densitate larve 20.04
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
1/65
larve dinrte scoarta si lemn
Piata Caracteristica Repetitia molid pin larice
R1 1 0 71R2 0 54 0R3 0 0 0
Total 1 54 71media 0.33 27.00 23.67R1 0 0 17R2 1 1 6R3 0 0 2Total 1 1 25media 0.33 0.33 8.33R1 0.31 0.37 0.35R2 0.36 0.34 0.36
R3 0.49 0.47 0.37Total 1.16 1.17 1.08media 0.39 0.39 0.36
R1 0 0 49.22R2 2.76 2.95 16.47R3 0.00 0.00 5.46Total 2.76 2.95 71.15media 0.92 0.98 23.72R1 3.22 0 205.56R2 0.00 159.53 0.00R3 0.00 0 0Total 3.22 159.53 205.56
media 1.07 53.18 68.52R1 0 0 0R2 13 0 28R3 0 0 0
Total 13 0 28media 4.33 0.00 9.33R1 17 0 2R2 11 3 3R3 3 0 2Total 31 3 7
media 10.33 1.00 2.33R1 0.54 0.27 0.37R2 0.23 0.41 0.39R3 0.30 0.21 0.30Total 1.07 0.89 1.06media 0.36 0.30 0.35
R1 31.33 0 5.40R2 47.47 7.24 7.66R3 10.10 0.00 6.68
Total 88.90 7.24 19.73media 29.63 2.41 6.58R1 0.00 0 0.00R2 56.10 0.00 71.45R3 0.00 0 0Total 56.10 0.00 71.45
P1
Nr intrari
Nr larve
supraf. sc
dens.larve
dens.intrari
Nr intrari
Nr larve
supraf. sc
dens.larve
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
2/65
media 18.70 0.00 23.82
PIATA 1
DENS CA LARVE
Repetitia molid pin larice RepetitiaR1 0 0 49.22 R1R2 2.76 2.95428 16.47 R2R3 0.00 0.00 5.46 R3
med 0.92 0.98 23.72 medsd 1.59609 1.705654 22.8 sd
Z max 1.154701 1.154701 1.120415 Z maxz min 0.57735 0.57735 0.802082 z minZteor=1.41 Zteor=1.41
H 203.3401 H
Hteor=87.5 Hteor=87.5
Repetitia molid pin larice RepetitiaR1 0 0 1.700862 R1R2 0.575708 0.597067 1.242359 R2R3 0 0 0.810409 R3
med 0.19 0.20 1.25 medsd 0.332385 0.344717 0.4 sd
Z max 1.154701 1.154701 1.00979 Z maxz min 0.57735 0.57735 0.989913 z minZteor=1.41 Zteor=1.41
H 1.794762 H
Hteor=87.5 Hteor=87.5
SPECIA SPECIAR1 R2 R3
MO 0 0.575708 0 MOPI 0 0.597067 0 PILA 1.700862 1.242359 0.810409 LA
Repetitia Specia RepetitiaMO PI LA
R1 0 0 1.700862 R1R2 0.575708 0.597067 1.242359 R2R3 0 0 0.810409 R3
dens.intrari
Repetitia
P2
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
3/65
Piaa Factorul DF
P2
ului ca nr.l 2
P1
ului ca nr.l 2
lui ca nr.i 1
lui ca nr.i 2
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
4/65
pin
0
0.000
0.000
#DIV/0!#DIV/0!
