design for disassembly - loughborough university · 2014. 4. 8. · sustainable design reduce...

34
David Harrison Brian Griffiths Brunel University Thanks to: Dr J.Chiodo, for early design and prototyping work Mr. Habib Hussein, for later design and manufacturing work. Design for Disassembly

Upload: others

Post on 18-Sep-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

David HarrisonBrian GriffithsBrunel University

Thanks to: Dr J.Chiodo, for early design and prototyping workMr. Habib Hussein, for later design and manufacturing work.

Design for Disassembly

Page 2: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Introduction

• New British Standard in Design for Disassembly

• Brunel work on active disassembly

Page 3: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Specification BS8888

Manufacture BS8887

Verification BS8889

Page 4: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Demanufacturing Processes(from Design Output for Manufacture. assembly, disassembly and end of life processing (MADE) – BS8887-1:2006 (draft)

a) Materials, piece parts and components• Minimize non-biodegradable materials.• Use compatible materials (in for example chemical,

electrolytic, polymer migration terms).• Avoid mixing of component and piece part materials which

reduce the efficiency of recycling, e.g. metal inserts in plastic parts.

• Maximize standardization of component variations.• Select materials with similar component life to match design

life of assembly.• Avoid composite materials employing adhesives.

Page 5: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Demanufacturing Processes(from Design Output for Manufacture. assembly, disassembly and end of

life processing (MADE) – BS8887-1:2006 (draft)

• Group harmful materials in separate, accessible modules.• Avoid combining ageing and corrosive materials.• Minimize number of piece partsb) Joining• Minimize number of fixings and fasteners and standardize types

and sizes.• Use joining technologies and methods which enable easy

separation of components and materials.c) Coatings/finishing• Avoid secondary finishing such as painting, coating or plating.• Choose durable materials in preference to protective coatings.

Page 6: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Demanufacturing Processes(from Design Output for Manufacture. assembly, disassembly and end of life processing (MADE) – BS8887-1:2006 (draft)

d) Recycling• Provide convenient access to valuable and reusable parts.• Provide clear identification of replacement/repair modules.• Protect sub-assemblies against soiling, corrosion and

erosion.• Code or otherwise identify parts to facilitate recycling and

audit trails to production data.• For plastic parts above 50 g, mark in accordance with BS

EN ISO 1043 and BS EN ISO11469.• Code or otherwise identify materials, including surface

coatings and alloys, to facilitate recycling and audit trails to production data.

• Provide all information to assist recycling in documentation.

Page 7: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Sustainable Design

REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics

- more effective than concentrating on the recycling of a product after use.

RE-USE -design for multiple lifecycles:- better than recycling

RECYCLE -design for disassembly:improving separation and sorting of the product

materials after use.

Currently, disassembly is slow and is often manual.

Page 8: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

One Possible Solution –Automatic or Active Disassembly using Active

Fasteners• Self Disassembling Products: • (the work of Habib Hussein)

• Smart actuators or releasable fasteners in products produce disassembly when triggered at the end of product life

• Allows production of high purity, pre-defined fractions, ready for recycling.

18 active fasteners allowed all the components of this Sony Playstation to automatically disassemble.

Page 9: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Actuators Using Shape Memory Alloys

• The two materials used were alloys of Nickel Titanium, and Copper Zinc Aluminium.

• Early trials by J.Chiodoused NiTi rods and discs

• Later trials used 2 way CuZnAl helical coil actuators

Page 10: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Using smart materials to separate product enclosures.

• This would potentially allow the circuit boards to removed automatically, and be processed separately from the largely plastic enclosure materials.

Page 11: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Shape Memory Polymers

• Polymers developed by Mitshibushi to have enhanced shape memory characteristics.

Page 12: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Mechanism of Shape Recovery in Shape Memory Polymers

Page 13: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Shape Memory Polymer Screws • Pioneering work by

Chiodo used shape memory polymers to create active fasteners applied to the disassembly of electronic products

• This was the world’s first shape memory polymer screw. When heated above the glass transistiontemperature, the thread withdraws into the shank

Page 14: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

LCD removal

• This shows a bracket for holding an LCD in a mobile phone, which has been moulded in shape memory polymer.

• Heating the bracket above the glass transition temperature releases the LCD screen.

Page 15: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Active Disassembly and the automotive sector

• Work was carried out by Jones et al applying these smart materials to disassembly in the automotive sector

• Issues addressed were• Glass removal• Instrument panel removal • Airbag removal• Electrically triggered

smart fasteners

Page 16: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Active Disassembly Fifth Framework Project

• Blue sky EPSRC funding, followed by EU project with Sony and Nokia.

