dentin bonding agents sneha
TRANSCRIPT
Dentin bonding agents- GUIDED BYDR SUNANDA GADDALAYDR ANITA KALEDR YOGESH AHIRRAODR HRISHIKESH GHULEDR ARCHANA DAGADR NANDINI BIRADAR
By Sneha RatnaniMds part 1
Introduction Principles of adhesion Indications for Use of Adhesives Advantages of Bonding Techniques Mechanisms of adhesion Factors affecting adhesion Challenges in adhesion Dentin bonding systems Evolution of bonding agents Classification of bonding agents Conclusion References
Contents
The dental profession has spent most of its history restoring the effects of dental disease but currently the majority of restoration work is replacement or repair of prior treatment
One reason for the change is populationrsquos burgeoning interest in health and beauty which is driving increased demand for cosmetic dental procedures
Historically for many adults the achievement of a pretty smile has meant submission to extensive invasive procedures and high-cost fixed prosthodontics
Improvements in tooth-colored restoratives and bonding technology have made cosmetic dental procedures more palatable and feasible
In addition newer technology allows the general practitioner to handle many previously complex esthetic problems more simply conservatively and economically
Introduction
The fundamental objective of all restorations since centuries has been to create adhesion between two dissimilar surfaces mineralized tooth structure and the restorative materials
The invention of dentin bonding agent is like a - dream come true for dentistry which led to the beginning of new era of adhesive dentistry
The concept of dentistry with the introduction of adhesives has changed from - Extension for Prevention to PREVENTION OF EXTENSION
Introduction
The principles of adhesive dentistry dates back to 1955 when buonocore after observing industrial use of phosphoric acid to improve adhesion of paints and resin coatings to metal surfaces applied acid to the teeth to lsquorender the tooth surface more receptive to adhesionrsquo
Michael Buonocore
The traditional ldquodrill and fillrdquo approach is fading now because of numerous advancements taking place in restorative dentistry
ADHESIVE DENTISTRY
Adhesion The state in which two surfaces are held together by interfacial forces
which may consists of valence forces or interlocking forces or both (The American Society for Testing and Materials specification D 907)
Adherend The surface or substrate that is adhered
Adhesiveadherent A material that can join substances together resist separation and transmit loads across the bond
Adhesive failure The bond that fails at the interface between the two substrates
Cohesive failure The bond fails within one of the substrates but not at the interface
PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
Adherend 1 Adherend 2
Adhesive Systemor Luting Cement
Interface 2Interface 1
DENTALJOINT
ENAMEL DENTIN gtLiner Base Cement gt
Post and Core gtDental Amalgam gt
Implant gt
lt Composite Amalgamlt Cast Inlay Onlay or Crownlt All-Ceramic Inlay Onlay or Crownlt Veneers Maryland Bridgeslt Orthodontic Brackets
AdhesiveInterface 1 DENTALADHESION
Introduction Principles of adhesion Indications for Use of Adhesives Advantages of Bonding Techniques Mechanisms of adhesion Factors affecting adhesion Challenges in adhesion Dentin bonding systems Evolution of bonding agents Classification of bonding agents Conclusion References
Contents
The dental profession has spent most of its history restoring the effects of dental disease but currently the majority of restoration work is replacement or repair of prior treatment
One reason for the change is populationrsquos burgeoning interest in health and beauty which is driving increased demand for cosmetic dental procedures
Historically for many adults the achievement of a pretty smile has meant submission to extensive invasive procedures and high-cost fixed prosthodontics
Improvements in tooth-colored restoratives and bonding technology have made cosmetic dental procedures more palatable and feasible
In addition newer technology allows the general practitioner to handle many previously complex esthetic problems more simply conservatively and economically
Introduction
The fundamental objective of all restorations since centuries has been to create adhesion between two dissimilar surfaces mineralized tooth structure and the restorative materials
The invention of dentin bonding agent is like a - dream come true for dentistry which led to the beginning of new era of adhesive dentistry
The concept of dentistry with the introduction of adhesives has changed from - Extension for Prevention to PREVENTION OF EXTENSION
Introduction
The principles of adhesive dentistry dates back to 1955 when buonocore after observing industrial use of phosphoric acid to improve adhesion of paints and resin coatings to metal surfaces applied acid to the teeth to lsquorender the tooth surface more receptive to adhesionrsquo
Michael Buonocore
The traditional ldquodrill and fillrdquo approach is fading now because of numerous advancements taking place in restorative dentistry
ADHESIVE DENTISTRY
Adhesion The state in which two surfaces are held together by interfacial forces
which may consists of valence forces or interlocking forces or both (The American Society for Testing and Materials specification D 907)
Adherend The surface or substrate that is adhered
Adhesiveadherent A material that can join substances together resist separation and transmit loads across the bond
Adhesive failure The bond that fails at the interface between the two substrates
Cohesive failure The bond fails within one of the substrates but not at the interface
PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
Adherend 1 Adherend 2
Adhesive Systemor Luting Cement
Interface 2Interface 1
DENTALJOINT
ENAMEL DENTIN gtLiner Base Cement gt
Post and Core gtDental Amalgam gt
Implant gt
lt Composite Amalgamlt Cast Inlay Onlay or Crownlt All-Ceramic Inlay Onlay or Crownlt Veneers Maryland Bridgeslt Orthodontic Brackets
AdhesiveInterface 1 DENTALADHESION
The dental profession has spent most of its history restoring the effects of dental disease but currently the majority of restoration work is replacement or repair of prior treatment
One reason for the change is populationrsquos burgeoning interest in health and beauty which is driving increased demand for cosmetic dental procedures
Historically for many adults the achievement of a pretty smile has meant submission to extensive invasive procedures and high-cost fixed prosthodontics
Improvements in tooth-colored restoratives and bonding technology have made cosmetic dental procedures more palatable and feasible
In addition newer technology allows the general practitioner to handle many previously complex esthetic problems more simply conservatively and economically
Introduction
The fundamental objective of all restorations since centuries has been to create adhesion between two dissimilar surfaces mineralized tooth structure and the restorative materials
The invention of dentin bonding agent is like a - dream come true for dentistry which led to the beginning of new era of adhesive dentistry
The concept of dentistry with the introduction of adhesives has changed from - Extension for Prevention to PREVENTION OF EXTENSION
Introduction
The principles of adhesive dentistry dates back to 1955 when buonocore after observing industrial use of phosphoric acid to improve adhesion of paints and resin coatings to metal surfaces applied acid to the teeth to lsquorender the tooth surface more receptive to adhesionrsquo
Michael Buonocore
The traditional ldquodrill and fillrdquo approach is fading now because of numerous advancements taking place in restorative dentistry
ADHESIVE DENTISTRY
Adhesion The state in which two surfaces are held together by interfacial forces
which may consists of valence forces or interlocking forces or both (The American Society for Testing and Materials specification D 907)
Adherend The surface or substrate that is adhered
Adhesiveadherent A material that can join substances together resist separation and transmit loads across the bond
Adhesive failure The bond that fails at the interface between the two substrates
Cohesive failure The bond fails within one of the substrates but not at the interface
PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
Adherend 1 Adherend 2
Adhesive Systemor Luting Cement
Interface 2Interface 1
DENTALJOINT
ENAMEL DENTIN gtLiner Base Cement gt
Post and Core gtDental Amalgam gt
Implant gt
lt Composite Amalgamlt Cast Inlay Onlay or Crownlt All-Ceramic Inlay Onlay or Crownlt Veneers Maryland Bridgeslt Orthodontic Brackets
AdhesiveInterface 1 DENTALADHESION
The fundamental objective of all restorations since centuries has been to create adhesion between two dissimilar surfaces mineralized tooth structure and the restorative materials
The invention of dentin bonding agent is like a - dream come true for dentistry which led to the beginning of new era of adhesive dentistry
The concept of dentistry with the introduction of adhesives has changed from - Extension for Prevention to PREVENTION OF EXTENSION
Introduction
The principles of adhesive dentistry dates back to 1955 when buonocore after observing industrial use of phosphoric acid to improve adhesion of paints and resin coatings to metal surfaces applied acid to the teeth to lsquorender the tooth surface more receptive to adhesionrsquo
Michael Buonocore
The traditional ldquodrill and fillrdquo approach is fading now because of numerous advancements taking place in restorative dentistry
ADHESIVE DENTISTRY
Adhesion The state in which two surfaces are held together by interfacial forces
which may consists of valence forces or interlocking forces or both (The American Society for Testing and Materials specification D 907)
Adherend The surface or substrate that is adhered
Adhesiveadherent A material that can join substances together resist separation and transmit loads across the bond
Adhesive failure The bond that fails at the interface between the two substrates
Cohesive failure The bond fails within one of the substrates but not at the interface
PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
Adherend 1 Adherend 2
Adhesive Systemor Luting Cement
Interface 2Interface 1
DENTALJOINT
ENAMEL DENTIN gtLiner Base Cement gt
Post and Core gtDental Amalgam gt
Implant gt
lt Composite Amalgamlt Cast Inlay Onlay or Crownlt All-Ceramic Inlay Onlay or Crownlt Veneers Maryland Bridgeslt Orthodontic Brackets
AdhesiveInterface 1 DENTALADHESION
The principles of adhesive dentistry dates back to 1955 when buonocore after observing industrial use of phosphoric acid to improve adhesion of paints and resin coatings to metal surfaces applied acid to the teeth to lsquorender the tooth surface more receptive to adhesionrsquo
Michael Buonocore
The traditional ldquodrill and fillrdquo approach is fading now because of numerous advancements taking place in restorative dentistry
ADHESIVE DENTISTRY
Adhesion The state in which two surfaces are held together by interfacial forces
which may consists of valence forces or interlocking forces or both (The American Society for Testing and Materials specification D 907)
Adherend The surface or substrate that is adhered
Adhesiveadherent A material that can join substances together resist separation and transmit loads across the bond
Adhesive failure The bond that fails at the interface between the two substrates
Cohesive failure The bond fails within one of the substrates but not at the interface
PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
Adherend 1 Adherend 2
Adhesive Systemor Luting Cement
Interface 2Interface 1
DENTALJOINT
ENAMEL DENTIN gtLiner Base Cement gt
Post and Core gtDental Amalgam gt
Implant gt
lt Composite Amalgamlt Cast Inlay Onlay or Crownlt All-Ceramic Inlay Onlay or Crownlt Veneers Maryland Bridgeslt Orthodontic Brackets
AdhesiveInterface 1 DENTALADHESION
The traditional ldquodrill and fillrdquo approach is fading now because of numerous advancements taking place in restorative dentistry
ADHESIVE DENTISTRY
Adhesion The state in which two surfaces are held together by interfacial forces
which may consists of valence forces or interlocking forces or both (The American Society for Testing and Materials specification D 907)
Adherend The surface or substrate that is adhered
Adhesiveadherent A material that can join substances together resist separation and transmit loads across the bond
Adhesive failure The bond that fails at the interface between the two substrates
Cohesive failure The bond fails within one of the substrates but not at the interface
PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
Adherend 1 Adherend 2
Adhesive Systemor Luting Cement
Interface 2Interface 1
DENTALJOINT
ENAMEL DENTIN gtLiner Base Cement gt
Post and Core gtDental Amalgam gt
Implant gt
lt Composite Amalgamlt Cast Inlay Onlay or Crownlt All-Ceramic Inlay Onlay or Crownlt Veneers Maryland Bridgeslt Orthodontic Brackets
AdhesiveInterface 1 DENTALADHESION
ADHESIVE DENTISTRY
Adhesion The state in which two surfaces are held together by interfacial forces
which may consists of valence forces or interlocking forces or both (The American Society for Testing and Materials specification D 907)
Adherend The surface or substrate that is adhered
Adhesiveadherent A material that can join substances together resist separation and transmit loads across the bond
Adhesive failure The bond that fails at the interface between the two substrates
Cohesive failure The bond fails within one of the substrates but not at the interface
PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
Adherend 1 Adherend 2
Adhesive Systemor Luting Cement
Interface 2Interface 1
DENTALJOINT
ENAMEL DENTIN gtLiner Base Cement gt
Post and Core gtDental Amalgam gt
Implant gt
lt Composite Amalgamlt Cast Inlay Onlay or Crownlt All-Ceramic Inlay Onlay or Crownlt Veneers Maryland Bridgeslt Orthodontic Brackets
AdhesiveInterface 1 DENTALADHESION
Adhesion The state in which two surfaces are held together by interfacial forces
which may consists of valence forces or interlocking forces or both (The American Society for Testing and Materials specification D 907)
Adherend The surface or substrate that is adhered
Adhesiveadherent A material that can join substances together resist separation and transmit loads across the bond
Adhesive failure The bond that fails at the interface between the two substrates
Cohesive failure The bond fails within one of the substrates but not at the interface
PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
Adherend 1 Adherend 2
Adhesive Systemor Luting Cement
Interface 2Interface 1
DENTALJOINT
ENAMEL DENTIN gtLiner Base Cement gt
Post and Core gtDental Amalgam gt
Implant gt
lt Composite Amalgamlt Cast Inlay Onlay or Crownlt All-Ceramic Inlay Onlay or Crownlt Veneers Maryland Bridgeslt Orthodontic Brackets
AdhesiveInterface 1 DENTALADHESION
Adherend 1 Adherend 2
Adhesive Systemor Luting Cement
Interface 2Interface 1
DENTALJOINT
ENAMEL DENTIN gtLiner Base Cement gt
Post and Core gtDental Amalgam gt
Implant gt
lt Composite Amalgamlt Cast Inlay Onlay or Crownlt All-Ceramic Inlay Onlay or Crownlt Veneers Maryland Bridgeslt Orthodontic Brackets
AdhesiveInterface 1 DENTALADHESION
Diagrammatic representation of dental adhesive system where Adherend 1 is
enamel dentin or both Adhesive is bonding agent
Adherend 2 is composite resin
ADHESIVE DENTISTRY
Indications of Bonding Techniques
Adhesive restorative techniques are currently used to accomplish the following
1 Restore Class I II III IV V and VI carious or traumatic defects 2 Change the shape and the color of anterior teeth 3 Improve retention for metallic crowns or for porcelain-fused-to-
metal crowns 4 Bond all-ceramic restorations 5 Bond indirect resin-based restorations 6 Seal pits and fissures 7 Bond orthodontic brackets 8 Bond periodontal splints and conservative tooth replacement
prostheses
9 Repair existing restorations (composite amalgam ceramic or ceramometal)
10 Provide foundations for crowns 11 Desensitize exposed root surfaces 12 Seal beneath or bond amalgam restorations to tooth structure 13 Impregnate dentin that has been exposed to the oral fluids making it
less susceptible to caries 14 Bond fractured fragments of anterior teeth 15 Bond prefabricated and cast posts 16 Reinforce fragile roots internally 17 Seal apical restorations placed during endodontic surgery
Four different mechanisms of adhesion has been described
Mechanical adhesion ndash interlocking of the adhesive with irregularities in the surface of the substrate or adherend
Adsorption adhesion ndash chemical bonding between the adhesive and the adherend The forces involved may be primary (ionic or covalent) or secondary (hydrogen bonds dipole interaction or van der Waals) valence forces
Diffusion adhesion ndash interlocking between the mobile molecules such as adhesion of two polymers through diffusion of polymer chain ends across an interface
Electrostatic adhesion ndash an electric double layer at the interface of a metal with a polymer that is part of the total bonding mechanism
Wetting is the ability of the liquid to flow easily over the entire surface and adhere to the solid
If the adhesive does not wet the surface of the adherend adhesion between the adhesive and adherend will be negligible or nonexistent
Wetting is principally influenced by
ndash Cleanliness of the adherend Cleaner surface greater adhesion ndash Surface energy of the adherend More surface energy greater
adhesion
FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
The extent to which an adhesive wets the surface of the adherend may be determined by measuring the contact angle which is the angle formed by the adhesive with the adherend at their interface
The stronger the attraction of the adhesive for the adherend the smaller will be the contact angle
The zero contact angle is the best to obtain wetting
Contact angle
Surface Energy
The surface tension of the liquid and the surface energy of the adherend ultimately determine the degree of wetting that occurs
Generally the harder the surface the higher the surface energy will be which means that adhesive properties of the material will be higher
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Surface Contamination
The substrate surface should be clean as contamination prevents the adhesion
Adhesive should be able to fill their regularities making the surface smooth allowing proper or intimate contact
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Water
The higher the water content the poorer is the adhesion
Water can react with both materials by the high polar group and hydrogen bond which can hamper the adhesion
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Steps in Forming Good Adhesion
(1) Clean adherend
(2) Good wetting
(3) Intimate adaptation
(4) Bonding
(5) Good curing
physicalbonding
chemicalbonding
mechanicalbonding
+ndash
ADHESIVE DENTISTRY
Indications of Bonding Techniques
Adhesive restorative techniques are currently used to accomplish the following
1 Restore Class I II III IV V and VI carious or traumatic defects 2 Change the shape and the color of anterior teeth 3 Improve retention for metallic crowns or for porcelain-fused-to-
metal crowns 4 Bond all-ceramic restorations 5 Bond indirect resin-based restorations 6 Seal pits and fissures 7 Bond orthodontic brackets 8 Bond periodontal splints and conservative tooth replacement
prostheses
9 Repair existing restorations (composite amalgam ceramic or ceramometal)
10 Provide foundations for crowns 11 Desensitize exposed root surfaces 12 Seal beneath or bond amalgam restorations to tooth structure 13 Impregnate dentin that has been exposed to the oral fluids making it
less susceptible to caries 14 Bond fractured fragments of anterior teeth 15 Bond prefabricated and cast posts 16 Reinforce fragile roots internally 17 Seal apical restorations placed during endodontic surgery
Four different mechanisms of adhesion has been described
Mechanical adhesion ndash interlocking of the adhesive with irregularities in the surface of the substrate or adherend
Adsorption adhesion ndash chemical bonding between the adhesive and the adherend The forces involved may be primary (ionic or covalent) or secondary (hydrogen bonds dipole interaction or van der Waals) valence forces
Diffusion adhesion ndash interlocking between the mobile molecules such as adhesion of two polymers through diffusion of polymer chain ends across an interface
Electrostatic adhesion ndash an electric double layer at the interface of a metal with a polymer that is part of the total bonding mechanism
Wetting is the ability of the liquid to flow easily over the entire surface and adhere to the solid
If the adhesive does not wet the surface of the adherend adhesion between the adhesive and adherend will be negligible or nonexistent
Wetting is principally influenced by
ndash Cleanliness of the adherend Cleaner surface greater adhesion ndash Surface energy of the adherend More surface energy greater
adhesion
FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
The extent to which an adhesive wets the surface of the adherend may be determined by measuring the contact angle which is the angle formed by the adhesive with the adherend at their interface
The stronger the attraction of the adhesive for the adherend the smaller will be the contact angle
The zero contact angle is the best to obtain wetting
Contact angle
Surface Energy
The surface tension of the liquid and the surface energy of the adherend ultimately determine the degree of wetting that occurs
Generally the harder the surface the higher the surface energy will be which means that adhesive properties of the material will be higher
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Surface Contamination
The substrate surface should be clean as contamination prevents the adhesion
Adhesive should be able to fill their regularities making the surface smooth allowing proper or intimate contact
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Water
The higher the water content the poorer is the adhesion
Water can react with both materials by the high polar group and hydrogen bond which can hamper the adhesion
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Steps in Forming Good Adhesion
(1) Clean adherend
(2) Good wetting
(3) Intimate adaptation
(4) Bonding
(5) Good curing
physicalbonding
chemicalbonding
mechanicalbonding
+ndash
Indications of Bonding Techniques
Adhesive restorative techniques are currently used to accomplish the following
1 Restore Class I II III IV V and VI carious or traumatic defects 2 Change the shape and the color of anterior teeth 3 Improve retention for metallic crowns or for porcelain-fused-to-
metal crowns 4 Bond all-ceramic restorations 5 Bond indirect resin-based restorations 6 Seal pits and fissures 7 Bond orthodontic brackets 8 Bond periodontal splints and conservative tooth replacement
prostheses
9 Repair existing restorations (composite amalgam ceramic or ceramometal)
10 Provide foundations for crowns 11 Desensitize exposed root surfaces 12 Seal beneath or bond amalgam restorations to tooth structure 13 Impregnate dentin that has been exposed to the oral fluids making it
less susceptible to caries 14 Bond fractured fragments of anterior teeth 15 Bond prefabricated and cast posts 16 Reinforce fragile roots internally 17 Seal apical restorations placed during endodontic surgery
Four different mechanisms of adhesion has been described
Mechanical adhesion ndash interlocking of the adhesive with irregularities in the surface of the substrate or adherend
Adsorption adhesion ndash chemical bonding between the adhesive and the adherend The forces involved may be primary (ionic or covalent) or secondary (hydrogen bonds dipole interaction or van der Waals) valence forces
Diffusion adhesion ndash interlocking between the mobile molecules such as adhesion of two polymers through diffusion of polymer chain ends across an interface
Electrostatic adhesion ndash an electric double layer at the interface of a metal with a polymer that is part of the total bonding mechanism
Wetting is the ability of the liquid to flow easily over the entire surface and adhere to the solid
If the adhesive does not wet the surface of the adherend adhesion between the adhesive and adherend will be negligible or nonexistent
Wetting is principally influenced by
ndash Cleanliness of the adherend Cleaner surface greater adhesion ndash Surface energy of the adherend More surface energy greater
adhesion
FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
The extent to which an adhesive wets the surface of the adherend may be determined by measuring the contact angle which is the angle formed by the adhesive with the adherend at their interface
The stronger the attraction of the adhesive for the adherend the smaller will be the contact angle
The zero contact angle is the best to obtain wetting
Contact angle
Surface Energy
The surface tension of the liquid and the surface energy of the adherend ultimately determine the degree of wetting that occurs
Generally the harder the surface the higher the surface energy will be which means that adhesive properties of the material will be higher
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Surface Contamination
The substrate surface should be clean as contamination prevents the adhesion
Adhesive should be able to fill their regularities making the surface smooth allowing proper or intimate contact
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Water
The higher the water content the poorer is the adhesion
Water can react with both materials by the high polar group and hydrogen bond which can hamper the adhesion
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Steps in Forming Good Adhesion
(1) Clean adherend
(2) Good wetting
(3) Intimate adaptation
(4) Bonding
(5) Good curing
physicalbonding
chemicalbonding
mechanicalbonding
+ndash
9 Repair existing restorations (composite amalgam ceramic or ceramometal)
10 Provide foundations for crowns 11 Desensitize exposed root surfaces 12 Seal beneath or bond amalgam restorations to tooth structure 13 Impregnate dentin that has been exposed to the oral fluids making it
less susceptible to caries 14 Bond fractured fragments of anterior teeth 15 Bond prefabricated and cast posts 16 Reinforce fragile roots internally 17 Seal apical restorations placed during endodontic surgery
Four different mechanisms of adhesion has been described
Mechanical adhesion ndash interlocking of the adhesive with irregularities in the surface of the substrate or adherend
Adsorption adhesion ndash chemical bonding between the adhesive and the adherend The forces involved may be primary (ionic or covalent) or secondary (hydrogen bonds dipole interaction or van der Waals) valence forces