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
5/65
PIATA 2DENS INTRARI DENS CA LARVE
molid pin larice Repetitia molid pin larice3.22 0 205.56 R1 31.33 0 5.400.00 159.53 0.00 R2 47.47 7.24 7.660.00 0 0 R3 10.10 0.00 6.681.07 53.18 68.52 med 29.63 2.41 6.58
1.857268 92.10532 118.7 sd 18.74233 4.178853 1.11.154701 1.154701 1.154701 Z max 0.951618 1.154701 0.9529550.57735 0.57735 0.57735 z min 1.042216 0.57735 1.041196
Zteor=1.41
4083.21 H 274.0408
Hteor=87.5
molid pin larice Repetitia molid pin larice0.624991 0 2.315044 R1 1.50962 0 0.8060320 2.205559 0 R2 1.685461 0.915821 0.9372950 0 0 R3 1.045304 0 0.885166
0.21 0.74 0.77 med 1.41 0.31 0.880.360839 1.27338 1.3 sd 0.330734 0.528749 0.11.154701 1.154701 1.154701 Z max 0.82241 1.154701 0.9249220.57735 0.57735 0.57735 z min 1.113153 0.57735 1.061118
Zteor=1.41
13.72051 H 64.00137
Hteor=87.5
SPECIA DENS LARVE
molid 1.50962R1 R2 R3 pin 00.624991 0 2.315044 larice 0.806032
0 2.205559 0 molid 1.6854610 0 0 pin 0.915821
larice 0.937295
molid 1.045304Specia pin 0
MO PI LA larice 0.8851660.624991 0 0
0 2.205559 02.315044 0 0
Repetitia
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
6/65
F P
7,027
0,253 0,785
7,820
0,027
0,029 0,874
0,021
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
7/65
larve din le
Piata Caracteristica Repetitia
R1R2R3
TotalmediaR1R2R3TotalmediaR1R2
R3Totalmedia
R1R2R3TotalmediaR1R2R3Total
mediaR1R2R3
TotalmediaR1R2R3Total
mediaR1R2R3Totalmedia
R1R2R3
TotalmediaR1R2R3Total
Nr intrari
Nr larve
supraf. sc
dens.larve
P1
Nr intrari
Nr larve
supraf. sc
dens.larve
dens.intrari
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
8/65
media
DENS INTRARI DENS CA LARVE
Repetitia molid larice Repetitia molidR1 0.00 0.00 R1 3.22R2 56.10 71.45 R2 0.00R3 0.00 0 R3 0.00
med 18.70 23.82 med 1.07
sd 32.38894 41.3 sd 1.857268Z max 1.154701 1.154701 Z max 1.154701z min 0.57735 0.57735 z min 0.57735Zteor=1.41 Zteor=1.41
H 1.622232 H 1347.604
Hteor=39.0 Hteor=39.0
Repetitia molidSPECIA R1 0.624991R1 R2 R3 R2 0
MO 0.00 56.10 0.00 R3 0LA 0.00 71.45 0 med 0.21
sd 0.360839Z max 1.154701z min 0.57735
Repetitia Specia Zteor=1.41
MO LA H 10.09406R1 0.00 0.00 Hteor=39.0R2 56.10 71.45R3 0.00 0
SPECIA DENS LARmolid 0.624991larice 2.136955molid 0larice 1.788167
molid 0larice 0
P2 dens.intrari
Repetitia
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
9/65
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
10/65
n
molid pin larice
1 0 710 54 00 0 0
1 54 710.33 27.00 23.67
1 0 470 0 220 0 01 0 69
0.33 0.00 23.000.31 0.37 0.350.36 0.34 0.36
0.49 0.47 0.371.16 1.17 1.080.39 0.39 0.36
3.22 0 136.070.00 0 60.400.00 0.00 0.003.22 0.00 196.471.07 0.00 65.493.22 0 205.560.00 159.53 0.000.00 0 03.22 159.53 205.56
1.07 53.18 68.520 0 0
13 0 280 0 0
13 0 284.33 0.00 9.33
0 0 03 0 100 0 03 0 10
1.00 0.00 3.330.54 0.27 0.370.23 0.41 0.390.30 0.21 0.301.07 0.89 1.060.36 0.30 0.35
0.00 0 0.0012.95 0.00 25.520.00 0.00 0.00
12.95 0.00 25.524.32 0.00 8.510.00 0 0.00
56.10 0.00 71.450.00 0 0
56.10 0.00 71.45
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
11/65
18.70 0.00 23.8200 PIATA 1 (LARVE LEMN)
0.00DENS INTRARI
DENS CA
larice Repetitia molid pin larice136.07 R1 3.22 0 205.56 Repetitia60.40 R2 0.00 159.53 0.00 R10.00 R3 0.00 0 0 R2
65.49 med 1.07 53.18 68.52 R368.2 sd 1.857268 92.10532 118.7 med
1.035246 Z max 1.154701 1.154701 1.154701 sd0.960567 z min 0.57735 0.57735 0.57735 Z max
Zteor=1.41 z min
H 4083.21 Zteor=1.41
Hteor=87.5 H
Hteor=39.0
larice Repetitia molid pin larice2.136955 R1 0.624991 0 2.3150441.788167 R2 0 2.205559 0 SPECIA
0 R3 0 0 01.31 med 0.21 0.74 0.77 MO1.1 sd 0.360839 1.27338 1.3 LA
0.722751 Z max 1.154701 1.154701 1.1547011.141262 z min 0.57735 0.57735 0.57735
Zteor=1.41
H 13.72051 Repetitia
Hteor=87.5R1R2
R3VE SPECIA
R1 R2 R3MO 0.624991 0 0PI 0 2.205559 0LA 2.315044 0 0
