design status of the solar uv-vis-ir telescope...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Design status of theSolar UV-Vis-IR Telescope
(SUVIT)
K.Ichimoto (Kyoto U.),Y.Katsukawa , Y.Suematsu, H.Hara, S.Tsuneta (NAOJ),
T.Shimizu, K.Matsuzaki (JAXA)and Solar-C WG
Hinode-6, Solar-C Science Meeting, 13 Aug. 2012 in St Andrews
Rev. 2012.8.9
-
The task of SUVITMeasure the magnetic field and plasma motion at the locations (from phtosphere to uppermost chromosphere) where the magnetic actions are taking place, with the highest angular resolution and spectropolarimetricprecision ever achieved.
Toward the understanding of,,– origin of the sun’s dynamic atmosphere (= chrompshere and corona),– fundamental MHD processes (reconnection, wave, acceleration,etc.),– mechanism of explosive phenomena (flare, CME,,) .
-
The design policy of SUVITEmploy the advantage of the space to the utmost.(We should never ignore ground-based telescopes)
Advantages of space;- Continuous sun light 24h/day (geo-synchronous orbit)- Constant PSF High spatial resolution diffraction limited optics High precision polarimetry high throughput
- Infinite isoplanatic angle Large field of view large ‘etendue’ (acceptance angle)
- Accessibility to shorter wavelength Include MgII 280nm (TBD) wide wavelength coverage
- No scattered light from the sky (coronagraph)- Different view angle from the earth (synergy with ground)
3
-
Important delta from SOT/Hinode
• Spatial resolution• Polarimetric sensitivity• New spectral lines for
chromospheric diagnosis• Cadence of magnetogram
wide coverage
Efficient 2D-spectropolarimetry& large telemetry
Larger telescope
Demand on HW
As SOT/Hinode, SUVIT will have Filtergraph (BFI, NFI) and Spectro-polarimeter (SP)
-
Design goal -1
Spatial resolutionSOT x 3 = dx = 0.05 ~ 0.1” = 35 ~ 70km- dx ~ photon mean free path in the photosphere
resolve the collapsed magnetic flux tubes- dx < thickness of line forming layer 3D structure in photosph.- 10 times higher sensitivity for flux/energy elements (Bll dx2, j2)- chromosphere unpredictable discovery
Requirement to the telescope Strehl > 0.8 @ 633nm
PSF @280 (Strehl ~ 0.34) recovered by post-processing
Need 1.2 - 1.5m telescopeSufficient spatial sampling is crucial! e.g. dx ~ 0.015”
-
Design goal -2
Field of view• Ubiquitous, elementary phenomena (spicule, flux elements,,) can
be captured by a few hour observing run with a small FOV ( 180” x 180”FG need dual modes; ‘high resolution mode’ and ‘wide FOV mode’!
60”x60”
Do you want a continuous observation for days with this FOV?
-
100”x100”
SUVIT FOV180”x180”
SOT 320”x160”
17.59=19507
-
Design goal -3
Wavelength coverage• Measure the magnetic field of chromosphere by Zeeman effect
extension to longer wavelength is inevitable• Observe chromospheric dynamics with a higher resolution and
contrast demand for shorter wavelength, i.e. MgII 280nm
Optics that accepts 280nm ~1100nm!
SUVIT candidate lines
-
Design goal -4
Polarimetric sensitivity• For chromospheric magnetic field -- 10-4 in CaII 854nm & HeI
1083nm • integration time w/ 1.5m telescope ~ 10sec for 0.2”x 0.2”pix
• For photospheric magnetic field -- 10-3 ~ 10-4
Need high throughput (= large aperture, high transmission),& fast readout of camera /data processing
CaII 8542A inversion testing(de la Cruz Rodriguez et al 2012)
simulation
= 10 -4
= 10 -3
Bz Bx By
-
Design goal -5
Time resolution (for spectro-polarimetory)• Time needed for scanning a spicule with a slit
– 5” /0.2” x 10sec = 250sec– Scanning speed ~ 14km/s too slow!