Diffusion adhesion ndash interlocking between the mobile molecules such as adhesion of two polymers through diffusion of polymer chain ends across an interface
Electrostatic adhesion ndash an electric double layer at the interface of a metal with a polymer that is part of the total bonding mechanism
Wetting is the ability of the liquid to flow easily over the entire surface and adhere to the solid
If the adhesive does not wet the surface of the adherend adhesion between the adhesive and adherend will be negligible or nonexistent
Wetting is principally influenced by
ndash Cleanliness of the adherend Cleaner surface greater adhesion ndash Surface energy of the adherend More surface energy greater
adhesion
FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
The extent to which an adhesive wets the surface of the adherend may be determined by measuring the contact angle which is the angle formed by the adhesive with the adherend at their interface
The stronger the attraction of the adhesive for the adherend the smaller will be the contact angle
The zero contact angle is the best to obtain wetting
Contact angle
Surface Energy
The surface tension of the liquid and the surface energy of the adherend ultimately determine the degree of wetting that occurs
Generally the harder the surface the higher the surface energy will be which means that adhesive properties of the material will be higher
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Surface Contamination
The substrate surface should be clean as contamination prevents the adhesion
Adhesive should be able to fill their regularities making the surface smooth allowing proper or intimate contact
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Water
The higher the water content the poorer is the adhesion
Water can react with both materials by the high polar group and hydrogen bond which can hamper the adhesion
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Steps in Forming Good Adhesion
(1) Clean adherend
(2) Good wetting
(3) Intimate adaptation
(4) Bonding
(5) Good curing
physicalbonding
chemicalbonding
mechanicalbonding
+ndash
Four different mechanisms of adhesion has been described
Mechanical adhesion ndash interlocking of the adhesive with irregularities in the surface of the substrate or adherend
Adsorption adhesion ndash chemical bonding between the adhesive and the adherend The forces involved may be primary (ionic or covalent) or secondary (hydrogen bonds dipole interaction or van der Waals) valence forces
Diffusion adhesion ndash interlocking between the mobile molecules such as adhesion of two polymers through diffusion of polymer chain ends across an interface
Electrostatic adhesion ndash an electric double layer at the interface of a metal with a polymer that is part of the total bonding mechanism
Wetting is the ability of the liquid to flow easily over the entire surface and adhere to the solid
If the adhesive does not wet the surface of the adherend adhesion between the adhesive and adherend will be negligible or nonexistent
Wetting is principally influenced by
ndash Cleanliness of the adherend Cleaner surface greater adhesion ndash Surface energy of the adherend More surface energy greater
adhesion
FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
The extent to which an adhesive wets the surface of the adherend may be determined by measuring the contact angle which is the angle formed by the adhesive with the adherend at their interface
The stronger the attraction of the adhesive for the adherend the smaller will be the contact angle
The zero contact angle is the best to obtain wetting
Contact angle
Surface Energy
The surface tension of the liquid and the surface energy of the adherend ultimately determine the degree of wetting that occurs
Generally the harder the surface the higher the surface energy will be which means that adhesive properties of the material will be higher
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Surface Contamination
The substrate surface should be clean as contamination prevents the adhesion
Adhesive should be able to fill their regularities making the surface smooth allowing proper or intimate contact
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Water
The higher the water content the poorer is the adhesion
Water can react with both materials by the high polar group and hydrogen bond which can hamper the adhesion
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Steps in Forming Good Adhesion
(1) Clean adherend
(2) Good wetting
(3) Intimate adaptation
(4) Bonding
(5) Good curing
physicalbonding
chemicalbonding
mechanicalbonding
+ndash
Wetting is the ability of the liquid to flow easily over the entire surface and adhere to the solid
If the adhesive does not wet the surface of the adherend adhesion between the adhesive and adherend will be negligible or nonexistent
Wetting is principally influenced by
ndash Cleanliness of the adherend Cleaner surface greater adhesion ndash Surface energy of the adherend More surface energy greater
adhesion
FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
The extent to which an adhesive wets the surface of the adherend may be determined by measuring the contact angle which is the angle formed by the adhesive with the adherend at their interface
The stronger the attraction of the adhesive for the adherend the smaller will be the contact angle
The zero contact angle is the best to obtain wetting
Contact angle
Surface Energy
The surface tension of the liquid and the surface energy of the adherend ultimately determine the degree of wetting that occurs
Generally the harder the surface the higher the surface energy will be which means that adhesive properties of the material will be higher
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Surface Contamination
The substrate surface should be clean as contamination prevents the adhesion
Adhesive should be able to fill their regularities making the surface smooth allowing proper or intimate contact
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Water
The higher the water content the poorer is the adhesion
Water can react with both materials by the high polar group and hydrogen bond which can hamper the adhesion
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Steps in Forming Good Adhesion
(1) Clean adherend
(2) Good wetting
(3) Intimate adaptation
(4) Bonding
(5) Good curing
physicalbonding
chemicalbonding
mechanicalbonding
+ndash
The extent to which an adhesive wets the surface of the adherend may be determined by measuring the contact angle which is the angle formed by the adhesive with the adherend at their interface
The stronger the attraction of the adhesive for the adherend the smaller will be the contact angle
The zero contact angle is the best to obtain wetting
Contact angle
Surface Energy
The surface tension of the liquid and the surface energy of the adherend ultimately determine the degree of wetting that occurs
Generally the harder the surface the higher the surface energy will be which means that adhesive properties of the material will be higher
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Surface Contamination
The substrate surface should be clean as contamination prevents the adhesion
Adhesive should be able to fill their regularities making the surface smooth allowing proper or intimate contact
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Water
The higher the water content the poorer is the adhesion
Water can react with both materials by the high polar group and hydrogen bond which can hamper the adhesion
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Steps in Forming Good Adhesion
(1) Clean adherend
(2) Good wetting
(3) Intimate adaptation
(4) Bonding
(5) Good curing
physicalbonding
chemicalbonding
mechanicalbonding
+ndash
Surface Energy
The surface tension of the liquid and the surface energy of the adherend ultimately determine the degree of wetting that occurs
Generally the harder the surface the higher the surface energy will be which means that adhesive properties of the material will be higher
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Surface Contamination
The substrate surface should be clean as contamination prevents the adhesion
Adhesive should be able to fill their regularities making the surface smooth allowing proper or intimate contact
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Water
The higher the water content the poorer is the adhesion
Water can react with both materials by the high polar group and hydrogen bond which can hamper the adhesion
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Steps in Forming Good Adhesion
(1) Clean adherend
(2) Good wetting
(3) Intimate adaptation
(4) Bonding
(5) Good curing
physicalbonding
chemicalbonding
mechanicalbonding
+ndash
Surface Contamination
The substrate surface should be clean as contamination prevents the adhesion
Adhesive should be able to fill their regularities making the surface smooth allowing proper or intimate contact
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Water
The higher the water content the poorer is the adhesion
Water can react with both materials by the high polar group and hydrogen bond which can hamper the adhesion
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Steps in Forming Good Adhesion
(1) Clean adherend
(2) Good wetting
(3) Intimate adaptation
(4) Bonding
(5) Good curing
physicalbonding
chemicalbonding
mechanicalbonding
+ndash
Water
The higher the water content the poorer is the adhesion
Water can react with both materials by the high polar group and hydrogen bond which can hamper the adhesion
Factors Affecting Adhesion
Steps in Forming Good Adhesion
(1) Clean adherend
(2) Good wetting
(3) Intimate adaptation
(4) Bonding
(5) Good curing
physicalbonding
chemicalbonding
mechanicalbonding
+ndash
Steps in Forming Good Adhesion
(1) Clean adherend
(2) Good wetting
(3) Intimate adaptation
(4) Bonding
(5) Good curing
physicalbonding
chemicalbonding
mechanicalbonding
+ndash
ENAMEL BONDINGbull To bond to enamel it is very important to focus on the mineral
component (hydroxyapatite) of enamel
bull Buonocore 1955 ndash was the first to reveal the adhesion of acrylic resin to acid
etched enamel ndash used 85 percent phosphoric acid for etching
bull Silverstone revealed that the optimum concentration of phosphoric acid should range between 30 to 40 percent to get a satisfactory adhesion to the enamel
ENAMEL BONDING
If the concentration is greater than 50 percent Monocalcium phosphate monohydrate may get
precipitated
Concentrations lower than 30 percent Dicalcium phosphate monohydrate is precipitated which
interferes with adhesion
ENAMEL BONDING Percentage of etchants used
35 to 40
Use of lower concentrations of phosphoric acid and reduced etching time has shown to give an adequate etch of the enamel while avoiding excessive demineralization of the dentin
Acid application time ideally 10 seconds
studies show that enamel should not be etched for more than 15 to 20 seconds
Scanning electron micrograph of enamel etched with 35 phosphoric acid (3M ESPE St Paul Minn) for 15 seconds
Enamel acid etching ndash removes 10 micron of enamel
Creates microporous layer 5 to50 microns deep
Smooth surface ndash irregular surface with high surface energy 72dynescm
Unfilled liquid acrylic resin (enamel bonding agent)
Wets the surface
Enters into microporosities by capillary action
Two types of resin tags are formed
Macrotags microtags (form between enamel prisms peripheries ) (form at the core of
enamel prisms )
Removes residual pellicle exposure to the inorganic crystallite component of enamel
Creates a porous layer with the depth of the pores ranging from 5-10 microm
Increases as the wettublity and surface area of the enamel substrate
Raises the surface energy of enamel with creation of reactive polar sites
EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
Silverstone et al (1975) studied the morphological changes in SEM produced on the acid etched enamel surface
Exposure of human enamel to conditioning solutions produces 3 basic etching patterns
PATTERN OF ETCHING
Type I (Preferential prism center etching) Dissolution of prism cores without dissolution
of prism peripheries resulting in a honey comb appearance The average diameter of the hollowed prism core is measured as about 3microm This is the most commonest type of etching pattern
Type II Dissolution of peripheral enamel without dissolution of prism cores resulting in a cobblestone appearance
Type III Mixed pattern Etching pattern is less distinct and includes areas resembling type I and type II patterns as well as regions in which the etching pattern appears unrelated to prism morphologyThis type of etching in general is associated with the presence of prism less enamel and appears as a generalized surface roughening
ETCHING PATTERNS
Clinically a uniform dull appearance is an indication that the tooth surface has been adequately etched
Silverstone in 1974 showed that etched enamel surface under polarized light resulted in 3 zones
1 Etched Zone2 Qualitative Zone3 Quantitative Zone
MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
1 Etched ZoneThis is the narrow zone of enamel at about 10microm in depth that is removed by etching The fully reacted mineral crystals are removed resulting in the exposure of more reactive surface This increased surface area and a reduced surface tension allows resin to wet in the etched surface more readily
2 Qualitative ZoneThis zone is about 20microm in depth and it is rendered porous during acid etching of the enamel when identified qualitatively using polarized light
3 Quantitative ZoneThis third zone is almost up to 20microm depth It is qualitatively indistinguishable from adjacent enamel and can be detected with quantitative polarized light In human enamel the pores may be spherical elongated or sometimes as large chamber that are connected to smaller channels called ink bottle systems
The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
Steps for Enamel Bonding Clean and wash the teeth with
water
Isolate to prevent any contamination from saliva or gingival crevicular fluid
Apply acid etchant in the form of liquid or gel for10 to 15 seconds
Deciduous teeth require longer time for etching than permanent teeth because of the presence of aprismatic enamel in deciduous teeth
Steps for Enamel Bonding
bull Now apply bonding agent and low viscosity monomers over the etched enamel surface
bull Generally enamel bonding agents contain Bis-GMA or UDMA with TEGDMA added to lower the viscosity of the bonding agent
bull The bonding agents due to their low viscosity rapidly wet and penetrate the clean dried conditioned enamel into the microspaces forming resin tags
Fluorosed teeth have an altered structure composition and appearance
With the increase in severity of fluorosis enamel becomes more porous and sub-surface lesion extends towards the inner enamel
Several studies have shown that composites can be bonded successfully to fluorosed enamel depending on the degree of fluorosis
It is always recommended to grind the enamel before bonding as it is seen that bond strength of composites to ground enamel of teeth with moderate fluorosis is similar to that of normal teeth
Acid etching is good for enamel bonding but not for dentin bonding in fluorosed teeth As a consequence a good choice of adhesive it would be a two-step self etch adhesive with an additional acid etching step for the enamel
Bonding to fluorosed teeth
Dentin Bonding
Dentin Bonding Adhesion of restorative materials to enamel has become a
routine and reliable aspect of modern restorative dentistry
But adhesion to dentin has proved to be more difficult and less predictable
Much of the difficulty in bonding to dentin is the result of the complex microstructure and variable composition of dentin in different areas of the tooth
Thus the composition of dentin is much different than that of enamel and one would expect it to behave differently when etched with acid
The presence of water and organic components lower the surface energy of dentin and make bonding with hydrophobic resins essentially impossible
Enamel vs Dentin
Dentin also contains a dense network of tubules that connect the pulp with the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ)
A cuff of hypermineralized dentin called peritubular dentin lines the tubules
The less mineralized intertubular dentin contains collagen fibrils with the characteristic collagen banding
The intertubular dentin is penetrated by submicron channels which allow the passage of tubular liquid and fibers between neighboring tubules forming intertubular anastomoses
Dentin is an intrinsically hydrated tissue penetrated by a maze of 1- to 025-μm-diameter fluid-filled dentin tubules
Movement of fluid from the pulp to the DEJ is a result of a slight but constant pulpal pressure
Pulpal pressure has a magnitude of 25 to 30 mm Hg or 34 to 40 cm H2O
Dentinal tubules enclose cellular extensions from the odontoblasts and are in direct communication with the pulp
Inside the tubule lumen other fibrous organic structures are present such as the lamina limitans which substantially decreases the functional radius of the tubule
Relative number of dentin tubules and tubule volume at different dentin levels as measured at different distances from the dentinoenamel Junction Adapted from Heymann 1995
Distribution of tubules in dentinDentin close to the pulp shows a
higher tubule density than indentin remote from the pulpThe higher the tubule densitythe lower the bond strength
values of the dentin adhesives tothe dentin
The relative area occupied by dentin tubules decreases with increasing distance from the pulp
Created whenever dentin is cut or ground with hand or rotary dental instruments and is about 1 to 5 μm thick (Brannstrom 1982)
It consists of debris that presumably reflects the composition of the underlying dentin
Thus the composition of superficial versus deep smear layers would be expected to be quite different
It has a uniform amorphous structure which appears to completely occlude the orifices of all dentinal tubules
Smear plugs are projections of the smear layer that extend to variable distances into dentinal tubules when the smear layer is created
Smear layer
The smear layer has both advantages and disadvantages in the bonding process (Yap et al 1994)
Advantages include
Reduction of dentin permeability to toxins and oral fluids Reduction of diffusion (usually inwards) and convection of fluids
(outwards by hydrostatic pressure or inwards for example while restorations are cemented)
Reduction of wetness of cut dentin surfaces and Prevention of bacterial penetration of dentinal tubules
Wetness and the harboring of bacteria or their products
It reduces the surface energy which compromises surface wetting
Prevents the intimate surface contact between the adhesive and dentin substrate and
Prevents resin penetration into dentinal tubules (Gwinnett 1984 Rees and Jacobsen 1990)
It acts like a separating agent since it is an intrinsically weak structure (5 to 6 MPa cohesive strength) that bond weakly to the underlying dentin (Tao and Pashley 1988)
Further the mineral component of the smear layer may dissolve slowly under a leaking restoration or may be removed by acid produced by bacteria to leave a gap which in turn increases marginal leakage and possibly secondary caries
Disadvantages include
Factors such as
radius and length of the tubules the viscosity of dentin fluid the pressure gradient the molecular size of the substances dissolved in the
tubular fluid and the rate of removal of substances by the blood vessels in
the pulp affect permeability
All of these variables make dentin a dynamic substrate and consequently a difficult substrate for bonding
Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
The factors important in understanding the over all lsquobonding equationrsquo is
Dentin factors Tooth factors Patient factors Material factors Clinical factors
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
ENAMEL BONDING
If the concentration is greater than 50 percent Monocalcium phosphate monohydrate may get
precipitated
Concentrations lower than 30 percent Dicalcium phosphate monohydrate is precipitated which
interferes with adhesion
ENAMEL BONDING Percentage of etchants used
35 to 40
Use of lower concentrations of phosphoric acid and reduced etching time has shown to give an adequate etch of the enamel while avoiding excessive demineralization of the dentin
Acid application time ideally 10 seconds
studies show that enamel should not be etched for more than 15 to 20 seconds
Scanning electron micrograph of enamel etched with 35 phosphoric acid (3M ESPE St Paul Minn) for 15 seconds
Enamel acid etching ndash removes 10 micron of enamel
Creates microporous layer 5 to50 microns deep
Smooth surface ndash irregular surface with high surface energy 72dynescm
Unfilled liquid acrylic resin (enamel bonding agent)
Wets the surface
Enters into microporosities by capillary action
Two types of resin tags are formed
Macrotags microtags (form between enamel prisms peripheries ) (form at the core of
enamel prisms )
Removes residual pellicle exposure to the inorganic crystallite component of enamel
Creates a porous layer with the depth of the pores ranging from 5-10 microm
Increases as the wettublity and surface area of the enamel substrate
Raises the surface energy of enamel with creation of reactive polar sites
EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
Silverstone et al (1975) studied the morphological changes in SEM produced on the acid etched enamel surface
Exposure of human enamel to conditioning solutions produces 3 basic etching patterns
PATTERN OF ETCHING
Type I (Preferential prism center etching) Dissolution of prism cores without dissolution
of prism peripheries resulting in a honey comb appearance The average diameter of the hollowed prism core is measured as about 3microm This is the most commonest type of etching pattern
Type II Dissolution of peripheral enamel without dissolution of prism cores resulting in a cobblestone appearance
Type III Mixed pattern Etching pattern is less distinct and includes areas resembling type I and type II patterns as well as regions in which the etching pattern appears unrelated to prism morphologyThis type of etching in general is associated with the presence of prism less enamel and appears as a generalized surface roughening
ETCHING PATTERNS
Clinically a uniform dull appearance is an indication that the tooth surface has been adequately etched
Silverstone in 1974 showed that etched enamel surface under polarized light resulted in 3 zones
1 Etched Zone2 Qualitative Zone3 Quantitative Zone
MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
1 Etched ZoneThis is the narrow zone of enamel at about 10microm in depth that is removed by etching The fully reacted mineral crystals are removed resulting in the exposure of more reactive surface This increased surface area and a reduced surface tension allows resin to wet in the etched surface more readily
2 Qualitative ZoneThis zone is about 20microm in depth and it is rendered porous during acid etching of the enamel when identified qualitatively using polarized light
3 Quantitative ZoneThis third zone is almost up to 20microm depth It is qualitatively indistinguishable from adjacent enamel and can be detected with quantitative polarized light In human enamel the pores may be spherical elongated or sometimes as large chamber that are connected to smaller channels called ink bottle systems
The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
Steps for Enamel Bonding Clean and wash the teeth with
water
Isolate to prevent any contamination from saliva or gingival crevicular fluid
Apply acid etchant in the form of liquid or gel for10 to 15 seconds
Deciduous teeth require longer time for etching than permanent teeth because of the presence of aprismatic enamel in deciduous teeth
Steps for Enamel Bonding
bull Now apply bonding agent and low viscosity monomers over the etched enamel surface
bull Generally enamel bonding agents contain Bis-GMA or UDMA with TEGDMA added to lower the viscosity of the bonding agent
bull The bonding agents due to their low viscosity rapidly wet and penetrate the clean dried conditioned enamel into the microspaces forming resin tags
Fluorosed teeth have an altered structure composition and appearance
With the increase in severity of fluorosis enamel becomes more porous and sub-surface lesion extends towards the inner enamel
Several studies have shown that composites can be bonded successfully to fluorosed enamel depending on the degree of fluorosis
It is always recommended to grind the enamel before bonding as it is seen that bond strength of composites to ground enamel of teeth with moderate fluorosis is similar to that of normal teeth
Acid etching is good for enamel bonding but not for dentin bonding in fluorosed teeth As a consequence a good choice of adhesive it would be a two-step self etch adhesive with an additional acid etching step for the enamel
Bonding to fluorosed teeth
Dentin Bonding
Dentin Bonding Adhesion of restorative materials to enamel has become a
routine and reliable aspect of modern restorative dentistry
But adhesion to dentin has proved to be more difficult and less predictable
Much of the difficulty in bonding to dentin is the result of the complex microstructure and variable composition of dentin in different areas of the tooth
Thus the composition of dentin is much different than that of enamel and one would expect it to behave differently when etched with acid
The presence of water and organic components lower the surface energy of dentin and make bonding with hydrophobic resins essentially impossible
Enamel vs Dentin
Dentin also contains a dense network of tubules that connect the pulp with the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ)
A cuff of hypermineralized dentin called peritubular dentin lines the tubules
The less mineralized intertubular dentin contains collagen fibrils with the characteristic collagen banding
The intertubular dentin is penetrated by submicron channels which allow the passage of tubular liquid and fibers between neighboring tubules forming intertubular anastomoses
Dentin is an intrinsically hydrated tissue penetrated by a maze of 1- to 025-μm-diameter fluid-filled dentin tubules
Movement of fluid from the pulp to the DEJ is a result of a slight but constant pulpal pressure
Pulpal pressure has a magnitude of 25 to 30 mm Hg or 34 to 40 cm H2O
Dentinal tubules enclose cellular extensions from the odontoblasts and are in direct communication with the pulp
Inside the tubule lumen other fibrous organic structures are present such as the lamina limitans which substantially decreases the functional radius of the tubule