Repetitia SpeciaMO PI LA
R1 0.624991 0 0R2 0 2.205559 0
R3 2.315044 0 0
Repetitia
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
12/65
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
13/65
0
0.000 0
0.000.00
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
14/65
PIATA2
ARVE DENS INTRARI
molid larice Repetitia molid larice
0.00 0.00 R1 0.00 0.0012.95 25.52 R2 56.10 71.450.00 0.00 R3 0.00 04.32 8.51 med 18.70 23.82
7.47437 14.7 sd 32.38894 41.31.154701 1.154701 Z max 1.154701 1.1547010.57735 0.57735 z min 0.57735 0.57735
Zteor=1.413.885447 H 1.622232
Hteor=39.0
SPECIAR1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
0.00 12.95 0.00 MO 0.00 56.10 0.000.00 25.52 0.00 LA 0.00 71.45 0
Specia Repetitia SpeciaMO LA MO LA
0.00 0.00 R1 0.00 0.0012.95 25.52 R2 56.10 71.45
0.00 0.00 R3 0.00 0
Repetitia Repetitia
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
15/65
XLSTAT 7.5.2 - Normality Tests - 6/9/2011 at 3:32:00 PMp1 dens lar Data: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $E$72:$G$74 / 3 row
Significance level: 0.05
Results for the sample molid :
Shapiro-Wilk Test:
W (observ 0.750One-tailed < 0.0001Alpha 0.05
Conclusion:At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the decision is to reject the null hypothesis that theIn other words, the non-normality is significant.
Results for the sample pin :
Shapiro-Wilk Test:
W (observ 0.750One-tailed < 0.0001Alpha 0.05
Conclusion:At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the decision is to reject the null hypothesis that theIn other words, the non-normality is significant.
Results for the sample larice:
Shapiro-Wilk Test:
W (observ 1.000One-tailed 0.967Alpha 0.05
Conclusion:At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis that tIn other words, the non-normality is not significant.
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
16/65
SOARTA SI LEMN XLSTAT 7.5.2 - Normand 3 columns P2 DENS INTRARI Data: workbook = den
Significance level: 0.05
Results for the sample
Shapiro-Wilk Test:
W (observ 0.750One-tailed < 0.0001Alpha 0.05
Conclusion:ample follows a normal distribution. At the level of significa
In other words, the no
Results for the sample
Shapiro-Wilk Test:
W (observ 0.750One-tailed < 0.0001Alpha 0.05
Conclusion:ample follows a normal distribution. At the level of significa
In other words, the no
Results for the sample
Shapiro-Wilk Test:
W (observ 0.750One-tailed < 0.0001Alpha 0.05
Conclusion:he sample follows a normal distribution. At the level of significa
In other words, the no
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
17/65
lity Tests - 6/9/2011 at 3:48:39 PMitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $J$60:$L$62 / 3 rows and 3 columns
molid :
ce Alpha=0.050 the decision is to reject the null hypothesis that the sample follows a normal distributio-normality is significant.
pin :
ce Alpha=0.050 the decision is to reject the null hypothesis that the sample follows a normal distributio-normality is significant.
larice:
ce Alpha=0.050 the decision is to reject the null hypothesis that the sample follows a normal distributio-normality is significant.
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
18/65
.
.
.
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
19/65
XLSTAT 7.5.2 - K Paired Samples Comparison (Friedman...) - 6/9/2011 at 1:20:19 AMData: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $J$101:$L$103 / 3 roNo missing valuesSignificance level: 0.05Multiple comparisons tests: don't use the Bonferroni correction to the overall significant level
Friedman's test:
Note: The calculation of the Friedman's Q takes ties into account
In case of small samples (
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
20/65
R1 R2 R3
R1R2 NSR3 NS NS
Note: NS = nonsignificant difference, = significant difference.
