dekooning v. keno auction complaint.pdf

Upload: mark-h-jaffe

Post on 02-Jun-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 DeKooning v. Keno Auction complaint.pdf

    1/13

    JS 44C/SDNY

    REV.

    4/2014

    PLAINTIFFS f

    THE

    WILLEM DE KOONING

    FOUNDATrCW

    w

    CIVIL

    COVER

    ,85.0 3

    5fp2014

    The JS-44 civilcover

    sheet

    and the informationcontained hereifceifrTBBBplace nV4uppement the

    filing

    pleadings orother papers as required by

    law

    except as provideonSy local rules ofcourt. This

    form

    apprm

    Judicial

    Conference

    oftheUnited States in September 1974 isrequired

    or

    useoftheClerk ofCouRMr

    initiating theivil

    docket

    sheet. ^

    EFEN NTS

    KENOAUCTIONS,

    LLC

    an d LEIGH KENO

    ATTORNEYS (FIRM

    NAME,

    ADDRESS, ANDTELEPHONENUMBER

    Robert

    W. Clanda,

    88 5

    Third Avenue,20th Floor, New York, NY 10022

    ATTORNEYS (IF KNOWN)

    CAUSE OF ACTION (CITETHEU.S.

    CIVIL

    STATUTE UNDER WHICH YOU ARE FILING AND WRITEA BRIEFSTATEMENT OF CAUSER

    (DO NOTCITE JURISDICTIONAL STATUTESUNLESS DIVERSITY)

    Pursuant

    to 17 U.S.C. 101 - Plaintiff

    seeks

    damages

    Has this

    action, case, or proceeding, or

    one essentially

    the same been

    previously filed

    in

    SDNY

    atany time? NcEJ esIbudge

    Previously

    Assigned

    Ifyes, was this case Vol.

    Invol.

    Dismissed. No [~j Yes If yes,give date &Case No.

    No

    0 Yes

    STHIS AN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CASE?

    PLACE

    AN[x]INONEBOX

    ONLY

    TORTS

    CONTRACT

    PERSONALINJURY

    1)110

    INSURANCE [ ] 310 AIRPLANE

    [ ]120

    MARINE [ ] 316 AIRPLANEPRODUCT

    I

    ]130

    MILLER

    AC T

    LIABILITY

    []140

    NEGOTIABLE

    [ ] 320 ASSAULT, LIBEL&

    INSTRUMENT

    SLANDER

    [ ]150

    RECOVERY OF [ ] 330 FEDERAL

    OVERPAYMENT &

    EMPLOYERS

    ENFORCEMENT

    LIABILITY

    OF JUDGMENT

    [ ] 340 MARINE

    [ ] 1 51

    MEDICARE ACT [ ] 345 MARINEPRODUCT

    []152

    RECOVERY OF

    LIABILITY

    DEFAULTED

    [ ] 350 MOTORVEHICLE

    STUDENT LOANS [ ] 355 MOTORVEHICLE

    (EXCLVETERANS)

    PRODUCT LIABILITY

    [J153

    RECOVERY

    OF

    [ ] 360 OTHER PERSONAL

    OVERPAYMENT

    INJURY

    OF

    VETERAN S

    [ ] 362 PERSONAL INJURY-

    BENEFITS

    MED MALPRACTICE

    [ ]160

    STOCKHOLDERS

    SUITS

    []190 OTHER

    CONTRACT

    [ ]195

    CONTRACT

    PRODUCT ACTIONS

    UNDER

    STATUTES

    LIABILITY

    [ ] 196 FRANCHISE

    CIVIL RIGHTS

    [ J440 OTHER CIVILRIGHTS

    REAL PROPERTY

    (Non-Prisoner)

    [ ] 441 VOTING

    [

    1210

    LAND

    [ ] 442 EMPLOYMENT

    CONDEMNATION

    [ )

    443

    HOUSING/

    [ ]220 FORECLOSURE

    ACCOMMODATIONS

    [ ]230

    RENT LEASE &

    [ ] 445 AMERICANSWITH

    EJECTMENT

    DISABILITIES -

    [ ]240 TORTS TO LAND

    EMPLOYMENT

    [ ]245

    TORT PRODUCT

    [ ]

    446

    AMERICANS WITH

    LIABILITY

    DISABILITIES

    -OTHER

    [ ]290 ALL

    OTHER

    REAL

    PROPERTY

    [ ]

    448

    EDUCATION

    Checkifdemanded incomplaint

    CHECK

    IF

    THIS

    IS A

    CLASS ACTION

    UNDER F.R .C .P .