Relative number of dentin tubules and tubule volume at different dentin levels as measured at different distances from the dentinoenamel Junction Adapted from Heymann 1995
Distribution of tubules in dentinDentin close to the pulp shows a
higher tubule density than indentin remote from the pulpThe higher the tubule densitythe lower the bond strength
values of the dentin adhesives tothe dentin
The relative area occupied by dentin tubules decreases with increasing distance from the pulp
Created whenever dentin is cut or ground with hand or rotary dental instruments and is about 1 to 5 μm thick (Brannstrom 1982)
It consists of debris that presumably reflects the composition of the underlying dentin
Thus the composition of superficial versus deep smear layers would be expected to be quite different
It has a uniform amorphous structure which appears to completely occlude the orifices of all dentinal tubules
Smear plugs are projections of the smear layer that extend to variable distances into dentinal tubules when the smear layer is created
Smear layer
The smear layer has both advantages and disadvantages in the bonding process (Yap et al 1994)
Advantages include
Reduction of dentin permeability to toxins and oral fluids Reduction of diffusion (usually inwards) and convection of fluids
(outwards by hydrostatic pressure or inwards for example while restorations are cemented)
Reduction of wetness of cut dentin surfaces and Prevention of bacterial penetration of dentinal tubules
Wetness and the harboring of bacteria or their products
It reduces the surface energy which compromises surface wetting
Prevents the intimate surface contact between the adhesive and dentin substrate and
Prevents resin penetration into dentinal tubules (Gwinnett 1984 Rees and Jacobsen 1990)
It acts like a separating agent since it is an intrinsically weak structure (5 to 6 MPa cohesive strength) that bond weakly to the underlying dentin (Tao and Pashley 1988)
Further the mineral component of the smear layer may dissolve slowly under a leaking restoration or may be removed by acid produced by bacteria to leave a gap which in turn increases marginal leakage and possibly secondary caries
Disadvantages include
Factors such as
radius and length of the tubules the viscosity of dentin fluid the pressure gradient the molecular size of the substances dissolved in the
tubular fluid and the rate of removal of substances by the blood vessels in
the pulp affect permeability
All of these variables make dentin a dynamic substrate and consequently a difficult substrate for bonding
Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
The factors important in understanding the over all lsquobonding equationrsquo is
Dentin factors Tooth factors Patient factors Material factors Clinical factors
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
ENAMEL BONDING Percentage of etchants used
35 to 40
Use of lower concentrations of phosphoric acid and reduced etching time has shown to give an adequate etch of the enamel while avoiding excessive demineralization of the dentin
Acid application time ideally 10 seconds
studies show that enamel should not be etched for more than 15 to 20 seconds
Scanning electron micrograph of enamel etched with 35 phosphoric acid (3M ESPE St Paul Minn) for 15 seconds
Enamel acid etching ndash removes 10 micron of enamel
Creates microporous layer 5 to50 microns deep
Smooth surface ndash irregular surface with high surface energy 72dynescm
Unfilled liquid acrylic resin (enamel bonding agent)
Wets the surface
Enters into microporosities by capillary action
Two types of resin tags are formed
Macrotags microtags (form between enamel prisms peripheries ) (form at the core of
enamel prisms )
Removes residual pellicle exposure to the inorganic crystallite component of enamel
Creates a porous layer with the depth of the pores ranging from 5-10 microm
Increases as the wettublity and surface area of the enamel substrate
Raises the surface energy of enamel with creation of reactive polar sites
EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
Silverstone et al (1975) studied the morphological changes in SEM produced on the acid etched enamel surface
Exposure of human enamel to conditioning solutions produces 3 basic etching patterns
PATTERN OF ETCHING
Type I (Preferential prism center etching) Dissolution of prism cores without dissolution
of prism peripheries resulting in a honey comb appearance The average diameter of the hollowed prism core is measured as about 3microm This is the most commonest type of etching pattern
Type II Dissolution of peripheral enamel without dissolution of prism cores resulting in a cobblestone appearance
Type III Mixed pattern Etching pattern is less distinct and includes areas resembling type I and type II patterns as well as regions in which the etching pattern appears unrelated to prism morphologyThis type of etching in general is associated with the presence of prism less enamel and appears as a generalized surface roughening
ETCHING PATTERNS
Clinically a uniform dull appearance is an indication that the tooth surface has been adequately etched
Silverstone in 1974 showed that etched enamel surface under polarized light resulted in 3 zones
1 Etched Zone2 Qualitative Zone3 Quantitative Zone
MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
1 Etched ZoneThis is the narrow zone of enamel at about 10microm in depth that is removed by etching The fully reacted mineral crystals are removed resulting in the exposure of more reactive surface This increased surface area and a reduced surface tension allows resin to wet in the etched surface more readily
2 Qualitative ZoneThis zone is about 20microm in depth and it is rendered porous during acid etching of the enamel when identified qualitatively using polarized light
3 Quantitative ZoneThis third zone is almost up to 20microm depth It is qualitatively indistinguishable from adjacent enamel and can be detected with quantitative polarized light In human enamel the pores may be spherical elongated or sometimes as large chamber that are connected to smaller channels called ink bottle systems
The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
Steps for Enamel Bonding Clean and wash the teeth with
water
Isolate to prevent any contamination from saliva or gingival crevicular fluid
Apply acid etchant in the form of liquid or gel for10 to 15 seconds
Deciduous teeth require longer time for etching than permanent teeth because of the presence of aprismatic enamel in deciduous teeth
Steps for Enamel Bonding
bull Now apply bonding agent and low viscosity monomers over the etched enamel surface
bull Generally enamel bonding agents contain Bis-GMA or UDMA with TEGDMA added to lower the viscosity of the bonding agent
bull The bonding agents due to their low viscosity rapidly wet and penetrate the clean dried conditioned enamel into the microspaces forming resin tags
Fluorosed teeth have an altered structure composition and appearance
With the increase in severity of fluorosis enamel becomes more porous and sub-surface lesion extends towards the inner enamel
Several studies have shown that composites can be bonded successfully to fluorosed enamel depending on the degree of fluorosis
It is always recommended to grind the enamel before bonding as it is seen that bond strength of composites to ground enamel of teeth with moderate fluorosis is similar to that of normal teeth
Acid etching is good for enamel bonding but not for dentin bonding in fluorosed teeth As a consequence a good choice of adhesive it would be a two-step self etch adhesive with an additional acid etching step for the enamel
Bonding to fluorosed teeth
Dentin Bonding
Dentin Bonding Adhesion of restorative materials to enamel has become a
routine and reliable aspect of modern restorative dentistry
But adhesion to dentin has proved to be more difficult and less predictable
Much of the difficulty in bonding to dentin is the result of the complex microstructure and variable composition of dentin in different areas of the tooth
Thus the composition of dentin is much different than that of enamel and one would expect it to behave differently when etched with acid
The presence of water and organic components lower the surface energy of dentin and make bonding with hydrophobic resins essentially impossible
Enamel vs Dentin
Dentin also contains a dense network of tubules that connect the pulp with the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ)
A cuff of hypermineralized dentin called peritubular dentin lines the tubules
The less mineralized intertubular dentin contains collagen fibrils with the characteristic collagen banding
The intertubular dentin is penetrated by submicron channels which allow the passage of tubular liquid and fibers between neighboring tubules forming intertubular anastomoses
Dentin is an intrinsically hydrated tissue penetrated by a maze of 1- to 025-μm-diameter fluid-filled dentin tubules
Movement of fluid from the pulp to the DEJ is a result of a slight but constant pulpal pressure
Pulpal pressure has a magnitude of 25 to 30 mm Hg or 34 to 40 cm H2O
Dentinal tubules enclose cellular extensions from the odontoblasts and are in direct communication with the pulp
Inside the tubule lumen other fibrous organic structures are present such as the lamina limitans which substantially decreases the functional radius of the tubule
Relative number of dentin tubules and tubule volume at different dentin levels as measured at different distances from the dentinoenamel Junction Adapted from Heymann 1995
Distribution of tubules in dentinDentin close to the pulp shows a
higher tubule density than indentin remote from the pulpThe higher the tubule densitythe lower the bond strength
values of the dentin adhesives tothe dentin
The relative area occupied by dentin tubules decreases with increasing distance from the pulp
Created whenever dentin is cut or ground with hand or rotary dental instruments and is about 1 to 5 μm thick (Brannstrom 1982)
It consists of debris that presumably reflects the composition of the underlying dentin
Thus the composition of superficial versus deep smear layers would be expected to be quite different
It has a uniform amorphous structure which appears to completely occlude the orifices of all dentinal tubules
Smear plugs are projections of the smear layer that extend to variable distances into dentinal tubules when the smear layer is created
Smear layer
The smear layer has both advantages and disadvantages in the bonding process (Yap et al 1994)
Advantages include
Reduction of dentin permeability to toxins and oral fluids Reduction of diffusion (usually inwards) and convection of fluids
(outwards by hydrostatic pressure or inwards for example while restorations are cemented)
Reduction of wetness of cut dentin surfaces and Prevention of bacterial penetration of dentinal tubules
Wetness and the harboring of bacteria or their products
It reduces the surface energy which compromises surface wetting
Prevents the intimate surface contact between the adhesive and dentin substrate and
Prevents resin penetration into dentinal tubules (Gwinnett 1984 Rees and Jacobsen 1990)
It acts like a separating agent since it is an intrinsically weak structure (5 to 6 MPa cohesive strength) that bond weakly to the underlying dentin (Tao and Pashley 1988)
Further the mineral component of the smear layer may dissolve slowly under a leaking restoration or may be removed by acid produced by bacteria to leave a gap which in turn increases marginal leakage and possibly secondary caries
Disadvantages include
Factors such as
radius and length of the tubules the viscosity of dentin fluid the pressure gradient the molecular size of the substances dissolved in the
tubular fluid and the rate of removal of substances by the blood vessels in
the pulp affect permeability
All of these variables make dentin a dynamic substrate and consequently a difficult substrate for bonding
Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
The factors important in understanding the over all lsquobonding equationrsquo is
Dentin factors Tooth factors Patient factors Material factors Clinical factors
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Acid application time ideally 10 seconds
studies show that enamel should not be etched for more than 15 to 20 seconds
Scanning electron micrograph of enamel etched with 35 phosphoric acid (3M ESPE St Paul Minn) for 15 seconds
Enamel acid etching ndash removes 10 micron of enamel
Creates microporous layer 5 to50 microns deep
Smooth surface ndash irregular surface with high surface energy 72dynescm
Unfilled liquid acrylic resin (enamel bonding agent)
Wets the surface
Enters into microporosities by capillary action
Two types of resin tags are formed
Macrotags microtags (form between enamel prisms peripheries ) (form at the core of
enamel prisms )
Removes residual pellicle exposure to the inorganic crystallite component of enamel
Creates a porous layer with the depth of the pores ranging from 5-10 microm
Increases as the wettublity and surface area of the enamel substrate
Raises the surface energy of enamel with creation of reactive polar sites
EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
Silverstone et al (1975) studied the morphological changes in SEM produced on the acid etched enamel surface
Exposure of human enamel to conditioning solutions produces 3 basic etching patterns
PATTERN OF ETCHING
Type I (Preferential prism center etching) Dissolution of prism cores without dissolution
of prism peripheries resulting in a honey comb appearance The average diameter of the hollowed prism core is measured as about 3microm This is the most commonest type of etching pattern
Type II Dissolution of peripheral enamel without dissolution of prism cores resulting in a cobblestone appearance
Type III Mixed pattern Etching pattern is less distinct and includes areas resembling type I and type II patterns as well as regions in which the etching pattern appears unrelated to prism morphologyThis type of etching in general is associated with the presence of prism less enamel and appears as a generalized surface roughening
ETCHING PATTERNS
Clinically a uniform dull appearance is an indication that the tooth surface has been adequately etched
Silverstone in 1974 showed that etched enamel surface under polarized light resulted in 3 zones
1 Etched Zone2 Qualitative Zone3 Quantitative Zone
MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
1 Etched ZoneThis is the narrow zone of enamel at about 10microm in depth that is removed by etching The fully reacted mineral crystals are removed resulting in the exposure of more reactive surface This increased surface area and a reduced surface tension allows resin to wet in the etched surface more readily
2 Qualitative ZoneThis zone is about 20microm in depth and it is rendered porous during acid etching of the enamel when identified qualitatively using polarized light
3 Quantitative ZoneThis third zone is almost up to 20microm depth It is qualitatively indistinguishable from adjacent enamel and can be detected with quantitative polarized light In human enamel the pores may be spherical elongated or sometimes as large chamber that are connected to smaller channels called ink bottle systems
The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
Steps for Enamel Bonding Clean and wash the teeth with
water
Isolate to prevent any contamination from saliva or gingival crevicular fluid
Apply acid etchant in the form of liquid or gel for10 to 15 seconds
Deciduous teeth require longer time for etching than permanent teeth because of the presence of aprismatic enamel in deciduous teeth
Steps for Enamel Bonding
bull Now apply bonding agent and low viscosity monomers over the etched enamel surface
bull Generally enamel bonding agents contain Bis-GMA or UDMA with TEGDMA added to lower the viscosity of the bonding agent
bull The bonding agents due to their low viscosity rapidly wet and penetrate the clean dried conditioned enamel into the microspaces forming resin tags
Fluorosed teeth have an altered structure composition and appearance
With the increase in severity of fluorosis enamel becomes more porous and sub-surface lesion extends towards the inner enamel
Several studies have shown that composites can be bonded successfully to fluorosed enamel depending on the degree of fluorosis
It is always recommended to grind the enamel before bonding as it is seen that bond strength of composites to ground enamel of teeth with moderate fluorosis is similar to that of normal teeth
Acid etching is good for enamel bonding but not for dentin bonding in fluorosed teeth As a consequence a good choice of adhesive it would be a two-step self etch adhesive with an additional acid etching step for the enamel
Bonding to fluorosed teeth
Dentin Bonding
Dentin Bonding Adhesion of restorative materials to enamel has become a
routine and reliable aspect of modern restorative dentistry
But adhesion to dentin has proved to be more difficult and less predictable
Much of the difficulty in bonding to dentin is the result of the complex microstructure and variable composition of dentin in different areas of the tooth
Thus the composition of dentin is much different than that of enamel and one would expect it to behave differently when etched with acid
The presence of water and organic components lower the surface energy of dentin and make bonding with hydrophobic resins essentially impossible
Enamel vs Dentin
Dentin also contains a dense network of tubules that connect the pulp with the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ)
A cuff of hypermineralized dentin called peritubular dentin lines the tubules
The less mineralized intertubular dentin contains collagen fibrils with the characteristic collagen banding
The intertubular dentin is penetrated by submicron channels which allow the passage of tubular liquid and fibers between neighboring tubules forming intertubular anastomoses
Dentin is an intrinsically hydrated tissue penetrated by a maze of 1- to 025-μm-diameter fluid-filled dentin tubules
Movement of fluid from the pulp to the DEJ is a result of a slight but constant pulpal pressure
Pulpal pressure has a magnitude of 25 to 30 mm Hg or 34 to 40 cm H2O
Dentinal tubules enclose cellular extensions from the odontoblasts and are in direct communication with the pulp
Inside the tubule lumen other fibrous organic structures are present such as the lamina limitans which substantially decreases the functional radius of the tubule
Relative number of dentin tubules and tubule volume at different dentin levels as measured at different distances from the dentinoenamel Junction Adapted from Heymann 1995
Distribution of tubules in dentinDentin close to the pulp shows a
higher tubule density than indentin remote from the pulpThe higher the tubule densitythe lower the bond strength
values of the dentin adhesives tothe dentin
The relative area occupied by dentin tubules decreases with increasing distance from the pulp
Created whenever dentin is cut or ground with hand or rotary dental instruments and is about 1 to 5 μm thick (Brannstrom 1982)
It consists of debris that presumably reflects the composition of the underlying dentin
Thus the composition of superficial versus deep smear layers would be expected to be quite different
It has a uniform amorphous structure which appears to completely occlude the orifices of all dentinal tubules
Smear plugs are projections of the smear layer that extend to variable distances into dentinal tubules when the smear layer is created
Smear layer
The smear layer has both advantages and disadvantages in the bonding process (Yap et al 1994)
Advantages include
Reduction of dentin permeability to toxins and oral fluids Reduction of diffusion (usually inwards) and convection of fluids
(outwards by hydrostatic pressure or inwards for example while restorations are cemented)
Reduction of wetness of cut dentin surfaces and Prevention of bacterial penetration of dentinal tubules
Wetness and the harboring of bacteria or their products
It reduces the surface energy which compromises surface wetting
Prevents the intimate surface contact between the adhesive and dentin substrate and
Prevents resin penetration into dentinal tubules (Gwinnett 1984 Rees and Jacobsen 1990)
It acts like a separating agent since it is an intrinsically weak structure (5 to 6 MPa cohesive strength) that bond weakly to the underlying dentin (Tao and Pashley 1988)
Further the mineral component of the smear layer may dissolve slowly under a leaking restoration or may be removed by acid produced by bacteria to leave a gap which in turn increases marginal leakage and possibly secondary caries
Disadvantages include
Factors such as
radius and length of the tubules the viscosity of dentin fluid the pressure gradient the molecular size of the substances dissolved in the
tubular fluid and the rate of removal of substances by the blood vessels in
the pulp affect permeability
All of these variables make dentin a dynamic substrate and consequently a difficult substrate for bonding
Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
The factors important in understanding the over all lsquobonding equationrsquo is
Dentin factors Tooth factors Patient factors Material factors Clinical factors
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Enamel acid etching ndash removes 10 micron of enamel
Creates microporous layer 5 to50 microns deep
Smooth surface ndash irregular surface with high surface energy 72dynescm
Unfilled liquid acrylic resin (enamel bonding agent)
Wets the surface
Enters into microporosities by capillary action
Two types of resin tags are formed
Macrotags microtags (form between enamel prisms peripheries ) (form at the core of
enamel prisms )
Removes residual pellicle exposure to the inorganic crystallite component of enamel
Creates a porous layer with the depth of the pores ranging from 5-10 microm
Increases as the wettublity and surface area of the enamel substrate
Raises the surface energy of enamel with creation of reactive polar sites
EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
Silverstone et al (1975) studied the morphological changes in SEM produced on the acid etched enamel surface
Exposure of human enamel to conditioning solutions produces 3 basic etching patterns
PATTERN OF ETCHING
Type I (Preferential prism center etching) Dissolution of prism cores without dissolution
of prism peripheries resulting in a honey comb appearance The average diameter of the hollowed prism core is measured as about 3microm This is the most commonest type of etching pattern
Type II Dissolution of peripheral enamel without dissolution of prism cores resulting in a cobblestone appearance
Type III Mixed pattern Etching pattern is less distinct and includes areas resembling type I and type II patterns as well as regions in which the etching pattern appears unrelated to prism morphologyThis type of etching in general is associated with the presence of prism less enamel and appears as a generalized surface roughening
ETCHING PATTERNS
Clinically a uniform dull appearance is an indication that the tooth surface has been adequately etched
Silverstone in 1974 showed that etched enamel surface under polarized light resulted in 3 zones
1 Etched Zone2 Qualitative Zone3 Quantitative Zone
MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
1 Etched ZoneThis is the narrow zone of enamel at about 10microm in depth that is removed by etching The fully reacted mineral crystals are removed resulting in the exposure of more reactive surface This increased surface area and a reduced surface tension allows resin to wet in the etched surface more readily
2 Qualitative ZoneThis zone is about 20microm in depth and it is rendered porous during acid etching of the enamel when identified qualitatively using polarized light
3 Quantitative ZoneThis third zone is almost up to 20microm depth It is qualitatively indistinguishable from adjacent enamel and can be detected with quantitative polarized light In human enamel the pores may be spherical elongated or sometimes as large chamber that are connected to smaller channels called ink bottle systems
The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
Steps for Enamel Bonding Clean and wash the teeth with
water
Isolate to prevent any contamination from saliva or gingival crevicular fluid
Apply acid etchant in the form of liquid or gel for10 to 15 seconds
Deciduous teeth require longer time for etching than permanent teeth because of the presence of aprismatic enamel in deciduous teeth
Steps for Enamel Bonding
bull Now apply bonding agent and low viscosity monomers over the etched enamel surface
bull Generally enamel bonding agents contain Bis-GMA or UDMA with TEGDMA added to lower the viscosity of the bonding agent
bull The bonding agents due to their low viscosity rapidly wet and penetrate the clean dried conditioned enamel into the microspaces forming resin tags
Fluorosed teeth have an altered structure composition and appearance
With the increase in severity of fluorosis enamel becomes more porous and sub-surface lesion extends towards the inner enamel
Several studies have shown that composites can be bonded successfully to fluorosed enamel depending on the degree of fluorosis
It is always recommended to grind the enamel before bonding as it is seen that bond strength of composites to ground enamel of teeth with moderate fluorosis is similar to that of normal teeth
Acid etching is good for enamel bonding but not for dentin bonding in fluorosed teeth As a consequence a good choice of adhesive it would be a two-step self etch adhesive with an additional acid etching step for the enamel
Bonding to fluorosed teeth
Dentin Bonding
Dentin Bonding Adhesion of restorative materials to enamel has become a
routine and reliable aspect of modern restorative dentistry
But adhesion to dentin has proved to be more difficult and less predictable
Much of the difficulty in bonding to dentin is the result of the complex microstructure and variable composition of dentin in different areas of the tooth
Thus the composition of dentin is much different than that of enamel and one would expect it to behave differently when etched with acid
The presence of water and organic components lower the surface energy of dentin and make bonding with hydrophobic resins essentially impossible
Enamel vs Dentin
Dentin also contains a dense network of tubules that connect the pulp with the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ)
A cuff of hypermineralized dentin called peritubular dentin lines the tubules
The less mineralized intertubular dentin contains collagen fibrils with the characteristic collagen banding