XLSTAT 7.5.2 - K Paired Samples Comparison (Friedman...) - 6/9/2011 at 3:37:42 PMData: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $E$96:$G$98 / 3 rowNo missing valuesSignificance level: 0.05Multiple comparisons tests: don't use the Bonferroni correction to the overall significant level
Friedman's test:
Note: The calculation of the Friedman's Q takes ties into account
In case of small samples (
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
21/65
Matrix of pairwise comparisons (difference):
R1 R2 R3R1R2 2.000
R3 2.000 4.000 0.000Critical value for the difference 4.801
Matrix of pairwise comparisons (conclusion):
R1 R2 R3 medR1 sdR2 NS R3 NS NS
Note: NS = nonsignificant difference, = significant differDensitatea atacului ca nr. larve /media(SD)
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
50.00
Densitate
aatacului(larve/mpscoarta)
(mediaSD)
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
22/65
SCOARTA SI LEMN XLSTAT 7.5.2 - K Paired Sampless and 3 columns P1 DENS INTRARI Data: workbook = densitate larve
No missing valuesSignificance level: 0.05
l Multiple comparisons tests: don't
Friedman's test:
Note: The calculation of the Fried
In case of small samples (
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
23/65
MO PI
MOPI NSLA NS NS
Note: NS = nonsignificant differen
P1 DESN LARVEXLSTAT 7.5.2 - K Paired Samples
and 3 columns Data: workbook = densitate larveNo missing valuesSignificance level: 0.05
l Multiple comparisons tests: don't
Friedman's test:
Note: The calculation of the Fried
In case of small samples (
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
24/65
Matrix of pairwise comparisons (di
MO PIMOPI 1.000
LA 5.000 4.000Critical value for the difference
Matrix of pairwise comparisons (cMolid Pin Larice
0.92 0.98 23.72 MO PI1.59609 1.705654 22.8 MO
PI NSLA NS
p scoarta Note: NS = nonsignificant differen
Molid Pin Larice
Specia
a
abb
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
25/65
Comparison (Friedman...) - 6/9/2011 at 1:21:42 AM0.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $J$108:$L$110 / 3 rows and 3 columns
se the Bonferroni correction to the overall significant level
an's Q takes ties into account
u can consult a table published instatistics for the behavioural sciences. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Tokyo, 312 p.d with the Friedman's Q is given pp. 280-281
a Chi-square
.050 the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis of absence of difference between the 3 samples.een the samples is not significant.
4.801
fference):
LA
0.000
4.801
nclusion):
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
26/65
LA
e, = significant difference.
Comparison (Friedman...) - 6/9/2011 at 3:39:03 PM0.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $E$102:$G$104 / 3 rows and 3 columns
se the Bonferroni correction to the overall significant level
an's Q takes ties into account
u can consult a table published instatistics for the behavioural sciences. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Tokyo, 312 p.d with the Friedman's Q is given pp. 280-281
a Chi-square
.050 the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis of absence of difference between the 3 samples.een the samples is not significant.
4.801
BB
ups
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
27/65
fference):
LA
0.0004.801
nclusion):
LA
e, = significant difference.
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
28/65
XLSTAT 7.5.2 - Normality Tests - 6/9/2011 at 3:50:42 PMP2 Data: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $O$72:$Q$74 / 3 rowDENS LARSignificance level: 0.05
Results for the sample molid :
Shapiro-Wilk Test:
W (observ 0.937One-tailed 0.514Alpha 0.05
Conclusion:At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis that tIn other words, the non-normality is not significant.
Results for the sample pin :
Shapiro-Wilk Test:
W (observ 0.750One-tailed < 0.0001Alpha 0.05
Conclusion:At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the decision is to reject the null hypothesis that theIn other words, the non-normality is significant.
Results for the sample larice:
Shapiro-Wilk Test:
W (observ 0.986One-tailed 0.774Alpha 0.05
Conclusion:At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis that tIn other words, the non-normality is not significant.
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
29/65
XLSTAT 7.5.2 - Normality Tests - 6/9/2011 ats and 3 columns P2 DENS INTRARI Data: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / s
Significance level: 0.05
Results for the sample molid :
Shapiro-Wilk Test:
W (observ 0.750One-tailed < 0.0001Alpha 0.05
Conclusion:he sample follows a normal distribution. At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the d
In other words, the non-normality is significant
Results for the sample larice:
Shapiro-Wilk Test:
W (observ 0.750One-tailed < 0.0001Alpha 0.05
Conclusion:ample follows a normal distribution. At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the d
In other words, the non-normality is significant
he sample follows a normal distribution.