    23

    DEMAND $

    OTHER

    Check

    YES

    onlyifdemandedincomplaint

    JURY DEMAND: E YES LNO

    NATURE OF SUIT

    PERSONAL INJURY FORFEITURE PENALTY

    [ ] 367 HEALTHCARE/

    PHARMACEUTICAL

    PERSONAL

    , , 6 25 DRUG RELATED

    INJURY/PRODUCT

    LIABILITY SE|ZURE

    QF pRopERTY

    [ ] 365 PERSONAL INJURY 21 USC881

    PRODUCT

    LIABILITY

    [ 1 368

    ASBESTOS

    PERSONAL

    INJURY PRODUCT

    LIABILITY

    PERSONALPROPERTY

    [ ] 370 OTHER FRAUD

    [ 1371 TRUTH INLENDING

    [ ] 380 OTHER PERSONAL

    PROPERTY DAMAGE

    [ ] 385 PROPERTY DAMAGE

    PRODUCT

    LIABILITY

    PRISONER PETITIONS

    [ ] 463 ALIEN DETAINEE

    [ ] 510 MOTIONSTO

    VACATE SENTENCE

    28 US C 2255

    [ ] 530 HABEASCORPUS

    [ ] 535 DEATH PENALTY

    [ ] 5 40

    MANDAMUS

    &OTHER

    PRISONERCIVILRIGHTS

    [ ] 550 CIVILRIGHTS

    [ ] 555 PRISON CONDITION

    56 0

    CIVIL DETAINEE

    ) 69 0 OTHER

    L BOR

    [ ] 710 FAIRLABOR

    STANDARDS

    AC T

    [ ] 720 LABOR/MGMT

    RELATIONS

    [ ] 740 RAILWAYLABOR ACT

    [ ] 751 FAMILY MEDICAL

    LEAVEACT (FMLA)

    [ ] 790 OTHER LABOR

    LITIGATION

    [ ]791 EMPLRET INC

    SECURITY

    AC T

    IMMIGRATION

    [ ] 462 NATURALIZATION

    APPLICATION

    [ ]465 OTHER IMMIGRATION

    ACTIONS

    CONDITIONS

    OF

    CONFINEMENT

    A C T I ON S U N D ER S T A TU T E S

    BANKRUPTCY

    [ ] 422 APPEAL

    28

    USC 15 8

    [ ] 423 WITHDRAWAL

    28

    USC 1 57

    PROPERTY

    RIGHTS

    M 820 COPYRIGHTS

    [ ] 830 PATENT

    84 0 TRADEMARK

    SOCIAL

    SECURITY

    [ ]861 HIA(1395ff)

    [ ] 862 BLACKLUNG (923)

    [ ] 863 DlWC/DIWW(405(g))

    [ )864 SSID TITLEXVI

    [ ] 865 RSI (405(g) )

    FEDERAL

    T X

    SUITS

    [ ] 870 TAXES (U.S. Plaintiffor

    Defendant)

    [ ] 871 IRS-THIRD PARTY

    26 US C 7609

    OTHER

    STATUTES

    I 1

    37 5

    FALSE CLAIMS

    [ ]

    400

    STATE

    REAPPORTIONMENT

    [ ]410 ANTITRUST

    [ ]430 BANKS&

    BANKING

    [ ]

    450

    COMMERCE

    [ ]460 DEPORTATION

    [ ] 470 RACKETEER INFLU

    ENCED

    &

    CORRUPT

    ORGANIZATION ACT

    (RICO)

    [ ] 480 CONSUMER CREDIT

    [ ] 490 CABLE/SATELLITE TV

    [ ] 850 SECURITIES/

    COMMODITIES/

    EXCHANGE

    [ ] 890 OTHER STATUTORY

    ACTIONS

    [ ] 891 AGRICULTURALACTS

    [ ] 8 93 ENVIRONMENTAL

    MATTERS

    [ ]895 FREEDOM OF

    INFORMATION

    ACT

    [ ] 896

    ARBITRATION

    [ ) 899 ADMINISTRATIVE

    PROCEDURE

    ACT/REVIEW

    APPEAL OF

    AGENCY

    DECI

    [ ]

    950

    CONSTITUTIONALIT

    STATE STATUTES

    DO YOU CLAJM

    THIS CASE

    IS

    RELATED

    TO A CIVIL

    CASE NOW

    PENDING

    IN

    S.D.N.Y.?