The intertubular dentin is penetrated by submicron channels which allow the passage of tubular liquid and fibers between neighboring tubules forming intertubular anastomoses
Dentin is an intrinsically hydrated tissue penetrated by a maze of 1- to 025-μm-diameter fluid-filled dentin tubules
Movement of fluid from the pulp to the DEJ is a result of a slight but constant pulpal pressure
Pulpal pressure has a magnitude of 25 to 30 mm Hg or 34 to 40 cm H2O
Dentinal tubules enclose cellular extensions from the odontoblasts and are in direct communication with the pulp
Inside the tubule lumen other fibrous organic structures are present such as the lamina limitans which substantially decreases the functional radius of the tubule
Relative number of dentin tubules and tubule volume at different dentin levels as measured at different distances from the dentinoenamel Junction Adapted from Heymann 1995
Distribution of tubules in dentinDentin close to the pulp shows a
higher tubule density than indentin remote from the pulpThe higher the tubule densitythe lower the bond strength
values of the dentin adhesives tothe dentin
The relative area occupied by dentin tubules decreases with increasing distance from the pulp
Created whenever dentin is cut or ground with hand or rotary dental instruments and is about 1 to 5 μm thick (Brannstrom 1982)
It consists of debris that presumably reflects the composition of the underlying dentin
Thus the composition of superficial versus deep smear layers would be expected to be quite different
It has a uniform amorphous structure which appears to completely occlude the orifices of all dentinal tubules
Smear plugs are projections of the smear layer that extend to variable distances into dentinal tubules when the smear layer is created
Smear layer
The smear layer has both advantages and disadvantages in the bonding process (Yap et al 1994)
Advantages include
Reduction of dentin permeability to toxins and oral fluids Reduction of diffusion (usually inwards) and convection of fluids
(outwards by hydrostatic pressure or inwards for example while restorations are cemented)
Reduction of wetness of cut dentin surfaces and Prevention of bacterial penetration of dentinal tubules
Wetness and the harboring of bacteria or their products
It reduces the surface energy which compromises surface wetting
Prevents the intimate surface contact between the adhesive and dentin substrate and
Prevents resin penetration into dentinal tubules (Gwinnett 1984 Rees and Jacobsen 1990)
It acts like a separating agent since it is an intrinsically weak structure (5 to 6 MPa cohesive strength) that bond weakly to the underlying dentin (Tao and Pashley 1988)
Further the mineral component of the smear layer may dissolve slowly under a leaking restoration or may be removed by acid produced by bacteria to leave a gap which in turn increases marginal leakage and possibly secondary caries
Disadvantages include
Factors such as
radius and length of the tubules the viscosity of dentin fluid the pressure gradient the molecular size of the substances dissolved in the
tubular fluid and the rate of removal of substances by the blood vessels in
the pulp affect permeability
All of these variables make dentin a dynamic substrate and consequently a difficult substrate for bonding
Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
The factors important in understanding the over all lsquobonding equationrsquo is
Dentin factors Tooth factors Patient factors Material factors Clinical factors
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Removes residual pellicle exposure to the inorganic crystallite component of enamel
Creates a porous layer with the depth of the pores ranging from 5-10 microm
Increases as the wettublity and surface area of the enamel substrate
Raises the surface energy of enamel with creation of reactive polar sites
EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
Silverstone et al (1975) studied the morphological changes in SEM produced on the acid etched enamel surface
Exposure of human enamel to conditioning solutions produces 3 basic etching patterns
PATTERN OF ETCHING
Type I (Preferential prism center etching) Dissolution of prism cores without dissolution
of prism peripheries resulting in a honey comb appearance The average diameter of the hollowed prism core is measured as about 3microm This is the most commonest type of etching pattern
Type II Dissolution of peripheral enamel without dissolution of prism cores resulting in a cobblestone appearance
Type III Mixed pattern Etching pattern is less distinct and includes areas resembling type I and type II patterns as well as regions in which the etching pattern appears unrelated to prism morphologyThis type of etching in general is associated with the presence of prism less enamel and appears as a generalized surface roughening
ETCHING PATTERNS
Clinically a uniform dull appearance is an indication that the tooth surface has been adequately etched
Silverstone in 1974 showed that etched enamel surface under polarized light resulted in 3 zones
1 Etched Zone2 Qualitative Zone3 Quantitative Zone
MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
1 Etched ZoneThis is the narrow zone of enamel at about 10microm in depth that is removed by etching The fully reacted mineral crystals are removed resulting in the exposure of more reactive surface This increased surface area and a reduced surface tension allows resin to wet in the etched surface more readily
2 Qualitative ZoneThis zone is about 20microm in depth and it is rendered porous during acid etching of the enamel when identified qualitatively using polarized light
3 Quantitative ZoneThis third zone is almost up to 20microm depth It is qualitatively indistinguishable from adjacent enamel and can be detected with quantitative polarized light In human enamel the pores may be spherical elongated or sometimes as large chamber that are connected to smaller channels called ink bottle systems
The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
Steps for Enamel Bonding Clean and wash the teeth with
water
Isolate to prevent any contamination from saliva or gingival crevicular fluid
Apply acid etchant in the form of liquid or gel for10 to 15 seconds
Deciduous teeth require longer time for etching than permanent teeth because of the presence of aprismatic enamel in deciduous teeth
Steps for Enamel Bonding
bull Now apply bonding agent and low viscosity monomers over the etched enamel surface
bull Generally enamel bonding agents contain Bis-GMA or UDMA with TEGDMA added to lower the viscosity of the bonding agent
bull The bonding agents due to their low viscosity rapidly wet and penetrate the clean dried conditioned enamel into the microspaces forming resin tags
Fluorosed teeth have an altered structure composition and appearance
With the increase in severity of fluorosis enamel becomes more porous and sub-surface lesion extends towards the inner enamel
Several studies have shown that composites can be bonded successfully to fluorosed enamel depending on the degree of fluorosis
It is always recommended to grind the enamel before bonding as it is seen that bond strength of composites to ground enamel of teeth with moderate fluorosis is similar to that of normal teeth
Acid etching is good for enamel bonding but not for dentin bonding in fluorosed teeth As a consequence a good choice of adhesive it would be a two-step self etch adhesive with an additional acid etching step for the enamel
Bonding to fluorosed teeth
Dentin Bonding
Dentin Bonding Adhesion of restorative materials to enamel has become a
routine and reliable aspect of modern restorative dentistry
But adhesion to dentin has proved to be more difficult and less predictable
Much of the difficulty in bonding to dentin is the result of the complex microstructure and variable composition of dentin in different areas of the tooth
Thus the composition of dentin is much different than that of enamel and one would expect it to behave differently when etched with acid
The presence of water and organic components lower the surface energy of dentin and make bonding with hydrophobic resins essentially impossible
Enamel vs Dentin
Dentin also contains a dense network of tubules that connect the pulp with the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ)
A cuff of hypermineralized dentin called peritubular dentin lines the tubules
The less mineralized intertubular dentin contains collagen fibrils with the characteristic collagen banding
The intertubular dentin is penetrated by submicron channels which allow the passage of tubular liquid and fibers between neighboring tubules forming intertubular anastomoses
Dentin is an intrinsically hydrated tissue penetrated by a maze of 1- to 025-μm-diameter fluid-filled dentin tubules
Movement of fluid from the pulp to the DEJ is a result of a slight but constant pulpal pressure
Pulpal pressure has a magnitude of 25 to 30 mm Hg or 34 to 40 cm H2O
Dentinal tubules enclose cellular extensions from the odontoblasts and are in direct communication with the pulp
Inside the tubule lumen other fibrous organic structures are present such as the lamina limitans which substantially decreases the functional radius of the tubule
Relative number of dentin tubules and tubule volume at different dentin levels as measured at different distances from the dentinoenamel Junction Adapted from Heymann 1995
Distribution of tubules in dentinDentin close to the pulp shows a
higher tubule density than indentin remote from the pulpThe higher the tubule densitythe lower the bond strength
values of the dentin adhesives tothe dentin
The relative area occupied by dentin tubules decreases with increasing distance from the pulp
Created whenever dentin is cut or ground with hand or rotary dental instruments and is about 1 to 5 μm thick (Brannstrom 1982)
It consists of debris that presumably reflects the composition of the underlying dentin
Thus the composition of superficial versus deep smear layers would be expected to be quite different
It has a uniform amorphous structure which appears to completely occlude the orifices of all dentinal tubules
Smear plugs are projections of the smear layer that extend to variable distances into dentinal tubules when the smear layer is created
Smear layer
The smear layer has both advantages and disadvantages in the bonding process (Yap et al 1994)
Advantages include
Reduction of dentin permeability to toxins and oral fluids Reduction of diffusion (usually inwards) and convection of fluids
(outwards by hydrostatic pressure or inwards for example while restorations are cemented)
Reduction of wetness of cut dentin surfaces and Prevention of bacterial penetration of dentinal tubules
Wetness and the harboring of bacteria or their products
It reduces the surface energy which compromises surface wetting
Prevents the intimate surface contact between the adhesive and dentin substrate and
Prevents resin penetration into dentinal tubules (Gwinnett 1984 Rees and Jacobsen 1990)
It acts like a separating agent since it is an intrinsically weak structure (5 to 6 MPa cohesive strength) that bond weakly to the underlying dentin (Tao and Pashley 1988)
Further the mineral component of the smear layer may dissolve slowly under a leaking restoration or may be removed by acid produced by bacteria to leave a gap which in turn increases marginal leakage and possibly secondary caries
Disadvantages include
Factors such as
radius and length of the tubules the viscosity of dentin fluid the pressure gradient the molecular size of the substances dissolved in the
tubular fluid and the rate of removal of substances by the blood vessels in
the pulp affect permeability
All of these variables make dentin a dynamic substrate and consequently a difficult substrate for bonding
Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
The factors important in understanding the over all lsquobonding equationrsquo is
Dentin factors Tooth factors Patient factors Material factors Clinical factors
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Silverstone et al (1975) studied the morphological changes in SEM produced on the acid etched enamel surface
Exposure of human enamel to conditioning solutions produces 3 basic etching patterns
PATTERN OF ETCHING
Type I (Preferential prism center etching) Dissolution of prism cores without dissolution
of prism peripheries resulting in a honey comb appearance The average diameter of the hollowed prism core is measured as about 3microm This is the most commonest type of etching pattern
Type II Dissolution of peripheral enamel without dissolution of prism cores resulting in a cobblestone appearance
Type III Mixed pattern Etching pattern is less distinct and includes areas resembling type I and type II patterns as well as regions in which the etching pattern appears unrelated to prism morphologyThis type of etching in general is associated with the presence of prism less enamel and appears as a generalized surface roughening
ETCHING PATTERNS
Clinically a uniform dull appearance is an indication that the tooth surface has been adequately etched
Silverstone in 1974 showed that etched enamel surface under polarized light resulted in 3 zones
1 Etched Zone2 Qualitative Zone3 Quantitative Zone
MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
1 Etched ZoneThis is the narrow zone of enamel at about 10microm in depth that is removed by etching The fully reacted mineral crystals are removed resulting in the exposure of more reactive surface This increased surface area and a reduced surface tension allows resin to wet in the etched surface more readily
2 Qualitative ZoneThis zone is about 20microm in depth and it is rendered porous during acid etching of the enamel when identified qualitatively using polarized light
3 Quantitative ZoneThis third zone is almost up to 20microm depth It is qualitatively indistinguishable from adjacent enamel and can be detected with quantitative polarized light In human enamel the pores may be spherical elongated or sometimes as large chamber that are connected to smaller channels called ink bottle systems
The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
Steps for Enamel Bonding Clean and wash the teeth with
water
Isolate to prevent any contamination from saliva or gingival crevicular fluid
Apply acid etchant in the form of liquid or gel for10 to 15 seconds
Deciduous teeth require longer time for etching than permanent teeth because of the presence of aprismatic enamel in deciduous teeth
Steps for Enamel Bonding
bull Now apply bonding agent and low viscosity monomers over the etched enamel surface
bull Generally enamel bonding agents contain Bis-GMA or UDMA with TEGDMA added to lower the viscosity of the bonding agent
bull The bonding agents due to their low viscosity rapidly wet and penetrate the clean dried conditioned enamel into the microspaces forming resin tags
Fluorosed teeth have an altered structure composition and appearance
With the increase in severity of fluorosis enamel becomes more porous and sub-surface lesion extends towards the inner enamel
Several studies have shown that composites can be bonded successfully to fluorosed enamel depending on the degree of fluorosis
It is always recommended to grind the enamel before bonding as it is seen that bond strength of composites to ground enamel of teeth with moderate fluorosis is similar to that of normal teeth
Acid etching is good for enamel bonding but not for dentin bonding in fluorosed teeth As a consequence a good choice of adhesive it would be a two-step self etch adhesive with an additional acid etching step for the enamel
Bonding to fluorosed teeth
Dentin Bonding
Dentin Bonding Adhesion of restorative materials to enamel has become a
routine and reliable aspect of modern restorative dentistry
But adhesion to dentin has proved to be more difficult and less predictable
Much of the difficulty in bonding to dentin is the result of the complex microstructure and variable composition of dentin in different areas of the tooth
Thus the composition of dentin is much different than that of enamel and one would expect it to behave differently when etched with acid
The presence of water and organic components lower the surface energy of dentin and make bonding with hydrophobic resins essentially impossible
Enamel vs Dentin
Dentin also contains a dense network of tubules that connect the pulp with the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ)
A cuff of hypermineralized dentin called peritubular dentin lines the tubules
The less mineralized intertubular dentin contains collagen fibrils with the characteristic collagen banding
The intertubular dentin is penetrated by submicron channels which allow the passage of tubular liquid and fibers between neighboring tubules forming intertubular anastomoses
Dentin is an intrinsically hydrated tissue penetrated by a maze of 1- to 025-μm-diameter fluid-filled dentin tubules
Movement of fluid from the pulp to the DEJ is a result of a slight but constant pulpal pressure
Pulpal pressure has a magnitude of 25 to 30 mm Hg or 34 to 40 cm H2O
Dentinal tubules enclose cellular extensions from the odontoblasts and are in direct communication with the pulp
Inside the tubule lumen other fibrous organic structures are present such as the lamina limitans which substantially decreases the functional radius of the tubule
Relative number of dentin tubules and tubule volume at different dentin levels as measured at different distances from the dentinoenamel Junction Adapted from Heymann 1995
Distribution of tubules in dentinDentin close to the pulp shows a
higher tubule density than indentin remote from the pulpThe higher the tubule densitythe lower the bond strength
values of the dentin adhesives tothe dentin
The relative area occupied by dentin tubules decreases with increasing distance from the pulp
Created whenever dentin is cut or ground with hand or rotary dental instruments and is about 1 to 5 μm thick (Brannstrom 1982)
It consists of debris that presumably reflects the composition of the underlying dentin
Thus the composition of superficial versus deep smear layers would be expected to be quite different
It has a uniform amorphous structure which appears to completely occlude the orifices of all dentinal tubules
Smear plugs are projections of the smear layer that extend to variable distances into dentinal tubules when the smear layer is created
Smear layer
The smear layer has both advantages and disadvantages in the bonding process (Yap et al 1994)
Advantages include
Reduction of dentin permeability to toxins and oral fluids Reduction of diffusion (usually inwards) and convection of fluids
(outwards by hydrostatic pressure or inwards for example while restorations are cemented)
Reduction of wetness of cut dentin surfaces and Prevention of bacterial penetration of dentinal tubules
Wetness and the harboring of bacteria or their products
It reduces the surface energy which compromises surface wetting
Prevents the intimate surface contact between the adhesive and dentin substrate and
Prevents resin penetration into dentinal tubules (Gwinnett 1984 Rees and Jacobsen 1990)
It acts like a separating agent since it is an intrinsically weak structure (5 to 6 MPa cohesive strength) that bond weakly to the underlying dentin (Tao and Pashley 1988)
Further the mineral component of the smear layer may dissolve slowly under a leaking restoration or may be removed by acid produced by bacteria to leave a gap which in turn increases marginal leakage and possibly secondary caries
Disadvantages include
Factors such as
radius and length of the tubules the viscosity of dentin fluid the pressure gradient the molecular size of the substances dissolved in the
tubular fluid and the rate of removal of substances by the blood vessels in
the pulp affect permeability
All of these variables make dentin a dynamic substrate and consequently a difficult substrate for bonding
Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
The factors important in understanding the over all lsquobonding equationrsquo is
Dentin factors Tooth factors Patient factors Material factors Clinical factors
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Type I (Preferential prism center etching) Dissolution of prism cores without dissolution
of prism peripheries resulting in a honey comb appearance The average diameter of the hollowed prism core is measured as about 3microm This is the most commonest type of etching pattern
Type II Dissolution of peripheral enamel without dissolution of prism cores resulting in a cobblestone appearance
Type III Mixed pattern Etching pattern is less distinct and includes areas resembling type I and type II patterns as well as regions in which the etching pattern appears unrelated to prism morphologyThis type of etching in general is associated with the presence of prism less enamel and appears as a generalized surface roughening
ETCHING PATTERNS
Clinically a uniform dull appearance is an indication that the tooth surface has been adequately etched
Silverstone in 1974 showed that etched enamel surface under polarized light resulted in 3 zones
1 Etched Zone2 Qualitative Zone3 Quantitative Zone
MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
1 Etched ZoneThis is the narrow zone of enamel at about 10microm in depth that is removed by etching The fully reacted mineral crystals are removed resulting in the exposure of more reactive surface This increased surface area and a reduced surface tension allows resin to wet in the etched surface more readily
2 Qualitative ZoneThis zone is about 20microm in depth and it is rendered porous during acid etching of the enamel when identified qualitatively using polarized light
3 Quantitative ZoneThis third zone is almost up to 20microm depth It is qualitatively indistinguishable from adjacent enamel and can be detected with quantitative polarized light In human enamel the pores may be spherical elongated or sometimes as large chamber that are connected to smaller channels called ink bottle systems
The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
Steps for Enamel Bonding Clean and wash the teeth with
water
Isolate to prevent any contamination from saliva or gingival crevicular fluid
Apply acid etchant in the form of liquid or gel for10 to 15 seconds
Deciduous teeth require longer time for etching than permanent teeth because of the presence of aprismatic enamel in deciduous teeth
Steps for Enamel Bonding
bull Now apply bonding agent and low viscosity monomers over the etched enamel surface
bull Generally enamel bonding agents contain Bis-GMA or UDMA with TEGDMA added to lower the viscosity of the bonding agent
bull The bonding agents due to their low viscosity rapidly wet and penetrate the clean dried conditioned enamel into the microspaces forming resin tags
Fluorosed teeth have an altered structure composition and appearance
With the increase in severity of fluorosis enamel becomes more porous and sub-surface lesion extends towards the inner enamel
Several studies have shown that composites can be bonded successfully to fluorosed enamel depending on the degree of fluorosis
It is always recommended to grind the enamel before bonding as it is seen that bond strength of composites to ground enamel of teeth with moderate fluorosis is similar to that of normal teeth
Acid etching is good for enamel bonding but not for dentin bonding in fluorosed teeth As a consequence a good choice of adhesive it would be a two-step self etch adhesive with an additional acid etching step for the enamel
Bonding to fluorosed teeth
Dentin Bonding
Dentin Bonding Adhesion of restorative materials to enamel has become a
routine and reliable aspect of modern restorative dentistry
But adhesion to dentin has proved to be more difficult and less predictable
Much of the difficulty in bonding to dentin is the result of the complex microstructure and variable composition of dentin in different areas of the tooth
Thus the composition of dentin is much different than that of enamel and one would expect it to behave differently when etched with acid
The presence of water and organic components lower the surface energy of dentin and make bonding with hydrophobic resins essentially impossible
Enamel vs Dentin
Dentin also contains a dense network of tubules that connect the pulp with the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ)
A cuff of hypermineralized dentin called peritubular dentin lines the tubules
The less mineralized intertubular dentin contains collagen fibrils with the characteristic collagen banding
The intertubular dentin is penetrated by submicron channels which allow the passage of tubular liquid and fibers between neighboring tubules forming intertubular anastomoses
Dentin is an intrinsically hydrated tissue penetrated by a maze of 1- to 025-μm-diameter fluid-filled dentin tubules
Movement of fluid from the pulp to the DEJ is a result of a slight but constant pulpal pressure
Pulpal pressure has a magnitude of 25 to 30 mm Hg or 34 to 40 cm H2O
Dentinal tubules enclose cellular extensions from the odontoblasts and are in direct communication with the pulp
Inside the tubule lumen other fibrous organic structures are present such as the lamina limitans which substantially decreases the functional radius of the tubule
Relative number of dentin tubules and tubule volume at different dentin levels as measured at different distances from the dentinoenamel Junction Adapted from Heymann 1995
Distribution of tubules in dentinDentin close to the pulp shows a
higher tubule density than indentin remote from the pulpThe higher the tubule densitythe lower the bond strength
values of the dentin adhesives tothe dentin
The relative area occupied by dentin tubules decreases with increasing distance from the pulp
Created whenever dentin is cut or ground with hand or rotary dental instruments and is about 1 to 5 μm thick (Brannstrom 1982)
It consists of debris that presumably reflects the composition of the underlying dentin
Thus the composition of superficial versus deep smear layers would be expected to be quite different
It has a uniform amorphous structure which appears to completely occlude the orifices of all dentinal tubules
Smear plugs are projections of the smear layer that extend to variable distances into dentinal tubules when the smear layer is created
Smear layer
The smear layer has both advantages and disadvantages in the bonding process (Yap et al 1994)
Advantages include
Reduction of dentin permeability to toxins and oral fluids Reduction of diffusion (usually inwards) and convection of fluids
(outwards by hydrostatic pressure or inwards for example while restorations are cemented)
Reduction of wetness of cut dentin surfaces and Prevention of bacterial penetration of dentinal tubules