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
30/65
3:51:07 PMheet = Sheet1 / range = $T$60:$U$62 / 3 rows and 2 columns
cision is to reject the null hypothesis that the sample follows a normal distribution..
cision is to reject the null hypothesis that the sample follows a normal distribution..
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
31/65
XLSTAT 7.5.2 - ANOVA - 6/9/2011 at 1:28:38 AMP2 Dependent variable(s): workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $O$DENS LARUniform weighting (default)
Qualitative variables: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $N$8No missing valuesConstraints: a1 = 0
Type I SS, III SSPerform multiple comparison testsConfidence interval (%): 95.00
Modeling variable DENS LARVE :
Summary for the dependent variable:
Variable al no. of val of values u f values ig m of weig Mean dard deviation
DENS LAR 9 9 0 9 0.865 0.573
Summary for the qualitative variables:
Variable er of cate Categories requenciesSPECIA 3 in ~ larice 3 ~ 3 ~ 3
Goodness of fit coefficients:
R (coeffici 0.837R (coeffici 0.701Radj. (adj 0.601
SSR 0.787
Evaluating the information brought by the variables (H0 = Y=Moy(Y)):
Source DF m of squar ean squar Fisher's F Pr > FModel 2 1.843 0.921 7.027 0.027Residuals 6 0.787 0.131
Total 8 2.629
Model analysis (Type I SS):
Source DF m of squar ean squar Fisher's F Pr > FSPECIA 2 1.843 0.921 7.027 0.027
Model analysis (Type III SS):
Source DF m of squar ean squar Fisher's F Pr > FSPECIA 2 1.843 0.921 7.027 0.027
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
32/65
Model parameters:
Parameter Value dard deviaStudent's t Pr > t er bound 9 er bound 95 %
Intercept 1.413 0.209 6.761 0.001 0.902 1.925
SPECIA-m 0.000 - - - - -SPECIA-pi -1.108 0.296 -3.748 0.010 -1.832 -0.385SPECIA-la -0.537 0.296 -1.817 0.119 -1.261 0.186
Multiple comparison tests for the variable SPECIA:
Tukey (HSD) / Analysis of the differences between groups with a confidence range of 95.00
Categories Difference rdized diff ritical valu Pr. > Diff Significantmolid ~ pi 1.108 3.748 3.068 0.022 Yesmolid ~ lar 0.537 1.817 3.068 0.242 No
larice ~ pin 0.571 1.931 3.068 0.210 NoTukey's d critical value: 4.339 med
sd
Sorting and grouping categories:
Categories Mean
molid 1.413 Alarice 0.876 A Bpin 0.305 B
Groupings
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
Densitateaatacului(lar
ve/mp)
(mediaSD)
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
33/65
XLSTAT 7.5.2 - K Pair84:$O$92 / 9 rows and 1 column P2 DENS INTRARI Data: workbook = den
No missing values:$N$92 / 9 rows and 1 column FRIEDMAN Significance level: 0.05
Multiple comparisons t
Friedman's test:
Note: The calculation
In case of small samplSiegel (S.), 1956. NonThe table of the p-valu
Q (observe 4.000
Q (critical v 5.991
DF 2
One-tailed 0.135Alpha 0.05
The Friedman's Q is di
Conclusion:
At the level of significaIn other words, the diff
Multiple comparisons t
Critical value for the dif
Table of groups:
Sum of rankR3 3R1 3
R2 6
Matrix of pairwise com
R1R1
R2 3.000
R3 0.000
Critical value for the di
Matrix of pairwise com
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
34/65
R1
R1R2 NS
R3 NS
Note: NS = nonsignific
%:
Molid Pin Larice29.63 2.41 6.58
18.74233 4.178853 1.1
Molid Pin LariceSpecia
a
abb
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
35/65
d Samples Comparison (Friedman...) - 6/9/2011 at 3:57:49 PMitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $T$74:$V$75 / 2 rows and 3 columns
ests: don't use the Bonferroni correction to the overall significant level
f the Friedman's Q takes ties into account
s (
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
36/65
R2 R3
NS
nt difference, = significant difference.