• To capture the chromospheric dynamic phenomena, 2D (Integrated Field Unit; IFU) spectroscopy is required
• For observations of photospheric B and chromospheric Doppler, a slit spectroscopy has advantage (higher throughput & resolution)
Require both slit and 2D spectro-polarimetry!
spectrograph
FOV of IFU spectro-polarimeter
slit
flare
wavelengthFilament
-
SUVITItem DescriptionTelescope Aplanatic Gregorian telescope: diameter of primary: ~1.5m
Focal Plane Instruments Broadband Filtergraph (BF), Narrowband Filtergraph (NF), Spectro-polarimeter (SP)
Wavelength coverage 280 nm (TBD) – 1100 nm
Spectral lines(spectro-polarimetry)
Chromosphere: He I 1083 nm, Ca II 854 nm Dynamics: Mg II 280nm (not baseline)Photosphere: Si I 1082.7 nm, Fe I 525 nm
Spectral lines(imaging)
Chromosphere: Mg II 280nm (TBD), Ca II 854nm, H I 656nm, Na I 589nm, Mg I 517nmPhotosphere: Fe I 525 nm, continuum (wavelength TBD)
Sampling scale Imaging: 0.015” (narrow field), 0.045” (wide field)Spectro-polarimetry: 0.07”
Spatial resolution (or imaging performance)
Imaging: 0.05” at 280nm (TBD), 0.09” at 525nm, 0.14” at 854nmSpectro-polarimetry: Slit scan: 0.14”, IFU: 0.14”(along slit)×0.18” (across slit)
Slit width Slit: 0.07”, IFU: effectively 0.18”
Spectral resolution Narrowband filtergram: ~50,000Spectro-polarimetry: 100,000 –210,000 (slit), ~96,000 (IFU)
Exposure time Intensity observations: 0.05 – 1 sec, Polarimetric observations: 1 – 20 sec
Polarimetric accuracy of chromospheric lines
1×10-4 (6×10-3) for 0.2” (0.1”) sampling and 20 (1) sec integration Sensitivity of Blong: 1–2 (10-20) G, of Btrans: ~100 (~300G) [Zeeman], 0.1–100 [Hanle] G
Filed of view Imaging: 61×61 arcsecs (narrow field), 184×184 arcsecs (wide field)Slit scanning polarimetry: 184×143 arcsecs2D spectro-polarimetry (IFU) : 10×10 arcsecs
-
SUVITItem Science requirements Science
backgroundsRelated hardware limitations
1.5m telescope aperture - High spatial resolution
-
SUVIT basic param’s (goal)SOT/Hinode SUVIT/Solar-C
BFI Wavelength 388 - 668nm (280) - 668nm
Spatial resolution 0.2” 0.05” - 0.11”
FOV 220” x 110” 61” x 61” (narrow)184” x 184” (wide)
NFI Wavelength 517 - 656 nm 517 - 854 nm
Spatial resolution ~0.3” ~0.1”
FOV 320” x 160” ~80” x 80” (narrow)~200” x 200” (wide)
SP Wavelength 630 nm (280), 525, 854, 1083 nm
Spatial sampling 0.16” 0.07” (slit)0.18” (IFU)
FOV 320” x 160” 184” x 143”(slit)~10” x 10” (IFU)
Sensitivity 10-3 10-3 - 10-4
Time resol. 180” x 140”(10-3) 10” x 10”
~6000 s340 s
~2600 s1 s 13
-
Current baseline designand
critical area
14
-
SUVIT ongoing design work• Maximum usage of the Hinode heritage
– An axi-symmetric Gregorian telescope with 1.5m aperture
– Filtergraph (BFI, NFI) and Spectro-polarimeter (SP)– Common rotating waveplate as a pol. modulator– Image stabilizing system with a tip-tilt mirror– Heat dump mirror and 2nd field stop to minimize
the heat lord to FPP
• But, SUVIT’s new demands make it something different from the SOT/Hinode …
15
-
16
1300
Pupilϕ60
200
SP package
FG package
200
1300
400
400
Optical layout (baseline)
TTMϕ89.2
PMUϕ60
CMU
BSϕ120.2
Reimg-lensϕ110.8
Scan mirrorϕ126.8
Folding mirrorϕ105.0
2FS
CT
IF unit
Entrance of FG packageϕ128
Beam size FOV 200”x200”(diagonal 282”)
-
17
SP package
FG package
1300
Pupilϕ60
PMUϕ73.4
TTMϕ90.8
CLUϕ87
1300
748.6
748.6
389M3ϕ132
2FS
M3ϕ132
Folding mirrorϕ79
CLUϕ87
PMUϕ73.4
TTMϕ90.8
Reimg lensϕ63.4
Scan mirrorϕ79.4
Folding mirrorϕ70.2
CT
IF unit
Entrance of FG packageϕ92
Beam size FOV 200”x200”(diagonal 282”)
Optical layout (another option)
-
Layout of the spectrograph
720 mm
24 m
m
~120 mm
92 mm
~184 mm
36 mm
spectrum mask
Slit/IFU
detector
offset parabola
grating18
Relay lensx1.5 magnification
The spectrograph with F/7.8 covers 1.5xFWHM of exit beam from the IFU.Collect 80% of photon.