Wetness and the harboring of bacteria or their products
It reduces the surface energy which compromises surface wetting
Prevents the intimate surface contact between the adhesive and dentin substrate and
Prevents resin penetration into dentinal tubules (Gwinnett 1984 Rees and Jacobsen 1990)
It acts like a separating agent since it is an intrinsically weak structure (5 to 6 MPa cohesive strength) that bond weakly to the underlying dentin (Tao and Pashley 1988)
Further the mineral component of the smear layer may dissolve slowly under a leaking restoration or may be removed by acid produced by bacteria to leave a gap which in turn increases marginal leakage and possibly secondary caries
Disadvantages include
Factors such as
radius and length of the tubules the viscosity of dentin fluid the pressure gradient the molecular size of the substances dissolved in the
tubular fluid and the rate of removal of substances by the blood vessels in
the pulp affect permeability
All of these variables make dentin a dynamic substrate and consequently a difficult substrate for bonding
Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
The factors important in understanding the over all lsquobonding equationrsquo is
Dentin factors Tooth factors Patient factors Material factors Clinical factors
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Clinically a uniform dull appearance is an indication that the tooth surface has been adequately etched
Silverstone in 1974 showed that etched enamel surface under polarized light resulted in 3 zones
1 Etched Zone2 Qualitative Zone3 Quantitative Zone
MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
1 Etched ZoneThis is the narrow zone of enamel at about 10microm in depth that is removed by etching The fully reacted mineral crystals are removed resulting in the exposure of more reactive surface This increased surface area and a reduced surface tension allows resin to wet in the etched surface more readily
2 Qualitative ZoneThis zone is about 20microm in depth and it is rendered porous during acid etching of the enamel when identified qualitatively using polarized light
3 Quantitative ZoneThis third zone is almost up to 20microm depth It is qualitatively indistinguishable from adjacent enamel and can be detected with quantitative polarized light In human enamel the pores may be spherical elongated or sometimes as large chamber that are connected to smaller channels called ink bottle systems
The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
Steps for Enamel Bonding Clean and wash the teeth with
water
Isolate to prevent any contamination from saliva or gingival crevicular fluid
Apply acid etchant in the form of liquid or gel for10 to 15 seconds
Deciduous teeth require longer time for etching than permanent teeth because of the presence of aprismatic enamel in deciduous teeth
Steps for Enamel Bonding
bull Now apply bonding agent and low viscosity monomers over the etched enamel surface
bull Generally enamel bonding agents contain Bis-GMA or UDMA with TEGDMA added to lower the viscosity of the bonding agent
bull The bonding agents due to their low viscosity rapidly wet and penetrate the clean dried conditioned enamel into the microspaces forming resin tags
Fluorosed teeth have an altered structure composition and appearance
With the increase in severity of fluorosis enamel becomes more porous and sub-surface lesion extends towards the inner enamel
Several studies have shown that composites can be bonded successfully to fluorosed enamel depending on the degree of fluorosis
It is always recommended to grind the enamel before bonding as it is seen that bond strength of composites to ground enamel of teeth with moderate fluorosis is similar to that of normal teeth
Acid etching is good for enamel bonding but not for dentin bonding in fluorosed teeth As a consequence a good choice of adhesive it would be a two-step self etch adhesive with an additional acid etching step for the enamel
Bonding to fluorosed teeth
Dentin Bonding
Dentin Bonding Adhesion of restorative materials to enamel has become a
routine and reliable aspect of modern restorative dentistry
But adhesion to dentin has proved to be more difficult and less predictable
Much of the difficulty in bonding to dentin is the result of the complex microstructure and variable composition of dentin in different areas of the tooth
Thus the composition of dentin is much different than that of enamel and one would expect it to behave differently when etched with acid
The presence of water and organic components lower the surface energy of dentin and make bonding with hydrophobic resins essentially impossible
Enamel vs Dentin
Dentin also contains a dense network of tubules that connect the pulp with the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ)
A cuff of hypermineralized dentin called peritubular dentin lines the tubules
The less mineralized intertubular dentin contains collagen fibrils with the characteristic collagen banding
The intertubular dentin is penetrated by submicron channels which allow the passage of tubular liquid and fibers between neighboring tubules forming intertubular anastomoses
Dentin is an intrinsically hydrated tissue penetrated by a maze of 1- to 025-μm-diameter fluid-filled dentin tubules
Movement of fluid from the pulp to the DEJ is a result of a slight but constant pulpal pressure
Pulpal pressure has a magnitude of 25 to 30 mm Hg or 34 to 40 cm H2O
Dentinal tubules enclose cellular extensions from the odontoblasts and are in direct communication with the pulp
Inside the tubule lumen other fibrous organic structures are present such as the lamina limitans which substantially decreases the functional radius of the tubule
Relative number of dentin tubules and tubule volume at different dentin levels as measured at different distances from the dentinoenamel Junction Adapted from Heymann 1995
Distribution of tubules in dentinDentin close to the pulp shows a
higher tubule density than indentin remote from the pulpThe higher the tubule densitythe lower the bond strength
values of the dentin adhesives tothe dentin
The relative area occupied by dentin tubules decreases with increasing distance from the pulp
Created whenever dentin is cut or ground with hand or rotary dental instruments and is about 1 to 5 μm thick (Brannstrom 1982)
It consists of debris that presumably reflects the composition of the underlying dentin
Thus the composition of superficial versus deep smear layers would be expected to be quite different
It has a uniform amorphous structure which appears to completely occlude the orifices of all dentinal tubules
Smear plugs are projections of the smear layer that extend to variable distances into dentinal tubules when the smear layer is created
Smear layer
The smear layer has both advantages and disadvantages in the bonding process (Yap et al 1994)
Advantages include
Reduction of dentin permeability to toxins and oral fluids Reduction of diffusion (usually inwards) and convection of fluids
(outwards by hydrostatic pressure or inwards for example while restorations are cemented)
Reduction of wetness of cut dentin surfaces and Prevention of bacterial penetration of dentinal tubules
Wetness and the harboring of bacteria or their products
It reduces the surface energy which compromises surface wetting
Prevents the intimate surface contact between the adhesive and dentin substrate and
Prevents resin penetration into dentinal tubules (Gwinnett 1984 Rees and Jacobsen 1990)
It acts like a separating agent since it is an intrinsically weak structure (5 to 6 MPa cohesive strength) that bond weakly to the underlying dentin (Tao and Pashley 1988)
Further the mineral component of the smear layer may dissolve slowly under a leaking restoration or may be removed by acid produced by bacteria to leave a gap which in turn increases marginal leakage and possibly secondary caries
Disadvantages include
Factors such as
radius and length of the tubules the viscosity of dentin fluid the pressure gradient the molecular size of the substances dissolved in the
tubular fluid and the rate of removal of substances by the blood vessels in
the pulp affect permeability
All of these variables make dentin a dynamic substrate and consequently a difficult substrate for bonding
Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
The factors important in understanding the over all lsquobonding equationrsquo is
Dentin factors Tooth factors Patient factors Material factors Clinical factors
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
1 Etched ZoneThis is the narrow zone of enamel at about 10microm in depth that is removed by etching The fully reacted mineral crystals are removed resulting in the exposure of more reactive surface This increased surface area and a reduced surface tension allows resin to wet in the etched surface more readily
2 Qualitative ZoneThis zone is about 20microm in depth and it is rendered porous during acid etching of the enamel when identified qualitatively using polarized light
3 Quantitative ZoneThis third zone is almost up to 20microm depth It is qualitatively indistinguishable from adjacent enamel and can be detected with quantitative polarized light In human enamel the pores may be spherical elongated or sometimes as large chamber that are connected to smaller channels called ink bottle systems
The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
Steps for Enamel Bonding Clean and wash the teeth with
water
Isolate to prevent any contamination from saliva or gingival crevicular fluid
Apply acid etchant in the form of liquid or gel for10 to 15 seconds
Deciduous teeth require longer time for etching than permanent teeth because of the presence of aprismatic enamel in deciduous teeth
Steps for Enamel Bonding
bull Now apply bonding agent and low viscosity monomers over the etched enamel surface
bull Generally enamel bonding agents contain Bis-GMA or UDMA with TEGDMA added to lower the viscosity of the bonding agent
bull The bonding agents due to their low viscosity rapidly wet and penetrate the clean dried conditioned enamel into the microspaces forming resin tags
Fluorosed teeth have an altered structure composition and appearance
With the increase in severity of fluorosis enamel becomes more porous and sub-surface lesion extends towards the inner enamel
Several studies have shown that composites can be bonded successfully to fluorosed enamel depending on the degree of fluorosis
It is always recommended to grind the enamel before bonding as it is seen that bond strength of composites to ground enamel of teeth with moderate fluorosis is similar to that of normal teeth
Acid etching is good for enamel bonding but not for dentin bonding in fluorosed teeth As a consequence a good choice of adhesive it would be a two-step self etch adhesive with an additional acid etching step for the enamel
Bonding to fluorosed teeth
Dentin Bonding
Dentin Bonding Adhesion of restorative materials to enamel has become a
routine and reliable aspect of modern restorative dentistry
But adhesion to dentin has proved to be more difficult and less predictable
Much of the difficulty in bonding to dentin is the result of the complex microstructure and variable composition of dentin in different areas of the tooth
Thus the composition of dentin is much different than that of enamel and one would expect it to behave differently when etched with acid
The presence of water and organic components lower the surface energy of dentin and make bonding with hydrophobic resins essentially impossible
Enamel vs Dentin
Dentin also contains a dense network of tubules that connect the pulp with the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ)
A cuff of hypermineralized dentin called peritubular dentin lines the tubules
The less mineralized intertubular dentin contains collagen fibrils with the characteristic collagen banding
The intertubular dentin is penetrated by submicron channels which allow the passage of tubular liquid and fibers between neighboring tubules forming intertubular anastomoses
Dentin is an intrinsically hydrated tissue penetrated by a maze of 1- to 025-μm-diameter fluid-filled dentin tubules
Movement of fluid from the pulp to the DEJ is a result of a slight but constant pulpal pressure
Pulpal pressure has a magnitude of 25 to 30 mm Hg or 34 to 40 cm H2O
Dentinal tubules enclose cellular extensions from the odontoblasts and are in direct communication with the pulp
Inside the tubule lumen other fibrous organic structures are present such as the lamina limitans which substantially decreases the functional radius of the tubule
Relative number of dentin tubules and tubule volume at different dentin levels as measured at different distances from the dentinoenamel Junction Adapted from Heymann 1995
Distribution of tubules in dentinDentin close to the pulp shows a
higher tubule density than indentin remote from the pulpThe higher the tubule densitythe lower the bond strength
values of the dentin adhesives tothe dentin
The relative area occupied by dentin tubules decreases with increasing distance from the pulp
Created whenever dentin is cut or ground with hand or rotary dental instruments and is about 1 to 5 μm thick (Brannstrom 1982)
It consists of debris that presumably reflects the composition of the underlying dentin
Thus the composition of superficial versus deep smear layers would be expected to be quite different
It has a uniform amorphous structure which appears to completely occlude the orifices of all dentinal tubules
Smear plugs are projections of the smear layer that extend to variable distances into dentinal tubules when the smear layer is created
Smear layer
The smear layer has both advantages and disadvantages in the bonding process (Yap et al 1994)
Advantages include
Reduction of dentin permeability to toxins and oral fluids Reduction of diffusion (usually inwards) and convection of fluids
(outwards by hydrostatic pressure or inwards for example while restorations are cemented)
Reduction of wetness of cut dentin surfaces and Prevention of bacterial penetration of dentinal tubules
Wetness and the harboring of bacteria or their products
It reduces the surface energy which compromises surface wetting
Prevents the intimate surface contact between the adhesive and dentin substrate and
Prevents resin penetration into dentinal tubules (Gwinnett 1984 Rees and Jacobsen 1990)
It acts like a separating agent since it is an intrinsically weak structure (5 to 6 MPa cohesive strength) that bond weakly to the underlying dentin (Tao and Pashley 1988)
Further the mineral component of the smear layer may dissolve slowly under a leaking restoration or may be removed by acid produced by bacteria to leave a gap which in turn increases marginal leakage and possibly secondary caries
Disadvantages include
Factors such as
radius and length of the tubules the viscosity of dentin fluid the pressure gradient the molecular size of the substances dissolved in the
tubular fluid and the rate of removal of substances by the blood vessels in
the pulp affect permeability
All of these variables make dentin a dynamic substrate and consequently a difficult substrate for bonding
Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
The factors important in understanding the over all lsquobonding equationrsquo is
Dentin factors Tooth factors Patient factors Material factors Clinical factors
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
Steps for Enamel Bonding Clean and wash the teeth with
water
Isolate to prevent any contamination from saliva or gingival crevicular fluid
Apply acid etchant in the form of liquid or gel for10 to 15 seconds
Deciduous teeth require longer time for etching than permanent teeth because of the presence of aprismatic enamel in deciduous teeth
Steps for Enamel Bonding
bull Now apply bonding agent and low viscosity monomers over the etched enamel surface
bull Generally enamel bonding agents contain Bis-GMA or UDMA with TEGDMA added to lower the viscosity of the bonding agent
bull The bonding agents due to their low viscosity rapidly wet and penetrate the clean dried conditioned enamel into the microspaces forming resin tags
Fluorosed teeth have an altered structure composition and appearance
With the increase in severity of fluorosis enamel becomes more porous and sub-surface lesion extends towards the inner enamel
Several studies have shown that composites can be bonded successfully to fluorosed enamel depending on the degree of fluorosis
It is always recommended to grind the enamel before bonding as it is seen that bond strength of composites to ground enamel of teeth with moderate fluorosis is similar to that of normal teeth
Acid etching is good for enamel bonding but not for dentin bonding in fluorosed teeth As a consequence a good choice of adhesive it would be a two-step self etch adhesive with an additional acid etching step for the enamel
Bonding to fluorosed teeth
Dentin Bonding
Dentin Bonding Adhesion of restorative materials to enamel has become a
routine and reliable aspect of modern restorative dentistry
But adhesion to dentin has proved to be more difficult and less predictable
Much of the difficulty in bonding to dentin is the result of the complex microstructure and variable composition of dentin in different areas of the tooth
Thus the composition of dentin is much different than that of enamel and one would expect it to behave differently when etched with acid
The presence of water and organic components lower the surface energy of dentin and make bonding with hydrophobic resins essentially impossible
Enamel vs Dentin
Dentin also contains a dense network of tubules that connect the pulp with the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ)
A cuff of hypermineralized dentin called peritubular dentin lines the tubules
The less mineralized intertubular dentin contains collagen fibrils with the characteristic collagen banding
The intertubular dentin is penetrated by submicron channels which allow the passage of tubular liquid and fibers between neighboring tubules forming intertubular anastomoses
Dentin is an intrinsically hydrated tissue penetrated by a maze of 1- to 025-μm-diameter fluid-filled dentin tubules
Movement of fluid from the pulp to the DEJ is a result of a slight but constant pulpal pressure
Pulpal pressure has a magnitude of 25 to 30 mm Hg or 34 to 40 cm H2O
Dentinal tubules enclose cellular extensions from the odontoblasts and are in direct communication with the pulp
Inside the tubule lumen other fibrous organic structures are present such as the lamina limitans which substantially decreases the functional radius of the tubule
Relative number of dentin tubules and tubule volume at different dentin levels as measured at different distances from the dentinoenamel Junction Adapted from Heymann 1995
Distribution of tubules in dentinDentin close to the pulp shows a
higher tubule density than indentin remote from the pulpThe higher the tubule densitythe lower the bond strength
values of the dentin adhesives tothe dentin
The relative area occupied by dentin tubules decreases with increasing distance from the pulp
Created whenever dentin is cut or ground with hand or rotary dental instruments and is about 1 to 5 μm thick (Brannstrom 1982)
It consists of debris that presumably reflects the composition of the underlying dentin
Thus the composition of superficial versus deep smear layers would be expected to be quite different
It has a uniform amorphous structure which appears to completely occlude the orifices of all dentinal tubules
Smear plugs are projections of the smear layer that extend to variable distances into dentinal tubules when the smear layer is created
Smear layer
The smear layer has both advantages and disadvantages in the bonding process (Yap et al 1994)
Advantages include
Reduction of dentin permeability to toxins and oral fluids Reduction of diffusion (usually inwards) and convection of fluids
(outwards by hydrostatic pressure or inwards for example while restorations are cemented)
Reduction of wetness of cut dentin surfaces and Prevention of bacterial penetration of dentinal tubules
Wetness and the harboring of bacteria or their products
It reduces the surface energy which compromises surface wetting
Prevents the intimate surface contact between the adhesive and dentin substrate and
Prevents resin penetration into dentinal tubules (Gwinnett 1984 Rees and Jacobsen 1990)
It acts like a separating agent since it is an intrinsically weak structure (5 to 6 MPa cohesive strength) that bond weakly to the underlying dentin (Tao and Pashley 1988)
Further the mineral component of the smear layer may dissolve slowly under a leaking restoration or may be removed by acid produced by bacteria to leave a gap which in turn increases marginal leakage and possibly secondary caries
Disadvantages include
Factors such as
radius and length of the tubules the viscosity of dentin fluid the pressure gradient the molecular size of the substances dissolved in the
tubular fluid and the rate of removal of substances by the blood vessels in
the pulp affect permeability
All of these variables make dentin a dynamic substrate and consequently a difficult substrate for bonding
Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
The factors important in understanding the over all lsquobonding equationrsquo is
Dentin factors Tooth factors Patient factors Material factors Clinical factors
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Steps for Enamel Bonding Clean and wash the teeth with
water
Isolate to prevent any contamination from saliva or gingival crevicular fluid
Apply acid etchant in the form of liquid or gel for10 to 15 seconds
Deciduous teeth require longer time for etching than permanent teeth because of the presence of aprismatic enamel in deciduous teeth
Steps for Enamel Bonding
bull Now apply bonding agent and low viscosity monomers over the etched enamel surface
bull Generally enamel bonding agents contain Bis-GMA or UDMA with TEGDMA added to lower the viscosity of the bonding agent
bull The bonding agents due to their low viscosity rapidly wet and penetrate the clean dried conditioned enamel into the microspaces forming resin tags
Fluorosed teeth have an altered structure composition and appearance
With the increase in severity of fluorosis enamel becomes more porous and sub-surface lesion extends towards the inner enamel
Several studies have shown that composites can be bonded successfully to fluorosed enamel depending on the degree of fluorosis
It is always recommended to grind the enamel before bonding as it is seen that bond strength of composites to ground enamel of teeth with moderate fluorosis is similar to that of normal teeth
Acid etching is good for enamel bonding but not for dentin bonding in fluorosed teeth As a consequence a good choice of adhesive it would be a two-step self etch adhesive with an additional acid etching step for the enamel
Bonding to fluorosed teeth
Dentin Bonding
Dentin Bonding Adhesion of restorative materials to enamel has become a
routine and reliable aspect of modern restorative dentistry
But adhesion to dentin has proved to be more difficult and less predictable
Much of the difficulty in bonding to dentin is the result of the complex microstructure and variable composition of dentin in different areas of the tooth
Thus the composition of dentin is much different than that of enamel and one would expect it to behave differently when etched with acid
The presence of water and organic components lower the surface energy of dentin and make bonding with hydrophobic resins essentially impossible
Enamel vs Dentin
Dentin also contains a dense network of tubules that connect the pulp with the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ)
A cuff of hypermineralized dentin called peritubular dentin lines the tubules
The less mineralized intertubular dentin contains collagen fibrils with the characteristic collagen banding
The intertubular dentin is penetrated by submicron channels which allow the passage of tubular liquid and fibers between neighboring tubules forming intertubular anastomoses
Dentin is an intrinsically hydrated tissue penetrated by a maze of 1- to 025-μm-diameter fluid-filled dentin tubules
Movement of fluid from the pulp to the DEJ is a result of a slight but constant pulpal pressure
Pulpal pressure has a magnitude of 25 to 30 mm Hg or 34 to 40 cm H2O
Dentinal tubules enclose cellular extensions from the odontoblasts and are in direct communication with the pulp
Inside the tubule lumen other fibrous organic structures are present such as the lamina limitans which substantially decreases the functional radius of the tubule
Relative number of dentin tubules and tubule volume at different dentin levels as measured at different distances from the dentinoenamel Junction Adapted from Heymann 1995
Distribution of tubules in dentinDentin close to the pulp shows a
higher tubule density than indentin remote from the pulpThe higher the tubule densitythe lower the bond strength
values of the dentin adhesives tothe dentin
The relative area occupied by dentin tubules decreases with increasing distance from the pulp
Created whenever dentin is cut or ground with hand or rotary dental instruments and is about 1 to 5 μm thick (Brannstrom 1982)
It consists of debris that presumably reflects the composition of the underlying dentin
Thus the composition of superficial versus deep smear layers would be expected to be quite different
It has a uniform amorphous structure which appears to completely occlude the orifices of all dentinal tubules
Smear plugs are projections of the smear layer that extend to variable distances into dentinal tubules when the smear layer is created
Smear layer
The smear layer has both advantages and disadvantages in the bonding process (Yap et al 1994)
Advantages include
Reduction of dentin permeability to toxins and oral fluids Reduction of diffusion (usually inwards) and convection of fluids
(outwards by hydrostatic pressure or inwards for example while restorations are cemented)
Reduction of wetness of cut dentin surfaces and Prevention of bacterial penetration of dentinal tubules
Wetness and the harboring of bacteria or their products
It reduces the surface energy which compromises surface wetting
Prevents the intimate surface contact between the adhesive and dentin substrate and
Prevents resin penetration into dentinal tubules (Gwinnett 1984 Rees and Jacobsen 1990)
It acts like a separating agent since it is an intrinsically weak structure (5 to 6 MPa cohesive strength) that bond weakly to the underlying dentin (Tao and Pashley 1988)
Further the mineral component of the smear layer may dissolve slowly under a leaking restoration or may be removed by acid produced by bacteria to leave a gap which in turn increases marginal leakage and possibly secondary caries