    JUDGE DOCKET NUMBER

    NOTE: You must also submit at the time offilingthe

    Statement

    of Relatedness form (Form IH-

  • 8/10/2019 DeKooning v. Keno Auction complaint.pdf

    2/13

    PLACEAN

    x INONEBOXONLY ORIGIN

    [El 1 Original 2 Removed from Ll 3

    Remanded

    D 4

    Reinstated or

    Q 5

    Transferred

    from 6

    Multidistrict

    7 Appeal to District

    Proceeding State Court

    from

    Reopened (Specify

    District)

    Litigation Judge

    from

    ll ~ Apellate Magistrate

    Judge

    |_| a.

    parties represented

    Court

    Judgment

    |~~| b. At

    least

    one

    party is prose.

    PLACE

    AN

    x

    IN

    ONEBOX

    ONLY

    BASIS

    OF JURISDICTION

    IF

    DIVERSITY, INDICATE

    1 U.S. PLAINTIFF 2 U.S. DEFENDANT [x]3 FEDERAL

    QUESTION

    D4

    DIVERSITY CITIZENSHIP

    BELOW

    (U.S. NOT A PARTY)

    CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (FOR DIVERSITY CASES ONLY)

    (Place an [X] in

    one

    box for Plaintiffand one box for Defendant)

    PTF DEF

    PTFDEF

    PTF

    DEF

    CITIZEN OFTHISSTATE []1 []1

    CITIZEN

    ORSUBJECT OFA [ ]3 [ ]3 INCORPORATED and PRINCIPAL PLACE [ ]S [ 5

    FOREIGN COUNTRY OF

    BUSINESS

    IN ANOTHER STATE

    CITIZEN

    OFANOTHER STATE [ ]2 [ ] 2 INCORPORATED or

    PRINCIPAL

    PLACE [ ] 4 [ ] 4 FOREIGN NATION [ ]6 [ ]6

    OF

    BUSINESS IN THIS STATE

    PLAINTIFF(S) ADDRESS(ES) AND COUNTY(IES)

    790

    Madison

    Avenue, New

    York,

    New

    York

    10065

    DEFENDANT(S)

    ADDRESS(ES)

    AND COUNTY(IES)

    Keno Auctions

    -127

    East

    69th Stree t, New

    York,

    New

    York

    10021

    Leigh Keno -1365 York Ave., Apt. 21F, New York, New York 10021

    DEFENDANT(S)

    ADDRESS

    UNKNOWN

    REPRESENTATION

    IS

    HEREBY

    MADE THAT, AT

    THIS

    TIME, I HAVE

    BEEN

    UNABLE, WITH

    REASONABLE

    DILIGENCE, TO

    ASCERTAIN

    RESILIENCE

    ADDRESSES OF

    THE

    FOLLOWING

    DEFENDANTS:

    Check one: THIS

    ACTION SHOULD

    BE ASSIGNED

    TO:

    WHITE

    PLAINS [x] MANHATTAN

    (DO NOT check either box ifthis a PRISONER PETITION/PRISONER CIVILRIGHTS

    COMPLAINT.)

    DATE

    9/24/2014

    StSbLATLIRE

    OF,ATTORNEY*

    Hi

    YES

    (DATE ADMITTED Mo. V*- Yr I

    >

    RECEIPT Attorney Bar

    Code

    Magistrate Judge is

    to

    be designated

    by the

    Clerk of ttft^uM/ai

    hi Ah

    Magistrate

    Judge

    is

    so

    Designated.

    Ruby J. Krajick, Clerk of Court by Deputy Clerk, DATED .