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
37/65
XLSTAT 7.5.2 - K Paired Samples Comparison (Friedman...) - 6/9/2011 at 3:59:Data: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $T$81:$UNo missing valuesSignificance level: 0.05Multiple comparisons tests: don't use the Bonferroni correction to the overall sig
Friedman's test:
Note: The calculation of the Friedman's Q takes ties into account
Q (observe 1.000Q (critical 3.841DF 1One-tailed 0.317
Alpha 0.05
The Friedman's Q is distributed as a Chi-square
Conclusion:At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the decision is to not reject the null hypo
In other words, the difference between the samples is not significant.
samples. Multiple comparisons tests:
Critical value for the difference: 3.395
Table of groups:
Sum of rank GroupsMO 4 ALA 5 A
Matrix of pairwise comparisons (difference):
MO LA
MOLA 1.000 0.000
Critical value for the difference 3.395
Matrix of pairwise comparisons (conclusion):
MO LA
MOLA NS
Note: NS = nonsignificant difference, = significant difference.
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
38/65
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
39/65
2 PM$83 / 3 rows and 2 columns
ificant level
thesis of absence of difference between the 2 samples.
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
40/65
XLSTAT 7.5.2 - Normality Tests - 6/9/2011 at 4:02:59 PMP1 DENS Data: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $AA$72:$AB$74 / 3 rLARVE Significance level: 0.05
Results for the sample molid :
Shapiro-Wilk Test:
W (observ 0.750One-tailed < 0.0001Alpha 0.05
Conclusion:At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the decision is to reject the null hypothesis that theIn other words, the non-normality is significant.
Results for the sample larice:
Shapiro-Wilk Test:
W (observ 0.869One-tailed 0.292Alpha 0.05
Conclusion:At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis that tIn other words, the non-normality is not significant.
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
41/65
LARVE IN LEMN XLSTAT 7.5.2 - Normality Tests -ws and 2 columns P1 Data: workbook = densitate larve
DENS INTRARI Significance level: 0.05
Results for the sample molid :
Shapiro-Wilk Test:
W (observ 0.750One-tailed < 0.0001Alpha 0.05
Conclusion:ample follows a normal distribution. At the level of significance Alpha=
In other words, the non-normality i
Results for the sample pin :
Shapiro-Wilk Test:
W (observ 0.750One-tailed < 0.0001Alpha 0.05
Conclusion:he sample follows a normal distribution. At the level of significance Alpha=
In other words, the non-normality i
Results for the sample larice:
Shapiro-Wilk Test:
W (observ 0.750One-tailed < 0.0001Alpha 0.05
Conclusion:At the level of significance Alpha=In other words, the non-normality i
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
42/65
6/9/2011 at 4:04:17 PM0.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $AE$72:$AG$74 / 3 rows and 3 columns
.050 the decision is to reject the null hypothesis that the sample follows a normal distribution.s significant.
.050 the decision is to reject the null hypothesis that the sample follows a normal distribution.s significant.
.050 the decision is to reject the null hypothesis that the sample follows a normal distribution.s significant.