Disadvantages include
Factors such as
radius and length of the tubules the viscosity of dentin fluid the pressure gradient the molecular size of the substances dissolved in the
tubular fluid and the rate of removal of substances by the blood vessels in
the pulp affect permeability
All of these variables make dentin a dynamic substrate and consequently a difficult substrate for bonding
Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
The factors important in understanding the over all lsquobonding equationrsquo is
Dentin factors Tooth factors Patient factors Material factors Clinical factors
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Steps for Enamel Bonding
bull Now apply bonding agent and low viscosity monomers over the etched enamel surface
bull Generally enamel bonding agents contain Bis-GMA or UDMA with TEGDMA added to lower the viscosity of the bonding agent
bull The bonding agents due to their low viscosity rapidly wet and penetrate the clean dried conditioned enamel into the microspaces forming resin tags
Fluorosed teeth have an altered structure composition and appearance
With the increase in severity of fluorosis enamel becomes more porous and sub-surface lesion extends towards the inner enamel
Several studies have shown that composites can be bonded successfully to fluorosed enamel depending on the degree of fluorosis
It is always recommended to grind the enamel before bonding as it is seen that bond strength of composites to ground enamel of teeth with moderate fluorosis is similar to that of normal teeth
Acid etching is good for enamel bonding but not for dentin bonding in fluorosed teeth As a consequence a good choice of adhesive it would be a two-step self etch adhesive with an additional acid etching step for the enamel
Bonding to fluorosed teeth
Dentin Bonding
Dentin Bonding Adhesion of restorative materials to enamel has become a
routine and reliable aspect of modern restorative dentistry
But adhesion to dentin has proved to be more difficult and less predictable
Much of the difficulty in bonding to dentin is the result of the complex microstructure and variable composition of dentin in different areas of the tooth
Thus the composition of dentin is much different than that of enamel and one would expect it to behave differently when etched with acid
The presence of water and organic components lower the surface energy of dentin and make bonding with hydrophobic resins essentially impossible
Enamel vs Dentin
Dentin also contains a dense network of tubules that connect the pulp with the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ)
A cuff of hypermineralized dentin called peritubular dentin lines the tubules
The less mineralized intertubular dentin contains collagen fibrils with the characteristic collagen banding
The intertubular dentin is penetrated by submicron channels which allow the passage of tubular liquid and fibers between neighboring tubules forming intertubular anastomoses
Dentin is an intrinsically hydrated tissue penetrated by a maze of 1- to 025-μm-diameter fluid-filled dentin tubules
Movement of fluid from the pulp to the DEJ is a result of a slight but constant pulpal pressure
Pulpal pressure has a magnitude of 25 to 30 mm Hg or 34 to 40 cm H2O
Dentinal tubules enclose cellular extensions from the odontoblasts and are in direct communication with the pulp
Inside the tubule lumen other fibrous organic structures are present such as the lamina limitans which substantially decreases the functional radius of the tubule
Relative number of dentin tubules and tubule volume at different dentin levels as measured at different distances from the dentinoenamel Junction Adapted from Heymann 1995
Distribution of tubules in dentinDentin close to the pulp shows a
higher tubule density than indentin remote from the pulpThe higher the tubule densitythe lower the bond strength
values of the dentin adhesives tothe dentin
The relative area occupied by dentin tubules decreases with increasing distance from the pulp
Created whenever dentin is cut or ground with hand or rotary dental instruments and is about 1 to 5 μm thick (Brannstrom 1982)
It consists of debris that presumably reflects the composition of the underlying dentin
Thus the composition of superficial versus deep smear layers would be expected to be quite different
It has a uniform amorphous structure which appears to completely occlude the orifices of all dentinal tubules
Smear plugs are projections of the smear layer that extend to variable distances into dentinal tubules when the smear layer is created
Smear layer
The smear layer has both advantages and disadvantages in the bonding process (Yap et al 1994)
Advantages include
Reduction of dentin permeability to toxins and oral fluids Reduction of diffusion (usually inwards) and convection of fluids
(outwards by hydrostatic pressure or inwards for example while restorations are cemented)
Reduction of wetness of cut dentin surfaces and Prevention of bacterial penetration of dentinal tubules
Wetness and the harboring of bacteria or their products
It reduces the surface energy which compromises surface wetting
Prevents the intimate surface contact between the adhesive and dentin substrate and
Prevents resin penetration into dentinal tubules (Gwinnett 1984 Rees and Jacobsen 1990)
It acts like a separating agent since it is an intrinsically weak structure (5 to 6 MPa cohesive strength) that bond weakly to the underlying dentin (Tao and Pashley 1988)
Further the mineral component of the smear layer may dissolve slowly under a leaking restoration or may be removed by acid produced by bacteria to leave a gap which in turn increases marginal leakage and possibly secondary caries
Disadvantages include
Factors such as
radius and length of the tubules the viscosity of dentin fluid the pressure gradient the molecular size of the substances dissolved in the
tubular fluid and the rate of removal of substances by the blood vessels in
the pulp affect permeability
All of these variables make dentin a dynamic substrate and consequently a difficult substrate for bonding
Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
The factors important in understanding the over all lsquobonding equationrsquo is
Dentin factors Tooth factors Patient factors Material factors Clinical factors
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Fluorosed teeth have an altered structure composition and appearance
With the increase in severity of fluorosis enamel becomes more porous and sub-surface lesion extends towards the inner enamel
Several studies have shown that composites can be bonded successfully to fluorosed enamel depending on the degree of fluorosis
It is always recommended to grind the enamel before bonding as it is seen that bond strength of composites to ground enamel of teeth with moderate fluorosis is similar to that of normal teeth
Acid etching is good for enamel bonding but not for dentin bonding in fluorosed teeth As a consequence a good choice of adhesive it would be a two-step self etch adhesive with an additional acid etching step for the enamel
Bonding to fluorosed teeth
Dentin Bonding
Dentin Bonding Adhesion of restorative materials to enamel has become a
routine and reliable aspect of modern restorative dentistry
But adhesion to dentin has proved to be more difficult and less predictable
Much of the difficulty in bonding to dentin is the result of the complex microstructure and variable composition of dentin in different areas of the tooth
Thus the composition of dentin is much different than that of enamel and one would expect it to behave differently when etched with acid
The presence of water and organic components lower the surface energy of dentin and make bonding with hydrophobic resins essentially impossible
Enamel vs Dentin
Dentin also contains a dense network of tubules that connect the pulp with the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ)
A cuff of hypermineralized dentin called peritubular dentin lines the tubules
The less mineralized intertubular dentin contains collagen fibrils with the characteristic collagen banding
The intertubular dentin is penetrated by submicron channels which allow the passage of tubular liquid and fibers between neighboring tubules forming intertubular anastomoses
Dentin is an intrinsically hydrated tissue penetrated by a maze of 1- to 025-μm-diameter fluid-filled dentin tubules
Movement of fluid from the pulp to the DEJ is a result of a slight but constant pulpal pressure
Pulpal pressure has a magnitude of 25 to 30 mm Hg or 34 to 40 cm H2O
Dentinal tubules enclose cellular extensions from the odontoblasts and are in direct communication with the pulp
Inside the tubule lumen other fibrous organic structures are present such as the lamina limitans which substantially decreases the functional radius of the tubule
Relative number of dentin tubules and tubule volume at different dentin levels as measured at different distances from the dentinoenamel Junction Adapted from Heymann 1995
Distribution of tubules in dentinDentin close to the pulp shows a
higher tubule density than indentin remote from the pulpThe higher the tubule densitythe lower the bond strength
values of the dentin adhesives tothe dentin
The relative area occupied by dentin tubules decreases with increasing distance from the pulp
Created whenever dentin is cut or ground with hand or rotary dental instruments and is about 1 to 5 μm thick (Brannstrom 1982)
It consists of debris that presumably reflects the composition of the underlying dentin
Thus the composition of superficial versus deep smear layers would be expected to be quite different
It has a uniform amorphous structure which appears to completely occlude the orifices of all dentinal tubules
Smear plugs are projections of the smear layer that extend to variable distances into dentinal tubules when the smear layer is created
Smear layer
The smear layer has both advantages and disadvantages in the bonding process (Yap et al 1994)
Advantages include
Reduction of dentin permeability to toxins and oral fluids Reduction of diffusion (usually inwards) and convection of fluids
(outwards by hydrostatic pressure or inwards for example while restorations are cemented)
Reduction of wetness of cut dentin surfaces and Prevention of bacterial penetration of dentinal tubules
Wetness and the harboring of bacteria or their products
It reduces the surface energy which compromises surface wetting
Prevents the intimate surface contact between the adhesive and dentin substrate and
Prevents resin penetration into dentinal tubules (Gwinnett 1984 Rees and Jacobsen 1990)
It acts like a separating agent since it is an intrinsically weak structure (5 to 6 MPa cohesive strength) that bond weakly to the underlying dentin (Tao and Pashley 1988)
Further the mineral component of the smear layer may dissolve slowly under a leaking restoration or may be removed by acid produced by bacteria to leave a gap which in turn increases marginal leakage and possibly secondary caries
Disadvantages include
Factors such as
radius and length of the tubules the viscosity of dentin fluid the pressure gradient the molecular size of the substances dissolved in the
tubular fluid and the rate of removal of substances by the blood vessels in
the pulp affect permeability
All of these variables make dentin a dynamic substrate and consequently a difficult substrate for bonding
Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
The factors important in understanding the over all lsquobonding equationrsquo is
Dentin factors Tooth factors Patient factors Material factors Clinical factors
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Dentin Bonding
Dentin Bonding Adhesion of restorative materials to enamel has become a
routine and reliable aspect of modern restorative dentistry
But adhesion to dentin has proved to be more difficult and less predictable
Much of the difficulty in bonding to dentin is the result of the complex microstructure and variable composition of dentin in different areas of the tooth
Thus the composition of dentin is much different than that of enamel and one would expect it to behave differently when etched with acid
The presence of water and organic components lower the surface energy of dentin and make bonding with hydrophobic resins essentially impossible
Enamel vs Dentin
Dentin also contains a dense network of tubules that connect the pulp with the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ)
A cuff of hypermineralized dentin called peritubular dentin lines the tubules
The less mineralized intertubular dentin contains collagen fibrils with the characteristic collagen banding
The intertubular dentin is penetrated by submicron channels which allow the passage of tubular liquid and fibers between neighboring tubules forming intertubular anastomoses
Dentin is an intrinsically hydrated tissue penetrated by a maze of 1- to 025-μm-diameter fluid-filled dentin tubules
Movement of fluid from the pulp to the DEJ is a result of a slight but constant pulpal pressure
Pulpal pressure has a magnitude of 25 to 30 mm Hg or 34 to 40 cm H2O
Dentinal tubules enclose cellular extensions from the odontoblasts and are in direct communication with the pulp
Inside the tubule lumen other fibrous organic structures are present such as the lamina limitans which substantially decreases the functional radius of the tubule
Relative number of dentin tubules and tubule volume at different dentin levels as measured at different distances from the dentinoenamel Junction Adapted from Heymann 1995
Distribution of tubules in dentinDentin close to the pulp shows a
higher tubule density than indentin remote from the pulpThe higher the tubule densitythe lower the bond strength
values of the dentin adhesives tothe dentin
The relative area occupied by dentin tubules decreases with increasing distance from the pulp
Created whenever dentin is cut or ground with hand or rotary dental instruments and is about 1 to 5 μm thick (Brannstrom 1982)
It consists of debris that presumably reflects the composition of the underlying dentin
Thus the composition of superficial versus deep smear layers would be expected to be quite different
It has a uniform amorphous structure which appears to completely occlude the orifices of all dentinal tubules
Smear plugs are projections of the smear layer that extend to variable distances into dentinal tubules when the smear layer is created
Smear layer
The smear layer has both advantages and disadvantages in the bonding process (Yap et al 1994)
Advantages include
Reduction of dentin permeability to toxins and oral fluids Reduction of diffusion (usually inwards) and convection of fluids
(outwards by hydrostatic pressure or inwards for example while restorations are cemented)
Reduction of wetness of cut dentin surfaces and Prevention of bacterial penetration of dentinal tubules
Wetness and the harboring of bacteria or their products
It reduces the surface energy which compromises surface wetting
Prevents the intimate surface contact between the adhesive and dentin substrate and
Prevents resin penetration into dentinal tubules (Gwinnett 1984 Rees and Jacobsen 1990)
It acts like a separating agent since it is an intrinsically weak structure (5 to 6 MPa cohesive strength) that bond weakly to the underlying dentin (Tao and Pashley 1988)
Further the mineral component of the smear layer may dissolve slowly under a leaking restoration or may be removed by acid produced by bacteria to leave a gap which in turn increases marginal leakage and possibly secondary caries
Disadvantages include
Factors such as
radius and length of the tubules the viscosity of dentin fluid the pressure gradient the molecular size of the substances dissolved in the
tubular fluid and the rate of removal of substances by the blood vessels in
the pulp affect permeability
All of these variables make dentin a dynamic substrate and consequently a difficult substrate for bonding
Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
The factors important in understanding the over all lsquobonding equationrsquo is
Dentin factors Tooth factors Patient factors Material factors Clinical factors
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Dentin Bonding Adhesion of restorative materials to enamel has become a
routine and reliable aspect of modern restorative dentistry
But adhesion to dentin has proved to be more difficult and less predictable
Much of the difficulty in bonding to dentin is the result of the complex microstructure and variable composition of dentin in different areas of the tooth
Thus the composition of dentin is much different than that of enamel and one would expect it to behave differently when etched with acid
The presence of water and organic components lower the surface energy of dentin and make bonding with hydrophobic resins essentially impossible
Enamel vs Dentin
Dentin also contains a dense network of tubules that connect the pulp with the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ)
A cuff of hypermineralized dentin called peritubular dentin lines the tubules
The less mineralized intertubular dentin contains collagen fibrils with the characteristic collagen banding
The intertubular dentin is penetrated by submicron channels which allow the passage of tubular liquid and fibers between neighboring tubules forming intertubular anastomoses
Dentin is an intrinsically hydrated tissue penetrated by a maze of 1- to 025-μm-diameter fluid-filled dentin tubules
Movement of fluid from the pulp to the DEJ is a result of a slight but constant pulpal pressure
Pulpal pressure has a magnitude of 25 to 30 mm Hg or 34 to 40 cm H2O
Dentinal tubules enclose cellular extensions from the odontoblasts and are in direct communication with the pulp
Inside the tubule lumen other fibrous organic structures are present such as the lamina limitans which substantially decreases the functional radius of the tubule
Relative number of dentin tubules and tubule volume at different dentin levels as measured at different distances from the dentinoenamel Junction Adapted from Heymann 1995
Distribution of tubules in dentinDentin close to the pulp shows a
higher tubule density than indentin remote from the pulpThe higher the tubule densitythe lower the bond strength
values of the dentin adhesives tothe dentin
The relative area occupied by dentin tubules decreases with increasing distance from the pulp
Created whenever dentin is cut or ground with hand or rotary dental instruments and is about 1 to 5 μm thick (Brannstrom 1982)
It consists of debris that presumably reflects the composition of the underlying dentin
Thus the composition of superficial versus deep smear layers would be expected to be quite different
It has a uniform amorphous structure which appears to completely occlude the orifices of all dentinal tubules
Smear plugs are projections of the smear layer that extend to variable distances into dentinal tubules when the smear layer is created
Smear layer
The smear layer has both advantages and disadvantages in the bonding process (Yap et al 1994)
Advantages include
Reduction of dentin permeability to toxins and oral fluids Reduction of diffusion (usually inwards) and convection of fluids
(outwards by hydrostatic pressure or inwards for example while restorations are cemented)
Reduction of wetness of cut dentin surfaces and Prevention of bacterial penetration of dentinal tubules
Wetness and the harboring of bacteria or their products
It reduces the surface energy which compromises surface wetting
Prevents the intimate surface contact between the adhesive and dentin substrate and
Prevents resin penetration into dentinal tubules (Gwinnett 1984 Rees and Jacobsen 1990)
It acts like a separating agent since it is an intrinsically weak structure (5 to 6 MPa cohesive strength) that bond weakly to the underlying dentin (Tao and Pashley 1988)
Further the mineral component of the smear layer may dissolve slowly under a leaking restoration or may be removed by acid produced by bacteria to leave a gap which in turn increases marginal leakage and possibly secondary caries
Disadvantages include
Factors such as
radius and length of the tubules the viscosity of dentin fluid the pressure gradient the molecular size of the substances dissolved in the
tubular fluid and the rate of removal of substances by the blood vessels in
the pulp affect permeability
All of these variables make dentin a dynamic substrate and consequently a difficult substrate for bonding
Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
The factors important in understanding the over all lsquobonding equationrsquo is
Dentin factors Tooth factors Patient factors Material factors Clinical factors
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Thus the composition of dentin is much different than that of enamel and one would expect it to behave differently when etched with acid
The presence of water and organic components lower the surface energy of dentin and make bonding with hydrophobic resins essentially impossible
Enamel vs Dentin
Dentin also contains a dense network of tubules that connect the pulp with the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ)
A cuff of hypermineralized dentin called peritubular dentin lines the tubules
The less mineralized intertubular dentin contains collagen fibrils with the characteristic collagen banding
The intertubular dentin is penetrated by submicron channels which allow the passage of tubular liquid and fibers between neighboring tubules forming intertubular anastomoses
Dentin is an intrinsically hydrated tissue penetrated by a maze of 1- to 025-μm-diameter fluid-filled dentin tubules
Movement of fluid from the pulp to the DEJ is a result of a slight but constant pulpal pressure
Pulpal pressure has a magnitude of 25 to 30 mm Hg or 34 to 40 cm H2O
Dentinal tubules enclose cellular extensions from the odontoblasts and are in direct communication with the pulp
Inside the tubule lumen other fibrous organic structures are present such as the lamina limitans which substantially decreases the functional radius of the tubule
Relative number of dentin tubules and tubule volume at different dentin levels as measured at different distances from the dentinoenamel Junction Adapted from Heymann 1995
Distribution of tubules in dentinDentin close to the pulp shows a
higher tubule density than indentin remote from the pulpThe higher the tubule densitythe lower the bond strength
values of the dentin adhesives tothe dentin
The relative area occupied by dentin tubules decreases with increasing distance from the pulp
Created whenever dentin is cut or ground with hand or rotary dental instruments and is about 1 to 5 μm thick (Brannstrom 1982)
It consists of debris that presumably reflects the composition of the underlying dentin
Thus the composition of superficial versus deep smear layers would be expected to be quite different
It has a uniform amorphous structure which appears to completely occlude the orifices of all dentinal tubules
Smear plugs are projections of the smear layer that extend to variable distances into dentinal tubules when the smear layer is created
Smear layer
The smear layer has both advantages and disadvantages in the bonding process (Yap et al 1994)
Advantages include
Reduction of dentin permeability to toxins and oral fluids Reduction of diffusion (usually inwards) and convection of fluids
(outwards by hydrostatic pressure or inwards for example while restorations are cemented)
Reduction of wetness of cut dentin surfaces and Prevention of bacterial penetration of dentinal tubules
Wetness and the harboring of bacteria or their products
It reduces the surface energy which compromises surface wetting
Prevents the intimate surface contact between the adhesive and dentin substrate and
Prevents resin penetration into dentinal tubules (Gwinnett 1984 Rees and Jacobsen 1990)
It acts like a separating agent since it is an intrinsically weak structure (5 to 6 MPa cohesive strength) that bond weakly to the underlying dentin (Tao and Pashley 1988)
Further the mineral component of the smear layer may dissolve slowly under a leaking restoration or may be removed by acid produced by bacteria to leave a gap which in turn increases marginal leakage and possibly secondary caries
Disadvantages include
Factors such as
radius and length of the tubules the viscosity of dentin fluid the pressure gradient the molecular size of the substances dissolved in the
tubular fluid and the rate of removal of substances by the blood vessels in
the pulp affect permeability
All of these variables make dentin a dynamic substrate and consequently a difficult substrate for bonding
Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
The factors important in understanding the over all lsquobonding equationrsquo is
Dentin factors Tooth factors Patient factors Material factors Clinical factors
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Dentin also contains a dense network of tubules that connect the pulp with the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ)
A cuff of hypermineralized dentin called peritubular dentin lines the tubules
The less mineralized intertubular dentin contains collagen fibrils with the characteristic collagen banding
The intertubular dentin is penetrated by submicron channels which allow the passage of tubular liquid and fibers between neighboring tubules forming intertubular anastomoses
Dentin is an intrinsically hydrated tissue penetrated by a maze of 1- to 025-μm-diameter fluid-filled dentin tubules
Movement of fluid from the pulp to the DEJ is a result of a slight but constant pulpal pressure
Pulpal pressure has a magnitude of 25 to 30 mm Hg or 34 to 40 cm H2O
Dentinal tubules enclose cellular extensions from the odontoblasts and are in direct communication with the pulp
Inside the tubule lumen other fibrous organic structures are present such as the lamina limitans which substantially decreases the functional radius of the tubule
Relative number of dentin tubules and tubule volume at different dentin levels as measured at different distances from the dentinoenamel Junction Adapted from Heymann 1995
Distribution of tubules in dentinDentin close to the pulp shows a
higher tubule density than indentin remote from the pulpThe higher the tubule densitythe lower the bond strength
values of the dentin adhesives tothe dentin
The relative area occupied by dentin tubules decreases with increasing distance from the pulp
Created whenever dentin is cut or ground with hand or rotary dental instruments and is about 1 to 5 μm thick (Brannstrom 1982)
It consists of debris that presumably reflects the composition of the underlying dentin