    UNITED

    STATES

    DISTRICT COURT (NEW

    YORK

    SOUTHERN)

  • 8/10/2019 DeKooning v. Keno Auction complaint.pdf

    3/13

    Rei t l e r Kai las

    &

    Rosenb l a t t LLC

    Robert William Clarida

    885 Third

    Avenue

    20th

    Floor

    New

    York,

    NY

    10022

    Phone:(212)209-3044

    Fax: (212) 371-5500

    ^

    Email: rclarida(a),reitlerlaw.com

    Attorneyfor Plaintiff

    The

    Willem de Kooning Foundation

    UNITED

    STATES

    DISTRICT COURT

    SOUTHERN

    DISTRICT OF

    NEW

    YORK

    14

    CV

    8503

    x

    THE

    WILLEM DE KOONING FOUNDATION

    Plaintiff,

    -against-

    COM PL INT

    JURY TR I L

    DEM NDED

    ENO AUCTIONS, LLC and

    LEIGH KENO,

    ~;~ in

    Defendants.

    o

    o

    Co

    ~ r

    x

    . \

    _ on

    ~ o

    PlaintiffThe Willem de Kooning Foundation ( The

    Foundation ),

    by its^ J5

    attorneys,Reitler Kailas & Rosenblatt LLC, alleges as follows:

    N TURE OF CT ION

    1. The Foundation is an artist-endowed, private, 501(c)(3) tax-exempt

    operating foundation with a principal place

    of

    business in this judicial District.

    2. The Foundation's mission is to foster the study and appreciation of the

    life and work

    of

    the late artist Willem de Kooning through research, exhibitions and

    educational programs. Through The Foundation's initiatives, it strives to encourage new

  • 8/10/2019 DeKooning v. Keno Auction complaint.pdf

    4/13

    discussion and a deeper understanding

    of

    de Kooning, his contemporaries, and their

    historical moment among scholars and the general public.

    3. Plaintiff seeks damages for willful copyright infringement by the

    defendants, Keno Auctions, LLC ( Keno Auctions ) and its founder and principal Leigh

    Keno ( Mr. Keno )(Keno Auctions and Mr. Keno are referred to collectively hereafter as

    Defendants ), arising from Defendants' unauthorized use

    of

    numerous original Willem de

    Kooning artworks in violation

    of

    the United States Copyright Act, 17U.S.C. 101 et seq.

    (the Copyright Act ).

    4. Defendants, without any authority from the Plaintiff, prepared,

    reproduced, publicly displayed and publicly performed a promotional audiovisual work (the

    Video ) incorporating exact copies of dozens

    of

    Willem de Kooning's copyrighted

    artworks, including without limitation the work registered in the U.S. Copyright Office as

    registration number VAu 1-180-097 (the Registered Work ).

    5. Plaintiff is the owner

    of

    copyright in all

    of

    the

    Willem de Kooning

    artworks incorporated in the Video, including the Registered Work.

    6. Sixty-eight (68) additional Willem de Kooning artworks infringed by

    the Defendants Video are identified o n th e at tached Schedule A. These additional

    works

    are

    being submitted to the U.S. Copyright Office for registration, and Plaintiffwill seek to

    amend this Complaint to add allegations

    of

    infringement regarding these additional works

    when

    those registrations

    have been

    issued.

    7. Plaintiff seeks legal and equitable rel ief to remedy Defendants' willful

    infringement

    of

    the Plaintiffs copyrights. Plaintiffrequests an order: (1) declaring that

    Defendants' unauthorized preparation, duplication, public performance and public display

    of

  • 8/10/2019 DeKooning v. Keno Auction complaint.pdf

    5/13

    the Video willfully

    infringes plaintiffs copyrights in

    violation

    of

    the

    Copyright

    Act; (2)

    prohibiting Defendants from further

    infringement

    ofthe Plaintiffs

    copyrights;

    (3)

    requiring

    the impoundment

    and

    destruction

    of

    all copies

    of

    the Video

    in

    Defendants' custody

    or

    control; and (4) awarding actual damages and profits totheextent permitted under the

    Copyright Act.

    JU RI SD IC TIO N N D V E N U E

    8. ThisCourthas subject matterjurisdictionover this actionunderthe

    copyright

    laws

    of

    the

    United

    States,

    17

    U.S.C.

    101

    et

    seq.

    and

    28

    U.S.C.

    1331

    and

    1338.

    9. Upon information andbelief,thisCourthas personaljurisdictionover

    the Defendants because Mr. Keno and Keno Auctions have distributed and performed the

    Video in New York and this District, or have authorized others to do so, and are otherwise

    doing business in this State and in this jurisdiction.

