detection, location, and analysis of permanent and ... & analysis of permanent faults on network...

19
Daniel Sabin Electrotek Concepts, Beverly, Massachusetts, USA Cristiana Dimitriu, John Foglio, and Frank Doherty The Consolidated Edison Company of New York, USA Detection, Location, and Analysis of Permanent and Incipient Faults at Con Edison

Upload: vuongkhanh

Post on 18-Apr-2018

227 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Daniel SabinElectrotek Concepts, Beverly, Massachusetts, USA

Cristiana Dimitriu, John Foglio, and Frank DohertyThe Consolidated Edison Company of New York, USA

Detection, Location, and Analysis of Permanent and Incipient Faults at Con Edison

The Consolidated Edison Company of New York

• New York City and Westchester• Headquarters in Manhattan• 3.3 million Electric Customers• System Peak Load:13322 MW

on July 19, 2013• 62 Area Substations• 83 Secondary Networks and

Non-Network Load Pockets• 2247 Distribution Feeders• 87% System is Underground

Fault Detection and Analysis at Con Edison

• Location & Analysis of Permanent Faults on Network Feeders– Employs Waveforms from Bus-Level Power Quality

Monitors and Feeder Overcurrent Protection Digital Relays– Displays Estimated Fault Location in Tables and Maps

• Alarming on Faults in Out-of-Service Cable Fed by Network• Alarming on Potential Tap Changer Misoperation• Incipient Fault Detection, Notification, and Location• Overhead Fault Location for Momentary Faults

PQ Monitors

RelationalDatabases

PQMS

DatabaseServer

HTTP via RASPQ Monitors

DownloadServers

Telnet/XMODEM/YMODEM

PQDIF Data Files via HTTP

PQ Monitors

UCA 2.0

LAN

PQ/Energy MetersHTTP via Frame Relay

Download Server

Download ServersDigital Relays COMTRADE

Files

FileShare

SQL via TCP/IP

Historian ServersSCADA RTU Sensors

LAN

Frame Relay

SCADA Server

Data Integrationand Federation

Temperature Sensors

Serial

Binary Data Files via File Share

Area SubstationTransformer

Primary Feeders Secondary Network

A

B

C

Single Line to Ground Fault

• PQ Monitors at Low Side of Many Area Substation Transformers

• Digital Relay Data Available at 20% of Primary Feeders

Example SLG Fault Recorded by PQ Monitor at Area Substation

1A

-1.0

-0.5

0

0.5

1.0

-2

0

2

4

0 0.05 0.10 0.15

SHERMN4N - 9/9/2012 18:59:01.6880I²t=28.85 kA²·s

OperationPoint Name SCBX54N.DXTime Stamp 9/9/2012 18:59:05.0012Value S_CREEK BKR 54N 1X23Description CLOSE-TRIP

Volta

ge (p

u)Cu

rren

t (kA

)

Time (s)

Va Vb Vc Ia Ib Ic

Reactance-to-Fault Calculations for PQ Measurement at Area Substation

1A 0.7469 (k1=3.800)

0.8

1.0

1.2

0

1

2

1.0

1.5

2.0

0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18

SHERMN4N - 9/9/2012 18:59:01.6880Voltage, Current, and Reactance Values

Volta

ge (p

u)Cu

rren

t (kA

)Re

acta

nce

(Ω)

Time (s)

Va Vb Vc V0 V1 V2 Ia Ib Ic XTF

Predicted Location of Fault by Matching Measured Reactance to Reactance of Circuit Model

Visualized Location of Fault

Distribution Fault Location Results

• On average, use of the reactance-to-fault method for fault location saves one hour per feeder restoration job

• Mitigates use of capacitive discharge thumpers and DC hi-pot

Year 0-1 MH 1-3 MH 3-5 MH 5-10 MH > 10 MH

2009 64% 24% 5% 2% 6%

2010 67% 14% 5% 3% 11%

2011 64% 20% 8% 3% 5%

Summer 2012 76% 14% 4% 4% 1%

Single Line to Ground Fault

C

T

C

C

Area Substation Transformer

Primary Feeders Secondary Network

A

B

C

• Within seconds of the circuit breaker trip in the area substation due to the fault, network protectors are engineered to open and fully deenergize the primary feeder cable.