Thus the composition of superficial versus deep smear layers would be expected to be quite different
It has a uniform amorphous structure which appears to completely occlude the orifices of all dentinal tubules
Smear plugs are projections of the smear layer that extend to variable distances into dentinal tubules when the smear layer is created
Smear layer
The smear layer has both advantages and disadvantages in the bonding process (Yap et al 1994)
Advantages include
Reduction of dentin permeability to toxins and oral fluids Reduction of diffusion (usually inwards) and convection of fluids
(outwards by hydrostatic pressure or inwards for example while restorations are cemented)
Reduction of wetness of cut dentin surfaces and Prevention of bacterial penetration of dentinal tubules
Wetness and the harboring of bacteria or their products
It reduces the surface energy which compromises surface wetting
Prevents the intimate surface contact between the adhesive and dentin substrate and
Prevents resin penetration into dentinal tubules (Gwinnett 1984 Rees and Jacobsen 1990)
It acts like a separating agent since it is an intrinsically weak structure (5 to 6 MPa cohesive strength) that bond weakly to the underlying dentin (Tao and Pashley 1988)
Further the mineral component of the smear layer may dissolve slowly under a leaking restoration or may be removed by acid produced by bacteria to leave a gap which in turn increases marginal leakage and possibly secondary caries
Disadvantages include
Factors such as
radius and length of the tubules the viscosity of dentin fluid the pressure gradient the molecular size of the substances dissolved in the
tubular fluid and the rate of removal of substances by the blood vessels in
the pulp affect permeability
All of these variables make dentin a dynamic substrate and consequently a difficult substrate for bonding
Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
The factors important in understanding the over all lsquobonding equationrsquo is
Dentin factors Tooth factors Patient factors Material factors Clinical factors
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Dentin is an intrinsically hydrated tissue penetrated by a maze of 1- to 025-μm-diameter fluid-filled dentin tubules
Movement of fluid from the pulp to the DEJ is a result of a slight but constant pulpal pressure
Pulpal pressure has a magnitude of 25 to 30 mm Hg or 34 to 40 cm H2O
Dentinal tubules enclose cellular extensions from the odontoblasts and are in direct communication with the pulp
Inside the tubule lumen other fibrous organic structures are present such as the lamina limitans which substantially decreases the functional radius of the tubule
Relative number of dentin tubules and tubule volume at different dentin levels as measured at different distances from the dentinoenamel Junction Adapted from Heymann 1995
Distribution of tubules in dentinDentin close to the pulp shows a
higher tubule density than indentin remote from the pulpThe higher the tubule densitythe lower the bond strength
values of the dentin adhesives tothe dentin
The relative area occupied by dentin tubules decreases with increasing distance from the pulp
Created whenever dentin is cut or ground with hand or rotary dental instruments and is about 1 to 5 μm thick (Brannstrom 1982)
It consists of debris that presumably reflects the composition of the underlying dentin
Thus the composition of superficial versus deep smear layers would be expected to be quite different
It has a uniform amorphous structure which appears to completely occlude the orifices of all dentinal tubules
Smear plugs are projections of the smear layer that extend to variable distances into dentinal tubules when the smear layer is created
Smear layer
The smear layer has both advantages and disadvantages in the bonding process (Yap et al 1994)
Advantages include
Reduction of dentin permeability to toxins and oral fluids Reduction of diffusion (usually inwards) and convection of fluids
(outwards by hydrostatic pressure or inwards for example while restorations are cemented)
Reduction of wetness of cut dentin surfaces and Prevention of bacterial penetration of dentinal tubules
Wetness and the harboring of bacteria or their products
It reduces the surface energy which compromises surface wetting
Prevents the intimate surface contact between the adhesive and dentin substrate and
Prevents resin penetration into dentinal tubules (Gwinnett 1984 Rees and Jacobsen 1990)
It acts like a separating agent since it is an intrinsically weak structure (5 to 6 MPa cohesive strength) that bond weakly to the underlying dentin (Tao and Pashley 1988)
Further the mineral component of the smear layer may dissolve slowly under a leaking restoration or may be removed by acid produced by bacteria to leave a gap which in turn increases marginal leakage and possibly secondary caries
Disadvantages include
Factors such as
radius and length of the tubules the viscosity of dentin fluid the pressure gradient the molecular size of the substances dissolved in the
tubular fluid and the rate of removal of substances by the blood vessels in
the pulp affect permeability
All of these variables make dentin a dynamic substrate and consequently a difficult substrate for bonding
Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
The factors important in understanding the over all lsquobonding equationrsquo is
Dentin factors Tooth factors Patient factors Material factors Clinical factors
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Relative number of dentin tubules and tubule volume at different dentin levels as measured at different distances from the dentinoenamel Junction Adapted from Heymann 1995
Distribution of tubules in dentinDentin close to the pulp shows a
higher tubule density than indentin remote from the pulpThe higher the tubule densitythe lower the bond strength
values of the dentin adhesives tothe dentin
The relative area occupied by dentin tubules decreases with increasing distance from the pulp
Created whenever dentin is cut or ground with hand or rotary dental instruments and is about 1 to 5 μm thick (Brannstrom 1982)
It consists of debris that presumably reflects the composition of the underlying dentin
Thus the composition of superficial versus deep smear layers would be expected to be quite different
It has a uniform amorphous structure which appears to completely occlude the orifices of all dentinal tubules
Smear plugs are projections of the smear layer that extend to variable distances into dentinal tubules when the smear layer is created
Smear layer
The smear layer has both advantages and disadvantages in the bonding process (Yap et al 1994)
Advantages include
Reduction of dentin permeability to toxins and oral fluids Reduction of diffusion (usually inwards) and convection of fluids
(outwards by hydrostatic pressure or inwards for example while restorations are cemented)
Reduction of wetness of cut dentin surfaces and Prevention of bacterial penetration of dentinal tubules
Wetness and the harboring of bacteria or their products
It reduces the surface energy which compromises surface wetting
Prevents the intimate surface contact between the adhesive and dentin substrate and
Prevents resin penetration into dentinal tubules (Gwinnett 1984 Rees and Jacobsen 1990)
It acts like a separating agent since it is an intrinsically weak structure (5 to 6 MPa cohesive strength) that bond weakly to the underlying dentin (Tao and Pashley 1988)
Further the mineral component of the smear layer may dissolve slowly under a leaking restoration or may be removed by acid produced by bacteria to leave a gap which in turn increases marginal leakage and possibly secondary caries
Disadvantages include
Factors such as
radius and length of the tubules the viscosity of dentin fluid the pressure gradient the molecular size of the substances dissolved in the
tubular fluid and the rate of removal of substances by the blood vessels in
the pulp affect permeability
All of these variables make dentin a dynamic substrate and consequently a difficult substrate for bonding
Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
The factors important in understanding the over all lsquobonding equationrsquo is
Dentin factors Tooth factors Patient factors Material factors Clinical factors
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Created whenever dentin is cut or ground with hand or rotary dental instruments and is about 1 to 5 μm thick (Brannstrom 1982)
It consists of debris that presumably reflects the composition of the underlying dentin
Thus the composition of superficial versus deep smear layers would be expected to be quite different
It has a uniform amorphous structure which appears to completely occlude the orifices of all dentinal tubules
Smear plugs are projections of the smear layer that extend to variable distances into dentinal tubules when the smear layer is created
Smear layer
The smear layer has both advantages and disadvantages in the bonding process (Yap et al 1994)
Advantages include
Reduction of dentin permeability to toxins and oral fluids Reduction of diffusion (usually inwards) and convection of fluids
(outwards by hydrostatic pressure or inwards for example while restorations are cemented)
Reduction of wetness of cut dentin surfaces and Prevention of bacterial penetration of dentinal tubules
Wetness and the harboring of bacteria or their products
It reduces the surface energy which compromises surface wetting
Prevents the intimate surface contact between the adhesive and dentin substrate and
Prevents resin penetration into dentinal tubules (Gwinnett 1984 Rees and Jacobsen 1990)
It acts like a separating agent since it is an intrinsically weak structure (5 to 6 MPa cohesive strength) that bond weakly to the underlying dentin (Tao and Pashley 1988)
Further the mineral component of the smear layer may dissolve slowly under a leaking restoration or may be removed by acid produced by bacteria to leave a gap which in turn increases marginal leakage and possibly secondary caries
Disadvantages include
Factors such as
radius and length of the tubules the viscosity of dentin fluid the pressure gradient the molecular size of the substances dissolved in the
tubular fluid and the rate of removal of substances by the blood vessels in
the pulp affect permeability
All of these variables make dentin a dynamic substrate and consequently a difficult substrate for bonding
Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
The factors important in understanding the over all lsquobonding equationrsquo is
Dentin factors Tooth factors Patient factors Material factors Clinical factors
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
The smear layer has both advantages and disadvantages in the bonding process (Yap et al 1994)
Advantages include
Reduction of dentin permeability to toxins and oral fluids Reduction of diffusion (usually inwards) and convection of fluids
(outwards by hydrostatic pressure or inwards for example while restorations are cemented)
Reduction of wetness of cut dentin surfaces and Prevention of bacterial penetration of dentinal tubules
Wetness and the harboring of bacteria or their products
It reduces the surface energy which compromises surface wetting
Prevents the intimate surface contact between the adhesive and dentin substrate and
Prevents resin penetration into dentinal tubules (Gwinnett 1984 Rees and Jacobsen 1990)
It acts like a separating agent since it is an intrinsically weak structure (5 to 6 MPa cohesive strength) that bond weakly to the underlying dentin (Tao and Pashley 1988)
Further the mineral component of the smear layer may dissolve slowly under a leaking restoration or may be removed by acid produced by bacteria to leave a gap which in turn increases marginal leakage and possibly secondary caries
Disadvantages include
Factors such as
radius and length of the tubules the viscosity of dentin fluid the pressure gradient the molecular size of the substances dissolved in the
tubular fluid and the rate of removal of substances by the blood vessels in
the pulp affect permeability
All of these variables make dentin a dynamic substrate and consequently a difficult substrate for bonding
Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
The factors important in understanding the over all lsquobonding equationrsquo is
Dentin factors Tooth factors Patient factors Material factors Clinical factors
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Wetness and the harboring of bacteria or their products
It reduces the surface energy which compromises surface wetting
Prevents the intimate surface contact between the adhesive and dentin substrate and
Prevents resin penetration into dentinal tubules (Gwinnett 1984 Rees and Jacobsen 1990)
It acts like a separating agent since it is an intrinsically weak structure (5 to 6 MPa cohesive strength) that bond weakly to the underlying dentin (Tao and Pashley 1988)
Further the mineral component of the smear layer may dissolve slowly under a leaking restoration or may be removed by acid produced by bacteria to leave a gap which in turn increases marginal leakage and possibly secondary caries
Disadvantages include
Factors such as
radius and length of the tubules the viscosity of dentin fluid the pressure gradient the molecular size of the substances dissolved in the
tubular fluid and the rate of removal of substances by the blood vessels in
the pulp affect permeability
All of these variables make dentin a dynamic substrate and consequently a difficult substrate for bonding
Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
The factors important in understanding the over all lsquobonding equationrsquo is
Dentin factors Tooth factors Patient factors Material factors Clinical factors
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Factors such as
radius and length of the tubules the viscosity of dentin fluid the pressure gradient the molecular size of the substances dissolved in the
tubular fluid and the rate of removal of substances by the blood vessels in
the pulp affect permeability
All of these variables make dentin a dynamic substrate and consequently a difficult substrate for bonding
Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
The factors important in understanding the over all lsquobonding equationrsquo is
Dentin factors Tooth factors Patient factors Material factors Clinical factors
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
The factors important in understanding the over all lsquobonding equationrsquo is
Dentin factors Tooth factors Patient factors Material factors Clinical factors
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Quality of dentin Higher bond strength is achieved for younger teeth
compared to the dentin of elderly patients
Altered dentin (sclertic or carious)
Variation in density of the tubules
Location of dentin (whether peripheral or close to pulp)
Etching of dentin (too long etching results in impeded hybrid layer formation and produces a weaker bond strength
The dentin should not be desiccated it must be kept moist during the entire procedure If it dries up the collagen structure collapses
Dentin factors
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Tooth factors The tooth factors include
Lesion size and shapeEnamel and dentin structureTooth flexureTooth locationFluoride content Surface roughness
Patient factorsPatient factors associated with dentin adhesion arebullThe degree of occlusal stressbullPatientrsquos age
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Saliva andor blood contamination Moisture contamination from handpieces or air-water
syringes Oil contamination from handpieces or air-water syringes Surface roughness of tooth surface Mechanical undercuts in tooth preparation Fluoride content of teeth Presence of plaque calculus extrinsic stains or debris Presence of bases and liners on the prepared teeth
Clinical factors
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Conditioner (Cleanser Etchant)
Conditioner is usually a weak organic acid (eg maleic acid) a low concentration of a stronger inorganic acid (eg phosphoric or nitric acid) or a chelating agent (eg EDTA)
Main Actions Heavily alters or removes the smear layer Demineralizes peritubular and intertubular surface dentin and
thereby exposes collagen fibrils Demineralizes up to a depth of 75 microns Depth of demineralization depends on type of acid its
concentration and etching time More mineralized peritubular dentin is etched more deeply
than the intertubular dentin Increases dentin permeability by 4 to 9 times
DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Primer is usually a bifunctional monomer in a volatile solvent such as acetone or alcohol a bifunctional monomer is one that has a hydrophilic end (ie one with an affinity for water) and a hydrophobic end (one lacking an affinity for water)
Examples of bifunctional monomers include HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) NMSA (N-methacryloyl-5- aminosalicylic acid) NPG (N-phenylglycine) PMDM (pyromellitic diethylmethacrylate) and 4-META (4- methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)
Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Monomer Hydrophilic Monomer)
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Links the hydrophilic dentin to the hydrophobic adhesive resin is able to do this because of its bifunctional nature (ie primers hydrophilic end bonds to the wet dentin and its hydrophobic end bonds to the adhesive resin)
Promotes infiltration of demineralized peritubular and intertubular dentin by its own monomers and those of the adhesive resin
Increases wettability of the conditioned dentin surface and increases contact between the dentin and resin
Main Actions
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Adhesive is an unfilled or partially filled resin may
contain some component of the primer (eg HEMA) in an attempt to promote increased bond strength
Main Actions
Combines with the primerrsquos monomers to form a resin-reinforced hybrid layer (resin-dentin interdiffusion zone) from 1 to 5 microns thick
Forms resin tags to seal the dentin tubules provides methacrylate groups to bond with the subsequently placed resin composite
Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
One of the first products that used this method for enamel and dentin treatment was Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive which used 10 to 12 maleic acid
Scotchbond MPA and most other current-generation products now use the same acid for etching dentin that they use for etching enamel (ie concentrations of phosphoric acid that range from 32 to 40)
This method of etching dentin with a 32 to 40 concentration of phosphoric acid is called the total-etch technique and was first discussed by Fusayama in 1977
Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Acid washing rinsingRemoves smear layerDissolves HA
Drying shrinks remainingCollagen polymer molecules Rehydration priming
Swells collagen
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Monomer penetration
Mechanism of dentine bonding
Monomer polymerisationAnd collagen entanglement
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Mechanism of Bonding Ideally a dentin bonding agent should have both
hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends The hydrophilic end displaces the dentinal fluid to wet the surface The hydrophobic end bonds to the composite resin
bull Mechanism of BondingM R X
bull Where M is the double bond of methacrylate which copolymerizes with composite resin
bull R is the spacer which makes the molecule largebull X is a functional group for bonding which bonds to
inorganic or organic portion of dentin
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Mechanism of Bonding
Bonding to the inorganic part of dentin involves ionic interaction among the negatively charged group on X for example phosphates amino acids and amino
alcohols or dicarboxylates) and the positively charged calcium ions
Commonly used bonding systems employ use of phosphates
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Mechanism of Bonding
bull Bonding to the organic part of dentin ndash Interaction with
bull Amino (ndashNH) bull Hydroxyl (ndashOH) bull Carboxylate (ndashCOOH) bull Amide (ndashCONH) groups
bull Dentin bonding agents have ndash isocyanates ndash aldehydes ndash carboxylic acid ndash anhydrides and ndash carboxylic acid chlorides
which extract hydrogen from the above mentioned groups
and bond chemically
present in dentinal collagen
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Developed in 1960s
Relied on adhesion to smear layer
No of steps involved were two etching of enamel + application of adhesive
Did not recommend dentin etch
Bowen formulated Cervident containing N-phenylglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NPG-GMA)
NPG-GMA is a surface-active comonomer that theoretically could mediate water- resistant chemical bonds of resin to dentinal calcium
First generation
Adhesive resin
Smear layer
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
This means that one end of this molecule bonds to dentin while the other polymerizes with composite resin
bond strengths - 2 to 3 MPa
The clinical results with these systems were poor
No improvement in marginal leakage when compared to conventional unfilled enamel bonding resins (Barkmeier and Cooley 1991)
Based on Carbon-13 NMR analysis it appears that no ionic bonding actually develops between NPG-GMA and hydroxyapatite (Jorge Perdigao Edward Swift)
First generation
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
In the late 1970s the second-generation systems were introduced
Incorporated halophosphorus esters of unfilled resins such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) which substituted methacrylate
Mechanism by which they bond to dentin was postulated to be through an ionic bond to calcium by chlorophosphate groups
The clinical performance of these bonding agents was relatively poor
Shear dentinal bond strengths of only 2 to 6 MPa were reported
SECOND GENERATION
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
A major reason for the poor performance of these bonding agents is the fact that they bond to the smear layer rather than to the underlying dentin hence
Their bond strength is limited by the cohesive strength of the smear layer or the adhesion of the smear layer to the dentin below (Tao et al 1988)
These bond strengths were not great enough to counteract contraction stress generated by shrinking composites which is estimated to exceed 20 MPa in some cavities
Furthermore some studies indicate that bonds between phosphate esters and dentin may also be hydrolyzed by immersion in water
Therefore composite resin tends to separate from dentin forming gaps at restoration margins and increasing the microleakage at margins in dentin or cementum
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Etched tubule dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin Bonding System (Den-Mat) Phosphate ester dentin bonding agents
Representative brands Bondlite (SDSKerr) Creation Bond (Den-Mat) Prisma Universal Bond (Caulk) and Scotchbond (3M)
Polyurethane dentin bonding agents Representative brand Dentin-Adhesit (Ivoclar Vivadent)
There were three types of second-generation products
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
In third generation the smear layer was partially removed or modified rather than complete removal
In most of the systems the phosphate primer modifies the smear layer by softening it after penetration it cures forming a hard surface
The adhesive is then applied attaching the cured primer to the composite resin
Bonding to smear layer-covered dentin was not very successful before 1990 however because the resins did not penetrate through the smear layer bond was weak approached 10-12 MPa (Leinfelder 1993)
THIRD GENERATION
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
The basis of third generation systems was laid in 1979 when the Japanese philosophy of acid-etching the dentin to remove the smear layer gained acceptance
The acid opens dentinal tubules partially and increases their permeability to form micromechanical attachment
Based on this total-etch concept Clearfil New bond was introduced in 1984 which contains HEMA and 10-methacryloyoxy-decyl-dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) which had long hydrophobic and short hydrophilic components as active components
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
3rd generation
1st step -Total etchingLeaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Total drying of surface
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resinThen adding Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive
3rd generation
Composite
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Fourth generation bonding agents-etch and rinse adhesives-three step adhesives-total etch adhesives
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Fourth-generation dentin adhesives were introduced for use on acid etched dentin
Because the clinical technique involves simultaneous application of an acid to enamel and dentin this method is commonly known as the total-etch technique
Also called the etch and rinse technique it was the most common strategy for dentin bonding during the 1990s and remains popular today
Application of acid results in partial or total removal of smear layer and demineralization of underlying dentine up to depth of 75 microns
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Application of acid to dentin partial or total removal of the smear layer and demineralization of intertubular and peritubular dentin
open dentin tubules and exposed collagen fibers increased microporosity of the intertubular dentin
Dentin is demineralized by up to 75 μm depending on the type of acid application time and concentration
The primer in a three-step system is designed to increase the critical surface tension of dentin
When primer and bonding resins are applied to etched dentin they penetrate the intertubular dentin forming a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone or hybrid layer
They also penetrate and polymerize in the open dentinal tubules forming resin tags
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
In the three-bottle total etch bonding technique acid is used to remove the smear layer and smear plugs from the dentin and to remove peritubular dentin increasing the
diameter of the tubules thereby (Fig A) that will form stronger resin tags The etched surface is then primed with dilute methacrylates (red) in a volatile solvent (Fig B) to insure that the matrix is expanded and precoated with methacrylates Then a solvent-
free adhesive (green) is applied that diffuses into the primed surface and down into the tubules where it polymerizes with the primer (Fig C)