PBS
Optical fiber IFU and slit Teledyne H2RG + SIDECAR ASIC, HgCdTe, 2k x 2k pixels, 18m/pixReadout 64 frames/sec
-
Choice of tunable filterLyot filter vs. Fabry Perot
Air spaceFoster etal 2009 Opt. Soc. America
LiNbO3Schuhle etal 2009(?)
19
Tunable filter FPP/SOT
Diameter (D=1.5m, FOV=2’)~40mm ~200mm ~80mm
Oil chamber Mitigated by LCVR
Big, heavy!Stability of flat
FragileSlow tuningSmall FSR
Experiment for LCVR Lyot filter is ongoing in SUVIT J-team and LMSAL/HAO.(Michelson -- another possibility..?)
-
TA: Telescope Assy (MELCO)
FG: Filtergraph (NASA)
SP: Spectrograph (MELCO,TBD)
PMU CTAdj.
M2M1
BS
CT-Cam
SP-Cam
FG-Cam
CL
SP-E-box(MHI)
FG-E-box(NASA)
Scan-M Gratingslit FW
E-box HK,HTR
E-box
Baseline config 2012.8.2TF FW1&2
HK, HTR
HK,HTR
BS
focus
focus
IF unit(MELCO)
TA-E-box(MELCO)
PMU signal
S/C bus
CT command
( TBD )
controldata
Control,data
Control,status
( ESA? )
20
SUVIT block diagram and possible task share
shutter
-
21
Design goal and impact on the instrument
MgII 280nm- challenging optical design may force a compromised optical performance
in Vis.&IR- challenging coating may cause a less throughput, larger heat absorption,
polarization effects- need more serious study of contamination control
HeI 1083nm in SP- IR camera saturates in room temp. How to test the instrument on ground..
FOV 200” w/ 1.5m aperture- large beam size, big optical elements (~14cm lens & BS in baseline layout)
10-4 accuracy in 10sec - fast readout (2kx2k 64frame/s), fast data transfer & processing- 2D spectro-polarimetry lower Technical Readiness Level
-
22
CollimatorCovering 280nm – 1100nm is a challenge..
3 mirror system(current baseline)
We need to allow a significant field curvature correction in FPP
Silica CaF2 Silica CaF2
Lens system with Silica+CaF2(athermal solution)
We need to allow a significant chromatic aberration correction in FPP
-
Scientific issues critical for SUVIT/Solar-C
• Scientific advantage and technical challenge for having MgII 280nm.
• FOV 184” x 184” necessary and sufficient?• Does Ca854nm/He1083nm spectro-polarimetory
(10”FOV, 0.2”pixel, dI/I~10-4 in 10s) really tell us .. – energy carried by waves to solve heating problem?– good boundary condition for field extrapolation?– direct evidence of magnetic reconnection?– origin of spicule, prominence, flare,,?
•23
-
Summary
24
SUVIT’s design goal and current concept are presented. More works on scientific justifications and technical feasibility are needed..
-
Backup slides
25
-
SOT lines
D1
6303
H
CaH
26
imaging
Spectro-polarimetory
-
D1
SUVIT lines
6303
H
CaK
HeI
CaII IR
27
imaging
Spectro-polarimetry
-
28
Polarization Calibration Unit (PCU), Collimating Mirror Unit (CMU), heat dump mirror (HDM), secondary field stop (2FS), polarization modulation unit (PMU), tip-tilt mirror (TTM)
Baseline Telescope Design
TTM
PMU
To FPP Out-of-field light
-
M1 structure and support
29
Light waighted (~90%) Zerodure or ULE
Designed for minimum gravitational deformation when the mirror is in vertical.