    10. Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b), 28 U.S.C.

    1391(c) and 28 U.S.C. 1400(a).

    P RT IES

    11. PlaintiffThe Foundation is private, tax-exempt operating foundation

    havinga principalplace of businessat 790MadisonAvenue,New York, New York 10065.

    12. Upon information and belief, DefendantKeno Auctions is a limited

    liability company established under the laws ofNewYorkhavinga principalplaceof

    businessat 127East 69th Street,NewYork,New York

    10021.

  • 8/10/2019 DeKooning v. Keno Auction complaint.pdf

    6/13

    13. Uponinformation andbelief,Defendant LeighKenois an individual

    residing or doing business in this judicial District.

    14. Upon information andbelief,Defendant LeighKeno is the founder of

    Defendant Keno Auctions.

    T H E R E G IS TE R ED W O R K

    15. Plaintiff is the copyright owner

    of

    the Registered Work, having

    acquired the copyright from TheWillemde KooningRevocableTrust bywritten agreement

    on Apri l 26, 2002.

    16. The Registered Work is an original work of authorship.

    17. The Registered Work has been fixed in a tangible medium of

    expression.

    18. The Registered Work contains substantial amounts

    of

    material created

    by the artist's own artistic judgment and creativity.

    19. TheRegistered Work is copyrightable subject matter under the laws of

    t h e Un it ed States.

    20. The Registered Work has never been published with the consent

    of

    Willem de Kooning or The Foundation.

    INFR INGEMENT

    21. Upon information and belief, Defendants had a reasonable opportunity

    to view the Registered Work prior to the making

    of

    the Video.

    22. Upon information and belief, Defendants obtained a photograph of the

    RegisteredWork from a third party who was employed by Willem de Kooning during his

    lifetime.

    4

  • 8/10/2019 DeKooning v. Keno Auction complaint.pdf

    7/13

    23. The photograph of the Registered Work that is incorporated into the

    Video is substantially similar to the Registered Work.

    24. Beginning on or about August 29, 2014, the Video was publicly

    displayed and performed on the Keno Auctions website, www.kenoauctions.com, to promote

    Keno Auctions and the sale by consignment

    of

    a painting other than the Registered Work.

    25. Promptly after becoming aware

    of

    Defendants's unauthorized use

    of

    the Registered Work in the Video, The Foundation contacted Defendants and advised

    Defendants that the use of any Willem de Kooning artwork in the Video was unauthorized.

    26. Plaintiffhas suffered, and continues to suffer, from the infringing

    activities

    of

    Defendants, including without limitation from the Defendants' failure to pay a

    license fee commensurate

    with

    the value

    of

    their commercial, promotional

    use of

    the

    Registered Work and from Defendants' usurping

    of

    Plaintiff s right to control the first

    publication and the commercial use of the Registered Work.

    DEFEND NT

    LE IGH

    K EN O

    27.

    The Keno

    Auctions website, www.kenoauctions.com, states that

    Leigh

    Keno is intimately involved in

    each

    consignment.

    28.

    The

    Keno

    Auctions website, www.kenoauctions.com, identifies only

    three employees

    of

    Keno Auctions, one

    of

    whom is the founder, Leigh Keno, and another

    of

    whom is

    an

    administrative

    assistant.

    29. Accordingly, upon information

    and

    belief, Mr. Keno at all relevant

    times had actual or constructive knowledge

    of

    the infringing activities complained of herein.

    30.

    Upon

    information and belief, Mr.

    Keno

    at all relevant times

    participated materially in the infringing activities complained

    of

    herein.

    5

  • 8/10/2019 DeKooning v. Keno Auction complaint.pdf

    8/13

    31. Upon

    information

    and belief, Mr. Keno

    at

    all

    relevant

    times had the

    right to control the infringing activities complained ofherein.

    32.

    Upon information and belief,

    Mr. Keno

    at all relevant times had the

    ability

    to

    control

    the

    infringing activities complained

    of

    herein.

    33. Upon

    information

    and

    belief, Mr.

    Keno at all

    relevant

    times

    realized

    or

    stood to realizea direct financial benefit from the infringingactivities complainedof herein.

    34.

    Accordingly, Mr. Keno is a

    contributory

    and/or

    vicarious

    infringer of

    Plaintiffs

    copyright

    inthe

    Registered Work

    andisjointly

    and severally liable

    for

    any

    damages that may be awarded in this action.