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Fourth-generation adhesives such as All-Bond 2 OptiBond FL and Scotchbond Multipurpose are basically composed of
An acid etching gel that is rinsed off
A solution of primers that are reactive hydrophilic monomers in ethanol acetone andor water
An unfilled or filled fluid boding agent-hydrophobic monomer such as Bis-GMA combined with hydrophilic HEMA
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond Multipurpose are two of the first fourth-generation adhesive systems which rely on the hydration of dentin as a critical parameter for effective bonding
All-Bond 2 uses a phosphoric acid enameldentin conditioning step to be followed by the application of hydrophilic primers containing N-tolyglycine-glycidyl methacrylate (NTG-GMA) and biphenyl methacrylate (BPDM) in acetone
This priming layer is followed by an unfilled resin containing Bis-GMA and HEMA
The original Scotchbond Multipurpose conditioned dentin with 10 maleic acid solution followed by a primer consisting of an aqueous layer of HEMA and Vitrebond copolymer
The adhesive resin system is also a Bis-GMA resin containing HEMA Later maleic acid was replaced by phosphoric acid to generate more consistent results
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Other fourth-generation adhesive systems include
Imperiva Bond (acid treatment ndash primer containing HEMA amp 4-acryloxyethyltrimeric acid - Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate and butylated hydroxytolune (BHT)
Permaquik (acid conditioning- ethanol based primer (naturally occurring elastic resin+ Canada balsam+HEMA)- adhesive resin (Bis-GMA+glass filler)
Optibond and Solidbond employs partially filled adhesive resins use of fillers in the adhesive resin exhibits less shrinkage in the bonding layer
It is hypothesized that generating less residual shrinkage stress in the adhesive reduces bond failures
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
ProBOND is unique in that it does not require dentin conditioning
It consists of an acetoneethanol primer with a phosphate adhesion promoter PENTA and an adhesive containing a urethane dimethacrylate resin (UDMA) PENTA and glutaraldehyde
Liner Bond 2 introduced the concept of a no-rinse self-etching primer
The primer consisted of pheny-P HEMA and N-methacryloyl 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-NMSA) and
a bonding resin containing 10-methacryloyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) Bis-GMA and colloidal silica
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
An additional feature of fourth-generation systems is the claim for their utility in multipurpose applications
In addition to dentin and enamel adhesion bond strength claims were made for cast alloys amalgam and porcelain
Mean shear bond strength of the fourth-generation systems are reported to range from 17MPa to great than 34MPa
If the clinician carefully adhered to the specific recommendations made regarding the methods and times required for application of the bonding agent the results were highly effective
Shear bond strengths to both enamel and dentin routinely approximated 25 MPa
Such a process has permitted forms of esthetic and functional treatment not previously conceived
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
4th generation
1st step -Total etching(removal of smear layer)Leaving free minerals on surface-Rinse surface-Without drying of surface (residual water left)
2nd step adding primer
3rd stepAdding adhesive resin amp then composite
4th generation
Composite
Smear layer Residual water Primer Adhesive resin
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to their respective solvent
Ethanol-based adhesivesEg OptiBond Solo (and later OptiBond Solo Plus)
Acetone-based adhesives All- bond 2 and One-Step (BISCO)
Water-based adhesives Scotchbond MP and ScotchBond 1
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
These also are called the ldquoone bottlerdquo systems because they combine the primer and bonding agent into a single solution
A separate etching step still is required
The first of these products was LD Caulkrsquos Prime amp Bond When originally introduced it was to be used only when placing direct composite resin restorations
Recently it underwent two changes and has been renamed Prime amp Bond 21
The changes were addition of fluoride and inclusion of an elastomeric monomer to reduce the DBAlsquos rigidity
Fifth generation
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Other fifth-generation products include OptiBond Solo (SDSKerr) Single Bond (3M ESPE) PQ1 (Ultradent) and Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer)
In general these products have limitations
Many require at least as much time to apply or even more time than three-component products and they lack many of the components necessary to perform multisubstrate bonding
It also appears important to apply multiple coats of these agents so that there is an adequately thick resin layer on top of the hybrid layer
This helps protect the DBA from early failure when the resin composite shrinks during polymerization
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Recently have been marketed
Contains extremely small filler particles
Include the products Prime amp Bond NT (DentsplyCaulk) and Excite (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Prime amp Bond NT contains 7 nanometer fillers has a greater concentration of resin and a smaller molecular weight resin
These changes are said to make the DBA tougher stronger and able to cover adequately with a single coat
it is also claimed to penetrate dentin better provide improved marginal integrity and have a low film thickness
Ivoclar Vivadentrsquos Excite contains 12-nanometer fillers and is packaged in a single-use capsule It is very fast to apply covers dentin in one coat and comes with a graphics-only instruction card
Nanofilled
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s
Self-etching primer and adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
Primer is applied prior to the adhesive Water is the solvent in these systemsSelf etching adhesive Available in two bottles
Primer Adhesive
A drop from each bottle is taken mixed and applied to the tooth surface for example Prompt L-pop
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
Mechanism of bonding In these agents as soon as the decalcification process starts infiltration of the empty spaces by the dentin bonding agent is initiated
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Comparable adhesion and bond strengths to enamel and dentin
Reduces postoperative sensitivity because they etch and prime simultaneously
They etch the dentin less aggressively than total etch products
The demineralized dentin is infiltrated by resin during the etching process
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Advantages of Self Etching Primers
Since they do not remove the smear layer the tubules remain sealed resulting in less sensitivity
They form a relatively thinner hybrid layer than traditional product which results in complete infiltration of the demineralized dentin by the resin monomers This results in increased bond strength
Much faster and simpler technique
Less technique sensitive as fewer number of steps are involved for the self etch system
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Xeno III
Clearfil se bond
prompt l pop
Examples
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
They achieve the same objective as the sixth generation systems except that they simplified the multiple sixth generation materials into a single component single bottle one-step self-etch adhesive thus avoiding any mistakes in mixing
Developed in late 2000s All in one concept ie components available as single component Uses self etch primer Good bond strength No postoperative sensitivity Also have disinfecting and desensitizing properties They have attained consistently lower bond strengths than the
fourth and fifth-generation adhesives
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Laboratory studies show that bond strengths and margin sealing to be equal to the sixth-generation systems
iBondTM is a seventh-generation single-component no-mix one-step application dental adhesive with an etchant adhesive desensitizer and photoinitiator
Laboratory testing confirms that iBondTM has physical characteristics similar to other self-etching adhesives and may be used in all clinical situations where dental adhesives are required
Seventh-generation
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
GC has also introduced one component self-etching light-cured adhesive under trade name of G-BOND
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
STEP 4TH GEERATION 5TH GENERATION
6TH GENERATION
6TH GEN(MIXING REQUIRED)
7TH GEN
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
SELF ETCHING ADHESIVE
Etching of enamel dentine
Etchant Etchant Self etching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Priming of dentin
Primer Self-priming resinsealer
Self ndashetching primer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Sealing of enamel and dentine
Resinsealer Self-priming resinsealer
Resinsealer Self etching self priming resinsealer
Self-etching self-priming resinsealer desensitizer disinfectant
Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhesive Systems
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
A new category of composite resin restorative materials which include what could be referred to as an ldquoeighth-generationrdquo bonding system has just become available for use
This new technology features a bonding agent which is contained within the composite resin restorative material
A self-etching self-adhering flowable composite technology eliminates the need for a separate bonding application step with composites for direct restorative procedures
Utilizing previous adhesive technology (found in the OptiBond system [Kerr]) this new self-etching self-bonding flowable composite resin system (Vertise Flow [Kerr]) simplifies the placement of direct composite restorations
Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Since fifth- sixth- and seventh-generation systems are incompatible with self-cure materials and dual-cure materials that cannot be effectively light-cured
Futura bond DC dual cured It is dual-cured and works with all light- self- or dual-cured
resins It takes only 35 sec from start to finish It needs only one coat Futurabond DC cures without any light in the self-cured
mode This is a big advantage for root canal cementation Futurabond DC eliminates the problem of the ldquopooling
effectrdquo with moisture
Eighth-generation
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
A new system would be developed that had the best attributes of the fourth generation and the ease of the sixth-generation bonding systems and that system is Surpassreg from Apex
Surpass is an eighth-generation material because it is very different from other generations
It consists of three bottles an etchantconditioner a primer and a separate hydrophobic bonding resin
In that regard it resembles fourth-generation materials but the etchantconditioner is not rinsed from the tooth
Thus Surpass also has characteristics of the sixth generationmdashthe ease of a no-rinse system but the performance of a fourth-generation system
Eighth-generation
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Surpass 1 is applied to the dentin and enamel for about 10 seconds agitating gently
Three brushfuls of Surpass 2 are then applied right onto the wet preparation
Once the three brushfuls have been applied the preparation is dried thoroughly for 10 seconds It cannot be overdried and the drier the tooth is following application of Surpass 2 the better the result
Then a layer of Surpass 3 is applied to the preparation and light-cured for 10 seconds
This is the only technique for Surpass no matter what kind of procedure is being performed
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Surpass may be used with any resin materialsmdashdual-cure self-cure and light-curemdashand no catalysts are required
For use with indirect restorations Surpass is simply made very thin prior to light-curing
For direct restorations the bonding resin can be made to the desired thickness although a thin uniform layer is recommended
Surpass dentin bond strengths have been demonstrated to be in the mid-50 MPa range
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
A dentin bonding agent is a low viscosity unfilled or semifilled resin for easy penetration and formation of a hybrid layer
When a bonding agent is applied part of it penetrates into the collagen network known as intertubular penetration and the rest of it penetrates into dentinal tubules called intratubular penetration
In intertubular penetration it polymerises with primer monomers forming a hybrid layerresin reinforced layer
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
Hybridization is the process of formation of a hybrid layer The hybrid layer is the phenomenon of formation of a resin
interlocking in the demineralized dentin surface The hybrid layer is responsible for micromechanical bonding between tooth and resin
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
When dentin is treated with a conditioner it exposes the collagen fibril network with interfibrillar microporosities
These spaces are filled with low viscosity monomers when primer is applied
This layer formed by demineralization of dentin and infilteration of monomer and subsequent polymerization is called the hybrid layer
Hybridoid layer is that area of demineralized dentin into which resin fail to penetrate
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Zones of the Hybrid Layer
1 Top layer Consists of loosely arranged collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces filled with resin
2 Middle layer Consists of interfibrillar spaces in which hydroxyapatite crystals have been replaced by resin monomer because of the hybridization process
3 Bottom layer Consists of almost unaffected dentin with a partly demineralized zone of dentin
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
The hybrid layer promotes good bond strength
Behaves like an impermeable membrane that can prevent noxious stimuli from invading pulpal tissue through dentinal tubules
Hybridized dentin reduces the risk of microleakage incidence of secondary caries and post-operative sensitivity
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Diagrammatic presentation of different zones of hybrid layer
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
OVER-ETCHING
Concerns have been raised that aggressive etching of the dentin may cause demineralization to a depth that might be inaccessible to complete resin impregnation
If this occurred a collagenous band at the base of the hybrid not impregnated by resin would dramatically weaken the resin-dentin bond and consequently the durability of bond
Incomplete resin penetration has been described as causing a microporous dentinal zone at the base of hybrid layer (Sano et al 1994) which is thought to be a pathway for nanoleakage of fluids causing hydrolysis of collagen and a reduction in longevity of bond
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull By etching dentin the smear layer and minerals from it are removed exposing
the collagen fibers
bull Areas from where minerals are removed are filled with water
bull This water acts as a plasticizer for collagen keeping it in an expanded soft state
bull Thus spaces for resin infiltration are also preserved But these collagen fibers collapse when dry and if the organic matrix is denatured
bull This obstructs the resin from reaching the dentin surface and forming a hybrid layer
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Moist vs Dry Dentinbull The desired effect of acid etching which is increased permeability
bull For this reason presence of moistwet dentin is needed to achieve successful dentin bonding
bull When primer is applied to wetmoist dentin water diffuses from the primer to the organic solvent and the solvent diffuses along with the polymers into the demineralized dentinal matrix and tubules
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Schematic (on the left) and transmission electron micrograph on the right of the ldquoover-wetrdquo phenomenon In the total-etch wet bonding technique there is the danger that some regions in complex cavity preparations (such as proximal boxes) may be too wet When single bottle primeradhesives are applied the solvent may diffuse into the water forcing adhesive monomers to undergo phase changes forming blisters resin globules etc Note that although the etched intertubular dentin has taken up resin to form hybrid layers (red zone on left) the adhesive (blue) did not form resin tags but left the tubules in communication with microblisters filled with water (light blue)
These blisters may compress when the restoration is under occlusal function forcing dentinal fluid toward the pulp and causing post-operative sensitivity This is one of the possible complications of this technique-sensitive
bonding method
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Transmission electron micrographs of dentin bonded with an all-in-one adhesive then placed in 37ordmC water for 24 hrs prior to soaking in silver nitrate to demonstrate the presence of water-filled (now silver-filled) channels called ldquowater treesrdquo (finger-pointers) extending from the hybrid layer (H) and passing through the cured adhesive layer The black silver deposits indicate where there
were water-filled channels Such water trees do not form in self-etching primer adhesives
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Modern dentin adhesives systems are classified as
Group one Modify the smear layer and incorporate in the bonding process They are further classified in one step and two step smear layer modifying system
Group two Complete removal of the smear layer Again they are
further classified in two and three step removing systems depending on a combined or a separate application of a primer and adhesive resin
Group three Dissolve the smear layer
Other classification systems
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a formula method first proposed by John Kanca (2004)
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
3-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nP + B)
Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (3M) Permaquick (Ultradent) Bond-It (Jeneric Pentron) All-Bond 2 (BISCO) Tenure ABS (Denmat) ProBond (Dentsply)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEP + B)
Clearfil SE Bond amp LinerBond 2v (Kuraray) Tyrian SPE (Bisco) Optibond Solo SE Plus (Kerr) Fluoro Bond (Shofu) UniFil Bond (GC) Mac Bond II (Tokuyama) NanoBond (Pentron)
2-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (E + nPB)
Syntac Single Component (Ivoclar) Ecusit PrimerMono (DMG Hamburg) One Coat Bond (Coltene Whaledent) Bond-1 (Jeneric Pentron) Tenure Quik with Fluoride (Denmat) Solid Bond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Imperva Bond (Shofu) EG Bond (Sun Chemical) PQ1 (Ultradent) Easy Bond (Parkell) Paama 2 and Stae (SDI) PrimeampBond NT (Dentsply) Single-Bond (3M) Optibond Solo and Solo Plus (Kerr) One-Step (BISCO) Excite (IvoclarVivadent) OSB Bonding System (ESPE) IntegraBond (Premier)
1-COMPONENT SYSTEMS (nEPB) AQBond (Sun Medical) or Touch-and-Bond (Parkell) Adper Prompt or LP3 (3M-ESPE) Solist (One-bottle-bond) (DMG Hamburg) iBond (Hereaus-Kulzer) Xeno III (Dentsply)
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al 2001 2003)
ETCH AND RINSE SELF ETCH ADHESIVES RESIN MODIFIED GLASS ADHESIVES IONOMER
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond strength (Eick et al1991)
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Besides the use of dentin bonding agent as a normal part of resin bonding they have other clinical applications like
Metal-Resin bonding of indirect resin-bonded inlay onlay crown or veneer
As amalgam bonding agent Prevention and treatment of hypersensitivity In establishing apical and coronal seal of the root along with resin Pulp capping agent As a protective coat for glass ionomer restorations
OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Amalgam BondingA technique to bond amalgam to the cavity
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
Conserve more tooth structure by reducing the need to remove sound tooth tissue for mechanical retention
Increased Amalgam retention
Reduce marginal leakage
Reduce the need for dentine pins
Potentially reduce sensitivity
Improve fracture resistance
Improved amalgam margins
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Materials for Amalgam Bonding Resin Cements ( Panavia)
Adhesive Bonding Agents-initially designed for composites-OptiBond solo-Amalgambond-Scotchbond multipurpose
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
OptiBond solo
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
How do they work
Etching dentine opens up dentinal tubules enabling adhesive resin to flow into dentine and is retained micromechanically
Adhesive resin adheres to amalgam roughness micromechanically and by 4-META adhesive
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Decreased microleakage YES
Increased amalgam retention YES if cavity lacks mechanical retention
Avoids risk of using pins YES 20 of pins perforate 80oC rise
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
Improved amalgam margins Depends on adhesive used Panavia weakens amalgam
at margins Technique may reduce incidence of ditching
Tooth reinforcement YES if large cavity NO if small cavity
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Clinical Indications Not recommended for routine amalgam cavities with
sufficient mechanical retention and undercuts No evidence of increased benefit to balance increased costs
Useful for large multisurface amalgams to avoid use of pins
Useful for amalgam repairs
Some easier to use than others
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Bonding Agents Technique
Place matrix band ( lightly vaselined) Etch 10 phosphoric acid Wash and dry Apply adhesive ( Kerr Optibond solo) Blow off excess solvent Light cure Pack amalgam
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Limitations of Technique Increased cost of restoration Technique sensitive Not in use long enough to permit adequate evaluation of
clinical performance Adhesion may breakdown over time
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Amalgam Bonding Summary
Amalgam is an excellent core build-up material for posterior teeth
Excellent interim restoration for posterior teeth
Adhesives can be used to improve retention in large amalgam restorations and cores
Adhesives and preparation features can often substitute for pin retention for cores
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
The choice may be ConfusingIt is easy for the clinician to believe that a new system is better over the old ones but this may not always be true
SOChemistry is more important than the companyTechnique is more important than the material
What we have to choose
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-
Thank you
- Slide 1
- Dentin bonding agents
- Contents
- Slide 5
- Introduction
- (2)
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- PRINCIPLES OF ADHESION
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Indications of Bonding Techniques
- (3)
- Slide 16
- FACTORS AFFECTING ADHESION
- Contact angle
- Slide 19
- Factors Affecting Adhesion
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (2)
- Factors Affecting Adhesion (3)
- Slide 23
- ENAMEL BONDING
- ENAMEL BONDING (2)
- ENAMEL BONDING (3)
- (4)
- Slide 28
- (5)
- (6)
- EFFECTS OF ETCHING ON ENAMEL
- PATTERN OF ETCHING
- ETCHING PATTERNS
- MICROSCOPIC APPEARANCE OF ETCHED ENAMEL
- Slide 35
- The effect of acid etching on enamel depends on
- Steps for Enamel Bonding
- Steps for Enamel Bonding (2)
- Bonding to fluorosed teeth
- Slide 40
- Dentin Bonding
- Dentin Bonding (2)
- Enamel vs Dentin
- (7)
- (8)
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Smear layer
- Slide 49
- (9)
- Disadvantages include
- Several additional factors affect dentin permeability
- (10)
- Dentin factors
- Slide 55
- Clinical factors
- DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Primer (Adhesion Promoter Adhesion Enhancer Bifunctional Mono
- Main Actions
- Adhesive (Bonding Resin Sealing Resin)
- Combining Enamel and Dentin Conditioners
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding
- Mechanism of Bonding (2)
- EVOLUTION OF DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM
- Slide 68
- First generation
- First generation (2)
- Slide 71
- SECOND GENERATION
- (11)
- There were three types of second-generation products
- THIRD GENERATION
- (12)
- Slide 77
- Fourth generation bonding agents -etch and rinse adhesives -thr
- (13)
- (14)
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- (15)
- (16)
- (17)
- (18)
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- The etch-and-rinse adhesives were categorized according to thei
- Fifth generation
- Slide 92
- (19)
- Nanofilled
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents
- Sixth Generation Dentin Bonding Agents (2)
- Slide 97
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers
- Advantages of Self Etching Primers (2)
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Seventh Generation Bonding Agents
- Seventh-generation
- Comparison of the Classification and Components of Dental Adhes
- Eighth-generation self-etching self-bonding
- Eighth-generation
- Eighth-generation (2)
- (20)
- Slide 110
- Slide 111
- HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982)
- Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) (2)
- Zones of the Hybrid Layer
- Slide 116
- Slide 117
- OVER-ETCHING
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 120
- Moist vs Dry Dentin
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Slide 124
- Slide 125
- Other classification systems
- Simple classification scheme for dentin bonding systems using a
- Slide 128
- Modern adhesives can also be classified as (Van Meerbeek et al
- Classification of bonding agents based on their shear bond stre
- OTHER USES OF DENTIN BONDING AGENT
- Slide 132
- Aims Behind lsquoBonded Amalgamsrsquo
- Materials for Amalgam Bonding
- OptiBond solo
- How do they work
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques
- Claimed Advantages of Amalgam Bonding Techniques (2)
- Clinical Indications
- Bonding Agents
- Limitations of Technique
- Slide 142
- Slide 143
- Amalgam Bonding
- Slide 145
- Slide 146
-