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
43/65
XLSTAT 7.5.2 - ANOVA - 6/9/2011 at 1:34:36 AMP1 Dependent variable(s): workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $AADENS L Uniform weighting (default)
Qualitative variables: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $Z$86No missing valuesConstraints: a1 = 0
Type I SS, III SSPerform multiple comparison testsConfidence interval (%): 95.00
Modeling variable DENS LARVE :
Summary for the dependent variable:
Variable al no. of val of values u f values ig m of weig Mean dard deviationDENS LAR 6 6 0 6 0.758 0.970
Summary for the qualitative variables:
Variable er of cate Categories requenciesSPECIA 2 lid ~ larice 3 ~ 3
Goodness of fit coefficients:
R (coeffici 0.621
R (coeffici 0.386Radj. (adj 0.232
SSR 2.889
Evaluating the information brought by the variables (H0 = Y=Moy(Y)):
Source DF m of squar ean squar Fisher's F Pr > FModel 1 1.815 1.815 2.513 0.188Residuals 4 2.889 0.722Total 5 4.704
Model analysis (Type I SS):
Source DF m of squar ean squar Fisher's F Pr > FSPECIA 1 1.815 1.815 2.513 0.188
Model analysis (Type III SS):
Source DF m of squar ean squar Fisher's F Pr > FSPECIA 1 1.815 1.815 2.513 0.188
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
44/65
Model parameters:
Parameter Value dard deviaStudent's t Pr > t er bound 9 er bound 95 %
Intercept 0.208 0.491 0.425 0.693 -1.154 1.571
SPECIA-m 0.000 - - - - -SPECIA-la 1.100 0.694 1.585 0.188 -0.827 3.027
Multiple comparison tests for the variable SPECIA:
Tukey (HSD) / Analysis of the differences between groups with a confidence range of 95.00
Categories Difference rdized diff ritical valu Pr. > Diff Significantlarice ~ mo 1.100 1.585 2.776 0.188 No
Tukey's d critical value: 3.927
Sorting and grouping categories:
Categories Mean Groupingslarice 1.308 Amolid 0.208 A
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
45/65
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
46/65
XLSTAT 7.$86:$AA$91 / 6 rows and 1 column P1 DENS I INTRARI Data: work
FRIEDMAN No missing:$Z$91 / 6 rows and 1 column Significanc
Multiple co
Friedman's
Note: The
In case of sSiegel (S.),The table o
Q (observeQ (critical v
DF
One-tailedAlpha
The Fried
Conclusion
At the levelIn other wo
Multiple co
Critical val
Table of gr
SR3R2R1
Matrix of p
R1
R2R3
Critical val
Matrix of p
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
47/65
R1R2
R3
Note: NS =
XLSTAT 7.Data: work
%: No missingSignificanc
Multiple co
Friedman's
Note: The
In case of sSiegel (S.),The table o
Q (observeQ (critical vDF
One-tailedAlpha
The Fried
ConclusionAt the levelIn other wo
Multiple co
Critical val
Table of gr
SLAPIMO
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
48/65
Matrix of p
MOPILA
Critical val
Matrix of p
MOPILA
Note: NS =
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
49/65
5.2 - K Paired Samples Comparison (Friedman...) - 6/9/2011 at 8:06:12 PMook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = TOTAL / range = $AE$87:$AG$89 / 3 rows and 3 columnsvalueslevel: 0.05parisons tests: don't use the Bonferroni correction to the overall significant level
test:
alculation of the Friedman's Q takes ties into account
mall samples (
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
50/65
R1 R2 R3
NS
NS NS
nonsignificant difference, = significant difference.
5.2 - K Paired Samples Comparison (Friedman...) - 6/9/2011 at 8:07:15 PMook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = TOTAL / range = $AE$94:$AG$96 / 3 rows and 3 columnsvalueslevel: 0.05
parisons tests: don't use the Bonferroni correction to the overall significant level
test:
alculation of the Friedman's Q takes ties into account
mall samples (
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
51/65
irwise comparisons (difference):
MO PI LA
1.5003.000 1.500 0.000
e for the difference 4.801
irwise comparisons (conclusion):
MO PI LA
NSNS NS
nonsignificant difference, = significant difference.
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
52/65
ween the 3 samples.
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
53/65
ween the 3 samples.
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
54/65
XLSTAT 7.5.2 - Normality Tests - 6/9/2011 at 4:21:36 PMP2 Data: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $AK$61:$AL$63 / 3 rDENS LARSignificance level: 0.05
Results for the sample molid :
Shapiro-Wilk Test:
W (observ 0.750One-tailed < 0.0001Alpha 0.05
Conclusion:At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the decision is to reject the null hypothesis that theIn other words, the non-normality is significant.
Results for the sample larice:
Shapiro-Wilk Test:
W (observ 0.750One-tailed < 0.0001Alpha 0.05
Conclusion:At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the decision is to reject the null hypothesis that theIn other words, the non-normality is significant.
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
55/65
LARVE LEMN XLSTAT 7.5.2 - Normality Tests - 6/9/2011 atws and 2 columns P2 DENS INTRARI Data: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / s
Significance level: 0.05
Results for the sample molid :
Shapiro-Wilk Test:
W (observ 0.750One-tailed < 0.0001Alpha 0.05
Conclusion:ample follows a normal distribution. At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the d
In other words, the non-normality is significant
Results for the sample larice:
Shapiro-Wilk Test:
W (observ 0.750One-tailed < 0.0001Alpha 0.05
Conclusion:ample follows a normal distribution. At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the d
In other words, the non-normality is significant
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
56/65
4:22:05 PMheet = Sheet1 / range = $AO$61:$AP$63 / 3 rows and 2 columns
cision is to reject the null hypothesis that the sample follows a normal distribution..
cision is to reject the null hypothesis that the sample follows a normal distribution..