    C OUN T

    I

    COPYRIGHT

    INFRINGEMENT

    35. Plaintiffrepeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1

    through 34 as if set forth fully herein.

    36. Defendants' unauthorized copying ofPlaintiffs Registered Work into

    the

    Video,

    and subsequent reproduction, public display andpublic performance of theVideo,

    are

    infringements

    ofPlaintiffs

    copyright

    in violation ofthe

    Copyright Act,

    17

    U.S.C.

    106.

    37. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing acts

    of

    the

    Defendants, the Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount to be proved at trial.

    WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffrequests the following relief:

    A. Actual damages and profits under 17U.S.C. 504 in an amount to be

    proved at trial;

  • 8/10/2019 DeKooning v. Keno Auction complaint.pdf

    9/13

    B. A permanent injunction requiring the Defendants to cease and desist

    from reproducing, distributing, performing and displaying the Video without authorization

    from the

    Plaintiff;

    C. An order requiring the impoundment

    and

    destruction

    of

    all copies

    of

    the Video in

    Defendants

    custody or control;

    D. Such other

    and

    further

    relief

    as this Court deems

    just

    and

    proper.

    Dated:

    New York,

    New York

    September^/, 2014

    By:_

    REITLER

    KAILAS

    &

    ROSENBLATT,

    LLC

    Attorneys for

    Plaintiff

    Robe r t

    W .

    Clar ida

    885 Third

    Avenue,

    20th Floor

    New

    York,

    NY

    10022

    Tel. (212) 209-3044

  • 8/10/2019 DeKooning v. Keno Auction complaint.pdf

    10/13

    SCHEDULE A

  • 8/10/2019 DeKooning v. Keno Auction complaint.pdf

    11/13

    WdK photo

    Title

    Date

    created

    (00220)

    Gansevoort Street

    1949

    (00238)

    sheville

    1949

    (00262)

    Excavation

    1950

    (00516)

    Women

    III

    1952-53

    (00703)

    Nude

    1964

    (00713)

    Sphinx

    1964

    (00888)

    Pink

    Woman Torso

    1967

    (01108)

    Th e Dancer

    1972

    (01412)

    Untitled VIII

    1977

    (01417)

    Untitled XIII

    1977

    (01432)

    Untitled XXVIi

    1977

    (01515)

    Man on the

    Dunes

    1971

    (01543)

    Pirate Untitled II

    1981

    (01544)

    Untitled

    III

    inprocess]

    1981

    (01550)

    Untitled IX

    1981

    (01830)

    UntitledXI[inprocess]

    1983

    (01849)

    Untitled XXI

    1983

    (01880)

    no Htle

    1983

    (02078)

    Untitled

    1988

    (02095)

    finprocess]

    1989

    (02108)

    1989

    (03584)

    71972

    (03600)

    c. 1970-1977

    (03609)

    c.

    1971

    (03615)

    1970-1977?

    (03653)

    1971?

    (03666)

    c. 1970-1971

    (03669)

    1970-1972?

    (03687)

  • 8/10/2019 DeKooning v. Keno Auction complaint.pdf

    12/13

    (03737)

    c. 1975-1979

    (03739)

    1975 1978?

    (03740)

    c.

    1966

    (03827)

    1982?

    (03842)

    Untitled mWomen

    1966-1968?

    (04161)

    c.

    1968

    (04175)

    1950

    (04597)

    1971?

    (04612)

    1971?

    (04613)

    1972?

    (04614)

    1972?

    (04615)

    n o

    title>

    1972?

    (04616)

    1972?

    (04617)

    1972?

    (04619)

    1972?

    (04620)

    1972?

    (04621)

    1972?

    (04622)

    1972?

    (04635)

    1972?

    (04829)

    71968

    (05545)

    1971

    (05774)

    71978

    (05884)

    1989

    (05965)

    71978

    (05966)

    71978

    (05967)

    71978

    (05970)

    1972?

    (05971)

    1972?

    (05972)

    1972?

    (05973)

    1972?

    (05974)

    1972?

    (05975)

    1972?

    (05976)

    1972?

    (05977)

    1972?

  • 8/10/2019 DeKooning v. Keno Auction complaint.pdf

    13/13

    05978