• If a network protector does not open, then there is an overvoltage on the unfaulted phases up to line-to-line voltage.

• This may cause a second fault on the out-of-service feeder that may not be in the same location as the first fault.

11

Capturing Waveforms during Second Faults and Sending Notifications

Secondary Network• Two Voltage Sags Recorded

by PQ Monitors at “Master Point”

• Only One SCADA OperationArea Substations• SLG Fault with Zero-

Sequence• Subsequent Negative-

Sequence Overcurrent• One SCADA Operation

PQ Monitor Retrofitted with Negative-Sequence Filter

12

Measurement of Second Fault Initiation Triggered by Negative-Sequence Filter

-100

-50

0

50

100

-2000

-1000

0

1000

2000

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Volta

ge (%

)Cu

rren

t (A)

Time (c)

Va Vb Vc Ia Ib Ic

-2000

-1500

-1000

-500

0

500

1000

1500

2000

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Curr

ent (

A)

Time (c)

Ia Ib Ic

Bonus: Lots of other potential problems can be captured by I2 triggering.

Detection and Notification of Tap Changer Problems

• Method 1: Look for Changes in Variation of Voltage Fluctuations (Pst or Plt)• Method 2: Look for Changes in Imbalance Uncorrelated with SCADA Operations• Method 3: Look for “Missing Current”

I0

-100

-50

0

50

100

-1500

-1000

-500

0

500

1000

1500

0 0.05 0.10 0.15

Waveform Recorded in Area Substation Prior to Tap Changer FailureIc Missing: 0.1500 s

Electrotek/EPRI PQView®

No Operations Found

Volta

ge (%

)Cu

rren

t (A)

Time (s)

Va Vb Vc Ia Ib Ic

Incipient Fault Identification and Notification

-1.0

-0.5

0

0.5

1.0

-2

0

2

4

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

Multiple Subcycle Faults - Possible Precursor to Permanent Fault

Volta

ge (p

u)Cu

rren

t (kA

)

Time (s)

Va Vb Vc Ia Ib Ic

Incipient Subcycle Fault LocationUsing Time-Domain Estimation

-1.0

-0.5

0

0.5

1.0

-3

-2

-1

0

0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55

Subcycle Incipient Fault

Volta

ge (p

u)Cu

rren

t (kA

)

Time (s)

Va Vb Vc Ia Ib Ic

Estimated XTF: 0.3235 Ω

Actual XTF: 0.3221 Ω

-1.0

-0.5

0

0.5

1.0

-5

0

5

10

0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75

Subsequent Permanent Fault

Volta

ge (p

u)Cu

rren

t (kA

)

Time (s)

Va Vb Vc Ia Ib Ic

Subcycle Fault with Breaker Operation

-1.0

-0.5

0

0.5

1.0

-6

-4

-2

0

0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70

Subcycle Fault Leads to Breaker OperationEstimate Reactance-to-Fault (XTF) = 0.1468 Ω Actual Reactance-to-Fault (XTF) = 0.1474 Ω

Volta

ge (p

u)Cu

rren

t (kA

)

Time (s)

Va Vb Vc Ia Ib Ic

What’s Next: Fault Location in Overhead Distribution System

• New power quality monitors installed in Queens as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act– New monitors installed to complete a pilot project on overhead fault location

with a primary goal to locate problem line sections or equipment after measuring momentary faults

• Radial feeder models from integrated from on company modeling software in 2013• SCADA correlation added in January 2014• Both resistance-to-fault and reactance-to-fault

will be explored• The project includes display of the feeders

using aerial imagery with one-line feeder overlays