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
57/65
P2 DENS XLSTAT 7.5.2 - K Paired Samples Comparison (Friedman...) - 6/9/2011 at 4:31:03 PMLARVE Data: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $AK$75:$AM$76 / 2 r
No missing valuesSignificance level: 0.05Multiple comparisons tests: don't use the Bonferroni correction to the overall significant level
Friedman's test:
Note: The calculation of the Friedman's Q takes ties into account
In case of small samples (
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
58/65
R1 R2 R3
R1R2 NSR3 NS NS
Note: NS = nonsignificant difference, = significant difference.
XLSTAT 7.5.2 - K Paired Samples Comparison (Friedman...) - 6/9/2011 at 8:11:
Data: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / sheet = TOTAL / range = $AK$82:$No missing valuesSignificance level: 0.05Multiple comparisons tests: don't use the Bonferroni correction to the overall sig
Friedman's test:
Note: The calculation of the Friedman's Q takes ties into account
Q (observe 1.000Q (critical 3.841DF 1One-tailed 0.317
Alpha 0.05
The Friedman's Q is distributed as a Chi-square
Conclusion:
At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the decision is to not reject the null hypoIn other words, the difference between the samples is not significant.
Multiple comparisons tests:
Critical value for the difference: 3.395
Table of groups:
Sum of rank GroupsMO 4 A
LA 5 A
Matrix of pairwise comparisons (difference):
MO LAMO
LA 1.000 0.000
Critical value for the difference 3.395
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
59/65
Matrix of pairwise comparisons (conclusion):
MO LAMO
LA NSNote: NS = nonsignificant difference, = significant difference.
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
60/65
XLSTAT 7.5.2 - K Paired Samples Comparisoows and 3 columns P2 Data: workbook = densitate larve 20.04.xls / s
DENS INT No missing valuesSignificance level: 0.05
l Multiple comparisons tests: don't use the Bon
Friedman's test:
Note: The calculation of the Friedman's Q tak
In case of small samples (
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
61/65
R1 R2 R3
R1R2 NSR3 NS NS
Note: NS = nonsignificant difference, = sign
XLSTAT 7.5.2 - K Paired Samples2 PM Data: workbook = densitate larve
AL$84 / 3 rows and 2 columns No missing valuesSignificance level: 0.05Multiple comparisons tests: don't
ificant level
Friedman's test:
Note: The calculation of the Fried
Q (observe 1.000
Q (critical 3.841DF 1One-tailed 0.317Alpha 0.05
The Friedman's Q is distributed as
Conclusion:At the level of significance Alpha=
thesis of absence of dif ference between the 2 samples. In other words, the difference bet
Multiple comparisons tests:
Critical value for the difference:
Table of groups:
Sum of rank Groups
MO 4 ALA 5 A
Matrix of pairwise comparisons (di
MO LA
MOLA 1.000 0.000
Critical value for the difference
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
62/65
Matrix of pairwise comparisons (c
MO LA
MOLA NS
Note: NS = nonsignificant differen
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
63/65
n (Friedman...) - 6/9/2011 at 4:29:42 PMheet = Sheet1 / range = $AP$75:$AR$76 / 2 rows and 3 columns
erroni correction to the overall significant level
s ties into account
lt a table published inr the behavioural sciences. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Tokyo, 312 p.riedman's Q is given pp. 280-281
re
cision is to not reject the null hypothesis of absence of difference between the 3 samples.ples is not significant.
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
64/65
ficant difference.
Comparison (Friedman...) - 6/9/2011 at 4:32:45 PM0.04.xls / sheet = Sheet1 / range = $AP$82:$AQ$84 / 3 rows and 2 columns
se the Bonferroni correction to the overall significant level
an's Q takes ties into account
a Chi-square
.050 the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis of absence of difference between the 2 samples.
een the samples is not significant.
3.395
fference):
3.395
-
8/2/2019 densitate larve 20.04
65/65
nclusion):
e, = significant difference.