l e li g i b l e vo t e r s t o b e f u l l y i n f o r m e d a b o u t t h e i r r i g h t s u n d e r F e d e r a l l aw a n d w a n t s b o t h

    E m p l o y e r s a n d U n i o n s t o k n o w w h a t i s e x p e c t e d o f t h e m w h e n i t h o l d s a n e l e c t io n .

    I f a g e n t s o f e i t h e r U n i o n s o r E m p l o y e r s i n t e r f e r e w i t h y o u r r i g h t t o a f r e e , f a i r , a n d h o n e s t e l e c t i o n t h e e l e c t i o n c a n b e

    s e t a s i d e b y t h e B o a r d . W h e n a p p r o p r i a t e , t h e B o a r d p r o v i d e s o t h e r r e m e d i e s , s u c h a s r e i n s t a t e m e n t f o r e m p l o y e e s

    f i r ed f o r e x e r c i s i n g t h e i r r i g h t s , in c l u d i n g b a c k p a y f r o m t h e p a r t y r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e i r d i s c h a r g e .

    The following are examples of conduct that interfere with the rights of employees

    and may result in setting aside of the election:

    • T h r e a te n i n g l o s s o f j o b s o r b e n e f i t s b y a n E m p l o y e r o r a U n i o n

    P r o m i s i n g o r g r a n t i n g p r o m o t i o n s , p a y r a i s e s , o r o t h e r b e n e f i t s , t o i n f l u e n c e a n e m p l o y e e s v o t e b y a p a r t y

    c a p a b l e o f c a r r y i n g o u t s u c h p r o m i s e s

    A n E m p l o y e r f i r i n g e m p l o y e e s t o d i s c o u r a g e o r e n c o u r a g e u n i o n a c t i v it y o r a U n i o n c a u s i n g t h e m t o b e f ir e d

    t o e n c o u r a g e u n i o n a c t i v i t y

    M a k in g c a m p a i g n s p e e c h e s t o a s s e m b l e d g r o u p s o f e m p l o y e e s o n c o m p a n y t i m e , w h e r e a tt e n d a n c e i s

    m a n d a t o r y , w i t h in t h e

    24 hour p er iod before the po l ls for the e lect ion

    f i r s t

    open or t he m a i l b a l l o t s are

    d i s p a t c h e d i n a m a i l b a ll o t e l ec t i o n

    I n c i t e m e n t b y e i t h e r an E m p l o y e r o r a U n i o n o f r a c i al o r r e l ig i o u s p r e j u d i c e b y i n f l a m m a t o r y a p p e a l s

    T h r e a t en i n g p h y s i c a l f o r c e o r v i o l e n c e t o e m p l o y e e s b y a U n i o n o r a n E m p l o y e r t o i n f l u en c e t h e i r v o t e s

    The National Labor Relations Board protects your right to a free choice.

    I m p r o p e r c o n d u c t w i ll n o t b e p e r m i t t e d . A l l p a r t i e s ar e e x p e c t e d t o c o o p e r a t e f u l l y w i t h t h i s A g e n c y i n m a i n t a i n i n g

    b a s i c p r i n c i p l e s o f a f a i r e l e c t i o n a s r e q u i r e d b y l a w .

    Anyone with a question about the election may contact the NLRB Office at 504)589-6361 or visit the NLRB

    website www.nlrb.gov

    for assistance.

    WARNING: This is the only official notice of this election and must not be defaced by anyone. Any markings that you may see on any sample ballot or

    anywhere on this notice have been made by someone other than the National Labor Relations Board, and have not been put there by the National Labor

    Relations Board. The National Labor Relations Board is an agency of the United States Government, and does not endorse any choice in the election.