-
Telescope frame structure and I/F to S/C
30
Tangential support of M2 to prevent the defocus caused by a thermal effect (lesson learned from Hinode OTA)
-
Obs Mg II h&k G-band Na I D H I Hα Ca II IR He Iwavelength 280nm 430nm 589nm 656nm 854nm 1083nm
Al+MgF2
Ag
Highly enhanced Ag(SAGEM)
Coating
An issue remains that non-uniformity of coating over the large mirror gives non-negligible WFE degradation with wavelengths. also polarization..
31
-
Accommodating Slit and IFU
32
Idea -1
Idea -2
24.6 mm
25 mm 25 mm
8 8
18.5 mm
~35 mm
~66 mm
F/23.6 F/7.83
F/23.6 F/7.83
F/23.6 F/7.83
18.5 mm
14.5 14.5
Switching mechanism4 slits / 4 IFU slits
No mechanism1 slit + 3 IFU slits
-
Parameters of the spectrographSlit BiFOIS image slicer
Focal length L 720 mm 720 mm
F-ratio F 23.57(f=1414.4 for 0.07”/12µm)
7.83
Footprint diameter D=L/F 31 mm(Diffraction λ/s x L = 65mm @ 1083 nm)
92 mm
Grating size W 31 x 62 mm 92 x 184 mm
Groove density (1/σ) 110 /mm 110 /mm
Order m 15 @ He I 1083 nm19 @ Ca II 854 nm31 @ Fe I 525 nm
15 @ He I 1083 nm19 @ Ca II 854 nm31 @Fe I 525 nm
Spatial sampling 0.07” / 12 µm(FOV 143”x143” with 2Kx2K)
0.18” /30 µm(FOV 11”x11” with 64x64)
Pixel size (at the spectrum mask) p 12 µm(12 x 1.5 mag = 18µm)
12 µm(12 x 1.5 mag = 18 µm)
Slit width s 12 µm 30 µm
Spectrum resolution (detector sampling)λ/Δλ = 2L tanβ/p
2.4×105 2.4×105
Spectrum resolution (slit width)λ/Δλ = 2L tanβ/s
2.4×105 9.6×104
Spectrum resolution (grating size)λ/δλ = m N = m W/σ
1.0×105 @ 1083 nm1.3×105 @ 854 nm2.1×105 @ 525 nm
(for W=62 mm)
3.0×105 @ 1083 nm3.8×105 @ 854 nm6.3x105 @ 525 nm(for W=184 mm) 33
-
Pointing stabilitySolar-C requires 2 – 3 times higher pointing stability than Hinode
Critical area
-
Contamination control;SOT throughput (real) SOT contamination model
We do not understand exactly the cause of degradation of SOT throughtput. Need further experiments for Solar-C!
-
FG: Filtergraph (NASA)
SP: Spectrograph (MELCO)BS
CT-Cam
SP-Cam
FG-Cam
SP-E-box(MHI)
FG-E-box(NASA)
Scan-M Gratingslit FW
E-box HK,HTR
E-box
SUVIT block diagram and possible task share
TF FW1&2
HK, HTR
TA: Telescope Assy (MELCO)
PMU CTAdj.
M2M1
CL
HK,HTR
BS
focus
focus
IF unit (MELCO)
TA-E-box(MELCO)
S/C bus
( TBD )
PMU signalCT com
controldata
Control,data
Control,status
( ESA? )
36
Another config 2012.8.2shutter
-
Image slicer (fiber ribbon)
• Fiber ribbon developed by Collimated Holes (Inc., CHI) with H. Lin (Hawaii Univ.)
• Size of the elemental fiber 10µm x 40µm.• Material: Bolosilicate Glass• Polarization maintaining (to be verified)
37
input arrayoutput array
-
Detector (candidate): H2RG
38
Teledyne Co.H2RG FPA, SIDECAR ASIC, HgCdTe, 2k x 2k pixels, 18m/pix
Space qualified(TRL-6 for H2RG, TRL-9 for SIDECAR)
Readout 64 frames/sec, (WP 1 sec/rot)
Critical areas;- very fast data transfer and demodulation- possible saturation at room temp.
-
Photometric accuracy vs. spatial scale
1000 100 1 0.1Spatial scale (arcsec)
10-2
10-3
10-4
Pola
rimet
ricse
nsiti
vity
10
SDO/HMI
Hinode/SOT
ATST, EST
Solar-CSUVIT
39