developing the competency of managers in the field of safety management aidan nelson director policy...

18
Developing the competency of managers in the field of safety management Aidan Nelson Director Policy & Standards International Railway Safety Conference October 2002

Upload: maurice-floyd

Post on 03-Jan-2016

220 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

 

Developing the competency of managers in the field of safety

management 

Aidan Nelson

Director Policy & Standards

International Railway Safety Conference

October 2002

Competence……

• The ability to undertake responsibilities and to perform activities to a recognised standard on a regular basis

• A product of practical and thinking skills, experience and knowledge, which is influenced by personal attributes such as attitudes, beliefs and values

Continuous improvement……

• A person, a team of people or an organisation is competent when they work consistently to an expected level of performance.

• Expected levels of performance change over time

• Competence and a positive safety culture require aligned values, beliefs, attitudes and behaviours

Senior management teams: why?

• Past focus on competence too narrow• Assessment criteria underpinning Railway

Safety Case Regulations (2000)• Due diligence and organisational learning • Evidence of repeating management and

system failures • Ladbroke Grove Inquiry: “Where it is not

already in place, a safety management strategic leadership team should be established in each company in the industry” (part two, recommendation 14)

Research suggestssenior management teams• Are technically competent but lack general

management skills

• Constant change means they have little time for building on experience and preventing repeat mistakes

• Lack formal processes for risk assessment other than financial

• Increasingly need to be able to identify key data to make decisions / measure performance

“Strategic safety management” describes the way a senior team

• Directs how safety is managed within the business

• Sets goals for safety performance

• Sets aside the organisation’s resources to achieve these goals

• Controls safety performance

Aims

• Support improvement in the competence of senior teams to manage safety strategically

• Help senior teams deliver their Railway Safety Case commitments

• Assist the development of a progressive safety culture in individual organisations and the wider industry

• Support continuous improvement in safety performance at all levels in the rail industry

Philosophy

• Safety management is but one aspect of risk management

• Risk is inherent in business processes • Safety performance can be continuously

improved • Cultural issues must not be swept under

the carpet• What are we not doing that we should be?

Good practice guides

• Advisory not mandatory, focus is maintaining and improving safety performance, not compliance

• Self-assessment processes not external audit

• Can be tailored to meet an organisation’s needs

What’s in the SSM good practice?

• A description of what all senior teams need to be able to do

• A recommended process for self-assessment and improvement

• Guidance and tools

SSM software

• Automates SSM self-assessment process and gives senior teams the ability to….• Assess their competence and performance

from a number of perspectives• Predict team performance given its current

composition and structure• Make a range of useful comparisons

Companies are now using the results to:

• Develop senior team & company performance• Clarify the organisation’s strategic safety

management priorities and identify how best to meet them

• Test if company safety plans are fit for purpose • Decide what the team needs to do and how

individual members can contribute• Review how the team makes & acts on decisions• Identify training & development needs of existing &

prospective senior managers

Developments

• In-company ‘kick start’ briefings • Mentoring programme: confidential and

independently delivered• Closer links with other leadership initiatives• Challenging the “unwritten rules” of railway

safety • Assimilating results to enable 2nd edition

software & 3rd edition of the good practice guides to be released in December 2002

With particular thanks to:

• Competence Assurance Solutions

• Heathrow Express• Railtrack GWZ• GNER• Thameslink• London Lines• AMEC• JacksonEve• DRS

• South Central Trains• First NW• Anglia Railways• Scotrail• SW Trains• Alstom• Eurostar• Carillion• Thales

Want to know more?

www.railwaysafety.org.uk