• Active screws and nuts• Triggered at the end of a

product’s life to permit automatic disassembly for recycling

Page 17: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Problems with the Use of Smart Materials

• Cost • Limited range of Suppliers (sometimes single

source)• Limited range of operating temperatures for

materials• Limited range of engineering properties for shape

memory polymer (PU based blends)• Poor toughness and heat stability for polymers

Page 18: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Shape Recovery in Standard Engineering Polymers

• Some Engineering Polymers exhibit significant degrees of shape recovery

• Although the strain is recovered less rapidly than with commercial shape memory polymers, there are advantages in terms of cost, availability, range of operating temperatures, and mechanical properties.

• A number of materials were evaluated for their suitability

• Selection of most appropriate material was based on the speed with which the material recovers its original form.

Page 19: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Comparison of Recovery Times was carried out for various polymer blends

T e st 2:R e cov e ry again st time (fo r mate r ia l 1) w ith re lation to be nd in g stre ss

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25

tim e (m in u te s)

reco

very

(deg

rees

)

810121416

Page 20: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Design of Active Snap Fasteners

• A number of prototype designs of fasteners were produced using ABS/PC blend materials

• Triple Clip• Cantilever Clip• Wing Clip

Page 21: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Cantilever Clip

• Snap fits were designed to operate by releasing embedded strain energy

• On heating the clips straighten, releasing the chassis from the top cover.

Page 22: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Cantilever Clip

• On heating the clips straighten, releasing the chassis from the top cover.

Page 23: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Wing Clip

Page 24: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Wing Clip – Shape Recovery and Disassembly Mechanism

Page 25: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Active Disassembly Pilot Plant• Hot Air System • - 24 kW oven• Temperature range 50-200

degrees C

• Hot Water Plant• Temperature range 25-175

degrees C • (heating media

water/glycerin)

Page 26: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Results from Active Disassembly Pilot Plant

Disassembly Solution

Hot Air ActivationTime @ Temp˚C

Hot Liquid Activation Time @ Temp˚C

Cantilever Clip ~10 min @ 140˚C ~1 min @ 117˚C~14 s @ 165˚C

Triple Clip ~ 6 min @ 140˚C ~10 s @ 165˚C

Wing Clip No disassembly @ 140˚C

~5 min @ 120˚C~34 s @ 172˚C

Page 27: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Results

• The shape recovery in the selected ABS/Polycarbonate blend material may be used successfully to achieve product disassembly.

• Hot liquid was found to be the most effective approach to triggering shape recovery in the hand held size products tested.

Page 28: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Key benefits and Issues with Reverse Logistics

• One key benefit of active disassembly would be the creation of large volumes of clean, separated polymer for recycling.

• However, a significant barrier to implementation is the way in which products are collected and processed

• In the UK there is little short term motivation for manufacturers to be an early adopter of radical technology, as product collection will be of mixed products and the processing techniques adopted will be those appropriate to the majority of products.

Page 29: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

‘Automated disassembly used smart materials’(ADSM) for a battery charger (Sharp).

Source:GLOBAL WATCH MISSION REPORT Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE): innovating novel recovery and recycling technologies in

Japan

Page 30: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Bold Streamlined LCA

• Streamlined LCA you can do before breakfast, going to do this by focusing on energy

• Assumptions:• Energy is a good surrogate for environmental

impact.• Combine extraction and manufacture, as a single

number

Page 31: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Assume SAME energy input to create 1 kg of any manufactured product

• 50 MJ / kg• (compare with 36 –40 MJ per kg for steel, 56 MJ

per kg for a typical polymer, 180 MJ for aluminium, 9 MJ for recycled aluminium)

• Different manufacturing processes have a small impact, adding in perhaps 2 or 3 MJ

• Exception !• 2000 MJ per kg for electronics!

Page 32: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

Streamlined LCA1) Extraction of Material and Manufacture

• Take product and weigh it – then use 50 MJ per kg

• 2) Use phase • – plug in kettle and time until boils• – Energy going in at 2.4 kW• – Find out how many secs till boil, multiply this

by 2.4 kW to give number of Joules used.• – 3 mins 30 sec = 210 secs• – 2400 x 210 = number of Joules• – approx 480000 = 0.5 MJ for 1 use of kettle• X 15,000 uses over life = 7500 MJ over life

Page 33: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

• If use phase is electrical:• EitherUse label on product, and time it

orUse kWH meter under the stairs

orMeasure volts x amps x estimated time (not for mains powered products)

orUse 1 MJ per £1 worth of batteries

Page 34: Design for Disassembly - Loughborough University · 2014. 4. 8. · Sustainable Design REDUCE -design for minimal energy and materials use, and to remove toxics - more effective than

• DISPOSAL• Negligible (typically 1-2 MJ)• TRANSPORT• Ship Typically 0.1 – 1 MJ per product• Lorry Typically 1 – 3 MJ per product • Van Typically 10 MJ per product• Car 25 MJ per item